Abstract
The ubiquitin specific protease 7 (USP7 or HAUSP) is known to regulate a variety of cellular processes by binding and deubiquitylating specific target proteins. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of its interactions and functions, we used affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry to profile USP7 interactions. This revealed a novel interaction with FBXO38, a poorly characterized F-box protein. We showed that USP7 stabilizes FBXO38 dependent on its catalytic activity by protecting FBXO38 from proteasomal degradation. We used a BioID approach to profile the protein interactions (and putative functions) of FBXO38, revealing an interaction with KIF20B, a Kinesin-6 protein required for efficient cytokinesis. FBXO38 was shown to function independently from an SCF complex to stabilize KIF20B. Consequently, depletion of either FBXO38 or USP7 led to dramatic decreases in KIF20B levels and KIF20B at the midbody, which were manifested in cytokinetic defects. Furthermore, cytokinetic defects associated with USP7 silencing were rescued by restoring FBXO38 or KIF20B. The results indicate a novel mechanism of regulating cytokinesis through USP7 and FBXO38.
Introduction
The ubiquitin specific protease 7 (USP7), also known as HAUSP (Herpesvirus Associated Ubiquitin Specific Protease), is a deubiquitylating enzyme (DUB) that removes ubiquitin from specific target proteins, often resulting in their stabilization due to protection from proteasomal-mediated degradation. Due to its wide variety of substrates, USP7 has been found to be an important regulator of many cellular processes, including apoptosis, the cell cycle, gene expression, DNA damage responses and DNA replication1–4. USP7 misregulation is also associated with several cancers5–9. For example, USP7 overexpression has been shown to correlate with poor prognosis in lung and ovarian cancer and with tumor aggressiveness in prostate cancer7,9,10. However, both overexpression and downregulation of USP7 have been observed in breast and colon cancer6,11–13. The association of USP7 with cancer has sparked a major interest in the development of USP7 inhibitors as anti-cancer therapies14–20.
USP7 was first identified as a binding partner of the herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) ICP0 protein, and later shown to be the target of multiple proteins from several different viruses, particularly herpesviruses21–33. The first cellular functions identified for USP7 were in the regulation of the p53 pathway. Studies showed that, upon DNA damage induction, USP7 directly deubiquitylates and stabilizes the p53 tumor suppressor protein34,35. Alternatively, under normal cellular conditions USP7 can act as a negative regulator of p53 by deubiquitylating and stabilizing the dominant p53 E3 ubiquitin ligases Hdm2 and HdmX36,37. Since then, USP7 has been shown to deubiquitylate and stabilize numerous other proteins with a variety of functions38–44. In addition to cleaving polyubiquitin chains that target proteins for degradation, USP7 can cleave monoubiquitin to alter protein localization or function. For example, USP7 cleaves monoubiquitin from histone H2B to impact gene expression and similarly removes monoubiquitin from FOXO4 to regulate its transcriptional activity5,27,45,46. Finally, USP7 has also been found to negatively regulate promyelocytic leukemia (PML) proteins and nuclear bodies through a mechanism independent of its deubiquitylating activity47.
A number of reports have demonstrated the importance of USP7 in regulating progression through the cell cycle. First, studies have shown that depletion of USP7 in cancer cells is positively correlated with a G1 arrest, which can be triggered in some cases by p53 accumulation14,48,49. In other cases, USP7 depletion may result in G1 arrest due to destabilization of USP7 targets UHRF1 and Chk1, which are required for G1/S transition43,50–54. We have previously shown that USP7 also promotes late S phase and G2 progression by facilitating unloading of the Minichromosome Maintenance protein (MCM) complex from chromatin during DNA-replication termination55. Further supporting its role in DNA replication, USP7 was shown to be a SUMO deubiquitylase that functions to maintain high concentrations of SUMOylated factors at replication forks, which is necessary for replication-fork progression56. In addition, USP7 was recently found to stabilize Geminin; a protein that inhibits replication origin licensing by Cdt113. USP7 also regulates early mitotic progression by stabilizing the mitotic checkpoint protein CHFR, which is responsible for delaying entry into metaphase in response to mitotic stress49,57,58.
The numerous roles of USP7 stem from its ability to specifically bind multiple target proteins. USP7 uses two different binding pockets to recognize its target proteins, both of which are distinct from its central catalytic domain4. The first identified binding pocket is within the N-terminal TRAF domain (NTD). Many USP7 targets bind this pocket including p53, Hdm2, HdmX, MCM-BP, Epstein-Barr virus EBNA1 and Kaposi’s sarcoma associated herpesvirus (KSHV) vIRF1 and vIRF424,26,33,55,59–61. Structures and mutational analyses of these interactions identified a P/A/ExxS motif in all of these targets that is responsible for the USP7 interaction, and showed that USP7 amino acids D164 and W165 are essential for mediating these interactions26,33,55,59–61. More recently, a second binding pocket was identified in USP7, found within one of the ubiquitin-like structures (Ubl2) in the C-terminal domain (CTD). This pocket is bound by GMP synthetase (GMPS), DNMT1, UHRF1 and the HSV-1 protein ICP0 through KxxxK motifs that contact USP7 residues D762 and D76462–66.
The above discoveries of USP7 functions have come from studies on the specific target proteins. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of USP7 interactions and potentially identify novel targets, we used an affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS) approach to profile interactions with USP7. This identified a novel interaction with a poorly characterized F-box protein, FBXO38, whose stability is dependent on USP7. We then used the BioID proteomics method to identify interactors and potential functions of FBXO38, revealing an interaction with KIF20B, a key regulator of cytokinesis. We show that FBXO38 has an important role in stabilizing KIF20B, thereby contributing to cytokinesis, and that USP7 indirectly regulates KIF20B and cytokinesis through FBXO38. Therefore, we have identified previously unknown roles for USP7 and FBXO38 in the regulation of cytokinesis.
Results
USP7 interacts with and stabilizes FBXO38
To characterize new functions of USP7 through the identification of novel interactors, we performed affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry (AP-MS) on FLAG-tagged USP7 that was expressed in AGS gastric carcinoma cells. To keep USP7 levels low, potentially avoiding artifacts of overexpression, we delivered FLAG-USP7 in an adenovirus expression system at low multiplicity of infection that resulted in expression in ~70% of the cells at levels close to endogenous (Supplementary Fig. S1A,B). FLAG-tagged β-galactosidase (β-gal) was used as a negative control and was similarly delivered. Bait proteins were recovered on anti-FLAG resin and similar recoveries of β-gal and USP7 were confirmed by Western blot (Supplementary Fig. S1C). Co-purifying proteins were identified by LC-MS/MS of tryptic peptides. Table 1 shows the peptide recovery (total spectral counts) of USP7 specific interactors, determined by comparison of recoveries with β-gal as well as to average values in the Contaminent Repository for Affinity Purification database http://www.crapome.org/; a repository of results of over 400 AP-MS experiments67. The complete data for USP7 and β-gal are provided in Supplementary Table S1. Previously characterized USP7 interactors, including GMPS, the ATM-dependant phosphatase PPM1G, DNA methyltransferase DNMT1 and the E3 ligase TRIP12 were among the specifically recovered proteins, providing validation of our method27,46,52,53,62,64,68–72. We also identified a number of uncharacterized USP7 interactors, including the F-box protein FBXO38, the deubiquitylating enzyme USP11, DEAD-box helicase DDX24, Peptidylprolyl Isomerase PPIL4, DEAH-Box Helicase DDX40, Lamina-associated polypeptide TMPO and the transcription elongation factor TCEAL4.
Table 1.
Identified proteins | Total Spectral Counts | Length (amino acids) | Peptide counts/length | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAG-USP7 | FLAG-β GAL | CRAPome average | |||
USP7 | 2307 | 0 | 1102 | 2.093 | |
GMPS | 303 | 0 | 3.6 | 693 | 0.437 |
USP11 | 159 | 0 | 3.2 | 963 | 0.165 |
TRIP12 | 133 | 0 | 4.3 | 1992 | 0.067 |
DNMT1 | 188 | 0 | 3.7 | 1616 | 0.116 |
DDX24 | 126 | 0 | 3.4 | 859 | 0.147 |
PPIL4 | 80 | 0 | 4.7 | 492 | 0.163 |
DHX40 | 68 | 0 | 2 | 779 | 0.087 |
PPM1G | 49 | 0 | 2 | 546 | 0.090 |
TMPO | 68 | 0 | 13.6 | 694 | 0.098 |
FBXO38 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 1188 | 0.045 |
TCEAL4 | 24 | 0 | 2 | 215 | 0.112 |
In this study, we focused on the USP7-FBXO38 interaction, which was also detected by Sowa et al.73 but not characterized. F-box proteins typically form Skp1-cullin- F-box (SCF) E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes. However, the only reported function for FBXO38 is a co-activator of the KLF7 transcription factor and this is independent of an SCF complex74–76. To investigate the significance of the USP7-FBXO38 interaction, we first validated the interaction by transiently expressing myc-tagged USP7 in AGS cells, performing myc immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting for endogenous FBXO38 (Fig. 1A; full length Western blots for all figures are provided in the Supplementary Fig. S2). USP7 but not empty plasmid recovered FBXO38. The interaction was also verified by co-expressing myc-USP7 and FLAG-FBXO38 in 293T cells, followed by FLAG IP (Fig. 1B). Myc-USP7 was efficiently recovered in samples containing FLAG-FBXO38 but not empty FLAG plasmid. We then used these expression systems to determine how USP7 binds FBXO38. We and others previously defined two USP7 binding pockets, one in the N-terminal TRAF domain (NTD) that is disrupted by D164A,W165A mutations (referred to here as DW) and a second in the Ubl2 ubiquitin-like domain that is disrupted by D762R,D764R mutations (referred to here as Ubl2)26,59–62. We compared recovery of endogenous FBXO38 with myc-USP7 containing WT sequence or DW or Ubl2 mutations (individually and in combination) or mutation in the USP7 catalytic cysteine (C223S) (Fig. 1A). Both the DW and Ubl2 mutations decreased FBXO38 recovery to some degree, with the DW mutation having the greater impact. The effect of these binding pocket mutations was also assessed by co-expression with FLAG-FBXO38 in 293T cells followed by FLAG IP (Fig. 1B). The Ubl2 mutant of USP7 was clearly recovered with FLAG-FBXO38, whereas the DW and DW/Ubl2 mutations abrogated the interaction. Together the results indicate that, while both the NTD and Ubl2 pockets contribute to FBXO38 binding, the NTD binding pocket is the major binding site.
Another interesting finding of the experiment in Fig. 1B, was that the level of FLAG-FBXO38 was significantly increased when it was co-expressed with myc-USP7 (compare lanes 2 and 3) and that the degree of increase of FLAG-FBXO38 paralleled the degree of binding of the USP7 mutants; DW and DW/Ubl2 mutants that did not bind FBXO38 did not upregulate it and the Ubl2 mutant that had decreased binding had an intermediate effect on FBXO38 levels. These results suggest that USP7 binding to FBXO38 stabilizes it, possibly by deubiquitylation. To investigate this further, we asked whether upregulation of FBXO38 required the catalytic activity of USP7. Comparison of FLAG-FBXO38 levels co-expressed with WT or catalytically inactive (C223S) USP7 or empty plasmid showed that the catalytic activity of USP7 was required to upregulate FBXO38, consistent with FBXO38 stabilization by deubiquitylation (Fig. 1C). We also tested whether silencing of USP7 with siRNA affected the level of endogenous FBXO38 and found a dramatic reduction in FBXO38 upon USP7 depletion (Fig. 1D). To determine if this loss of FBXO38 was due to proteasomal-mediated degradation, we repeated the USP7 silencing in the presence of the MG132 proteasome inhibitor and found that this restored FBXO38 levels. Together the results suggest that USP7 binds and stabilizes FBXO38 through deubiquitylation, preventing its proteasomal-mediated degradation.
Identification of KIF20B as an FBXO38 interactor stabilized by FBXO38 and USP7
Little is known about the functions of FBXO38, other than it can act as a transcriptional coactivator with KLF7. To more comprehensively identify FBXO38 interactions that could reflect its functions, we performed FBXO38 proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID), expressing a FLAGBirA*-tagged version of FBXO38 at close to endogenous levels from an inducible stably integrated cassette in 293 T-REx cells and compared the proximal interactions to the FLAGBirA* negative control. Selected high-confidence interactors with FLAGBirA*–FBXO38 in two independent experiments are shown in Fig. 2A. The complete list of specific interactors and raw data are provided in Supplementary Table S2 and the raw data files were deposited in the MassIVE database (https://massive.ucsd.edu/; accession number MSV000082444). Interestingly, USP7 was the most prevalent FBXO38 interactor. SKP1 and CUL1, the two core components for the SCF complex were also among the top hits, indicating that FBXO38 can form an SCF complex. In addition, we identified several novel interactions, including one with the Kinesin Family member 20B (KIF20B), a plus-end-directed motor enzyme that is required for the completion of cytokinesis77–80.
The interaction between FBXO38 and KIF20B was validated in AGS cells by transient expression and IP of FLAG-FBXO38 and immunoblotting for endogenous KIF20B (Fig. 2B). To further confirm the specificity of the FBXO38-KIF20B interaction, we also compared the recovery of endogenous KIF20B and transiently expressed HA-KIF20B with unrelated FLAG-tagged proteins (USP11 and β-gal). In both cases, KIF20B was preferentially recovered with FLAG-FBXO38, despite the much higher expression levels of FLAG-USP11 and FLAG- β-GAL (Supplementary Fig. S3). In addition, we examined recovery of KIF20B in 400 published BioID analyses of 200 different FLAGBirA*-tagged bait proteins, performed using similar systems and protocol as for FBXO38 (Supplementary Table S3)81–84. KIF20B was only detected in duplicate samples for 6 out of 200 proteins (and with lower recovery than for FBXO38), supporting the high specificity of the FBXO38-KIF20B interaction.
The finding that FBXO38 can form an SCF complex, which would be expected to induce the degradation of specific targets, prompted us to examine whether FBXO38 regulated the levels of KIF20B. To this end, we silenced FBXO38 in AGS cells with two different siRNAs and examined effects on endogenous KIF20B (Fig. 3A). Surprisingly, both siRNAs resulted in a dramatic reduction in KIF20B levels (without affecting USP7 levels), suggesting that FBXO38 stabilized KIF20B, rather than destabilizing it as expected if FBXO38 was acting as part of the SCF complex. Since FBXO38 levels are controlled by USP7, we also examined the effect of USP7 silencing on KIF20B in AGS cells. As expected, USP7 depletion (with two different siRNAs) greatly decreased both FBXO38 and KIF20B levels (Fig. 3B). Quantification of these effects from multiple experiments showed a ~25 fold decrease in KIF20B upon FBXO38 silencing and ~5-fold decrease upon USP7 silencing (Fig. 3C). While both FBXO38 and USP7 control KIF20B levels, this effect was not reciprocal as silencing of KIF20B did not affect the levels of FBXO38 or USP7 (Fig. 3D). We also tested the possibility that the decrease in KIF20B upon FBXO38 silencing was due to loss of KIF20B transcripts (Fig. 3E). However, FBXO38 silencing only slightly decreased the level of KIF20B transcripts (~30% decrease) as opposed to the ~25-fold decrease seen at the protein level. Together the results support a model in which FBXO38 binds and stabilizes KIF20B and USP7 stabilizes KIF20B indirectly by stabilizing FBXO38.
To determine the generality of these effects, we repeated the FBXO38 and USP7 silencing experiments in HCT116 cells (Fig. 3F). Again we observed that depletion of either FBXO38 or USP7 greatly decreased KIF20B levels. HCT116 cells with USP7 knockout have been previously generated37, and our findings predict that these cells should have reduced levels of FBXO38 and KIF20B. A comparison of the levels of these proteins in HCT116 cells with and without the USP7 knockout confirmed that FBXO38 and KIF20B cells are considerably reduced in the absence of USP7 (Fig. 3G).
To verify that the regulation of FBXO38 and KIF20B levels by USP7 was due to the deubiquitylation activity of USP7, AGS and HCT116 cells were treated with a USP7 catalytic inhibitor (Compound 4, also known as AD04) recently developed by Harrison and colleagues15 or its inactive enantiomer (Fig. 3H). USP7 inhibition was confirmed by examining p53 levels, which are known to increase due to destabilization of the p53 E3 ubiquitin ligases, Hdm2 and Hdmx15,36,85,86. Consistent with the USP7 depletion and overexpression experiments, USP7 inhibition resulted in decreased levels of FBXO38 and KIF20B. This further supports our model that FBXO38 is stabilized by the deubiquitylation activity of USP7 which in turn stabilizes KIF20B.
FBXO38 interacts with and stabilizes KIF20B by an SCF-independent mechanism
While the role of FBXO38 in stabilizing KIF20B is not what is expected of an SCF complex, it is possible that an FBXO38-containing SCF complex may be affecting KIF20B indirectly by inducing degradation of a KIF20B destabilizing protein. Alternatively, FBXO38 might be acting independently of an SCF complex. We addressed these possibilities by comparing the effects of overexpression of FBXO38 on KIF20B levels to that of an FBXO38 mutant that lacks the F-box sequence needed to form the SCF complex. The F-box sequence in FBXO38 is located between amino acids 33 to 6574 and therefore we generated an F-box deletion mutant of FBXO38 (FBXO38ΔFBX) by truncating the first 77 amino acids. Co-expression of HA-KIF20B and either FLAG-FBXO38, FLAG-FBXO38ΔFBX or empty FLAG plasmid in AGS and 293T cells showed that both FBXO38 proteins greatly increased the levels of HA-KIF20B in both cell lines (Fig. 4A,B). Furthermore, immunoprecipitation of the FBXO38 proteins showed that FBXO38ΔFBX recovered similar amounts of KIF20B as WT FBXO38 but, unlike WT FBXO38, did not recover Skp1 (Fig. 4B). These results indicate that the F-box of FBXO38 (that is needed to form an SCF complex) is dispensable for KIF20B binding and stabilization, and therefore FBXO38 stabilizes KIF20B in an SCF-independent manner. In keeping with an SCF-independent effect of FBXO38, treatment of the cells with the MG132 proteasome inhibitor did not restore KIF20B levels caused by FBXO38 silencing (Fig. 4C).
FBXO38 and USP7 regulate cytokinesis through KIF20B
Since KIF20B’s function in cytokinesis involves its localization to midbodies77,79,80, we asked whether silencing FBXO38 and USP7 affected the level of KIF20B at midbodies. To this end, AGS cells treated with siRNA targeting FBXO38 or USP7 or negative control siRNA (Fig. 5A) were fixed and stained for KIF20B and acetylated tubulin to mark the midbody (Fig. 5B,C), and the level of KIF20B staining at the midbodies (relative to acetylated tubulin staining) was quantified for 30 midbodies per sample in three independent experiments (Fig. 5D). Silencing of either FBXO38 or USP7 resulted in a significant decrease in KIF20B at the midbodies, suggesting that FBXO38 and USP7 can affect KIF20B function in cytokinesis.
Previous reports have shown that KIF20B depletion results in the accumulation of multinucleated cells, due to defects in cytokinetic abscission49,77,79,80. To test whether USP7 and FBXO38 silencing affected KIF20B function in cytokinesis, we treated AGS cells with siRNA targeting each of the three proteins (see Fig. 3A,B,D for degree of silencing), or with a negative control siRNA and determined the number of multinucleated cells by microscopy of DAPI-stained cells. To differentiate multinucleated cells from overlapping single cells, we also stained for F-actin using fluorescently-labelled phalloidin to mark the outer edges of the cell. ~1500 cells in each sample were then counted and the percentage of cells containing two or more nuclei was determined. Sample images and quantification from three independent experiments are shown in Fig. 6A. Consistent with previous reports, KIF20B silencing resulted in a 13-fold increase in the frequency of multinucleated cells when compared to the silencing control. In addition, silencing of FBXO38 had almost an identical effect as silencing KIF20B on inducing multinucleated cells. USP7 silencing also obviously increased the percentage of multinucleated cells (~6-fold) relative to the silencing control. The results confirm that both FBXO38 and USP7 affect the cytokinetic function of KIF20B. The more modest effect of USP7 silencing (as compared to KIF20B and FBXO38 silencing) is consistent with the model that USP7 regulates KIF20B indirectly through FBXO38.
To further confirm the cytokinetic defect associated with USP7 we compared the number of multinucleated cells in HCT116 USP7 knockout cells or parental HCT116 cells. USP7 knockout cells exhibited a 4-fold higher frequency of multinucleated cells as the parental cells, in good agreement with the results of USP7 silencing in AGS cells (Fig. 6B).
Since USP7 is known to regulate the levels of multiple proteins, it is possible that the multinucleated phenotype that we found to be associated with USP7 depletion is independent of FBXO38 and KIF20B. For example, USP7 has been reported to affect Aurora A, whose loss of function is associated with a multipolar spindle phenotype that can lead to multinucleated cells49,87,88. We examined the possibility that USP7 silencing in AGS cells increased the incidence of multipolar spindles but found no cells with multipolar spindles in 50 metaphase cells examined (Supplementary Fig. S4). In addition, we tested whether the multinucleated phenotype associated with USP7 silencing was caused by loss of FBXO38 and KIF20B by performing rescue experiments. To this end, AGS cells were treated with siRNA targeting the 3′UTR of USP7 or a negative control siRNA, then transfected with a plasmid expressing myc-USP7, HA-KIF20B, FLAG-FBXO38 or an empty plasmid. Cells were then stained with antibodies against FLAG, HA or myc to identify cells expressing the transfected plasmid and also stained with DAPI and fluorescently-labelled phalloidin to identify multinucleated cells (Fig. 7A,B). As expected, USP7 silencing (which was confirmed by Western blotting; Fig. 7C) in the presence of the control plasmid resulted in an increase in multinucleated cells when compared to the silencing control (Fig. 7B). Also as expected, this phenotype was greatly reduced (compared to the empty vector control) in cells in which myc-USP7 was expressed. In addition, we found that USP7 silenced cells expressing HA-KIF20B or FLAG-FBXO38 had greatly reduced numbers of multinucleated cells, with HA-KIF20B almost completely rescuing the phenotype. Note that since only a small percentage of the USP7-silenced cells express the recombinant proteins, only a small effect on FBXO38 levels upon USP7 rescue and on KIF20B levels upon USP7 and FBXO38 rescue can be seen by western blots of total cells (Fig. 7C). The data strongly suggest that the cytokinetic defect observed upon USP7 silencing is a result of decreased KIF20B levels. The same rescue experiments were also performed with FBXO38ΔFBX, giving almost identical results to WT FBXO38 and further confirming that FBXO38 is functioning independently from an SCF complex in its regulation of KIF20B levels and function. Together the results indicate that USP7 and FBXO38 can affect cytokinesis through effects on KIF20B.
Discussion
USP7 is known to bind and deubiquitylate multiple proteins with diverse functions, thereby regulating a variety of cellular pathways relevant for oncogenesis. To gain additional insight into the protein interactions and functions of USP7, we used an AP-MS proteomics approach to identify USP7 binding partners in the context of gastric carcinoma cells. This led to the identification of a previously uncharacterized interaction with FBXO38. We now show that the USP7-FBXO38 interaction has a role in regulating cytokinesis through KIF20B.
We have shown that FBXO38 interacts with USP7, predominantly through the USP7 NTD binding pocket, that is also known to bind p53, Hdm2, HdmX, MCM-BP, Epstein-Barr virus EBNA1 and Kaposi’s sarcoma associated herpesvirus (KSHV) vIRF1 and vIRF424,26,33,55,59–61. We have previously defined a P/A/ExxS motif that is used to bind this NTD binding pocket26,59,61 and FBXO38 has 8 such motifs that might be responsible for this interaction. We also observed that mutation of the USP7 Ubl2 binding pocket consistently decreased FBXO38 binding, suggesting that part of FBXO38 might also contact this pocket. Other proteins that bind the Ubl2 pocket do so using a polybasic KxxxK motif62, and FBXO38 contains five of these motifs that may contribute to USP7 binding.
The interaction of USP7 with FBXO38 prompted us to examine a role of USP7 in stabilizing FBXO38 through deubiquitylation. In support of this hypothesis, we found that FBXO38 levels increased upon overexpression of WT USP7 but not the USP7 catalytic mutant (Fig. 1C) as well as upon treatment with the MG132 protease inhibitor (Fig. 4C). Note that this effect on FBXO38 levels is more readily detected when FBXO38 is co-overexpressed with USP7 than on endogenous FBXO38, because the transfected USP7 is only expressed in a minority of the cells. Furthermore, depletion of USP7 in several cell lines dramatically decreased endogenous levels of FBXO38, an effect that could be reversed upon inhibition of the proteasome (Fig. 1D). Finally inhibition of the catalytic activity of USP7 also decreased FBXO38. Together these findings suggest that FBXO38 is an unstable protein that is stabilized by USP7 through deubiquitylation, preventing its proteasomal degradation. However, it is also possible that USP7 affects FBXO38 stability indirectly through deubiquitylation of another protein that stabilizes FBXO38.
FBXO38 has not been extensively studied but has been found to be a coactivator of the KLF7 transcription factor, which is a regulator of neuronal differentiation74–76. FBXO38 (also called MoKA) was shown to bind KLF7 through its F-box domain and to enhance transcription of KLF7 target genes, including p21Waf/Cip74. Furthermore, a dominant mutation in FBXO38 that renders it unable to bind KLF7 causes spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), an inherited disorder characterized by progressive muscle weakness75. FBXO38 has also been found to shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm, suggesting that it also has cytoplasmic functions74,76. To gain a more comprehensive profile of the protein interactions of FBXO38 that might reflect additional functions, we performed a BioID experiment with FBXO38. This revealed several novel interactions including one with KIF20B. In addition, the SCF complex components, SKP1 and CUL1, were prominent interactors showing that FBXO38, like other F-box proteins, is capable of forming an SCF ubiquitin ligase complex. This suggests that FBXO38 may have roles in the ubiquitylation and degradation of specific target proteins, which may include some of the proteins identified as FBXO38 interactors in the BioID experiment. However, FBXO38 was found to stabilize KIF20B and this stabilization did not require the F-Box motif necessary to form the SCF complex. Therefore FBXO38 stabilizes KIF20B independently from the SCF complex. Together, our results support a model where USP7 binds and stabilizes FBXO38, which in turn, binds and stabilizes KIF20B.
Our finding that FBXO38 acts independently of an SCF complex to stabilize KIF20B, is consistent with the KLF7 co-activator function of FBXO38, which was also shown to be independent of an SCF complex74. Furthermore, SCF-independent functions have been reported for ~12% of human F-box proteins89. This includes FBXO7, which has both SCF-dependent and independent functions, and resembles FBXO38 in that it binds and stabilizes specific proteins (p27 and Cdk6 complexes)89–91. Although there are currently no known SCF-dependant functions of FBXO38, the fact that we showed it could interact with SKP1 and CUL1 suggests that, like FBXO7, it might have additional SCF-dependant functions. While FBXO38 functions with KLF7 and KIF20B are both SCF-independent, the mechanisms of these interactions are distinct; FBXO38 binds KLF7 through its F-box sequence74, while FBXO38 lacking this sequence binds KIF20B, indicating that the KIF20B binding site is elsewhere in the protein. FBXO38 contains a central RNase Inhibitor (RNI)-like domain, similar to that of leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) in placental RNase inhibitor92. LRRs are protein interaction domains93,94 and therefore this domain might mediate the KIF20B interaction.
KIF20B (previously called MPHOSPH1 or MPP1) is one of three members of the Kinesin-6 family and is a critical regulator of cytokinesis77–80,95. In cytokinesis a contractile ring drives the ingression of a cleavage furrow that partitions the cytoplasm between the daughter cells that are connected through an intercellular bridge. A midbody forms at the center of the intercellular bridge and serves as both the anchor for the ingressed cleavage furrow and a platform for the assembly of the machinery that drives abscission. KIF20B has been shown to promote cytokinesis by temporally regulating both cytokinetic furrow ingression and abscission and also by promoting efficient midbody maturation and microtubule stabilization80. In keeping with these important roles, multiple studies have shown that knockdown of KIF20B in bladder, liver and HCT116 colon cancer cells results in cytokinetic defects that are reflected in accumulation of multinucleated cells that eventually undergo apoptosis33,57,79,80. The major effect of FBXO38 and USP7 on KIF20B levels, prompted us to investigate whether these two proteins are also important for cytokinesis. As predicted, silencing of USP7 or FBXO38 or USP7 knockout significantly increased the percentage of multinucleated cells. Furthermore, rescue experiments showed that multinucleated cells caused by lack of USP7 could be prevented by providing KIF20B or FBXO38, confirming that cytokinetic defects associated with USP7 depletion are a result of decreased FBXO38 and KIF20B levels. The decreased levels of KIF20B observed at the midbodies upon depletion of FBXO38 or USP7 further supports the contention that these proteins are affecting cytokinesis through disruption of KIF20B function.
In conclusion, we have identified novel roles for USP7 and FBXO38 in cytokinesis through the stabilization of KIF20B. While USP7 has several identified roles in cell cycle progression13,14,48,49,55,56,58, to our knowledge, this is the first report of a role for USP7 in cytokinesis. Overexpression of KIF20B has been found to positively correlate with tumorigenesis and cell proliferation in bladder and liver cancer79,95. Consequently, KIF20B is recognized as a potential therapeutic target for these cancers, since depletion of KIF20B in these cells leads to mitotic arrest, through failure of cytokinesis, and subsequent apoptosis. Similarly, the overexpression of USP7 that has been reported in many cancer cells may also induce their proliferation by upregulating KIF20B and promoting cytokinesis. Our findings suggest that USP7 and FBXO38 may both be useful targets for inhibiting the growth of cancer cells with KIF20B overexpression.
Materials and Methods
Cell Lines
AGS human gastric adenocarcinoma cells were maintained in in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Wisent Inc). HEK293T and HEK293A human embryonic kidney cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS. The HCT116 human colon carcinoma cells (received from Daniel Durocher) and USP7-null HCT116 cells (obtained from Bert Vogelstein) were maintained in minimal essential medium (MEM alpha) supplemented with 10% FBS. All media was purchased from Life Technologies Inc.
Plasmids and siRNA
Plasmids expressing myc-USP7 (pCDNA3), the myc-USP7 catalytic mutant (C223S) and myc-USP7 D762R/D764R (UBL2) were described previously47,62. Myc-USP7 (DW) and myc-USP7 D164A/W165A/D762R/W764A (DW/Ubl2) were gifts from Yi Sheng and Vivian Saridakis, respectively96. pME-HA-KIF20B and PCDNA6:FLAG-FBXO38 were gifts from Masatoshi Hagiwara and Charlotte Sumner, respectively and were described previously75,97. The FLAG-FBXO38 mutant lacking the first 77 amino acids that contains the F-Box domain (FLAG-FBXO38∆FBX) was generated by PCR amplification of the FBXO38 sequence in PCDNA6:FLAG-FBXO38 using forward primer: 5′-CATGGCGATCGCACCATG GCAGGGCGCTGGTGGGAATATATG-3′ and reverse primer: 5′-CATGACGCGTAATGTAGTCGTCTTCAACTGGCTC-3′. The resulting PCR product was inserted between the Sgf1 and Mlu1 sites of the original FLAG-FBXO38 pcDNA6 vector. The FBXO38 WT and ∆FBX plasmids were verified by DNA sequencing. Stealth siRNA targeting FBXO38 (#1 5′-GGUGGUGGCCGAGAGUGGAAAUAAU-3′ and #2 5′-CCACAGCCAUUUAAAGACUUCCUUU-3′) and USP7 (#1 5′-CCCAAATTATTCCGCGGCAAA-3′ and #2 5′-CCTCTAGCCGAAGTCTTCAGCAAGA-3′) were from Invitrogen. A previously characterized siRNA targeting KIF20B (GTGAAGAAGTGCGACCGAA79) was synthesized by SIGMA. AllStar negative-control siRNA was obtained from Qiagen.
Transfections and USP7 Inhibitor Treatment
Approximately 6 × 105 AGS or HCT116 cells in 10-cm dishes or on coverslips (for microscopy) were transfected with 100 pmol of small interfering RNA (siRNA) against USP7, FBXO38 or KIF20B using 4 μl of Lipofectamine 2000. For USP7 and FBXO38 silencing, siRNA transfections were repeated two additional times after 24 and 48 h. Cells were harvested 48 h after the last round of transfection and processed for Western blotting, microscopy or mRNA quantification as described below. For proteasome inhibition, 10 µM final concentration of MG132 (Sigma) was added to the cells 12 hours before harvesting. For overexpression experiments, 293 T or AGS cells at ~80% confluency in 10-cm dishes were transfected with 7 µg of the indicated plasmids using transfection grade Polyethylenimine (PEI, Polyscience 23966). In brief, 7 µg DNA was diluted in 1 ml optimum media, followed by addition of 21 µl PEI reagent. The DNA-PEI complexes were mixed briefly by vortexing and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes prior adding to the cells. Cells were harvested 48 hours post-transfection. For the rescue experiments after USP7 silencing, 7 hours after the last round of USP7 siRNA transfection, AGS cells were transiently transfected with plasmids expressing myc-USP7, HA-KIF20B and FLAG-FBXO38 or FLAG-FBXO38∆FBX as described above, then harvested 48 hours post-transfection and processed for microscopy or Western blotting. For the USP7 inhibitor experiments, AGS and HCT116 cells at ~40% confluency were treated with a final concentration of 5 µM of USP7 inhibitor (Compound 4; also known as AD04) or the inactive enantiomer (gifts from Timothy Harrison15). Cells were harvested or 24 hours post-inhibitor treatment.
Generation of Recombinant Adenovirus
To generate adenovirus expressing USP7 or LacZ (negative control) with C-terminal sequential peptide affinity (SPA)-tag98, the coding sequence for the SPA tag was first inserted between the EcoRI and NotI sites of the multicloning site of pENTR4 (Life Technologies). The USP7 or LacZ coding sequences were then individually inserted between the BamHI and KpnI sites of the multicloning sites to generate constructs expressing C-terminally tagged USP7 or β-Gal. USP7-SPA and LacZ-SPA were transferred to the pAd⁄CMV⁄V5-DEST adenovirus expression vector using the ViraPower™ Adenoviral Gateway™ expression kit (Invitrogen). Adenovirus was generated and amplified in HEK293A cells as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The virus was titred onto AGS cells, followed by immunofluorescence microscopy and Western blotting using antibody against the FLAG epitope in the SPA tag (F1804 from Sigma; 1:800 dilution) to verify expression of the full length proteins and determine the minimum amount of virus that could be used to infect most of the cells.
Affinity Purification Coupled to Mass Spectrometry (AP-MS)
AGS cells in 25 15-cm diameter plates at 70% confluence were transduced with the adenoviruses expressing USP7 or LacZ (minimum amount required to infect 70% of the cells) and harvested 48 hours post-transduction. Cells were lysed and extracted by the “high salt extraction” method that we have previously described99. In brief, cells were resuspended in 1.33 pellet volumes of TpA (10 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM DTT and P8340 protease inhibitor) followed by 10 strokes in a dounce homogenizer. 1 pellet volume of TpB (50 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM DTT, 1.26 M potassium acetate and 75% glycerol) was added to the lysate followed by 10 additional strokes in the homogenizer. After incubation on ice for 30 minutes, the extract was clarified by centrifugation and subsequently dialyzed against 10 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 0.1 M potassium acetate, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol. After dialysis, the extract was incubated with 50 μl of anti-FLAG M2 resin (Sigma-Aldrich) 4 hours at 4 °C with end-over-end rotation. The resin was washed first in IPP buffer (10 mM Hepes pH 7], 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton, 10% glycerol) followed by a second wash in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, 75 mM KCl. Immunoprecipitated proteins were eluted three times in 150 μl 0.5 M ammonium hydroxide, pH 11. Eluates were dried by lyophilisation using a SpeedVac, washed once in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-grade water and further dried by lyophilisation. The lyophilized protein was resuspended in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate containing 10 µg/µl proteomic grade trypsin (Sigma) and incubated overnight at 37 °C followed by further incubation for 2 hours in freshly added trypsin. Samples were lyophilised again and the peptides were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using a LTQ Orbitrap system (Thermo Finnigan) and identified using Mascot software (Matrix Science, United Kingdom).
Identification of FBXO38 Interactions by BioID
BioID100 was carried out essentially as we described previously101. In brief, full length FBXO38 (BC050424) coding sequence was amplified by PCR, and cloned into our pcDNA5 FRT/TO FLAGBirA* expression vector. Using the Flp-In system (Invitrogen), HEK293TREx Flp-In cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific) stably expressing FLAGBirA* alone or FLAGBirA*–FBXO38 were generated. After selection (DMEM + 10% FBS + 200 μg/ml hygromycin B), two independent replicates of five 150 cm2 plates of sub-confluent (60%) cells were incubated for 24 hrs in complete media supplemented with 1 µg/ml tetracycline (Sigma), 50 µM biotin (BioShop). Cells were collected and pelleted (2,000 rpm, 3 min), the pellet was washed twice with PBS, and dried pellets were snap frozen. The cell pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 1:500 protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich), 1:1000 benzonase nuclease (Novagen) and incubated on an end-over-end rotator at 4 °C for 1 hour, briefly sonicated to disrupt any visible aggregates, then centrifuged at 16,000 g for 30 min at 4 °C. Supernatant was transferred to a fresh 15 mL conical tube. 30 μl of packed, pre-equilibrated Streptavidin sepharose beads (GE) were added and the mixture incubated for 3 hours at 4 °C with end-over-end rotation. Beads were pelleted by centrifugation at 2000 rpm for 2 min and transferred with 1 mL of lysis buffer to a fresh Eppendorf tube. Beads were washed once with 1 mL lysis buffer and twice with 1 mL of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (pH = 8.3). Beads were transferred in ammonium bicarbonate to a fresh centrifuge tube, and washed two more times with 1 ml ammonium bicarbonate buffer. Tryptic digestion was performed by incubating the beads with 1 µg MS-grade TPCK trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI) dissolved in 200 μl of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (pH 8.3) overnight at 37 °C. The following morning, 0.5 μg MS-grade TPCK trypsin was added, and beads were incubated 2 additional hours at 37 °C. Beads were pelleted by centrifugation at 2000 × g for 2 min, and the supernatant was transferred to a fresh Eppendorf tube. Beads were washed twice with 150 µL of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, and these washes were pooled with the first eluate. The sample was lyophilized, and resuspended in buffer A (0.1% formic acid). 1/5th of the sample was analyzed per MS run.
High performance liquid chromatography was conducted using a 2 cm pre-column (Acclaim PepMap 50 mm × 100 um inner diameter (ID)), and 50 cm analytical column (Acclaim PepMap, 500 mm × 75 um diameter; C18; 2 um; 100 Å, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), running a 120 min reversed-phase buffer gradient at 225 nl/min on a Proxeon EASY-nLC 1000 pump in-line with a Thermo Q-Exactive HF quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer. A parent ion scan was performed using a resolving power of 60,000, then up to the twenty most intense peaks were selected for MS/MS (minimum ion count of 1,000 for activation) using higher energy collision induced dissociation (HCD) fragmentation. Dynamic exclusion was activated such that MS/MS of the same m/z (within a range of 10 ppm; exclusion list size = 500) detected twice within 5 sec were excluded from analysis for 15 sec. For protein identification, Thermo. RAW files were converted to the mzXML format using Proteowizard102, then searched using X!Tandem103 and Comet104 against the human Human RefSeq Version 45 database (containing 36,113 entries). Search parameters specified a parent ion mass tolerance of 10 ppm, and an MS/MS fragment ion tolerance of 0.4 Da, with up to 2 missed cleavages allowed for trypsin. Variable modifications of +16@M and W, +32@M and W, +42@N-terminus, and +1@N and Q were allowed. Proteins identified with an iProphet cut-off of 0.9 (corresponding to ≤1% FDR) and at least two unique peptides were analyzed with SAINT Express v.3.6. Sixteen control runs (from cells expressing the FlagBirA* epitope tag) were collapsed to the two highest spectral counts for each prey, and compared to the two technical of each of the two biological replicates of FBXO38 BioID. High confidence interactors were defined as those with BFDR ≤ 0.01.
Immunofluorescence Microscopy
For identification of multinucleated cells, cells transfected with siRNA targeting KIF20B, USP7 or FBXO38 or the silencing control were grown on coverslips and fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 20 min, rinsed once in PBS and permeabilized with 1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min. Samples were blocked with 4% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS followed by incubation with Phalloidin Alexa Fluor 647 (Invitrogen A22287; 1:1000 dilution) in 4% BSA. Coverslips were mounted on slides using ProLong Gold antifade medium with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (Invitrogen). Images were obtained using the 40x oil objective on a Leica inverted fluorescence microscope and processed using the Leica Application Suite X (LAS X, version 3.3.0) software program. ~1500 cells per sample were examined for the number of multinucleated cells (cells containing two or more nuclei) in three independent experiments. Averages and standard deviations were calculated in Excel. P values were determined using two-tailed t-tests in Excel. For the multinuclei rescue experiment, cells transfected with siRNA targeting USP7 or the silencing control were fixed, permeabilized and blocked as described above, followed by incubation with primary antibodies against HA (Santa Cruz 805; 1:500 dilution), FLAG (F1804 from Sigma; 1:800 dilution) and myc (Santa Cruz 789; 1:500 dilution) in 4% BSA. After washing in PBS, cells were incubated with Phalloidin Alexa Fluor 647 (Invitrogen A22287; 1:1000 dilution) and secondary antibodies goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen; 1:800 dilution) in 4% BSA. Coverslips were mounted and images were obtained and processed as described above. For quantification of KIF20B flourescence intensity at the midbodies, cells silenced for FBXO38 or USP7 or transfected with the silencing control were fixed in 100% methanol for 15 minutes at −20 °C. After blocking, cells were incubated with antibodies against KIF20B (Santa Cruz 515194; 1:50) and acetylated tubulin (Santa Cruz 82557; 1:800). After washing in PBS, cells were incubated with secondary antibodies goat-anti mouse IgG1 Alexa Fluor 488 and goat-anti mouse IgG2b Alexa Fluor 594 (Invitrogen; 1:800 dilution) in 4% BSA. Coverslips were mounted and images were obtained and processed as described above using a 60x oil objective. Exposure times used were the same for all samples and images were taken on the same day. The fluorescence intensity of KIF20B was quantified using Fiji/ImageJ (http://imagej.net/Fiji/Downloads) for 30 midbodies per sample for each of three independent experiments, and values were normalized to the acetylated tubulin staining at the midbodies.
Western Blotting
Cells were lysed in 9 M urea, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, sonicated and clarified by centrifugation. 80 µg of protein was subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. Membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat dry milk in TBS-T (TBS with 0.1% Tween), then incubated with primary antibodies: mouse FLAG M2 (F1804 from Sigma; 1:5000 dilution), rabbit anti-FLAG (PA1-984B from Invitrogen; 1:5000 dilution), rabbit anti-HA (Santa Cruz 805; 1:200 dilution), rabbit anti-myc (Santa Cruz 789; 1:5000 dilution), rabbit anti-USP7 (Bethyl laboratories A300-033A; 1:10000 dilution), mouse anti-KIF20B (Santa Cruz 515194; 1:200 dilution), rabbit anti-FBXO38 (Bethyl laboratories A302-378A; 1:5000 dilution), rabbit anti-SKP1 (Santa Cruz 7163; 1:200 dilution), goat anti-actin (Santa Cruz 1615; 1:1000 dilution). Membranes were washed three times in TBS-T, followed by incubation with goat anti-mouse HRP (Santa Cruz 2005), goat anti-rabbit HRP (Sigma SAB3700878) or donkey anti-goat HRP (Sigma SAB3700285) at 1:5000 dilution. Membranes were developed using chemiluminescence reagents (ECL or ECL-prime; Santa Cruz or Amersham). Protein bands were quantified using ImageQuantTL (GE Healthcare Sciences) and normalized to actin bands.
RNA Extraction and KIF20B mRNA Quantification
Total RNA was isolated from cells transfected with the silencing control or FBXO38 siRNA (as described above) using TRIzol (Invitrogen). The quantity and quality of the extracted RNA were determined by reading the optical densities at 260 and 280 nm using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). To quantify the KIF20B or actin (control) mRNA, 1 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed in a 20 μl reaction mixture using SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies) and random hexamer primers according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using 0.2 μl of the cDNA and SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix (Bio-Rad) on the CFX384 Touch Real Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). Primers used were: KIF20B forward 5′-AGA AAC CAA CAG GCA AGA AAC-3′, KIF20B reverse 5′-CTC ATC ACG CAT TAC AGA TAC C-3′, actin forward 5′-GGACTTCGAGCAAGAGATGG-3′ and actin reverse 5′-AGCACTGTGTTGGCGTACAG-3′. Experiments were performed in triplicate and KIF20B mRNA signals in each sample was normalized to the actin mRNA signal.
Immunoprecipitation
Cells co-transfected with the FLAG-FBXO38 and the myc-USP7 expression constructs or the myc-USP7 construct alone were lysed on ice for 30 min in 4X volume of radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.5% NP-40) with complete protease inhibitors (Sigma P8340), followed by sonication and clarification by centrifugation. For the co-expression experiments, 2 mg of each clarified lysate was incubated with 10 μl of M2 anti-FLAG resin (Sigma) overnight at 4 °C with end-over-end rotation. Cells with myc-USP7 constructs alone were lysed in RIPA buffer and incubated with 10 μl of anti-Myc resin (c-myc AC – sc-40 AC Santa Cruz) overnight at 4 °C with end-over-end rotation. For immunoprecipitation of FLAG-FBXO38 with HA-KIF20B or endogenous KIF20B, cells were lysed in 4X volume of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol and 0.1% NP-40). FLAG-tagged FBXO38 was immunoprecipitated using anti-FLAG M2 resin as described above. All resins were harvested by centrifugation, washed 4 times in lysis buffer, then boiled in 2x SDS loading buffer. Recovered proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blotting, as described above.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge Kathy Shire for the co-immunoprecipitation experiments in Supplemental Fig. S3. We thank Dr. Masatoshi Hagiwara for pME-HA-KIF20B, Dr. Charlotte Sumner for pcDNA6:FLAG-FBXO38, Drs. Vivian Saridakis and Yi Sheng for plasmids expressing USP7 point mutants and Timothy Harrison for USP7 inhibitor. We also thank Dr. Andy Wilde and Thomas Panagiotou for Phalloidin Alexa Fluor 647, acetylated tubulin antibody, assistance with confocal microscopy and helpful comments on cytokinesis experiments. This work was supported by operating grants to L.F. from the Cancer Research Society and Canadian Institutes for Health Research and by Ontario Graduate Scholarships to A.G.
Author Contributions
All experiments except the BioID experiment were performed by A.G. and supervised by L.F. E.C. performed the BioID experiment supervised by B.R. Mass spectrometry analyses for the AP-MS experiment was performed by E.M. and J.G. A.G. and L.F. wrote the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Data Availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-39368-y.
References
- 1.Pfoh R, Lacdao IK, Saridakis V. Deubiquitinases and the new therapeutic opportunities offered to cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015;22:T35–54. doi: 10.1530/ERC-14-0516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Frappier L, Verrijzer CP. Gene expression control by protein deubiquitinases. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2011;21:207–213. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2011.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nicholson B, Suresh Kumar KG. The multifaceted roles of USP7: new therapeutic opportunities. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2011;60:61–68. doi: 10.1007/s12013-011-9185-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kim RQ, Sixma TK. Regulation of USP7: A High Incidence of E3 Complexes. J Mol Biol. 2017;429:3395–3408. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Song MS, et al. The deubiquitinylation and localization of PTEN are regulated by a HAUSP-PML network. Nature. 2008;455:813–817. doi: 10.1038/nature07290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yang Z, et al. STAT3 repressed USP7 expression is crucial for colon cancer development. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:3013–3017. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang L, Wang H, Tian L, Li H. Expression of USP7 and MARCH7 Is Correlated with Poor Prognosis in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2016;239:165–175. doi: 10.1620/tjem.239.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Qin D, et al. CDDO-Me reveals USP7 as a novel target in ovarian cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7:77096–77109. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhao GY, et al. USP7 overexpression predicts a poor prognosis in lung squamous cell carcinoma and large cell carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:1721–1729. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2773-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Masuya D, et al. The HAUSP gene plays an important role in non-small cell lung carcinogenesis through p53-dependent pathways. J Pathol. 2006;208:724–732. doi: 10.1002/path.1931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hussain S, Zhang Y, Galardy PJ. DUBs and cancer: the role of deubiquitinating enzymes as oncogenes, non-oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:1688–1697. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.11.8739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang Q, et al. Stabilization of histone demethylase PHF8 by USP7 promotes breast carcinogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:2205–2220. doi: 10.1172/JCI85747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hernandez-Perez S, et al. DUB3 and USP7 de-ubiquitinating enzymes control replication inhibitor Geminin: molecular characterization and associations with breast cancer. Oncogene. 2017;36:4817. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Reverdy C, et al. Discovery of specific inhibitors of human USP7/HAUSP deubiquitinating enzyme. Chem Biol. 2012;19:467–477. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gavory G, et al. Discovery and characterization of highly potent and selective allosteric USP7 inhibitors. Nat Chem Biol. 2018;14:118–125. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jing, B. et al. Characterization of naturally occurring pentacyclic triterpenes as novel inhibitors of deubiquitinating protease USP7 with anticancer activity in vitro. Acta Pharmacol Sin, 10.1038/aps.2017.119 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 17.Di Lello P, et al. Discovery of Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Ubiquitin Specific Protease 7 (USP7) Using Integrated NMR and in Silico Techniques. J Med Chem. 2017;60:10056–10070. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lamberto I, et al. Structure-Guided Development of a Potent and Selective Non-covalent Active-Site Inhibitor of USP7. Cell Chem Biol. 2017;24:1490–1500 e1411. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kategaya L, et al. USP7 small-molecule inhibitors interfere with ubiquitin binding. Nature. 2017;550:534–538. doi: 10.1038/nature24006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Turnbull AP, et al. Molecular basis of USP7 inhibition by selective small-molecule inhibitors. Nature. 2017;550:481–486. doi: 10.1038/nature24451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ching W, et al. A ubiquitin-specific protease possesses a decisive role for adenovirus replication and oncogene-mediated transformation. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003273. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Holowaty MN, et al. Protein profiling with Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen-1 reveals an interaction with the herpesvirus-associated ubiquitin-specific protease HAUSP/USP7. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:29987–29994. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303977200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jager W, et al. The ubiquitin-specific protease USP7 modulates the replication of Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus latent episomal DNA. J Virol. 2012;86:6745–6757. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06840-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee HR, et al. Bilateral inhibition of HAUSP deubiquitinase by a viral interferon regulatory factor protein. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18:1336–1344. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Salsman J, et al. Proteomic profiling of the human cytomegalovirus UL35 gene products reveals a role for UL35 in the DNA repair response. J Virol. 2012;86:806–820. doi: 10.1128/JVI.05442-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Saridakis V, et al. Structure of the p53 binding domain of HAUSP/USP7 bound to Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 implications for EBV-mediated immortalization. Mol Cell. 2005;18:25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sarkari F, et al. EBNA1-mediated recruitment of a histone H2B deubiquitylating complex to the Epstein-Barr virus latent origin of DNA replication. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000624. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Everett RD, et al. A novel ubiquitin-specific protease is dynamically associated with the PML nuclear domain and binds to a herpesvirus regulatory protein. Embo J. 1997;16:1519–1530. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.7.1519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Everett RD, Meredith M, Orr A. The ability of herpes simplex virus type 1 immediate-early protein Vmw110 to bind to a ubiquitin-specific protease contributes to its roles in the activation of gene expression and stimulation of virus replication. J Virol. 1999;73:417–426. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.1.417-426.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Everett RD, et al. The disruption of ND10 during herpes simplex virus infection correlates with the Vmw110- and proteasome-dependent loss of several PML isoforms. J Virol. 1998;72:6581–6591. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.8.6581-6591.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gillen J, et al. A survey of the interactome of Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus ORF45 revealed its binding to viral ORF33 and cellular USP7, resulting in stabilization of ORF33 that is required for production of progeny viruses. J Virol. 2015;89:4918–4931. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02925-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xiang, Q. et al. Human Herpesvirus 8 Interferon Regulatory Factors 1 and 3 Mediate Replication and Latency Activities via Interactions with USP7 Deubiquitinase. J Virol, 10.1128/JVI.02003-17 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 33.Chavoshi S, et al. Identification of Kaposi Sarcoma Herpesvirus (KSHV) vIRF1 Protein as a Novel Interaction Partner of Human Deubiquitinase USP7. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:6281–6291. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.710632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li M, et al. Deubiquitination of p53 by HAUSP is an important pathway for p53 stabilization. Nature. 2002;416:648–653. doi: 10.1038/nature737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Brooks CL, Li M, Hu M, Shi Y, Gu W. The p53–Mdm2–HAUSP complex is involved in p53 stabilization by HAUSP. Oncogene. 2007;26:7262–7266. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Li M, Brooks CL, Kon N, Gu W. A dynamic role of HAUSP in the p53-Mdm2 pathway. Mol Cell. 2004;13:879–886. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00157-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cummins, J. M. et al. Tumour suppression: disruption of HAUSP gene stabilizes p53. Nature428, 1 p following 486, 10.1038/nature02501 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 38.Dar A, Shibata E, Dutta A. Deubiquitination of Tip60 by USP7 determines the activity of the p53-dependent apoptotic pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33:3309–3320. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00358-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bhattacharya S, Ghosh MK. HAUSP, a novel deubiquitinase for Rb - MDM2 the critical regulator. Febs J. 2014;281:3061–3078. doi: 10.1111/febs.12843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.van Loosdregt J, et al. Stabilization of the transcription factor Foxp3 by the deubiquitinase USP7 increases Treg-cell-suppressive capacity. Immunity. 2013;39:259–271. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.05.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Giovinazzi S, et al. Usp7 protects genomic stability by regulating Bub3. Oncotarget. 2014;5:3728–3742. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Faustrup H, Bekker-Jensen S, Bartek J, Lukas J, Mailand N. USP7 counteracts SCFbetaTrCP- but not APCCdh1-mediated proteolysis of Claspin. J Cell Biol. 2009;184:13–19. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200807137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Alonso-de Vega I, Martin Y, Smits VA. USP7 controls Chk1 protein stability by direct deubiquitination. Cell Cycle. 2014;13:3921–3926. doi: 10.4161/15384101.2014.973324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Maertens GN, El Messaoudi-Aubert S, Elderkin S, Hiom K, Peters G. Ubiquitin-specific proteases 7 and 11 modulate Polycomb regulation of the INK4a tumour suppressor. Embo J. 2010;29:2553–2565. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.van der Horst A, et al. FOXO4 transcriptional activity is regulated by monoubiquitination and USP7/HAUSP. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8:1064–1073. doi: 10.1038/ncb1469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.van der Knaap JA, et al. GMP synthetase stimulates histone H2B deubiquitylation by the epigenetic silencer USP7. Mol Cell. 2005;17:695–707. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sarkari F, Wang X, Nguyen T, Frappier L. The herpesvirus associated ubiquitin specific protease, USP7, is a negative regulator of PML proteins and PML nuclear bodies. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yi L, Cui Y, Xu Q, Jiang Y. Stabilization of LSD1 by deubiquitinating enzyme USP7 promotes glioblastoma cell tumorigenesis and metastasis through suppression of the p53 signaling pathway. Oncol Rep. 2016;36:2935–2945. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.5099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Giovinazzi S, Morozov VM, Summers MK, Reinhold WC, Ishov AM. USP7 and Daxx regulate mitosis progression and taxane sensitivity by affecting stability of Aurora-A kinase. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20:721–731. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2012.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jenkins Y, et al. Critical role of the ubiquitin ligase activity of UHRF1, a nuclear RING finger protein, in tumor cell growth. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:5621–5629. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-03-0194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mousli M, et al. ICBP90 belongs to a new family of proteins with an expression that is deregulated in cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:120–127. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Felle M, et al. The USP7/Dnmt1 complex stimulates the DNA methylation activity of Dnmt1 and regulates the stability of UHRF1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:8355–8365. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Qin W, Leonhardt H, Spada F. Usp7 and Uhrf1 control ubiquitination and stability of the maintenance DNA methyltransferase Dnmt1. J Cell Biochem. 2011;112:439–444. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sanchez Y, et al. Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25. Science. 1997;277:1497–1501. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5331.1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jagannathan M, et al. A role for USP7 in DNA replication. Mol Cell Biol. 2014;34:132–145. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00639-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lecona E, et al. USP7 is a SUMO deubiquitinase essential for DNA replication. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016;23:270–277. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Scolnick DM, Halazonetis TD. Chfr defines a mitotic stress checkpoint that delays entry into metaphase. Nature. 2000;406:430–435. doi: 10.1038/35019108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Oh YM, Yoo SJ, Seol JH. Deubiquitination of Chfr, a checkpoint protein, by USP7/HAUSP regulates its stability and activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;357:615–619. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.03.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sheng Y, et al. Molecular recognition of p53 and MDM2 by USP7/HAUSP. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006;13:285–291. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hu M, et al. Structural basis of competitive recognition of p53 and MDM2 by HAUSP/USP7: implications for the regulation of the p53-MDM2 pathway. PLoS Biol 4, e27. 2006 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sarkari F, et al. Further insight into substrate recognition by USP7: structural and biochemical analysis of the HdmX and Hdm2 interactions with USP7. J Mol Biol. 2010;402:825–837. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Pfoh R, et al. Crystal Structure of USP7 Ubiquitin-like Domains with an ICP0 Peptide Reveals a Novel Mechanism Used by Viral and Cellular Proteins to Target USP7. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004950. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Holowaty MN, Sheng Y, Nguyen T, Arrowsmith C, Frappier L. Protein interaction domains of the ubiquitin-specific protease, USP7/HAUSP. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:47753–47761. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307200200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Faesen AC, et al. Mechanism of USP7/HAUSP activation by its C-terminal ubiquitin-like domain and allosteric regulation by GMP-synthetase. Mol Cell. 2011;44:147–159. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ma H, et al. M phase phosphorylation of the epigenetic regulator UHRF1 regulates its physical association with the deubiquitylase USP7 and stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:4828–4833. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116349109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Pozhidaeva AK, et al. Structural Characterization of Interaction between Human Ubiquitin-specific Protease 7 and Immediate-Early Protein ICP0 of Herpes Simplex Virus-1. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:22907–22918. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.664805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Mellacheruvu D, et al. The CRAPome: a contaminant repository for affinity purification-mass spectrometry data. Nat Methods. 2013;10:730–736. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Khoronenkova SV, et al. ATM-dependent downregulation of USP7/HAUSP by PPM1G activates p53 response to DNA damage. Mol Cell. 2012;45:801–813. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Du Z, et al. DNMT1 stability is regulated by proteins coordinating deubiquitination and acetylation-driven ubiquitination. Sci Signal. 2010;3:ra80. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Cheng J, et al. Molecular mechanism for USP7-mediated DNMT1 stabilization by acetylation. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7023. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Cai JB, et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease 7 acceleratesp14(ARF) degradation by deubiquitinating thyroid hormone receptor-interacting protein 12 and promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Hepatology. 2015;61:1603–1614. doi: 10.1002/hep.27682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Liu X, et al. Trip12 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase for USP7/HAUSP involved in the DNA damage response. FEBS Lett. 2016;590:4213–4222. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sowa ME, Bennett EJ, Gygi SP, Harper JW. Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape. Cell. 2009;138:389–403. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Smaldone S, Laub F, Else C, Dragomir C, Ramirez F. Identification of MoKA, a novel F-box protein that modulates Kruppel-like transcription factor 7 activity. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:1058–1069. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.3.1058-1069.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sumner CJ, et al. A dominant mutation in FBXO38 causes distal spinal muscular atrophy with calf predominance. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93:976–983. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Smaldone S, Ramirez F. Multiple pathways regulate intracellular shuttling of MoKA, a co-activator of transcription factor KLF7. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:5060–5068. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Abaza A, et al. M phase phosphoprotein 1 is a human plus-end-directed kinesin-related protein required for cytokinesis. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:27844–27852. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304522200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Janisch KM, et al. The vertebrate-specific Kinesin-6, Kif20b, is required for normal cytokinesis of polarized cortical stem cells and cerebral cortex size. Development. 2013;140:4672–4682. doi: 10.1242/dev.093286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kanehira M, et al. Oncogenic role of MPHOSPH1, a cancer-testis antigen specific to human bladder cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67:3276–3285. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Janisch KM, McNeely KC, Dardick JM, Lim SH, Dwyer ND. Kinesin-6 KIF20B is required for efficient cytokinetic furrowing and timely abscission in human cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2018;29:166–179. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E17-08-0495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Hua R, et al. VAPs and ACBD5 tether peroxisomes to the ER for peroxisome maintenance and lipid homeostasis. J Cell Biol. 2017;216:367–377. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201608128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Coyaud E, et al. Global Interactomics Uncovers Extensive Organellar Targeting by Zika Virus. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2018;17:2242–2255. doi: 10.1074/mcp.TIR118.000800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Youn JY, et al. High-Density Proximity Mapping Reveals the Subcellular Organization of mRNA-Associated Granules and Bodies. Mol Cell. 2018;69:517–532 e511. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Gupta GD, et al. A Dynamic Protein Interaction Landscape of the Human Centrosome-Cilium Interface. Cell. 2015;163:1484–1499. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Chauhan D, et al. A small molecule inhibitor of ubiquitin-specific protease-7 induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells and overcomes bortezomib resistance. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:345–358. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Altun M, et al. Activity-based chemical proteomics accelerates inhibitor development for deubiquitylating enzymes. Chem Biol. 2011;18:1401–1412. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Marumoto T, et al. Aurora-A kinase maintains the fidelity of early and late mitotic events in HeLa cells. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:51786–51795. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306275200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Hoar K, et al. MLN8054, a small-molecule inhibitor of Aurora A, causes spindle pole and chromosome congression defects leading to aneuploidy. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:4513–4525. doi: 10.1128/MCB.02364-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Nelson DE, Randle SJ, Laman H. Beyond ubiquitination: the atypical functions of Fbxo7 and other F-box proteins. Open Biol. 2013;3:130131. doi: 10.1098/rsob.130131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Meziane el K, Randle SJ, Nelson DE, Lomonosov M, Laman H. Knockdown of Fbxo7 reveals its regulatory role in proliferation and differentiation of haematopoietic precursor cells. J Cell Sci. 2011;124:2175–2186. doi: 10.1242/jcs.080465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Laman H, et al. Transforming activity of Fbxo7 is mediated specifically through regulation of cyclin D/cdk6. Embo J. 2005;24:3104–3116. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Jin J, et al. Systematic analysis and nomenclature of mammalian F-box proteins. Genes Dev. 2004;18:2573–2580. doi: 10.1101/gad.1255304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kobe B, Kajava AV. The leucine-rich repeat as a protein recognition motif. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2001;11:725–732. doi: 10.1016/S0959-440X(01)00266-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Bella J, Hindle KL, McEwan PA, Lovell SC. The leucine-rich repeat structure. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65:2307–2333. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8019-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Liu X, et al. MPHOSPH1: a potential therapeutic target for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2014;74:6623–6634. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Sarkari F, et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease 7 is a regulator of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UbE2E1. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:16975–16985. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.469262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Kamimoto T, Zama T, Aoki R, Muro Y, Hagiwara M. Identification of a novel kinesin-related protein, KRMP1, as a target for mitotic peptidyl-prolyl isomerase Pin1. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:37520–37528. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106207200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Zeghouf M, et al. Sequential Peptide Affinity (SPA) system for the identification of mammalian and bacterial protein complexes. J Proteome Res. 2004;3:463–468. doi: 10.1021/pr034084x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Georges AA, Frappier L. Proteomics methods for discovering viral-host interactions. Methods. 2015;90:21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Roux KJ, Kim DI, Raida M, Burke B. A promiscuous biotin ligase fusion protein identifies proximal and interacting proteins in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol. 2012;196:801–810. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201112098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Coyaud E, et al. BioID-based Identification of Skp Cullin F-box (SCF)beta-TrCP1/2 E3 Ligase Substrates. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015;14:1781–1795. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M114.045658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Kessner D, Chambers M, Burke R, Agus D, Mallick P. ProteoWizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:2534–2536. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Craig R, Beavis RC. TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:1466–1467. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Eng JK, Jahan TA, Hoopmann MR. Comet: an open-source MS/MS sequence database search tool. Proteomics. 2013;13:22–24. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201200439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.