Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2019 Feb 6;14(2):e0211653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211653

YwqL (EndoV), ExoA and PolA act in a novel alternative excision pathway to repair deaminated DNA bases in Bacillus subtilis

Adriana G Patlán 1,#, Víctor M Ayala-García 1,¤,#, Luz I Valenzuela-García 1, Jimena Meneses-Plascencia 1, Pedro L Vargas-Arias 1, Marcelo Barraza-Salas 2, Peter Setlow 3, Luis G Brieba 4, Mario Pedraza-Reyes 1,*
Editor: Michael R Volkert5
PMCID: PMC6364969  PMID: 30726292

Abstract

DNA deamination generates base transitions and apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP)-sites which are potentially genotoxic and cytotoxic. In Bacillus subtilis uracil can be removed from DNA by the uracil DNA-glycosylase through the base excision repair pathway. Genetic evidence suggests that B. subtilis YwqL, a homolog of Endonuclease-V (EndoV), acts on a wider spectrum of deaminated bases but the factors that complete this pathway have remained elusive. Here, we report that a purified His6-YwqL (hereafter BsEndoV) protein had in vitro endonuclease activity against double-stranded DNAs containing a single uracil (U), hypoxanthine (Hx), xanthine (X) or an AP site. Interestingly, while BsEndoV catalyzed a single strand break at the second phosphodiester bond towards the 3'-end of the U and AP lesions, there was an additional cleavage of the phosphodiester bond preceding the Hx and X lesions. Remarkably, the repair event initiated by BsEndoV on Hx and X, was completed by a recombinant B. subtilis His6-DNA polymerase A (BsPolA), but not on BsEndoV-processed U and AP lesions. For the latter lesions a second excision event performed by a recombinant B. subtilis His6-ExoA (BsExoA) was necessary before completion of their repair by BsPolA. These results suggest the existence of a novel alternative excision repair pathway in B. subtilis that counteracts the genotoxic effects of base deamination. The presence of this novel pathway in vivo in B. subtilis was also supported by analysis of effects of single or multiple deletions of exoA, endoV and polA on spontaneous mutations in growing cells, and the sensitivity of growing wild-type and mutant cells to a DNA deaminating agent.

Introduction

Deamination of DNA bases is one of the most common types of genetic insults in all organisms. Exocyclic amino groups in cytosine, adenine and guanine are particularly vulnerable to spontaneous or chemically induced hydrolytic events [15]. Deamination of cytosine, adenine and guanine generates uracil (U), hypoxanthine (Hx) and xanthine (X), respectively, and if not removed from DNA, these lesions promote transition mutations including, CG to TA, AT to GC and GC to AT, respectively [6]. To counteract the adverse effects of U, bacteria and mammals rely on repair proteins termed uracil DNA glycosylases (Ung) [7], which catalyze the cleavage of the glycosidic bond that connects U with the deoxyribose moiety, generating an apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site; this non-coding lesion is further processed by components of the canonical base excision repair pathway (BER) [7,8,9].

Some bacteria and archaea also have a repair protein able to recognize and hydrolyze double-stranded DNA containing a wide spectrum of genetic lesions, including uracil, additional deaminated bases, AP sites, mismatches, flap structures and pseudo-Y structures [1013]. In E. coli, this enzyme, encoded by the nfi gene (EC: 3.1.21.7), has been termed endonuclease V (EndoV) [14,15]. This Mg2+-dependent enzyme catalyzes the incision of the second phosphodiester bond towards the 3' end of the lesion [13], thus constituting the first step of an Alternative Excision Repair (AER) pathway [6,16]. Fundamental aspects of catalysis, function and structure of EndoV homologs from distinct organisms have been compiled in an excellent recent review [17].

The genome of the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis possess a protein termed YwqL whose amino acid sequence shares 51% identity with that of EndoV (Nfi) from E. coli [18]. It has been shown that YwqL (hereafter BsEndoV) plays a more prominent role than Ung in protecting B. subtilis from the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of spontaneous and induced factors that promote DNA deamination in this bacterium [18]. Additionally, starved, non-growing B. subtilis cells lacking ung and ywqL (hereafter endoV) increased their mutation frequency in response to accumulation of DNA lesions [19)]. A recent report revealed that in addition to Ung and BsEndoV, B. subtilis employs Aag, an alkyl-adenine DNA-glycosylase, to help counteract the noxious effects of base deamination [20].

The downstream steps completing the hydrolytic event catalyzed by EndoV on different DNA substrates are currently a matter of investigation. However, the proofreading and polymerase activities of DNA polymerase I (Pol I) are involved in this pathway in E. coli [6, 21, 22]. This proposed mechanism postulates that Pol I recognizes the nick generated by EndoV and uses its 3'➔5' exonuclease activity to remove a stretch of DNA containing the lesion to generate a new 3' -OH terminus. The DNA gap is subsequently filled by Pol I and the repair process is completed by a DNA ligase [6,21,22]. However, genetic and structural evidence have revealed the lack of proofreading (3’➔5’ exonuclease) activity in DNA Pol Is from members of the genus Bacillus [23,24], thus, ruling out the existence of this simple repair pathway in B. subtilis.

In B. subtilis, PolA (BsuPolA), the homolog of Pol I of E. coli, works in concert with the BER and nucleotide excision repair (NER) systems to maintain the genome integrity of actively replicating cells [6,25,26]. Further evidence has implicated this enzyme in translesion synthesis (TLS), interacting with low fidelity DNA-polymerases of the Y-family [27], as well as in stimulating formation of mutations that allow nutritionally stressed cells to escape from growth-arresting conditions [28].

In Salmonella enterica Pol I is essential for growth [29], and in Pol I-deficient E. coli, this growth defect is only manifested in rich medium [30]. In contrast, PolA is not essential for efficient B. subtilis growth, a difference presumably attributed to the 5'➔3' exonuclease activity present in a paralogous B. subtilis protein termed YpcP. In support of this notion, a double mutant polA ypcP is not viable [27,31,32] and recently the participation of YpcP in an alternative route for the repair of UV-photoproducts initiated by the UV-endonuclease YwjD along with Y-family DNA polymerases was suggested [33]. Although the function of BsuPolA has been extensively determined at the genetic and physiological levels, to our knowledge, evidence reporting the contribution of this enzyme to in vitro DNA repair processes have remained elusive.

In this work, we report the cloning, heterologous synthesis and purification of a His6-YwqL protein from B. subtilis (BsEndoV) that exhibited in vitro activity on synthetic ds-DNA substrates carrying U, Hx, X or AP sites. BsEndoV catalyzed a single hydrolytic event downstream of the DNA strand containing U or an AP site generating a single DNA nick. In contrast, in DNA substrates containing Hx or X, the purified enzyme performed a double cleavage flanking both lesions. Remarkably, the intermediate products derived from BsEndoV action on Hx or X substrates, but not those from action on U and AP substrates, were efficiently repaired by a pure recombinant B. subtilis His6-PolA (BsPolA). However, the repair products resulting from hydrolysis on U or AP-containing ds-DNA by BsEndoV required the 3'➔5' exonuclease activity of ExoA to excise these lesions prior to BsPolA-dependent DNA synthesis. We also analyzed the effects of endoV, exoA and polA mutations, alone or in combinations, on spontaneous mutagenesis of growing B. subtilis cells, as well as cell killing by a DNA deaminating agent. Overall, our results suggest the presence of of a novel alternative repair pathway in B. subtilis that operates on deaminated bases and AP-sites employing the proteins YwqL, ExoA and PolA.

Results

Sequence and structure analyses of different EndoV enzymes and purification of BsEndoV

B. subtilis strains deficient for Ung and/or BsEndoV exhibit, significantly decreased ability to contend with the genotoxic effects of spontaneous and induced DNA deamination, suggesting that these enzymes are important in maintaining genomic integrity in this bacterium [18]. The biochemical properties and substrate specificity of a purified recombinant Ung protein from B. subtilis were recently reported [34]. However, the demonstration that the protein product of the endoV gene possesses the capability to remove deaminated bases and other lesions from DNA has remained elusive. The mechanistic aspects governing the structure/function relationship of EndoV proteins have been explored in bacteria, although these studies have been focused mainly on the processing of hypoxanthine [35,36,37]. Of note, whereas the primary structure of BsEndoV has 51 and 57% amino acid similarity with EndoV proteins from E. coli and T. maritima, respectively, significant differences in key amino acids involved in recognition and processing of the DNA lesion can be identified in BsEndoV (Fig 1A). These modifications predicted significant structural changes in the wedge pocket recognition and DNA-protein stabilization domains of BsEndoV (Fig 1A and 1B) that may impact its substrate recognition and catalytic properties. To investigate these possibilities, the endoV gene was amplified by PCR and the gene product expressed from the IPTG inducible T5 promoter of the plasmid pQE30 to generate a protein tagged with 6 histidines on its N-terminus. The optimum conditions for endoV induction, 0.25 mM IPTG for 3 h at 28°C, produced the maximum amount of the recombinant protein in soluble form. SDS-PAGE analysis showed the presence of a highly abundant soluble 31 kDa protein in cell extracts from cultures of E. coli PERM1071 induced with IPTG, but not from those that were not supplemented with this inducer (Fig 1C, lanes 2, 3). The induced cell extract was loaded onto a Ni-NTA-agarose column, and a protein with a molecular mass of ~31 kDa and high purity was eluted from the column with 250 mM imidazole as revealed by SDS-PAGE (Fig 1C, lanes 6–13).

Fig 1. Comparison of different Endonuclease Vs and purification of BsEndoV.

Fig 1

(A) Amino acid sequence alignment of BsEndoV with homologs from E. coli (Nfi) and T. maritima (Nfi). Identical residues involved in activity between enzymes are enclosed with solid lines; dissimilar residues are enclosed with dashed lines. Colors of amino acids denote: red—residues comprising the insertional wedge to stabilize flipping-out of Hx; green—residues involved in the damaged-base recognition pocket; blue—residues that bind Mg2+ necessary for endonucleolytic action; and orange—residues involved in forming the post-incision complex. (B) Tertiary structures (magenta) of EndoV homologs from B. subtilis, E. coli and T. maritima; PDB accession numbers 3HD0, 3GA2 and 4XPU, respectively. Amino acids involved in recognition, catalysis, and complex formation are depicted as sticks with the same color code as in (A). (C) SDS-PAGE analysis of BsEndoV induction and purification by IMAC, all as described in Methods. Lane 1, molecular weight markers; lane 2, cell lysate of non-induced E.coli PERM1071 strain; lane 3, IPTG-induced extract of E. coli PERM1071; lane 4, flowthrough; lane 5, wash fraction and lanes 6 to 13, protein eluted from the Ni-NTA column with 250 mM imidazole. The purified protein from fraction 13 was employed for the DNA repair assays.

Endonuclease activity of His6-BsEndoV on ds-DNAs containing U, X, Hx or an AP site

EndoVs are promiscuous enzymes that can act on different DNA lesions depending on their origin [17]. Therefore, the enzymatic activity of BsEndoV was tested against 5'-[32P] end-labelled ds-19-mer DNAs containing, uracil, hypoxanthine, xanthine or an AP-site. In these experiments, the reactions were supplemented with Mg2+ to optimize the endonuclease activity of BsEndoV [17)]. To unambiguously establish the position of the phosphodiester bond hydrolysed by BsEndoV, the 19-bp DNA duplex containing uracil was sequentially treated with commercial Ung to generate an AP site and subsequently with the AP-endonuclease Nfo, generating the expected 10-nt long radioactive ss-oligonucleotide (Fig 2A, column 1). As shown in Fig 2A (columns 2–5), BsEndoV was also able to incise the four damaged substrates in a time-dependent fashion, mainly generating an 11-nt radioactive ss-oligonucleotide, strongly suggesting that the enzyme attacked the second phosphodiester bond downstream of these lesions. Of note, the 5'-end-radiolabelled ds-19-mer DNA free of lesions remained intact after 45 min of incubation with BsEndoV (S1 Fig), thus confirming the specificity of this enzyme to operate over ds-DNAs carrying deaminated bases or an AP site. Remarkably, whereas BsEndoV exclusively produced the 11-nt radioactive product with the substrates containing U or AP lesions (Fig 2; lanes 2 and 5), small amounts of an additional 9-nt long radioactive product (of the 11nt product) resulted from the processing of the 19-mer substrates carrying the HX and X lesions (Fig 2A; lanes 3 and 4). This DNA product, which could result from a double incision event or from a 3'➔5' exonucleolytic activity displayed by BsEndoV, may potentially eliminate the stretch of DNA bearing Hx and X. Quantitation of the cleavage products by densitometry revealed that BsEndoV processed uracil, hypoxanthine and AP lesions with approximately the same efficiency, but xanthine was nicked to a much lesser extent (Fig 2B and Table 1). These results revealed that BsEndoV retains the promiscuous character of EndoV homologs and also suggests that downstream repair events may be different for HX and X than for U and AP sites.

Fig 2. Differential processing of DNA lesions by BsEndoV.

Fig 2

(A) Ability of BsEndoV to process different deaminated bases and AP-sites in ds-DNA. A [32P]-labeled 19-mer-DNA (at 10 nM concentration) containing a U (column 2), a Hx (column 3), an X (column 4), or an AP-site (column 5) were annealed to their complementary non-radioactive oligonucleotide and incubated separately with 100 nM of BsEndoV in presence of MgCl2 as described in Methods, and samples were collected at indicated times. A control reaction (column 1) contained the labeled oligonucleotide with U incubated with commercial uracil-DNA glycosylase (Ung) and AP-endonuclease (Nfo) in order to estimate the size of the nicked products generated by BsEndoV. All reactions were separated by denaturing electrophoresis, exposed and analyzed as described in Methods. (B) Densitometry analyses of the conversion of each substrate into product by BsEndoV using radiolabeled ds-DNAs containing U (Δ), Hx (◊), X (○) or an AP-site (□). (C) Effects of the divalent ions Mg2+ (column 1) and Mn2+ (column 2) on the endonuclease activity of BsEndoV on ds-DNAs containing deaminated bases or an AP site. U, uracil; H, hypoxanthine; X, xanthine and AP, apurinic/apirimidinic site.

Table 1. Percentage of cleavage of different lesions by BsEndoV.

Lesion a% of cleavage
Uracil 87.1 ± 1.5
Hypoxanthine 92 ± 3
Xanthine 30.1 ± 1.6
AP-site 84.2 ± 2

aThe percent of remaining radioactive substrates following 45 min incubation with BsEndoV were quantitated by densitometry in reference to non-enzymatically treated controls as shown in Fig 2B. Results are the average of three independent experiments ± SD.

EndoVs employ Mg2+ for efficient catalysis; as previously reported, this ion is responsible for activating a water molecule involved in hydrolysing the phosphodiester bond downstream of the recognized lesion [35,38]. Although Mg2+ is the natural cofactor for EndoV [17], this metal can apparently be substituted for Mn2+ [38]. Consequently, the effect of both metals on the substrate specificity of BsEndoV were tested. Independent reactions containing 100 nM of purified BsEndoV and the 19-bp DNA duplex substrates containing U, Hx, X or an AP site were incubated for 1 h at 37°C in reactions with MgCl2 or MnCl2. In reactions with Mg2+, BsEndoV generated the expected pattern of repair products with the four damaged DNA substrates (Fig 2C column 1). These results corroborated the specific attack of the second phosphodiester bond located downstream of the four lesions tested as well as an additional incision repair event on the phosphodiester bond preceding the Hx and X lesions (Fig 2C, column 1). However, with Mn2+ present, the specificity of BsEndoV on all 4 DNA substrates tested changed, as products larger than 11-nt, primarily 13 nt, were generated from all substrates (Fig 2C, column 2).

Purification and DNA-Polymerase activity of a recombinant B. subtilis His6-PolA protein (BsPolA)

In different microorganisms PolA participates in the post-incision/excision events of the canonical mismatch repair (MMR), NER and BER pathways, thus playing a central role in maintaining the bacterial genome free of damage [39]. To test the contribution of PolA to the post-incision repair events initiated by BsEndoV on deaminated DNA in vitro, it was necessary to produce and purify a recombinant form of BsPolA. This task was accomplished in an E. coli strain carrying a construct overexpressing a his6-polA B. subtilis gene from an IPTG-inducible promoter. In the presence of the inducer, this heterologous host generated high amounts of a soluble protein with the expected molecular mass of BsPolA, ~100 kDa (Fig 3A, lane 3). The BsPolA protein purified to homogeneity by metal-affinity chromatography (Fig 3A, lane 4) was functional, as evidenced by its capacity to catalyse the full extension of a 5'-[32P] labelled 24-nt primer hybridized to a 45-nt complementary strand (Fig 3B, Lanes 2–5). A positive control with commercial Pfu DNA polymerase, which also extended the radioactive primer, attested to the functionality of the polymerase assay employed in these experiments (Fig 3B, lane 6).

Fig 3. Purification and DNA polymerase activity of a recombinant BsPolA.

Fig 3

(A) SDS-PAGE analysis of His6-BsPolA induction and purification by IMAC. E. coli PERM1367 was grown, induced and enzyme extracted and purified as described in Methods. Lane 1, molecular weight markers; lane 2, cell lysate of non-induced E. coli PERM1367 strain; lane 3, IPTG-induced extract of E. coli PERM1367; and lane 4, protein eluted from the Ni-NTA column with 300 mM imidazole. (B) DNA polymerase activity of BsPolA in vitro. Primer extension reactions were conducted with 0, 1, 10, 100 or 1000 nM of BsPolA (lanes 1–5) incubated at 37°C with a radiolabeled 24-mer-oligonucleotide hybridized with a non-radioactive 45-mer-oligonucleotide probe and supplemented with dNTPs as described in Methods. A positive control for DNA synthesis was carried out with Pfu DNA polymerase (lane 6). All reactions were separated by denaturing electrophoresis, exposed and analyzed as described in Methods.

BsEndoV and BsPolA eliminate Hx and X from DNA but not U and AP lesions

As noted above, BsEndoV catalyzed the incision of ds-DNAsubstrates carrying deaminated bases or an AP site (Fig 2), and previous genetic evidences have shown that BsPolA plays a critical role in the BER and NER pathways of B. subtilis [39]. Therefore, the mechanistic details of the BsEndoV-dependent AER pathway were investigated further in in vitro repair assays that contained the post-incision repair products generated by BsEndoV, after processing radioactive 19-mer ds-DNAs carrying Hx, X, U or an AP site. In these experiments the hydrolytic reactions of BsEndoV on the four types of lesions were carried out for 2 h with saturating amounts of the enzyme allowing production of a 9-nt radioactive product with Hx and X and an 11-nt long product with U and AP (Fig 2A). The results with BsPolA showed that this enzyme completed the incision repair event initiated by BsEndoV on ds-DNA substrates containing Hx or X (Fig 4). In support of this contention, the 9-nt radioactive products that were free of Hx or X after the hydrolytic events catalysed by BsEndoV, were efficiently extended by BsPolA (Fig 4A, lanes 2 and 5) as well as by Pfu PolI, which was used as a positive control (Fig 4A, lanes 3 and 6). In marked contrast, BsPolA was unable to extend the 11-nt radioactive products generated from the BsEndoV-treated ds-DNA oligonucleotides containing uracil or AP-sites (Fig 4B, lanes 3, 4). Therefore, the single hydrolytic attack catalysed by BsEndoV on DNA containing U or AP generates intermediates in which the 3'-OH group for BsPolA-dependent extension are inaccessible.

Fig 4. Ability of BsPolA to recognize and polymerize repair-intermediates generated by BsEndoV.

Fig 4

(A) BsEndoV-incised ds-DNA substrates carrying Hx (lanes 1–3) or X (lanes 4–6) were purified and employed as substrates for BsPolA-dependent DNA synthesis. (B) BsEndoV-incised ds-DNA substrates carrying U (lanes 1, 3 and 5) or an AP-site (lanes 2, 4 and 6) were purified and employed as substrates for BsPolA-dependent DNA synthesis. As shown, this enzyme was able to polymerize DNA on the incision products of BsEndoV on ds-DNA bearing Hx and X (A; lanes 2 and 5, respectively) but not on those containing U or an AP site (B; lanes 3 and 4, respectively). Positive controls were performed with Pfu Pol I (A, lanes 3 and 6; B, lanes 5 and 6). Negative controls were reactions lacking DNA polymerases (A, lanes 1 and 4; B, lanes 1 and 2). Shown beneath (A) and (B) are schematic representations of BsEndoV-incised and BsPolA-extended products with Hx and X (2 and 3) and BsEndoV-incised products of U and AP (2') lesions, respectively. Hx or X (◆); U or AP (■).

BsEndoV operates in a common pathway with ExoA to counteract the mutagenic effects of uracil in DNA

As noted above, BsPolA failed to process the repair product generated from the attack of BsEndoV on ds-DNA with U or an AP site. Therefore, we postulated that an additional incision event was required to remove these lesions before BsPolA-dependent repair synthesis. The ability of Pfu PolI which possesses 3'➔5' exonuclease activity [40], to at least partially extend the U or AP-containing 11-nt radioactive products (Fig 4B, lanes 5 and 6), provided support for this hypothesis. In B. subtilis, ExoA, a homolog of E. coli Xth, has been previously purified and shown to possess AP-endonuclease and exonuclease activities, and plays an important role in the BER pathway [41, 42, 43]. To implement an in vitro repair assay to investigate whether ExoA is involved in the downstream repair events initiated by BsEndoV on U and AP sites, we constructed an E. coli strain overproducing B. subtilis ExoA (BsExoA) carrying an N-terminal His6 tag (Fig 5A). The recombinant BsExoA had a molecular mass of ~30 kDa and was purified to homogeneity by metal affinity chromatography (Fig 5A). The purified BsExoA protein possessed exonuclease activity as demonstrated by its ability to hydrolyze a radiolabeled DNA in the 3'➔5' direction (Fig 5B, lanes 3 to 5). A similar result was obtained in a control reaction control that contained the Pfu Pol I under conditions that promote the 3'➔5' exonuclease activity of this enzyme (Fig 5B, lane 6).

Fig 5. Purification and 3’➔5’ exonuclease activity of BsExoA.

Fig 5

(A) SDS-PAGE analysis of His6-BsExoA induction and purification by IMAC as described in Methods. Lane 1, molecular weight markers; lane 2, cell lysate of non-induced E. coli PERM1311 strain; lane 3, IPTG-induced extract of E. coli PERM1311; and lane 4, protein eluted from the Ni-NTA column with 300 mM imidazole. (B) 3'➔5' exonuclease activity of BsExoA. Nuclease reactions were conducted with 0, 1, 10, 100 or 1000 nM of BsExoA (lanes 1–5) with a radiolabeled 24-mer-oligonucleotide hybridized with a non-radioactive 45-mer-oligonucleotide and incubated at 37°C as described in Methods. A positive control for DNA degradation was carried out with Pfu Pol I without dNTPs (lane 6). All reactions were separated by denaturing electrophoresis, exposed and analyzed as describe in Methods.

Repair intermediaries of uracil and AP sites generated by BsEndoV are efficiently removed by BsExoA to allow BsPolA-dependent DNA synthesis

Having confirmed the activity of BsExoA, we evaluated its capacity to hydrolyze the blocking residues left after BsEndoV processing of ds-DNA containing uracil or an AP-site. To this end, the radioactive-19bp DNAs containing uracil or an AP-site were subjected to incision by BsEndoV as described above, generating 11 nt radioactive products (Fig 6, lanes 2 and 6 respectively). BsExoA was able to hydrolyze both latter radioactive products in the 3'➔5' direction, generating mostly 3-nt shorter radioactive oligonucleotides (Fig 6, lanes 3 and 7). After heat inactivation and phenol/chloroform extraction to eliminate BsExoA, the renatured residual repair products lacking the DNA lesions that presumably blocked the access of BsPolA, were incubated with this replicase. As shown in Fig 6 (lanes 4 and 8), BsPolA was able to successfully extend these ~ 8 nt repair intermediates, generating a product of 19-nt, thus completing the repair of these lesions. These results highlight the importance of BsExoA as an essential component of the BsEndoV/BsPolA-dependent excision repair pathway dealing with the deleterious effect of uracils and AP-sites in the B. subtilis genome.

Fig 6. Capacity of BsExoA to remove BsEndoV-repair intermediates and completion of repair by BsPolA.

Fig 6

19-mer-ds-DNAs containing U (lane 1) or an AP-site (lanes 5) were subjected to incision by BsEndoV to generate ds-DNA products with a single nick in the 11th phosphodiester bond inaccessible to BsPolA-dependent DNA synthesis (lanes 2 and 6). Addition of BsExoA to these repair products resulted in the efficient removal of nucleotides in the 3'➔5' direction, thus presumably removing the DNA damage (lanes 3 and 7). Finally, DNA synthesis was performed by BsPolA completing the repair process (lanes 4 and 8). The distinct repair steps are schematically presented next to the autoradiograms with corresponding lane numbers. U or AP (■).

Contribution of EndoV, ExoA and PolA to spontaneous mutagenesis and damaging effects of base deamination in B. subtilis

All the in vitro data given above indicate that PolA, ExoA and EndoV can repair DNA with various base deaminations in vitro. However, an obvious question is whether these in vitro repair pathways also take place in vivo? To address this question, the spontaneous mutagenesis to rifampicin resistance (Rifr) was determined in B. subtilis cells deficient in BsEndoV, PolA and ExoA proteins (Fig 7). Disruption of exoA did not significantly increase the spontaneous Rifr mutation frequency of the endoV strain, suggesting that BsEndoV and ExoA may work in a common pathway that counteracts spontaneous mutagenic events in B. subtilis. Notably, inactivation of polA significantly decreased the mutation frequency to Rifr of endoV and endoV exoA strains suggesting that, in response to accumulation of DNA damage such as deaminated bases and AP sites, PolA can process these lesions in an error-prone manner.

Fig 7. Frequencies of spontaneous mutation to Rifr in cells of various B. subtilis strains.

Fig 7

Cells of B. subtilis WT, endoV, exoA, polA, endoV exoA, endoV polA and endoV exoA polA strains were cultivated in liquid PAB medium, and spontaneous mutation frequencies to Rifr were determined as described in Methods. Results represent the mean of three independent experiments. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). **, P< 0.01 (by the Mann-Whitney U test). NS, non significant.

We further investigated the contribution of BsEndoV, BsExoA and BsPolA to counteract the deleterious effects of base deamination in B. subtilis. To this end, strains with single and combined deficiencies in these proteins were challenged with increasing doses of the DNA deaminating agent sodium bisulfite (SB). As shown in Fig 8A and 8B, compared to the wild-type strain, whereas the endoV or polA mutants slightly increased SB susceptibility, the absence of ExoA greatly sensitized B. subtilis cells to this genotoxic agent. These analyses also revealed that disruption of exoA but not of polA significantly increased the SB susceptibility of the endoV strain (Fig 8A and 8B). Of note, the simultaneous inactivation of exoA and polA in the endoV strain did not significantly increase this strain’s SB susceptibility compared to the endoV exoA strain (Fig 8A and 8B). Taken together, these results strongly suggest that BsEndoV, ExoA and BsPolA all act to reduce the genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of base deamination in growing B. subtilis cells.

Fig 8. Effect of sodium bisulfite (SB) on survival of different B. subtilis strains.

Fig 8

(A). Cells of B. subtilis WT, endoV, exoA, polA, endoV polA, ywqL exoA and endoV exoA polA strains were grown in liquid PAB medium to an OD600nm of 0.5. Cells collected by centrifugation were washed with cold PBS and treated or not for 1 h at 25°C with distinct doses of SB. Cell survival after these treatments was determined by plating serial dilutions on solid LB medium, and colony-forming units were counted after 16 h of incubation at 37°C as indicated in Methods. (B). The LD90 was calculated for each strain from dose-response curves shown in A. Results are expressed as averages ± SD from at least three independent experiments. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM); statistical significance (a, b, c) was determined by ANOVA followed by a Tukey test (P < .05).

Discussion

In this work, the substrate specificity as well the involvement of BsPolA and BsExoA in the post incision events initiated by BsEndoV on DNA containing deaminated and AP lesions was investigated. We further analyzed the in vivo roles of these enzymes in mutagenesis and resistance to a DNA-deaminating agent. Overall, our results revealed that BsEndoV efficiently nicked DNA containing these lesions and together with BsPolA completed the repair of Hx and X lesions, but an additional enzymatic excision event mediated by BsExoA was necessary to eliminate U and AP lesions through this alternative repair pathway.

To contend with the genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of base deamination, B. subtilis employs Ung and BsEndoV [1820]. Whereas a multiplicity of Ung proteins has been described in E. coli and mammals [44], B. subtilis has only one gene encoding an Ung [18]. However, as revealed a previous genetic study, BsEndoV contributes more to avoid mutagenesis than Ung in this microorganism [18]. The biochemical properties of Ung, which specifically operates on uracil-containing DNA through the BER pathway, have been reported [34].

In the current work, the substrate specificity of BsEndoV was evaluated employing radiolabelled DNA probes containing different types of DNA lesions. As described for its counterparts from E. coli and T. maritima, BsEndoV exhibited enzyme activity against a wide range of damaged DNA substrates, including, Hx, X, U and AP sites. BsEndoV had the same mode of action as that described for EndoV homologs from different species, hydrolyzing the second phosphodiester bond 3' to the four lesions tested (Fig 2A). However, while BsEndoV shared substrate specificity and action properties with previously characterized EndoV proteins, some substantial differences were apparent. First, although BsEndoV processed DNA substrates containing deaminated bases and AP sites in vitro, the cleavage preference showed a hierarchy of Hx = U>AP>X (Fig 2B and Table 1). These results differ from those with the E. coli and Archeoglobus fulgidus EndoV homologs, as the latter enzymes preferred Hx-containing DNA [21,45]. BsEndoV also catalyzed an additional hydrolytic attack on the 5' phosphodiester bond flanking Hx and X lesions generating a 9-mer radioactive fragment free of damage; interestingly, neither the uracil- nor the AP site-containing DNAs suffered this secondary hydrolytic attack. A previous study revealed that the initial post-incision products generated by T. maritima EndoV can also undergo a second hydrolytic event when the enzyme is in excess. However, the second cleavage takes place on the complementary strand, generating a double-stranded break [46]. It has been reported that E. coli and T. maritima EndoV can use either Mg2+ or Mn2+ for efficient catalysis [11,46]. Interestingly, both the single and double nicking events catalyzed by BsEndoV on U/AP and X/Hx containing DNA were performed when Mg2+ was present in the repair reactions (Fig 2A and 2C). However, the presence of Mn2+ in BsEndoV reactions not only affected the specificity of the nicking event but also promoted unspecific hydrolytic cuts toward the 3' end of DNAs with the four lesions tested (Fig 2C). It has been shown that the presence of Mn2+ instead of Mg2+ uncovers a 3'➔5'-exonuclease activity in DNA-binding mutants of the EndoV homolog of T. maritima during repair of Hx-containing DNA [47]. However, under our experimental conditions, Mn2+ inhibited the BsEndoV nicking at the 3' second phosphodiester bond near of all the damaged substrates and promoted a nonspecific incision (Fig 2C). Of note, a structural comparison between BsEndoV and the crystal structures of the best characterized bacterial EndoVs revealed some important differences in key amino acids for recognition and processing of damage, including those in the stabilization wedge and damage recognition pocket involved in post-incision interactions with DNA, conserving only those residues necessary for the coordination of the Mg2+ ion necessary for the nucleophilic attack during phosphodiester bond cleavage (Fig 1A and 1B). We speculate that these structural changes in BsEndoV could account for the different action of the enzyme when the DNA lesion is a Hx or X (two-nick mode), or a U or an AP site (one-nick mode). However, the molecular and mechanistic details of lesion recognition and incision remain to be elucidated.

In B. subtilis, PolA plays a central role in completing post incision/excision repair in the canonical NER, BER and MMR pathways [27,28,32]. Importantly, the results from an epistatic study, which analyzed the spontaneous Rifr mutation frequency of B. subtilis cells deficient in BsEndoV, BsPolA or both proteins, suggested that these proteins work in concert to repair DNA with deaminated bases and AP-sites (Fig 7). It must be pointed that under our experimental conditions in vivo, in the absence of BsEndoV, BsPolA is an error-prone processing enzyme, since the mutation rate decreased considerably when the polA gene was inactivated in the endoV strain (Fig 7). This mutagenic behavior of BsPolA has been described previously [28], and it could be due to: i) the lack of proofreading by this enzyme due to the lack of a useful 3'➔5'exonuclease domain [23] and/or ii) the ability of BsPolA to interact with error-prone DNA polymerases of the Y-family [27].

Based on these observations we initially considered BsPolA to be a good candidate to complete repair event(s) initiated by BsEndoV on the four lesion-containing DNA substrates employed in this work. Indeed, the products resulting from the double nicking event catalyzed by BsEndoV on DNA containing X and Hx were good substrates for BsPolA. These results strongly support the concept that BsEndoV and BsPolA constitute a novel alternative pathway that eliminates X and Hx from the B. subtilis genome.

In contrast the nicked U- or AP-containing DNA oligomers generated by BsEndoV action were not efficiently polymerized by BsPolA (Fig 4). Therefore, we predicted that full repair following the nicking adjacent to U and an AP site by BsEndoV would require a 3'➔5' exonuclease or a flap-endonuclease activity to eliminate a short DNA patch containing the lesion before DNA synthesis by BsPolA. Notably, the lack of 3'➔5' exonuclease activity in BsPolA [23,24] most probably prevented this enzyme from completing the repair of the U and AP intermediate products generated by BsEndoV.

Interestingly, results from epistatic studies measuring Rifr mutagenesis and susceptibility to a DNA-deaminating agent with B. subtilis mutants that combined deficiencies in BsEndoV and the AP-endonuclease BsExoA suggest that both proteins did actually work in a common repair pathway in this bacterium (Figs 7 and 8). It has been shown that ExoA together with Nfo play important roles in DNA repair events in vegetative cells as well as in germinating/outgrowing spores of B. subtilis [41,42]. A previous report revealed that ExoA possesses a multiplicity of repair activities including hydrolysis of AP sites, ribonuclease H, 3'-phosphomonoesterase, as well as 3'➔5' exonuclease [40]. In agreement with this report, purified BsExoA efficiently hydrolyzed a radioactive ds-DNA substrate in the 3'➔5' direction (Fig 5).

Since the products of the single incision event catalyzed by BsEndoV on DNA carrying a single U or an AP lesion were not substrates for BsPolA we hypothesized that the lesions made the 3'-OH of the hydrolyzed phosphodiester bond inaccessible for DNA synthesis. Indeed, the orientation of the single hydrolytic event catalyzed by BsEndoV on these lesions (Figs 2 and 4) is such that DNA synthesis from these nicks will lead to futile repair events. As noted above, BsPolA lacks 3'➔5' proofreading activity to eliminate the DNA stretch harboring a single U or AP lesion, but as demonstrated in this work, BsExoA proficiently catalyzed this excision event, and then BsPolA efficiently extended the incision/excision repair intermediates resulting from the concomitant action of BsEndoV and BsExoA thus completing the repair of these lesions in vitro. Overall, our results provide genetic and biochemical evidence for the existence of a novel AER pathway in B. subtilis that uses EndoV, ExoA and PolA to process a wide range of lesions, including, AP sites and deaminated bases (Fig 9).

Fig 9. AER mechanism mediated by BsEndoV, BsExoA and BsPolA during removal of deaminated bases and AP sites in B. subtilis DNA.

Fig 9

(1) BsEndoV incises the second phospodiester bond downstream from a deaminated base or an AP site. Post-incision events are dependent on the type of damage. (2) BsEndoV performs a second incision at the 5' side of the lesion when the deaminated bases are Hx or X, directly allowing DNA extension by BsPolA. (3) Processing of U or an AP site initiated by BsEndoV requires the subsequent activity of BsExoA before a BsPolA-dependent DNA synthesis step. In both cases, a DNA ligase would be necessary to complete the AER events.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids and growth conditions

Strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in S1 Table. Isolation of genomic DNA from B. subtilis 168 was as previously described [48], as were transformation and plasmid DNA isolation [49]. Liquid cultures of E. coli were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium [50]. Liquid cultures of B. subtilis were grown in Difco antibiotic no. 3 (PAB) medium. When required, ampicillin (Amp) (100 μg mL-1), chloramphenicol (Cm) (25 μg mL-1), tetracycline (Tet) (15 μg mL-1), erythromycin (Er) (5 μg mL-1) or spectinomycin (Sp) (100 μg mL-1) was add to media and incubated at 37°C with vigorous aeration; growth was followed by measuring cultures’ optical density at 600 nm (OD600nm).

Sequence and structure analysis of EndoV proteins

Alignments of amino acid sequences from B. subtilis EndoV, E. coli Nfi and T. maritima Nfi were performed with the sequence analyser Geneious software. Crystal structures of B. subtilis (YwqL) [51], E. coli (Nfi) [37] and T. maritima (Nfi) [52] EndoVs with the accession numbers in protein data bank 3GA2, 4XPU and 3HD0, respectively, were visualized and coloured for structural and amino acid comparison.

Design of DNA constructs for protein expression

To overexpress BsEndoV, BsExoA and BsPolA, the ORFs of endoV, exoA and polA lacking the start and stop codons were amplified by PCR using specific oligonucleotide primers carrying the appropriate restriction enzyme sequences (S2 Table) and the PCR products ligated between the multiple cloning sites (MCS) of the expression vector pQE30 (QIAGEN Inc., Valencia, CA). The resulting recombinant constructs carrying respective in-frame hexahistidine tags on the 5´-ends of polA, endoV and exoA (S1 Table) were obtained in E. coli XL10-Gold (TcR). All PCR reactions were performed with high fidelity Vent DNA polymerase (New England Bio Labs, Ipswich, MA) and chromosomal DNA from B. subtilis 168.

Purification of recombinant proteins

Strains containing each pQE30 construct were grown at 37°C in LB medium supplemented with ampicillin and tetracycline. At an OD600nm of 0.5, gene expression was induced with 0.25 mM isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and growth continued for 4 h at 28°C for endoV, 3h at 30°C for exoA and 2h at 37°C for polA. Cells were collected by centrifugation (4800 × g, 10 min), washed twice with 10 mL of lysis buffer (see below) and finally resuspended in 20 mL of this buffer. The cell suspensions were treated with lysozyme (0.2 mg/mL), incubated for 30 min at 37°C, disrupted by sonication, and the extracts were centrifuged (15 000 × g, 20 min, 4°C) to remove cells debris. Cell-free crude extract was applied to a 5 mL Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) agarose column (QIAGEN Inc., Valencia, CA), previously equilibrated with lysis buffer. The column was washed with 30 volumes of wash buffer (see below) before eluting the protein bound to the resin with 5 mL of elution buffer (see below). Eluted fractions were dialyzed overnight in storage buffer (see below), aliquoted and stored at -20°C until use. The composition of buffers used to purify BsEndoV were: lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 0.03% Tween 20); wash buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 0.03% Tween 20); elution buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole, 0.03% Tween 20, 5mM DTT); storage buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 100 mM NaCl, 5mM DTT, 50% glycerol). The composition of buffers to purify BsExoA and BsPolA were: lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4 [pH 8], 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 0.05% Tween 20); wash buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4 [pH 8], 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM imidazole, 0.05% Tween 20); elution buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4 [pH 8], 300 mM NaCl, 300 mM imidazole, 0.05% Tween 20); dialysis/storage buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4 [pH 8], 100 mM NaCl, 5mM DTT, 50% glycerol). Aliquots of the cell homogenate and the column flow-through as well as the eluted bound fractions were analysed by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and gels were stained as previously described [53].

Substrates and enzymatic assays to determine endonuclease activity of recombinant BsEndoV

The enzymatic acivity of recombinant BsEndoV was assessed against a radioactive double-stranded 19-mer nucleotide. For this purpose, 100 nM of the oligonucleotide 5'-GCACCGGACXGAGGCGACG (Sigma-Aldrich, The Woodlands, TX) containing a single U, Hx, X or AP-site at nt 10 denoted by underlined “X” above was 5' end-labelled with [γ-32P] ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Bio-Labs, Ipsiwch, MA). The radioactive oligonucleotide was annealed to the complementary oligonucleotide 5'-CGTCGCCTCYGTCCGGTGC (where the underlined “Y” was substituted with A as a complementary base for U or an AP-site, T as a complementary base for Hx and by C as a complementary base for X. The three complementary oligonucleotide primers were used at a final concentration of 10 nM in annealing buffer (5 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 1 mM NaCl). For proper annealing of complementary strands, the samples were heated for 5 min at 95°C and cooled slowly to room temperature [54]. 10 nM of radioactive ds-DNA containing the lesion were used as substrates in 50 μL reactions that included, 5 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 100 nM of purified BsEndoV, 10 μg/mL BSA and 5 mM DTT. The divalent metal ion cofactor, either MgCl2 or MnCl2, was at 5 mM. All reactions were incubated at 37°C and samples were collected at different times and diluted 1:1 (v/v) with stop buffer (95% formamide, 20 mM EDTA, 0.1% xylene cyanol and 0.01% bromophenol blue). Aliquots of 5 μL were run on electrophoresis through 8 M urea-17% polyacrylamide gels and analyzed by phosphorimagery on a personal molecular imager (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Densitometry analysis of reaction products was performed using the software ImageJ 1.47n (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).

Determination of spontaneous mutagenesis and treatment of cells with sodium bisulfite (SB)

Mutation rates to Rifr were determined as follows. Cultures of each strain grown overnight were inoculated into flasks containing fresh PAB medium and OD600nm monitored until reaching 0.5 and then further incubated at 37°C for 12 h with vigorous aeration. Mutation frequencies were calculated by spreading aliquots on six LB plates supplemented with rifampin (Rif) (10 μg mL-1) as well as spreading aliquots of serial dilutions on LB plates to determine total viable counts. Rifr colonies were counted after 48 h of incubation at 37°C. Differences in mutagenesis rates between B. subtilis strains were calculated with the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test. P<0.01 denoted significant differences. Analyses were done using Minitab 17 software.

Cultures of the different strains were propagated in liquid PAB medium to an OD600nm of 0.5. Cells of each culture collected by centrifugation were washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 0.7% Na2HPO4, 0.3% KH2PO4, 0.4% NaCl [pH 7.5]). Cell aliquots in PBS were treated or not with 60, 80, 100 or 140 mM (final concentration) of SB for 1 h at 25°C. Cell survival after these treatments was determined by plating serial dilutions on solid LB medium, and colony-forming units were counted after 24 h of incubation at 37°C. Statistical significance between strains was determined by performing one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc analysis. Significance was set at P < 0.05.

DNA polymerase activity of BsPolA

To determine the DNA synthesis capacity of purified BsPolA in vitro, a 45-mer DNA oligonucleotide (5'-CCTTGGCACTAGCGCAGGGCCAGTTAGGTGGGCAGGTGGGCTGCG) was hybridized as described above to the complementary 5’-end [γ-32P] labelled 24-mer oligonucleotide 5'-CGCAGCCCACCTGCCCACCTAACT-3'. Reactions containing 20 nM of ds-DNA and purified BsPolA (0, 1, 10, 100 or 1000 nM) were incubated at 37°C in polymerization buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT) supplemented with 250 μM of each dNTP. All reactions were incubated at 37°C for 10 min and then diluted 1:1 (v/v) with stop buffer. A positive control for DNA polymerization used Pfu DNA polymerase following the instructions of the supplier (Monserate Biotechnology Group, San Diego, CA). Reactions products were resolved by 17% denaturing polyacrylamide gels and analysed by phosphorimagery.

Exonucleolytic activity of BsExoA

The ability of BsExoA to degrade DNA in the 3'➔5' direction was evaluated at 37°C in 50 μL reactions containing 0, 1, 10, 100 and 1000 nM BsExoA, 20 nM of a 24/45-nt annealed radioactive ds-DNA probe described above, 5 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 5 mM MgCl2 and 100 mM NaCl. The reaction was diluted 1:1 (v/v) with stop buffer at the end of the incubation. A positive control for exonuclease in the 3'➔5' direction used a unit of Pfu Pol I in a reaction lacking dNTP’s. All reaction products were resolved by 17% denaturing polyacrylamide gels and analyzed by phosphorimagery.

In vitro reconstitution of an alternative excision repair pathway to process deaminated bases and AP sites

To assess the participation of ExoA and PolA as part of the DNA repair pathway initiated by BsEndoV, 100 nM of each ds-DNA containing the various lesions was treated in 50 μL reactions with a saturating amount of BsEndoV (1μM) that included 5 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 1mM DTT, 10 μg/mL BSA and 5 mM MgCl2. The reactions were incubated at 37°C for 1h. After confirming the full cleavage of the DNA probes by the recombinant protein, the intermediate products were extracted from the reaction mixtures with phenol:chloroform (25:25 v/v), precipitated with 10 volumes of absolute ethanol and 100 nM sodium acetate and dissolved in nuclease-free water. 40 μL reactions containing 20 nM of each [32P]-labelled protein-free ds-DNA products and 100 nM BsPolA in polymerization buffer were incubated for 30 min at 37°C. When required, prior to the DNA synthesis, 20 nM of the BsEndoV-incised ds-DNA containing U or AP-sites were treated with 10 nM of BsExoA for 5 min in the same polymerization buffer; BsExoA was inactivated by heat at 70°C during 10 min before DNA synthesis. Where indicated, the exonuclease activity of Pfu Pol I, incubated under the manufacturers recommendations (Monserate Biotechnology Group), was used as a control. Reaction products were resolved by 17% denaturing polyacrylamide gels and analysed by phosphorimagery.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Strains and plasmids used in this study.

(PDF)

S2 Table. Oligonucleotides used to amplify and clone the ORFs of endoV, exoA and polA into pQE30.

(PDF)

S1 Fig. Incapability of BsEndoV to operate over a 19-mer ds-DNA free of lesions.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the excellent technical assistance of Norma Ramirez-Ramirez and Karina López-Olmos.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by: 1) MPR, Grant 221231 National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT), México; 2) MPR, Grant CIIC 188/2018 University of Guanajuato, México; 3) AGP, VMAG, LIVG, PLVA and JMP were supported by scholarships from CONACyT. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Ponnamperuma C, Lemmon RM, Bennett EL and Calvin M. Deamination of adenine by ionizing radiation. Science. 1961; 134: 113–113. 10.1126/science.134.3472.113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shapiro R, and Pohl SH. The reaction of ribonucleosides with nitrous acid. Side products and kinetics. Biochem. 1968; 7: 448–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shapiro R, and Shiuey SJ. Reaction of nitrous acid with alkylaminopurines. Biochim. Biophys Acta. 1969; 174: 403–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen H, and Shaw BR. Kinetics of bisulfite-induced cytosine deamination in single-stranded DNA. Biochem. 1993; 3: 3535–3539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ravanat JL, Douki T, and Cadet J. Direct and indirect effects of UV radiation on DNA and its components. J Photochem Photobiol. 2001; 63: 88–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Wood RD, Schultz RA, Ellenberger T. DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. 2nd. edn American Society for Microbiology Press; Washington, DC: 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Krokan HE, Standal R, and Slupphaug G. DNA glycosylases in the base excision repair of DNA. Biochem J.1997; 325: 1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lindahl T. An N-glycosidase from Escherichia coli that releases free uracil from DNA containing deaminated cytosine residues. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1974; 71, 3649–3653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lindahl T. DNA glycosylases, endonucleases for apurinic/apyrimidinic sites, and base excision-repair. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1979; 22: 135–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yao M, Hatahet Z, Melamede RJ and Kow YW. Deoxyinosine 3' endonuclease, a novel deoxyinosine-specific endonuclease from Escherichia coli. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1994. a; 726: 315–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yao M, Hatahet Z, Melamede RJ, and Kow YW. Purification and characterization of a novel deoxyinosine-specific enzyme, deoxyinosine 3' endonuclease, from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1994. b; 269: 16260–16268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yao M, and Kow YW. Strand-specific cleavage of mismatch-containing DNA by deoxyinosine 3'-endonuclease from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1994; 269: 31390–31396. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yao M, and Kow YW. Cleavage of insertion/deletion mismatches, flap and pseudo-Y DNA structures by deoxyinosine 3'-endonuclease from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1996; 271: 30672–30676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gates FT, and Linn S. Endonuclease V of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem.1977; 252, 1647–1653. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.He B, Qing H, and Kow YW. Deoxyxanthosine in DNA is repaired by Escherichia coli endonuclease V. Mutat Res. 2000; 459: 109–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kow YW. Repair of deaminated bases in DNA. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002; 33: 886–893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cao W. Endonuclease V: an unusual enzyme for repair of DNA deamination. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013; 70: 3145–3156. 10.1007/s00018-012-1222-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.López-Olmos K, Hernandez MP, Contreras-Garduño JA, Robleto EA, Setlow P, Yasbin RE, et al. Roles of endonuclease V, uracil-DNA glycosylase, and mismatch repair in Bacillus subtilis DNA base-deamination-induced mutagenesis. J Bacteriol. 2012; 194: 243–252 10.1128/JB.06082-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ambriz-Aviña V, Yasbin RE, Robleto EA, and Pedraza-Reyes M. Role of base excision repair (BER) in transcription-associated mutagenesis of nutritionally stressed nongrowing Bacillus subtilis cell subpopulations. Curr Microbiol. 2016; 73: 721–726. 10.1007/s00284-016-1122-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ayala-García VM, Valenzuela-García LI, Setlow P, and Pedraza-Reyes M. Aag hypoxanthine-DNA glycosylase is synthesized in the forespore compartment and involved in counteracting the genotoxic and mutagenic effects of hypoxanthine and alkylated bases in DNA during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. J Bacteriol. 2016; 198: 3345–3354. 10.1128/JB.00625-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee CC, Yang YC, Goodman SD, Yu YH, Lin SB, Kao JT, et al. Endonuclease V–mediated deoxyinosine excision repair in vitro. DNA Repair. 2010; 9:1073–1079. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Su KY, Lin LI, Goodman SD, Yen RS, Wu CY, Chang WC, et al. DNA polymerase I proofreading exonuclease activity is required for endonuclease V repair pathway both in vitro and in vivo. DNA Repair. 2018; 64: 59–67. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Aliotta JM, Pelletier JJ, Ware JL, Moran LS, Benner JS, and Kong H. Thermostable Bst DNA polymerase I lacks a 3′→ 5′ proofreading exonuclease activity. Genet Anal–Biomol Eng. 1996; 12: 185–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kiefer JR, Mao C, Braman JC, and Beese LS. Visualizing DNA replication in a catalytically active Bacillus DNA polymerase crystal. Nature. 1998; 391: 304–307. 10.1038/34693 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Witkin EM. Ultraviolet mutagenesis and inducible DNA repair in Escherichia coli. Bacteriol Rev. 1976; 40: 869–907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kornberg A, and Baker T. DNA Replication, 2nd edit., W.H. Freeman and Co., NY: 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Duigou S, Ehrlich SD, Noirot P, and Noirot‐Gros MF. DNA polymerase I acts in translesion synthesis mediated by the Y‐polymerases in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2005; 57: 678–690. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04725.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gómez-Marroquín M, Martin HA, Pepper A, Girard ME, Kidman AA, Vallin C, et al. Stationary-phase mutagenesis in stressed Bacillus subtilis cells operates by Mfd-dependent mutagenic pathways. Genes. 2016: 7, 33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Knuth K, Niesalla H, Hueck CJ, and Fuchs TM. Large-scale identification of essential Salmonella genes by trapping lethal insertions. Mol Microbiol. 2004; 51: 1729–1744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Joyce CM, and Grindley ND. Method for determining whether a gene of Escherichia coli is essential: application to the polA gene. J Bacteriol. 1984; 158: 636–643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Thomaides HB, Davison EJ, Burston L, Johnson H, Brown DR, Hunt AC, et al. Essential bacterial functions encoded by gene pairs. J Bacteriol. 2007;189: 591–602. 10.1128/JB.01381-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fukushima S, Itaya M, Kato H, Ogasawara N, and Yoshikawa H. Reassessment of the in vivo functions of DNA polymerase I and RNase H in bacterial cell growth. J Bacteriol. 2007; 189: 8575–83. 10.1128/JB.00653-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Patlán AG, Corona SU, Ayala-García VM and Pedraza-Reyes M. Non-canonical processing of DNA photodimers with Bacillus subtilis UV-endonuclease YwjD, 5'→ 3' exonuclease YpcP and low-fidelity DNA polymerases YqjH and YqjW. DNA Repair. 2018; 70: 1–9. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2018.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Perez-Lago L, Serrano-Heras G, Baños B, Lazaro JM, Alcorlo M, Villar L, et al. Characterization of Bacillus subtilis uracil-DNA glycosylase and its inhibition by phage phi29 protein p56. Mol Microbiol. 2011; 80: 1657–1666. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07675.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dalhus B, Arvai AS, Rosnes I, Olsen ØE, Backe PH, Alseth I, et al. Structures of endonuclease V with DNA reveal initiation of deaminated adenine repair. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009; 16: 138–143. 10.1038/nsmb.1538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mi R, Abole AK, and Cao W. Dissecting endonuclease and exonuclease activities in endonuclease V from Thermotoga maritima. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39: 536–544 10.1093/nar/gkq791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang Z, Jia Q, Zhou C, and Xie W. Crystal structure of E. coli endonuclease V, an essential enzyme for deamination repair. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 12754 10.1038/srep12754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hitchcock TM, Gao H, and Cao W. Cleavage of deoxyoxanosine-containing oligodeoxyribonucleotides by bacterial endonuclease V. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32: 4071–4080. 10.1093/nar/gkh747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Batty DP, and Wood RD. Damage recognition in nucleotide excision repair of DNA. Gene. 2000; 241: 193–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lundberg KS, Shoemaker DD, Adams MW, Short JM, Sorge JA and Mathur EJ. High-fidelity amplification using a thermostable DNA polymerase isolated from Pyrococcus furiosus. Gene. 1991; 108: 1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shida T, Ogawa T, Ogasawara N, and Sekiguchi J. Characterization of Bacillus subtilis ExoA protein: a multifunctional DNA-repair enzyme similar to the Escherichia coli exonuclease III. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1999; 63:1528–34. 10.1271/bbb.63.1528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Salas-Pacheco JM, Setlow B, Setlow P, and Pedraza-Reyes M. Role of the Nfo (YqfS) and ExoA apurinic/apyrimidinic endonucleases in protecting Bacillus subtilis spores from DNA damage. J Bacteriol. 2005; 187: 7374–81. 10.1128/JB.187.21.7374-7381.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ibarra JR, Orozco AD, Rojas JA, López K, Setlow P, Yasbin RE, et al. Role of the Nfo and ExoA apurinic/apyrimidinic endonucleases in repair of DNA damage during outgrowth of Bacillus subtilis spores. J Bacteriol. 2008; 190: 2031–2038. 10.1128/JB.01625-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pearl LH. Structure and function in the uracil-DNA glycosylase superfamily. Mutat Res/DNA Repair. 2000; 460: 165–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu J, He B, Qing H, and Kow YW. A deoxyinosine specific endonuclease from hyperthermophile, Archaeoglobus fulgidus: a homolog of Escherichia coli endonuclease V. Mutat Res/DNA Repair. 2000; 461: 169–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Huang J, Lu J, Barany F, and Cao W. Multiple cleavage activities of endonuclease V from Thermotoga maritima: recognition and strand nicking mechanism. Biochem. 2001; 40: 8738–8748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Feng H, Dong L, Klutz AM, Aghaebrahim N, and Cao W. Defining amino acid residues involved in DNA− protein interactions and revelation of 3 ‘-exonuclease activity in endonuclease V. Biochem. 2005; 44: 11486–11495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cutting SM, and Vander Horn PB. Genetic analysis, p. 27–74. In Harwood C. R. and Cutting S. M. (ed.), Molecular biological methods for Bacillus. John Wiley and Sons, Sussex, England: 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, and Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Miller JH. (1972). Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Forouhar F, Abashidze M, Hussain M, Seetharaman J, Janjua H, Fang Y, et al. Crystal structure of the Endonuclease_V (BSU36170) from Bacillus subtilis, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium Target SR624. 2009. PDB accession number: 3GA2.
  • 52.Utepbergenov D, Cooper DR, Derewenda U, and Derewenda ZS. Crystal structure of Tm1865, an Endonuclease V from Thermotoga maritima. Integrated Center for Structure and Function Innovation (ISFI). 2009. PDB accession number: 3HD0
  • 53.Laemmli UK. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970; 227: 680–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Thomas PS. Hybridization of denatured RNA and small DNA fragments transferred to nitrocellulose. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1980; 77: 5201–5205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Strains and plasmids used in this study.

(PDF)

S2 Table. Oligonucleotides used to amplify and clone the ORFs of endoV, exoA and polA into pQE30.

(PDF)

S1 Fig. Incapability of BsEndoV to operate over a 19-mer ds-DNA free of lesions.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES