Abstract
Background: Individuals over age 65 are projected to account for over 20% of the general population by 2030. This trend is reflected in an increase in the age of individuals sustaining traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Based on current evidence, there is concern regarding the needs of older individuals aging with SCI and current health care services. Research is limited regarding factors that contribute to health status and treatment outcomes associated with aging 5 or more years post SCI. Objective: The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore changing health care needs of individuals aging with SCI and their caregivers and to identify the environmental supports and barriers to achieving long-term health and treatment outcomes. Methods: This was a phenomenological study utilizing semi-structured interviews. Inclusion criteria were age greater than 60 years old and 5 years post SCI. Between October 2014 and January 2016, 41 individuals with SCI and eight caregivers participated in the semi-structured interviews. Emergent themes and quotations were noted and analyzed using established methods. Triangulation was used to establish rigor and trustworthiness. Results: Data analysis of the interviews revealed four themes (health literacy, health services, changes with age, and environment) and 10 subthemes. Conclusion: Rehabilitation programs should consider the health literacy of older individuals with SCI and their caregivers. Similarly, these programs should be designed to allow them to identify and utilize resources in solving barriers to everyday participation. Further investigation is required to examine the macro-environmental influences (systems and policies) on the changing health care needs of individuals aging with SCI.
Keywords: aging, environmental supports and barriers, health care, health literacy, health status, interviews, older adults, outcomes, traumatic spinal cord injury
Individuals over 65 years old are projected to account for over 20% of the general population in 2030, an increase from 13% in 2010 and 9.8% in 1970.1 This aging trend is reflected in an increase in the age of individuals sustaining traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).2 Older individuals are increasingly sustaining traumatic, incomplete cervical injuries.3 Studies indicate that SCI alters the process and effects of aging by impacting multiple factors related to physical and mental health and quality of life (QOL).4–10 There is concern about the needs of older individuals aging with SCI and current health care services.2 Hammel et al11 documented the need to evaluate the impact of the environment on participation at the community and societal levels.
Significant changes when aging post SCI are found in the areas of employment, social life, sex life, and health.12 Individuals who sustain SCI over the age of 65 demonstrate increased dependency on caregivers and experience the highest annual mortality rates within the SCI population.2,4 Caregivers of aging individuals with SCI experience increased physical and mental stress and are challenged by comorbidities.13 Groah et al4 highlight an inherent complexity in these individuals due to the interaction between factors related to aging and those related to SCI. This perspective implies that needs are contingent on the unique experience and context of the individual with SCI. Maintaining health, maximizing function, and improving level of activity and participation constitute three major rehabilitation goals for people aging with SCI.4 Age is a significant factor in determining health care utilization.14 There is a tendency for rehabilitation professionals to view SCI as an acute event rather than a life-long process.12 Research emphasizes factors that influence health status and treatment outcomes.2 The common target of this research has been the acute health care needs of individuals with SCI as they relate to age at time of injury. While there is research describing the changing health care needs of individuals aging with SCI, this study specifically looked at individuals who sustained injury at age 60 or older.
The purpose of this qualitative study was twofold: to explore changing health care needs of individuals aging with SCI and their caregivers and identify environmental supports and barriers to achieving those long-term outcomes. This study aims to provide information on the changing health care needs of this population from the perspectives of individuals living with SCI and caregivers.
Methods
Design
This was a phenomenological study utilizing semi-structured interviews with individuals who had sustained traumatic SCI and their caregivers.
Participants
Participants and caregivers were recruited through a quarterly newsletter published by the Regional SCI Center of the Delaware Valley (RSCICDV). Inclusion criteria of participants included age greater than 60 years old with SCI and 5 years post injury. Of the 61 individuals with SCI recruited to participate, 41 individuals with SCI and eight non-paid family caregivers participated in semi-structured interviews (Table 1).
Table 1.
Age, mean (range), years | 73.4 (61-89) |
Mean time since SCI, years | 10.8 |
SCI level of injury | |
Tetraplegia | 54% |
Paraplegia | 31% |
Unknown or not identified | 15% |
Total no. of caregivers | 8 (3 male, 5 female) |
No. of participants with spouse as caregiver | 6 |
No. of participants with nonspousal caregiver | 2 (1 son, 1 granddaughter) |
Procedure
A literature review was conducted to identify health care needs of individuals aging with SCI; these results informed the development of the interview questions. The research team reviewed all potential interview questions until consensus was achieved (Table 2). Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained and recruitment continued until data saturation. Data collection occurred between October 2014 and January 2016. Team members, all of whom were faculty or graduate occupational and physical therapy students, were assigned sample methodology and research readings prior to participating in training sessions by the lead author. Electronic data analysis programs were not used in this study. The team participated in data collection and analysis.
Table 2.
Topics | Participant questions |
---|---|
Health status |
|
Health services |
|
Energy |
|
Activity and participation |
|
Minimal significant change |
|
Social |
|
Mentorship |
|
Participant needs |
|
Caregiver needs |
|
Note: ADL = activities of daily living; QOL = quality of life.
Table 2.
Topics | Participant questions |
---|---|
Health status |
|
Health services |
|
Energy |
|
Activity and participation |
|
Minimal significant change |
|
Social |
|
Mentorship |
|
Participant needs |
|
Caregiver needs |
|
Note: ADL = activities of daily living; QOL = quality of life.
Interviews
Two pilot semi-structured interviews were conducted by trained investigators to verify content validity and clarity of intent. Questions were refined, clarity of intent was verified with the participants, and questions were finalized. Informed consent was obtained prior to the interviews. All in-person interviews except three via telephone (due to distance) lasted 60 to 90 minutes.
Data analysis
Data analysis began after completion and transcription of the first 10 interviews and continued until saturation was achieved. Using accepted methods of data analysis,15 emergent themes and subthemes were identified in order to understand the participants' natural context and experience. After individual analyses were completed, the entire team met and discussed themes. Upon achieving consensus of the thematic codes, an individual team member resumed data analysis followed by an additional team review for theme formation or revision. Rigor and trustworthiness were achieved through both member checks of the transcripts and triangulation through iterative data analysis by the team.
Results
Health literacy
Health literacy refers to “the degree to which an individual has the capacity to obtain, communicate, process, and understand basic health information andservicestomakeappropriatehealthdecisions.”16 It includes knowledge of mechanism of injury, rehabilitation and medical process since injury, insurance coverage, and any health concerns.
One subtheme was the existence of a continuum of individuals with and without a high degree of health literacy (Table 3, subtheme a). Two areas of health literacy that demonstrated this continuum for individuals with SCI involved knowledge of their medications and rehabilitation importance. Some individuals acknowledged the need to take several medications but were unable to recall or provide documentation of a medication routine. As far as rehabilitation, few individuals participated in an occupational therapy (OT) or physical therapy (PT) program or regular exercise.
Table 3.
Theme | Subthemes | Participant quotes reflecting subthemes |
---|---|---|
Health literacy | a. Continuum of health literacy |
|
b. Degree of problem-solvingskills and abilities |
|
Another subtheme of health literacy was the degree of problem-solving capabilities among respondents (Table 3, subtheme b). There seemed to be a significant difference in internal motivation as it related to problem-solving capabilities.
Health services
Health services refers to “all services dealing with the diagnosis and treatment of disease, or the promotion, maintenance and restoration of health.”17 This theme encompasses patient perception of quality and satisfaction with health services, professional perception of patient's functional ability, and patient's perception of personal and caregiver's needs. One subtheme involved participants' perception of access to health services (Table 4, subtheme a). Several respondents expressed the need to prioritize their health services based on health insurance and reimbursement. It seemed that they needed to choose between obtaining their medications and receiving OT, PT, or other services due to finances.
Table 4.
Theme | Subthemes | Participant quotes reflecting subthemes |
---|---|---|
Health services | a. Perception of access to health services |
|
b. Perception of self and caregiver's needs & prioritization of needs by health care professionals |
|
|
c. Provider perceptions of individuals' abilities and the resultant disconnect in the plan of care |
|
An additional subtheme for health services was the respondents' perceptions of health care professionals since their SCI (Table 4, subtheme b). Respondents acknowledged that individuals with SCI are a different patient population with specific needs, and trained SCI rehabilitation specialists are limited.
A final subtheme involved a disconnection and lack of collaboration between respondents and health care providers (Table 4, subtheme c). It seemed that providers were not listening to the respondents in terms of rehabilitation goals. Some respondents actually discussed the need for advocates for individuals with SCI due to this disconnect. They commented that it is even more important to have advocates after their initial acute rehabilitation than with aging with an SCI.
Functional changes with age
Whereas the entire study is an exploration of the overall effects of aging with an SCI, this theme is specific to functional changes. One subtheme of functional changes with age involved changes in health status (Table 5, subtheme a). Health status is “often summarized by life expectancy or self-assessed health status, and more broadly includes measures of functioning, physical illness, and mental well-being.”18 Changes were noted along a continuum of diminished to improved health status regarding energy levels, sleep patterns, memory, bowel and bladder control, and additional comorbidities. One significant change in health was an increase in falls, which is also common for those aging without SCI. Another change related to changes in skin integrity and how to manage them, especially due to increased potential risks as a result of the SCI. Finally, a disconnect was noted between what typical changes were due to aging alone versus having an SCI. Some respondents were able to note that certain changes in energy levels were due to aging alone.
Table 5.
Theme | Subthemes | |
---|---|---|
Changes with age | a. Perceptions of health status (age vs SCI) |
|
b. Level of participation and potency of replacement activities |
|
|
c. Future orientation |
|
Change in level of participation was another subtheme (Table 5, subtheme b). The central concept of participation is being a part of informal and formal activities. Formal activities include concrete rules and goals and informal activities involve little to no planning.19 A continuum of change was noted and included topics of socialization, activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living (ADLs/IADLs), employment, and physical activity. Certain respondents and caregivers were motivated in terms of participation whereas others were not.
A final subtheme was future orientation (Table 5, subtheme c). The definition of future orientation is the “image that individuals have for the future” and “provides the grounds for setting goals and planning.”20(p3) It appeared that there was not a consensus among respondents and caregivers with perceptions of their futures. Motivation and resources greatly influenced respondents' perceptions. Some respondents never really thought about the future whereas others were more motivated to improve their lives.
Environment
Environment was the final theme that was addressed by respondents. Subthemes included both non-human and human environments. Changes in the non-human environment were defined as modifications to the physical environment and/or adaptation to the activity (occupation) performed by an individual to promote health, welfare, and safety of the participant. For many respondents, several of the changes in the non-human environment after injury were directly related to their homes and improvement in accessibility and functionality (Table 6, subtheme a). The respondents discussed how this led to a financial burden.
Table 6.
Theme | Subthemes | Participant quotes reflecting subthemes |
---|---|---|
Environment | a. Non-human: includes built environment factors (architectural, accessibility, geographic factors, access to assistive technology) |
|
b. Human: includes social & attitudinal factors |
|
Note: CVA = cerebrovascular accident.
Human environment was another subtheme and is defined as the various types of support provided by others. It is generally classified into three major categories: emotional, instrumental, and informational support.21 Human environment included caregiving and receiving, social support including family and friend relationships, and mentorship. It appeared that respondents relied heavily on their caregivers even though they did not want to have to do this (Table 6, subtheme b). Caregiver overburden was discussed throughout the interviews from the perspectives of both the individuals with SCI and the caregivers.
Discussion
To understand the changing health care needs of older individuals aging post SCI and caregivers, it is important to analyze experiences and identify environmental supports/barriers to achieving long-term outcomes. This study reinforces, expands, and adds to the literature regarding the changing health care needs of individuals aging with SCI. Health care services should focus on enhancing and applying patient and caregiver health literacy to everyday activities. Active engagement in health promotion may improve recipients' future problem-solving skills to deal with environmental barriers and increase participation.
Findings are consistent with current literature, except for the addition of the health literacy theme. Participants describe a continuum of health literacy: There are those who are more knowledgeable and those who are less knowledgeable. Similarly, participants' responses describe a continuum in the degree of problem solving. This highlights the need for the health care provider to assess patient and caregiver health literacy and provide opportunities to demonstrate these skills. Health care professionals should provide additional opportunities to practice and discuss outcomes of problem solving to potentially empower long-term skills.
The findings of this study expand the knowledge of environmental influences and reinforce the findings of more recent research in the past 2 years. Hammel et al11 described four themes identified by individuals with disabilities within environmental supports and barriers to participation as the built environment, the natural environment, assistive technology, and transportation. Whereas, additional environmental supports and barrier subthemes identified in this study included the human and non-human environment.
Health literacy
Research shows that health literacy and rehabilitation are linked by common emphasis on the capacity, functioning, participation, and empowerment of the patient.22 Advanced age, over 65, has been identified as a limiting factor.22 A cross-sectional study of people with SCI identified communication with health care professionals as being associated with levels of participation and functioning and perceptions of well-being.23
Health services
A prevalent portion of health services was the lack of comprehensive coverage for both home health and outpatient therapy services. However, under Medicare, individuals with an SCI are only eligible for either one. Because many of these individuals require home health in order to complete their ADLs, they often do not receive therapy services due to reimbursement limitations.
In addition, individuals with SCI may have limited access to health care services secondary to low income, low functional ability, and geographic factors. Guilcher et al14 compared socio-demographic characteristics and utilization of a physician and emergency department visits for non-traumatic and traumatic SCI 1 year after acute rehabilitation. Those individuals who had a non-traumatic SCI experienced fewer acute rehabilitation days compared to those with traumatic SCI. The results also indicated rural-dwelling individuals faced several environmental barriers limiting access to community services.14
Those aging with SCI face many environmental barriers to health services including insurance coverage, income, functional ability, rural living, and, according to one participant, poor service from health care professionals. Pershouse et al7 reported a solution that suggested health care professionals should engage in the early phase (onset of injury) by educating patients about maintenance and mitigation strategies to sustain their meaningful life roles. In addition, Zinman et al24 determined that participation in therapeutic education can improve the well-being in an individual with SCI and reintegration into communities. The findings of our study reinforce the importance of providing patient-centered, long-term reassessment of levels of function and requirements needed for everyday participation.
Change in health status/energy with aging
A prominent item that appeared in our study was the presence of repetitive injuries related to long-term wheelchair use and other adaptive equipment as well as the incidence of falls. An implication for future therapy is that greater emphasis should be placed on ongoing balance interventions for individuals with SCIs during and after immediate post-SCI rehabilitation. This study coincides with the changes in health status associated with aging with an SCI as in previous studies. These changes include upper extremity conditions, deconditioning, bowel and bladder difficulties, spasticity, pain, fatigue, osteoporosis, and diabetes.4–10
Change in level of participation
Recent literature regarding the levels of participation disparities among individuals aging with SCI suggests that continued participation in meaningful activities in/outside the home supports positive adjustment to SCI.25,26 Prior literature supported that the presence of resources, social support, and continued involvement in leisure activities as individuals age with SCI correlated with higher QOL.27 Barclay et al26 concluded that adequate financial resources and social support contributes to participation in meaningful activities, whereas physical environment and lack of social supports were identified as barriers to participation.
Our study has demonstrated a need for greater rehabilitative emphasis on modifying preexisting leisure activities or exploring new ones following SCI. Additional emphasis should be on providing individuals with SCI and caregivers strategies to overcome environmental barriers. Williams et al28 found in a recent study that despite physical therapists placing a high level of value on physical activity, active promotion of engagement in physical activity remains absent from practice with this population. They recommend that health care professionals (physical therapists) begin to promote and prescribe physical activity as an integral component of practice.28
Similarly, our results suggest the need for greater long-term involvement of health care professionals after initial discharge. However, our findings indicate more disparity among the levels of change in participation, and we were unable to directly associate these changes in level of participation to life satisfaction and QOL.
Based on previous literature and the results of our study, individuals aging with SCI may benefit from increased involvement of health care professionals after discharge in order to increase awareness of systems, health and social policies, and other available resources. Future research may indicate the incorporation of telerehab and outreach group programs to assist individuals in staying active within the community.
Future orientation
Although not a potent theme, some participants gave voice to the presence of or lack of a future orientation. This theme requires additional data and analysis to further understand the implications of this orientation.
Environment
This study differentiated coding of the data between human and non-human environments, but this was not found in the literature. The literature does not use the term human environment29 often to describe caregiving and social environment. Human environment29 defined as “friends/peers”29 does appear in relation to factors that influence community participation and QOL in individuals with SCI who use wheelchairs.29 The literature prefers the term caregiving 29 to describe ideas similar to our theme of human environment.29 Two studies demonstrated that social integration, receiving social support, and experiencing negative social interactions independently influenced the impact of SCI caregiver burden.13,30
These findings resonated with Hammel et al's11 more detailed factors and had great applicability to rehabilitation practice and education of rehabilitation professionals. Prior to their study, a limited number of environmental factors such as transportation, assistive technology, and social supports were described in the literature as barriers or supports to participation in individuals experiencing SCI.11
Hammel and her colleagues11 proposed a conceptual framework that described the relationship between eight environmental factors (human and non-human) and participation. Those factors were the built environment, natural environment, assistive technology, transportation, information and technology (IT) access, economics, social support and social attitudes, and system, services, and policies. Our findings resonated with those of Hammel et al and further contributed to the body of knowledge of environmental influences on participation for individuals aging with disability, such as SCI.
Study limitations
This qualitative study was limited to a small, convenience sampling of individuals who received rehabilitation through the RSCICDV. Caregiver interviews were conducted with the participant present. This could have contributed to the veracity of the caregivers' responses. In future studies, participant and caregiver interviews should be conducted separately. Thematic differences between participant and caregiver interview responses did not emerge from the data, however this should be further investigated in future studies. A recommendation would be to interview caregivers separately from the SCI participant.
Conclusion
This study highlighted and supported previous findings reporting the changing needs of individuals aging with SCI. Our findings suggested that contemporary rehabilitation for individuals with SCI consider the health literacy of the patients and their families at all phases of rehabilitation. Similarly, rehabilitation programs should be designed so that patients and families practice, at all phases of rehabilitation, identifying and using resources in solving barriers to everyday participation in health promotion and other meaningful activities. Further investigation is required to elucidate our understanding of the macro-environmental (systems and policies) influences on the changing health care needs of individuals aging with SCI.
Acknowledgments
Dr. Kern and Dr. Hunter report a grant from the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research H133N110021: Model SCI Systems Grant (PI-Marino) during the conduct of the study. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ortman JM, Velkoff VA, Hogan H. An aging nation: The older population in the United States. US Census Bureau website. http://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1140.pdf Updated May 2014. Accessed November 20, 2015.
- 2.DeVivo MJ, Chen Y. Trends in new injuries, prevalent cases, and aging with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(3):332–338. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.031. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.DeVivo M. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury: Trends and future implications. Spinal Cord. 2012;50(5):365–372. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.178. doi:10.1038/sc.2011.178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Groah SL, Charlifue S, Tate D et al. Spinal cord injury and aging: Challenges and recommendations for future research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(1):80–93. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31821f70bc. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31821f70bc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hitzig SL, Eng JJ, Miller WC, Sakakibara BM. An evidence-based review of aging of the body systems following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(6):684–701. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.178. doi:10.1038/sc.2010.178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fann JR, Bombardier CH, Richards JS, Tate DG, Wilson CS, Temkin N. Depression after spinal cord injury: Comorbidities, mental health service use, and adequacy of treatment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(3):352–360. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.05.016. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pershouse KJ, Barker RN, Kendall MB et al. Investigating changes in quality of life and function along the lifespan for people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(3):413–419. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.014. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Frontera JE, Mollett P. Aging with spinal cord injury: An update. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2017;28(4):821–828. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2017.06.013. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2017.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jensen MP, Molton IR, Groah SL et al. Secondary health conditions in individuals aging with SCI: Terminology, concepts and analytic approaches. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:373–378. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jorgensen S, Iwarsson S, Lexell J. Secondary health conditions, activity limitations, and life satisfaction in older adults with long-term spinal cord injury. Am Acad Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;9(4):356–366. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.09.004. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A et al. Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: A qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:578–588. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.008. doi: 10.1016/j.ampr.2014.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Krause J, Bozard J. Natural course of life changes after spinal cord injury: A 35-year longitudinal study. Spinal Cord. 2012;50(3):227–231. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.106. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rodakowski J, Skidmore ER, Rogers JC, Schulz R. Role of social support in predicting caregiver burden. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(12):2229–2236. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.07.004. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Guilcher S, Munce SE, Couris C et al. Health care utilization in non-traumatic and traumatic spinal cord injury: A population-based study. Spinal Cord. 2010;48(1):45–50. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.78. doi: doi:10.1038/sc.2009.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lincoln YS, Guba E. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, California: SAGE Publications; 1985. [Google Scholar]
- 16.What is health literacy? Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/learn/index.html Updated December 13, 2016. Accessed January 6, 2018.
- 17.Health services World Health Organization website. http://www.who.int/topics/health_services/en/ Updated 2018. Accessed January 6, 2018.
- 18.Health status. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare website. http://www.aihw.gov.au/male-health/health-status/ Updated 2015. Accessed November 25, 2015.
- 19.Law M. Participation in the occupations of everyday life. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56:640–649. doi: 10.5014/ajot.56.6.640. doi: 10.5014/ajot.56.6.640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Seginer R. Adolescent future orientation: An integrated cultural and ecological perspective. Online Readings Psychol Culture. 2003 doi: 10.9707/2307-0919.1056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Seeman L. Support & social conflict: Section one – Social support. University of California website. http://www.macses.ucsf.edu/research/psychosocial/socsupp.php Updated April 2008. Accessed January 6, 2018.
- 22.Levasseur M, Carrier A. Do rehabilitation professionals need to consider their clients' health literacy for effective practice? Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(8):756–765. doi: 10.1177/0269215509360752. doi: 10.1177/0269215509360752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wong AWK, Ng S, Dashner J et al. Relationships between environmental factors and participation in adults with traumatic brain injury, stroke, and spinal cord injury: A cross sectional multi-center study. Qual Life Res. 2017;26:2633–2645. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1586-5. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1586-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zinman A, Digout N, Bain P, Haycock S, Hébert D, Hitzig S. Evaluation of a community reintegration outpatient program service for community-dwelling wpersons with spinal cord injury. Rehabil Res Practice. 2014:1–14. doi: 10.1155/2014/989025. doi:10.1155/2014/989025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Duggan C, Wilson C, DiPonio L, Trumpower B, Meade MA. Resilience and happiness after spinal cord injury: A qualitative study. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2016;22(2):99–110. doi: 10.1310/sci2202-99. doi: 10.1310/sci2202-99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Barclay L, McDonald R, Lentin P, Bourke-Taylor H. Facilitators and barriers to social and community participation following spinal cord injury. Austral Occup Ther J. 2015;63:19–28. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12241. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Charlifue S, Gerhart K. Community integration in spinal cord injury of long duration. NeuroRehabilitation. 2004;19(2):91–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Williams TL, Smith B, Papathomas A. Physical activity promotion for people with spinal cord injury: Physiotherapists' beliefs and actions [published online ahead of print December 5, 2016] Disabil Rehabil. 2016 doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1242176. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1242176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chan SC, Chan AP. User satisfaction, community participation and quality of life among chinese wheelchair users with spinal cord injury: A preliminary study. Occup Ther Int. 2007;14(3):123–143. doi: 10.1002/oti.228. doi: 10.1002/oti.228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rodakowski J, Skidmore ER, Rogers JC, Schulz R. Does social support impact depression in caregivers of adults ageing with spinal cord injuries? Clin Rehabil. 2013;27(6):565–575. doi: 10.1177/0269215512464503. doi: 10.1177/0269215512464503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]