Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Feb 6;9:1509. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36605-8

Transcriptomic profiles of tumor-associated neutrophils reveal prominent roles in enhancing angiogenesis in liver tumorigenesis in zebrafish

Xiaojing Huo 1, Hankun Li 1, Zhen Li 2, Chuan Yan 1, Ira Agrawal 1, Sinnakaruppan Mathavan 2, Jianjun Liu 2, Zhiyuan Gong 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6365535  PMID: 30728369

Abstract

We have previously demonstrated the pro-tumoral role of neutrophils using a kras-induced zebrafish hepatocarcinogenesis model. To further illustrate the molecular basis of the pro-tumoral role, Tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and transcriptomic analyses were carried out by RNA-Seq. Differentially expressed gene profiles of TANs from larvae, male and female livers indicate great variations during liver tumorigenesis, but the common responsive canonical pathways included an immune pathway (Acute Phase Response Signaling), a liver metabolism-related pathway (LXR/RXR Activation) and Thrombin Signaling. Consistent with the pro-tumoral role of TANs, gene module analysis identified a consistent down-regulation of Cytotoxicity module, which may allow continued proliferation of malignant cells. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis indicated up-regulation of several genes promoting angiogenesis. Consistent with this, we found decreased density of blood vessels accompanied with decreased oncogenic liver sizes in neutrophil-depleted larvae. Collectively, our study has indicated some molecular mechanisms of the pro-tumoral roles of TANs in hepatocarcinogenesis, including weakened immune clearance against tumor cells and enhanced function in angiogenesis.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer with high malignancy and mortality1. HCC is frequently caused by chronic inflammation in the liver, where the immune cells create an unresolved, chronic inflammation by initiating and maintaining infiltrating immune cells and producing cytokines in the liver2,3. Among these immune cells, neutrophils, the most abundant immune cells in human, have been proved to play a role in a variety of tumors4,5. In recent studies, various roles of tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) have been identified, including the existence of N1 (anti-tumoral) and N2 (pro-tumoral) tumor-associated neutrophils in tumor development and progression6.

We have previously developed several inducible HCC models by transgenic expression of selected driver oncogenes7–11. In these transgenic models, the driver oncogene can be temporally activated to initiate liver carcinogenesis and histologically proven HCC are usually produced in a few weeks. Thus, these transgenic models provide a powerful tool for investigation of liver tumor initiation. In previous studies, we have found a prominent role of immune response during liver cancer progression12. In particular, we found a rapid migration of neutrophils towards oncogenic liver in a kras-induced zebrafish HCC model13. By manipulation of neutrophil numbers and activities through pharmaceutical treatments and genetic knockdown, we have demonstrated that tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) promoted hepatocarcinogenesis during the initiation of kras-induced oncogenesis. We found that increased TAN activity accelerated the proliferation of oncogenic hepatocytes and deterred their apoptosis, thus contributing to the pathological malignancy. In that study, although the pro-tumor roles of TANs have been demonstrated, these roles remain to be elucidated at the molecular level. The purpose of this study was to use a transcriptomic approach to provide molecular insights into TANs and their roles in hepatocarcinogenesis. Thus, neutrophils were isolated from larvae, adult males and adult females following oncogenic kras activation and used for RNA-seq analyses. By comparing transcriptomic profiles of TANs and matched naïve neutrophils (NNs), we observed prominent roles of TANs in loss of cytotoxicity and pro-angiogenesis, both of which apparently favor tumor initiation and progression.

Results and Discussion

Validation of neutrophil identity by transcriptomic profiling

TANs were isolated from kras+/lyz+ fish (see Methods) and NNs isolated from lyz+ fish by FACS. The fluorescent microscope images and flow cytometry dot-plots of the isolated cells showed an obvious enrichment of DsRed+ neutrophils in comparison to the cell suspension before sorting (Supplementary Fig. S1). The purity of the sorted neutrophils (DsRed+) is above 90%. The neutrophil samples from larva (L), male (M) and female (F) adult fish were collected with biological duplicates or triplicates, as summarized in Table S1. RNAs were isolated from these neutrophil samples and sequenced to a depth of 23.4–98.9 × 106 reads for each library. In total, 15 RNA samples were sequenced, including three TAN_L and three matched NN_L from larvae, three TAN_M and two NN_M from male adults, and two TAN_F and two NN_F from female adults. All the sequence reads were then mapped to the zebrafish genome reference, danRer7, after removing low-quality reads. By annotating the mapped reads, a total of 8.8–13.5 × 103 transcript entries were identified with at least one mapped read, constituting 60–90% of total known zebrafish transcript entries in the danRer7 zebrafish genome database (14,868 RefSeq transcript entries in total). To minimize the effect from potentially leaky expression, a cut-off of 30 reads was used to retain the robustly expressed transcripts. As a result, 6.2–10.7 × 103 transcript entries were identified for each pool of neutrophils and used for subsequent analyses (Supplementary Table S1), representing 42–72% of the danRer7 database.

The distribution of transcript entries and total counts over different transcript abundance categories showed similar profiles for all neutrophil samples (Fig. 1A). There were only a few transcripts which had high abundance while the majority of transcripts were at the very low abundance, which was the typical pattern of transcriptomic profiles of essentially all tissues and cell types14,15. The top 10 transcripts accounted for about 20% transcriptome body and the top 100 transcripts constituted around 50% of the transcriptome body. In contrast, the lowest expressed ~11,000 transcript entries (ranked after 1000 and categorized in others) contributed only about 15% of the transcriptome body. In the sub-pie of the top 10 abundant transcripts, the most abundant and common genes in all neutrophil groups were actb1, actb2, lyz and lect2l. Both actb1 and actb2 encodes β-actin, which are commonly known as housekeeping genes and play critical roles in cell mobility. Their crucial roles in neutrophil functions have long been recognized as mutation of these genes in neutrophils could result in abnormalities in chemotaxis, superoxide production and membrane potential response16. Both lyz and lect2l are well-known as neutrophil-specific genes. lyz encodes a specific enzyme to hydrolyze specific linkages in bacterial cell wall17 while lect21 is a leukocyte-derived chemotactic factor gene18. Both of them play significant roles against pathogen infection in neutrophils. Thus, these top abundantly expressed genes are consistent with the function of neutrophils and validate the neutrophil identities of the cell population we isolated.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Transcript abundance in neutrophils and hierarchical clustering of neutrophil samples and transcript abundance. (A) Transcript abundance distribution in neutrophil populations. The main pie charts of TAN_L, NN_L, TAN_M, NN_M, TAN_F, and NN_F are composed of four slices based on abundance ranking: top 10, 11–100, 101–1,000 and the rest (1,001 and the rest up to 12,000). Gene symbols and relative abundance of the top 10 transcripts are indicated in a subpie in each group. (B) Hierarchical clustering of the 15 neutrophil samples. The red and green colors indicate the high and low abundance, respectively.

To examine the similarities between the RNA-seq samples, we performed hierarchical clustering across all the 15 samples based on gene expression abundance. These samples were clearly clustered into two branches, larva and adult (Fig. 1B). Thus, there was an overwhelming influence of developmental stages on neutrophil transcriptomes. Two distinct gene clusters were enriched in larvae and adults respectively. Among the larva enriched genes, a number of neutrophil developmental regulators were identified, such as etv5a, hyal6, ctrp, ctrl and ctbp2. Among them, ctbp2 encodes a C-terminal binding protein, which co-activates neutrophil differentiation with a zinc finger transcription factor19, indicating an active development of neutrophils in the larval stage (8 dpf), in which the adaptive immune system has not been fully developed20. In the adult enriched gene cluster, mhc1uha, cd74a and cd74b, which encode major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, may indicate the maturity of the adaptive immune system in adult fish. In addition, psmb8 and b2m are important components of MHC I molecules21,22 while grn1, grn2, rgs12, and tnfsfl3b are associated with neutrophil responses to chemokines and cytokines23,24.

Distinct transcriptomes between tumor associated and naïve neutrophils

In order to extract specific transcriptomic features for TANs, DEGs were identified by comparison of matched TANs and NNs. By using selection criteria of fold change >1.25 and p-value <0.05, DEGs were selected from the three TAN/NN groups. The numbers of up- and down-regulated genes in the larva, male and female TANs are shown in Venn diagrams in Fig. 2 and the list of these genes are shown in Supplementary Tables S2–S4, including 619 up- and 564 down-regulated genes in larva TANs (Supplementary Table S2), 403 up- and 368 down-regulated genes in male TANs (Supplementary Table S3), and 581 up- and 387-down-regulated genes in female TANs (Supplementary Table S4). However, deregulated genes from the three TAN groups had relatively small overlaps with only seven commonly up-regulated genes and eight commonly down-regulated genes (Fig. 2), indicating that both developmental stages and genders affected the response of neutrophils greatly during hepatocarcinogenesis. This is consistent with a previous study on gender difference in neutrophils in responses to cytokine stimulations and malignant growth25. Moreover, the aged neutrophils have also been demonstrated to be different from the young ones in human26. To verify the dynamic range of gene expression, reverse-transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed for the fifteen common DEGs. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S2, there was a good correlation between the RNA-seq and RT-qPCR results for up- and down-regulation of these common DEGs (Supplementary Fig. S2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Venn diagrams of DEGs in the three TAN groups: TAN_L, TAN_M and TAN-F. (A) Overlaps of up-regulated genes in the three TAN groups. (B) Overlaps of down-regulated genes in the three TAN groups. The commonly deregulated genes among all the three TAN groups are listed on the right of each Venn diagram.

The seven commonly up-regulated genes are involved in various biological activities, including regulation of G-protein signaling (rgs3), lipid transport (pltp), transcriptional regulation (raraa and znf710a) and vascularization (lgals2b, naa35 and esm1). Among these genes, esm1 has been reported to be associated with cancer and it is involved in cell survival, cell cycle progression, migration, angiogenesis, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition during tumor invasion in colorectal cancer27. The eight commonly down-regulated genes also have multiple functional implications, including apoptosis (dap1b), phosphatase activity (ctdsp2) and chromatin-associated protein (cbx7a), ion binding and metal transition (pter and phf20b), translation (dalrd3, eif4ebp3), and antigen presenting and processing (psme2). Notably, psme2 encodes a proteinase in immunoproteasome, which plays a role in the processing of class I MHC peptides28. The consistent down-regulation of this gene in all the three TAN groups might indicate their suppressed antigen presenting function during hepatocarcinogenesis.

Commonly upregulated canonical pathways in TANs as revealed by IPA

To further understand biological properties of TANs, we identified canonical pathways enriched in DEGs in TANs via IPA. As shown in Fig. 3, the overlapping pathways among the three TAN groups were few. The common pathways enriched in all TAN groups were Acute Phase Response Signaling, LXR/RXR Activation, and Thrombin Signaling. The first two pathways were highly robust and appeared to be highly significant (p-value < 0.001) at the top of the lists from all three TAN groups. Acute Phase Response Signaling is associated with cytokine production for innate immune cells in response to stimuli, such as malignant growth29. LXR/RXR Activation is involved in lipid metabolism and it has been reported to be activated in HCC30,31. It is interesting to note that LXR activation has been demonstrated to impair neutrophil motility in an infection model, and the inhibition of chemokine-induced RhoA activation has been identified as a putative underlying mechanism32,33. The functional implication of this pathway is consistent with our earlier observation that TANs becomes more stagnant after infiltrating into the tumor microenvironment13. In addition, Thrombin Signaling plays an enhancing role in cell adhesion and has long been found to promote tumor in metastasis initiation34,35. Thus, these data revealed crucial responses of neutrophil towards the oncogenic transformation of hepatocytes and tend to indicate their pro-tumor roles.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Overlap of IPA canonical pathways in the three TAN groups: TAN_L, TAN_M and TAN-F. The Venn diagram shows the overlap among the TAN groups. The pathways from each component of the Venn diagram are listed in the tables with indication of their statistical significance in canonical pathway analysis (***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05).

Impairment of cytotoxicity function in TANs as revealed by immune module analysis

To further characterize immune response in the three TAN groups, gene module analysis was conducted. All gene modules significantly up- and down-regulated are shown in Fig. 4A. These gene modules revealed distinct enrichments in the three TAN group; however, Module 2.1 (Cytotoxicity) was consistently down-regulated among the three TAN groups. In this module, TAN_L, TAN_M and TAN_F contained 18, 15 and 14 leading edge genes and 14 of them were common in all the three TANs (Fig. 4B). The top down-regulated genes included tumor suppressors such as GPR56, RARRES3, and GLCCI1. GPR56 encodes a non-classical adhesion receptor and has been identified as a new type of adhesion receptor that binds to extracellular matrix proteins36. Mediated by this transmembrane receptor, the cell adhesion has formed a critical inhibitory process during cancer progression; for example, GPR56 has been reported to suppress tumor growth and metastasis in a melanoma model37. RARRES3 has been identified as a class II tumor suppressor in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and colorectal cancer38,39. It is also down-regulated in human HCC tumors and its overexpression in hepatoma cells promotes apoptosis40. GLCCI1 is an early marker of glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis, involving in breast cancer and colorectal cancer41–44. Consistent with the roles of RARRES3 and GLCCI1 in apoptosis, we also observed previously that TANs inhibited apoptosis of oncogenic hepatocytes in zebrafish and thus promoted hepatocarcinogenesis13. Thus, the transcriptomic data further support the pro-tumor role of TANs by suppression of tumor-killing capability through inhibition of apoptosis.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Immune module analysis of TAN transcriptomes by GSEA. (A) List of enriched immune modules in TAN groups. Significant normalized enrichment scores (NES) are highlighted based on False Discovery Rates (FDR), which are shown in color as indicated by a color scale on the right. Red indicates positive values of NES and green indicates the negative values. FDR values below 0.25 are regarded as statistical significance. (B) List of leading edge genes in Module 2.1 Cytotoxicity. Gene No. 1–14 are common among all the TAN groups. No. 15 is common in TAN_L and TAN_M. No. 16–18 are only found in TAN_L. The bold highlighted genes are discussed in the paragraph. N.A., not available.

Resemblance of zebrafish TAN signature to mouse TAN transcriptome

To further validate the isolated zebrafish TANs and their potential functional conservation across species, zebrafish TAN transcriptomic data were compared by GSEA with the transcriptomic data from mouse TANs, which were isolated from Kras-driven melanoma and were so far the best matched TAN data for our kras-driven liver tumor in zebrafish45. The dataset also contained microarray data of NNs isolated from mouse bone marrow and the granulocyte-like myeloid derived suppressor cells (G-MDSC) isolated from melanoma respectively as non-tumor control and parallel tumor associated granulocytes. The up-regulated gene list of each zebrafish TAN group was used to represent its transcriptomic signature. As shown in Fig. 5A–F, based on normalized enrichment scores (NES) and false discovery rate (FDR), the zebrafish TAN groups show significantly high resemblance to the mouse TANs when they were compared against both NNs and G-MDSC. Thus, there is a significant similarity between zebrafish TAN transcriptomes and mouse TAN transcriptome, which are highly distinguishable from either NN or G-MDSC.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Enrichment of TAN signatures in comparison to mouse TAN dataset. (A–F) Enrichment plots by GSEA in comparison of zebrafish TANs with mouse TAN (A–C) or G-MDSC (D–F). Up-regulated genes from TAN_L (A,D), TAN_M (B,E), and TAN_F (C,F) as signatures were compared to a mouse TAN microarray dataset (GSE43254) by GSEA. The similarity between zebrafish TAN groups and mouse TAN (TAN_mus) was separately compared against mouse NN (NN_mus, A–C) and against mouse G-MDSC (G-MDSC_mus, D–F). NES indicate the correlation between two dataset and a positive value refers to positive correlation. FDR measures the statistical significance of NES, and the value below 0.25 is regarded as significance. (G) List of the top 10 leading edge genes between zebrafish TAN groups and TAN_mus basedon mouse gene symbols. The leading edge genes which also emerged in other TAN groups are labeled in red.

To gain biological insights of the similarity between zebrafish and mouse TANs, the top leading edge genes between them are presented in Fig. 5G and Supplementary Tables S5–S7, and their strong association with tumors were noted. The list contains pro-angiogenic genes (Lgals1, Lgals3bpb, Il1b, Vegfa), pro-tumor cytokines (Il1b, Il10, and Il10ra), and tumor-related transcriptional factors (Egr1 and Egr2), indicating that zebrafish and mouse TANs may have similar pro-tumor characteristics in these aspects. These example genes could be potential biomarkers for diagnosis and therapy. For example, IL10 and IL10RA have been utilized as potential therapeutic targets in a mouse HCC model, as the use of anti-IL10 and anti-IL10RA oligodeoxynucleotide in the treatment has enhanced the anti-tumor activity of macrophages46.

Pro-angiogenic role of TANs

There was initial evidence suggesting that TANs can affect tumor angiogenesis47. However, the mechanism remains unclear. As shown in Fig. 6A, we found that many pro-angiogenic genes were differentially expressed in all three TAN groups. These pro-angiogenic genes included vegfa (vascular endothelial growth factor), il1b (pro-angiogenic interleukin), itgb1 (integrin), mmp14 and mmp9 (matrix metallopeptidases) and gene encoding other cell adhesion molecules (ilgals1 and igals3bp). The overwhelming up-regulation of these pro-angiogenesis genes in TANs has indicated a prominent role of neutrophils in promoting tumor angiogenesis during tumor initiation. Notably, lgals3bpb was found to be up-regulated in TANs from both mouse melanoma and early zebrafish liver tumorigenesis based on the leading edge genes of cross-species transcriptomic comparison between zebrafish and mice (Fig. 5G). Interestingly, LGALS3BP is also up-regulated in human HCC and cirrhosis tissue48. Lgals3bp extensively interacts with extracellular matrix components including fibronectin and β1-integrin, both of which are up-regulated in oncogenic hepatocytes based on our unpublished hepatocyte transcriptomic data. This interaction involved in fibrosis and angiogenesis in the development of malignant liver tumors49.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Expression of cancer angiogenesis genes in TANs and effects of neutrophil depletion on liver tumorigenesis and angiogenesis. (A) Heatmap representation of expression of cancer angiogenesis genes extracted from DEGs of TANs. The color codes represent fold changes of expression of each gene in each sample relative to the mean expression of all samples. The list of cancer angiogenesis genes was obtained based on IPA knowledge datbase. (B) Representative confocal images of 6-dpf lyz+ larvae injected with different morpholinos: MO_SC (left, n = 18) or MO_gcsfr (right, n = 20). (C) Numbers of neutrophils in the middle body after injection of morpholinos. Neutrophils were counted in the the middle body surrounding the liver region (from the posterior edge of eye to posterior edge of swimbladder). (D) Representative 3D confocal images of 6-dpf kras−/fli+ and kras+/fli+ larvae injected with MO_SC or MO_gcsfr. For fli+ larvae, both Tg(fli1a::GFP) (left) and Tg(fli1a::RFP) (middle and right) were used. Kras- larvae were LiPan strain (left) with DsRed expression in the liver. (C and D) Quantification of blood vessel density in the liver area (E) and liver size (F) after morpholino injection. N >20 in each group. Statistical significance: *p < 0.05.

To evaluate the effect of neutrophils on tumor angiogenesis, the number of neutrophils was manipulated by suppression of neutrophil differentiation with MO_gcsfr50 in kras+/fli+ double transgenic embryos. The effects of these morpholino oligonucleotides have been previously validated in earlier reports50 as well as in our laboratory13,51. In this study, as shown in Fig. 6B,C, we found that the number of neutrophils in the liver region in MO_gcsfr injected larva was significantly lower than that in the larvae injected with the control MO_SC morpholino. Next, we injected mopholino oligonucleotides into the kras+/fli+ and kras−/fli+ embryos at one-cell stage and analyzed under a confocal microscope at 6 dpf with Dox induction from 3 dpf. As shown in Fig. 6D, in the MO_SC injected groups, blood vessels were obviously increased in kras+/fli+ larvae (middle) compared to kras−/fli+ larvae after Dox induction (left). The increased blood vessels as well as increased liver size were confirmed by quantification of fli+ blood vessel area (Fig. 6E) and the 2D liver size (Fig. 6F), which were consistent with our observation of increased blood vessels in the Myc transgenic zebrafish model following the induction of Myc-mediated liver tumorigenesis52. Thus, MO_gcsfr injection suppressed neutrophil differentiation and resulted in significant decreases in both the density of blood vessels and liver size. These observations made at two different dpf (RNA-seq at 8 dpf and morpholino knockdown at 6 dpf) are consistent for a pro-angiogenic role of neutrophils in the initial stage of hepatocarcinogenesis and should add more confidence on the conclusion, which is also consistent with a prominent pro-angiogenic role of TANs in hepatocarcinogenesis as previously suggested for human HCC53.

Methods

Zebrafish husbandry and induction of liver tumors

All zebrafish experiments were carried out in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health and the protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the National University of Singapore (Protocol Number: 096/12). Five transgenic lines were used in this study: Tg(fabp10::rtTA2s-M2; TRE2::EGFP-krasG12V), shorted as kras+, which was generated using a Tet-On system to have liver-specific expression of oncogenic krasG12V 7; Tg(lyz::DsRed), shorted as lyz+. in which neutrophils are labeled with DsRed under the control of neutrophil-specific lyz (lysozyme C) promotor54; Tg(fli1a::GFP)55 and Tg(fli1a::RFP)56 with GFP- and RFP-labeled blood vessels respectively, both of which are shorted as fli+ in this report; LiPan transgenic zebrafish, Tg(fabp10::DsRed; ela3l::EGFP) with DsRed expression in the liver and EGFP expression in exocrine pancreas57. To induce the expression of KrasG12V-EGFP in kras+ fish, 20 µg/ml doxycycline (Dox; Sigma, D9891) was used for larvae from 3 day post fertilization (dpf) to 8 dpf and for adult fish from 6 month post fertilization for 5 days.

Isolation of neutrophils

Neutrophils were isolated from both 8-dpf larvae (n > 50 each sample) after removal of head and tail parts to enrich the liver portion) and adult livers (4–7 fish pooled for each sample) through fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) using a cell sorter (BD Aria) following a previously described protocol58. TANs were isolated based on DsRed expression cells from Dox-treated kras+/lyz+ double transgenic fish and NNs were isolated based on DsRed expression from lyz+ larvae. The purity of FACS isolated neutrophils was above 90%, and the number of cells collected from each sample was above 10,000.

Morpholino knockdown and confocal imaging

Morpholino knockdown was performed on kras+/fli+ or kras−/fli+ as previously described13. Two morpholino oligonucleotides were designed and synthesized by GeneTools (Philomath, OR). A previously validated morpholino oligonucleotides for reduction (MO_gcsfr, 5′-GAAGCACAAGCGAGACGGATGCCAT-3′)50 of neutrophil population, as well as a standard control morpholino (MO_SC, 5′-CCTCTTACCTCAGTTACAATTTATA-3′) that targeted a human beta-globin intron, were used in this study. These morpholinos were injected into zebrafish embryos at one-cell stage and the larvae developed from injected embryos were imaged at 6 dpf using a confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss LSM510) for examination of their angiogenesis in livers. Measurement of neutrophil number, liver sizes and blood vessels was performed using ImageJ as previously described9,59 and >20 larva for each group were analyzed in this study. The difference between comparing groups was evaluated by student’s t-test using Graphpad Prism 6 (statistical significance: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

RNA extraction and library preparation

Following FACS sorting, the viability and purity of isolated neutrophils was tested immediately once the cell sorting was finished. Only the sorted samples with over 98% DAPI negative (living cells) and over 90% DsRed positive (neutrophil marker) were processed for the RNA extraction using the RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen, 74004). The quality and quantity of isolated RNA were examined with Bioanalyzer by using Agilent RNA 6000 Pico Kit (Agilent Technologies, 5067-1513) and all RNA samples in this study had RNA integrity values above 7. These RNAs were processed to NGS (next generation sequencing)-qualified cDNA by using SMARTer Ultra Low Input RNA Kit for Sequencing (Clontech Laboratories, Inc., 634848). The cDNAs were examined with Bioanalyzer by using Agilent High Sensitivity DNA Kit (Agilent Technologies, 5067-4626). DNA shearing was performed on Covaris AFA system and the resulting DNA was in the 200–500 bp range. The sheared cDNA was prepared for constructing multiplex sequencing libraries using NEB DNA Library Prep Kits (New England Biolabs Inc., E7370L and E7335S). Each multiplex occupied one lane and was sequenced on Illumina HiSeq NGS platform with the sequencing read length of 100 bp.

RNA-seq data processing and annotation

Sequence reads were assembled by aligning to the zebrafish reference genome sequence (Danio rerio, UCSC version danRer7, 2010) using TopHat2.0 (http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/tophat/index.shtml). All the zebrafish genes were annotated to human and mouse orthologous/homologous genes by retrieving from the Genome Institute of Singapore Zebrafish Annotation Database (http://giscompute.gis.a-star.edu.sg/~govind/unigene_db/) as previously described60. The quantification of reads mapped to each gene was performed using a python package, HT-Seq61 with ambiguous and non-unique alignments depleted.

RNA-seq data analyses

Based on sequence count of each gene, which has been normalized against the total sequence counts, hierarchical clustering was performed using Cluster 3.0 (http://bonsai.hgc.jp/~mdehoon/software/cluster/software.htm) across all neutrophil samples to examine their similarities. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between TANs and NNs were identified by using DESeq2, an R package, which normalizes the count data and models with negative binomial distribution62, with cut-off p-value at 0.05 and fold change at 1.25. The biological insights of the DEGs were mined by using IPA (Ingenuity Pathway Analysis, Qiagen). The fold change and p-value of DEGs were input for the establishment of causal networks and the overlap p-value for each pathway was calculated using one-sided Fisher’s exact test. The overlap p-value < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Gene module analysis was conducted based on coordinated gene expression pattern from multiple disease conditions according to Chaussabel et al.63. The comparison between zebrafish TAN signatures (defined by significantly up-regulated genes against NNs) and mouse TAN microarray dataset (GSE43254) obtained from GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) was performed by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA)64. The enrichment score of the signatures was estimated by using an empirical phenotype-based permutation test and statistical significance of enrichment score was estimated by FDR < 0.25.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Figures and Tables (1.6MB, docx)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from Ministry of Education of Singapore (8).

Author Contributions

X.H., C.Y. and Z.G. conceived experiments. X.H., H.L. and C.Y. performed all experiments. Z.L., I.A., M.S. and J.L. provided materials and/or analysis tools. X.H. and Z.G. analyzed data and wrote the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-36605-8.

References

  • 1.Davis GL, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: management of an increasingly common problem. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2008;21:266–80. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2008.11928410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Matsuzaki K, et al. Chronic inflammation associated with hepatitis C virus infection perturbs hepatic transforming growth factor beta signaling, promoting cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2007;46:48–57. doi: 10.1002/hep.21672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Weber A, Boege Y, Reisinger F, Heikenwalder M. Chronic liver inflammation and hepatocellular carcinoma: persistence matters. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011;141:w13197. doi: 10.4414/smw.2011.13197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zivkovic M, et al. Oxidative burst of neutrophils against melanoma B16-F10. Cancer Lett. 2007;246:100–8. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2006.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bellocq A, et al. Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Intermediates Increase Transforming Growth Factor– β 1 Release from Human Epithelial Alveolar Cells through Two Different Mechanisms. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 1999;21:128–136. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.21.1.3379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Piccard H, Muschel RJ, Opdenakker G. On the dual roles and polarized phenotypes of neutrophils in tumor development and progression. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology. 2012;82:296–309. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chew, T. W. et al. Crosstalk of Ras and Rho: activation of RhoA abates Kras-induced liver tumorigenesis in transgenic zebrafish models. Oncogene (2013). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8.Li Z, et al. Inducible and repressable oncogene-addicted hepatocellular carcinoma in Tet-on xmrk transgenic zebrafish. J Hepatol. 2012;56:419–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li Z, et al. A transgenic zebrafish liver tumor model with inducible Myc expression reveals conserved Myc signatures with mammalian liver tumors. Dis Model Mech. 2013;6:414–23. doi: 10.1242/dmm.010462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nguyen AT, et al. An inducible kras(V12) transgenic zebrafish model for liver tumorigenesis and chemical drug screening. Dis Model Mech. 2012;5:63–72. doi: 10.1242/dmm.008367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sun L, Nguyen AT, Spitsbergen JM, Gong Z. Myc-induced liver tumors in transgenic zebrafish can regress in tp53 null mutation. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li Z, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of a transgenic zebrafish hepatocellular carcinoma model reveals a prominent role of immune responses in tumour progression and regression. Int J Cancer. 2014;135:1564–73. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yan C, Huo X, Wang S, Feng Y, Gong Z. Stimulation of hepatocarcinogenesis by neutrophils upon induction of oncogenic kras expression in transgenic zebrafish. J Hepatol. 2015;63:420–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.03.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hegedus Z, et al. Deep sequencing of the zebrafish transcriptome response to mycobacterium infection. Mol Immunol. 2009;46:2918–30. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zheng W, et al. Comparative transcriptome analyses indicate molecular homology of zebrafish swimbladder and mammalian lung. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nunoi H, et al. A heterozygous mutation of beta-actin associated with neutrophil dysfunction and recurrent infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:8693–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yang C-T, et al. Neutrophils Exert Protection in the Early Tuberculous Granuloma by Oxidative Killing of Mycobacteria Phagocytosed from Infected Macrophages. Cell host & microbe. 2012;12:301–312. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yamagoe S, et al. Expression of a neutrophil chemotactic protein LECT2 in human hepatocytes revealed by immunochemical studies using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies to a recombinant LECT2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;237:116–20. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dumortier A, Kirstetter P, Kastner P, Chan S. Ikaros regulates neutrophil differentiation. Blood. 2003;101:2219–2226. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-05-1336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lam SH, Chua HL, Gong Z, Lam TJ, Sin YM. Development and maturation of the immune system in zebrafish, Danio rerio: a gene expression profiling, in situ hybridization and immunological study. Dev Comp Immunol. 2004;28:9–28. doi: 10.1016/S0145-305X(03)00103-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu Y, et al. Mutations in proteasome subunit beta type 8 cause chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperature with evidence of genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:895–907. doi: 10.1002/art.33368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang X, Ding L, Sandford AJ. Selection of reference genes for gene expression studies in human neutrophils by real-time PCR. BMC Molecular Biology. 2005;6:4–4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-6-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Avula LR, et al. Whole-genome microarray analysis and functional characterization reveal distinct gene expression profiles and patterns in two mouse models of ileal inflammation. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:377–377. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chen X, Wen Z, Xu W, Xiong S. Granulin Exacerbates Lupus Nephritis via Enhancing Macrophage M2b Polarization. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e65542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Benson DD, et al. Gender-specific transfusion affects tumor-associated neutrophil: macrophage ratios in murine pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1560–5. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1329-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Purandhar K, Seshadri S. Age associated variations in human neutrophil and sperm functioning. Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction. 2013;2:201–208. doi: 10.1016/S2305-0500(13)60147-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kang YH, et al. ESM-1 regulates cell growth and metastatic process through activation of NF-kappaB in colorectal cancer. Cell Signal. 2012;24:1940–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.de Graaf N, et al. PA28 and the proteasome immunosubunits play a central and independent role in the production of MHC class I-binding peptides in vivo. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41:926–35. doi: 10.1002/eji.201041040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Davalieva K, et al. Proteomics analysis of urine reveals acute phase response proteins as candidate diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer. Proteome Sci. 2015;13:2. doi: 10.1186/s12953-014-0059-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shirakami Y, Sakai H, Shimizu M. Retinoid roles in blocking hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. 2015;4:222–228. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2015.05.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ma J, Malladi S, Beck AH. Systematic Analysis of Sex-Linked Molecular Alterations and Therapies in Cancer. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19119. doi: 10.1038/srep19119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kolaczkowska E, Kubes P. Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:159–175. doi: 10.1038/nri3399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Smoak K, et al. Effects of Liver X Receptor Agonist Treatment on Pulmonary Inflammation and Host Defense. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) 2008;180:3305–3312. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.5.3305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mitroulis I, Kambas K, Anyfanti P, Doumas M, Ritis K. The multivalent activity of the tissue factor-thrombin pathway in thrombotic and non-thrombotic disorders as a target for therapeutic intervention. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2011;15:75–89. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2011.532788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ohshiro K, et al. Thrombin stimulation of inflammatory breast cancer cells leads to aggressiveness via the EGFR-PAR1-Pak1 pathway. Int J Biol Markers. 2012;27:e305–13. doi: 10.5301/JBM.2012.10437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yang L, Xu L. GPR56 in cancer progression: current status and future perspective. Future Oncol. 2012;8:431–40. doi: 10.2217/fon.12.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xu L, et al. GPR56 plays varying roles in endogenous cancer progression. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2010;27:241–9. doi: 10.1007/s10585-010-9322-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang Z, et al. RARRES3 suppressed metastasis through suppression of MTDH to regulate epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer. American Journal of Cancer Research. 2015;5:1988–1999. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Casanova B, et al. The class II tumor-suppressor gene RARRES3 is expressed in B cell lymphocytic leukemias and down-regulated with disease progression. Leukemia. 2001;15:1521–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xu Y, et al. The antitumor effect of TIG3 in liver cancer cells is involved in ERK1/2 inhibition. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:11311–20. doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-4998-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhou D, et al. Exome Capture Sequencing of Adenoma Reveals Genetic Alterations in Multiple Cellular Pathways at the Early Stage of Colorectal Tumorigenesis. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e53310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gruver-Yates AL, Cidlowski JA. Tissue-Specific Actions of Glucocorticoids on Apoptosis: A Double-Edged Sword. Cells. 2013;2:202–223. doi: 10.3390/cells2020202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Volden PA, Conzen SD. The influence of glucocorticoid signaling on tumor progression. Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2013;30:S26–S31. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.10.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang M, et al. Impaired anti-inflammatory action of glucocorticoid in neutrophil from patients with steroid-resistant asthma. Respiratory Research. 2016;17:153. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0462-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fridlender ZG, et al. Transcriptomic analysis comparing tumor-associated neutrophils with granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells and normal neutrophils. PLoS One. 2012;7:e31524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.De Palma M, Lewis CE. Macrophage regulation of tumor responses to anticancer therapies. Cancer Cell. 2013;23:277–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tazzyman S, Niaz H, Murdoch C. Neutrophil-mediated tumour angiogenesis: subversion of immune responses to promote tumour growth. Semin Cancer Biol. 2013;23:149–58. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2013.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mas VR, et al. Differentially Expressed Genes between Early and Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) as a Potential Tool for Selecting Liver Transplant Recipients. Molecular Medicine. 2006;12:97–104. doi: 10.2119/2006-00032.Mas. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Stampolidis P, Ullrich A, Iacobelli S. LGALS3BP, lectin galactoside-binding soluble 3 binding protein, promotes oncogenic cellular events impeded by antibody intervention. Oncogene. 2015;34:39–52. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Liongue C, Hall CJ, O’Connell BA, Crosier P, Ward AC. Zebrafish granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor signaling promotes myelopoiesis and myeloid cell migration. Blood. 2009;113:2535–46. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-171967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yan C, Yang Q, Gong Z. Tumor-Associated Neutrophils and Macrophages Promote Gender Disparity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Zebrafish. Cancer Res. 2017;77:1395–1407. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhao Y, Huang X, Ding TW, Gong Z. Enhanced angiogenesis, hypoxia and neutrophil recruitment during Myc-induced liver tumorigenesis in zebrafish. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31952. doi: 10.1038/srep31952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kuang DM, et al. Peritumoral neutrophils link inflammatory response to disease progression by fostering angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2011;54:948–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.08.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hall C, Flores M, Storm T, Crosier K, Crosier P. The zebrafish lysozyme C promoter drives myeloid-specific expression in transgenic fish. BMC Developmental Biology. 2007;7:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-7-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lawson ND, Weinstein BM. In vivo imaging of embryonic vascular development using transgenic zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2002;248:307–18. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Martin M, et al. PP2A regulatory subunit Balpha controls endothelial contractility and vessel lumen integrity via regulation of HDAC7. Embo j. 2013;32:2491–503. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Korzh S, et al. Requirement of vasculogenesis and blood circulation in late stages of liver growth in zebrafish. BMC Dev Biol. 2008;8:84. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-8-84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Manoli, M. & Driever, W. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of fluorescently tagged cells from zebrafish larvae for RNA isolation. Cold Spring Harb Protoc2012 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 59.Zhao, Y., Huang, X., Ding, T. W. & Gong, Z. Enhanced angiogenesis, hypoxia and neutrophil recruitment during Myc-induced liver tumorigenesis in zebrafish. 6, 31952 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 60.Lam SH, et al. Conservation of gene expression signatures between zebrafish and human liver tumors and tumor progression. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:73–5. doi: 10.1038/nbt1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq – A Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 62.Anders S, et al. Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:1765–86. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Chaussabel D, et al. A modular analysis framework for blood genomics studies: application to systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunity. 2008;29:150–64. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Subramanian A, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2005;102:15545–15550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures and Tables (1.6MB, docx)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES