Skip to main content
Cardiovascular Diabetology logoLink to Cardiovascular Diabetology
. 2019 Mar 1;18:23. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0825-1

Correction to: GLP-1RAs in type 2 diabetes: mechanisms that underlie cardiovascular effects and overview of cardiovascular outcome data

Andrei C Sposito 1,, Otávio Berwanger 2, Luiz Sérgio F de Carvalho 1, José Francisco Kerr Saraiva 3
PMCID: PMC6396451  PMID: 30823882

Correction to: Cardiovascular Diabetology (2018) 17:157 10.1186/s12933-018-0800-2

Following publication of the original article [1], based on the authors review, the GLP1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes published in Cardiovascular Diabetology, a meta-analysis of GLP-1 and non-GLP-1 based therapies was performed on cardiovascular outcomes. Unfortunately, as the authors later realized, there was an error in the equation used to calculate the relative risks. Instead of subtracting the number of events from the total number of patients in the sample, these values were added which generated a similar increase in all studies. They reframed the analyzes and found small differences, which were relatively proportional to each study. There was no change in the significance of the analyzes; i.e. all data that were initially statistically significant remained significant and vice versa. The changes have been corrected in the new figures (Figs. 1, 2, Additional file 1) presented below. There was no compromise of any of the conclusions of the text and, therefore, no change was made in the manuscript.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Forest plots showing the effects of GLP-1- and non-GLP-1-based therapies on a therapies on a MACE, b non-fatal MI

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Forest plots showing the effects of GLP-1- and non-GLP-1-based therapies on cardiovascular death

Additional files

12933_2019_825_MOESM1_ESM.docx (236.1KB, docx)

Additional file 1: Table S1. Risk of Bias of Individual Randomized Controlled Trials. Table S2. Egger Bias Analysis. Table S3. Differences in p-values for all trials combined according to the choice of fixed or random methods. Figure S1. Funnel plots for myocardial infarction. Figure S2. Funnel plots for MACE. Figure S3. Funnel plots for Death due to heart failure. Figure S4. Funnel plots for CV death. Figure S5. Funnel plots for All-cause death.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Andrei C. Sposito, Phone: 55 19 3521 7098, Email: andreisposito@gmail.com

Otávio Berwanger, Email: otavioberwanger@gmail.com.

Luiz Sérgio F. de Carvalho, Phone: 55 19 3521 7098, Email: luizsergiofc@gmail.com

José Francisco Kerr Saraiva, Email: jfsaraiva@uol.com.br.

Reference

  • 1.Sposito AC, Berwanger O, de Carvalho LSF, Saraiva JFK. GLP-1RAs in type 2 diabetes: mechanisms that underlie cardiovascular effects and overview of cardiovascular outcome data. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17:157. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0800-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12933_2019_825_MOESM1_ESM.docx (236.1KB, docx)

Additional file 1: Table S1. Risk of Bias of Individual Randomized Controlled Trials. Table S2. Egger Bias Analysis. Table S3. Differences in p-values for all trials combined according to the choice of fixed or random methods. Figure S1. Funnel plots for myocardial infarction. Figure S2. Funnel plots for MACE. Figure S3. Funnel plots for Death due to heart failure. Figure S4. Funnel plots for CV death. Figure S5. Funnel plots for All-cause death.


Articles from Cardiovascular Diabetology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES