Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2018 Dec 25;116(3):477–486. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.11.3141

Lipid-Conjugated Rigidochromic Probe Discloses Membrane Alteration in Model Cells of Krabbe Disease

Gerardo Abbandonato 1, Barbara Storti 1, Ilaria Tonazzini 1, Martin Stöckl 2, Vinod Subramaniam 3,4, Costanza Montis 5, Riccardo Nifosì 1, Marco Cecchini 1, Giovanni Signore 1,6,, Ranieri Bizzarri 1,5,∗∗
PMCID: PMC6369402  PMID: 30709620

Abstract

The plasma membrane of cells has a complex architecture based on the bidimensional liquid-crystalline bilayer arrangement of phospho- and sphingolipids, which in turn embeds several proteins and is connected to the cytoskeleton. Several studies highlight the spatial membrane organization into more ordered (Lo or lipid raft) and more disordered (Ld) domains. We here report on a fluorescent analog of the green fluorescent protein chromophore that, when conjugated to a phospholipid, enables the quantification of the Lo and Ld domains in living cells on account of its large fluorescence lifetime variation in the two phases. The domain composition is straightforwardly obtained by the phasor approach to confocal fluorescence lifetime imaging, a graphical method that does not require global fitting of the fluorescence decay in every spatial position of the sample. Our imaging strategy was applied to recover the domain composition in human oligodendrocytes at rest and under treatment with galactosylsphingosine (psychosine). Exogenous psychosine administration recapitulates many of the molecular fingerprints of a severe neurological disease, globoid cell leukodystrophy, better known as Krabbe disease. We found out that psychosine progressively destabilizes plasma membrane, as witnessed by a shrinking of the Lo fraction. The unchanged levels of galactosyl ceramidase, i.e., the enzyme lacking in Krabbe disease, upon psychosine treatment suggest that psychosine alters the plasma membrane structure by direct physical effect, as also recently demonstrated in model membranes.

Introduction

The composition and organization of the plasma membrane (PM) is one of the most debated issues in biophysics, and its description is enriched every year by new biomolecular details. The original fluid mosaic model and the liquid-crystalline interpretation have been overtaken by a spatially interlaced combination of liquid-order (Lo, also referred to as “lipid raft”) and liquid-disorder (Ld) phases, enriched respectively in saturated and unsaturated lipids, together with different amounts of cholesterol (1, 2, 3). In its simplest description, the “raft” model depicts the PM as a nanostructured dynamic assembly of Ld and Lo phases, which are not separated by definite boundaries but organized around the cytoskeletal network. A continuous exchange of proteins and protein complexes occurs between the two phases, modulated also by the confining action of the cytoskeleton (3). This paradigm of membrane assembly was proposed to be at the basis of and influential in every membrane process, such as formation of protein clusters, signal transduction, endocytosis, and cell polarization and motility (2, 3, 4, 5, 6). The raft hypothesis stimulated developments of new techniques for studying the properties and localization of Lo and Ld phases in model and cellular membranes. In this context, fluorescence microscopy offers high sensitivity and low sample perturbation and has become one of the most popular methods (1). Accordingly, in the last few years, the number of published environmentally sensitive fluorescent probes targeted to the membrane has been growing rapidly. These kinds of probes display optical responses able to distinguish Lo and Ld because of the sensitivity to different physicochemical properties of the two phases, such as local polarity (solvatochromic probes) due to hydration and protein presence and/or local viscosity (molecular rotors, also referred to as rigidochromic probes) due to lipid packing (7, 8). Classical examples of solvatochromic membrane probes are Laurdan (9, 10, 11, 12) and Prodan (13), which distribute evenly between Lo and Ld phases, showing strongly blue-shifted emission in the Lo phase of model membranes. Recently, Laurdan was also applied to studies of membrane rafts in live cells, although the data analysis is complicated by the rapid internalization of this dye (14) and the need for two-photon excitation. Other important examples of solvatochromic membrane probes are di-4-ANEPPDHQ and derivates (15), 3-hydroxichromone dyes (i.e., F2N12S (16, 17, 18)), coumarins (19), Nile Red, and NR12S derivate (20). On the other hand, most molecular rotors targeted to membrane are functionalized analogs of julolidine (DCVJ, CCVJ) (21, 22), BODIPY (23, 24, 25), or NBD (26, 27). Membrane-targeted rigidochromic probes are widely used to probe the transition from the gel to liquid-crystal phase or, in general, the microviscosity of the phospholipid bilayers (25, 26, 27, 28). In most cases, however, available rigidochromic probes targeted to membranes displayed a narrow change of optical properties between the two lipid phases and/or were fairly sensitive to compositional features (e.g., the cholesterol content) as well as changes in local polarity.

Recently, we demonstrated how a close derivative of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) chromophore, Ge1, acts as a dual probe of polarity and viscosity, providing fully decoupled fluorescence responses to these parameters (29). In this work, we demonstrate that a lipid bioconjugate of Ge1, Ge1L (Fig. 1), addresses most drawbacks of membrane-targeted rigidochromic probes, thus offering a reliable means to follow membrane assembly in biochemical studies. Indeed, Ge1L is associated with distinct fluorescence lifetimes when embedded in Lo or Ld phases. Such change can be exploited to yield the Lo/Ld composition by phasor analysis of fluorescence lifetime imaging (ph-FLIM), a straightforward approach that relies on a simple graphical analysis of spectral and lifetime fluorescence images when observed in the frequency domain (30, 31, 32, 33, 34).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Molecular structure of Ge1L.

Exploiting its peculiar sensing capabilities, Ge1L has been here applied to monitor the remodeling of the PM in a model of Krabbe disease (KD) in vitro. KD (also known as globoid cell leukodystrophy) is a rare, rapidly progressing childhood leukodystrophy triggered by a deficit of the lysosomal enzyme galactosylceramidase (GALC) and characterized by the accumulation of galactosylsphingosine (psychosine; PSY) in the nervous system. Exogenous PSY administrated in vitro to glial cell lines, such as the MO3.13 human oligodendrocytes, is known to recapitulate many of the molecular fingerprints of the disease, including cell death by apoptosis and oxidative stress activation (35). Recently, a few studies showed that the balance between cell membrane rafts and disordered regions are altered in KD cells in vivo and in vitro (36). Dysregulations of pathways related to membrane proteins were also demonstrated by the same group (37). Significantly, our results confirm the progressive membrane alteration of MO3.13 cells upon PSY administration and support the use of Ge1L as an imaging tool for further studies in this field.

Materials and Methods

Materials

1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC), sphingomyelin, and cholesterol were all from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL). All other reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) (reverse phase grade), and were used without further purification.

Synthetic procedure for Ge1L

The synthetic procedure for Ge1L is reported in (38).

Solutions

Details on the preparation of solutions are reported in the Supporting Materials and Methods.

Lipid vesicle preparation

Multilamellar vesicles

A dry lipid film (see below for composition) was prepared from a chloroform solution by evaporation. Homogeneous multilamellar vesicles were prepared by hydrating the lipid film in 20 mM Hepes, 140 mM NaCl (pH 7.4) by vortexing.

Large unilamellar vesicles

The multilamellar vesicles (see above) were subjected to five freeze-thaw cycles (liquid N2/37°C) before being extruded 11 times through 100 nm polycarbonate filters using a hand-held extruder (Avanti Polar Lipids). Large unilamellar vesicle (LUV) diameters were checked by a Malvern Dynamic Light Scattering system and resulted always in measurements between 100 and 120 nm.

Giant unilamellar vesicles

Giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) were prepared through electroformation. Briefly, 10 μL of a 0.5 mg/mL lipid mixture solution in CHCl3 (see below for composition) was deposited on each of two indium tin oxide-coated glass slides on the conductive side. CHCl3 was dried under vacuum overnight, and a dry lipid film on each sheet was obtained. The electroformation chamber was prepared, sandwiching the sheets with an O-ring separating the lipid films. The chamber was filled with an aqueous solution of sucrose 0.1 M, and the electrical contact between the sheets was provided by putting on each sheet a copper tape connected to a pulse generator, set at a sinusoidal alternating voltage of 10 Hz frequency and two Vpp amplitude for 3 h at 60°C. GUVs were employed within 3 h after preparation.

Compositions of lipid phases

Homogeneous lipid phases were obtained by the following lipid compositions:

  • Ld: POPC 100% (multilamellar vesicles, LUV, GUV).

  • Lo: DPPC/cholesterol 70/30 (39) or sphingomyelin/cholesterol/POPC 20/60/20 (40, 41) (multilamellar vesicles, LUV).

Nonhomogeneous lipid phases (phase coexistence in vesicles) were obtained by the following lipid compositions:

  • Ld/Lo: 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine/1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine/cholesterol 40/32/28 (GUV) (42).

The chromophore/lipid molar ratio was 1:100 in all experiments.

Cell cultures and treatment

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) K1 cells were provided by American Type Culture Collection (CCL-61; ATCC, Manassas, VA) and grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium F-12 nutrient mix (DMEM/F-12) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin. All products were from Thermo Fisher (Waltham, MA). For live imaging, 12 × 104 cells were plated 24 h before transfection onto a 35 mm glass-bottom dish (WillCo-dish GWSt-3522; WillCo Beheer B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands).

Human oligodendrocyte MO3.13 cells (Cat. No. CLU301-P; Tebu Bio, Le-Perray-en-Yvelines, France) were maintained at 37°C in humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 in high-glucose DMEM supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomicyn, and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS); all products were from Thermo Fisher. For experiments, MO3.13 cells were seeded at 30,000 cells/cm2 in WillCo dishes, and 24 h after plating, cells were washed two times with phosphate-buffered saline and then cultured in 0.2% FBS medium (DMEM supplemented with 0.2% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin/streptomicyn). Then, MO3.13 cells were cultured in 0.2% FBS medium (control) or treated with psychosine (PSY) 10 μM for 15 min (PSY15) or for 24 h (PSY24) (35). For selected experiments, cells were also treated with PSY 10 μM for 24 h, then washed and cultured in control 0.2% FBS medium for 6 h (PSY24/6). PSY (Sigma Aldrich) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide; control cultures received the same quantity of dimethyl sulfoxide, which never exceeded 0.1% v/v.

Fluorescence imaging and lifetime measurements

Fluorescence imaging and lifetime measurements were performed by means of a Leica TCS SP5 SMD inverted confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems AG, Buffalo Grove, IL) equipped with an external pulsed diode laser for excitation at 405 and 470 nm and a time-correleated single photon counting acquisition card (PicoHarp 300; PicoQuant, Berlin, Germany) connected to internal spectral detectors. Laser repetition rate was set to 40 Hz. Image size was 256 × 256 pixels, and scan speed was usually set to 400 Hz (lines per second). The pinhole aperture was set to 1.0 Airy. Samples were imaged using a 100 × 1.5 NA oil immersion objective (Leica Microsystems). Emission was monitored in the 480–525 and 540–580 nm ranges, using the built-in acousto-optical beam-splitter detection system of the confocal microscope. Acquisitions lasted until ∼100–200 photons per pixel were collected, at a photon-counting rate of 100–500 kHz. The two acquired ranges allowed us to evaluate the generalized poloarization while the lifetime analysis was performed on the joined channels. For each condition, CHO cells (15–20) and MO3.13 cells (30–50) were treated with 1 mg/mL of Ge1L in DMEM and imaged after 15 min upon administration at 37°C. At this temperature, Ge1L showed negligible internalization by endocytosis for 1 h.

Cholesterol depletion

According to the protocol reported in (43), CHO cells were incubated with 5 mM MβCD at 37°C and 5% CO2 in the culture medium for different times (1, 2, 3, and 6 h).

GALC level quantification

MO3.13 cells were plated on standard six-well plates, treated as previously reported, and lysed on ice by 120 μL/well of radioimmunoprecipitation assay (R0278; Sigma Aldrich), containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors cocktail (cOmplete and PhosSTOP; Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). Cell lysates were centrifugated (15000 × g for 15 min, 4°C), and then the supernatants were tested for protein concentration by a protein assay kit (Micro BCA, Pierce; Thermo Scientific). 10 μL of each sample (on average, 10 μg of protein lysate was used per assay) was tested for GALC assay. The GALC assay was performed with specific synthetic fluorescent 6-hexadecanoylamino-4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (HMU) following procedures previously described (44). Briefly, we performed the assay by mixing 10 μL of protein extract (10–15 μg) with 20 μL of 50 μM HMU substrate (freshly suspended in 0.2 M Na2HPO4/0.1M citric-acid buffer (pH 5.2) with 0.02% w/v of sodium azide). Reactions were incubated 17 h at 37°C and then stopped with 0.2 M glycine/NaOH-buffer (pH 10.7) with 0.2% Na-dodecylsulfate (170 μL). After stopping the assay, 100 μL aliquots from the total solution were transferred to 96-well plates for reading in a fluorescence plate reader (GloMax multiplate reader; Promega, Madison, WI) at the wavelengths of HMU (emission filter: 415–485 nm; excitation filter: ultraviolet 365 nm). Each lysate was run in duplicate. Results were normalized for protein content and reported in % with respect to control condition.

Statistical analysis on Lo of MO3.13

Lo fractions in MO3.13 are reported as average value ± the standard error of the mean (mean ± standard error), obtained from n ≥ 3 independent experiments. Data were statistically analyzed by GraphPad PRISM 5.00 program (GraphPad Software; San Diego, CA). One-Way ANOVA (Dunnett’s multiple comparison test) analysis was used; the mean values obtained in each repeated experiment were assumed to be normally distributed about the true mean. Statistical significance refers to results where p < 0.05 was obtained.

Molecular dynamics simulations

Two different compositions of the lipid bilayer were simulated, one Ld with 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholin (POPC) as a model of the disordered phase, the other Lo with DPPC and cholesterol (70:30) as a model of the ordered phase. The starting configurations for the lipid bilayer patches were obtained using the Membrane Builder at the Charmm-Gui website (www.charmm-gui.org). Each leaflet of system Ld contained 38 POPC molecules, whereas that of system Lo contained 13 cholesterol and 32 DPPC molecules. The systems were solvated in a box of water molecules (4435 in system Ld and 3626 in system Lo), and Na+/Cl ions were added (corresponding to NaCl concentration of 0.2 M) within the usual periodic boundary condition scheme. The Charmm36 force field was used for the lipids in the bilayer and for the lipid tail of the Ge1L. The TIP3P model was used for water molecules. For the chromophore part, the charges and other force field parameters were adjusted starting from those of Reuter et al. for the GFP chromophore (45) and from those suggested by CgenFF (46) available online (https://cgenff.umaryland.edu/). Some specific torsion angle parameters were reparameterized by comparison with QM-MP2 scans. Gromacs (47) was used to run the molecular dynamics simulations (version 5.0.5). The simulations were performed using a 2 fs time step, with constraints on the bond lengths by the LINCS algorithm. A constant temperature (310 K) and pressure (one bar) ensemble was forced by, respectively, the v-rescale thermostat (with separate thermostats for water and the rest of the system) and the Parrinello-Rahman barostat (or Berendsen in the initial equilibration stages) with semi-isotropic pressure coupling, in which changes in the z direction are uncoupled to those in the x-y plane, as appropriate for lipid bilayer systems. Temperature and pressure time couplings were 0.2 and 5.0 ps, respectively. The Verlet cutoff scheme was used, with a 1.2 nm cutoff for van der Waal’s and Coulomb short-range interactions. The long-range Coulomb interactions were treated with the usual particle mesh Ewald scheme. The Ge1L molecule was added to the solvent part of the system. The lipid bilayers were partially denatured by increasing the temperature to 450 K for 10 ns and then letting the system gradually cool down to 310 K. This automatically led to the insertion of the molecule into the lipid bilayer. The systems were then simulated for 300 ns. The average surface area of the simulated lipid bilayer patches was 23.8 (0.6) nm2 for system Ld and 18.4 (0.2) nm2 for system Lo. Extending the simulations up to 500 ns did not result in any relevant change to the results shown.

Results

Spectroscopic properties of Ge1L in solution and in LUVs

At first, the spectroscopic properties of Ge1L were evaluated in solvents and solvent mixtures with different polarities and viscosities. In the visible range of the electromagnetic spectrum, the absorption spectrum of Ge1L peaks around 419 nm and displays poor dependence on the solvent polarity (Table 1). Conversely, the fluorescence emission ranges between 497 and 521 nm (Table 1), depending on the dielectric properties of the solvent (38). The fluorescence decay of Ge1L is biexponential (Table 1), in keeping with the peculiar emission photophysics of its fluorogenic unit Ge1 that entails two concurring excited states (29). Yet, time-resolved anisotropy measurements in tetrahydrofurane (THF) show a rotational correlation time (θ) of ∼200 ps, much longer than expected for untargeted Ge1 (1–10 ps). This finding suggests that in Ge1L, the lipid tether somewhat restrains the rotational degrees of freedom of the fluorogenic unit. The strong rigidochromism of Ge1L is witnessed by the double-logarithmic lifetime versus viscosity (Förster-Hoffman (48, 49)) linear plot obtained in mixtures of variable viscosity (Fig. 2 b).

Table 1.

Spectroscopic Properties of Ge1L in Solvents and Lipid Phases

Solvent εa λabs,max (nm) λem,max (nm) η (cP) τ1 (ns) τ2 (ns) % τ1
CCl4 3.2 420.5 497 0.91 2.21 1.22 60
AcOEt 3.3 416.5 508 0.42 2.42 1.14 25
THF 2.7 420 507 0.48 1.71 0.97 61
IPA 2.4 420 518 2.06 1.85 0.75 13
MeOH 2.6 416 521 0.59 2.30 0.78 12
Lo 512 3.67 2.15 46
Ld 519 6.20 3.20 75
a

Molar extinction coefficient (10+4).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Spectroscopic properties of Ge1L in solvents and solvent mixtures with variable polarity and viscosity. (a) Absorption (dashed) and emission (full) spectra in CCl4 (black), THF (gray), and isopropryl alcohol (IPA, light gray). (b) Forster-Hoffmann plot: log(‹τ›) vs. log(η) of Ge1L in Triton X-100/isoamyl alcohol, THF/PEG400, and CCl4/polybutene mixtures.

Next, the spectral and rigidochromic properties of Ge1L were investigated in LUVs of 100 nm diameter. LUVs are classical in vitro models of cell membrane phases and are frequently used to validate membrane probes (1, 41). LUVs were tested to investigate the optical response of Ge1L in pure lipid environments, namely the Ld and Lo phases (see Materials and Methods). Note that lipid compositions leading to homogeneous phases were carefully selected in all cases, following (39, 40). We observed that the phase nature negligibly affects the spectral emission properties of Ge1L. This complies with the similar dielectric properties explored by Ge1L in the bilayer. Instead, embedding the probe into the rigid bilayer environment leads to rather long fluorescent lifetimes, still biexponential in nature (Table 1). Remarkably, however, Ge1L average lifetimes differ by more than 3 ns between the Ld and Lo domains (Table 1). This finding indicates that the intramolecular twisting of Ge1L is much more hampered in Lo than in Ld phases. Dynamic anisotropy measurements support this picture because we measured τ = 15 ns in Ld domains and τ > 100 ns in Lo domains, in both cases with the same intrinsic anisotropy r0 = 0.34. For comparison, r0 = 0.35 in THF, demonstrating that the nature of the medium does not affect the transition dipole moments of Ge1L.

The emission properties of Ge1L were also assessed in GUVs either characterized by homogeneous Ld phase or Ld/Lo phase coexistence (42). Fluorescence analysis indicated that Ge1L is much more emissive in Lo, with a relative intensity ratio r = I(Ld)/I(Lo) = 0.18 ± 0.01. Such an intensity ratio can be expressed by

r=I(Ld)I(Lo)=ε(Ld)ε(Lo)×Φ(Ld)Φ(Lo)×Kp, (1)

where ε stands for the extinction coefficient, Φ for the quantum yield, and Kp is the partition ratio [Ge1L (Ld)]/[Ge1L (Lo)].

On account of the poor sensitivity of Ge1L absorption to the local environment, we can assume that ε(Ld)/ε(Lo)1. Also, the ratio of quantum yields can be expressed by the ratio of average lifetimes Φ(Ld)/Φ(Lo)τ(Ld)/τ(Lo)=0.52, under the reasonable hypothesis that the radiative lifetime is negligibly affected by the lipid environment. This leads to Kp = 0.35, i.e., Ge1L partitions more preferably in Lo phase than in Ld, likely on account of the saturated structure of its lipid tether.

Molecular dynamics simulations

Molecular dynamics simulations of the Ge1L/LUV system shed light over the observed rigidochromic behavior of the probe in the Ld and Lo domains. In Ld domains, the fluorogenic unit of Ge1L positions approximately parallel to the lipid-water interface, and its center of mass is localized, on average, at 0.8 nm underneath (Fig. 3 a).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Molecular dynamics of Ld or Lo homogeneous lipid bilayers embedding Ge1L. (a) On the left, a representative snapshot of molecular dynamics simulations of Ge1L interacting with Ld phase; on the right, a histogram reporting the depth within the bilayer of the lipid phosphate groups (brown), the Ge1L phosphate head (yellow), the imidazolinone ring (green), and the carboxymethyl molecular tether (red) is shown. (b) Same as for (a) but relevant to Lo phase (note that the snapshot is on the right and the depth histogram on the left). In light blue is the cholesterol hydoxyl distribution. To see this figure in color, go online.

Additionally, the amplitude of the distributions clearly indicates some flexibility of the fluorogenic unit inside the bilayer. Conversely, in Lo domains, the chromophore “kernel” slips down into the bilayer (the average position of the center of mass is 1.4 nm below the polar phosphate heads) and is characterized by poor flexibility (Fig. 3 b). Notably, in Lo domains, the cholesterol molecules accumulate near the fluorogenic unit: the interaction with the hydroxyl group of cholesterol could explain the slightly higher dielectric constant detected in Lo as compared to Ld domains (ε = 15–16 in Lo vs. ε = 8–10 in Ld domains) (38). The different flexibility of the fluorophore is also confirmed by the dihedral angle distributions of both its phenyl groups Phe1 and Phe2 (scheme 1), which in Lo regions show sharp peaks at 0 and 180°, respectively (Fig. S1, a and b). Conversely, in the Ld phase, only a slight bias appears between their orientations. In this case, the steric effect of the “flagpole” hydrogen is more evident. Finally, the obtained flip-flop frequencies (Document S1. Supporting Materials and Methods and Figs. S1–S4, Document S2. Article plus Supporting Material) are Phe1(Lo) = 0.00 ns−1, Phe1(Ld) = 0.04 ns−1, Phe2(Lo) = 0.01 ns−1, and Phe2(Ld) = 0.28 ns−1. These findings attest that although the Phe1 is mostly blocked by the steric hindrance of the targeting lipid, Phe2 is very sensitive to the different phase orders.

ph-FLIM and membrane domain composition in CHO

The strong sensitivity of Ge1L lifetime to the nature of the lipid phase prompted us to evaluate ph-FLIM (30) as a convenient means to spatially map the phase composition in cell membranes. The phasor analysis represents, in a polar two-dimensional plot (“phasor plot” (50)), the cosine (gi,j) and sine (si,j) Fourier transforms of the normalized emission decay collected in each pixel i, j of an image. For monoexponential decays, the phasor (gi,j, si,j) lies on a semicircle (universal circle) of radius 1/2 and center (1/2, 0); for multiexponential decays, the phasor lies inside the semicircle. On the phasor plot, the combinations of distinguishable photophysical states, such as those determined by Ld and Lo phases, follow a vectorial addition rule, regardless of the number of exponentials they entail (30, 50, 51). Thus, the individual contributions of lipid phases to a given membrane location can be quantified by simple vector algebra starting from the reference phasors relevant to Ld and Lo domains. To calibrate ph-FLIM, we obtained the reference phasors by ph-FLIM of Ge1L embedded in multilamellar vesicles characterized by homogeneous Ld or Lo phases. The finite precision of our measurements and/or the vesicle heterogeneity pinpointed a phasor distribution for each phase whose mass center was taken as the reference value (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Phasor plot of Ge1L in multilamellar vesicles whose compositions enable the homogeneous Ld or Lo phases.

After calibration, Ge1L was put to the test to quantify the phase domains of the PM of CHO cells. First, a colocalization experiment between the marker DiIC18(5)-DS and Ge1L confirmed that our probe selectively stains the PM of the living cells (Fig. S2). Next, we carried out FLIM and ph-FLIM analysis. The average lifetime of Ge1L in the PM of CHO cells is ∼4.2 ns. Comparison of this value with the lifetimes found in Lo and Ld phases (Table 1) suggests the “interlaced” coexistence of the two domains, as hypothesized for the modern model of the PM. Accordingly, ph-FLIM highlighted a phasor cloud lying on the calibration line that connects the Lo and Ld phases (Fig. S3). Vector algebra led to fractional intensity compositions (i.e., the fraction of emitted photons by Ge1L in each phase) χ(Lo) = 60% and χ(Ld) = 40%. This result is in good agreement with data obtained by other dyes such as Laurdan (52).

The relative abundances f(Lo) and f(Ld) of the two phases were calculated from the intensity ratio r, according to

f(Lo)=r×χ(Lo)1+r×χ(Lo)χ(Lo);f(Ld)=1f(Lo). (2)

We found out f(Lo) = 21% and f(Ld) = 79%.

Cholesterol depletion of the PM was reflected in a significant shift of the phasor cloud in the plot (Fig. 5), in excellent agreement with the expected gradual disappearance of the ordered phase (20, 43).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

ph-FLIM of Ge1L in the PM of CHO cells. (a) Temporal evolution of the cholesterol depletion observed through Ge1L lifetime. The colors of the images in panel (a) are relative to the phasor plot (b). The histograms in (c) describe the trend of the calculated intensity fraction of Ge1L in Lo phase during the extraction process (from red to green: control, 1, 2, 3, and 6 h). To see this figure in color, go online.

Membrane domain composition in MO3.13 oligodendrocytes

We then applied Ge1L to study the PM in a model of KD in vitro. MO3.13 human oligodendrocyte cells were cultured in control conditions or treated with PSY 10μM (35, 53) for different times: 15 min (PSY15), 24 h (PSY24), or 24 h followed by a 6 h recovery in control conditions (PSY24/6). In all conditions, the membrane Lo/Ld ratio was measured by ph-FLIM using Ge1L.

The exposure to PSY induced a linearly decreasing trend in fraction of Lo phase (Fig. 6 a) as compared to control. This behavior was visible in all the experiments (single data sets are reported in Fig. S4). Notably, the presence of PSY in the medium at the measurement time enhances cell variability, as witnessed by the larger SDs detected for PSY15 and PSY24. Removal of PSY in PSY24/6 diminishes cell variability, and the depletion of the Lo phase due to PSY exposure becomes statistically significant (p < 0.05 vs. control, one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s test). Concomitantly to ph-FLIM, we measured the level of the GALC enzyme (i.e., the enzyme lacking in KD) in parallel batches of MO3.13 cells treated in the same ways to verify whether the change in membrane order was correlated to GALC activity. Our findings highlight that GALC activity is stable in the treated and untreated cells (Fig. 6 b). These data suggest that GALC enzyme activity is not affected by the destabilization of the PM in MO3.13 cells induced by PSY.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(a) Quantification of Lo domain in cell membrane by Ge1L. Mo3.13 cells were cultured in control conditions or treated with PSY 10 μM for 15 min (PSY15), 24 h (PSY24), or 24 h followed by a 6 h recovery in control conditions (PSY24/6). p < 0.05 control vs. PSY24/6, one-way ANOVA Dunnett’s test. (b) Level of GALC activity in MO3.13 cells in different conditions (as above). The GALC assay was performed with HMU, and results are reported in % in respect to control condition. In all cases, error bars refer to 1 SD.

Discussion

Fluorescence is a highly dynamic phenomenon occurring in the ns timescale. This relatively long time window allows for the occurrence of several processes that can strongly modify the nature of emission, including nanoscale friction by surrounding molecules (rigidochromism). Ge1L is a lipid bioconjugate of an efficient and polarity-independent rigidochromic probe, Ge1, which targets selectively the PM of living cells. In the modern picture of the PM, the coexistence of ordered and disordered domains appears to be behind a variety of processes, such as formation of protein clusters, signal transduction, endocytosis, cell polarization, and motility (54). Accordingly, the detection of membrane phase composition is a relevant target in biophysics (1). We found that Ge1L partitions in both Ld and Lo phases, in which it experiences rather different environments in terms of local fluidity, as witnessed by a large change in fluorescence lifetime. Our molecular dynamics simulations afford a rational explanation for this phenomenon: Ge1L pins deeply inside the bilayer in Lo domains, whereupon it experiences a very rigid environment. Conversely, the higher molecular flexibity experienced by Ge1L in Ld phases is owed to the closer position of the fluorogenic unit to the lipid bilayer surface.

The large lifetime difference of Ge1L in lipid bilayers identifies two “reference states” that can be usefully exploited by ph-FLIM (31, 33). From these reference states and the relative intensities of the dye therein, the simple vectorial rules of ph-FLIM enable the straightforward determination of the fractions of Ld and Lo phases in each single pixel after Ge1L imaging. When Ge1L stains the cell membrane, ph-FLIM measurement of Ld and Lo fractions is a suitable way to construct a map of cell membrane composition. We note that the typical diffraction-limit resolution of a wide-field fluorescence or confocal microscope operating with visible light is, at most, around 200 nm. This means that the lifetime from each pixel reflects an average of Ld and Lo phases, whose dimensions were identified below 50 nm by several authors (3, 55, 56), although this figure is still a matter of debate, and the actual value is unknown. Notably, Kuimova et al. proposed the same ph-FLIM approach for a different molecular rotor, although they did not provide a quantitative estimate of the two phases in living cells (57, 58).

It is worth noting that the homogeneous lipid systems used to calibrate Ld and Lo phases in ph-FLIM are simplistic representations of the actual Ld and Lo nanophases in cells, which both contain proteins, cholesterol, variable amounts of charged lipids, and other biomolecules. Yet, for calibration, we need a stable model system in which we know, for sure, that we have homogeneous (“pure”) phases. Anything closer to the real lipid composition already may introduce nanodomains. Giant PM vesicles, for example, show phase separation, but this does not show up in the lifetime histogram, as previously reported by some of us (27). As previously stated, our phasor calibration method identifies two pure “states” and predicts that any mixture of these two states would fall along their connection line in the phasor plot. Remarkably, phasors of Ge1L in cell membrane do fall along this line, substantiating the strong effect on lifetime by the local phase composition. However, this does not imply that the two ideal states are actually there, but rather that we can interpret the composition in any membrane point as ideally made up of two limit pure phases. Actually, the strength of ph-FLIM applied to Ge1L resides in our capability to relate membrane changes to real composition shifts toward one or the other of the two pure phases, yielding a biological insight. Our experiments on cells attest to that.

At first, Ge1L was simply applied to analyze the membrane of reference CHO cells. There, we found out that the Lo phase accounts for ∼21% of the recorded intensity, and this fraction is critically dependent on the available cholesterol. In more biologically insightful experiments, Ge1L highlighted the membrane alteration in MO3.13 human oligodendrocyte provoked by PSY, the cytotoxic sphingolipid that accumulates in the nervous system in KD owing to loss of GALC activity. Data reported in Fig. 6, along with the single experiment data sets (Fig. S4), show that PSY administration to MO3.13 cells destabilizes the membrane, supported by the rather large variation of phase compositions measured when the cells are exposed and imaged in the presence of PSY. Importantly, our findings reveal the shrinking of the Lo phase along with PSY exposure. This decrease is partially hidden by data variability for PSY15 and PSY24 conditions, but it becomes statistically significant when PSY is removed after 24 h of exposure and cells are allowed to recover for 6 h (PSY24/6). Additionally, PSY effect seems unrelated to GALC activity, thus excluding a feedback action of PSY-induced membrane alteration against the accumulation of PSY. The latter data suggest that prolonged exposure to PSY might induce irreversible alterations in the PM, far beyond the possibility of rescue by endogenous GALC.

The PM changes upon PSY treatment were recently addressed by biochemical means. In all cases, PSY was found to induce significant lipid raft alteration and slight enrichment of cholesterol (36, 37, 59). Significantly, the non-natural enantiomer of PSY (ent-PSY) was found to have equal or greater toxicity compared with PSY (60). This strongly suggests that PSY exerts its toxic action through a nonenantioselective mechanism, possibly through membrane perturbation rather than through stereospecific protein-PSY interactions. In keeping with this hypothesis, Diaz et al. very recently reported that PSY remodels physically model lipid membranes at neutral pH (61). Actually, they found out that PSY reduces the compactness of the membrane and increases the fraction of the disordered phase.

The in cellulo reduction of Lo phases that we observed upon PSY administration fits very well in this context, representing the first proof, to our knowledge, of the physical action of PSY on actual PM. Our findings, also, are not contradictory with the reduction of lateral mobility observed by some authors in the myelin membrane upon PSY treatment (36). Indeed, PSY intercalation in the ordered domains leads to the loss of several raft proteins (e.g., caveolin-1) that are apparently displaced by the toxic lipid. Ge1L could be forced out of the altered ordered domains, signaling the shrinking of the Lo phase. At any rate, our experimental results add new insights into this puzzling scenario, directly linking the previous observations about KD raft composition alteration to a physical property of the membrane, which we could directly measure thanks to the Ge1L probe.

Conclusions

We here reported on a fluorescent analog of the GFP chromophore that, when conjugated to a phospholipid, enables the quantification of the Lo and Ld domains in living cells on account of its large fluorescence lifetime variation in the two phases. The lifetime variation stems from a different rigidochromic effect on the fluorogenic unit of Ge1L due to the dissimilar arrangement of the probe in Lo and Ld domains, as demonstrated by molecular dynamics simulations. We note that spatially resolved quantification of Lo and Ld domains is a relevant goal in fluorescence microscopy of living cells on account of the regulating role of the two bilayer phases on several biological processes. Indeed, many approaches have been proposed to achieve this goal. The advantage of our Ge1L probe lies in the combination of excitation and emission in the visible range of electromagnetic spectrum (for instance, the popular membrane probe Laurdan requires ultraviolet or two-photon excitation), with high sensitivity to the two phases by a rigidochromic effect on its lifetime. Additionally, the use of ph-FLIM leads to a straightforward, all-graphic determination of Lo and Ld composition in each pixel. Our imaging strategy was applied to unveil the effect of PSY administration to human oligodendrocytes, a simple in vitro model of KD that nonetheless recapitulates most of the molecular phenotypes associated with this pathology. We observed that PSY progressively destabilizes the PM, as witnessed by a shrinking of the Lo fraction. The unchanged levels of GALC, i.e., the enzyme lacking in KD, upon PSY treatment suggest that PSY alters the PM structure by a direct physical effect, possibly without altering the lipid metabolism of the cell. This confirms experiments by Hawkins-Salsbury et al. (60) that highlighted similar membrane destabilization effects by PSY and its non-natural enantiomer that are not recognized by the stereospecific cell machinery. We believe that Ge1L represents a, to our knowledge, novel remarkable molecular fluorescent indicator to monitor, with sub-micrometer spatial resolution, any biological process that leads to membrane remodeling and/or destabilization.

Author Contributions

G.A., M.S., R.N., M.C., G.S., and R.B. designed research. G.A., B.S., I.T., M.S., R.N., G.S., and R.B. performed research. G.A., I.T., R.N., M.C., G.S., and R.B. analyzed data. All authors wrote the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Prof. Piet Dijkstra (Twente University) for useful discussions.

This research was supported by 1) Regione Toscana, Bando Fondo Aree Sottoutilizzate Salute 2014, under the framework of the project “DIAMANTE-Diagnostica Molecolare Innovativa per la scelta terapeutica personalizzata dell’adenocarcinoma pancreatico” (grant number CUP I56D15000310005); 2) Fondazione Cassa Di Risparmio di Lucca, under the framework of the project “Pre-Clinical Testing of Lithium Treatment in Krabbe Disease”; 3) European Leukodystrophy Association (ELA) International, under the framework of the project “Development of a novel, nanovector-mediated enzyme replacement therapy for Globoid Cell Leukodystrophy (GLD)”, grant no. ELA 2015-010C1A.

Editor: Joseph Falke.

Footnotes

Supporting Materials and Methods and four figures are available at http://www.biophysj.org/biophysj/supplemental/S0006-3495(18)34509-0.

Contributor Information

Giovanni Signore, Email: giovanni.signore@sns.it.

Ranieri Bizzarri, Email: r.bizzarri@sns.it.

Supporting Material

Document S1. Supporting Materials and Methods and Figs. S1–S4
mmc1.pdf (2.3MB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus Supporting Material
mmc2.pdf (4MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Klymchenko A.S., Kreder R. Fluorescent probes for lipid rafts: from model membranes to living cells. Chem. Biol. 2014;21:97–113. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jacobson K., Mouritsen O.G., Anderson R.G. Lipid rafts: at a crossroad between cell biology and physics. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007;9:7–14. doi: 10.1038/ncb0107-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lingwood D., Simons K. Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science. 2010;327:46–50. doi: 10.1126/science.1174621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Simons K., Ikonen E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature. 1997;387:569–572. doi: 10.1038/42408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brown D.A., London E. Structure and function of sphingolipid- and cholesterol-rich membrane rafts. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:17221–17224. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R000005200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Simons K., Toomre D. Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000;1:31–39. doi: 10.1038/35036052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.M’Baye G., Mély Y., Klymchenko A.S. Liquid ordered and gel phases of lipid bilayers: fluorescent probes reveal close fluidity but different hydration. Biophys. J. 2008;95:1217–1225. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.127480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Haidekker M.A., Brady T.P., Theodorakis E.A. Effects of solvent polarity and solvent viscosity on the fluorescent properties of molecular rotors and related probes. Bioorg. Chem. 2005;33:415–425. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2005.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Parasassi T., De Stasio G., Gratton E. Phase fluctuation in phospholipid membranes revealed by Laurdan fluorescence. Biophys. J. 1990;57:1179–1186. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82637-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Parasassi T., Di Stefano M., Gratton E. Membrane aging during cell growth ascertained by Laurdan generalized polarization. Exp. Cell Res. 1992;202:432–439. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(92)90096-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Harris F.M., Best K.B., Bell J.D. Use of laurdan fluorescence intensity and polarization to distinguish between changes in membrane fluidity and phospholipid order. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2002;1565:123–128. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(02)00514-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gaus K., Zech T., Harder T. Visualizing membrane microdomains by Laurdan 2-photon microscopy. Mol. Membr. Biol. 2006;23:41–48. doi: 10.1080/09687860500466857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rottenberg H. Probing the interactions of alcohols with biological membranes with the fluorescent probe Prodan. Biochemistry. 1992;31:9473–9481. doi: 10.1021/bi00154a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Owen D.M., Rentero C., Gaus K. Quantitative imaging of membrane lipid order in cells and organisms. Nat. Protoc. 2011;7:24–35. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kwiatek J.M., Owen D.M., Gaus K. Characterization of a new series of fluorescent probes for imaging membrane order. PLoS One. 2013;8:e52960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Demchenko A.P., Mély Y., Klymchenko A.S. Monitoring biophysical properties of lipid membranes by environment-sensitive fluorescent probes. Biophys. J. 2009;96:3461–3470. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Klymchenko A.S., Demchenko A.P. Electrochromic modulation of excited-state intramolecular proton transfer: the new principle in design of fluorescence sensors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:12372–12379. doi: 10.1021/ja027669l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Oncul S., Klymchenko A.S., Mély Y. Liquid ordered phase in cell membranes evidenced by a hydration-sensitive probe: effects of cholesterol depletion and apoptosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2010;1798:1436–1443. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Signore G., Nifosì R., Bizzarri R. A novel coumarin fluorescent sensor to probe polarity around biomolecules. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2009;5:722–729. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2009.1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kucherak O.A., Oncul S., Klymchenko A.S. Switchable nile red-based probe for cholesterol and lipid order at the outer leaflet of biomembranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:4907–4916. doi: 10.1021/ja100351w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Haidekker M.A., Theodorakis E.A. Molecular rotors--fluorescent biosensors for viscosity and flow. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007;5:1669–1678. doi: 10.1039/b618415d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sutharsan J., Lichlyter D., Theodorakis E.A. Molecular rotors: synthesis and evaluation as viscosity sensors. Tetrahedron. 2010;66:2582–2588. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2010.01.093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kuimova M.K. Mapping viscosity in cells using molecular rotors. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012;14:12671–12686. doi: 10.1039/c2cp41674c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kuimova M.K., Yahioglu G., Suhling K. Molecular rotor measures viscosity of live cells via fluorescence lifetime imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:6672–6673. doi: 10.1021/ja800570d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.López-Duarte I., Vu T.T., Kuimova M.K. A molecular rotor for measuring viscosity in plasma membranes of live cells. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2014;50:5282–5284. doi: 10.1039/c3cc47530a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stöckl M., Plazzo A.P., Herrmann A. Detection of lipid domains in model and cell membranes by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy of fluorescent lipid analogues. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:30828–30837. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M801418200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Stöckl M.T., Herrmann A. Detection of lipid domains in model and cell membranes by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2010;1798:1444–1456. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nipper M.E., Majd S., Haidekker M.A. Characterization of changes in the viscosity of lipid membranes with the molecular rotor FCVJ. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2008;1778:1148–1153. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Abbandonato G., Polli D., Bizzarri R. Simultaneous detection of local polarizability and viscosity by a single fluorescent probe in cells. Biophys. J. 2018;114:2212–2220. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.02.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Digman M.A., Caiolfa V.R., Gratton E. The phasor approach to fluorescence lifetime imaging analysis. Biophys. J. 2008;94:L14–L16. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.120154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Battisti A., Digman M.A., Bizzarri R. Intracellular pH measurements made simple by fluorescent protein probes and the phasor approach to fluorescence lifetime imaging. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2012;48:5127–5129. doi: 10.1039/c2cc30373f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Battisti A., Panettieri S., Bizzarri R. Imaging intracellular viscosity by a new molecular rotor suitable for phasor analysis of fluorescence lifetime. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013;405:6223–6233. doi: 10.1007/s00216-013-7084-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ferri G., Nucara L., Bizzarri R. Organization of inner cellular components as reported by a viscosity-sensitive fluorescent Bodipy probe suitable for phasor approach to FLIM. Biophys. Chem. 2016;208:17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2015.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Koenig M., Storti B., Bottari G. A fluorescent molecular rotor showing vapochromism, aggregation-induced emission, and environmental sensing in living cells. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2016;4:3018–3027. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Del Grosso A., Antonini S., Cecchini M. Lithium improves cell viability in psychosine-treated MO3.13 human oligodendrocyte cell line via autophagy activation. J. Neurosci. Res. 2016;94:1246–1260. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.D’Auria L., Reiter C., Bongarzone E.R. Psychosine enhances the shedding of membrane microvesicles: implications in demyelination in Krabbe’s disease. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.White A.B., Galbiati F., Bongarzone E.R. Persistence of psychosine in brain lipid rafts is a limiting factor in the therapeutic recovery of a mouse model for Krabbe disease. J. Neurosci. Res. 2011;89:352–364. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Signore G., Abbandonato G., Bizzarri R. Imaging the static dielectric constant in vitro and in living cells by a bioconjugable GFP chromophore analog. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2013;49:1723–1725. doi: 10.1039/c3cc38071h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Veatch S.L., Keller S.L. Separation of liquid phases in giant vesicles of ternary mixtures of phospholipids and cholesterol. Biophys. J. 2003;85:3074–3083. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74726-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Smith A.K., Freed J.H. Determination of tie-line fields for coexisting lipid phases: an ESR study. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2009;113:3957–3971. doi: 10.1021/jp808412x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wu Y., Stefl M., Kuimova M.K. Molecular rheometry: direct determination of viscosity in Lo and Ld lipid phases via fluorescence lifetime imaging. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013;15:14986–14993. doi: 10.1039/c3cp51953h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Montis C., Generini V., Berti D. Model lipid bilayers mimic non-specific interactions of gold nanoparticles with macrophage plasma membranes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018;516:284–294. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.01.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zidovetzki R., Levitan I. Use of cyclodextrins to manipulate plasma membrane cholesterol content: evidence, misconceptions and control strategies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2007;1768:1311–1324. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.03.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ribbens J.J., Moser A.B., Maegawa G.H.B. Characterization and application of a disease-cell model for a neurodegenerative lysosomal disease. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2014;111:172–183. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Reuter N., Lin H., Thiel W. Green fluorescent proteins: empirical force field for the neutral and deprotonated forms of the chromophore. Molecular dynamics simulations of the wild type and S65T mutant. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2002;106:6310–6321. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vanommeslaeghe K., Hatcher E., Mackerell A.D., Jr. CHARMM general force field: a force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields. J. Comput. Chem. 2010;31:671–690. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hess B., Kutzner C., Lindahl E. GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008;4:435–447. doi: 10.1021/ct700301q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Forster T., Hoffmann G. Viscosity dependence of fluorescent quantum yields of some dye systems. Zeitschrift Fur Physikalische Chemie-Frankfurt. 1971;75:63. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Haidekker M.A., Theodorakis E.A. Environment-sensitive behavior of fluorescent molecular rotors. J. Biol. Eng. 2010;4:11. doi: 10.1186/1754-1611-4-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Clayton A.H., Hanley Q.S., Verveer P.J. Graphical representation and multicomponent analysis of single-frequency fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy data. J. Microsc. 2004;213:1–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2004.01265.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hirshfield K.M., Toptygin D., Brand L. Dynamic fluorescence measurements of two-state systems: applications to calcium-chelating probes. Anal. Biochem. 1993;209:209–218. doi: 10.1006/abio.1993.1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Owen D.M., Williamson D.J., Gaus K. Sub-resolution lipid domains exist in the plasma membrane and regulate protein diffusion and distribution. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1256. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Voccoli V., Tonazzini I., Cecchini M. Role of extracellular calcium and mitochondrial oxygen species in psychosine-induced oligodendrocyte cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1529. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Simons K., Gerl M.J. Revitalizing membrane rafts: new tools and insights. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010;11:688–699. doi: 10.1038/nrm2977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kusumi A., Suzuki K.G., Fujiwara T.K. Hierarchical mesoscale domain organization of the plasma membrane. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011;36:604–615. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2011.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Owen D.M., Gaus K. Imaging lipid domains in cell membranes: the advent of super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. Front. Plant Sci. 2013;4:503. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dent M.R., López-Duarte I., Kuimova M.K. Imaging plasma membrane phase behaviour in live cells using a thiophene-based molecular rotor. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2016;52:13269–13272. doi: 10.1039/c6cc05954f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sherin P.S., López-Duarte I., Kuimova M.K. Visualising the membrane viscosity of porcine eye lens cells using molecular rotors. Chem. Sci. (Camb.) 2017;8:3523–3528. doi: 10.1039/c6sc05369f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.White A.B., Givogri M.I., Bongarzone E.R. Psychosine accumulates in membrane microdomains in the brain of krabbe patients, disrupting the raft architecture. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:6068–6077. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5597-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hawkins-Salsbury J.A., Parameswar A.R., Sands M.S. Psychosine, the cytotoxic sphingolipid that accumulates in globoid cell leukodystrophy, alters membrane architecture. J. Lipid Res. 2013;54:3303–3311. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M039610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zulueta Díaz Y.L.M., Caby S., Fanani M.L. Psychosine remodels model lipid membranes at neutral pH. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2018;1860:2515–2526. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2018.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Supporting Materials and Methods and Figs. S1–S4
mmc1.pdf (2.3MB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus Supporting Material
mmc2.pdf (4MB, pdf)

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES