Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 14.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Res Toxicol. 2004 Jun;17(6):814–818. doi: 10.1021/tx049955b

Mutations Induced by the Carcinogenic Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid Riddelliine in the Liver cII Gene of Transgenic Big Blue Rats

Nan Mei †,*, Robert H Heflich , Ming W Chou , Tao Chen
PMCID: PMC6375673  NIHMSID: NIHMS1009949  PMID: 15206902

Abstract

Riddelliine is a naturally occurring pyrrolizidine alkaloid that forms a number of different mononucleotide and dinucleotide adducts in DNA. It is a rodent carcinogen and a potential human hazard via food contamination. To examine the mutagenicity of riddelliine, groups of six female transgenic Big Blue rats were gavaged with 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 mg riddelliine per kg body weight. The middle and high doses resulted in liver tumors in a previous carcinogenesis bioassay. The animals were treated 5 days a week for 12 weeks and sacrificed 1 day after the last treatment. The liver DNA was isolated for analysis of the mutant frequency (MF) in the transgenic cII gene, and the types of mutations were characterized by sequencing the mutants. A significant dose-dependent increase in MF was found, increasing from 30 × 10−6 in the control animals to 47, 55, and 103 × 10−6 in the low, middle, and high dose groups, respectively. Molecular analysis of the mutants indicated that there was a statistically significant difference between the mutational spectra from the riddelliine-treated and the control rats. A G:C → T:A transversion (35%) was the major type of mutation in rats treated with riddelliine, whereas a G:C → A:T transition (55%) was the predominant mutation in the controls. In addition, mutations from the riddelliine-treated rats included an unusually high frequency (8%) of tandem base substitutions of GG → TT and GG → AT. These results indicate that riddelliine is a genotoxic carcinogen in rat liver and that the types of mutations induced by riddelliine are consistent with riddelliine adducts involving G:C base pairs.

Introduction

Pyrrolizidine alkaloids are constituents of over 6000 plants. About half of the identified pyrrolizidine alkaloids are genotoxic, and many are tumorigenic (1, 2). Thus, the human health risk posed by exposure to pyrrolizidine alkaloids has been a concern. Riddelliine is a representative genotoxic pyrrolizidine (35) that is present in plants growing in the rangelands of the western United States. Human foodstuffs, such as grains, herbs, milk, honey, herbal tea, and herbal medicine, may be contaminated with pyrrolizine alkaloids including riddelliine (2, 5).

Riddelliine is completely absorbed within 30 min after gavage dosing to rodents (6) and is metabolically activated to DHP.1 The reactive metabolite binds to cellular macromolecules such as proteins and DNA and is responsible for the toxicities of riddelliine. DHP-derived DNA adducts are formed by in vitro metabolism of riddelliine in human (7) and rat (8) liver. Using 32 P-postlabeling HPLC analysis of DNA adducts, a linear dose-dependent formation of eight DHP-derived DNA adducts was observed in riddelliine-treated rats (8, 9). Two were enantiomers of DHP-derived 7-deoxyguanosin-N2-yl adducts, and the others were DHP-modified dinucleotides.

Because of its genotoxicity and potential for human exposure, riddelliine was tested by the NTP for carcinogenicity in a 2 year bioassay. The results showed that riddelliine causes liver tumors in male and female rats and male mice, mononuclear cell leukemia in male and female rats, and lung neoplasms in female mice (3, 4). Riddelliine is genotoxic both in vitro and in vivo, inducing increases in sister chromatid exchange, chromosomal aberrations, unscheduled DNA synthesis, and micronucleated erythrocyte frequencies (reviewed by Fu et al. in ref 2). However, the mutagenicity of riddelliine in the target tissues for carcinogenesis has not been studied. Also, it is not clear to what extent the various types of DNA adducts formed by riddelliine participate in its genotoxicity.

Transgenic mutation assays provide a unique opportunity for studying the induction of in vivo mutation. The assays permit quantitative measurements of mutant frequencies in all tissues/organs of transgenic rodents and molecular analysis of the induced and spontaneous mutations. The cII gene, located on the λ vector of Big Blue rodents and Muta mice, can be used as a reporter of mutagenicity. The cII gene has advantages over the lacZ or lacI transgenic reporter genes on λ because of its relatively small size (about 300 base pairs), because of its positive selection system for cII mutations, and because the mutant assay for cII mutants is relatively less labor intensive (10). In this study, we evaluated the mutagenicity of riddelliine in the liver cII gene of Big Blue rats.

Materials and Methods

Chemical and Animals.

Riddelliine (>97% pure by reversed phase HPLC analysis) was obtained from the NTP and dissolved in 0.9% sodium chloride. Female Big Blue Fisher 344 transgenic rats were obtained from Taconic Laboratories (Germantown, NY) through a purchase from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). All animal procedures followed the recommendations of the NCTR Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee for the handling, maintenance, treatment, and sacrifice of laboratory animals.

Treatments.

The treatment schedule was based on the preliminary results from the NTP 2 year chronic tumorigenicity bioassay (3). Female, 6 week old Big Blue rats were treated with ridelliine at concentrations of 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 mg/kg body weight by gavage five times a week for 12 weeks. Vehicle control rats were gavaged with 0.9% sodium chloride using the same schedule as for the ridelliine-treated rats. Six rats from each treatment group were sacrificed 1 day after the last treatment. The livers were isolated, frozen quickly in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C.

cII Mutation Assay.

High molecular weight genomic DNA was extracted from rat livers using the RecoverEase DNA Isolation Kit (Stratagene) and stored at 4 °C until DNA packaging was performed. The packaging of the phage, plating of the packaged DNA samples, and determination of MF were carried out following the manufacturer’s instructions for the λ Select-cII Mutation Detection System for Big Blue Rodents (Stratagene). The shuttle vector containing the cII target gene was rescued from total genomic DNA with phage packaging extract (Transpack; Stratagene). The plating was performed with the Escherichia coli host strain G1250. To determine the total titer of packaged phages, G1250 bacteria were mixed with 1:3000 dilutions of phage, plated on TB1 plates, and incubated overnight at 37 °C (nonselective conditions). For mutant selection, the packaged phages were mixed with G1250, plated on TB1 plates, and incubated at 24 °C for about 42 h (conditions for cII-selection). Under these conditions, phages with wild-type cII genes undergo lysogenization and become part of the developing bacterial lawn, whereas phages with mutated cII genes undergo lytic growth and give rise to plaques. When incubated at 37 °C, phages with wild-type cII genes also undergo a lytic cycle, resulting in plaque formation. Assays were repeated until a minimum of 2 × 105 pfus from each sample was examined for mutation. The cII MF is defined as the total number of mutant plaques (determined at 24 °C) divided by the total number of plaques screened (determined at 37 °C).

Sequence Analysis of the cII Mutants.

The mutants were sequenced using a modification of the methods of Chen et al. (11). The cII mutant plaques were selected at random from different animals and replated at low density to verify the mutant phenotype. Single, well-isolated plaques were selected from these plates and transferred to a microcentrifuge tube containing 100 µL of sterile distilled water. The tube was heated at 100 °C for 5 min and centrifuged at 12 000g for 3 min. The cII target DNA for sequencing was amplified by PCR using primers 5′-AAAAAGGGCATCAAATTAACC-3′ (upstream) and 5′-CCGAAGTTGAGTATTTTTGCTG-3′ (downstream). For PCR amplification, 10 µL of the supernatant was added to 10 µL of a PCR Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI) and the primers. The final concentrations of the reagents were 1 × Taq polymerase reaction buffer, 0.2 µmol of each primer, 200 µM each dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.25 U of Taq DNA polymerase. The PCR reaction was performed using a PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), with the following cycling parameters: a 3 min denaturation at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 1 min at 60 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C, with a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. The PCR products were isolated using a PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). The cII mutant DNA was sequenced with a CEQ Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit and a CEQ 8000 Genetic Analysis System (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). The primer for cII mutation sequencing was the upstream primer used for the PCR.

Statistical Analyses.

Analyses were performed using the SigmaStat 2.03 program (SPSS, Chicago, IL). All of the MF data are expressed as the mean ± SD from six rats per group. Statistical significance was determined by one way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test. Because the variance increased with the magnitude of the MF, the data were log-transformed before conducting the analysis. Mutational spectra were compared using the computer program written by Cariello and colleagues (12) for the Monte Carlo analysis developed by Adams and Skopek (13).

Results

MF in the Liver cII Gene from Riddelliine-Treated and Control Rats.

Female Big Blue rats were treated with riddelliine for 12 weeks, and the MFs in the liver cII gene were determined (Table 1). DNA from each liver was packaged 2–4 times either to confirm the MF or to obtain a minimum of 2 × 105 pfus for mutant detection. The MFs for the control female Big Blue rats ranged from 18 to 44 × 10−6, with an average of 30 ± 10 × 10−6. The MFs for the riddelliine-treated rats increased in a linear dose-dependent manner (Figure 1), and a statistically significant difference was observed among the four study groups (P < 0.001). The MFs for rats treated with 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 mg/kg riddelliine were 47 ± 14 × 10−6, 55 ± 8 × 10−6, and 103 ± 16 × 10−6, respectively, and all were significantly increased over the control group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively). The MF in the 1.0 mg/kg riddelliine-treated group was also significantly higher than those in other treatment groups (P < 0.01).

Table 1.

cII MFs in Livers of the Control and Riddelliine-Treated Transgenic Big Blue Rats

group rat ID total plaques
screened
(×103)
mutant
plaques
MF
(×10−6)
mean ± SD
(×10−6)
control I-1F 440  13   30
I-2F 458  18   39
I-3F 442  10   23
I-4F 398   7   18
I-5F 315  14   44
I-6F 431  11   26
30 ± 10
0.1 mg/kg II-1F 379  12   32
II-2F 392  16   41
II-3F 531  22   41
II-4F 269  18   67
II-5F 295  11   37
II-6F 245  15   61
47 ± 14a
0.3 mg/kg III-1F 570  33   58
III-2F 378  20   53
III-3F 359  18   50
III-4F 393  24   61
III-5F 216  14   65
III-6F 378  16   42
55 ± 8b
1.0 mg/kg IV-1F 349  38  109
IV-2F 399  31   78
IV-3F 249  30  121
IV-4F 271  29  107
IV-5F 577  52   90
IV-6F 387  43  111
   103 ± 16c,d
a

P < 0.05.

b

P < 0.01.

c

P < 0.001 (significantly higher than the control group, Tukey test).

d

Significantly higher than the groups treated with 0.1 or 0.3 mg riddelliine per kg body weight (P < 0.01, Tukey test).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Riddelliine-induced cII MF as a function of dose. Big Blue rats were gavaged with 0.1–1.0 mg/kg body weight riddelliine for 12 weeks, and the cII MF was determined in the liver 1 day after the last treatment. The induced MF was obtained by subtracting the background MF observed in the vehicle control rats. The data represent the mean ± SD for each group of six rats.

Mutation Spectra in the Liver cII Gene from Riddelliine-Treated and Control Rats.

Riddelliine-induced and spontaneous mutations in the liver cII gene were evaluated by DNA sequence analysis of 92 mutants isolated from six rats treated with 1.0 mg/kg riddelliine and 63 mutants from six rats in the control group (Table 2). Mutations that were found more than once among the mutants isolated from a single animal were assumed to be siblings and to represent only one independent mutation. Accordingly, a total of 83 and 55 independent mutations were identified from the riddelliine-treated rats and control rats, respectively (Table 3). The overall pattern of mutations in the control and riddelliine-treated rats differed significantly (P < 0.001). Among the independent mutations, about 82% from both the riddelliine-treated and control rats were base pair substitutions. A G:C → T:A transversion (35%) was the major type of mutation in the riddelliine-treated rats, whereas a G:C → A:T transition (55%) was the predominant mutation in the controls. In addition, an unusually high frequency of tandem base substitutions (8%) was observed among the mutations from the riddelliine-treated rats; these included four independent GG → TT mutations and three independent GG → AT mutations.

Table 2.

Mutations in the cII Gene of Livers from the Riddelliine-Treated and Control Big Blue Rats

positiona mutation b amino acid
change
sequence
context 5′ → 3′c
no. of
mutations
(independent)
position a mutation b amino acid
change
sequence
context
5′ → 3′c
no. of
mutations
(independent)
control treated control treated
(−14)-(−13) GG → TT N/A ctaAGGaaa  1 134 −135 GG → TT Arg → Ile aagAGGgac  1
–13 G → T N/A ctaAGGaaa  3 (3) 135 G → A Arg → Arg aagAGGgac  1
19 C → G Arg → Gly aaaCGCaac  1 135 G → T Arg → Ser aagAGGgac  1
19 C → T Arg → Cys aaaCGCaac  1 136 G → T Asp → Tyr aggGACtgg  1
24 C → G Asn → Lys cgcAACgag  1 139 T → G Trp → Gly gacTGGatt  1
27 G → T Glu → Asp aacGAGgct  1 145 C → A Pro → Thr attCCAaag  1
28 G → A Ala → Thr gagGCTcta  1 145 C → T Pro → Ser attCCAaag  1
29 C → T Ala → Val gagGCTcta  3 (2) 152 T → G Phe → Cys aagTTCtca  2 (2)
30 T → A Ala → Ala gagGCTcta  1 154 T → C Ser → Pro ttcTCAatg  1
34 C → T Arg → stop ctaCGAatc  4 (3)  1 163 C → T Leu → Phe ctgCTTgct  2 (1)
35 G → A Arg → Gln ctaCGAatc  1 164 T → C Leu → Pro ctgCTTgct  1
40 G → A Glu → Lys atcGAGagt  1 166 G → A Ala → Thr cttGCTgtt  1
46 G → T Ala → Ser agtGCGttc  1 172 C → A Leu → Ile gttCTTgaa  1
57/62 + A frameshift aacAAAatc  1 175 G → C Glu → Gln cttGAAtgg  1
60 A → T Lys → Asn aacAAAatc  1 178/185 + G frameshift gaaTGGGGGGTCgtt  6 (4)  7 (5)
61 A → C Ile → Leu aaaATCgca  1 178 T → C Trp → Arg gaaTGGggg  1
64 G → C Ala → Pro atcGCAatg  1 179 G → T Trp → Leu gaaTGGggg  1
65 C → T Ala → Val atcGCAatg  1 179/184 − G frameshift gaaTGGGGGGTCgtt  2 (2)  1
65/68 + A frameshift gcaATGctt  1 180 G → A Trp → stop gaaTGGggg  1
73–74 GG → AT Gly → Ile cttGGAact  2 (2) 180 −181 GG → AT Trp-Gly → stop-Trp gaaTGGGGGgtc  1
73–74 GG → TT Gly → Leu cttGGAact  1 182 G → T Gly → Val tggGGGgtc  2 (2)
74 G → T Gly → Val cttGGAact  4 (4) 184 G → T Val → Phe gggGTCgtt  1
76 A → G Thr → Ala ggaACTgag  1 185 T → G Val → Gly gggGTCgtt  1
81 G → A Glu → Glu actGAGaag  1 185, 178/186 T → G;+G complex gggGTCgtt  1
86 C → A Thr → Lys aagACAgcg  1 187 G → T Val → Phe gtcGTTgac  1
86 C → G Thr → Arg aagACAgcg  1 191 A → G Asp → Gly gttGACgac  1
89 C → A Ala → Glu acaGCGgaa  1 192 C → G Asp → Glu gttGACgac  1
89 C → T Ala → Val acaGCGgaa  3 (3)  4 (2) 196 G → A Asp → Asn gacGACatg  2 (2)  1
90–91 GG → TT Ala-Glu → Ala-stop acaGCGGAAgct  1 203 C → A Ala → Asp atgGCTcga  1
91 G → T Glu → stop gcgGAAgct  1 206 G → A Arg → Gln gctCGAttg  1  3 (2)
94 G → A Ala → Thr gaaGCTgtg  1 208 T → A Leu → Met cgaTTGgcg  1
95 C → T Ala → Val gaaGCTgtg  1 209 T → G Leu → Trp cgaTTGgcg  1
98 T → C Val → Ala gctGTGggc  1 211 G → A Ala → Thr ttgGCGcga  1
99/101 − G frameshift gctGTGGGCgtt  1 212 C → A Ala → Glu ttgGCGcga  1
101 G → A Gly → Asp gtgGGCgtt  1 212 C → T Ala → Val ttgGCGcga  2 (2)  2 (2)
101 G → T Gly → Val gtgGGCgtt  1 212/214 + G frameshift ttgGCGCGAcaa  1
103 G → A Val → Ile ggcGTTgat  4 (3)  3 (2) 213 G → T Ala → Ala ttgGCGcga  1
103 G → T Val → Phe ggcGTTgat  1 214 C → T Arg → stop gcgCGAcaa  9 (5)  3 (2)
113 C → A Ser → stop aagTCGcag  1 217 C → T Gln → stop cgaCAAgtt  1
118 A → T Ile → Phe cagATCagc  1 220 G → T Val → Phe caaGTTgct  1
122 G → A Ser → Asn atcAGCagg  1 222 T → G Val → Val caaGTTgct  1
125 G → T Arg → Met agcAGGtgg  1 224 C → A Ala → Asp gttGCTgcg  1
126 G → T Arg → Ser agcAGGtgg  1 230 T → G Ile → Ser gcgATTctc  1
127 T → A Trp → Arg aggTGGaag  1 232 C → A Leu → Ile attCTCacc  2 (2)
128 G → A Trp → stop aggTGGaag  1 233 T → C Leu → Pro attCTCacc  1
129 G → T Trp → Cys aggTGGaag  1 266 G → A Arg → His gagCGTtct  1
131 A → T Lys → Met tggAAGagg  1 total 63 (55) 92 (83)
133 A → T Arg → Trp aagAGGgac  1
a

Position 1 is the first base of the start codon in the cII coding sequence.

b

Presented in terms of sequence change on a nontranscribed DNA strand.

c

Uppercase indicates the target codon, and target bases are underlined. Abbreviations: −, deletion; +, insertion.

Table 3.

Summary of the Independent Mutations in the Liver cII Gene from the Ridelliine-Treated and Control Big Blue Rats

controla
riddelliinea
type of mutation number % number %
G:C → C:G   2   4   4   5
G:C → A:T  30  55  22  26
G:C → T:A   5   9  29  35
A:T → T:A   3   5   4   5
A:T → C:G   3   5   5   6
A:T → G:C   3   5   4   5
frameshift   8  15   8  10
tandem base substitution   0   0   7   8
complexb   1   2   0   0
total  55 100  83 100
a

Spectra of mutations from control and riddelliine-treated rats significantly different [P < 0.001; Adams and Skopek test (13)].

b

Base substitution plus frameshift.

Discussion

Many carcinogens exhibit tissue specificity. A major target tissue for riddelliine tumorigenesis is liver, where the compound is metabolized to reactive derivatives. Among the tissues examined, the highest concentration of riddelliine-induced DNA adducts was found in rat liver (14). Also, in the NTP 2 year carcinogenesis studies, riddelliine-induced neoplasms in the rat were mostly found in the liver. Treating rats by gavage with 1.0 mg riddelliine per kg body weight resulted in a 76–86% incidence of liver hemangiosarcomas and an 8–14% incidence of hepatocellular adenoma, along with an 18–28% incidence of mononuclear cell leukemia. The liver is also a major target tissue for tumor induction by riddelliine in the mouse (3, 4). Hemangiosarcoma is a malignant neoplasm of endothelial cells and occurs in many tissues including liver.

If riddelliine’s carcinogenicity operates through a genotoxic mechanism, it would be anticipated that liver is also a main target tissue for riddelliine’s mutagenesis. To understand the mechanisms of riddelliine’s carcinogenesis, we determined MFs in the liver cII gene using Big Blue transgenic rats. After treatment with 0.1–1.0 mg/ kg riddelliine 5 days per week for 12 weeks, we observed a linear dose-dependent increase of MF in the liver cII gene. The increase in MF was consistent with dose-dependent DHP-derived DNA adduct formation (8). Although mutation induction and adduct formation were presumably involved in the liver hemangiosarcomas, the increase of the tumor incidence is nonlinear, with riddelliine doses of 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 mg/kg producing tumor incidences of 0, 6, and 76%, respectively (3). It is possible that the kinetics for DNA damage formation/repair, cII mutation induction, and tumor formation differed over the range of riddelliine doses that were evaluated. However, in the rats treated with riddelliine, the cII MF data correlate better with the DNA adducts that are presumably responsible for the mutations than the incidence of liver tumors. It is tempting to speculate that these relationships indicate that there are one or more events between riddelliine-induced mutation and liver tumor formation that occur at a disproportionately greater frequency at high doses of riddelliine. Alternatively, mutation and adduct formation in the liver cells that are the specific targets of carcinogenic response (the endothelial cells) may correlate better with riddelliine tumorigenicity than mutation and adducts within liver as a whole. A previous study indicates that DHR-derived DNA adduct levels differ between rat endothelial cells and parenchymal cells (15).

The overall pattern of mutations induced by riddelliine was significantly different from the control rats (P < 0.001). About 80% of the independent mutations from both the riddelliine-treated and the control rats were base pair substitutions. In contrast to the G:C → A:T transitions that dominated the mutation spectrum in control rats (55% of all mutations), the main type of mutation induced by riddelliine was G:C → T:A transversion (35%). Riddelliine (DHP) reacts with guanine, adenine, and thymine and has the greatest affinity for guanine (9). Two of eight riddelliine-induced DHP-derived DNA adducts are epimers of DHP-deoxyguanosine-monophosphate (8). These DHP-guanosine adducts are bulky DNA adducts, a type of adduct that commonly results in a G:C → T:A transversion mutation. The G:C → T:A transversion may also cause the initiation of tumors in the liver of rats treated with riddelliine because it has been reported that more than half of the riddelliine-induced hemangiosarcomas have a G → T mutation at K-ras codon 12 (16). Interestingly, riddelliine also induced a relatively high frequency of tandem base substitutions (8%), while no such mutations were found in the controls. Although no previous reports have described tandem base substitution in the cII gene of transgenic rodents, there have been several reports of these mutations in other genes. For example, two tandem mutations were detected in the lacI gene of 1,2-epoxybutene-exposed Big Blue mice (17). Acetaldehyde, which is found in tobacco smoke and automotive exhaust gases (18), and cis-diamminedichloroplatinnum(II), which is used in clinical oncology as a chemotherapeutic agent (19), induce GG to TT transversions in the supF gene. It is believed that these chemicals form intrastrand cross-links in adjacent guanine bases, and then adenines are incorporated opposite the crosslinked guanines during DNA replication, resulting in GG to TT tandem base substitution (18). In addition, NO2+ produced by peroxyacetyl nitrate (a ubiquitous air pollutant) attacks the exocyclic nitrogen of guanine creating a positively charged reactive intermediate, which when in close proximity to an adjacent guanine may produce a structure similar to a GG adduct. Errors in the replication of these dimers may account for the mutation at two adjacent bases (20). It is unknown which of the eight DHP-derived DNA adducts induced by riddelliine (8, 9) and what mechanism result in these specific types of mutations in present study. However, this unique tandem base substitution may serve as a signature mutation for genetic damage produced by riddelliine.

In conclusion, tumorigenic doses of riddelliine increased the MF in the liver cII gene of rats and resulted in a unique spectrum of cII mutation. The types of mutations induced by riddelliine suggest that both mononucleotide and dinucleotide DNA adducts involving G:C base pairs are mainly responsible for its mutagenicity.

Acknowledgment.

We thank Drs. P. P. Fu and B. L. Parsons of the National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR) for their helpful discussions. This research was supported by an appointment (N.M.) to the Postgraduate Research Program at the NCTR administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The views presented in this article do not necessarily reflect those of the Food and Drug Administration.

Footnotes

1

Abbreviations: DHP, 6,7-dihydro-1-hydroxymethyl-5H-pyrrolizine; MF, mutant frequency; NTP, National Toxicology Program; pfus, plaque-forming units.

References

  • (1).Mattocks AR (1986) Chemistry and Toxicology of Pyrrolizine Alkaloids, Academic Press, London, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Fu PP, Xia Q, Lin G, and Chou MW (2004) Pyrrolizidine alkaloids-genotoxicity, metabolism enzymes, metabolic activation, and mechanisms. Drug Metab. Rev 36, 1–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).National Toxicology Program (2003) Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of riddelliine (CAS No. 23246–96-0) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (gavage studies). Natl. Toxicol. Program Technol. Rep. Ser 508, 1–280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Chan PC, Haseman JK, Prejean JD, and Nyska A (2003) Toxicology and carcinogenicity of riddelliine in rats and mice. Toxicol. Lett 144, 295–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Chan PC, Mahler J, Bucher JR, Travlos GS, and Reid JB (1994) Toxicity and carcinogenicity of riddelliine following 13 weeks of treatment to rats and mice. Toxicon 32, 891–908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Williams L, Chou MW, Yan J, Young JF, Chan PC, and Doerge DR (2002) Toxicokinetics of riddelliine, a carcinogenic pyrrolizidine alkaloid, and metabolites in rats and mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol 182, 98–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Xia Q, Chou MW, Kadlubar FF, Chan PC, and Fu PP (2003) Human liver microsomal metabolism and DNA adduct formation of the tumorigenic pyrrolizidine alkaloid, riddelliine. Chem. Res. Toxicol 16, 66–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Yang YC, Yan J, Doerge DR, Chan PC, Fu PP, and Chou MW (2001) Metabolic activation of the tumorigenic pyrrolizidine alkaloid, riddelliine, leading to DNA adduct formation in vivo. Chem. Res. Toxicol 14, 101–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Chou MW, Yan J, Williams LD, Xia Q, Churchwell M, Doerge DR, and Fu PP (2003) Identification of DNA adducts derived from riddelliine, a carcinogenic pyrrolizidine alkaloid. Chem. Res. Toxicol 16, 1130–1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Nohmi T, Suzuki T, and Masumura K (2000) Recent advances in the protocols of transgenic mouse mutation assays. Mutat. Res 455, 191–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Chen T, Gamboa da Costa G, Marques MM, Shelton SD, Beland FA, and Manjanatha MG (2002) Mutations induced by alpha-hydroxytamoxifen in the lacI and cII genes of Big Blue transgenic rats. Carcinogenesis 23, 1751–1757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Cariello NF (1994) Software for the analysis of mutations at the human hprt gene. Mutat. Res 312, 173–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Adams WT, and Skopek TR (1987) Statistical test for the comparison of samples from mutational spectra. J. Mol. Biol 194, 391–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Yan J, Nichols J, Yang YC, Fu PP, and Chou MW (2002) Detection of riddelliine-derived DNA adducts in blood of rats fed riddelliine. Int. J. Mol. Sci 3, 1019–1026. [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Chou MW, Yan J, Nichols J, Xia Q, Beland FA, Chan PC, and Fu PP (2003) Correlation of DNA adduct formation and riddelliine-induced liver tumorigenesis in F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice. Cancer Lett 193, 119–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Hong HL, Ton TV, Devereux TR, Moomaw C, Clayton N, Chan P, Dunnick JK, and Sills RC (2003) Chemical-specific alterations in ras, p53, and β-catenin genes in hemangiosarcomas from B6C3F1 mice exposed to o-nitrotoluene or riddelliine for 2 years. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol 191, 227–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Saranko CJ, Meyer KG, Pluta LJ, Henderson RF, and Recio L (2001) Lung-specific mutagenicity and mutational spectrum in B6C3F1 lacI transgenic mice following inhalation exposure to 1,2-epoxybutene. Mutat. Res 473, 37–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Matsuda T, Kawanishi M, Yagi T, Matsui S, and Takebe H (1998) Specific tandem GG to TT base substitutions induced by acetaldehyde are due to intra-strand cross-links between adjacent guanine bases. Nucleic Acids Res 26, 1769–1774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Bubley GJ, Ashburner BP, and Teicher BA (1991) Spectrum of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II)-induced mutations in a shuttle vector propagated in human cells. Mol. Carcinog 4, 397–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).DeMarini DM, Shelton ML, Kohan MJ, Hudgens EE, Kleindienst TE, Ball LM, Walsh D, de Boer JG, Lewis-Bevan L, Rabinowitz JR, Claxton LD, and Lewtas J (2000) Mutagenicity in lung of Big Blue mice and induction of tandem-base substitutions in Salmonella by the air pollutant peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN): predicted formation of intrastrand cross-links. Mutat. Res 457, 41–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES