Skip to main content
BMC Research Notes logoLink to BMC Research Notes
. 2019 Mar 1;12:114. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4158-7

Delivery place preference and its associated factors among women who deliver in the last 12 months in Simada district of Amhara Region, Northwest Ethiopia: a community based cross sectional study

Maru Mekie 1,, Wubet Taklual 2
PMCID: PMC6397443  PMID: 30823885

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess delivery place preference and its determinant factors in Simada District of Amhara Region, Northwest Ethiopia. Data was collected among 346 women who delivered in the last 12 months.

Result

Of the total 362 study participants, 346 were included in the analysis giving a response rate of 95.6%. More than half, 56.4% of the study participants reported home as their preferred delivery place. The odds of preferring home delivery was higher among women with low household income (AOR = 2.13, 95%, CI (1.06, 4.35)), and those who had < 4 antenatal care visits (AOR = 3.65, 95%, CI (1.58, 8.41)). Whereas, preference of home delivery was lower (AOR = 0.13, 95%, CI (0.05, 0.32)), (AOR = 0.40, 95%, CI (0.17, 0.98)), and (AOR = 0.31, 95%, CI (0.15, 0.67)) among women with facility delivery, within 5 km distance to health facility, and who had transport access respectively. Improving access of health facility to the nearest possible and improving transport access shall be emphasized to improve institutional delivery.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-019-4158-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Delivery place preference, Home delivery, Determinant factors, Amhara, Ethiopia

Introduction

There is pronounced disparity in maternal mortality between developed and developing countries which showed 99% of maternal mortality burden resides in developing countries [1]. The life time risk of maternal mortality is found to be 1 in 41 and 1 in 3300 pregnancies among developed and developing countries respectively. Maternal mortality was reported to be 236 per 100,000 live births in low-income countries and 216 per 100,000 at global level in 2015 [24].

Ethiopia is one of Sub-Saharan country where maternal mortality is a great public health concern. Maternal mortality is found to be higher in the country even compared to other low income countries. According to the 2016 Ethiopia demographic and health survey, maternal mortality ratio was 412 per 100, 000 live births. Despite a significant maternal mortality reduction has been achieved from 1400 per 100,000 in 1990 to 412 per 100,000 in 2015, the problem is still un acceptably high in the country [5, 6]. Studies revealed that more than three quarter of maternal mortality is attributed to direct obstetrics causes which could be resolved by skilled delivery care [2, 7].

The government of Ethiopia has been undertaking several measures to counteract maternal morbidity and mortality such as expansion of health facilities, construction of maternity waiting homes, training, and deployment of midwives confined to health sector transformation plan [7, 8].

Despite substantial measures have been undertaken by the Ethiopian government and support organizations [9], institutional delivery is still unacceptably low in the country. Place of delivery is critical factor for women and child survival [10]. Hence, identifying potential determinant factors influencing women’s preference of delivery site is crucial for program implementers and policy makers to achieve the health sector transformation plan [7]. This study aimed to assess determinants of delivery place preference and women’s experience in place of delivery.

Main text

Methods

Study setting

A community based cross-sectional study design was employed in Simada district of Amhara Region, Northwest Ethiopia from March to May 2018. Women who delivered in the last 12 months and permanent resident of the district were included. Whereas, those who refused to participate and those lived < 6 months in the district were excluded.

Sample size and data collection procedures

The sample size was performed by using a single population proportion formula with Zα/2 = 1.96, p = 0.31 [11], d (margin of error) = 5%. The final sample size after adding 10% non-response rate was 362. There were 10,112 women who delivered in the last 12 months in the district and the calculated sample was proportionally allocated to kebeles (the lowest administrative scheme in Ethiopia). Then study participants were selected by simple random sampling technique by using the list of women who delivered in the last 12 months as a sample frame. The data was collected by pretested questionnaire (see Additional file 1) adapted from Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey [5] through face to face interview by trained data collectors. The quality of the data was ensured during data collection, coding, entry, and analysis.

Analysis

The data were entered in Epi-data Version 3.1, cleaned, edited, and analyzed by SPSS version 20. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify factors affecting preference of delivery place among study participants. Variables with a p-value of < 0.2 in the binary logistic regression were included in the multivariable model to identify the predictors of preference of delivery place. The statistical significance is confirmed at p < 0.05 with 95% confidence interval.

Ethical approval

The ethical issue was approved by Research Review Committee of the College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University. An official letter was written to administrative body of Simada district and the administrative bodies of the kebeles. Study participants were informed that the participation is voluntary and confidentiality of the information was maintained.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants

Of the total 362 samples, 346 were included in the analysis giving a response rate of 95.6% in which 16 cases were excluded in the analysis due to incompleteness. The mean age of the study participants was 30.82 years and the standard deviation was ± 6.41 years (see Table 1).

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of women who delivered in the last 12 months in Simada district of Amhara region, Ethiopia

Variables Frequency (N) Percent (%)
Age (years)
 < 20 19 5.5
 20–34 224 64.7
 ≥ 35 103 29.8
Marital status
 In union 318 91.9
 Not in union 28 8.1
Education
 No formal education 183 52.9
 Primary education 113 32.7
 Secondary and above 50 14.5
Occupation
 House maker 319 92.2
 Student 12 3.5
 Government employee 15 4.3
Monthly household income (ETB)
 < 1800 161 46.5
 ≥ 1800 185 53.5
Husband education
 No formal education 168 48.6
 Primary education 112 32.4
 Secondary and above 66 19.1
Husband occupation
 Government employee 31 9.0
 Farmer 287 82.9
 Merchant 14 4.0
 Daily laborers 14 4.0

Obstetrics characteristics and factors influencing preference of delivery place

More than half, 195 (56.4%) of women prefer home delivery. Transport problem and far distance of health facility were reasons mostly cited by respondents with respective frequencies of 55 (28.1%) and 51 (26%). Trust on TBA and unfriendly care accounts for 36 (18.4%) and 25 (12.8%) respectively as a driving factors for preference of home delivery (Table 2.)

Table 2.

Preference of place of delivery and related factors of women who delivered in the last 12 months in Simada district of Amhara region, Ethiopia

Variables Frequency (N) Percent (%)
Woman preference of delivery
 Facility 151 43.6
 Home 195 56.4
Last place of delivery
 Facility delivery 150 43.4
 Home delivery 196 56.6
Reasons for home delivery
 Short delivery time 29 14.8
 Far facility 51 26.0
 Transport problem 55 28.1
 Trust on TBA 36 18.4
 Unfriendly care 25 12.8
Who manage at home
 Mother in low 15 7.7
 TTBA 21 10.7
 Female neighbor 89 45.4
 Health extension workers 4 2.0
 Untrained TBA 67 34.2
Decision of delivery place
 Husband/TBA 195 56.4
 Woman herself 151 43.6
Distance of health facility (km)
 < 5 182 52.6
 ≥ 5 164 47.4
Transport access
 Yes 159 46.0
 No 187 54.0

Pregnancy and child birth related characteristics of the study participants

With regards to number of pregnancies, 81 (23.4%) and 96 (27.7) participants were primiparous and grand multiparous respectively. More than a quarter, 97 (28%) of study participants had no information about advantage of giving birth at a health facility.

Previous institutional delivery and living within 5 km distance to health facility were found to be associated with preference of institutional delivery (Table 3).

Table 3.

Multivariable analysis of factors determining preference of delivery place among women who delivered in the last 12 months in Simada district, Ethiopia

Variables Facility delivery N (%) Home delivery N (%) COR (95%) AOR (95%)
Education
 No formal education 62 (41.1) 121 (62.1) 3.79 (1.96, 7.33)* 0.87 (0.18, 4.25)
 Primary education 56 (37.1) 57 (29.2) 1.98 (0.99, 3.95) 1.01 (0.26, 3.95)
 Secondary and above 33 (21.9) 17 (8.7) 1 1
Monthly income (ETB)
 < 1800 56 (37.1) 105 (53.8) 1.98 (1.28, 3.05)* 2.13 (1.06, 4.35)**
 ≥ 1800 95 (62.9) 90 (46.2) 1 1
Husband education
 No formal education 56 (37.1) 56 (28.7) 1.75 (0.94, 3.26) 1.25 (0.33, 4.75)
 Primary education 53 (35.1) 115 (59.0) 3.80 (2.09, 6.90)* 2.42 (0.57, 10.30)
 Secondary and above 42 (27.8) 24 (12.3) 1 1
Previous delivery place
 Facility 108 (71.5) 42 (21.5) 0.11 (0.07, 0.18)* 0.13 (0.05, 0.32)**
 Home 43 (28.5) 153 (78.5) 1 1
Decision of delivery place
 Husband/TBA 61 (40.6) 134 (68.7) 3.24 (2.08, 5.05)* 1.11 (0.51, 2.39)
 Woman herself 90 (59.6) 61 (31.3) 1 1
Distance of facility (km)
 < 5 99 (65.6) 83 (42.6) 0.39 (0.25, 0.60)* 0.40 (0.17, 0.98)**
 ≥ 5 52 (34.4) 112 (57.4) 1 1
Transport access
 Yes 90 (59.6) 69 (35.4) 0.37 (0.24, 0.58)* 0.31 (0.15, 0.67)**
 No 61 (40.6) 126 (64.6) 1 1
No of past pregnancies
 1 pregnancy 38 (25.2) 43 (22.1) 0.49 (0.26, 0.91)* 0.96 (0.32, 2.86)
 2–5 pregnancies 84 (55.6) 85 (43.6) 0.44 (0.26, 0.74)* 0.49 (0.21, 1.55)
 > 5 pregnancies 29 (19.2) 67 (34.4) 1 1
Know advantage of facility birth
 Yes 136 (90.1) 113 (57.9) 0.15 (0.08, 0.28)* 0.57 (0.20, 1.63)
 No 15 (9.9) 82 (42.1) 1 1
Number of ANC
 < 4 visit 88 (67.7) 105 (89.7) 4.18 (2.07, 8.42)* 3.65 (1.58, 8.41)**
 ≥ 4 visits 42 (32.3) 12 (10.3) 1 1

In this study, grand multiparity is defined as women who have > 5 deliveries

1 reference

* Significant on binary analysis

** Significant on multivariable analysis

Discussion

Less than half, 151 (43.6%, 95%, CI 37.9%, 49.2%) women prefer facility delivery as their preferred delivery place. The prevalence of institutional delivery is better than the national average (26%) [5]. However, the finding of our study is found to be much lower than a study conducted in Debre Markos town of Ethiopia [12]. The difference could be related to difference in study population in which the aforementioned study was conducted in urban area unlike our study.

With regards to reasons of preference of home delivery; transport problem and far distance of health facility were reasons mostly cited by respondents with respective frequencies of 55 (28.1%) and 51 (26%). Trust on TBA and unfriendly care accounts for 36 (18.4%) and 25 (12.8%) respectively as a driving factors for preference of home delivery. The finding is consistent with previous studies [13, 14]. Government shall work on compassionate respectful maternity care in addition to improving the competency of health care workers to increase women’s trust [7].

With regards to previous place of delivery, our study revealed that the odds preferring home delivery was found to be lower among women who delivered at health facility in previous births compared with counterparts (AOR = 0.13, 95%, CI (0.05, 0.32)). The finding of our study is supported by previous studies [12, 15]. Similarly, the odds of preferring home delivery was found to be 2.13 times higher among women with household income of < 1800 ETB (AOR = 2.13, 95%, CI (1.06, 4.35)). The finding is supported by previous studies [14, 16].

With regards to distance to health facility, the odds of preferring home delivery was found to be lower among women living within 5 km distance (AOR = 0.40, 95, CI (0.17, 0.98)) compared with counterparts. Women who live > 5 km distance to health facility might face difficulty of transport access, cost and other related logistics which are likely to be associated with preference of home delivery. The finding of our study is consistent with previous studies [14, 17, 18]. Likewise, the odds of preferring home delivery was found to be lower among women who had transport access (AOR = 0.31, 95%, CI (0.15, 0.67)) compared with counterparts. The finding of our study is consistent with previous studies [17, 19, 20].

Consistent with previous studies [13, 17], the odds of preferring home delivery was found to be 3.7 times higher among women who had < 4 ANC visits (AOR = 3.65, 95%, (1.58, 8.41)) compared with women who had ≥ 4 ANC visits. This might be women had frequent ANC visit had a chance to be counseled frequently about delivery place, birth preparedness, and complication readiness plan.

Conclusion and recommendation

Institutional delivery in the study district was better than the national average. Women who had low household income and less than 4 ANC visit were more likely to prefer home delivery. Whereas, women who deliver at health facility in previous pregnancy, had transport access, and within 5 km radius to health facility were more likely to prefer institutional delivery. Improving transport access and health facility to the nearest possible shall be emphasized. Lessons that could be taken from this study are; apart from improving health and transport infrastructure, the influence of poor quality of health care cannot be undermined.

Limitations

The study was conducted in one district which might affect generalizability and representativeness of the finding. Cross-sectional study design was used which might affect cause effect relationship. However, effort was made to increase generalizability by collecting data at community level and those who delivered in the last 12 months to minimize recall bias which can be taken as a strength.

Additional file

13104_2019_4158_MOESM1_ESM.docx (25.4KB, docx)

Additional file 1. English version Questionnaires used to assess delivery place preference.

Authors’ contributions

MM and WT have contributed in the design, data collection, thesis write-up, manuscript development and edition. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to acknowledge Debre Tabor University, College of Health Science for approving the ethical review process. The authors are also keen to express gratitude to supervisors, data collectors, and study participants.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by Research Ethics Committee of Debre Tabor University. The purpose of the study was revealed and written informed consent was obtained from each study participant prior to initiation of the data collection process. Autonomy of the study participants and confidentiality of information were maintained.

Funding

No fund was obtained for this particular study.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abbreviations

ANC

antenatal care

ETB

Ethiopian Birr

TBA

traditional birth attendant

TTBA

trained traditional birth attendant

Contributor Information

Maru Mekie, Email: marumekie@gmail.com.

Wubet Taklual, Email: wubettaklual21@yahoo.com.

References

  • 1.WHO. UNICEF. UNFPA. World Bank Group. United Nations Population Division . Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015. Geneva: Switzerland World Health Organization; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp O, Moller A, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:1–11. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.WHO. Global maternal mortality fact sheet. http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality. Accessed 16 Feb 2018.
  • 4.United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Monitoring the situations of children and women. https://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/maternal-mortality/.
  • 5.Central Statistical Agency . Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2016. Addis Ababa: Ethiopia Central statistical agency, ICF; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Assefa Y, Damme W, Williams O, Hill P. Successes and challenges of the millennium development goals in Ethiopia: lessons for the sustainable development goals. BMJ Glob Health. 2017;2(2):e000318. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ethiopian Ministry of Health (MOH) Ethiopia-health-system-transformation-plan. Addis Ababa: Ethiopia Ministry of Health; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Federal Ministry of Health of Ethiopia . Health sector transformation plan IV. Addis Ababa: Ethiopia Minstry of Health; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.All African report. Promising results in reducing maternal mortality in Ethiopia. https://allafrica.com/stories/201804050979.html. Accessed 5 Dec 2018.
  • 10.Gupta S, Pal D, Tiwari R, Garg R, Shrivastava AK, Sarawagi R, et al. Impact of Janani Suraksha Yojana on institutional delivery rate and maternal morbidity and mortality: an observational study in India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2012;30(4):464–471. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v30i4.13416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Habte F, Demissie M. Magnitude and factors associated with institutional delivery service utilization among childbearing mothers in Cheha district, Gurage zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia: a community based cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:299. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0716-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bayu H, Adefris M, Amano A, Abuhay M. Pregnant women’s preference and factors associated with institutional delivery service utilization in Debra Markos Town, North West Ethiopia: a community based follow up study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:15. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0437-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Weldemariam S, Kiros A, Welday M. Utilization of institutional delivery service and associated factors among mothers in North West Ethiopian. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3295-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ngowi AF, Kamazima SR, Kibusi S, Gesase A, Bali T. Women’s determinant factors for preferred place of delivery in Dodoma region Tanzania: a cross sectional study. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0373-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ababulgu FA, Bekuma TT. Delivery site preferences and associated factors among married women of child bearing age in Bench Maji Zone, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2016;26(1):45–53. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v26i1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kesterton A, Cleland J, Sloggett A, Ronsmans C. Institutional delivery in rural India: the relative importance of accessibility and economic status. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(30):1–9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tsegay R, Aregay A, Kidanu K, Alemayehu M, Yohannes G. Determinant factors of home delivery among women in Northern Ethiopia: a case control study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(289):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4159-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gabrysch S, Cousens S, Cox J, Campbell OM. The influence of distance and level of care on delivery place in rural Zambia: a study of linked national data in a geographic information system. PLoS Med. 2011;8(1):e1000394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zafar S, Sikander S, Ahmad I, Ahmad M, Parveen N, Saleem S, et al. Is home delivery really preferred? a mixed-methods national study in Pakistan. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13(Suppl 1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0039-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Anyait A, Mukanga D, Oundo G, Nuwaha F. Predictors for health facility delivery in Busia district of Uganda: a cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12(132):1–9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

13104_2019_4158_MOESM1_ESM.docx (25.4KB, docx)

Additional file 1. English version Questionnaires used to assess delivery place preference.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Research Notes are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES