Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Feb 27;9:2931. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38929-5

Fabrication of transition metal dichalcogenides quantum dots based on femtosecond laser ablation

Yanmin Xu 1, Lihe Yan 1,, Xiaoyu Li 1, Huanhuan Xu 1
PMCID: PMC6393534  PMID: 30814552

Abstract

As heavy metal-free quantum dots, transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) and boron nitride (BN) quantum dots (QDs) have aroused great interest due to features such as good thermal conductivity, chemical stability, and unique optical properties. Although TMDs have been synthesized using different methods, most of these methods require time-consuming or complex steps, limiting the applications of TMDs. We propose a fast and simple method for the synthesis of high-quality molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) QDs and tungsten disulfide (WS2) QDs based on femtosecond laser ablation and sonication-assisted liquid exfoliation. The prepared MoS2 QDs and WS2 QDs were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The resulting products possessed few-layered thickness with an average size of 3.7 nm and 2.1 nm. Due to the abundance of functional groups on their surface, the MoS2 QDs and WS2 QDs showed bright blue-green luminescence under UV irradiation. Our method offers a facile and novel synthetic strategy for TMDs QDs and other two-dimensional nanomaterial quantum dots, such as boron nitride quantum dots (BNQDs).

Introduction

Following the successful application of graphene, great attention has been paid to other layered inorganic graphene analogues due to their peculiar and fascinating physical properties that are correlated with their 2D ultrathin atomic layer structure. Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have attracted increasing attention in recent years due to their unique optical and electronic properties and have found many applications in catalysts, optoelectronics, and bio-imaging14. As the electronic band structure of semiconductor materials is relatively sensitive to the quantum size effect, layered TMDs exhibit excellent fluorescence properties when they are tailored into quantum dots (QDs)58. Compared with traditional semiconductor QDs (such as CdS and CdSe), TMDs QDs have been proven to be good candidates for bio-imaging and bio-sensing areas due to their intrinsic low toxicity and good dispersibility2,911.

Similar to the fabrication of well-known carbon QDs or carbon nanodots (C-dots), the synthetic strategies of TMDs can be divided into two groups: top-down and bottom-up methods. Top-down methods mainly use physical or chemical methods to weaken the van der Waals forces between the layers and tailor them into QDs. Although monolayered TMDs can be made by ultrasonication12, intercalation reaction11,13 and CVD methods14, further reduction of the lateral size of TMDs film to form QDs has remained a significant challenge. For example, P. Wu et al. fabricated MoS2 and WS2 QDs with controllable size using the sonication-assisted liquid exfoliation technique followed by a solvothermal process that was carried out at 140 °C for 9 h7. Although TMDs QDs have been successfully synthesized by top-down methods, the top-down preparation processes of TMDs QDs is generally time-consuming. In contrast with the top-down methods, the bottom-up methods involve the oxidative condensation of different elements, which is typically used to produce C-dots on the basis of dehydrogenation and carbonization1517. Due to the difficulties in selecting proper precursors, much less attention has been devoted to TMDs QDs synthesized by the bottom-up methods. W. Song et al. obtained MoS2 QDs by hydrothermal treatment of a mixture of ammonium molybdate and thiourea. However, their further application was largely hindered because the ammonia solution was harmful to human tissue18. Based on the above reasons, it is necessary to develop a new fast, green and facile method for preparing TMDs QDs.

Femtosecond laser ablation has attracted much attention due to its outstanding features, such as being fast, clean and efficient19,20. When the femtosecond pulses are injected into the targets, multiphoton-absorption ionization occurs, and a plasma plume is formed in a high temperature and high pressure environment21,22. Under these extreme conditions, the nanoparticles can be produced through Coulombic explosion, and surface functionalization of the nanoparticles occurs simultaneously23. Hence, femtosecond laser ablation is a convenient method for preparing different nanoparticles, including iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles24,25, alloy nanoparticles26,27 and C-dots2830. Compared with the bottom-up synthetic strategies, the laser ablation method is more environmentally friendly, benefiting from a decrease in the usage of chemical ligands and the residues of reducing agents. In addition, as the size reduction of the particles into nanostructures can be completed in a short time through laser ablation (tens of minutes typically), the femtosecond laser ablation method for TMDs nanoparticles preparation seems to be timesaving compared with top-down methods such as solvothermal approaches7,10.

Herein, we designed a facile route to synthesize the TMDs QDs through femtosecond laser ablation combined with sonication-assisted liquid exfoliation. Using this method, bulk TMDs were first tailored into small nanoparticles using femtosecond laser ablation and then exfoliated into few-layered QDs by ultrasonic processing in liquid. The optical properties and chemical structures were characterized using a transmission electron microscope (TEM), atomic force microscope (AFM), UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy, photoluminescence (PL), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy. Meanwhile, the carrier dynamics of the TMDs QDs were investigated using picosecond time-resolved spectroscopy, which showed that the abundance of surface functional groups lead to the TMDs QDs PL. The TMDs QDs fabricated by femtosecond laser ablation exhibited good dispersibility, high purity, bright fluorescence, and low toxicity. In brief, our method is a good candidate for the fabrication of high-quality TMDs QDs as well as boron nitride quantum dots (BNQDs).

Results and Discussion

The TMDs QDs were prepared by femtosecond laser ablation combined with sonication-assisted liquid exfoliation of bulk TMDs in NMP, a schematic diagram of the process is shown in Fig. 1, where M represents Mo and W elements. There are two critical steps during the process. First, large bulk MoS2 and WS2 powders were cut into small multilayer MoS2 and WS2 nanoparticles by femtosecond laser ablation. Second, the produced multilayer MoS2 and WS2 nanoparticles were exfoliated into QDs through an ultrasonic exfoliation process. When the two steps were completed, faint yellow solutions containing MoS2 and WS2 QDs were obtained. Here, NMP was selected as the solvent because its surface energy matched the van der Waals forces of the MoS2 and WS2 layers16,31, which benefits the exfoliation of the MoS2 and WS2 nanoparticles from the multilayer to the monolayer.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic illustration of the synthetic procedure of TMDs QDs based on femtosecond laser ablation and sonication-assisted liquid exfoliation.

TEM images were used to characterize the microstructure and size distribution of the MoS2 and WS2 QDs. The TEM samples were prepared by depositing a small droplet of the TMDs QDs solution onto a microscopic copper grid coated with a thin transparent carbon film. As shown in Fig. 2(a,b), the average lateral sizes of the MoS2 and WS2 QDs were approximately 3.7 nm and 2.1 nm, respectively. The HRTEM images in the inset of Fig. 2(a,b) indicate that both QDs were well-crystallized. The d-spacing of the MoS2 QDs was 0.19 nm, corresponding to the (105) facet of the MoS2 crystal1. A lattice spacing of approximately 0.2 nm could be indexed to the (006) plane of the WS2 crystal32, indicating that these QDs were MoS2 or WS2 QDs. To further investigate the morphology and thickness of the as-prepared QDs, AFM measurements of these nanostructures were carried out. The AFM images and the height profile (Fig. 2(c,d)) exhibit typical topographic heights for MoS2 and WS2 ranging from 1 to 2 nm, corresponding to 1–2 layers of MoS2 and WS214,33. Due to equipment limitations, the AFM testing was restricted to the current height resolution. These morphological investigations indicated that MoS2 and WS2 nanoparticles were formed during the laser ablation process and were exfoliated into few-layered QDs after ultrasonic processing in NMP.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a,b) TEM images of the MoS2 QDs and WS2 QDs. The inset are the size distributions and the HRTEM images of the MoS2 QDs and WS2 QDs. (c,d) AFM images of the MoS2 QDs and WS2 QDs. The inset is the height distribution of MoS2 QDs and WS2 QDs, marked with a solid red line in (c,d).

To explore the chemical structure of the prepared TMDs QDs, XPS measurements of the MoS2 QDs and WS2 QDs were obtained. The high-resolution spectra of Mo (Fig. 3(a)) showed three peaks at 231, 233 and 234.5 eV, which belonged to Mo4+ 3d5/2 and Mo4+ 3d3/2 of 2H-MoS2, respectively. Moreover, the existence of Mo6+ demonstrated that the Mo edges in the MoS2 QDs are oxidized during the preparation process1,34. S peaks at 166.5 and 168.3 eV were assigned to S2− 2p3/2 and S2− 2p1/2 in 2H-MoS2 (Fig. 3(b))3. As shown in Fig. 3(c,d), the XPS spectra of WS2 QDs revealed that the structure of S-W-S was maintained through all of the preparation processes. The S peaks (2p3/2 at ~166.5 eV and 2p1/2 at ~168.3 eV) in Fig. 3(c) were attributed to the −2 valence state of the S atoms. The peaks for the 4 f level of W atoms that correspond to a bound +4 valence state (WS2) are presented in Fig. 3(d). The bands at 33.7, 35.2 and 37.3 eV were assigned to W 4f7/2, W 4f5/2 and W 5p3/2, respectively35. The XPS results indicate that functional groups were attached to the surfaces of the MoS2 and WS2 QDs during the fabrication process. As reported, ionization of the raw materials and solution occurred in the laser ablation process, and a plasma with a high temperature and high pressure was formed23. Under these extreme conditions, MoS2 and WS2 nanoparticles with a size of several nanometres could be produced, and surface functionalization of the nanoparticles occurred simultaneously.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

XPS spectra of (a) Mo 3d and (b) S 2p regions for MoS2 QDs and the (c) S 2p and (d) W 5p and W 4 f regions for WS2 QDs.

The chemical structures of MoS2 and WS2 QDs were investigated by Raman and FTIR spectroscopy. In Fig. 4(a), the Raman spectrum of the bulk MoS2 powder had two main modes, the A1g (the out-of-plane vibration of the S atoms) and the E2g (the in-plane vibration of the Mo–S bonds) located at 402 and 377 cm−1, respectively5. The Raman spectrum of the MoS2 QDs showed that the A1g peak had blue shifted on the order of 3 cm−1, and the peak position of the E2g had also decreased 5 cm−1, which was attributed to the A1g softening and E2g stiffening with decreasing layer thickness3. In the Raman spectra of WS2, the bulk WS2 also showed two peaks at approximately 415 (A1g) and 348 cm−1 (E2g) (Fig. 4(b)). For the WS2 QDs, the E2g peak blue shifted to 344 cm−1, and the A1g peak redshifted to 417 cm−1. The blue shift of the E2g was attributed to the reduced long-range Coulomb interactions between the effective charges caused by an increase in the dielectric screening of stacking-induced changes in the interlayer bonding36. The shift of the A1g may be caused by a decrease in the interlayer Van der Waals interactions, which results in a weaker restoring force in the vibration as WS2 QDs form32. The Raman spectra of the MoS2 and WS2 QDs confirmed that the bulk TMDs were exfoliated into few-layered QDs during the fabrication process.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) Raman spectra of MoS2 powder and MoS2 QDs. (b) Raman spectra of WS2 powder and WS2 QDs. (c) FTIR spectrum of MoS2 QDs. (d) FTIR spectrum of WS2 QDs.

The FTIR measurements were used to study the surface functional groups of the QDs. The FTIR spectrum of the MoS2 QDs (Fig. 4(c)) showed one weak absorption peak at 474 cm−1, which could be ascribed to the Mo-S stretching vibration mode of MoS237. Figure 4(d) exhibited characteristic absorptions at approximately 821–985 cm−1 and 608 cm−1, which corresponded to the S-S bond and W-S bond, respectively36,38. Apart from the above characteristic peaks, the MoS2 QDs and WS2 QDs had almost the same FTIR peaks. The appearance of peaks at 3359 cm−1 (OH bond stretching), 2924 cm−1 (CH2 asymmetric stretching), 1673 cm−1 (C=O vibration), 1401 cm−1 (C-NH-C or C=N-C stretching vibration), 1285 cm−1 (C–N stretching frequencies) and 1121 cm−1 (C-NH-C or C-N stretching) indicated the attachment of NMP to the QD surface during the femtosecond laser ablation process5,18,3941. In addition, the presence of carboxyl and hydroxyl groups were deemed to be responsible for the good water solubility of the prepared MoS2 QDs and WS2 QDs.

UV−vis absorbance, PL excitation (PLE) and PL spectra were obtained to study the optical properties of the MoS2 QDs and WS2 QDs. The as-prepared MoS2 QDs and WS2 QDs under visible light were yellowish in colour (as shown by the left inset of Fig. 5(a,c)), while blue-green photoluminescent emission could be observed under UV (395 nm) irradiation (the right inset in Fig. 5(a,c)). As shown in Fig. 5(a), MoS2 QDs showed an optical absorption peak at 275 nm with the edge extending to approximately 450 nm, which may be attributed to the functional groups on its surface[3; 4]. Similarly, the WS2 QDs had almost the same absorption spectrum. Meanwhile, the strongest emission of the MoS2 QDs and WS2 QDs occurred at 480 nm under 400 nm light excitation with a Stokes shift of 80 nm. Figure 5(b,d) show that the as-prepared MoS2 QDs and WS2 QDs all exhibited excitation-dependent PL behaviour, which may be caused by the abundance of surface functional groups of the QDs.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a,c) UV–vis ABS (black line), PLE (red line) and PL (blue line) of the MoS2 QDs and WS2 QDs, respectively. (b,d) Excitation-dependent PL emission behaviour of the MoS2 QDs and WS2 QDs, respectively, excited at wavelengths from 300 to 480 nm. The inserts of (a,c) show photographs of the bulk materials and the corresponding QDs taken under visible (left) and 395 nm UV (right) lights.

To study the origin and mechanism of the PL process in MoS2 QDs, the NMP solvent was replaced with distilled water for the laser ablation process. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S1, no photoluminescence appeared in the PL spectrum of the prepared MoS2 QDs. Because there were no carbon atoms in water, carbon functional groups were not able to form on the MoS2 QDs. Therefore, we could infer that the PL of MoS2 QDs prepared in NMP originated from its surface functional groups rather than its intrinsic luminescence42. Picosecond time-resolved spectroscopy was further used to study the PL mechanism of the prepared MoS2 QDs in NMP. The PL emissions were excited using a 404 nm laser, and the temporal behaviour of the emissions at wavelengths of 420, 450, and 480 nm was measured. As shown in Fig. 6, each of the decay curves of these emissions could be well fitted using a double-exponential function, indicating both a fast decay (0.65~0.95 ns) and a slow decay (4.90~7.95 ns). The fitting results are given in Supplementary Table S1. Generally, with increasing emission wavelength, the slow time component in the PL dynamics increased, and the average lifetime of the PL was prolonged. Similar to the PL mechanism in C-dots prepared using laser ablation methods, when the MoS2 QDs were excited, there were two pathways for electron-hole recombination in the prepared MoS2 QDs: direct radiative recombination of the surface states (a fast decay), and a relaxation of carriers from the intrinsic states of MoS2 QDs to the surface states followed by radiative recombination of the surface states (a slow decay)43. When the emission wavelength was increased, the lower electron energy levels of the surface states were corresponded, and relaxation from the intrinsic states to the excited surface states was prolonged, causing an increase in the slow time components of the PL lifetime.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Time-resolved PL spectra of the prepared MoS2 QDs at detection wavelengths of 420, 450, and 480 nm under 404 nm excitation.

Similar to the TMDs QDs, the newly emerged BNQDs have also attracted great attention44,45. Unfortunately, the synthesis of BNQDs has also been limited to time-consuming top-down methods due to the difficulty in selecting proper precursors for the bottom-up synthetic strategies46. The proposed method in this report, based on femtosecond laser ablation and sonication-assisted liquid exfoliation, was also successfully used to fabricate BNQDs. The experimental details and results are given in the supporting information. TEM images (Supplementary Fig. S2) and XPS (Supplementary Fig. S3) demonstrate the formation of the BNQDs. The PL spectra and the Raman survey (Supplementary Fig. S4) indicate the excellent fluorescence properties of the products.

Conclusion

In summary, a fast and simple method for the synthesis of high-quality TMDs QDs based on femtosecond laser ablation and sonication-assisted liquid exfoliation is proposed. The bulk MoS2 and WS2 were cut into small nanoparticles by femtosecond laser ablation, and the ultrasonic process exfoliated these nanoparticles into MoS2 QDs and WS2 QDs. By analysing the results of TEM, AFM, XPS, FTIR and PL, we found that the prepared MoS2 QDs and WS2 QDs were few layered and exhibited good optical properties. To study the origin and mechanism of the PL process in MoS2 QDs, time-resolved PL was also investigated. In addition, our work also provides a fast, low-cost, and simple synthetic strategy for the synthesis of transitional metal dichalcogenides QDs and other 2D nanomaterials.

Methods

Materials

Bulk hexagonal boron nitride (hBN), bulk MoS2 powders, bulk WS2 powders and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP, 99.5%) were commercially purchased from Aladdin Industrial Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All materials were of analytical grade and used without further purification.

Preparation of TMDs QDs

Using the MoS2 QDs as an example, the MoS2 QDs were prepared using the following procedures. A total of 3.2 mg of MoS2 powder was dispersed into 40 mL of NMP solution, and the mixture was sonicated for 2–3 minutes to obtain a uniform distribution. Next, 10 mL of the above solution was placed into a glass beaker (outside diameter × height: 25 mm × 35 mm) for ablation. By focusing with a lens (focal length 100 mm), a femtosecond laser with a wavelength of 800 nm that was produced by a Ti:sapphire laser (with 80 fs pulse duration, 400 mW laser power, and 1 kHz repetition rate) was directed into the solution for approximately 0.5 h. During laser irradiation, a magnetic stirrer was used to prevent gravitational settling of the initial powder. After laser ablation, the solution was centrifuged for 20 min at 12000 rpm to remove large MoS2 particles. The supernatant was collected and processed by ultrasound for 2 h with 500 mW power. During the sonication process, an ice/water system was used to maintain a temperature of 10 °C. After sonication, the prepared MoS2 QDs contained in the supernatant were collected for use. The fabrication process of the WS2 QDs was similar to that of the MoS2 QDs. The yield of QDs from the powder suspensions was seriously affected by the ablation conditions, such as the pulse energy, irradiation time and spot size23,47. In our experiments, the yield of the QDs for 30-min laser ablation was estimated to be approximately 11%, which is comparable with that reported in previous studies7.

Instrumentation

The PL spectrum measurements were conducted with a spectrometer (Omni-λ, China). The UV-vis absorption spectra were obtained from a spectrophotometer (UV-2600, China). TEM and high resolution TEM (HRTEM) images of the BNQDs were obtained using a high-resolution transmission electron microscope (JEM-ARM200F, Japan). XPS experiments were carried out with an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (ESCALAB Xi+, USA). The AFM images were obtained using an atomic force microscope (DIMENSION IOON, Germany). The Raman spectra were acquired from a Raman System (HR800, France) with a 532 nm laser excitation. FTIR spectroscopy was performed with a time-resolution infrared spectrometer (Vetex70, Germany) using the KBr pellet method. The time-resolved PL spectra of the BNQDs were monitored with a time-correlated single-photon counting system (FLSPP20, UK) (excited by picosecond pulsed LDs, a time resolution of 100 ps, pulse duration: <850 ps, repetition rate: 10 MHz).

“Ethics”

We were not required to complete an ethical assessment prior to conducting our research, and no permissions were required prior to conducting our research.

Supplementary information

Dataset 1 (589.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National R&D Program of China (2017YFA0207400), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61690221, 11674260 and 11474078), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and the collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology. The TEM work was performed at the International Center for Dielectric Research (ICDR), Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China. The AFM work was measured by the Electronic Materials Research Laboratory, Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education &International Center for Dielectric Research, School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University. The authors also thank Mr. Ma and Ms. Lu for their help in collecting the TEM images.

Author Contributions

Yanmin Xu carried out the experimental work, data analysis and writing of the manuscript. Lihe Yan helped design the experiments. Xiaoyu Li and Huanhuan Xu contributed to the discussion of the results.

Data Availability

All of the data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-38929-5.

References

  • 1.Li B, et al. Preparation of monolayer MoS2 quantum dots using temporally shaped femtosecond laser ablation of bulk MoS2 targets in water. Sci Rep-UK. 2017;7:11182. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10632-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhao X, He DW, Wang YS, Fu C. Facile fabrication of tungsten disulfide quantum dots (WS2 QDs) as effective probes for fluorescence detection of dopamine (DA) Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018;207:130–134. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.12.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dong HF, et al. Fluorescent MoS2 quantum dots: ultrasonic preparation, up-conversion and down-conversion bioimaging, and photodynamic therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2016;8:3107–3114. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b10459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Long H, et al. The WS2 quantum dot: preparation, characterization and its optical limiting effect in polymethylmethacrylate. Nanotechnology. 2016;27:414005. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/41/414005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Haldar D, Dinda D, Saha SK. High selectivity in water soluble MoS2 quantum dots for sensing nitro explosives. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2016;4:6321–6326. doi: 10.1039/C6TC01811D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhu XQ, et al. Tunable photoluminescence of MoS2 quantum dots passivated by different functional groups. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2018;511:209–214. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.09.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xu SJ, Li D, Wu PY. One-pot, facile, and versatile synthesis of monolayer MoS2 /WS2 quantum dots as bioimaging probes and efficient electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015;25:1127–1136. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201403863. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lin HH, et al. Colloidal synthesis of MoS2 quantum dots: size-dependent tunable photoluminescence and bioimaging. New J. Chem. 2015;39:8492–8497. doi: 10.1039/C5NJ01698C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhao M, et al. MoS2 Quantum Dots as new electrochemiluminescence emitters for ultrasensitive bioanalysis of lipopolysaccharide. Anal. Chem. 2017;89:8335–8342. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gu W, et al. A facile and one-step ethanol-thermal synthesis of MoS2 quantum dots for two-photon fluorescence imaging. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2016;4:27–31. doi: 10.1039/C5TB01839K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhou K, Zhang Y, Xia Z, Wei WL. As-prepared MoS2 quantum dot as a facile fluorescent probe for long-term tracing of live cells. Nanotechnology. 2016;27:275101. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/27/275101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stengl V, Henych J. Strongly luminescent monolayered MoS2 prepared by effective ultrasound exfoliation. Nanoscale. 2013;5:3387–3394. doi: 10.1039/c3nr00192j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu QQ, Hu CF, Wang XM. A facile one-step method to produce MoS2 quantum dots as promising bio-imaging materials. RSC Adv. 2016;6:25605–25610. doi: 10.1039/C6RA00572A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Park SJ, et al. Structural and optical characterization of MoS2 quantum dots defined by thermal annealing. J. Lumin. 2017;183:62–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2016.11.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cunningham G, et al. Solvent exfoliation of transition metal dichalcogenides: dispersibility of exfoliated nanosheets varies only weakly between compounds. ACS Nano. 2012;6:3468–3480. doi: 10.1021/nn300503e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tan C, et al. Recent advances in ultrathin two-dimensional nanomaterials. Chem. Rev. 2017;117:6225–6331. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nguyen V, Yan LH, Xu HH, Yue MM. One-step synthesis of multi-emission carbon nanodots for ratiometric temperature sensing. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018;427:1118–1123. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huang H, et al. Water-soluble monolayer molybdenum disulfide quantum dots with upconversion fluorescence. Part. Syst. Char. 2015;32:72–79. doi: 10.1002/ppsc.201400101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Singh SC, et al. Optical properties of selenium quantum dots produced with laser irradiation of water suspended Se nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2010;114:17374–17384. doi: 10.1021/jp105037w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hu SL, et al. One-step synthesis of fluorescent carbon nanoparticles by laser irradiation. J. Mater. Chem. 2009;19:484–488. doi: 10.1039/B812943F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Si J, Hirao K. Phase-matched second-harmonic generation in cross-linking polyurethane films by thermal-assisted optical poling. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007;91:91105. doi: 10.1063/1.2776876. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cui W, Si JH, Chen T. Compact bending sensor based on a fiber Bragg grating in an abrupt biconical taper. Opt. Express. 2015;23:11031–11036. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.011031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nguyen V, Yan LH, Si JH, Hou X. Femtosecond laser-induced size reduction of carbon nanodots in solution: Effect of laser fluence, spot size, and irradiation time. J. Appl. Phys. 2015;117:84304. doi: 10.1063/1.4909506. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Amendola V, et al. Top-down synthesis of multifunctional iron oxide nanoparticles for macrophage labelling and manipulation. J. Mater. Chem. 2011;21:3803–3813. doi: 10.1039/c0jm03863f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Xiao J, et al. Ultrahigh relaxivity and safe probes of manganese oxide nanoparticles for in vivo imaging. Sci. Rep-UK. 2013;3:3424. doi: 10.1038/srep03424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Amendola V, et al. Magneto-plasmonic Au-Fe alloy nanoparticles designed for multimodal SERS-MRI-CT imaging. Small. 2014;10:3823. doi: 10.1002/smll.201402576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wagener P, et al. Solvent-surface interactions control the phase structure in laser-generated iron-gold core-shell nanoparticles. Sci. Rep-UK. 2016;6:23352. doi: 10.1038/srep23352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu YL, Zhou QX, Yuan YY, Wu YL. Hydrothermal synthesis of fluorescent carbon dots from sodium citrate and polyacrylamide and their highly selective detection of lead and pyrophosphate. Carbon. 2017;115:550–560. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu W, et al. Green synthesis of carbon dots from rose-heart radish and application for Fe3+ detection and cell imaging. Sens. Actuators, B. 2017;241:190–198. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.10.068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xu HH, Yan LH, Nguyen V, Yu Y, Xu YM. One-step synthesis of nitrogen-doped carbon nanodots for ratiometric pH sensing by femtosecond laser ablation method. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017;414:238–243. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.092. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kapatel S, Mania C, Sumesh CK. Salt assisted sonochemical exfoliation and synthesis of highly stable few-to-monolayer WS2 quantum dots with tunable optical properties. J. Mater. Sci.-Mater.Electron. 2017;28:7184–7189. doi: 10.1007/s10854-017-6399-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yan YH, et al. Facile synthesis of water-soluble WS2 quantum dots for turn-on fluorescent measurement of lipoic acid. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120:12170–12177. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01868. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhou LY, Yan SC, Wu H, Song HZ, Shi Y. Facile sonication synthesis of WS2 quantum dots for photoelectrochemical performance. Catalysts. 2017;7:18. doi: 10.3390/catal7010018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ou G, et al. Defective molybdenum sulfide quantum dots as highly active hydrogen evolution electrocatalysts. Nano. Res. 2018;11:751–761. doi: 10.1007/s12274-017-1684-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mahler B, Hoepfner V, Liao K, Ozin GA. Colloidal synthesis of 1T-WS2 and 2H-WS2 nanosheets: applications for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:14121–14127. doi: 10.1021/ja506261t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hazarika SJ, Mohanta D. Inorganic fullerene-type WS2 nanoparticles: processing, characterization and its photocatalytic performance on malachite green. Appl. Phys. A. 2017;123:381. doi: 10.1007/s00339-017-0965-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gao D, et al. Ferromagnetism in freestanding MoS2 nanosheets. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2013;8:129. doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vattikuti SVP, Byon C, Chitturi V. Selective hydrothermally synthesis of hexagonal WS2 platelets and their photocatalytic performance under visible light irradiation. Superlattices Microstruct. 2016;94:39–50. doi: 10.1016/j.spmi.2016.03.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Guo XR, Wang Y, Wu FY, Ni YN, Kokot S. The use of tungsten disulfide dots as highly selective, fluorescent probes for analysis of nitrofurazone. Talanta. 2015;144:1036–1043. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.07.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zeng XW, et al. Effect of polymer addition on the structure and hydrogen evolution reaction property of nanoflower-like molybdenum disulfide. Metals. 2015;5:1829–1844. doi: 10.3390/met5041829. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Das R, Mishra H, Srivastava A, Kayastha AM. Covalent immobilization of β-amylase onto functionalized molybdenum sulfide nanosheets, its kinetics and stability studies: A gateway to boost enzyme application. Chem. Eng. J. 2017;328:215–227. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nguyen V, Si JH, Yan LH, Hou X. Direct demonstration of photoluminescence originated from surface functional groups in carbon nanodots. Carbon. 2016;108:268–273. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.07.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nguyen V, Si JH, Yan LH, Hou X. Electron–hole recombination dynamics in carbon nanodots. Carbon. 2015;95:659–663. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.08.066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Huo BB, et al. One-step synthesis of fluorescent boron nitride quantum dots via a hydrothermal strategy using melamine as nitrogen source for the detection of Ferric ions. Langmuir. 2017;33:10673–10678. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b01699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Xue Q, et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of blue-fluorescent monolayer BN and BCNO quantum dots for bio-imaging probes. RSC Adv. 2016;6:79090–79094. doi: 10.1039/C6RA16744F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liu BP, et al. One-step synthesis of boron nitride quantum dots: simple chemistry meets delicate nanotechnology. Chem. Eur. J. 2016;22:18899–18907. doi: 10.1002/chem.201603935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Amendola V, Meneghetti M. What controls the composition and the structure of nanomaterials generated by laser ablation in liquid solution? Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013;15:3027–3046. doi: 10.1039/C2CP42895D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Dataset 1 (589.8KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All of the data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES