Skip to main content
ZooKeys logoLink to ZooKeys
. 2019 Feb 4;(822):17–31. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.822.30927

Three new species of the spider genus Luzonacera Li & Li, 2017 from Philippines (Araneae, Psilodercidae)

Wan-Jin Chang 1,2, Fengyuan Li 1, Shuqiang Li 1,
PMCID: PMC6370752  PMID: 30766420

Abstract Abstract

Three new species of Luzonacera Li & Li, 2017 are described: L.francescoballarini Li & Li, sp. n. (♂♀), L.lattuensis Li & Li, sp. n. (♂♀) and L.peterjaegeri Li & Li, sp. n. (♂♀). Prior to this study, the genus was known by two species, both from Luzon Island, Philippines. So far, the genus and all five species are endemic to Luzon Island and can be found in dry or humid caves in a dark environment.

Keywords: cave, endemic, Luzon Island, Southeast Asia, tropical

Introduction

The spider family Psilodercidae Machado, 1951 contains eleven genera and 116 species (World Spider Catalog 2018, Li and Quan 2017). All species are restricted to tropical Asia and known from Sri Lanka and India to Philippines (World Spider Catalog 2018). Currently, five species of Psilodercidae belonging to four genera are known to occur in Philippines (World Spider Catalog 2018): Psilodercesegeria Simon, 1892 from Luzon, Althepusnoonadanae Brignoli, 1973 from Mindanao, Leclerceranegros Deeleman-Reinhold, 1995 from Negros, and Luzonacerachang Li & Li, 2017 and L.duan Li & Li, 2017 from Luzon.

The recently described genus Luzonacera Li & Li, 2017 was known from two species, L.chang Li & Li, 2017 and L.duan Li & Li, 2017 (World Spider Catalog 2018). While studying new material collected on Luzon Island, we recognized three new species of the genus. The goal of this paper is to provide detailed descriptions of these new species.

Materials and methods

All specimens were collected in Luzon Island and preserved in 95% ethanol solution. All types are deposited in the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing (IZCAS) and Senckenberg Research Institute in Frankfurt (SMF). A Leica M205 C stereomicroscope was used to measure and examine the specimens. Morphological details of the specimens were studied with an Olympus BX41 compound microscope. An Olympus C7070 wide zoom digital camera (7.1 megapixels) mounted on an Olympus SZX12 stereomicroscope was used to take photos. The images were generated using Helicon Focus 6.7.1 image stacking software and further revised with Adobe Photoshop. Leg measurements are shown as total length (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, and tarsus). Leg segments were measured from their retrolateral side except for L.peterjaegeri sp. n. which was measured from the prolateral side. All measurements are given in millimetres (mm). Terminology follows that of Li et al. (2014), Tong and Li (2007) and Deeleman-Reinhold (1995).

The extraction of genomic DNA from legs followed Li and Li (2018). Primer sets for the PCR and cycle sequencing reactions used for cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) in this study are from Folmer et al. (1994). All sequences were analysed using BLAST. The GenBank accession numbers are provided in Table 1. The COI dataset of the three sequences obtained in this study and two sequences from GenBank were aligned using MAFFT version 7 (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/ alignment/server/). MEGA7.0.16 (Kumar et al. 2016) was used for subsequent manual adjustment of the sequences and calculation of pairwise comparisons of uncorrected K2P-distances.

Table 1.

The accession numbers for each species in this paper.

Species Length (bp) GenBank accession number
Luzonacerafrancescoballarini sp. n. 651 MK238752
Luzonaceralattuensis sp. n. 651 MK238753
Luzonacerapeterjaegeri sp. n. 651 MK238754

Taxonomy

Family Psilodercidae Machado, 1951

Genus. Luzonacera

Li & Li, 2017

Type species.

Luzonacerachang Li & Li, 2017

Emended diagnosis.

Luzonacera resembles Althepus Thorell, 1898 and Leclercera Deeleman-Reinhold, 1995. However, Luzonacera can be differentiated by the combination of the following characteristics: 1) absence of a conductor (versus presence of a conductor in both Althepus and Leclercera); 2) absence of a retrolateral protrusion on the tibia or cymbium of the male palp (versus presence of a retrolateral protrusion on the tibia or cymbium of the male palp in Althepus and Leclercera); 3) remarkably inflated tibia of the male palp; 4) pyriform bulb with spirally extended embolus; and 5) two pairs of spermathecae, the lateral spermathecae with longer stalks than the medial spermathecae.

Composition.

L.chang Li & Li, 2017 (the type species), L.duan Li & Li, 2017, L.francescoballarini sp. n., L.lattuensis sp. n. and L.peterjaegeri sp. n.

Distribution.

Philippines.

Illustrated key to the males of Luzonacera

1 Embolus and bulb equal in length; embolus and bulb ratio approximately equal to 1 (Fig. 1i) L. chang
Embolus short (bulb ca. 2 times longer than the embolus); embolus and bulb ratio: 0.40–0.57 (Fig. 1ii–v) 2
2 Slight constriction of the central part of bulb (Fig. 1iii) L.francescoballarini sp. n.
Pronounced constriction of the central part of bulb (Fig. 1ii, iv, v) 3
3 Bulb with smooth surface dorsally (Fig. 1v) L.peterjaegeri sp. n.
Bulb with a notch (NO) dorsally (Fig. 1ii & iv) 4
4 The tip of the bulb without protrusion (PT) (Fig. 1ii) L. duan
The tip of the bulb with protrusion (PT) (Fig. 1iv) L.lattuensis sp. n.
Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Prolateral view of male palp bulbs of Luzonacera species: iL.changiiL.duaniiiL.francescoballarini sp. n. ivL.lattuensis sp. n. and vL.peterjaegeri sp. n. Abbreviations: PT = protrusion, NO = notch.

Illustrated key to the females of Luzonacera

1 Two pairs of similar spermathecae (Fig. 2a–d) 2
Two pairs of dissimilar spermathecae (medial pair oblique, tube-shaped) (Fig. 2e) L.peterjaegeri sp. n.
2 Spermathecae without globose distal part (with swollen distal ends) (Fig. 2a) L. chang
Spermathecae with globose distal part (Fig. 2b–d) 3
3 Two pairs of spermathecae pointed almost the same direction (Fig. 2b, d) 4
Two pairs of spermathecae pointed opposite directions (Fig. 2c) L.francescoballarini sp. n.
4 Relatively short stalks of medial spermathecae; distal part and stalk ratio approximately 0.5 (Fig. 2d) L.lattuensis sp. n.
Relatively long stalks of medial spermathecae; distal part and stalk ratio approximately 0.25 (Fig. 2b) L. duan
Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Female internal genitalia of five different species of Luzonacera: aL.changbL.duancL.francescoballarini sp. n. dL.lattuensis sp. n. and eL.peterjaegeri sp. n. Abbreviation: SP = spermathecae.

Luzonacera francescoballarini

Li & Li sp. n.

http://zoobank.org/EEE59EF0-7FF6-4F7D-BB5E-6FE76729FB76

Figs 3 , 4 , 9 , 10

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Luzonacerafrancescoballarini sp. n., male holotype A palp bulb, retrolateral view B palp bulb, ventral view C palp bulb, prolateral view D palp, prolateral view E palp, retrolateral view. Abbreviations: EM = embolus; CP = cymbial protrusion.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Luzonacerafrancescoballarini sp. n., male holotype and female paratype A internal genitalia, dorsal view B female epigastric furrow, ventral view C male habitus, dorsal view D female habitus, dorsal view E female habitus, ventral view. Abbreviation: SP = spermathecae.

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Cheliceral retromargin AL.francescoballarini sp. n. BL.lattuensis sp. n. CL.peterjaegeri sp. n. Abbreviations: PT = promargin teeth; RT = retromargin teeth; CL = cheliceral lamina.

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Distribution of five Luzonacera in Philippines 1Luzonacerafrancescoballarini sp. n. 2L.lattuensis sp. n. 3L.peterjaegeri sp. n. 4L.duan5L.chang.

Types.

Holotype: ♂ (IZCAS), Philippines, Luzon Island, Bulacan Province, San Miguel City, near Biak-Na-Bato National Park, Bayukbok Cave, 15°10'5.4"N, 121°5'4.3"E, 125 m, 21.V.2015, F. Ballarin and Y. Li. Paratypes: 1♂, 1♀ (IZCAS), same data as holotype.

Etymology.

The species is named after Francesco Ballarin, who collected the type series; name in genitive case.

Diagnosis.

Luzonacerafrancescoballarini sp. n. resembles L.lattuensis sp. n. in having a short embolus, and two pairs of twisted spermathecae globose at distal parts. Males can be distinguished from the latter species by the smooth dorsal surface of the bulb (Figure 3B); females can be distinguished by having longer spermathecae (Figure 4A; versus shorter in L.lattuensis sp. n. in Figure 4A).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Luzonaceralattuensis sp. n., male holotype and female paratype A internal genitalia, dorsal view B female epigastric furrow, ventral view C male habitus, dorsal view D female habitus, dorsal view E female habitus, ventral view. Abbreviation: SP = spermathecae.

Description.

Male (Holotype). Total length 4.81; carapace 1.60 long, 1.28 wide; abdomen 3.20 long, 0.96 wide. Colour faded. Carapace round, pale yellow, with ovoid brown patch medially and rounded brown patch posterior to ocular area. Fovea shallow. Anterior margin of thoracic region distinctly elevated. Chelicerae light brown with lamina, promargin with a single tooth and retromargin with two small teeth (Figure 9A). Clypeus slanting, light brown. Labium slanting, pale brown. Sternum pale brown with large patch of brown spots medially. Abdomen elongated with complex patterns dorsally and ventrally. Legs light brown; measurements: I 22.44 (6.73, 0.64, 6.41, 3.21, 5.45), II 17.63 (5.13, 0.64, 5.13, 5.45, 1.28), III 12.05 (3.53, 0.32, 3.40, 3.20, 1.60), IV 23.07 (7.05, 0.64, 7.05, 6.41, 1.92). Palp (Figure 3A–E): tibia swollen at the base, length/width = 2.40; cymbium swollen with distal protrusion and numerous long setae; length/width = 2.33; bulb light brown, pyriform; embolus forms a slender spiral extending from tip of bulb.

Female (paratype). Similar to male in coloration and general features but slightly larger (Figure 4D, E). Measurements: total length 3.59; carapace 1.20 long, 1.40 wide; abdomen 2.20 long, 0.80 wide. Leg measurements: I 14.11(4.17, 0.32, 4.17, 4.17, 1.28), II 10.88 (3.50, 0.32, 3.53, 3.21, 0.32), III 9.26 (2.56, 0.50, 2.60, 2.60, 1.00), IV 14.06 (4.49, 0.40, 4.17, 4.00, 1.00). Internal genitalia: two pairs of slender spermathecae with long stalks (ca. 6 times longer than distal globular parts), spermathecae distal parts not wider than basal width of stalks, both pairs equal in width (Figure 4A).

Distribution.

Type locality only (Figure 10).

Natural history.

Collected in a dark and rather humid cave, close to the ground, along the wall of the cave with huge rocks.

Comments.

Based on the 651 bp aligned sequences, the COI uncorrected K2P-distance between L.francescoballarini sp. n. and L.chang is 13.5%, between L.francescoballarini sp. n. and L.duan is 15.0%, between L.francescoballarini sp. n. and L.lattuensis sp. n. is 14.9%, and between L.francescoballarini sp. n. and L.peterjaegeri sp. n. is 13.9%.

Luzonacera lattuensis

Li & Li sp. n.

http://zoobank.org/0D355C5B-450C-4F82-805E-0062E14381F0

Figs 5 , 6 , 9 , 10

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Luzonaceralattuensis sp. n., male holotype A palp bulb, retrolateral view B palp bulb, ventral view C palp bulb, prolateral view D palp, prolateral view E palp, retrolateral view. Abbreviations: EM = embolus; CP = cymbial protrusion; NO = notch.

Types.

Holotype: ♂ (IZCAS), Philippines, Luzon Island, Cagayon Province, Tuguegarao City, Penablanca Village, Lattu-Lattuc Cave, 17°42'23"N, 121°49'2"E, 111 m, 31.V.2015, F. Ballarin and Y. Li. Paratypes: 1♂, 1♀ (IZCAS), same data as holotype.

Etymology.

The species name is an adjective referring to the type locality.

Diagnosis.

Both sexes of L.lattuensis sp. n. and L.francescoballarini sp. n. are very similar. Males of L.lattuensis sp. n. can be distinguished from L.francescoballarini sp. n. by the bulb with a dorsal notch (Figure 5A) and a relatively longer cymbium tip (Figure 5E); females can be distinguished by having shorter spermathecae with more widely spaced bases (Figure 6A; versus longer spermathecae with more narrowly spaced bases in L.francescoballarini sp. n. in Figure 8A).

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Luzonacerapeterjaegeri sp. n., male holotype and female paratype A internal genitalia, dorsal view f female epigastric furrow, ventral view C male habitus, dorsal view D female habitus, dorsal view E female habitus, ventral view. Abbreviation: SP = spermathecae.

Description.

Male (Holotype). Total length 3.85; carapace 1.28 long, 0.96 wide; abdomen 2.56 long, 0.75 wide. Carapace round and brown, with three longitudinal brown bands; the central band is 3 times wider than the lateral bands (Figure 6C). Fovea shallow, brown. Anterior margin of thoracic region distinctly elevated. Chelicerae brown with lamina, promargin with one tooth and retromargin with two small teeth (Figure 9B). Clypeus slanting, brown with two pale rounded areas laterally and two triangular projections basally. Labium slanting, dark brown. Sternum pale brown with three dark brown patches laterally. Abdomen elongated, with complex patterns dorsally and ventrally. Legs brown with white annulations; measurements: I & II missing, III 7.80 (2.24, 0.32, 2.24, 2.00, 1.00), IV missing. Palp (Figure 5A–E): tibia swollen at the base, length/width = 2.50; cymbium with distal protrusion, length/width = 2.0; bulb light brown, pyriform; embolus forms a slender spiral extending subapically from bulb.

Female (paratype). General features and coloration are similar to the male, but the female is slightly larger (Figure 6D, E). Measurements: total length 3.81; carapace 1.25 long, 1.00 wide; abdomen 2.56 long, 1.40 wide. Leg measurements: I 11.05 (3.25, 0.40, 3.20, 3.20, 1.00), II 10.57 (3.20, 0.32, 2.88, 3.21, 0.96), III 6.74 (2.00, 0.32, 1.92, 1.75, 0.75), IV 13.35 (3.75, 0.31, 3.80, 4.49, 1.00). Internal genitalia: two pairs of twisted spermathecae, medial spermathecae with globose distal parts and short stalks, and lateral spermathecae with globose distal parts and long stalks (stalks ca. 3 times longer than distal parts) (Figure 6A).

Distribution.

Type locality only (Figure 10).

Natural history.

Collected close to the ground along the wall of a dark, rather dry and dusty secondary cave with huge rocks.

Comments.

Based on the 651 bp- aligned sequences, the COI uncorrected K2P-distance between L.lattuensis sp. n. and L.chang is 12.4%, between L.lattuensis sp. n. and L.duan is 11.5%, and between L.lattuensis sp. n. and L.peterjaegeri sp. n. is 13.6%.

Luzonacera peterjaegeri

Li & Li sp. n.

http://zoobank.org/ B57BC1C9-4645-4662-90C1-CE3FFC211E96

Figs 7 , 8 , 9 , 10

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Luzonacerapeterjaegeri sp. n., male holotype A right palp bulb, retrolateral view B right palp bulb, ventral view C right palp bulb, prolateral view D right palp, prolateral view E right palp, retrolateral view. Abbreviations: EM = embolus; CP = cymbial protrusion.

Types.

Holotype: ♂ (SMF), Philippines, Northern Luzon Island, Teresita State, Cagayan Province, Lower Kimmabalyu Cave, 18°11'35.4"N, 121°52'10.3"E, 22.I.2015, H. Steiner. Paratypes: 1♂, 2♀ (SMF), same data as holotype.

Etymology.

The species is named after Peter Jäger in honour of his contribution to the study of spiders from Asia; name in genitive case.

Diagnosis.

Luzonacerapeterjaegeri sp. n. can be distinguished from all other known species of the genus by a distinct constriction on the central part of the bulb (Figure 7A); females can be distinguished by two types of spermathecae: one pair of slender spermathecae bearing a globose distal part, and one pair of oblique, tube-shaped spermathecae (Figure 8A; versus both pairs of spermathecae bearing a globose distal part in other species). Moreover, both sexes of L.peterjaegeri sp. n. have longer chelicerae (Figure 8; versus shorter chelicerae in other species).

Description.

Male (Holotype). Total length 4.00; carapace 1.50 long, 1.40 wide; abdomen 2.50 long, 1.00 wide. Carapace round, pale brown, with three longitudinal brown bands, with the middle band 3 times wider than the lateral bands (Figure 8C). Fovea shallow and brown. Anterior margin of thoracic region distinctly elevated. Chelicerae long, brown with lamina, promargin with one tooth, and retromargin with two small teeth (Figure 9C). Clypeus brown with two pale rounded areas laterally and two relatively longer protrusions basally. Labium brown. Sternum brown with three dark brown patches laterally. Abdomen elongated, with complex patterns dorsally and ventrally. Leg measurements: all legs missing. Right palp (Figure 7A–E): tibia swollen at the base, length/width = 2.25; cymbium with distal protrusion, length/width = 3.4; bulb light brown, pyriform; embolus forms a slender spiral elongating terminally from bulb.

Female (paratype). General features and coloration are similar to male, but the female is slightly larger (Figure 8D, E). Measurements: total length 4.17; carapace 1.60 long, 1.28 wide; abdomen 2.56 long, 1.5 wide. Legs missing. Internal genitalia: two pairs of spermathecae, one pair of spermathecae globose distally with long stalks (ca. 6 times longer than distal parts), the other pair are oblique, tube-shaped spermathecae (Figure 8A).

Distribution.

Type locality only (Figure 10).

Comments.

Based on the 651 bp aligned sequences, the COI uncorrected K2P-distance between L.peterjaegeri sp. n. and L.chang is 15.9%, and between L.peterjaegeri sp. n. and L.duan is 13.9%.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Luzonacera
XML Treatment for Luzonacera francescoballarini
XML Treatment for Luzonacera lattuensis
XML Treatment for Luzonacera peterjaegeri

Acknowledgements

The manuscript benefited greatly from comments by Drs Yuri Marusik (Magadan, Russia), Mark Harvey (Western Australia, Australia), and Yanfeng Tong (Shenyang, China). Sarah Crews (San Francisco, USA) kindly checked the English. We are indebted to Francesco Ballarin (Tokyo, Japan), Helmut Steiner (Hanau, Germany), and Peter Jaeger (SMF) who provided the specimens examined in this study. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC-31530067) to Shuqiang Li.

Citation

Chang W-J, Li F, Li S (2019) Three new species of the spider genus Luzonacera Li & Li, 2017 from Philippines (Araneae, Psilodercidae). ZooKeys 822: 17–32. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.822.30927

References

  1. Brignoli PM. (1973) Ragni delle Filippine, I. Un nuovo Althepus cavernicolo dell’isola de Mindanao (Araneae, Ochyroceratidae). International Journal of Speleology 5: 111–115. 10.5038/1827-806X.5.2.2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Deeleman-Reinhold CL. (1995) The Ochyroceratidae of the Indo-Pacific region (Araneae). The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, Supplement 2: 1–103. [Google Scholar]
  3. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3: 294–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. (2016) MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33(7): 1870–1874. 10.1093/molbev/msw054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Li S, Quan R. (2017) Taxonomy is the cornerstone of biodiversity conservation – SEABRI reports on biological surveys in Southeast Asia. Zoological Research 38(5): 213–214. 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2017.061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Li F, Li S. (2018) Paleocene–Eocene and Plio–Pleistocene sea-level changes as “species pumps” in Southeast Asia: Evidence from Althepus spiders. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 127: 545–555. 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.05.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Li F, Li S, Jäger P. (2014) Six new species of the spider family Ochyroceratidae Fage, 1912 (Arachnida: Aranae) from Southeast Asia. Zootaxa 3768(2): 119–138. 10.11646/zootaxa.3768.2.2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu C, Li F, Li S, Zheng G. (2017) Five new genera of the subfamily Psilodercinae (Araneae: Ochyroceratidae) from Southeast Asia. Zoological Systematics 42(4): 395–417. [Google Scholar]
  9. Simon E. (1892) Arachnides. In: Raffrey A, Bolivar I, Simon E. (Eds) Etudes Cavernicoles de l’île Luzon. Voyage de ME Simon aux l’îles Phillipines (mars et avril 1890). 4e Mémoire.Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 61: 35–52.
  10. Tong Y, Li S. (2007) First records of the family Ochyroceratidae (Arachnida: Araneae) from China, with descriptions of a new genus and eight new species. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 55: 63–76. [Google Scholar]
  11. World Spider Catalog (2018) World Spider Catalog, version 19.5. Natural History Museum, Bern. http://wsc.nmbe.ch [accessed 30 November 2018]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Luzonacera
XML Treatment for Luzonacera francescoballarini
XML Treatment for Luzonacera lattuensis
XML Treatment for Luzonacera peterjaegeri

Articles from ZooKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES