Abstract
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease affecting both the upper and lower motor neurons (MNs), with no effective treatment currently available. Early pathological events in ALS include perturbations in axonal transport (AT), formation of toxic protein aggregates and Neuromuscular Junction (NMJ) disruption, which all lead to axonal degeneration and motor neuron death. Pridopidine is a small molecule that has been clinically developed for Huntington disease. Here we tested the efficacy of pridopidine for ALS using in vitro and in vivo models. Pridopidine beneficially modulates AT deficits and diminishes NMJ disruption, as well as motor neuron death in SOD1G93A MNs and in neuromuscular co-cultures. Furthermore, we demonstrate that pridopidine activates the ERK pathway and mediates its beneficial effects through the sigma-1 receptor (S1R). Strikingly, in vivo evaluation of pridopidine in SOD1G93A mice reveals a profound reduction in mutant SOD1 aggregation in the spinal cord, and attenuation of NMJ disruption, as well as subsequent muscle wasting. Taken together, we demonstrate for the first time that pridopidine improves several cellular and histological hallmark pathologies of ALS through the S1R.
Introduction
ALS is a progressive, MN disease manifested by loss of control over voluntary muscles, which leads to death between 3–5 years after diagnosis. Currently, there is no effective treatment for ALS. Familial and sporadic forms of ALS share several key cellular pathologies, including NMJ disruption1,2, defects in AT3, formation of toxic aggregates4 and loss of MNs in the spinal cord and cortex.
The most studied mutation of familial ALS is in the Cu/Zn Superoxide Dismutase-1 (SOD1) gene5. Transgenic mice expressing the mutated human SOD1 (SOD1G93A) gene exhibit pathologies similar to ALS in human patients6.
Although the mechanism underlying the disease is still not fully understood, it is thought that loss of NMJs and MNs in ALS may be related to defects in AT. AT is required for the efficient supply and clearance of cellular organelles and proteins essential to axons and NMJs, as well as for regulating vital spatiotemporal signaling events with high specificity and fidelity. Evidently, mutations in AT machinery can cause ALS and motor deficits7,8.
Pridopidine is a novel compound that has been under development for the treatment of Huntington disease (HD). Accumulating evidence has suggested that pridopidine mediates its beneficial effects through high-affinity binding to S1R at pharmacologically applicable doses9–11. Pridopidine can upregulate the BDNF pathway in neurons via a S1R-dependent mechanism, leading to increased BDNF secretion11.
S1R functions as a molecular chaperone in the mitochondria-associated ER membrane (MAM), where it obtains high potency in protein folding12,13, and it also regulates ER-mitochondria Ca2+ signaling and cell survival14. Moreover, the S1R was shown to suppress the generation of ROS15. Interestingly, tissue expression profile of S1R in the nervous system reveals that it is mostly expressed in the brainstem and in spinal MNs16,17. Indeed, deletion of S1R in mice leads to motor defects18,19, and a deletion of S1R in SOD1G93A mice, exacerbates disease progression20. Importantly, mutations in the S1R gene cause juvenile and adult forms of ALS21–23.
Here we have tested the efficacy of pridopidine in improving fundamental ALS-linked pathologies in SOD1G93A mutants.
Results
Pridopidine restores NMJ activity in a neuromuscular co-culture model of ALS
In order to study the possible beneficial effects of pridopidine on ALS pathology, we used our unique simplified motor unit system24,25, co-culturing embryonic ventral spinal cord explants (vSCE) and primary myocytes in compartmental microfluidic chambers (MFCs). This simplified platform allows precise control, monitoring and manipulation of subcellular microenvironments that may impact MN survival, function, and NMJ integrity (Fig. 1a). We demonstrated that primary myocytes within this system differentiate and form connections with MN axons, and that these connections are positive for pre- and post-synaptic markers (Fig. 1b, c). Furthermore, we also developed an image-based method sensitive enough to detect functional NMJs by analyzing the contractile behavior of innervated myocytes24 (Fig. 1d). Since NMJ disruption may be an early event in ALS patients2, we sought first to determine the effects of only diseased MNs or diseased myocytes on NMJ activity. Testing the percentage of contracting muscles in the absence of MNs demonstrated that healthy (WT) and SOD1G93A denervated myocytes hardly contract (Fig. 1e). Next, we co-cultured combinations of WT or SOD1G93A MNs with WT or SOD1G93A myocytes, and compared the number of contracting innervated-myocytes. The presence of diseased MNs results in a significant reduction in active NMJs in these co-cultures. Strikingly, SOD1G93A myocytes alone are sufficient to generate NMJ dysfunction when cultured with healthy neurons, suggesting a role for muscles in the disease’s etiology.
Next, we tested the outcome of applying pridopidine to these co-cultures. The presence of pridopidine restored NMJ activity in diseased co-cultures, and it also increased NMJ activity in WT cultures even further.
Following that, we visualized the state of NMJ health in WT and SOD1G93A co-cultures. To this end, we used SCE from a MN reporter mouse that expresses tdTomato under the ChAT promotor (ChAT::tdTomato) (Fig. 1a). By crossing these mice with SOD1G93A mice, we were able to isolate SCE from WTChAT::tdTomato and SOD1G93A/ChAT::tdTomato embryos and co-culture them with WT and SOD1G93A myocytes, respectively. Co-cultures were fixed after 7 days, and stained with α-bungarotoxin-FITC (BTX) to visualize AchRs. High-magnification images of the NMJ compartment reveal massive axon degeneration and NMJ disruption in the SOD1G93A co-cultures, whereas ~ 75% of NMJs remain intact in WT co-cultures (Fig. 1g).
Quantifying the percentage of healthy NMJs reveals a strikingly improved condition in SOD1G93A co-cultures treated with pridopidine (0.1 µM), suggesting that low dose of pridopidine in these co-cultures is sufficient to retrieve the WT phenotypes, whereas higher dosage (1 µM) may result in conflicting outcomes. Thus, our in vitro experiments suggest that pridopidine prevents NMJ disruption and restores their activity in SOD1G93A cultures.
Pridopidine impedes MN death in co-cultures of SOD1G93A
To study if pridopidine can alleviate MN death, we tracked the number of MNs within the SCE of WTChAT::tdTomato and SOD1G93A/ChAT::tdTomato in co-culture over time (Fig. 2). Explants were monitored at 7, 10, 12, 14, and 16 days of co-culture. Our observations indicate a massive neuronal death in the SOD1G93A co-cultures which began at day 10 and progressed rapidly up to ~50% loss of MNs at day 16 (Fig. 2a, b). Evidently, pridopidine (0.1 µM) markedly delays the death of MNs in the SOD1G93A co-cultures (Fig. 2c).
Noteworthy, our results indicate that the massive death of MNs in SOD1G93A begins at day 10, shortly after NMJ disruption and axonal degeneration, therefore supporting a dying-back mechanism for ALS2.
The evident potency of pridopidine to ameliorate the cellular phenotypes of ALS led us to investigate the mechanism by which pridopidine facilitates its beneficial effects.
Pridopidine enhances AT in MNs and repairs the AT defects in SOD1G93A MNs
Defects in AT have been previously described in models of ALS26, as well as in several other neurodegenerative diseases27. In order to visualize and analyze AT, we plated SCE from WT or SOD1G93A embryos in the proximal compartment of an MFC (Fig. 3a). We tracked the retrograde AT of Qdot-BDNF particles that were introduced exclusively to axons in the distal compartment using live imaging (Fig. 3b).
Our analysis revealed a significant reduction in the instantaneous velocity (Vinst) of Qdot-BDNF in SOD1G93A MN (Fig. 3c). Remarkably, overnight treatment of cultures with 0.1 or 1 µM pridopidine accelerated the Vinst in SOD1G93A MN in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas the effect on WT neurons is milder and exhibited a concentration-independent behavior. Notably, overnight treatment with 25 and 100 µM of Riluzole28, the current medication for ALS, did not have a similar effect. The average number of stops during particle transport was similar in untreated WT and SOD1G93A MN (Fig. 3d). Nevertheless, pridopidine reduced the stop-count in SOD1G93A to a greater extent than in WT neurons, which might explain the overcompensation observed in Vinst. Further analysis of the Mean Square Displacement (MSD) in SOD1G93A revealed a significant elevation in the displacement of Qdot-BDNF in pridopidine-treated MNs (Fig. 3e, f). The increase in Vinst, and the reduction in the stop-count eventually translate to a significant increase in the average velocity (Vavg) of particles in SOD1G93A MNs (Fig. 3g). Taken together, these results indicate that pridopidine treatment improves AT defects in SOD1G93A MNs and further accelerates and shifts the AT to a more directed mode.
Pridopidine beneficially modulates AT in SOD1G93A neuromuscular co-cultures
We next sought to test the AT properties of SOD1G93A in co-culture to better mimic mature motor units (Fig. 4a). Myocytes were transfected with both BDNF-mCherry and GDNF-GFP and differentiated for 7 days in the MFC, after which SCE were plated in the proximal compartment. At 7 days in co-culture, mitochondria were stained with MitoTracker for enabling their tracking in MNs as well, and AT time-lapse movies of BDNF-mCherry, GDNF-GFP and MitoTracker were acquired (Fig. 4b). Our recordings in both WT and SOD1G93A co-cultures reveal that BDNF-mCherry and GDNF-GFP are both secreted from muscles, transported into MNs and move mostly retrogradely within the axons (Fig. 4c). Interestingly, we also identified co-transporting particles, suggesting the existence of various populations of transported cargo that might have different roles, destinations, and transport properties (Fig. 4c).
Extended analysis of the AT in these co-cultures revealed unexpected results. Both the Vinst (Fig. 4d–f) and Vavg (Fig. 4g–i) of BDNF-mCherry, GDNF-GFP, and mitochondria were significantly increased in the SOD1G93A co-cultures. Nevertheless, applying 0.1 µM of pridopidine exclusively in the NMJ compartment, was sufficient to decrease the AT of BDNF-mCherry and GDNF-GFP back to WT levels. Notably, in presence of pridopidine in SOD1G93A co-cultures, we could hardly detect GDNF-GFP particles moving retrogradely (data not shown). Intriguingly, the Vinst of mitochondria in the pridopidine-treated co-cultures was increased even further in both WT and SOD1G93A co-cultures. Distribution plots of mitochondrial Vavg point to a specific subpopulation of mitochondria moving much faster (Fig. 4i).
Pridopidine activates ERK but not AKT in WT and SOD1G93A MNs
ERK and AKT are key signaling pathways that regulate many cellular processes, including neurotrophic ones24,29. We sought to determine whether pridopidine could activate ERK or AKT pathways in WT and SOD1G93A MNs, and therefore play a neuroprotective role via one of these pathways. Primary MN cultures at 2DIV were starved overnight in neurotrophin- and serum-free medium (PNB). The following day, cultures were treated for 30 min with pridopidine or with BDNF as a positive control. Western-blot analyses for phosphorylated-ERK (pERK) reveal a significant activation of ERK (Fig. 5a, b).
ERK activation in pridopidine-treated SOD1G93A MNs was to the same extent as in WT MNs. Interestingly, we did not detect any change in the phosphorylation level of AKT following application of pridopidine (Fig. 5c). Since both ERK and AKT activation can be downstream to the activation of neurotrophin receptor, TrkB30, we investigated whether pridopidine modulates the expression or activation of this receptor. Western-blot analysis suggests that pridopidine does not affect the expression levels, nor the phosphorylation of Y51631 residue of TrkB in MNs (Fig. 5d–f).
Next, we investigated whether pridopidine influences BDNF secretion from myocytes. Hence, we transfected WT and SOD1G93A myocytes with BDNF-mCherry. Following 7-day differentiation, pridopidine (0.1 µM) was added for overnight incubation. Western-blot analysis of BDNF-mCherry in conditioned media compared to its total level in the culture extracts, of the SOD1G93A but not the WT, showed a mild increase in the secretion of BDNF-mCherry following pridopidine application (Supplementary Figure 2). Hence, pridopidine could promote neuronal survival and ameliorate NMJ disruption through activation of the ERK pathway via a neurotrophin- and TrkB(pY516)-independent mechanism.
Pridopidine facilitates its neuroprotective effects through the S1R pathway
Mutations in the S1R gene were recently reported to cause various forms of ALS including a juvenile form21–23. Furthermore, reports by several groups suggest that pridopidine mediates its protective effects via the S1R pathway in neurodegenerative models of HD9,10. Thus, we sought to determine whether the neuroprotective effects we observed are reproducible in MNs from S1R−/− mice18.
SCE from S1R−/− embryos were cultured in the MFC as described before, and the contractile behavior of SOD1G93A or WT myocytes was tested. Strikingly, co-cultures with S1R−/− SCE exhibited a severe disruption of neuromuscular activity when combined with either healthy or diseased myocytes (Fig. 1f). Pridopidine at 0.1 µM was insufficient to restore NMJ activity to the WT levels, suggesting that pridopidine acts via the S1R. Surprisingly, we did observe a minor increase in the percentage of contracting muscles at the 1 µM concentration, suggesting that pridopidine either acts also on muscles, or that higher concentrations may bind low-affinity targets and activate alternative pathway.
Co-culturing S1R−/− primary myocytes with WT MNs, did not demonstrate a similar disruption of neuromuscular activity as in the S1R−/− MNs co-cultures (Fig. 1f), and under these conditions pridopidine did not increase the percentage of contracting muscles any further (Supplementary Figure 3). Next, we analyzed the AT of Qdot-BDNF in S1R−/− MNs. Our observations revealed that the Vinst of Qdot-BDNF is significantly reduced in S1R−/− MNs, and is reminiscent of the SOD1G93A one (Fig. 3c). Importantly, unlike in WT or SOD1G93A MNs, pridopidine did not facilitate AT in S1R−/− MNs in any of the tested parameters and concentrations (Fig. 3d–f). Finally, testing for ERK-pathway activation in S1R−/− MNs revealed that deletion of S1R in MNs hinders the pridopidine-mediated ERK phosphorylation (Fig. 5a, b). Interestingly, encouraged by the hypothesis that S1R levels might be altered in SOD1G93A tissues, and in different compartments of MNs, we carried out western-blot analyses of MN cultures, as well as analyses of brain, spinal-cord, sciatic-nerve, and muscle tissues from these mice. SOD1G93A tissues displayed variable levels of S1R but we could not detect any appreciable differences in its levels (Supplementary Figure 1). Thus, our data suggest that pridopidine restores NMJ activity and facilitates AT in SOD1G93A in a S1R-dependent mechanism.
Pridopidine sub-cutaneous administration leads to reduced hSOD1 aggregates in the spinal-cords of SOD1G93A mice
S1R functions as a molecular chaperone partly localized to the MAM12, and its deletion in mice increases protein aggregation13. Thus, we sought to determine the in vivo effect of pridopidine administration on mSOD1 aggregation. SOD1G93A and WT mice were subcutaneously (SC) administered with pridopidine daily for 11-weeks at 3 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg. Control mice were treated with saline. As expected, by staining spinal-cord sections with NSC500 to label mSOD1 aggregates32, we identified a significantly higher number of SOD1 aggregates in the gray, as well as the white matter of spinal-cords from SOD1G93A vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 6a–c). Strikingly, daily SC administration of pridopidine at 30 mg/kg eliminated ~50% of SOD1 aggregates in the spinal-cords of SOD1G93A mice.
Pridopidine ameliorates muscle fiber atrophy and preserves NMJs in vivo
NMJ disruption and the subsequent skeletal muscle wasting are key pathologies of ALS. Following our results in vitro, we sought to determine whether NMJs and muscle wasting are also spared in vivo. Gastrocnemius muscles from vehicle or pridopidine-treated (SC) mice were extracted at the age of 16-weeks. Muscle cross-sections were stained with Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E), and the mean-muscle fiber diameter was quantified for each group. In accordance with previous reports, the muscle fiber diameter of vehicle-treated SOD1G93A mice was markedly smaller than that of WT controls (Fig. 7a–c). Notably, daily SC administration of pridopidine at 30mpk significantly ameliorated muscle fiber deterioration in SOD1G93A mice. Next, we evaluated the number of innervated NMJs in gastrocnemius muscles by co-localizing pre- and post-synaptic markers. Here too, our observations recapitulate previous key reports and indicate significant NMJ disruption, and morphological changes in the post-synaptic apparatus in SOD1G93A muscles (Fig. 7b–d). Strikingly, muscles from pridopidine-treated subjects consist of ~50% more innervated-NMJs, and maintain the healthy morphological traits of the post-synaptic apparatus.
Taken together, our results provide primary evidence for the beneficial outcomes of administering pridopidine to ALS subjects.
Discussion
In this study, we identify the potency, and the partial mechanism by which pridopidine conveys its effects in ALS, including NMJ degeneration, MN loss and AT (Fig. 8). Our observations indicate that pridopidine activates the ERK signaling pathway and provides a deeper mechanistic view of previous research that demonstrated the beneficial effects of a S1R agonist in SOD1G93A mice33.
Preservation of NMJs and MN survival
NMJ disruption and distal axonopathy are part of the ‘Dying-back’ mechanism in ALS, which supports the notion that NMJs are the first compartment to fall and to initiate axonal degeneration, followed by neuronal death and muscle atrophy1.
Utilizing our unique co-culture method24,34, we detect neuromuscular abnormalities in cultures of MNs and myocytes expressing ALS-causative mutations. Remarkably, pridopidine was able to prevent NMJ loss in this model via a S1R-dependent mechanism. Interestingly, high concentrations of pridopidine were able to moderately increase the innervation rate even in co-cultures with S1R−/− neurons. This observation suggest that at high concentrations pridopidine may bind and act on targets with lower affinity, such as D2R9. Alternatively, pridopidine could bind targets in skeletal muscles and promote the release of neurotrophins, Indeed, recent reports reveal that activation of S1R increases the secretion of BDNF and GDNF in various cell types11,35,36. Noteworthy, our results indicate pridopidine mildly increases BDNF secretion in the SOD1G93A which may account for the above discussed effects in the co-cultures with S1R−/− MNs.
One of our striking findings is that the death of MNs occurs in a dying-back mechanism emphasizing the importance of focusing therapeutic attempts on limiting the disruption of the NMJs as a critical break to the consequent MN death. Nevertheless, pridopidine could potentially enhance neuronal survival via glial cells37, and therefore, we evaluated MN survival in SOD1G93A co-cultures by exposing all compartments to pridopidine. Our results indicate that a low dose of pridopidine profoundly impedes the observed death of SOD1G93A MNs.
Axonal transport
Consistent with previous reports of AT deficits in ALS, we demonstrate alterations of AT in SOD1G93A MNs that precede its stereotypic symptoms26,38. Importantly, pridopidine was able to enhance AT in both WT and SOD1G93A neurons, and thus improve these deficits. Since we could not detect differences in S1R levels between WT and SOD1G93A MNs, the conflicting results between these two at high (1 µM) concentration of pridopidine could again relate to its binding to low-affinity targets which may be expressed differently between these two in MNs. Therefore, we continued our experiments only with the low dosage of pridopidine (100 nM).
Our data reveal that pridopidine phosphorylates ERK in MNs, similarly to its phosphorylation by neurotrophins29 or upon nerve injury39. This was previously shown to activate retrograde AT by recruiting Dynein motor-proteins39. Optionally, S1R may regulate of Tau phosphorylation by negatively regulating P35 and CDK540, therefore, targeting S1R may reduce tau phosphorylation and generate stable microtubule networks as fast routes for long-distance AT41.
According to our data, the retrograde transport velocities of BDNF, GDNF and mitochondria were increased in SOD1G93A co-cultures. Remarkably, pridopidine could modulate the AT properties of these entities, even when applied exclusively on axons/NMJs.
Unlike the immature MN cultures we initially tested, in co-cultures, MNs become active and are also exposed to SOD1G93A muscles; therefor, better mimicking mature motor units. Thus the enhanced retrograde transport of neurotrophins could be due to an active stress mechanism42 in SOD1G93A MNs in response to ER-stress43, calcium overload44 and ROS45, which all might be diminished in by pridopidine via its action on the S1R14. Another option could be the binding of BDNF to receptors such as p75NTR which may traffic at different velocities, and affect neuronal survival by conveying retrograde death signals46,47.
Furthermore, pridopidine strongly repressed GDNF transport in SOD1G93A co-cultures. The Vavg distribution plots (Fig. 4h) indicate the co-occurrence of two transporting populations. Previous reports suggest GDNF plays a dual-spatial role in its action by locally enhancing axonal arborization48,49 and innervation rate of muscles, and by distally activating AKT signaling in the cell body through its transport24,50. We hypothesize that the reduced stress levels and activation of ERK signaling in SOD1G93A co-cultures treated with pridopidine initiate local mechanisms such as synaptogenesis that depend on local GDNF. The population of fast-moving GDNF may induce survival via AKT activation, and is common for both WT and SOD1G93A treated cultures.
Lastly, enhanced mitochondrial transport could originate in a specific population, which transports faster towards the cell body. This population might consist of damaged mitochondria that need to undergo reparation or degradation51,52. Importantly, Bernard-Marissal and colleagues have demonstrated that dysfunction of S1R perturbs AT of mitochondria in MNs19. Consistent with the above, S1R are enriched at the MAM, suggesting they might specially control mitochondrial fate.
Pridopidine, S1R, and ERK activation
Our results demonstrate that pridopidine activates the ERK pathway in a S1R-dependent manner11. However, we could not detect the reported pridopidine-dependent AKT activation. Our recent publication revealed that ERK activation occurs following TrkB phosphorylation at the plasma membrane, whereas AKT activation requires internalization of TrkB into endosomes53. Recent reports illustrate that agonizing S1Rs can activate TrkB in both BDNF-dependent31 and independent54 manners, consequently activating ERK. Testing whether pridopidine functions similarly, we were not able to detect the TrkB activation. Future research will have to address the intriguing question of whether pridopidine activates TrkB and subsequently ERK through an alternative pathway independent of BDNF.
Aggregates and mitochondrial dysfunction
A key finding in this study is the strong reduction in mSOD1 aggregates in the spinal cords of diseased mice treated with pridopidine. The formation of protein aggregates is a common feature in several genetic mutations that cause familial ALS4, and it was also reported to occur in sporadic forms of ALS55. Protein aggregates are hallmarks of several other neurodegenerative diseases, e.g., Huntington’s, Parkinson’s, and Alzheimer’s disease56. Our results repeatedly imply that pridopidine functions through S1R. Indeed, mutations in S1R cause ALS21 and deletion of S1R in mice induces motor deficits, NMJ disruption, defects in AT of mitochondria, axon degeneration, increases α-synuclein aggregation and loss of dopaminergic neurons13,19. Strikingly, deletion of S1R in SOD1G93A mice exacerbates the disease’s progression in mice20.
This work provides the first evidence for the efficacy of pridopidine in treating ALS via its activity on the S1R (Fig. 8). Although our efforts in testing the survival and weight of orally administered pridopidine in SOD1G93A did not yield any significant effect (Supplementary Figure 4), the promising results we reveal in this work encourage further evaluation of pridopidine in ALS. Additionally, other ALS models, including ALS iPSCs should be tested for assessing the potency of pridopidine in ameliorating disease phenotypes and extending the lifespan.
Materials and methods
Animal experiments
HB9::GFP (Stock No: 005029) mice were originally obtained from Jackson Laboratories. The colony was maintained by breeding with ICR mice. SOD1G93A mice (Stock No: 002726) were originally obtained from Jackson Laboratories, and maintained by breeding with C57BL/6 J mice. B6;129S6-Chattm2(cre)Lowl/J (Stock No: 006410) and B6;129S6-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm14(CAG−tdTomato)Hze/J (Stock No: 007908) mice were originally obtained from Jackson Laboratories, and were cross bred in the Tel-Aviv SPF animal unit to yield the homozygous ChAT::RosatdTomato mice. The ChAT::RosatdTomato colony was maintained by in-breeding males and females from the colony. SOD1G93A-ChAT::tdTomato and WT ChAT::tdTomato embryos were obtained by mating ChAT::ROSAtdTomato females with SOD1G93A males. Embryos were genotyped to distinguish WT from SOD1G93A embryos. Pregnant mSigmaR1 knockout female mice and adult male and females (Stock No: GTA000234) were obtained from Charles River Laboratories. The colony was maintained by breeding males and females within the colony. Mice and embryos were genotyped using the polymerase chain reaction (KAPA Bio systems); DNA samples were generated from ear, tail, or embryonic tissue biopsies.
Animal experiments were performed under the supervision and approval of the Tel-Aviv University Committee for Animal Ethics. The in vivo experiments were conducted under the animal housing and care conditions of Teva Pharmaceuticals: SOP 33.22.01 and 33.22.02 and were approved and carried out in accordance with Israel animal welfare laws by the ethics committee (#684).
Drugs
Pridopidine HCL (TV-7820, ACR16, Batch #160IN0815A) was dissolved in sterile ddH2O. Sterile ddH2O was used as a vehicle control.
Riluzole (Sigma; R116; Lot # 057K3900V) was dissolved in sterile DMSO.
Microfluidic chamber preparation
Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic chambers (MFCs) for co-culture and AT assays were designed and casted as previously described24,25,57.
Briefly, three 7-mm wells were punched, and three small ‘caves’ were further carved in the explant compartment to enable spinal cord explants to anchor and enter the growth channels. MFCs are cleaned first with adhesive tape to remove gross dirt and then soaked in 70% EtOH for 15 min, after which MFCs were dried and UV radiated for 10 min. MFCs were then attached to a 50 mm Fluorodish glass bottom dish (WPI) or to a 60-mm plastic bottom dish. AT assays were performed on a glass bottom dish. All compartments were coated with 1.5 ng/mL polyornithine (P-8638, Sigma) in PBS and left overnight, and then replaced with 150 µL laminin (L-2020, Sigma), 1:333 in deionized distilled water (DDW) overnight. Muscle-neuron co-cultures were performed in a plastic bottom dish.
Muscle channels were coated with Matrigel diluted 1:10 with DMEM containing 2.5% PSN for 30 min at 37 °C, before filling the muscle wells with 150 µL of Bioamf-2 medium (Biological Industries; 01-194-1 A). The explant well and channel were filled with 150 µL of 1.5 ng/mL polyornithine (P-8638, Sigma) in PBS and left overnight, and then replaced with 150 µL laminin (L-2020, Sigma), 1:333 in deionized distilled water (DDW) overnight. One day before plating the spinal cord explant, laminin was replaced with explant medium containing Neurobasal (Life Technologies; 21103049) supplemented with 2% B27 (Invitrogen; 1750404), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Biological Industries), 1% Glutamax (Life Technologies), and 25 ng/mL brain-derived neurotrophic factor (Alomone Labs), until the day on which co-culturing began.
Fluorescence microscopy and image analysis
All confocal images were captured using a Nikon Ti microscope equipped with a Yokogawa CSU X-1 spinning disc and an Andor iXon897 EMCCD camera controlled by Andor IQ3 software. Bright field movies of muscle contraction were acquired using the same microscope in wide field mode and images were captured with an Andor Neo sCMOS camera. All live-imaging assays were performed at 37 °C and in a 5% CO2 controlled and humidified environment.
Axonal transport of quantum-dot:BDNF
Axonal transport in ventral spinal cord explants was tracked using a modified version of a previously described procedure in dorsal root ganglia57,58. Briefly, ventral spinal cord explants from mouse embryos at embryonic day 12.5 (E12.5) were cultured and plated in the MFCs. At 4 DIV the medium in both compartments of the MFC was refreshed and either pridopidine (0.1 µM / 1 µM; Teva Pharmaceuticals) or Riluzole (25 µM / 100 µM; Sigma, R116) was added to all compartments for overnight incubation. Medium in control chambers was refreshed and the chambers remained untreated. The next day, the medium in all wells was replaced with starvation medium (PNB; 1% Glutamax, 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin in Neurobasal) for 1.5 h. Fresh Quantum-dot:BDNF (Qdot-BDNF) was prepared by mixing Qdot (1 µM; Life technologies, Q10101MP) with Biotin-BDNF (30 ng/µL; Alamone Labs, B-250-B) in a 1:3 ratio. The mixture was incubated for 30 min on ice, then diluted 1:55 with culture medium and applied to the distal compartment of the microfluidic chamber. The volume in the proximal well was kept higher than in the distal compartment to prevent the free-flow of Qdot-BDNF from one compartment to another. Following a 50-min incubation, high-magnification movies of Qdot-BDNF axonal transport were acquired for 5 min each, at a frame rate of 20 frames per min, using a 60X oil objective.
Axonal transport of BDNF-mCherry, GDNF-GFP and MitoTracker in co-culture
BDNF-mCherry and GDNF-GFP expression vectors were sub-cloned by KeyClone, Ltd. Primary myocytes at 5 DIV were transfected with both BDNF-mCherry and GDNF-GFP overnight using Lipofectamin 2000 (Invitrogen). The next day, muscles were trypsinized and plated in the distal compartment of MFCs and underwent differentiation for another 7 days. On the 7th day, ventral spinal cord explants from WT or SOD1G93A embryos were plated in the proximal compartment of the microfluidic chambers. The NMJ compartment was exclusively treated every other day with either 0.1 µM Pridopidine in PNB medium or PNB medium as a control. One week after co-culturing, 200 nM MitoTracker Deep-Red FM (Molecular Probes; M22426) was added to both compartments for 30 min and then washed away. High magnification, multi-channeled movies of BDNF-mCherry, GDNF-GFP, and MitoTracker axonal transport were acquired for 5 min each, at a frame rate of 20 frames per minute, using a 60X oil objective.
Axonal transport analysis
Qdot-BDNF particle tracking was performed on Bitplane Imaris, using the semi-automated spot tracking function. Inclusion criteria for particle analysis: Track duration > 10 frames; average velocity ≥ 0.2 µm/s; stop duration: Speed < 0.1 µm/s for 3 frames. Data were then exported to MATLAB for further analysis of particle transport: Instantaneous Velocity, Average Velocity, Stops Count, Run Length, and Mean Square Displacement (MSD).
Muscle-MN co-culture
Primary muscle culture and co-culturing procedures were performed as previously described25. Briefly, SOD1G93A adult female mice, or their healthy littermates were euthanized at the age of 60 days (P60). Gastrocnemius muscles were excised and treated with 2 mg/mL Collagenase-I (Sigma) for 3 h. Muscles were then dissociated into single fibers, and were collected into pre-coated matrigel (Thermo) dishes for a 3-day incubation in a Bioamf-2 + 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin-Nystatin medium. On the 4th, 5th, and 6th days, cultures underwent pre-plating for isolation of pure, fibroblast, and debris-free, myoblast culture. Next, 100,000 myoblasts were plated in the distal compartment of a pre-coated MFC. Cultures were grown and allowed to differentiate for another 7 days prior to the addition of a spinal cord explant to the proximal compartment. Bioamf medium was refreshed every second day. At 13 DIV, ventral spinal cord explants were dissected from E12.5 embryos and plated in the proximal channel of the muscle-containing MFC. On the same day, Bioamf-2 medium for muscles and SCEx for spinal cord explants were added with Pridopidine (either 0.1 µM or 1 µM). Control (“0 µM”) chambers remained untreated. Medium containing Pridopidine was refreshed at 15 DIV. At 17DIV, once axons had already extended into the muscle compartment, medium in both muscle and neuronal compartments was switched to starvation media, with or without Pridopidine at either of the concentrations. Medium was refreshed at 19DIV. At 21DIV, movies of muscle contraction were acquired at a frame rate of 30 frames per second for 1000 frames.
Muscle contraction analysis
Muscle contractile behavior was analyzed as previously described25. Briefly, we examined the contractile activity of muscles in the distal compartment of the MFC; the muscles overlapped by at least one axon. Muscles were categorized into two groups: ‘contracting’ or ‘non-contracting’, depending on their motile activity during the movie. The motility of muscles was validated by generating intensity-over-time plots for each muscle (Fig. 2d). The number of contracting muscle fibers per chamber was divided by the total number of muscle fibers analyzed in the same chamber, yielding the percentage of contracting myotubes as an output of NMJ activity.
In vitro NMJ quantification
NMJ disruption was determined by imaging the NMJ compartment in co-cultures of WT or SOD1G93A myocytes with ventral spinal cord explants from WT and SOD1G93A embryos expressing tdTomato in ChAT-positive cells (ChAT::Rosa/tdTomato), respectively. Co-cultures were treated every other day either with 0.1 µM Pridopidine in PNB medium or with PNB medium as a control. At 7 days of co-culture, cultures were fixed and the myocytes in the NMJ compartment were stained with α-Bungarotoxin-FITC 1:30 (Alamone Labs; B-100-F) to label the extracellular domain of postsynaptic nAchR. Confocal high-magnification images of myocytes and axons in the distal compartment were acquired, and co-localized ChAT::tdTomato axons with α-Bungarotoxin patches were analyzed. The percentage of healthy NMJs was determined by dividing the number of intact co-localization events, with intact non-degenerated axons, by the total number of co-localization events identified in every MFC.
Analysis of motor neuron survival
The percentage of surviving motor neurons in co-culture was calculated by counting the ChAT::tdTomato-positive motor neurons within a spinal cord explant over time in co-cultures of WT or SOD1G93A myocytes with WT or SOD1G93A spinal cord explants expressing ChAT::tdTomato, respectively. Briefly, co-cultures were treated every other day with either 0.1 µM Pridopidine in PNB medium or with PNB medium in controls. Confocal multi-stacked images of the same spinal cord explant were acquired at different time points starting at day 7 of co-culture and onwards. The percentage of surviving motor neurons at each time point was calculated by dividing the number of motor neurons in every explant by the number of motor neurons that was initially detected in it.
BDNF-mCherry secretion assay
Primary myocytes at day 5 in vitro were transfected with BDNF-mCherry as previously described above. Myocyte cultures were then grown for another 7 days. Bioamf 2.0 was used as the growth medium until 9DIV and was replaced with muscle differentiation medium containing 2% Horse Serum, 1% PSN, and 1% Glutamax in DMEM. At 12DIV, cultures were incubated for 16 h with 0.1 µM Pridopidine in muscle differentiation medium (collection medium) at a minimal volume. Media in control cultures was refreshed as well. At the end of incubation, conditioned media was collected and treated immediately with protease inhibitors. Media was then centrifuged once at 400 × g to remove dead cells, and then again at 10,000 × g to remove cell debris. The corresponding myocyte cultures for each condition were immediately cooled down and lysed using radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (RIPA) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. The levels of BDNF-mCherry in the conditioned media and the culture extract were determined by SDS-PAGE.
Immunohistochemistry
In vitro neuromuscular junctions were stained as previously described25. Briefly, co-cultures we fixed with 4% PFA for 15 min. TMR-α-Bungarotoxin 1:100 (Sigma; T0195) was used to mark post-synaptic AChR prior to permeabilization. Permabilization was performed by using 0.5% Triton X100 in PBS for 10 min. Cultures were blocked for 1 h in blocking solution containing 1 mg/mL BSA (Amresco; 0332-TAM), 10% Goat serum, and 0.1% Triton in PBS. Primary antibody labeling was performed over night at 4 °C in blocking solution. Primary antibodies were Chicken-anti-NFH 1:500 (abcam; ab72996) and Rabbit-anti-Ryanodine Receptor 1:400 (Milipore; AB9078). Secondary antibodies used: AlexaFluor 405-anti-Chicken 1:500 (abcam; ab175675). AlexaFluor 488-anti-mouse 1:500 (Jackson; 715-545-151). AlexaFluor 488-anti-Rabbit 1:500 (Invitrogen; A11034)Nuclei were stained with DAPI 1:10,000 (Sigma, D8417). Samples were mounted using ProLong Gold antifade reagent (molecular probes; P36934).
Spinal cord sections were prepared by fixation of adult spinal cords in 4% PFA for 24 h, followed by incubation in 20% Sucrose for 24 h. Spinal cords were embedded in OCT and ~15 µM sections were cryo-sectioned. Lumbar spinal cords sections (L1-L6) were extracted, fixed and embedded for cryosectioning. 10 µm sections were prepared. Sections were permeabilized by 0.5% Triton X100 for 15 min. NSC500 (Psychogenetics32) was used to stain the SOD1 aggregates. SOD1 aggregates were analyzed in a blinded fashion.
NMJs in vivo were stained on gastrocnemius muscles as previously described59. Briefly, gastrocnemius muscles were fixed for 24 h in 4% PFA. AchR was labeled with TMR-α-Bungarotoxin 594 (1:100; Sigma, T0195) for 15 min. Samples were permeabilized in ice-cold 100% MeOH for 5 min. Blocking was performed by incubating samples in 1 mg/mL BSA (Amresco; 0332-TAM) and 0.1% Triton X100 in PBS for 1 h. Primary antibodies were diluted in blocking solution and incubated with samples over night at 4 °C. Primary antibodies: NFH 1:500 (chicken; Abcam, ab72996); Synaptophysin 1:500 (mouse, Milipore, MAB5258); Synapsin-I 1:500 (mouse, Abcam, MAB1543P). Secondary antibodies used: Alexafluore 488-anti-Mouse (Jackson Laboratories; 715-545-151) Alexafluore 488-anti-Chicken (Abcam; Ab150173). Muscle fibers were spread on a slide and mounted with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories; H-1000). Analysis of the co-localization of NMJs in vivo was performed in a blinded fashion.
Primary motor neuron culture
Motor neurons were cultured as previously described59. Briefly, spinal cord explants from SOD1G93A, WT, or Sig1R−/− E12.5 mouse embryos were collected in 1X HBSS buffer (Gibco), then trypsinized and consequently triturated in L-15 medium (Life Technologies) containing 0.4% BSA (Sigma) and 2–10% DNAse (Sigma). Cells were centrifuged through a 4% BSA cushion and then resuspended in Complete Neurobasal Medium (CNB) containing 2% Horse serum (Biological Industries, Ltd.), 2% B27 Supplement, 1% Glutamax, 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin, 0.5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 ng/mL BDNF (Alamone labs, B-250), 1 ng/mL GDNF (Alamone labs; G-240), and 0.25 ng/mL CNTF (Alamone labs; C-240). Motor neurons were isolated by centrifugation through Optiprep gradient (10.4% Optiprep (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 mM Tricine, 4% glucose) for 20 min at 760 × g with the brake turned off. Culture dishes were pre-coated with 1.5 g/mL poly D-L- ornithine (PLO; Sigma-Aldrich) overnight at 37 °C and with 3 g/mL Laminin (Sigma-Aldrich) overnight at 37 °C.
For western blotting, 400,000 cells were plated in two 24-well plate wells per condition. MN cultures at 2DIV were starved for 16 h in PNB medium prior to applying pridopidine or BDNF. At 3DIV, BDNF 50 ng/mL or pridopidine (0.1 µM; 1 µM) was diluted in PNB medium and added to the cultures for 30 min. PNB medium was used as a control.
Western blotting
Primary motor neuron cultures were lysed with RIPA buffer containing 1x protease inhibitors (Roche, 11697498001) and 1x phosphatase inhibitors (Roche, 04906837001), followed by centrifugation and collection of the supernatant. Protein samples were denatured by boiling in SDS sample buffer, then electrophoresed in SDS-PAGE gels, and finally transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were blocked with 5% (w/v) skim milk in TBS-T for 1 h and then immunoblotted with primary antibodies in 5% skim milk: pERK 1:5 000 (Sigma-Aldrich; M8159l); MAP Kinase (ERK1/2) 1:10 000 (Sigma-Aldrich; M5679); pan-AKT 1:1 000 (CST; #4691); phospho(S473)AKT1 1:500 (abcam; ab81823); phospho(Tyr490/516)Trk 1:500; #4619, Cell Signaling Technology); TrkB 1:500 (BD transduction laboratories; #610101); Sigma receptor B-5 1:300 (Santa-Cruz; #137075); mCherry 1:1 000 (abcam, ab167453), followed by species-specific HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies 1:10 000 (Rabbit 111-035-003; Mouse 715-035-151; Jackson Laboratories) and visualized using myECL Imager (Thermo).
Histology tissue collection and fixation
Gastrocnemius muscles of 20 samples were harvested and fixed in 4% PFA. The samples were then outsourced for histological morphometric analysis at PathoLogica (Nes Ziona, Israel). All tissues were trimmed into block cassettes and sent to CDX-Diagnostics for slide preparation.
Slide preparation and histological evaluation
Tissues were trimmed, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at no more than 5 microns thickness, and stained with Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E). The histological processing was performed by CDX-Diagnostics, Jerusalem, Israel. Image analysis was performed using “Image Pro Plus” Version 6.1, Media Cybernetics, US. Two histologic pictures were acquired from each slide of a cross section of the gastrocnemius muscle, and sent for digital analysis using a 10X magnification. A blinded third party performed the analysis.
In vivo evaluation of survival and body-mass of mice orally administered (P.O.) with pridopidine
The in vivo evaluation studies were performed at Melior-Discovery LTD.
Evaluation was performed on two cohorts of male mice between week 5 to week 18. Each cohort consisted of 4 groups of 12 mice: 36 hSOD1G93A/B6SJL and 12 nTG/B6SJL obtained from Jackson laboratories (hSOD1G93A/B6SJL stock #002726). hSOD1G93A/B6SJL mice were split to 3 groups of 12 mice each and were treated daily per os with either: vehicle, 0.3 or 30 mg/kg of pridopidine. 12 nTG/B6SJL in control group were fed daily with vehicle. Cohorts 1 and 2 were evaluated identically. Body weight of individuals was measured weekly. Survival age was calculated as the age at which they either lost righting (in which case the animal was euthanized that day) or were found dead. Those mice were considered “failures” for the survival analysis, while animals that survived to the end of the study and were taken down were considered “censored”. Since none of the WT-Vehicle mice lost righting or died before takedown, the age at takedown for this group is shown for reference.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Mrs. Shani Kaspi, Ms. Chen Kadosh and Ms. Avital Friedland for their help with the axonal transport analysis. This work was supported by the ISF (Israel Science foundation), and the ERC (European Research Council) grants, 561/11, 309377 respectively.
Author contributions
A.I., T.G., M.G., M.H., and E.P. designed the research. A.I., N.S.A., R.M., T.A., and T.G. performed the research and the analysis. A.I. and E.P. wrote the manuscript with the agreement of the others.
Conflict of interest
The project was funded by Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd (Netanya Israel), which owns patent rights for pridopidine.
Footnotes
Edited by C. Parish
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Ariel Ionescu, Tal Gradus
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at (10.1038/s41419-019-1451-2).
References
- 1.Moloney EB, de Winter F, Verhaagen J. ALS as a distal axonopathy: molecular mechanisms affecting neuromuscular junction stability in the presymptomatic stages of the disease. Front. Neurosci. 2014;8:252. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fischer LR, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a distal axonopathy: Evidence in mice and man. Exp. Neurol. 2004;185:232–240. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2003.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ikenaka K, et al. Disruption of axonal transport in motor neuron diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012;13:1225–1238. doi: 10.3390/ijms13011225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Blokhuis AM, Groen EJN, Koppers M, van den Berg LH, Pasterkamp RJ. Protein aggregation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;125:777–794. doi: 10.1007/s00401-013-1125-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rosen DR, et al. Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature. 1993;362:59–62. doi: 10.1038/362059a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gurney ME, et al. Motor neuron degeneration in mice that express a human Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase mutation. Science. 1994;264:1772–1775. doi: 10.1126/science.8209258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hafezparast M, et al. Mutations in Dynein Link Motor Neuron Degeneration to Defects in Retrograde. Transp. Sci. 2003;300:808–812. doi: 10.1126/science.1083129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brenner D, et al. Hot-spot KIF5A mutations cause familial ALS. Brain. 2018;141:688–697. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sahlholm K, et al. Pridopidine selectively occupies sigma-1 rather than dopamine D2 receptors at behaviorally active doses. Psychopharmacology. 2015;232:3443–3453. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-3997-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ryskamp D, et al. The sigma-1 receptor mediates the beneficial effects of pridopidine in a mouse model of Huntington disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2017;97:46–59. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Geva M, et al. Pridopidine activates neuroprotective pathways impaired in Huntington disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016;25:3975–3987. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hayashi T, Su TP. Sigma-1 receptor chaperones at the ER- mitochondrion interface regulate Ca2 + signaling and cell survival. Cell. 2007;131:596–610. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hong J, Wang L, Zhang T, Zhang B, Chen L. Sigma-1 receptor knockout increases α-synuclein aggregation and phosphorylation with loss of dopaminergic neurons in substantia nigra. Neurobiol. Aging. 2017;59:171–183. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mori T, Hayashi T, Hayashi E, Su TP. Sigma-1 receptor chaperone at the ER-mitochondrion interface mediates the mitochondrion-ER-nucleus signaling for cellular survival. PLoS. One. 2013;8:e76941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Meunier J, Hayashi T. Sigma-1 receptors regulate Bcl-2 expression by reactive oxygen species-dependent transcriptional regulation of nuclear factor B. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2010;332:388–397. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.160960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mavlyutov TA, Epstein ML, Andersen KA, Ziskind-Conhaim L, Ruoho AE. The sigma-1 receptor is enriched in postsynaptic sites of C-terminals in mouse motoneurons. An anatomical and behavioral study. Neuroscience. 2010;167:247–255. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.02.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gundlach AL, Largent BL, Snyder SH. Autoradiographic localization of sigma receptor binding sites in guinea pig and rat central nervous system with ( + )3H-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-(1-propyl)piperidine. J. Neurosci. 1986;6:1757–1770. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-06-01757.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Langa F, et al. Generation and phenotypic analysis of sigma receptor type I (sigma 1) knockout mice. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2003;18:2188–2196. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02950.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bernard-Marissal N, Médard JJ, Azzedine H, Chrast R. Dysfunction in endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria crosstalk underlies SIGMAR1 loss of function mediated motor neuron degeneration. Brain. 2015;138:875–890. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mavlyutov TA, et al. Lack of sigma-1 receptor exacerbates ALS progression in mice. Neuroscience. 2013;240:129–134. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.02.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Al-Saif A, Al-Mohanna F, Bohlega S. A mutation in sigma-1 receptor causes juvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2011;70:913–919. doi: 10.1002/ana.22534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Watanabe S, et al. Mitochondria-associated membrane collapse is a common pathomechanism in SIGMAR1- and SOD1-linked ALS. EMBO Mol. Med. 2016;8:1421–1437. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201606403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Luty AA, et al. Sigma nonopioid intracellular receptor 1 mutations cause frontotemporal lobar degeneration-motor neuron disease. Ann. Neurol. 2010;68:639–649. doi: 10.1002/ana.22274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zahavi EE, et al. A compartmentalized microfluidic neuromuscular co-culture system reveals spatial aspects of GDNF functions. J. Cell. Sci. 2015;128:1241–1252. doi: 10.1242/jcs.167544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ionescu A, Zahavi EE, Gradus T, Ben-Yaakov K, Perlson E. Compartmental microfluidic system for studying muscle-neuron communication and neuromuscular junction maintenance. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2016;95:69–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2015.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bilsland LG, et al. Deficits in axonal transport precede ALS symptoms in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:20523–20528. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006869107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Millecamps S, Julien JP. Axonal transport deficits and neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013;14:161–176. doi: 10.1038/nrn3380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stevenson A, et al. Riluzole protects against glutamate-induced slowing of neurofilament axonal transport. Neurosci. Lett. 2009;454:161–164. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.02.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bonni A, et al. Cell survival promoted by the Ras-MAPK signaling pathway by transcription-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Science. 1999;286:1358–1362. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5443.1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zahavi, E. E. etal. The receptor tyrosin kinase TrkB signals without dimerization at the plasma membrane. Sci. Signal.11, eaao4006 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 31.Kimura Y, Fujita Y, Shibata K, Mori M, Yamashita T. Sigma-1 receptor enhances neurite elongation of cerebellar granule neurons via TrkB signaling. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e75760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hammarström P, et al. A Fluorescent pentameric thiophene derivative detects in vitro-formed prefibrillar protein aggregates. Biochemistry. 2010;49:6838–6845. doi: 10.1021/bi100922r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ono Y, et al. SA4503, a sigma-1 receptor agonist, suppresses motor neuron damage in in vitro and in vivo amyotrophic lateral sclerosis models. Neurosci. Lett. 2014;559:174–178. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Maimon, R. etal. miR126-5p down-regulation facilitates axon degeneration and NMJ disruption via a non-cell-autonomous mechanism in ALS. J. Neurosci.38, 5478–5494 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 35.Penas C, et al. Sigma receptor agonist 2-(4-morpholinethyl)1 phenylcyclohexanecarboxylate (Pre084) increases GDNF and BiP expression and promotes neuroprotection after root avulsion injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2011;28:831–840. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fujimoto M, Hayashi T, Urfer R, Mita S, Su TP. Sigma-1 receptor chaperones regulate the secretion of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Synapse. 2012;66:630–639. doi: 10.1002/syn.21549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Malik M, et al. The effects of sigma (σ1) receptor-selective ligands on muscarinic receptor antagonist-induced cognitive deficits in mice. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2015;172:2519–2531. doi: 10.1111/bph.13076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Baldwin KR, Godena VK, Hewitt VL, Whitworth AJ. Axonal transport defects are a common phenotype in Drosophila models of ALS. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016;25:ddw105. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Perlson E, et al. Vimentin-dependent spatial translocation of an activated MAP kinase in injured nerve. Neuron. 2005;45:715–726. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tsai SYA, Pokrass MJ, Klauer NR, Nohara H, Su TP. Sigma-1 receptor regulates Tau phosphorylation and axon extension by shaping p35 turnover via myristic acid. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:6742–6747. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1422001112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kadavath H, et al. Tau stabilizes microtubules by binding at the interface between tubulin heterodimers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2015;112:7501–7506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504081112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gauthier LR, et al. Huntingtin controls neurotrophic support and survival of neurons by enhancing BDNF vesicular transport along microtubules. Cell. 2004;118:127–138. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nishitoh H, et al. ALS-linked mutant SOD1 induces ER stress- and ASK1-dependent motor neuron death by targeting Derlin-1. Genes Dev. 2008;22:1451–1464. doi: 10.1101/gad.1640108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Leal SS, Gomes CM. Calcium dysregulation links ALS defective proteins and motor neuron selective vulnerability. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015;9:225. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Barber SC, Mead RJ, Shaw PJ. Oxidative stress in ALS: A mechanism of neurodegeneration and a therapeutic target. Biochim Biophys. Acta - Mol. Basis Dis. 2006;1762:1051–1067. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2006.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bamji SX, et al. Thep75 neurotrophin receptor mediates neuronal apoptosis and is essential for naturally occurring sympathetic neuron death. J. Cell. Biol. 1998;140:911–923. doi: 10.1083/jcb.140.4.911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Perlson E, et al. A switch in retrograde signaling from survival to stress in rapid-onset neurodegeneration. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:9903–9917. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0813-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang CY, et al. Regulation of neuromuscular synapse development by glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and neurturin. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:10614–10625. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106116200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Keller-Peck CR, et al. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor administration in postnatal life results in motor unit enlargement and continuous synaptic remodeling at the neuromuscular junction. J. Neurosci. 2001;21:6136–6146. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-16-06136.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang LJ, et al. Neuroprotective effects of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor mediated by an adeno-associated virus vector in a transgenic animal model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurosci. 2002;22:6920–6928. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-16-06920.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.De Vos KJ, et al. Familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-linked SOD1 mutants perturb fast axonal transport to reduce axonal mitochondria content. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2007;16:2720–2728. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Miller KE, Sheetz MP. Axonal mitochondrial transport and potential are correlated. J. Cell. Sci. 2004;117:2791–2804. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zahavi EE, et al. The receptor tyrosine kinase TrkB signals without dimerization at the plasma membrane. Sci. Signal. 2018;11:eaao4006. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aao4006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ka M, Kook YH, Liao K, Buch S, Kim WY. Transactivation of TrkB by Sigma-1 receptor mediates cocaine-induced changes in dendritic spine density and morphology in hippocampal and cortical neurons. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2414–e2414. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mackenzie IRA, et al. Pathological TDP-43 distinguishes sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis withSOD1 mutations. Ann. Neurol. 2007;61:427–434. doi: 10.1002/ana.21147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ross CA, Poirier MA. Protein aggregation and neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Med. 2004;10:S10–S17. doi: 10.1038/nm1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gluska S, Chein M, Rotem N, Ionescu A, Perlson E. Tracking Quantum-Dot labeled neurotropic factors transport along primary neuronal axons in compartmental microfluidic chambers. Methods Cell Biol. 2016;13:365–387. doi: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2015.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gluska S, et al. Rabies virus hijacks and accelerates the p75NTR retrograde axonal transport machinery. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004348. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rotem N, et al. ALS along the axons – expression of coding and noncoding RNA differs in axons of ALS models. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:44500. doi: 10.1038/srep44500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.