Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2019 Feb 22;10:181. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00181

Determining the Optimal N Input to Improve Grain Yield and Quality in Winter Wheat With Reduced Apparent N Loss in the North China Plain

Geng Ma 1,†, Weixing Liu 1,†, Shasha Li 1, Panpan Zhang 1, Chenyang Wang 1,2,3,*, Hongfang Lu 1,2,3, Lifang Wang 1,2,3, Yingxin Xie 1,2,3, Dongyun Ma 1,2,3, Guozhang Kang 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC6396033  PMID: 30853966

Abstract

Excessive or improper nitrogen (N) application rates negatively affect crop production and thereby environmental quality, particularly for winter wheat production in the North China Plain. Therefore, it is very important to optimize N fertilizer input to balance grain yield, environmental risk, and benefits under irrigated conditions. Three long-term stationary field experiments including five N levels, from 0 to 300 kg ha-1 [0 (N0), 90 (N90), 180 (N180), 240 (N240), and 300 (N300) kg ha-1] were carried out to investigate the effects of N regime on wheat yield, photosynthesis, and N balance at different sites. The grain yield and protein content increased quadratically with N rate, and the maximum values were 8087 kg ha-1 and 13.9% at N application rates of 250 and 337 kg N ha-1, respectively. N application increased the photosynthetic fluorescence parameters (Pn, Gs, and Tr) and N metabolism enzyme activities (NR and GS) which then increased grain yield. The leaching of soil nitrate into the deeper soil layers ( > 100 cm) increased with higher N fertilization and experimental years. The partial factor productivity (PFPN) was decreased by N because the apparent N loss increased with N application rate. In order to balance grain yield, N use efficiency (NUE), and N loss, the recommended N rate should be 120–171 kg N ha-1, and the corresponding yields and apparent N loss were 7278–7787 ka ha-1 and 22–37 kg ha-1, respectively.

Keywords: wheat, grain yield, protein content, N application rate, N use efficiency, apparent N loss

Introduction

As the largest wheat producer and consumer in the world, China produced about 115 million tons of wheat on a planting area of 24.3 million hectares (ha) in 2010 (FAO, 2013). The Huang-Huai-Hai Plain is one of the most important food production regions in China, where more than 60% of the wheat is planted and the irrigated area accounts for approximately 70% of the total cultivated area (NBS, 2013). High yields will be necessary and important to feed the growing population on the limited cropland in the coming decades (Zhang et al., 2013). Also, grain protein content is one of the most important quality traits of wheat, especially in countries or regions in which the dietary protein intake depends largely on the amount of protein in cereal grains.

Generally, nitrogen (N) is considered to be the single most important factor for determining wheat productivity and grain quality in the current cropping systems employed around the world (Triboi et al., 2000; Sinclair and Rufty, 2012). Therefore, to ensure the necessary high yields, protein content, and good economic benefit, farmers tend to apply excessive N fertilizer due to a lack of knowledge about how to use N effectively and how to prevent groundwater pollution from NO3–N. In fact, excessive N application does not significantly improve crop yields, and it can decrease N use efficiency (NUE) and also cause serious environmental problems due to the loss of a large amount of applied N (∼180 kg ha-1 yr-1) into the environment (Vitousek et al., 2009). The extent of soil nitrate accumulation (SNA) is so high that 55% of farmers find that it is not necessary to apply N fertilizers before sowing (Cui et al., 2010), as revealed from data on wheat yield response. Therefore, nitrate accumulation in the soil has been increasing attention.

At present, crop N use efficiency (NUE) is low because the input rate of chemical N fertilizer greatly surpasses crop needs (Ju et al., 2009). It has been previously reported that crop yields are correlated with NO3-N levels in the soil at harvest (Miao et al., 2014). Some studies have examined the relationship between wheat grain yield and N application rate at specific locations or at different scales (Valkama et al., 2013; Gaudin et al., 2015) using several models, and the quadratic model has been most commonly used in China (Hartmann et al., 2015). Recently, several studies have been carried out on nitrate accumulation at harvest in this intensive crop production region (Delin and Stenberg, 2014; Wang et al., 2015). However, these were all short-term studies that failed to identify the variations and characteristics of yield and nitrate accumulation and distribution in the soil profile under the specific climatic conditions and the cropping system used in this area.

Therefore, we initiated a field experiment in 2011 with winter wheat grown at different N rates on the same plots each year. The objectives of the investigation were to: (1) study the long-term effects of varying levels of N fertilization on wheat yield, protein content, and photosynthetic characteristics, (2) ascertain residual nitrate accumulation that occurs in the different soil layers and quantify apparent N loss for the different N applications, and (3) determine an optimal N application rate to balance yield, benefit, NUE, and environmental cost on the North China Plain.

Materials and Methods

Experimental Site

The field experiments were conducted at three locations in Henan Province, which is a typical Huang-huai crop planting area in China for winter wheat production. From 2011–2016, experiments were simultaneously carried out at Wenxian (34°92′ N, 112°99′ E) and Zhengzhou (34°47′N,113°38′E), where the annual mean temperatures are 13.0° and 14.3°C and the annual precipitation levels are 650 mm and 605 mm, respectively. For the 2013–2017 growing seasons, the experiments were performed at Kaifeng Experimental Farm (34°41′N,114°49′E), where the annual mean temperature and precipitation level are 14.5°C and 627 mm, respectively. Supplementary Figure S1 shows the precipitation distribution during the wheat growing seasons at the three experimental sites. The physical and chemical properties of the 0–20 cm soil layers at the experimental sites are given in Supplementary Table S1. The natural conditions and agricultural production levels at the three experimental sites are typical for the Huang-Huai wheat production area and represent standard high-yield agricultural production conditions for winter wheat.

Experimental Design and Fertilizer Treatments

‘Yumai 49–198’, a high-yielding wheat cultivar that is widely planted in the Huang-Huai wheat production area, was used in this study. The field experiments were designed with four different N fertilizer rates (0, 180, 240, and 300 kg ha-1; designated N0, N180, N240, and N300, respectively) in Wenxian and Kaifeng, while the experiment had five N rates (0, 90, 180, 240, and 300 kg ha-1) in Zhengzhou. Individual plots were 6.1 m × 2.5 m (15.25 m2) in Wenxian and 7 m × 2.9 m (20.3 m2) in Zhengzhou and Kaifeng, with three replicates in a randomized design. All plots were irrigated at the jointing and booting stages with 75 mm each time; the amount of water used was calculated using a water meter. Nitrogen fertilizer was applied as urea (46%), and phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) fertilizer as calcium superphosphate (15%) and potassium chloride fertilizer (60%) at rates of 150 (P2O5) and 120 (K2O) kg ha-1, respectively. Half the amount of nitrogen, and all of the phosphorus and potassium fertilizer, was spread by hand before plowing at the time of sowing. Additional N fertilizer was applied at the jointing stage in selected plots. The management practices for controlling pests, diseases, and weeds complied with local practices for high-yield wheat production.

Sampling and Sample Analysis

At maturation stage, wheat was hand-harvested from a 6 m2 area (3 m × 2 m) in the middle of each plot. The grain was weighed after air-drying, and the grain weights at corresponding moisture contents were recorded and expressed against a standard moisture content of 13%. Grain protein was calculated by multiplying the nitrogen content by 5.7, and nitrogen content was measured using a nitrogen analyzer (Kjeltec 2300, FOSS, Sweden) according to the ICC Standard Method 105/2. Soil samples were collected from 0–20, 20–40, 40–60, 60–80, and 80–100 cm soil depths for determination of NO3--N before sowing and after harvest. Soil samples (5 g) were extracted in 50 ml 1M KCl and shaken for 1 h (Li et al., 2012). After filtration, the extracts were immediately measured for nitrate-N concentration using a high-resolution digital colorimeter AutoAnalyzer3 (AA3; SEAL Company, Germany).

Chlorophyll was estimated in crude flag leaf extracts at anthesis using the method of Arnon (1949). Briefly, acetone (80%) was used for extraction of chlorophyll and particulate impurities were removed by centrifugation. Chlorophylls a and b were calculated by measuring absorbance at 663 and 645 nm, respectively, and the total chlorophyll content is the sum of chlorophylls a and b.

Photosynthetic parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence were measured using an LI-6400 Portable Photosynthesis System (LI-COR, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States) and a portable chlorophyll fluorometer (FMS 2.02; Hansatech, United Kingdom) under field conditions at anthesis stage in the growing season of 2015–2016. Intact leaves of fresh wheat plants from each treatment were selected to measure the following photosynthetic gas exchange parameters: photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), internal CO2 concentration (Ci) and transpiration rate (Tr). The measurements were taken from 9:00 am to 11:00 am to avoid the midday decrease in photosynthesis. was measured using Minimal fluorescence, F0, was measured in 30 min dark-adapted leaves and maximal fluorescence, Fm, was measured in the same leaves under full light-adapted conditions. Maximal variable fluorescence (Fv = Fm-F0) and the photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) for dark-adapted leaves were also calculated from the measured parameters (Maxwell and Johnson, 2000). In light-adapted leaves (for 15 min), the steady state fluorescence yield (Fs′), maximal fluorescence (Fm′) after a 0.8 s saturating white light pulse, and minimal fluorescence (F0′) were measured when the actinic light was turned off, and further calculations were made by using the equation F0′ = F0/(Fv/Fm+F0/Fm′) (Oxborough and Baker, 1997). Values for quenching due to non-photochemical dissipation of absorbed light energy (qN) was determined at each saturating pulse using the equation qN = (Fm-Fm′)/Fm′. The coefficient for photochemical quenching, qP, which represents the fraction of open PSII reaction centers, was calculated as qP = (Fm′-Fs′)/(Fm′-F0′) (Maxwell and Johnson, 2000), The photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (ΦPSII) was calculated as follows:

ΦPSII=(Fm′−Fs′)/Fm′ (1)

Enzymatic activity in the flag leaves was analyzed at 7-day intervals from 0 to 28 days after anthesis (DAA). Enzymes were extracted from leaf material stored at -80°C. All extractions were performed at 4°C. Mg2+-dependent nitrate reductase (NR) activity was measured according to the protocol described by Ferrario-Mery et al. (1998). Glutamine synthetase (GS) activity was measured using the synthetase assay based on the method described by Lea et al. (1990).

The soil nitrate accumulation (SNA; kg N ha-1) in each soil layer was calculated as follows:

SNA=CN×BD×SD×0.1 (2)

Where SD is the soil layer thickness (cm), BD is the soil bulk density (g cm-3), CN is the soil NO3-N concentration (mg kg-1) of the corresponding layer, and 0.1 is the conversion coefficient.

The apparent N mineralization rate (Nmin) during the wheat growing season was calculated as the difference between N output (plant N uptake plus residual soil N) and the N input (initial soil N in the 0–100cm soil layers) in the no-N (N0) plots (Meisinger, 1984):

Nmin=soil Nend+Nuptake−soil Ninitial (3)

Apparent N losses during the wheat growing season were calculated as the difference between N input (N fertilizer application rate plus initial soil N plus apparent N mineralization) and N output (plant N uptake plus residual soil N) in plots where N was applied (Ma et al., 1999).

Nloss=Nfer+soil Ninitial+Nmin−plant Nuptake−soil Nend (4)

Here, soil Ninitial and Nend are the SNA within the top 100 cm of the soil profile before planting and after harvest, respectively; plant Nuptake represents N accumulation in the above-ground biomass at harvest; and Nfer is the N application rate in kg ha-1.

Two indicators were used to evaluate NUE: (1) the partial factor productivity of N (PFPN), and (2) the agronomic efficiency of N (NAE) were calculated with the following formulas:

PFPN(kgkg−1)=YNAN (5)
NAE(kgkg−1)=YN−Y0AN (6)

Where YN (kg ha-1) is the grain yield from treatments with N fertilizer, Y0 (kg ha-1) is the grain yield from the treatment without N fertilizer, and AN (kg ha-1) is the amount of N fertilizer applied (Yang et al., 2017).

The relative economic return was calculated as: (wheat price × wheat yield increment)-(N fertilizer price × increment in amount of N fertilizer). The average prices of wheat and N fertilizer were 0.340 and 0.623 USD kg-1 (1 US dollar = 6.2 Chinese Yuan Renminbi) over the past two decades, computed from China’s food information network1 and China’s fertilizer network2, respectively.

Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) as implemented in the SPSS software package (Version 17.0) to test whether significant differences existed between the treatments and years. The means for treatments and years were compared with the least significant difference (LSD) test at the 0.05 probability level (at p ≤ 0.05). The relationships between yield, cumulative NO3-N, and N application rate were analyzed using regression or stepwise regression analyses to determine the best-fit equations. The graphs were prepared using Sigmaplot 12.3.

Results

Grain Yield and Protein Content

We found that grain yield in wheat is significantly affected by N application rate. Compared with the N0 treatment, the N180, N240, and N300 treatments increased grain yield by 47.6%, 49.6%, and 54.5% in Wenxian (Figure 1A) and 36.2%, 45.8%, and 47.9% in Kaifeng (Figure 1C), respectively. The N90, N180, N240, and N300 treatments increased yield by 67.7%, 78.7%, 87.6%, and 75.1%, respectively, compared with the N0 treatment in Zhengzhou (Figure 1B). In the first growing season, wheat grain yield in the N0 treatments were 4.5%, 15.8%, and 6.3% less than in the N180 treatments in Wenxian, Zhengzhou, and Kaifeng, respectively. However, the N0 wheat yields in the last experimental year were significantly less by 48.3%, 62.1%, and 50.8% compared to the N180 treatments in Wenxian, Zhengzhou, and Kaifeng, respectively. The average yields of N rates of 0, 90, 180, 240, and 300 kg ha-1 were 5102, 7010, 7751, 8089, and 8047 kg ha-1 respectively, across all the different experimental seasons and sites (Figure 1D). In all years and locations, regression analysis showed that wheat grain yield increased quadratically with N rate, with a maximum value of 8087.1 kg ha-1 that corresponded to a N application rate of 250.4 kg ha-1 under these experimental conditions.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Grain yields of winter wheat at different N application rates for each experimental year in Wenxian (A), Zhengzhou (B), and Kaifeng (C), and their correlation with N application rate (D). Bars (A–C) denote the standard errors. Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among years, and lowercase letters denote significant differences among N rates at p < 0.05 using the LSD test in SPSS. Solid and dashed lines, box boundaries, and bars and dots inside or outside of the boxes (D) represent the median and mean values, the 25th and 75th, the 10th and 90th, and < 5th and > 95th percentiles of all data, respectively. These symbols are the same used in Figure 2.

Similarly, the grain protein content increased with increases in the N rate in most years (Figure 2). The average of the N treatments increased by 29.6% compared with the N0 control. The average protein contents were 10.54%, 11.89%, 13.29%, 13.98%, and 14.37%, respectively, at N rates of 0, 90, 180, 240, and 300 kg ha-1 across all growing seasons and locations. Regression analysis (Figure 2D) showed that protein content increased quadratically with N rate, with a maximum value of 13.9%, corresponding to a N application rate of 336.7 kg ha-1 under these experimental conditions.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Grain protein content of winter wheat grown at different N application rates for all experimental years at Wenxian (A), Zhengzhou (B), and Kaifeng (C) and their correlation with N application rate (D).

Leaf Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters

The photosynthetic and fluorescence characteristics of flag leaves at anthesis in 2015–2016 growing season are shown in Table 1. The highest chlorophyll content was observed when the wheat was supplied with 240 kg N ha-1, and the N0 treatments had the lowest chlorophyll contents at all sites. There was no significant difference in the chlorophyll content of flag leaves in the N240 and N300 treatments. The Pn, Gs, and Tr of flag leaves at anthesis in the N0 treatment were significantly lower than in the other N treatments, and the Ci was highest in the N0 treatment at all three sites. Chl fluorescence was affected by N application rate, especially ΦPSII and qN under these experimental conditions. The N180 treatment had the highest ΦPSII, which was significantly higher than in the N0 treatments at all sites. However, there were no significant differences in the Fv/Fm and qP values among the four treatments in Wenxian. For the N240 treatments, the Zhengzhou and Kaifeng sites had the largest qP and Fv/Fm, respectively, and they were significantly larger than in the N0 treatments.

Table 1.

Chlorophyll content, photosynthesis (Pn, Gs, Ci, and Tr), and chlorophyll fluorescence (ΦPSII, Fv/Fm, qP and qN) parameters in flag leaves of wheat plants grown under different N application rates at anthesis in Wenxian, Zhengzhou, and Kaifeng (2015–2016).

Site N rate (kg ha-1) Chlorophyll content (mg g-1 FW) Pn (μmol CO2 m-2 s-1) Gs (mol H2O m-2 s-1) Ci (μmol CO2 mol-1) Tr (mmol H2O m-2 s-1) ΦPSII Fv/Fm qP qN
Wenxian 0 2.15c 16.81b 0.57b 244.33b 6.71b 0.83bc 0.86a 0.99a 0.15c
180 2.69b 25.26a 0.61b 195.64b 7.15ab 0.87a 0.88a 0.99a 0.17bc
240 3.07a 25.93a 0.76ab 182.52b 7.55ab 0.84bc 0.87a 1.00a 0.22b
300 2.91ab 26.98a 0.86a 169.63bc 8.14a 0.82c 0.86a 1.00a 0.25a
Zhengzhou 0 1.75c 15.68c 0.32c 314.33a 6.52b 0.81b 0.86a 0.91b 0.11b
90 2.35b 18.15b 0.43b 310.12a 6.69ab 0.82ab 0.86a 0.92b 0.11b
180 2.75ab 20.36ab 0.47b 296.45ab 6.97a 0.84a 0.86a 0.96a 0.13ab
240 2.98a 23.95a 0.66a 274.43b 7.15a 0.81b 0.88a 0.99a 0.16a
300 2.62ab 21.55ab 0.51ab 289.60ab 7.22a 0.83ab 0.88a 0.96a 0.15a
Kaifeng 0 1.98c 16.52b 0.36c 259.67a 6.65b 0.79b 0.86c 0.93a 0.12b
180 2.63b 22.63a 0.46b 235.28b 6.79b 0.83a 0.88bc 0.97a 0.22a
240 3.13a 23.26a 0.58a 231.47b 7.43ab 0.82a 0.90a 0.95a 0.16ab
300 2.86ab 21.85a 0.46b 243.23ab 7.73a 0.83a 0.89ab 0.94a 0.13b
Open in a new tab

The lowercase letters following the values within a column indicate significant differences among N treatments at P < 0.05 based on the LSD test.

NR and GS Activities in Flag Leaves

Nitrate reductase (NR) is the key enzyme of N assimilation in plants, and glutamine synthetase (GS) is a multifunctional enzyme at the center of N metabolism that plays an important role in the regulation of N metabolism. Changes in the physiological markers of the flag leaf after anthesis are shown in Figure 3. This study was performed on five different sampling dates following anthesis. The results showed that the NR and GS activities of the flag leaves in the N0 treatment were significantly lower than in the other treatments from 0 to 28 DAA at all three sites. The NR activities of flag leaves in the N240 treatments were higher than for flag leaves in the other N treatments (N90, N180, N300) from 0 to 21 DAA in Wenxian (Figure 3A) and Zhengzhou (Figure 3B). The changes in flag leaf GS activity were similar to those found for NR activity.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

Nitrate reductase (NR) and glutamine synthetase (GS) activities in flag leaves in winter during grain filing under different N application rates at Wenxian (A,D), Zhengzhou (B,E), and Kaifeng (C,F) in 2016. Horizontal bars represent the standard errors of the mean.

Soil Nitrate Accumulation (SNA)

The results for SNA in the three experimental sites were similar, so only the soil profile distribution of SNA for the six wheat cropping seasons in Wenxian is shown in Figure 4. SNA increased significantly with increasing N application rate and was also observed in the N0 treatment. The SNA in each soil layer increased with N rate, and the highest SNA of all the treatments occurred in the surface soil layer (0-20 cm) in 2011 and 2012 (Figure 4A,B). The SNA decreased in the 20–40 cm soil layer but increased in the 40–60 cm soil layer and peaked during 2013 and 2014 (Figure 4C,D). Also, the SNA peak was at a lower depth (80–100 cm) in last two cropping years (Figure 4E,F), and the total SNA in the 0–100 cm soil layer was less than it was before the growing season in 2015 and 2016. The yearly SNA in the 0–100 cm soil layer gradually increased until the fourth experimental year (2014), and was 61.9, 175.3, 220.3, and 268.8 kg ha-1, respectively, for the 0, 180, 240, and 300 kg N ha-1 application rates. The SNA gradually decreased in the last two years (2015 and 2016) by 71.3, 25.2, 20.0, and 16.4% respectively, compared with 2014 at the 0, 180, 240, and 300 kg N ha-1 application rates.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Open in a new tab

Nitrate distribution in the 0–100 cm soil layers after the winter wheat harvest for plants grown under different N application rates during the harvest years 2011–2016 in Wenxian. Panels (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), and (F) show the nitrate distribution for the different N rates in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively. Horizontal bars represent the standard errors of the mean.

N Use Efficiency (NUE)

PFPN and NAE for winter wheat varied among treatments and growing seasons at the Wenxian site (Table 2). Both N and experimental year, and their interaction, had significant effects on PFPN and NAE. The higher the nitrogen fertilizer application, the lower the value of PFPN obtained each year. Compared with the N180 treatment, the PFPN of the N240 and N300 treatments decreased significantly by 24.5 and 37.4%, respectively. In all years except for 2013, the average PFPN values in the different treatments across all N levels increased gradually with advancing experimental years; the PFPN in 2016 increased by 10.3% compared with that in 2011. Similarly, the NAE for the N240 and N300 treatments decreased significantly by 23.5% and 31.9% on average compared with the N180 treatment, respectively. The NAE in 2016 increased 7.5-fold compared with that in 2011.

Table 2.

Partial factor productivity of N (PFPN) and agronomic efficiency of N (NAE) for winter wheat grown at different N application rates in Wenxian for harvest years 2011-2016.

Year PFPN (kg kg-1)
 Average NAE (kg kg-1)
 Average
N180 N240 N300 N180 N240 N300
2011 43.36d 33.07c 27.44b 34.62f 1.94d 2.01d 2.59c 2.18d
2012 45.69c 34.42bc 28.47ab 36.19c 16.79b 12.75b 11.13b 13.56b
2013 36.94e 27.99d 22.86c 29.26e 6.07c 4.84c 4.34c 5.08c
2014 47.10b 34.61bc 29.78ab 37.16bc 17.93b 12.74b 12.28b 14.31b
2015 49.93a 37.96a 29.78ab 39.22a 22.26a 17.21a 13.17ab 17.55a
2016 47.49b 36.11ab 30.99a 38.20ab 22.46a 17.34a 15.98a 18.59a
Average 45.08A 34.03B 28.22C 14.57A 11.15B 9.92C
Analysis of variance(F)
N Rate 1091.83∗∗∗ 41.35∗∗∗
Year 94.61∗∗∗ 160.53∗∗∗
N Rate × Year 2.94∗∗ 3.95∗∗∗
Open in a new tab

The lowercase letters following the values within a column indicate significant differences among years, and the uppercase letters within a row indicate significant differences among N treatments at P < 0.05 basedon to the LSD test. ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗P < 0.05; ns: P > 0.05. The symbols used top show significance are used in the other tables.

Apparent N Balance

Table 3 shows that the initial N accumulation before sowing, the wheat plant N uptake, and the SNA all increased with increasing N rate. Soil N mineralization during the wheat growing period varied across the sites, and was 75.56, 58.58, and 94.63 kg ha-1 in Wenxian, Zhengzhou, and Kaifeng, respectively. With the addition of N to the soil before sowing, the amount of N supplied by the soil can reach 227-365 kg ha-1, which is only slightly below the total nitrogen requirement of wheat during the growth stage. These results showed that it is feasible to reduce the amount of applied N in these three different sites. The averages for the three sites were 14.66, 43.38, 61.58, and 96.14 kg ha-1 for the N90, N180, N240, and N300 treatments, respectively. These results showed that the low N application rate would lead to a decrease in soil fertility under high-yield conditions, while the proper N application would be beneficial to the balance of inorganic N in the soil.

Table 3.

Average initial N content before sowing( soil Ninitial), N uptake by the plant(plant Nuptake), residual N after harvest (soil Nend), N mineralization(Nmin), N loss(Nloss), and N loss rate for all study years at the three planting sites.

Site N rate (kg ha-1) Soil Ninitial (kg ha-1) Plant Nuptake (kg ha-1) Soil Nend (kg ha-1) Nmin (kg ha-1) Nloss (kg ha-1) N loss rate (%)
Wenxian 0 64.28c 105.73c 38.11d 79.56 0 —
180 213.62b 272.75b 148.78c 79.56 51.65ab 28.69b
240 239.47b 289.76b 199.27b 79.56 70.01b 29.17ab
300 285.82a 315.41a 254.69a 79.56 95.28a 31.76a
Zhengzhou 0 91.94c 112.38c 38.14d 58.58 0 —
90 128.51bc 205.54b 56.89cd 58.58 14.66c 16.29c
180 168.56b 260.28a 107.91c 58.58 38.95bc 21.64b
240 186.99ab 277.46a 148.75b 58.58 59.36b 24.73b
300 216.93a 271.62a 214.76a 58.58 89.13a 29.71a
Kaifeng 0 109.21c 155.02c 48.77d 94.63 0 —
180 133.63b 253.01b 115.71c 94.63 39.54b 21.97b
240 185.36a 295.69a 168.94b 94.63 55.36b 23.07b
300 211.87a 308.06a 194.42a 94.63 104.02a 34.67a
Open in a new tab

The lowercase letters following the values within a column indicate significant differences among N treatments at P < 0.05 based on the LSD test.

Discussion

N fertilizer is a crucial factor in wheat production; it results in a significant increase in grain yield and grain protein content compared to no-N treatment (Ercoli et al., 2013), and both yield and protein content are increased to a comparable extent by N application (Zhang et al., 2016). In our study, the response of grain yield and protein content to N rates fitted a quadratic model, and N rate can explain 61% of the variation in yield and 84% of the variation in protein content (Figure 1D, 2D). Based on the quadratic model, maximum grain yield and protein content were obtained with 250 and 337 kg N ha-1, respectively. Similar to the findings of Abad et al. (2004), we found that grain yield reached a plateau with lower N application rates than did protein content. Thus, to a certain extent, N application is an efficient way to increase grain protein content without causing yield reductions.

Enhanced grain yields have been consistently reported to be associated with changes in photosynthetic characteristics, such as Pn, Gs, Ci, and Tr (Dahal et al., 2014). Under well-watered conditions, the Pn and Gs of plants grown under high-N nutrition conditions were greater than those of plants grown under lower-N nutrition (Shangguan et al., 2000). Compared with the N-unfertilized treatment (0 kg N ha-1), the Gs in the fertilized treatments was higher by an average of 27% (Dordas and Sioulas, 2008). We found that the Pn, Gs, and Tr were increased significantly by N application. Also, the Pn and Gs at the different sites were ranked in the order Wenxian > Kaifeng > Zhengzhou, and this trend was consistent with the average yield. These results indicate that N application rate affects yield formation by regulating photosynthetic parameters. In sunflower, N deficiency did not significantly change Fv/Fm, indicating that there was no reduction in PS II efficiency (Ciompi et al., 1996). Our results also showed that there was no significant change in Fv/Fm in Wenxian and Zhengzhou in all treatments. However, the decrease in Fv/Fm is remarkable in Kaifeng, and it might inhibit photochemical activities and potential photosynthetic activity in PSII. In our study, we observed that there was a significant reduction of ΦPSII in the N0 treatment, indicating a decline in the electron transport activities of PSII. These data suggest that N deficiency can lead to a reduction in photochemical efficiency in wheat leaves at anthesis. Furthermore, an excess supply of N is not conducive to the effective utilization of trapped light energy.

NR has long been considered to be the rate-limiting step in nitrate assimilation (Masclaux-Daubresse et al., 2010). The GS enzyme is responsible for the first step of ammonium assimilation and transformation into glutamine, and it exists in both cytosolic (GS1) and chloroplastic (GS2) forms that are encoded by 3-5 genes and one gene, respectively (Lea and Miflin, 2011). Wang et al. (2002) and Li et al. (2008) reported that the NR and GS activity in flag leaves significant decreased after anthesis. Jenner et al. (1991) surmised that the N demands of developing grains induced leaf senescence. In our study, NR showed a general decrease as the leaves aged for most treatments. Also, the NR activity in the N240 treatment was the highest, and it was significantly higher than in the N0 treatment. This is consistent with previous results showing that N starvation causes a significant decrease in the NR activity, but high levels of external nitrate reduce the activity of this enzyme (Lambeck et al., 2012; Balotf et al., 2016). GS activity in flag leaves plays a key role in protein synthesis, especially during the grain filling stage when N is remobilized to the reproductive sinks (Habash et al., 2007). In this study, we found that the GS activity was increased by N addition and showed a general decrease as the leaves aged for all treatments, and the wheat samples with higher GS activities during the grain filling stage also showed increased grain protein content, in agreement with our previous study that used different wheat cultivars (Zhang et al., 2017). One possibility is that N increased GS1 and GS2 expression in flag leaves at early grain filling stage, but the GS expression decreased at mid grain filling stage, especially the GS2 (Zhang et al., 2017).

Dai et al. (2015) reported that the SNA increased sharply with N rate at high N rates in the Loess Plateau of China. In our study, a low level (38.1 kg ha-1) of SNA was found in the 0–100 cm soil layer for the N0 treatment, and 68% of the SNA was distributed in the 0–40 cm layer. In the N-fertilized plots, the average SNA increased quadratically from 148.8 to 254.7 kg ha-1 in the 0–100 cm soil layer when the N rate was increased from 180 to 300 kg ha-1, and these results are similar to those of previous studies. Furthermore, the SNA peak gradually moved down with advancing experimental years, and the SNA gradually decreased during the last two years of the experiment (2015 and 2016). This indicates that the NO3-N had moved to the soil layer below 100 cm with irrigation and rainfall, which was due to continuous irrigation for six years and increased precipitation in the last two seasons under the high N application levels. In addition, the increase in the amount of N that accumulated in the plant could be one possible reason behind the higher yields in 2015 and 2016. These results agree with those of Thorburn et al. (2003), who found that N leaching levels were often positively correlated with the amount of irrigation or the N application rate, and there was nitrate leaching in the winter wheat season when each irrigation depth was > 60 mm.

One of the methods used to evaluate the rationality of nitrogen management is to estimate the balance between incorporated N, N removed by the crop, and residual inorganic N (Guarda et al., 2004). Our results are consistent with those of Ju et al. (2006) and Sieling and Kage (2006), who found that N surplus is positively correlated with N fertilizer application rate. Our study showed that N rates explain a large part of the variation (∼97%) in N loss for wheat (Figure 5B), which also agrees with the results of Valkama et al. (2013). Soil surpluses and deficits are obviously linked to the N supply and crop N demand. In present study, the N0 and N300 treatments showed a N deficit and surplus, respectively. Several studies have reported that surplus N can be lost by NO3-N leaching, which then pollutes the environment (Sieling and Kage, 2006).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Open in a new tab

The relationships between SNA in the 0–100 cm soil layer (A) and apparent N loss (B) with N application rates across all experimental years and planting sites.

On a national or regional scale, PFPN and NAE are important indices of NUE that can be estimated reasonably well, and SNA is negatively related to NUE (Dang et al., 2009). Previous studies have also shown that NAE is significantly reduced at the highest N fertilizer level, and that the average NAE for wheat of 20-25 kg grain increased per kg of N applied worldwide. In our studies, the PFPN and NAE values for wheat varied between 22.9 and 49.9 kg kg-1 and between 2.0 and 22.5 kg kg-1, respectively, for the different N treatments (Table 2). The significantly lower values of NAE in 2011 (2.2 kg kg-1) were due to the higher yield in the N0 treatment at the beginning of the experiment. The lower values of NAE observed in 2013 were due to reduced precipitation during the growing season, which occurred mostly (>70%) at the late grain-filling stage and limited the use of N fertilizer.

The main aim of agricultural production has traditionally been to increase cereal grain yields to feed the expanding population and to meet improved living standards (Liu et al., 2016). Equally importantly, grain protein contents have been increasing in wheat, resulting in improved nutritional quality (Shewry, 2007). In this study, the N rate-yield and N rate-protein content relationships may be valuable models for predicting the N application rates needed to achieve target grain yields, protein contents, and N use efficiencies while reducing N loss and also reducing the environmental costs for sustainable development of agricultural production.

As shown in the present work, grain yield, grain protein content, SNA in the 0–100 cm soil layer, surplus N, and the relative economic return are all significantly correlated with the N fertilization rate (Figure 6). When the maximum yield (8087 kg ha-1) was obtained at 250 kg N ha-1, the SNA was as high as 153 kg N ha-1 in the 0–100 cm soil layer, corresponding to a PFPN of 32 kg kg-1. Clearly, these excessive fertilizer N inputs significantly increase nitrate accumulation in soils, and thus inevitably increase the possibilities of nitrate leaching. The European Union has stipulated that the cumulative NO3-N level in the 0–90 cm soil layer should not exceed 90–100 kg N ha-1 (Clercq et al., 2001). Therefore, when the SNA in the 0–100 cm soil layer was maintained at environmentally acceptable levels (100 kg N ha-1) in this study, the N rate was 171 kg N ha-1 and the grain yield was 7787 kg ha-1, which was 96.5% of the highest yield. Cui et al. (2005) reported that the apparent N loss for winter wheat was 32 kg ha-1 under N-optimized management conditions in the North China Plain. Consistently, the apparent loss was 36.7 kg ha-1 in our study at a N rate of 171 kg ha-1, and this demonstrates that our models and methods are reliable. Turner et al. (2004) recommend that the grain protein content should be higher than 12.5%, which is the level needed for bread making and for the necessary nutritional quality. Hence, the N application rate should be at least 120 kg ha-1 to ensure high grain quality, and that the corresponding yield and SNA reach 7278 and 76 kg ha-1, respectively. For common wheat production in North China, the economic benefit is certainly a component need to consider. In this study, the highest relative economic return was obtained at a N rate of 231 kg ha-1, which is far higher than the environmentally safe N rate of 171 kg ha-1 specified by the European Union. Although this N rate produced higher economic return and yield, N loss and environmental costs also increased because of high N input. It has been well documented that China has been facing larger environmental challenges than many other major countries (Liu and Diamond, 2005), and a great extent of these issues comes from the overuse of N fertilizer in agricultural production (Liu et al., 2013). Therefore, in order to balance grain yield, NUE, N loss, and environmental costs, the recommended N rate should be between 120 and 171 kg N ha-1. The ecological environmental benefit is affected by the soil fertility and production conditions. Thus, there is still a need for future research focused on optimizing N management for sustainable agricultural development.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Open in a new tab

Relationships between grain yield, protein content, apparent N loss, SNA in the 0–100 cm soil layer, and relative economic return with the different N fertilizer application rates.

Conclusion

The grain yield and protein content of winter wheat were found to be significantly related to the N fertilizer application rate in all years and planting sites in this study. The different N application rates significantly affected the chlorophyll content and photosynthetic characteristics of flag leaves at anthesis. Also, the NR and GS activities in flag leaves for the N application treatments were significantly higher than the activities in the N0 treatment after anthesis at three sites. N fertilizer guarantees both wheat yield and quality by regulating these physiological indexes. The SNA in the 0–100cm soil layer and apparent N loss increased sharply with increasing N application rates. An excessive fertilizer N supply triggers nitrate leaching in the intensive crop production system in the North China Plain. In order to balance grain yield, NUE, and N loss, the recommend N application rate is among 120–171 kg N ha-1, for these rates, the corresponding yield and apparent N loss were 7278–7787 ka ha-1 and 22–37 kg ha-1, respectively. The results presented here can help guide winter wheat production, especially in rural areas of China, as well as in similar cropping systems around the world.

Author Contributions

CW conceived the research and designed the study. GM and WL analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. GM, PZ, and SL carried out the field measurements and soil analysis. HL, LW, and YX critically reviewed the manuscript. DM and GK assisted with manuscript writing and editing. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Numbers 2017YFD0300204 and 2017YFD0300408) and the Modern Wheat Industrial Technology System of Henan Province (S2010-01-G07).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.00181/full#supplementary-material

FIGURE S1

Annual precipitation by month (October to May) during the wheat growing seasons at the Wenxian (a), Zhengzhou (b), and Kaifeng (c) planting sites. The years shown indicate wheat that was harvested that year but was sown the preceding year; for example “2011” represents winter wheat sown in 2010 and harvested in 2011.

Click here for additional data file. (228.8KB, TIF)
TABLE S1

Various physical and chemical properties of the field experiment in 0–20 cm soil in Wenxian, Zhengzhou and Kaifeng.

Click here for additional data file. (13.2KB, DOCX)

References

  1. Abad A., Lloveras J., Michelena A. (2004). Nitrogen fertilization and foliar urea effects on durum wheat yield and quality and on residual soil nitrate in irrigated mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Res. 87 257–269. 10.1016/j.fcr.2003.11.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnon D. I. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris L. Plant Physiol. 24 1–15. 10.1104/pp.24.1.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Balotf S., Kavoosi G., Kholdebarin B. (2016). Nitrate reductase, nitrite reductase, glutamine synthetase and glutamate synthase expression and activity in response to different nitrogen sources in nitrogen-starved wheat seedlings. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 63 220–229. 10.1002/bab.1362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ciompi S., Gentili E., Guidi L., Soldatini G. F. (1996). The effect of nitrogen deficiency on leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in sunflower. Plant Sci. 118 177–184. 10.1016/0168-9452(96)04442-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clercq P., Hofman G., Jarvis S. C., Neeteson J. J., Sinabel F., Gertsis A. (2001). Nutrient Management Legislation in European Countries. Wageningen: Wageningen University and Research Center Publications. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cui Z., Chen X., Zhang F. (2010). Current nitrogen management status and measures to improve the intensive wheat–maize system in China. AMBIO 39 376–384. 10.1007/s13280-010-0076-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cui Z., Shi L., Xu L., Li J., Zhang F., Chen X. (2005). Effects of N fertilization on winter wheat grain yield and its crude protein content and apparent N losses. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 16 2071–2075. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dahal K., Knowles V. L., Plaxton W. C., Huner Norman P. A. (2014). Enhancement of photosynthetic performance, water use efficiency and grain yield during long-term growth under elevated CO2 in wheat and rye is growth temperature and cultivar dependent. Environ. Exp. Bot. 106 207–220. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.11.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dai J., Wang Z., Li F., He G., Wang S., Li Q., et al. (2015). Optimizing nitrogen input by balancing winter wheat yield and residual nitrate-N in soil in a long-term dryland field experiment in the Loess Plateau of China. Field Crops Res. 181 32–41. 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.06.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dang T., Qi L., Guo S., Hao M. (2009). Relationship between soil nitrate, nitrogen balance and utilization in rainfed land. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci. 15 573–577. [Google Scholar]
  11. Delin S., Stenberg M. (2014). Effect of nitrogen fertilization on nitrate leaching in relation to grain yield response on loamy sand in Sweden. Eur. J. Agron. 52 291–296. 10.1016/j.eja.2013.08.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dordas C. A., Sioulas C. (2008). Safflower yield, chlorophyll content, photosynthesis, and water use efficiency response to nitrogen fertilization under rainfed conditions. Ind. Crops Prod. 27 75–85. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.07.020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ercoli L., Masoni A., Pampana S., Mariotti M., Arduini I. (2013). As durum wheat productivity is affected by nitrogen fertilisation management in Central Italy. Eur. J. Agron. 44 38–45. 10.1016/j.eja.2012.08.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. FAO STAT-Agriculture Database. Available at: http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx [accessed January 6 2013]. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ferrario-Mery S., Valadier M. H., Foyer C. (1998). Overexpression of nitrate reductase in tobacco delays drought-induced decreases in nitrate reductase activity and mRNA. Plant Physiol. 117 293–302. 10.1104/pp.117.1.293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gaudin A. C. M., Janovicek K., Deen B., Hooker D. C. (2015). Wheat improves nitrogen use efficiency of maize and soybean-based cropping systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 210 1–10. 10.1016/j.agee.2015.04.034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Guarda G., Padovan S., Delogu G. (2004). Grain yield, nitrogen-use efficiency and baking quality of old and modern Italian bread-wheat cultivars grown at different nitrogen levels. Eur. J. Agron. 21 181–192. 10.1016/j.eja.2003.08.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Habash D. Z., Swarbreck S., Schondelmaier J., Weyen J., Quarrie S. (2007). The genetics of nitrogen use in hexaploid wheat: N utilisation, development and yield. Theor. Appl. Genet. 114 403–419. 10.1007/s00122-006-0429-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hartmann T. E., Yue S., Schulz R., He X., Chen X., Zhang F., et al. (2015). Yield and N use efficiency of a maize–wheat cropping system as affected by different fertilizer management strategies in a farmer’s field of the North China Plain. Field Crops Res. 174 30–39. 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.01.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jenner F. C., Ugalde T. D., Aspinall D. (1991). The physiology of starch and protein deposition in the endosperm of wheat. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 18 211–226. 10.1071/pp9910211 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ju X., Kou C., Zhang F., Christie P. (2006). Nitrogen balance and groundwater nitrate contamination: comparison among three intensive cropping systems on the North China Plain. Environ. Pollut. 143 117–125. 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ju X., Xing G., Chen X., Zhang S., Zhang L., Liu X., et al. (2009). Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 3041–3046. 10.1073/pnas.0813417106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lambeck I. C., Fischer-Schrader K., Niks D., Roeper J., Chi J. C., Hille R. (2012). Molecular mechanism of 14-3-3 protein-mediated inhibition of plant nitrate reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 287 4562–4571. 10.1074/jbc.M111.323113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lea P. J., Blackwell R. D., Chen F., Hecht U. (1990). “Enzymes of ammonia assimilation,” in Methods in Plant Biochemistry ed. Lea P. J. (New York, NY: Academic Press; ) 257–267. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lea P. J., Miflin B. J. (2011). Nitrogen assimilation and its relevance to crop improvement. Annu. Plant Rev. Volume 42 1–40. 10.1002/9781444328608.ch1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li J., Wang Z., Gao R., Li S., Cai R., Yan S., et al. (2008). Activities of enzymes involved in sucrose and starch synthesis during grain filling and the relation to nitrogen metabolism in strong- and weak-gluten wheat cultivars. Acta Agron. Sin. 6 1014–1018. 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Li K., Zhao Y., Yuan X., Zhao H., Wang Z., Li S., et al. (2012). Comparison of factors affecting soil nitrate nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen extraction. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant 43 571–588. 10.1080/00103624.2012.639108 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu H., Wang Z., Yu R., Li F., Li K., Cao H., et al. (2016). Optimal nitrogen input for higher efficiency and lower environmental impacts of winter wheat production in China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 224 1–11. 10.1016/j.agee.2016.03.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu J., Diamond J. (2005). China’s environment in a globalizing world. Nature 435 1179–1186. 10.1038/4351179a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu X., Zhang Y., Han W., Tang A., Shen J., Cui Z., et al. (2013). Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature 494 459–462. 10.1038/nature11917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ma B. L., Dwyer L. M., Gregorich E. G. (1999). Soil nitrogen amendment effects on seasonal nitrogen mineralization and nitrogen cycling in maize production. Agron. J. 91 1003–1009. 10.2134/agronj1999.9161003x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Masclaux-Daubresse C., Daniel-Vedele F., Dechorgnat J., Chardon F., Gaufichon L., Suzuki A. (2010). Nitrogen uptake, assimilation and remobilization in plants: challenges for sustainable and productive agriculture. Ann. Bot. Lond. 105 1141–1157. 10.1093/aob/mcq028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Maxwell K., Johnson G. N. (2000). Chlorophyll fluorescenceea practical guide. J. Exp. Bot. 51 659–668. 10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Meisinger J. J. (1984). “Evaluating plant-available nitrogen in soil-crop systems,” in Nitrogen in Crop Production ed. Hauck R. D. (Madison: ASA-CSSA-SSSA; ) 391–416. [Google Scholar]
  35. Miao Y., Wang Z., Li S. (2014). Relation of nitrate N accumulation in dryland soil with wheat response to N fertilizer. Field Crops Res. 170 119–130. 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.09.016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. NBS (2013). National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistics Yearbook. Available at: www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2013/indexch.htm [Google Scholar]
  37. Oxborough K., Baker N. (1997). An instrument capable of imaging chlorophyll-a fluorescence from intact leaves at very low irradiance and at cellular and subcellular levels of organization. Plant Cell Environ. 20 1473–1483. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-42.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Shangguan Z., Shao M., Dyckmans J. (2000). Nitrogen nutrition and water stress effects on leaf photosynthetic gas exchange and water use efficiency in winter wheat. Environ. Exp. Bot. 44 141–149. 10.1016/s0098-8472(00)00064-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Shewry P. R. (2007). Improving the protein content and composition of cereal grain. J. Cereal Sci. 46 239–250. 10.1016/j.jcs.2007.06.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sieling K., Kage H. (2006). N balance as an indicator of N leaching in an oilseed rape–winter wheat–winter barley rotation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 115 261–269. 10.1016/j.agee.2006.01.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sinclair T. R., Rufty T. W. (2012). Nitrogen and water resources commonly limit crop yield increases, not necessarily plant genetics. Glob. Food Secur. 1 94–98. 10.1016/j.gfs.2012.07.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Thorburn P. J., Biggs J. S., Weier K. L., Keating B. A. (2003). Nitrate in groundwaters of intensive agricultural areas in coastal Northeastern Australia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 94 49–58. 10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00018-X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Triboi E., Abad A., Michelena A., Lloveras J., Ollier J. L., Daniel C. (2000). Environmental effects on the quality of two wheat genotypes: 1. quantitative and qualitative variation of storage proteins. Eur. J. Agron. 13 47–64. 10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00059-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Turner A. S., Bradburne R. P., Fish L., Snape J. W. (2004). New quantitative trait loci influencing grain texture and protein content in bread wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 40 51–60. 10.1016/j.jcs.2004.03.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Valkama E., Salo T., Esala M., Turtola E. (2013). Nitrogen balances and yields of spring cereals as affected by nitrogen fertilization in northern conditions: a meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 164 1–13. 10.1016/j.agee.2012.09.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Vitousek P. M., Naylor R., Crews T., David M. B., Drinkwater L. E., Holland E., et al. (2009). Nutrient Imbalances in Agricultural Development. Science 324 1519–1520. 10.1126/science.1170261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang X., Shi Y., Guo Z., Zhang Y., Yu Z. (2015). Water use and soil nitrate nitrogen changes under supplemental irrigation with nitrogen application rate in wheat field. Field Crops Res. 183 117–125. 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang Y., Yu Z., Li S., Yu S. (2002). Effect of N itrogen nutrition on the change of key enzyme activity during the nitrogen metabolism and kernel protein content in winter wheat. Acta Agron. Sin. 28 743–748. [Google Scholar]
  49. Yang X., Lu Y., Ding Y., Yin X., Sajjad R. (2017). Optimising nitrogen fertilisation: a key to improving nitrogen-use efficiency and minimising nitrate leaching losses in an intensive wheat/maize rotation (2008–2014). Field Crops Res. 206 1–10. 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.02.016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang F., Chen X., Vitousek P. (2013). An experiment for the world. Nature 497 33–35. 10.1038/497033a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang M., Ma D., Ma G., Wang C., Xie X., Kang G. (2017). Responses of glutamine synthetase activity and gene expression to nitrogen levels in winter wheat cultivars with different grain protein content. J. Cereal Sci. 74 187–193. 10.1016/j.jcs.2017.01.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang Y., Dai X., Jia D., Li H., Wang Y., Li C., et al. (2016). Effects of plant density on grain yield, protein size distribution, and breadmaking quality of winter wheat grown under two nitrogen fertilisation rates. Eur. J. Agron. 73 1–10. 10.1016/j.eja.2015.11.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FIGURE S1

Annual precipitation by month (October to May) during the wheat growing seasons at the Wenxian (a), Zhengzhou (b), and Kaifeng (c) planting sites. The years shown indicate wheat that was harvested that year but was sown the preceding year; for example “2011” represents winter wheat sown in 2010 and harvested in 2011.

Click here for additional data file. (228.8KB, TIF)
TABLE S1

Various physical and chemical properties of the field experiment in 0–20 cm soil in Wenxian, Zhengzhou and Kaifeng.

Click here for additional data file. (13.2KB, DOCX)

Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES