Significance
Cells express a family of three inositol hexakisphosphate kinases (IP6Ks), whose functions depend on the intracellular microenvironment. We find that IP6K3 is enriched at the migrating leading edge of cell membranes, where IP6K3 physiologically interacts with protein dynein intermediate chain 2 (DIC2). The cell membrane localizations of IP6K3 and DIC2 are interdependent. At the cell membrane, IP6K3 promotes cell motility via influences on the turnover of cell adhesions. Deletion of IP6K3 impairs neuronal cell migration and elicits brain malformation.
Keywords: IP6K, focal adhesion, dynein, cell migration, FAK
Abstract
Cells express a family of three inositol hexakisphosphate kinases (IP6Ks). Although sharing the same enzymatic activity, individual IP6Ks mediate different cellular processes. Here we report that IP6K3 is enriched at the leading edge of migrating cells where it associates with dynein intermediate chain 2 (DIC2). Using immunofluorescence microscopy and total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy, we found that DIC2 and IP6K3 are recruited interdependently to the leading edge of migrating cells, where they function coordinately to enhance the turnover of focal adhesions. Deletion of IP6K3 causes defects in cell motility and neuronal dendritic growth, eventually leading to brain malformations. Our results reveal a mechanism whereby IP6K3 functions in coordination with DIC2 in a confined intracellular microenvironment to promote focal adhesion turnover.
Cells express a family of three inositol hexakisphosphate kinases (IP6Ks), which generate 5-diphosphoinositol pentakisphosphate (5-IP7) by pyrophosphorylating inositol hexakisphosphate on the 5-position (1). In mammalian cells, 90% of total IP7 is 5-IP7 (2). Another form of IP7 is 1-IP7, which is produced by diphosphoinositol pentakisphosphate kinases (PPIP5Ks) acting at the 1-position of the inositol ring (3). PPIP5K also uses 5-IP7 to make bisdiphosphoinositol tetrakisphosphate (1,5PP-IP4 or IP8) (2). Reported functions of 5-IP7 include regulation of insulin release (4, 5), protein pyrophosphorylation (6), and energy metabolism (7). Although IP6Ks share the same kinase activity, their functions vary depending on the immediate intracellular microenvironment. IP6K1 regulates energy consumption (8), gene transcription (9), immune response (10), and male fertility (11, 12). IP6K2 physiologically mediates cell death (13–15). IP6K3 promotes synapse formation in cerebellar Purkinje cells (16), regulates lifespan (17), and plays a role in the onset of Alzheimer’s disease (18).
Cytoplasmic dynein is a microtubule-based cytoskeleton motor that is responsible for retrograde movement of intracellular vesicles, organelles, and large protein and RNA-containing complexes (19). Dynein also functions at the cell membrane, where it tethers and/or generates pulling forces (20). Dynein is a complex composed of multiple subunits: heavy chain (DHC), intermediate chains (DIC), light intermediate chains (DLIC), and light chains (DLCs) (20). Dynein interacts with dynactin through binding between DIC and p150glued, a major subunit of dynactin (21). The interaction between DIC and p150glued is critical for dynein function (22). During cell migration, dynein is enriched at the leading edge (23), where it pulls the centrosome and the nucleus (24–26). Cytoplasmic dynein interacts with microtubules and some nonmicrotubule proteins at the cell membrane (23, 27) to regulate microtubule dynamics and centrosome reorientation in living cells (28). However, functions of dynein at the leading edge during cell migration have been elusive.
Focal adhesions are mediated by large dynamic multiprotein complexes whereby cells interact with the environment (29). Nascent focal adhesions (often called focal complexes) are initiated at the leading edge of cell protrusions. Focal adhesion turnover is restricted to protrusive regions of cells, although disassembly of focal adhesions occurs at the rear portion of cells (30). Focal adhesion assembly and disassembly and cell motility are mediated in part by focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activity (31–33). Deregulation of FAK is associated with defective focal adhesion dynamics and impairment of cell movement (34–36), yet spatial and temporal regulation of focal adhesions during coordinated and productive cell movement or migration remains incompletely understood.
In this study, we investigated cellular localization and functions of IP6K3. We found that IP6K3 is highly expressed at the leading edge of migrating cells. We observed a selective interaction of IP6K3 with dynein intermediate chain 2 (DIC2). IP6K3 and DIC2 are recruited interdependently to the leading edge of migrating cells, where they coordinately enhance the dynamics of focal adhesion. Deletion of IP6K3 leads to a major defect of focal adhesion dynamics. Consistently, deletion of IP6K3 disrupts neuronal cell motility and eventually causes brain malformation.
Results
IP6K3 Is at the Leading Edge of Migrating Cells.
To understand diversity of IP6 kinases, we investigated their intracellular localizations. Mice brain and mouse embryonic fibroblast cells (MEFs) express all three IP6Ks (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A). We performed cell fractionation and found that IP6K3 and IP6K1 are enriched in the plasma membrane in both mice brain and MEFs, while IP6K2 is mainly in the nucleus (SI Appendix, Fig. S1 B and C). The cellular localizations of IP6Ks are confirmed by immunostaining of IP6Ks in cortical neurons (SI Appendix, Fig. S1D) and MEFs (SI Appendix, Fig. S1E). The human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells also express three IP6Ks (SI Appendix, Fig. S2A). We performed total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy, which illustrates only ∼100 nm above the coverslip to achieve high signal-to-noise ratios (SI Appendix, Fig. S2B). IP6K3 is seen at the leading edge of migrating SH-SY5Y cells in a wound-induced migration assay (SI Appendix, Fig. S2B). IP6K3 also occurs at membrane protrusions in apparently migrating MEFs observed by immunofluorescence microscopy (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 C–F). To further explore the intracellular localization of IP6K3, we immunostained IP6K3 together with markers for the Golgi apparatus (SI Appendix, Fig. S2D), mitochondria (SI Appendix, Fig. S2E), or lysosome (SI Appendix, Fig. S2F). IP6K3 does not apparently localize in any of those organelles.
IP6K3 Interacts with Dynein Intermediate Chain 2.
We wondered whether the functions of IP6K3 are reflected by its associated proteins. We immunoprecipitated IP6K3 and searched for binding partners. Several proteins pulled down by IP6K3 from the wild-type tissues are lost in the IP6K3 knockouts (Fig. 1A). Presumably the missing bands in the KOs reflect proteins that physiologically associate with IP6K3. One of the prominent bands is identified as dynein intermediate chain 2 (DIC2) (Fig. 1A). We confirmed IP6K3/DIC2 interaction by immunoprecipitation of IP6K3 or DIC2, which reveals binding of IP6K3/DIC2 in WT preparations but not in the IP6K3 knockouts (Fig. 1B). To rule out nonspecific activity of the IP6K3 antibody, we expressed flag-tagged IP6K3 and myc-tagged DIC2 in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells and validated the IP6K3/DIC2 binding by immunoprecipitation of flag tag and myc tag (Fig. 1 C and D). IP6K3 binds robustly to DIC2 in vitro as does the kinase-deficient IP6K3 (K217A) (SI Appendix, Fig. S3). Thus, the catalytic activity of IP6K3 is not required for its binding with DIC2. DIC2 binds specifically to IP6K3, because immunoprecipitation of either IP6K1 or IP6K2 does not pull down DIC2 (Fig. 1 E and F). Consistently, immunoprecipitation of DIC2 pulls down IP6K3 but not IP6K1 or IP6K2 (Fig. 1G). We aligned IP6Ks’ protein sequences using the web services provided by the European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) (37). The amino acid sequences of substrate binding regions of IP6Ks are identical. The amino acid sequence of IP6K3 kinase domain displays ∼70% identity to that of IP6K1 and IP6K2; however, the variable regions of IP6Ks are less than 20% identical (SI Appendix, Fig. S2). Thus, the distinct intracellular localizations and functions of IP6Ks may be determined by their variable regions. DIC2 binds to the 67- to 138-amino acid fragment of IP6K3, which is unique to IP6K3 (Fig. 1 H–J).
Recruitment of DIC2 to the Leading Edge Requires IP6K3.
Deletion of IP6K3 does not affect the expression levels of dynein heavy chain (DHC), intermediate chain 1 (DIC1), intermediate chain 2 (DIC2), light intermediate chain 1 (DLIC1), light chain (DLC), and the dynactin subunit p150glued (Fig. 2A). The binding between IP6K3 and DIC2 is specific, because immunoprecipitation of IP6K3 does not pull down DHC, DIC1, DLIC1, DLC, or p150glued (Fig. 2B). Bhandari and coworkers have reported that depletion of 5-IP7 weakens the interaction of DICs/p150glued (38). We thus wondered whether knockout of IP6K3 affects the interaction between DIC2 and p150glued. Indeed, immunoprecipitation of DIC2 pulls down substantially less p150glued from the IP6K3 KOs (Fig. 2C). In contrast, equal amounts of p150glued are pulled down by DIC1 from IP6K3 WTs and KOs (Fig. 2D). Consistently, immunoprecipitation of p150glued in the IP6K3 KO brain tissues pulls down significantly less DIC2 but equal amounts of DIC1 (Fig. 2E). Thus, IP6K3 is required for DIC2/p150glued interaction.
The interaction of DIC with p150glued mediates the recruitment of dynein to the cell membrane (39, 40). We thus investigated whether deletion of IP6K3 influences DIC2 at the cell membrane. Indeed, DIC2 levels in the plasma membrane fraction are notably reduced in IP6K3 KO MEFs (Fig. 2F). Immunostaining of DIC2 on IP6K3 KO MEFs shows diminished DIC2 at the cell membranes (Fig. 2G). In a wound-induced migration assay, recruitment of DIC2 to the leading edge is substantially decreased in IP6K3 knockout MEFs (Fig. 2H). We isolated mouse astrocytes (SI Appendix, Fig. S4). Deletion of IP6K3 in astrocytes reduces IP7 by 25% (SI Appendix, Fig. S4). We performed TIRF microscopy on a wound-induced migration assay of astrocytes (Fig. 2I). Deletion of IP6K3 abolishes the recruitment of DIC2 to the leading edge (Fig. 2I). Immunostaining of pericentrin for centrosomes in a wound-induced migration assay reveals disruption of centrosome orientation in IP6K3 KO MEFs (centrosomes are orientated in 75% WT cells vs. 40% in IP6K3 KO cells), consistent with the deficit of DIC2 at the leading edge (41) (Fig. 2J). Centrosome orientation is defined as the centrosome occurring between the nucleus and the wound edge (±45° deviation from the direction perpendicular to the wound) (41).
IP6K3 Promotes Focal Adhesion Dynamics in the Leading Edge.
To further explore the influence of IP6K3 upon DIC2, we blotted for phosphoserine/threonine and phosphotyrosine in the DIC2 immunoprecipitations from IP6K3 WT and KO brain tissues (Fig. 3A). A phosphotyrosine band with molecular weight around 120 kDa occurs in the WT but not the IP6K3 KO preparations (Fig. 3A). This result is reminiscent of FAK, whose phosphorylation is enhanced by 5-IP7 (42, 43). We thus investigated FAK phosphorylation in IP6K3 KO brain tissues. Levels of phosphorylated FAK are moderately decreased in the IP6K3 KO tissues, as is phosphorylated paxillin (Fig. 3B). Immunoprecipitation of DIC2 pulls down much less phosphorylated FAK in the IP6K3 KOs (Fig. 3C), although there is no difference in total FAK. IP6K3 does not associate with FAK or paxillin directly (SI Appendix, Fig. S5). We immunostained phosphorylated FAK (Y397) in IP6K3 WT and KO astrocytes. Density of phosphorylated FAK at the cell peripheral is markedly decreased in IP6K3-deleted cells (Fig. 3 D and G). Similarly, the density of phosphorylated paxillin, which is the target of FAK, is also decreased in the IP6K3 KO astrocytes (Fig. 3 E and H). The sizes of focal adhesions at the cell cortex of the IP6K3 KO astrocytes are relatively larger, revealed by vinculin staining, indicating fewer turnovers of focal adhesions (Fig. 3 F–H). We also immunostained phosphorylated FAK (Y397) and phosphorylated paxillin and vinculin in a wound-induced migration assay. Deletion of IP6K3 greatly decreases phosphorylation of FAK (Fig. 3I) and paxillin (Fig. 3J) at the leading edge of migrating cells. Vinculin stains tiny spots at the leading edge of IP6K3 KO astrocytes, which is consistent with the concept that the recruitment of vinculin to focal adhesions requires FAK-mediated paxillin phosphorylation (44). Thus, deletion of IP6K3 elicits deficits of focal adhesion maturation (Fig. 3K). Defective actin filament assembly at the leading edge is also evident in IP6K3-deleted astrocytes (Fig. 3 I–K). Thus, IP6K3 is required for focal adhesion dynamics in the leading edge.
DIC2 Takes IP6K3 to the Leading Edge to Promote Focal Adhesion Turnover.
To test whether DIC2 is responsible for the recruitment of IP6K3 to the leading edge, we depleted DIC2 in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells by shRNA transduction (Fig. 4A) and observed the intracellular localization of IP6K3 by immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 4B). Knocking down DIC2 substantially decreases the amount of IP6K3 at the cell leading edge (Fig. 4B). TIRF microscopy reveals polarized intracellular localizations of IP6K3 with a substantial amount at the cell membrane (Fig. 4C). In striking contrast, in the DIC2-deleted cells, IP6K3 is mainly in the cytosol and accumulated around the nucleus without polarized distribution (Fig. 4 B and C). In the wound-induced migration assay, deletion of DIC2 significantly reduces recruitment of IP6K3 to the leading edge, demonstrated by TIRF microscopy (Fig. 4D). Thus, DIC2 is required for the recruitment of IP6K3 to cell membranes.
We asked whether disrupted IP6K3’s plasma membrane localization affects FAK phosphorylation in DIC2-deleted cells. Knocking down DIC2 substantially diminishes the density of phospho-FAK in cell membranes (Fig. 4 E and G). Similarly, depletion of DIC2 results in a dramatic diminution of phosphopaxillin at the cell protrusion region (Fig. 4 F and H). Thus, DIC2 drives IP6K3 to the migrating leading edge to promote the turnover of focal adhesions.
Deletion of IP6K3 Causes Defects in Neuronal Cell Migration and Brain Malformation.
To characterize IP6K3/DIC2/FAK activities in a more physiological setting, we isolated mouse primary cortical neurons and investigated the influence of IP6K3 upon dendritic growth. Deletion of IP6K3 leads to a markedly reduced length of neuronal processes (Fig. 5A). This phenotype is rescued by WT IP6K3 but not the kinase-deficient mutant (Fig. 5B). Consistently, the IP6K3 KO Purkinje cells display dendritic growth retardation (Fig. 5C). We evaluated the IP6K3/DIC2/FAK activities in several models of cell migration. In a scratch assay in MEFs, deletion of IP6K3 causes a 40% decrease in movement (SI Appendix, Fig. S6A). The Boyden chamber assay shows a 50% decline of migration in the IP6K3 KO preparations (SI Appendix, Fig. S6B). We rescued the protein expression in IP6K3 knockout MEFs by overexpressing WT IP6K3 or catalytically inactive IP6K3-kinase dead (KD) (SI Appendix, Fig. S6C). In both the scratch assay (SI Appendix, Fig. S6D) and the Boyden chamber assay (SI Appendix, Fig. S6E), the defect of IP6K3 knockouts in motility is reversed by WT IP6K3 but not by the catalytically dead mutant.
To test whether IP6K3 deletion impairs neuronal cell migration, we monitored neuronal disposition at embryonic day 15.5 (E15.5) following the administration of 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) (Fig. 5 D and E). Retardation of neuronal migration is evident in IP6K3 mutants at 24 h after EdU administration and persists at 48 h.
We evaluated the neuronal movement of different cortical layers by staining endogenous Satb2 and Ctip2 for layers 2–4 and 5, respectively (Fig. 5F and SI Appendix, Fig. S7A). At E15.5 a large number of Satb2-positive cells have migrated to the superficial layers in the WTs; however, sparse Satb2 positive cells are evident in the superficial layer in the IP6K3 KOs (Fig. 5F). Consistently, at E17.5 Satb2- and Ctip2-positive neurons appear to have attained their adult sites in the WTs, whereas in the IP6K3 knockouts, migration of Satb2 and Ctip2 continues (SI Appendix, Fig. S7A).
We stained calbindin for Purkinje cells in the cerebellum and monitored their movement during development. At E19.5, the WT Purkinje cells have completed migration to the cerebellar cortex, whereas, the IP6K3 KO Purkinje cells are still migrating (Fig. 5G). At postnatal day 1 (P1), all of the WT Purkinje cells have reached the Purkinje cell layer, however, a number of IP6K3 mutant cells are in the granule cell layer, indicating that they have not migrated to their mature position (Fig. 5H). At P7, the majority of IP6K3 KO Purkinje cells have reached the Purkinje cell layer, but some are observed in the granule cell layer (Fig. 5I). This phenotype continues at P28 (Fig. 5J). Deletion of IP6K3 elicits cerebellar malformation, which presumably is the result of migration deficits (Fig. 5 K and L and SI Appendix, Fig. S7 B and C). The malformation is first observed at P7, when a number of Purkinje cells are trapped in the granule cell layer (Fig. 5K and SI Appendix, Fig. S7B), and lasts through adult life (Fig. 5L and SI Appendix, Fig. S7C).
Discussion
In this study, we investigated the intracellular localization and corresponding functions of IP6K3. IP6K3 displays a polarized intracellular distribution and is highly enriched in the leading edge of migrating cells, although not specifically to focal adhesion sites. IP6K3 physiologically associates with DIC2. IP6K3 and DIC2 are recruited together to the leading cell membranes. IP6K3 enhances the recruitment of DIC2 to the leading edge by promoting DIC2/p150glued interactions. Consequently, DIC2 takes IP6K3 to the cell membrane. At the cell membrane, IP6K3 promotes the phosphorylation of FAK and turnover of focal adhesions. Deletion of IP6K3 elicits defects of cell motility and brain malformation. Thus, our study reveals a mechanism by which IP6K3 and DIC2 coordinately regulate the dynamics of focal adhesion (Fig. 6).
Inositol pyrophosphates have been associated with FAK activity. IP6K1 generates 5-IP7 to promote FAK phosphorylation (42, 43). IP6K2, via its product 5-IP7, sequesters the tumor suppressor enzyme liver kinase B1 in the nucleus, thus blocking its repressive effects on FAK activity (45). In this study, we found IP6K3 is taken by DIC2 to the leading cell membranes, where it promotes FAK phosphorylation. In MEF cells, IP6K1 is responsible for up to 60% IP7 production (46). Thus, deletion of IP6K1 leads to a major defect of FAK phosphorylation (42, 43). Whereas IP6K3 generates less than 25% of cellular IP7 in astrocytes (this study), its enhancement of FAK phosphorylation in cell membranes supports the possibility that IP6K3 performs subtle functions in a specific intracellular microenviroment. Inositol pyrophosphates that are generated by IP6K1 promote dynein-mediated transportation (38). Dynein is responsible for transportation of the Golgi apparatus (47) and lysosome (48). However, IP6K3 does not apparently associate with those organelles, indicating IP6K3 may not influence dynein transportation, which is different from IP6K1 (38).
During cell migration, dynein is enriched in the leading cell membranes (23, 27), where it pulls the centrosome forward (49). Recruitment of dynein to the cell membrane is mediated by p150glued-dependent and -independent mechanisms (50). The 5-IP7 enhances the binding between DIC and p150glued (38). Deletion of IP6K3 depletes 5-IP7 in areas where IP6K3 is normally localized, thereby weakening the interaction of DIC2/p150glued, and consequently disrupting the recruitment of DIC2 to the cell membrane (40). However, the exact mechanisms that recruit IP6K3 and DIC2 to the cell membrane have been elusive.
At the cell membrane, dynein is in adherens junctions (51) and focal adhesions (52). DIC2 binds with FAK, an interaction increases during cell migration (52). DIC2 is required for the turnover of focal adhesions at cell membranes (52); however, regulatory mechanisms have been elusive. We found that DIC2 takes IP6K3 to the cell membrane to promote FAK activity and the turnover of focal adhesions. FAK also occurs in centrosome where phosphorylation of FAK at serine 732 renders its interaction with DIC (53). The 5-IP7, the major product of IP6Ks, enhances FAK activity via increasing its phosphorylation at tyrosine 397 (42, 43). Consistently, deletion of IP6K3 decreases FAK phosphorylation at tyrosine 397. However, IP6K3 deletion does not alter the interaction between FAK and DIC2, indicating IP6K3 does not affect FAK phosphorylation at serine 732, which is mainly regulated by CDK5 (54).
Mutations in dynein or its regulators are linked to neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases (50). Deletion of IP6K3 also elicits brain malformation, albeit less severe than that of dynein mutants (55). Dendritic growth depends on normal FAK (56) and dynein functions (27). Deletion of IP6K3 disrupts DIC2 membrane localization and FAK activity thus delays the growth of neuronal processes. Disrupting the interaction between dynein and dynactin by inducing dynactin disassembly causes late-onset progressive motor neuron degenerative disease (57). IP6K3 contributes to late onset Alzheimer’s disease (18). IP6K3 directly associates with DIC2. Inositol pyrophosphates generated by IP6K3 enhances the interaction between DIC2 and p150glued, a major subunit of dynactin. Mutations in the promoter region of IP6K3 that increase its transcription activity are associated with a lower risk of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (18). Thus, the protective effects of elevated IP6K3 protein and 5-IP7 levels may involve regulation of dynein and FAK activities. Inositol pyrophosphates generated by IP6K1 also enhances the binding of DIC/p150glued, although no direct interaction has been found between IP6K1 and DIC (38). We previously found that deletion of IP6K1 induces brain malformation (42). The deficits of DIC/p150glued interaction in IP6K1 mutants may also contribute to the developmental defects. Earlier, we found that IP6K3 affects the morphology and synapse formation of cerebellar Purkinje cells (16). The IP6K3 deletion-induced brain malformation may also contribute to the deficits in motor learning and coordination (16). In our previous study, we did not anticipate alterations in brain structure. Accordingly, we focused on the midline of brain, which is the most common area to be investigated (16). The aberrant aggregations of Purkinje cells, however, occur in the lateral cerebellar hemispheres but not the midline vermis, and so were not detected.
Though IP6K3 produces only a small pool of 5-IP7, it performs critical cellular functions. Thus, 5-IP7 is not equally distributed in a cell. Individual pools of IP6K-generated 5-IP7 function in localized areas where the protein is concentrated. Discretely localized generation of 5-IP7 to maintain normal cell function may be the reason for a cell to express three IP6Ks. Differences in localization, expression, and kinase activity of the three isoforms may contribute to selective regulation of 5-IP7 generation.
Materials and Methods
Antibody and Reagents.
Chemicals were from MilliporeSigma. Antibodies against IP6K1, IP6K2, IP6K3, myc tag (clone 9E10), flag tag (clone M2), GST, and vinculin were purchased from MilliporeSigma. Antibodies against DIC2, DLIC1, and p150glued were purchased from Bethyl Laboratories. Antibodies against cadherin, α-tubulin, phosphoserine/threonine, GFAP, β-actin, FAK, paxillin, phospho-FAK (Y397), phospho-FAK (Y576/577), phospho-FAK (Y925), and phosphopaxillin were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Antibodies against pericentrin, Satb2, and Ctip2 were from Abcam. Antibodies against calbindin, DHC, DIC1, DLC1/2, phosphotyrosine, HSP60, ACBD3, and normal rabit IgG were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Rhodamine phalloidin, Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit, Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-mouse IgG, and EdU were from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Anti LAMP1 antibody was from PhosphoSolutions.
Cell Culture.
HEK 293 cells, HEK 293T cells, human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells, IP6K3 WT and KO MEF cells and astrocytes were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) FBS, 100 units/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. IP6K3 WT and KO primary cortical neuronal cells were cultured in neurobasal-A medium (no glucose, no sodium pyruvate) supplemented with 12.5 mM glucose, 2 mM l-glutamine, and 2% (vol/vol) B-27 supplement (minus antioxidants). Cell culture plates were coated with poly-l-ornithine for astrocytes and cortical neuronal cells. DIC2 knockdown SH-SY5Y cells were generated by lentiviral transduction. Virus-infected cells were selected using puromycin (5 μg/mL). All cells were maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
Animals.
The IP6K3 WT and KO animals were littermates from heterozygous breeding. Animal breeding and procedures were conducted in strict accordance with the NIH Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (58). Animal experiments were approved by the Johns Hopkins University Animal Care and Use Committee.
Western Blot and Immunoprecipitation.
The lysis buffer contained 50 mmol/L Tris⋅HCl (pH 7.4), 100 mmol/L NaCl, 0.5% Igepal CA630, 5 mmol/L MgCl2, protease inhibitors, and phosphatase inhibitors. Cells were lysed on ice, and the lysates were passed 20 times through a 30-gauge needle with syringe. The cell lysates were then centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected. Protein concentrations were determined by using Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and equalized. Equal amounts of whole cell lysates were precleared with protein A/G agarose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 1 h at 4 °C. Then the supernatants were added with antibody and incubated overnight at 4 °C followed by protein A/G agarose precipitation.
Immunofluorescence Staining.
Animals were perfused and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (wt/vol). The brain slices were cut at 30-μm thickness. Cultured cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (wt/vol). Slides were blocked with 10% goat serum (vol/vol) for 10 min at room temperature, followed by incubation with primary antibody at 4 °C overnight, and then, fluorescence-labeled secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. Slides were mounted with ProLong Gold antifade mountant. Pictures were taken with a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 700, National Institutes of Health Award No. S10 OD016374) or Nikon Eclipse Ti-ETIRF microscope.
RNA Isolation and PCR.
Total RNA was isolated from brain tissues and cells using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) and reverse transcribed to cDNA using SuperScript III (Invitrogen). PCR was run by using Titanium Taq DNA polymerase (Clontech). Primers are mouse IP6K1 forward: ATGTGTGTTTGTCAAACCATGGAAGT, reverse: CTACTGGTTCTCATCCCGCATCTGCT; mouse IP6K2 forward: ATGAGCCCAGCCTTCAGGACCATGGA, reverse: TCACTCCCCACTCTCCTCACTTATCTCT; mouse IP6K3 forward: ATGGTGGTGCGGCACAGCTCGGACAA, reverse: TCATTCTCCTTCCTGGATATCCCGCAGAAT; human IP6K1 forward: ATGTGTGTTTGTCAAACCATGGAAGT, reverse: CTACTGGTTCTCGTCCCGCATCTGTT; human IP6K2 forward: ATGAGCCCAGCCTTCAGGGCCATGGAT, reverse: TCACTCCCCACTCTCCTCACTTATCTCT; and human IP6K3 forward: ATGGTTGTGCAAAACAGCGCAGACGCCGGGGACAT, reverse: TCATTCTCCCTCTTGGATATCCTGCAGGAT.
Wound-Induced Migration Assay.
For the wound-induced migration assay, a scratch wound was drawn on a confluent monolayer of cells. Cells were fixed 8 h later by 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde and immunofluorescence staining was performed.
Subcellular Fractionation.
The cytosol and nuclear fractions were isolated using the NE-PER nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
EdU Labeling of Neuronal Migration.
Heterozygous breeding pregnant mice at E15.5 were injected i.p. with 100 mg/kg EdU in normal saline and fetuses were harvested at 24 or 48 h after injection. The fetuses were fixed with 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde and cut as sagittal sections. The slices were stained with Alexa Fluor 488 PicolylAzide to label EdU-incorporated cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
In Vitro Protein Expression and Purification.
The myc-tag GFP, myc-tag WT IP6K3, and myc-tag kinase-dead mutant IP6K3 were cloned into the pGEX-6P-2 vector (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). PreScission Protease was used to remove the GST from myc-tag GFP, myc-tag WT, and mutant IP6K3. GFP and DIC2 were also cloned into the pGEX-6P-2 vector (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) to produce GST-fused GFP and GST-fused DIC2.
Plasmid and Lentiviral Expression.
The DIC2 shRNA and scrambled control plasmids were from MilliporeSigma. The myc-tagged GFP and myc-tagged human DIC2 were cloned to pCDH-EF1-MCS-T2A-copGFP vector (System Biosciences). The flag-tagged GFP and flag-tagged human WT IP6K3 constructs were cloned to pLVX-AcGFP1-N1 vector (Clontech). The flag-tagged IP6K3 fragments were cloned to pLVX-AcGFP1-N1 vector (Clontech). The myc-tagged murine WT and kinase-deficient (KD) IP6K3 were cloned to pCDH-EF1-MCS-T2A-copGFP vectors (System Biosciences). Lentivirus was generated by transfection of lentiviral vector together with pMD2.G and psPAX2 in HEK 293T cells (59).
Intracellular Inositol Phosphate Calculation.
WT and IP6K3 KO astrocytes were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, sodium pyruvate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and GlutaMAX supplement (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The cell culture plates were coated with collagen. Cells were plated at 70% confluence and 100 μCi [3H] myo-inositol was added to the medium and cultured for 3 d. The inositol phosphates were separated by HPLC (58).
Statistical Analysis.
Quantitative data are expressed as means ± SEM. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, unpaired Student’s t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For nonquantitative data, results were representative of at least three independent experiments.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Rashna Bhandari for discussions. This work was supported by US Public Health Service Grant MH18501 (to S.H.S.). Z.G., X.L., Y.W., and C.F. were supported by startup funding from Tianjin Medical University (to C.F.).
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1817001116/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Chakraborty A. The inositol pyrophosphate pathway in health and diseases. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018;93:1203–1227. doi: 10.1111/brv.12392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shears SB, Baughman BM, Gu C, Nair VS, Wang H. The significance of the 1-kinase/1-phosphatase activities of the PPIP5K family. Adv Biol Regul. 2017;63:98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jbior.2016.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shears SB. Towards pharmacological intervention in inositol pyrophosphate signalling. Biochem Soc Trans. 2016;44:191–196. doi: 10.1042/BST20150184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Illies C, et al. Requirement of inositol pyrophosphates for full exocytotic capacity in pancreatic beta cells. Science. 2007;318:1299–1302. doi: 10.1126/science.1146824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rajasekaran SS, et al. Inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1 is a metabolic sensor in pancreatic β-cells. Cell Signal. 2018;46:120–128. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2018.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Saiardi A, Bhandari R, Resnick AC, Snowman AM, Snyder SH. Phosphorylation of proteins by inositol pyrophosphates. Science. 2004;306:2101–2105. doi: 10.1126/science.1103344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gu C, et al. KO of 5-InsP7 kinase activity transforms the HCT116 colon cancer cell line into a hypermetabolic, growth-inhibited phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:11968–11973. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702370114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhu Q, et al. Adipocyte-specific deletion of Ip6k1 reduces diet-induced obesity by enhancing AMPK-mediated thermogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:4273–4288. doi: 10.1172/JCI85510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Burton A, Azevedo C, Andreassi C, Riccio A, Saiardi A. Inositol pyrophosphates regulate JMJD2C-dependent histone demethylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:18970–18975. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309699110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hou Q, et al. Inhibition of IP6K1 suppresses neutrophil-mediated pulmonary damage in bacterial pneumonia. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:eaal4045. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aal4045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Malla AB, Bhandari R. IP6K1 is essential for chromatoid body formation and temporal regulation of Tnp2 and Prm2 expression in mouse spermatids. J Cell Sci. 2017;130:2854–2866. doi: 10.1242/jcs.204966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fu C, et al. Multiple aspects of male germ cell development and interactions with Sertoli cells require inositol hexakisphosphate kinase-1. Sci Rep. 2018;8:7039. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25468-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Morrison BH, et al. Gene deletion of inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 2 predisposes to aerodigestive tract carcinoma. Oncogene. 2009;28:2383–2392. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Morrison BH, et al. Inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 2 sensitizes ovarian carcinoma cells to multiple cancer therapeutics. Oncogene. 2002;21:1882–1889. doi: 10.1038/sj/onc/1205265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rao F, et al. Inositol pyrophosphates mediate the DNA-PK/ATM-p53 cell death pathway by regulating CK2 phosphorylation of Tti1/Tel2. Mol Cell. 2014;54:119–132. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.02.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fu C, et al. Inositol hexakisphosphate kinase-3 regulates the morphology and synapse formation of cerebellar purkinje cells via spectrin/adducin. J Neurosci. 2015;35:11056–11067. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1069-15.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Moritoh Y, et al. Inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 3 regulates metabolism and lifespan in mice. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32072. doi: 10.1038/srep32072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Crocco P, et al. Contribution of polymorphic variation of inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 3 (IP6K3) gene promoter to the susceptibility to late onset Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1862:1766–1773. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vallee RB, McKenney RJ, Ori-McKenney KM. Multiple modes of cytoplasmic dynein regulation. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14:224–230. doi: 10.1038/ncb2420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Reck-Peterson SL, Redwine WB, Vale RD, Carter AP. The cytoplasmic dynein transport machinery and its many cargoes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19:382–398. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0004-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Siglin AE, et al. Dynein and dynactin leverage their bivalent character to form a high-affinity interaction. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schroer TA. Dynactin. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004;20:759–779. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.012103.094623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dujardin DL, et al. A role for cytoplasmic dynein and LIS1 in directed cell movement. J Cell Biol. 2003;163:1205–1211. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200310097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tsai JW, Bremner KH, Vallee RB. Dual subcellular roles for LIS1 and dynein in radial neuronal migration in live brain tissue. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:970–979. doi: 10.1038/nn1934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tsai JW, Lian WN, Kemal S, Kriegstein AR, Vallee RB. Kinesin 3 and cytoplasmic dynein mediate interkinetic nuclear migration in neural stem cells. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:1463–1471. doi: 10.1038/nn.2665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Folker ES, Schulman VK, Baylies MK. Translocating myonuclei have distinct leading and lagging edges that require kinesin and dynein. Development. 2014;141:355–366. doi: 10.1242/dev.095612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Grabham PW, Seale GE, Bennecib M, Goldberg DJ, Vallee RB. Cytoplasmic dynein and LIS1 are required for microtubule advance during growth cone remodeling and fast axonal outgrowth. J Neurosci. 2007;27:5823–5834. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1135-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Laan L, et al. Cortical dynein controls microtubule dynamics to generate pulling forces that position microtubule asters. Cell. 2012;148:502–514. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Geiger B, Spatz JP, Bershadsky AD. Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:21–33. doi: 10.1038/nrm2593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Broussard JA, Webb DJ, Kaverina I. Asymmetric focal adhesion disassembly in motile cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20:85–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wu Y, et al. In-situ coupling between kinase activities and protein dynamics within single focal adhesions. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29377. doi: 10.1038/srep29377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zaidel-Bar R, Milo R, Kam Z, Geiger B. A paxillin tyrosine phosphorylation switch regulates the assembly and form of cell-matrix adhesions. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:137–148. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Webb DJ, et al. FAK-Src signalling through paxillin, ERK and MLCK regulates adhesion disassembly. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:154–161. doi: 10.1038/ncb1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ilić D, et al. Reduced cell motility and enhanced focal adhesion contact formation in cells from FAK-deficient mice. Nature. 1995;377:539–544. doi: 10.1038/377539a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yu DH, Qu CK, Henegariu O, Lu X, Feng GS. Protein-tyrosine phosphatase Shp-2 regulates cell spreading, migration, and focal adhesion. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:21125–21131. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.33.21125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Angers-Loustau A, et al. Protein tyrosine phosphatase-PEST regulates focal adhesion disassembly, migration, and cytokinesis in fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1999;144:1019–1031. doi: 10.1083/jcb.144.5.1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.McWilliam H, et al. Analysis tool web services from the EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:W597–W600. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chanduri M, et al. Inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1 (IP6K1) activity is required for cytoplasmic dynein-driven transport. Biochem J. 2016;473:3031–3047. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Steffen W, et al. The involvement of the intermediate chain of cytoplasmic dynein in binding the motor complex to membranous organelles of Xenopus oocytes. Mol Biol Cell. 1997;8:2077–2088. doi: 10.1091/mbc.8.10.2077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Duellberg C, et al. Reconstitution of a hierarchical +TIP interaction network controlling microtubule end tracking of dynein. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:804–811. doi: 10.1038/ncb2999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Manneville JB, Jehanno M, Etienne-Manneville S. Dlg1 binds GKAP to control dynein association with microtubules, centrosome positioning, and cell polarity. J Cell Biol. 2010;191:585–598. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201002151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fu C, et al. Neuronal migration is mediated by inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1 via α-actinin and focal adhesion kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:2036–2041. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700165114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jadav RS, et al. Deletion of inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1 (IP6K1) reduces cell migration and invasion, conferring protection from aerodigestive tract carcinoma in mice. Cell Signal. 2016;28:1124–1136. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2016.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pasapera AM, Schneider IC, Rericha E, Schlaepfer DD, Waterman CM. Myosin II activity regulates vinculin recruitment to focal adhesions through FAK-mediated paxillin phosphorylation. J Cell Biol. 2010;188:877–890. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200906012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rao F, et al. Inositol pyrophosphates promote tumor growth and metastasis by antagonizing liver kinase B1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:1773–1778. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1424642112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chakraborty A, et al. Inositol pyrophosphates inhibit Akt signaling, thereby regulating insulin sensitivity and weight gain. Cell. 2010;143:897–910. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Matanis T, et al. Bicaudal-D regulates COPI-independent Golgi-ER transport by recruiting the dynein-dynactin motor complex. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:986–992. doi: 10.1038/ncb891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tan SC, Scherer J, Vallee RB. Recruitment of dynein to late endosomes and lysosomes through light intermediate chains. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22:467–477. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-02-0129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Shu T, et al. Ndel1 operates in a common pathway with LIS1 and cytoplasmic dynein to regulate cortical neuronal positioning. Neuron. 2004;44:263–277. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Cianfrocco MA, DeSantis ME, Leschziner AE, Reck-Peterson SL. Mechanism and regulation of cytoplasmic dynein. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2015;31:83–108. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100814-125438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ligon LA, Karki S, Tokito M, Holzbaur EL. Dynein binds to beta-catenin and may tether microtubules at adherens junctions. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:913–917. doi: 10.1038/ncb1001-913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Rosse C, et al. Binding of dynein intermediate chain 2 to paxillin controls focal adhesion dynamics and migration. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:3733–3738. doi: 10.1242/jcs.089557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Park AY, Shen TL, Chien S, Guan JL. Role of focal adhesion kinase Ser-732 phosphorylation in centrosome function during mitosis. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:9418–9425. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M809040200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Xie Z, Sanada K, Samuels BA, Shih H, Tsai LH. Serine 732 phosphorylation of FAK by Cdk5 is important for microtubule organization, nuclear movement, and neuronal migration. Cell. 2003;114:469–482. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00605-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hafezparast M, et al. Mutations in dynein link motor neuron degeneration to defects in retrograde transport. Science. 2003;300:808–812. doi: 10.1126/science.1083129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Schlomann U, Schwamborn JC, Müller M, Fässler R, Püschel AW. The stimulation of dendrite growth by Sema3A requires integrin engagement and focal adhesion kinase. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:2034–2042. doi: 10.1242/jcs.038232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.LaMonte BH, et al. Disruption of dynein/dynactin inhibits axonal transport in motor neurons causing late-onset progressive degeneration. Neuron. 2002;34:715–727. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00696-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.National Research Council . Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8th Ed National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fu C, et al. Inositol polyphosphate multikinase inhibits angiogenesis via inositol pentakisphosphate-induced HIF-1α degradation. Circ Res. 2018;122:457–472. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.