Abstract.
Chagas disease is a public health problem caused by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi that affects about 8 million people worldwide. The main form of transmission of T. cruzi is vectorial, through triatomines feces contaminated with the parasite. All species are considered as potential vectors of T. cruzi. The main identification keys of these vectors are based only on morphological characters. However, there are very similar or even same species (cryptic species) that may lead to wrong classification of the vectors. Therefore, we developed an identification key using cytogenetic data, to aid and help the correct classification of triatomines. From the cytogenetic characters, identification keys were created for the five Brazilian states (Alagoas, Amapá, Ceará, Roraima, and Santa Catarina). These data are important because the correct classification of triatomines helps directly the activity of the vector control programs.
Chagas disease is a public health problem in Latin America and is increasingly spreading to new geographic regions such as Europe, North America, Japan, and Australia, mainly associated with the migration of people infected by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas, 1909) (Kinetoplastida, Trypanosomatidae), the etiologic agent of Chagas disease.1–3 Although it is estimated that eight million people are infected by T. cruzi and ten thousand chagasic patients die annually, approximately 70 million people are at risk of contracting Chagas disease, making it the main cause of death due to parasitic disease in Latin America and the main cause of infectious cardiomyopathy in the world.3–6
The main form of transmission of T. cruzi is vectorial, through the feces of triatomines contaminated with the parasite because these insects are hematophagous and have the habit of defecating during the blood repast.3,7 The triatomines belong to the order Hemiptera, suborder Heteroptera, family Reduviidae, and subfamily Triatominae.8 Currently, 152 species are admitted in the subfamily Triatominae, grouped into 18 genera and five tribes.9 Brazil presents a great diversity of species,10 that, as a result of anthropic actions (such as deforestation and burning), are migrating to the house environment, a process known as domiciliation.11
Although there are species with a greater or lesser degree of importance in the transmission of Chagas disease (with emphasis on Triatoma infestans [Klug, 1834], Rhodnius prolixus Stål, 1859, Triatoma dimidiata [Latreille, 1811], Panstrongylus megistus [Burmeister, 1835], and Triatoma brasiliensis Neiva, 1911, which are worldwide in the transmission of the disease, as well as T. infestans, T. brasiliensis, Triatoma pseudomaculata Corrêa & Espínola, 1964, Triatoma sordida [Stål, 1859] P. megistus, which present the greatest vectorial competence in Brazil),10 all triatomines of both sexes and at any stage of development are considered as potential vectors of this disease.
The taxonomy and systematics of triatomines are mainly based on morphological characters and the main identification keys of these vectors used only these characters.8,9,12 However, there are very similar or even same species (cryptic species) from the morphological point of view,13 hindering the activity of vector control programs. Thus, the use of new approaches is necessary to characterize a taxon, and cytogenetic14–20 and molecular21–25 analyses have been shown to be important tools to differentiate these hematophagous insects.
Based on this, we developed an identification key based on cytogenetic data, with the purpose of helping and facilitating the correct classification of triatomines.
Cytogenetic data available in the literature were grouped and used for the construction of the identification keys of the triatomines present in the Brazilian states.14–16 Because 60 species were never studied cytogenetically, we present only the keys referring to the states in which all the triatomines had already been analyzed, namely Alagoas, Amapá, Ceará, Roraima, and Santa Catarina (the geographical distribution of triatomines was based on Galvão10).
From the cytogenetic characteristics (karyotype, constitutive heterochromatin pattern in chromatin, and chromosomes and localization of 45S rDNA probes), identification keys were created for the five Brazilian states (Table 1).
Table 1.
Key for the Brazilian triatomines based on cytogenetic data
Identification Key | |
---|---|
Alagoas State | |
1. Karyotype with 2n = 21 chromosomes (18A + X1X2Y) | Panstrongylus megistus |
2. Karyotype with 2n = 23 chromosomes (20A + X1X2Y) | Triatoma tibiamaculata |
3. Karyotype with 2n = 24 chromosomes (20A + X1X2X3Y) | Panstrongylus lutzi |
4. Karyotype with 2n = 25 chromosomes (22A + X1X2Y) | Triatoma rubrofasciata |
5. Karyotype with 2n = 22 chromosomes (20A + XY) | 6 |
6a. Prophase without heterochromatin blocks dispersed inside the nucleus | Psammolestes tertius |
6b. Prophase with heterochromatic blocks dispersed inside the nucleus | 7 |
7a. Heterochromatin in 3--4 pairs of autosomes | Triatoma pseudomaculata |
7b. Heterochromatin in the all autosomes | Triatoma brasiliensis |
Amapá State | |
1. Karyotype with 2n = 23 chromosomes (20A + X1X2Y) | Panstrongylus geniculatus |
2. Karyotype with 2n = 22 chromosomes (20A + XY) | 3 |
3a. 45S rDNA probe located in X chromosome | Rhodnius robustus |
3b. 45S rDNA probe located in X and Y chromosomes | Rhodnius pictipes |
Ceará State | |
1. Karyotype with 2n = 21 chromosomes (18A + X1X2Y) | Panstrongylus megistus |
2. Karyotype with 2n = 23 chromosomes (20A + X1X2Y) | Panstrongylus geniculatus |
3. Karyotype with 2n = 24 chromosomes (20A + X1X2X3Y) | Panstrongylus lutzi |
4. Karyotype with 2n = 22 chromosomes (20A + XY) | 5 |
5a. Prophase without heterochromatin blocks dispersed inside the nucleus | Psammolestes tertius |
5b. Prophase with heterochromatic blocks dispersed inside the nucleus | 6 |
6a. 45S rDNA probe located in sex chromosome (X) | Rhodnius nasutus |
6b. 45S rDNA probe located in autosomes | 7 |
7a. Heterochromatin in 3--4 pairs of autosomes | Triatoma pseudomaculata |
7b. Heterochromatin in the all autosomes | Triatoma brasiliensis |
Roraima State | |
1. Karyotype with 2n = 23 chromosomes (20A + X1X2Y) | Panstrongylus geniculatus |
2. Karyotype with 2n = 22 chromosomes (20A + XY) | 3 |
3a. Prophase with heterochromatic blocks dispersed inside the nucleus | Triatoma maculata |
3b. Prophase without heterochromatin blocks dispersed inside the nucleus | 4 |
4a. 45S rDNA probe located in X chromosome | Rhodnius robustus |
4b. 45S rDNA probe located in X and Y chromosomes | Rhodnius pictipes |
Santa Catarina State | |
1. Karyotype with 2n = 21 chromosomes (18A + X1X2Y) | Panstrongylus megistus |
2. Karyotype with 2n = 23 chromosomes (20A + X1X2Y) | Triatoma tibiamaculata |
3. Karyotype with 2n = 22 chromosomes (20A + XY) | 4 |
4a. Prophase without heterochromatin blocks dispersed inside the nucleus | Rhodnius domesticus |
4b. Prophase with heterochromatic blocks dispersed inside the nucleus | Tratoma sordida |
Karyotypes were the main tools used to differentiate species within each Brazilian state (Table 1). The karyosystematic of triatomines was initiated in 2012 when Alevi et al.17 proposed the exclusion of Triatoma melanocephala Neiva & Pinto, 1923, Triatoma vitticeps (Stål, 1859) Triatoma tibiamaculata (Pinto, 1926) of the Brasiliensis subcomplex because they had different chromosomes. In addition, Alevi et al.18 point out that this tool made it possible to differentiate Triatoma rubrofasciata (De Geer, 1773) from all other triatomine species.
In the case where the species had the same number of chromosomes, the constitutive heterochromatin pattern and the location of the 45S rDNA probes were important tools to differentiate the species in the identification keys (Table 1). The presence or absence of heterochromatin in chromatin or chromosomes is a very common tool for the taxonomy and systematics of triatomines. For example, the characterization of the last described triatomine species, Rhodnius taquarussuensis Rosa et al.,19 was supported by the presence of heterochromatin in the autosomes, because most Rhodnius, including the related species Rhodnius neglectus Lent, 1954, do not present heterochromatin in the autosomes. Furthermore, the position of the 45S rDNA probes has also been used to differentiate/group Triatominae species, because the chromosomal site of rDNA clusters is a species-specific character.20
Taking into account that the correct classification of triatomines helps directly the activity of vector control programs, we present, for the first time, an identification key based on cytogenetic data that allows differentiating the triatomine species present in five Brazilian states. Moreover, we emphasize the need for new cytogenetic studies, with emphasis on triatomine species that have never been analyzed, so that an identification key of all vectors of Chagas disease in Brazil can created.
REFERENCES
- 1.Gascon J, Bern C, Pinazo MJ, 2010. Chagas disease in Spain, the United States and other non-endemic countries. Acta Trop 115: 22–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jackson Y, Pinto A, Pett S, 2014. Chagas disease in Australia and New Zealand: risks and needs for public health interventions. Trop Med Int Health 19: 212–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.WHO , 2017. Chagas Disease (American trypanosomiasis) Available at: http://www.who.int/chagas/disease/en/. Accessed November 20, 2017.
- 4.Martins-Melo FR, Ramos AN, Jr., Alencar CH, Heukelbach J, 2012. Mortality due to Chagas disease in Brazil from 1979 to 2009: trends and regional differences. J Infect Dev Ctries 6: 817–824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cucunubá ZM, Okuwoga O, Basáñez MG, Nouvellet P, 2016. Increased mortality attributed to Chagas disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasit Vectors 9: 42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.DNDI , 2017. Doença de Chagas Available at: http://www.dndial.org/pt/doencas-negligenciadas/doenca-de-chagas.html. Accessed November 20, 2017.
- 7.Chagas C, 1909. Nova tripanozomiaze humana: estudos sobre a morfolojia e o ciclo evolutivo do Schizotrypanum cruzi n. gen., n. sp., ajente etiolojico de nova entidade morbida do homem. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 1: 159–218. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lent H, Wygodzinsky P, 1979. Revision of the Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae), and their significance as vectors of Chagas’s disease. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 163: 123–520. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Oliveira J, Alevi KCC, 2017. Taxonomic status of Panstrongylus herreri Wygodzinsky, 1948 and the number of Chagas disease vectors. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 50: 434–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Galvão C, 2014. Vetores da Doença de Chagas no Brasil. Curitiba, Brazil: Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, 289. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dias JCP, Schofield CJ, 1998. Controle da transmissão transfusional da doença de Chagas na Iniciativa do Cone Sul. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 31: 373–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Costa J, Correia NC, Neiva VL, Gonçalves TCM, Félix M, 2013. Revalidation and redescription of Triatoma brasiliensis macromelasoma Galvão, 1956 and an identification key for the Triatoma brasiliensis complex (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 108: 785–789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Monteiro FA, Wesson DM, Dotson EM, Schofield CJ, Beard CB, 2000. Phylogeny and molecular taxonomy of the Rhodniini derived from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Am J Trop Med Hyg 62: 460–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alevi KCC, Moreira FFF, Jurberg J, Azeredo-Oliveira MTV, 2016. Description of the diploid chromosome set of Triatoma pintodiasi (Hemiptera, Triatominae). Genet Mol Res 25: 15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Panzera F, Pérez R, Panzera Y, Ferrandis I, Ferreiro MJ, Calleros L, 2010. Cytogenetics and genome evolution in the subfamily Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae). Cytogenet Genome Res 128: 77–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pita S, Panzera F, Ferrandis I, Galvão C, Gómez-Palacio A, Panzera Y, 2013. Chromosomal divergence and evolutionary inferences in Rhodniini based on the chromosomal location of ribosomal genes. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 108: 376–382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Alevi KCC, Mendonça PP, Pereira NP, Rosa JA, Azeredo-Oliveira MTV, 2012. Karyotype of Triatoma melanocephala Neiva and Pinto (1923). Does this species fit in the Brasiliensis subcomplex? Infect Genet Evol 12: 1652–1653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Alevi KCC, Borsatto KC, Moreira FFF, Jurberg J, Azeredo-Oliveira MTV, 2015. Karyosystematics of Triatoma rubrofasciata (De Geer, 1773) (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). Zootaxa 3994: 433–438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rosa JA, Justino HHG, Nascimento JD, Mendonça VJ, Rocha CS, Carvalho DB, Falcone R, Azeredo-Oliveira MTV, Alevi KCC, Oliveira J, 2017. A new species of Rhodnius from Brazil (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae). ZooKeys 675: 1–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pita S, Lorite P, Nattero J, Galvão C, Alevi KCC, Teves SC, Azeredo-Oliveira MTV, Panzera F, 2016. New arrangements on several species subcomplexes of Triatoma genus based on the chromosomal position of ribosomal genes (Hemiptera—Triatominae). Infect Genet Evol 43: 225–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Almeida CE, Pacheco RS, Haag K, Dupas S, Dotson E, Costa J, 2008. Inferring from the cyt B gene the Triatoma brasiliensis Neiva, 1911 (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). Genetic structure and domiciliary infestation in the state of Paraíba, Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg 78: 791–802. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Oliveira J, et al. 2017. Combined phylogenetic and morphometric information to delimit and unify the Triatoma brasiliensis species complex and the Brasiliensis subcomplex. Acta Trop 170: 140–148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gardim S, Almeida CE, Takiya DM, Oliveira J, Araújo RF, Cicarelli RMB, Rosa JA, 2014. Multiple mitochondrial genes of some sylvatic Brazilian Triatoma: non-monophyly of the T. brasiliensis subcomplex and the need for a generic revision in the Triatomini. Inf Gen Evol 23: 74–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Justi SA, Galvão C, Schrago CG, 2016. Geological changes of the Americas and their influence on the diversification of the Neotropical kissing bugs (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10: e0004527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Justi SA, Russo CAM, dos Santos-Mallet JR, Obara MT, Galvão C, 2014. Molecular phylogeny of Triatomini (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). Parasit Vectors 7: 149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]