Abstract
Mitochondrial pyruvate carrier 1 (MPC1), a key factor that controls pyruvate transportation in the mitochondria, is known to be frequently dysregulated in tumor initiation and progression. However, the clinical relevance and potential molecular mechanisms of MPC1 in lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) progression remain to be illustrated. Herein, MPC1 was lowly expressed in LAC tissues and significantly associated with favorable survival of patients with LAC. Functionally, MPC1 markedly suppressed stemness, invasion, and migration in vitro and spreading growth of LAC cells in vivo. Further study revealed that MPC1 could interact with mitochondrial signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (mito-STAT3), disrupting the distribution of STAT3 and reducing cytoplasmic signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (cyto-STAT3) as well as its phosphorylation, while the activation of cyto-STAT3 by IL-6 reversed the attenuated malignant progression in MPC1-overexpression LAC cells. Collectively, we reveal that MPC1/STAT3 axis plays an important role in the progression of LAC, and our work may promote the development of new therapeutic strategies for LAC.
Introduction
Lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) represents about 40% of overall lung cancers and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide1. Stemness, invasion, and subsequent metastasis, which increase the incidence of recurrence and treatment failure, are the major causes of LAC-related death2,3. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying LAC cell progression is crucial for developing effective treatments.
Aberrant mitochondrial pyruvate metabolism is the important feature in cancer cells, and key enzymes associated with mitochondrial pyruvate metabolism are crucial in the tumor progression4–6. Mitochondrial pyruvate carrier 1 (MPC1), which is located in the inner mitochondrial membrane, is one of the key enzymes responsible for pyruvate transportation and oxidation7–9, MPC1 deficiency or inactivation accelerates aerobic glycolysis and malignant progression in diverse types of cancer, such as colon cancer and esophageal squamous cell carcinomas6,10. Additionally, decreased expression of MPC1 is associated with poor prognosis in various types of tumors, including prostate cancer and colon cancer11,12. Collectively, these findings indicate that MPC1 probably serves as a tumor suppressor to impair tumor malignancy.
Despite the involvement of MPC1 in tumor progression, the clinical relevance and function of MPC1 in LAC remains to be investigated. In this study, we showed that MPC1 in LAC was positively correlated with overall survival of LAC patients. Functionally, overexpression of MPC1 attenuated the stemness, invasion, and migration capacities of LAC cancer cells in vitro and in vivo, while knockdown of MPC1 or using MPC inhibitor UK5099 promoted those malignant phenotypes. Mechanically, MPC1 suppressed tumor progression via interacting with mito-STAT3, disrupting STAT3 distribution and inhibiting cyto-STAT3 activation. Thus, our data revealed a critical role of MPC1 in controlling the progression of LAC and its potential therapeutic and prognostic value for LAC patients.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and reagents
Human LAC cell lines A549, H1299, H1975, and human normal bronchial epithelial (HBE) cells were purchased from the ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) and 100 U/ml penicillin–streptomycin (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA). The cells were maintained in a humidified 37 °C incubator with a 5% CO2 atmosphere. UK5099 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), a MPC1 inhibitor, cells were treated with UK5099 with 40 μM for 48 h6. IL-6 (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA), a STAT3 specific agonist, cells were treated with indicated dose for 24 h.
Patients and tissue specimen
Tumor and adjacent normal tissues from LAC patients who underwent surgical resection in Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) from May 2016 to June 2017, Chongqing, China, with approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. The tissue microarray, including 78 LAC without radiotherapy or chemotherapy before surgery, was from OUTDO BIOTECH (Shanghai, China). All patients were provided with informed consent and clinical data were listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and scoring
Human Tissue slices were deparaffinized and hydrated by a series of xylene and alcohol treatment, and the procedure was performed as previously described13. The slices were incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-MPC1 (1:250; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and anti-P-STAT3(Y705) (1:100; Abcam, Cambridge, UK); anti-SOX2 (1:100; CST, Danvers, MA, USA); anti-MMP2 (1:100; CST, Danvers, MA, USA) antibodies at 4 °C overnight, followed by incubation with avidin–biotin–peroxidase (DAKO). MPC1 expression using the following system: 0, 0–5% positive cells; 1, < 25% positive cells; 2, 25–50% positive cells; 3, 50–75% positive cells; and 4, 75–100% positive cells. The staining intensity was scored as follows: 0, no positive staining; 1, weak staining; 2, moderate staining; 3, strong staining. The final scores were obtained by multiplying the extent scores by intensity scores and analysis using the statistical X-tile software with score of 4 as the cutoff value14.
GEO database analysis
A total number of 1926 tumor samples were used to generate Kaplan–Meier curves for the survival analysis of MPC1 in LAC (http://www.kmplot.com/lung). The median expression was used as the final cutoff value.
Lentiviral infection procedures
For construction of the MPC1 overexpressing cell line, Flag (EF-1a/Puro/Amp) lentiviral vector (Hanbio, shanghai, China) containing human MPC1 was used to transfect cancer cells. Lentiviral particles packaged with a blank vector were used as a negative control. A549 and H1299 cells (1 × 106/well) were infected with lentivirus containing Ctrl or MPC1-Flag. Cells were selected and enriched by 4 μg/ml puromycin. For the siMPC1 cell line, H1299 cells (1 × 106/well) were infected with siRNAs targeting MPC1 (GenePharma, Shanghai, China). Cell transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The siRNAs were list as follows, MPC1 siRNAs were custom synthesized from GenePharma (Shanghai, China) and were pooled as (5′-UCCCTCTUTTUCTATTCTTTU-3′) and (5′-UUCTTATCAAACACUAUATUA-3′).
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from cancer cells with RNAiso reagent according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Reverse transcription and qRT-PCR were performed using a One Step SYBR primer. MPC1: forward: 5′-TGGCTAAAGGAGCAGAGGAA-3′, reverse: 5′-ATGACCACATCACGGCTACA-3′ GAPDH: forward: 5′-TGTTCGTCATGGGTGTGAAC-3′, reverse: 5′-ATGGCATGGACTGTGGTCAT-3′.
Western blotting
Western blotting was performed as previously described15. The primary antibodies were as follows: anti-MPC1(1:1000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK); anti-GAPDH (1:1000 CST, Danvers, MA, USA); anti-COX IV (1:1000 CST, Danvers, MA, USA); anti-β-actin (1:1000 CST, Danvers, MA, USA); anti-P-STAT3 (Y705)(1:1000; CST, Danvers, MA, USA); anti-P-STAT3 (S727) (1:1000; CST, Danvers, MA, USA); anti-STAT3 (1:1000; CST, Danvers, MA, USA); anti-OCT4 (1:1000 CST, Danvers, MA, USA); anti-MMP2 (1:1000 CST, Danvers, MA, USA); anti-MMP3 (1:1000 CST, Danvers, MA, USA); anti-MMP7 (1:1000 CST, Danvers, MA, USA); anti-SOX2 (1:1000; CST, Danvers, MA, USA); anti-NANOG (1:1000; CST, Danvers, MA, USA).
Nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction assays
The NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were purchased from Thermo Scientific. The detailed procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Isolation of mitochondrion and cytoplasm fractions
Mitochondrion and cytoplasm fractions from tumor cells were separated using Mitochondria Isolation Kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China) (number: SM0020) following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) and mass spectrometry (MS) analyses
For Co-IP, LAC cells were infected with MPC1 overexpressing lentivirus or control lentivirus, which contained a 3 × flag sequence. Anti-flag M2 Magnetic Beads (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used for detection and capture of the fusion proteins. The detailed procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For the liquid chromatography–MS analysis, the gel pieces with MPC1 immunoprecipitated complex or control were dehydrated in acetonitrile, dried in a speed vacuum, and digested with trypsin. The peptides were extracted from the polyacrylamide and were evaporated for MS analysis using LTQ-Orbitrap Elite Mass Spectrometer System (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
Tumorsphere-formation assay
Cancer cell were seeded into 96-well plates (1 × 102/well) by flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter, S. Kraemer Boulevard Brea, CA, USA). Cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 stem cell medium containing basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and B-27 for 1 week, the tumorspheres were photographed by a light microscope and counted to calculate the tumorsphere efficiency.
Tumor cell invasion and migration assay
Tumor cell invasion assay was performed as previously described13. For the migration assay, 1 × 104 cells were added to the transwell chambers with 8-μm pore size (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). After incubation for 24 h, the chambers were wiped using cotton swabs, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and stained with crystal violet. The lower chamber was photographed using a light microscope, and the cells were counted.
Invadopodia immunofluorescence staining
Tumor cells grown on glass coverslips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized by 0.3% Triton X-100 for 5 min, and then incubated with anti-rhodamine phalloidin (Solarbio, Beijing, China). Cells were then photographed under a laser confocal scanning microscope (Leica, Brunswick, Ohio, Germany). Cells with more than four microspikes on the surface were considered invadopodia-positive cells16. The cells were counted in 10 separate, randomly selected 200 × fields with a fluorescence microscopy.
Xenograft
Four-week-old female BALB/c athymic nude mice were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Southwest Hospital, TMMU. The number of 1 × 106 MPC1-overexpression cells or control cells were suspended in 50 μl of PBS and subcutaneously implanted in female nude mice. The size of the xenograft tumor was measured every 4 days for a month using a Vernier calliper, and the volume was calculated at different indicated intervals post-transplantation as follows: volume = shortest diameter2 × longest diameter/2. The animals were killed 1 month after cell implantation, and the subcutaneous xenografts were weighed and analyzed by IHC. The animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed at least three times with triplicate samples. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism 6.0 (San Diego, CA, USA) and were expressed as the mean ± SD. Unless otherwise noted, the data were analyzed using Student’s t test or one-way ANOVA. Significance of correlation between the expression of MPC1 and histopathological factors were determined using Pearson’s χ2 test. Kaplan–Meier plots were performed to investigate the prognostic relevance of MPC1 in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed by applying Cox proportional hazards test. Statistical difference was considered significant if P-values were < 0.05. All significant statistical differences were defined as *P<0.05; **P<0.01, and ***P<0.001.
Results
MPC1 is downregulated in LAC and predicts favorable prognosis
To determine the status of MPC1 in LAC, we examined the expression of MPC1 in nine pairs of LAC tissues, and found that MPC1 was lowly expressed in LAC tissues as compared with corresponding adjacent non-tumor tissues (Fig. 1a, b). Furthermore, MPC1 mRNA also decreased in LAC tissues as compared with that in corresponding normal tissue (Fig. 1c), and the similar results were observed in LAC cells (A549, H1299, H1975) as compared with normal human bronchial epithelial (HBE) cells (Fig. 1d). Additionally MPC1 was negatively correlated with tumor size and TNM stages, but not related with tumor location, histological grade, EGFR mutation (Supplementary Table 2). Furthermore, the overall survivals (OS) of LAC patients with MPC1low showed shorter than that with MPC1high in our clinical cohort (Fig. 1e, f) and GEO database (Fig. 1g). Univariate and multivariate analyses further indicated that MPC1 was an independent prognostic indicator for OS of LAC patients (Table 1). Therefore, MPC1 might act as an indicator of favorable prognosis for patients with LAC.
Table 1.
Factors | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HR (95% CI) | P-value | HR (95% CI) | P-value | |
Gender | 0.591 (0.337–1.038) | 0.067 | 0.484 (0.267–0.874) | 0.016 |
Age | 1.030 (0.992–1.069) | 0.992 | 1.584 (0.863–2.905) | 0.137 |
Location | 0.908 (0.515–1.530) | 0.746 | 0.940 (0.508–1.742) | 0.845 |
MPC1 expression | 0.558 (0.318–0.969) | 0.038 | 0.583 (0.327–1.040) | 0.048 |
Grade | 1.429 (0.948–2.129) | 0.112 | 2.123 (1.497–3.288) | 0.619 |
TNM Stage | 1.833 (1.309–2.567) | 0.001 | 1.760 (1.223–2.531) | 0.002 |
HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, TNM tumor lymph node metastasis
MPC1 deficiency augments the stemness of LAC cells in vitro
To explore the potential relationship between MPC1 status and the stemness of LAC cells, MPC1-overexpression and MPC1-knockdown cells were established (Supplementary Figure 1). The volume and number of tumorspheres derived from OEMPC1 cells were smaller than those of control cells (Fig. 2a, b), whereas knockdown of MPC1 or inhibiting MPC1 activity treated with UK5099 increased those capabilities (Fig. 2c, d). In addition, western blotting revealed that overexpression of MPC1 decreased the level of cancer stem cell (CSC) markers, including NANOG, OCT4, and SOX2 in LAC cells (Fig. 2e), while knockdown of MPC1 increased the level of these markers (Fig. 2f). Conclusively, these data indicate MPC1 deficiency increased cancer stem-like traits of LAC cells.
Loss of MPC1 accelerates the migration and invasion of LAC cells in vitro
Next, we determined whether MPC1 can influence the invasion and migration of LAC cells. The transwell assay showed that overexpression of MPC1 significantly reduced motile ability of LAC cells (Fig. 3a, b), while treatment with siMPC1 or UK5099 in H1299 cells increased their mobility (Fig. 3c, d). Invadopodia, a form of cellular projection that is embedded in or protruding from the lamellipodial actin network, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are critical in migration and invasion of cancer cells17,18. We revealed that the number of invadopodia in the OEMPC1 LAC cells was decreased (Fig. 3e, f), while in the siMPC1 H1299 cells, the number of invadopodia was increased (Fig. 3g, h). Additionally, western blotting showed that the expression levels of MMP2, MMP3, and MMP7 were significantly decreased in OEMPC1 group (Supplementary Figure 2a), while downregulated MPC1 increased the expression levels of those proteins (Supplementary Figure 2b). Collectively, these observations demonstrate that MPC1 decreases the invasion and migration capabilities of LAC cells through invadopodia formation and the MMPs pathway.
MPC1 interacts with mito-STAT3 to inhibit cyto-STAT3 activation in LAC cells
To further explore the underlying mechanism of MPC1 in progression of LAC cells, we screened potential MPC1-binding proteins through mass spectrometric (MS) analysis. STAT3 was identified in the intersection candidate of MPC1 interacting protein set with the KEGG pathway in cancer gene set from GSEA (Fig. 4a). Furthermore, Co-IP assays further demonstrated that MPC1 can interact with STAT3 rather than P-STAT3 (Fig. 4b, c and Supplementary Figure 3a). STAT3 is present in mitochondrial (mito-STAT3) and cytoplamic (cyto-STAT3) fractions19. To further define the location, where the interaction between MPC1 and STAT3 occured, we extracted the mitochondria from cytoplasm, and the Co-IP assays demonstrated that MPC1 could interact with mito-STAT3 (Fig. 4d), but not cyto-STAT3 (Supplementary Figure 3b). Additionally, overexpression of MPC1 downregulated P-STAT3(Y705), whereas knockdown of MPC1 upregulated P-STAT3(Y705), but without affecting P-STAT3(S727) and total STAT3 expression (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Figure 3c). Since cyto-STAT3 can be recruited into the mitochondrial inner membrane by some chaperone, and MPC1 is located in the inner membrane of mitochondrial, we proposed that the binding of MPC1 with STAT3 in the mitochondria promotes the process that cyto-STAT3 is transported into the mitochondria. To test this possibility, we overexpressed MPC1 expression in two LAC cell lines and determined the protein abundance of STAT3 in mitochondria fractions and in cytoplasm fractions. Western blotting shows that overexpression of MPC1 increased the level of STAT3 anchored on mitochondrion, but decreased the level of STAT3 and P-STAT3(Y705) in cytoplasm without mitochondria (Fig. 4f). Previous study shows that STAT3 promotes cancer progression in various types of cancer and is activated by phosphorylation at Tyr705(Y705)20,21, and P-STAT3 is translocated into the nuclei to induce the transcription of several target genes implicated in cancer cell malignancy22. Cell fractionation analysis demonstrated that overexpression of MPC1 reduced P-STAT3(Y705) in the cytoplasm and nuclei (Fig. 4g). Furthermore, IHC analysis of both MPC1 and P-STAT3(Y705) in the specimens from 20 LAC patients revealed that P-STAT3(Y705) was highly expressed in the MPC1low group (Fig. 4h, i). Taken together, these data indicate that MPC1 interacts with mito-STAT3 and disrupts the location of STAT3 in the cytoplasm and mitochondria, which decreases P-STAT3(Y705) into the nuclei.
MPC1/ STAT3 axis regulates the progression of LAC cells
Since MPC1 binds to mito-STAT3 and inhibits the phosphorylation of STAT3, we explored whether MPC1-mediated cancer cell progression depends on the downstream of the STAT3 pathway. Previous report23 and our data demonstrated that IL-6 acts as the agonist for the phosphorylation of STAT3 (Fig. 5a). We found OEMPC1 LAC cells treated with IL-6 (100 ng/ml) increased the stemness (Fig. 5b, c) and mobility capacities (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Figure 4), which partially overcame the inhibitory effects of MPC1 on progression of LAC cells. Furthermore, OEMPC1 LAC cells treated with IL-6 (100 ng/ml) partially recovered the basal expression levels of SOX2 and MMP2 (Fig. 5e). Altogether, STAT3 was a novel downstream regulator of MPC1 to mediate progression in LAC cells.
Overexpression of MPC1 inhibits tumorigenicity in vivo
To further examine the effect of MPC1 on LAC cells in vivo, the subcutaneous xenograft model was established. The xenograft tumors formed by OEMPC1 cells had a slower growth rate and smaller average volume as compared with those formed by control cells (Fig. 6a–c). Consistent with our previous data, IHC showed that the expression of P-STAT3(Y705), SOX2, and MMP2 in the OEMPC1 groups was decreased compared with the control group (Fig. 6d). Therefore, these results indicate that upregulated MPC1 inhibits the tumorigenicity of LAC cells in vivo.
Discussion
The “Warburg effect” is considered a vital hallmark of cancer cells, characterized by an altered pyruvate metabolism, indicating mitochondrial pyruvate carrier is involved in the progression of cancer5. MPC1, which is located at the genomic locus of 6q27 and known as BRP44L, has been reported to form a heterologous protein complex with MPC2 in the inner mitochondrial membrane and acts as a gatekeeper for pyruvate entry into the mitochondria24,25. Actually, MPC1 has been reported to be downregulated in several types of cancers, such as gastric cancer26 and colon cancer27, but the clinical relevance and function of MPC1 in LAC remains elusive. Herein, we revealed that MPC1 was lowly expressed in LAC tissues and positively correlated with prognosis. Further studies showed that the malignancy of LAC cells were increased via depletion of MPC1 or MPC1 inhibitor, but decreased by overexpression of MPC1 in vitro and in vivo. Thus, these data indicate that MPC1 could act as a tumor suppressor and a candidate for therapeutic target as well as a prognostic biomarker in LAC.
Previous studies have shown that MPC1 can transport pyruvate into the mitochondria for oxidation, reducing lactate production in PGC1α-transduced cholangiocarcinoma cells, but elevating reactive oxygen species (ROS) production to facilitate metastatic dissemination of cholangiocarcinoma cells28. It has been found that MPC inhibitor UK5099 treatment in esophageal squamous epithelium cells can block pyruvate transportation into the mitochondria so as to attenuate mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and trigger aerobic glycolysis. In addition, UK5099-treated cells exhibit stronger invasive capacity compared with the parental cells and is more resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The HIF-1α expression and ROS production were also activated10. However, whether MPC1-overexpression could regulate Warburg effect to affect the production of lactate in LAC cells has not been illustrated yet. Our results showed that upregulated MPC1 significantly decreased the production of lactate compared with the control groups (data not shown), suggesting that MPC1 may increase pyruvate into the mitochondria for oxidation and decreased lactate production in LAC cells.
Invasion is correlated with invadopodia formation. Actin cytoskeleton and actin-binding proteins control the dynamic changes in the formation of polarized actin-based migratory protrusions, such as lamellipodia, filopodia, apically restricted circular dorsal ruffles (CDRs), and invadopodia. Herein, we found MPC1 could act as a regulator in invadopodia to control LAC cell invasion.
Our study also revealed that MPC1 was a key inhibitory factor in sustaining the stemness capability of LAC cells by decreasing the expression of stemness biomarker. In our previous work, we have shown that IGF-1R mediated OCT4 expression to form a complex with β-catenin and SOX2, which is crucial for the stemness of LAC cells13,29. Despite IGF-1R, our study on MPC1 may bring forward a new underlying mechanism of the stemness traits in LAC.
STAT3, a member of the signal transducer and activator family, was phosphorylated on tyrosin 705 (Y705) and serine 727 (S727) residue to form a dimmer and then translocated into the nuclei upon binding of growth factors and cytokines with their receptors, such as IL-630. P-STAT3 acts as a transcription factors to activate downstream target genes that are implicated in cancer progression31. However, robust and stable antitumor STAT3 activity has not been observed in clinical trials32. Recent reports showed STAT3 is not only present in the cytoplasm, but also resides in the inner mitochondrial membrane to increases activity of complex I and II of the electron transport chain to regulate cellular respiration in a transcriptional independent manner, and mitochondrial STAT3 sustained glycolytic and oxidative phosphorylation activities of cancer cells33–35. Additionally, the mitochondrial STAT3 suppresses autophagy induced by oxidative stress and may effectively preserve the mitochondria from being degraded by mitophagy36. Gene associated with retinoid interferon-induced cell mortality 19 (GRIM-19) can recruit STAT3 by the site of S727A into the mitochondria and enhance the integration of STAT3 involved in celluar respiration and glycolysis37. These data indicate that altering the balance between cyto-STAT3 and mito-STAT3, leading to the phosphorylation of STAT3 may be an effective way to combat cancer. Our work identified the interaction between mito-STAT3 and MPC1, which preventing STAT3 distribution in the cytoplasm and decreasing its phosphorylation in the cytoplasm and nuclei.
In summary, our study illustrates an important function of MPC1 in controlling the malignant behavior of LAC and acts as a novel prognostic indicator for LAC patients. Furthermore, we identify that MPC1/STAT3 axis is crucial in the progression of LAC (Fig. 6e), which provides a new train of thought regarding the molecular targeting of STAT3 pathway.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank all the lab members for their critical reading of the paper. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81572892, No. 81302025, and No. 81773040) and Sichuan Provincial Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (No. 2015JQO055).
Authors’ contributions
H.Z., Q.C., G.J., and C.X. conceived and designed the study. H.Z., Q.C., A.Z., H.W., S.W., J.Y., S.W., M.L., Y.Y., X.W., W.C., and W.F. performed the experiments. R.Y., L.C., M.Z., Q.X., and H.L. contributed to the analysis of the lung cancer clinical samples and provided experimental support. H.Z., Q.C., X.Z., and C.X. analyzed the data and wrote the paper. All authors approved the final version of the paper.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Edited by C. Munoz-Pinedo
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Hongbo Zou, Qian Chen, Anmei Zhang, Songtao Wang
Contributor Information
Guoxiang Jin, Email: gxjinking@hotmail.com.
Chuan Xu, Email: xuchuan100@163.com.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at (10.1038/s41419-019-1324-8).
References
- 1.Torre LA, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Takamochi K, Oh S, Matsunaga T, Suzuki K. Prognostic impacts of EGFR mutation status and subtype in patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2017;154:1768–1774. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.06.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Reck M, Rabe KF. Precision diagnosis and treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:849–861. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1703413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Corbet C, et al. Interruption of lactate uptake by inhibiting mitochondrial pyruvate transport unravels direct antitumor and radiosensitizing effects. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:1208. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03525-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lu J, et al. LY294002 inhibits the Warburg effect in gastric cancer cells by downregulating pyruvate kinase M2. Oncol. Lett. 2018;15:4358–4364. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.7843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li X, et al. Mitochondrial pyruvate carrier function determines cell stemness and metabolic reprogramming in cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8:46363–46380. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Herzig S, et al. Identification and functional expression of the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier. Science. 2012;337:93–96. doi: 10.1126/science.1218530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bricker DK, et al. A mitochondrial pyruvate carrier required for pyruvate uptake in yeast, Drosophila, and humans. Science. 2012;337:96–100. doi: 10.1126/science.1218099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.McCommis KS, et al. An ancestral role for the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Mol. Metab. 2016;5:602–614. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2016.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li Y, et al. Mitochondrial pyruvate carrier function is negatively linked to Warburg phenotype in vitro and malignant features in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Oncotarget. 2017;8:1058–1073. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhong Y, et al. Application of mitochondrial pyruvate carrier blocker UK5099 creates metabolic reprogram and greater stem-like properties in LnCap prostate cancer cells in vitro. Oncotarget. 2015;6:37758–37769. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang L, et al. MPC1, a key gene in cancer metabolism, is regulated by COUPTFII in human prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:14673–14683. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Xu C, et al. beta-Catenin/POU5F1/SOX2 transcription factor complex mediates IGF-I receptor signaling and predicts poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2013;73:3181–3189. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004;10:7252–7259. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen, Q. et al. ARL4C stabilized by AKT/mTOR pathway promotes the invasion of PTEN-deficient primary human glioblastoma. J. Pathol. 247, 266–278 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 16.Gadea G, Lapasset L, Gauthier-Rouviere C, Roux P. Regulation of Cdc42-mediated morphological effects: a novel function for p53. EMBO J. 2002;21:2373–2382. doi: 10.1093/emboj/21.10.2373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Merchant N, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases: their functional role in lung cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2017;38:766–780. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgx063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang CC, et al. HOXA5 inhibits metastasis via regulating cytoskeletal remodelling and associates with prolonged survival in non-small-cell lung carcinoma. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0124191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rincon M, Pereira FV. A new perspective: mitochondrial stat3 as a regulator for lymphocyte function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:E1656. doi: 10.3390/ijms19061656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kusaba T, et al. Activation of STAT3 is a marker of poor prognosis in human colorectal cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2006;15:1445–1451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tierney BJ, et al. Aberrantly activated pSTAT3-Ser727 in human endometrial cancer is suppressed by HO-3867, a novel STAT3 inhibitor. Gynecol. Oncol. 2014;135:133–141. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.07.087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Levy DE, Darnell JE., Jr. Stats: transcriptional control and biological impact. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;3:651–662. doi: 10.1038/nrm909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhou M, Yang H, Learned RM, Tian H, Ling L. Non-cell-autonomous activation of IL-6/STAT3 signaling mediates FGF19-driven hepatocarcinogenesis. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:15433. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schell JC, Rutter J. The long and winding road to the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier. Cancer & Metab. 2013;1:6. doi: 10.1186/2049-3002-1-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Trachtulec Z, Forejt J. Synteny of orthologous genes conserved in mammals, snake, fly, nematode, and fission yeast. Mamm. Genome. 2001;12:227–231. doi: 10.1007/s003350010259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhou X, et al. Overexpression of MPC1 inhibits the proliferation, migration, invasion, and stem cell-like properties of gastric cancer cells. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:5151–5163. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S148681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schell JC, et al. A role for the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier as a repressor of the Warburg effect and colon cancer cell growth. Mol. Cell. 2014;56:400–413. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dan L, et al. PGC1alpha promotes cholangiocarcinoma metastasis by upregulating PDHA1 and MPC1 expression to reverse the Warburg effect. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:466. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0494-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xin YH, et al. POU5F1 enhances the invasiveness of cancer stem-like cells in lung adenocarcinoma by upregulation of MMP-2 expression. PLoS One. 2013;8:e83373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lei Y, et al. Hdac7 promotes lung tumorigenesis by inhibiting Stat3 activation. Mol. Cancer. 2017;16:170. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0736-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kang HJ, et al. Disruption of STAT3-DNMT1 interaction by SH-I-14 induces re-expression of tumor suppressor genes and inhibits growth of triple-negative breast tumor. Oncotarget. 2017;8:83457–83468. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Johnson DE, O’Keefe RA, Grandis JR. Targeting the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signalling axis in cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018;15:234–248. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2018.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gough DJ, et al. Mitochondrial STAT3 supports Ras-dependent oncogenic transformation. Science. 2009;324:1713–1716. doi: 10.1126/science.1171721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Garama DJ, White CL, Balic JJ, Gough DJ. Mitochondrial STAT3: Powering up a potent factor. Cytokine. 2016;87:20–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2016.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wegrzyn J, et al. Function of mitochondrial Stat3 in cellular respiration. Science. 2009;323:793–797. doi: 10.1126/science.1164551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.You L, et al. The role of STAT3 in autophagy. Autophagy. 2015;11:729–739. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1017192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tammineni P, et al. The import of the transcription factor STAT3 into mitochondria depends on GRIM-19, a component of the electron transport chain. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:4723–4732. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.378984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.