Abstract
Internet gaming disorder (IGD), defined as an inability to control Internet-based game play, leads to serious impairment in psychological and social functioning, but few studies have identified the neurophysiological characteristics of patients with IGD. The aim of this study was to determine neurophysiological markers of P300 components associated with changes in symptoms after outpatient management with pharmacotherapy in patients with IGD. The present prospective longitudinal study included 18 patients with IGD and 29 healthy controls. The patients with IGD completed a 6-month outpatient management program including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-based pharmacotherapy. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were acquired during the auditory oddball task. ERPs of the patients with IGD were recorded before and after treatment. Between-group differences and the pre-to-post treatment differences in P300 components were investigated using repeated-measures analysis of variance. The primary treatment outcome was a change in score on Young Internet Addiction Test between before and after treatment. At baseline assessments, the IGD group showed significantly reduced P300 amplitudes and delayed latencies at the midline centro-parietal site compared with those in the healthy controls. No significant changes in the P300 indices were observed between pre and post-treatment in the patients with IGD after 6 months of treatment, even though the patients with IGD exhibited significant improvements in their IGD symptoms. Furthermore, no significant difference in ERPs was observed between responders and nonresponders to a 6-month treatment in patients with IGD. These results suggest that reduced P300 amplitudes and delayed latencies are candidate endophenotypes in the pathophysiology of IGD.
Keywords: auditory oddball task, event-related potential (ERP), internet gaming disorder, P300, treatment response
1. Introduction
Internet gaming disorder (IGD) is defined as excessive, recurrent, and problematic use of Internet gaming despite its negative consequences. IGD has recently appeared in the appendix of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) for further study.[1] In the past decades, neurobiological findings related to IGD have begun to accumulate; however, additional neurobiological evidence is needed to clarify the pathophysiology of IGD.
Electroencephalography (EEG) is a useful tool for assessing brain activity with high temporal resolution on the order of milliseconds. EEG is generated by the summed postsynaptic potentials in the dendrites of pyramidal cells aligned perpendicular to the cortical surface. Several studies have used quantitative EEG (QEEG) to assess patients with IGD and reported a decrease in absolute power on the beta frequency band on the resting-state QEEG of patients with IGD compared with that of healthy controls (HCs).[2,3] A recent study showed differences in the resting-state QEEG of patients with IGD and alcohol use disorder (AUD), suggesting the unique characteristics of IGD as a behavioral addiction, which is distinct from AUD.[4] Furthermore, event-related potentials (ERPs), which represent averaged time-locked EEG activity related to sensory, motor, or cognitive events, provide information about the neuronal activity underlying specific cognitive processes.[5] Therefore, the ERP method is considered to provide an index of information processing.[6] The requirement of the oddball paradigm is to discriminate infrequent “target” stimuli from more frequently occurring “nontargets.” The P300 wave is a late cognitive ERP component associated with context updating and allocation of attentional resources.[7] The amplitude of the P300 component is classically enhanced when a target is detected compared with that of a nontarget.[8] Some studies have reported that P300 amplitude is impaired in patients with IGD, AUD, or heroin dependence.[9–11] A meta-analysis of 30 studies of male youths with alcoholic parents confirmed that smaller P300 amplitudes are observed in males with a family history of alcoholism than in controls.[12] One study reported that patients with IGD have lower P300 amplitudes during the auditory oddball task than do HCs.[10] The decrease in the P300 amplitude during the auditory oddball task reflects dysfunctional information processing related to attention or working memory in patients with IGD.[10]
Identifying biological markers associated with predicting the development of IGD or longitudinal changes in IGD can provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology underlying IGD. A smaller P300 at age 17 years predicts the development of alcohol or drug problems by age 20.[13] Prior differences in consumption do not explain this observation, as the reduced P300 amplitude is not a consequence of alcohol or drug use. Furthermore, the reduction in P300 amplitude at age 17 years sustained at age 29 in patients with substance use disorder (SUD) suggests that the P300 index is a candidate endophenotype of SUD.[14] A recent resting-state QEEG study showed that absolute delta activity is associated with changes in prospective addiction symptoms in patients with IGD after 6 months of outpatient management.[15] However, to date, no study has investigated the ERP-related neurophysiological factors associated with prospective changes in patients with IGD. Thus, the present study aimed to determine the neurophysiological markers associated with symptom changes during the auditory oddball task in patients with IGD and to detect markers related to the treatment response after outpatient management with pharmacotherapy. Based on previous studies of patients with IGD[10] and SUD,[13,14] it was hypothesized that patients with IGD would exhibit decreased P300 amplitudes and that these decreased amplitudes would be sustained after 6 months of outpatient management.
2. Subjects and methods
2.1. Study participants
This prospective longitudinal study was conducted with 47 male participants (18 with IGD, mean age: 22.61 ± 5.10 years; 29 HCs, mean age: 24.66 ± 3.80 years). All patients had sought treatment at an outpatient clinic of Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea, due to excessive participation in Internet gaming, and IGD was diagnosed by an experienced psychiatrist based on the criteria of the DSM-5.[1] Additionally, Young Internet Addiction Test (IAT) was used to measure the severity of IGD symptomatology.[16] The IAT items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very rarely) to 5 (very frequently); in the present study, IAT scores were calculated as the total score for all 20 items ranging from 20 to 100. Additionally, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV disorders was used to assess lifetime psychiatric diagnoses.
After completion of the clinical assessments and a baseline EEG scan, the patients with IGD completed a 6-month outpatient management program that included pharmacotherapy with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor using the following average daily doses: escitalopram at 15.83 ± 9.17 mg, fluoxetine at 50.00 ± 9.17 mg, or paroxetine at 30.00 ± 14.14 mg. All patients with IGD who completed the 6-month treatment program had comorbid depressive or anxiety symptoms at baseline and completed a follow-up EEG scan upon finishing. The primary treatment outcome of the present study was change in the IAT score from pre to post-treatment, and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)[17] and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)[18] were administered at the pre and post-treatment assessments of the patients with IGD to evaluate changes in comorbid depressive and anxiety symptoms. HCs were directly recruited from the local community, did not have a history of a psychiatric disorder, and played Internet games <2 hours per day.
Participants with no history of significant head injury, seizure disorder, intellectual disability, psychotic disorder, or SUD (other than one involving nicotine) were included in this study. Additionally, all participants were medication-naïve at the time of the baseline assessment. The Korean version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III (WAIS-III) was administered to all participants to estimate their intelligence quotient (IQ); individuals with WAIS-III scores <80 were excluded from the present study. The investigation was carried out in accordance with the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study protocol was approved by Institutional Review Board of Boramae Medical Center. Informed consent was obtained from all participants before participation.
2.2. Experimental procedure
A detailed description of the experimental procedure was presented in our previous report.[10] A pseudorandom sequence of deviant stimuli (15%) and standard stimuli (85%) were presented binaurally by a STIM 2 sound generator (Compumedics, El Paso, TX) for the auditory oddball task. In all, 300 stimuli were presented binaurally through earphones; the deviant stimulus was classified as a high-frequency tone of 2000 Hz, and the standard stimulus was classified as a low-frequency tone of 1000 Hz. Each stimulus had a duration of 100 ms (10-ms rise and fall times) with fixed intertrial intervals of 1250 ms. The participants were instructed to press a response-box button with their right hand in reaction only to the high-pitched sound. The speed and accuracy of the response were emphasized.
2.3. EEG recording
The ERPs were recorded from patients with IGD before and after the 6-month treatment. The EEG was acquired using a 64-channel Quick-cap system (Compumedics), which refers to the linked mastoid in an isolated sound-shielded room with the ground channel located in an electrode cap between FPz and Fz. Horizontal and vertical electro-oculograms (EOGs) were recorded from electrodes positioned at the outer canthus of each eye, and above and underneath the left eye. The sampling rate for EEG recording was 250 or 500 Hz. All data were processed with a 0.3 to 100 Hz bandpass filter. The impedance of all electrodes was <10 kΩ.
2.4. ERP analysis
The EEG signals were further processed off-line using Curry 7 software (Compumedics). Recordings were first down-sampled to 250 Hz. Data were then re-referenced to a common average reference and filtered using a bandpass frequency of 0.3 to 30 Hz. All EEG and EOG recordings were visually inspected to reject gross artifacts, such as those involving movement. Eye blinks and eye movements were corrected based on the artifact reduction method developed by Semlitsch et al.[19] Data were segmented into 1000-ms epochs, which included the 100 ms before stimulus onset. All segments with voltage ≥70 μV were considered artifacts and automatically discarded from further processing. Trials with response times >800 ms were considered error responses and were rejected. Only those trials with correct responses to the infrequent stimuli were averaged and analyzed. A region of interest including 2 midline centro-parietal electrodes of maximal voltage was chosen (CPz and Pz). The ERP waveforms of each participant had a minimum of 30 artifact-free trials. The auditory P300 was identified as the most positive peak in a 248 to 500-ms time window after stimulus onset. Topographic maps were created using Matlab 7.10.0 (MathWorks, Natick, MA) and the EEGLAB toolbox.[20]
2.5. Statistical analysis
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare group differences in the demographic and clinical data. One-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used, with age and IQ as covariates, to compare group differences in the behavioral data. A repeated-measures ANCOVA was performed for the P300 amplitudes and latencies with electrode site as a within-subject factor, group as the between-subject factor, and age, IQ, BDI, and BAI as covariates. We evaluated the effects of treatment separately for the P300 amplitudes and latencies using repeated-measures ANCOVA with electrode site as the within-subject factor and treatment (pre vs post-treatment) as the between-subject factor. The relationship between ERP changes and addiction symptom changes after treatment was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis. A P value <.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v20.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
3. Results
3.1. Demographic and clinical data
The demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. No significant differences in age or IQ were observed between the IGD and HC groups, but the IGD group had a lower education level (P < .001) than the HC group. The IGD group had higher BDI (P < .001) and BAI (P < .001) scores than the HC group. No significant differences in BDI or BAI scores were observed between the pretreatment IGD and post-treatment IGD groups. The primary treatment outcome was a change in score on the Young IAT from before and after treatment (P = .004).
Table 1.
3.2. Behavioral measures before and after treatment
The behavioral performance data are presented in Table 2. No significant group (HCs vs pretreatment IGD, pretreatment IGD vs post-treatment IGD) differences with regard to accuracy rate and reaction times were observed.
Table 2.
3.3. ERP values in the 2 groups at the baseline assessment
The grand-average ERP waveforms for deviant stimuli are shown in Fig. 1. Significant main effects of group (F[1, 40] = 5.458, P = .025_ for P300 amplitudes were found. There were no main effect of electrode site and no interaction with the P300 amplitudes. Post hoc tests revealed that the IGD group showed significantly lower P300 amplitudes than those of the HCs at CPz (F[1, 40] = 5.681, P = .022), but not at Pz. Significant main effects of group (F[1, 40] = 5.269, P = .027) for P300 latencies were found. There were no main effects of electrode site and no interaction with the P300 latencies. Post hoc tests revealed that the IGD group had significantly longer P300 latencies than those of the HCs at CPz (F[1, 40] = 5.337, P = .026], but not at Pz.
3.4. ERP values before and after treatment in the IGD group
None of the main effects or interactions was statistically significant for the P300 amplitudes or P300 latencies. No significant changes in P300 amplitudes or P300 latencies were observed between before and 6 months after IGD treatment, even though the patients with IGD exhibited significant improvements in their IGD symptoms as measured by Young IAT. In further analysis, no significant differences in ERP were observed at baseline between responders (decrease of IAT scores ≤30% relative to baseline IAT scores, n = 10) and nonresponders after the 6-month treatment in patients with IGD (n = 8).
3.5. Relationship between ERP changes and addiction symptom changes after treatment
No significant correlations were observed between P300 amplitudes or latencies at the CPz site or IAT scores at baseline in patients with IGD. Changes in P300 amplitudes and latencies after treatment in the IGD were not correlated with changes in the IAT score.
4. Discussion
The present study found that decreased P300 amplitudes and delayed latencies in patients with IGD were sustained after treatment with pharmacotherapy, even though the patients’ IGD symptoms improved significantly after treatment. This finding indicates that the decreased P300 amplitudes and delayed latencies at the baseline assessment, and sustained dysfunction after treatment in patients with IGD are reliable neurobiological markers for IGD and are associated with vulnerability to develop the disorder. This is the first study to investigate prospective ERP changes associated with symptomatic improvements in patients with IGD.
Identifying biological markers associated with treatment-related changes can provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology underlying IGD. Because IGD is associated with a poor quality of life and lower psychological well-being,[21] identifying vulnerable individuals early and implementing early interventions involving individualized treatment approaches would likely have significant clinical importance. Of the various biological markers, those related to vulnerability to develop the disorder are considered the endophenotype. The endophenotype is stable over time, and those who possess the endophenotype, state independent whether illness is present or in remission phenotypically, are at high risk of developing psychiatric disorders.[22] Furthermore, a reduction in P300 amplitude in childhood could increase the odds of SUD in adolescence or late adolescence.[23–25]
In the present study, we found decreased P300 amplitudes and delayed latencies at the baseline assessments and sustained dysfunction after treatment in patients with IGD during the auditory oddball task. Abnormal changes in the P300 measurements during the auditory oddball task reflect that patients with IGD demonstrate cognitive deficiencies in the capacity and speed of information processing. These results are consistent with a previous ERP study.[10] In addition, the neurotransmitter mechanisms underlying the generation of P300 are as yet unclear, but several researches suggest some neurotransmitter-mediated P300 generations have been implicated. Striatal dopamine D2/D3 receptor status is positively correlated with P300 amplitude and negatively correlated with P300 latency in patients with depression, and those evidence indicates that dopaminergic activity plays a role in the generation of the P300.[26] Some studies have also found evidence that IGD is associated with deficit in the dopaminergic neural system. In a previous positron emission tomography (PET) imaging study, reductions in dopamine D2 receptors availability in subdivisions of the striatum, including the bilateral dorsal caudate and right putamen, have been observed in patients with IGD.[27] Patients with SUD were also found to have P300 dysfunctions associated with the dopaminergic brain systems.[28] Furthermore, in this study, we found no correlations between ERP changes and addiction symptoms in patients with IGD and no differences in ERP measures between treatment responders and treatment nonresponders in patients with IGD. Wan et al[29] reported significantly reduced P300 amplitudes at Pz in patients with SUD who did not complete treatment compared with those who did. Those authors also suggested that P300 amplitude is a good candidate for predicting treatment completion, as reduced P300 amplitude has been consistently observed in patients with SUD.[29] However, we found no differences in ERP amplitudes or latencies according to the treatment responses in patients with IGD. Taking these findings together, the neurophysiological characteristics according to genetic status of the dopaminergic system must be examined to clarify the role of ERP measures in the IGD endophenotype.
The present study had some limitations. First, the sample size was too small to represent the overall characteristics of patients with IGD, and only male subjects were included. Thus, the generalizability of the results is limited. Second, the treatment modalities were not well-organized, but consisted of typical outpatient care. However, the main focus of this study was to determine the ERP markers associated with longitudinal changes in symptoms rather than the effects of the treatment itself. In the future, it will be necessary to investigate the effects of specific treatment modalities on the neurophysiological markers of patients with IGD.
5. Conclusions
The main overall finding from this study is that decreased P300 amplitudes and delayed latencies were sustained in patients with IGD after a 6-month treatment including pharmacotherapy, even though their IGD symptoms significantly improved after treatment. In addition, no correlations were detected between the P300 indices and addiction symptoms, and no differences in baseline P300 indices were observed between treatment responders and treatment nonresponders in the patients with IGD. Therefore, reduced P300 amplitudes and delayed latencies could be candidate endophenotypes in the pathophysiology of IGD.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Areum Choi, Ji Yoon Lee, and Su Mi Park for helping to collect data.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: ANCOVA = analysis of covariance, BAI = Beck Anxiety Inventory, BDI = Beck Depression Inventory, DSM = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, EEG = electroencephalography, EOG = electro-oculograms, ERP = event-related potentials, IAT = Young Internet Addiction Test, IGD = Internet gaming disorder.
MP and YJK equally contributed to this work as the first authors.
Author contributions: JS and DJ were responsible for the study concept and design. MK, YJ, and JS contributed to analysis of data and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.
Funding: This work was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (2014M3C7A1062894).
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
- [1].American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed.Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Choi J-S, Park SM, Lee J, et al. Resting-state beta and gamma activity in Internet addiction. Int J Psychophysiol 2013;89:328–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Lee J, Hwang JY, Park SM, et al. Differential resting-state EEG patterns associated with comorbid depression in Internet addiction. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2014;50:21–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Son K, Choi J, Lee J, et al. Neurophysiological features of Internet gaming disorder and alcohol use disorder: a resting-state EEG study. Transl Psychiatry 2015;5:e628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Picton T, Bentin S, Berg P, et al. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 2000;37:127–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Näätänen R, Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987;24:375–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118:2128–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Morault P, Guillem F, Bourgeois M, et al. Improvement predictors in obsessive-compulsive disorder. An event-related potential study. Psychiatry Res 1998;81:87–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Kamarajan C, Porjesz B, Jones KA, et al. Alcoholism is a disinhibitory disorder: neurophysiological evidence from a Go/No-Go task. Biol Psychol 2005;69:353–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Park M, Choi J, Park S, et al. Dysfunctional information processing during an auditory event-related potential task in individuals with Internet gaming disorder. Transl Psychiatry 2016;6:e721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Marques-Teixeira JE, Barbosa MFS. Emotional states and informational brain processing in drug addicts free of drugs: an ERPs study. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract 2005;9:213–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Polich J, Pollock VE, Bloom FE. Meta-analysis of P300 amplitude from males at risk for alcoholism. Psychol Bull 1994;115:55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Iacono WG, Malone SM, McGue M. Substance use disorders, externalizing psychopathology, and P300 event-related potential amplitude. Int J Psychophysiol 2003;48:147–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Yoon HH, Malone SM, Iacono WG. Longitudinal stability and predictive utility of the visual P3 response in adults with externalizing psychopathology. Psychophysiology 2015;52:1632–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Kim YJ, Lee J-Y, Oh S, et al. Associations between prospective symptom changes and slow-wave activity in patients with Internet gaming disorder: a resting-state EEG study. Medicine 2017;96:e6178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Young KS. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav 1998;1:237–44. [Google Scholar]
- [17].Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4:561–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, et al. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988;56:893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Semlitsch HV, Anderer P, Schuster P, et al. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology 1986;23:695–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 2004;134:9–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Suh SW, Gwak AR, Lim JA, et al. Quality of life and psychosocial well-being in Internet gaming disorder: a comparison with alcohol-dependent and healthy control groups. J Korean Acad Addict Psychiatry 2015;19:29–34. [Google Scholar]
- [22].Iacono WG, Malone SM. Developmental endophenotypes: Indexing genetic risk for substance abuse with the P300 brain event-related potential. Child Dev Perspect 2011;5:239–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Berman SM, Whipple S, Fitch R, et al. P3 in young boys as a predictor of adolescent substance use. Alcohol 1993;10:69–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Habeych ME, Charles PJ, Sclabassi RJ, et al. Direct and mediated associations between P300 amplitude in childhood and substance use disorders outcome in young adulthood. Biol Psychiatry 2005;57:76–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Hill SY, Steinhauer SR, Locke-Wellman J, et al. Childhood risk factors for young adult substance dependence outcome in offspring from multiplex alcohol dependence families: a prospective study. Biol Psychiatry 2009;66:750–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Pogarell O, Padberg F, Karch S, et al. Dopaminergic mechanisms of target detection: P300 event related potential and striatal dopamine. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 2011;194:212–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Kim SH, Baik S-H, Park CS, et al. Reduced striatal dopamine D2 receptors in people with Internet addiction. Neuroreport 2011;22:407–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Hesselbrock V, Begleiter H, Porjesz B, et al. P300 event-related potential amplitude as an endophenotype of alcoholism-evidence from the collaborative study on the genetics of alcoholism. J Biomed Sci 2001;8:77–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Wan L, Baldridge RM, Colby AM, et al. Association of P3 amplitude to treatment completion in substance dependent individuals. Psychiatry Res 2010;177:223–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]