Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Feb 25;9:2658. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39297-w

A 3D Model of the Effect of Tortuosity and Constrictivity on the Diffusion in Mineralized Collagen Fibril

Fabiano Bini 1,, Andrada Pica 1, Andrea Marinozzi 2, Franco Marinozzi 1
PMCID: PMC6389916  PMID: 30804401

Abstract

Bone tissue is a hierarchically structured material composed at the nanoscale by an organic matrix of collagen type I, apatite mineral and water. We considered an idealized 3D geometrical model of the mineralized collagen fibril in order to analyze the influence of structural factors, i.e. tortuosity, constrictivity, on the water effective diffusivity. The average values of the factors investigated in the diffusivity are computed on 5000 iterations by means of the Montecarlo method. The input parameters of the numerical model are the geometrical dimensions of the apatite mineral, collagen fibrils and their spatial orientation obtained with random extractions from Gaussian probability distribution functions. We analyzed the diffusion phenomenon for concentration gradients parallel to three orthogonal directions (Length, Width and Thickness) and for different scenarios, namely low, intermediate and high apatite volume fraction. For each degree of volume fraction, in the thickness direction, the tortuosity assumes greater values, up to two orders of magnitude, in comparison with the tortuous factors computed in the other directions, highlighting the anisotropy of the nanostructure. Furthermore, it was found that the tortuosity is the dominant parameter which control the effective transport properties within the mineralized collagen fibrils.

Introduction

Diffusion phenomena in porous media have been studied extensively with the aim of a thorough understanding of the associated transport mechanism and the impact on the structure properties. The application of porous media theories to biological tissues has led to significant advances in the analysis of the structural characteristics of the medium13 and in the investigation of physiological processes, e.g. intercellular signaling4, diffusion of nutrients. With a particular focus on bone tissue, transport phenomena assume an important role also in the mechanosensing system which governs bone remodeling. A detailed understanding of the structure and properties of this complex porous system and their influence on the mass transport mechanism could give a contribution on crucial issues including alterations of bone tissue due to degenerative pathologies, e.g. osteoporosis5, osteoarthritis6,7.

Bone is a hierarchical composite biomaterial8,9. At the nanoscale, it is characterized by an assembly of 300 nm long and 1.5 nm thick collagen molecules which provides the site for mineral nanoparticles and water diffusion8. Namely, the mineralized collagen fibril contains 60–70 wt% plate-shaped apatite crystals, 20–30 wt% type I collagen fibrils and 10–20 wt% water9. The percentages vary depending on bone site, age, health conditions and environmental factors, resulting in an extremely heterogeneous structure8,10.

Collagen arrangement can be described by the quarter stagger-overlap configuration proposed by Hodge and Petruska11, that leads to a pattern of gap and overlap regions in the longitudinal direction of the fibril. The mineral nucleates first in the collagen gap region and successively extends in the pore spaces in the overlap zones9. An essential feature is the co-alignment between the apatite crystals and the collagen long axis1215. Namely, the crystallographic c-axes of the apatite platelets lie within ±15–20° of one another rather than being perfectly parallel14,15. Moreover, Atomic Force Microscope imaging16 showed that, in the longitudinal direction of the fibril, the apatite minerals replicate the periodicity of the collagen matrix.

The 3D organization of the mineralized collagen fibril and the amount of mineral have a fundamental role in the structural and physiological functions of bone tissue. In pathological conditions, e.g. osteoporosis, zones with pronounced variations of mineral volume fraction (VF) are encountered1,2,9,10,13,14,1719, thus analysis of the nanostructure arrangement could result useful for the characterization of diseases. Backscattered electron imaging methods20,21 report a mineral content for the human bone matrix between 0% and 43%. It is well established in literature that the apatite length can vary in the range 40 to 170 nm16,22, its width from 10 to 80 nm13 and its thickness from 2 to 5 nm13, but few considerations are available with regard to the distance between adjacent mineral platelets and their spatial arrangement15,23. The present model considers a staggered arrangement including overlapping of the apatite crystals in the longitudinal direction, while in the thickness and width direction parallel layers are assumed, in agreement with the studies of Hodge and Petruska11 and Vercher-Martinez et al.23.

The sizes of the mineral and the distances between the platelets are set in order to analyse three different mineralization percentage: low (7 vol%)23 and high (42 vol%) calculated in 3D, according to Vercher-Martinez et al.23, equivalent to the 52% vol. related to a 2D model adopted from Nikolov et al.24. Similarly, an intermediate value in 3D was calculated (32 vol%, see Supplementary Figs S1S3) equivalent to the 42% vol. for a 2D model adopted from Jäger et al.25.

The third main component of bone nanostructure is water and it may be distinguished into two main types according to its free or bound state. In this study, we analyse free bone water at the collagen-apatite level of porosity (about 10 nm)26 that contributes to important processes in mineralization, bone growth and healing through the transmission of remodelling signals3 or plays a structuring role by orienting apatite crystals27.

The impact of the orientation and arrangement of the bone structure on the transport properties have been already investigated in several experimental18 and computational studies28. Experiments performed by Marinozzi and co-workers18 allowed to highlight a marked anisotropy of the arrangement of the apatite crystals along the three main axes of the trabecula. In fact, from an analysis of the experimental data by means of a genetic algorithm18, three different values of the diffusion coefficient along the main axes of a human trabecula (Length L, Width W and Thickness T) were achieved. As expected, the diffusivity values, i.e. [DL = 1.03·10−9, DW = 1.26·10−10, DT = 1.16·10−11 (m2·s−1)] along the axes of the trabecula results minor than the diffusion coefficient of water in a homogenous medium, i.e. D0 = 2.66·10−9 (m2·s−1)29. The observed anisotropic behaviour was confirmed also by molecular dynamics studies performed by Di Tommaso and colleagues30.

In this study, we improve a previous analytical model28 of the diffusion phenomenon at the collagen-apatite level of porosity, i.e. 10 nm26. The crucial goal of this work is a detailed investigation of the structural factors which control the effective diffusion coefficient within the bone nanostructure. The structure of the collagen fibril reinforced with mineral particles leads to a deviation of the diffusion paths of water from straight lines due to the presence of solid components. Thus, transport mechanism is influenced by geometric features and structural configuration, which cause a decrement of the effective diffusion coefficient with respect to the diffusivity in a homogeneous medium31.

Predictions of the effective diffusivity achieved analytically in function of the structural nature of porous media were developed first in the fields of chemical engineering and geological sciences32,33. Subsequently, these models have been extended to the brain tissue34, and more recently, to the mineralized collagen fibrils28. The effect of the spatial configuration on the transport properties may be analyzed by means of three factors: porosity of the material, tortuosity of the flow path, which characterizes the sinuousness of the solutes streamlines through the heterogeneous medium and constrictivity, which represents the so-called bottleneck effect33,35.

The tortuous factor (τ) is a quantitative measure of the reduction of diffusive flux caused by the sinuous path imposed by the obstacles compared to the straightest path in an unrestricted medium, in the direction of the flow36. The complex nature of porous medium creates difficulties in order to quantify the tortuosity. Different approaches for estimating this geometric factor have been developed: diffusion experiments18, ultrasonic reflectivity methods37, NMR measurements38, analytical models36,39,40 or 3D image analysis41.

The constrictivity (δ) is a dimensionless factor and it assesses the impact of the variation of pores cross section on the mass transport33. It becomes important only if the size of the solute is comparable to the dimensions of the pores42. Recently, new methods have been proposed in order to determine the constrictivity factor directly from disordered porous medium from tomography and 3D image analysis36 or by means of experimental methods as mercury intrusion porosimetry43. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, image analysis on bone tissue which could provide a quantification of the topological features, i.e. tortuosity and the constrictivity, directly from tomographic 3D reconstruction is still absent.

In this work, we implemented a numerical model that predicts the effective diffusivity based on an idealized geometry of the mineralized collagen fibrils and analyses the influence of the tortuosity and constrictivity on the mass transport properties. Although electron microscopic tomography has been utilized to study the 3D spatial arrangement of mineral crystals within the fibrils, the resolution of this technique, 4–6 nm, is not sufficient to resolve the thickness of mineral platelets embedded in the densely packed collagen fibrils14,15. Therefore, there are very few available data about the packing of mineral crystals in the radial direction of the collagen fibrils.

Theoretical models of bone at the nanoscale can give remarkable insight on the tissue behaviour and its physical properties. Numerous approaches are presented in literature, spanning from continuum levels studies25,28,44,45 to atomic level simulations3.

In this work, the assessment of the effective diffusion coefficient of water has been conducted considering a continuum mechanics approach. We reconstructed the bone nanostructure as a periodically staggered model and geometrical expressions were derived for the tortuosity of solute streamlines and the constrictivity, as functions of the model parameters. Numerical values of the effective diffusion coefficients were achieved by means of the Monte Carlo method. Moreover, we analysed the impact of these structure parameters, i.e. tortuosity and constrictivity, on the reduction of the water diffusion coefficient and illustrated their dependence on the nanostructure VF.

Results

We analysed the diffusion phenomenon within a repeating unit cell of bone nanostructure composed by three platelets of apatite embedded in the collagen matrix (Fig. 1). We determined the diffusion coefficient of water assuming a concentration gradient parallel to the three axes, i.e. L, W, T, of a global coordinate system (CST) fixed to the main axes of the trabecula, compliance with the system of reference used in the previous computational study28.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of the mineralized collagen fibril assumed as a composite of collagen fibrils (light blue region) and apatite platelets (grey region). We represent four unit cells of bone nanostructure in order to highlight the spatial arrangement of the mineral embedded in the collagen fibrils. Each unit cell is composed by three apatite platelets disposed in a staggered configuration along the longitudinal axis. We consider that the inclination of mineral with respect to the longitudinal axis L is identified by the angle θLT in the LT plane and respectively by θLW in the LW plane. In the WT plane, the inclination, θWT, is considered with respect to the width axis W.

Experimental observations from TEM and SAXS studies46,47 highlight that the apatite minerals are locally parallel between them. Therefore, we introduce the assumption that the unit cell is composed of parallel platelets, while their orientation with respect to the axes of the CST is described by Gaussian probability density functions (PDFs) with mean 0 degrees and variable standard deviation. We considered 5000 realizations for each Gaussian PDF describing the unit cell inclinations. Overall, we investigated 5000 different Gaussian PDFs and for each one we computed the average of the 5000 realizations. We analysed different values of the degree of apatite volume fraction (Vf_A), respectively 0.07, 0.32 and 0.42.

For each main plane, i.e. LT, WT and LW, we take into account the contributes to the transport resistance expressed by the tortuosity, i.e. the path length the molecule of water has to perform between two points with respect to a straight line in the direction of the flow (Figs 24), the constrictivity, i.e. the reduction of the flow due to the variations in the cross section of the passageway available for the water molecule path diffusion (Fig. 5) and the porosity.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Graphical definition of the tortuosity for a flow parallel to the longitudinal direction (L). The apatite platelets configuration is characterized by an inclination of θLT = −20°; θLW = − 25°; θWT = 25° in both cases of Vf_A = 0.07 (a,b) and Vf_A = 0.42 (c,d). (b,d) Show sections of the model parallel to the LT plane. The green dashed lines illustrate the streamlines of the water molecule along the longitudinal direction. The red continuous lines represent the Euclidean distance between the path extremes. Sections of the two degrees of mineralization are in scale in order to highlight the changes in the geometry with the increase of the mineral VF.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Graphical definition of the tortuosity for a flow parallel to the thickness (T) direction. The apatite platelets configuration is characterized by an inclination of θLT = −20°; θLW = −25°; θWT = 25° in both cases of Vf_A = 0.07 (a,b) and Vf_A = 0.42 (c,d). (b,d) Show sections of the model parallel to the WT plane. The green dashed lines illustrate the streamlines of the water molecule along the thickness direction. The red continuous lines represent the Euclidean distance between the path extremes. Sections of the two mineral content cases are in scale in order to highlight the changes in the geometry with the increase of the mineral VF. In (c) is showed the period length (D) between adjacent mineral platelets in the longitudinal direction.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Graphical definition of constrictivity. The apatite platelets configuration is characterized by an inclination of θLT = −20°; θLW = −25°; θWT = 25° in both cases of Vf_A = 0.07 (a,b) and Vf_A = 0.42 (c,d). (b,d) Show sections of the model parallel to the WT plane. The dark blue and red double arrows represent the maximum and minimum cross sections respectively, considered for the calculation of the constrictivity factor in Eq. (6).

Subsequently, we represent the values of the diffusion coefficient in function of the tortuosity and the constrictivity calculated for flows parallel to the longitudinal (Fig. 6), width (Fig. 7) and thickness (Fig. 8) directions for both degrees of Vf_A = 0.07 and Vf_A = 0.42.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Diffusion coefficient (DL) for a flow parallel to the longitudinal axis (L) represented in function of the constrictivity and tortuosity factors for both models, i.e. Vf_A = 0.07 (a–c) and Vf_A = 0.42 (d,f): in (a,d) 3-D plot of the diffusivity DL versus constrictivity and tortuosity. In (b,e) 2-D plot of DL versus the constrictivity and in (c,f) 2-D plot of DL versus the tortuosity. The colour bands in the 2-D plots indicates the Confidence Interval at 95 percent.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Diffusion coefficient (DW) for a flow parallel to the width direction (W) represented in function of the constrictivity and tortuosity factors for both models, i.e. Vf_A = 0.07 (a–c) and Vf_A = 0.42 (d,f): in (a,d) 3-D plot of the diffusivity DW versus constrictivity and tortuosity. In (b,e) 2-D plot of DW versus the constrictivity and in (c,f) 2-D plot of DW versus the tortuosity. The colour bands in the 2-D plots indicates the Confidence Interval at 95 percent.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Diffusion coefficient (DT) for a flow parallel to the thickness direction (T) represented in function of the constrictivity and tortuosity factors for both models, i.e. Vf_A = 0.07 (a–c) and Vf_A = 0.42 (d,f): in (a,d) 3-D plot of the diffusivity DT versus constrictivity and tortuosity. In (b,e) 2-D plot of DT versus the constrictivity and in (c,f) 2-D plot of DT versus the tortuosity. The colour bands in the 2-D plots indicates the Confidence Interval at 95 percent.

The outcomes of the intermediate level, i.e. Vf_A = 0.32, are reported in the Supplementary Figs S1S3. We compared the behaviour of this mineral VF with the previous outcomes28 concerning a physiological mineralization degree.

Discussions

It has been noticed that the water flux significantly influences the provision of nutrients and the interaction between mineral and proteins constituents27, enhancing the strength of the collagen apatite matrix1. Moreover, since the signalling functions have a fundamental role in bone remodelling4,48, an alteration of the diffusion properties could contribute to an abnormal development of the tissue.

In this study, we investigate the influence of geometric factors, i.e. tortuosity and constrictivity, on the water diffusion coefficient in the nanostructure of bone tissue for different degrees of mineral VF. We also highlight the dependence of the tortuosity and constrictivity on the mineral aspect ratio that characterizes each VF and on the arrangement of the constituent elements of the mineralized collagen fibrils. Water diffusion within bone nanostructure has been already analysed by experimental and numerical investigations18,28 and pronounced anisotropy of the structure has been revealed. As a consequence of this spatial feature, in the study of Marinozzi et al.18 the diffusion coefficient along the longitudinal axis of the trabecula (DL) is found to be greater with one order of magnitude than the coefficient along the width direction (DW) and with two orders of magnitude than the coefficient in the thickness direction (DT). The outcomes of the present study are consistent with previous investigations3,18,28 and offers additional information with regard to the relationship between the structural anisotropy and mass transport properties.

Overall, the results indicate that the variation of the mineral VF influences the values of tortuosity, constrictivity and diffusivity. It is worth pointing out that the order of magnitude of the ratio between the diffusion coefficient along the directions of CST is conserved for all the degrees of mineralization considered. For high apatite, Vf_A = 0.42, the combined effect of the tortuosity and constrictivity for all the principal flow directions investigated corresponds to a decrease of the diffusion coefficient with respect to the physiological values achieved previously by Marinozzi et al.18. Conversely, the low apatite, Vf_A = 0.07, is characterized by slightly higher values of the diffusion coefficient in comparison to the diffusivity investigated in physiological conditions18. In addition, the intermediate condition of mineral, Vf_A = 0.32, shows outcomes in agreement with the previous study18.

Figures 68 illustrate the dependence of the diffusion coefficient on the constrictivity and tortuosity factors. According to its definition (Eq. (6), see Methods section for details), the constrictivity assumes values in the range 0–1, where the maximum value represents the absence of variations in the section of the passageway of the water molecule. Conversely, the adopted definition for the tortuosity (Eq. (3), see Methods section for details) leads to values greater than 1. This observation implies that the presence of mineral increases the path length of the fluid between two points with respect to the shortest distance between the points in a homogeneous medium32,49. For a fixed mineral VF, the variations of the tortuosity and constrictivity and, subsequently, those of the effective diffusion coefficient are mainly due to changes in the platelets orientation with respect to the CST. The influence of the apatite inclination relative to the trabecula main axes on the diffusion coefficient has been already discussed in a previous study28, whilst in this paper we focus on the relationship between the structural parameters and the diffusion coefficient.

For a parallel flow to the longitudinal direction (Fig. 6), the effective diffusion coefficient is slightly minor than the diffusivity in free space, i.e. D0 = 2.66·10−9 (m2·s−1)29. In fact, in this direction, the topology of the model is characterized by negligible obstacles. It should be noted that the constrictivity values have variations only in the third decimal place, namely for the low VF model δL ϵ [0.954; 0.961], while for the high VF model δL ϵ [0.839; 0.842]. Increasing the level of mineral VF, the variation of the platelets aspect ratio and the distance between mineral crystals leads to a decrement of the constrictivity values, and therefore to a slightly marked bottleneck effect on the diffusion coefficient.

For both levels of mineral VF, the tortuosity achieves values in a narrow range close to 1, namely for the low VF model τL ϵ [1.20; 1.35], while for the high VF model τL ϵ [1.13; 1.23]. These outcomes imply that, independently from the range of inclinations of the apatite platelets, in the longitudinal direction, the diffusing particle frequently does not encounter geometrical obstructions in terms of the presence of barriers that could extend significantly the length of the streamline with respect to the Euclidean distance between the path extremes. Moreover, increasing the platelets dimensions and reducing the distances between the mineral, as it occurs in the high VF condition, leads to a decrease of the tortuosity. Since the same set of values for the unit cell inclination was considered in the numerical simulations of all degrees of VF, this reduction of the tortuosity in the high VF model is justified by the increment of continuous straight paths with respect to the length of possible path deviations.

For a flow parallel to the width direction, a noticeable dependence of the diffusion coefficient DW on the tortuosity could be highlighted (Fig. 7). Along this direction, the diffusing particles are more frequently interrupted by obstacles, i.e. the apatite minerals, and, therefore the tortuosity is higher with an order of magnitude in comparison with the tortuous factor in the longitudinal direction. Conversely, the constrictivity factor shows a minor impact on the diffusivity trend. For each mineral VF, the variations of the constrictivity factor due to the different Gaussian PDFs considered for the mineral inclinations with respect to the CST, are extremely smaller, with changes in the third decimal place. The narrow interval suggests that the constrictivity is less influenced by the inclinations of the mineral platelets, meanwhile it exhibits a dependence on the degree of mineralization, assuming higher values in the low VF case.

In the thickness direction, the diffusion coefficient shows the minimum values among the other directions, with two orders of magnitude minor than DL (Fig. 8). The diffusivity along the thickness direction allows to properly highlight the major influence of the tortuosity on controlling the effective transport properties. In this condition, the tortuosity factor achieves higher values than in the longitudinal case with roughly two orders of magnitude. This is an expected behaviour since in the thickness direction, the diffusion pathways are the most complex, due to the spatial arrangement of the mineral platelets. Conversely, the constrictivity is characterized by narrow intervals, with variations in the third decimal place consequent to the different Gaussian PDFs considered for the apatite inclination. It is worth pointing out that for flow parallel to the thickness direction, the constrictivity is substantially influenced by variations of VF. In fact, in the high mineral VF model, changes in the cross section of the pores due to reductions of the distances between the mineral platelets results in a remarkable diminution of the constrictivity factor in comparison to the low VF condition.

In this study, we have predicted the diffusion coefficient within the unit cell of bone nanostructure relating it to the internal geometry. The different mineral aspect ratio, achieved for the degrees of mineralization analysed, i.e. Vf_A = 0.07 and Vf_A = 0.42, influences significantly the three factors that interact with the self-diffusion coefficient, i.e. tortuosity, constrictivity and porosity. The outcomes confirm that the tortuosity and constrictivity factors are mostly governed by the geometry of the structure. A growth of the mineral VF corresponds to a mineral matrix more densely embedded in the collagen fibrils which leads to smaller values of constrictivity, thus to a more marked bottleneck effect. Overall, the constrictivity factor shows modest variations with respect to the platelets arrangement for fixed VF and with respect to the concentration gradient. Conversely, the tortuosity displays a significant variation for the different flow directions considered. For concentration gradients parallel to the width and thickness directions, the tortuosity is higher with one and two orders of magnitude respectively, in comparison with the tortuosity in the longitudinal direction. It emerges that the tortuosity is significantly influenced by the anisotropy of the medium and it is, therefore, the main parameter controlling the effective diffusion coefficient.

These outcomes could provide also further insights into bone nanostructure geometry. Moreover, a critical point revealed by this study is referred to the average dimensions adopted for the apatite platelets in each level of VF analysed. A significant improvement in the numerical analysis performed consists in taking into account the variation of the platelets dimensions within the range present in literature. As highlighted in the Introduction, the dimensions of the platelets are well defined in literature9,13, whilst the distances between the mineral crystals (e.g. aW) are scarcely characterized. In the Supplementary Table S2 we report the average dimensions assumed for each model. We considered that, on average, an increased level of VF corresponds to higher dimensions of the apatite crystals and reduced distances between the platelets. In the present model, for different degrees of VF, the width of the apatite platelets has the major variation among all the other geometrical parameters, e.g. in the high VF condition the average width is roughly three times higher than the average width that characterizes the low apatite VF case13. Conversely, the increment of the mineral in the longitudinal direction is characterized by a minor factor, since the length of the apatite increases on average from 70 nm in the low VF model to 105 nm in the high VF condition. Minimal variations are considered also for the crystal thickness. The distance between the platelets in the longitudinal direction has geometric constraints, determined by the staggered pattern with axial period D = 67 nm. The distance along the thickness direction is assumed on the same order of magnitude as the apatite thickness15,23. In addition, the distance in the width direction that allows to achieve the mineral VF of interest is on the same order of magnitude as the minimum width dimension of the apatite, i.e. 10 nm13. The good agreement between the effective diffusivities obtained in this study and the literature data18,30 confirms the suitability of the sets of geometric dimensions considered for the mineralized collagen fibrils. Moreover, the corroboration of the mass transport coefficients represents also a validation of the arrangement of the mineral platelets along the width and thickness directions assumed in the model.

The analysis focuses on extreme values of the interval that describes the mineral content of the human bone matrix20,21, i.e. Vf_A = 0.07 and Vf_A = 0.42. This approach allows to investigate the mass transport behaviour in conditions that represent significant alterations of the mineralization level. For instance, a small amount of apatite crystallites is encountered in the pathological condition of osteomalacia50, while high mineral VFs are characteristic of the osteoporotic tissue50,51. However, the number of experimental and computational studies that evaluate variations in altered VFs structures are limited. In fact, the structural assumptions adopted for the low VF condition are based on computational studies23, since, to the best of our knowledge, experimental characterization at the nanoscale has not been undertaken. Conversely, the hypotheses relative to the apatite arrangement in the high VF case are supported by SAXS and TEM investigations13,50. The latter studies highlighted that the spatial structure remains invariant with respect to a physiological degree of VF, while modifications occur in terms of platelets size and interspacing52. In addition, the outcomes of the high VF condition, namely the decrease of the diffusion coefficient with respect to the physiological values achieved by Marinozzi et al.18, are in agreement with the experimental study of Roschger et al.20 In fact, they observed that in the osteoporotic disease, free water in the matrix is gradually replaced by mineral, and the mineralization density is approaching a plateau value, corresponding to the percolation threshold20. However, more research investigation with regard to the nanomorphology of the mineralized collagen fibril is required to fully extend the numerical approach presented in this work also to pathological situations.

In conclusion, we improved a previous computational model of bone nanostructure28 by considering more realistic fluctuations of the geometrical parameters that define the mineralized collagen fibrils. We applied the concepts of tortuosity and constrictivity in the diffusion process within the bone nanostructure and analysed their influence on the effective diffusion coefficient of water. However, there are several limitations to acknowledge. The model currently considers a limited unit cell composed of three apatite platelets. This is known as a simplification and, in perspective, a major number of mineral crystals should be assembled in order to obtain more accurate prediction of the diffusion coefficient and also to mimic a higher hierarchical level of bone structure, e.g. trabecula.

It should also be mentioned that an ulterior limitation of this study consists in the axial period of 67 nm set for the staggered pattern of mineral apatite in the longitudinal direction. Whilst the staggered arrangement is well established11 and corroborated by experimental studies9,46, the dimension of the period D is still under investigation53. It is worth investigating an optimal size which could provide the proper behaviour of the mineralized collagen fibril in terms of mass transport and mechanical properties. In fact, this longitudinal periodicity of the structure influences the load transfer between the collagen matrix and the apatite platelets and optimizes the mechanical properties of the composite10,54.

Despite these limitations, it may be observed that the computational model provides a good prediction of the diffusion coefficient. This model approach may offer a valuable foundation for future investigation in order to further understand the structure and mechanical behaviour of the mineralized collagen fibrils. Moreover, an optimization of the computational model could be a valuable support for predictive studies of the mechanical properties of biocomposite that mimic bone tissue55 or that could improve bone behaviour like biosensors based on ZnO nanomaterials56,57.

Methods

This work extends a previous computational study of water diffusion coefficient within bone nanostructure28. Enhancements and crucial aspects are summarised in this section while the equations implemented in the numerical model are reported as Supplementary Eqs S1S54.

Geometry model overview

The analysis is based on a 3-D unit cell of the mineralized collagen fibril (Fig. 1). We consider three apatite VFs, that represent low (Vf_A = 0.07), intermediate (Vf_A = 0.32) and high (Vf_A = 0.42) mineralized conditions. The mineral VF is obtained according to Eq. (1)23:

Vf_A=LWT(L+aL)(W+aW)(T+aT) 1

where L, W, T are the length, width and thickness of the mineral platelet, aL, aW and aT are the distances between the platelets in the longitudinal, width and thickness direction (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Graphical definition of the tortuosity for a flow parallel to the width (W) direction. The apatite platelets configuration is characterized by an inclination of θLT = −20°; θLW = −25°; θWT = 25° in both cases of Vf_A = 0.07 (a,b) and Vf_A = 0.42 (c,d). (b,d) Show sections of the model parallel to the WT plane. The green dashed lines illustrate the streamlines of the water molecule along the width direction. The red continuous lines represent the Euclidean distance between the path extremes. Sections of the two mineral content cases are in scale in order to highlight the changes in the geometry with the increase of the mineral VF. In (a,b) we also indicated the variables that characterize the distance between the platelets (aL, aW and aT) and between the collagen fibrils (ac) of diameter (d).

With respect to the previous model28, in this study we improved the 3D geometric model by considering all random values for the geometrical parameters involved in the characterization of the mineralized collagen fibril. These values were achieved by means of random extractions from Gaussian PDFs in the ranges indicated in literature8,10,13,15,16 (Supplementary Table S1). In particular, we assumed that the collagen diameter (d) range values spanning8 from 1.1 nm to 1.4 nm, while the distance between adjacent fibrils (ac) is in the range10 from 1 to 1.5 nm. Furthermore, in agreement with experimental analysis13, we considered for the apatite thickness (T) a range of values between 2.5 nm to 5 nm. Subsequently, these values are used as input parameters in the Monte Carlo computational analysis.

We assume that the mineral platelets and the collagen fibril composing a functional unit cell maintain their reciprocal parallelism (Fig. 1) independently of the cell inclination with respect to a global coordinate system (CST) fixed to the axes of the single trabeculae (Length L, Width W and Thickness T)28. We also consider that the orientation of the unit cell, i.e. the tern (θLT, θWT, θLW), is on average parallel to the axes of CST. Thus, the numerical values for the tern (θLT, θWT, θLW) were set from Gaussian PDFs identified by mean zero degrees and variable values of standard deviation (σ)14,15. In order to have a finite angle domain for each inclination θLT, θWT, θLW, numerical simulations were carried out with truncated Gaussian distributions in the interval [−2σ; +2σ].

Diffusion coefficient

The mineralized collagen fibril is characterized as a composite porous material. Thus, the effective diffusivity (Deff) is achieved introducing the tortuosity (τ), constrictivity (δ) and porosity factors (φ)32,33:

Deff(θLT,θLW,θWT,L,W,T,aL,aW,aT)=D0δ(θLT,θLW,θWT,L,W,T,aL,aW,aT)ϕ(L,W,T,aL,aW,aT)τ(θLT,θLW,θWT,L,W,T,aL,aW,aT) 2

In a homogeneous medium, the diffusion coefficient of water is D0 = 2.66 10−9 m2·s−1 at 27 °C29.

Tortuosity

The tortuosity factor (τ) is defined as the square ratio between the effective path length (li) of the sinuous streamline and the Euclidean straight path, (li_E) in the direction of flow, between the path extremes31,32,40, i.e.:

τ=(lili_E)2 3

The mineral matrix within the collagen fibrils is assumed as an impermeable obstacle to the water diffusion. Therefore, the tortuosity is influenced by the arrangement of the collagen-apatite matrix and flow direction. The numerical simulations were implemented assuming that a concentration gradient exists along one of the three axes of the CST at a time and the pore space allows the crossing of a single molecule of water at a time. The assessment of the tortuosity was performed by analysing separately the contribution of the mineral and collagen matrix, respectively. Subsequently, the overall tortuosity is obtained applying Eq. (8) reported in the study of Bini et al.28.

The tortuosity in the mineral matrix is determined with a geometrical approach. Taking into account the direction of the concentration gradient, we considered probable flow paths inside the unit cell in all the three main planes, i.e. LT, LW and WT (Figs 24, green dotted lines). The resulting trajectories lengths (li) are achieved through the Supplementary Eqs S1S36. Each equation is function of the dimensions of the mineral platelets, the spacing between the minerals and the inclination (θLT, θWT, θLW) of the apatite with respect to the CST. The denominator of Eq. (3) represents the straight-line distance in the direction of flow that connects the initial and final point of the tortuous flow path (Figs 24, red continuous lines). Supplementary Eqs S1S36 assess also the straight-line distance (li_E).

To consider the collagen contribution to the tortuosity factor, we analysed cross sections of the geometrical model parallel to the LT, LW and WT planes of CST (Figs 24). Since the collagen is inclined with respect to the CST, the cross sections have elliptical shape. We assumed that the water molecule, given the high density of the collagen fibrils and their arrangement, performs tangent trajectories to the fibril characterized by a length equal to the semi-perimeter of the ellipse. Whether the ellipse is expressed as a parametric curve, i.e. {x(t)=acos(t),y(t)=bsin(t)}, its semi-perimeter can be calculated through the elliptic integral of second kind58:

L(t)=tmintmaxx(t)2+y(t)2dt 4

where a is the semi-major axis of the ellipse, b is the semi-minor axis of the ellipse and tmin, tmax are the extreme angles of the arc considered. The semi-axes of the ellipse are determined according to Supplementary Eqs S37S48.

In the case of the collagen matrix, the Euclidean distance, li_E, is represented by the major axis of the ellipse.

Constrictivity

The constrictivity δ ϵ [0, 1] represents the hindrance to which the fluid is subject travelling through pores of varying cross section33,36. It becomes important only if the size of the solute, i.e. water molecule, is comparable to the dimensions of the pores. Several studies59,60 evaluate δ as a function of the ratio of the maximum and minimum cross section for different pore size structures:

δ=maxcrosssectionmincrosssectionmeancrosssection 5

Variations of the width of the passageway in the collagen-mineral matrix are identified by comparing the distance between the collagen fibrils and the spacing between collagen and apatite (Fig. 5). These distances are influenced by the dimensions of the matrix and the inclination with respect to the CST. The adaptation of Eq. (5) for each plane of our model is represented by the Supplementary Eqs S49S54.

Porosity

The porosity is considered independent from the inclination of the functional unit cell and is calculated by Eq. (5) reported in the previous study28.

Numerical simulation

Montecarlo method (Mathematica 10, Wolfram, Oxfordshire, UK) is used to assess the tortuosity, constrictivity and diffusion coefficient along the main directions of the CST for each percentage of VF. The computational algorithm developed for a concentration gradient parallel to one of the main axes of the CST can be summarized as follows:

  1. Random extraction of the standard deviations (σLT, σLW, σWT) that define the Gaussian PDFs;

  2. Fixed a value for σLT, σLW and σWT, respectively, random extraction of the orientation angles θLT, θLW, θWT from the corresponding Gaussian PDFs are performed;

  3. Random extraction of the geometric parameters that characterize the apatite matrix, i.e. L, W, T, aT, aW, and the collagen fibrils, i.e. d, ac, from the corresponding Gaussian PDFs.

  4. Calculation of the constrictivity and the tortuosity through the Supplementary Eqs S1S54 based on Eqs (5) and (3), respectively.

  5. Calculation of the effective diffusion coefficient in accordance to Eq. (2).

  6. For a fixed concentration gradient, the geometrical approach implemented for the assessment of the constrictivity and tortuosity allow to achieve information about the previous two structural factors and the effective diffusion coefficient from two planes. Therefore, an average between the two values resulting from the different planes is performed.

  7. Repeating steps from (b) to (f) until completing N realizations equal to 5000.

  8. Calculation of the mean of means of the constrictivity, tortuosity and effective diffusion coefficient respectively, corresponding to the Gaussian PDF considered for the mineral inclinations.

Therefore, in Figs 68 we represent the mean of means of the effective diffusion coefficients in function of the mean of means of the tortuosity and the mean of means of the constrictivity. In order to obtain the outcomes reported in Figs 68, we repeat the previous steps (a)–(h) for 5000 different Gaussian PDFs, performing overall up to 25·106 of iterations. Whilst in model28 the results show as the apatite inclination affects the effective diffusion coefficient for 100 different Gaussian PDFs, performing overall up to 104 iterations.

Statistical analysis

We performed a nonlinear fit on the mean of means of the diffusivity corresponding to each diffusion gradient in function of the tortuosity and constrictivity factors, respectively. We also reported a confidence interval of 95 percent that provides the interval for predicting the diffusivity mean of means at fixed values of the predictors, i.e. mean of means of tortuosity and mean of means of constrictivity. It is calculated as follows:

Dfitting±kσ2+ 6

where Dfitting is the fitting value of the diffusivity mean of means, k = 1.96044 is the coverage factor, σ2 is the estimated error variance and Σ is the estimated covariance matrix for the parameters. The estimated error variance is calculated as:

σ2=i(DiDfitting)2N1 7

The estimated covariance matrix is obtained as:

Σ=σˆ2(XTWX)1 8

where σˆ2 is the variance estimate, X is the design matrix and W is the diagonal matrix of weights.

Supplementary information

Author Contributions

F.B. and F.M. conceived the equation system and supervised the research. F.B. has conceived data processing. A.P. implemented the data analysis algorithm, performed the data analysis and drawn the figures. A.M. provided clinical expertise and performed the supervision of the results. F.B. and A.P. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and contributed to revising the manuscript.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-39297-w.

References

  • 1.Marinozzi F, Bini F, Marinozzi A. Evidence of entropic elasticity of human bone trabeculae at low strains. J. Biomech. 2011;44:988–991. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Marinozzi F, Bini F, Marinozzi A. Water uptake and swelling in single trabeculæ from human femur head. Biomatter. 2014;4:1–6. doi: 10.4161/biom.28237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pham TT, et al. Properties of water confined in hydroxyapatite nanopores as derived from molecular dynamics simulations. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2015;134:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s00214-015-1653-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gatti V, Azoulay EM, Fritton SP. Microstructural changes associated with osteoporosis negatively affect loading-induced fluid flow around osteocytes in cortical bone. J. Biomech. 2017;66:127–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Marinozzi F, et al. Variability of morphometric parameters of human trabecular tissue from coxo-arthritis and osteoporotic samples. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanità. 2012;48:19–25. doi: 10.4415/ANN_12_01_04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Marinozzi F, et al. A finite element analysis of altered load distribution within femoral head in osteoarthritis. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. Imaging Vis. 2015;3:84–90. doi: 10.1080/21681163.2013.869185. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Marinozzi F, Bini F, De Paolis A, De Luca R, Marinozzi A. Effects of hip osteoarthritis on mechanical stimulation of trabecular bone: A finite element study. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 2015;35:535–544. doi: 10.1007/s40846-015-0061-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Launey ME, Buehler MJ, Ritchie RO. On the Mechanistic Origins of Toughness in Bone. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2010;40:25–53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104427. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Olszta MJ, et al. Bone structure and formation: A new perspective. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Reports. 2007;58:77–116. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2007.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fratzl P, Gupta HS, Paschalis EP, Roschger P. Structure and mechanical quality of the collagen–mineral nano-composite in bone. J. Mater. Chem. 2004;14:2115–2123. doi: 10.1039/B402005G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hodge, A. J., Petruska, J. A. Recent studies with the electron microscope on ordered aggregates of the tropocollagen molecule. In: Ramachandran (Ed.), Aspects of Protein Structure. Academic Press. 289–300 (1963).
  • 12.Jaschouz D, Paris O, Roschger P, Hwang HS, Fratzl P. Pole figure analysis of mineral nanoparticle orientation in individual trabecula of human vertebral bone. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2003;36:494–498. doi: 10.1107/S0021889803000566. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rubin MA, et al. TEM analysis of the nanostructure of normal and osteoporotic human trabecular bone. Bone. 2003;33:270–282. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00194-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Reznikov N, Chase H, Brumfeld V, Shahar R, Weiner S. The 3D structure of the collagen fibril network in human trabecular bone: Relation to trabecular organization. Bone. 2015;71:189–195. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Landis WJ, Song MJ, Leith A, McEwen L, McEwen BF. Mineral and organic matrix interaction in normally calcifying tendon visualized in three dimensions by high-voltage electron microscopic tomography and graphic image reconstruction. J Struct Biol. 1993;110:39–54. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1993.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hassenkam T, et al. High-resolution AFM imaging of intact and fractured trabecular bone. Bone. 2004;35:4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bini F, Marinozzi A, Marinozzi F, Patanè F. Microtensile measurements of single trabeculae stiffness in human femur. J. Biomech. 2002;35:1515–1519. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00182-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Marinozzi, F., Bini, F., Quintino, A., Corcione, M., Marinozzi, A. Experimental study of diffusion coefficients of water through the collagen: Apatite porosity in human trabecular bone tissue. Biomed Res. Int. 2014, Article ID796519, 10.1155/2014/796519 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 19.Marinozzi F, et al. Technique for bone volume measurement from human femur head samples by classification of micro-CT image histograms. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanità. 2013;49:300–305. doi: 10.4415/ANN_13_03_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Roschger P, Paschalis EP, Fratzl P, Klaushofer K. Bone mineralization density distribution in health and disease. Bone. 2008;42:456–466. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bloebaum RD, Skedros JG, Vajda EG, Bachus KN, Constantz BR. Determining mineral content variations in bone using backscattered electron imaging. Bone. 1997;20:485–490. doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(97)00015-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Landis WJ, Silver FH. The structure and function of normally mineralizing avian tendons. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. - A. 2002;133:1135–1157. doi: 10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00248-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vercher-Martínez A, Giner E, Arango C, Javier Fuenmayor F. Influence of the mineral staggering on the elastic properties of the mineralized collagen fibril in lamellar bone. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2015;42:243–256. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nikolov S, Raabe D. Hierarchical modelling of the elastic properties of bone at submicron scales: the role of extrafibrillar mineralization. Biophys. J. 2008;94:4220–4232. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.125567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jäger I, Fratzl P. Mineralized collagen fibrils: A mechanical model with a staggered arrangement of mineral particles. Biophys. J. 2000;79:1737–1746. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76426-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cowin SC. Bone poroelasticity. J. Biomech. 1999;32:217–238. doi: 10.1016/S00219290(98)00161-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang Y, et al. Water-mediated structuring of bone apatite. Nat. Mater. 2013;12:1144–1153. doi: 10.1038/nmat3787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bini F, Pica A, Marinozzi A, Marinozzi F. 3D diffusion model within the collagen apatite porosity: An insight to the nanostructure of human trabecular bone. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0189041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chiavazzo E, Fasano M, Asinari P, Decuzzi P. Scaling behaviour for the water transport in nanoconfined geometries. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:1–11. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Di Tommaso D, et al. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Hydroxyapatite Nanopores in Contact with Electrolyte Solutions: The Effect of Nanoconfinement and Solvated Ions on the Surface Reactivity and the Structural, Dynamical, and Vibrational Properties of Water. Crystals. 2017;7:57. doi: 10.3390/cryst7020057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ghanbarian B, Hunt AG, Ewing RP, Sahimi M. Tortuosity in Porous Media: ACritical Review. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2013;77:1461–1477. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2012.0435. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shen L, Chen Z. Critical review of the impact of tortuosity on diffusion. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007;62:3748–3755. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.03.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Van Brakel J, Heertjes PM. Analysis of diffusion in macroporous media in terms of a porosity, a tortuosity and a constrictivity factor. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 1974;17:1093–1103. doi: 10.1016/0017-9310(74)90190-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hrabe J, Hrabětová S, Segeth K. A model of effective diffusion and tortuosity in the extracellular space of the brain. Biophys. J. 2004;87:1606–1617. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.103.039495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Holzer L, et al. The influence of constrictivity on the effective transport properties of porous layers in electrolysis and fuel cells. J. Mater. Sci. 2013;48:2934–2952. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-6968-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Stenzel O, Pecho O, Holzer L, Neumann M, Schmidt V. Predicting effective conductivities based on geometric microstructure characteristics. AIChE J. 2016;62:1834–1843. doi: 10.1002/aic.15160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Moussatov A, Ayrault C, Castagnède B. Porous material characterization - Ultrasonic method for estimation of tortuosity and characteristic length using a barometric chamber. Ultrasonics. 2001;39:195–202. doi: 10.1016/S0041-624X(00)00062-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rottreau TJ, Parlett CMA, Lee AF, Evans R. Diffusion NMR Characterization of Catalytic Silica Supports: A Tortuous Path. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2017;121:16250–16256. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02929. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Matyka, M., Khalili, A., Koza, Z. Tortuosity-porosity relation in porous media flow. Phys. Rev. E. 78, ID 026306, 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.026306 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 40.Yun M, Yu B, Xu P, Wu J. Geometrical Models for Tortuosity of Streamlines in Three-Dimensional Porous Media. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2006;84:301–309. doi: 10.1002/cjce.5450840305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wu YS, van Vliet LJ, Frijlink HW. & van der Voort Maarschalk, K. The determination of relative path length as a measure for tortuosity in compacts using image analysis. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2006;28:433–440. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2006.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Boving TB, Grathwohl P. Tracer diffusion coefficients in sedimentary rocks: Correlation to porosity and hydraulic conductivity. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2001;53:85–100. doi: 10.1016/S01697722(01)00138-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Münch B, Holzer L. Contradicting geometrical concepts in pore size analysis attained with electron microscopy and mercury intrusion. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2008;91:4059–4067. doi: 10.1111/j.15512916.2008.02736.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.McNally EA, Schwarcz HP, Botton GA, Arsenault AL. A model for the ultrastructure of bone based on electron microscopy of ion-milled sections. PLoS One. 2012;7:e29258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schwarcz, H. P., Abueidda, D., Jasiuk, I. The ultrastructure of bone and its relevance to mechanical properties. Front. Phys. 5(39), 10.3389/fphy.2017.00039 (2017).
  • 46.Georgiadis, M., Müller, R., Schneider, P. Techniques to assess bone ultrastructure organization: orientation and arrangement of mineralized collagen fibrils. J. R. Soc. Interface 13, ID 20160088, 10.1098/rsif.2016.0088 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 47.Georgiadis M, et al. 3D scanning SAXS: A novel method for the assessment of bone ultrastructure orientation. Bone. 2015;71:42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lemaire V, Tobin FL, Greller LD, Cho CR, Suva LJ. Modeling the interactions between osteoblast and osteoclast activities in bone remodeling. J. Theor. Biol. 2004;229:293–309. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Valdés-Parada FJ, Porter ML, Wood BD. The role of tortuosity in upscaling. Transp. Porous Med. 2011;88:1–30. doi: 10.1007/s11242-011-9787-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Boskey AL, Imbert L. Bone quality changes associated with aging and disease: a review. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2017;1410:93–106. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Aido M, et al. Relationship between nanoscale mineral properties and calcein labeling in mineralizing bone surfaces. Connect. Tissue Res. 2014;55:15–17. doi: 10.3109/03008207.2014.923869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Maude G, et al. One-month spaceflight compromises the bone microstructure, tissue-level mechanical properties, osteocyte survival and lacunae volume in mature mice skeletons. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03014-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fang, M. & Banaszak Holl, M. M. Variation in type I collagen fibril nanomorphology: the significance and origin. BoneKEy Reports2, Article number 394, 10.1038/bonekey.2013.128 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 54.Yuan F, et al. A new model to simulate the elastic properties of mineralized collagen fibril. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2011;10:147–160. doi: 10.1007/s10237-010-0223-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dutta A, Vanderklok A, Tekalur SA. High strain rate mechanical behavior of seashell-mimetic composites: Analytical model formulation and validation. Mech. Mater. 2012;55:102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2012.08.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Araneo R, et al. Effect of the scaling of the mechanical properties on the performances of ZnO piezo-semiconductive nanowires. AIP Conf. Proc. 2014;1603:14–22. doi: 10.1063/1.4883037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Araneo R, et al. Design concepts, fabrication and advanced characterization methods of innovative piezoelectric sensors based on ZnO nanowires. Sensors. 2014;14:23539–23562. doi: 10.3390/s141223539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. (Eds). Elliptic Integrals in Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, 9th printing. 587-607 (New York: Dover, 1972).
  • 59.Curie JA. Gaseous Diffusion in Porous Media. Part 1. A non-steady state method. Br. J. Appl. Phys. 1960;11:314–317. doi: 10.1088/0508-3443/11/8/302. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Takahashi H, Seida Y, Yui M. 3D X-ray CT and diffusion measurements to assess tortuosity and constrictivity in a sedimentary rock. diffusion-fundamentals.org. 2009;11:1–11. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES