Skip to main content
European Journal of Ageing logoLink to European Journal of Ageing
. 2018 May 26;16(1):25–37. doi: 10.1007/s10433-018-0477-0

Remote home physical training for seniors: guidelines from the AAL-supported MOTION project

Giovanni Ottoboni 1,, Teresa Gallelli 2, Elena Mariani 1, Valentina Rebecca Soluri 2, Stefano Nunziata 2, Alessia Tessari 2, Jean-Pierre Savary 3, Rabih Chattat 1
PMCID: PMC6397112  PMID: 30886558

Abstract

European population will face an unprecedented aging era in the next years. Albeit aging in itself is a success goal, it may bring with it a general decline and functional limitations. In order to decelerate such decline, one of the most efficient strategies is physical activity. The present paper reports the insight emerging from three focus-group interviews organized at the beginning of the MOTION—Remote Home Physical Training for Seniors project, whose main aim regarded the implementation of an ICT system capable of offering home-based gym sessions to healthy seniors. The sixteen interview participants (11 females and 5 males, averaged age 72.3) provided several indications, which were grouped into the following themes: (1) ICT technical characteristics; (2) Platform accessibility; (3) Physical program features; (4) Psychological factors. At the end of the thematic analysis, results suggest that theoretical frameworks mainly focusing on ICT issues might be insufficient to endorse the successful development and maintenance of ICT systems such as MOTION, which challenges seniors to accept ICT while staying committed to the physical exercise program .

Keywords: Older people, Remote physical training, Coaching, Socialization, ICT

Introduction

Aging-related issues

Europe is aging: The age profile of the EU will change dramatically in the coming decades. Unfortunately, such increase will affect any health care system (European-Social-Network 2008) because, apart from the physical issues, aging highly correlates with debilitating mental conditions (Galeotti et al. 2013). Due to the nature of cognitive impairment and dementia, in particular, it has been calculated that the age-related public expenditures would increase by 4.1 percentage points of gross domestic product by 2060 (European Commission 2015; Rechel et al. 2013; Zsarnoczky 2016). However, no drug has yet been identified as capable of modulating the curve of cognitive decline. The only actions to deploy in order to contrast such conditions are psychosocial interventions. In fact, much recent evidence suggests that the earlier psychosocial interventions are implemented, the higher are the chances to stabilize as much as possible both cognitive functions and quality of life (e.g., Barnett et al. 2014; Vernooij-Dassen et al. 2010). Recently, the evidence suggesting the positive effect of cognitive, affective and social treatments has been enriched by further, independent, reports which addressed physical exercises as capable of exerting positive cognitive and psychological effects, on the top of physiological ones (Alkhatib 2016; Snigdha and Prieto 2017; Sofi et al. 2011).

However, access to gyms or the possibility to practice physical activities may be difficult if one lives in rural and semi-rural areas (Abbaspour et al. 2017; Coburn et al. 2007; Perkins and Moran 2010), or if one is subjected to limited availability of income (Smith et al. 2014), or refrained by cultural barriers (Clark 1995; Smith 2017). Seniors can be reluctant to enter the changing rooms, as they would like not to share intimacy with people they know too little, especially when they suffer from embarrassing, even when not invalidating, physical problems. Moreover, the frequent occurrence of fears, negative beliefs or overprotection from people who take care of them can lead seniors to refrain even more than what the former would expect (Dergance et al. 2003). Further aggravating such scenario, it is a fact that people aged 65 are usually more numerous than the working age population (Eurostat European-Commission, 2013) who, ultimately, often cannot support seniors in reaching the gyms (Bertolini et al. 2008).

ICT-based supports for successful aging

In all these cases, information and communication technologies (ICT) might represent a suitable solution (Chen and Schulz 2016). Indeed, as Blaz̃un et al. (2012) showed, the development of basic ICT skills—like browsing the Internet, using e-mails, word processors, chat rooms and forums—directly increases socialization and self-confidence, but also increases the amount of physical activities people perform. On the other hand, ICT might also offer people unable to access gym facilities a set of opportunities to live comparable experiences. ICT projects using web-based apps (Cotten et al. 2013), telephone debriefing interventions (Cattan et al. 2011) or mobile visual pet companion (Machesney et al. 2014) can increase contacts, social interactions and quality of life among the senior population. In their review, Chen and Schulz (2016) analyzed the case of Nintendo Wii, a technology used to have elderly playing. Nevertheless, the results Kahlbaugh et al. (2011) reported regard improvements in mood levels, less experienced loneliness, but no modulation either in life satisfaction or in physical activity. Further, independent evidence tends to suggest that once ICT solutions are used to invite people, each staying at their own houses, to play ball game together (Mueller and Agamanolis 2005) or to follow a instruction of a virtual gaming agent (Vaziri et al. 2016), the effects on the amount of performed activity increase, as well as on what concerned their quality of life (see also Gordt et al. 2018). Moreover, ICT solutions increase the quality of life of frail seniors by supporting people to stay at their own homes as much as possible (Keränen et al. 2017; Meiland et al. 2007; Nugent 2007).

Rationale

The present paper presents some of the results that were yielded during the running of the ALL-supported1 project called MOTION—Remote Home Physical Training for Seniors.2 The project was a result-oriented research, that is, a project whose results are supposed to reach the market in 2–3 years. Such a line of research was featured by a double funding-based system, i.e., research was funded by the National Funding Agency of each partner who takes part in the consortium and jointly was complemented by the European Commission. Specifically, the MOTION project aimed at providing the services that can be found in a professional gym , i.e., to do physical exercise while supervised by professional trainers, within the walls of the users’ own homes instead. At the end, the results that would emerge from the study are expected to exert a twofold effect: On the one side, they will increase the practical knowledge about the aspects related to implement future ICT platforms delivering gym sessions for seniors; on the other side, they should help to identify the most adapt theoretical background to describe seniors’ acceptance of ICT platforms delivering physical programs coached remotely.

Practical side

The present paper reports the insights that emerged during three focus-group interviews organized in Italy at the beginning of the project. The interviews were aimed at identifying features, facilitators and negative factors that could affect the usability of the MOTION platform (Dal Bello-Haas et al. 2014). After the data collection, the results of the interviews were shared with the MOTION technological partners for the platform design and further development. In any ICT project devoted to support end-users in some life aspects (Hartswood et al. 2002), their co-involvement is fundamental as they foster the project development by bringing into discussion naïve insights, realistic problems and real-life experiences (Lindsay et al. 2012)

Theoretical side

According to one of the most influential model accounting for technology acceptance, i.e., Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis 1989; Holden and Karsh 2010; Venkatesh et al. 2003), people acceptance of any ICT systems is mostly modulated by perceived usefulness and perceived ease at use of the system. However, in this project, ICT is a mean to support seniors to keep doing physical exercises. Consequently, by incorporating two challenges at the same time, i.e., that seniors accept an ICT platform (1) and that they stay committed to the program of exercises delivered and guided by trainers who are not close at hand (2), other, more general, theoretical frameworks, as the Theory of Planned Behaviour (Ajzen 1985), might explain better the interviews’ results.

Ethical clearance

The interviews were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Participants were all informed about the aims of the project and provided with all the time they needed to raise any doubts. Afterward, they signed the consent form. The personal details that were gathered were treated following the indication of Italian Law for Data Protection (D.Lgs 196/03).

Methods

The focus-group interviews that were organized aimed at stimulating the most diversified possible type of users of the MOTION system to share their opinions and thoughts about how a remote home physical training for seniors might be, in order to effectively work. Indeed, as many authors pointed out (Hartswood et al. 2002; Kristoffersson et al. 2016; Lindsay et al. 2012; Llorens et al. 2014), end-user support must surely be considered at the beginning of any project, but also later, when the project is running (Barsocchi et al. 2016). During the focus groups, the interview moderators explored all the instances that emerged along the interviews, until data saturation was reached (Glaser and Strauss 2009), that is, until “no new or relevant data seem to emerge regarding a category”. (Strauss and Corbin 1990, p. 188). In particular, each interview started with the moderators contextualizing the topics of the discussion by presenting a summary of the main goal the project MOTION was designed to achieve (i.e., physical activity for seniors delivered distantly). Then, they drove the participants’ attention toward the fundamental impact that end-users involvement has on the project development. Participants were then requested to talk freely about any attitude or experience they had with technological devices and means they were used to use; later, participants were urged to talk about their attitude or experience with physical exercises and gyms, and then about the combination of the two aspects. Every time a group went silent, the interview moderators asked participants if nothing could be added to the discussion concerning the just-debated point; if not, they were prompted to think and talk about a further aspect to consider.

Participants

The focus groups were advertised publicly through wall posters displayed on the external facilities of the project partners and inviting the interested public. Age limits—indicatively to be around 65 years old—were indicated just for seniors, while no limits were set for the professionals. No other limits were expressed but the following inclusion criteria. Once people expressed the intention to participate, they were sorted in two groups. One focus-group was composed of participants selected because they admitted having no familiarity with the Internet. Another group was composed of people that were familiar with the Internet. The last group was composed of either Internet, healthcare or gym-related professionals. The majority of participants were over 65, retired from work and female. Among them was a Director working for the Local Health Authority, an Internet service developer, a yoga teacher and two psychologists who were experts in the care of older people (for more details, see Table 1). Due to the fact that no senior with cognitive impairment showed up, cognitive screening resulted unnecessary.

Table 1.

Focus-group interviews participants’ characteristics

Gender Female Male
Number 11 5
Age 62.6±17.4 82.0±13.0
Participants marital status
 Married/in a relationship 9 3
 Divorced
 Widowed 1 2
 Unmarried 1
Group composition
 Participants familiar with the Internet 6 1
 Participants non-familiar with the Internet 1 3
 Expert participants 4 1

Age is expressed as a function of mean and standard deviation

Data collection

Each focus-group interview was governed by experienced moderators. In particular, the focus-group interviews that assessed expert and naïve Internet users were conducted by the same moderator. All the interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim.

Data analysis

Each focus-group interview was coded by using conventional content analysis, its main feature regards the way coding categories are derived (e.g., Hsieh and Shannon 2005; Mariani et al. 2016). Differently from other forms of content analysis, the codes emerge directly from the text data. In the present context, the direct approach was assumed not to be the one of choice, as the initial assumption was that investigating the usability of an ICT system, capable of connecting seniors and coaches in order to exercise together, could involve supplementary theoretical modules in addition to the ones used to describe mere technological acceptance (Venkatesh and Davis 1996).

Pragmatically, the first step into the process of analysis regards the interview transcripts that were read carefully. The meaning units seeming to capture relevant factors were identified and labeled with appropriate codes. GO and ER identified independently the units; thus, they discussed the codes until they reached a consensus: when no consensus was reached, RC, AT and TG were involved in the discussion. No further inter-rater checks were used. On the base of the relations among codes, GO and EM sorted the identified codes into categories; the latter were then organized and grouped into the main themes reported in Table 2.

Table 2.

The table reports the main themes, categories and codes emerged from the analysis of the three focus-group interviews

Themes Categories Codes
ICT Technical characteristics ICT components Types of platform
Platform features
Communication devices (interactions)
Health-related components Physical parameters devices
GP involvements
Setting components Setup exercise room
Sessions’ timing and scheduling
Platform accessibility User attitudes ICT attitudes
Physical activities attitudes
Service charges
ICT-related assistance Initial setup
External support concerning technology
Simple instructions
Intergroup support
Physical program features Trainers features Trainers professional expertise
Psychological and communicative characters of the trainers
Trainers physical aspect
Training program characteristics Goals of the exercises
Technical equipments (mat, balls, dumbbells)
Users’ groups
Psychological factors Intrinsic motivational aspects Loneliness
Commitment
Motivation
Extrinsic social aspects Socialization
Secondary ICT uses
Self-esteem

In the following paragraphs, the MOTION remote home physical training for senior is indicated with the term the platform, while the exercise program is indicated with the term the program.

Results

Theme: ICT technical characteristics

The theme labelled ICT Technical characteristics is a theme that comprehends all the requests addressed by the focus-groups participants concerning the platform technology. The theme can be sorted into three distinctive categories: ICT components, Heath-related components, Setting components.

ICT components

The first issue that arose among the participants in the interviews was related to the screen. They immediately expressed the need for the screen to be wide enough to include the image of people doing exercises. The ideal dimensions for the participants’ screens were identified to be the ones of a family TV ( 21–24"): Within the screen, the image of the participant her/himself and the images of the trainers must be included.

While the dimension problem was easy to spot, the nature of the screens was a bit controversial. Seniors described people of their age as more confident with a television-like device than thinking about an extension of a computer. They were aware of the difference between TVs and computers, as well as of the fact that computers are going be very popular in everyone’s house; but since the system was to be built for seniors, they suggested that seniors may preferably use devices resembling pieces of technology they have already used.

Participant non-familiar with the Internet said: We all have a TV, so why not to plug a computer- or something smaller than that- into the TV screen: problem solved! [...] The TV is a passive device; the computer enters our homes even if you do not know how to use it. In a few years it will become something to get familiar with. Computers can serve other purposes that we could never have imagined when they arrived at our home.

Coherently with the old-fashioned suggestion, they also suggested that, in order to be capable of interacting with the platform, a sort of remote control may be provided. The remote control devices, but also the entire platform, were asked to be provided with few, bright and colorful buttons to press. Such easily detectable choices were envisioned to decrease any discomfort that might be generated by the platform use, since seniors tend to be aware that their perceptual system is deteriorating with time.

As for the trainers’ screen, instead, participants immediately agreed that those screens must be the widest (40"). Indeed, trainers must be capable of watching and keeping control of many participants moving at the same time, together with a picture of themselves moving too. In fact, it was suggested that trainers must see each person entirely while s/he is moving; however, it might be very useful if they were provided with the possibility to zoom in and focus on some parts of the figure so they can detect if some movements have been performed wrongly, and prevent accidents.

Participant familiar with the Internet said: First of all, the trainers should be put in the condition to see the entire person doing the exercises; later, in case they need to do so, they might have the chance to zoom in on the image and see more in detail how the movements are executed.

Later the zooming facility was envisioned as useful also for the users, as they might need to see in detail how trainers are executing a movement and better copy them. While thinking about watching the movement straight after its execution, participants envisioned a sort of repository where to store the images. By accessing such storage, participants and trainers might retrieve videos of past sessions. The request was advanced by participants to see themselves after the session in order to improve the execution of the actions. In this light, they also suggested that the possibility to see others’ actions might improve the performance, since each participants might understand better what to avoid/how to execute a correct movement. Coherently with these video features, they advanced the option of implementing a slow motion facility to see each movement in detail.

Participant familiar with the Internet said: Another aspect that could be useful is to have a facility that allows trainers to say “hang on a second, I need to see again which movements were wrong”.

Aside from the features about the visual information conveyed by the platform, participants highlighted that a proper headset, composed of headphones and microphone, was to be preferred by speakers.

Participant familiar with the Internet said: What about a headset? It would serve to improve communication between users and trainers and among users, they can say something like: “I can not see the exercise; how should I do it? and so on”.

Heath-related components

Independently of the nature of the screen, participants suggested to leave some spare space at the bottom of the screen to display physiological feedback indexes (e.g., heart rate or blood pressure) that ad-hoc studied bracelets should record during the exercises. In this light, the use of bracelets or portable devices capable of measuring the changing of seniors’ physical state was considered controversial. The device was assumed to be important as a measure of improvements in physical shape, and as a safety measure: Once the level of heart rate, for example, would exceed the safety limits indicated by users’ general practitioners (GPs), trainers should make an emergency call. On the other hand, bracelets were said to refrain people from getting interested, as they may impede movements. Connected to the discourses about the physical states and measurements, the importance to create a connection between trainers and GPs was felt as fundamental. Again, frailty of elderly people was reported as a main issue and the possibility to be in control of what is happening, alerting the doctor or paramedics if something is not going well, was reported as crucial since trainers are not in the same room as the users.

Participant non-familiar with the Internet said: By taking into account what the GP has indicated, the trainer makes you do certain- specific- exercises.

Setting components

One of the aspects that captured the attention of the participants in the interview was the setup of the exercise room. The space around the spot where people would exercise must be large enough to permit their movements. However, in order to do so, another important issue has to be solved: where to put the platform. Moreover, this aspect was envisioned as closely related to the type of platform that would be used. The majority of our participants suggested that the device must be small and easy to move, as seniors are used to living in small places; other participants suggested that the platform might be hanged on the wall or behind a door. Again, whatever the platform, in any case it must be composed of easy parts: concerns for difficulties to carry or move the platform around the house were expressed for people their age.

Participant non-familiar with the Internet said: The platform must be movable: it must be moved around the house, to find the best place to exercise.

Music too emerged as an issue that interested participants: They highlighted the need to use only instrumental music. Moreover, the music must be respectful of the exercise effort so that high bpm (beat-per-minute) music accompanies high exercise rhythm and low bpm music is used for relaxing and cooling-down moments.

Another setting issue involved the idea to receive a signal that warns users that the session is about to start. It was suggested that, preferably, the signal should be a telephone call made by trainers, but also a text message sent to the users’ mobile was suggested to be good enough. Interviews’ participants reported that such a call serves to develop the psychological relationship, especially at the very beginning of the program.

Expert participant said: From my working experience, seniors are usually very happy to receive a call from a person trained to speak with them, to remind (in my case) to take their pills.

The warning call opens the discussion about the program scheduling. Seniors are very busy people. They have many duties to accomplish: to take care of grandchildren, to go to the cinema, to go shopping and prepare lunch and dinner. However, they quite easily converged upon the indication that the best time to exercise is in the morning.

Participant familiar with the Internet said: Once awake, it takes time for an old person to wake up completely and to get ready to exercise. Thus, the training must be done between 9.00 am and 11.00 am or between 10.00 am and 11.00 am. This way, people can go shopping, prepare for the session, but prepare lunch too [...]. The morning is a very good moment: usually, in the afternoon, our body sends some backdown signals.

Theme: platform accessibility

The theme Platform accessibility includes the issues that could emerge after the development of the platform, once that it reaches the user’s premises doorstep. The theme consists of two categories, namely User attitude and ICT-related assistance.

User attitudes

Participants described Italian seniors as people used to being involved in many social activities. However, according to them, just very few are the ones that are interested in learning new technological competences and attending specific courses, for example.

Participant non-familiar with the Internet: The truth is that Italy is full of older people that meet other people to play cards, going to the theater, or other similar activities; they do not want to spend time in learning new [ICT] activities.

At the same time, participants admitted that, in the very last years, seniors were obliged to become used to technology: One way or another, they learned how to use some devices, primarily the mobile phones. In fact, seniors were described as used to using them only to accomplish simple tasks, such as sending short text messages and receiving calls. Regardless of such admissions, they assumed that seniors may be worried to face new—and maybe more complicated—instruments.

Participant non-familiar with the Internet: I am not prepared for technology: I have a mobile, where I can receive calls, text messages, everything. I can also call. I am an older person, what do I have to do with the remote training platform? I can use the TV, if there is some disk or tape, I can use those.

Seniors negative attitudes might not only involve ICT aspects. Seniors might tend to be somewhat lazy to do physical exercises. And this is particularly real when physical exercises are something that seniors have never done in their life. Participants recommended the education of seniors as a very important factor. According to them, seniors need to change their point of view and realize how physical exercise is fruitful to improve their quality of life.

Participant non-familiar with the Internet said: You need to inform and educate older people. By education, I mean that you have to convince them that exercises are necessary. We are a bit lazy, especially people who are sedentary or who could not do what healthy [senior] people can usually do.

The last issue that participants rose was related to the program payment. The point was stressed while talking about the commitment one must dedicate to the program. Gym lessons are usually paid in advance; here the platform should work in the same manner; however, the fee might also be provided by the National Health System, or by hospitals for prevention or rehabilitation, or by insurance companies.

ICT-related assistance

The worry about a new device was not reported as insurmountable. Participants suggested that through an adequate assistance, any senior could face such novelty. They reported, for example, that when their adult children give them some new technological gifts, they require them to provide assistance; when children would not, they tend to loose interest in the device.

Participant non-familiar with the Internet said: At the very beginning of the training program, users’ children or external professionals might be involved to support seniors to familiarize with the platform.

Moreover, the technology-related worry was suggested to be reducible even more, if easy instructions are provided.

Participant non-familiar with the Internet said: If you use the computer, you have to turn it on, you have to ask your children to tell you how to do so. You need to have three or four key-actions to learn, not much more.

In fact, once the program begins, users might support one another. The group will surely work to self-support all of its members.

Theme: physical program features

The theme Physical program features aggregates all the components featured in the entire programs, not just the ICT part. The theme includes two categories: Trainers features, Training program characteristics.

Trainers’ features

According to interviews participants’ trainers should already have experience working with older people. Trainers should be used to listening and paying attention to older people’s requests. They should know which is the most proper modality of communicating, the warmest one.

Participant familiar with the Internet said: The most important aspect is the relationship that would be created between users and trainers. I know that today I am going to have a session with my trainer, s/he is all for me: I have to prepare myself, comb my hair, wear a clean gym suit, put some make-up on, and so on. Even if I’d rather not, I will make the effort [...] Trainers must speak Italian while understanding us using dialectal jargon.

One way to boost the creation of good and profitable relationships between users and trainers would be the scheduling of trainers’ visits to users’ premises. The fact that the gym sessions occur via remote connection rose the issue of how important is physical contact for seniors. Participants were indeed afraid that the lack of it may affect negatively the entire program: To avoid negative consequences, as drop-offs for example, participants suggested that a strong relationship should be sought from the beginning of the program. If a qualitatively good start is implemented, any difficulty emerging afterward would be faced more easily.

Participant familiar with the Internet said: Before the beginning of the course, the trainer should visit all participants at their premises. This way, they can establish a dialogue, a discourse, they can get to know each other.

Trainers experience must also be reflected through asking people to do the right exercises. Indeed, particular attention must be paid to what users would say about their physical status and about the information conveyed by the measuring devices (e.g., bracelets): On the basis of such information, trainers must be experienced enough to modulate the exercise program.

Participant non-familiar with the Internet said: Trainers should know how to motivate older people, to adapt the exercise to the people’s needs: our body is fragile, we cannot crack open our legs.

Even the physical aspect was identified as crucial: Trainers should not be too fit, in order to permit participants to identify with them.

Expert participant said: The trainer we have is very appreciated by the users, he is very handsome, fit but not too much, and, most importantly, he speaks very gently and warmly even when he has to correct the execution of some exercise: seniors love him.

Training program characteristics

Any signal users should provide about their heath status must be used to adapt the training program.

Participant non-familiar with the Internet said: It is not easy when one wakes up with pains: not all days are the same.

Reciprocally, trainers must constantly talk to seniors about the reached levels of fitness, about what they are going to do next, and the reason why.

Participant familiar with the Internet said: It is necessary that trainers constantly tell users what they are going to do next, why, and what are the expected outcomes.

Trainers must be prepared that exercises are not performed in a gym. If, on the one hand, they might bring tools as mats, balls and dumbbells to users’ home during one of the visits, on the other hand they might implement bodyweight exercises, that is, without specific tools, or they might be prepared to ask people to use pieces of furniture to help seniors doing the exercise. They could ask seniors, for example, to grab the chair and stand on one foot; otherwise, they may ask people to seat on the chair and extend one leg per time.

Participant familiar with the Internet said: I cannot think about any equipment to use for this exercise. I can do low level exercises as raising my arms, crossing them, sitting, standing, and so on. People with difficulties in orientation can hardly perform such simple actions.

Moreover, another aspect arose during the interviews. It concerned the number of people that might compose each gym group and the possibility to swap from a group to another to meet other people or to exercise more. The issues was controversial, as not everyone agreed. Some participants envisioned the chance to enlarge the number of friends; some others claimed that the relation among users might benefit from small and stable groups.

Expert user said: Groups tend to generate habits: you can change the groups, it might stimulate the components, but you must take into account how to coordinate the swaps. The idea might be useful to improve socialization even further, but habit is synonymous of stability.

Theme: psychological factors

The theme Psychological factors comprehends all the psychological issues that might influence how each user decided to adopt the platform. Two categories emerged, namely Intrinsic motivational aspects and Extrinsic social aspects.

Intrinsic motivational aspects

Participants revealed that seniors are very used to live alone. The platform—and the entire program firstly—was envisioned as a very good tool to contrast such negative psychological condition. Seniors would be supported doubly: First they would be supported and guided to acquire (or refine) technical skills; later, they would be supported and taken care of by the trainers all the way through the program.

Participant used to the Internet said: My isolation must not become chronic and insurmountable: if I could get involved with other people in projects like this, I would feel more prone to do the suggested activity. Loneliness is the most important problem for older people, especially when the person is affected by an invalidating disease.[...] Recently, I met my new fiancée in a group chat.

Regarding the issue of support, users’ families were described to support seniors in dealing with ICT devices just during the approaching phase. The support a son or a daughter can provide was indicated as important only during the first approach to the new activity, while keeping the seniors’ family informed about the progress of the system was not mentioned.

Participant non-familiar with the Internet said: At the very beginning of the training program, users’ children or external professionals might be involved to support seniors in familiarizing with the system.

Physical exercises require a strong commitment to reach valuable results. Such issue was highlighted by participants as an important one to face. It was related to seniors’ attitude, but also to the fact that seniors, indisputably, tend to avoid unnecessary pain.

Participant non-familiar with the Internet said: Persons must be appropriately supported: the person knows that it [the program] requires commitment, because from a psychological point of view, life is at its end; children are distant, we get bored and depressed easily if we have nothing to do—even walking the dog. However, being committed to something, for instance, each Monday, Tuesday, or let’s say Thursday, means to organize ourselves, prepare ourselves for the meeting- comb our hair, taking a shower, putting some make-up on.

In line with the commitment issues, motivation proved to be fundamental to avoid seniors getting bored or losing interest in the exercise program.

Participant familiar with the Internet said: It is necessary that trainers constantly tell users what they are going to do next, why, and what are the expected outcomes.

Another aspect that emerged as important arose from the assumption that seniors are frail people. In this light, participants suggested they might need many attentions and much support.

Participant non-familiar with the Internet said: More than a training program, seniors need kindness and caresses- both physical and psychological.

Extrinsic social aspects

Socialization was seen as a powerful incentive to carry on exercises, given the initial technological support and personal involvement. In order to foster the fulfillment of such need, the possibility to leave participants free to communicate with each other at the beginning and at the end of the gym sessions, or even when the session is terminated, was very important. By using a web-cam and headsets, users can socialize and build friendly relationships that might be further explored outside the virtual environment provided by the platform.

Expert participant said: With time, by exercising together, gym users usually make friends. Once the number of persons using the platform rises, more chances to know new people will be available.

Technology is also seen as providing the chance to bring secondary benefits. One of them is the possibility to use the communication system of the project to communicate with parents and relatives, grandchildren in particular.

Participant familiar with the Internet said: Once I get better, I will use this [computer] to communicate with my grandchildren.

While developing the remote physical training system, it would be necessary to take into account that the system should be used to support the person in avoiding personal fall-down, getting grumpy, and loosing interest in personal activities, as personal hygiene.

Participant non-familiar with the Internet said: I believe that a person suffering from problems that prevent her/him to go outside, would use a cyclette (i.e., exercise bike) for a very short period: if personal trainers are provided to support and drive the person in exercising, using appropriate rewards, that would drive the person to perform the exercise.

Discussion

The present study increases the body of research aimed at understanding how to support seniors to do physical exercise. In particular, by focusing on ICT remotely delivered exercise program, the study represents the preliminary example of guidelines for further development.

Practical implications

The main aspect that emerges from the data analysis is that seniors did not seem to be reluctant to test themselves on new activities. They were aware of the technology boom, and of the fact that sooner or later, technological devices will be part and parcel of everybody’s life. At the same time, however, they figured that the effort to use technology must be counterbalanced by some support work. Older people’s attitude toward technology is sometimes negative (Timmermann 1998). Even if such attitude is mainly related to the poor performance seniors realize to achieve at their first attempts (Hawthorn 2007; Sayago et al. 2011; Turner et al. 2007), the seniors we interviewed described people of their age as not very prone to learn new skills. In fact, in order to bypass such worry, they suggested to implement a system resembling or embedding some features seniors already know. One of the solution they envisioned relates to plugging a computer into the old TV systems; another involves the use of a remote control to manage the system’s features. When taking into account what was requested by the focus-group interviews participants, it is necessary to consider that none of them was a digital-native. Their age, indeed, suggests to classify them as digital-immigrants (Bennett et al. 2008; Prensky 2001). As predictable to occur to such a type of immigrant people, our participants envision clearly the need of a real (read: physical) support at the beginning of such a new ICT experience. Congruently, moreover, they requested to have someone to whom they can physically rely on. However, even within such immigrant label there are differences: Today seniors define a quite heterogeneous group (Amaro and Gil 2011). Indeed, in some cases seniors got used to technological devices during their life, but such devices were just electronic, meaning that they were just programmed to very specific actions. These seniors may have been either housewives used to knead bread, oven cooking, dishwashers or washing machines, or blue collars who were used to utilize, to start, or to control automatic machines. On the contrary, there is a minority of seniors who worked in administrative offices and that, along the years, were obliged to develop office-related abilities according to the evolution of the office automation. Even if all these categories may have a certain predisposition to technology, it is quite likely that the latter more than the former would present themselves as very prone to face ICT computer-based devices. Atop of that, as soon as one thinks that the indications we gathered during the focus-groups interviews will be used to develop future ICT systems, one must evaluate that seniors of tomorrow will not be the same as those of today. In the last 20 years, the relationship with technology has changed drastically (Bennett et al. 2008; Helsper and Eynon 2010; Prensky 2009): It has changed because, nowadays, the devices are providing users with a level of freedom that would have never been reached by electronic devices. However, as Arthur and Polak (2004) addressed, any piece of technology is not build from scratch: it is the combination of older pieces, assembled to respond to up-to-then not fulfilled human needs. In this way, the capability of end users to be in control of any new piece of technology that enters the market may put pressure on the users, especially if they belong to the “seniors” group. However, programs like MOTION, i.e., programs that aimed to have seniors exercise with a remote supervision, are not merely composed of technological components. One of the most important aspects regards the execution of gym exercises. In this light, it may be considered that, atop of the worries seniors reported to exist about having to deal with ICT systems, exercise-related worries must also be taken into account in developing such systems. As Grove and Spier (1999) pointed out, in pursuing the commitment to follow exercise programs, seniors may be afflicted by many personal and motivational conflicts. The way our interviewed participants described the support needed by senior users, target such points directly. Warm listening, calm replies, consideration of the individual state, feedbacks about the training level reached are all responses that trainers must learn to provide to seniors, using them to avoid drop-offs. It must also be pointed out that such responses gained even further importance as they must also counterbalance the ICT-related worries. In fact, in programs like MOTION drop-offs are particularly problematic: Every time one MOTION user would leave the program, the cost to install the system in another user’s site would increase the total costs. The cost/person of systems as MOTION is approximately 10% of the total cost for each installed user. However, aside from what interviews participants reported, there was another issue that only retrospectively, i.e., just once the MOTION project terminated, we realized they skipped. None of our participants mentioned that the internet band width may be problematic. Speculatively, we can assume that by being invited to discuss about a system that was presented as using an Internet connection to put in contact users and trainers, participants may have underestimated Internet bandwidth problems. The project was developed by assuming that users would have a dedicated ADSL broadband connection with a download capability of at least 4 mbps/s and an upload capability of at least 600 kbps/s. In reality, however, many MOTION users were not provided with the necessary signal to allow good communication. In Emilia-Romagna, i.e., the Italian region where the MOTION project was run, during the second semester of the project period, the averaged upload band calculated over 27101 samples was 552±.3 kbps/s (95% = 558–5% 542 kbps/s). The average download band was instead 7354±18.1 kbps/s (95% = 7632—5% 6733 kbps/s).3 In particular, the values that were recorded with the premises of MOTION users’ who reported connection problems, concerned a download bandwidth of 6554±9023 kbps/s (with the former indicating the mean value and the latter the standard deviation value) and an upload bandwidth of 845±968 kbps/s. The solution the MOTION technicians operated was the downgrade of the bandwidth necessary to transmit the video/audio information to 256 Kbps. Both trainers and users reported that the quality of images was good enough. Moreover, they reported to be happy that such action decreased the number of interrupted sessions. At the end, the ICT platform MOTION technicians developed involved screens that were, at least, larger than 23". In fact, two different platforms were developed. One solution involved a PC embedded into a touch screen, i.e., a Lenovo C50-30 58,4 cm (23 Zoll FHD LED) All-in-One Desktop-PC and an Intel-NUC 5I3RYH with wired or wireless keyboard and mouse, which needed to be connected to users’ TVs. The two solutions were developed in order to offer users the chance to pick the most appropriate solution according to their preferences and needs. For what concerned the physiological feedback used to monitor the progression of the exercises, Hearth Rate Mio Link bracelets were connected to the MOTION platforms via blue-tooth connection. Instead, for what concerned the warning call, the solution adopted and implemented was the following: When users agreed to have an exercise session, as soon as they would turn the platform on, warning messages were promptly displayed. However, if there were platform features that matched with the indications, there were few aspects that were not implemented. Within the allowed budget, the zooming was a feature that was considered not to be crucial, for example. In the same manner, the change to have a devoted button on the screen to begin a emergency call was solved by explicitly requesting trainers to make the emergency call with their mobiles as soon as they noticed that something was going wrong. For what concerns the gym program, trainers were selected on the base of their experience to work with seniors. Exercises were indicated to be selected by fitting the exercises goals with the requests of the seniors. A workshop was organized to train the trainers to communicate with seniors by paying attention to seniors’ needs, and supporting them in those negative moments when they might be not willing to participate.

Theoretical implications

The TAM is a very influential model capable of explaining people usage of technology. The model is very modular, and recently, it evolved and included the factors modulating technology acceptance in seniors (Chen and Chan 2014). However, as MOTION is a project aimed at providing the services that can be found in a professional gym—i.e., to be supervised by professional trainers—within the walls of the seniors’ own homes, it requires seniors to face two types of adaptive challenges: On the one hand, they have to deal with the ICT platform; on the other hand, they have to stay committed to the gym program. Although TAM might provide a good theoretical background for our data, on the base of the results we yielded at the end of the thematic analysis, TAM seems provide a less valid theoretical framework than TPB (Ajzen 1985). The TPB appears to work better as it is more general and can account both the components featuring the MOTION project: ICT (e.g., Holden and Karsh 2010) and physical exercises (e.g., Norman et al. 2000). Indeed, as our data suggest, ease of use may be a crucial factor, but only at the beginning of the adoption of the ICT platform, as it fades away with time (Venkatesh et al. 2003); its mention was just related to the development of the ICT platform. Such time-related decrease suggests to consider this one as a factor lighter than others in accounting for the adoption of systems as the MOTION one. Attitudes toward ICT and physical exercise are both frequently reported in our data. However, as the data suggest, the initial support of ICT experts and the continuous one provided by the trainers can both impact favorably on users’ attitude toward the MOTION program. In our data, this factor seems to be composed by what we called intrinsic motivational and extrinsic social aspects featuring our data. Moreover, the TPB indicates that being able to obtain tangible results from the behaviour is important to describe and predict the behaviour. Our participants required the system to share results with their GPs and the adoption of bracelets as conditions that can promote the adherence to the ICT gym program. In the same direction goes the fact that our participants suggested that the system should remind them that a new sessions is starting soon. In this way such a form of continuous communication generates a sense of engagements that very likely is reinforced even more by the communicative skills trainers are required to possess. However, as we admitted at the beginning of the last comment, the data we gained allow us just to speculate about the models that might better describe our data, although, we are confident that our assumptions can support researches to suggest the need to verify potentially important relationships not specified earlier. Using the same speculative logic, we might also formulate few hypotheses on the amount of effort that would be requested to the next users, when MOTION would be launched to the market. The participants who tested the prototype declared to be very happy to participate to the project and they remained so until the program reached its natural end. However, as age increases, the behaviour one plans requires functional adaptations. As the SOC model predicts (Freund and Baltes 2002), the physiological decrease of the senses might be problematic when one needs to start an ICT supported plan of physical exercises, for example. The increasing weakness could have an effect too, balanced, however, by the past exercising rate (Dishman et al. 1985; Norman et al. 2000; Oman and King 1998). In this light, the compensatory actions that seniors’ caring systems must be focused on regard the development of a plan to provide seniors with firm support and warm communicative abilities, confident patience.

Conclusion

The present paper attempted to identify the features that designers should take into account during the process of building a system aimed to do physical exercises with seniors within their houses walls. Overall, this study indicates that the technical aspects emerged as important in developing a system like MOTION. Aside from the technical issues, however, psychological ones were strongly highlighted. Their nature was twofold: On the one hand, they dealt with the support seniors need when they have to face new pieces of technology; on the other hand, they dealt with the support that must be provided during the exercise program. If one wants to speculate about the underpinning psychological issues, he might suggest that people must feel to be part of the program, to be active. In our case, people loved to know which gym level they reached, what they were going to do, but even more generally, people loved to exert control of the activity they were doing (Edvardsson et al. 2011; Sanders and Stappers 2008). The effect of MOTION did not stop once the program terminated. Independently of social meetings we organized, users crated autonomously a sort of community: They met to have some tea together, to go to the theater, they keep calling each other. However, despite the positive process of development and implementation of the MOTION platform, there is a main limit that can be used to foster further research: All our participants were seniors who did not suffer of cognitive impairments. People in those conditions have different needs and resources than healthy seniors (Long 2010), but that factor should be taken into account as soon as one wants to address his research and commercial attention toward the various level of frailty characterizing the end-of-life period (Lautenschlager et al., 2008; Laurin et al., 2001). Finally, the most important message we derived from the MOTION experience is that any program involving users must be planned and organized keeping in mind their co-involvement.

Acknowledgements

The MOTION project was carried out within the EU Active and Assisted Living Programme (AAL Project Number: AAL-2012-5-031) and thanks to the involvement of Italian Ministry of Learning, University and Research (MIUR Reference 1347E). Authors want to really thank all MOTION senior participants for their enthusiastic participation in the project. We want also thank the entire MOTION consortium without whose support and expertise the achievements we reported in the present paper would have never been possible.

Footnotes

References

  1. Abbaspour S, Farmanbar R, Najafi F, Mohamadkhani Ghiasvand A, Dehghankar L. Decisional balance and self-efficacy of physical activity among the elderly in Rasht in 2013 based on the transtheoretical model. Electr Phys. 2017;9(5):4447–4453. doi: 10.19082/4447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J, editors. Action control. SSSP Springer Series in Social Psychology. Berlin: Springer; 1985. pp. 11–39. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alkhatib A. Prescribing exercise as an alternative treatment for ageing populations of the 21st century. Obes Res Open J. 2016;3(1):e1–e2. [Google Scholar]
  4. Amaro F, Gil H (2011) ICT for elderly people: « yes, ‘they’ can!  ». In: e-CASE & e-Tech internation conference 2011, Knowledge Association of Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan, pp 3792–3803
  5. Arthur WB, Polak W. The evolution of technology within a simple computer model. Complexity. 2004;11(5):23–31. [Google Scholar]
  6. Barnett JH, Lewis L, Blackwell AD, Taylor M. Early intervention in Alzheimer’s disease: a health economic study of the effects of diagnostic timing. BMC Neurol. 2014;14(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barsocchi P, Cesta A, Coraci L, Cortellessa G, Benedictis RD, Fracasso F et al (2016) The giraffplus experience: from laboratory settings to test sites robustness (short paper). In: 2016 5th IEEE international conference on cloud networking (Cloudnet), pp 192–195. 10.1109/CloudNet.2016.15
  8. Bennett S, Maton K, Kervin L. The digital natives debate: a critical review of the evidence. Br J Educ Technol. 2008;39(5):775–786. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bertolini P, Pisano E, Sivini S, Scaramuzzi S (2008) Poverty and social exclusion in rural areas. Technical Report, European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Unit E2
  10. Blaz̃un H, Saranto K, Kokol P, Vošner J (2012) Information and communication technology as a tool for improving physical and social activity of the elderly. In: NI 2012: proceedings of the 11th international congress on nursing informatics, vol 026 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Cattan M, Kime N, Bagnall A-M. The use of telephone befriending in low level support for socially isolated older people-an evaluation. Health Soc Care Commun. 2011;19(2):198–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00967.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen K, Chan AHS. Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM) Ergonomics. 2014;57(5):635–652. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.895855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen Y, Schulz P. The effect of information communication technology interventions on reducing social isolation in the elderly: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e18. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Clark DO. Racial and educational differences in physical activity among older adults. Gerontologist. 1995;35(4):472–480. doi: 10.1093/geront/35.4.472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Coburn AF, MacKinney AC, McBride TD, Mueller KJ, Slifkin RT, Wakefield MK (2007) Choosing rural definitions: implications for health policy, vol 2, Technical Report. Rural Policy Research Institute Health Panel, Omaha, NE
  16. Cotten SR, Anderson WA, McCullough BM. Impact of internet use on loneliness and contact with others among older adults: cross-sectional analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(2):e39. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dal Bello-Haas V, O’Connell M, Morgan D, Crossley M. Lessons learned: feasibility and acceptability of a telehealth-delivered exercise intervention for rural-dwelling individuals with dementia and their caregivers. Rural Remote Health. 2014;14:2715. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–340. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dergance JM, Calmbach WL, Dhanda R, Miles TP, Hazuda HP, Mouton CP. Barriers to and benefits of leisure time physical activity in the elderly: differences across cultures. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(6):863–868. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51271.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dishman RK, Sallis JF, Orenstein DR. The determinants of physical activity and exercise. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2):158. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Edvardsson B, Tronvoll B, Gruber T. Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: a social construction approach. J Acad Mark Sci. 2011;39(2):327–339. [Google Scholar]
  22. European Commission (2015) The 2015 ageing report-economic and budgetary projections for the 28 eu member states (2013-2060). European Economy, pp 1–424. 10.2765/877631
  23. European-Social-Network (2008) Services for older people in Europe. Facts and figures about long term care services in Europe
  24. Freund AM, Baltes PB. Life-management strategies of selection, optimization and compensation: measurement by self-report and construct validity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82(4):642. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Galeotti F, Giusti A, Meduri F, Raschetti R, Scardetta P, Vanacore N. Epidemiological data on dementia: synthesis report (techreport) Italy: National Institute of Health; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  26. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gordt K, Gerhardy T, Najafi B, Schwenk M. Effects of wearable sensor-based balance and gait training on balance, gait, and functional performance in healthy and patient populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gerontology. 2018;64(1):74–89. doi: 10.1159/000481454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Grove NC, Spier BE. Motivating the well elderly to exercise. J Commun Health Nurs. 1999;16(3):179–189. doi: 10.1207/S15327655JCHN1603_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hartswood M, Procter R, Slack R, Vob A, Buscher M, Rouncefield M, Rouchy P. Co-realisation: towards a principled synthesis of ethnomethodology and participatory design. Scand J Inf Syst. 2002;14(2):9–30. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hawthorn D. Interface design and engagement with older people. Behav Inf Technolgy. 2007;26(4):333–341. [Google Scholar]
  31. Helsper EJ, Eynon R. Digital natives: where is the evidence? Br Educ Res J. 2010;36(3):503–520. [Google Scholar]
  32. Holden RJ, Karsh B-T. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inf. 2010;43(1):159–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kahlbaugh PE, Sperandio AJ, Carlson AL, Hauselt J. Effects of playing wii on well-being in the elderly: physical activity, loneliness, and mood. Act Adapt Aging. 2011;35(4):331–344. [Google Scholar]
  35. Keränen NS, Kangas M, Immonen M, Similä H, Enwald H, Korpelainen R, Jämsä T. Use of information and communication technologies among older people with and without frailty: a population-based survey. J Med Internet Res. 2017 doi: 10.2196/jmir.5507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kristoffersson A, Kiselev A, Loutfi A, Coradeschi S, Björkman P, Gustafsson K. Excite project: a review of forty-two months of robotic telepresence technology evolution. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ. 2016;25:204–221. [Google Scholar]
  37. Laurin D, Verreault R, Lindsay J, MacPherson K, Rockwood K. Physical activity and risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in elderly persons. Arch Neurol. 2001;58(3):498–504. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.3.498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lautenschlager NT, Cox KL, Flicker L, Foster JK, van Bockxmeer FM, Xiao J, et al. Effect of physical activity on cognitive function in older adults at risk for alzheimer disease: a randomized trial. Jama. 2008;300(9):1027–1037. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.9.1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lindsay S, Jackson D, Schofield G, Olivier P (2012) Engaging older people using participatory design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 1199–1208. 10.1145/2207676.2208570
  40. Llorens F, Molina R, Compañ P, Satorre R. Technological ecosystem for open education. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2014. pp. 706–715. [Google Scholar]
  41. Long JV. Palliative care for advanced alzheimer’s and dementia: guidelines and standards for evidence-based care. Berlin: Springer; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  42. Machesney D, Wexler SS, Chen T, Coppola JF (2014) Gerontechnology companion: virutal pets for dementia patients. In: IEEE long island systems, applications and technology (LISAT) conference 2014, pp 1–3. 10.1109/LISAT.2014.6845226
  43. Mariani E, Vernooij-Dassen M, Koopmans R, Engels Y, Chattat R. Shared decision-making in dementia care planning: barriers and facilitators in two european countries. Aging Ment Health. 2016;21(1):31–39. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1255715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Meiland F, Reinersmann A, Bergvall-Kareborn B, Craig D, Moelaert F, Mulvenna M et al (2007) COGKNOW: development and evaluation of an ICT-device for people with mild dementia. In: (Vol. 127) [PubMed]
  45. Mueller FF, Agamanolis S. Sports over a distance. Comput Entertain (CIE) 2005;3(3):4–4. [Google Scholar]
  46. Norman P, Conner M, Bell R. The theory of planned behaviour and exercise: evidence for the moderating role of past behaviour. Br J Health Psychol. 2000;5(3):249–261. doi: 10.1348/135910705X43741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Nugent CD. ICT in the elderly and dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2007;11(5):473–476. doi: 10.1080/13607860701643071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Oman RF, King AC. Predicting the adoption and maintenance of exercise participation using self-efficacy and previous exercise participation rates. Am J Health Promot. 1998;12(3):154–161. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-12.3.154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Perkins E, Moran J. Aging adults with intellectual disabilities. JAMA. 2010;304(1):91–92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. Horizon. 2001;9(5):1–6. [Google Scholar]
  51. Prensky M. H sapiens digital: from digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom. Innov J Online Educ. 2009;5(3):1–11. [Google Scholar]
  52. Rechel B, Grundy E, Robine J-M, Cylus J, Mackenbach JP, Knai C, McKee M. Ageing in the european union. Lancet. 2013;381(9874):1312–1322. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62087-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sanders EB-N, Stappers PJ. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design. 2008;4(1):5–18. [Google Scholar]
  54. Sayago S, Sloan D, Blat J. Everyday use of computer-mediated communication tools and its evolution over time: an ethnographical study with older people. Interact Comput. 2011;23(5):543–554. [Google Scholar]
  55. Smith IH. Revisiting the health and wellness benefits of lifetime sports to aging individuals 25 years later. J Sports Sci. 2017;5:185–188. [Google Scholar]
  56. Smith LP, Ng SW, Popkin BM. Not just couch potatoes or gym rats: alternative non-labor market time use patterns are associated with meeting physical activity guidelines among sedentary full-time employees. Soc Sci Med. 2014;1982(120):126–134. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Snigdha S, Prieto G (2017) Exercise enhances cognitive capacity in the aging brain. In: Physical Activity and the Aging Brain, Elsevier, pp 161–172
  58. Sofi F, Valecchi D, Bacci D, Abbate R, Gensini GF, Casini A, Macchi C. Physical activity and risk of cognitive decline: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Intern Med. 2011;269(1):107–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02281.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  60. Timmermann S. The role of information technology in older adult learning. New Dir Adult Contin Educ. 1998;1998(77):61–71. [Google Scholar]
  61. Turner P, Turner S, Van de Walle G. How older people account for their experiences with interactive technology. Behav Inf Technol. 2007;26(4):287–296. [Google Scholar]
  62. Vaziri DD, Aal K, Ogonowski C, Von Rekowski T, Kroll M, Marston HR, Poveda R, Gschwind YJ, Delbaere K, Wieching R, Wulf V. Exploring user experience and technology acceptance for a fall prevention system: results from a randomized clinical trial and a living lab. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2016;13(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s11556-016-0165-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decis Sci. 1996;27(3):451–481. [Google Scholar]
  64. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–478. [Google Scholar]
  65. Vernooij-Dassen M, Vasse E, Zuidema S, Cohen-Mansfield J, Moyle W. Psychosocial interventions for dementia patients in long-term care. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010;22(7):1121–1128. doi: 10.1017/S1041610210001365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Zsarnoczky M. Innovation challenges of the silver economy. VADYBA. 2016;1(28):105–109. [Google Scholar]

Articles from European Journal of Ageing are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES