Table 1. Common tests for the assessment of neuropathy.
Type of nerve | Investigation | Advantages and disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Large fibre | Nerve conduction studies | Gold standard
Sensitive, specific, and reproducible and easily standardised Must be done by trained professional |
Large and small fibres | Neuropathy disability score | Good predictor for risk of ulceration
Subjective Does not detect sub-clinical large fibre damage |
Small fibre | Quantitative sensory testing | Reproducible and reliable
Subjective |
Skin biopsy | Gold standard for small fibre testing
Reliable and reproducible Invasive procedure which needs specialised laboratory service |
|
Corneal confocal
microscopy |
Rapid, reproducible, non-invasive
Detects small fibre damage and tracks worsening and improvement in small phase 2b clinical trials Requires training to perform |