Herpes simplex virus (HSV) causes invasive disease in half of infected neonates, resulting in significant mortality and permanent cognitive morbidity. The factors that contribute to invasive disease are not understood. This study revealed diversity among HSV isolates from infected neonates and detected the first associations between viral genetic variations and clinical disease manifestations. We found that viruses isolated from newborns with encephalitis showed enhanced spread in culture. These viruses contained protein-coding variations not found in viruses causing noninvasive disease. Many of these variations were found in proteins known to impact neurovirulence and viral spread between cells. This work advances our understanding of HSV diversity in the neonatal population and how it may impact disease outcome.
KEYWORDS: comparative genomics, herpes simplex virus, human herpesvirus 2, minor variants, neonatal, viral spread
ABSTRACT
More than 14,000 neonates are infected with herpes simplex virus (HSV) annually. Approximately half display manifestations limited to the skin, eyes, or mouth (SEM disease). The rest develop invasive infections that spread to the central nervous system (CNS disease or encephalitis) or throughout the infected neonate (disseminated disease). Invasive HSV disease is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, but the viral and host factors that predispose neonates to these forms are unknown. To define viral diversity within the infected neonatal population, we evaluated 10 HSV-2 isolates from newborns with a range of clinical presentations. To assess viral fitness independently of host immune factors, we measured viral growth characteristics in cultured cells and found diverse in vitro phenotypes. Isolates from neonates with CNS disease were associated with larger plaque size and enhanced spread, with the isolates from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) exhibiting the most robust growth. We sequenced complete viral genomes of all 10 neonatal viruses, providing new insights into HSV-2 genomic diversity in this clinical setting. We found extensive interhost and intrahost genomic diversity throughout the viral genome, including amino acid differences in more than 90% of the viral proteome. The genes encoding glycoprotein G (gG; US4), glycoprotein I (gI; US7), and glycoprotein K (gK; UL53) and viral proteins UL8, UL20, UL24, and US2 contained variants that were found in association with CNS isolates. Many of these viral proteins are known to contribute to cell spread and neurovirulence in mouse models of CNS disease. This report represents the first application of comparative pathogen genomics to neonatal HSV disease.
IMPORTANCE Herpes simplex virus (HSV) causes invasive disease in half of infected neonates, resulting in significant mortality and permanent cognitive morbidity. The factors that contribute to invasive disease are not understood. This study revealed diversity among HSV isolates from infected neonates and detected the first associations between viral genetic variations and clinical disease manifestations. We found that viruses isolated from newborns with encephalitis showed enhanced spread in culture. These viruses contained protein-coding variations not found in viruses causing noninvasive disease. Many of these variations were found in proteins known to impact neurovirulence and viral spread between cells. This work advances our understanding of HSV diversity in the neonatal population and how it may impact disease outcome.
Podcast: A podcast concerning this article is available.
INTRODUCTION
Each year, an estimated 10,000 neonates are infected with herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2), and 4,000 are infected with HSV-1, worldwide (1). Infants are typically infected at the time of birth by maternal genital shedding of HSV, most often by mothers who are not aware of their infection (2–4). The recent increase in genital HSV-1 incidence among women of childbearing age, particularly in developed nations, suggests that the burden of neonatal infection will continue to rise (1, 5). While some infected infants exhibit only superficial infection limited to the skin, eyes, or mouth (SEM disease; 45%), about half develop invasive systemic infections (disseminated [DISS] disease; 25%) or infections of the central nervous system (CNS disease; 30%) associated with significant morbidity and mortality (6, 7). Currently, administration of the antiviral medication acyclovir is the standard therapy for all forms of neonatal HSV disease. Although this intervention has reduced mortality due to invasive disease, most survivors of invasive disease are left with permanent neurodevelopmental deficits (8, 9).
The factors that predispose a neonate to invasive HSV infection are not entirely known. Recent studies have found that some adults and children outside the neonatal period who experience HSV infection of the brain have a host genetic defect within the Toll-like receptor-3 (TLR3) pathway (10, 11). Outside the neonatal period, HSV encephalitis is rare, as are host defects in the TLR3 pathway. In contrast, half of HSV-infected neonates experience invasive CNS or disseminated disease, making it less likely that host genetic defects alone could account for all of the observed cases of invasive infection in neonates. Prior clinical data on mother-to-infant transmission of HSV indicate that most cases of neonatal disease, including invasive forms of disease, result from newly acquired or primary HSV infection prior to the development of maternal antibody production (2–4, 12). This suggests a window of opportunity where the contributions of viral genetic variation to the progression of invasive infection and disease may be greater in neonates than in adults.
Prior studies have identified viral genetic factors that influence virulence or disease for reoviruses, influenza virus, HIV, and other viruses (13–18). In contrast to these RNA viruses, HSV was presumed to have lower genetic diversity and potential for variation in virulence, due to its relatively stable DNA genome and long coevolutionary history with humans (19). The assumption of limited HSV heterogeneity was supported by early studies that utilized low-resolution restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) or single-gene analyses to compare multiple HSV isolates (20–22). However, Rosenthal and colleagues used RFLP and PCR analysis of a single locus to demonstrate that a heterogeneous HSV population can exist in an invasive neonatal infection and provided proof of principle that natural genetic variation can impact neurovirulence (23, 24). More recently, advances in high-throughput sequencing (HTSeq) have enabled a reevaluation of herpesvirus genome-wide variation, which suggests that herpesviruses harbor extensive diversity both between strains or individuals (interhost variation) as well as within a single individual (intrahost variation) (25–27). These minor genetic variants may become clinically important if a variant within the viral population becomes the new dominant allele or genotype as a result of a bottleneck at transmission, entry into a new body compartment, or selective pressure such as that represented by antiviral therapy (28, 29).
Several recent examples have demonstrated the potential for gaining new insights by applying HTSeq approaches to herpesvirus infections in a clinical setting. In HTSeq studies of congenital infection by the beta-herpesvirus human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), Renzette et al. found evidence for heterogeneous viral populations both within and between hosts (30–35). The levels of diversity observed in congenital HCMV infections far exceeded those observed in adult infections (36–38). HTSeq-based examination of vaccine-associated rashes due to the alphaherpesvirus varicella zoster virus (VZV) demonstrated that adult skin vesicles contain a subset of the viral population introduced during vaccination and revealed at least 11 VZV genomic loci that were linked to rash formation (26). Recent HTSeq comparisons of adult genital HSV-2 isolates revealed the first evidence of a single individual shedding two distinct strains (39), demonstrated changes in the viral genome over time in a recently infected host (40), and provided the first evidence of ancient recombination between HSV-1 and HSV-2 (41, 42). To date, however, there has been no evaluation of genome-wide variation in neonatal HSV isolates to determine the levels of diversity in this population or the potential impact(s) of viral genetic variants on disease.
Until recently, several technical barriers prevented thorough assessment of neonatal HSV genomes. A key constraint on studies of neonatal disease has been the limited availability of cultured, minimally passaged viral samples that are associated with clinical information and have also been maintained in a low-passage-number state that is appropriate for sequencing and further experimental studies. Historically, viral culture was part of the HSV diagnostic workflow, but this has been superseded in clinical laboratory settings by the speed and sensitivity of viral detection by PCR (6, 43, 44). This change limits neonatal HSV sample availability for in vitro and animal model studies. In addition, many previously archived neonatal HSV isolates have been subjected to extensive passage, allowing them to acquire mutations that enhance viral growth in culture (23, 24). Additional challenges for HTSeq approaches to analysis of neonatal HSV include the large size (∼152 kb) of the viral genome, its high (∼70%) G+C content, and the large number of variable-number tandem repeats in the viral genome (>240 minisatellite/microsatellite repeats and >660 homopolymers of ≥6 bp) (27, 45). Therefore, many studies of HSV diversity (21, 46–49) or of the effect of HSV genetic variation on disease (50–52) have relied on low-resolution RFLP or single-gene PCR analyses due to the speed and ease of analysis in comparison to whole-genome approaches (53–58). To overcome these challenges, we combined our expertise in HSV comparative genomics and phenotypic analysis (53, 54, 58, 59) with a unique resource of low-passage-number, well-annotated neonatal specimens (8, 9, 60).
Here we analyzed a set of 10 low-passage-number clinical HSV-2 isolates collected from neonates with HSV infection who had been enrolled in one of two clinical studies that spanned 3 decades of patient enrollment (1981 to 2008) (8, 9, 60). These samples represented a wide range of clinical manifestations, including SEM, CNS, and disseminated disease, and each sample was associated with deidentified clinical information. We defined the level of diversity in this population using comparative genomics and an array of cell-based phenotypic assays. We found that HSV-2 isolates displayed diverse in vitro phenotypes as well as extensive interhost and intrahost diversity distributed throughout the HSV-2 genome. Finally, we found coding variations in several HSV-2 proteins associated with CNS disease. This report represents the first-ever application of comparative pathogen genomics to neonatal HSV disease and provides a basis for further exploration of genotype-phenotype links in this clinically vulnerable patient population.
RESULTS
Neonatal HSV-2 samples represent a diverse clinical population.
We utilized samples collected from 10 HSV-2-infected neonates enrolled by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Collaborative Antiviral Study Group (CASG) for clinical trials between 1981 and 2008 (8, 9, 60). These infants encompassed a range of clinical disease manifestations (see Table 1), with about half experiencing invasive CNS disease (5 patients) or disseminated (DISS) disease with CNS involvement (2 patients) and the remainder experiencing noninvasive SEM disease (3 patients). Extensive clinical information was available for each patient, including long-term neurocognitive and motor outcomes (Table 1). This population was also diverse with respect to sex, race, gestational age, and enrollment center (Table 1; enrollment center data not shown). All samples were collected at the time of diagnosis, prior to initiation of acyclovir therapy. Each isolate was cultured once as part of the diagnostic process, with expansion performed only for the experiments described here. Although the sample size was constrained by the rarity of neonatal HSV infection and availability of appropriately maintained isolates, our group is similar in size to groups used for prior HTSeq comparisons of congenital HCMV samples (30–35) and represents the largest group of neonatal HSV samples ever subjected to comparative genomic and phenotypic analysis.
TABLE 1.
Clinical isolatea |
Clinical disease(s) at diagnosis |
Sample source |
Morbidity score |
Patient age at disease onset (days) |
Gestational age at time of birth (wks) |
Patient sex and raceb |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mental | Motor | ||||||
CNS11 | CNS | CSF | 4 | 4 | 12 | 37 | M, W |
DISS14 | DISS + CNS | CSF | 2 | 2 | 7 | 39 | M, W |
CNS03 | CNS | Skin | 4 | 4 | 17 | 37 | M, W |
CNS15 | CNS | Skin | 3 | 4 | 19 | 36 | M, W |
CNS17 | CNS | Skin | 4 | 4 | 17 | 40 | M, W |
DISS29 | DISS + CNS | Skin | 3 | 3 | 5 | 38 | F, B |
CNS12 | CNS | Skin | 4 | 4 | 16 | 41 | F, W |
SEM02 | SEM | Skin | 1 | 1 | 5 | 38 | F, W |
SEM13 | SEM | Skin | 4 | 4 | 11 | 27 | F, B |
SEM18 | SEM | Skin | 2 | 2 | 17 | 37 | F, W |
Clinical isolate order based on data in Fig. 1.
F, female; M, male; B, black; W, white.
Neonatal HSV-2 isolates have different levels of fitness in culture.
To determine whether the viruses isolated from this neonatal population (Table 1) were intrinsically different, we assessed viral growth in culture, which provides a consistent environment that is independent of host genetic variation. To minimize the impact of immune pressure, we selected Vero monkey kidney cells, which lack an interferon response (61, 62). Each viral isolate was applied to a confluent monolayer of cells in vitro and allowed to form plaques for 100 h (Fig. 1A). The average plaque sizes differed between isolates, with the plaques seen with 6 of the 10 isolates being statistically significantly larger (indicated in green) than those seen with the other 4 (indicated in black; Fig. 1B) (one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA] with Holm-Sidak’s multiple-comparison test; P < 0.05). The average plaque size of the previously described low-passage-number, adult HSV-2 isolate SD90e is shown for comparison (63). The largest plaque sizes were observed in the two viruses isolated directly from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF; isolates CNS11 and DISS14; Fig. 1B); these two isolates were not statistically significantly different from one another in size but were significantly larger than any of those isolated from the skin (one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak’s multiple-comparison test, P < 0.05). Plaque size was assessed at each passage in culture and remained constant from the time the isolates were received in our laboratory (passage 2) through their genetic and phenotypic analysis (passage 4). The variances in plaque sizes produced by a given isolate were not statistically significantly different between isolates (Fig. 1B). The differences in average plaque sizes between isolates suggested that the HSV-2 populations found in each neonatal isolate were indeed intrinsically different.
Entry kinetics, DNA replication, protein expression, and virus production do not account for differences in plaque size.
Plaque formation is a complex endpoint that involves the ability of the virus to enter the cell, replicate its double-stranded DNA genome, produce viral proteins, and assemble new virions that then spread to adjacent cells. Therefore, we explored whether the differences in plaque formation observed in Vero cells reflected inherent differences in the abilities of isolates to complete each of these stages of the viral life cycle. For these comparisons, two large-plaque-forming isolates (CNS11 and CNS03) were compared to two small-plaque-forming isolates (CNS12 and SEM02). First, we compared the rates of cell entry seen with the isolates. Virus was applied to chilled cells, followed by warming to synchronize cell entry (Fig. 2A). A low-pH solution was applied at various points over the first hour of cell entry to inactivate any virus that had not yet entered a cell, and plaque formation was then allowed to proceed for 100 h. We found no difference between these four representative viral isolates in their rates of cell entry (Fig. 2B), suggesting that the large plaques did not result from increased rates of virus entry into cells.
We next infected Vero cells at a high multiplicity of infection (MOI = 5) to compare the outcomes of a single round of viral replication. We found that the four isolates produced similar numbers of genome copies (as measured by quantitative PCR [qPCR] for the gB gene; see Materials and Methods for details) (Fig. 2C), indicating that differences in viral DNA replication did not influence plaque size. We quantified the production of infectious virus by counting plaque-forming-units (PFU) on Vero cell monolayers as well as on cells of the highly permissive U2OS human bone osteosarcoma epithelial cell line (64). No differences in virus production were noted between the four isolates in quantification on either cell type (Fig. 2D and E). U2OS cells lack innate sensing of viral infection through the STING pathway (65) and can even support the growth of highly defective HSV isolates that lack ICP0 function (64). All isolates formed large plaques on the highly permissive U2OS cell monolayers (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), allowing us to rule out the possibility that very small foci of infection were missed during determination of the titers of the small-plaque-forming isolates on Vero cells (Fig. 2D and E). Finally, we compared viral protein production levels for these isolates and found no differences in the expression levels of a panel of HSV-2 viral proteins at either early (6 h postinfection [hpi]) or late (24 hpi) time points of a single round of high-MOI infection (Fig. 2F and G; see legend for the list of proteins). Taken together, these results suggested that the large-plaque-forming and small-plaque-forming neonatal HSV-2 isolates did not differ significantly in viral entry, DNA replication, infectious virus production, or protein production over a single round of infection.
Large-plaque-forming isolates exhibit enhanced cell-to-cell spread.
We next assessed the ability of representative large-plaque-forming and small-plaque-forming isolates to spread from cell to cell. Vero cell monolayers were infected at a low MOI (MOI = 0.001) in order to assess differences over multiple rounds of viral replication and spread throughout the cell monolayer (Fig. 3A). The contribution of indirect cell-free spread was minimized by inclusion of 0.1% human serum in the media and by changing the media every 24 h to remove released virus and refresh serum levels. Over a 72-h time course, cell monolayers were assessed to measure the extent of cell-to-cell spread, either by harvesting and determining the titers of PFU production (Fig. 3B and C) or by fixing infected cell monolayers and evaluating the distribution of virus by immunofluorescence (Fig. 3D and E; see also Fig. S2). Viral titers recovered from harvested cells were similar at 2 hpi, confirming that equivalent amounts of each virus were present following the initial infection (Fig. 3B). By 72 hpi, after multiple rounds of replication and spread, large-plaque-forming isolates CNS11 and CNS03 had achieved viral titers significantly greater than those measured for small-plaque-forming isolates CNS12 and SEM02 (Fig. 3B and C; two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test, P < 0.0001 at 72 h). Isolate CNS11, which was obtained directly from the CSF, produced titers statistically greater than those produced by the other three isolates (Fig. 3B and C).
We also directly evaluated cell-to-cell spread by immunostaining and quantifying the distribution of infected cells around each infectious focus. Infected Vero cell monolayers were fixed at 24, 48, and 72 hpi and were subjected to fluorescent immunocytochemistry analysis using an antibody directed against total HSV (Fig. 3D; see also Fig. S2). The region of HSV-positive cells surrounding a single initial infection was greater for the large-plaque-forming neonatal HSV-2 isolates at 24 hpi and had increased by 48 and 72 hpi. The central cytolytic clearings seen in the monolayers infected by CNS11 or CNS03 were approximately 2-fold greater than those in the monolayers infected by CNS12 or SEM02, reflecting the average 2-fold increase in plaque size observed in methylene-blue-stained monolayers shown in Fig. 1. However, the region of infected cells surrounding the central cytolytic clearing was dramatically larger for CNS11 and CNS03 than for CNS12 and SEM02, suggesting that large-plaque-forming neonatal HSV-2 isolates show greater spread from cell to cell than would have been predicted by measuring plaque size alone. To quantify this increase in the area of infected cells after a low-MOI infection, each coverslip was imaged (Fig. S2) and the total number of immunofluorescent pixels was quantified (Fig. 3E). By 72 hpi, the area of HSV-infected cells was statistically greater for large-plaque-forming isolates CNS11 and CNS03 than for small-plaque-forming isolates CNS12 and SEM02 (two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test, P < 0.05 at 72 h). Together, these data indicated that large-plaque-forming isolates shared an enhanced ability to spread cell to cell through culture in comparison to small-plaque-forming isolates.
Comparative genomics reveals genetic diversity in neonatal HSV-2 isolates.
The differences identified in cell-to-cell spread between neonatal isolates in culture indicated the existence of intrinsic differences between these viruses. To reveal how genetic variation may contribute to viral phenotypes in culture and, ultimately, to clinical disease manifestations, we sequenced the complete viral genome of all 10 neonatal HSV-2 isolates (Table 2). For each isolate, we sequenced purified viral nucleocapsid DNA and assembled a consensus genome, which represented the most common genotype at each nucleotide locus in the viral population. The clinical trials utilized in this study enrolled HSV-infected infants from multiple sites across the United States (8, 9, 60). Therefore, we first assessed the overall degree of relatedness between these viral genomes to understand whether any similarities in viral or geographic origins might have contributed to in vitro or clinical phenotype patterns. In light of the known potential for recombination in the phylogenetic history of HSV (42, 49, 53, 66), we used a graph-based network to investigate the phylogenetic relationships among these isolates. We found similar degrees of divergence among all 10 neonatal HSV-2 consensus genomes (Fig. 4A). We then compared these 10 neonatal HSV-2 genomes to all available HSV-2 genomes in GenBank (all of which are derived from adults; see Table S1 for HSV-2 GenBank accession numbers and references) to discern any geographic or other clustering. The neonatal isolates did not segregate into any exclusive groupings but instead intermingled among the nonneonatal isolates, with deep branches between each pair of isolates (Fig. 4B). These findings were corroborated using an alternative phylogenetic clustering algorithm as well (Fig. S3). These data suggested that similarities in viral genetic origin were not responsible for determining the cellular or clinical outcomes of neonatal HSV-2 infection.
TABLE 2.
Clinical isolatea |
Avg coverage |
No. of raw sequence reads |
No. of reads used for assemblyb |
% viral reads |
% of reads with depth >100 |
GenBank accession no. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNS11 | 6,081× | 3.5 million | 2.8 million | 79 | 96 | MK105996 |
DISS14 | 6,267× | 3.8 million | 3.0 million | 77 | 97 | MK106000 |
CNS03 | 6,269× | 3.9 million | 3.1 million | 78 | 96 | MK105995 |
CNS15 | 7,486× | 6.1 million | 4.4 million | 73 | 97 | MK105998 |
CNS17 | 5,059× | 3.1 million | 2.3 million | 73 | 96 | MK105999 |
DISS29 | 2,588× | 1.4 million | 1.1 million | 78 | 99 | MK106001 |
CNS12 | 5,839× | 3.9 million | 2.8 million | 73 | 96 | MK105997 |
SEM02 | 6,455× | 4.8 million | 3.7 million | 77 | 95 | MK106002 |
SEM13 | 5,291× | 3.4 million | 2.4 million | 72 | 89 | MK106003 |
SEM18 | 7,514× | 16.9 million | 12.2 million | 72 | 98 | MK106004 |
The clinical isolate order is based on data in Fig. 1.
Numbers reflect the count of sequence read 1 of paired-end reads.
The overall protein-coding diversity in neonatal HSV-2 isolates is similar to that observed in adult HSV-2 strains.
We next asked whether overt defects in any single HSV-2 protein might be associated with clinical or in vitro spread phenotypes. In examining the coding potential of all 10 neonatal HSV-2 isolates, we found no protein deletions or truncations encoded by any of these viral genomes. These comparisons revealed a total of 784 nucleotide differences in 71 genes (see Table S2) that resulted in 342 nonsynonymous amino acid differences in 65 proteins. This led to an average coding variation level of 1% (range, 0.0% to 2.6%). This variation was spread widely throughout the HSV-2 genome, without any concentration in a particular genomic region or category of protein function (Fig. 5). The level of coding diversity in this set of neonatal isolates was similar to that detected in a comparable set of 10 adult HSV-2 isolates (Fig. 5; see also Table S2). We also compared these neonatal genomes to the full set of 58 annotated adult HSV-2 genomes from GenBank (listed in Table S1). As expected from the differences in sample size, there was more overall diversity found across the 58 adult HSV-2 genomes than in the 10 neonatal genomes. A comparison of the dN/dS ratios in the neonatal versus the adult HSV-2 genomes revealed similar trends, with a few outliers visible on each axis; e.g., UL38 and US8A had a higher dN/dS ratio in neonatal isolates than in adult isolates (see Table S2 and Fig. S4 for full comparisons). These data indicated that at the consensus level, the neonatal HSV-2 isolates displayed substantial interhost coding diversity spread throughout the genome but did not possess strikingly more diversity or an excess of genetic drift compared to the adult isolates.
Minor variants expand the potential coding diversity of neonatal HSV-2 isolates.
We next focused our attention on differences below the consensus level in each intrahost viral population. The amino acid variations described above exist in the consensus genomes of each isolate. Since viral replication creates a population of genomes, we next assessed whether minor allelic variants existed within the viral population of any neonatal HSV-2 isolate, thereby expanding the viral genetic diversity within each host. The significant depth of coverage from deep sequencing of each isolate allowed us to search for minor variants (MV) at every nucleotide position of each genome. We defined a minor variant as any nucleotide allele (single nucleotide polymorphism [SNP]) or insertion/deletion (indel) with a frequency level below 50% but above 2% (a conservative limit of detection; see Materials and Methods for additional criteria). We found minor variants in the viral genome population of all 10 neonatal HSV-2 isolates, albeit to different degrees in each isolate (Fig. 6A; see also Table S3). In total, there were 1,821 minor variants, distributed across all genomic regions (Fig. S5; see also Table S3). For both SNPs and indels, intergenic minor variants outnumbered those in genes (genic), likely reflecting the higher selective pressures against unfavorable mutations in coding regions. Neonatal isolate DISS29 had levels of minor variants that were 8-fold to 10-fold higher than those seen with the other neonatal isolates (Fig. 6A; see also Fig. S5), and those variants were often present at a higher frequency or with higher penetrance of the minor allele than was observed in other neonatal isolates (Fig. 6B; see also Fig. S5). We further examined the distribution of minor variants that occurred in genes and found that nearly every HSV-2 protein harbored minor variants in at least one neonatal isolate (Fig. 6C). Only UL3, UL11, UL35, and UL55 were completely devoid of minor variants. Three of these genes (UL3, UL11, and UL35) were also devoid of amino acid variations at the consensus level (Fig. 5). These data revealed the breadth of potential contributions of minor variants to neonatal HSV-2 biology, which could undergo selection over time or in specific niches.
Coding variations identified in neonatal HSV-2 isolates associated with CNS disease.
To understand how viral genetic variants might relate to clinical disease, we assessed whether any of the consensus level coding variations identified in our group of 10 neonatal HSV samples segregated with clinical disease features. A number of amino acid variations were shared by CSF-derived isolates CNS11 and DISS14, which formed the largest plaques in vitro. These included amino acid variants at the level of the consensus genome in the HSV-2 genes encoding glycoprotein K (gK, UL53 gene: V323M), glycoprotein I (gI, US7 gene: R159L and P215S), UL8 (R221S), US2 (F137L), and glycoprotein G (gG, US4 gene: R338L, S442P, and E574D) (Fig. 7). The gI variants exist individually in other viral isolates obtained from neonates with CNS disease (Table S4). Isolates collected from infants experiencing disseminated disease with CNS involvement also shared a variant in the HSV-2 UL20 gene (P129L) (Fig. 7). One variant in the HSV-2 UL24 gene (V93A) was shared only by isolates from infants with SEM disease, with all isolates from infants with CNS disease containing a valine at this position (Fig. 7). The sample size of these comparisons was constrained by the overall limits of neonatal HSV-2 isolate availability and was too small to allow evaluation of statistical significance for any of these associations. While CNS11 and DISS14 shared several variants (listed in Fig. 7), these viral genomes were not similar at the consensus-genome level (Fig. 4). These isolates also had nonshared coding differences in the same genes that contained shared variants (e.g., gK, UL8, gG). This indicates a potential for convergent evolution at these loci. Many of the coding variations identified in this data set involve viral proteins that are known to modulate cell-to-cell spread (67–71) and/or contribute to neurovirulence in mouse models of CNS infection (69, 72–78) (Fig. 7; see also Table S4); however, their role in human disease has not yet been assessed.
DISCUSSION
Host factors have not been identified to explain the >50% of neonates experiencing invasive CNS or disseminated forms of HSV infection. There is growing evidence that most herpesviruses, including HSV-1 and HSV-2, contain significant genetic variation (27, 53, 56, 79–81). The potential contributions of viral genetic variation to clinical disease in neonates therefore warrant exploration. Here, we analyzed genetic and phenotypic diversity for HSV-2 isolated from 10 neonatal patients spanning two clinical studies (8, 9, 60). Although this group is small, the associations identified here provide the first insights into the potential impact of viral variability on clinical outcomes in neonatal HSV disease and serve as a starting point for further mechanistic investigation. We found that these 10 neonatal HSV-2 isolates exhibited diverse growth characteristics in culture, with larger-plaque-forming isolates observed more often in infants with CNS disease than in those with SEM disease. Furthermore, we established that enhanced viral spread through culture was the main contributor to this large-plaque formation. Using comprehensive comparative genomics, we further demonstrated that these neonatal HSV-2 isolates contained extensive genetic diversity both within and between hosts. These data revealed several specific viral genetic variations that were associated with cases of CNS disease in proteins known to contribute to cell-to-cell spread and/or neurovirulence in mouse models of CNS disease. Further studies are required to determine the impact of these variations on HSV-2 neurovirulence and progression to CNS disease.
Genomic comparison of these neonatal isolates revealed a wide range of genetic diversity. At the consensus-genome level, which reflects the most common allele in each viral population, we found that the coding differences between strains were as numerous as those between previously described sets of adult HSV-2 isolates (Fig. 5) (79–81). Furthermore, the specific genetic variations associated with neonatal CNS disease in our study can also be found in genital HSV-2 isolates which are not associated with CNS disease in adults. This suggests that the dramatic differences in clinical manifestations seen following HSV-2 infection in neonates, with significantly higher rates of invasive CNS infection, are not due to unique neonatal HSV-2 strains. However, we did detect several outliers in the comparison between the rates of nonsynonymous to synonymous nucleotide differences (the dN/dS ratio) for several genes in neonatal HSV-2 isolates versus those previously sequenced from adult patients (see Fig. S4). The genes encoding putative virulence factor US8A (82, 83) and capsid triplex protein VP19C (UL38) (84, 85) have a markedly higher dN/dS ratio in neonates, while that of glycoprotein C (gC; UL44) is notably lower in neonates than in adults (Fig. S4). These differences in dN/dS ratios may reflect the distinct host environment of these isolates. For example, viruses isolated from adult patients, often with recurrent genital infection, may have increased diversity of surface proteins such as gC due to selection for viral immune evasion (86, 87). The lower variability in gC (UL44) in neonates could result from their immunologically naive state and/or from the shorter duration of neonatal infection prior to virus isolation (Table 1). The observation of certain genes having higher dN/dS ratios in neonatal isolates than in adults could have resulted either from a loosening of selective pressures (i.e., drift) or from driving forces unique to the neonatal environment that remain to be understood. Comparisons of additional isolates and ongoing characterization of understudied proteins such as US8A (83) will help to distinguish these possibilities.
At the level of specific genetic variations in individual proteins, we detected a few fully penetrant patterns that distinguish one clinical group from another. All of the fully penetrant, group-specific variations that we detected in the two CSF-derived strains, the two disseminated strains, and three SEM strains available for study are highlighted in Fig. 7. However, other loci of potential interest exist if we consider those genetic variants found in a majority, but not all, of the neuroinvasive (CNS and DISS) strains—e.g., variations in envelope glycoprotein gH (UL22), viral serine/threonine kinase US3, viral thymidine kinase (UL23), major capsid protein UL19, and DNA polymerase processivity factor UL42. Characterization of additional neonatal isolates will no doubt improve the clarity of these comparisons and help to distinguish consistent patterns from those detected by chance due to the clinical limitations of the infant sample pool. Regardless of the specific viral genetic candidates under consideration, we hypothesize that viral variations impacting neonatal outcomes could act either by conferring enhanced neurovirulence or by limiting the rate of viral spread or degree of neuroinvasion. For instance, it is tempting to speculate that variations in glycoprotein I (US7) might be associated with enhanced viral spread, due to their observation in several large-plaque-associated viruses in this study and to prior data demonstrating the involvement of gI in both immune evasion and neuronal spread (see Table S4) (68, 88, 89). Conversely, the UL24 V93A variant, which was observed only in SEM-derived isolates and is relatively rare among adult HSV-2 isolates as well, could be a potential example of a spread-limiting variation. UL24 function is required to disperse nucleolin during lytic HSV-1 infection (90, 91), and mutation of UL24 has been associated with a loss of neuroinvasion in animal models (75–77). Further research will be needed to build stronger genetic associations with additional neonatal isolates and to expand upon prior studies by testing these specific genetic variations in animal models. The application of animal models of neonatal infection will also enable the exploration of how nongenetic environmental factors such as dose and timing of viral exposure contribute to the severity and progression of disease and how viral genetic variations and environmental factors intersect with the host genetic background.
At the level of minor variants (MV), which represent rare alleles that exist within each intrahost viral population, we found that the DISS29 genome harbored 8-fold to 10-fold more and the CNS15 genome harbored 3-fold to 4-fold more MV than other neonatal virus genomes (Fig. 6; see also Fig. S4). This could be indicative of a mixed viral population (e.g., a multistrain infection), decreased polymerase fidelity, or the presence or absence of host selective pressure (27, 28). Diversity in viral populations has also been observed in congenital HCMV infection (30–35). However, this is the first time that evidence has been found for this level of viral population diversity with HSV-2. These minor genotypes may be selected or genetically isolated in particular niches (e.g., CSF), as observed in a comparison of VZV skin vesicles (26), or by antiviral drug selection, as was recently demonstrated in two adults with genital HSV-2 infection (40). All of the isolates sequenced in this study were collected at the initial time of diagnosis (from neonates who were ≤19 days old), prior to acyclovir treatment and prior to the development of an HSV-specific immune response. It would therefore be compelling to examine the viral genome population from serial patient isolates over time to identify shifts in the frequency of MV due to antiviral or immune selection. Isolates from different body sites of the same patient could likewise be compared to determine whether particular genotypes are enriched in different body niches.
This comparison of viral genotype to clinical phenotype revealed associations between neonatal CNS disease and several viral protein variants that may impact neurovirulence through modulation of cell-to-cell spread. Although the sample set in this proof-of-concept study was small, we observed potential patterns that warrant exploration in a larger data set. It must be acknowledged that there is limited availability of samples from neonatal infection due to both the rarity of these infections and the fragility and small physical size of the infected infants. These natural circumstances lead to minimal sample collection from infected neonates. The finding that the CNS-associated isolates in our study, particularly those derived directly from the CSF, often exhibited enhanced spread between cells in culture suggests that one or more of these variants could be functionally significant. Coding differences in viral proteins not known to contribute to neurovirulence were also found to be associated with neonatal CNS disease and represent potential novel contributions to invasive infection. These promising results warrant exploration in a larger study, ideally one analyzing isolates from multiple time points and/or body sites from each infected infant. This would enable a better understanding of how overall viral genetic diversity contributes to neuroinvasion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Viruses.
Viruses were collected from neonates enrolled in clinical studies (8, 9, 60) by the Collaborative Antiviral Study Group (CASG) at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB). Samples were collected from either the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or skin. Enrollment in original studies was evenly split between males and females and included both black and white patients. The clinical morbidity score was determined at 12 months of life as previously defined (12, 92). Initial collection of samples, use of samples in this study, and use of deidentified clinical information were approved by the UAB Institutional Review Board. See Text S1 in the supplemental material for additional details of this and subsequent methods.
Cell culture.
Human lung fibroblast MRC-5 cells (ATCC, CCL-171), African green monkey kidney Vero cells (ATCC, CCL-81), and human epithelial bone osteosarcoma U2OS cells (ATCC, HTB-96) were cultured under standard conditions. Cell lines were authenticated by ATCC prior to purchase and were confirmed to be mycoplasma free throughout the experiments by periodic testing (LookOut Mycoplasma; Sigma).
Virus culture.
Viruses were cultured at the time of diagnosis and snap-frozen after 1 passage. Each viral isolate was then passaged 3 times on MRC-5 cells at an MOI of 0.01, with harvest at the time of complete cytopathic effect (between 50 to 70 h). Titers of viral stocks were determined on either Vero cells (100 h) or U2OS cells (48 h) under a methylcellulose overlay. Plaque size and morphology did not change for any viral isolates over the course of virus stock expansion.
Plaque measurements.
Plaques were stained with 0.5% methylene blue. Serial 4× bright-field images were collected on an EVOS FL Auto Imaging system and stitched by EVOS software (University of Pennsylvania [UPenn] Cell and Developmental Biology Microscopy Core). Plaque area was measured using ImageJ software.
Genome copy number estimation by quantitative PCR for UL27.
DNA was extracted and quantitative PCR was performed with primers specific to the viral glycoprotein B gene (gB; UL27) (43). Absolute quantification was calculated based on a standard curve of HSV-1 strain F nucleocapsid DNA (59).
Viral entry assay.
Monolayers of Vero cells were cooled to 4°C for 30 min prior to infection with 100 PFU of each viral isolate. After 1 h of viral incubation at 4°C, unbound virus was removed by washing and cells were moved to 37°C. At 0, 10, 20, 30, 45, or 60 min, a low-pH citrate buffer was applied to inactivate extracellular virus. Under each condition, parallel infections were performed without the addition of citrate solution (control). Cell monolayers were washed and allowed to form plaques under methylcellulose for 100 h. Viral entry was quantified as the fraction of plaques formed following citrate buffer application, where 100% is the number of plaques formed on a monolayer not treated with citrate buffer (control).
Single-step and multistep growth curves.
Growth curves of HSV infection were performed in Vero cells. At 2 hpi, 0.1% human serum was added to reduce cell-free spread of virus. Single-step growth curves were performed at MOI = 5, and multistep growth curves at MOI = 0.001, as defined by titering viral stocks on U2OS cells. Every 24 h, the supernatant was removed and media containing 0.1% human serum reapplied.
Immunocytochemistry.
Immunocytochemistry analysis was performed as previously described (93). Infection was detected with rabbit anti-HSV primary antibodies (Agilent Dako; B0114) and fluorophore-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Invitrogen; A-11008). Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole). Images (5×) were collected with a Leica DM6000 wide-field microscope equipped with a Photometrics HQ2 high-resolution monochrome charge-coupled-device (CCD) camera and processed with LAS AF software (UPenn Cell and Developmental Microscopy Core). Images (10×) were collected on an EVOS FL Auto Imaging system and stitched using EVOS software (UPenn Cell and Developmental Microscopy Core). Exposure and gain were optimized within each experiment for one virus at the 72-h time point and applied identically to each image within that experiment. Subsequent image processing (ImageJ) was applied equally to all images in a given experiment.
Immunoblotting.
Immunoblotting was performed as previously described (93). Equal amounts of whole-cell lysate were separated by SDS-PAGE. Membranes were immunoblotted with antibodies raised against total HSV (Agilent Dako, B0114); glycoprotein C (gC), gD, gE, gH, and VP5 (all gifts from Gary Cohen); ICP8 (gift from David Knipe); and GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) (GeneTex; GTX100118).
Viral DNA isolation and Illumina sequencing.
Viral nucleocapsid DNA for genome sequencing was prepared by infecting MRC-5 cells at an MOI of ≥5 as previously described (94, 95). Viral nucleocapsid gDNA was sheared using a Covaris M220 sonicator/disruptor under the following conditions: duration, 60 s; peak power, 50; duty cycle, 10%; temperature, 4°C. Barcoded sequencing libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq low-throughput protocol according to manufacturer’s specifications and as previously described (54, 57). The quality of sequencing libraries was evaluated by Qubit (Invitrogen, CA), Bioanalyzer (Agilent), and qPCR (KAPA Biosystems). Paired-end sequencing (2 × 300-bp length) was performed on an Illumina MiSeq, according to manufacturer’s recommendations (17 pM input).
De novo genome assembly.
A consensus genome was assembled for each viral isolate using a previously described Viral Genome Assembly (VirGA) bioinformatics workflow (54) (Table 2). Annotation of new genome sequences was guided by the use of the HSV-2 reference genome (strain HG52; GenBank accession no. NC_001798) based on sequence homology (96).
Comparative genomics and phylogenetic analysis.
The 10 neonatal HSV-2 genomes were aligned with all annotated HSV-2 genomes available in GenBank (see Table S1 for the full list of 58 genomes, all of which were derived from adults) using MAFFT (97). The genome-wide alignment used a trimmed-genome format (lacking the terminal repeats) to avoid giving undue weight to the duplicated sequences. The MAFFT alignment was used to generate a NeighborNet phylogenetic network in SplitsTree with uncorrected P distances (49, 98, 99), as well as a neighbor-joining tree (Jukes-Cantor; 1,000 bootstraps) in MEGA Omega for Windows (100). A diverse subset of 10 adult HSV-2 isolates was selected for protein-level comparisons with the 10 neonatal isolates (indicated in Table S1 with an asterisk). ClustalW2 was used to construct pairwise nucleotide alignments between whole genomes and to construct pairwise amino acid alignments for each gene and protein (101). Pan-HSV-2 comparisons excluded the following three viral proteins for which sequences have not been fully determined in most published strains, likely due to the high levels of G+C content and numerous tandem repeats in these regions: ICP34.5 (RL1—annotated/complete in only 9 published genomes in Table S1), ICP0 (RL2—annotated/complete in only 8 genomes in Table S1), and ICP4 (RS1—annotated/complete in only 6 genomes in Table S1) (79–81). Custom Python scripts were used on these alignments to identify nucleotide and amino acid differences between samples.
Minor variant detection and quantification.
Minor variants (MV) were detected using VarScan v2.2.11 (mpileup2snp and mpileup2indel commands) (102) and the following parameters to differentiate true MV from technical artifacts (26): minimum allele frequency of ≥0.02 (2%); base call quality of ≥20; read depth of ≥100; ≥5 independent reads supporting minor alleles (see Table S3). MV with directional strand bias levels of ≥90% were excluded. The genomic location and potential impact of each MV were assessed using SnpEff and SnpSift (103, 104). We use the conservative cutoff value of 2% for detection of minor variants both to avoid false-positive signals and to provide data that are comparable to recent examples in the literature on genomic analysis of herpesviruses in clinical samples (28, 105, 106).
Data availability.
Newly deposited sequences for HSV-2 isolates can be found in GenBank under accession no. MK105995 to MK106004.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Penny Jester and the UAB clinical support team for their assistance in retrieving archival records. The UPenn Cell and Developmental Biology Microscopy Core provided imaging assistance, and Elise M. Peaurori provided technical assistance during early stages of this project. We thank members of the Szpara and Weitzman laboratories for helpful discussions.
This research was supported by NIAID grant 1R21AI140443 (M.L.S. and M.D.W.), with additional support from the following: startup funds from the Pennsylvania State University (M.L.S.), a CURE grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Health (M.L.S.), a grant from the National Institutes of Health (NS082240 to M.D.W.), and NICHD Pediatric Scientist Development grant K12-HD000850 (L.N.A.). The published NIAID CASG clinical studies of neonatal HSV infection were funded by a contract (N01-AI-62554) with the NIAID Development and Applications Branch and by grants from the General Clinical Research Center Program (RR-032) and the state of Alabama.
The original draft was written by L.N.A., C.D.B., A.N.D.F., and M.L.S.; reviewing and editing the writing were performed by L.N.A., M.D.W., and M.L.S.; L.N.A. and M.L.S. conceived the study; L.N.A., C.D.B., A.N.D.F., D.W.R., and U.P. performed investigations for the study; D.W.K., M.N.P., and R.J.W. acquired resources for the study; M.L.S., R.J.W., and M.D.W. were responsible for funding acquisition.
We declare that we have no competing interests.
REFERENCES
- 1.Looker KJ, Magaret AS, May MT, Turner KM, Vickerman P, Newman LM, Gottlieb SL. 2017. First estimates of the global and regional incidence of neonatal herpes infection. Lancet Glob Health 5:e300–e309. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30362-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stephenson-Famy A, Gardella C. 2014. Herpes simplex virus infection during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 41:601–614. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2014.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brown ZA, Wald A, Morrow RA, Selke S, Zeh J, Corey L. 2003. Effect of serologic status and cesarean delivery on transmission rates of herpes simplex virus from mother to infant. JAMA 289:203–209. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.2.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Corey L, Wald A. 2009. Maternal and neonatal HSV infections. N Engl J Med 361:1376–1385. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0807633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bradley H, Markowitz LE, Gibson T, McQuillan GM. 2014. Seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2–United States, 1999–2010. J Infect Dis 209:325–333. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.James SH, Kimberlin DW. 2015. Neonatal herpes simplex virus infection: epidemiology and treatment. Clin Perinatol 42:47–59. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2014.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pinninti SG, Kimberlin DW. 2014. Preventing herpes simplex virus in the newborn. Clin Perinatol 41:945–955. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2014.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kimberlin DW, Lin CY, Jacobs RF, Powell DA, Frenkel LM, Gruber WC, Rathore M, Bradley JS, Diaz PS, Kumar M, Arvin AM, Gutierrez K, Shelton M, Weiner LB, Sleasman JW, de Sierra TM, Soong SJ, Kiell J, Lakeman FD, Whitley RJ; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Collaborative Antiviral Study Group. 2001. Natural history of neonatal herpes simplex virus infections in the acyclovir era. Pediatrics 108:223–229. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.2.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kimberlin DW, Whitley RJ, Wan W, Powell DA, Storch G, Ahmed A, Palmer A, Sánchez PJ, Jacobs RF, Bradley JS, Robinson JL, Shelton M, Dennehy PH, Leach C, Rathore M, Abughali N, Wright P, Frenkel LM, Brady RC, Van Dyke R, Weiner LB, Guzman-Cottrill J, McCarthy CA, Griffin J, Jester P, Parker M, Lakeman FD, Kuo H, Lee CH, Cloud GA. 2011. Oral acyclovir suppression and neurodevelopment after neonatal herpes. N Engl J Med 365:1284–1292. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Casanova J-L. 30 November 2015. Human genetic basis of interindividual variability in the course of infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521644112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang S-Y, Jouanguy E, Ugolini S, Smahi A, Elain G, Romero P, Segal D, Sancho-Shimizu V, Lorenzo L, Puel A, Picard C, Chapgier A, Plancoulaine S, Titeux M, Cognet C, von Bernuth H, Ku C-L, Casrouge A, Zhang X-X, Barreiro L, Leonard J, Hamilton C, Lebon P, Heron B, Vallee L, Quintana-Murci L, Hovnanian A, Rozenberg F, Vivier E, Geissmann F, Tardieu M, Abel L, Casanova J-L. 2007. TLR3 deficiency in patients with herpes simplex encephalitis. Science 317:1522–1527. doi: 10.1126/science.1139522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Whitley R, Arvin A, Prober C, Corey L, Burchett S, Plotkin S, Starr S, Jacobs R, Powell D, Nahmias A, Sumaya C, Edwards K, Alford C, Caddell G, Soong S-J; the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Collaborative Antiviral Study Group. 1991. Predictors of morbidity and mortality in neonates with herpes simplex virus infections. N Engl J Med 324:450–454. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102143240704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fields BN, Byers K. 1983. The genetic basis of viral virulence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 303:209–218. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1983.0094. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gonzalez-Scarano F, Beaty B, Sundin D, Janssen R, Endres MJ, Nathanson N. 1988. Genetic determinants of the virulence and infectivity of La Crosse virus. Microb Pathog 4:1–7. doi: 10.1016/0882-4010(88)90041-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tscherne DM, García-Sastre A. 2011. Virulence determinants of pandemic influenza viruses. J Clin Invest 121:6–13. doi: 10.1172/JCI44947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Müller V, Fraser C, Herbeck JT. 2011. A strong case for viral genetic factors in HIV virulence. Viruses 3:204–216. doi: 10.3390/v3030204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Robinson CM, Jesudhasan PR, Pfeiffer JK. 2014. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide binding enhances virion stability and promotes environmental fitness of an enteric virus. Cell Host Microbe 15:36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yoshii K, Sunden Y, Yokozawa K, Igarashi M, Kariwa H, Holbrook MR, Takashima I. 2014. A critical determinant of neurological disease associated with highly pathogenic tick-borne flavivirus in mice. J Virol 88:5406–5420. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00421-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Roizman B, Whitley RJ. 2001. The nine ages of herpes simplex virus. Herpes 8:23–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sakaoka H, Kawana T, Grillner L, Aomori T, Yamiguchi T, Saito H, Fujinaga K. 1987. Genome variations in herpes simplex virus type 2 strains isolated in Japan and Sweden. J Gen Virol 68:2105–2116. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-68-8-2105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sakaoka H, Kurita K, Iida Y, Takada S, Umene K, Kim YT, Ren CS, Nahmias AJ. 1994. Quantitative analysis of genomic polymorphism of herpes simplex virus type 1 strains from six countries: studies of molecular evolution and molecular epidemiology of the virus. J Gen Virol 75:513–527. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-75-3-513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bowden R, Sakaoka H, Ward R, Donnelly P. 2006. Patterns of Eurasian HSV-1 molecular diversity and inferences of human migrations. Infect Genet Evol 6:63–74. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2005.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bower JR, Mao H, Durishin C, Rozenbom E, Detwiler M, Rempinski D, Karban TL, Rosenthal KS. 1999. Intrastrain variants of herpes simplex virus type 1 isolated from a neonate with fatal disseminated infection differ in the ICP34.5 gene, glycoprotein processing, and neuroinvasiveness. J Virol 73:3843–3853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mao H, Rosenthal KS. 2003. Strain-dependent structural variants of herpes simplex virus type 1 ICP34.5 determine viral plaque size, efficiency of glycoprotein processing, and viral release and neuroinvasive disease potential. J Virol 77:3409–3417. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.6.3409-3417.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Renzette N, Gibson L, Jensen JD, Kowalik TF. 2014. Human cytomegalovirus intrahost evolution—a new avenue for understanding and controlling herpesvirus infections. Curr Opin Virol 8:109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2014.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Depledge DP, Kundu S, Jensen NJ, Gray ER, Jones M, Steinberg S, Gershon A, Kinchington PR, Schmid DS, Balloux F, Nichols RA, Breuer J. 2014. Deep sequencing of viral genomes provides insight into the evolution and pathogenesis of varicella zoster virus and its vaccine in humans. Mol Biol Evol 31:397–409. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Renner DW, Szpara ML. 2018. The impacts of genome-wide analyses on our understanding of human herpesvirus diversity and evolution. J Virol 92:e00908-17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00908-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Houldcroft CJ, Bryant JM, Depledge DP, Margetts BK, Simmonds J, Nicolaou S, Tutill HJ, Williams R, Worth AJJ, Marks SD, Veys P, Whittaker E, Breuer J. 9 September 2016. Detection of low frequency multi-drug resistance and novel putative maribavir resistance in immunocompromised pediatric patients with cytomegalovirus. Front Microbiol doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Houldcroft CJ, Beale MA, Breuer J. 2017. Clinical and biological insights from viral genome sequencing. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:183–192. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Renzette N, Bhattacharjee B, Jensen JD, Gibson L, Kowalik TF. 2011. Extensive genome-wide variability of human cytomegalovirus in congenitally infected infants. PLoS Pathog 7:e1001344. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Renzette N, Gibson L, Bhattacharjee B, Fisher D, Schleiss MR, Jensen JD, Kowalik TF. 2013. Rapid intrahost evolution of human cytomegalovirus is shaped by demography and positive selection. PLoS Genet 9:e1003735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Renzette N, Pokalyuk C, Gibson L, Bhattacharjee B, Schleiss MR, Hamprecht K, Yamamoto AY, Mussi-Pinhata MM, Britt WJ, Jensen JD, Kowalik TF. 2015. Limits and patterns of cytomegalovirus genomic diversity in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E4120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501880112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Renzette N, Kowalik TF, Jensen JD. 2016. On the relative roles of background selection and genetic hitchhiking in shaping human cytomegalovirus genetic diversity. Mol Ecol 25:403–413. doi: 10.1111/mec.13331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Renzette N, Pfeifer SP, Matuszewski S, Kowalik TF, Jensen JD. 2017. On the analysis of intrahost and interhost viral populations: human cytomegalovirus as a case study of pitfalls and expectations. J Virol 91:e01976-16. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01976-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pokalyuk C, Renzette N, Irwin KK, Pfeifer SP, Gibson L, Britt WJ, Yamamoto AY, Mussi-Pinhata MM, Kowalik TF, Jensen JD. 2017. Characterizing human cytomegalovirus reinfection in congenitally infected infants: an evolutionary perspective. Mol Ecol 26:1980–1990. doi: 10.1111/mec.13953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sijmons S, Van Ranst M, Maes P. 2014. Genomic and functional characteristics of human cytomegalovirus revealed by next-generation sequencing. Viruses 6:1049–1072. doi: 10.3390/v6031049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sijmons S, Thys K, Mbong Ngwese M, Van Damme E, Dvorak J, Van Loock M, Li G, Tachezy R, Busson L, Aerssens J, Van Ranst M, Maes P. 2015. High-throughput analysis of human cytomegalovirus genome diversity highlights the widespread occurrence of gene-disrupting mutations and pervasive recombination. J Virol 89:7673–7695. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00578-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lassalle F, Depledge DP, Reeves MB, Brown AC, Christiansen MT, Tutill HJ, Williams RJ, Einer-Jensen K, Holdstock J, Atkinson C, Brown JR, van Loenen FB, Clark DA, Griffiths PD, Verjans GMGM, Schutten M, Milne RSB, Balloux F, Breuer J. 2016. Islands of linkage in an ocean of pervasive recombination reveals two-speed evolution of human cytomegalovirus genomes. Virus Evol 2:vew017. doi: 10.1093/ve/vew017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Johnston C, Magaret A, Roychoudhury P, Greninger AL, Reeves D, Schiffer J, Jerome KR, Sather C, Diem K, Lingappa JR, Celum C, Koelle DM, Wald A. 2017. Dual-strain genital herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infection in the US, Peru, and 8 countries in sub-Saharan Africa: a nested cross-sectional viral genotyping study. PLoS Med 14:e1002475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Minaya MA, Jensen TL, Goll JB, Korom M, Datla SH, Belshe RB, Morrison LA. 2017. Molecular evolution of herpes simplex virus 2 complete genomes: comparison between primary and recurrent infections. J Virol 91:e00942-17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00942-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Koelle DM, Norberg P, Fitzgibbon MP, Russell RM, Greninger AL, Huang M-L, Stensland L, Jing L, Magaret AS, Diem K, Selke S, Xie H, Celum C, Lingappa JR, Jerome KR, Wald A, Johnston C. 2017. Worldwide circulation of HSV-2 × HSV-1 recombinant strains. Sci Rep 7:44084. doi: 10.1038/srep44084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Burrel S, Boutolleau D, Ryu D, Agut H, Merkel K, Leendertz FH, Calvignac-Spencer S. 2017. Ancient recombination events between human herpes simplex viruses. Mol Biol Evol 34:1713–1721. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ryncarz AJ, Goddard J, Wald A, Huang M-L, Roizman B, Corey L. 1999. Development of a high-throughput quantitative assay for detecting herpes simplex virus DNA in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 37:1941–1947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wald A, Huang M-L, Carrell D, Selke S, Corey L. 2003. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of herpes simplex virus (HSV) DNA on mucosal surfaces: comparison with HSV isolation in cell culture. J Infect Dis 188:1345–1351. doi: 10.1086/379043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Szpara ML, Tafuri YR, Parsons L, Shamim SR, Verstrepen KJ, Legendre M, Enquist LW. 2011. A wide extent of inter-strain diversity in virulent and vaccine strains of alphaherpesviruses. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002282. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Brown J. 2004. Effect of gene location on the evolutionary rate of amino acid substitutions in herpes simplex virus proteins. Virology 330:209–220. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bowden R, Sakaoka H, Donnelly P, Ward R. 2004. High recombination rate in herpes simplex virus type 1 natural populations suggests significant co-infection. Infect Genet Evol 4:115–123. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2004.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Norberg P, Bergström T, Rekabdar E, Lindh M, Liljeqvist J-A. 2004. Phylogenetic analysis of clinical herpes simplex virus type 1 isolates identified three genetic groups and recombinant viruses. J Virol 78:10755–10764. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.19.10755-10764.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Norberg P, Kasubi MJ, Haarr L, Bergstrom T, Liljeqvist J-A. 2007. Divergence and recombination of clinical herpes simplex virus type 2 isolates. J Virol 81:13158–13167. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01310-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lonsdale DM, Brown SM, Lang J, Subak-Sharpe JH, Koprowski H, Warren KG. 1980. Variations in herpes simplex virus isolated from human ganglia and a study of clonal variation in HSV-1. Ann N Y Acad Sci 354:291–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb27973.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Liljeqvist JA, Tunback P, Norberg P. 2009. Asymptomatically shed recombinant herpes simplex virus type 1 strains detected in saliva. J Gen Virol 90:559–566. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.007070-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Haarr L, Nilsen A, Knappskog PM, Langeland N. 2014. Stability of glycoprotein gene sequences of herpes simplex virus type 2 from primary to recurrent human infection, and diversity of the sequences among patients attending an STD clinic. BMC Infect Dis 14:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Szpara ML, Gatherer D, Ochoa A, Greenbaum B, Dolan A, Bowden RJ, Enquist LW, Legendre M, Davison AJ. 2014. Evolution and diversity in human herpes simplex virus genomes. J Virol 88:1209–1227. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01987-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Parsons LR, Tafuri YR, Shreve JT, Bowen CD, Shipley MM, Enquist LW, Szpara ML. 2015. Rapid genome assembly and comparison decode intrastrain variation in human alphaherpesviruses. mBio 6:e02213-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02213-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kolb AW, Lee K, Larsen I, Craven M, Brandt CR. 2016. Quantitative trait locus based virulence determinant mapping of the HSV-1 genome in murine ocular infection: genes involved in viral regulatory and innate immune networks contribute to virulence. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005499. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pfaff F, Groth M, Sauerbrei A, Zell R. 24 August 2016. Genotyping of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) by whole genome sequencing. J Gen Virol doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bowen CD, Renner DW, Shreve JT, Tafuri Y, Payne KM, Dix RD, Kinchington PR, Gatherer D, Szpara ML. 2016. Viral forensic genomics reveals the relatedness of classic herpes simplex virus strains KOS, KOS63, and KOS79. Virology 492:179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2016.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Pandey U, Renner DW, Thompson RL, Szpara ML, Sawtell NM. 2017. Inferred father-to-son transmission of herpes simplex virus results in near-perfect preservation of viral genome identity and in vivo phenotypes. Sci Rep 7:13666. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13936-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Szpara ML, Parsons L, Enquist LW. 2010. Sequence variability in clinical and laboratory isolates of herpes simplex virus 1 reveals new mutations. J Virol 84:5303–5313. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00312-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kimberlin DW, Lin CY, Jacobs RF, Powell DA, Corey L, Gruber WC, Rathore M, Bradley JS, Diaz PS, Kumar M, Arvin AM, Gutierrez K, Shelton M, Weiner LB, Sleasman JW, de Sierra TM, Weller S, Soong SJ, Kiell J, Lakeman FD, Whitley RJ; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Collaborative Antiviral Study Group. 2001. Safety and efficacy of high-dose intravenous acyclovir in the management of neonatal herpes simplex virus infections. Pediatrics 108:230–238. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.2.230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Desmyter J, Melnick JL, Rawls WE. 1968. Defectiveness of interferon production and of rubella virus interference in a line of African green monkey kidney cells (Vero). J Virol 2:955–961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Emeny JM, Morgan MJ. 1979. Regulation of the interferon system: evidence that Vero cells have a genetic defect in interferon production. J Gen Virol 43:247–252. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-43-1-247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Colgrove R, Diaz F, Newman R, Saif S, Shea T, Young S, Henn M, Knipe DM. 2014. Genomic sequences of a low passage herpes simplex virus 2 clinical isolate and its plaque-purified derivative strain. Virology 450–451:140–145. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yao F, Schaffer PA. 1995. An activity specified by the osteosarcoma line U2OS can substitute functionally for ICP0, a major regulatory protein of herpes simplex virus type 1. J Virol 69:6249–6258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Deschamps T, Kalamvoki M. 2017. Impaired STING pathway in human osteosarcoma U2OS cells contributes to the growth of ICP0-null mutant herpes simplex virus. J Virol 91:e00006-17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00006-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Norberg P. 2010. Divergence and genotyping of human alpha-herpesviruses: an overview. Infect Genet Evol 10:14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.David AT, Saied A, Charles A, Subramanian R, Chouljenko VN, Kousoulas KG. 2012. A herpes simplex virus 1 (McKrae) mutant lacking the glycoprotein K gene is unable to infect via neuronal axons and egress from neuronal cell bodies. mBio 3:e00144-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00144-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Dingwell KS, Brunetti CR, Hendricks RL, Tang Q, Tang M, Rainbow AJ, Johnson DC. 1994. Herpes simplex virus glycoproteins E and I facilitate cell-to-cell spread in vivo and across junctions of cultured cells. J Virol 68:834–845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Weber PC, Levine M, Glorioso JC. 1987. Rapid identification of nonessential genes of herpes simplex virus type 1 by Tn5 mutagenesis. Science 236:576–579. doi: 10.1126/science.3033824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Jacobson JG, Martin SL, Coen DM. 1989. A conserved open reading frame that overlaps the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene is important for viral growth in cell culture. J Virol 63:1839–1843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Foster TP, Melancon JM, Baines JD, Kousoulas KG. 2004. The herpes simplex virus type 1 UL20 protein modulates membrane fusion events during cytoplasmic virion morphogenesis and virus-induced cell fusion. J Virol 78:5347–5357. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.10.5347-5357.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.David AT, Baghian A, Foster TP, Chouljenko VN, Kousoulas KG. 2008. The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) glycoprotein K(gK) is essential for viral corneal spread and neuroinvasiveness. Curr Eye Res 33:455–467. doi: 10.1080/02713680802130362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Dingwell KS, Johnson DC. 1998. The herpes simplex virus gE-gI complex facilitates cell-to-cell spread and binds to components of cell junctions. J Virol 72:8933–8942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Meignier B, Longnecker R, Mavromara-Nazos P, Sears AE, Roizman B. 1988. Virulence of and establishment of latency by genetically engineered deletion mutants of herpes simplex virus 1. Virology 162:251–254. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(88)90417-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Rochette P-A, Bourget A, Sanabria-Solano C, Lahmidi S, Lavallée GO, Pearson A. 2015. Mutation of UL24 impedes the dissemination of acute herpes simplex virus 1 infection from the cornea to neurons of trigeminal ganglia. J Gen Virol 96:2794–2805. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.000189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Jacobson JG, Chen SH, Cook WJ, Kramer MF, Coen DM. 1998. Importance of the herpes simplex virus UL24 gene for productive ganglionic infection in mice. Virology 242:161–169. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.9012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Leiva-Torres GA, Rochette P-A, Pearson A. 2010. Differential importance of highly conserved residues in UL24 for herpes simplex virus 1 replication in vivo and reactivation. J Gen Virol 91:1109–1116. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.017921-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Liu J, Lewin AS, Tuli SS, Ghivizzani SC, Schultz GS, Bloom DC. 2008. Reduction in severity of a herpes simplex virus type 1 murine infection by treatment with a ribozyme targeting the UL20 gene RNA. J Virol 82:7467–7474. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02720-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Newman RM, Lamers SL, Weiner B, Ray SC, Colgrove RC, Diaz F, Jing L, Wang K, Saif S, Young S, Henn M, Laeyendecker O, Tobian AAR, Cohen JI, Koelle DM, Quinn TC, Knipe DM. 2015. Genome sequencing and analysis of geographically diverse clinical isolates of herpes simplex virus 2. J Virol 89:8219–8232. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01303-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kolb AW, Larsen IV, Cuellar JA, Brandt CR. 2015. Genomic, phylogenetic, and recombinational characterization of herpes simplex virus 2 strains. J Virol 89:6427–6434. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00416-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Johnston C, Magaret A, Roychoudhury P, Greninger AL, Cheng A, Diem K, Fitzgibbon MP, Huang M, Selke S, Lingappa JR, Celum C, Jerome KR, Wald A, Koelle DM. 2017. Highly conserved intragenic HSV-2 sequences: results from next-generation sequencing of HSV-2 UL and US regions from genital swabs collected from 3 continents. Virology 510:90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2017.06.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Georgopoulou U, Kakkanas A, Miriagou V, Michaelidou A, Mavromara P. 1995. Characterization of the US8.5 protein of herpes simplex virus. Arch Virol 140:2227–2241. doi: 10.1007/BF01323242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Kato A, Ando T, Oda S, Watanabe M, Koyanagi N, Arii J, Kawaguchi Y. 2016. Roles of Us8A and its phosphorylation mediated by Us3 in herpes simplex virus 1 pathogenesis. J Virol 90:5622–5635. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00446-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Adamson WE, McNab D, Preston VG, Rixon FJ. 2006. Mutational analysis of the herpes simplex virus triplex protein VP19C. J Virol 80:1537–1548. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.3.1537-1548.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Okoye ME, Sexton GL, Huang E, McCaffery JM, Desai P. 2006. Functional analysis of the triplex proteins (VP19C and VP23) of herpes simplex virus type 1. J Virol 80:929–940. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.2.929-940.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Friedman HM, Wang L, Fishman NO, Lambris JD, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH, Lubinski J. 1996. Immune evasion properties of herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoprotein gC. J Virol 70:4253–4260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Lubinski J, Wang L, Mastellos D, Sahu A, Lambris JD, Friedman HM. 1999. In vivo role of complement-interacting domains of herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoprotein gC. J Exp Med 190:1637–1646. doi: 10.1084/jem.190.11.1637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Johnson DC, Frame MC, Ligas MW, Cross AM, Stow ND. 1988. Herpes simplex virus immunoglobulin G Fc receptor activity depends on a complex of two viral glycoproteins, gE and gI. J Virol 62:1347–1354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Dingwell KS, Doering LC, Johnson DC. 1995. Glycoproteins E and I facilitate neuron-to-neuron spread of herpes simplex virus. J Virol 69:7087–7098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Lymberopoulos MH, Pearson A. 2007. Involvement of UL24 in herpes-simplex-virus-1-induced dispersal of nucleolin. Virology 363:397–409. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Bertrand L, Leiva-Torres GA, Hyjazie H, Pearson A. 2010. Conserved residues in the UL24 protein of herpes simplex virus 1 are important for dispersal of the nucleolar protein nucleolin. Author correction. J Virol 84:10436. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01538-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Whitley R, Arvin A, Prober C, Burchett S, Corey L, Powell D, Plotkin S, Starr S, Alford C, Connor J, Jacobs R, Nahmias A, Soong S-J; the National Institute of Allergy Infectious Diseases Collaborative Antiviral Study Group. 1991. A controlled trial comparing vidarabine with acyclovir in neonatal herpes simplex virus infection. N Engl J Med 324:444–449. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102143240703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Avgousti DC, Della Fera AN, Otter CJ, Herrmann C, Pancholi NJ, Weitzman MD. 2017. Adenovirus core protein VII downregulates the DNA damage response on the host genome. J Virol 91:e01089-17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01089-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Szpara ML, Tafuri YR, Enquist LW. 2011. Preparation of viral DNA from nucleocapsids. J Vis Exp 2011:3151. doi: 10.3791/3151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Szpara M. 2014. Isolation of herpes simplex virus nucleocapsid DNA, p 31–41. In Diefenbach RJ, Fraefel C (ed), Herpes simplex virus. Springer New York, New York, NY. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Dolan A, Jamieson FE, Cunningham C, Barnett BC, McGeoch DJ. 1998. The genome sequence of herpes simplex virus type 2. J Virol 72:2010–2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3059–3066. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Strimmer K, Wiuf C, Moulton V. 2001. Recombination analysis using directed graphical models. Mol Biol Evol 18:97–99. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Norberg P, Tyler S, Severini A, Whitley R, Liljeqvist J-A, Bergstrom T. 2011. A genome-wide comparative evolutionary analysis of herpes simplex virus type 1 and varicella zoster virus. PLoS One 6:e22527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Koboldt DC, Zhang Q, Larson DE, Shen D, McLellan MD, Lin L, Miller CA, Mardis ER, Ding L, Wilson RK. 2012. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res 22:568–576. doi: 10.1101/gr.129684.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X, Ruden DM. 2012. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff. Fly (Austin) 6:80–92. doi: 10.4161/fly.19695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Cingolani P, Patel VM, Coon M, Nguyen T, Land SJ, Ruden DM, Lu X. 2012. Using Drosophila melanogaster as a model for genotoxic chemical mutational studies with a new program, SnpSift. Front Genet 3:35. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Depledge DP, Yamanishi K, Gomi Y, Gershon AA, Breuer J. 2016. Deep sequencing of distinct preparations of the live attenuated varicella-zoster virus vaccine reveals a conserved core of attenuating single-nucleotide polymorphisms. J Virol 90:8698–8704. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00998-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Hage E, Wilkie GS, Linnenweber-Held S, Dhingra A, Suárez NM, Schmidt JJ, Kay-Fedorov PC, Mischak-Weissinger E, Heim A, Schwarz A, Schulz TF, Davison AJ, Ganzenmueller T. 2017. Characterization of human cytomegalovirus genome diversity in immunocompromised hosts by whole-genome sequencing directly from clinical specimens. J Infect Dis 215:1673–1683. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Newly deposited sequences for HSV-2 isolates can be found in GenBank under accession no. MK105995 to MK106004.