Abstract
Background and Aims
Zenker's diverticulum is a false diverticulum through Killian's dehiscence. Symptoms include halitosis, dysphagia, regurgitation, cough, and aspiration pneumonia. Treatment options include open transcervical cricopharyngeal myotomy, trans-oral rigid endoscopic stapling, and minimally invasive endoscopic myotomy. Although open surgical techniques have historically been the criterion standard for treatment, endoscopic options have become increasingly used. We propose the use of flexible endoscopy in the management of Zenker's diverticulum.
Methods
We present a retrospective case series of 9 patients undergoing endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy from 2014 to 2018 using our endoscopic technique.
Results
We demonstrate that endoscopic technique provided adequate symptomatic relief in 7 of 9 patients, with no operative adverse events.
Conclusions
Cricopharyngeal myotomy using flexible endoscopy is a safe and effective technique for the management of Zenker's diverticulum. Potential benefits of this approach include shorter operative times, shorter postoperative admissions, and earlier progression of diet. Initial treatment with endoscopic technique does not preclude future open repairs.
Zenker’s diverticulum is a rare acquired herniation through the posterior pharyngoesophageal junction into the posterior pharyngeal wall through Killian’s dehiscence, which is an area of weakness bounded by the oblique fibers of the lower inferior constrictor muscle and the transverse fibers of the cricopharyngeus muscle.1 It is considered a false diverticulum and consists only of mucosa and submucosa, and it is believed to be caused by chronic increased pressure in the esophageal lumen.2 The pathologic changes are most prevalent in the 6th and 7th decade and typically present with halitosis, dysphagia, regurgitation, cough, and aspiration pneumonia, with the criterion standard for diagnosis being a barium swallow and continuous fluoroscopy.1
Treatment options include open transcervical cricopharyngeal myotomy, transoral rigid endoscopic stapling, and minimally invasive endoscopic myotomy.3 Although open surgical techniques have historically been the criterion standard for treatment, endoscopic options have become increasingly used.1
Multiple studies have shown that minimally invasive endoscopic techniques are favored over open techniques in terms of lower perioperative morbidity and mortality, shorter operative times, shorter recovery times, and lower adverse event rates.4, 5, 6 Furthermore, endoscopic techniques demonstrate comparable results in terms of resolution of dysphagia, regurgitation, cough, and aspiration.1, 7
Flexible endoscopy has been increasingly popular because of its suitability for patients who are otherwise unsuitable for rigid endoscopy, such as those with limited neck mobility or medical comorbidities.8 Flexible endoscopy can be performed with the patient under sedation or general anesthesia and has been shown to be comparable to rigid endoscopy and open techniques in terms of safety and effectiveness.9, 10, 11, 12
The fundamental principle of a repair with the use of flexible endoscopy involves myotomy of the cricopharyngeus muscle to open up the diverticulum to the esophageal lumen. Various instruments including needle-knife, hook-knife, harmonic scalpels, lasers, hot biopsy forceps, bipolar forceps, and various other diathermy and electrocautery devices have been used.13
We present a retrospective case series of all patients undergoing endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy from 2014 to 2018 from a single upper-GI and endoscopic surgeon, and we include a video to demonstrate our technique (Video 1, available online at www.VideoGIE.org). A flexible endoscope with an EMR cap was used to visualize the Zenker’s diverticulum. Patients had general anesthesia with endotracheal tube intubation. A cricopharyngeal myotomy was performed with use of a needle-knife (monopolar diathermy cut setting, 3; coagulation setting, 2) (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3). For patients in whom we faced difficulty in locating the diverticulum or maintaining position, a nasogastric tube was inserted for guidance (Fig. 4). For patients in whom we encountered an intraoperative bleed, submucosal clips were placed to achieve hemostasis. Postoperatively, all patients were given clear fluids the same day, free fluids the next day for 48 hours, and then pureed food for a week. The technical success of our procedures was demonstrated by preoperative and postoperative barium-swallow fluoroscopy studies to show initial collection of contrast material in the diverticulum and subsequent flow of contrast material from the diverticulum into the esophagus (Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8).
Figure 1.
The Zenker’s diverticulum is confirmed on endoscopy.
Figure 2.
Cricopharyngectomy is performed with needle-knife.
Figure 3.
Adequate dissection is performed to allow the inferior aspect of the diverticulum to freely communicate with the esophagus.
Figure 4.
Nasogastric tube inserted to guide the gastroscope to the Zenker’s diverticulum.
Figure 5.
Preoperative barium swallow image showing contrast material flowing down the esophagus.
Figure 6.
Preoperative barium swallow image showing contrast material collecting in the Zenker’s diverticulum.
Figure 7.
Postoperative barium swallow image showing contrast material flowing down the esophagus.
Figure 8.
Preoperative barium swallow image showing no contrast material collecting in the Zenker’s diverticulum.
A total of 9 patients were treated for Zenker’s diverticulum with flexible endoscopic myotomy. The patients consisted of 3 men and 6 women with a mean age of 77 years (range, 66-85 years) and a mean American Society of Anethesiologists score of 2.22 (range, 1-3) (Table 1). These patients universally presented with dysphagia and reflux and received diagnoses of Zenker’s diverticulum with endoscopy and barium swallow. The mean operative time was 36 minutes (range, 14-65 minutes). One patient required a nasogastric tube to guide the endoscopic procedure because of difficult access. The same patient required the application of 1 clip for hemostasis. There were no intraoperative or postoperative adverse events. Our results build on the early international experience of this technique.14
Table 1.
Patient demographics and operative details
| Variable | Value |
|---|---|
| Number | 9 |
| Gender M:F | 1:2 |
| Mean ASA score | 2.22 (1-3) |
| Mean operative time (minutes) | 36 (14-65) |
| Postoperative adverse events | 0 |
| Mean length of stay (days) | 1.1 (1-2) |
| Mean follow-up (weeks) | 11 (2-46) |
ASA, American Society of Anethesiologists.
Patients were given clear fluids on the same day without clinical issues, and the mean length of stay was 1.1 days (range, 1-2 days). The mean follow-up time was 11 weeks (range, 2-46 weeks), and both dysphagia and reflux significantly improved in 7 of the 9 patients, of whom 1 patient had persistent reflux secondary to a hiatus hernia. Of the remaining 2 patients in whom symptoms persisted, both presented with dysphagia and reflux and underwent preoperative barium swallow. Both patients had a small residual diverticulum on follow-up endoscopy. One patient had persistent dysphagia, which was improved in comparison with preoperative symptoms, and did not wish for further intervention. The other patient had persistent dysphagia and reflux and subsequently underwent an open repair with satisfactory result.
Although it is difficult to identify predictive factors for failure in a small series, it is speculated that both these patients had larger diverticula, as reflected by the increased operative time (59-65 vs 36 minutes cohort mean). One patient required nasogastric tube guidance and application of a hemostatic clip at the completion of the procedure.
In conclusion, cricopharyngeal myotomy with the use of flexible endoscopy for the management of Zenker’s diverticulum has potential benefits of shorter operative times, shorter postoperative admissions, and earlier progression of diet. Initial treatment with endoscopic technique does not preclude future open repairs.
Disclosure
All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
Acknowledgement
We acknowledge the Upper Gastrointestinal and Metabolic Research Foundation for funding the publication of this research.
Supplementary data
Endoscopic management of Zenker’s diverticulum.
References
- 1.Pescarus R., Shlomovitz E., Sharata A.M. Trans-oral cricomyotomy using a flexible endoscope: technique and clinical outcomes. Surg Endos. 2016;30:1784–1789. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4445-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bizzotto A., Iacopini F., Landi R. Zenker's diverticulum: exploring treatment options. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2013;33:219–229. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ferreira L.E., Simmons D.T., Baron T.H. Zenker's diverticula: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and flexible endoscopic management. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00795.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yuan Y., Zhao Y.F., Hu Y. Surgical treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. Dig Surg. 2013;30:207–218. doi: 10.1159/000351433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Keck T., Rozsasi A., Grun P.M. Surgical treatment of hypopharyngeal diverticulum (Zenker's diverticulum) Eur Archives of Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267:587–592. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-1079-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zbaren P., Schar P., Tschopp L. Surgical treatment of Zenker's diverticulum: transcutaneous diverticulectomy versus microendoscopic myotomy of the cricopharyngeal muscle with CO2 laser. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;121:482–487. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70242-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Van Abel K.M., Tombers N.M., Krein K.A. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following transoral diverticulotomy for Zenker's diverticulum: a prospective single-group study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;154:322–327. doi: 10.1177/0194599815616078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Halland M., Grooteman K.V., Baron T.H. Flexible endosopic management of Zenker's diverticulum: characteristics and outcomes of 52 cases at a tertiary referral center. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29:273–277. doi: 10.1111/dote.12323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.de la Morena Madrigal E.J., Perez Arellano E., Rodriguez Garcia I. Flexible endoscopic treatment of Zenker's diverticulum: thirteen years' experience in Spain. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2016;108:297–303. doi: 10.17235/reed.2016.4030/2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Verdonck J., Morton R.P. Systematic review on treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272:3095–3107. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3267-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Murer K., Soyka M.B., Broglie M.A. Zenker's diverticulum: outcome of endoscopic surgery is dependent on the intraoperative exposure. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272:167–173. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-2959-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jones D., Aloraini A., Gowing S. Evolving management of Zenker's diverticulum in the endoscopic era: a North American experience. World J Surg. 2016;40:1390–1396. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3442-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sakai P. Endoscopic myotomy of Zenker's diverticulum: lessons from 3 decades of experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:774–775. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Case D.J., Baron T.H. Flexible endoscopic management of Zenker diverticulum: the Mayo Clinic experience. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2010;85:719–722. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Endoscopic management of Zenker’s diverticulum.








