Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2019 Feb 7;10:62. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00062

The CRISPR/Cas9 System for Targeted Genome Engineering in Free-Living Fungi: Advances and Opportunities for Lichenized Fungi

Karthik Shanmugam 1,2, Sivaprakash Ramalingam 3, Gayathri Venkataraman 1, G N Hariharan 1,*
PMCID: PMC6375251  PMID: 30792699

Abstract

Studies using whole genome sequencing, computational and gene expression, targeted genome engineering techniques for generating site-specific sequence alterations through non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) by genomic double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway with high precision, resulting in gene inactivation have elucidated the complexity of gene expression, and metabolic pathways in fungi. These tools and the data generated are crucial for precise generation of fungal products such as enzymes, secondary metabolites, antibiotics etc. Artificially engineered molecular scissors, zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), Transcriptional activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs; that use protein motifs for DNA sequence recognition in the genome) and CRISPR associated protein 9 (Cas9;CRISPR/Cas9) system (RNA-DNA recognition) are being used in achieving targeted genome modifications for modifying traits in free-living fungal systems. Here, we discuss the recent research breakthroughs and developments which utilize CRISPR/Cas9 in the metabolic engineering of free-living fungi for the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, enzyme production, antibiotics and to develop resistance against post-harvest browning of edible mushrooms and fungal pathogenesis. We also discuss the potential and advantages of using targeted genome engineering in lichenized fungal (mycobiont) cultures to enhance their growth and secondary metabolite production in vitro can be complemented by other molecular approaches.

Keywords: free-living fungi, lichenized fungi, TALENS, CRISPR/Cas9, ZFNs, SSNs, mycobiont culture, transcriptome analysis

Introduction

Fungal products are important in agriculture, textile, food, pharmaceutical industries, (Cowan, 2001; Chang and Miles, 2004) and in bioremediation. In nature, fungi play an important role in nutrient cycling, such as decomposition of dead organic matter (Molina et al., 1993; Keizer, 1998; Pilz and Molina, 2001) and act as biofertilizers (Hunt, 1999; Gates et al., 2005). Recent advances in fungal molecular biology have enabled us to sequence complete genomes, and carry out gene and protein expression arrays which further provide opportunities for development of novel products such as mammalian proteins, antibiotics, pigments, and fatty acids for human welfare using fungi (Demain, 1999; Adrio and Demain, 2003; Idnurm and Meyer, 2014). The selection of potential fungal strains for protein and metabolite biosynthesis is made on the basis of production yields and regulatory concerns, especially for fungi used in the pharmaceuticals and food industry. Several species of fungi are currently being used for large-scale biosynthesis of recombinant proteins and metabolites (Punt, 2006). Geographically, tropical forests are considered as “treasure-boxes” for fungal biotechnologists due to high levels of fungal biodiversity (Hawksworth and Kalin-Arroyo, 1995). Approximately 20% of all known fungal species and ~50% of ascomycetes are obligate symbionts in lichens (fungi that live in symbiotic association with algae or cyanobacteria (Hawksworth and Hill, 1984). Metabolites produced by fungi in particular, are well-known for their therapeutic potential; but a vast resource of these metabolites are unexplored and their potential needs to be tapped. Lichens have been long neglected by mycologists and overlooked by the industry for its relevant novel secondary compounds, its derivatives, proteins and genetic material for the development of useful products. Lichen compounds belong to aliphatic, cyclo-aliphatic, aromatic, and terpenic compound classes and are structurally unique and pharmaceutically relevant (Müller, 2001). Lichen metabolites have been screened for numerous biological activities viz. antiviral, antibiotic, antitumor, allergenic, plant growth inhibitory, anti-herbivore, and enzyme inhibitory properties (Boustie and Grube, 2005). Some compounds were found to have immense potential. The lichen compound diploicin isolated from Buellia canescens, served as a base to derive anilinoaposafranine, an important drug against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Barry, 1969). Usnic acid, a dibenzofuran isolated from several lichen species was used as a major ingredient in many antibiotics, cosmetics, and sunscreen products (Oran et al., 2016). However, in nature lichens are slow growing, low biomass producing, and also crust forming, making large scale harvest difficult (Balaji et al., 2006). In recent years, mycobiont and whole thallus cultures of several lichen species were established for the biosynthesis of secondary compounds (Valarmathi and Hariharan, 2007; Kinoshita et al., 2015; Molina et al., 2015; Muthukumar et al., 2016; Shanmugam et al., 2016). Cutting edge technologies such as transcriptomics and CRISPR can be used to elucidate gene networks contributing to slow growth rates of mycobionts in culture.

CRISPR/Cas9 System in Bacteria, Archaea and Eukaryotes

Viruses/phages infect both bacterial and archeal communities that have developed many strategies to evade infection as well as prevent virus adsorption to fend off viral DNA insertion (Horvath and Barrangou, 2010). In 1987, Nakata et al. (1987) discovered curious repeat and non-repeat sequences in the iap gene (Ishino et al., 1987) that are now referred to as Clustered Regular Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) (Jansen et al., 2002). Mojica et al. (2005) reported that these sequences consist DNA from bacteriophages that were shown to play a role in conferring adaptive bacterial immunity that prevents foreign DNA from being inserted into their genome as well as targets the invasive DNA for destruction. Bolotin et al. (2005) detected the existence of several Cas (CRISPR-associated proteins) genes, which encode DNA endonucleases, suggesting that foreign DNA degradation may be the primary function of CRISPR/Cas9. Three types of CRISPR systems such as Type I, II, and III were identified in 2011, of which the Type II CRISPR system has revolutionized genome editing in eukaryotic cells because of its relative simplicity (Mali et al., 2013). In 2012, Feng Zhang and his co-workers demonstrated its applicability for genome editing in prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Jinek et al., 2012; Cong et al., 2013; Jiang et al., 2013; Doudna and Charpentier, 2014; Nissim et al., 2014; Sander and Joung, 2014). The CRISPR/Cas9 system (Figure 1) is made up of three basic components: CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs), transactivating crRNA (tracrRNA), and CRISPR associated protein (Cas) (Ishino et al., 1987). A single component called synthetic guide RNAs (sgRNA) generated by crRNA and tracrRNA fusion is sufficient to accomplish genome editing in the presence of the Cas endonuclease. The CRIPSR/Cas9 system recognizes DNA through a RNA-DNA interaction between the target site and a CRISPR based synthetic guide RNA. Cas9 nuclease makes double-strand breaks (DSB) at the target site complementary/near complementary to the short 20-nucleotide gRNA present adjacent to the protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) sequence. Both the 20-base-pair (bp) guide sequence on the gRNA and the (PAM) motif, “NGG” present downstream of the unique target sequence determine the specificity of Cas9-mediated DSB (Gasiunas et al., 2012; Jinek et al., 2012). Till date, several publications have reported on effective genetic modifications using CRISPR/Cas9 in several eukaryotic organisms including filamentous fungi (Table 1). The development of a CRISPR/Cas9 system for fungi was first reported in 2013, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for disruption of the ADE 2, CAN1.Y genes (DiCarlo et al., 2013). After this study was published, gene editing technology was widely applied in several strains of yeast to improve their industrial production by several researchers (Bao et al., 2014; Horwitz et al., 2015; Mans et al., 2015; Stovicek et al., 2015; Fabre Jessop et al., 2016) Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Jake et al., 2015).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

CRISPR/Cas9 system is based on RNA guided engineered nucleases that use complementary base pairing to recognize DNA sequences at target sites. Cas9 protein with nuclease activity induces DSB at the target site via direction of synthetic guide RNA (sgRNA) to the PAM sequence (NGG).

Table 1.

Applications of programmable site-specific nucleases in free-living and higher fungi.

Targeted fungal strains Gene editing tool employed Targeted genes or sites Method of gene delivery Promoter of sgRNA Type of modification Findings or achieved traits References
Agaricus bisporus CRISPR/Cas9 Polyphenol oxidase gene (PPO) Not mentioned Not mentioned Gene disruption Inhibiting the synthesis of polyphenol oxidase (PPO), an enzyme that causes browning in Mushroom which leads increase in shelf life of edible mushroom. Waltz, 2016
Alternaria alternata CRISPR/Cas9 Melanin pathway genes, pksA and brm2 PEG mediated Protoplast transformation gpdA Gene inactivation Gene inactivation in A. alternata. They established pyr4 as a selection marker and GFP for protein tagging. Wenderoth et al., 2017
Aspergillus fumigatus CRISPR/Cas9 Polyketide synthase gene (pksP) Protoplast transformation SNR52 Gene disruption Inhibiting the synthesis of dihydroxynaphthalene (DHN), melanin and constitutive cas9 expression not deleterious to growth of A. fumigatus. Fuller et al., 2015
Aspergillus fumigatus CRISPR/Cas9 Trypacidin biosynthetic pathway gene Protoplast transformation gpdA Base pair insertion Trypacidin production enabled in non-producing strains of A. fumigatus by single nucleotide insertion. Weber et al., 2017
Aspergillus aculeatus
luchuensis
brasiliensi
carbonarius
nidulans
A. niger
CRISPR/Cas9 yA gene
albA gene
pyrG gene
Protoplast transformation gpdA Base pair deletion and insertion Common CRISPR/Cas9 system established for six different fungal species. Nødvig et al., 2015
Aspergillus oryzae CRISPR/Cas9 wA gene
yA gene
pyrG gene
Protoplast transformation U6 Gene disruption Common CRISPR/Cas9 system established to achieve desired phenotypic variation. Katayama et al., 2016
Aspergillus oryzae PtFg TALEN (ligase D)
lig D gene
PEG mediated Protoplast transformation glaA142 Gene disruption Targeted mutations to generate strains with specific phenotypes, industrial applications and deletions reduced due to the application of PtFg TALEN. Mizutani et al., 2016
Candida albicans CRISPR/Cas9 ENO1, ADE2 genes Lithium acetate method SNR52 Gene disruption Creation of strains with mutations in multiple genes, gene families, and genes that encode essential functions. Vyas et al., 2015
Candida glabrata CRISPR/Cas9 GPI-anchored aspartyl protease genes
Serine/threonine kinase genes
pCYC1,
pRNAH1
Gene disruption Using D. melanogaster as a model of infection, they find that CRISPR-Cas9 is a suitable tool to engineer C. glabrata, disrupt any specific gene and studied its impact during the infection process. Enkler et al., 2016
Cryptococcus neoformans Class 2 CRISPR ADE2 gene Biolistic particle delivery ACT1 Gene disruption Understanding its pathogenicity. Arras et al., 2016
Ganoderma species CRISPR/Cas9 ura3 gene PEG mediated transformation T7 Gene disruption CRISPR/Cas9 system with codon-optimized Cas9 and in vitro transcribed gRNA. Qin et al., 2017
Myceliophthora thermophila
M. heterothallica
CRISPR/Cas9 cre-1, res-1, gh1-1, alp-1 Agrobacterium mediated transformation U6 Gene disruption Increased celluase enzyme production. Liu et al., 2017
Neurospora crassa CRISPR/Cas9 CLR-2 gene
GSY-1 gene
β-tubulin Gene replacement ß-tubulin promoter driven clr-2 strain shows increased expression of cellulases enzyme.
Introduce a codon optimized Fire fly luciferase under the control of the gsy-1 promoter at the csr-1 locus.
Matsu-ura et al., 2015
Penicillium chrysogenum CRISPR/Cas9-RNP PKS gene 17 Protoplast transformation U6 Gene disruption Inhibit synthesis of green pigment formation in spores. Pohl et al., 2016
Phytophthora sojae CRISPR/Cas9 RXLR gene Avr4/6 replaced with NPT II gene PEG mediated Protoplast transformation RPL41 Gene replacement Control of this pathogen by reducing the pathogenecity of fungus. Fang and Tyler, 2016
Pyricularia oryzae PtFg TALENs SRS2 gene PEG mediated Protoplast transformation Gene replacement Mutations in SRS2 result in a hyper-recombination phenotype, sensitivity to DNA damaging agents and synthetic lethality with mutation that affects DNA metabolism. Arazoe et al., 2015

Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Kluyveromyces lactis
CRISPR/Cas9 Resistant alleles to elevated temperature ethanol concentrations Lithium acetate SNR52 Gene disruption Multiplex integration of point mutations Enhancement of ethanol resistance and integration of muconic acid pathway. Horwitz et al., 2015
Saccharomyces cerevisiae CRISPR/Cas9 ADE2 gene
CAN1.Y gene
Lithium acetate SNR52 Gene disruption Controlling purine biosynthetic pathway.
More gRNAs can be easily synthesized and Combinatorial transformed. This could allow for genomic targeting of many loci at time.
DiCarlo et al., 2013
Saccharomyces cerevisiae CRISPR/Cas9 ADE2 gene
PDC1 and PDC5 genes
PEG/LiAc method SNR52 Gene disruption Using the ADE2 gene as the disruption target and GFP as insertion fragment for simultaneous disruption and knock-in.
Single step construction and alleles of PDC1 and PDC5 genes are disrupted and heterologous lactate dehydrogenase genes are inserted.
Stovicek et al., 2015
Saccharomyces cerevisiae HI-CRISPR/Cas9 CAN1, ADE2 and LYP1 genes
ATF2, GCY1 and YPR1 genes
LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method SNR52 Gene disruption (HI-CRISPR) strategy represents a powerful tool for creating yeast strains with multiple gene 16 knockouts. Bao et al., 2014
Saccharomyces cerevisiae CRISPR/Cas9 Acetyl-CoA carboxylase
Malonyl-CoA
reductase gene
PDC1, ALD6, ACL1 and ACL2 genes
LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method TEF1 Gene disruption Acetyl-CoA production in the cytosol to increase 3-hydroxypropionic acid. Fabre Jessop et al., 2016
Saccharomyces cerevisiae CRISPR/Cas9 ACS1, ACS2 genes replaced by pdhA, pdhB, aceF, lpd, lplA, and lplA2 LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method SNR52 Gene replacement Achieved simultaneous integration of a multigene construct combined with gene deletion. Mans et al., 2015
Saccharomyces cerevisiae CRISPR/Cas9 tHMG1 gene Lithium acetate TEF1 Gene disruption Non-native β-carotene pathway was reconstructed in S. cerevisiae by simultaneous integration of three pathway genes into individual intergenic genomic sites Ronda et al., 2015
Saccharomyces cerevisiae CRISPRm NatR gene nourseothricin-resistance Lithium acetate RNR2 Gene disruption Metabolic engineering and strain improvement's Ryan et al., 2014
Schizosaccharomyces pombe rrk1CRISPR/Cas9 rrk1 gene Lithium Acetate/PEG/Heat-shock method rrk1 Gene disruption The rrk1 CRISPR-Cas9 method enables rapid and efficient genome manipulation and unlocks the CRISPR toolset for use in fission yeast. Jake et al., 2015
Talaromyces atroroseus CRISPR/Cas9 UA08_00425 encoding the naphtha-γ-pyrone PKS gene PEG mediated Protoplast transformation gpdA Gene disruption Explore the secondary metabolism of this fungus and identified a novel gene encoding a hybrid PKS-NRPS, which is responsible for production of medically relevant ZG-1494α. Nielsen et al., 2017
Ustilago maydis CRISPR/Cas9 bE1,bW2 genes Protoplast transformation U6 Gene disruption Controlling the pathogenecity of Ustilago maydis. Schuster et al., 2016

Development of CRISPR/Cas9 System for Filamentous Fungi and Higher Fungi

Similarly CRISPR/Cas9 technology was used to edit the genomes of various filamentous fungi and higher fungi including Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes and fungus-like eukaryotic microorganisms. Programmable Site-Specific Nucleases for Targeted Genome Engineering in these fungi groups encouragingly have shown promising outcomes (Table 1). For example, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has now been applied and established in several fungal species such as Agaricus bisporus (Waltz, 2016); Aspergillus species (Nødvig et al., 2015); Myceliophthora (Liu et al., 2017); Neurospora crassa (Matsu-ura et al., 2015), Phytophthora sojae (Fang and Tyler, 2016); Talaromyces atroroseus (Nielsen et al., 2017); Trichoderma reesei (Liu et al., 2015), and Ustilago maydis (Schuster et al., 2016).

Applications of Targeted Genome Engineering in Free-living Fungi

In filamentous fungi, substantial homology lengths (~1 Kb) with near 100% homology are required to achieve efficient homologous replacement leading to low recombinational efficiencies (HR; Weld et al., 2006). One strategy to circumvent this would be to increase either the expression of genes involved in promoting HR or decrease expression of genes involved in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). In Penicillium chrysogenum, knocking out a gene conferring NHEJ (hfdA) resulted in efficient disruption of three genes related to beta-lactam antibiotic biosynthesis (Kück and Hoff, 2010). There was a significant increase in the osmotic sensitivity of the strain, suggesting that there is always some tradeoff that is incurred by disrupting the natural NHEJ process and disruption of NHEJ-related genes, and deficiency in NHEJ activity may promote genomic instability (Zhang and Jasin, 2011). In this background, using gene-editing nucleases that can bring about targeted genome engineering is an alternative advancement to the above-mentioned method and can prove to be a more precise and efficient method for targeted gene modifications in a free-living fungal system. Gene-editing nucleases can be used for experimental exploration of fungal gene function and enhancement of essential traits in economically important fungal species such as biosynthesis of secondary compounds, antibiotics, enzyme production, and increasing shelf life time of edible mushrooms.

Recent advancements in genome sequencing technologies and establishment of transformation protocols for industrially important fungi has now paved the way for fungal biotechnologists to efficiently use engineered nucleases for establishing important free-living fungal species with industrially important desired traits. Gene-editing nucleases are powerful tools for site-specific mutagenesis utilizing either NHEJ mediated repair pathway or homology-directed repair involving transgene integration at a target locus in the fungal genome. The first successful example of targeted genome engineering in fungi using CRISPR/Cas9 system was established in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (DiCarlo et al., 2013).

Genome Editing for Postharvest Browning of Edible Mushrooms

Rapid postharvest browning of white button mushrooms is a process leads to substantial economic losses. Browning is initiated by enzymatic oxidation of phenols such as tyrosine and non-enzymatic phenol oxidation induced by different factors, including bacteria (Nerya et al., 2006). Knocking out a single polyphenol oxidase gene (PPO) in A. bisporus using CRISPR based deletion of specific bases in PPO results in a 30% reduction in PPO activity and concomitant reduction in browning. This leads to increased shelf life time of edible mushroom.

Genome Editing for Secondary Metabolite, Antibiotics and Enzyme Production

The potential of fungal secondary metabolism to provide secondary metabolites has until recently been impeded by the lack of knowledge in available genetic tools for most of the fungal species. However, the emergence of several Site-Specific Nucleases (SSN)—mediated genome engineering technology: TALENs/CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing systems adapted for several genera of industrially important filamentous fungi species, has now opened doors for future efforts in discovery and biosynthesis of desired quantity of natural products such as secondary metabolites, antibiotics, and enzymes and engineering their biosynthetic pathways for industrial applications. Several studies have reported successful genetic modifications in several eukaryotic organisms including filamentous fungi. For instance, Liu et al. (2015) showed efficient genome editing in filamentous fungus T. reesei using CRISPR/Cas9 system. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that multiple genome modifications can be generated simultaneously in T. reesei using CRISPR/Cas9 system. In another study, the Cas9 and sgRNAs were introduced through Agrobacterium mediated transformation (Liu et al., 2015). Recently, Matsu-ura et al. (2015) have shown efficient gene replacement in a model filamentous fungus, Neurospora crassa using CRISPR/Cas9 system. The authors replaced the endogenous promoter of clr-2 with beta-tubulin promoter and introduced codon-optimized fire fly luciferase gene under the control of gsy-1 promoter at the clr-2 and csr-1 loci, respectively. The introduced beta-tubulin promoter driven clr-2 strain shows increased expression of cellulase (Matsu-ura et al., 2015). Very recently, Liu et al. (2017) have successfully used the CRISPR/Cas9 system for increasing the production of cellulase in Myceliopthora thermophila and M. heterothallica. In this study, the genes cre-1, res-1, gh1-1and alp-1 responsible for synthesizing cellulase were disrupted simultaneously leading to hyper cellulase producing strains. A Cas9-sgRNA RNP mixture targeting the PKS17 gene in P. chrysogenum resulted in absence of green pigment inspores, giving white colonies and a visual screen to examine efficiency of CRISPR mediated gene disruption (Pohl et al., 2016).

In 2016, Jessop-Fabre et al. engineered S. cerevisiae to produce 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) by inserting genes for 3-HP production (ACC carboxylase and malonyl coA reductase) derived from Chloroflexus aurantiacus using CRISPR coupled with a newly developed EasyClone-Marker Free toolkit. Further upstream engineering to boost cytosolic acetyl-CoA production to feed into 3-HP production utilizing genes from diverse organisms (Enterococcus faecalis; Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex), Salmonella enterica (PDC1, ALD6 and ACS) and Yarrowia lypotica (ACL1/ACL2 citrate lyase subunits; citrate transporter gene) was also examined using CRISPR. Using this genome engineering vector suite, single and triple insertions are obtained with 90–100 and 60–70% targeting efficiency, respectively.

Genome Editing of Human and Plant Fungal Pathogens

Human Fungal Pathogens

Fungal pathogens kill more people per year worldwide than malaria or tuberculosis. It is estimated that around 1.6–2 million people are affected every year because of fungal pathogens (Denning and Bromley, 2015). Major human pathogenic fungi occur in the genera Cryptococcus, Candida, and Aspergillus, of which the genus Aspergillus causes between 38 and 80% of fungal disease-associated mortality across the world.

Vyas et al. (2015) have demonstrated development of an efficient codon optimized Cas9 system to target genes in drug-resistant clinical isolate strains of diploid Candida. This paves the way to examine mechanisms that render Candida resistant to antifungals using CRISPR technology.

The fungal pathogen Candida glabrata has become the second most common causative agent of candidiasis in the world and it is a major public health concern. Enkler et al. (2016) demonstrated CRISPR/Cas 9 disruption of GPI-anchored aspartyl protease and serine/threonine kinase in C. glabrata reduces infectivity in the model invertebrate organism Drosophila melanogaster. Thus, the CRISPR-Cas9 system is a powerful tool to assess the potential role of candidate genes in C. glabrata infectivity. Arras et al. (2016) have demonstrated functionality of the CRISPR construct in Cryptococcus neoformans by disruption of the ADE2 gene. It was also established that Cas9 carrying C. neoformans strains do not affect progression of virulence in a murine inhalation model and is thus a powerful tool to explore mechanisms of C. neoformans pathogenicity.

Plant Fungal Pathogens

Plant pathogenic fungi extensively damage global crop production, affecting an estimated 10% of harvested crops impacting food security. Platinum–Fungal TALENs (PtFg TALENs) and CRISPR/Cas9 have now made gene editing possible in fungi (Arazoe et al., 2015; Matsu-ura et al., 2015; Nødvig et al., 2015). PtFg TALENs harbor nonRVD variations at specific residues and have been applied in rice blast fungus Pyricularia oryzae to improve the efficiency of homologous recombination-mediated targeted gene replacement by up to 100% demonstrating its efficacy for basic and applied biology in filamentous fungi (Arazoe et al., 2015). Using CRISPR/Cas9, the effector Avr4/6 of the soybean pathogen P. sojae was efficiently knocked out and precisely replaced by the selectable marker nptII, uncovering additional roles for the corresponding R gene loci, RPS4 and RPS6 in conferring resistance that do not involve recognition through Avr4/6 (Fang and Tyler, 2016). The basidiomycete U. maydis is the causative agent of corn smut disease. The utility of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in this fungal pathogen was established by disrupting the homeodomain complex protein encoding genes bE1 and bW2 with a visual phenotypic screen (filamentous) to pick disruptants due to loss of filament formation (Schuster et al., 2016). Establishment of the utility of gene editing tools in plant pathogenic fungus-like eukaryotic microorganisms such P. sojae, P. oryzae, and U. maydis will encourage further refinements in the technology and provide plant breeders and pathologists an additional weapon in their fight against fungal pathogens.

Opportunities to Utilize Targeted Genome Engineering in Lichenized Fungi

The major challenge in culturing lichenized fungi are their slow growth rates in both natural and laboratory culture conditions. Molecular mechanisms contributing to slow growth rates need to be examined as they hinder establishment of mycobiont cultures. Unraveling these mechanisms will help in isolating known and novel bioactive secondary metabolites in desired industrial quantities using established in vitro systems. So far only few lichen forming fungal species have been sequenced for discovery of secondary metabolites and mechanisms conferring drought tolerance and symbiosis (Junttila and Rudd, 2012; Wang et al., 2014). However, there are no reports available regarding molecular mechanisms in lichenized fungi with special reference to factors such as growth inhibiting mechanisms, nutritional choices, key metabolic pathways and compound biosynthesis from the pure mycobiont cultures. Hence, we hypothesize (Figures 2, 3) that whole transcriptome analysis of cultured lichenized fungal species will reveal gene clusters associated with the above key factors. Comparison of the transcriptome data from the lichenized cultured fungal specimen with that from a free-living fungal specimen from the same genus will help identify key genes that correlate with slower growth rates in the former. Subsequently, functional validation of the predicted gene clusters can be achieved through targeted disruption of key genes using cutting-edge CRISPR/Cas9 technology to identify molecular mechanisms controlling growth rates. This will facilitate metabolic engineering of important genes to enhance growth potential of the lichenized mycobiont.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Targeted genome engineering in lichenized/free-living fungal genome using programmable SSNs.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Hypothetical workflow of whole transcriptome and targeted genome engineering in ascospore derived lichen mycobiont culture.

Conclusions and Future perspective

Advancements in Next Generation Sequencing and targeted engineering of genomic regions using site specific nucleases has allowed more reliable targeted genome editing in eukaryotes including fungal genomes. In comparison to conventional genetic methods, CRISPR gene editing technology will provide more rapidly executable tools to carry out functional genomics in filamentous fungal species that target desired traits. This will need to be complemented by genomic (methylome) and small RNA profiling studies that could potentially silence gene clusters to related growth, development and biosynthesis of targeted natural products to realize the full potential of lichenized fungal metabolomics. This also includes exploring regions of the lichenized fungal genome.

Author Contributions

KS, SR, and GH developed the concept and wrote the manuscript. KS and SR designed the schematic figures. GV contributed during revision and provided inputs to improvement the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. M.S. Swaminathan, Founder Chairman, and Executive Director, M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation, for their constant encouragement and support. Dr. Suja George, Principal Scientist and Dr. G. Ganesan, Assistant Professor for helpful on correcting the language with first version of the manuscript. Mr. G.K. Dayanandham for his help in formatting and proof reading the final version of manuscript. The authors acknowledged Department of Biotechnology, Government of India for the financial support.

Glossary

Abbreviations

CAZymes

Carbohydrate Active Enzymes

CRISPR

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats

Cas

CRISPR associated proteins

NGS

Next generation sequencing

SSNs

Site specific nucleases

TALENs

Transcriptional activator-like effector nucleases

PAM

Protospacer associated motif

ZFNs

Zinc finger nucleases.

References

  1. Adrio J. L., Demain A. L. (2003). Fungal biotechnology. Int.Microbiol. 6, 191–199. 10.1007/s10123-003-0133-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arazoe T., Miyoshi K., Yamato T., Ogawa T., Ohsato S., Arie T., et al. (2015). Tailor-made CRISPR/Cas system for highly efficient targeted gene replacement in the rice blast fungus. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 112, 2543–2549. 10.1002/bit.25662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arras S. D. M., Chua S. M. H., Wizrah M. S. I., Faint J. A., Yap A. S., Fraser J. A. (2016). Targeted genome editing via CRISPR in the pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. PLoS ONE 11:e0164322. 10.1371/journal.pone.0164322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Balaji P., Bharath P., Valarmathi P., Trupti M., Hariharan G. N. (2006). Lichen bioprospecting-future prospects. J. Swamy Bot. 23, 81–90. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bao Z., Xiao H., Liang J., Zhang L., Xiong X., Sun N., et al. (2014). Homology-integrated CRISPR–Cas (HI-CRISPR) system for one-step multigene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth. Biol. 4, 585–594. 10.1021/sb500255k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barry V. C. (1969). Synthetic phenazine derivatives and mycobacterial disease: a twenty year investigation. Sci. Proc. R Dublin Soc. Ser. A 3, 153–170. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bolotin A., Quinquis B., Sorokin A., Ehrlich SD. (2005). Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin. Microbiology. 151, 2551–2561. 10.1099/mic.0.28048-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Boustie J., Grube M. (2005). Lichens—a promising source of bioactive secondary metabolites. Plant Genet. Resour. 3, 273–287. 10.1079/PGR200572 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang S., Miles G P. (2004). Mushrooms: Cultivation, Nutritional Value, Medicinal Effects and Environmental Impact. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press [Google Scholar]
  10. Cong L., Ran F. A., Cox D., Lin S., Barretto R., Habib N., et al. (2013). Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 33, 819–823. 10.1126/science.1231143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cowan A. (2001). Fungi – life support for ecosystems. Essential ARB 4:1c5 10.1016/S0065-2296(08)60073-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Demain A. L. (1999). Pharmaceutically active secondary metabolites of microorganisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 52, 455–463. 10.1007/s002530051546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Denning D. W., Bromley M. J. (2015). How to bolster the antifungal pipeline. Science 347, 1414–1416. 10.1126/science.aaa6097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. DiCarlo J. E., Norville J., Mali P., Rios X., Aach J., Church G. M. (2013). Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 4336–4343. 10.1093/nar/gkt135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Doudna J. A., Charpentier E. (2014). The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346:1258096. 10.1126/science.1258096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Enkler L., Richer D., Marchand A. L., Ferrandon D., Fabrice J. (2016). Genome engineering in the yeast pathogen Candida glabrata using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Sci. Rep. 6, 357–366. 10.1038/srep35766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fabre Jessop M. M., Jakočiunas T., Stovicek V., Dai Z., Jensen M. K., Keasling J. D., et al. (2016). Easy Clone-Marker Free: a vector toolkit for marker-less integration of genes in to Saccharomyces cerevisiae via CRISPR-Cas9. Biotechnol. J. 11, 1110–1117. 10.1002/biot.201600147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fang Y., Tyler B. M. (2016). Efficient disruption and replacement of an effector gene in the Oomycete Phytophthora sojae using CRISPR/Cas9. Mol. Plant Pathol. 17, 127–139. 10.1111/mpp.12318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fuller K. K., Chen S., Loros J. J., Dunlap J. C. (2015). Development of the CRISPR/Cas9 system for targeted gene disruption in Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot. Cell 14, 1073–1080. 10.1128/EC.00107-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gasiunas G., Barrangou R., Horvath P., Siksnys V. (2012). Cas9-crRNA ribonucleo protein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, E2579–E2586. 10.1073/pnas.1208507109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gates G. M., Ratkowsky D. A., Grove S. J. (2005). A comparison of macrofungi in young silvicultural regeneration and mature forest at the Warra LTER Site in the southern forests of Tasmania. Tasforests 16, 127–152. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hawksworth D. L., Hill D. J. (1984). The Lichen-Forming Fungi. Tertiary Level Biology Series. Glasgow arid London: Blackie and Son Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hawksworth D. L., Kalin-Arroyo M. T. (1995). Magnitude and distribution of biodiversity, in Global Biodiversity Assessment, ed Heywood V. H. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; ), 107–191. [Google Scholar]
  24. Horvath P., Barrangou R. (2010). CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science 327, 167–170. 10.1126/science.1179555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Horwitz A. A., Walter J. M., Schubert M. G., Kung SH., Hawkins K., Platt D. M., et al. (2015). Efficient multiplexed integration of synergistic alleles and metabolic pathways in yeasts via CRISPR-Cas. Cell Syst. 1, 88–96. 10.1016/j.cels.2015.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hunt G. A. (1999). Assessing macrofungi of special concern for conservation in Forested ecosystems, in Proceedings of Biology and Management of Species and Habitats at Risk (Victoria, BC: ), 779–780. [Google Scholar]
  27. Idnurm A., Meyer V. (2014). Welcome to Fungal biology and biotechnology. Fungal Biol. Biotech. 1, 8–9. 10.1186/s40694-014-0008-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ishino Y., Shinagawa H., Makino K., Amemura M., Nakata A. (1987). Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product. J. Bacteriol. 169, 5429–5433. 10.1128/jb.169.12.5429-5433.1987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jake Z. J., Keith M. C., Vincent T., Mikel Z. (2015). Implementation of the CRISPR-Cas9 system in fission yeast. Nat. Commun. 5:5344 10.1038/ncomms6344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jansen R., Embden J. D., Gaastra W., Schouls L. M. (2002). Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Mol. Microbiol. 43, 1565–1575. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02839.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jiang W., Bikard D., Cox D., Zhang F., Marraffini L. A. (2013). RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Biotechnol. 31 233–239. 10.1038/nbt.2508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jinek M., Chylinski K., Fonfara I., Hauer M., Doudna J. A., Charpentier E. (2012). A programmable dual-RNA- guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821. 10.1126/science.1225829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Junttila S., Rudd S. (2012). Characterization of a transcriptome from a non-model organism Cladonia rangiferina, the grey reindeer lichen, using high-throughput next generation sequencing and EST sequence data. BMC Genomics 13:575. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Katayama T., Tanaka Y., Okabe T., Nakamura H., Fujii W., Kitamoto K., et al. (2016). Development of a genome editing technique using the CRISPR/Cas9 system in the industrial filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Biotechnol. Lett. 38, 637–642. 10.1007/s10529-015-2015-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Keizer G. J. (1998). The Complete Encyclopedia of Mushrooms. Lisses: Rebo. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kinoshita K., Fukumaru M., Yamamoto Y., Koyama K., Takahashi K. (2015). Biosynthesis of panaefluoroline B from the cultured mycobiont of Amygdalaria panaeola. J. Nat. Prod. 78, 1745–1747. 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kück U., Hoff B. (2010). New tools for the genetic manipulation of filamentous fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 86:5162. 10.1007/s00253-009-2416-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu Q., Ranran G., Jingen L., Liangcai L, Junqi Z., Wenliang S., et al. (2017). Development of a genome-editing CRISPR/Cas9 system in thermophilic fungal Mycelioph thora species and its application to hyper-cellulase production strain engineering. Biotechnol. Biofuels 10:1 10.1186/s13068-016-0693-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu R., Ling C., Yanping J., Zhihua Z., Gen Z. (2015). Efficient genome editing in filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell Discov. 1:15007. 10.1038/celldisc.2015.7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mali P., Yang L., Esvelt K. M., Aach J., Guell M., DiCarlo J. E., et al. (2013). RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. 339:823. 10.1126/science.1232033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mans R., Harmen M. R., Melanie W., Backx A., Niels G. A., van Kuijpers B. M., et al. (2015). CRISPR/Cas9: a molecular Swiss army knife for simultaneous introduction of multiple genetic modifications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 15:fov004. 10.1093/femsyr/fov004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Matsu-ura T., Baek M., Kwon J., Hong C. (2015). Efficient gene editing in Neurospora crassa with CRISPR technology. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2:4. 10.1186/s40694-015-0015-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mizutani O., Arazoe T., Toshida K., Hayashi R., Ohsato S., Sakuma T., et al. (2016). Detailed analysis of targeted gene mutations caused by the Platinum-Fungal TALENs in Aspergillus oryzae RIB40 strain and a ligD disruptant. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 123, 287–293. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.09.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mojica F. J., Díez-Villaseñor C., García-Martínez J., Soria E. (2005). Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genomic elements. J. Mol. Evol. 60, 174–182. 10.1007/s00239-004-0046-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Molina M. C., Divakar P. K., González N. (2015). Success in the isolation and axenic culture of Anaptychia ciliaris (Physciaceae, Lecanoromycetes) mycobiont. Mycoscience 56, 351–358. 10.1016/j.myc.2014.10.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Molina R., O'Dell T., Luoma D., Amaranthus M., Castellano R. K. (1993). Biology, Ecology and Social Aspects of Wild Edible Mushrooms in the Forests of the Pacific Northwest: A Preface of Managing Commercial Harvest. Portland, OR: U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. [Google Scholar]
  47. Müller K. (2001). Pharmaceutically relevant metabolites from lichens. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 56, 9–16. 10.1007/s002530100684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Muthukumar S., Karthik S., Hariharan G. N. (2016). Mycobiont and whole thallus cultures of Roccella montagnei Bél. For the biosynthesis of secondary compounds. Crypt. Biodivers. Assess. 1, 15–20. 10.21756/cba.v0i.11014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Nakata A., Shinagawa H., Rothman F. G. (1987). Molecular mechanism of isozyme formation of alkaline phosphatase in Escherichia coli, in Phosphate Metabolism and Cellular Regulation in Microorganisms, eds Torriani A., Rothman F., Silver S., Wright A., Yagil E. (Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; ), 139–141. [Google Scholar]
  50. Nerya O., Arie R. B., Luzzatto T., Musa R., Khativ S., Vaya J. (2006). Prevention of Agaricus bisporus postharvest browning with tyrosinase inhibitors. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 39, 272–277. 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.11.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Nielsen M. L., Isbrandt T., Rasmussen K. B., Thrane U., Hoof J. B., Larsen T. O. L., et al. (2017). Genes linked to production of secondary metabolites in Talaromyces atroroseus revealed using CRISPR-Cas9. PLoS ONE 12:e0169712. 10.1371/journal.pone.0169712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Nissim L., Perli S. D., Fridkin A., Perez-Pinera P., Lu T. K. (2014). Multiplexed and programmable regulation of gene networks with an integrated RNA and CRISPR/Cas toolkit in human cells. Mol. Cell 54, 698–710. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.04.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Nødvig C. S., Nielsen J. B., Kogle M. E., Mortensen U. H. (2015). A CRISPR-Cas9 system for genetic engineering of filamentous fungi. PLoS ONE 10:e0133085. 10.1371/journal.pone.0133085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Oran S., Sahin S., Sahinturk P., Ozturk S., Demir C. (2016). Antioxidant and antimicrobial potential, and HPLC analysis of stictic and usnic acids of three Usnea species from Uludag mountain (Bursa, Turkey). Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 15, 527–535. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Pilz D., Molina R. (2001). Commercial harvests of Edible Mushrooms from the forests of the Pacific Northwest United States: issues, management and monitoring for sustainability. For. Ecol. Manage. 155, 3–16. 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00543-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Pohl C., Kiel J. A., Driessen A. J., Bovenberg R. A, Nygárd Y. (2016). CRISPR/Cas9 based genome editing of Penicillium chrysogenum. ACS Synth. Biol. 5, 754–764. 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Punt P. (2006). Filamentous fungi as cell factories for protein production. Microb. Cell Fact. 5:S32 10.1186/1475-2859-5-S1-S32 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Qin H., Han X., Gen Z., Zhihua Z., Jian-Jiang Z. (2017). CRISPR-Cas9 assisted gene disruption in the higher fungus Ganoderma species. Process Biochem. 56, 57–61. 10.1016/j.procbio.2017.02.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Ronda C., Maury J., Tadas J., Simo A. B. J., Susanne M. G., Scott J. H., et al. (2015). CrEdit: CRISPR mediated multi-loci gene integration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb. Cell Fact. 14:97. 10.1186/s12934-015-0288-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ryan O. W., Skerker J. M., Maurer M. J., Li X., Tsai J. C., Poddar S., et al. (2014). Selection of chromosomal DNA libraries using a multiplex CRISPR system. eLife 3:3703. 10.7554/eLife.03703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Sander J. D., Joung J. K. (2014). CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 347–355. 10.1038/nbt.2842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Schuster M., Schweizer G., Reissmann S., Kahmann R. (2016). Genome editing in Ustilago maydis using the CRISPR-Cas system. Fungal Genet. Biol. 89, 3–9. 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Shanmugam K., Srinivasan M., Hariharan G. N. (2016). Developmental stages and secondary compound biosynthesis of mycobiont and whole thallus cultures of Buellia subsororioides. Mycol. Prog. 15:41 10.1007/s11557-016-1184-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Stovicek V., Borodina I., Forster J. (2015). CRISPR–Cas system enables fast and simple genome editing of industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Metab. Eng. Commun. 2, 13–22. 10.1016/j.meteno.2015.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Valarmathi R., Hariharan G. N. (2007). Soredial culture of Dirinaria applanata (Fée) Awasthi: observations on developmental stages and compound production. Symbiosis 43, 137–142. [Google Scholar]
  66. Vyas V. K., Barrasa M. I., Fink G. R. (2015). A Candida albicans CRISPR system permits genetic engineering of essential genes and gene families. Sci. Adv. 1, 1500248–1500248. 10.1126/sciadv.1500248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Waltz E. (2016). Gene-edited CRISPR mushroom escapes US regulation. Nature 532:293. 10.1038/nature.2016.19754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wang Y.-Y., Liu B., Zhang X.-Y., Zhou Q.-M., Zhang T., Li H., et al. (2014). Genome characteristics reveal the impact of lichenization on lichen-forming fungus Endocarpon pusillum Hedwig (Verrucariales, Ascomycota). BMC Genomics 15:34. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Weber J., Valiante V., Nødvig C. S., Mattern D. J., Slotkowski R. A., Mortensen U. H., et al. (2017). Functional reconstitution of fungal natural product gene cluster by advance genome editing. ACS Synth. Biol. 6, 62–68. 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Weld R. J., Plummer K. M., Carpenter M.A, Ridgway H. J. (2006). Approaches to functional genomics in filamentous fungi. Cell Res. 16, 31–44. 10.1038/sj.cr.7310006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Wenderoth M., Pinecker C., Voß B., Fischer R. (2017). Establishment of CRISPR/Cas9 in Alternaria alternata. Fungal Genet. Biol. 101, 55–60. 10.1016/j.fgb.2017.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhang Y., Jasin M. (2011). An essential role for CtIP in chromosomal translocation formation through an alternative end-joining pathway. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18,80–84. 10.1038/nsmb.1940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES