Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 6.
Published in final edited form as: RSC Adv. 2017 Jan 30;7(16):9412–9416. doi: 10.1039/C6RA24764D

Copper salt-catalyzed formation of a novel series of triazole–spirodienone conjugates with potent anticancer activity

Linghui Gu a, Peng Wang a, Qiu Zhong b,c, Yuxing Deng a, Jiangping Xie a, Fei Liu a, Fan Xiao d, Shilong Zheng b,c, Yue Chen e, Guangdi Wang b,c, Ling He a
PMCID: PMC6364840  NIHMSID: NIHMS963735  PMID: 30740218

Abstract

Copper salt-catalyzed oxidative amination resulted in the formation of a novel series of triazole– spirodienone conjugates, 4-triazolyl-1-oxa-4-azaspiro[4,5]deca-6,9-dien-3,8-diones and 4-triazolyl-1-oxa-4-azaspiro[4,5]deca-6,9-dien-8-ones. A single crystal of compound 1p among them was grown and analyzed by X-ray crystallography. These compounds were evaluated for their antiproliferative activities against MDA-MB-231, HeLa, A549 and MCF-7 cell lines. Most of them showed moderate to high anticancer potency in the four cancer cell lines. The discovery of the triazole–spirodienone conjugates as cytotoxic agents against cancer cells may open up a new field in which these novel small molecules could be further explored as promising anticancer agents.

Introduction

More than one hundred drugs have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) for clinical treatment of cancers over the last half century, yet the search for new chemical entities as potential anticancer agents continues in the hope that improved pharmaceutical profiles may come from hitherto unknown molecular structures that encode the keys to greater efficacy and more manageable adverse side effects. Among numerous drug discovery approaches such as high-throughout screening, molecular modeling, and natural compound mimetics, one method may prove effective that takes pharmacophores important in existing anticancer agents on which to rationally design modified structures that may confer a better therapeutic index.

Quinone is a common moiety of numerous biologically active molecules, including natural and synthetic anticancer drugs such as doxorubicin,1 mitoxantrone,2 andaunorubicin3 and mitomycin C.4 The role of the quinone moiety appears to be important in endowing bioactivities in the molecules ranging from simple small quinones to large complex quinoid systems.59 Thus the utility of quinone-containing structures has been extensively explored in search of anticancer drug candidates, leading to an ever increasing library of new promising quinones with anticancer activities.1016 We have previously obtained some quinone derivatives and conjugates as anticancer agents.17,18 In another previous work on quinones,19 we found that N-sulfonamide spirodienone derivatives (Fig. 1) demonstrated moderate cytotoxic activities against HCT-8, Bel-7402, BGC-823, A549 and A2780 cell lines with IC50 values in the range of 1.93–51 μM.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

N-Sulfonamide spirodienones and synthetic scheme of designed novel triazole–spirodienone conjugates (1 and 2). Reagents and conditions: (a) chloroacetyl chloride, (Et)3N, CH2Cl2; (b) R3-PhONa, DMF; (c) [Cu(CH3CN)4]ClO4, PhI(CF3CO2)2, CH2Cl2, rt; (d) LiAlH4, AlCl3; (e) Cu(CF3SO2)2, PhI(CF3CO2)2, CH2Cl2, rt.

The introduction of a 1,2,4-trizole20,21 ring into molecules has been reported to significantly increase anticancer activity or improve the bioavailability and overall pharmacological profile of a drug candidate.2226 Indeed, clinically proven anticancer drugs27,28 such as letrozole, vorozole, and anastrozole all contain a 1,2,4-triazole nucleus which is stable to metabolism and acts as an important pharmacophore at the active site of receptors as hydrogen bond acceptor or donor. We hypothesize that conjugating quinones with a 1,2,4-triazole nucleus may generate novel molecular entities with desirable anticancer activities. Therefore, N-sulfonamide-spiro-dienones were chosen as the lead compound and triazole–spirodienone conjugates were designed by replacing the sulfonyl functional group with a 1,2,4 (the relative position of ring nitrogen)-triazole nucleus (Fig. 1). Herein, we report the synthesis and anticancer evaluation of the designed triazole–spirodienone conjugates: 4-triazolyl-1-oxa-4-azaspiro[4,5]deca-6,9-dien-3,8-diones (1) and 4-triazolyl-1-oxa-4-azaspiro[4,5]-deca-6,9-dien-8-ones (2).

Results and discussion

Chemical synthesis

The target conjugates were prepared following the synthetic scheme as depicted in Fig. 1. The starting materials 1,2,4-triazoles (3) were prepared in an efficient one-pot procedure including the cyanoimidation of aldehydes and cyclization.29 Following acylation of 3 to form 1,3-substituted-2-chloro-N-(1H-1,2,4-trizol-5-yl)acetamides (4), the sodium phenoates attacked 4 to provide N-(1,3-disubstituent-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)-2-phenoxyacetamides (5). The reduction of 5 gave 1,3-disubstituent-N-(2-phenoxyethyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-amines (6). Subsequently, the key step is the oxidative amination reaction19,30,31 of 5 and 6 leading to their corresponding 4-triazolyl-1-oxa-4-azaspiro[4,5]deca-6,9-dien-3,8-dione (1) and 4-triazolyl-1-oxa-4-azaspiro[4,5]deca-6,9-dien-8-one (2) in moderate to high yields.

The formations reaction of 1a and 2a were taken as an example for optimization of reaction conditions of the oxidative amination using the previous work as ref. 19 and 31 The results (Table 1) show that copper(II), rhodium(II) and ruthenium(II) could be used as a catalyst for the amination of aromatic ether 5 and 6. Other metal complexes, such as those of Mn(II), Co(II) and Fe(II) displayed poor catalytic activities. At same time, we found that the yields increased inconspicuously when the loading of [Cu(CH3-CN)4]ClO4 and Cu(CF3SO2)2 increased from 5% to 20%. In addition, PhI(OAc)2 and PhI(CF3CO2)2 were employed effectively as oxidant for the oxidative amination of amides (5) and amines (6). Finally, the optimized conditions for the formation of triazole– spirodienones 1a and 2a are in the molar ratio of 1 : 2.5 : 2.5 : 0.1 of substrate : PhI(CF3CO2)2 : Al2O3 : Cu[(CH3CN)4]ClO4 for 1a or (Cu(CF3SO2)2) for 2a at room temperature. Next, the reaction conditions of 1a and 2a were expanded to the formation reactions of all triazole–spirodienones 1 and 2, respectively. Thus, twenty four triazole–spirodienone 1 and 2 were obtained in 36–94% yield (Fig. 1) from corresponding 2-phenoxy-ethyl-acet-N-2,3,5-triazoleamides and 2-phenoxy-ethyl-ethyl-N-2,3,5-triazoleamines.

Table 1.

Effect of catalysts and oxidants on the aminationa

graphic file with name nihms963735u1.jpg
Entry Catalyst Oxidant Yieldb (%)
1a 2a
1 PhI(CF3CO2)2
2 10% CuCl2 PhI(CF3CO2)2 32 Trace
3 10% CuBr2 PhI(CF3CO2)2 32 Trace
4 10% Cu(CF3SO3)2 PhI(CF3CO2)2 49 57
5 10% Cu(acac)2 PhI(CF3CO2)2 36 28
6 10% Cu(OAC)2 PhI(CF3CO2)2 30 22
7 10% Cu(CF3COCH2COCF3)2 PhI(CF3CO2)2 36 29
8 10% Cu[(CH3CN)4]ClO4 PhI(CF3CO2)2 94 40
9 5% Rh2(OAc)4 PhI(CF3CO2)2 33 Trace
10 5% Ru(TTP)CO PhI(CF3CO2)2 44 Trace
11 10% Cu(CF3SO3)2 PhI(OAc) 2 35 51
12 10% Cu(CF3SO3)2 PhI═O 27 Trace
13 10% Cu[(CH3CN)4]ClO4 PhI(OAc) 2 45 47
14 10% Cu[(CH3CN)4]ClO4 PhI═O 30 Trace
a

Substrate(1 mmol), oxidant (2.5 mmol), Al2O3(2.5 mmol); CH2Cl2 as solvent, room temperature, 4 A molecular sieve.

b

Isolated yield based on the amount of compounds 1a and 2a consumed.

In entry, the effects of the substituents on the oxidative amidation reaction were noticed that the electron-donating groups sped the oxidative amination reaction of the aromatic ether derivatives (5 and 6) and the electron-withdrawing substituents resulted in moderate yields of the reaction, thereby, the reaction rates rely on the easy of oxidation of the substrate and the yields of triazole–spirodienone (1 and 2) are linked with the activity of the nitrogen sources, especially, the effect of N–H dissociation energies of the nitrogen source.

To confirm the structures of triazole spirodienone conjugates, a single crystal of 1p was grown and analyzed by X-ray crystallography (the detailed crystal data are provided in the ESI†). The ORTEP structure plot of 1p is displayed in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

ORTEP plot of molecular structure of 1p.

The effect of substituent was investigated using different substituted aromatic ether derivatives as substrates under strictly identical condition. Interestingly, we notice that the reaction of these methoxy group substituent in the meta-position gave only two corresponding six-membered heterocyclic products 3a and 3b in 53% and 24% yield respectively (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

The reaction results of m-methoxy substituted aromatic ether derivatives as substrates.

A mechanism is proposed in Scheme 2 for the oxidative amination reaction of the aromatic ether with β-NH–imidazole based on the mechanisms proposed originally for the amination by Antonchick32 and Chiba.33 Initially ditrifluoro-acetoxyiodobenzene reacts with the amide to give intermediate A, which is then transformed into intermediate B through an oxidative insertion of N–I bond by copper(II). The reductive elimination of intermediate C releases copper(I) salt, trifluoroacetic acid and iodobenzene, leading to final product 4-(1,3-diphenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)-1-oxa-4-azaspiro[4.5]-deca-6,9-diene-3,8-dione (1). And the 4-(1,3-diphenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5- yl)-1-oxa-4-azaspiro[4.5]deca-6,9-diene-8-one (2) was obtained in similar mechanisms.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Proposed mechanism for oxidative amination.

Antiproliferation activity against a panel of cancer cell lines

All of triazole–spirodienone conjugates (1 and 2) were examined for in vitro antiproliferation activities against a triple negative human breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-231, an ER + human epithelial mammary carcinoma cell line, MCF-7, an invasive cervical cancer cell line, HeLa, and a metastatic non-small cell lung cancer cell line, A549. Table 2 displayed the IC50 values of 1 and 2 against these four cell lines. Moderate to high antiproliferative activities were observed in most of 1 and 2 derivatives, with IC50 values ranging from low nanomolar concentration to micromolar concentration. The triazole–spirodienone conjugates inhibited cancer cell growth in a dose-dependent manner in all four cancer cell lines tested, and appear to exert a greater inhibitory effect on MDA-MB-231 cells in particular. Notably, 4-triazolyl-1-oxa-4-azaspiro[4,5]-deca-6,9-dien-3,8-diones (1) were generally stronger cell growth inhibitors than the corresponding 4-triazolyl-1-oxa-4-azaspiro[4,5] deca-6,9-dien-8-ones (2). The only structural difference between 1 and 2 is the extra carbonyl group on 3-position of the spirodienone ring of 1, suggesting that introduction of a 3-one functional group at the spiro-ring increased the antiproliferation activity against cancer cells.

Table 2.

Antiproliferation activity against cancer cell lines of 1 and 2

Compds IC50 (nM)
MDA-MB-231 HeLa A549 MCF-7
1a 20.3 93.9 288 40.7
1b 16.8 12.2 69.0 231
1c 17.1 95.5 395 111
1d 4.56 21.0 4.18 62.1
1e 67.8 326 1800 31.4
1f 6.44 17.5 457 16.2
1g 73.7 123 485 315
1h 270 308 399 397
1i 1.37 62.9 203 43.3
1j 22.2 25.2 266 116
1k 27.7 10.0 268 88.8
1l 113 727 346 245
1m 123 134 340 763
1n 157 107 484 1080
1o 453 381 31.1 465
1p 0.80 45.3 25.2 4.11
2a 470 123 357 694
2b 555 126 698 442
2c 60.6 976 465 843
2d 170 979 809 846
2e 309 753 1800 1530
2f 684 996 1010 476
2g 332 84.9 511 1100
2h 141 1240 1190 442

Cytotoxicity towards MCF-10A normal mammary epithelial cells

Seven of the most promising triazole–spirodienone conjugates (1a, 1df, and 1ik) were selected for further evaluation of toxicity in normal mammary epithelial cells, MCF-10A. At 10 μM, all the compounds were found to be significantly toxic towards MCF-10A cells, with toxicities moderating at a lower dosage of 1 μM. At both doses of 1 and 10 μM, doxorubicin, a widely used anticancer drug in clinic, was found to be much more toxic to normal cells than any of the selected triazole– spirodienone conjugates (the detailed data see ESI†). This observation is encouraging because the novel structural motif of triazole–spirodienone conjugates may offer a better separation of desired tumor toxicity and toxicity to normal cells.

Apoptosis of HeLa cells

We performed a caspase 3/7 activation assay for compounds 1b, 1i, 1f and 1p using fluorescence microscopy. HeLa cells were treated with four selected triazole–spirodienone conjugates at 1.0 μM or vehicle for 24 hours. In this assay, fluorescence signal was related to the degree of caspase 3/7 activation and hence apoptosis induced by the treatment. As shown in Fig. 3, untreated cells showed minimal fluorescence, while treated cells exhibited significant increase in fluorescence (shown in green) indicating the prevalence of apoptosis of HeLa cells. These observations strongly suggest that triazole–spirodienone conjugates inhibited HeLa cells proliferation by triggering apoptosis.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Images of apoptosis induced by triazole–spirodienones conjugates, doxorubicin and vehicle control in HeLa cell lines.

Conclusions

Copper salt-catalyzed oxidative amination resulted in the formation of novel triazole–spirodienone conjugates, 4-triazolyl- 1-oxa-4-aza-spiro[4,5]deca-6,9-dien-3,8-diones (1) and 4-triazolyl-1-oxa-4-aza-spiro[4,5]deca-6,9-dien-8-ones (2) which were evaluated for their antiproliferative activities against MDA-MB-231, HeLa, A549 and MCF-7 cell lines. Most of them showed moderate to high anticancer potency in the four cancer cell lines. Moreover, 4-triazolyl-1-oxa-4-azaspiro[4,5]deca-6,9-dien-3,8-diones (1) were found to exhibit superior anticancer activities compared to 4-triazolyl-1-oxa-4-azaspiro[4,5]deca-6,9-dien-8-ones (2). The cytotoxicities of 1a, 1df, and 1ik toward non-cancerous cells (MCF-10A) were measurable, but much less severe than that of doxorubicin, a known and widely used chemotherapy agent. Our study represents the first report on the preparation and biological evaluation of the novel triazole–spirodienone conjugates as potential anticancer agents. The analogs (1) are promising lead compounds on which further optimization of structure–activity relationships may lead to therapeutically useful new chemical entities for clinical treatment of cancer. Preliminary study on the mode of action suggests that the triazole–spirodienone conjugates inhibited cancer cell proliferation by triggering apoptosis, with more in-depth mechanistic studies under way in our laboratories.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Sichuan University-Lu Zhou Strategic Cooperation Projects (No. 2013CDLZ-S18) (Ling He) and the NIH RCMI program at Xavier University of Louisiana through Grant 2G12MD007595-07 (G. Wang).

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. CCDC 1486522. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c6ra24764d

References

  • 1.Tacar O, Sriamornsak P, Dass CR. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2013;65:157–170. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2012.01567.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Parker C, Waters R, Leighton C, Hancock J, Sutton R, Moorman AV, Ancliff P, Morgan M, Masurekar A, Goulden N, Green N, Révész T, Darbyshire P, Love S, Saha V. Lancet. 2010;376:2009–2017. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62002-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tan C, Tasaka H, Yu KP, Murphy ML, Karnofsky D. Cancer. 1967;20:333–353. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1967)20:3<333::aid-cncr2820200302>3.0.co;2-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tomasz M, Mitomycin C. Chem Biol. 1995;2:575–579. doi: 10.1016/1074-5521(95)90120-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bachur NR, Gordon SL, Gee MV, Kon H. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76:954–957. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.2.954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hoyt MT, Palchaudhuri R, Hergenrother PJ. Invest New Drugs. 2011;29:562–573. doi: 10.1007/s10637-010-9390-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kaur G, Cholia RP, Mantha AK, Kumar R. J Med Chem. 2014;57:10241–10256. doi: 10.1021/jm500865u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bachur NR, Gordon SL, Gee MV. Cancer Res. 1978;38:1745–1750. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bair JS, Palchaudhuri R, Hergenrother PJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:5469–5478. doi: 10.1021/ja100610m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gomez-Monterrey I, Campiglia P, Aquino C, Bertamino A, Granata I, Carotenuto A, Brancaccio D, Stiuso P, Scognamiglio I, Rusciano MR. J Med Chem. 2011;54:4077–4091. doi: 10.1021/jm200094h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.El-Dakdouki MH, Adamski N, Foster L, Hacker MP, Erhardt PW. J Med Chem. 2011;54:8224–8227. doi: 10.1021/jm200984x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Trzoss L, Fukuda T, Costa-Lotufo LV, Jimenez P, La Clair JJ, Fenical W. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:14687–14692. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1410932111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Morales P, Vara D, Goméz-Cañas M, Zúñiga MC, Olea-Azar C, Goya P, Fernández-Ruiz J, Díaz-Laviada I, Jagerovic N. Eur J Med Chem. 2013;70:111–119. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.09.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vieira AA, Brandão IR, Valença WO, de Simone CA, Cavalcanti BC, Pessoa C, Carneiro TR, Braga AL, da Silva EN. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;101:254–265. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.06.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.da Silva EN, Jr, Cavalcanti BC, Guimarães TT, Pinto MdCFR, Cabral IO, Pessoa C, Costa-Lotufo LV, de Moraes MO, de Andrade CKZ, dos Santos MR, de Simone CA, Goulart MOF, Pinto AV. Eur J Med Chem. 2011;46:399–410. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Grasso C, Larsen L, McConnell M, Smith RAJ, Berridge MV. J Med Chem. 2013;56:3168–3176. doi: 10.1021/jm301585z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li X, Zheng SL, Li X, Li JL, Qiang O, Liu R, He L. Eur J Med Chem. 2012;54:42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhao LM, Ma FY, Jin HS, Zheng S, Zhong Q, Wang G. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;102:303–309. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.L. He, Y. Chen, J. Xie and J. Li, CN102285934, 2013
  • 20.Chen ZK, Yan QQ, Liu ZX, Xu YM, Zhang YH. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2013;52:13324–13328. doi: 10.1002/anie.201306416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen ZK, Yan QQ, Yi H, Liu ZX, Lei AW, Zhang YH. Chem–Eur J. 2014;20:13692–13697. doi: 10.1002/chem.201403515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hou YP, Sun J, Pang ZH, Lv PC, Li DD, Yan L, Zhang HJ, Zheng EX, Zhao J, Zhu HL. Bioorg Med Chem. 2011;19:5948–5954. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.08.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xu F, Jia Y, Wen Q, Wang X, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Yang K, Xu W. Eur J Med Chem. 2013;64:377–388. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.03.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lee J, Kim SJ, Choi H, Kim YH, Lim IT, Yang H-m, Lee CS, Kang HR, Ahn SK, Moon SK, Kim D-H, Lee S, Choi NS, Lee KJ. J Med Chem. 2010;53:6337–6354. doi: 10.1021/jm1002414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Romagnoli R, Baraldi PG, Cruz-Lopez O, Lopez Cara C, Carrion MD, Brancale A, Hamel E, Chen L, Bortolozzi R, Basso G, Viola G. J Med Chem. 2010;53:4248–4258. doi: 10.1021/jm100245q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kaur R, Dwivedi AR, Kumar B, Kumar V. Anti-Cancer Agents Med Chem. 2016;16:465–489. doi: 10.2174/1871520615666150819121106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Santen RJ, Brodie H, Simpson ER, Siiteri PK, Brodie A. Endocr Rev. 2009;30:343–375. doi: 10.1210/er.2008-0016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Goss P. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1998;49:S59–S65. doi: 10.1023/a:1006052923468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yin P, Ma WB, Chen Y, Huang WC, Deng Y, He L. Org Lett. 2009;11:5482–5485. doi: 10.1021/ol902207h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dohi T, Maruyama A, Minamitsuji Y, Takenaga N, Kita Y. Chem Commun. 2007;12:1224–1226. doi: 10.1039/b616510a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Deng YX, Xie JP, Zhang WW, Yin P, Yu J, He L. Chem–Eur J. 2012;18:1077–1082. doi: 10.1002/chem.201102303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Antonchick AP, Samanta R, Kulikov K, Lategahn J. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2011;50:8605–8608. doi: 10.1002/anie.201102984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chiba S, Zhang L, Lee JY. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:7266–7267. doi: 10.1021/ja1027327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1

RESOURCES