Abstract
Introduction
Atrial fibrillation is an independent risk factor of thromboembolism. Women with atrial fibrillation are at a higher overall risk for stroke compared to men with atrial fibrillation. The aim of this study was to evaluate for sex differences in patients with acute stroke and atrial fibrillation, regarding risk factors, treatments received and outcomes.
Methods
Data were analyzed from the “Recurrence and Cerebral Bleeding in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation” (RAF-study), a prospective, multicenter, international study including only patients with acute stroke and atrial fibrillation. Patients were followed up for 90 days. Disability was measured by the modified Rankin Scale (0–2 favorable outcome, 3–6 unfavorable outcome).
Results
Of the 1029 patients enrolled, 561 were women (54.5%) (p < 0.001) and younger (p < 0.001) compared to men. In patients with known atrial fibrillation, women were less likely to receive oral anticoagulants before index stroke (p = 0.026) and were less likely to receive anticoagulants after stroke (71.3% versus 78.4%, p = 0.01). There was no observed sex difference regarding the time of starting anticoagulant therapy between the two groups (6.4 ± 11.7 days for men versus 6.5 ± 12.4 days for women, p = 0.902). Men presented with more severe strokes at onset (mean NIHSS 9.2 ± 6.9 versus 8.1 ± 7.5, p < 0.001). Within 90 days, 46 (8.2%) recurrent ischemic events (stroke/TIA/systemic embolism) and 19 (3.4%) symptomatic cerebral bleedings were found in women compared to 30 (6.4%) and 18 (3.8%) in men (p = 0.28 and p = 0.74). At 90 days, 57.7% of women were disabled or deceased, compared to 41.1% of the men (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis did not confirm this significance.
Conclusions
Women with atrial fibrillation were less likely to receive oral anticoagulants prior to and after stroke compared to men with atrial fibrillation, and when stroke occurred, regardless of the fact that in our study women were younger and with less severe stroke, outcomes did not differ between the sexes.
Keywords: Sex differences, atrial fibrillation, ischemic stroke, secondary prevention, anticoagulation therapy, stroke outcome
Introduction
Strokes in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients are common and frequently devastating (70–80% of patients die or become disabled,1,2 yet these strokes are preventable with anticoagulant therapy: 64% reduction in the risk of stroke and 25% reduction in mortality.3
Recent evidence shows that women are more frequently affected by AF compared to men, and have a higher associated risk for thromboembolic events.4–6 Therefore, female sex has been added as an independent risk-factor when calculating the CHA2DS2-VASc-score.7 Despite of this increased risk, women with AF still tend to be less treated with anticoagulants.8,9
The “Early Recurrence and Cerebral Bleeding in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation” (RAF) Study investigated for (1) the risk of recurrent ischemic event and severe bleeding; (2) the risk factors for recurrence and bleeding; and (3) the risks of recurrence and bleeding associated with anticoagulant therapy and its starting time after the acute stroke.10 The results of this study have been recently published.10
The aim of this study was to evaluate the sex-differences in patients with acute stroke and AF, regarding risk factors, treatments received and outcomes.
Methods
The methods and results of the RAF-study have been published recently.10 Briefly, RAF-study was performed between January 2012 and March 2014 and included 29 Stroke Units across Europe and Asia. All of the participating 29 Stroke Units provided standard stroke unit care and monitoring.10
On admission, stroke severity was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). All patients underwent cerebral computed tomography examination without contrast or cerebral magnetic resonance to exclude intracranial hemorrhage. Thrombolysis treatment was administered as per local standard protocol, when appropriate. All patients were monitored for blood pressure, temperature, glucose level, heart rate, and blood gases in the first days after stroke. The choice of anticoagulant treatment (low molecular weight heparin [LMWH] or oral anticoagulants), as well as the day of its initiation, was left to the discretion of the treating physicians. AF was classified as paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent. A second brain computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance was performed 24–72 h from stroke onset in all patients. Hemorrhagic transformation was defined as any degree of hyperdensity within the area of low attenuation and was classified as either hemorrhagic infarction or parenchymal hematoma.11,12 The sites and sizes of the qualifying infarcts were determined based on standard templates as small, medium, large anterior or large posterior infarctions.11,13,14 Data on known stroke risk factors and treatment were collected and reported in the main paper.10 The CHA2DS2-VASc score before the index event was also calculated. The standard protocol also included a transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) during the hospital stay. Patients were followed up prospectively through face-to-face or telephone interviews. Study outcomes were (1) recurrent ischemic cerebrovascular events (stroke or TIA) and symptomatic systemic embolism; (2) symptomatic cerebral bleedings and major extracerebral bleeding at 90 days. The primary outcome was the composite of stroke, TIA, symptomatic systemic embolism, symptomatic cerebral bleeding, and major extracerebral bleeding. Disability and mortality at 90 days were also assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Functional outcome was defined as either favorable (mRS 0–2) or unfavorable (mRS 3–6).
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables, as well as NIHSS score, were reported as mean ± SD, and categorical variables were reported as percentages. Pearson’s chi-square test was used to compare categorized proportions. A comparison of discrete variables was conducted using a non-parametric test (Mann–Whitney). Multivariate logistic regression was performed in order to investigate sex differences for dichotomous outcomes. Included variables were: age, vascular risk factors, NIHSS on admission, the type of AF, lesion size, antithrombotic treatment before and after stroke, previous use of statins. The decision concerning which variables to include and to adjust in the multivariable analysis was guided by either the presence of an a priori theoretical or biological relationship among the examined patient characteristics as well as primary endpoints.15 A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered significant for all statistical tests. All statistical analyses were performed using software SPSS/PC Win package 20.0.
Results
Overall, 1037 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study (59 from Asia) and 1029 were included in the analysis (eight excluded for incomplete data). Overall, 561 women were included (54.5%, p < 0.001), and they were on average younger (p < 0.001) compared to men. There was no observed difference in AF subtypes (paroxysmal, persistent or permanent) between the sexes (Table 1). History of myocardial infarction was more common in men (p = 0.002), as was history of peripheral arterial disease (p = 0.003) and aortic atherosclerosis (p = 0.016). Also, men more often had a pacemaker (p = 0.023) and were more often taking statins at the time of stroke onset (p < 0.001), while smoking and alcohol abuse were more common in men (p < 0.001). Previous use of antiplatelet agents was not significantly different between the two groups, while the use of anticoagulants was less frequent in women (25.5% versus 31.9%, respectively, p = 0.026).
Table 1.
Variables | Women | Men | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years) (mean ± SD) | 75.1 ± 9.04 | 77.2 ± 9.73 | <0.001 |
Type of AF, n (%): | |||
Paroxysmal | 198 (35.4) | 166 (35.6) | 0.948 |
Permanent | 248 (44.4) | 224 (48.1) | 0.232 |
Persistent | 115 (20.2) | 76 (16.3) | 0.091 |
Concomitant medical history, n (%): | |||
Hypertension | 457 (82.3) | 364 (78.3) | 0.113 |
Hyperlipidemia | 161 (29.2) | 171 (36.9) | 0.011 |
Diabetes mellitus | 144 (25.9) | 120 (25.8) | 1.0 |
History of stroke/TIA | 138 (25.0) | 127 (27.4) | 0.39 |
Chronic heart failure | 99 (17.7) | 94 (20.2) | 0.336 |
History of myocardial infarction | 72 (13.0) | 94 (20.2) | 0.002 |
History of peripheral artery disease | 36 (6.49) | 56 (12.1) | 0.003 |
Aortic atherosclerosis | 44 (7.86) | 58 (12.5) | 0.016 |
Atherosclerosis in other sitesa | 115 (21.3) | 116 (25.2) | 0.153 |
Pacemaker | 36 (6.45) | 49 (10.5) | 0.023 |
Smoking | 67 (12.1) | 197(42.4) | <0.001 |
Alcoholism | 7 (1.25) | 61 (13.1) | <0.001 |
Previous use of oral anticoagulants, n (%): | 141 (25.5) | 148 (31.9) | 0.026 |
Previous use of antiplatelets, n (%) | 248 (44.8) | 217 (46.9) | 0.528 |
Previous use of statins, n (%) | 115 (20.8) | 145 (31.2) | <0.001 |
Lesion site and size, n (%): | |||
Small lesion | 187 (33.4) | 192 (41.1) | 0.011 |
Medium lesion | 202 (36.1) | 166 (35.5) | 0.896 |
Large anterior lesion | 137 (24.5) | 83 (17.8) | 0.012 |
Large posterior lesion | 34 (6.1) | 25 (5.4) | 0.687 |
Leukoaraiosis, n (%) | 261 (47.1) | 165 (35.9) | <0.001 |
NIHSS, mean ± SD | 8.1 ± 7.5 | 9.2 ± 6.9 | <0.001 |
Systolic AP, mean ± SD | 148.4 ± 25.2 | 150.1 ± 25.3 | 0.048 |
Diastolic AP, mean ± SD | 82.8 ± 14.3 | 82.9 ± 14.1 | 0.923 |
Laboratory data on admission, mean ± SD: | |||
Hemoglobin (g/dL), mean ± SD | 14.3 ± 14.2 | 14.7 ± 12.3 | 0.65 |
Glycemia (mg/dL), mean ± SD | 130.5 ± 39.8 | 223.5 ± 48.2 | 0.362 |
Total cholesterol (mg/dL), mean ± SD | 171.8 ± 41.3 | 180.6 ± 42.8 | <0.001 |
INR, mean ± SD | 2.2 ± 3.3 | 3.5 ± 13.6 | 0.152 |
Presence of internal carotid/vertebral artery stenosis ≥50%. AF: atrial fibrillation; AP: arterial pressure; INR: International Normalized Ratios at admission for all patients; TIA: transient ischemic attack.
Both large anterior lesions (p = 0.012) and leukoaraiosis (p < 0.001) were more frequent in women (Table 1). On transthoracic echocardiography, performed on 853 patients, mitral disease, aortic disease and severe atrial enlargement were more frequent in women (p = 0.025, p = 0.03 and p = 0.007, respectively), while cardiomyopathy was more frequent in men (p = 0.001). Tricuspid disease, and presence of aortic or mitral prostheses were not significantly different between the sexes (p = ns) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Variables | Women | Men | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Atrial enlargement, n (%): | 304 (68.5) | 244 (62.7) | 0.092 |
Mild | 75 (28.3) | 70 (26.8) | 0.77 |
Moderate | 113 (39.6) | 90 (35.2) | 0.287 |
Severe | 116 (43.8) | 81 (32.1) | 0.007 |
Intracardiac thrombus, n (%) | 4 (0.9) | 7 (1.8) | 0.383 |
Cardiomyopathy, n (%) | 37 (8.31) | 62 (15.9) | 0.001 |
Mitral disease, n (%) | 209 (46.8) | 152 (39.0) | 0.025 |
Aortic disease, n (%) | 137 (30.6) | 93 (23.9) | 0.03 |
Tricuspid disease, n (%) | 118 (26.3) | 95 (24.5) | 0.578 |
Biologic aortic prosthesis | 4 (0.8) | 6 (1.5) | 0.526 |
Mechanical aortic prosthesis, n (%) | 8 (1.7) | 9 (2.2) | 0.627 |
Biologic mitral prosthesis, n (%) | 4 (0.8) | 4 (0.7) | 1.0 |
Mechanical mitral prosthesis, n (%) | 15(3.2) | 8 (2.0) | 0.298 |
Types of revascularization therapy administered after ischemic stroke did not differ between the two groups. Anticoagulants were less often prescribed in women than in men after index stroke (71.3% versus 78.4%, respectively, p = 0.01). There were no sex differences regarding the time of initiating anticoagulant therapy between the two groups: (6.4 ± 11.7 days for men versus 6.5 ± 12.4 days for women, p = 0.902) (Table 3). A CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3 was found in 5.7% and 27.8% for women and men, respectively (p < 0.001), while a score between 7 and 9 was recorded more commonly in women (12.2% and 4.4% for women and men, respectively, p < 0.001). Men had more severe strokes than women on NIHSS (mean 9.2 ± 6.9 versus 8.1 ± 7.5, respectively, p < 0.001). Within 90 days, women had 46 (8.2%) recurrent ischemic events (stroke/TIA/systemic embolism) and 19 (3.4%) symptomatic cerebral bleedings compared to 30 (6.4%) and 18 (3.8%), respectively, in men (p = 0.28 and p = 0.74). At 90 days, 57.7% women were disabled or deceased compared to 41.1% of men (p < 0.001) (Table 3). In multivariate analysis, this significance was not confirmed (for unfavorable outcome – odds ratio (OR), 0.783, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.536–1.143, p = 0.205 and for mortality – OR, 1.287, 95% CI, 0.726–2.284, p = 0.388) (Table 4).
Table 3.
Variables | Women | Men | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Revascularization therapy (IV and/or IA), n (%) | 115 (20.6) | 96 (20.6) | 1.0 |
HT on neuroimaginga, n (%): | 79 (14.1) | 55 (11.9) | 0.307 |
hemorrhagic infarction, n (%) | 55 (11.0) | 37 (9.1) | 0.437 |
parenchymal hematoma, n (%) | 24 (4.9) | 18 (4.4) | 0.874 |
Therapy with anticoagulants after index stroke, n (%) | 399 (71.3) | 367 (78.4) | 0.01 |
Type of anticoagulation, n (%): | |||
LMWH | 68 (12.1) | 45 (9.6) | 0.197 |
Oral anticoagulants (warfarin/DOA) | 196 (35.0) | 181 (38.7) | 0.22 |
Bridging therapy (LMWH, followed by oral anticoagulants) | 135 (24.1) | 141 (30.1) | 0.03 |
No anticoagulants at all | 161 (28.8) | 101 (21.6) | 0.009 |
Time when anticoagulant therapy was initiated, mean ± SD, days | 6.5 ± 12.4 | 6.4 ± 11.7 | 0.902 |
Outcome effects, n (%): | |||
Outcome ischemic events | 46 (8.2) | 30 (6.4) | 0.284 |
Symptomatic HT | 19 (3.4) | 18 (3.8) | 0.738 |
Mortality at 90 days | 64 (11.6) | 47 (10.1) | 0.481 |
Unfavorable functional outcome (mRS 3-6) at 90 days | 319 (57.7) | 191 (41.1) | <0.001 |
Neuroimaging performed after 24–72 h from stroke onset. DOA: direct oral anticoagulants; HT: hemorrhagic transformation (either hemorrhagic infarction or parenchymal hematoma); IA: intra-arterial revascularization therapy; IV: intravenous revascularization therapy; LMWH: low molecular weight heparin.
Table 4.
Variables | Unfavorable outcome |
Mortality |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | P | |
Age | 1.039 | 1.018–1.062 | <0.001 | 1.044 | 1.009–1.079 | 0.014 |
NIHSS on admission | 1.178 | 1.136–1.222 | <0.001 | 1.076 | 1.037–1.118 | <0.001 |
Diabetes mellitus | 1.133 | 0.734–1.747 | 0.574 | 1.277 | 0.695–2.345 | 0.431 |
Previous use of antiplatelets | 0.999 | 0.669–1.492 | 0.996 | 0.907 | 0.496–1.661 | 0.752 |
Previous use of oral anticoagulants | 1.139 | 0.708–1.834 | 0.591 | 1.484 | 0.720–3.058 | 0.285 |
Previous use of statins | 0.629 | 0.360–1.099 | 0.104 | 1.080 | 0.475–2.456 | 0.854 |
Hypertension | 0.830 | 0.513–1.343 | 0.448 | 0.874 | 0.421–1.814 | 0.717 |
Hyperlipidemia | 0.890 | 0.537–1.476 | 0.653 | 0.814 | 0.376–1.763 | 0.602 |
Paroxysmal AF | 0.848 | 0.524–1.374 | 0.503 | 1.037 | 0.501–2.147 | 0.922 |
History of stroke/TIA | 1.734 | 1.148–2.620 | 0.009 | 0.741 | 0.405–1.357 | 0.332 |
Smoking | 0.939 | 0.673–1.308 | 0.709 | 1.318 | 0.833–2.086 | 0.238 |
Alcoholism | 1.528 | 0.720–3.243 | 0.269 | 1.928 | 0.690–5.387 | 0.211 |
Chronic heart failure | 1.235 | 0.767–1.989 | 0.385 | 0.962 | 0.501–1.845 | 0.907 |
History of myocardial infarction | 1.194 | 0.737–1.934 | 0.470 | 1.240 | 0.638–2.411 | 0.526 |
Pacemaker | 1.048 | 0.562–1.955 | 0.883 | 2.130 | 0.959–4.733 | 0.063 |
Small ischemic lesion | 0.408 | 0.195–0.853 | 0.017 | 0.090 | 0.027–0.295 | <0.001 |
Leukoaraiosis | 0.991 | 0.688–1.427 | 0.961 | 1.394 | 0.816–2.379 | 0.224 |
Therapy with anticoagulants after index stroke | 0.389 | 0.249–0.605 | <0.001 | 0.237 | 0.137–0.411 | <0.001 |
AF: atrial fibrillation; AP: arterial pressure; INR: International Normalized Ratios at admission for all patients; TIA: transient ischemic attack.
Regarding sex differences, East European Stroke Units had 71 patients: 33 women (46.5%) and 38 men (53.5%)) and other Stroke Units in Europe (900 patients: 492 women (54.7%) and 408 men (45.3%)). Comparing women and men from Eastern Europe, the former were older (mean age 79.9 ± 8.3 versus 71.2 ±11.8, respectively, p < 0.001) and had more severe strokes than men (mean NIHSS 10.0 ± 7.2 versus 5.8 ± 4.96, respectively, p = 0.006) (Supplementary Table 1). No differences in the rates of prescribing anticoagulants between women and men in East Europe before and after index stroke were observed. While, after index stroke, LMWHs were prescribed more often to women than men (66.7% versus 31.6%, p = 0.004) and much more often than oral anticoagulants in East Europe. There were no observed sex differences regarding the time of initiating anticoagulant therapy in East Europe: (3.95 ± 15.9 days for men versus 3.67 ± 7.5 days for women, p = 0.923). (Supplementary Table 2).
Discussion
This study found that women overall in Europe with AF were less likely to receive oral anticoagulants prior to and after stroke compared to men and regardless of the fact that women were significantly younger and with less severe stroke at onset; outcomes did not differ between the sexes. The RAF-study included more women (54.5%) than men, who were on average younger and had less severe stroke at onset compared to previous studies.16,17 Moreover, while previous studies had included patients with all types of stroke and with and without AF,16–18 the RAF-study included only ischemic stroke patients with AF. Furthermore, women more frequently had mitral disease and severe atrial enlargement. The latter fact has been reported by Gómez-Doblas, who has stating that women have more rheumatic aetiologies, while men tend to be more affected by ischemic or congenital aetiologies.19 Rheumatic aetiologies have been correlated with a higher embolic risk of AF and an earlier onset of stroke.20
In this study, women were less likely to receive oral anticoagulants before the index stroke, a finding in line with past population studies.8,9 Likewise, women were less likely to receive anticoagulation therapy for secondary prevention. This clear disparity in treatment delivery has also been documented by the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry.18 This under-treatment for women has been hypothesized as being due to a lack of social support, as well as other concomitant diseases afflicting these patients, including cognitive decline, a higher burden of vascular brain disease, epilepsy and an increased risk of falls.18 Furthermore, we also observed that women had a lower rate of statin use, despite an equal rate of atherosclerosis between the sexes.18,21
Even though men were older and had more severe stroke, the mortality and disability rates between the sexes were similar. The selection of patient cohorts could have influenced this, as only cardioembolic strokes were included, which could also explain the younger age of women at stroke onset.
Study limitations
This hospital-based clinical study was not randomized but based upon consecutively admitted patients fulfilling inclusion criteria.
Conclusions
The RAF-study observed that women regardless of lower NIHSS-score at admission and younger age, experienced the same outcomes as men with higher NIHSS at admission and older age. Moreover, this study also observed that women were less likely, compared to men, to have been prescribed anticoagulants before and after stroke.
Supplementary Material
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: M Paciaroni has received honoraria as a member of the speaker bureaus of Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer and Pfizer. G Agnelli has received honoraria as a member of the speaker bureaus of Boehringer Ingelheim and Bayer. C Becattini has received honoraria as a member of the speaker bureaus of Bristol Meyer Squibb and Bayer P Michel has received a Research Grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation and Swiss Heart Foundation; he has also received speaker fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Covidien, St. Jude Medical as well as received honoraria for an advisory relationship from Pierre-Fabre, Bayer, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Amgen, and Boehringer Ingelheim. J Putaala has received honoraria for lectures related to atrial fibrillation and anticoagulants for Orion Pharma, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Pfizer, Bayer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. T Tatlisumak received honoraria as consultant or advisory relationship by Lundbeck and Boehringer Ingelheim. G Tsivgoulis had research support by European Regional Development Fund, Project St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, International Clinical Research Center (FNUSA-ICRC) (No. CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0123). D Toni has received honoraria as a member of speaker bureaus and as advisory board member for Boehringer Ingelheim and Bayer. The other authors report no conflicts.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the local hospital board.
Informed consent
not necessary as the study report on clinical practice.
Guarantor
KA.
Contributorship
All authors contributed equally.
References
- 1.Gladstone DJ, Bui E, Fang J, et al. Potentially preventable strokes in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation who are not adequately anticoagulated. Stroke 2009; 40: 235–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Saposnik G, Gladstone D, Raptis R, et al. Atrial fibrillation in ischemic stroke: predicting response to thrombolysis and clinical outcomes. Stroke 2013; 44: 99–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Metaanalysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 857–867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bushnell C, McCullough L. Stroke prevention in women: synopsis of the 2014 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Guideline. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160: 853–857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cove CL, Albert CM, Andreotti F, et al. Female sex as an independent risk factor for stroke in atrial fibrillation: possible mechanisms. Thromb Haemost 2014; 111.3: 385–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fang MC, Singer DE, Chang Y, et al. Gender differences in the risk of ischemic stroke and peripheral embolism in atrial fibrillation: the Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) study. Circulation 2005; 112: 1687–1691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, et al. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the Euro Heart Survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest 2010; 137: 263–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dagres N, Nieuwlaat R, Vardas PE, et al. Gender-related differences in presentation, treatment, and outcome of patients with atrial fibrillation in Europe: a report from the Euro Heart Survey on Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 572–577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jespersen SF, Christensen LM, Christensen A, et al. Use of oral anticoagulation therapy in atrial fibrillation after stroke: results from a nationwide registry. Thrombosis 2013; 7 p., 10.1155/2013/601450 (accessed 25 September 2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Paciaroni M, Agnelli G, Falocci N, et al. Early recurrence and cerebral bleeding in patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation. effect of anticoagulation and its timing: The RAF Study. Stroke 2015; 46: 2175–2182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Paciaroni M, Agnelli G, Corea F, et al. Early hemorrhagic transformation of brain infarction: rate, predictive factors, and influence on clinical outcome: results of a prospective multicenter study. Stroke 2008; 39: 2249–2256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wolpert SM, Bruckmann H, Greenlee R, et al. Neuroradiologic evaluation of patients with acute stroke treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. The rt-PA Acute Stroke Study Group. AJNR 1993; 14: 3–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tatu L, Moulin T, Bogousslavsky J, et al. Arterial territories of human brain: brainstem and cerebellum. Neurology 1996; 47: 1125–1135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tatu L, Moulin T, Bogousslavsky J, et al. Arterial territories of the human brain: cerebral hemispheres. Neurology 1998; 50: 1699–1708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Reboldi G, Angeli F, Verdecchia P. Mutivariable analysis in cerebrovascular research: practical notes for the clinician. Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 35: 187–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kapral MK, Fang J, Hill MD, et al. Sex differences in stroke care and outcomes: results from the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. Stroke 2005; 36: 809–814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Santalucia P, Pezzella FR, Sessa M, et al. Sex differences in clinical presentation, severity and outcome of stroke: Results from a hospital-based registry. EJIM 2013; 24: 167–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gattringer T, Ferrari J, Knoflach M, et al. Sex related differences of acute stroke unit care: results from the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry. Stroke 2014; 45: 1632–1638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gómez-Doblas JJ. Valvular heart disease in women: sex differences in Spain. Rev Esp Cardiol 2010; 8: 42–48. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang D, Liu M, Hao Z, et al. Features of acute ischemic stroke with rheumatic heart disease in a hospitalized Chinese population. Stroke 2012; 43: 2853–2857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Eriksson M, Glader EL, Norrving B, et al. Sex differences in stroke care and outcome in the Swedish national quality register for stroke care. Stroke 2009; 40: 900–914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.