Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that certain vaccines, including Bacillus-Calmette Guérin (BCG), can induce changes in the innate immune system with non-specific memory characteristics, termed ‘trained immunity’. Here we present the results of a randomised, controlled phase 1 clinical trial in 20 healthy male and female volunteers to evaluate the induction of immunity and protective efficacy of the anti-tuberculosis BCG vaccine against a controlled human malaria infection. After malaria challenge infection, BCG vaccinated volunteers present with earlier and more severe clinical adverse events, and have significantly earlier expression of NK cell activation markers and a trend towards earlier phenotypic monocyte activation. Furthermore, parasitemia in BCG vaccinated volunteers is inversely correlated with increased phenotypic NK cell and monocyte activation. The combined data demonstrate that BCG vaccination alters the clinical and immunological response to malaria, and form an impetus to further explore its potential in strategies for clinical malaria vaccine development.
Immune activation induces long-term alterations of setpoints, impacting responses to subsequent unrelated stimuli. Here the authors show that volunteers vaccinated with BCG respond to controlled human malaria infection with increased clinical symptoms and an inverse correlation between immune activation markers and parasitemia.
Introduction
With nearly 200 million clinical cases and nearly half a million deaths in 20151, malaria remains a major global health problem and there is pressing need for a highly efficacious vaccine. RTS,S (Mosquirix®, GlaxoSmithKline), the only registered malaria vaccine, confers only modest, short-term protection2. It is clear that novel and improved malaria vaccine strategies are required for eradication.
To date malaria vaccine research has focused primarily on the induction of strong antibody or T-cell responses. However, recent evidence suggests that certain vaccines, including the Bacillus-Calmette Guérin (BCG) developed against tuberculosis, can induce long-term changes in the innate immune system with non-specific memory characteristics. This BCG-induced ‘trained immunity’3 increases pro-inflammatory cytokine responses to other pathogens4,5 and is mediated by epigenetic changes in innate immune cells6,7. The clinical relevance of trained innate immunity has been demonstrated in mice, where it reduced mortality of Staphylococcus aureus sepsis6 and Candida albicans infection8.
There is also evidence that BCG administration reduces parasitemia in rodent malaria models9–12, and in endemic areas BCG vaccination has been associated with reduced malaria-specific mortality13. However, any direct evidence for protective efficacy of BCG-induced trained immunity against malaria, or any clinically relevant pathogen, in humans is lacking.
Here, we show that a subset of BCG vaccinated healthy volunteers have accelerated NK cell and monocyte activation that correlates with reduced parasitemia after controlled human malaria infection (CHMI). These findings are consistent with the possibility that BCG vaccination may induce trained immunity with functional activity against another human pathogen in vivo.
Results
BCG vaccination alters the clinical course of P. falciparum infection
In a single-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial, ten healthy BCG- and malaria-naive volunteers received an intradermal BCG vaccination, while ten control volunteers received no intervention. A single volunteer was excluded post vaccination due to a concomitant Epstein–Barr virus infection. Five weeks after vaccination, 9 BCG vaccinated and 10 control volunteers underwent a Controlled Human Malaria Infection (CHMI) by exposure to bites of five P. falciparum (Pf) infected female Anopheles mosquitoes (Supplementary Fig. 1). Randomisation was stratified by gender in order to ensure an equal distribution of male and female volunteers. Other baseline characteristics were similar between groups (Supplementary Table 1). Study primary endpoints were (1) Frequency and magnitude of adverse events and (2) Time to blood stage parasitemia detectable by quantitative PCR (qPCR). Study secondary endpoints were (1) Changes in cellular (innate and adaptive) immune responses and (2) Changes in plasma cytokine levels.
All volunteers developed parasitemia as detected by qPCR after challenge infection. Blood samples from 8 out of 9 BCG vaccinated and all controls exceeded the predetermined threshold of 100 parasites per millilitre blood on day 7, which was followed by a curative treatment with atovaqone/proguanil. One BCG vaccinated volunteer became positive on day 9. Interestingly, the variation in day 7 parasitemia was much higher in the BCG vaccinated group (geometric mean: 752 Pf/mL, 95% CI: 217–2602 Pf/mL) than in the controls (geometric mean: 813 Pf/mL, 95% CI 481–1373 Pf/mL) (Levene’s test for equality of variances: p = 0.005, Fig. 1a, b).
BCG vaccinated volunteers developed clinical symptoms of malaria infection at an earlier time point and reported a higher frequency of moderate or severe clinical symptoms than control volunteers (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon Test, p = 0.01, Fig. 1c; Supplementary table 2). The moderate and severe adverse event frequency in the BCG vaccinated group was also significantly higher than in historical controls (Supplementary Fig. 2). In line with this finding, BCG vaccinated volunteers presented with a more significant decrease in platelet count (mean relative change BCG group: 0.689, 95% CI: 0.637–0.741; control group: 0.778, 95% CI: 0.703–0.853; student’s t-test: p = 0.05; Supplementary Fig. 3). Moreover, in a subset of BCG vaccinated volunteers, circulating platelets, lymphocytes and neutrophils dropped earlier (Fig. 1d–f). There was no significant difference in temperature during follow-up (Supplementary Fig. 4).
BCG vaccinated volunteers show memory-like immune responses
To study the kinetics of the immune response to CHMI, whole blood flow cytometry was performed to determine lymphocyte, monocyte and neutrophil activation. Post-BCG vaccination but prior to CHMI and during parasite liver stage (day 5 post-challenge), there was no activation of peripheral blood leucocytes in either group as measured by the expression of the early activation marker CD69 in lymphocytes, or the expression of CD16, the antigen presenting molecule HLA-DR, and the co-stimulatory molecule CD86, in monocytes (Fig. 2a–g). On day 7, coinciding with the first appearance of blood stage parasites, there was a marked increase in the proportion of CD56dim NK cells expressing CD69 in half of the BCG vaccinated volunteers, absent in the control group (Mann–Whitney U-test of vaccinated vs. controls: p = 0.03, Fig. 2a). Instead, control volunteers primarily showed immune activation only after treatment. CD69 expression on gamma-delta (γδ) T cells, NKT cells and alpha-beta (αβ) T cells followed a similar pattern, with the same subgroup of BCG vaccinees showing activation on day 7 post-challenge (Fig. 2b–d). There was no significant increase in CD69 expression on CD56bright NK cells after challenge (Supplementary Fig. 5).
Next, the expression of CD16, HLA-DR and CD86, were determined on CD14+ monocytes (Fig. 2e–g), markers previously shown to increase with monocyte activation during CHMI14. The percentage of activated neutrophils, those lacking CD62L with high CD11b expression, was also analysed (Fig. 2h). On day 7 after challenge, the same subgroup of BCG vaccinated volunteers showed increased expression of HLA-DR and CD86 on CD14+CD16− monocytes, which was absent in controls.
The three BCG vaccinees with the strongest lymphocyte and monocyte activation also responded with early increases in plasma interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) or granzyme B, and inflammatory C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations (Fig. 2i–k).
BCG-induced trained immunity correlates with lower parasitemia
We next evaluated whether this altered innate immune phenotype had consequences for control of parasitemia. While at group level this primary endpoint was not statistically met, we identify a subgroup of approximately half of BCG vaccinated volunteers with lower levels of parasitemia after challenge. These effects were correlated with changes in the immune parameters defined as secondary endpoints. Indeed, the subset of BCG vaccinated volunteers with early lymphocyte and monocyte activation were also those with lower parasitemia within the BCG group (Fig. 3a, b and Supplementary Fig. 6), and early NK cell CD69 expression and monocyte HLA-DR expression were correlated with decreased parasitemia. In contrast, increased neutrophil activation in BCG vaccinated volunteers was not associated with decreased parasitemia (Supplementary Fig. 7).
BCG augments P. falciparum-induced cytotoxic lymphocyte responses
NK cells stimulated with P. falciparum-infected red blood cells (PfRBC) in vitro showed no difference in degranulation (defined by CD107a staining), IFN-γ or granzyme B production in BCG vaccinated versus controls prior to challenge infection (Fig. 4). However, 37 days after challenge infection, NK cells from BCG vaccinated volunteers produced significantly more granzyme B (Mann–Whitney U-test: p = 0.03) with a tendency towards increased degranulation, compared to controls.
The induction of T-cell responses after CHMI was also analysed in both groups (Supplementary Fig. 8). Again, there were no measurable differences between the groups after BCG vaccination and prior to malaria infection. However, post CHMI there were more P. falciparum-specific CD4+ T cells producing granzyme B in BCG vaccinated volunteers (Mann–Whitney U-test: p = 0.02). Furthermore, there were trends towards increased degranulation and granyzme B production in γδT cells.
Finally, the induction of P. falciparum-specific antibody responses was analysed in both groups. There were no differences in antibody responses to the immunodominant Circumsporozoite protein (CSP) expressed on sporozoite stages, the liver stage antigen (LSA) expressed on liver stages or total lysate of asexual blood stages (Supplementary Fig. 9a–c). Furthermore, BCG vaccination did not influence the ability of antibodies to block sporozoite invasion into the HC-04 hepatoma cell line (Supplementary Fig. 9d).
Discussion
Here, we provide in vivo evidence suggestive of the induction of functional trained immunity by BCG vaccination against a heterologous, clinically relevant human pathogen. The existence of trained immunity after BCG vaccination has been previously demonstrated in vitro4,5,15 and in murine models6,8. However, translation of such findings into equivalent human responses in vivo has so far been limited to a single study where BCG reduced viremia after vaccination with the non-pathogenic, live-attenuated yellow fever vaccine16.
The vaccinated volunteers develop early clinical symptoms and laboratory abnormalities, and earlier and stronger inflammatory responses in a subset of volunteers are associated with lower parasitemia. This altered course of immune activation in BCG vaccinated individuals sharply contrasts with CHMIs in control volunteers of this and previous studies, where innate immune activation is only detectable just prior to microscopic parasitemia17–19, i.e., at 3−4 days after parasites emerge from the liver. In addition, the course of clinical symptoms is strikingly different from that seen in other, similar CHMI studies at our centre, where symptoms are typically absent on day 7 post-challenge20–22. The prompt activation of NK cells in BCG vaccinated volunteers apparently represents a true memory phenotype rather than persistent inflammation, as immediately prior to CHMI there was no difference in activation of peripheral blood lymphocytes between the control and test groups.
Interestingly, the earlier and stronger immune activation markers in half the BCG vaccinated volunteers correlated with a reduced parasitemia in early infection, whereas those with higher parasitemia had no immune activation on day 7 after challenge. This may be due to either reduced release of parasites emerging from the liver or by rapid clearance of blood stage parasites. Indeed, IFN-γ produced by liver lymphocytes in mice suppresses schizont development and subsequent parasitemia23,24. In this study we neither detect peripheral blood leucocyte activation, nor increases in circulating IFN-γ or CRP during the liver stage. However, the contribution of undetected local inflammatory processes in the liver cannot be excluded. More sensitive techniques such as (single-cell) transcriptomic analysis may be needed to study peripheral blood responses during the liver stage. Alternatively, the observed reduction of parasite load after BCG vaccination may be the result of efficient asexual clearance as previously shown in C57BL/6 mice infected with P. yoelii12. In the current CHMI, estimation of asexual parasite multiplication has not been possible since curative treatment was administered at very low parasite densities. In future studies, this might be addressed by allowing longer duration of parasitemia, or alternatively, by using a blood stage challenge infection with a low inoculum, which would allow for even longer exposure to blood stage parasites.
The changes in the clinical and parasitological outcomes in BCG vaccinated volunteers are also associated with P. falciparum-specific elicited cellular immune responses after CHMI, including an improved P. falciparum-induced NK cell granzyme B production and a trend towards increased degranulation. Such memory-like NK cell responses after CHMI have been described previously25, and found to be T-cell dependent. In addition, the number of granzyme B producing CD4+ T cells in response to P. falciparum is also increased with a trend towards increased CD4+ T cell IFN-γ production and γδT cell granzyme B production and degranulation. The combined data do suggest that the altered kinetics of immune cell activation in BCG vaccinated volunteers may improve their ability to generate P. falciparum-specific responses as has been shown in relation to other vaccines26. However, a CHMI with five mosquito bites is not likely to induce significant cellular or humoral immunity, and this hypothesis should be tested in a study combining BCG with a malaria vaccine.
A recent study examined the epigenetic and transcriptomic changes in monocytes of healthy volunteers vaccinated with BCG16, showing genome-wide changes in histone H3 acetylation at lysine 27 (H3K27ac) in ‘responding’ volunteers. Our study finds functional changes in NK cells as well, confirming previous in vitro observations15. This may be the result of increased monocyte activation, as NK cell activity against malaria is partially dependent on monocytes27. Whether BCG induces epigenetic changes in NK cells as well should be subject of a future study.
This study is limited by its small sample size and the subsequent lack of sufficient power for comprehensive statistical analysis of all immune responses. However, the fact that strong correlations can be found in such a small sample size is encouraging. It is striking that there is such clear dichotomy between volunteers, with 4 out of 9 ‘responders’, showing accelerated immune responses and a relative decrease in parasitemia. Interestingly, the ‘non-responders’ in this cohort seem to have increased parasitemia compared to the controls. Other studies with BCG-induced trained innate immunity have also identified significant variability in responses between individuals28. The small size of this study, however, does prohibit a clear identification of the factors that predict the effect of BCG vaccination, and future larger cohort studies are needed to explore the factors underlying this variation.
For this study, the observation period of 5 weeks was chosen based on evidence of BCG-induced protection against malaria in mice at 1–2 months post vaccination9–12 and BCG-induced trained innate immunity in humans at 2 weeks and 3 months post vaccination5. Since the observation period is limited to 5 weeks, it will be important in future studies to determine the duration of this effect, even more so as the in vitro effects seem to persist up to a year after vaccination4.
Yet even in the possible absence of longer term effects, these findings may still have clinical implications for malaria as BCG vaccination may improve immunity to malaria, before sufficient adaptive immune responses have been generated to prevent (severe) disease. Although its immune modulatory properties have been known for decades29, BCG is currently facing renewed interest after randomised controlled trials have shown it decreases neonatal mortality due to sepsis and respiratory infections30,31. There is limited data on BCG and the incidence of malaria from observational studies, with one study showing a reduction in malaria mortality in BCG vaccinated infants13. Non-specific beneficial clinical effects of BCG vaccination might be explained by trained innate immunity32,33, supporting the further exploration of these effects to better inform the place of BCG in vaccination regimens. Although BCG vaccination is common practice in malaria-endemic countries as part of the WHO Expanded Programme on Immunisation, potential efficacy against malaria and other pathogens underscores the need for investment in timely and correct BCG administration. Epidemiological data and randomised trials suggest revaccination with live-attenuated vaccines such as BCG confers additional protection against all cause mortality34. It will be important to determine whether BCG revaccination induces non-specific beneficial effects against malaria. Although BCG revaccination did not reduce malaria morbidity in one study in Guinea-Bissau35 potential confounding effects of other vaccines, including DTP with known interference with the overall non-specific effects of BCG36 was not taken into account.
In conclusion, BCG vaccination alters some of the the clinical, immunological and parasitological outcomes of malaria infection in a subset of volunteers. Earlier NK cell and monocyte activation in this subset of vaccinated volunteers is consistent with the possibility that induction of trained innate immunity in vivo may have functional activity against a heterologous pathogen in humans. These findings may open perspectives and pathways for clinical vaccine development.
Methods
Clinical trial
This single-centre, single-blinded randomised controlled trial was conducted at the Radboud university medical centre (Nijmegen, The Netherlands) from August 2016 until February 2017. Prior to inclusion, study volunteers were medically screened as described previously37 and provided written informed consent. The trial was approved by the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO NL56222.091.15) of the Netherlands, performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice and prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02692963).
Twenty healthy, BCG-naive volunteers (age 18–35 years) without a history of malaria or residence in a malaria-endemic area in the 6 months before study entry were included and randomly assigned to two groups. Male and female volunteers were allocated separately, to ensure an equal distribution between groups. Volunteers had not received any other vaccinations within 3 months of enrolment. Ten subjects received standard dose (0.1 mL of the reconstituted vaccine) of intradermal BCG vaccination (BCG Bulgaria, Intervax) 5 weeks prior to challenge infection. Ten controls (group 2) received no vaccination.
Five weeks after BCG vaccination, both groups (BCG vaccinated, n = 9; 1 excluded after BCG vaccination and controls, n = 10) were exposed to bites of five Plasmodium falciparum NF54 strain infected Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes (sporozoite challenge). Details on the challenge infection are provided in Supplementary Table 3. Subjects and investigators were not blinded, whereas those performing the qPCR analysis were blinded until after the last qPCR data had been collected. qPCR was performed prospectively, once daily from day 6 after CHMI until day 3 after antimalarial treatment, according to previously published protocols22,38,39. All volunteers were treated with a curative regimen of antimalarial drugs (atovaquone/proguanil) once the treatment threshold of 100 parasites/mL blood was exceeded detected by qPCR or presumptively on day 21 after challenge if qPCR remained below treatment threshold.
Recording of adverse events
Subjects recorded clinical symptoms in a diary, from the time of BCG vaccination until 37 days after the CHMI. Both solicited and unsolicited adverse events were recorded after questioning by the investigators at set time points: prior to BCG vaccination, prior to the CHMI, daily from day 6 after infection until 3 days after antimalarial treatment, and on day 37 post CHMI21,40. Adverse events were graded according to criteria defined in the Clinical Trial Protocol: mild (grade 1): awareness of symptoms that are easily tolerated and do not interfere with usual daily activity; moderate (grade 2): discomfort that interferes with or limits usual daily activity; severe (grade 3): disabling, with subsequent inability to perform usual daily activity, resulting in absence or required bed rest. Relatedness was assessed by the investigator, also on the bases of pre-defined criteria: probable: an adverse event that follows a reasonable temporal sequence from the challenge procedure and cannot be reasonably explained by the known characteristics of the subject’s clinical state; possible: an adverse event for which insufficient information exists to exclude that the event is related to the study procedure; not related: an event for which sufficient information exists to indicate that the aetiology is unrelated either because of the temporal sequence of events or because of the subject’s clinical state or other therapies.
Oral temperature was measured by volunteers and recorded in the symptom diary every morning and more frequently during symptoms. Tympanic temperature was measured by the study physician at every follow-up visit. Fever was scored as follows: mild (grade 1): 37.6–38.0 °C; moderate (grade 2): 38.1–39.0 °C; severe (grade 3): ≥39.1 °C.
Whole blood flow cytometry
One-hundred microlitres(lymphocytes) or 50 µL (monocytes and neutrophils) of fresh EDTA blood was stained directly with antibodies. For lymphocyte analysis, samples were stained with CD3-AlexaFluor700 (Biolegend; clone OKT3; catalogue number 317340; final dilution 1:640), pan-γδTCR−PE (Beckman Coulter; clone IMMU510; catalogue number COIM1349; final dilution 1:160), CD56-Brilliant Violet(BV)421 (Biolegend; clone HCD56; catalogue number 318328; final dilution 1:320), CD16-APC-eFluor780 (eBiosciences; clone CB16; catalogue number 47–0168–42; final dilution 1:640), CD69-PerCP-Cy5.5 (Biolegend; clone FN50; catalogue number 310926; final dilution 1:640). For monocyte analysis, samples were stained with a lineage mix containing CD3-PerCP-Cy5.5 (Biolegend; clone HIT3a; catalogue number 300328; final dilution 1:400), CD19-PerCP-Cy5.5 (Biolegend; clone HIB19; catalogue number 302230; final dilution 1:200) and CD56-PerCP-Cy5.5 (Biolegend; clone HCD56; catalogue number 318322; final dilution 1:100), CD14-FITC (Biolegend; clone HCD14; catalogue number 325604; final dilution 1:80), CD16-PE-Cy7 (Biolegend; clone 3G8; catalogue number 302016; final dilution 1:1280), HLA-DR−APC-Cy7 (Biolegend; clone L243; catalogue number 307618; final dilution 1:160) and CD86−Pacific Blue (Biolegend; clone IT2.2; catalogue number 305423; final dilution 1:100). For neutrophil analysis samples were stained with CD14-PerCP (Biolegend; clone HCD14; catalogue number 325632; final dilution 1:30), HLA-DR-APC (Biolegend; clone L243; catalogue number 307610; final dilution 1:80), CD16−APC-eFluor780 (eBiosciences; clone CB16; catalogue number 47–0168–42; final dilution 1:1280), CD62L-PE-Cy7 (eBioscience; clone DREG-56; catalogue number 25–0629–42; final dilution 1:1280) and CD11b-BV510 (Biolegend; clone ICRF44; catalogue number 301334; final dilution 1:180). Samples were stained for 30 min at 4° C (C) in the dark. After staining, erythrocytes were lysed for 5 min at 4 °C with 1 mL BD FACS Lysis buffer, followed by centrifugation. Cell pellets were washed once with 1 mL FACS buffer (0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS) and resuspended in PBS with 1% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and analysed on a Gallios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) the same day. Flow cytometry data was analysed using Flow Jo software (version 10.0.8 for Apple OS). The gating strategy and representative plots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 10.
PBMC isolation, cryopreservation and thawing
Blood samples for peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) isolation were collected at inclusion (incl), prior to challenge (C−1) and 37 and 121 days after challenge infection (C + 37, C + 121). PBMC were isolated by density gradient centrifugation from citrate anti-coagulated blood using vacutainer cell preparation tubes (CPT; BD Diagnostics). Following four washes in ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS), cells were counted and cryopreserved at a concentration of 10 × 106 cells/mL in ice-cold foetal calf serum (Gibco)/10% DMSO (Merck) using Mr. Frosty freezing containers (Nalgene). Samples were stored in vapour-phase nitrogen. Immediately prior to use, cells were thawed, washed twice in Dutch-modified RPMI 1640 (Gibco/Invitrogen) and counted in 0·1% Trypan blue with 5% Zap-o-Globin II Lytic Reagent (Beckman Coulter) to assess cell viability.
PBMC restimulation
For lymphocyte responses, PBMCs taken at inclusion, C-1, C + 37, and C + 121 were stimulated with purified NF54 strain schizonts or uninfected erythrocytes. Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Dutch Modification; Gibco) with 5 mg/mL gentamycin (Centraform), 100 mM pyruvate (Gibco), 200 mM glutamax (Gibco), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated pooled human A + serum (obtained from Sanquin Bloodbank, Nijmegen, The Netherlands). Anti-CD107a-Pacific Blue antibody (Biolegend; clone H4A3; catalogue number 328624; final dilution 1:400) was added throughout co-culture. Brefeldin A (10 µg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich) and monansin (2 µM; eBioscience) were added after 20 h. After an additional 4 h of stimulation, cells were washed and stained with a fixable viability dye labelled with eFlour780 (eBioscience) for 30 min at 4° C. After washing cells were stained with antibodies against surface markers: CD3-ECD (Beckman Coulter; clone UCHT1; catalogue number A07748; final dilution 1:100), CD4-FITC (BD Biosciences; clone SK3; catalogue number 340133; final dilution 1:20), CD8-AlexaFluor700 (Biolegend; clone HIT8A; catalogue number 300920; final dilution 1:2000), pan-γδTCR-PE (Beckman Coulter; clone IMMU510; catalogue number COIM1349; final dilution 1:160), and CD56-PerCP-Cy5.5 (Biolegend; clone HCD56; catalogue number 318322; final dilution 1:100), for 30 min at 4 degrees. Cells were washed and fixed with Foxp3 fixation/permeabilization buffer (eBioscience) for 30 min at 4 degrees. After washing with permeabilization buffer (eBioscience) cells were stained for intracellular cytokines with IFN-γ-PE-Cy7 (Biolegend; clone 4 S.B3; catalogue number 502528; final dilution 1:200) and granzyme B-AlexaFluor647 (Biolegend; clone GB11; catalogue number 515406; final dilution 1:200) for 30 min at 4 degrees. After washing with permeabilization buffer, cells were taken up in PBS with 1% PFA. Cells stimulated PMA (10 ng/mL; Sigma) and ionomycin (1 µg/mL; Sigma) for 4 h were used as a positive control.
Samples were analysed on a Gallios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) the same day. Flow cytometry data was analysed using Flow Jo software (version 10.0.8 for Apple OS). CD107a and cytokine responses to PfRBC were corrected for uRBC at every time point (thus, defined as percent increase over background), and then corrected for baseline (pre-vaccination) responses. Gating strategy and representative plots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 11.
Circulating cytokines and granzyme B
Plasma concentrations of TNF-α, IL-1β, (detection range 0.98–4000 pg/mL) IL-6 (0.36−1500 pg/mL), IL-8 (0.62–2500 pg/mL), IL-10, (2.92–12,000 pg/mL) IFN-γ (1.22–5000 pg/mL) and granzyme B (2–10.000 pg/mL) were measured in citrate plasma using a Luminex assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Milliplex, Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).
High sensitivity C-reactive protein
Automated hsCRP measurements were performed on citrated plasma samples with immunonephelometry with a Behring Nephelometer Analyser following the manufacturers’ instructions, using reagents and calibrators specifically designed for high sensitivity measurements. The detection limit was 0.16 mg/L.
Malaria-specific antibody ELISA
Malaria-specific antibody levels were determined by standardised ELISA as described previously41. In short, plates were coated with circumsporozoite protein (CSP), liver stage antigen-1 (LSA1) protein or lysed ring stage parasites. Citrated plasma from volunteers was diluted 50x and 150x and analysed in duplicate. A standard curve was generated by serial twofold dilutions of serum from a pool of 100 Tanzanian adults living in an endemic area (HIT serum). ELISA data analysis was performed with Auditable Data Analysis and Management System for ELISA (ADAMSEL, version 1.1). Post-challenge plasma samples were corrected for pre-challenge responses.
Sporozoite invasion assay
HC-04 human hepatoma cells (obtained from MR4) were seeded in collagen coated 96-well plates (coated with 0.056 mg/mL for 1 h; Collagen from Rat Tail, Sigma-Aldrich) at 50,000 cells per well. Sixteen hours after seeding, NF54 P. falciparum sporozoites were pre-incubated on ice for 30 min with 10% heat-inactivated pre- or post-challenge citrate plasma from volunteers and 10% heat-inactivated serum from non-immune adult. Sporozoites incubated with 10% heat-inactivated serum from highly immune Tanzanian adults and 10% non-immune serum, or 20% non-immune serum served as positive and negative control, respectively. Following pre-incubation, 50,000 sporozoites were added per well in triplicate. Plates were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min (Eppendorf Centrifuge 5810R) and incubated for 3 h on 37 °C, 5% CO2.
After three hours, wells were washed three times with PBS to remove medium, antibodies and non-invaded sporozoites. Subsequently, cells and any extracellular adherent sporozoites were dissociated by incubating with 0.05% trypsin with EDTA (ThermoFisher) for 5 min at 37 °C, followed by neutralisation with an equal volume 10% heat-inactivated human serum in PBS. Cells were transferred into 96-well V-bottom plates, spun down at 1700 rpm for 4 min at 4 °C.
Cells were washed with PBS and fixed with Foxp3 fixation/permeabilization buffer (eBioscience). After washing with permeabilization buffer (eBioscience), intracellular sporozoites were stained with FITC-labelled 3SP2 antibody (monoclonal antibody against CSP, published previously42) for 30 min at 4 °C. After washing in permeabilization buffer cells were taken up in 1% paraformaldehyde and analysed on a Gallios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) the same day.
Flow cytometry data was analysed using Flow Jo software (version 10.0.8 for Apple OS). Live cells were gated based on forward scatter/sideways scatter characteristics and percent invasion was defined as percentage of live cells positive for FITC. Post-challenge samples were compared to pre-challenge samples.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Jolanda Klaassen, Laura Pelser-Posthumus, Jacqueline Kuhnen and Astrid Pouwelsen for technical assistance with generation of infected mosquitoes and with performing the malaria challenge infection. We also thank Heidi Lemmers, Kiki Schraa, Helga Dijkstra, Michelle Damen, Mark Gresnigt, Martin Jaeger, Berenice Rosler for their assistance with the PBMC isolations and cytokine ELISAs, and Anieck Lomans for her assistance in setting up the NK cell flow cytometry analysis. We thank Prof. Jan Smit for his advice as safety monitor for the clinical trial. Finally, we would like to thank all the volunteers who participated in this trial. MGN was supported by an ERC Consolidator grant (#310372) and a Spinoza grant of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research.
Author contributions
J.W., M.G.N. and R.W.S. conceived and designed the clinical trial, which was performed by J.W., C.d.B., Q.d.M., A.J.v.d.V. and R.W.S., M.v.d.V.B., W.G., R.S. and G.J.v.G. generated parasites and infected mosquitoes for the clinical trial, and provided blood stage parasites for the immunological assays. J.W., C.d.B., W.G., R.S., R.J.W.A., M.C.B., F.K., S.J.C.F.M.M., and A.S.P.Y. conducted the immunological experiments. C.C.H. and K.T. performed qPCR analysis. J.W., C.d.B., R.v.C., P.A., C.S.B., M.G.N. and R.W.S. analysed and interpreted the clinical and immunological data. J.W. and C.d.B. wrote the manuscript, which was critically reviewed and approved by all authors.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request. A reporting summary for this Article is available as a Supplementary Information file.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Jona Walk L., Charlotte J. de Bree.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-019-08659-3.
References
- 1.WHO. World Malaria Report 2015. (World Health Organization, Geneva, 2015).
- 2.Olotu A, et al. Seven-year efficacy of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine among young african children. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374:2519–2529. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Netea MG, Latz E, Mills KH, O’Neill LA. Innate immune memory: a paradigm shift in understanding host defense. Nat. Immunol. 2015;16:675–679. doi: 10.1038/ni.3178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kleinnijenhuis J, et al. Long-lasting effects of BCG vaccination on both heterologous Th1/Th17 responses and innate trained immunity. J. Innate Immun. 2014;6:152–158. doi: 10.1159/000355628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kleinnijenhuis J, et al. Bacille Calmette-Guerin induces NOD2-dependent nonspecific protection from reinfection via epigenetic reprogramming of monocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012;109:17537–17542. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202870109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cheng SC, et al. mTOR− and HIF-1alpha-mediated aerobic glycolysis as metabolic basis for trained immunity. Science. 2014;345:1250684. doi: 10.1126/science.1250684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Saeed S, et al. Epigenetic programming of monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation and trained innate immunity. Science. 2014;345:1251086. doi: 10.1126/science.1251086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Quintin J, et al. Candida albicans infection affords protection against reinfection via functional reprogramming of monocytes. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;12:223–232. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Clark IA, Allison AC, Cox FE. Protection of mice against Babesia and Plasmodium with BCG. Nature. 1976;259:309–311. doi: 10.1038/259309a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Matsumoto S, et al. Mycobacterium bovis bacillus calmette-guerin induces protective immunity against infection by Plasmodium yoelii at blood-stage depending on shifting immunity toward Th1 type and inducing protective IgG2a after the parasite infection. Vaccine. 2000;19:779–787. doi: 10.1016/S0264-410X(00)00257-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Murphy JR. Host defenses in murine malaria: nonspecific resistance to Plasmodium berghei generated in response to Mycobacterium bovis infection or Corynebacterium parvum stimulation. Infect. Immun. 1981;33:199–211. doi: 10.1128/iai.33.1.199-211.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Parra M, et al. Molecular analysis of non-specific protection against murine malaria induced by BCG vaccination. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e66115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Roth A, et al. BCG vaccination scar associated with better childhood survival in Guinea-Bissau. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2005;34:540–547. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Teirlinck AC, et al. Plasmodium falciparum infection of human volunteers activates monocytes and CD16 + dendritic cells and induces upregulation of CD16 and CD1c expression. Infect. Immun. 2015;83:3732–3739. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00473-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kleinnijenhuis J, et al. BCG-induced trained immunity in NK cells: Role for non-specific protection to infection. Clin. Immunol. 2014;155:213–219. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2014.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Arts RJW, et al. BCG vaccination protects against experimental viral infection in humans through the induction of cytokines associated with trained immunity. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23:89–100 e105. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Harpaz R, et al. Serum cytokine profiles in experimental human malaria. Relationship to protection and disease course after challenge. J. Clin. Investig. 1992;90:515–523. doi: 10.1172/JCI115889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hermsen CC, et al. Circulating concentrations of soluble granzyme A and B increase during natural and experimental Plasmodium falciparum infections. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2003;132:467–472. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02160.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Walther M, et al. Innate immune responses to human malaria: heterogeneous cytokine responses to blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum correlate with parasitological and clinical outcomes. J. Immunol. 2006;177:5736–5745. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.8.5736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Church LW, et al. Clinical manifestations of Plasmodium falciparum malaria experimentally induced by mosquito challenge. J. Infect. Dis. 1997;175:915–920. doi: 10.1086/513990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Roestenberg M, et al. Comparison of clinical and parasitological data from controlled human malaria infection trials. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e38434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Walk J, et al. Diagnosis and treatment based on quantitative PCR after controlled human malaria infection. Malar. J. 2016;15:398. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1434-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liehl P, et al. Host-cell sensors for Plasmodium activate innate immunity against liver-stage infection. Nat. Med. 2014;20:47–53. doi: 10.1038/nm.3424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Miller JL, Sack BK, Baldwin M, Vaughan AM, Kappe SH. Interferon-mediated innate immune responses against malaria parasite liver stages. Cell Rep. 2014;7:436–447. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.McCall MB, et al. Memory-like IFN-gamma response by NK cells following malaria infection reveals the crucial role of T cells in NK cell activation by P. falciparum. Eur. J. Immunol. 2010;40:3472–3477. doi: 10.1002/eji.201040587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Leentjens J, et al. BCG vaccination enhances the immunogenicity of subsequent influenza vaccination in healthy volunteers: A randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study. J. Infect. Dis. 2015;212:1930–1938. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Artavanis-Tsakonas K, et al. Activation of a subset of human NK cells upon contact with Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes. J. Immunol. 2003;171:5396–5405. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.10.5396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Buffen K, et al. Autophagy controls BCG-induced trained immunity and the response to intravesical BCG therapy for bladder cancer. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004485. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Roth A, Garly ML, Jensen H, Nielsen J, Aaby P. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccination and infant mortality. Expert. Rev. Vaccin. 2006;5:277–293. doi: 10.1586/14760584.5.2.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Aaby P, et al. Randomized trial of BCG vaccination at birth to low-birth-weight children: beneficial nonspecific effects in the neonatal period? J. Infect. Dis. 2011;204:245–252. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Biering-Sorensen S, et al. Early BCG-denmark and neonatal mortality among infants weighing < 2500 g: A randomized controlled trial. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017;65:1183–1190. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.de Bree, L. C. J., et al. Non-specific effects of vaccines: Current evidence and potential implications. Semin. Immunol.39, 35–43 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 33.Netea MG, van Crevel R. BCG-induced protection: effects on innate immune memory. Semin. Immunol. 2014;26:512–517. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2014.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Benn CS, Fisker AB, Whittle HC, Aaby P. Revaccination with live attenuated vaccines confer additional beneficial nonspecific effects on overall survival: A review. EBioMedicine. 2016;10:312–317. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rodrigues A, et al. Revaccination with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine does not reduce morbidity from malaria in African children. Trop. Med. Int. Health.: TM & IH. 2007;12:224–229. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01766.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Roth AE, et al. Effect of revaccination with BCG in early childhood on mortality: randomised trial in Guinea-Bissau. BMJ. 2010;340:c671. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bijker EM, et al. Protection against malaria after immunization by chloroquine prophylaxis and sporozoites is mediated by preerythrocytic immunity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013;110:7862–7867. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220360110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hermsen CC, et al. Detection of Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites in vivo by real-time quantitative PCR. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2001;118:247–251. doi: 10.1016/S0166-6851(01)00379-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schats R, et al. Heterologous protection against malaria after immunization with plasmodium falciparum sporozoites. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0124243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Roestenberg M, et al. Protection against a malaria challenge by sporozoite inoculation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:468–477. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nahrendorf W, et al. Memory B-cell and antibody responses induced by Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite immunization. J. Infect. Dis. 2014;210:1981–1990. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Verhave JP, Leeuwenberg AD, Ponnudurai T, Meuwissen JH, van Druten JA. The biotin-streptavidin system in a two-site ELISA for the detection of plasmodial sporozoite antigen in mosquitoes. Parasite Immunol. 1988;10:17–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1988.tb00200.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request. A reporting summary for this Article is available as a Supplementary Information file.