Abstract
Background:
Previous clinical trials have reported that cyclophosphamide can be used for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, its efficacy is still unclear. In this systematic review study, we aim to evaluate its efficacy and safety for ALL.
Methods:
The following 9 databases will be searched from their inception to the present: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), and four Chinese databases. The randomized controlled trials or case control studies of cyclophosphamide that assess the clinical efficacy and safety in patients with ALL are included. The methodological quality of all eligible included studies will be assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
The primary outcome measurement will be all-cause mortality at the period of treatment and follow-up. The secondary outcome measurements will include the health-related quality of life (HRQL), postinduction complete remission (CR) rate, event-free survival (EFS), relapse rate, and adverse events. Two authors will independently select eligible studies, exact data, and assess the methodological quality of included studies. RevMan 5.3 software will be used to synthesize the data. Reporting bias will be evaluated by the funnel plots, Begg, and Egger tests.
Results:
This systematic review will evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide for ALL.
Dissemination and ethics:
The findings of this review will summarize the present evidence of cyclophosphamide for ALL, and may provide guidance for clinical practice of cyclophosphamide for ALL. Its results will be published through peer-reviewed journals. This study does not need ethic approval, because it will not involve the individual data.
Systematic review registration:
PROSPERO CRD42018119333.
Keywords: acute lymphoblastic leukemia, cyclophosphamide, efficacy, safety, systematic review
1. Introduction
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common hematologic malignancy cancer of bone marrow.[1–3] It is featured by the overproduction of immature lymphoblasts.[4–7] It has been reported that about 6000 patients are diagnosed with this condition annually, and it accounts more than 75% acute leukemias in children, and 20% of all leukemias in adults.[8–11] Although several treatments are available for such disorder, its relapse rate is still about 15%–20% in ALL. Furthermore, the cue rate is much lower after the relapse.[12]
Despite the prevalence and incidence of ALL is very high, its treatments are still suffered from limited efficacy and poorly supported.[13–19] Cyclophosphamide has been reported to improve the efficacy of patients with ALL and has achieved promising efficacy.[13–28] However, no systematic review has further evaluated its efficacy of higher level evidence with more convinced conclusion. Thus, it is very necessary to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide for the treatment of ALL.
2. Methods
2.1. Objective
This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide for the treatment of ALL.
2.2. Study registration
This protocol was designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol (PRISMA-P) statement guidelines,[29] and it has been registered in PROSPERO with CRD42018119333.
2.3. Inclusion criteria for study selection
2.3.1. Study type
This review will consider the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or case control studies that assessed the efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide on ALL without any restrictions, such as age, race, and region. Any other studies including animal studies, case reports, case series, observational studies, qualitative studies, letters, comments, and reviews will all be excluded.
2.3.2. Participant type
Patients with ALL, regarding gender, and age will be included.
2.3.3. Intervention type
Intervention of any type of cyclophosphamide treatment will be included. However, the combination of cyclophosphamide with other treatments will be excluded. Control therapy will include placebo, or other interventions, except the cyclophosphamide will be considered.
2.3.4. Outcome measurement type
The primary outcome includes all-cause mortality at the period of treatment and follow-up. The secondary outcomes consist of health-related quality of life (HRQL), postinduction complete remission (CR) rate, event-free survival (EFS), relapse rate, and adverse events.
2.4. Search methods for the identification of studies
2.4.1. Electronic searches
The following databases will be searched from the inception to the present: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), and four Chinese databases of Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP Information (VIP), and Wanfang Data (WANFANG). The details of search strategy for CENTRAL are shown in Table 1. Similar strategies will be used and applied for all other electronic databases.
Table 1.
Search strategy applied in CENTRAL database.
2.4.2. Search for other resources
The ongoing and recently completed studies will also be searched from the clinical registration website. Additionally, the reference lists of potentially related studies will also be considered to search in order to avoiding missing any other potential eligible studies.
2.5. Data collection and analysis
2.5.1. Study selection
Two authors will independently select the initial titles and abstracts. Then, the full text of potential related studies will be further reviewed for inclusion according to the study eligibility. All selection procedures will be applied according to the PRISMA flow chart. A third author will resolve the disagreements by discussion if there will be occurred between the two authors. The flowchart of study selection is presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of study selection process.
2.5.2. Data extraction and management
Two authors will independently extract data from the included studies using the redefined standard data extraction form. The exacted information includes author, published year, region, age, gender, ethnicity, disease type, treatment dosage, outcome measurements, and so on. If any disagreement regarding the data extraction between these 2 authors occurred, the matter will be resolved by a third author through discussion.
2.5.3. Risk of bias in included studies
Two authors will also independently assess the risk of bias in each included study by using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Tool. The evaluation includes following 7 specific aspects according to the Cochrane Handbook for bias risk assessment. Any divisions will also be solved by a third author involved.
2.5.4. Measurement of treatment effect
We will use mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to analyze the continuous data. As for dichotomous data, we will use risk ratio (RR) to perform the treatment effect with 95% CIs.
2.5.5. Unit of analysis
We will evaluate the data of first study period in cross-over studies in order to avoid the carryover effects. If included studies have multiple intervention groups, all related treatment and control groups will be combined into a single unit to further avoid the unit analysis.
2.5.6. Dealing with missing data
If the data information is missing, or insufficient or unclear, the original authors will be contact to request these data. If the missing data are not obtainable, the available data will be analyzed and will be discussed in the discussion as limitations.
2.5.7. Subgroup analysis
Subgroup analysis will be performed for different treatment forms if the substantial heterogeneity will be identified, such as different treatment types, control therapies, and outcome measurements.
2.5.8. Assessment of heterogeneity and data synthesis
Heterogeneity will be assessed by the I2 and χ2 tests in this study. When the value of I2 was less than 50%, no statistical heterogeneity will be considered, and fixed-effect model will be utilized. Otherwise, substantial heterogeneity will be considered and random-effect model will be used to analyze the outcome data. In such situation, subgroup analysis will be conducted and potential reasons will be analyzed to investigate the potential causes of heterogeneity. If the substantial heterogeneity remains significant, and meta-analysis is not appropriate, a narrative summary will be presented.
2.5.9. Publication biases
We will use funnel plot to detect the publication bias if more than ten included studies are available. Furthermore, Egger's regression and Begg's tests will also be applied to detect the funnel plot asymmetry.
2.5.10. Sensitivity analysis
Sensitivity analysis will be conducted to check the robustness of results, as well as the methodological quality, sample size, and the missing data of included studies.
3. Discussion
The protocol of this systematic review will be conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide for the treatment of patients with ALL. Currently, no systematic review and meta-analysis has been performed on this issue. Thus, it is very important and very necessary to run this study to further investigate the efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide for ALL in both children and adults.
In the current systematic review, we will retrieve all associated literature without language restrictions. All potential studies regarding the cyclophosphamide for ALL will be fully considered to avoid missing any potential trials. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will provide a summary of the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide for patients with ALL. This evidence may also yield helpful evidence both for clinical practice and the health policy-makers.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: Yue-Rong Zhao, Hong-Mei Song, Lei Ni.
Data curation: Yue-Rong Zhao, Hong-Mei Song, Lei Ni.
Formal analysis: Yue-Rong Zhao.
Funding acquisition: Lei Ni.
Investigation: Hong-Mei Song.
Methodology: Yue-Rong Zhao, Hong-Mei Song.
Project administration: Hong-Mei Song.
Resources: Yue-Rong Zhao, Lei Ni.
Software: Yue-Rong Zhao, Hong-Mei Song.
Supervision: Hong-Mei Song.
Validation: Yue-Rong Zhao, Lei Ni.
Visualization: Yue-Rong Zhao, Lei Ni.
Writing – original draft: Yue-Rong Zhao, Hong-Mei Song, Lei Ni.
Writing – review & editing: Yue-Rong Zhao, Hong-Mei Song, Lei Ni.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: ALL = acute lymphoblastic leukemia, AMED = Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, CBM = Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, CENTRAL = Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL = Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, CIs = confidence intervals, CNKI = China National Knowledge Infrastructure, MD = mean difference, PRISMA-P = Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol, RCTs = randomized controlled trials, RR = risk ratio, SMD = standardized mean difference, VIP = VIP Information, WANFANG = Wanfang Data.
YZ and HS contributed equally to this study.
This work was supported by the Heilongjiang Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission Research Project (NO.2016-314).
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
- [1].Terwilliger T, Abdul-Hay M. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2017 update. Blood Cancer J 2017;7:e577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Nordlund J, Syvänen AC. Epigenetics in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Semin Cancer Biol 2018;51:129–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Lilljebjörn H, Fioretos T. New oncogenic subtypes in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2017;130:1395–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Lee SHR, Yang JJ. Pharmacogenomics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2017;30:229–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Vetsch J, Wakefield CE, Robertson EG, et al. Health-related quality of life of survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2018;27:1431–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Muffly LS, Reizine N, Stock W. Management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in young adults. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2018;16:138–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Boissel N, Baruchel A. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescent and young adults: treat as adults or as children? Blood 2018;132:351–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Alvarnas JC, Brown PA, Aoun P, et al. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2012;10:858–914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Hunger SP, Mullighan CG. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. N Engl J Med 2015;373:1541–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Phelan KW, Advani AS. Novel therapies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2018;13:289–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Sawalha Y, Advani AS. Management of older adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: challenges & current approaches. Int J Hematol Oncol 2018;7:IJH02. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Oskarsson T, Söderhäll S, Arvidson J, et al. Relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the Nordic countries: prognostic factors, treatment and outcome. Haematologica 2016;101:68–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Sitarz AL, Albo V, Movassaghi N, et al. Dibromodulcitol (NSC-104800) compared with cyclophosphamide (NSC-26271) as remission maintenance therapy in previously treated children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or acute undifferentiated leukemia: possible effectiveness in reducing the incidence of central nervous system leukemia. Cancer Chemother Rep 1975;59:989–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Albo V, Movassaghi N, Sitarz AL, et al. Cyclophosphamide (NSC-26271) maintenance therapy after a second remission of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: comparative clinical trial (standard dose versus intermittent high dose versus cyclophosphamide plus cytosine arabinoside (NSC-63878)). Cancer Chemother Rep 1975;59:1097–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Sackmann Muriel F, Svarch E, Pavlovsky S, et al. Alternating pulses of vincristine-prednisone with cytarabine-cyclophosphamide versus vincristine-prednisone in the maintenance therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Treat Rep 1984;68:581–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Lauer SJ, Pinkel D, Buchanan GR, et al. Cytosine arabinoside/cyclophosphamide pulses during continuation therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Potential selective effect in T-cell leukemia. Cancer 1987;60:2366–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Uderzo C, Coleselli P, Messina C, et al. Allogeneic BMT versus autologous BMT in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): an Italian cooperative study of vincristine (VCR), F-TBI and cyclophosphamide. AIEOP (Associazione Italiana Ematologia ed Oncologia Pediatrica) Italy. Bone Marrow Transplant 1991;7Suppl 2:132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Ciolli S, Leoni F, Caporale R, et al. Continuous-infusion cyclophosphamide plus vincristine, cytosine-arabinoside and prednisone for refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults. Haematologica 1991;76:293–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Russell S, Vowels M. Busulphan, cyclophosphamide, and melphalan as conditioning therapy in allogeneic bone marrow transplants for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Transplant Proc 1992;24:183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Thomas X, Danaïla C, Bach QK, et al. Sequential induction chemotherapy with vincristine, daunorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Ann Hematol 1995;70:65–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Zecca M, Pession A, Messina C, et al. Total body irradiation, thiotepa, and cyclophosphamide as a conditioning regimen for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first or second remission undergoing bone marrow transplantation with HLA-identical siblings. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1838–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Bassan R, Pogliani E, Lerede T, et al. Fractionated cyclophosphamide added to the IVAP regimen (idarubicin-vincristine-l-asparaginase-prednisone) could lower the risk of primary refractory disease in T-lineage but not B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia: first results from a phase II clinical study. Haematologica 1999;84:1088–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Umeda K, Lin YW, Watanabe K, et al. [Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with busulfanthiotepa-cyclophosphamide conditioning for pediatric patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia]. Rinsho Ketsueki 2001;42:685–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Jaing TH, Tsay PK, Hung IJ, et al. Single-dose oral granisetron versus multidose intravenous ondansetron for moderately emetogenic cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy in pediatric outpatients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2004;21:227–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Marks DI, Forman SJ, Blume KG, et al. A comparison of cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation with etoposide and total body irradiation as conditioning regimens for patients undergoing sibling allografting for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first or second complete remission. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006;12:438–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Tang W, Wang L, Zhao WL, et al. Intravenous busulfan-cyclophosphamide as a preparative regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011;17:1555–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Hijiya N, Thomson B, Isakoff MS, et al. Phase 2 trial of clofarabine in combination with etoposide and cyclophosphamide in pediatric patients with refractory or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2011;118:6043–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Faderl S, Balakrishnan K, Thomas DA, et al. Phase I and extension study of clofarabine plus cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2014;14:231–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 2015;350:g7647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]