Skip to main content
Royal Society Open Science logoLink to Royal Society Open Science
. 2019 Jan 23;6(1):181453. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181453

Behavioural and transcriptional changes in post-mating females of an egg parasitoid wasp species

Peng-Cheng Liu 1,2, De-Jun Hao 1,2,
PMCID: PMC6366167  PMID: 30800387

Abstract

In many animals, mating is essential for the production of offspring by females; however, mating seems to not be necessary in Hymenoptera insects. Virgin females can produce offspring, although the sex of the offspring is all male. Usually, behavioural and physiological changes are induced by mating in female insects, including parasitoid wasps. However, very little is known about the resulting changes in gene expression that contribute to the post-mating response in females; thus, we studied this aspect in the egg parasitoid wasp species Anastatus disparis (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae) by transcriptional analysis. A total of 55 differentially expressed genes were identified in post-mating females, and most of the genes (90.9%) were downregulated. Upregulated genes encoded products that were mainly involved in fatty acid synthesis and pyrimidine metabolism, while the downregulated genes were mainly involved in substance transport and metabolism. In addition, post-mating A. disparis females exhibited a tendency to accelerate egg maturation and became unreceptive to further mating. Based on the transcriptional data, we discuss how specific genes mediate these behavioural and physiological changes. Overall, our study provided new and comprehensive insights into post-mating changes in females and provided a basis for future mechanistic studies.

Keywords: mating, parasitoid wasp, transcriptional analysis, post-mating behaviour

1. Background

In many animals, mating is essential for the production of offspring by females [1,2]; however, mating seems to not be necessary in Hymenoptera, in which sex determination is haplodiploid. Usually, males develop from unfertilized eggs and are haploid, while females develop from fertilized eggs and are diploid. Thus, virgin females can produce offspring, but the sex of all these offspring is male [3,4]. Mating often induces behavioural and physiological changes in female insects [5], including parasitoid wasps. Most commonly, these changes include increased oviposition behaviour and repression of subsequent sexual activity as a result of the transfer of male accessory gland substances [6]. In addition, in Hymenoptera parasitoids, virgin and mated female wasps may behave differently because of differences in the benefits and costs of mating [1]. Compared to mated females, unmated females are usually likely to exhibit reduced fitness, especially in highly structured populations, where brothers compete for mates and the reproductive return through sons is low, requiring females to minimize the number of male offspring [79]. Unmated females can increase their fitness by producing only a few small sons, sufficient for mother–son mating, to produce female offspring [10,11]. In many species, mated females produce more offspring than virgin females [1215]; however, there have been a few reports of virgin females producing more offspring than mated females [1618], and many species exhibit no significant difference [1,1923].

In addition, there have been several studies on the effect of female mating status on other aspects including superparasitism [24,25], host discrimination capacity [26], longevity [1,17,27], foraging [28] and offspring fitness [9]. Hypothetically, virgin females need to trade-off between either (1) searching for hosts and producing sons immediately or (2) searching for mates and perhaps producing both sons and daughters later in life [13,16,28,29]. Generally, studies on the difference between virgin and mated female parasitoid wasps have focused on behaviour and demographic parameters. However, very little is known about the resulting changes in gene expression in females that contribute to the post-mating response. Thus, we attempted to study the changes in gene expression in post-mating females in the egg parasitoid wasp species Anastatus disparis (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae) by transcriptomic analysis.

Anastatus disparis is an egg parasitoid of several harmful species of Lepidoptera that are primarily considered forest pests in China [30]. In previous studies, A. disparis is considered a potential biological control agent for Lymantria dispar which is an important defoliator of broad-leaved and coniferous trees [3032]. As with other parasitoids, the sex determination of A. disparis is haplodiploid; both virgin and mated females can produce several hundred offspring in a lifetime and live for more than a month in the wild [23,30]. In terms of oviposition and longevity, there are no significant differences between virgin and mated A. disparis females [23,30]. Here, we also focused on other reproductive aspects of changes induced by mating in A. disparis females (e.g. mating ability and egg load). Besides identifying changes in gene expression prompted by mating, our study attempted to provide new and comprehensive insights into post-mating changes in females and provide a basis for future mechanistic studies.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Insect cultures

Anastatus disparis colonies were first established from a population reared on an L. dispar egg mass collected in Longhua County, Hebei Province (41°31′ N, 117°74′ E) in March 2012, and the colony was subsequently maintained on Antheraea pernyi eggs. Antheraea pernyi is of commercial interest due to the use of its pupae in silk production. Pupae of A. pernyi were purchased from Qinhuangdao, Hebei Province, China. Adult A. pernyi emerged from the pupae at 25–30°C. Eggs of A. pernyi were obtained by dissecting adult female abdomens and maintained at 0°C [25,33]. Approximately 20 hosts were offered to a female for oviposition lasting 24 h at 26–28°C. Then, we isolated the hosts individually in polyethylene tubes (height: 7.5 cm; diameter: 1 cm) whose openings were covered with cotton balls to prevent any mating behaviour before the start of the experiment. The parasitized hosts were incubated at a temperature of 28 ± 0.5°C, a relative humidity of 70 ± 5% and a photoperiod of 14 L : 10 D. After approximately 18 days [23], females and males started to emerge and were collected daily. Before the experiment began, the adult wasps were fed honey water (honey : water = 4 : 6) on cotton balls [30,33].

2.2. Transcriptomic analyses

For the transcriptomic experiment, 2-day-old virgin and 2-day-old mated female adults were selected. Each treatment included three replicates, and each replicate included 15 adults (virgin or mated females). Similar to Anastatus sp. [30], most A. disparis adults emerge daily in the morning, especially from 9.00 to 10.00. These virgin females were collected during this period, then divided into two groups. One group of females was maintained in a virgin condition, while each female from the other group was offered one new emerged male, and the mated females who mated within 2 h were selected. At 12.00 on day 2, the whole bodies of adults in the same treatment were pooled into a plastic tube (1.5 ml), snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and transferred to a −80°C freezer for long-term storage. RNA from each sample group was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA). A total of 3 µg of total RNA from each sample was converted into cDNA using the NEBNext® Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, USA). In total, six cDNA libraries were constructed and subsequently sequenced with the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform by Beijing Biomarker Technologies Co. Ltd, yielding raw reads. Raw sequence data generated were deposited into Sequence Read Archive database of NCBI with the accession no. PRJNA505044. Clean reads were obtained by removing reads containing the adapter sequence, poly-N reads and low-quality reads from the raw data using FASTX-Toolkit (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/), and these clean reads were used for further analysis. Then, all the high-quality reads from the six samples were pooled and assembled using Trinity software (v. 2.5.1) with the default parameters [34]. A tool of TransRate was used in our study to evaluate the transcriptome assembly [35]. We chose the longest isoform of each gene to construct the unigene set. After the isoforms were selected, these assembled transcripts were predicted to be the unigenes produced. Bowtie was used to align reads to unigenes [36], then identified putatively expressed genes by RSEM [37] using the reads per kb per million reads (RPKM) method. For functional annotation, the pooled assembled unigenes were searched using BLASTX (v. 2.2.31) against five public databases, namely, Swiss-Prot, euKaryotic Orthologous Groups (KOG), NCBI non-redundant protein sequences (nr), KEGG Ortholog database (KO) and Gene Ontology (GO), with an E-value cut-off of 10−5. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were indentified using DESeq2 package (v. 1.6.3) in R, and incorporate RSEM reads into DESeq2 using tximport [38]. Genes with at least a two-fold change (FC) (i.e. log2|FC| greater than or equal to 1) and a false discovery rate (FDR) less than 0.01 were considered to be differentially expressed. The GOseq R package [39] was used to implement the statistical enrichment of DEGs in the GO database, and an adjusted p-value < 0.05 was chosen as the significance cut-off.

2.3. Mating

All adults were collected from 9.00 to 11.00 every day. Then, a virgin female (1-day-old) was supplied with a newly emerged virgin male in a Petri dish (height: 1.5 cm; diameter: 8 cm) at an environmental temperature of 26 ± 1°C. We recorded whether and when the female exhibited mating behaviour over a period of 60 min. If multiple matings occurred in this period, we also recorded the mating times. Then, the mated females were selected and removed and then offered another newly emerged male for 60 min, and the condition of mating (e.g. whether and when mating behaviour was exhibited, and mating times) was examined. Additionally, females that mated on the first day were fed honey water (honey : water = 4 : 6) on cotton balls. On days 2, 3, 4 and 5 at 11.00, these females were supplied with newly emerged males to examine mating. As a control, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-day-old virgins were also tested.

2.4. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Mating generally causes changes in attractiveness, that is correlated with pheromone levels [40,41]. Many studies of lepidopteran species [42] and other insect orders [43,44] have shown that pheromone biosynthesis in females is stimulated by a brain factor known as pheromone biosynthesis-activating neuropeptide (PBAN). Therefore, we aimed to test whether a change in pheromone may result in mated females becoming less attractive by evaluating the mRNA expression of PBAN between mated female and virgin through quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis. Total RNA was extracted from the whole bodies of mated female and virgin female adults using TRIzol (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocols, and then resuspended in nuclease-free water; finally, the RNA concentration was measured using a Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific Nanodrop 2000; USA). Approximately 0.5 mg of total RNA was used as a template to synthesize the first-strand cDNA using a PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa; Japan) following the manufacturer's protocols. The resultant cDNA was diluted to 0.1 mg ml−1 for further qRT-PCR analysis (ABI StepOne Plus; USA) using SYBR Green Real-Time PCR Master Mix (TaKaRa; Japan). qRT-PCR reaction was amplified with 2 µl of cDNA template, 10 µl of 2×SYBR Green Master Mix and 0.4 µl of each primer (10 µmol µl−1), to a final volume of 20 µl by adding water. The cycling parameters were 95°C for 30 s followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 62°C for 34 s, ending with a melting curve analysis (65°C to 95°C in increments of 0.5°C every 5 s) to check for nonspecific product amplification. Relative gene expression was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method using the housekeeping gene translation elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1A) as a reference to eliminate sample-to-sample variations in the initial cDNA samples. Primers (table 1) for PBAN and EF1A gene were designed using Primer Express 2.0 software.

Table 1.

Primer pairs used for expression analysis using qRT-PCR.

gene name primer sequences
PBAN forward: 5′-CGAAGCTCCGATGTTGAAGG-3′
reverse: 5′-AGTCTTGGACCGAACCACAT-3′
EF1A forward: 5′-ACCACGAAGCTCTCCAAGAA-3′
reverse: 5′-AATCTGCAGCACCCTTAGGT-3′

2.5. Egg load determination

Unmated A. disparis females and females mated with conspecific males were dissected at ages ranging from 1 to 5 days for determination of egg loads. Egg loads were measured in terms of the number of mature eggs in the ovaries [45]. Unmated individuals that emerged each day from 9.00 to 11.00. were collected. To obtain mated females, newly emerged males were supplied to a virgin female (1-day-old) for mating, and mating behaviour was observed. All female adults were fed honey water (honey : water = 4 : 6) until dissection. The selected adults were subjected to sudden death at −80°C, and then the abdomens were placed into a Petri dish with a saline solution. We counted the number of mature eggs by dissecting the abdomens using forceps under a microscope (Leica M205A, Germany). In total, 15 replicates were performed for each treatment.

2.6. Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using R software, version 2.14.1. The chi-square test was used to determine the effects of female age on the rate of mating. Prior to analysis, the raw data were tested for normality and homogeneity of variance with Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Levene's tests, respectively, and the data were transformed if necessary. The q-PCR data comparing gene expression in mated females and virgin were analysed with an independent t-test. In addition, a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was applied to test for the effects of mating status and female age on egg loads. For the analysis of GLMM, we used the lme4 package [46]. Egg loads were measured as response variables, with mating status and female age as fixed effects. Interactions are presented only where significant at a level of p < 0.01; this criterion for significance is recommended when testing interactions [47]. The positive/negative relationship between maternal age and egg load numbers was tested by correlation analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Transcriptomic analyses

We constructed six cDNA libraries derived from three A. disparis mated female and virgin adult samples. Approximately 8.57 Gb of paired-end reads were produced for each RNAseq sample. After removing reads containing adapter sequences, poly-N reads and low-quality reads from the raw data, approximately 7.17 Gb of clean reads were obtained from each sample. The percentages of Q30 were higher than 93.62% in each sample, which showed that sequencing of each sample was of high quality.

All high-quality reads from the six samples were pooled and assembled using Trinity with the default parameters, and the TransRate score of our assembly was 0.19 (optimized score of 0.23). A total of 132 543 transcripts with lengths longer than 300 bp were generated. More than half of the transcripts (73,211, 55.23%) were longer than 1 kb in length, whereas 44.76% (13 951) were between 300 and 1000 bp in length, and the N50 size was 5020 bp. Then, these assembled transcripts were predicted to be produced from a total of 57 152 unigenes. The N50 size of the unigenes was approximately 1935 bp, and their mean length was 1044.11 bp. 49.61% unigenes were between 300 and 500 bp in length, and half were longer than 500 bp (electronic supplementary material, table S1).

For annotation, the pooled assembled unigenes were searched using BLASTX against five public databases with an E-value cut-off of 10−5. A total of 28 174 unigenes were successfully annotated (table 2). Using our assembled transcriptome as a reference, we identified putatively expressed genes using the RPKM method, and genes with at least a two-FC and FDR less than 0.01 were defined as DEGs. Consequently, 55 DEGs were identified, including 5 upregulated and 50 downregulated genes in mated females (table 3). As shown in table 2, 12 genes were found in the GO database, 19 in KOG, 44 in nr, 25 in Swiss-Prot and 7 in KEGG. The upregulated genes after mating included those that encoded products that were mainly involved in fatty acid synthesis and pyrimidine metabolism. Downregulated genes were mainly involved in substance transport and metabolism (e.g. amino acids, carbohydrates and lipids).

Table 2.

Functional annotation of assembled unigenes and differentially expressed genes (DEGs).

annotation database annotated unigenes number of DEGs
KOG 16 948 19
GO 6481 12
KEGG 9500 7
Swiss-Prot 12 427 25
nr 21 919 44
total 28 174 55

Table 3.

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between virgin and mated females. Sign: FDR, false discovery rate; log2FC, log2 fold change.

number gene ID FDR log2FC GO KOG Swiss-Prot nr KEGG_pathway
1 c40539.graph_c0 1.44E−17 1.33 amino acid transport and metabolism beta-ureidopropionase OS = Dictyostelium discoideum GN = pyd3 PE = 1 SV = 1 predicted: beta-ureidopropionase-like [Nasonia vitripennis] pyrimidine metabolism (ko00240); beta-alanine metabolism (ko00410); pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis (ko00770); drug metabolism—other enzymes (ko00983)
2 c40539.graph_c1 4.04E−12 1.09 biological process: nitrogen compound metabolic process (GO:0006807); molecular function: hydrolase activity, acting on carbon-nitrogen (but not peptide) bonds (GO:0016810) amino acid transport and metabolism beta-ureidopropionase OS = Dictyostelium discoideum GN = pyd3 PE = 1 SV = 1 predicted: beta-ureidopropionase-like [Nasonia vitripennis] pyrimidine metabolism (ko00240); beta-alanine metabolism (ko00410); pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis (ko00770); drug metabolism—other enzymes (ko00983)
3 c47555.graph_c0 5.59E−06 1.27 predicted: titin isoform X3 [Nasonia vitripennis]
4 c48536.graph_c0 0.001191 1.76 molecular function: catalytic activity (GO:0003824) fatty acid synthase [Bombyx mori]
5 c47989.graph_c4 0.00995 1.34 probable cytochrome P450 4p2 OS = Drosophila melanogaster GN = Cyp4p2 PE = 2 SV = 1 predicted: cytochrome P450 4C1-like isoform X1 [Nasonia vitripennis]
6 c22148.graph_c0 2.39E−09 −5.20 ejaculatory bulb-specific protein 3 OS = Drosophila melanogaster GN = EbpIII PE = 2 SV = 2 predicted: ejaculatory bulb-specific protein 3-like [Polistes dominula]
7 c44788.graph_c0 3.28E−09 −1.08 molecular function: catalytic activity (GO:0003824); biological process: single-organism metabolic process (GO:0044710) amino acid transport and metabolism predicted: sarcosine dehydrogenase, mitochondrial [Nasonia vitripennis]
8 c46224.graph_c3 5.43E−08 −1.13 translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis excitatory amino acid transporter OS = Caenorhabditis elegans GN = glt-1 PE = 1 SV = 2 predicted: tRNA (adenine(58)-N(1))-methyltransferase non-catalytic subunit TRM6 [Ceratosolen solmsi marchali]
9 c30533.graph_c0 2.77E−07 −1.06
10 c37608.graph_c0 5.50E−07 −2.51
11 c32071.graph_c0 9.79E−07 −1.11 predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC105363533 [Ceratosolen solmsi marchali]
12 c33559.graph_c1 1.04E−06 −5.93 putative UDP-glucuronosyltransferase ugt-47 OS = Caenorhabditis elegans GN = ugt-47 PE = 1 SV = 2 predicted: UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A1-like [Nasonia vitripennis]
13 c43661.graph_c0 7.82E−06 −1.78 predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC100680050 isoform X1 [Nasonia vitripennis]
14 c46098.graph_c0 9.06E−06 −1.14 molecular function: DNA binding (GO:0003677); oxidoreductase activity (GO:0016491); cellular component: nucleus (GO:0005634); biological process: transcription initiation from RNA polymerase II promoter (GO:0006367); positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated (GO:0045893); oxidation–reduction process (GO:0055114) amino acid transport and metabolism probable saccharopine dehydrogenase [NADP(+), l-glutamate-forming] OS = Dictyostelium discoideum GN = sdh PE = 2 SV = 1 predicted: alpha-aminoadipic semialdehyde synthase, mitochondrial isoform X1 [Nasonia vitripennis] lysine degradation (ko00310)
15 c38071.graph_c0 9.06E−06 −1.40 predicted: RNA polymerase II degradation factor 1-like [Trachymyrmex septentrionalis]
16 c43170.graph_c1 9.08E−06 −1.26 molecular function: phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (GTP) activity (GO:0004613); kinase activity (GO:0016301); GTP binding (GO:0005525); biological process: gluconeogenesis (GO:0006094); phosphorylation (GO:0016310) energy production and conversion phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase [GTP] OS = Drosophila melanogaster GN = Pepck PE = 2 SV = 2 predicted: phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase [GTP]-like [Nasonia vitripennis] glycolysis/gluconeogenesis (ko00010); citrate cycle (TCA cycle) (ko00020); pyruvate metabolism (ko00620); FoxO signalling pathway (ko04068)
17 c49157.graph_c0 1.45E−05 −1.22
18 c38677.graph_c0 2.95E−05 −4.45 general function prediction only glucose dehydrogenase [FAD, quinone] OS = Drosophila pseudoobscura pseudoobscura GN = Gld PE = 3 SV = 4 predicted: glucose dehydrogenase [FAD, quinone]-like [Nasonia vitripennis]
19 c28240.graph_c0 3.40E−05 −5.47 ejaculatory bulb-specific protein 3 OS = Drosophila melanogaster GN = EbpIII PE = 2 SV = 2 predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC100113667 [Nasonia vitripennis]
20 c48156.graph_c5 0.000103 −1.37
21 c40480.graph_c0 0.000118 −1.93 lipid transport and metabolism retinol-binding protein pinta OS = Drosophila melanogaster GN = pinta PE = 2 SV = 1 predicted: alpha-tocopherol transfer protein-like [Copidosoma floridanum]
22 c47339.graph_c0 0.000149 −1.81 predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC100122494 [Nasonia vitripennis]
23 c46393.graph_c7 0.000169 −1.38 molecular function: phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C activity (GO:0004435); signal transducer activity (GO:0004871); guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor activity (GO:0005085); calcium ion binding (GO:0005509); cellular component: intracellular (GO:0005622); biological process: lipid metabolic process (GO:0006629); small GTPase mediated signal transduction (GO:0007264) 1-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase epsilon-1 OS = Caenorhabditis elegans GN = plc-1 PE = 1 SV = 1 predicted: 1-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase epsilon-1-like [Nasonia vitripennis] inositol phosphate metabolism (ko00562); phosphatidylinositol signalling system (ko04070); AGE-RAGE signalling pathway in diabetic complications (ko04933)
24 c30180.graph_c0 0.000325 −1.41 venom protein N precursor [Nasonia vitripennis]
25 c37769.graph_c0 0.000522 −1.58 carbohydrate transport and metabolism putative inorganic phosphate cotransporter OS = Drosophila ananassae GN = Picot PE = 3 SV = 1 predicted: sialin-like [Ceratosolen solmsi marchali]
26 c38035.graph_c1 0.000522 −2.21 predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC100113667 [Nasonia vitripennis]
27 c41154.graph_c0 0.000699 −5.36 predicted: general odorant-binding protein 56d [Nasonia vitripennis]
28 c32591.graph_c0 0.000883 −1.38 general function prediction only opsin, blue-sensitive OS = Apis mellifera GN = BLOP PE = 1 SV = 2 predicted: opsin, blue-sensitive [Nasonia vitripennis]
29 c49861.graph_c0 0.000883 -Inf molecular function: oxidoreductase activity, acting on CH-OH group of donors (GO:0016614); biological process: single-organism metabolic process (GO:0044710) general function prediction only glucose dehydrogenase [FAD, quinone] OS = Drosophila pseudoobscura pseudoobscura GN = Gld PE = 3 SV = 4 predicted: glucose dehydrogenase [FAD, quinone]-like [Trichogramma pretiosum]
30 c43486.graph_c0 0.00102 −3.61 amino acid transport and metabolism chymotrypsin-2 OS = Vespa crabro PE = 1 SV = 1 serine protease 137 precursor [Nasonia vitripennis]
31 c44805.graph_c0 0.0011 −1.23 predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC100122494 [Nasonia vitripennis]
32 c48890.graph_c0 0.00117 −1.03 amino acid transport and metabolism chymotrypsin-2 OS = Vespa crabro PE = 1 SV = 1 predicted: chymotrypsin-2-like [Copidosoma floridanum] neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction (ko04080)
33 c30678.graph_c0 0.00128 −6.30 general function prediction only venom carboxylesterase-6 OS = Apis mellifera PE = 2 SV = 1 carboxylesterase clade B, member 6 precursor [Nasonia vitripennis]
34 c22369.graph_c0 0.0013 −1.17 predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC100115024 [Nasonia vitripennis]
35 c45559.graph_c0 0.00173 −1.02 arylphorin subunit alpha OS = Manduca sexta PE = 2 SV = 1 predicted: hexamerin 70b isoform X1 [Nasonia vitripennis]
36 c29056.graph_c0 0.00179 −1.31 predicted: pheromone-binding protein Gp-9 [Nasonia vitripennis]
37 c21285.graph_c0 0.00185 −6.30 molecular function: odorant binding (GO:0005549) general odorant-binding protein 83a OS = Drosophila melanogaster GN = Obp83a PE = 1 SV = 1 predicted: general odorant-binding protein 69a [Nasonia vitripennis]
38 c34718.graph_c0 0.00195 −2.09
39 c41422.graph_c0 0.00214 −1.32 cellular component: integral component of membrane (GO:0016021); molecular function: transmembrane transporter activity (GO:0022857); biological process: transmembrane transport (GO:0055085) general function prediction only carcinine transporter OS = Drosophila melanogaster GN = CarT PE = 2 SV = 1 predicted: carcinine transporter isoform X1 [Ceratina calcarata]
40 c33252.graph_c0 0.00234 −1.39 predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC106647010 [Copidosoma floridanum]
41 c37607.graph_c0 0.00234 −1.18
42 c48570.graph_c2 0.00246 −1.03
43 c47166.graph_c0 0.00247 −1.37 lipid transport and metabolism 1-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase OS = Drosophila melanogaster GN = norpA PE = 1 SV = 4 predicted: 1-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase-like [Nasonia vitripennis]
44 c43794.graph_c0 0.00314 −1.43 molecular function: hydrolase activity, hydrolyzing O-glycosyl compounds (GO:0004553); biological process: chitin metabolic process (GO:0006030) carbohydrate transport and metabolism probable chitinase 2 OS = Drosophila melanogaster GN = Cht2 PE = 1 SV = 1 predicted: chitotriosidase-1-like isoform X1 [Nasonia vitripennis] amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism (ko00520)
45 c44018.graph_c0 0.00318 −1.41
46 c48776.graph_c0 0.00319 −1.94
47 c46454.graph_c0 0.00328 −1.37 predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC108766667 [Trachymyrmex cornetzi]
48 c40631.graph_c0 0.00468 −1.06 predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC100680146 [Nasonia vitripennis]
49 c44319.graph_c1 0.00702 −1.24 general function prediction only rhodopsin OS = Camponotus atriceps PE = 2 SV = 1 predicted: rhodopsin-like [Nasonia vitripennis]
50 c35460.graph_c0 0.00749 −1.22
51 c49077.graph_c0 0.00803 −1.58 predicted: serine protease inhibitor 3-like isoform X2 [Bombus impatiens]
52 c42015.graph_c0 0.00885 −1.49 biological process: intracellular signal transduction (GO:0035556) predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC100678008 [Nasonia vitripennis]
53 c46871.graph_c1 0.00928 −1.31
54 c21488.graph_c0 0.00948 −1.37 cellular component: extracellular region (GO:0005576); biological process: chitin metabolic process (GO:0006030); molecular function: chitin binding (GO:0008061) predicted: uncharacterized protein LOC100120615 [Nasonia vitripennis]
55 c41137.graph_c0 0.00995 −2.29 signal transduction mechanisms probable serine/threonine-protein kinase DDB_G0270146 OS = Dictyostelium discoideum GN = DDB_G0270146 PE = 3 SV = 1 predicted: dual specificity protein kinase shkE-like [Trichogramma pretiosum]

In the GO enrichment analyses, subcategories were enriched among the downregulated genes in mated females, mainly involved in chitin metabolism (GO: 0006030; p = 0.005), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase activity (GO:0004613; p = 0.048) and positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated (GO:0045893; p = 0.048). Subcategories of hydrolase activity, acting on carbon–nitrogen (but not peptide) bonds (GO:0016810; p = 0.01) and nitrogen compound metabolic processes (GO:0006807; p = 0.004) were enriched among the upregulated genes in mated females.

3.2. Mating

When males were offered to virgins ranging from 1 to 5 days in age, approximately 80.42% of the virgins exhibited successful mating, which was not significantly affected by age (χ2 = 1.55, d.f. = 4, p > 0.05). Most of the mating behaviour occurred 10 min after a male was offered. After a virgin female mated with a male, she was not observed to mate again with the same male or another male. With increasing age, the mated females also ceased to exhibit mating behaviour (figure 1). Additionally, we observed that males still fan and run towards mated females as they do virgin females.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Mating capacity of mated and virgin females with different ages. Mating capacity was measured by the proportion of females successfully completed mating with male during 60 min.

The expression of the PBAN gene determined through qRT-PCR and RNASeq was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt and RPKM methods, respectively. Results showed that the expression of the PBAN gene was not significantly different between virgin and mated females (figure 2a: qRT-PCR, t = −0.71, d.f.1 = 1, d.f.2 = 7, p > 0.05; figure 2b: RPKM, FDR = 0.9997, log2FC = −10.0308).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Expression of PBAN genes from qRT-PCR and RNASeq. (a) The expression of PBAN genes determined through qRT-PCR was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method using the housekeeping gene EF1A as a reference to eliminate sample-to-sample variations in the initial cDNA samples. (b) The expression of PBAN genes determined through RNASeq was identified by the RPKM method.

3.3. Effect of mating status on egg loading

After female eclosion, few mature eggs (virgin females: 3.97 ± 0.4; mated females: 4.52 ± 0.4) were observed in the ovaries. The number of mature eggs in virgin and mated females showed an increasing tendency with individual age (virgin females: R2 = 0.465, p = 0.000; mated females: R2 = 0.436, p = 0.000). The result of GLMM analysis showed that the number of mature eggs in the females was significantly influenced by individual age (F = 20.28, d.f.1 = 4, d.f.2 = 268, p = 0.000), and mated females loaded significantly more mature eggs than virgin females (F = 8.69, d.f.1 = 1, d.f.2 = 270, p = 0.003; figure 3). At day 5, the mature egg counts of the mated females (10.77 ± 0.82) and virgins (10.29 ± 1.26) were not significantly different (p > 0.05).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Mean egg loads (±SEs) over time of mated and unmated Anastatus disparis females. Egg loads were measured in terms of the number of mature eggs in the ovaries. And the age of measured females ranged from 1 to 5 days old.

4. Discussion

Mating often induces behavioural and physiological changes in female insects [5]. In the egg parasitoid wasp A. disparis, post-mating females become unattractive and exhibit accelerated egg maturation (figures 1 and 3), which is accompanied by substantial changes in gene expression (table 3). A total of 55 DEGs were identified in post-mating females, and most (90.9%) of the DEGs were downregulated. Overall, the changes in gene expression prompted by mating observed in our study provide insight and useful information to improve comprehension of behavioural and physiological changes, which are discussed below.

With respect to the mode of egg production, parasitoids can be classified as pro-ovigenic or synovigenic. Pro-ovigenic species mature all or most of their lifetime complement of eggs prior to emergence from hosts, whereas synovigenic species emerge with very few or no mature eggs and have to mature the eggs as they age [48,49]. Therefore, A. disparis is thought to be a synovigenic species in which the number of eggs per day (figure 3, max. = 15) is significantly less than the lifetime fecundity of hundreds [23], and the number of mature eggs increases with female age. In addition, we found that as female age increased, the egg loads in mated females increased more rapidly than those in virgin females (figure 3). Gillott & Friedel [50] and Wheeler [51] reviewed ‘fecundity-enhancing substances' in addition to sperm that are transferred by male insects during mating and that stimulate oogenesis, egg maturation and oviposition. Our transcriptional data indicate that increased egg loads in mated females are associated with high expression of the fatty acid synthase (FASN) gene, which encodes the enzyme catalysing fatty acid synthesis [5254] and is upregulated in mated females (table 3). FAS expression has been demonstrated to be related to fecundity in insects; in Nilaparvata lugens, when FAS expression decreased, female weights, ovarian total lipids and the number of oviposited eggs also significantly decreased [55]. A similar finding showed that FAS silencing suppressed fatty acid biosynthesis and decreased fecundity in the mosquito Aedes aegypti [56]. In addition, increased egg production in mated females might require that females allocate resources away from somatic maintenance and invest resources in reproductive processes [57], which may suggest that many genes related to metabolism exhibit changes after female mating according to our transcriptional data. For example, there were two upregulated genes involved in pyrimidine metabolism (c40539.graph_c0, c40539.graph_c1). While most of the genes were involved in the metabolism of lipids, carbohydrates and amino acids (e.g. c47166.graph_c0; c43794.graph_c0; c49861.graph_c0; c21488.graph_c0; c46393.graph_c7; c44788.graph_c0; table 3), hexamerin (c45559.graph_c0) was also downregulated, which may reflect a trade-off between reproductive and nonreproductive processes [58], likely because egg production is energetically costly and females shift from nutrient storage to utilization as their stores are depleted [59].

Polyandrous females can gain direct and indirect benefits [6064]. Similar to many parasitoid wasp species (reviewed by Ridley [65]), the A. disparis females in this study also exhibited the characteristics of monandry, in which post-mating females rejected subsequent mating (figure 1). As male A. disparis mate only once, they can supply females with sufficient sperm for subsequent reproduction [23]; thus, females may refuse to mate multiple times to avoid wasting time and energy. Several studies have shown that females of some parasitoid species may re-mate if they have mated with sperm-depleted males [16,66], which will be studied further. Furthermore, during copulation, males can transfer certain chemicals with the spermatozoa [67,68], which may include toxic compounds, such as those found in Drosophila fruit flies [69], the bruchid Acanthoscelides obtectus [70] and the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans [71]. Other negative effects of multiple mating include concomitant increased vulnerability to predation, sexual diseases, parasites and pathogens [72,73]. A cytochrome P450 gene (c47989.graph_c4) was found to be upregulated by mating in females, which may be involved in detoxification [74]. In addition, the post-mating expression levels of four protease genes change, among which predicted serine protease genes (c43486.graph_c0) and a chymotrypsin gene (c48890.graph_c0) were downregulated after mating. Induced proteases in virgin female could protect females from harmful proteins introduced during mating [58]. Females receive sperm from their mates, then maintain the sperm in storage organs to await opportunities for fertilization. A serine protease inhibitor (c49077.graph_c0) was downregulated after mating, which may play a role in protecting sperm from degradation or expose sperm surface proteins needed for storage or fertilization [58].

Females may cease to attract males after mating resulting in mating only once [75]. It has been shown that mating generally causes changes in attractiveness in many species of moths and parasitoids, which are correlated with pheromone levels [41,77,76]. However, as shown in Spalangia endius [78], we observed that males fan and run towards mated females, and our q-PCR results (figure 2a) and transcriptional analyses (figure 2b) showed that expression of the PBAN gene was not significantly different between virgin and mated females. This finding suggested that because the production of attractants may not cease or decrease after mating, mating might not cause changes in the attractiveness of females to males, and the mating of A. disparis females only once may therefore be unlikely to be caused by lower attractiveness of mated females (also see Cotesia flavipes [79]). Besides, odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) are a class of olfactory proteins and are thought to aid in the capture and transport of odorants and pheromones to receptors [80]. In fruit flies, OBP expression levels in females changed significantly after mating [81], and ectopic expression of Obp99b in female fat body tissue led to reduced receptivity and mating success [82]. Our transcriptome data showed that a total of three annotated genes associated with OBPs were downregulated in A. disparis females after mating (table 3; c41154.graph_c0; c29056.graph_c0; c21285.graph_c0), which may explain why mated females become unreceptive to further mating. In addition, our transcriptional data also showed that four genes (c40480.graph_c0; c41422.graph_c0; c44319.graph_c1; c32591.graph_c0) that are expressed in the adult eye or are known to function in visual transduction (including opsin, rhodopsin and carcinine transporter [59,83]; table 3) were downregulated after mating (see also the honeybee and Apis florae [84,85]). Altered expression of vision genes could impact a female's response to other females or males [83]. Therefore, the downregulation of vision-related genes after mating in our species may also influence the re-mating behaviour of females. Rather than a change in female pheromone related attractive, our results suggested that decreased visual and odorant-binding abilities also resulted in mated females becoming unreceptive and refusing to mate again.

In addition, as shown in other studies [58,59], other genes in our study, for example, involved in chitin metabolism (c43794.graph_c0; c21488.graph_c0), signal transduction (c41137.graph_c0; c42015.graph_c0), that exhibit ectopic expression after mating involved in post-mating behavioural and physiological responses, while those with unknown or unclear function require further study. By identifying changes in gene expression prompted by mating, our study provided new insights into changes in behavioural and physiological aspects. Simultaneously, this dataset provides a basis for future mechanistic studies examining how specific genes mediate behavioural and physiological changes in females post-mating. Additionally, understanding how these changes in gene expression orchestrate the post-mating response in this species may provide insight into the reproductive behaviour of more complex animals.

Supplementary Material

Statistics of transcriptome assembly and predicted unigenes
rsos181453supp1.docx (12.7KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge undergraduates Ju Luo, Min Li and Chenxi Zhao of the Nanjing Forestry University for their assistance.

Ethics

There was no requirement to seek ethical approval to carry out the work described above. However, the use of insects in the above experiments was kept to a minimum.

Data accessibility

The datasets supporting this article have been uploaded as part of the electronic supplementary material. All raw sequence data files are available from the Sequence Read Archive database (accession no. PRJNA505044).

Authors' contributions

P.-C.L. conceived and performed the experiments and wrote the paper. P.-C.L. and D.-J.H. reviewed the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

A project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD). This work was also supported by the Doctorate Fellowship Foundation of Nanjing Forestry University, and National Science Foundation of China (31870639).

References

  • 1.King BH. 2002. Breeding strategies in females of the parasitoid wasp Spalangia endius: effects of mating status and size. J. Insect Behav. 15, 181–193. ( 10.1023/a:1015432900180) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shukla S, Shilpa MC, Gadagkar R. 2013. Virgin wasps develop ovaries on par with mated females, but lay fewer eggs. Insect. Soc. 60, 345–350. ( 10.1007/s00040-013-0299-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cook JM. 1993. Sex determination in the Hymenoptera: a review of models and evidence. Heredity 71, 421–435. ( 10.1038/hdy.1993.157) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Heimpel GE, de Boer JG.. 2008. Sex determination in the Hymenoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 53, 209–230. ( 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093441) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yeh C, Klowden MJ. 1990. Effects of male accessory gland substances on the pre-oviposition behaviour of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. J. Insect Physiol. 36, 799–803. ( 10.1016/0022-1910(90)90165-C) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen PS. 1984. The functional morphology and biochemistry of insect male accessory glands and their secretions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 29, 233–255. ( 10.1146/annurev.en.29.010184.001313) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.West SA, Herre EA. 1998. Partial local mate competition and the sex ratio: a study on non-pollinating fig wasps. J. Evol. Biol. 11, 531–548. ( 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1998.11050531.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hardy ICW, Godfray HCJ. 1990. Estimating the frequency of constrained sex allocation in field populations of Hymenoptera. Behaviour 114, 137–147. ( 10.1163/156853990X00086) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gottlieb D, Lubin Y, Harari AR. 2014. The effect of female mating status on male offspring traits. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 68, 701–710. ( 10.1007/s00265-014-1683-1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Adamson M, Ludwig D. 1993. Oedipal mating as a factor in sex allocation in haplodiploids. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 341, 195–202. ( 10.1098/rstb.1993.0103) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abe J, Innocent TM, Reece SE, West SA. 2010. Virginity and the clutch size behavior of a parasitoid wasp where mothers mate their sons. Behav. Ecol. 21, 730–738. ( 10.1093/beheco/arq046) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nong L, Sailer RI. 1986. Arrhenotokous reproduction of Pediobius foveolatus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79, 737–741. ( 10.1093/aesa/79.4.737) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Godfray HCJ, Hardy ICW. 1993. Sex ratio and virginity in haplodiploid insects. In Evolution and diversity of sex ratio in insects and mites (eds Wrench DL, Ebbert MA), pp. 402–417. London, UK: Chapman & Hall. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Michaud JP. 1994. Differences in foraging behaviour between virgin and mated aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Can. J. Zool. 72, 1597–1602. ( 10.1139/z94-212) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Edwards OR, Hoy MA. 1998. Biology of Ageniaspis citricola (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), a parasitoid of the Leafminer Phyllocnistis dtrella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 91, 654–660. ( 10.1093/aesa/91.5.654) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Godfray HCJ. 1994. Parasitoids. Behavioral and evolutionary ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Carpenter JE. 1995. Ichneumon promissorius (Erichson) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): factors affecting fecundity, oviposition, and longevity. J. Entomol. Sci. 30, 279–286. ( 10.18474/0749-8004-30.2.279) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nishimura K. 1997. Host selection by virgin and inseminated females of the parasitic wasp, Dinarmus basalis (Pteromalidae, Hymenoptera). Funct. Ecol. 11, 336–341. ( 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1997.00092.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sandlan K. 1979. Sex ratio regulation in Coccygomimus turionella Linnaeus (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) and its ecological implications. Ecol. Entomol. 4, 365–378. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1979.tb00596.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Collins RD, Grafius E. 1986. Biology and life cycle of Anaphes sordidatus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), an egg parasitoid of the carrot weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Environ. Entomol. 15, 100–105. ( 10.1093/ee/15.1.100) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.King BH. 1988. Sex-ratio manipulation in response to host size by the parasitoid wasp Spalangia cameroni: a laboratory study. Evolution 42, 1190–1198. ( 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb04179.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Petitt FL, Wietlisbach DO. 1993. Effects of host instar and size on parasitization efficiency and life history parameters of Opius dissitus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 66, 227–236. ( 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1993.tb00713.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu PC, Wei JR, Wang JJ, Liu JX, Dong LJ. 2015. Relationship between the environmental temperatures and development of Anastatus disparis (Ruschka) (Hymenoptera: Eupelmidae) and the sex ratio control of the offspring. For. Pest. Dis. 34, 9–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Michaud JP, Mackauer M. 1995. The oviposition behavior of Monoctonus paulensis (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae): factors influencing reproductive allocation to hosts and host patches. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 88, 220–226. ( 10.1093/aesa/88.2.220) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu PC, Luo J, Tian S, Wen SY, Wei JR, Hao DJ. 2018. Facultative production of multiple-egg clutches in a quasi-gregarious parasitoid: fitness gains for offspring at low developmental temperature. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 72, 39 ( 10.1007/s00265-018-2458-x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Darrouzet E, Bignon L, Chevrier C. 2007. Impact of mating status on egg-laying and superparasitism behaviour in a parasitoid wasp. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 123, 279–285. ( 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2007.00544.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jacob HS, Evans EW. 2000. Influence of carbohydrate foods and mating on longevity of the parasitoid Bathyplectes curculionis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Environ. Entomol. 29, 1088–1095. ( 10.1603/0046-225X-29.5.1088) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fauvergue X, Genco AL, Pinto ML. 2008. Virgins in the wild: mating status affects the behavior of a parasitoid foraging in the field. Oecologia 156, 913 ( 10.1007/s00442-008-1037-7) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Godfray HCJ. 1990. The causes and consequences of constrained sex allocation in haplodiploid animals. J. Evol. Biol. 3, 3–17. ( 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1990.3010003.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yan JJ, Xu CH, Gao WC, Li GW, Yao DF, Zhang PY. 1989. Parasites and predators of forest pest. Beijing, People's Republic of China: China Forestry Publishing House. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Crossman SS. 1925. Two imported egg parasites of the gipsy moth, Anastatus bifasciatus Fonsc and Schedius kuvanae Howard. J. Agr. Res. 30, 643–675. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Alalouni U, Schädler M, Brandl R. 2013. Natural enemies and environmental factors affecting the population dynamics of the gypsy moth. J. App. Entomol. 137, 721–738. ( 10.1111/jen.12072) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liu PC, Men J, Zhao B, Wei JR. 2017. Fitness-related offspring sex allocation of Anastatus disparis, a gypsy moth egg parasitoid, on different-sized host species. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 163, 281–286. ( 10.1111/eea.12579) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Grabherr MG, et al. 2011. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 644–652. ( 10.1038/nbt.1883) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Smith-Unna R, Boursnell C, Patro R, Hibberd JM, Kelly S. 2016. TransRate: reference-free quality assessment of de novo transcriptome assemblies. Genome Res. 26, 1134–1144. ( 10.1101/gr.196469.115) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. 2009. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 ( 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li B, Dewey CN. 2011. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform. 12, 323 ( 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Soneson C, Love MI, Robinson MD. 2015. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Res. 4, 1521 ( 10.12688/f1000research.7563.2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A. 2010. Gene ontology analysis for rna-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 11, R14 ( 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.van den Assem J. 1986. Mating behaviour in parasitic wasps. New York, NY: Academic. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Raina AK, Kingan TG, Giebultowicz JM. 1994. Mating-induced loss of sex pheromone and sexual receptivity in insects with emphasis on Helicoverpa zea and Lymantria dispar. Arch. Insect. Biochem. 25, 317–327. ( 10.1002/arch.940250407) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rafaeli A. 2009. Pheromone biosynthesis activating neuropeptide (PBAN): regulatory role and mode of action. Gen. Comp. Endocr. 162, 69–78. ( 10.1016/j.ygcen.2008.04.004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Choi MY, Vander Meer RK. 2012. Ant trail pheromone biosynthesis is triggered by a neuropeptide hormone. PLoS ONE 7, e50400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Choi MY, Vander Meer RK. 2012. Molecular structure and diversity of PBAN/pyrokinin family peptides in ants. Front. Endocrinol. 3, 32 ( 10.3389/fendo.2012.00032) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.De Clercq P, Degheele D.. 1997. Effects of mating status on body weight, oviposition, egg load, and predation in the predatory stinkbug Podisus maculiventris (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 90, 121–127. ( 10.1093/aesa/90.2.121) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bates D. et al 2015. Package ‘lme4’. Convergence 12, 1–122. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Crawley M. 2007. The R book. Chichester, UK: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Quicke DLJ. 1997. Parasitic wasps. London, UK: Chapman and Hall. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ellers J, Sevenster JG, Driessen G. 2000. Egg load evolution in parasitoids. Am. Nat. 156, 650–665. ( 10.1086/316990) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gillott C, Friedel T. 1977. Fecundity enhancing and receptivity inhibiting substances produced by male insects: a review. Adv. Invert. Reprod. 1, 199–218. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wheeler D. 1996. The role of nourishment in oogenesis. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 41, 407–431. ( 10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.002203) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jayakumar A, Chirala SS, Chinault AC, Baldini A, Abu-Elheiga L, Wakil SJ. 1994. Isolation and chromosomal mapping of genomic clones encoding the human fatty acid synthase gene. Genomics 23, 420–424. ( 10.1006/geno.1994.1518) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jayakumar A, Tai MH, Huang WY, Al-Feel W, Hsu M, Abu-Elheiga L, Chirala SS, Wakil SJ. 1995. Human fatty acid synthase: properties and molecular cloning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 8695–8699. ( 10.1073/pnas.92.19.8695) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Persson B, et al. 2008. The sdr (short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase and related enzymes) nomenclature initiative. Chem-Biol. Interact. 178, 94–98. ( 10.1016/j.cbi.2008.10.040) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Li L, et al. 2016. Jinggangmycin increases fecundity of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) via fatty acid synthase gene expression. J. Proteomics 130, 140–149. ( 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.09.022) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Alabaster A, Isoe J, Zhou G, Lee A, Murphy A, Day WA, Miesfeld RL. 2011. Deficiencies in acetyl-CoA carboxylase and fatty acid synthase 1 differentially affect eggshell formation and blood meal digestion in Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem. Mol. 41, 946–955. ( 10.1016/j.ibmb.2011.09.004) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Simmons FH, Bradley TJ. 1997. An analysis of resource allocation in response to dietary yeast in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 43, 779–788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.McGraw LA, Gibson G, Clark AG, Wolfner MF. 2004. Genes regulated by mating, sperm, or seminal proteins in mated female Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 14, 1509–1514. ( 10.1016/j.cub.2004.08.028) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Dalton JE, Kacheria TS, Knott SR, Lebo MS, Nishitani A, Sanders LE, Stirling EJ, Winbush A, Arbeitman MN. 2010. Dynamic, mating-induced gene expression changes in female head and brain tissues of Drosophila melanogaster. BMC Genomics 11, 541 ( 10.1186/1471-2164-11-541) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Fedorka KM, Mousseau TA. 2002. Material and genetic benefits of female multiple mating and polyandry. Anim. Behav. 64, 361–367. ( 10.1006/anbe.2002.3052) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jennions MD, Petrie M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75, 21–64. ( 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1999.tb00040.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Konior M, Radwan J, Kolodziejczyk M. 2001. Polyandry increases offspring fecundity in the bulb mite. Evolution 55, 1893–1896. ( 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00838.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Arnold SJ, Duvall D. 1994. Animal mating systems: a synthesis based on selection theory. Am. Nat. 143, 317–348. ( 10.1086/285606) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ridley M. 1993. Clutch size and mating frequency in parasitic Hymenoptera. Am. Nat. 142, 893–910. ( 10.1086/285579) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Pérez-Lachaud G. 2010. Reproductive costs of mating with a sibling male: sperm depletion and multiple mating in Cephalonomia hyalinipennis. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 137, 62–72. ( 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2010.01037.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Davey KG. 1985. The female reproductive tract. In Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology (ed. Kerkut GA.), pp. 15–36. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Neubaum DM, Wolfner MF. 1998. 3 Wise, winsome, or weird? Mechanisms of sperm storage in female animals. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 41, 67–97. ( 10.1016/S0070-2153(08)60270-7) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Chapman T, Liddle LF, Kalb JM, Wolfner MF, Partridge L. 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373, 241–244. ( 10.1038/373241a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Das AK, Huignard J, Barbier M, Quesneau-Thierry A. 1980. Isolation of the two paragonial substances deposited into the spermatophores of Acanthoscelides obtectus (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Experientia 36, 918–920. ( 10.1007/BF01953792) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gems D, Riddle DL. 1996. Longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans reduced by mating but not gamete production. Nature 379, 723–725. ( 10.1038/379723a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Morrow EH, Arnqvist G, Pitnick S. 2003. Adaptation versus pleiotropy: why do males harm their mates? Behav. Ecol. 14, 802–806. ( 10.1093/beheco/arg073) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Arnqvist G, Nilsson T. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60, 145–164. ( 10.1006/anbe.2000.1446) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Feyereisen R. 1999. Insect P450 enzymes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 44, 507–533. ( 10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.507) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Perez R, Long WH. 1964. Sex attractant and mating behavior in the sugarcane borer. J. Econ. Entomol. 57, 688 ( 10.1093/jee/57.5.688) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Tram U, Wolfner MF. 1998. Seminal fluid regulation of female sexual attractiveness in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 4051–4054. ( 10.1073/pnas.95.7.4051) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.McClure M, Whistlecraft J, McNeil JN. 2007. Courtship behavior in relation to the female sex pheromone in the parasitoid, Aphidius ervi (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 33, 1946–1959. ( 10.1007/s10886-007-9355-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.King BH, Saporito KB, Ellison JH, Bratzke RM. 2005. Unattractiveness of mated females to males in the parasitoid wasp Spalangia endius. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57, 350–356. ( 10.1007/s00265-004-0863-9) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.De Freitas MDRT, De Lima MendonÇa A, Nascimento RRD, Sant'Ana AEG. 2004. Behavioural evidence for a female sex pheromone in Cotesia flavipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Physiol. Entomol. 29, 183–187. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Pelosi P, Maida R. 1990. Odorant-binding proteins in vertebrates and insects: similarities and possible common function. Chem. Senses 15, 205–215. ( 10.1093/chemse/15.2.205) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Campanini EB, Congrains C, Torres FR, Brito RA. 2017. Odorant-binding proteins expression patterns in recently diverged species of Anastrepha fruit flies. Sci. Rep. 7, 2194 ( 10.1038/s41598-017-02371-2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Fujii S, Amrein H. 2002. Genes expressed in the Drosophila head reveal a role for fat cells in sex-specific physiology. EMBO J. 21, 5353–5363. ( 10.1093/emboj/cdf556) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Chintapalli VR, Wang J, Dow JA. 2007. Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila melanogaster models of human disease. Nat. Genet. 39, 715–720. ( 10.1038/ng2049) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Oldroyd BP, Wongsiri S. 2009. Asian honey bees: biology, conservation, and human interactions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Manfredini F, Brown MJ, Vergoz V, Oldroyd BP. 2015. RNA-sequencing elucidates the regulation of behavioural transitions associated with the mating process in honey bee queens. BMC Genomics 16, 563 ( 10.1186/s12864-015-1750-7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Statistics of transcriptome assembly and predicted unigenes
rsos181453supp1.docx (12.7KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting this article have been uploaded as part of the electronic supplementary material. All raw sequence data files are available from the Sequence Read Archive database (accession no. PRJNA505044).


Articles from Royal Society Open Science are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES