Skip to main content
PMC home page
Development (Cambridge, England) logoLink to Development (Cambridge, England)
. 2019 Feb 20;146(4):dev171124. doi: 10.1242/dev.171124

Morphogenesis of neurons and glia within an epithelium

Isabel I C Low 1,‡, Claire R Williams 1,‡, Megan K Chong 1, Ian G McLachlan 1, Bradley M Wierbowski 1, Irina Kolotuev 2,*, Maxwell G Heiman 1,§
PMCID: PMC6398450  PMID: 30683663

ABSTRACT

To sense the outside world, some neurons protrude across epithelia, the cellular barriers that line every surface of our bodies. To study the morphogenesis of such neurons, we examined the C. elegans amphid, in which dendrites protrude through a glial channel at the nose. During development, amphid dendrites extend by attaching to the nose via DYF-7, a type of protein typically found in epithelial apical ECM. Here, we show that amphid neurons and glia exhibit epithelial properties, including tight junctions and apical-basal polarity, and develop in a manner resembling other epithelia. We find that DYF-7 is a fibril-forming apical ECM component that promotes formation of the tube-shaped glial channel, reminiscent of roles for apical ECM in other narrow epithelial tubes. We also identify a requirement for FRM-2, a homolog of EPBL15/moe/Yurt that promotes epithelial integrity in other systems. Finally, we show that other environmentally exposed neurons share a requirement for DYF-7. Together, our results suggest that these neurons and glia can be viewed as part of an epithelium continuous with the skin, and are shaped by mechanisms shared with other epithelia.

KEY WORDS: C. elegans, Amphid, Dendrites, Glia, Neurodevelopment, Sensory epithelia

Summary: Sensory neurons and glia, which breach the epithelial barrier between an organism and its environment, exhibit epithelial properties themselves and develop through mechanisms shared with other epithelia.

INTRODUCTION

Between each of us and the outer world sits an epithelium. These sheets of cells, held together by tight and adherens junctions, create a barrier at every surface of our body and provide the interface through which we perceive our surroundings.

Neurons form intimate connections with epithelia in order to transmit information from the exterior surfaces of the body to the brain. For example, our sense of touch is mediated by mechanosensory neurons that branch along the basal (‘inner’) side of the skin epithelium. The skin plays a major role in shaping these sensory neurons, and these epithelia-neuron interactions have been extensively studied in vertebrates (Wang et al., 2013; Zimmerman et al., 2014), Drosophila (Parrish et al., 2009; Han et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2012; Jiang et al., 2014; Tenenbaum et al., 2017) and C. elegans (Dong et al., 2013; Liang et al., 2015; Díaz-Balzac et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2016; Zou et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2017; Celestrin et al., 2018). Similarly, our senses of hearing and taste are mediated by afferent neurons that are positioned at the basal surfaces of epithelia and receive information from specialized non-neuronal sensory cells (hair cells, taste cells) within these epithelia (Roper, 2013; Frank and Goodrich, 2018). In each of these examples, neurons make intimate connections with epithelia, but they remain restricted to the ‘inside’ surface and do not directly contact the outside world.

In contrast, our sense of smell is mediated by sensory neurons with a different topology: they protrude through the epithelium to the apical (‘outside’) surface where they detect odorants in the outside world (Firestein, 2001). On one side, the neurons extend dendrites that form tight junctions with glial-like cells in the epithelium (Steinke et al., 2008). On the other side, the neurons extend axons that pierce the basal lamina of the epithelium and extend into the brain (Graziadei and Graziadei, 1979). Thus, based on their anatomy, these sensory neurons have properties of both epithelial cells and neurons: like an epithelial cell, they have an outward-facing surface exposed to the environment; but, like a true neuron, they have an axon that projects into the brain. Sensory neurons with this anatomy are prevalent in invertebrates, and might represent an ancestral sensory structure (McLachlan and Heiman, 2013). In most cases, they are surrounded by glial supporting cells that are also exposed to the outside environment. These interesting structures raise several questions. Do the neurons and glia exhibit other epithelial-like properties, such as apical-basal polarity, in addition to axon-dendrite polarity? Do they develop using mechanisms of morphogenesis that are similar to those used by epithelia? What role do the glia play during neuron development?

Here, we address these questions using the C. elegans amphid, which consists of 12 neurons and two glial cells (Ward et al., 1975). Each neuron extends an unbranched dendrite to the nose where it senses environmental stimuli, as well as an axon that projects into the nerve ring or ‘brain’ (White et al., 1986). The two glial cells, called the sheath and socket, each extend a single process to the nose where they form a tube-shaped pore through which most of the dendrites have direct access to the outside environment (Ward et al., 1975). The sheath completely wraps the dendrite endings, creating a local environment that can affect sensory function (Perens and Shaham, 2005; Bacaj et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2008; Oikonomou et al., 2011, 2012; Procko et al., 2011; Singhvi et al., 2016; Wallace et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017), while the socket forms an opening continuous with the skin. Most of the dendrite endings protrude through this tube-shaped glial pore into the environment, and are decorated with cilia bearing receptors for specific smells, tastes or other stimuli (Bargmann, 2006).

In the embryo, the amphid dendrites develop by a mechanism called retrograde extension, which is distinct from the typical growth cone-mediated outgrowth of axons or dendrites (Heiman and Shaham, 2009). First, amphid neurons and glia are assembled into a polarized multicellular rosette that is carried to the nose by the migrating skin epithelium (Fan et al., 2018preprint). Then, the nascent tips of the amphid dendrites stay anchored at the nose while the neuronal cell bodies migrate away, stretching the dendrites out behind them (Heiman and Shaham, 2009). DYF-7, a zona pellucida (ZP) domain protein, is required to keep the dendrite tips anchored at the nose; in the absence of DYF-7, the nascent dendrites are dragged along behind the migrating neuronal cell bodies and fail to extend (Heiman and Shaham, 2009). Interestingly, ZP domain proteins such as DYF-7 are typically associated with epithelia, rather than with developing neurons (Plaza et al., 2010). They are almost always found in the apical extracellular matrix (ECM), which coats the outer (or luminal) surfaces of epithelia in the kidney, liver and many other tissues. ZP domain proteins, along with other apical ECM proteins, play important roles in shaping epithelia, especially narrow epithelial tubes (Sundaram and Cohen, 2017). This led us to consider whether epithelial features of amphid neurons and glia might be important for their development.

Here, we show that amphid neurons and glia exhibit hallmarks of epithelial cells, including tight junctions and apical-basal polarity. Consistent with the idea that DYF-7 acts as a component of apical ECM, we find that it is required for the formation of fibrils at the apical surface of the developing amphid and that it incorporates into fibrils when expressed in vitro. Loss of DYF-7 leads to failure to form the continuous tube-shaped glial pore that surrounds the dendrites, reminiscent of rupture defects seen in other epithelial tubes upon disrupting apical ECM. These defects are exacerbated by loss of FRM-2, a homolog of proteins that are also involved in epithelial integrity in other systems. Finally, we show that a requirement for DYF-7 is shared by other sensory neurons that are exposed to the environment. Our results suggest that these environmentally exposed sensory neurons and their associated glia should be viewed as part of an epithelium that is continuous with the skin, with apical-basal polarity and a mechanism of development that shares key features with other epithelia, especially narrow epithelial tubes.

RESULTS

Amphid neurons and glia exhibit hallmarks of an epithelium

Two hallmarks of an epithelium are the presence of tight junctions and apical-basal polarity that divide an outward-facing surface from an inward-facing surface. (In this context, ‘outward’ and ‘inward’ do not refer to the extracellullar and cytoplasmic faces of the plasma membrane, but to the regions of the cell that face the outer environment or internal tissues, respectively.) Outward-facing apical surfaces are exposed to the outside world or topologically equivalent spaces, such as the lumen of a secretory duct, airway, blood vessel or brain ventricle. In the mature amphid, the terminal ∼5 µm of most dendrites is exposed directly to the environment through a tube-shaped glial pore, while the remaining ∼95 µm of the dendrite is exposed to the internal tissues (pseudocoelom) of the organism (Fig. 1A-D, Fig. S1A-D). We asked whether amphid neurons and glia exhibit properties of true epithelial cells, namely the presence of tight junctions and apical-basal polarity.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Open in a new tab

Amphid neurons and glia exhibit tight junctions and distinct apical and basolateral surfaces. (A-C) Schematics showing relative positions of (A) amphid dendrite endings, (B) tight junctions (purple), and (C) apical (green) and basolateral (red) surfaces. For simplicity, only a single neuron is drawn. Neuron (Ne), pink; sheath (Sh), blue; socket (So), yellow; hypodermis (H, skin), gray. (D) Cell-specific markers were used to visualize single neurons and glia. ASER neuron (gcy-5pro, red); sheath glia (F16F9.3pro, blue); socket glia (grl-2pro, yellow). (E,F) Overlap of neuron:sheath and sheath:socket tight junctions was visualized by using these promoters to express AJM-1-YFP in the sheath and cytoplasmic mCherry plus AJM-1-CFP in (E) the neuron or (F) the socket. (D′,E′,F′) Dotted line in schematics indicates approximate outline of sheath. Images are higher magnifications of the boxed areas in D,E,F; purple arrowheads indicate the position of overlapping tight junctions. (G-I) The apical and basolateral markers ApiGreen (Ap, green) and BasoRed (Ba, red) (see Fig. S2) were expressed in (G) the neuron, (H) the sheath and (I) the socket, using the same promoters. Boxed regions in G-I are magnified in G'-I′. jxn, junction; Ap, ApiGreen; Ba, BasoRed.

Tight junctions

Classical EM analysis described electron-dense tight junctions between amphid neurons and the sheath glial cell; the sheath and socket glia; and the socket and skin (Ward et al., 1975; Perkins et al., 1986). Consistent with these observations, recent studies have noted localization of the tight junction protein AJM-1 near amphid dendrite endings (Nguyen et al., 2014; Nechipurenko et al., 2016). We used promoters specific to the ASE neuron, the sheath or the socket (gcy-5pro, F16F9.3pro and grl-2pro, respectively; Fig. 1D) to drive expression of a region of AJM-1 cDNA tagged with CFP or YFP in each of these cell types. This approach allowed us to visualize defined tight junctions with single-cell resolution.

AJM-1-YFP expressed in the sheath glial cell labeled 13 ring-shaped junctions (Fig. 1E, yellow). Their positions are consistent with a single large junction to the socket plus 12 smaller junctions to each of the dendrites. The ASE dendrite passes through one of the more anterior of these smaller rings (Fig. 1E, red). AJM-1-CFP expressed in the ASE neuron labels a ring that is concentric with one of the sheath rings and is positioned near the dendrite ending, proximal to the cilium (Fig. 1E′, arrowhead). We obtained similar results with other amphid neurons (AWB and AWC; Fig. S1E). These results indicate that each neuron forms an individual ring-shaped tight junction with the sheath glial cell.

AJM-1-CFP expressed in the socket glial cell labels two ring-shaped structures whose positions are consistent with the presence of socket:skin and socket:sheath junctions (Fig. 1F′, blue). The latter overlaps AJM-1-YFP expressed in the sheath glial cell (Fig. 1F′, yellow). AJM-1-CFP also labels a stripe connecting these rings, consistent with the auto-junction that the socket makes on itself as it wraps into a single-cell tube (Fig. 1B,F). We obtained similar results using another tight junction component (DLG-1, Fig. S1F). Together, the neuron:sheath, sheath:socket and socket:skin tight junctions delineate an outward-facing surface that is continuous with the skin epithelium (Fig. 1B).

Apical-basal polarity

Another hallmark of epithelia is the presence of biochemically distinct apical and basolateral membranes. We recently developed constructs derived from the transmembrane protein SAX-7 that localize exclusively to apical or basolateral surfaces in a canonical epithelium (Fig. S2). For simplicity, we will refer to these markers as ApiGreen and BasoRed. We expressed these markers under control of promoters specific to single amphid neurons or glia.

In the neuron, ApiGreen localized distal to the tight junction in the dendrite ending (Fig. 1G, green). BasoRed localized along the length of the dendrite and was excluded from the dendrite ending (Fig. 1G, red). This suggests that the outward- and inward-facing surfaces of the neuron are biochemically distinct. The region labeled by ApiGreen has been referred to as the periciliary membrane compartment (PCMC) and is a site of membrane trafficking that is important for ciliogenesis (Blacque and Sanders, 2014). ApiGreen was typically, but not always, excluded from the cilium itself; in general, transmembrane proteins are excluded from the cilium via a diffusion barrier called the ciliary gate (Garcia-Gonzalo and Reiter, 2017) but higher expression levels of ApiGreen may have allowed it to leak through this barrier in some cases.

In the sheath glial cell, ApiGreen localized in a pattern consistent with the outward-facing surface between the sheath:socket junction and the most posterior of the sheath:neuron junctions (Fig. 1H, green). This surface is more extensive than that observed for the ASE neuron, which forms one of the more anterior junctions with the sheath (see Fig. S1A-D). A marker of apical cytoskeleton, ERM-1, localized in a similar pattern (Fig. S1G). BasoRed localized to the rest of the glial surface and did not overlap with ApiGreen (Fig. 1H, red). Similarly, in the socket glial cell, ApiGreen localized to the outward-facing surface between the sheath:socket and socket:skin junctions, with BasoRed localizing to the rest of the glial surface (Fig. 1C,I). Together, the presence of tight junctions and apical-basal polarity suggest that amphid neurons and glia can be viewed as part of an epithelium continuous with the skin.

DYF-7 is an apical ECM component that promotes integrity of the amphid epithelium

Next, we considered how the epithelial properties of these neurons and glia might relate to their morphogenesis in the embryo. We previously found that the ZP domain protein DYF-7 is required for amphid dendrite extension during development. Most ZP domain proteins are found at the apical surfaces of epithelia, where they polymerize into fibrils and play important roles in epithelial morphogenesis, including preventing rupture of narrow epithelial tubes (Plaza et al., 2010). We therefore considered the hypothesis that DYF-7 promotes dendrite extension by acting as an apical ECM component. Further justification for this idea comes from two recent studies showing that DEX-1, a protein we identified as acting similarly to DYF-7, plays a role in apical ECM in other model epithelia (Cohen et al., 2018; Flatt et al., 2018). Thus, viewing the amphid neurons and glia as part of an epithelium, we tested three predictions about DYF-7: first, that it localizes to apical surfaces; second, that it polymerizes into fibrils; and third, that dendrite defects caused by disruption of DYF-7 reflect the loss of epithelial integrity in the amphid.

DYF-7 localizes to apical surfaces

We examined the localization of DYF-7 in the developing amphid and other tissues. Most ZP domain proteins are synthesized with a membrane anchor and undergo proteolytic cleavage at a consensus furin cleavage site (CFCS) to release the ectodomain (Bokhove and Jovine, 2018). DYF-7 contains a CFCS and can undergo proteolytic cleavage in vitro (Heiman and Shaham, 2009). In order to determine whether DYF-7 undergoes cleavage in vivo and to track the localization of its ectodomain, we tagged DYF-7 with superfolderGFP (sfGFP) on its ectodomain (DYF-7ecto) and mCherry on its cytoplasmic tail (DYF-7cyt) (Fig. 2A). This construct completely rescues a dyf-7 null mutant (Fig. S3A).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Open in a new tab

DYF-7 is cleaved in vivo and its ectodomain localizes to apical surfaces. (A) Cartoon schematic of an embryo showing a single neuron (blue; cell body is marked with an asterisk) with its dendrite extending to the developing nose (dendrite ending, arrowhead). Topology of the DYF-7 reporter construct, consisting of the ZP domain (ZP), superfolder GFP tag (sfGFP), consensus furin-family cleavage site (CFCS), transmembrane segment (TM) and cytoplasmic region tagged with mCherry (mCherry). (B) A live, intact embryo expressing this construct in sensory neurons (dyf-7pro) during dendrite extension (asterisks and arrowheads indicate cell body and dendrite ending). (C,D) Embryos expressing sfGFP-DYF-7 in sensory neurons (dyf-7pro) (C) with myristyl-mCherry or (D) with immunostaining against AJM-1. Some structures appear as short linear segments (arrow) rather than rounded caps. (E-G) Embryos misexpressing sfGFP-DYF-7 in gut (pha-4pro) with myristyl-mCherry (E), ubiquitously (heat shock promoter) with myristyl-mCherry (F) or with immunostaining against AJM-1 (G). Brackets mark pharynx (p) and gut (g). Scale bars: 10 µm in main panels; 2 µm in magnified views.

We expressed this construct under control of the dyf-7 promoter, which is expressed in sensory neurons, and examined embryos at the time of dendrite extension. We found that the DYF-7ecto and DYF-7cyt fragments localized differently, consistent with proteolytic cleavage at the CFCS (Fig. 2B). Deletion of the CFCS led to increased colocalization, confirming that DYF-7 undergoes CFCS-dependent proteolysis in vivo (Fig. S3B). The membrane-anchored cytoplasmic tail of DYF-7 localized diffusely across the neuronal membrane with enrichment at dendrite endings (Fig. 2B, red), consistent with our previous observations (Heiman and Shaham, 2009). In contrast, the ZP domain of DYF-7ecto localized with exquisite precision to caps at dendrite endings (Fig. 2B, green). This localization requires the ZP domain, as a construct lacking the ZP domain localized diffusely throughout the extra-embryonic space (Fig. S3C).

Multiple dendrite caps were observed, corresponding to the amphid and other sense organs in the head (Fig. 2C). In some cases, these structures took the shape of short linear segments, consistent with the luminal surface of a tube (Fig. 2C, arrow). Immunostaining with an antibody against AJM-1 revealed that each of these caps is situated adjacent to a tight junction (Fig. 2D). The position of these caps is thus consistent with the outward-facing apical surfaces of the dendrites.

Next, we asked where DYF-7 would localize if it were misexpressed in other epithelia. We expressed the tagged DYF-7ecto construct under control of gut-specific or ubiquitously expressed promoters. In the gut, DYF-7ecto localized to the lumen, which is the apical surface of this well-studied model epithelium (Leung et al., 1999) (Fig. 2E). When expressed ubiquitously, DYF-7ecto localized to the lumens of the gut and pharynx, as well as to dendritic caps at the developing nose (Fig. 2F). It was absent from non-epithelial regions of the embryo. Immunostaining against AJM-1 confirmed that misexpressed DYF-7ecto localizes in the pharynx and gut, specifically to apical surfaces (Fig. 2G).

DYF-7 forms fibrils in vivo and in vitro

Other ZP domain proteins contribute to apical ECM by polymerizing into fibrils that form a meshwork at the apical surfaces of epithelia (Jovine et al., 2002, 2004, 2006; Schaeffer et al., 2009). We therefore asked whether DYF-7 also forms fibrils.

Previous EM studies noted the appearance of extracellular fibrils in the developing amphid (Oikonomou et al., 2011). However, these structures are difficult to visualize using standard approaches because their appearance depends on the angle of sectioning and the developmental stage of the embryo. We used a method called positional correlative anatomy EM to provide greater control over these variables (Kolotuev, 2014; Burel et al., 2018). Briefly, a high-pressure frozen sample is flat-embedded at the surface of a resin block, a region of interest is identified at high magnification and the sample is then oriented for ultramicrotome sectioning with respect to known anatomical features.

Using this method, we identified embryos undergoing dendrite extension – between the comma and 1.5-fold stages of embryogenesis (∼420 min post-fertilization) – and sectioned them at an angle parallel to the long axis of the dendrites (Fig. 3A, top). In wild-type animals at this stage, cilia had not yet formed but a centriole/basal body was always present at the dendrite endings (annotated in Fig. 3Aiii, arrowheads). We found that the developing dendrites form direct contacts with each other, rather than making individual junctions to the sheath, as in the mature structure. The dendrites are bundled together in a single channel of the sheath glial cell that is continuous with the channel of the socket glial cell, which in turn is open to the extra-embryonic space (Fig. 3A). In all cases, we observed fibrils that originate near the dendrite endings, extend through the sheath:socket channel and terminate near the extra-embryonic ECM, extending ∼1.5 µm in total (Fig. 3A; fibrils, brackets). These fibrils were consistently visible across serial sections in all embryos imaged (n=3 amphids).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Open in a new tab

DYF-7 forms extracellular fibrils. (A) Image of a wild-type embryo after high-pressure freezing, fixation and flat embedding. Flat embedding allowed selection of embryos at the desired stage and orientation for sectioning. Serial sectioning led to identification of the (i-iii) left- and (iv-vi) right-hand amphids. Three serial sections of each amphid are shown. Neurons, red; sheath, blue; socket, yellow. Basal bodies/centrioles are annotated in iii with arrowheads. Extracellular fibrils are marked with brackets. (B) Three serial sections (vii-ix) of an amphid in a dyf-7 embryo at the same developmental stage. The sheath forms a pocket around the neurons and no fibrils are visible. Basal bodies/centrioles appear normal (arrowheads). (C) Drosophila S2 cells were transfected with sfGFP-DYF-7. A representative field of cells is shown. GFP-labeled structures appeared as (i) a plume at the cell surface, (ii) complex tangles, (iii) puncta and fibrils that appear to encircle the cells, and (iv,v) small webs.

Next, we compared this with dyf-7 mutant embryos at the same stage. In dyf-7 embryos at this stage, the nascent dendrites and sheath have just begun to withdraw from the developing nose (Fig. 3B, top). The dendrites are organized within the sheath in a manner similar to wild type but the sheath forms a closed cavity rather than an open channel (Fig. 3Bvii-ix). We did not observe fibrils in any of the dyf-7 embryos imaged (n=6 amphids). We considered the possibility that fibrils might be present but disorganized and hard to recognize (e.g. too short or oriented randomly). However, we were unable to identify fibril-like structures in any serial sections across a variety of embryo orientations and a range of section thicknesses (60-100 nm). This finding suggests that DYF-7 is required for formation of these fibrils.

Finally, we asked whether DYF-7 would be incorporated into fibrils when expressed in vitro. We expressed sfGFP-DYF-7 in Drosophila S2 cells. We observed GFP-positive clumps and tangles extending from the surfaces of cells (Fig. 3C). In some cases, GFP-positive fibrils appeared to wrap around the cells (Fig. 3Cii,iii). Thus, our results indicate that DYF-7 is incorporated into fibrils in vitro and that it is necessary for the formation or maintenance of such fibrils at the apical surface of the developing amphid in vivo. These observations support the idea that, like ZP domain proteins in other systems, DYF-7 is an apical ECM component.

DYF-7 is required for the tube-shaped glial pore to form

Studies in C. elegans and Drosophila have shown that disrupting ZP domain proteins that are part of the apical ECM leads to epithelial rupture, including loss of a continuous lumen in the narrow epithelial tubes of the C. elegans excretory system and the Drosophila tracheal system (Wilkin et al., 2000; Jaźwińska et al., 2003; Bökel et al., 2005; Kelley et al., 2015; Gill et al., 2016; Cohen et al., 2018). Previously, we focused on the role of DYF-7 in anchoring dendrites to the embryonic nose; however, viewing DYF-7 as an apical ECM component, we decided to ask whether dendrite-anchoring defects might be related to failure to form the tube-shaped glial pore that normally surrounds the dendrites.

In dyf-7 mutants, amphid dendrites and the sheath glial cell fail to extend but the socket glial cell still extends a process to the nose (Heiman and Shaham, 2009) (Fig. 4A). First, we examined tight junctions and apical-basal markers in the socket. At the nose, tight junctions were still present between the socket and the skin, and the apical marker ApiGreen still localized to the outward-facing surface (Fig. 4B-C). However, the auto-junction that normally seals the socket into a tube was absent, and no signs of the normal socket channel could be seen. In 32 of 48 amphids, the sheath and socket appeared completely dissociated from each other; however, in the remaining 16 amphids, the socket glial cell extended an ectopic posterior process to contact the shortened sheath glial cell (see schematic in Fig. 4A). In these examples, tight junction markers colocalized at the sheath:socket contact, but appeared as a small dot rather than a ring, as in wild type (Fig. 4D-D″). ApiGreen did not localize to the sheath:socket contact (Fig. 4E-E″). These results suggest that the socket cell retains tight junctions and apical-basal polarity, but no longer forms a continuous channel with the sheath.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Open in a new tab

Disruption of the amphid glial channel in dyf-7 mutants. (A) Schematic showing the relative positions of the socket (So), sheath (Sh) and neurons (Ne) in a dyf-7 mutant. A posterior process from socket to sheath developed in 16/48 amphids. Regions of interest are boxed: (i) socket:skin junction, shown in B-C; (ii) sheath:socket junction, shown in D-E; (iii) neuron:sheath junction, shown in F-H. (B-F″) Three-color merged images showing tight junctions: AJM-1-YFP expressed in sheath (B″,D″,F″) plus AJM-1-CFP (B′,D′,F′) and cytoplasmic mCherry expressed in (B,D) socket or (F) neuron. Purple arrowheads indicate positions of relevant tight junctions; asterisks indicate cell bodies. (C,E,G,H) ApiGreen and BasoRed expressed in (C,E) socket, (G) neuron or (H) sheath. All markers and promoters are the same as in Fig. 1.

Next, we examined these markers in the amphid sheath and an amphid neuron. Both cells retained their tight junctions and apical-basal polarity (Fig. 4F-H). The dendrite still appeared to enter the sheath and form tight junctions with it, consistent with our previous EM analysis (Heiman and Shaham, 2009) (Fig. 4F-F″). However, the apical surface of the sheath glial cell appeared to be organized in a network of cyst-like internal pouches rather than an open channel (Fig. 4H). These defects are reminiscent of the loss of lumen integrity caused by disruption of ZP domain proteins in other narrow epithelial tubes. Together, these results strongly suggest that amphid neurons and glia use a developmental mechanism that shares key features with other epithelia: namely, the use of a fibril-forming ZP domain protein in the apical ECM to generate a narrow epithelial tube.

DYF-7 defects are enhanced by loss of FRM-2, a homolog of epithelial integrity proteins

Next, we wanted to identify additional factors that help to promote morphogenesis of amphid neurons and glia. We reasoned that, if the amphid shares developmental features with epithelia, then it might use additional factors that are typically found in developing epithelia, such as proteins involved in apical-basal polarity or cell junction integrity. Conversely, if the amphid differs in important ways from conventional epithelia, then it might rely more heavily on factors that are typically associated with neuronal or glial development, or novel factors.

To this end, we performed an unbiased genetic screen using a sensitized background in which DYF-7 activity is mildly impaired. We took advantage of a hypomorphic missense allele, dyf-7(ns117), in which only ∼35% of amphids are affected (Heiman and Shaham, 2009). Briefly, we performed chemical mutagenesis of dyf-7(ns117) mutants bearing a fluorescent marker for a single amphid neuron. One-thousand F2 self-progeny bearing novel unique homozygous mutations were picked to individual plates and their clonal F3 offspring were visually screened for increased (enhanced) penetrance of the dendrite extension defect (Fig. 5A). We isolated two mutants with heritably increased penetrance: hmn162 and hmn169. As hmn169 was less strongly enhanced and exhibited semi-dominance (see Materials and Methods), we chose to focus on hmn162.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Open in a new tab

Loss of FRM-2 enhances weak dyf-7 defects. (A) Schematic of genetic strategy used to isolate enhancers of the hypomorphic missense mutant dyf-7(ns117). Parental (P0) strain exhibits ∼35% short amphids (red) and ∼65% full-length amphids (green). Following mutagenesis, clonal third-generation (F3) progeny bearing additional mutations (mut) were visually screened for enhanced penetrance. (B) Schematic of the FRM-2 protein showing location of hmn162 nonsense mutation. FRM-2 is roughly 50-60% identical to human EPB41L5, zebrafish moe and Drosophila Yurt throughout the FERM B-lobe (FB), FERM C-lobe (FC) and FERM-adjacent (FA) domains, with a more divergent C-terminal sequence. (C) frm-2(hmn162) enhances the amphid dendrite extension defects of dyf-7(ns117). frm-2(+) transgene indicates animals bearing a transgene with a wild-type frm-2 genomic fragment. n≥100 amphids per genotype. Data are mean±s.e.m. (D) frm-2pro drives expression in sensory neurons (dyf-7pro, arrowheads) at the time of dendrite extension, as well as bright expression in pharynx and gut. (E) A rescuing FRM-2-GFP construct expressed by its endogenous promoter localizes to developing dendrite endings (arrow).

Single-step mapping and sequencing of hmn162 identified a nonsense mutation in a previously uncharacterized gene called frm-2 (Fig. 5B). Mutants bearing frm-2(hmn162) alone exhibit very rare (1±1%) dendrite defects (Fig. 5C). However, whereas dyf-7(ns117) exhibits 35±5% penetrant dendrite defects, the dyf-7(ns117); frm-2(hmn162) double mutant exhibits an enhanced penetrance of 70±4% (Fig. 5C). A wild-type frm-2 genomic fragment expressed under its own regulatory sequences completely rescues this phenotype, returning the penetrance to the level of the dyf-7(ns117) single mutant (37±5%) (Fig. 5C).

frm-2 is predicted to encode a FERM-domain protein most closely related to mammalian EPB41L5, zebrafish mosaic eyes (moe) and Drosophila Yurt (Yrt) (Fig. 5B). Each of these proteins has been shown to interact with the Crumbs apical polarity complex to regulate epithelial morphogenesis (Hsu et al., 2006; Laprise et al., 2006, 2009; Gosens et al., 2007; Salis et al., 2017). Disruption of EPB41L5, moe and Yrt has been shown in each of these systems to cause disorganized tight junctions and loss of epithelial integrity (Jensen and Westerfield, 2004; Salis et al., 2017; Schell et al., 2017). Interestingly, in Drosophila trachea, the relationship between Yrt and apical ECM has been examined, and these pathways were found to act independently and in parallel to shape epithelial tubes, an observation that would be consistent with loss of FRM-2 leading to enhancement of dyf-7 defects (Laprise et al., 2010).

To determine whether FRM-2 might be acting directly in the amphid, we examined its expression. At the time of dendrite extension, a frm-2pro:GFP reporter is expressed brightly in the developing epithelium of the pharynx and gut, with much weaker but consistent expression in sensory neurons (Fig. 5D, arrowheads). We did not observe rescue using a dyf-7pro:FRM-2 construct, which is expressed only in the sensory neurons, possibly suggesting a requirement for FRM-2 in other cells such as glia (data not shown). We examined FRM-2 protein localization using a frm-2pro:FRM-2-GFP reporter. We consistently observed localization at developing amphid dendrite endings (Fig. 5E, arrow), although it was sometimes obscured by the much brighter signal from the pharynx and gut. We did not detect FRM-2 in the mature amphid although expression persisted in the pharynx (Fig. S4), suggesting it may act mainly in the embryo to promote amphid morphogenesis, similar to DYF-7 (Heiman and Shaham, 2009).

These results support the idea that FRM-2 acts apically in the developing amphid to promote epithelial integrity, similar to what has been shown for EPB41L5, moe and Yrt in other epithelia. Our results are consistent with the idea that, like Yrt, FRM-2 acts in parallel to apical ECM proteins such as DYF-7 to regulate the formation of a narrow epithelial tube. Although our unbiased screen was not comprehensive, it is interesting that it identified a factor that most closely resembles ones found in other epithelia, rather than ones typically involved in the development of neurons or glia.

Other environmentally exposed neurons also require DYF-7

In addition to the amphid, other sensory neurons in the head are exposed directly to the environment and are thus likely to have epithelial properties (Ward et al., 1975). These include the cephalic (CEP), inner labial (IL) and outer labial (OL) neurons. Each of these classes of neuron has its own dedicated glia (CEP sheath and socket; IL sheath and socket; OL sheath and socket) that form a tube-shaped channel around the dendrites. In all cases, there are junctions between the dendrites and sheath; the sheath and socket; and the socket and skin to delineate an outward-facing surface (Ward et al., 1975). We wondered whether these neurons also require DYF-7.

To test this, we used cell-specific promoters to visualize amphid, CEP, OL and IL dendrites in wild-type and dyf-7 animals (Fig. 6). In dyf-7 mutants, amphid neurons are typically ∼10% of wild-type length (Fig. 6B,C). We found that CEP, OL and IL neurons are also affected by the loss of DYF-7 (Fig. 6B,C). The defects were highly penetrant, with >90% of dendrites having lengths at least five standard deviations below the wild-type mean (Fig. 6C). These dendrites were typically ∼80% of wild-type length (Fig. 6C), but length varied even within a class; e.g. ventral CEPs were consistently more affected than dorsal CEPs (75.2±17.4 and 91.2±3.2% of nose length, respectively).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Open in a new tab

Sensory neurons within epithelia exhibit a shared dependence on DYF-7. (A,B) Cell-specific markers were used to visualize sensory neurons within epithelia – amphid (AWC, odr-1pro), CEP (dat-1pro), OL (OLQ, ocr-4pro) and IL (IL2, klp-6pro) – as well as URY (tol-1pro), which is not within an epithelium, in (A) wild type and (B) dyf-7(ns119) null mutants. Arrowheads indicate position of dendrite endings. (C) Quantification of dendrite lengths as a fraction of nose length for each neuron in wild-type (left column) and dyf-7 (right column) animals. Colored bars represent individual dendrites (n≥48 per column); black bars represent means. Shaded areas represent the wild-type mean±5 standard deviations (s.d.) for each neuron type; the percentage of dendrites in this range (‘full-length dendrites’) is given.

For comparison, we also examined the URY sensory neuron. This neuron extends an unbranched dendrite to the nose that associates with sheath glia, but its dendrite ending does not enter the glial channel and is not exposed to the environment; thus, it is not expected to have epithelial properties (Ward et al., 1975). We found that these dendrites were mostly unaffected by loss of DYF-7, suggesting that its role is specific to environmentally exposed neurons (Fig. 6B,C). Together, these results indicate that the amphid, CEP, OL and IL neurons share a dependence on DYF-7. Thus, what we have learned about epithelial features of amphid neurons and glia might apply broadly to other environmentally exposed neurons in C. elegans and, perhaps, in other organisms as well.

DISCUSSION

Epithelial properties of amphid neurons and glia

Our results suggest that amphid neurons and glia exhibit features of an epithelium, including the use of apical ECM to shape the structure during development, and the presence of tight junctions and apical-basal polarity in the mature structure. These epithelial features allow the neurons to gain direct access to environmental stimuli, similar to the arrangement of neurons and glia in the olfactory and vomeronasal systems of mammals. This cellular anatomy is also the predominant sensory structure in invertebrates, including the campaniform, trichoid and chordotonal neurons of Drosophila and most sensory neurons of C. elegans (IL, OL, CEP in the head, as discussed above, as well as phasmids, deirids and male-specific tail sensory neurons) (White et al., 1986; Hartenstein, 1988). Thus, neurons with epithelial properties may be an ancestral type of sensory structure.

Viewed as an epithelium, the glial pore of the amphid especially resembles narrow epithelial tubes found in capillaries and the branching ductwork of kidney, pancreas, lung or other organs (Sundaram and Cohen, 2017). The development of narrow epithelial tubes has been studied extensively in the C. elegans excretory system, which includes three tube-forming cells: the canal, duct and pore cells (Sundaram and Buechner, 2016). The canal and pore cells bear anatomical similarities to the amphid sheath and socket, respectively, with the canal and sheath forming seamless tubes that are not lined with cuticle, and the pore and socket using auto-junctions to create cuticle-lined tubes that are open to the environment via junctions with the skin. An additional curious parallel is that the excretory pore and amphid socket can each act in a stem cell-like manner, undergoing a post-embryonic division that results in self-renewal plus the production of a neuron (Sulston and Horvitz, 1977; Sammut et al., 2015). Besides their anatomical similarities, the excretory system and amphid share genetic and molecular features: several mutants have been described that cause strong phenotypes affecting both the excretory system and amphid (Rdy phenotype, for ‘rod-like larval lethality and dye-filling defective’), and several molecular markers exhibit prominent expression shared by both these organs (e.g. pros-1, daf-6, lin-48 and grl-2) (Michaux et al., 2000; Johnson et al., 2001; Perens and Shaham, 2005; Hao et al., 2006; Liégeois et al., 2007; Kolotuev et al., 2013; Kage-Nakadai et al., 2016; Wallace et al., 2016).

These parallels are consistent with the idea that the development of the amphid resembles that of other narrow epithelial tubes. With its easily visualized morphology and the ability to label or genetically manipulate each neuron and glial cell with single-cell specificity, the amphid offers a novel and potentially powerful model system with which to ask questions about epithelial development. The epithelial properties of amphid neurons also raise new questions, including: (1) how can a cell simultaneously have apical-basal and axon-dendrite polarity?; (2) given that the transcription factor LIN-26 is thought to promote epithelial fates while repressing neuronal fates (Labouesse et al., 1994, 1996), what kind of transcriptional programs allow the simultaneous expression of epithelial and neuronal genes?; and (3) why do DYF-7 and FRM-2 affect epithelia that contain neurons and glia more strongly than they affect other epithelia?

DYF-7 as an apical ECM component

ZP domain proteins are found in the apical ECM of nearly all epithelia and are present from cnidaria to chordates (Plaza et al., 2010; Matveev et al., 2012). They play important roles in human disease: the tectorins of the inner ear are mutated in deafness; the tumor suppressor DMBT1 is expressed in many epithelia and is frequently mutated in cancer; uromodulin in the kidney is mutated in hereditary nephropathy; GP-2 is expressed in the pancreas and intestine, and acts as an autoantigen in Crohn's disease; and the TGF-β co-receptor endoglin is expressed in endothelia, mutated in vascular dysplasia and elevated in pre-eclampsia (Legan et al., 1997; Ligtenberg et al., 2007; Gregory et al., 2014; Roggenbuck et al., 2014; Devuyst et al., 2017). Previously, it was unclear how the expression of DYF-7 in neurons related to this well-established literature on ZP domain proteins in the apical ECM of epithelia. Our results clarify that, like other ZP domain proteins, DYF-7 localizes to apical surfaces and polymerizes into fibrils, and thus it is also likely to be an apical ECM component.

Morphogenesis of neurons and glia within an epithelium

Our results suggest a model in which epithelial properties of amphid neurons and glia play an integral role in their morphogenesis. First, amphid neurons and glia form an apical-basal polarized rosette shortly after the cells are born (Fan et al., 2018 preprint). Next, this rosette interacts with the developing epithelium of the skin and is carried to the nose (Fan et al., 2018 preprint). Finally, the cell bodies migrate away while their apical surfaces and cell junctions remain anchored at the nose (Heiman and Shaham, 2009). This anchoring requires apical ECM, including DYF-7 and contributions from apically localized FRM-2. The absence of these factors could prevent formation of a continuous tube-shaped glial pore around the dendrites, or the tube might form initially but then rupture at sheath:socket glial junctions. Thus, although each of the individual cells retains its apical-basal polarity, the continuous lumen from sheath to socket is lost. These defects are comparable with phenotypes seen in the C. elegans excretory system or Drosophila tracheal tubes upon disruption of apical ECM (Jaźwińska et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2006; Stone et al., 2009; Mancuso et al., 2012; Gill et al., 2016; Forman-Rubinsky et al., 2017; Pu et al., 2017; Cohen et al., 2018; Rosa et al., 2018). Thus, amphid dendrites are shaped by interactions within an epithelium composed of neurons, glia and skin.

These features seem to be shared with other epithelial sense organs in C. elegans (CEP, IL and OL). Intriguingly, retrograde extension has recently been reported in developing olfactory neurons in vertebrates. In zebrafish, olfactory placodes (which will give rise to olfactory epithelia) develop adjacent to the surface of the brain (Breau et al., 2017). Olfactory placode neurons attach nascent axons near the brain surface and then the cell bodies move away, extending axons behind them (Breau et al., 2017). The mechanism of anchoring in this case has not been described. However, given that much of our nervous system develops as a neuroepithelium – including sensory placodes, the cortex and the cerebellum – it will be interesting to explore whether neuron-epithelial interactions might also help to shape dendrites and axons in other contexts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and plasmids

Strains were constructed in the N2 background and cultured under standard conditions (Brenner, 1974; Stiernagle, 2006). Strains, transgenes and plasmids are listed in Tables S1-S3, respectively. All strains and plasmids are available upon request.

Fluorescence microscopy and image processing

Animals were mounted on 2% agarose pads in water or M9 buffer (Sulston et al., 1983) with 0-50 mM sodium azide, depending on developmental stage, and imaged using a Deltavision Core imaging system (Applied Precision) with UApo/340 40×1.35NA, PlanApo 60×1.42NA and U-PlanApo 100×1.4NA objectives (Olympus) and a CoolSnap HQ2 camera. The amphid socket promoter (grl-2pro) yields bright expression in the excretory system that obscures the amphid features we wished to highlight in Fig. 4 and Fig. S1; we therefore used a fluorescence stereomicroscope to select rare mosaic animals that lacked excretory system expression to obtain the amphid images in these figures. Images were deconvolved using Softworx (Applied Precision) and maximum-brightness projections were obtained from contiguous optical sections using ImageJ. All projections used the same upper and lower limits across wavelengths; however, a thinner optical stack was often used in high-magnification images shown as insets. Owing to large differences in signal intensity between neuronal and glial cell bodies and their thin processes, gamma settings were adjusted for the red signal in S1C in order to show the relevant structures clearly.

Immunofluorescence

Embryos were fixed using a methanol-acetone procedure and stained with anti-AJM-1 primary antibody MH27 (Francis and Waterston, 1991) (obtained from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank established at the University of Iowa by the NICHD/NIH) and sheep anti-mouse DyLight649 secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 515-495-062). Briefly, embryos were cracked by sandwiching them between a coverslip and Superfrost Plus slide (Fisher), then freezing them for 5 min on a metal block on dry ice, and briskly removing the coverslip. The slide was placed in methanol at −20°C for 20 min followed by acetone at −20°C for 10 min, then washed in PBST (phosphate-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween) and incubated in blocking solution [0.5% I-Block (ThermoFisher) in PBST] at room temperature for 1 h. Primary and secondary antibodies were used at 1:10 and 1:100, respectively, in blocking solution. GFP fluorescence was preserved and visualized directly.

Electron microscopy

Samples were subjected to high-pressure freezing followed by freeze substitution as described previously (Kolotuev et al., 2010). Samples were flat embedded, targeted and sectioned using the positional correlation and tight trimming approach (Kolotuev, 2014). This method facilitates identification of rare features in complex samples by using a precisely targeted region for sectioning. The sample was first viewed on a high-magnification optical microscope (Leica SPE confocal, 63× Leica oil immersion objective) and the distance between the first section and the expected location of the feature of interest was calculated. The sample was then mounted for ultramicrotome sectioning, and advancement of the sectioning was tracked following the feed count parameters of the ultramicrotome. Sections (100 nm) were collected on the slot/formvar-coated grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and observed with respect to the desired position using a JEOL JEM 1400 TEM microscope (JEOL, Japan).

S2 cells

Drosophila Schneider (S2) cells (Invitrogen) were cultured and transfected with FuGene HD (Roche), as described previously (Heiman and Shaham, 2009). Two days after transfection, cells and medium were harvested, applied in a small volume (∼10 µl) directly to a coverslip without a slide and imaged as described above.

Genetic screen and mutant identification

Fourth larval stage (L4) animals of strain CHB99 [oyIs44V; dyf-7(ns117) X] were mutagenized using 70 mM ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS, Sigma) at 20°C for 4 h. Nonclonal F2 progeny were picked to 1000 individual plates. F3 populations were scored visually using a fluorescence stereomicroscope for increased (enhanced) or decreased (suppressed) penetrance of dendrite extension defects. Isolates corresponding to hmn162 and hmn169 exhibited 87% and 61% penetrance, respectively (n=100). Following a backcross to dyf-7(ns117) kyIs136[str-2pro:GFP] X males, cross-progeny exhibited 37% and 55% penetrance, respectively (n>150), suggesting a recessive mode of inheritance for hmn162 and a dominant or partially dominant mode of inheritance for hmn169. In both cases, penetrance was similar between hermaphrodite and male cross-progeny, suggesting an absence of sex linkage. For mapping, 160 backcrossed F2 animals were picked to individual plates and the resulting F3 progeny were screened for enhanced penetrance of dendrite defects. Forty plates of animals with enhanced penetrance were identified, and these recombinants were pooled and subjected to genomic DNA extraction and whole-genome sequencing for one-step mapping (Doitsidou et al., 2010). The parental strains were also sequenced. Analysis with CloudMap (Minevich et al., 2012) identified a linked region on LG III including a nonsense mutation in frm-2 [AAGTTTGTT(C>T)AGTGCAAGG].

Dendrite length measurements

L4 animals were mounted and imaged as described above, and dendrite lengths were measured using the segmented line tool in ImageJ. The dendrite was traced from the point where it joins the cell body to the point where it ends at the nose, then normalized by the distance from the cell body to the nose to account for variance in the size of the animal.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

We thank Shai Shaham, under whose support and guidance this project was initiated; Agnes Burel and Marie Therese Lavault for assistance with electron microscopy; Elizabeth Lamkin and Karolina Mizeracka for plasmids; Jeff Simske and Verena Göbel for advice on AJM-1 and ERM-1 markers; Elisabeth Altendorfer and Monica Colaiacovo for assistance with immunofluorescence; Meera Sundaram, Zhirong Bao and Li Fan for sharing unpublished data and generous advice; members of the Heiman lab for comments on the manuscript; and the C. elegans Genome Center and WormBase.

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

Author contributions

Investigation: I.I.C.L., C.R.W., M.K.C., I.G.M., B.M.W., I.K.; Writing - original draft preparation: I.I.C.L., C.R.W., M.K.C., I.G.M., B.M.W., I.K., M.G.H.; Writing - review and editing: I.I.C.L., C.R.W., M.K.C., I.G.M., B.M.W., I.K., M.G.H.; Supervision: M.G.H.; Funding acquisition: I.G.M., M.G.H.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship to I.G.M.), the National Institutes of Health [GM108754 to M.G.H.] and the March of Dimes Foundation [Basil O'Connor Starter Scholar Award to M.G.H.]. Deposited in PMC for release after 12 months.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information available online at http://dev.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/dev.171124.supplemental

References

  1. Bacaj T., Tevlin M., Lu Y. and Shaham S. (2008). Glia are essential for sensory organ function in C. elegans. Science 322, 744-747. 10.1126/science.1163074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bargmann C. I. (2006). Chemosensation in C. elegans WormBook, 1-29. 10.1895/wormbook.1.123.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Blacque O. E. and Sanders A. A. (2014). Compartments within a compartment: what C. elegans can tell us about ciliary subdomain composition, biogenesis, function, and disease. Organogenesis 10, 126-137. 10.4161/org.28830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bökel C., Prokop A. and Brown N. H. (2005). Papillote and Piopio: Drosophila ZP-domain proteins required for cell adhesion to the apical extracellular matrix and microtubule organization. J. Cell Sci. 118, 633-642. 10.1242/jcs.01619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bokhove M. and Jovine L. (2018). Structure of zona pellucida module proteins. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 130, 413-442. 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2018.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Breau M. A., Bonnet I., Stoufflet J., Xie J., De Castro S. and Schneider-Maunoury S. (2017). Extrinsic mechanical forces mediate retrograde axon extension in a developing neuronal circuit. Nat. Commun. 8, 282 10.1038/s41467-017-00283-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brenner S. (1974). The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77, 71-94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burel A., Lavault M.-T., Chevalier C., Gnaegi H., Prigent S., Mucciolo A., Dutertre S., Humbel B. M., Guillaudeux T. and Kolotuev I. (2018). A targeted 3D EM and correlative microscopy method using SEM array tomography. Development 145, dev160879 10.1242/dev.160879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Celestrin K., Díaz-Balzac C. A., Tang L. T. H., Ackley B. D. and Bülow H. E. (2018). Four specific immunoglobulin domains in UNC-52/Perlecan function with NID-1/Nidogen during dendrite morphogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 145, dev158881 10.1242/dev.158881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen J. D., Flatt K. M., Schroeder N. E. and Sundaram M. V. (2018). Epithelial shaping by diverse apical extracellular matrices requires the nidogen domain protein DEX-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 211, 185-200. 10.1534/genetics.118.301752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Devuyst O., Olinger E. and Rampoldi L. (2017). Uromodulin: from physiology to rare and complex kidney disorders. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 13, 525-544. 10.1038/nrneph.2017.101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Díaz-Balzac C. A., Rahman M., Lázaro-Peña M. I., Martin Hernandez L. A., Salzberg Y., Aguirre-Chen C., Kaprielian Z. and Bülow H. E. (2016). Muscle- and skin-derived cues jointly orchestrate patterning of somatosensory dendrites. Curr. Biol. 26, 2379-2387. 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Doitsidou M., Poole R. J., Sarin S., Bigelow H. and Hobert O. (2010). C. elegans mutant identification with a one-step whole-genome-sequencing and SNP mapping strategy. PLoS ONE 5, e15435 10.1371/journal.pone.0015435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dong X., Liu O. W., Howell A. S. and Shen K. (2013). An extracellular adhesion molecule complex patterns dendritic branching and morphogenesis. Cell 155, 296-307. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Doroquez D. B., Berciu C., Anderson J. R., Sengupta P. and Nicastro D. (2014). A high-resolution morphological and ultrastructural map of anterior sensory cilia and glia in Caenorhabditis elegans. eLife 3, e01948 10.7554/eLife.01948 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fan L., Kovacevic I., Heiman M. G. and Bao Z. (2018). A multicellular rosette-mediated collective dendrite extension. bioRxiv. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Firestein S. (2001). How the olfactory system makes sense of scents. Nature 413, 211-218. 10.1038/35093026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Flatt K. M., Beshers C., Unal C., Cohen J. D., Sundaram M. V. and Schroeder N. E. (2018). Epidermal remodeling in Caenorhabditis elegans Dauers requires the nidogen domain protein DEX-1. Genetics 211, 169-183. 10.1534/genetics.118.301557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Forman-Rubinsky R., Cohen J. D. and Sundaram M. V. (2017). Lipocalins are required for apical extracellular matrix organization and remodeling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 207, 625-642. 10.1534/genetics.117.300207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Francis R. and Waterston R. H. (1991). Muscle cell attachment in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Biol. 114, 465-479. 10.1083/jcb.114.3.465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Frank M. M. and Goodrich L. V. (2018). Talking back: development of the olivocochlear efferent system. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 7, e324 10.1002/wdev.324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Garcia-Gonzalo F. R. and Reiter J. F. (2017). Open sesame: how transition fibers and the transition zone control ciliary composition. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 9, a028134 10.1101/cshperspect.a028134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gill H. K., Cohen J. D., Ayala-Figueroa J., Forman-Rubinsky R., Poggioli C., Bickard K., Parry J. M., Pu P., Hall D. H. and Sundaram M. V. (2016). Integrity of narrow epithelial tubes in the C. elegans excretory system requires a transient luminal matrix. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006205 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gilleland C. L., Falls A. T., Noraky J., Heiman M. G. and Yanik M. F. (2015). Computer-assisted transgenesis of Caenorhabditis elegans for deep phenotyping. Genetics 201, 39-46. 10.1534/genetics.115.179648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gosens I., Sessa A., den Hollander A. I., Letteboer S. J. F., Belloni V., Arends M. L., Le Bivic A., Cremers F. P. M., Broccoli V. and Roepman R. (2007). FERM protein EPB41L5 is a novel member of the mammalian CRB-MPP5 polarity complex. Exp. Cell Res. 313, 3959-3970. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.08.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Graziadei P. P. C. and Graziadei G. A. M. (1979). Neurogenesis and neuron regeneration in the olfactory system of mammals. I. Morphological aspects of differentiation and structural organization of the olfactory sensory neurons. J. Neurocytol. 8, 1-18. 10.1007/BF01206454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gregory A. L., Xu G., Sotov V. and Letarte M. (2014). Review: the enigmatic role of endoglin in the placenta. Placenta 35 Suppl., S93-S99. 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.10.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Han C., Wang D., Soba P., Zhu S., Lin X., Jan L. Y. and Jan Y.-N. (2012). Integrins regulate repulsion-mediated dendritic patterning of drosophila sensory neurons by restricting dendrites in a 2D space. Neuron 73, 64-78. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hao L., Johnsen R., Lauter G., Baillie D. and Bürglin T. R. (2006). Comprehensive analysis of gene expression patterns of hedgehog-related genes. BMC Genomics 7, 280 10.1186/1471-2164-7-280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hartenstein V. (1988). Development of Drosophila larval sensory organs: spatiotemporal pattern of sensory neurones, peripheral axonal pathways and sensilla differentiation. Development 102, 869-886. [Google Scholar]
  31. Heiman M. G. and Shaham S. (2009). DEX-1 and DYF-7 establish sensory dendrite length by anchoring dendritic tips during cell migration. Cell 137, 344-355. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hsu Y.-C., Willoughby J. J., Christensen A. K. and Jensen A. M. (2006). Mosaic Eyes is a novel component of the Crumbs complex and negatively regulates photoreceptor apical size. Development 133, 4849-4859. 10.1242/dev.02685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jaźwińska A., Ribeiro C. and Affolter M. (2003). Epithelial tube morphogenesis during Drosophila tracheal development requires Piopio, a luminal ZP protein. Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 895-901. 10.1038/ncb1049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jensen A. M. and Westerfield M. (2004). Zebrafish mosaic eyes is a novel FERM protein required for retinal lamination and retinal pigmented epithelial tight junction formation. Curr. Biol. 14, 711-717. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jiang N., Soba P., Parker E., Kim C. C. and Parrish J. Z. (2014). The microRNA bantam regulates a developmental transition in epithelial cells that restricts sensory dendrite growth. Development 141, 2657-2668. 10.1242/dev.107573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Johnson A. D., Fitzsimmons D., Hagman J. and Chamberlin H. M. (2001). EGL-38 Pax regulates the ovo-related gene lin-48 during Caenorhabditis elegans organ development. Development 128, 2857-2865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jovine L., Qi H., Williams Z., Litscher E. and Wassarman P. M. (2002). The ZP domain is a conserved module for polymerization of extracellular proteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 457-461. 10.1038/ncb802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jovine L., Qi H., Williams Z., Litscher E. S. and Wassarman P. M. (2004). A duplicated motif controls assembly of zona pellucida domain proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 5922-5927. 10.1073/pnas.0401600101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jovine L., Janssen W. G., Litscher E. S. and Wassarman P. M. (2006). The PLAC1-homology region of the ZP domain is sufficient for protein polymerisation. BMC Biochem. 7, 11 10.1186/1471-2091-7-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kage-Nakadai E., Ohta A., Ujisawa T., Sun S., Nishikawa Y., Kuhara A. and Mitani S. (2016). Caenorhabditis elegans homologue of Prox1/Prospero is expressed in the glia and is required for sensory behavior and cold tolerance. Genes Cells 21, 936-948. 10.1111/gtc.12394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kelley M., Yochem J., Krieg M., Calixto A., Heiman M. G., Kuzmanov A., Meli V., Chalfie M., Goodman M. B., Shaham S. et al. (2015). FBN-1, a fibrillin-related protein, is required for resistance of the epidermis to mechanical deformation during C. elegans embryogenesis. eLife 4, e06565 10.7554/eLife.06565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kim K. and Li C. (2004). Expression and regulation of an FMRFamide-related neuropeptide gene family in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Comp. Neurol. 475, 540-550. 10.1002/cne.20189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kim M. E., Shrestha B. R., Blazeski R., Mason C. A. and Grueber W. B. (2012). Integrins establish dendrite-substrate relationships that promote dendritic self-avoidance and patterning in drosophila sensory neurons. Neuron 73, 79-91. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kolotuev I. (2014). Positional correlative anatomy of invertebrate model organisms increases efficiency of TEM data production. Microsc. Microanal. 20, 1392-1403. 10.1017/S1431927614012999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kolotuev I., Schwab Y. and Labouesse M. (2010). A precise and rapid mapping protocol for correlative light and electron microscopy of small invertebrate organisms. Biol. Cell 102, 121-132. 10.1042/BC20090096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kolotuev I., Hyenne V., Schwab Y., Rodriguez D. and Labouesse M. (2013). A pathway for unicellular tube extension depending on the lymphatic vessel determinant Prox1 and on osmoregulation. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 157-168. 10.1038/ncb2662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Köppen M., Simske J. S., Sims P. A., Firestein B. L., Hall D. H., Radice A. D., Rongo C. and Hardin J. D. (2001). Cooperative regulation of AJM-1 controls junctional integrity in Caenorhabditis elegans epithelia. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 983-991. 10.1038/ncb1101-983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Labouesse M., Sookhareea S. and Horvitz H. R. (1994). The Caenorhabditis elegans gene lin-26 is required to specify the fates of hypodermal cells and encodes a presumptive zinc-finger transcription factor. Development 120, 2359-2368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Labouesse M., Hartwieg E. and Horvitz H. R. (1996). The Caenorhabditis elegans LIN-26 protein is required to specify and/or maintain all non-neuronal ectodermal cell fates. Development 122, 2579-2588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Laprise P., Beronja S., Silva-Gagliardi N. F., Pellikka M., Jensen A. M., McGlade C. J. and Tepass U. (2006). The FERM protein Yurt is a negative regulatory component of the Crumbs complex that controls epithelial polarity and apical membrane size. Dev. Cell 11, 363-374. 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Laprise P., Lau K. M., Harris K. P., Silva-Gagliardi N. F., Paul S. M., Beronja S., Beitel G. J., McGlade C. J. and Tepass U. (2009). Yurt, Coracle, Neurexin IV and the Na(+),K(+)-ATPase form a novel group of epithelial polarity proteins. Nature 459, 1141-1145. 10.1038/nature08067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Laprise P., Paul S. M., Boulanger J., Robbins R. M., Beitel G. J. and Tepass U. (2010). Epithelial polarity proteins regulate Drosophila tracheal tube size in parallel to the luminal matrix pathway. Curr. Biol. 20, 55-61. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Legan P. K., Rau A., Keen J. N. and Richardson G. P. (1997). The mouse tectorins. Modular matrix proteins of the inner ear homologous to components of the sperm-egg adhesion system. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 8791-8801. 10.1074/jbc.272.13.8791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. L'Etoile N. D. and Bargmann C. I. (2000). Olfaction and odor discrimination are mediated by the C. elegans guanylyl cyclase ODR-1. Neuron 25, 575-586. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81061-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Leung B., Hermann G. J. and Priess J. R. (1999). Organogenesis of the Caenorhabditis elegans intestine. Dev. Biol. 216, 114-134. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Liang X., Dong X., Moerman D. G., Shen K. and Wang X. (2015). Sarcomeres pattern proprioceptive sensory dendritic endings through UNC-52/Perlecan in C. elegans. Dev. Cell 33, 388-400. 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.03.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Liégeois S., Benedetto A., Michaux G., Belliard G. and Labouesse M. (2007). Genes required for osmoregulation and apical secretion in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 175, 709-724. 10.1534/genetics.106.066035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Ligtenberg A. J. M., Veerman E. C. I., Nieuw Amerongen A. V. and Mollenhauer J. (2007). Salivary agglutinin/glycoprotein-340/DMBT1: a single molecule with variable composition and with different functions in infection, inflammation and cancer. Biol. Chem. 388, 1275-1289. 10.1515/BC.2007.158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Liu X., Wang X. and Shen K. (2016). Receptor tyrosine phosphatase CLR-1 acts in skin cells to promote sensory dendrite outgrowth. Dev. Biol. 413, 60-69. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Lockwood C. A., Lynch A. M. and Hardin J. (2008). Dynamic analysis identifies novel roles for DLG-1 subdomains in AJM-1 recruitment and LET-413-dependent apical focusing. J. Cell Sci. 121, 1477-1487. 10.1242/jcs.017137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Maduro M. and Pilgrim D. (1995). Identification and cloning of unc-119, a gene expressed in the Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system. Genetics 141, 977-988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Mancuso V. P., Parry J. M., Storer L., Poggioli C., Nguyen K. C. Q., Hall D. H. and Sundaram M. V. (2012). Extracellular leucine-rich repeat proteins are required to organize the apical extracellular matrix and maintain epithelial junction integrity in C. elegans. Development 139, 979-990. 10.1242/dev.075135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Matveev I. V., Adonin L. S., Shaposhnikova T. G. and Podgornaya O. I. (2012). Aurelia aurita-Cnidarian with a prominent medusiod stage. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 318B, 1-12. 10.1002/jez.b.21440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. McLachlan I. G. and Heiman M. G. (2013). Shaping dendrites with machinery borrowed from epithelia. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 23, 1005-1010. 10.1016/j.conb.2013.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Mello C. C., Kramer J. M., Stinchcomb D. and Ambros V. (1991). Efficient gene transfer in C.elegans: extrachromosomal maintenance and integration of transforming sequences. EMBO J. 10, 3959-3970. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04966.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Michaux G., Gansmuller A., Hindelang C. and Labouesse M. (2000). CHE-14, a protein with a sterol-sensing domain, is required for apical sorting in C. elegans ectodermal epithelial cells. Curr. Biol. 10, 1098-1107. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00695-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Minevich G., Park D. S., Blankenberg D., Poole R. J. and Hobert O. (2012). CloudMap: a cloud-based pipeline for analysis of mutant genome sequences. Genetics 192, 1249-1269. 10.1534/genetics.112.144204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Nechipurenko I. V., Olivier-Mason A., Kazatskaya A., Kennedy J., McLachlan I. G., Heiman M. G., Blacque O. E. and Sengupta P. (2016). A conserved role for girdin in basal body positioning and ciliogenesis. Dev. Cell 38, 493-506. 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.07.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Nguyen P. A. T., Liou W., Hall D. H. and Leroux M. R. (2014). Ciliopathy proteins establish a bipartite signaling compartment in a C. elegans thermosensory neuron. J. Cell Sci. 127, 5317-5330. 10.1242/jcs.157610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Oikonomou G., Perens E. A., Lu Y., Watanabe S., Jorgensen E. M. and Shaham S. (2011). Opposing activities of LIT-1/NLK and DAF-6/patched-related direct sensory compartment morphogenesis in C. elegans. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001121 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Oikonomou G., Perens E. A., Lu Y. and Shaham S. (2012). Some, but not all, retromer components promote morphogenesis of C. elegans sensory compartments. Dev. Biol. 362, 42-49. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.11.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Parrish J. Z., Xu P., Kim C. C., Jan L. Y. and Jan Y. N. (2009). The microRNA bantam functions in epithelial cells to regulate scaling growth of dendrite arbors in drosophila sensory neurons. Neuron 63, 788-802. 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.08.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Peden E. M. and Barr M. M. (2005). The KLP-6 kinesin is required for male mating behaviors and polycystin localization in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol. 15, 394-404. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Perens E. A. and Shaham S. (2005). C. elegans daf-6 encodes a patched-related protein required for lumen formation. Dev. Cell 8, 893-906. 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Perkins L. A., Hedgecock E. M., Thomson J. N. and Culotti J. G. (1986). Mutant sensory cilia in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 117, 456-487. 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90314-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Plaza S., Chanut-Delalande H., Fernandes I., Wassarman P. M. and Payre F. (2010). From A to Z: apical structures and zona pellucida-domain proteins. Trends Cell Biol. 20, 524-532. 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Procko C., Lu Y. and Shaham S. (2011). Glia delimit shape changes of sensory neuron receptive endings in C. elegans. Development 138, 1371-1381. 10.1242/dev.058305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Pu P., Stone C. E., Burdick J. T., Murray J. I. and Sundaram M. V. (2017). The Lipocalin LPR-1 cooperates with LIN-3/EGF signaling to maintain narrow tube integrity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 205, 1247-1260. 10.1534/genetics.116.195156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Roggenbuck D., Reinhold D., Schierack P., Bogdanos D. P., Conrad K. and Laass M. W. (2014). Crohn's disease specific pancreatic antibodies: clinical and pathophysiological challenges. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 52, 483-494. 10.1515/cclm-2013-0801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Roper S. D. (2013). Taste buds as peripheral chemosensory processors. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 24, 71-79. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Rosa J. B., Metzstein M. M. and Ghabrial A. S. (2018). An Ichor-dependent apical extracellular matrix regulates seamless tube shape and integrity. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007146 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Salis P., Payre F., Valenti P., Bazellieres E., Le Bivic A. and Mottola G. (2017). Crumbs, Moesin and Yurt regulate junctional stability and dynamics for a proper morphogenesis of the Drosophila pupal wing epithelium. Sci. Rep. 7, 16778 10.1038/s41598-017-15272-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Sammut M., Cook S. J., Nguyen K. C. Q., Felton T., Hall D. H., Emmons S. W., Poole R. J. and Barrios A. (2015). Glia-derived neurons are required for sex-specific learning in C. elegans. Nature 526, 385-390. 10.1038/nature15700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Sasakura H., Inada H., Kuhara A., Fusaoka E., Takemoto D., Takeuchi K. and Mori I. (2005). Maintenance of neuronal positions in organized ganglia by SAX-7, a Caenorhabditis elegans homologue of L1. EMBO J. 24, 1477-1488. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Schaeffer C., Santambrogio S., Perucca S., Casari G. and Rampoldi L. (2009). Analysis of uromodulin polymerization provides new insights into the mechanisms regulating ZP domain-mediated protein assembly. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 589-599. 10.1091/mbc.e08-08-0876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Schell C., Rogg M., Suhm M., Helmstädter M., Sellung D., Yasuda-Yamahara M., Kretz O., Küttner V., Suleiman H., Kollipara L. et al. (2017). The FERM protein EPB41L5 regulates actomyosin contractility and focal adhesion formation to maintain the kidney filtration barrier. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, E4621-E4630. 10.1073/pnas.1617004114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Singhvi A., Liu B., Friedman C. J., Fong J., Lu Y., Huang X.-Y. and Shaham S. (2016). A Glial K/Cl transporter controls neuronal receptive ending shape by chloride inhibition of an rGC. Cell 165, 936-948. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Steinke A., Meier-Stiegen S., Drenckhahn D. and Asan E. (2008). Molecular composition of tight and adherens junctions in the rat olfactory epithelium and fila. Histochem. Cell Biol. 130, 339-361. 10.1007/s00418-008-0441-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Stiernagle T. (2006). Maintenance of C. elegans. WormBook (The C. elegans Research Community, ed.), doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.101.1 10.1895/wormbook.1.101.1 [DOI]
  90. Stone C. E., Hall D. H. and Sundaram M. V. (2009). Lipocalin signaling controls unicellular tube development in the Caenorhabditis elegans excretory system. Dev. Biol. 329, 201-211. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.02.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Sulston J. E. and Horvitz H. R. (1977). Post-embryonic cell lineages of the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 56, 110-156. 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90158-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Sulston J. E., Schierenberg E., White J. G. and Thomson J. N. (1983). The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 100, 64-119. 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90201-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Sundaram M. V. and Buechner M. (2016). The Caenorhabditis elegans excretory system: a model for tubulogenesis, cell fate specification, and plasticity. Genetics 203, 35-63. 10.1534/genetics.116.189357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Sundaram M. V. and Cohen J. D. (2017). Time to make the doughnuts: building and shaping seamless tubes. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 67, 123-131. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Tenenbaum C. M., Misra M., Alizzi R. A. and Gavis E. R. (2017). Enclosure of dendrites by epidermal cells restricts branching and permits coordinated development of spatially overlapping sensory neurons. Cell Rep. 20, 3043-3056. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Tobin D. M., Madsen D. M., Kahn-Kirby A., Peckol E. L., Moulder G., Barstead R., Maricq A. V. and Bargmann C. I. (2002). Combinatorial expression of TRPV channel proteins defines their sensory functions and subcellular localization in C. elegans neurons. Neuron 35, 307-318. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00757-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Tsalik E. L., Niacaris T., Wenick A. S., Pau K., Avery L. and Hobert O. (2003). LIM homeobox gene-dependent expression of biogenic amine receptors in restricted regions of the C. elegans nervous system. Dev. Biol. 263, 81-102. 10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00447-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Wallace S. W., Singhvi A., Liang Y., Lu Y. and Shaham S. (2016). PROS-1/prospero is a major regulator of the glia-specific secretome controlling sensory-neuron shape and function in C. elegans. Cell Rep. 15, 550-562. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Wang F., Julien D. P. and Sagasti A. (2013). Journey to the skin: somatosensory peripheral axon guidance and morphogenesis. Cell Adh. Migr. 7, 388-394. 10.4161/cam.25000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Wang S., Jayaram S. A., Hemphälä J., Senti K.-A., Tsarouhas V., Jin H. and Samakovlis C. (2006). Septate-junction-dependent luminal deposition of chitin deacetylases restricts tube elongation in the Drosophila trachea. Curr. Biol. 16, 180-185. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Wang Y., Apicella A., Lee S.-K., Ezcurra M., Slone R. D., Goldmit M., Schafer W. R., Shaham S., Driscoll M. and Bianchi L. (2008). A glial DEG/ENaC channel functions with neuronal channel DEG-1 to mediate specific sensory functions in C. elegans. EMBO J. 27, 2388-2399. 10.1038/emboj.2008.161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Wang W., Perens E. A., Oikonomou G., Wallace S. W., Lu Y. and Shaham S. (2017). IGDB-2, an Ig/FNIII protein, binds the ion channel LGC-34 and controls sensory compartment morphogenesis in C. elegans. Dev. Biol. 430, 105-112. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.08.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Ward S., Thomson N., White J. G. and Brenner S. (1975). Electron microscopical reconstruction of the anterior sensory anatomy of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Comp. Neurol. 160, 313-337. 10.1002/cne.901600305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. White J. G., Southgate E., Thomson J. N. and Brenner S. (1986). The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 314, 1-340. 10.1098/rstb.1986.0056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Wilkin M. B., Becker M. N., Mulvey D., Phan I., Chao A., Cooper K., Chung H.-J., Campbell I. D., Baron M. and MacIntyre R. (2000). Drosophila dumpy is a gigantic extracellular protein required to maintain tension at epidermal-cuticle attachment sites. Curr. Biol. 10, 559-567. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00482-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Yu S., Avery L., Baude E. and Garbers D. L. (1997). Guanylyl cyclase expression in specific sensory neurons: a new family of chemosensory receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3384-3387. 10.1073/pnas.94.7.3384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Zhu T., Liang X., Wang X.-M. and Shen K. (2017). Dynein and EFF-1 control dendrite morphology by regulating the localization pattern of SAX-7 in epidermal cells. J. Cell Sci. 130, 4063-4071. 10.1242/jcs.201699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Zimmerman A., Bai L. and Ginty D. D. (2014). The gentle touch receptors of mammalian skin. Science 346, 950-954. 10.1126/science.1254229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Zou W., Shen A., Dong X., Tugizova M., Xiang Y. K. and Shen K. (2016). A multi-protein receptor-ligand complex underlies combinatorial dendrite guidance choices in C. elegans. eLife 5, e18345 10.7554/eLife.18345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary information
develop-146-171124-s1.pdf (3.3MB, pdf)

Articles from Development (Cambridge, England) are provided here courtesy of Company of Biologists

RESOURCES