Abstract
Background
Little is known about the prevalence of adverse symptoms electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) users report experiencing.
Methods
Between August 2016 and May 2017, we conducted a nationally representative cross-sectional telephone survey of 4,964 US adults age 18 and over. Respondents who reported ever trying e-cigarettes were asked whether they ever experienced six symptoms they thought were caused by e-cigarette use. In weighted analyses, we assessed whether symptoms varied by demographics, e-cigarette use frequency, and cigarette smoking status.
Results
Approximately one-fourth of respondents (n=1,624, 26.8%) reported ever trying e-cigarettes. Most were current (40.3%) or former (30.7%) cigarette smokers, with 29.0% never smokers. Just over half (58.2%) reported at least one symptom and on average 1.6 (SE=0.1) symptoms. Symptoms included cough (40.0%), dry or irritated mouth or throat (31.0%), dizziness or lightheadedness (27.1%), headache or migraine (21.9%), shortness of breath (18.1%), change in or loss of taste (12.9%), or other (6.2%; most commonly nausea, tight chest, congestion). Among past 30-day e-cigarette users, current and never cigarette smokers were more likely than former smokers to report any symptoms (AOR=5.25, CI=2.05–13.46 and AOR=2.58, CI=0.85–7.81, respectively).
Conclusions
A majority of e-cigarette users reported at least one symptom, most commonly cough or dry or irritated mouth or throat. Former cigarette smokers who used e-cigarettes in the past 30 days were less likely than current or never smokers to report adverse symptoms of e-cigarette use. Future research should examine frequency of symptoms among different user groups to understand how e-cigarettes may influence public health.
Keywords: Electronic Cigarette, Health Symptoms
1. Introduction
Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) were introduced into the US in the mid-2000s and now are among the most prevalent and frequently used tobacco products (Wang, 2018). Primary reasons adults use e-cigarettes are to quit smoking combustible cigarettes and to use in situations when cigarette smoking is not acceptable (Caraballo et al., 2017; Patel et al., 2016; Pepper et al., 2014). Consistent with this, e-cigarettes and cigarettes are the most commonly reported tobacco product use combination (Wang, 2018).
According to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) Report, e-cigarettes have the potential to expose users to less health risk compared to cigarettes (NASEM, 2018). However, e-cigarettes are not risk-free; e-cigarettes heat a liquid, typically containing nicotine and flavoring, to create an aerosol of ultrafine particles that are inhaled into the lungs. The NASEM report concluded, “most e-cigarette products contain and emit numerous potentially toxic substances” (NASEM, 2018). These substances are associated with adverse health effects, including pulmonary disease and myocardial infarction (Alzahrani et al., 2018; Benowitz and Fraiman, 2017; Callahan-Lyon, 2014; Glasser et al., 2017; Hajek Peter et al., 2014; Perez et al., 2018). These adverse health effects may be reflected in symptoms self-reported by e-cigarette users. A 2014 systematic review of 20 studies on adverse effects of e-cigarettes found symptoms were ‘inconsistent and contradicting’ and stated that although no conclusions could be drawn on safety, e-cigarettes could hardly be considered harmless (Pisinger and Døssing, 2014). Most studies examined in that review, and those published since, used small samples (e.g., laboratory studies) or convenience samples (Baweja et al., 2016; Etter, 2016; Goniewicz et al., 2017; Volesky et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2018). Given the limitations of previous studies, additional research is needed to further understand the prevalence of symptoms e-cigarette users might experience.
The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of self-reported adverse symptoms attributed to e-cigarette use in a nationally representative sample of US adults. We also examined whether symptoms varied by demographic variables, e-cigarette use frequency, and cigarette smoking status.
2. Methods
2.1. Study Sample
From August 2016 through May 2017, we conducted a nationally representative cross-sectional telephone survey of 4,964 US adults; the weighted response rate was 38.7% (Agans et al., 2018; Boynton et al., 2016). The Carolina Survey Research Laboratory (CRSL) at the University of North Carolina (UNC) recruited a probability sample of adults living in the US using two independent and non-overlapping random-digit-dial landline and cell phone frames. Coverage extended to 98% of all US households. The CSRL oversampled counties with higher rates of smoking and poverty to obtain more smokers, oversampled cell phone numbers to obtain more young adults, and undersampled adults ages 65+ because they are overrepresented in landline frames. The CSRL recruited additional smokers and lesbian/gay/bisexual/transgender (LGBT) individuals through respondent-driven sampling procedures in order to increase sample sizes of those groups. The final sample had higher rates of smokers, individuals living in poverty, LGBT, and young adults than the US population. Additional details on sampling design, sampling weights (estimated from the American Community Survey) and adjustments, and sample characteristics are published elsewhere (Agans et al., 2018; Boynton et al., 2016).
2.2. Procedures
Eligible participants were 18 years or older and spoke English or Spanish. The interview lasted approximately 26 minutes, and participants were compensated $40. The UNC Institutional Review Board approved this study.
2.3. Measures
All participants were read this statement: “The next few questions are about electronic or e-cigarettes and other vaping devices, such as vape pens. Popular brands include Blu, Vuse, NJOY, and Flavor Vapes.” Then, we asked participants whether they ever used an e-cigarette or other vaping devices, even one or two times. We asked participants who reported ever using e-cigarettes on how many of the past 30 days they used e-cigarettes.
We asked participants who ever used an e-cigarette “Have you ever experienced any of the following symptoms or side effects you think were caused by using e-cigarettes or other vaping devices” prior to listing six specific symptoms and an open-ended “other” option. Participants responded yes or no following each symptom. We identified the six symptoms through a two-stage process. In May 2016, we identified 14 symptoms experienced by e-cigarette users through literature review of observed and self-reported symptoms. In June 2016, we surveyed 392 e-cigarette users via Amazon’s Mechanical Turk to identify the most frequent symptoms of e-cigarette use (Supplement 1)1. The most common symptoms were dry mouth or throat (43.4%), cough (42.3%), throat or mouth irritation (36.0%), dizziness or lightheadedness (33.5%), headache or migraine (21.0%), shortness of breath (15.1%), and changes in or loss of taste (14.0%). Overlap between throat or mouth irritation and dry mouth or throat led to combining those two categories.
For cigarette status, we asked participants: “Have you smoked at least 100 cigarettes in your entire life” and “Do you now smoke cigarettes every day, some days, or not at all.” Participants were considered current cigarette smokers if they smoked at least 100 cigarettes and now smoked every day or some days, former cigarette smokers if they smoked at least 100 cigarettes and now smoked ‘not at all’, and never cigarette smokers if they had not smoked at least 100 cigarettes.
2.4. Analyses
Descriptive statistics were calculated to describe the sample’s demographic characteristics, e-cigarette use, and cigarette smoking status. Weighted percentages were estimated using PROC SURVEYFREQ and weighted means using PROC SURVEYMEANS in SAS V9.4 to account for sampling design features. Differences in the prevalence of symptoms attributed to e-cigarette use among current e-cigarette users were compared by demographic characteristics, including age, race, gender, ethnicity, income, e-cigarette use status, cigarette use status, combustible use status, and e-cigarette use frequency in a multivariable logistic regression model using PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC in SAS V9.4. We compared the number of symptoms reported using PROC SURVEYREG. We conducted similar analyses for the sample of ever e-cigarette users.
3. Results
Of 4,964 adults surveyed, 26.8% reported ever using e-cigarettes. Thus, our analytic sample consisted of 1,624 ever e-cigarette users. Participants were 43.9% female, 67.3% white, with mean age 37.9. Approximately one-fourth reported past 30-day e-cigarette use (28.1%). Table 1 reports additional sample characteristics.
Table 1.
Sample Characteristics, unweighted n (weighted %)
Ever e-cigarette users n=1624* | Past 30-day users, n=456* | |
---|---|---|
Age | ||
18–24 | 383 (25.5) | 125 (37.2) |
25–44 | 712 (48.2) | 195 (41.4) |
45+ | 529 (26.3) | 136 (21.5) |
Sex | ||
Male | 802 (56.1) | 246 (63.1) |
Female | 820 (43.9) | 210 (36.9) |
Race | ||
Nonwhite | 477 (32.7) | 142 (34.9) |
White | 1140 (67.3) | 313 (65.1) |
Ethnicity | ||
Non-Latino | 1477 (82.4) | 412 (90.2) |
Latino | 140 (17.6) | 41 (9.8) |
Annual Income | ||
< $25,000 | 558 (30.4) | 172 (32.9) |
$25,000 – $49,999 | 439 (30.7) | 122 (27.8) |
$50,000 – $74,999 | 265 (19.1) | 68 (18.6) |
$75,000 – $100,000 | 149 (9.3) | 38 (12.2) |
Above $100,000 | 144 (10.5) | 38 (8.5) |
Cigarette Use Status | ||
Former Smoker | 369 (30.7) | 97 (28.0) |
Current Smoker | 912 (40.3) | 274 (45.5) |
Never Smoker | 343 (29.0) | 85 (26.5) |
Combustible User | ||
No | 1280 (77.4) | 318 (69.3) |
Yes | 343 (22.5) | 138 (30.7) |
E-cigarette Use Status | ||
Former User | 1167 (71.9) | NA |
Current <5 days | 201 (11.2) | 201 (39.7) |
Current 5+ days | 255 (16.9) | 255 (60.3) |
Sample sizes vary due to missing data on covariates
Over half (58.2%) of participants attributed one or more symptoms to their e-cigarette use (range 0–6 symptoms). On average, users reported 1.6 (SE=0.1) symptoms, most frequently cough (40.0%), dry or irritated mouth or throat (31.0%), dizziness or lightheadedness (27.1%), headache or migraine (21.9%), shortness of breath (18.1%), and change in or loss of taste (12.9%). Few (6.2%) reported other symptoms, including nausea (1.6%), chest pain (0.8%), and congestion (0.8%).
We found few demographic differences in symptoms reported within the multivariable model among ever e-cigarette users (Supplement 2)2. Adults ages 25–44 and 45+ were less likely to report any symptom compared to younger adults (AOR=0.52, CI=0.29–0.92 and AOR=0.28, CI=0.15–0.52, respectively). Females, 25–44-year olds, 45+ year olds, and never smokers were more likely to report shortness of breath than their respective counterparts (Supplement 2)2.
Among past 30-day e-cigarette users, current and never cigarette smokers were more likely than former smokers to report any symptoms (AOR=5.25, CI=2.05–13.5 and AOR=2.58, CI=0.85–7.81, respectively). Current smokers also reported more symptoms than former smokers (β=1.09, CI=0.55, 1.63). Adults ages 25–44 and 45+ were more likely than younger adults (18–24) to report any symptoms (AOR=0.22, 0.08–0.60 and AOR=0.12, 0.04–0.39, respectively). Whites were less likely than nonwhites to report any symptoms (AOR=0.43, 0.19–0.96). We also identified some differences among individual symptoms, notably related to age, cigarette smoking status, and income (Table 2).
Table 2.
Symptoms Reported among Past 30-Day E-Cigarette Users, n=459
Any Symptom AOR (95% CI) | # of Symptoms Beta (95% CI) | Cough AOR (95% CI) | Dry Mouth or Throat AOR (95% CI) | Dizziness or lightheaded ness AOR (95% CI) | Headache or Migraine AOR (95% CI) | Shortness of breath AOR (95% CI) | Change in or loss of taste AOR (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | ||||||||
18–24 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
25–44 | 0.22 (0.08–0.60) | −0.59 (−1.21, 0.02) | 0.59 (0.21–1.64) | 0.38 (0.13–1.16) | 0.85 (0.29–2.51) | 0.60 (0.16–2.25) | 0.29 (0.10–0.84) | 1.46 (0.48–4.37) |
45+ | 0.12 (0.04–0.39) | −0.68 (−1.43, 0.07) | 0.32 (0.09–1.16) | 0.23 (0.07–0.77) | 0.82 (0.24–2.75) | 0.45 (0.12–1.72) | 0.72 (0.21–2.46) | 2.97 (0.94–9.44) |
Sex | ||||||||
Female | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Male | 1.82 (0.90–3.68) | 0.07 (−0.45, 0.58) | 1.00 (0.49–2.04) | 1.19 (0.53–2.66) | 1.32 (0.54–3.20) | 0.64 (0.25–1.66) | 0.68 (0.28–1.65) | 2.23 (0.76–6.55) |
Race | ||||||||
Nonwhite | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
White | 0.43 (0.19–0.96) | −0.56 (−1.16, 0.04) | 1.12 (0.50–2.50) | 0.56 (0.24–1.29) | 0.71 (0.30–1.68) | 0.76 (0.27–2.12) | 0.32 (0.13–0.80) | 0.41 (0.14–1.15) |
Ethnicity | ||||||||
Non-Latino | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Latino | 0.71 (0.20–2.48) | 0.26 (−0.54, 1.06) | 0.71 (0.21–2.34) | 1.09 (0.33–3.66) | 2.60 (0.93–7.28) | 3.20 (0.98–10.4) | 1.62 (0.43–6.10) | 0.48 (0.05–4.37) |
Annual Income | ||||||||
< $25,000 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
$25,000 – $49,999 | 0.61 (0.24–1.57) | −0.76 (−1.36, −0.15) | 0.65 (0.24–1.74) | 0.57 (0.23–1.39) | 0.28 (0.10–0.81) | 0.49 (0.15–1.58) | 0.33 (0.09–1.17) | 1.31 (0.40–4.25) |
$50,000 – $74,999 | 0.48 (0.16–1.47) | −0.61 (−1.23, 0.01) | 0.30 (0.09–0.98) | 0.40 (0.11–1.48) | 0.09 (0.03–0.33) | 1.62 (0.52–4.98) | 1.18 (0.32–4.33) | 0.98 (0.18–5.22) |
$75,000 – $100,000 | 0.68 (0.21–2.19) | −0.22 (−1.21, 0.77) | 1.14 (0.25–5.32) | 0.30 (0.06–1.54) | 0.95 (0.22–3.98) | 2.13 (0.57–7.96) | 0.41 (0.07–2.50) | 0.55 (0.05–5.98) |
Above $100,000 | 1.96 (0.32–11.9) | 0.88 (−0.58, 2.35) | 2.04 (0.48–8.64) | 1.56 (0.38–6.34) | 1.31 (0.33–5.17) | 4.51 (1.04–19.6) | 3.04 (0.70–13.2) | 0.04 (0.004–0.27) |
Cigarette Use Status | ||||||||
Former Smoker | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Current Smoker | 5.25 (2.05–13.5) | 1.09 (0.55, 1.63) | 10.1 (2.70–37.1) | 1.24 (0.50–3.05) | 3.12 (0.88–11.0) | 3.20 (0.94–10.9) | 3.63 (0.90–14.7) | 23.4 (4.32–126.3) |
Never Smoker | 2.58 (0.85–7.81) | 0.52 (−0.12, 1.15) | 6.1 (1.30–29.8) | 0.48 (0.14–1.60) | 5.94 (1.38–25.6) | 1.34 (0.29–6.19) | 2.67 (0.54–13.2) | 6.81 (0.68–67.8) |
Combustible User | ||||||||
No | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Yes | 0.70 (0.30–1.60) | −0.42 (−0.92, 0.08) | 0.89 (0.37–2.13) | 0.53 (0.22–1.30) | 0.70 (0.28–1.76) | 0.31 (0.10–0.96) | 0.54 (0.20–1.45) | 1.12 (0.35–3.53) |
E-cig Use Status | ||||||||
Current <5 days | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Current 5+ days | 2.17 (0.96–4.93) | 0.21 (−0.33, 0.76) | 1.10 (0.51–2.36) | 1.80 (0.81–3.99) | 1.23 (0.53–2.86) | 1.40 (0.56–3.54) | 1.91 (0.77–4.78) | 0.52 (0.17–1.59) |
Note: Bold indicates significant at p<0.05; AOR=Adjusted odds ratio
4. Discussion
In our large, national sample of U.S. adults, more than half of ever e-cigarette users reported at least one adverse symptom related to their e-cigarette use. The most common symptoms were cough and dry or irritated mouth or throat, which is consistent with findings from other studies of self-reported or observed symptoms related to e-cigarette use (Pisinger and Døssing, 2014). With few exceptions, self-reported symptoms were generally consistent across demographic groups of ever e-cigarette users.
Among past 30-day e-cigarette users, former cigarette smokers were less likely than never or current cigarette smokers to self-report adverse symptoms of their e-cigarette use. There are several reasons former cigarette smokers may report fewer symptoms of e-cigarette use than current cigarette smokers. First, former cigarette smokers may experience fewer symptoms when using e-cigarettes compared to current cigarette smokers because they may be accustomed to higher levels of symptoms, and therefore, not consider present symptoms to be severe enough to warrant mentioning (e.g., the cough I had while smoking cigarettes is far worse than the cough I have from an e-cigarette). Additionally, former cigarette smokers may interpret their e-cigarette symptoms as a carry-over effect from their former cigarette use, and thus choose to not report. Alternatively, current cigarette smokers may attribute symptoms caused by their cigarette smoking to e-cigarette use, which may also explain why former smokers reported fewer symptoms. Regardless of the mechanism, it is noteworthy that former cigarette smokers self-reported fewer symptoms related to e-cigarette use, as this may explain, in part, the attractiveness of e-cigarettes to this group.
Twenty-nine percent of our sample of ever e-cigarette users were never cigarette users. In past 30-day models, never cigarette users reported higher rates of cough and dizziness or lightheadedness than former smokers. Higher reporting of symptoms among never cigarette smokers compared to former cigarette smokers may be due to negative effects when individuals are first introduced to nicotine. For instance, those experimenting with cigarettes for the first time often report symptoms of dizziness and nausea, which are likely due to nicotine effects (DiFranza et al., 2004; Pomerleau et al., 1999). Similar symptoms would be expected among nicotine-naïve e-cigarette users. However, overall, never cigarette smokers reported experiencing similar symptoms as former cigarettes smokers. While we would expect nicotine naïve individuals to report more adverse symptoms (i.e., due to nicotine effects), these incipient experiences may also deter use. Future research is needed to monitor never smokers’ use of e-cigarettes to understand predictors of initiation and progression to regular e-cigarette use and to other tobacco product use.
We found few differences in symptoms reported across demographic groups. Most consistently, we found that younger adults were more likely than older adults to report symptoms. In past 30-day models, we also found nonwhites were more likely than whites to report symptoms, and we found differences in individual symptoms across income categories. Demographic groups may vary on flavor, brand, or device preferences, which might influence symptoms. We did not observe differences in frequency of use by demographic groups (data not presented). However, future research should examine flavors and brands used by different demographic groups in examining symptoms reported.
There are several limitations to our study. First, we did not assess an exhaustive list of symptoms; although the symptoms we included were the most commonly reported symptoms in a prior convenience sample, one or more of the original 14 symptoms we measured could be more prevalent in a national sample. Second, symptoms were self-reported. While perceptions are important for understanding use, clinical verification might be needed to verify symptoms and identify the severity of symptoms. Additionally, e-cigarette products vary widely, and different product characteristics may be associated with different types and frequencies of symptoms. Our study used a crude measure of device type, which may not have been adequate to detect differences across devices. Finally, our sample had a higher proportion of ever e-cigarette use rates among adults than other national surveys.
5. Conclusions
As the first national sample of US adults in which symptoms of e-cigarette use were examined, this study highlights the prevalence of symptoms users self-report from e-cigarette use. A large proportion of e-cigarette users attribute at least one symptom to their e-cigarette use. Although symptoms examined in this study are widespread among most users, symptoms do not appear to be deterring individuals from use, as over 50% of those who reported symptoms were past 30-day e-cigarette users.
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
This is the first national sample of adults that examines e-cigarette use symptoms
Most ever-e-cigarette users attribute at least one symptom to their e-cigarette use
Symptoms are generally consistent across demographic and e-cigarette user groups
Acknowledgments
Role of Funding Source
This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health and the FDA Center for Tobacco Products (P50-CA180907). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or the Food and Drug Administration. The study sponsor did not have any role in study design; data collection, analysis, or interpretation; writing the report; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. ABS is supported by the UNC Lineberger Cancer Control Education Program (T32-CA57726).
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest
No Conflict declared.
Supplementary material can be found by accessing the online version of this paper at http://dx.doi.org and by entering doi:...
Supplementary material can be found by accessing the online version of this paper at http://dx.doi.org and by entering doi:...
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- Agans RP, Zeng D, Shook-Sa B, Boynton MH, Brewer NT, Sutfin EL, Goldstein AO, Noar SM, Vallejos Q, Kim K, Queen T, Bowling JM, Ribisl KM, 2018. Using social networks to supplement RDD telephone surveys to oversample hard-to-reach populations: a new RDD+RDS approach.
- Alzahrani T, Pena I, Temesgen N, Glantz SA, 2018. Association between electronic cigarette use and myocardial infarction. Am. J. Prev. Med 55, 455–466. 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baweja R, Curci KM, Yingst J, Veldheer S, Hrabovsky S, Wilson SJ, Nichols TT, Eissenberg T, Foulds J, 2016. Views of experienced electronic cigarette users. Addict. Res. Theory 24, 80–88. 10.3109/16066359.2015.1077947 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benowitz NL, Fraiman JB, 2017. Cardiovascular effects of electronic cigarettes. Nat. Rev. Cardiol 14, 447–456. 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boynton MH, Agans RP, Bowling JM, Brewer NT, Sutfin EL, Goldstein AO, Noar SM, Ribisl KM, 2016. Understanding how perceptions of tobacco constituents and the FDA relate to effective and credible tobacco risk messaging: A national phone survey of US adults, 2014–2015. BMC Public Health 16 10.1186/s12889-016-3151-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Callahan-Lyon P, 2014. Electronic cigarettes: human health effects. Tob. Control 23, ii36–ii40. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caraballo RS, Shafer PR, Patel D, Davis KC, McAfee TA, 2017. Quit methods used by US adult cigarette smokers, 2014–2016. Prev. Chronic. Dis 14 10.5888/pcd14.160600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DiFranza JR, Savageau JA, Fletcher K, Ockene JK, Rigotti NA, McNeill AD, Coleman M, Wood C, 2004. Recollections and repercussions of the first inhaled cigarette. Addict. Behav 29, 261–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Etter J-F, 2016. Characteristics of users and usage of different types of electronic cigarettes: findings from an online survey. Addiction 111, 724–733. 10.1111/add.13240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glasser AM, Collins L, Pearson JL, Abudayyeh H, Niaura RS, Abrams DB, Villanti AC, 2017. Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A systematic review. Am. J. Prev. Med 52, e33–e66. 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goniewicz ML, Gawron M, Smith DM, Peng M, Jacob P, Benowitz NL, 2017. Exposure to nicotine and selected toxicants in cigarette smokers who switched to electronic cigarettes: A longitudinal within-subjects observational study. Nicotine Tob. Res 19, 160–167. 10.1093/ntr/ntw160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hajek P, Etter J‐F, Benowitz N, Eissenberg T, McRobbie H, 2014. Electronic cigarettes: review of use, content, safety, effects on smokers and potential for harm and benefit. Addiction 109, 1801–1810. 10.1111/add.12659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- National Academies of Sciences, E., 2018. Public health consequences of e-cigarettes. 10.17226/24952 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Patel D, Davis KC, Cox S, Bradfield B, King BA, Shafer P, Caraballo R, Bunnell R, 2016. Reasons for current E-cigarette use among U.S. adults. Prev. Med 93, 14–20. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pepper JK, Ribisl KM, Emery SL, Brewer NT, 2014. Reasons for starting and stopping electronic cigarette use. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 11, 10345–10361. 10.3390/ijerph111010345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perez MF, Atuegwu N, Mead E, Oncken C, Mortensen EM, 2018. E-Cigarette use is associated with emphysema, chronic bronchitis and COPD, in: D22. Cutting Edge Research in Smoking Cessation and E-Cigarettes, American Thoracic Society International Conference Abstracts. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med 197, A6245 10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2018.197.1_MeetingAbstracts.A6245 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pisinger C, Døssing M, 2014. A systematic review of health effects of electronic cigarettes. Prev. Med 69, 248–260. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pomerleau CS, Pomerleau OF, Namenek RJ, Marks JL, 1999. Initial exposure to nicotine in college-age women smokers and never-smokers. J. Addict. Dis 18, 13–19. 10.1300/J069v18n03_02 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Volesky KD, Maki A, Scherf C, Watson LM, Cassol E, Villeneuve PJ, 2016. Characteristics of e-cigarette users and their perceptions of the benefits, harms and risks of e-cigarette use: survey results from a convenience sample in Ottawa, Canada. Health Promot. Chronic Dis. Prev. Can 36, 130–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang JB, Olgin JE, Nah G, Vittinghoff E, Cataldo JK, Pletcher MJ, Marcus GM, 2018. Cigarette and e-cigarette dual use and risk of cardiopulmonary symptoms in the Health eHeart Study. PloS One 13, e0198681 10.1371/journal.pone.0198681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang TW, 2018. Tobacco product use among adults — United States, 2017. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep 67 10.15585/mmwr.mm6744a2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.