Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2019 Feb 4;8:F1000 Faculty Rev-148. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17056.1

Recent advances in understanding RAG deficiencies

Andrew Gennery 1,2,a
PMCID: PMC6364374  PMID: 30800289

Abstract

Recombination-activating genes ( RAG) 1 and RAG2 initiate the molecular processes that lead to lymphocyte receptor formation through VDJ recombination. Nonsense mutations in RAG1/ RAG2 cause the most profound immunodeficiency syndrome, severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID). Other severe and less-severe clinical phenotypes due to mutations in RAG genes are now recognized. The degree of residual protein function may permit some lymphocyte receptor formation, which confers a less-severe clinical phenotype. Many of the non-SCID phenotypes are associated with autoimmunity. New findings into the effect of mutations in RAG1/2 on the developing T- and B-lymphocyte receptor give insight into the development of autoimmunity. This article summarizes recent findings and places the genetic and molecular findings in a clinical context.

Keywords: Atypical SCID; Autoimmunity; Omenn syndrome; Recombination-activating genes; Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID); VDJ recombination;

Introduction

Recombination-activating genes ( RAG) 1 and RAG2 encode endonuclease proteins, which are critical to initiate the molecular processes that lead to lymphocyte receptor formation. Nonsense mutations in RAG1/ RAG2 completely annul this process and abrogate T- and B-lymphocyte receptor formation, leading to the most profound immunodeficiency syndrome, severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID). A spectrum of less-severe clinical phenotypes is now recognized to be due to mutations in RAG genes; recent understanding of the impact of mutations on protein function helps to explain, at least some of, these features. This article summarizes recent findings and places the genetic and molecular findings in a clinical context.

Clinical phenotypes of RAG deficiency

The recombination activity retained by RAG mutants correlates with the severity of clinical presentation, in that the least recombination activity is associated with the most-severe phenotype.

Severe combined immunodeficiency

Nonsense mutations in RAG1 or RAG2 abolish the initiation of antigen receptor recombination, which prevents the progression of T- and B-lymphocyte progenitors beyond the DN3 and pre-B-1 stage of development, giving rise to a T-B-natural killer cell (NK)+ SCID phenotype 1. Infants classically present with infectious symptoms caused by common viral pathogens, which include respiratory viruses such as respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza viruses, as well as cytomegalovirus and adenoviruses and viruses causing enteritis, including rotavirus (which may be acquired from live-attenuated vaccine) and norovirus 2. Susceptibility to opportunistic pathogens such as Pneumocystis jirovecii, or attenuated vaccine organisms used in live vaccines, including BCG, and poliovirus vaccines is pathognomic 2, 3. Infections persist, causing pneumonitis, enteritis, and failure to thrive, and may disseminate.

Omenn syndrome and ‘leaky’ severe combined immunodeficiency

Missense mutations in RAG1 or RAG2 severely disrupt the function of the recombinase proteins but permit occasional recombination events that maintain partial V(D)J recombination activity and lead to the expansion of oligoclonal T-lymphocyte populations 4. A study of RAG-deficient patients established that null mutations on both RAG alleles give rise to the T-B- SCID phenotype, whereas those patients who manifested classical Omenn syndrome harbored missense mutations on at least one RAG allele that permitted partial V(D)J recombination activity, which enabled the generation of residual, oligoclonal T lymphocytes 5. Patients with Omenn syndrome present with generalized lichenified protein-losing erythroderma, often associated with scaling and exfoliation. Scalp, and often eyebrow and eyelash, hair is lost with evolution of the rash; severe alopecia is characteristic and an important clinical indication of the diagnosis. The rash is usually present at birth or within a few days afterwards but may evolve over the first few weeks of life. Axillary and inguinal lymphadenopathy with hepatosplenomegaly is a frequent finding. Inflammatory pneumonitis, enteritis, or hepatitis may be present. Co-existing infection with conventional or opportunistic pathogens is usually demonstrated.

Immunological investigations reveal a T-lymphocytosis with a highly activated phenotype, dominated by a restricted oligoclonal expansion of a few TCRVβ families and absence of other families 68. T-lymphocytes fail to proliferate in response to stimulation with phytohemagglutinin. Indicators of thymopoiesis and B-lymphocytes are absent and NK cells are generally present in normal numbers. Serum immunoglobulins IgM, IgA, and IgG are absent, with absence of vaccine antigen responses, but the serum IgE is usually raised, with an associated eosinophilia. A group of patients with a milder phenotype than classical Omenn syndrome, known as ‘leaky’ or ‘atypical’ SCID, were also shown to harbor missense mutations in RAG1 or RAG2 5. Genotype is important in conferring immunotypes, as demonstrated by a patient with a classical nonsense 2113delC homozygous mutation in RAG1 genomic DNA but who exhibited a typical clinico-hemato-immunophenotype associated with Omenn syndrome 9. The mutation was confirmed in both parents as heterozygote carriers and found in a homozygous state in genomic DNA from granulocytes from the patient. Contrary to predictions of a frameshift with abolition of protein function, DNA extracted from the patient’s peripheral CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes showed six co-existent somatic second-site missense mutations (absent from monocytes, granulocytes, and NK cells) along with the base C deletion. These compensatory mutations acted to restore the RAG1 reading frame and suggested that the revertant somatic mutations occurred in early T-lymphocyte progenitors, demonstrating the importance of partial RAG function in the evolution of Omenn syndrome or atypical SCID. A similar case has since been reported 10. Other phenotypes associated with missense RAG mutations include patients who exhibit specific antibody production and autoantibody production despite profound B-lymphocytopenia and those who exhibit T-lymphocytopenia for TCRαβ-expressing lymphocytes but normal numbers of TCRγδ-expressing T-lymphocytes 11. A similar phenotype is described in which RAG1 missense mutations were associated with autoimmune cytopenia and oligoclonal expansion of TCRγδ T-lymphocytes with TCRαβ+ T-lymphocytopenia 12 in the context of severe, disseminated CMV infection.

Not only is the division between SCID, atypical SCID, and Omenn syndrome dependent on gene mutation, demonstrated by the finding that siblings within a family can demonstrate alternate phenotypes 13, but also environmental factors can contribute to the phenotype. One study described three related patients presenting with classical immunological and phenotypic features of T-B-NK+ SCID, who harbored a homozygous mutation in the core domain of RAG2 (1305G>T) 14, previously described in patients with T-B-NK+ SCID and in patients with Omenn syndrome 15. In the course of one month, a clinico-hemato-immunophenotype was seen to develop in the third patient, which was consistent with classical Omenn syndrome, following a parainfluenza type 3 lower respiratory tract infection 14. This case implies that environmental factors may act as a trigger for the evolution of a SCID phenotype into Omenn syndrome; in this case, an external infectious agent acted as a trigger, although other triggers could be unidentified internal stimuli.

Combined immunodeficiency with granulomas

A syndrome characterized by later-onset infection with midline or widespread skin or deep-seated granulomatous lesions is now well described 1618. Severe viral or vaccine-induced infection is described, with fatal sepsis in childhood. Autoimmune features are also described. Immunoglobulin levels, vaccine responses, and lymphocyte numbers are variably absent, low, or normal. Missense mutations in RAG have been described in affected patients. A further adult patient who harbored a frameshift and a missense mutation with reduced function in RAG1 has been described with combined immunodeficiency, who died from JC virus-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy 19. Granulomas identified in RAG-deficient patients generally have no identifiable infectious or systemic cause, but vaccine strain rubella virus can create chronic infection in M2 macrophages and keratinocytes within granulomas of patients with various T-lymphocyte defects, including RAG deficiency, suggesting a role for chronic viral infection and immune dysfunction in granuloma formation 20.

Common variable immunodeficiency

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), typically associated with hypogammaglobulinemia and low or nonexistent specific antibody responses to vaccination, comprises a heterogeneous group of primary immunodeficiencies. Other non-infectious features are common, including autoimmune cytopenias, granulomatous disease, and enteropathy. Around 10% of patients have a genetic diagnosis, and, in some, missense RAG mutations have been implicated 21, 22.

Antibody deficiency

Although most cases of RAG deficiency described to date associate with a greater or lesser degree of T-lymphocyte deficiency, isolated agammaglobulinemia is described 23, 24, as well as polysaccharide antibody deficiency in adults 25, and a patient with isolated IgA deficiency is also described 26 with associated missense mutations in RAG.

Autoimmunity

Infectious manifestations are the predominant presenting feature in RAG deficiency, but autoimmune features are the predominant presenting phenotype in a number of patients, including hematological cytopenias, autoimmune hepatitis, myopathy, and nephrotic syndrome, with associated RAG missense mutations 27, 28. Intriguingly, one patient developed systemic lupus erythematosus with erosive arthritis and was demonstrated to have a heterozygous RAG2 missense mutation associated with diminished lymphocyte receptor editing 29.

Miscellaneous presentations

A number of other immunological presentations are described, including isolated idiopathic CD4+ lymphocytopenia 30, sterile chronic multi-focal osteomyelitis 31, pyoderma gangrenosum 32, and a patient with affected siblings but who was clinically normal despite sharing the same mutations 33 ( Table 1).

Table 1. Clinical phenotypes in patients with mutations in RAG1 or RAG2.

Phenotype Autoimmunity described
Severe combined immunodeficiency
(SCID)
No
Omenn syndrome Yes
“Atypical” SCID Yes
Combined immunodeficiency Yes
Combined immunodeficiency with granulomas Yes
Common variable immunodeficiency Yes
Miscellaneous autoimmunity Yes
Chronic multi-focal osteomyelitis No
Pyoderma gangrenosum No
Idiopathic CD4+ lymphocytopenia No
No clinical abnormality No

The most striking feature about these newly described presentations is that they are not new disease manifestations but rather previously described diseases, which now, in some cases, are associated with a defect in RAG1 or RAG2. In some populations, the frequency of individuals carrying mutations in RAG1 or RAG2 is estimated to be much higher than is accounted for by the number of SCID or Omenn syndrome patients 28, suggesting that many more older patients with less-severe clinical manifestations, including combined immunodeficiency, autoimmune cytopenias, organ-specific autoimmune disease, and antibody deficiency, are yet to be identified. The future challenge will be to decide which patients with these common manifestations should be screened for RAG defects and whether a positive finding would alter management of the disease.

How is it that mutations in two small genes can give rise to a plethora of clinical phenotypes? Recent discoveries into the biological effects of hypomorphic mutations on lymphocyte development, in conjunction with modifying environmental factors, help explain the diversity of presentation.

Thymopoiesis and thymic formation

T- and B-lymphocytes, key cells of the adaptive immune response, are generated in the thymus and bone marrow, respectively. Each naive lymphocyte has a unique antigen receptor and lymphocyte receptor diversity, generated by stochastic genetic rearrangements that cut, splice, and modify lymphocyte receptor variable region gene segments at the lymphocyte receptor loci, that is estimated to be in the region of 10 20 α–β chain combinations for T-lymphocyte receptors 34 or heavy-light chain combinations for B-lymphocyte receptors.

DNA double-strand breaks introduced by an endonuclease complex coded by RAG1 and RAG2, which randomly incise DNA at highly conserved sequences of DNA (recombination signal sequences) that flank all variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) coding regions, initiate T-lymphocyte receptor gene segment re-arrangement in the thymic cortex, enabling the assembly of interspersed V(D)J gene elements, a process known as V(D)J recombination.

The stochastic re-assembly of V(D)J gene segments leads to the formation of a wide receptor repertoire. The random nature of receptor formation inevitably generates some strongly self-reactive lymphocyte receptors, which carry the risk of initiating autoimmune responses. Developing thymocytes that successfully re-arrange the antigen receptor therefore navigate a rigorous intra-thymic two-stage selection process to identify and remove these potentially damaging self-reactive T-lymphocytes 35. In the first phase, known as positive selection, thymocytes are exposed to a self-peptide/major histocompatibility complex (MHC) presented by cortical thymic epithelial cells in the thymic cortex. By recognition of this complex with intermediate receptor affinity, thymocytes can advance to the next developmental phase, ensuring that antigen is recognized in the company of self-MHC molecules. Receptors that fail to bind the complex or bind with high affinity facilitate apoptosis of the thymocyte.

Surviving thymocytes migrate to the thymic medulla and submit to the second stage of thymocyte selection, designated negative selection, during which the antigen receptor interacts with a self-peptide/MHC complex presented by medullary thymic epithelial cells and dendritic cells. Medullary thymic epithelial cells express a wide range of ectopic peripheral tissue-restricted self-antigens (TRA), partly controlled by the Autoimmune Regulator (AIRE) and Fezf2 transcription factors 3638, exposing a “molecular mirror of peripheral self”. Antigen receptors that bind with high affinity to the TRA/MHC complexes are deleted, or forced down a regulatory T-lymphocyte developmental pathway, as otherwise these have the potential to elicit autoimmunity 39. Negative selection is an indispensable function of central tolerance, a key process that eliminates auto-reactive T-lymphocytes.

A calm and uninterrupted thymic microenvironment is required for normal T-lymphocyte development 40; however, typical thymic architectural development relies on “thymic crosstalk”, i.e. feedback from the developing thymocytes 41. CD4+ thymocytes express CD40 ligand and RANK ligand, which provide signals to medullary thymic epithelial cells 42, enabling cellular maturation and subsequent expression of AIRE.

Effect of RAG deficiency on thymic development

Seminal studies in infants with genetic defects that severely impair T-lymphocyte development have shown disrupted thymic architecture, with diminished thymic epithelial cell development, absent AIRE expression, and severely reduced FOXP3+ regulatory T-lymphocytes not seen in mutations that permit T-lymphocyte development 43. Furthermore, disturbed AIRE expression with diminished self-antigen expression has been demonstrated in the thymus of infants with hypomorphic RAG mutations 44. These findings demonstrate that significant impairment of T-lymphocyte development may diminish central and peripheral tolerance mechanisms, increasing the risk of escape of highly autoreactive T-lymphocyte clones and thus the risk of developing autoimmunity for an affected individual. Nonsense mutations in RAG1 or RAG2 disrupt the function of RAG endonucleases profoundly and result in complete failure to initiate antigen receptor V(D)J re-arrangement, which causes failure of progression of T- and B-lymphocyte progenitors beyond the DN3 and pre-B-1 stage of development. This gives rise to a T-B-NK+ SCID phenotype. Thymic development is interrupted, and no T-lymphocytes are able to develop because of the intrinsic hematopoietic stem cell defect. In hypomorphic RAG deficiency, residual V(D)J function is permissive of some T-lymphocyte development, and so thymic development occurs, albeit in an aberrant fashion.

Role of RAG deficiency on T-lymphocyte-mediated clinical features

Increasing evidence demonstrates advancing restriction in the IGH and TRB repertoire associated with increased T- and B-lymphocyte clonality in patients with associated increasingly severe RAG deficiency, step-wise from normal through combined immunodeficiency with granulomas/autoimmunity, leaky SCID, and Omenn syndrome 45. A reduction in TCRβ diversity accompanied by distorted use of V, D, and J gene segments and restriction in CDR3 length diversity are more pronounced in patients with a more-severe clinical phenotype 45. This repertoire restriction is determined by the residual endonuclease activity conferred by the mutation in RAG1 46 or RAG2 47, which permits some V(D)J recombination in less-severe mutations and permits the formation of a few T-lymphocyte clones which experience impaired positive and negative selection as they pass through the disrupted thymic structure.

However, more recent findings also directly implicate the effect of the RAG mutation on V(D)J recombination, preferentially conferring an autoreactive phenotype on the lymphocyte, leading to subsequent development of dysregulated immune responses, as well as the impact of the impaired central and peripheral tolerance mechanisms. Hypomorphic RAG mutations are more likely to lead to the development of an antigen receptor that is autoreactive as well as reduce the likelihood of deletion through central tolerance because of disrupted thymic architecture.

High-throughput sequencing of the T-lymphocyte receptor from patients with RAG mutations has demonstrated less junctional diversity and smaller CDR3 regions than seen in patients with Omenn syndrome caused by other gene mutations 48. During normal lymphocyte development, T-lymphocyte receptor and immunoglobulin gene rearrangements progress through a unique somatic recombination development. The TCRα locus employs a multistep recombination process, progressing from use of proximal TRAV elements to distal TRAV elements. This process is arrested by downregulation of RAG1/2 expression following positive selection of thymocytes. The persistent reduced recombinase activity over successive waves of TCRα rearrangement in patients with RAG defects manifests as a bias in TCRα use towards more proximal TRAV/TRAJ associations. These specific patterns can be detected using flow cytometric methods, which have been observed in patients with V(D)J recombination defects, including RAG deficiency 49.

Hypomorphic Rag murine models demonstrate impaired gene rearrangement at the Igh, Igk, and Trb loci, which limits antigen receptor diversity from a very early stage in thymocyte development 50. Hydrophobic residues within the T-lymphocyte receptor CDR3 region have been associated with the development of autoreactive T-lymphocytes 51, and specific cysteine patterns in the same CDR3 region have also been shown to predict the development of autoreactivity 52. In the conventional CD4+ T-lymphocytes of patients with combined immunodeficiency or atypical SCID, associated with hypomorphic RAG mutations, enhancement for hydrophobic amino acids associated with auto-reactivity and a reduction in those hydrophilic amino acids that limit autoimmunity have been identified in the CDR3 region 53. This may reveal an intrinsic bias favoring the production of auto-reactive T-lymphocytes as well as impaired negative selection due to impaired central tolerance, indicated by reduced expression of AIRE 44.

Additionally, there is a reduction in the number 43, 44, 50, 54 and function 53, 55 of regulatory T lymphocytes in these patients, which will have an impact on peripheral tolerance.

Role of RAG deficiency on B-lymphocyte-mediated clinical features

As well as a raised IgE, IgM and IgG autoantibodies have been detected in patients with hypomorphic RAG mutations, including those with Omenn syndrome, and especially those with autoimmune manifestations with combined immunodeficiency or granulomas, against a wide range of auto-antigens 56. Amongst these autoantibodies are neutralizing anti-cytokine antibodies directed against anti-IFN-α or anti-IFN-ω, which may be precipitated by environmental triggers such as viral infection 28, 57. Murine models with hypomorphic Rag mutations produce high levels of low-affinity autoantibodies, associated with impaired receptor editing and an increase in serum B-lymphocyte-activating factor (BAFF) concentrations, also identified in patients with Omenn syndrome and leaky SCID, implicating B-lymphocytes in the autoreactivity found in these patients 57. BAFF is important in promoting B-lymphocyte survival. Reduced levels of BAFF receptor are expressed by anergic self-reactive B-lymphocytes compared to naïve B-lymphocytes 58, and in normal homeostasis, auto-reactive cells are therefore eliminated from the pool of circulating naïve B-lymphocytes. RAG-mutated patients and mouse models exhibit profound B-lymphocytopenia, and the higher circulating levels of BAFF enable the survival of immature auto-reactive B-lymphocytes 56, 59. These patients have more class-switched immunoglobulin heavy chain transcripts and an increased rate of somatic hypermutation, indicating in vivo B lymphocyte activation 45, 57.

Role of RAG deficiency on natural killer cell-mediated clinical features

Invariant NK T-lymphocyte populations protect against autoimmunity and graft-versus-host disease 60, 61. Development requires thymic-dependent, RAG-initiated V(D)J recombination. These cells are absent in patients with Omenn syndrome, the lack of which may contribute to the autoimmune phenomena seen in these patients 62.

Conventional NK cells are found in normal or sometimes increased numbers in patients with RAG mutations, regardless of the clinical presentation. Within the NK population, however, is a higher-than-normal proportion of immature (CD56 bright) NK cells, which exhibit both increased perforin content and enhanced degranulation activity 63. This heightened NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity may be responsible for the increased rate of graft rejection observed after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with RAG-deficient SCID 64, in contrast to patients with other NK+ SCID phenotypes, such as IL7Ra deficiency. An increased cytotoxic reaction has been observed also in NK lymphocytes from Rag –/– mice, although the NK cells display a mature and activated phenotype in contrast to patients 65.

Role of the environment in clinical manifestations of RAG deficiency

The degree of residual protein function clearly plays a role in determining clinical phenotype, but it is not the sole determinant, because patients who share similar RAG mutations, which confer similar immunobiological effects, may present with different clinical phenotypes 66. Omenn syndrome can evolve from SCID over a period of weeks, as internal or external antigens, including viruses 14, drive T-lymphocyte clonal expansion. Anti-cytokine antibodies, such as anti-IFN-α or anti-IFN-ω, seen in patients with RAG-mutated combined immunodeficiency or atypical SCID, may be produced as a result of viral infection in predisposed patients 57, 67. The intestinal microbiota may also influence the development of autoimmunity. In murine models of RAG deficiency, inflammatory bowel disease mediated by intestinal CD4 T H1/T H17 T-lymphocytes has been ameliorated by manipulating the intestinal flora, resulting in the reduction of gut tropic T-lymphocytes and reduced IgE levels 68 ( Table 2).

Table 2. Mechanisms of autoimmunity in RAG deficiency.

Lymphocyte population Mechanism of autoimmunity
T-lymphocyte receptor development Restriction in T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire
Reduction in TCRβ diversity
Distorted use of V, D, and J gene segments
Restriction in CDR3 length diversity
Reduction in VDJ junctional diversity
Bias in TCRα use towards more proximal TRAV/TRAJ associations
Enhanced use of hydrophobic amino acids in the CDR3 region
T-lymphocytes – central tolerance Impaired T-lymphocyte development leading to disordered thymic architecture
Impaired positive and negative thymocyte selection
Failure of apoptosis of autoreactive T-lymphocytes due to diminished Autoimmune Regulator (AIRE) expression
T-lymphocytes – peripheral tolerance Diminished regulatory T-lymphocyte numbers
Impaired regulatory T-lymphocyte function
B-lymphocyte receptor development Distorted use of V, D, and J gene segments
Reduction in antigen receptor diversity
B-lymphocyte-activating factor (BAFF)-associated survival of immature auto-reactive B-lymphocytes
Production of auto-antibodies
Production of neutralizing anti-cytokine antibodies
Environmental factors Viral-driven clonal T-lymphocyte expansion
Viral-driven clonal T-lymphocyte anti-cytokine antibody production
Intestinal microbiota-driven expansion of gut-trophic T-lymphocytes

Therapy

For the most-severe disease manifestations, including SCID, atypical SCID, and Omenn syndrome, HSCT is the standard of care. Initial management should be directed at the treatment of pre-existing infections, appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis, and immunoglobulin replacement. Nutritional support with hyper alimentation or total parenteral nutrition is often required. Skin care is critical, and topical treatments should be utilized, including steroid ointments and topical tacrolimus, as well as topical anti-bacterial washes and emollients and barrier creams. Patients frequently experience super-added bacterial infection; Staphylococcus aureus is usually implicated. These infections should be treated aggressively. Calcineurin inhibitors and other systemic immunosuppression may improve the inflammation 69, which may affect any and all organs. Serotherapy may be required to remove auto-inflammatory cells, although immunosuppression in the presence of active infection can present specific challenges. Careful pre-transplant care is critical to a successful outcome following HSCT. In the modern era, survival from HSCT for primary immunodeficiencies is similar whether a matched sibling, matched unrelated, or mismatched T-lymphocyte-depleted donor is utilized. The outcome of HSCT for RAG deficiency (characterized as T-B- SCID) has been significantly worse than other forms of SCID 70, but a recent report has shown similar survival rates for RAG-SCID as for other genetically defined T-B+ SCID phenotypes 71. Thymic and bone marrow niches are occupied by developmentally arrested pre-cursors in RAG-deficient patients, and so long-term immune reconstitution is likely to be achieved only after the use of a conditioning regimen 72, preferentially with serotherapy which targets NK cells. Graft failure is common in RAG deficiency 64, 71, perhaps partly mediated by highly reactive NK cells which exhibit enhanced degranulation and increased amounts of perforin 63. The best results are achieved if patients are infection-free at the time of transplantation 71, 73, most likely accomplished if they are detected by newborn screening 74.

Genetic therapy using gene addition is likely to be the next therapeutic advance in treating these patients. Autologous stem cells are used, removing the risk of graft-versus-host disease and rejection. Gene therapy for X-linked SCID and for adenosine deaminase-deficient SCID has been established, with a licensed vector for adenosine deaminase-deficient SCID available in Europe. Survival results are excellent, and the lentiviral vectors have a better safety profile than gammaretroviral vectors 75, 76. Preclinical lentiviral vector gene therapy studies for RAG1 and RAG2 deficiency using animal models have shown some success 77, 78 to date without the risks of oncogenesis described when older retroviral vectors were used 79; clinical trials using lentiviral vectors to treat patients are now in progress 80. The very best outcomes may be possible when patients are treated infection-free as newborns using a gene therapy protocol with chemotherapy-free antibody-based conditioning regimens 81, 82.

Conclusion

It is now clear that hypomorphic mutations in RAG genes can result in protean manifestations of immunodeficiency, immunodysregulation, or autoimmunity, even manifesting in late adolescence or early adulthood. New understandings of the biological effects of these mutations, particularly on the development of T- and B-lymphocyte receptors, help explain these clinical presentations. For the more-severe manifestations, emerging gene therapy technologies may offer novel therapy options.

Editorial Note on the Review Process

F1000 Faculty Reviews are commissioned from members of the prestigious F1000 Faculty and are edited as a service to readers. In order to make these reviews as comprehensive and accessible as possible, the referees provide input before publication and only the final, revised version is published. The referees who approved the final version are listed with their names and affiliations but without their reports on earlier versions (any comments will already have been addressed in the published version).

The referees who approved this article are:

  • Barbara Cassani, Istituto di Ricerca Genetica e Biomedica, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Milan, Italy

  • David G Schatz, Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 1; referees: 2 approved]

References

  • 1. Schwarz K, Gauss GH, Ludwig L, et al. : RAG Mutations in Human B Cell-Negative SCID. Science. 1996;274(5284):97–9. 10.1126/science.274.5284.97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Fischer A, Notarangelo LD, Neven B, et al. : Severe combined immunodeficiencies and related disorders. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;1:15061. 10.1038/nrdp.2015.61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Marciano BE, Huang CY, Joshi G, et al. : BCG vaccination in patients with severe combined immunodeficiency: Complications, risks, and vaccination policies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(4):1134–41. 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.02.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Villa A, Santagata S, Bozzi F, et al. : Partial V(D)J recombination activity leads to omenn syndrome. Cell. 1998;93(5):885–96. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81448-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Villa A: V(D)J recombination defects in lymphocytes due to RAG mutations: Severe immunodeficiency with a spectrum of clinical presentations. Blood. 2001;97(1):81–8. 10.1182/blood.V97.1.81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Rieux-Laucat F, Bahadoran P, Brousse N, et al. : Highly restricted human T cell repertoire in peripheral blood and tissue-infiltrating lymphocytes in Omenn's syndrome. J Clin Invest. 1998;102(2):312–21. 10.1172/JCI332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Harville TO, Adams DM, Howard TA, et al. : Oligoclonal expansion of CD45RO + T lymphocytes in Omenn syndrome. J Clin Immunol. 1997;17(4):322–32. 10.1023/A:1027330800085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. de Saint-Basile G, Le Deist F, de Villartay JP, et al. : Restricted heterogeneity of T lymphocytes in combined immunodeficiency with hypereosinophilia (Omenn's syndrome). J Clin Invest. 1991;87(4):1352–9. 10.1172/JCI115139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Wada T, Toma T, Okamoto H, et al. : Oligoclonal expansion of T lymphocytes with multiple second-site mutations leads to Omenn syndrome in a patient with RAG1-deficient severe combined immunodeficiency. Blood. 2005;106(6):2099–101. 10.1182/blood-2005-03-0936 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Crestani E, Choo S, Frugoni F, et al. : RAG1 reversion mosaicism in a patient with Omenn syndrome. J Clin Immunol. 2014;34(5):551–4. 10.1007/s10875-014-0051-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ehl S, Schwarz K, Enders A, et al. : A variant of SCID with specific immune responses and predominance of gamma delta T cells. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(11):3140–8. 10.1172/JCI25221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. de Villartay JP, Lim A, Al-Mousa H, et al. : A novel immunodeficiency associated with hypomorphic RAG1 mutations and CMV infection. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(11):3291–9. 10.1172/JCI25178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Corneo B, Moshous D, Güngör T, et al. : Identical mutations in RAG1 or RAG2 genes leading to defective V(D)J recombinase activity can cause either T-B-severe combined immune deficiency or Omenn syndrome. Blood. 2001;97(9):2772–6. 10.1182/blood.V97.9.2772 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Dalal I, Tabori U, Bielorai B, et al. : Evolution of a T-B- SCID into an Omenn syndrome phenotype following parainfluenza 3 virus infection. Clin Immunol. 2005;115(1):70–3. 10.1016/j.clim.2004.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Tabori U, Mark Z, Amariglio N, et al. : Detection of RAG mutations and prenatal diagnosis in families presenting with either T-B- severe combined immunodeficiency or Omenn's syndrome. Clin Genet. 2004;65(4):322–6. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00227.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Schuetz C, Huck K, Gudowius S, et al. : An immunodeficiency disease with RAG mutations and granulomas. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(19):2030–8. 10.1056/NEJMoa073966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. de Ravin SS, Cowen EW, Zarember KA, et al. : Hypomorphic Rag mutations can cause destructive midline granulomatous disease. Blood. 2010;116(8):1263–71. 10.1182/blood-2010-02-267583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sharapova SO, Migas A, Guryanova I, et al. : Late-onset combined immune deficiency associated to skin granuloma due to heterozygous compound mutations in RAG1 gene in a 14 years old male. Hum Immunol. 2013;74(1):18–22. 10.1016/j.humimm.2012.10.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Schröder C, Baerlecken NT, Pannicke U, et al. : Evaluation of RAG1 mutations in an adult with combined immunodeficiency and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Clin Immunol. 2017;179:1–7. 10.1016/j.clim.2016.12.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 20. Neven B, Pérot P, Bruneau J, et al. : Cutaneous and Visceral Chronic Granulomatous Disease Triggered by a Rubella Virus Vaccine Strain in Children With Primary Immunodeficiencies. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(1):83–6. 10.1093/cid/ciw675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 21. Abolhassani H, Wang N, Aghamohammadi A, et al. : A hypomorphic recombination-activating gene 1 ( RAG1) mutation resulting in a phenotype resembling common variable immunodeficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134(6):1375–80. 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.04.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Buchbinder D, Baker R, Lee YN, et al. : Identification of Patients with RAG Mutations Previously Diagnosed with Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorders. J Clin Immunol. 2015;35(2):119–24. 10.1007/s10875-014-0121-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 23. Cifaldi C, Scarselli A, Petricone D, et al. : Agammaglobulinemia associated to nasal polyposis due to a hypomorphic RAG1 mutation in a 12 years old boy. Clin Immunol. 2016;173:121–3. 10.1016/j.clim.2016.09.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 24. Hedayat M, Massaad MJ, Lee YN, et al. : Lessons in gene hunting: A RAG1 mutation presenting with agammaglobulinemia and absence of B cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134(4):983–985.e1. 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.04.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Geier CB, Piller A, Linder A, et al. : Leaky RAG Deficiency in Adult Patients with Impaired Antibody Production against Bacterial Polysaccharide Antigens. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133220. 10.1371/journal.pone.0133220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 26. Kato T, Crestani E, Kamae C, et al. : RAG1 deficiency may present clinically as selective IgA deficiency. J Clin Immunol. 2015;35(3):280–8. 10.1007/s10875-015-0146-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 27. Henderson LA, Frugoni F, Hopkins G, et al. : Expanding the spectrum of recombination-activating gene 1 deficiency: A family with early-onset autoimmunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(4):969–71.e1-2. 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.06.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Chen K, Wu W, Mathew D, et al. : Autoimmunity due to RAG deficiency and estimated disease incidence in RAG1/2 mutations. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(3):880–2.e10. 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.11.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Walter JE, Lo MS, Kis-Toth K, et al. : Impaired receptor editing and heterozygous RAG2 mutation in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and erosive arthritis. J Allergy Clin Immuno. 2015;135(1):272–3. 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.07.063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 30. Kuijpers TW, Ijspeert H, van Leeuwen EM, et al. : Idiopathic CD4 + T lymphopenia without autoimmunity or granulomatous disease in the slipstream of RAG mutations. Blood. 2011;117(22):5892–6. 10.1182/blood-2011-01-329052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Reiff A, Bassuk AG, Church JA, et al. : Exome sequencing reveals RAG1 mutations in a child with autoimmunity and sterile chronic multifocal osteomyelitis evolving into disseminated granulomatous disease. J Clin Immunol. 2013;33(8):1289–92. 10.1007/s10875-013-9953-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Patiroglu T, Akar HH, Gilmour K, et al. : Atypical severe combined immunodeficiency caused by a novel homozygous mutation in Rag1 gene in a girl who presented with pyoderma gangrenosum: a case report and literature review. J Clin Immunol. 2014;34(7):792–5. 10.1007/s10875-014-0077-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Schuetz C, Pannicke U, Jacobsen EM, et al. : Lesson from hypomorphic recombination-activating gene ( RAG) mutations: Why asymptomatic siblings should also be tested. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(4):1211–5. 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.10.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Holländer GA, Peterson P: Learning to be tolerant: How T cells keep out of trouble. J Intern Med. 2009;265(5):541–61. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02093.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Gill J, Malin M, Sutherland J, et al. : Thymic generation and regeneration. Immunol Rev. 2003;195:28–50. 10.1034/j.1600-065X.2003.00077.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Takaba H, Morishita Y, Tomofuji Y, et al. : Fezf2 Orchestrates a Thymic Program of Self-Antigen Expression for Immune Tolerance. Cell. 2015;163(4):975–87. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 37. Anderson MS, Venanzi ES, Chen Z, et al. : The cellular mechanism of Aire control of T cell tolerance. Immunity. 2005;23(2):227–39. 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 38. Anderson MS, Venanzi ES, Klein L, et al. : Projection of an immunological self shadow within the thymus by the aire protein. Science. 2002;298(5597):1395–401. 10.1126/science.1075958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 39. Klein L, Hinterberger M, Wirnsberger G, et al. : Antigen presentation in the thymus for positive selection and central tolerance induction. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(12):833–44. 10.1038/nri2669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Holländer GA, Wang B, Nichogiannopoulou A, et al. : Developmental control point in induction of thymic cortex regulated by a subpopulation of prothymocytes. Nature. 1995;373(6512):350–3. 10.1038/373350a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. van Ewijk W, Shores EW, Singer A: Crosstalk in the mouse thymus. Immunol Today. 1994;15(5):214–7. 10.1016/0167-5699(94)90246-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Akiyama T, Tateishi R, Akiyama N, et al. : Positive and Negative Regulatory Mechanisms for Fine-Tuning Cellularity and Functions of Medullary Thymic Epithelial Cells. Front Immunol. 2015;6:461. 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 43. Poliani PL, Facchetti F, Ravanini M, et al. : Early defects in human T-cell development severely affect distribution and maturation of thymic stromal cells: possible implications for the pathophysiology of Omenn syndrome. Blood. 2009;114(1):105–8. 10.1182/blood-2009-03-211029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Cavadini P, Vermi W, Facchetti F, et al. : AIRE deficiency in thymus of 2 patients with Omenn syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(3):728–32. 10.1172/JCI23087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Lee YN, Frugoni F, Dobbs K, et al. : Characterization of T and B cell repertoire diversity in patients with RAG deficiency. Sci Immunol. 2016;1(6): pii: eaah6109. 10.1126/sciimmunol.aah6109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Lee YN, Frugoni F, Dobbs K, et al. : A systematic analysis of recombination activity and genotype-phenotype correlation in human recombination-activating gene 1 deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(4):1099–108. 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.10.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 47. Tirosh I, Yamazaki Y, Frugoni F, et al. : Recombination activity of human recombination-activating gene 2 ( RAG2) mutations and correlation with clinical phenotype. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018; pii: S0091-6749(18)30699-7. 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.04.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Yu X, Almeida JR, Darko S, et al. : Human syndromes of immunodeficiency and dysregulation are characterized by distinct defects in T-cell receptor repertoire development. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(4):1109–1115. 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.11.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Berland A, Rosain J, Kaltenbach S, et al. : PROMIDISα: A T-cell receptor α signature associated with immunodeficiencies caused by V(D)J recombination defects. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(1):325–334.e2. 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.05.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 50. Ott de Bruin LM, Bosticardo M, Barbieri A, et al. : Hypomorphic Rag1 mutations alter the preimmune repertoire at early stages of lymphoid development. Blood. 2018;132(3):281–92. 10.1182/blood-2017-12-820985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 51. Stadinski BD, Shekhar K, Gómez-Touriño I, et al. : Hydrophobic CDR3 residues promote the development of self-reactive T cells. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(8):946–55. 10.1038/ni.3491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 52. Wirasinha RC, Singh M, Archer SK, et al. : αβ T-cell receptors with a central CDR3 cysteine are enriched in CD8αα intraepithelial lymphocytes and their thymic precursors. Immunol Cell Biol. 2018;96(6):553–61. 10.1111/imcb.12047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 53. Rowe JH, Stadinski BD, Henderson LA, et al. : Abnormalities of T-cell receptor repertoire in CD4 + regulatory and conventional T cells in patients with RAG mutations: Implications for autoimmunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140(6):1739–1743.e7. 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.08.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 54. Rucci F, Poliani PL, Caraffi S, et al. : Abnormalities of thymic stroma may contribute to immune dysregulation in murine models of leaky severe combined immunodeficiency. Front Immunol. 2011;2(15): pii: 00015. 10.3389/fimmu.2011.00015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Cassani B, Poliani PL, Moratto D, et al. : Defect of regulatory T cells in patients with Omenn syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125(1):209–16. 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.10.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Walter JE, Rucci F, Patrizi L, et al. : Expansion of immunoglobulin-secreting cells and defects in B cell tolerance in Rag-dependent immunodeficiency. J Exp Med. 2010;207(7):1541–54. 10.1084/jem.20091927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 57. Walter JE, Rosen LB, Csomos K, et al. : Broad-spectrum antibodies against self-antigens and cytokines in RAG deficiency. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(11):4135–48. 10.1172/JCI80477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Lesley R, Xu Y, Kalled SL, et al. : Reduced competitiveness of autoantigen-engaged B cells due to increased dependence on BAFF. Immunity. 2004;20(4):441–53. 10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00079-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Cassani B, Poliani PL, Marrella V, et al. : Homeostatic expansion of autoreactive immunoglobulin-secreting cells in the Rag2 mouse model of Omenn syndrome. J Exp Med. 2010;207(7):1525–40. 10.1084/jem.20091928 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Bendelac A, Savage PB, Teyton L: The Biology of NKT Cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:297–336. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Pillai AB, George TI, Dutt S, et al. : Host NKT Cells Can Prevent Graft-versus-Host Disease and Permit Graft Antitumor Activity after Bone Marrow Transplantation. J Immunol. 2007;178(10):6242–51. 10.4049/jimmunol.178.10.6242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Matangkasombut P, Pichavant M, Saez DE, et al. : Lack of iNKT cells in patients with combined immune deficiency due to hypomorphic RAG mutations. Blood. 2008;111(1):271–4. 10.1182/blood-2007-06-096487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Dobbs K, Tabellini G, Calzoni E, et al. : Natural Killer Cells from Patients with Recombinase-Activating Gene and Non-Homologous End Joining Gene Defects Comprise a Higher Frequency of CD56 bright NKG2A +++ Cells, and Yet Display Increased Degranulation and Higher Perforin Content. Front Immunol. 2017;8:798. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Schuetz C, Neven B, Dvorak CC, et al. : SCID patients with ARTEMIS vs RAG deficiencies following HCT: increased risk of late toxicity in ARTEMIS-deficient SCID. Blood. 2014;123(2):281–9. 10.1182/blood-2013-01-476432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 65. Karo JM, Schatz DG, Sun JC: The RAG recombinase dictates functional heterogeneity and cellular fitness in natural killer cells. Cell. 2014;159(1):94–107. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 66. IJspeert H, Driessen GJ, Moorhouse MJ, et al. : Similar recombination-activating gene ( RAG) mutations result in similar immunobiological effects but in different clinical phenotypes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(4):1124–33. 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.11.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Goda V, Malik A, Kalmar T, et al. : Partial RAG deficiency in a patient with varicella infection, autoimmune cytopenia, and anticytokine antibodies. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(5):1769–1771.e2. 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.01.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 68. Rigoni R, Fontana E, Guglielmetti S, et al. : Intestinal microbiota sustains inflammation and autoimmunity induced by hypomorphic RAG defects. J Exp Med. 2016;213(3):355–75. 10.1084/jem.20151116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 69. Lev A, Simon AJ, Amariglio N, et al. : Selective clinical and immune response of the oligoclonal autoreactive T cells in Omenn patients after cyclosporin A treatment. Clin Exp Immunol. 2012;167(2):338–45. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2011.04508.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Gennery AR, Slatter MA, Grandin L, et al. : Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells and long-term survival for primary immunodeficiencies in Europe: entering a new century, do we do better? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126(3):602–10.e1-11. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.06.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Haddad E, Logan BR, Griffith LM, et al. : SCID genotype and 6-month posttransplant CD4 count predict survival and immune recovery. Blood. 2018;132(17):1737–49. 10.1182/blood-2018-03-840702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 72. Abd Hamid IJ, Slatter MA, McKendrick F, et al. : Long-Term Health Outcome and Quality of Life Post-HSCT for IL7Rα-, Artemis-, RAG1- and RAG2-Deficient Severe Combined Immunodeficiency: A Single Center Report. J Clin Immunol. 2018;38(6):727–32. 10.1007/s10875-018-0540-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Pai SY, Logan BR, Griffith LM, et al. : Transplantation outcomes for severe combined immunodeficiency, 2000-2009. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(5):434–46. 10.1056/NEJMoa1401177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 74. Kwan A, Abraham RS, Currier R, et al. : Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency in 11 screening programs in the United States. JAMA. 2014;312(7):729–38. 10.1001/jama.2014.9132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 75. Cicalese MP, Ferrua F, Castagnaro L, et al. : Update on the safety and efficacy of retroviral gene therapy for immunodeficiency due to adenosine deaminase deficiency. Blood. 2016;128(1):45–54. 10.1182/blood-2016-01-688226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. de Ravin SS, Wu X, Moir S, et al. : Lentiviral hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(335):335ra57. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad8856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Pike-Overzet K, Rodijk M, Ng YY, et al. : Correction of murine Rag1 deficiency by self-inactivating lentiviral vector-mediated gene transfer. Leukemia. 2011;25(9):1471–83. 10.1038/leu.2011.106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 78. Capo V, Castiello MC, Fontana E, et al. : Efficacy of lentivirus-mediated gene therapy in an Omenn syndrome recombination-activating gene 2 mouse model is not hindered by inflammation and immune dysregulation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(3):928–941.e8. 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.11.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 79. Lagresle-Peyrou C, Yates F, Malassis-Séris M, et al. : Long-term immune reconstitution in RAG-1-deficient mice treated by retroviral gene therapy: a balance between efficiency and toxicity. Blood. 2006;107(1):63–72. 10.1182/blood-2005-05-2032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Recomb gene therapy. (accessed 09/11/2018) Reference Source
  • 81. Derderian SC, Togarrati PP, King C, et al. : In utero depletion of fetal hematopoietic stem cells improves engraftment after neonatal transplantation in mice. Blood. 2014;124(6):973–80. 10.1182/blood-2014-02-550327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 82. AMG191 Conditioning/CD34+CD90 Stem Cell Transplant Study for SCID Patients. (accessed 09/11/2018). Reference Source

Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

RESOURCES