Skip to main content
BMC Research Notes logoLink to BMC Research Notes
. 2019 Feb 14;12:86. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4125-3

Prevalence and predictors of self care practices among hypertensive patients at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia: cross-sectional study

Busha Gamachu Labata 1,, Muktar Beshir Ahmed 2, Ginenus Fekadu Mekonen 1, Fekede Bekele Daba 3
PMCID: PMC6376695  PMID: 30764868

Abstract

Objective

Hypertension is a major risk factor and precursor of myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease, heart failure and premature death. These vascular events increased costs of hypertension management. Self-care Practices were recommended to control blood pressure among hypertensive patients. Therefore, the objective of this study is to assess predictors of self-care practices among hypertensive patients at Jimma University Specialized Hospital.

Results

A 341-hypertensive patients participated in the study. The mean age of the participants was 54.35 ± 12.48 years with range of 26 to 89 years. One hundred seventy-seven (51.9%) respondents were males and male to female ratio is 1.08. About 61.9% of respondents were adherent to medication usage and 30.5%, 44.9%, 88.3%, 93.5% and 56.9% of respondents were adherent to low salt diet, physical activity, non-alcohol drinking, nonsmoking and weight management respectively. Normal weight (AOR = 1.822, 95% CI 1.073–3.093) was independent predictor of medication usage whereas good self-efficacy (AOR = 2.584, 95% CI 1.477–4.521) and being female (AOR = 0.517, 95% CI 0.301–0.887) were independent predictor of low salt diet and physical activity respectively. Also being female (AOR = 3.626, 95% CI 1.211–10.851) was independent predictors of non-smoking.

Keywords: Hypertension, Predictors, Self-care practices

Introduction

Hypertension is a condition in which the blood vessels have persistently raised pressure and the average of two or more properly measured, seated blood pressure (BP) readings on each of two or more clinic visits is used [1]. Hypertension is a major risk factor and precursor of myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease, heart failure and premature death. These vascular events increased costs of hypertension management [2].

About one-third of adults in the world have hypertension [3]. These are predicted to 1.56 billion by the year 2025 [4]. Ethiopian epidemiology of hypertension was not well studied. Nevertheless, in southwest Ethiopia, the overall prevalence of hypertension is 13.2% [5] while in Gondar city is 28.3% [6].

Self-care practices (SCPs) includes that the medication taking, non-smoking, weight management, low-sodium and low-fat diet, physical activity and moderate alcohol consumption [7]. Self-care is multidimensional as it relates to chronic disease management [8]. Adherences to SCPs were the similarity between recommended practice and actual practice [9].

Smoking cessation has immediate as well as long-term benefits for patients with hypertension, prevents cardiovascular disease and premature deaths [10, 11]. Similarly, reducing of dietary sodium intake less than 2400 mg/day and implementing dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) through proper diet program like fruits and vegetables leads to reduce BP [10]. The literature studies revels that DASH diet reduced systolic BP by 8–14 mmHg, moderation of alcohol reduce systolic BP by 2–4 mmHg [12] and reduction in weight by 5–10 kg shows significant impact on systolic and diastolic BP [13]. WHO recommend at least 150 min of moderate-intensity aerobic physical activity throughout the week to lower BP [14, 15].

Patients who involved in SCPs benefit from the BP control, but adopting and maintaining SCPs for chronic disease management often require life-long practices, motivation and support [16]. Older age, female, self-efficacy and longer duration of hypertension were predictors of SCPs [16, 17]. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess Predictors of SCPs among hypertensive patients on follow up at Jimma University Specialized Hospital (JUSH) ambulatory unit using adapted Hypertension Self-Care Activity Level Effects (H-SCALE) questionnaire [17].

Main text

Patients and methods

Study design and period

Hospital based cross-sectional study was conducted from April 4 to May 30, 2016.

Study population

Adult hypertensive patients on follow up in the ambulatory care unit of JUSH, and who were placed on treatment for more than 6 months were included in the study [18]. Patients unable to communicate and mentally ill were excluded from the study.

Sample size and sampling technique

Sample size was calculated using a single population proportion formula considering a 95% confidence level, margin of error (0.05), proportion of adherence with antihypertensive medication (P = 0.557) [19].

n=Zα/22p1-pd2

The formula yields 380 hypertensive patients. Since the estimated total population of hypertensive patients was, less than 10,000 we used correction formula.

nf=n/1+nN

N = total targeted population on chronic follow up (2015).

Then the final sample size according to these equation yields 320 and adding 10% for nonresponse it becomes 352. Therefore, using patients’ card number 352 patients were recruited by simple random sampling technique from 2015 hypertensive patients and were interviewed after they re-fill their medication.

Data collection instrument

Sociodemographic, hypertension knowledge, and social support of patients’ data were obtained by structured questionnaire. Hypertension self-care practices were assessed by adapted H-SCALE questionnaire [17].

Ethical considerations

Approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Jimma University and JUSH clinical director in 2016. Written approval consent was obtained from literate participants and oral approval was considered in case of illiterate participants.

Operational definitions

Self-care practice: Is a framework for patient centred hypertension self-management and care.

Self-efficacy: A confidence in one‘s ability to participate in a given activities.

Medication adherence: Three items assessed the number of days in the last week that an individual takes medication, at recommended dosage and at same time. Responses were summed (range 0–21). Score = 21 were considered adherent.

Low-salt diet: six items assessed practices related to eating a healthy diet. A mean score is calculated. Scores of 6 or better were considered adherent.

Physical activity: Past 7 days physical activity of patients’ was assessed by 2 items. Responses were summed (range 0–14). Participants who scored ≥ 8 were adhering to physical activity.

Non-smoker: Respondents who reported 0 day smoking in the past 7 days.

Alcohol: Alcohol intake is assessed using 3-items. Participants who usually did not drink at all were considered abstainers.

Weight management: Seven items, strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5), assessed weight management. Responses were summed creating a range of scores from 7 to 35. Score ≥ 28 were considered adherent to weight management practices.

Social support: It was assessed with 12 questions and answers range from 12 to 60.

Range of 12–42 has low, 43–52 has medium and 53–60 has greater social support.

Knowledge: Assessed by 15 questions by giving 1 to correct answer and 0 to the wrong answer. Scores < 8 were taken as poor, 8–12 average, and 13–15 adequate knowledge of hypertension.

Urban residence: Patients who had town identification card.

Results

Characteristic of hypertensive patients

A total of 352 individuals were invited to participate in the study; out of them only 341 (96.88%) were fully responded. The mean age of the participants was 54.35 ± 12.48 years with range of 26 to 89 years. One hundred seventy-seven (51.9%) respondents were males. One hundred eighty-six (54.5%) were Muslim by religion and Oromo account 200 (58.7%). One hundred forty-nine (43.7%) were Illiterate. Married respondents account 279 (81.8%) and 182 (53.4%) live in Urban. One hundred twenty-two of respondents had estimated monthly income of 501–1500 Ethiopian birr (ETB). About 52% of respondents had medium social support. Two hundred thirty-seven (69.5%) of the participants were diagnosed to have hypertension before 3 years. Fifty-five (16.1%) of patients had diabetes as comorbid disease. Two hundred fifteen (63%) have normal weight whereas about 53 (15.5%) respondents self-rated their health as very good. Poor self-efficacy to manage hypertension accounts 70% of respondents (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristic of hypertensive patients at Jimma University Specialized Hospital (n = 341)

Variables Frequency (%) Variables Frequency (%)
Age Ethnicity
19–39 years 42 (12.3) Oromo 200 (58.7)
40–64 years 222 (65.1) Amhara 51 (15)
65–89 years 77 (22.6) Tigre 18 (5.3)
Gender Guragie 26 (7.6)
Male 177 (51.9) Dawuro 17 (5)
female 164 (48.1) Kafa 17 (5)
Education Yem 4 (1.2)
Tanbaro 3 (0.9)
Sulte 5 (1.5)
Illiterate 149 (43.7) Average monthly income (ETB)
Read and write 35 (10.3) < 500 61 (17.9)
Primary 80 (23.5) 501–1500 122 (35.8)
Secondary 43 (12.6) 1501–2500 82 (24)
College/above 34 (10) 2501–3500 38 (11.1)
Religion > 3501 38 (11.1)
Muslim 186 (54.5) Live alone
Orthodox 99 (29) Yes 24 (7)
Protestant 55 (16.1) No 317 (93)
Wakefata 1 (0.3) Social support
Occupation Low 114 (33.4)
House wife 82 (24) Medium 177 (51.9)
Farmer 122 (35.8) Greater 50 (14.7)
merchant 38 (11.1) Marital status
Employed 47 (13.8) Married 279 (81.8)
Retired 32 (9.4) Single 2 (.6)
Daily laborer 7 (2) Widow 46 (13.5)
House servant 9 (2.6)
Students 4 (1.2)
Place of residence Divorced 14 (4.1)
Rural 159 (46.6) BMI
Urban 182 (53.4) 16.3–18.499 22 (6.5)
Time since diagnosis of hypertension 18.5–24.99 215 (63)
< 3 years 104 (30.5) 25–29.9 92 (27)
≥ 3 years 237 (69.5) ≥ 30 12 (3.5)
self-reported Comorbidities Self-rated health
Diabetes 55 (16.1) Very good 53 (15.5)
Heart failure 20 (5.9) Good 141 (41.3)
Kidney disease 26 (7.6) Fair 113 (33.1)
Liver disease 2 (0.6) Poor or very poor 34 (10)
Asthma 10 (2.9) Self-efficacy
Retinopathy 5 (1.5) Good 103 (30.2)
Neuropathy 3 (0.9) Poor 238 (69.8)

Prevalence of self-care practices of hypertensive patients

Of the study participants; 61.9%, 30.5%, 44.9%, 93.5%, 88.3% and 56.9% were reported adherent to medication usage, low salt diet, physical activity, non-smoking, non-alcohol drinking and weight management practices respectively (Table 2).

Table 2.

Self-care practices of hypertensive patients at Jimma University specialized hospital (n = 341)

Prevalence of self-care practices
Variables Frequency (%)
Medication usage
Adherent 211 (61.9)
Non-adherent 130 (38.1)
Physical activity
Adherent 153 (44.9)
Non-adherent 188 (55.1)
Weight management
Adherent 194 (56.9)
Non-adherent 147 (43.1)
Low salt diet
Adherent 104 (30.5)
Non-adherent 237 (69.5)
Non Smoking
Adherent 319 (93.5)
Non-adherent 22 (6.5)
Moderate alcohol usage
Adherent 301 (88.3)
Non-adherent 40 (11.7)

Predictors of self-care practices

In bivariate logistic regression variables like younger age, female sex, normal weight, hypertension knowledge, self-efficacy, education, time since hypertension diagnosis and marital status were significantly associated with SCPs.

In multivariate logistic regression, normal weight patients were 1.82 times more likely to adhere medication usage practice than over weight respondents (AOR = 1.822, 95% CI 1.073–3.093). However, participants of poor self-efficacy (AOR = 0.407, 95% CI 0.227–0.730) were less likely to adhere medication usage than participants of good self-efficacy.

Participants who get greater social support were 2.81 times (AOR = 2.811, 95% CI 1.209–6.534) more likely adherent to low salt diet than their counterparts.

Female were 3.63 time more likely to non-smoking than male (AOR = 3.626, 95% CI 1.211–10.851).

Respondents having adequate knowledge of hypertension were 2.58 times more likely (AOR = 2.585, 95% CI 1.125–5.940) to adhere practicing physical activity. However, female (AOR = 0.517, 95% CI 0.301–0.887) respondents were less likely to adhere physical activity than male.

Normal weight respondents were 2.22 times more likely (AOR = 2.219, 95% CI 1.218–4.043) to practice weight management. Besides, having good self-efficacy were 2.60 times more likely (AOR = 2.584, 95% CI 1.411–4.731) to maintain their weight than poor self-efficacy (Table 3).

Table 3.

Predictors of Self-care practices among hypertensive patients at Jimma University specialized Hospital

Variables Medication usage Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis
Adherent Non-adherent P-value COR (95% CI) P-value AOR (95% CI)
Age in years
19–39 years 32 10 0.022 2.667 (1.151–6.176) 0.064 2.455 (0.951–6.339)
40–64 years 137 85 0.270 1.343 (0.795–2.268) 0.380 1.300 (0.723–2.337)
≥ 65 years 42 35 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Time of HTN diagnosis
< 3 years 74 30 0.020 1.800 (1.096–2.958) 0.092 1.605 (0.926–2.782)
≥ 3 years 137 100 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
BMI
16–18.49 14 8 0.360 1.559 (0.603–4.032) 0.098 2.396 (0.851–6.747)
18.5–24.9 142 73 0.024 1.733 (1.075–2.793) 0.026 1.822 (1.073–3.093)
≥ 25 55 49 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Self-efficacy
Good 80 23 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Poor 131 107 0.000 0.352 (0.207–0.598) 0.003 0.407 (0.227–0.730)
Variables Low salt diet Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis
Adherent Non–adherent P–value COR (95% CI) P–value AOR (95% CI)
Time of HTN diagnosis
< 3 years 40 64 0.035 1.689 (1.037–2.753) 0.050 1.752 (0.999–3.074)
≥ 3 years 64 173 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Social support
Low 23 91 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Medium 58 119 0.020 1.928 (1.107–3.358) 0.053 1.837 (0.992–3.401)
Greater 23 27 0.001 3.370 (1.640–6.925) 0.016 2.811 (1.209–6.534)
HTN knowledge
Poor 28 94 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Average 55 127 0.164 1.454 (0.858–2.464) 0.313 1.345 (0.756–2.391)
Adequate 21 16 0.000 4.406 (2.029–9.567) 0.003 3.789 (1.575–9.114)
Self-efficacy
Good 49 54 0.001 3.019 (1.849–4.930) 0.001 2.584 (1.477–4.521)
Poor 55 183 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Variables Physical activity Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis
Adherent Non-adherent P-value COR (95% CI) P-value AOR (95% CI)
Age in years
19–39 years 24 18 0.043 2.207 (1.026–4.745) 0.164 1.864 (0.775–4.480)
40–64 years 100 122 0.261 1.357 (0.797–2.308) 0.345 1.346 (0.726–2.495)
≥ 65 years 29 48 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Sex
Male 93 84 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Female 60 104 0.003 0.521 (0.338–0.804) 0.017 0.517 (0.301–0.887)
Education
Illiterate 47 102 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Read and write 12 23 0.755 1.132 (0.520–2.467) 0.929 0.963 (0.422–2.200)
Primary 43 37 0.001 2.522 (1.442–4.411) 0.077 1.728 (0.942–3.170)
Secondary 29 14 0.000 4.495 (2.176–9.286) 0.002 3.301 (1.529–7.126)
College/above 22 12 0.001 3.979 (1.817–8.711) 0.172 1.912 (0.754–4.846)
Marital status
Married 135 144 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Others 18 44 0.006 0.436 (0.240–0.792) 0.627 0.842 (0.420–1.686)
HTN knowledge
Poor 45 77 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Average 84 98 0.110 1.467 (0.917–2.345) 0.288 1.320 (0.791–2.204)
Adequate 24 13 0.003 3.159 (1.465–6.813) 0.025 2.585 (1.125–5.940)
Self-efficacy
Good 60 43 0.001 2.176 (1.359–3.482) 0.097 1.567 (0.922–2.664)
Poor 93 145 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Variables Non-smoking Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis
Adherent Non-adherent P-value COR (95% CI) P-value AOR (95% CI)
Sex
Male 160 17 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Female 159 5 0.019 3.376 (1.217–9.379) 0.021 3.626 (1.21–10.851)
Self-rated health
Good-very good 190 4 0.001 6.628 (2.193–20.036) 0.012 4.482 (1.39–14.45)
Fair to poor 129 18 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Social support
Low 103 13 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Medium 170 7 0.019 3.126 (1.207–8.093) 0.148 2.246 (0.749–6.732)
Greater 48 2 0.148 3.089 (0.670–14.235) 0.524 1.730 (0.320–9.337)
Self-efficacy
Good 102 1 0.026 9.87 (1.310–74.399) 0.052 9.541 (0.98–92.752)
Poor 217 21 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Variables Non-alcohol usage Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis
Adherent Non-adherent P-value COR (95% CI) P-value AOR (95% CI)
Education
Illiterate 131 18 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Read and write 29 6 0.426 0.664 (0.242–1.819) 0.732 0.817 (0.267–2.250)
Primary 76 4 0.093 2.611 (0.852–7.999) 0.398 1.701 (0.496–5.835)
Secondary 38 5 0.936 1.044 (0.364–2.998) 0.900 1.081 (0.321–3.644)
College/above 27 7 0.198 0.530 (0.202–1.393) 0.036 0.239 (0.063–0.908)
Presence of DM
Yes 43 12 0.014 0.389 (0.184–0.823) 0.282 0.615 (0.254–1.491)
No 258 28 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
BMI
16–18.49 19 3 0.675 1.326 (0.354–4.959) 0.581 1.537 (0.334–7.061)
18.5–24.9 196 19 0.029 2.159 (1.080–4.316) 0.084 2.036 (0.909–4.561)
≥ 25 86 18 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Self-rated health
Good-very good 178 16 0.024 2.171 (1.107–4.255) 0.198 1.638 (0.773–3.470)
Fair to poor 123 24 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Variables Weight management Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis
Adherent Non-adherent P-value COR (95% CI) P-value AOR (95% CI)
Education
Illiterate 63 86 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Read and write 21 14 0.061 2.048 (0.967–4.336) 0.095 2.099 (0.879–5.015)
Primary 49 31 0.007 2.158 (1.239–3.758) 0.258 1.467 (0.755–2.849)
Secondary 32 11 0.000 3.971 (1.860–8.476) 0.002 4.146 (1.65–10.405)
College/above 29 5 0.000 7.917 (2.903–21.591) 0.017 4.241 (1.289–13.96)
BMI
16–18.49 13 9 0.273 1.685 (0.663–4.285) 0.058 2.903 (0.964–8.742)
18.5–24.9 133 82 0.008 1.892 (1.178–3.039) 0.009 2.219 (1.218–4.043)
≥ 25 48 56 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Social support
Low 38 76 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Medium 118 59 0.000 4.000 (2.428–6.590) 0.000 4.050 (2.279–7.196)
Greater 38 12 0.000 6.333 (2.971–13.500) 0.000 6.694 (2.733–16.39)
HTN knowledge
Poor 60 62 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Average 106 76 0.120 1.441 (0.909–2.286) 0.303 1.334 (0.771–2.305)
Adequate 28 9 0.006 3.215 (1.401–7.378) 0.011 3.524 (1.331–9.328)
Self-efficacy
Good 78 25 0.000 3.215 (1.956–5.504) 0.002 2.584 (1.411–4.731)
Poor 116 122 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

Discussion

Trials showed using SCPs in patients with hypertension have shown reduction in BP, cardiovascular events and total mortality [20].

In this study, the prevalence of SCPs of medication usage was 61.9%, which is similar to studies done in China in which 61.3% of the participants reported taking antihypertensive medications as prescribed [21]. However, this study result is lower than a study done in Tikur Anbessa; Ethiopia in which 69.2% were adherent to medication [22]. This difference might be due to educational variation as some of study participants were illiterate. However, our current result is higher than study done in Nigeria [23]. Normal weight patients adhere to medication use as compared to overweight patients, which is in line with a study done in metropolitan Charlotte area [24].

Importantly in this result, we found the prevalence of SCP of adherence to low salt diet was 30.5%, which is much lower than the study done in China [21]. This might be the daily consumption of salt per person is high in Ethiopia and most countries [25]. Participants who are less than 3 years since diagnosis to have hypertension were found to be independent predictor of low salt diet practice, which is not consistent with research done in china [21]. The possible reason might be patients unable to go through with diet regimen for long period, which is different from the other family members. In addition, participants with greater social support are independent predictor of self-care practice of low salt diet similar to a study done by Hu et al. [26]. Respondents who have adequate knowledge of hypertension adhere to low salt diet and this is in line with a study done in India [27].

In this study, the prevalence of SCP of adherence to physical activity was 44.9%, which is lower than study done in china were 51.9% of participants engage in physical exercise [21]. The main barriers in practicing physical activity were lack of desire and not convinced of the benefits [28]. Zinat Motlagh et al. [29] found 24.5% of hypertensive patients do physical activity, which is lower than our study. However, this study result is in line with a study done in Black Lion, Ethiopia [30]. Respondents who have secondary education practiced physical activity as compared to illiterate since they learnt benefit of physical activity at school. Female patients were less likely to involve in physical activities than males. This is not in line with the study done in China and Iran [21, 29]. In areas like ours, females are culturally made busy at home activities and they are responsible in making foods for their family.

Non-smoking practice was the most widely practiced SCP among hypertensive patients studied, which accounted for 93.5% respondents. This finding was found to be higher compared to a study done in China and India [21, 27]. This might be due to low prevalence of smoking habit in Ethiopia [31] and females were more likely to adhere to non-smoking practice in our study which is in line with a study done in China [21] and different from a study done in Iran [29]. Women are much less likely than men to report using smoking [32].

Non-alcohol use practice was the second most widely practiced SCP, which account for 88.3% of respondents that is higher than study done in china and India [21, 27]. The possible discrepancy may be low alcohol drinking prevalence and difficulty to afford daily expenditure of alcohol. However, this study is lower than study done in Iran because alcoholic drinks are banned in Iran. However, this finding is in line with a study done in Brazil were 88.7% of respondents adherent to non-alcohol drink [33].

More than half of respondents in this study, 56.9% were adherent to SCP of weight management which is higher than study done by Warren-Findlow and Seymour [17]. In addition, this study result is higher than a study done in Iran were 39.2% managed their weight [29]. Having good self-efficacy encouraged practicing weight management similar to a study done by Warren Findlow et al. [24].

Conclusion

Self-care practices of low salt diet (30.5%), physical activity (44.9%), medication usage (61.9%) and weight management (56.9%) were low whereas self-care practices of non-alcohol use and non-smoking were good. Self-efficacy was independent predictor of SCPs of low salt diet and weight management. Females were independent predictor of non-smoking.

Limitation

Recall bias may influence the result this study because data was gathered through a self-report questionnaire. It was difficult to assess the amount of salt intake of the patients.

Authors’ contributions

BGL was the principal investigator who conceived and designed the study; extracted, analyzed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. FBD, MBA and GFM supervised the whole research, guided the conception and design of the study and assisted with interpretation of data and manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We were thankful for the co-operation of all hypertensive patients who participated in this study for their sincere response and precious time. We would also like to thanks all data collectors.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Jimma University and JUSH clinical director in 2016. At hospital, patients were informed about the objective of study. Written approval consent was obtained from literate participants and oral approval was considered in case of illiterate participants. All patients were informed the right to out of the research. The data was handled with strong confidentiality.

Funding

There is no funding for this research. Busha Gamachu covered cost of data collection. Busha Gamachu designed the study, analysed data, interpreted data and involved in writing the manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abbreviations

AOR

adjusted odds ratio

BP

blood pressure

DASH

dietary approaches to stop hypertension

ETB

Ethiopian Birr

H-SCALE

hypertension self-care activity level effects

JUSH

Jimma University Specialized Hospital

SCP (s)

self-care practice (s)

Contributor Information

Busha Gamachu Labata, Phone: +251912119297, Email: bushagemechu1@gmail.com.

Muktar Beshir Ahmed, Phone: +251911548787, Email: muktar27@yahoo.com.

Ginenus Fekadu Mekonen, Phone: +251917137145, Email: take828pharm@gmail.com.

Fekede Bekele Daba, Phone: +2519117558845, Email: fekedeb@gmail.com.

References

  • 1.WHO. A Global brief on Hypertension. Silent killer, global public health crisis. 2013.
  • 2.National Heart Foundation of Australia . Guideline for the diagnosis and management of hypertension in adults—2016. Melbourne: National Heart Foundation of Australia; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Weber MA, Schiffrin EL, White WB, Mann S, Lindholm LH, Kenerson JG, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in the community. A statement by the american society of hypertension and the international society of hypertension. J Clin Hypertens. 2013;16:1–13. doi: 10.1111/jch.12237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005;365:217–223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)70151-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Michael Y, Gudina EK, Assegid S. Prevalence of hypertension and its risk factors in southwest Ethiopia: a hospital-based cross-sectional survey. Integr Blood Press Control. 2013;6:111–117. doi: 10.2147/IBPC.S47298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Awoke A, Awoke T, Alemu S, Megabiaw B. Prevalence and associated factors of hypertension among adults in Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012;12(113):2–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-12-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.US Department of Health and Human Services. The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. National Institutes of Health; 2004. (NIH Publication No. 04-5230).
  • 8.Gohar F, Greenfield SM, Beevers DG, Lip GY, Jolly K. Self-care and adherence to medication: a survey in the hypertension outpatient clinic. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2008;8(4):1–9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-8-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Han H-R, Lee H, Commodore-Mensah Y, Kim M. Development and validation of the hypertension self-care profile: a practical tool to measure hypertension self-care. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014;29(3):11–20. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3182a3fd46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Thayer C, Cohen A, Brock P, Dozois D, Haugen S, Mayfield R, et al. Hypertension diagnosis and treatment guideline. 2014. 1–19
  • 11.Huang N, Duggan K, Harman J. Lifestyle management of hypertension. Aust Prescr. 2008;31:150–153. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2008.085. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Seedat YK, Rayner BL, Veriava Y. South African hypertension practice guideline 2014. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2014;25(6):288–294. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2014-062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Azadbakht L, Mirmiran P, Esmaillzadeh A, Azizi F. Better dietary adherence and weight maintenance achieved by a long-term moderate fat diet. Br J Nutr. 2007;97:399–404. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507328602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.WHO . Global Recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: WHO; 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cornelissen VA, Buys R, Smart NA. Endurance exercise beneficially affects ambulatory blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2013;31:639–648. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835ca964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lee J, Han H, Song H, Kim J, Kim KB, Ryu JP, et al. Correlates of self-care behaviors for managing hypertension among Korean Americans: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(4):411–417. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Warren-Findlow J, Seymour B. Prevalence rates of hypertension self-care activities among African Americans. J Natl Med Assoc. 2011;103(6):503–512. doi: 10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30365-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ali MA, Bekele ML, Teklay G. Antihypertensive medication non-adherence and its determinants among patients on follow up in public hospitals in Northern Ethiopia. Int J Clin Trials. 2014;1(3):95–104. doi: 10.5455/2349-3259.ijct20141103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Girma F, Emishaw S, Alemseged F, Mekonnen A. Compliance with anti-hypertensive treatment and associated factors among hypertensive patients on follow-up in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Jimma, South West Ethiopia: a quantitative cross-sectional study. J Hypertens. 2014;3(5):174. doi: 10.4172/2167-1095.1000174. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Eriksson MK, Franks PW, Eliasson M. A 3-year randomized trial of lifestyle intervention for cardiovascular risk reduction in the primary care setting: the Swedish Bjorknas study. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(4):1–15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hu H, Li G, Arao T. Prevalence rates of self-care behaviors and related factors in a rural hypertension population: a questionnaire survey. Int J Hypertens. 2013;2013:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2013/526949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hareri HA, Abebe M. Assessments of adherence to hypertension medications and associated factors among patients attending Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital Renal Unit, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2012. Int J Nurs Sci. 2013;3(1):1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ajayi EA, Adeoti AO, Ajayi IA, Ajayi AO, Adeyeye VO. Adherence to antihypertensive medications and some of its clinical implications in patients seen at a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2013;8(4):36–40. doi: 10.9790/0853-0843640. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Warren-findlow J, Huber LRB, Seymour RB. The association between self-efficacy and hypertension self care activities among African American Adults. J Community Heal. 2012;37(1):15–24. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9410-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.WHO . Sodium intakes around the world. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hu HH, Li G, Arao T. The association of family social support, depression, anxiety and self-efficacy with specific hypertension self-care behaviours in Chinese local community. J Hum Hypertens. 2015;29:198–203. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2014.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Durai V, Muthuthandavan AR. Knowledge and practice on lifestyle modifications among males with hypertension. Indian J Comm Heal. 2015;27(1):143–149. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Alsairafi M, Alshamali K, Al-rashed A. Effect of physical activity on controlling blood pressure among hypertensive patients from Mishref Area of Kuwait. Eur J Gen Med. 2010;7(4):377–384. doi: 10.29333/ejgm/82889. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zinat Motlagh SF, Chaman R, Sadeghi E, Eslami AA. Self-care behaviors and related factors in hypertensive patients. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016;18(6):1–10. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.35805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hareri HA, Abebe M, Asefaw T. Assessment of adherence to hypertesion managements and its influencing factors among hypertensive patients attending Black lion hospital chronic follow up unit, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia—a cross-sectional study. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2013;4(3):1086–1095. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Central Statistical Agency [Ethiopia] and ICF International . Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2011. Addis Ababa: Central Statistical Agency and ICF International; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ansara, Donna L., Fred Arnold, Sunita Kishor, Jason Hsia, and Rachel Kaufmann. 2013. Tobacco Use by Men and Women in 49 Countries with Demographic and Health Surveys. DHS Comparative Reports No. 31. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ICF International.
  • 33.Mendes C, Souza T, Felipe G, Lima F, Miranda M. Self-care comparison of hypertensive patients in primary and secondary health care services. Acta Paul Enferm. 2015;28(6):580–586. doi: 10.1590/1982-0194201500095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Research Notes are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES