Abstract
Recent studies showed that lncRNA CASC9 was upregulated and acted as an oncogene in a variety of tumors. However, the expression and biological functions of CASC9 in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remain unknown. In this study, we found for the first time that CASC9 was remarkably upregulated in OSCC tissues and cell lines compared with paired noncancerous tissues and normal oral epithelial cells. Highly expressed CASC9 is strongly associated with tumor size, clinical stage, regional lymph node metastasis and overall survival time in OSCC patients. In vitro, CASC9 knockdown in OSCC cells SCC15 and CAL27 significantly promotes autophagy and apoptosis, while inhibiting proliferation. Moreover, the expression levels of p-AKT, p-mTOR, P62 and BCL-2 were significantly decreased, while the expression levels of BAX and the LC3BII/LC3BI ratio were increased in CASC9-knockdown SCC15 and CAL27 cells. After the addition of the AKT activator SC79 in CASC9-knockdown SCC15 and CAL27 cells, we found that the increased autophagy and apoptosis were remarkably rescued. Furthermore, the increased apoptosis was remarkably rescued in CASC9-knockdown OSCC cells treated with the autophagy inhibitor Autophinib. In addition, CASC9 depletion suppressed tumor growth in vivo. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that lncRNA CASC9 promotes OSCC progression through enhancing cell proliferation and suppressing autophagy-mediated cell apoptosis via the AKT/mTOR pathway. CASC9 could potentially be used as a valuable biomarker for OSCC diagnosis and prognosis.
Introduction
Head and neck cancer is the sixth most common malignant tumor in the world1, and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common type of head and neck cancer2. There are over 300 000 new cases of OSCC every year worldwide, and more than 140 000 patients die of OSCC each year2,3. At present, the primary treatment for OSCC is surgery with adjuvant radiation or chemoradiation treatment. Although great progress has been made in surgical techniques, radiation and chemoradiation treatment, the overall 5-year survival rate of OSCC patients has remained approximately 50% for 30 years without any significantly progress4. Therefore, further study of the molecular mechanisms underlying OSCC development is the key to developing more effective treatments.
Long noncoding RNA (lncRNAs) is noncoding RNA with a length of more than 200 nt, attracting increasing studies5. The number of gene classified as lncRNA is the largest. LncRNA regulates the expression of genes at the level of transcription, posttranscription and translation, affecting various physiological and pathological processes of cells6–9. Current studies have shown that variable abnormal expression of lncRNA is closely related to the occurrence of various diseases, including tumors10–12. Emerging studies have found that long noncoding RNA cancer susceptibility candidate 9 (CASC9) is highly expressed in various cancers, such as esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma, implying a crucial carcinogenic effect of this lncRNA13–19. Although CASC9 is a lncRNA with extensive clinical prospects, the expression and role of CASC9 in OSCC remain unclear.
Autophagy is a complex process involving the lysosomal-mediated degradation of intracytoplasmic components. The AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is the primary pathway regulating autophagy20, which can determine the survival and death of cells and plays an important role in tumorigenesis21–23. Recently, Liang et al. reported that high expression of CASC9 activates the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, which promotes the invasion and metastasis of esophageal squamous carcinoma cells13. Klingenberg M. et al. demonstrated that increased expression of CASC9 promotes the phosphorylation of AKT (p-AKT), which induces the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma cells14. However, it is unclear whether CASC9 regulates tumor cell autophagy through the AKT/mTOR pathway.
In the present study, we found that CASC9 is highly expressed in OSCC tissues and cell lines, and the overall survival time of patients with higher levels of CASC9 expression is significantly shorter compared with patients with low expression. Moreover, silencing CASC9 inhibits OSCC growth in vivo. More importantly, we discovered for the first time that CASC9 regulates autophagy through the AKT/mTOR pathway in tumor cells, promoting autophagy-mediated apoptosis.
Results
CASC9 is increased in OSCC tissues and cell lines
RT-qPCR was performed to analyze CASC9 expression in 35 cases of OSCC tissues and paired para-tumor tissues. The results revealed that the expression of CASC9 in OSCC tissues was significantly higher compared with adjacent normal tissues (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1a). The expression of CASC9 in normal oral mucosal cell HOMEC cell and oral squamous cell carcinoma cells, including TSCCA, SCC15 and CAL27 was further detected by RT-qPCR. Similarly, the results revealed that CASC9 expression levels in TSCCA, SCC15 and CAL27 cells were significantly higher compared with HOMEC cells (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1b). These findings demonstrate that CASC9 expression is significantly elevated in OSCC.
Elevated CASC9 is related to poor prognosis in OSCC patients
To verify the relationships between elevated CASC9 expression and prognosis in OSCC patients, ISH was performed to detect the expression of CASC9 in 84 cases of OSCC patients with complete clinical data and follow-up data (cohort 2), and the relationship between CASC9 expression and clinicopathological features and overall survival time were analyzed in cohort 2. Consistent with the results of cohort 1, the expression of CASC9 in OSCC was higher compared with the corresponding adjacent tissues (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1c and Table 1). CASC9 was located both in the nucleus and cytoplasm in OSCC, and CASC9 was distributed primarily in the cytoplasm (Fig. 1c). What’s more, CASC9 expression was found to be significantly correlated with tumor size, regional lymph node metastasis and clinical stage of OSCC (P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that the mean overall survival time of patients with high and low CASC9 expression was 49.3 ± 4.3 months and 62.9 ± 6.5, months, respectively, which means that the overall survival time of OSCC patients with elevated CASC9 expression was significantly shorter than that of patients with low expression (P = 0.023) (Fig. 1d). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the CASC9 expression level was an independent prognostic factor in OSCC patients (Table 2). IHC revealed that p-AKT was highly expressed in OSCC relative to the corresponding adjacent normal tissues and positively correlated with CASC9 expression (R2 = 0.4546, P < 0.001). LC3B was downregulated in OSCC relative to adjacent normal tissues and negatively correlated with CASC9 expression (R2 = 0.5801, P < 0.001) (Fig. 1e, f). These results indicate that CASC9 is an independent prognostic factor affecting the survival of OSCC patients. Moreover, elevated CASC9 expression in OSCC may play a role in promoting cancer by activating the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway to regulate autophagy.
Table 1.
Parameters | Total | CASC9 Expression | χ2 | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
High | Low | ||||
Tissue type | 9.47 | 0.002* | |||
OSCC | 84 | 53 | 31 | ||
ANT | 32 | 10 | 22 | ||
Age | 2.647 | 0.266 | |||
≥60 | 38 | 27 | 11 | ||
40–60 | 35 | 21 | 14 | ||
<40 | 11 | 5 | 6 | ||
Gender | 0.568 | 0.451 | |||
Male | 47 | 28 | 19 | ||
Female | 37 | 25 | 12 | ||
Tumor differentiation | 2.849 | 0.241 | |||
Well | 28 | 20 | 8 | ||
Moderate | 31 | 16 | 15 | ||
Poor | 25 | 17 | 8 | ||
T staging | 9.31 | 0.025* | |||
T1 | 14 | 5 | 9 | ||
T2 | 21 | 11 | 10 | ||
T3 | 32 | 23 | 9 | ||
T4 | 17 | 14 | 3 | ||
Regional lymph node metastasis | 10.063 | 0.002* | |||
No | 49 | 24 | 25 | ||
Yes | 35 | 29 | 6 | ||
Clinical stage | 14.227 | 0.003* | |||
I | 12 | 4 | 8 | ||
II | 14 | 5 | 9 | ||
III | 38 | 27 | 11 | ||
IV | 20 | 17 | 3 | ||
Site | 5.883 | 0.208 | |||
Gingiva | 13 | 10 | 3 | ||
Tongue | 33 | 24 | 9 | ||
Buccal | 26 | 14 | 12 | ||
The floor of the oral | 8 | 3 | 5 | ||
Palate | 4 | 2 | 2 |
P values reflect the relationship between CASC9 expression and clinicopathological parameters with Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. *P < 0.05. High (Score 6–12), Low (Score 0–4)
OSCC Oral squamous cell carcinoma, ANT adjacent noncancerous tissues
Table 2.
Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P value | HR | 95% CI | P value | HR | 95% CI | |
CASC9 | 0.025* | 0.558 | 0.335–0.930 | 0.023* | 2.31 | 1.123–4.752 |
Age | 0.758 | 0.951 | 0.693–1.306 | 0.832 | 1.045 | 0.695–1.572 |
Gender | 0.652 | 0.897 | 0.561–1.437 | 0.467 | 0.821 | 0.482–1.398 |
Tumor differentiation | 0.277 | 1.18 | 0.875–1.592 | 0.317 | 1.193 | 0.844–1.687 |
T classification | < 0.001* | 6.36 | 4.232–9.559 | < 0.001* | 3.711 | 2.077–6.631 |
Regional lymph node metastasis | < 0.001* | 7.832 | 4.274–14.351 | 0.006* | 2.749 | 1.340–5.643 |
Clinical stage | < 0.001* | 5.092 | 3.439–7.539 | 0.011* | 2.383 | 1.224–4.637 |
Site | 0.902 | 0.984 | 0.767–1.263 | 0.924 | 0.987 | 0.761–1.282 |
HR hazard ratio CI confidence interval
*P < 0.05
Suppression of CASC9 inhibits proliferation and promotes tumor cell apoptosis
To explore the effect of altered CASC9 expression on OSCC cells, SCC15 and CAL27 cells, in which CASC9 is the most highly expressed, were selected for the following assays. We verified the knockdown efficiency of three siRNAs (si-1, si-2, si-3) targeting different sites of CASC9 in SCC15 and CAL27 cells, and the results showed that si-3 was the most effective siRNA for silencing CASC9 in both SCC15 and CAL27 cells (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 2a). Therefore, si-3 was selected for all subsequent experiments. Three experimental groups were defined, as follows: the experimental group (si-CASC9), negative control group (si-NC), and blank control group (blank).
To explore the effects of altered CASC9 expression on the proliferation and apoptosis of OSCC cells, MTT assay, flow cytometry, and TUNEL assays were performed. The MTT assay revealed that the proliferation of SCC15 and CAL27 cells was significantly decreased after CASC9 expression was silenced (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2b). In addition, the apoptotic index of SCC15 and CAL27 was significantly increased after CASC9 expression was silenced, as detected by flow cytometry (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2c). The TUNEL assay showed that the apoptotic rate of SCC15 and CAL27 cells was significantly increased after CASC9 expression was silenced (Fig. 2d). Western blotting and RT-qPCR analysis revealed that the protein and mRNA expression levels of BCL-2 were significantly decreased (P < 0.05), while the protein and mRNA expression levels of BAX were significantly increased in the CASC9-knockdown SCC15 and CAL27 cells (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2e, f). These findings demonstrate that the cell proliferation was inhibited, while the apoptosis was enhanced in CASC9-knockdown SCC15 and CAL27 cells.
Depletion of CASC9 triggers autophagy in OSCC cells
Autophagic density was significantly increased in SCC15 and CAL27 cells after the knockdown of CASC9, according to the TEM analysis (P < 0.001) (Fig. 3a). The immunofluorescence assay showed that the fluorescence intensity of the LC3B protein in CASC9-knockdown SCC15 and CAL27 cells was significantly increased (P < 0.001), while the fluorescence intensity of the P62 protein was significantly decreased (P = 0.001) (Fig. 3b). After CASC9 expression was silenced, the LC3B II/LC3B I ratio was significantly increased (P < 0.05), while the P62 expression level was significantly decreased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3c), as detected by western blotting. LC3B mRNA expression was significantly elevated (P < 0.05), while P62 mRNA expression was significantly reduced (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3d), as detected by RT-qPCR in CASC9-knockdown SCC15 and CAL27 cells. These findings demonstrate that the depletion of CASC9 triggers autophagy in SCC15 and CAL27 cells.
CASC9 knockdown reduces the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway activation in OSCC cells
Emerging evidence suggests that CASC9 regulates the AKT signaling pathway in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma13,14. To investigate whether CASC9 affects the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway, the expression of p-AKT and p-mTOR, which are key proteins in the AKT/mTOR pathway, was examined. Western blotting analysis revealed that there was no significant change in the total AKT or total mTOR expression after CASC9 was silenced in SCC15 and CAL27 cells (P > 0.05), whereas the expression of p-AKT and p-mTOR was significantly decreased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4). These results demonstrate that CASC9 knockdown reduces the activation of the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in OSCC cells.
CASC9 inhibits apoptosis and autophagy through the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in OSCC cells
The AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is important for regulating cell autophagy and apoptosis24,25. To investigate whether CASC9 regulates autophagy and apoptosis in OSCC through the regulation of the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway, autophagy and apoptosis were measured after the addition of an AKT activator (SC79) (HY-18749, MCE, New Jersey, USA) in CASC9-knockdown SCC15 and CAL27 cells. The results showed that treatment with SC79 significantly reduced the autophagosome density and apoptotic index (Fig. 5a, b) compared to the controls. Moreover, the LC3B II/LC3B I ratio and BAX expression were significantly reduced, whereas BCL-2 expression was significantly increased (Fig. 5c). These results demonstrate that adding SC79 into transfected SCC15 and CAL27 cells alleviated the CASC9-knockdown mediated increase in autophagy and apoptosis. In summary, CASC9 regulates autophagy and apoptosis through the regulation of the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in OSCC.
CASC9 reduces apoptosis by inhibition of autophagy in OSCC cells
To investigate the regulatory relationship between autophagy and apoptosis in OSCC, we detected apoptosis in SCC15 and CAL27 cells that were cotreated with si-CASC9 and the autophagy inhibitor (Autophinib) (HY-101920, MCE, New Jersey, USA). Flow cytometric analysis revealed that the apoptotic index of cells coincubated with si-CASC9 and Autophinib was significantly decreased compared to cells without Autophinib treatment (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6a). Western Blotting analysis further revealed that, in the cells cotreated with si-CASC9 and Autophinib, BCL-2 protein expression was significantly increased, while BAX protein expression was significantly decreased compared to the cells treated only with si-CASC9 (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6b). These results demonstrate that inhibition of autophagy in OSCC cells reversed the increased rate of apoptosis caused by the CASC9 knockdown, suggesting that the regulation of apoptosis by CASC9 in OSCC is dependent on the regulation of autophagy.
CASC9 knockdown suppressed tumor growth in vivo
An in vivo tumorigenicity assay in nude mice revealed that the weight and volume of tumors in the sh-CASC9 group were significantly less than those in the sh-NC group (Fig. 7a). Meanwhile, the tumor growth of the sh-CASC9 group was slower compared to that of the sh-NC group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 7b). RT-qPCR analysis revealed that, compared with the sh-NC group, the mRNA expression level of LC3B and BAX mRNA was increased in the sh-CASC9 tumor tissues, whereas the mRNA expression level of P62 and BCL-2 was decreased (P < 0.05) (Fig. 7c). These results indicate that silencing CASC9 significantly inhibits the growth of tumors in vivo.
Discussion
Less than 2% of the RNA produced by transcription of the human genome encodes for proteins, and nearly 98% of the RNA does not encode for proteins, the latter is called noncoding RNA (ncRNA)26,27. Over 68% of genes were classified as lncRNAs28. Previously, lncRNA was considered to be nonfunctional “noise.” However, in recent years, extensive research has demonstrated that abnormally expressed lncRNA is closely related to the occurrence and development of various cancers. In addition, lncRNA is regarded as an important marker for cancer diagnosis and prognosis as well as a therapeutic target for cancer treatment29–36. lncRNA is characterized by strong tissue specificity, and its expression level and function may vary greatly between different cell types37. However, recent studies have determined that CASC9 is highly expressed in many cancers, such as esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Moreover, this increased expression is significantly correlated with tumor size, clinical stage and overall survival time, which indicates that CASC9 plays an important carcinogenic role in various cancers13–19. The present study also demonstrated that increased CASC9 in OSCC is significantly associated with tumor size, regional lymph node metastasis, clinical stage, and overall survival time, suggesting that CASC9 may be an effective therapeutic target and prognostic marker in a variety of tumors. Therefore, there are broad and important clinical prospects of CASC9, which warrant further research.
Disorder of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and metastasis is an important trigger of cancer occurrence and development. The PI3K/AKT signaling pathway is an important signaling pathway that regulates cell proliferation, apoptosis, and metastasis38–40. Recent studies have shown that autophagy plays an important role in tumorigenesis21–23. Moreover, mTOR, which is downstream of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, is a crucial negative regulator of autophagy25. Studies on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma have shown that high expression of CASC9 activates the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, promoting the proliferation, invasion and metastasis of cancer cells13,14. The present study also demonstrated that increased CASC9 expression promotes OSCC cell proliferation. It is unclear whether the increased CASC9 expression in cancer cells regulates the expression of mTOR through the regulation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway to control autophagy. In this study, depletion of CASC9 in OSCC cells led to the significantly decreased expression of p-AKT and p-mTOR, as well as increased autophagy. Treatment with an AKT activator in CASC9-knockdown cells partially rescued the decreased p-mTOR expression and increased autophagy. In addition, the expression of CASC9 was also positively correlated with p-AKT and negatively correlated with LC3B in OSCC tissue samples. Taken together, these findings demonstrate for the first time that CASC9, which is highly expressed in cancer cells, inhibits autophagy by activating the AKT/mTOR pathway.
Autophagy plays an important role in the occurrence and development of tumors22,23,41–43. There exists crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis; autophagy can both inhibit and promote apoptosis to affect the occurrence and development of cancers21. Due to the diversity of cells, conditions and stimulating factors, autophagy acts as a double-edged sword for apoptosis44. For example, Zhao Z. et al. found that oxamate inhibits apoptosis by promoting autophagy to promote gastric cancer;45 in contrast, Yeh P.S. et al found that honokiol can promote apoptosis by promoting autophagy to promote neuroblastoma46. Our study found that autophagy and apoptosis were both increased in cells with silenced CASC9. However, apoptosis was significantly reduced in the cells cotreated with si-CASC9 and the autophagy inhibitor, indicating that silencing CASC9 induced autophagy as a pro-death response. The current study found that autophagy can regulate early apoptosis47,48. For example, Fan et al.48 found resveratrol-induced autophagy enhances early apoptosis in HL-60 cells. This study also found that CASC9 knockdown in OSCC cells increased the early apoptosis. It is shown that P62 can regulate both autophagy and apoptosis, and many studies reported that P62 mediates apoptosis primarily through regulating autophagy49. Bjørkøy G. et al50 reported that P62 is incorporated into autophagosomes through binding to LC3 in autophagy-activated cells, and subsequently P62 is degraded by autophagy; thus, P62 protein expression decreases, and reduced P62 protein expression increases cell apoptosis. In this study, autophagy and apoptosis were enhanced in CASC9-knockdown OSCC cells, and P62 protein expression was decreased. Moreover, rescue experiments showed that autophagy positively regulates apoptosis. Thus, we supposed that CASC9 depletion in OSCC cells might promote the binding of P62 to LC3, and then P62 is incorporated into autophagosomes, resulting in the degradation of P62; subsequently, reduction of P62 may increase the autophagy-mediated apoptosis. However, the detailed mechanism remains to be further studied.
In summary, this study found for the first time that increased CASC9 was significantly associated with tumor size, regional lymph node metastasis, clinical stage and overall survival time in OSCC patients. Experiments in vivo and in vitro demonstrated that high expression of CASC9 promotes the proliferation of OSCC cells. More importantly, we found for the first time that CASC9 regulates autophagy in tumor cells. We also demonstrated that CASC9 depletion increases autophagy by inhibiting the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway to promote autophagic apoptosis in OSCC cells (Fig. 8). These findings suggest that CASC9 could potentially be used as a valuable biomarker for OSCC diagnosis and prognosis.
Materials and Methods
Human tissue samples
There were two groups of OSCC patients tissue samples used. Cohort 1 included fresh OSCC tissue and matched adjacent normal tissues from 35 patients who underwent surgical resection in the oral and maxillofacial surgery department of the first hospital affiliated to Chongqing Medical University between July 2017 and November 2017. The fresh tissues were stored in liquid nitrogen immediately after resection. Cohort 2 included paraffin-embedded tissue sections of 84 OSCC patients obtained from the department of pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Patients in cohort 2 were hospitalized in the oral and maxillofacial surgery department of the first hospital affiliated to Chongqing Medical University between January 2007 and February 2011. The clinicopathological data of all patients are shown in Table 1. Thirty-two para-cancerous tissues were selected from cohort 2 as a control group. All of the patients included in the study were diagnosed by pathology, and no treatment, such as radiotherapy or chemotherapy, was performed before the operation. The study was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (ApprovaI number: 2017–053), and all patients provided informed consent.
Cell culture and reagents
Normal oral mucosal HOMEC cells were purchased from Shanghai Bioleaf Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China); OSCC TSCCA cells were purchased from Shanghai Zhong Qiao Xin Zhou Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China); OSCC SCC15 and CAL27 cells were donated by Professor Huang Enyi from Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedicine. The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibico, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin in an incubator containing 5% CO2 at 37 °C.
In situ hybridization (ISH)
In situ hybridization (ISH) was performed using a kit (MK10506-h, Boster, Wuhan, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, a hybridization probe specific for CASC9 in ISH was designed according to 3 transcripts of CASC9 in NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The probe sequences are shown in Supplementary Table. S1. The probes were synthesized by Boster bioengineering co., LTD. (Boster, Wuhan, China). Paraffin-embedded OSCC and matched adjacent tissue sections were digested at room temperature for 2 min with fresh 3% citrate diluted pepsin (1 ml of 3% citrate plus 2 drops of condensed pepsin). Next, the sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated, washed with PBS 3 times for 5 min and then washed with distilled water, and then incubated with 20 μl of preliminary hybrid liquid at 37 °C for 2 h. Then, the slides were subsequently incubated with 20 μl of hybrid liquid at 42 °C overnight. For the negative control, the hybrid liquid was replaced with preliminary hybrid liquid. After hybridization, the slides were washed in gradient dilute solution SSC buffer, incubated with biotin-labeled rat anti-digoxin for 60 min at 37 °C, and then washed with PBS 4 times. Each slide was developed with DAB and observed under the optical microscope. Tissues were counterstained with Mayer’s Hematoxylin, differentiated with 0.1% alcohol hydrochloride, and washed with running water. Subsequently, the slides were dehydrated and then sealed with neutral gum. Images were captured with the fluorescence microscope (BX51TRF, OLYMPUS, Japan), and a brown color was considered positive. The results were evaluated by double grading and semiquantitative grading.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Immunohistochemistry was performed using a kit (Beijing, Zhong Shan Jin Qiao, SP-9000) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, 4-μm paraffin-embedded sections were routinely deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was accomplished by microwaving the sections in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0). The activity of endogenous peroxidase was eliminated with 3% H2O2. Then, the slides were incubated with normal goat serum seal solution at room temperature for 20 min to prevent nonspecific binding. Next, the slides were incubated with primary antibodies against p-AKT and LC3B overnight at 4 °C, and then the slides were incubated with biotin-labeled goat anti-mouse/rabbit IgG secondary antibodies at room temperature for 10 min. Streptavidin-peroxidase was applied for 15 min at room temperature followed by development with DAB, and then the sections were counterstained with Mayer’s Hematoxylin for 2 min. Subsequently, the sections were dehydrated and sealed with neutral gum. For the negative control, PBS was used in place of the primary antibody. The results were evaluated by double grading and semiquantitative grading.
Vector construction and transfection
Three siRNAs (si-1, si-2, si-3) were designed according to the common sequence of CASC9 transcripts in NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), with a nonspecific scramble siRNA as a negative control (si-NC). The siRNAs were designed and synthesized by Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and the sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S2. Briefly, cells at a concentration of 5 × 104/ml were incubated for 24 h in six-well plates in culture medium. When the cell density reached 50–70%, the cells were transfected with CASC9 siRNA and si-NC in the presence of Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, USA). After transfection for 48 h, RNA was collected for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) to verify the knockdown efficiency. The sequences of sh-CASC9 and sh-NC were designed according to the sequences of si-3 and si-NC, respectively as follows: CCGG was added at the 5’ end of the sequence, while TTTTTG was added at the 3’ end of the sequence. Then, a CTCGAG loop was added in the middle, and Age I and EcoRI restriction sequences were added to both ends. The sh-RNAs were synthesized and packaged in lentiviral vectors by Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), designated sh-CASC9 and sh-NC. The sequences are shown in Supplementary Table. S2. During logarithmic growth, SCC15 cells were seeded into 4 ml of DMEM/F12 medium containing 10% FBS to which 1 ml of medium containing the lentiviral vectors and 5 μl of Polybrene were added. The cells were cultured for 24 h in an incubator at 37 °C under an atmosphere of 5% CO2. Fresh culture medium containing 2 μg/ml puromycin was added once per day. Stable pools were obtained 7 days later.
Immunofuorescence assay
Cell lines were seeded on glass coverslips. After incubation in 100% methanol (chilled at −20 °C) at room temperature for 5 min, the cells were washed three times with ice-cold PBS. Next, the cells were incubated with 1% BSA for 30 min and then with antibodies against LC3B (ab192890, abcam, Cambridge, UK) and P62 (ab109012, abcam, Cambridge, UK) overnight at 4 °C. Then, the cells were incubated with Cy3-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) (A0516, Biyuntian, China) for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. Finally, the cells were incubated with DAPI for 5 min, and then the coverslips were visualized under fluorescence microscopy (BX51TRF, OLYMPUS, Japan). The experiment was repeated three times, and five fields were randomly selected to analyze the fluorescence intensity using ImagJ-5.0 software (windows, 64-bit Java 1.8.0_112).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
The cells were harvested, fixed with 4% gluteraldehyde overnight and then postfixed with 2.5% osmium tetroxide. After dehydration in an ascending series of ethanol, the samples were embedded in paraffin and cut into 80-nm sections. Autophagy, morphology and quantity in the sections were examined by transmission electron microscopy (Hitachi-7500, Hitachi Limited, Japan). The number of autophagosomes was calculated by randomly selecting 10 cells in each group using the following formula: autophagosome density = autophagosome number/cell number.
Flow cytometry assay
During logarithmic growth, the cells were digested with 0.25% trypsin and washed twice with PBS. Then, the cell concentration was adjusted to 1 × 106 cells/ml with PBS. Next, 200 μl of Annexin V-FITC staining solution was added to a 1-ml cell suspension and incubated at room temperature for 15 min in the dark. Then, 200 μl of propidium iodide staining solution was added and mixed. Apoptosis was detected by flow cytometry (FACSVantage SE, BD, USA). The apoptotic index was calculated as follows: (number of apoptotic cells / total number of cells tested) × 100%.
TUNEL assay
The TUNEL assay was performed using the in situ cell death detection kit-POD (TUNEL, Roche, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were cultured on glass coverslips overnight. After being fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h, the cells were washed twice with PBS. Next, the cells were blocked with freshly prepared 3% H2O2 dissolved in methanol for 10 min and then washed with PBS. Then, the cells were permeated with freshly prepared 0.1% Triton X-100 at 4 °C for 2 min. After a second round of washes, the slides were then incubated with 50 μl of freshly prepared TUNEL reaction mixture for 1 h at 37 °C in a moist chamber. After being washed twice with PBS, the slices were observed under the fluorescence microscope (BX51TRF, OLYMPUS, Japan). The experiment was repeated three times, and five independent fields were randomly selected to calculate the cell numbers using ImagJ-5.0 software (windows, 64-bit Java 1.8.0_112). The TUNEL-positive rate was calculated as follows: TUNEL-positive cell number / total cell number × 100%.
MTT assay
Cell proliferation was measured using the Cell Proliferation Kit I (MTT) (11465007001, Roche, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First, 1000 cells/100 μl of cell suspension were added into each well in a 96-well plate, and 3 replicate wells were tested in each group. Then, the plates were placed in an incubator overnight (37 °C, 5% CO2). Then, 20 μl of MTT solution was added to each well at 24, 48, 72, 96 h, and incubated for 4 h. After removing the MTT-containing medium, 150 μl of DMSO was added. The absorbance at 490 nm was measured with a microplate reader (Gene Company Limited, Hong Kong, China). Cell growth curves were generated according to time and absorbance.
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay
Total RNA was extracted from tissues or cells with RNAiso Plus (9180, Takara, Japan) according to the instructions, and the OA value of the RNA at 260 nm and 280 nm was measured by Nanodrop ND 2000 (Thermo Scientific) to calculate the RNA concentration and purity. The total RNA was reverse-transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using The PrimeScript RT reagent Kit gDNAEraser (Perfect Real Time) (RR047A, Takara, Japan). Real-time PCR was performed using 2 × SYBR Premix Ex TaqTMII according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primers used to amplify CASC9, LC3B, P62, BCL-2, BAX and the housekeeping gene GAPDH were designed using the Oligo7.0 software, and the sequences are shown in Supplementary Table. S3. The total volume of the reaction solution was 25 μl. A C-1000™ Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) was used for qPCR. The PCR amplification was performed for 40 cycles of 95 °C for 90 s, 95 °C for 10 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. The relative expression level of each gene was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method.
Western blotting
Cells were collected and lysed in ice-cold RIPA lysis buffer (P0013B, Beyotime, Shanghai, China) containing PMSF and phosphatase inhibitor for 30 min. The supernatant was collected after centrifugation at 14000 × g for 5 min. The protein concentration was determined using a BCA protein quantification kit (P0010, Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Then, 30 μg of total protein was separated on an 8 to 15% SDS-PAGE gel, and the protein in the gel was transferred to a 0.45-µm PVDF membrane. The PVDF membrane was blocked by immersion in 5% skim milk for 1 h. Next, the membrane was incubated with primary antibodies against AKT, p-AKT, mTOR, p-mTOR, LC3B, P62, BCL-2, BAX and GAPDH overnight at 4 °C. The details of the antibodies used are shown in Supplementary. Table S4. Then, the membrane was incubated with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled secondary antibody was at 37 °C for 40 min. An ECL-Advance Western Blot Detection system (Bio-Rad) with an enhanced chemiluminescent substrate (34577, thermo scientific, USA) was used for the detection of the protein bands. The intensities of GAPDH were used as a control for all other bands. Each test was performed on the same membrane and repeated 3 times. Data were analyzed using ImagJ-5.0 software (windows, 64-bit Java 1.8.0_112).
In vivo tumorigenicity assay
Ten specific pathogen-free (SPF) BALB/c nu/nu female nude mice (18 to 22 g, 4–6 weeks old) (Chongqing Medical University Laboratory Animal Research Institute) were randomly divided into the sh-CASC9 group and sh -NC group with 5 mice in each group. Then, 0.2 ml of sh-CASC9 and sh-NC SCC15 cell suspensions with a cell concentration of 5 × 107 cells/ml were injected into the left back of each mouse. The tumor size was observed and recorded every 4 days for 4 weeks. After tumor formation was obvious, the nude mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The tumor weight was measured using an electronic balance (A250, Denver Instrument, USA), and the maximum long diameter (a) and minimum short diameter (b) of the tumor were measured with a Vernier caliper. The tumor volume (V) was calculated with the following formula: V = 0.5 × a × b2. The mRNA expression level of LC3B, P62, BCL-2 and BAX in the tumor tissues was detected by RT-qPCR. All animal experimental procedures were approved by the Laboratory Animal Use Management Committee of the Experimental Animal Institute of Chongqing Medical University (Approval number: 2018–040).
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 7.0 (Graphpad Software, La Jolla, CA) and SPSS 23 (IBM, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The Chi-Squared test was used to analyze the relationship between the CASC9, p-AKT and LC3B expression levels and the clinicopathological characteristics. The statistical significance of survival-related factors was analyzed by the Cox regression model in the multivariate analysis. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the difference of overall survival time between the two groups was statistically analyzed by the log-rank test. The two-tailed Student’s t test was used for comparison between two independent groups, and the one-way ANOVA test was used for the comparison of three or more means. Data are shown as the mean ± SD from at least 3 independent experiments. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Program for Graduate Student Research Innovation in Chongqing (CYS17167).
Author contributions
Y.Y. performed experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the paper; D.C. and H.L. performed experiments and analyzed the data; K.Y. designed experiments, analyzed the data and revised the paper.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Edited by B. Zhivotovsky
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at (10.1038/s41419-018-1280-8).
References
- 1.Lala M, Chirovsky D, Cheng JD, Mayawala K. Clinical outcomes with therapies for previously treated recurrent/metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC): a systematic literature review. Oral Oncol. 2018;84:108–120. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Angela C, et al. Oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma--an update. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015;65:401–421. doi: 10.3322/caac.21293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sasahira T, Kirita T. Hallmarks of cancer-related newly prognostic factors of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:2413. doi: 10.3390/ijms19082413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:309–316. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mercer TR, Dinger ME, Mattick JS. Long non-coding RNAs: insights into functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009;10:155–159. doi: 10.1038/nrg2521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rinn JL, Chang HY. Genome regulation by long noncoding RNAs. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012;81:145–166. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-051410-092902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Quinn JJ, Chang HY. Unique features of long non-coding RNA biogenesis and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016;17:47–62. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2015.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Batista PJ, Chang HY. Long noncoding RNAs: cellular address codes in development and disease. Cell. 2013;152:1298–1307. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lin C, Yang L. Long noncoding RNA in cancer: wiring signaling circuitry. Trends Cell Biol. 2018;28:287–301. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2017.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sun M, Kraus WL. From discovery to function_ the expanding roles of long non-coding RNAs in physiology and disease. Endocr. Rev. 2015;36:25–64. doi: 10.1210/er.2014-1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Peng WX, Koirala P, Mo YY. LncRNA-mediated regulation of cell signaling in cancer. Oncogene. 2017;36:5661–5667. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gao P, Wei GH. Genomic insight into the role of lncRNA in cancer susceptibility. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:1239. doi: 10.3390/ijms18061239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Klingenberg, M. etal. The lncRNA CASC9 and RNA binding protein HNRNPL form a complex and co-regulate genes linked to AKT signaling. Hepatology. Preprint at 10.1002/hep.30102 (2018).
- 14.Liang, Y. et al. LncRNA CASC9 promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma metastasis through upregulating LAMC2 expression by interacting with the CREB-binding protein. Cell Death Differ. Preprint at 10.1038/s41418-018-0084-9 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Wu Y, et al. Up-regulation of lncRNA CASC9 promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma growth by negatively regulating PDCD4 expression through EZH2. Mol. Cancer. 2017;16:150. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0715-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ma P, et al. Transcriptome analysis of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors resistance associated long noncoding RNA in non-small cell lung cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017;87:20–26. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.12.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yu X, Lin Y, Sui W, Zou Y, Lv Z. Analysis of distinct long noncoding RNA transcriptional fingerprints in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Med. 2017;6:673–680. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shang C, et al. Silence of cancer susceptibility candidate 9 inhibits gastric cancer and reverses chemoresistance. Oncotarget. 2017;8:15393–15398. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Su X, Li G, Liu W. The long noncoding RNA cancer cusceptibility candidate 9 promotes nasopharyngeal carcinogenesis via stabilizing HIF1α. DNA Cell Biol. 2017;36:394–400. doi: 10.1089/dna.2016.3615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kim YC, Guan KL. mTOR: a pharmacologic target for autophagy regulation. J. Clin. Invest. 2015;125:25–32. doi: 10.1172/JCI73939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Levine B. Cell biology: autophagy and cancer. Nature. 2007;446:745–747. doi: 10.1038/446745a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shintani T, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy in health and disease_ a double-edged sword. Science. 2004;306:990–995. doi: 10.1126/science.1099993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.White E, DiPaola RS. The double-edged sword of autophagy modulation in cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009;15:5308–5316. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kapoor V, Zaharieva MM, Das SN, Berger MR. Erufosine simultaneously induces apoptosis and autophagy by modulating the Akt-mTOR signaling pathway in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2012;319:39–48. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.He C, Klionsky DJ. Regulation mechanisms and signaling pathways of autophagy. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009;43:67–93. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102808-114910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Eddy SR, Non-coding RNA. genes and the modern RNA world. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001;2:919–929. doi: 10.1038/35103511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Alexander RP, Fang G, Rozowsky J, Snyder M, Gerstein MB. Annotating non-coding regions of the genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010;11:559–571. doi: 10.1038/nrg2814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Iyer MK, et al. The landscape of long noncoding RNAs in the human transcriptome. Nat. Genet. 2015;47:199–208. doi: 10.1038/ng.3192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wahlestedt C. Targeting long non-coding RNA to therapeutically upregulate gene expression. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2013;12:433–446. doi: 10.1038/nrd4018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gupta RA, et al. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR reprograms chromatin state to promote cancer metastasis. Nature. 2010;464:1071–1076. doi: 10.1038/nature08975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gibb, E. A. et al. Long non-coding RNAs are expressed in oral mucosa and altered in oral premalignant lesions. Oral Oncol. 47, 1055–1061 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 32.Bussemakers MJ, et al. DD3: A new prostate-specific gene, highly overexpressed in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 1999;59:5975–5979. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Monisha J, et al. NGAL is downregulated in oral squamous cell carcinoma and leads to increased survival, proliferation, migration and chemoresistance. Cancers. 2018;10:228. doi: 10.3390/cancers10070228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Irimie AI, et al. A looking-glass of non-coding rnas in oral cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:2620. doi: 10.3390/ijms18122620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ling H, Fabbri M, Calin GA. MicroRNAs and other non-coding RNAs as targets for anticancer drug development. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2013;12:847–865. doi: 10.1038/nrd4140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Modarresi F, et al. Inhibition of natural antisense transcripts in vivo results in gene-specific transcriptional upregulation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012;30:453–459. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Washietl S, Kellis M, Garber M. Evolutionary dynamics and tissue specificity of human long noncoding RNAs in six mammals. Genome Res. 2014;24:616–628. doi: 10.1101/gr.165035.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chang F, et al. Involvement of PI3K/Akt pathway in cell cycle progression, apoptosis, and neoplastic transformation: a target for cancer chemotherapy. Leukemia. 2003;17:590–603. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Amornphimoltham P, et al. Mammalian target of rapamycin, a molecular target in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Cancer Res. 2005;65:9953–9961. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Martini M, De Santis MC, Braccini L, Gulluni F, Hirsch E. PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and cancer: an updated review. Ann. Med. 2014;46:372–383. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2014.912836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Adhauliya N, Kalappanavar AN, Ali IM, Annigeri RG. Autophagy: a boon or bane in oral cancer. Oral. Oncol. 2016;61:120–126. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sharif T, et al. Phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase inhibition induces p-mTOR-independent autophagy and promotes multilineage differentiation in embryonal carcinoma stem-like cells. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:990. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0997-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pagotto A, et al. Autophagy inhibition reduces chemoresistance and tumorigenic potential of human ovarian cancer stem cells. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e2943. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mariño G, Niso-Santano M, Baehrecke EH, Kroemer G. Self-consumption: the interplay of autophagy and apoptosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014;15:81–94. doi: 10.1038/nrm3735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhao Z, Han F, Yang S, Wu J, Zhan W. Oxamate-mediated inhibition of lactate dehydrogenase induces protective autophagy in gastric cancer cells: Involvement of the Akt–mTOR signaling pathway. Cancer Lett. 2015;358:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.11.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yeh PS, et al. Honokiol induces autophagy of neuroblastoma cells through activating the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and endoplasmic reticular stress/ERK1/2 signaling pathways and suppressing cell migration. Cancer Lett. 2016;370:66–77. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.So KY, Lee BH, Oh SH. The critical role of autophagy in cadmium-induced immunosuppression regulated by endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated calpain activation in RAW264.7 mouse monocytes. Toxicology. 2018;393:15–25. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2017.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fan Y, et al. Resveratrol induces autophagy-dependent apoptosis in HL-60 cells. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:581. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4504-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Islam MA, Sooro MA, Zhang P. Autophagic regulation of p62 is critical for cancer therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:e1405. doi: 10.3390/ijms19051405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bjørkøy G, et al. p62_SQSTM1 forms protein aggregates degraded by autophagy and has a protective effect on huntingtin-induced cell death. J. Cell. Biol. 2005;171:603–614. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200507002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.