Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Mar 1;9:3289. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39772-4

Mobilization of Stem and Progenitor Cells in Septic Shock Patients

Tomasz Skirecki 1,2,3,✉, Małgorzata Mikaszewska-Sokolewicz 4, Marlena Godlewska 5, Barbara Dołęgowska 6, Jarosław Czubak 7, Grażyna Hoser 2, Jerzy Kawiak 3, Urszula Zielińska-Borkowska 1
PMCID: PMC6397313  PMID: 30824730

Abstract

Septic shock is associated with multiple injuries to organs and tissues. These events may induce the regenerative response of adult stem cells. However, little is known about how endogenous stem cells are modulated by sepsis. This study analyzed the circulation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and very small embryonic-like stem cells (VSELs) in the peripheral blood of patients with septic shock. Thirty-three patients with septic shock and twenty-two healthy control subjects were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Blood samples were collected on the first, third and seventh days of septic shock. Populations of stem cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Chemotactic mediators were analyzed by HPLC and ELISA. Populations of early HSCs (Lin-CD133+CD45+ and CD34+CD38−) were mobilized to the peripheral blood after an initial decrease. Mobilized HSCs showed significantly increased expression of Ki-67, a marker of cell proliferation. Circulating EPCs and VSELs were mobilized to the blood circulation upon the first day of sepsis. Patients with a greater number of Lin-CD133+CD45+ HSCs and Lin-CD34+CD45− VSELs had a significantly lower probability of 60-day survival. The concentration of CXCL12 was elevated in the blood of septic patients, while the concentration of sphingosine-1-phosphate was significantly decreased. As an emergency early response to sepsis, VSELs and EPCs were mobilized to the peripheral blood, while the HSCs showed delayed mobilization. Differential mobilization of stem cell subsets reflected changes in the concentration of chemoattractants in the blood. The relationship between the probability of death and a large number of HSCs and VSELs in septic shock patients can be used as a novel prognostic marker and may provide new therapeutic approaches.

Introduction

Sepsis is a leading cause of death in the US and Europe1. It remains a resource-consuming condition with high mortality, although no specific treatment has been implemented thus far. The inflammatory-driven maladaptive response induces endothelial and epithelial barrier disruption resulting in organ dysfunction2. The alleviation of these disturbances with subsequent regeneration is a prerequisite for recovery and survival.

Adult organisms contain a variety of stem and progenitor cells that are responsible for the continuous renewal and regeneration of damaged tissues. Bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) are responsible for maintaining adult hematopoiesis3. The host response to infection induces the activation and proliferation of HSCs, which is referred to as emergency myelopoiesis3. However, studies in animal models have shown that sepsis influences hematopoiesis by stimulating the proliferation of HSCs with concomitant induction of functional impairment4–6. Whether dysfunctional immune responses in septic patients are caused by impaired hematopoiesis remain unknown. Although, under physiological conditions, only a few stem cells have been observed in peripheral blood7; however, under stress conditions, numerous stem cells have been shown to migrate into the blood circulation8. The circulation of HSCs is strictly regulated by molecular interactions responsible for their retention in bone marrow (i.e., CXCL12-CXCR4) and other interactions that orchestrate their mobilization into the blood (sphingosine phosphate (S1P) gradient – SP1R)9. It is hypothesized that sepsis affects these regulatory axes. Aside from HSCs, bone marrow contains other stem cell populations, such as endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and primitive very small embryonic-like stem cells (VSELs), which have the potential to differentiate into multiple cell types, including hematopoietic cells10–12. VSELs constitute a rare population of pluripotent/multipotent quiescent adult stem cells that express transcription factors related to pluripotency13. Due to the specific imprinting pattern of the insulin growth factor signaling genes, these cells are activated in a strictly regulated manner and have been hypothesized to contribute to the tissue renewal and regeneration13. The mobilization of HSCs, EPCs and VSELs has been reported in several clinical conditions (myocardial infarction, cerebral ischemia, and severe burns) and has been shown to be related to the outcome of these conditions14–17. To date, in septic patients, only circulating endothelial progenitor cells (cEPCs) have been investigated, and the number of cEPCs has been shown to be correlated with survival18. It is speculated that the mobilized stem cells can contribute to the regeneration of injured tissues and enhance the immune response via direct and paracrine mechanisms.

There is limited information regarding the influence of sepsis on the circulation and mobilization of HSCs, HPCs and VSELs. Examining the influence of sepsis on the circulation and mobilization of these cells could improve the understanding of the extent of perturbation of stem cell homeostasis in sepsis and the role of stem cells in the pathogenesis of sepsis. Therefore, we conducted a study aimed at evaluating the circulation of different stem cell populations during septic shock.

Methods

Patient recruitment

This prospective observational study enrolled septic shock patients treated in the general ICUs of two teaching hospital (Professor Orlowski Independent Public Clinical Hospital and The Infant Jesus Teaching Hospital in Warsaw) in the period between March 2012 and January 2014. This study was approved by the Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education Ethics Board in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. Informed consent was obtained from patients in agreement with the rules of the Ethics Committee. Patients with suspected or proven infection who fulfilled the septic shock criteria according to the 2001 ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference19 definitions were enrolled in this study within 24 h (from the beginning of vasopressor treatment), and informed consent was obtained in agreement with the rules of the Ethics Committee. The exclusion criteria included: ages <16 or > 85y.o., immunosuppressive treatment, hematological malignancy, metastatic neoplasms, HIV infection, and pregnancy. All patients received standard treatment recommended by the Surviving Sepsis Guidelines, 200820. Standard clinical data were recorded. The healthy control group consisted of sex- (11 male) and age-matched (median: 63 (IQRs: 50–78)) volunteers with no chronic diseases who had no symptoms of infection.

Bone marrow for the chemotaxis assay was collected during elective hip surgery from adult patients with no chronic inflammatory disease who provided informed consent (Gruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Otwock, Poland).

Flow cytometry (FACS)

The total cell count was analyzed using the Burk’s hemocytometer and the Turk’s solution. Immunocytochemical staining was performed as previously described21. Briefly, 100 μl of peripheral blood (PB) was stained with cocktails of antibodies (Table S1.) and incubated for 30 min. at room temperature. Then, cells were lysed with BD Pharm Lyse (BD Biosciences, San Jose, USA) for 10 min, washed and fixed in 0.5% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). For intracellular staining of Ki-67, fixed cells were washed with PBS and permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 10 min and labeled with antibodies for 30 min. Appropriate isotype and FMO (fluorescence minus one) controls were used. The cells were analyzed using a FACS Canto II flow cytometer with FACS Diva software (BD Bioscience). At least 100,000 events were recorded in the mononuclear cell gate set on the SSC/FSC morphological plot. The results were analyzed using FlowJo V10 software (Tree Star Inc, Ashland, USA).

CXCL12 and S1P concentrations

The concentration of circulating CXCL12 was measured in low-platelet plasma using a commercially available ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

The concentration of S1P in plasma was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method as described previously22, and the detailed protocol is included in the supplemental methods.

Chemotaxis assay

Migration of nucleated bone marrow cells towards human plasma was assessed using a Transwell migration assay. Nucleated bone marrow cells were isolated from bone marrow samples after erythrocyte lysis. A total of 650 μl of RPMI medium (Gibco, Thermo Fisher, Rochester, USA) containing 10% of plasma from septic patients (pooled from 10 patients on day 1) or pooled normal human plasma (obtained from 10 healthy volunteers) was placed in the lower chamber of a 24-well plate equipped with a 3 μm ThinCert (Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria) Transwell insert. Then, 1 × 106 nucleated bone marrow cells suspended in 100 μl of RPMI medium were loaded into the upper chamber, and the plate was incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 2.5 h. Cells that migrated to the lower chamber were collected and stained with anti-CD34 PE and anti-CD38 PE.Cy5 monoclonal antibodies (BD Biosciences) and counted using a flow cytometer (FACS Canto II, BD Biosciences). In some experiments bone marrow cells were preincubated in 100 nM sphingosine-1 phosphate (Cayman Chemical, Michigan, USA) for 60 minutes before chemotaxis assay. In total, experiments were performed with cells from five bone marrow donors. Due to the very low number of VSELs, we did not perform these assays for VSELs.

Statistical analysis

The absolute number of cells per milliliter of PB was calculated from white blood counts and percentage frequencies from flow cytometry analyses. Data are expressed as medians and interquartile range values. Comparisons between the control and septic groups were performed by Mann-Whitney U test. For the comparison of the cell number between days 1 and 3, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. The strength of the correlation between two variables was assessed using the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Logistic regression was performed to assess the odds ratio of death depending on the number of circulating stem cells. Receiver operator curves (ROC) were calculated for the evaluation of the predictive utility of analyzed stem cell populations. Cut-off values were chosen using Youden’s method after the ROC analysis was conducted to stratify patients with high and low numbers of circulating populations of particular of cells. Then, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using Cox’s F-test. In migration experiments Anova with Dunnet’s multiple comparison test was used. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistica 12 (StatSoft, Inc., USA) and GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad, Inc., USA) software were used.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education Institutional Review Board approved this study. All patients and healthy volunteers who met the eligibility criteria were consented prior to blood sampling.

Results

Patient characteristics

For this study, 33 patients were enrolled based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A summary of the clinical data is presented in Table 1. Patients who died had increased APACHE II scores (26 vs. 20, p < 0.001), SOFA scores (12 vs. 8, p < 0.001), and SAPS scores (63 vs. 43, p < 0.001) compared with patients who did not die during the observation period.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the studied septic shock patients.

N (%) Median (IQR)
Age 65 (53–77)
Sex (M) 16 (48%)
Hospital mortality 19 (57%)
7-day mortality 5 (15%)
Infection source
   peritoneum 20 (60.6%)
   lungs 10 (30.3%)
   other 3 (9.1%)
Positive blood cultures Gram positive/negative 19 (57%)
5/14
APACHE II 22 (20–31)
SAPS 57 (44–65)
SOFA D1 11 (8–12.5)
Lactate D1 (mg/dl) 24 (18–38.2)
CRP D1 (mg/l) 207 (132–357)
PCT D1 (ng/ml) 6.9 (2.7–39)
ARDS 14 (42%)
Open in a new tab

APACHE II: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; CRP: C-reactive protein; IQR: interquartile range; PCT: procalcitonin; SAPS: simplified acute physiology score; SOFA: sequential organ failure assessment.

Circulation of hematopoietic and VSEL stem cells

To investigate the kinetics of stem cell circulation, we focused on the analysis of the absolute counts of specific cell populations. We used different combinations of antibodies specific for hematopoietic stem cell markers, which enabled the use of several strategies for stem cell identification (Fig. 1). Because the CD34+CD38− phenotype has been extensively used to identify HSCs in numerous studies, we included this phenotype in our panel (Supplemental Fig. 1). The frequency of circulating CD34+CD38− HSCs was significantly decreased on the days 1 and 7 of sepsis compared to the healthy controls (Supplemental Table 2). Regarding absolute values, on day 3 the number of CD34+CD38− HSCs was 3-fold higher than in healthy controls (Fig. 2A). However, there were no significant changes in the number of circulating CD34+CD38+ progenitor cells (Fig. 2B, Supplemental Table 2). The proper identification of VSEL stem cells requires strict gating criteria, which results in the ability to observe and analyze this rare population of CD45-negative stem cells that are smaller than the CD45+ HSCs (Fig. 1A–D)23. This morphological difference is shown in the SSC/FCS dot plots, which show VSELs vs. HSCs (Fig. 1E,F). Both stem cell populations have similar granularity, but VSELs are less abundant than HSCs. Additionally, both populations are Lin- (e.g., they are negative for: CD19, CD2, CD3, CD4, CD14, CD66b, CD24, CD16, CD56 and CD235a). The number of circulating Lin-CD34+CD45− VSELs was 4-fold greater on day 1 of sepsis than that in healthy controls, and the number of circulating Lin-CD34+CD451− VSELs was the greatest at day 3 (Fig. 2C, Supplemental Table 2). Similarly, Lin-CD133+CD45− VSELs migrated to the peripheral blood upon the onset of sepsis, and their number remained elevated on day 7 (Fig. 2D, Supplemental Table 2). The number of HSCs identified as Lin-CD34+CD45+ in the circulation of septic shock patients was significantly less than that in the healthy controls (Fig. 2E, Supplemental Table 2), while HSCs gated as Lin-CD133+CD45+ cells migrated to the peripheral blood on day 1 (Fig. 2F, Supplemental Table 2). However, neither of the HSC populations differed significantly between the analyzed timepoints of sepsis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Representative gating strategy for the analysis of VSELs and HSCs. (A) First, an extended lymphocyte gate was created, (B) then cells negative for the Lineage cocktail antigens are gated. (C) Lin- cells were then analyzed for the expression of CD45 and CD34 and (D) CD45 and CD133. (E) Lin-CD34+CD45+ HSCs and Lin-CD34+CD45− VSELs were then plotted on the SSC/FSC dot plot to compare their granularity and size. (F) SSC/FSC dot plot graph showing Lin-CD133+CD45− VSELs and Lin-CD133+CD45+ HSCs.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Total numbers of circulating stem cell subpopulations per mL of peripheral blood. (A) CD34+CD38– HSCs. (B) CD34+CD38+ HPCs. (C) Lin-CD34+CD45− VSELs. (D) Lin-CD133+CD45− VSELs. (E) Lin-CD34+CD45+ HSCs. (F) Lin-CD133+CD45+ HSCs. Comparisons between the control and septic groups were performed by Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical significance between values for healthy controls and septic shock patients are marked as follows: *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01. The comparison of the cell number between days 1 and 3 by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test did not reveal significant differences.

Circulation of endothelial progenitor cells

Additionally, we determined the number of cEPCs because their mobilization in sepsis has been previously reported18. We gated cEPCs as CD34+CD133+VEGFR2+ mononuclear cells (Fig. 3A,B). The number of cEPCs was significantly greater in septic patients only on day 1 compared to that in healthy controls (Fig. 3C, Supplemental Table 2).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Analysis of the circulating endothelial cells. (A) A cytogram of CD34 versus CD133 expression gated from the extended lymphocyte gate (Fig. 1A). (B) VEGFR2 receptor expression by double-positive progenitor cells. (C) Dynamics of the changes in the total number of cEPCs in septic shock patients. Cell counts between healthy controls and septic shock patients were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and the statistical significance was marked as follows: *p < 0.05. Cell counts between days 1 and 3 was compared by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test which did not reveal significant differences.

Proliferation of circulating hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in septic shock patients

We also aimed to investigate whether the mobilized HSPCs are more proliferative than HSPCs under physiological conditions. Therefore, samples were stained for HSPC markers and the Ki-67 antigen. HSPCs positive for Ki-67 expression were observed in control subjects and patients with sepsis (Fig. 4A). On day 1 of sepsis, the number of Lin-CD34+Ki-67+ cells rapidly increased compared to the healthy volunteers (469 (109–1578) cells per ml vs. 105 (47–375) cells per ml, respectively; p < 0.05). An increase was observed on day 3 (1148 (421–2750) cells per ml), while on day 7, the number of proliferating HSPCs began to decrease (367 (164–965) cells per ml) (Fig. 4B). Interestingly, we found a significant correlation between the number of Lin-CD34+Ki-67+ cells and the C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration on day 3 (r = 0.9, p < 0.05).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Analysis of the proliferation of circulating hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by the expression of Ki-67. (A) Lineage-negative cells (Fig. 1A,B) were analyzed for the expression of the Ki-67 antigen in the CD34+ cells. (B) The dynamics of the circulation of Lin-CD34+Ki-67+ cells in septic shock patients. Cell counts between healthy controls and septic shock patients were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and the statistical significance was marked as follows: *p < 0.05. Cell counts between days 1 and 3 was compared by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test which did not reveal significant differences.

Stem cell counts and clinical variables

There was no relationship between the stem cell population counts and the patient sex, age or source of infection (data not shown). The frequencies of circulating Lin-CD34+CD45− and Lin-CD133+CD45− VSELs on day 1 was correlated with the SOFA score (r = 0.56 and r = 0.44, respectively, p < 0.05). There was also a negative correlation between the frequency of VSELs and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio on day 1 (r = −0.44, p < 0.05 for both Lin-CD34+CD45− and Lin-CD133+CD45− VSELs). Logistic regression analysis did not reveal significant relationships between mortality from sepsis and the median numbers of circulating stem cell populations. Additionally, we evaluated the potential of circulating stem cells as outcome predictors by performing ROC analysis. The two stem cell populations with the greatest AUC were Lin-CD34+CD45− VSELs and Lin-CD133+CD45+ HSCs (0.72 95% CI (0.50–0.94) and 0.67 95% CI (0.41–0.93), respectively). Then, we compared the patient survival curves based on the number of VSELs and HSCs selected by the Youden’s method. Septic shock patients who had less than 392 Lin-CD34+CD45− VSELs per ml of blood had a greater probability of survival (p = 0.03). Patients who had less than 714 Lin-CD133+CD45+ HSCs per ml of blood were more likely to survive (p = 0.005) (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Probability of 60-day survival of septic shock patients in relation to the number of circulating stem cells. (A) Survival curves of patients with varied number of Lin-CD133+CD45+ HSCs. (B) Survival curves of patients with varied numbers of Lin-CD34+CD45− VSELs.

Mechanisms of HSPC mobilization in sepsis

To investigate the mechanism of HSPC dynamic circulation during sepsis, we first analyzed the two well-known mediators of chemotaxis for HSPCs, CXCL12 and S1P. The plasma level of the CXCL12 was significantly greater in septic shock patients on day 1 compared to the healthy controls (Fig. 6A). In contrast, the plasma level of S1P was lower in septic patients compared to the healthy controls (Fig. 6B). Then, we evaluated the ex vivo chemotactic activity of plasma from septic patients. Plasma from septic patients demonstrated much less chemotactic activity than control plasma. This was observed for all nucleated bone marrow cells and, in particular, CD34+CD38− HSCs and CD34+CD38+ HPCs (0.31 and 0.03, respectively, and 0.13 for normal plasma activity; Fig. 6C). In order to verify the involvement of S1P and its receptors in the migration of HSCs to plasma, we incubated bone marrow cells in 100 nM S1P to induce internalization of S1P receptors24. Preincubation of bone marrow cells with S1P decreased CD34+CD38− HSCs migration to normal plasma to the level comparable with migration of untreated bone marrow cells towards septic plasma (Fig. 6D).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Mechanisms of stem cell mobilization. (A) Serum levels of CXCL12 in septic shock patients and healthy volunteers. (B) Plasma concentrations of S1P in septic shock and in controls. (C) The chemotactic activity of septic plasma was evaluated using a Transwell migration assay on human bone marrow cells. The migration of all nucleated cells, CD34+CD38− HSCs and CD34+CD38+ HPCs was analyzed. The results were normalized to the number of cells that migrated to the normal human plasma (n = 5). (D) Migration of bone marrow cells that were preincubated in 100 nM S1P or medium only for 60 minutes before the chemotaxis assay. The concentration of mediators was compared using Mann-Whitney U test (A,B) and comparisons between multiple groups were performed using Anova with Dunnet’s multiple comparison test (C,D) *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001.

Discussion

In this study, we found that during septic shock, a differential kinetics characterize stem cell populations with early mobilization of primitive VSELs and cEPCs and enhanced mobilization of proliferating HSCs. Importantly, increased mobilization of primitive stem cells was correlated with unfavorable outcomes.

We found that CD34+CD38− HSCs, which are known to contain all repopulating cells25, migrated to the peripheral blood on day 3. Similar kinetics characterized the circulation of Lin-CD34+CD45+ HSCs, which contain also more mature progenitor cells. Only the rare population of primitive Lin-CD133+CD45+ HSCs was mobilized at day 1 and remained elevated. To the best of our knowledge, the only report on hematopoietic progenitor cells in sepsis has been published by Tsaganos et al.26. In their study, only the population of CD34+CD45+ cells was increased in septic patients. Cells of this phenotype also contain committed myeloid and lymphoid progenitors27, which makes it impossible to compare their results with our current work. Similar to our work, Drukala et al.17 found a decreased number of circulating Lin-CD34+CD45+ HSCs and Lin-CD133+CD45+ HSCs at early timepoints in severely burned patients17. Interestingly, we found that the mobilized HSPCs are actively proliferating. This result is consistent with our previously reported results showing the enhanced proliferation of human HSCs in the bone marrow of humanized mice after cecal ligation and puncture sepsis4. A strong correlation between the number of proliferating HSCs and CRP levels supports the link between inflammation and activation of otherwise dormant HSCs. Observations from other acute conditions that are associated with HSC mobilization14,28 suggest that this process is part of the stress response and may be protective. Although the major function of HSCs is the maintenance of central hematopoiesis, mounting evidence has indicated that these cells are active players in the immune response29–34. Additionally, it could be speculated that the migration of these cells from their bone marrow niches affects the hematopoiesis during sepsis.

For the first time, we have reported the mobilization of the developmentally primitive population of VSEL cells in septic shock patients. Two subsets of VSELs were distinguished, namely, CD34+ and CD133+ VSELs. Both subsets were found to migrate early to the blood circulation of septic shock patients. Notably, there was a negative correlation between Lin-CD133+CD45− VSELs and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, suggesting the effects of hypoxia and lung injury on the mobilization of these cells. Thus, the observed mobilization of VSELs in septic shock with lung injury is in agreement with their potential to differentiate into alveolar epithelial cells35. Whether mobilized VSELs in sepsis do not remain dormant and induce differentiation pathways remains to be tested.

In agreement with the previous reports, we found early mobilization of cEPCs in septic patients18,36,37. Our results clearly show that the CD34+CD133+VEGFR2+ cells demonstrated a distinct pattern of circulation compared to HSPCs. Based on research performed on patients with chronic conditions, it is considered that the mobilization of cEPCs is a protective mechanism38.

We attempted to evaluate the prognostic value of circulating stem cells in septic shock. The ROC analysis revealed that the Lin-CD133+CD45+ HSCs and Lin-CD34+CD45− VSELs showed moderate accuracy in predicting mortality. Patients with greater numbers of those cells in circulation were less likely to survive. A similar relationship has been reported by Tsanagas et al.26 for CD34+CD45+ cells. Whether HSCs and VSELs could serve as biomarkers of sepsis requires further investigation in a dedicated prospective trial.

Finally, in order to understand the mechanism responsible for the observed differential mobilization of stem cells in sepsis, we conducted an in vitro analysis of the chemotactic activity of plasma from septic patients. Surprisingly, plasma from septic patients showed significantly less chemotactic activity on bone marrow nucleated cells as well as HSCs. This decreased activity of septic plasma was correlated with the lower concentration of S1P in septic patients, which is the major plasma chemoattractant for HSCs39. Additionally, we have shown that inhibition of S1P-S1P receptor signaling reduced migration of HSCs to normal plasma to the level comparable with the migration of HSCs to septic plasma. These observations support the involvement of S1P in the observed differences in mobilization of HSC in septic patients. Our results are in a striking contrast with observations of stem cell mobilization shortly after myocardial infarction, which showed an increase in S1P concentration followed by HSCs and VSELs mobilization40. In contrast, another important stem cell chemoattractant, CXCL12, was found to be elevated in septic plasma. Elevation of CXCL12 has been previously reported36,37, but in the context of the rest of our findings, it can be hypothesized that CXCL12 is a plasma chemoattractant for VSELs and cEPCs in sepsis but not for HSPCs. Indeed, CXCL12 has recently been shown to mobilize cEPCs in septic mice41. Our hypothesis is also supported by the finding that the cytokine milieu modulates the mobilization and retention of stem cells42.

Despite our efforts to perform a comprehensive analysis of the circulation of stem cells in septic shock patients, our study has several limitations. First, we did not conduct a functional analysis of the circulating progenitor cells or specific gene-expression assays. Instead, we focused on a rigorous flow cytometry analysis of different cell phenotypes, which allowed for simultaneous comparison of their circulation kinetics. Additionally, we measured the concentration of chemotactic mediators only on the day 1. The study protocol did not include comparison of septic shock patients with a group of non-septic critically ill patients which makes it impossible to answer whether the observed changes are specific to septic shock only or associate with critical illness. We are also aware that the studied group was relatively small, and a follow-up study to confirm the prognostic utility of stem cell evaluation in a new cohort of patients should be performed.

Experimental studies have shown that stem cell-based therapy may be beneficial in septic animals43. Whether the modulation of the autologous stem cells is beneficial in sepsis remains unknown, but we showed stem cell mobilization by the G-CSF in a septic shock patient44. Well-designed experimental studies are required to verify whether the enhancement of particular stem cell populations can provide benefits in sepsis.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we observed a differential mobilization of stem cell subsets in sepsis related to changes in the levels of plasma chemoattractants. Early mobilization of primitive VSELs and cEPCs is a part of the stress response in sepsis. The mobilization of VSELs and early HSCs was found to be correlated with mortality. Moreover, sepsis was shown to strongly affect the population of HSCs, inducing their proliferation and mobilization. Whether autologous stem cells can become a novel and useful biomarker or therapeutic target in sepsis requires further study.

Supplementary information

Online Supplement (581.4KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by European Union Structural Funds, ‘Innovative methods of stem cells applications in medicine’, Innovative Economy Operational Program, grant POIG 01.01.02-00-109/09 and the Polish National Science Centre grant 2013/11/N/NZ6/02581.

Author Contributions

T.S. study design, sample analyses, analysis of results, and manuscript preparation, M.M.S. study design, sample collection, and manuscript revision, M.G. laboratory analyses and manuscript revision, B.D. laboratory analyses and manuscript revision, J.C. bone marrow collection and manuscript revision, G.H. study design, analysis of results and manuscript revision, J.K. study design, analysis of results and manuscript revision, U.Z.B. study design, sample collection and manuscript revision, All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-39772-4.

References

  • 1.Levy MM, et al. Outcomes of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign in intensive care units in the USA and Europe: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:919–924. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70239-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abraham E, Singer M. Mechanisms of sepsis-induced organ dysfunction. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:2408–2416. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000282072.56245.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Manz MG, Boettcher S. Emergency granulopoiesis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14:302–314. doi: 10.1038/nri3660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Skirecki T, et al. Early severe impairment of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from the bone marrow caused by CLP sepsis and endotoxemia in a humanized mice model. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:142. doi: 10.1186/s13287-015-0135-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rodriguez S, et al. Dysfunctional expansion of hematopoietic stem cells and block of myeloid differentiation in lethal sepsis. Blood. 2009;114:4064–4076. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-04-214916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Scumpia PO, et al. Cutting edge: bacterial infection induces hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell expansion in the absence of TLR signaling. J Immunol. 2010;184:2247–2251. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wright DE, et al. Physiological migration of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Science. 2001;294:1933–1936. doi: 10.1126/science.1064081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Massberg S, et al. Immunosurveillance by hematopoietic progenitor cells trafficking through blood, lymph, and peripheral tissues. Cell. 2007;131:994–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Adamiak M, Ratajczak MZ. Innate Immunity and Mobilization of Hematopoietic Stem Cells. Curr Stem Cell Rep. 2017;3:172–180. doi: 10.1007/s40778-017-0087-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bara JJ, et al. Concise review: Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells change phenotype following in vitro culture: implications for basic research and the clinic. Stem Cells. 2014;32:1713–1723. doi: 10.1002/stem.1649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dome B, et al. Circulating bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells: characterization, mobilization, and therapeutic considerations in malignant disease. Cytometry A. 2008;73:186–193. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ratajczak, M. Z. A novel view of the adult bone marrow stem cell hierarchy and stem cell trafficking. Leukemia29, 776–782, 10.1038/leu.2014.346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Ratajczak MZ, et al. A Novel View of the Adult Stem Cell Compartment From the Perspective of a Quiescent Population of Very Small Embryonic-Like Stem Cells. Circ Res. 2017;120:166–178. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hennemann B, et al. Mobilization of CD34+ hematopoietic cells, colony-forming cells and long-term culture-initiating cells into the peripheral blood of patients with an acute cerebral ischemic insult. Cytotherapy. 2008;10:303–311. doi: 10.1080/14653240801949994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wojakowski W, et al. Mobilization of bone marrow-derived Oct-4+SSEA-4+ very small embryonic-like stem cells in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Paczkowska E, et al. Clinical evidence that very small embryonic-like stem cells are mobilized into peripheral blood in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2009;40:1237–1244. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.535062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Drukala J, et al. Stem cells, including a population of very small embryonic-like stem cells, are mobilized into peripheral blood in patients after skin burn injury. Stem Cell Rev. 2012;8:184–194. doi: 10.1007/s12015-011-9272-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rafat N, et al. Increased circulating endothelial progenitor cells in septic patients: correlation with survival. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1677–1684. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000269034.86817.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Levy MM, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1250–1256. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000050454.01978.3B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dellinger RP, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:17–60. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0934-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hoser GA, et al. Absolute counts of peripheral blood leukocyte subpopulations in intraabdominal sepsis and pneumonia-derived sepsis: a pilot study. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2012;50:420–426. doi: 10.5603/19751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Blogowski W, et al. Peripheral trafficking of bone-marrow-derived stem cells in patients with different types of gastric neoplasms. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5:e1099798. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1099798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Suszynska M, et al. The proper criteria for identification and sorting of very small embryonic-like stem cells, and some nomenclature issues. Stem Cells Dev. 2014;23:702–713. doi: 10.1089/scd.2013.0472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lo CG, et al. Cyclical modulation of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 surface expression during lymphocyte recirculation and relationship to lymphoid organ transit. J Exp Med. 2005;201:291–301. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bhatia M, et al. Purification of primitive human hematopoietic cells capable of repopulating immune-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:5320–5325. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tsaganos T, et al. Kinetics of progenitor hemopoetic stem cells in sepsis: correlation with patients survival? BMC Infect Dis. 2006;6:142. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.van Lochem EG, et al. Immunophenotypic differentiation patterns of normal hematopoiesis in human bone marrow: reference patterns for age-related changes and disease-induced shifts. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2004;60:1–13. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Massa M, et al. Increased circulating hematopoietic and endothelial progenitor cells in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction. Blood. 2005;105:199–206. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-05-1831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nagai Y, et al. Toll-like receptors on hematopoietic progenitor cells stimulate innate immune system replenishment. Immunity. 2006;24:801–812. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Granick JL, et al. Staphylococcus aureus recognition by hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells via TLR2/MyD88/PGE2 stimulates granulopoiesis in wounds. Blood. 2013;122:1770–1778. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-11-466268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Burberry A, et al. Infection mobilizes hematopoietic stem cells through cooperative NOD-like receptor and Toll-like receptor signaling. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15:779–791. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Majka M, et al. Numerous growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines are secreted by human CD34(+) cells, myeloblasts, erythroblasts, and megakaryoblasts and regulate normal hematopoiesis in an autocrine/paracrine manner. Blood. 2001;97:3075–3085. doi: 10.1182/blood.V97.10.3075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Allakhverdi Z, et al. CD34+ hemopoietic progenitor cells are potent effectors of allergic inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123:472–478. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Umland O, et al. Induction of various immune modulatory molecules in CD34(+) hematopoietic cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2004;75:671–679. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1003501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kassmer SH, et al. Very small embryonic-like stem cells from the murine bone marrow differentiate into epithelial cells of the lung. Stem Cells. 2013;31:2759–2766. doi: 10.1002/stem.1413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Patschan SA, et al. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in sepsis with acute renal dysfunction (ARD) Crit Care. 2011;15:R94. doi: 10.1186/cc10100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Becchi C, et al. The increase of endothelial progenitor cells in the peripheral blood: a new parameter for detecting onset and severity of sepsis. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2008;21:697–705. doi: 10.1177/039463200802100324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fadini GP, et al. Circulating progenitor cell count for cardiovascular risk stratification: a pooled analysis. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ratajczak MZ, et al. Novel insight into stem cell mobilization-plasma sphingosine-1-phosphate is a major chemoattractant that directs the egress of hematopoietic stem progenitor cells from the bone marrow and its level in peripheral blood increases during mobilization due to activation of complement cascade/membrane attack complex. Leukemia. 2010;24:976–985. doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Karapetyan AV, et al. Bioactive lipids and cationic antimicrobial peptides as new potential regulators for trafficking of bone marrow-derived stem cells in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Stem Cells Dev. 2013;22:1645–1656. doi: 10.1089/scd.2012.0488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Siavashi V, et al. Endothelial Progenitor Cell Mobilization in Preterm Infants With Sepsis Is Associated With Improved Survival. J Cell Biochem. 2017;118:3299–3307. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pitchford SC, et al. Differential mobilization of subsets of progenitor cells from the bone marrow. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;4:62–72. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Keane C, et al. Stem Cell-based Therapies for Sepsis. Anesthesiology. 2017;127:1017–1034. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Skirecki T, et al. Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on circulating immune and stem cells in septic shock: revisit the basics and consider giving it another chance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:217–219. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.187.2.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Online Supplement (581.4KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES