Skip to main content
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation logoLink to Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
. 2018 Mar 21;34(3):474–485. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy050

Panel sequencing distinguishes monogenic forms of nephritis from nephrosis in children

David Schapiro 1, Ankana Daga 1, Jennifer A Lawson 1, Amar J Majmundar 1, Svjetlana Lovric 1, Weizhen Tan 1, Jillian K Warejko 1, Inés Fessi 1, Jia Rao 1, Merlin Airik 1, Heon Yung Gee 1, Ronen Schneider 1, Eugen Widmeier 1, Tobias Hermle 1, Shazia Ashraf 1, Tilman Jobst-Schwan 1, Amelie T van der Ven 1, Makiko Nakayama 1, Shirlee Shril 1, Daniela A Braun 1, Friedhelm Hildebrandt 1,
PMCID: PMC6399484  PMID: 30295827

Abstract

Background

Alport syndrome (AS) and atypical hemolytic–uremic syndrome (aHUS) are rare forms of chronic kidney disease (CKD) that can lead to a severe decline of renal function. Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is more common than AS and aHUS and causes 10% of childhood-onset CKD. In recent years, multiple monogenic causes of AS, aHUS and SRNS have been identified, but their relative prevalence has yet to be studied together in a typical pediatric cohort of children with proteinuria and hematuria. We hypothesized that identification of causative mutations by whole exome sequencing (WES) in known monogenic nephritis and nephrosis genes would allow distinguishing nephritis from nephrosis in a typical pediatric group of patients with both proteinuria and hematuria at any level.

Methods

We therefore conducted an exon sequencing (WES) analysis for 11 AS, aHUS and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-causing genes in an international cohort of 371 patients from 362 families presenting with both proteinuria and hematuria before age 25 years. In parallel, we conducted either WES or high-throughput exon sequencing for 23 SRNS-causing genes in all patients.

Results

We detected pathogenic mutations in 18 of the 34 genes analyzed, leading to a molecular diagnosis in 14.1% of families (51 of 362). Disease-causing mutations were detected in 3 AS-causing genes (4.7%), 3 aHUS-causing genes (1.4%) and 12 NS-causing genes (8.0%). We observed a much higher mutation detection rate for monogenic forms of CKD in consanguineous families (35.7% versus 10.1%).

Conclusions

We present the first estimate of relative frequency of inherited AS, aHUS and NS in a typical pediatric cohort with proteinuria and hematuria. Important therapeutic and preventative measures may result from mutational analysis in individuals with proteinuria and hematuria.

Keywords: genetics; monogenic renal disease; nephritis, nephrotic syndrome; pediatrics

INTRODUCTION

Alport syndrome (AS) is a rare, progressive hereditary nephropathy that accounts for 1.6% of chronic kidney disease (CKD) manifesting before age 25 years [1, 2]. It is characterized by hematuria, proteinuria and extrarenal manifestations such as ocular and cochlear abnormalities. Patients with AS usually display severe decline of renal function, with 50% of males reaching end-stage renal disease (ESRD) by age 25 years and 15% of females reaching ESRD by age 40 years [3]. In contrast, thin basement membrane nephropathy (TBMN) is characterized by largely asymptomatic hematuria that is rarely associated with proteinuria and ESRD. Recessive mutations have been identified in the COL4A3 and COL4A4 genes as causative for AS and dominant mutations in the COL4A3 and COL4A4 genes have been identified as causative for TBMN [4–6]. Mutations in the COL4A5 gene cause X-linked AS [4–6]. To date, >1000 different mutations in COL4A3, COL4A4 and COL4A5 have been described. In patients with COL4A4 mutations, the ability to distinguish early which patients will exhibit severe renal disease and which patients will display benign hematuria can help reduce or delay the decline of renal function [7–10]. Previously, other groups have been able to identify disease-causing mutations in genes encoding for type IV collagen in 80% of patients with AS [11].

Atypical hemolytic–uremic syndrome (aHUS) is another rare nephropathy, characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia and acute kidney injury. It accounts for ∼2% of CKD cases that manifest before age 25 years [1, 2]. Mutations in nine genes have been identified as causative for aHUS [1, 2, 12–15]. The approval of eculizumab in 2011 has opened the door for new therapeutic approaches to the treatment of chronic aHUS. Thus, distinguishing between hereditary and nonhereditary forms of HUS has major implications for treatment approaches. In contrast, steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is a more common form of nephropathy that is characterized by proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia and edema. SRNS accounts for ∼10% of all CKD manifesting before age 25 years [1, 2, 16]. A monogenic cause of SRNS can be identified in ∼30% of cases that manifest before age 25 years [10, 16, 17].

In the setting of a pediatric nephrology clinic, presentation with a combination of proteinuria and hematuria poses a common diagnostic challenge. Molecular screening approaches for hereditary forms of CKD have been applied to well-defined disease cohorts, but few studies have tested for hereditary forms of CKD in such a typical pediatric patient population with both proteinuria and hematuria. We therefore hypothesized that identification of causative mutations by whole exome sequencing (WES) in known nephritis and nephrosis (NS) genes would allow distinguishing nephritis from nephrosis in a typical pediatric group of patients with proteinuria and hematuria. To examine the prevalence of hereditary forms of AS, aHUS and NS in a pediatric cohort of 371 CKD patients with proteinuria and hematuria manifesting before 25 years of age, we sequenced the coding regions of 11 AS-, aHUS- and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP)-causing genes and in parallel sequenced the coding regions of 23 common SRNS-causing genes. Causative mutations in AS-, aHUS- or NS-causing genes could be identified in 14.1% of individuals with childhood-onset proteinuria and hematuria and mutation analysis provides a safe approach for arriving at an etiologic diagnosis that can help distinguish nephritis from nephrosis in a pediatric population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human subjects

This study was approved by the institutional review boards of Boston Children’s Hospital and the University of Michigan. DNA samples were collected from 2854 individuals between 2003 and 2014 after obtaining informed consent, clinical data and pedigree information (www.renalgenes.org). Inclusion criteria were defined by the clinical presentation of both any level of proteinuria and any level of hematuria. The majority of patients had nephrotic-range proteinuria as defined by >2.5 g of proteinuria per day or a urine protein:creatinine ratio >2 g/g of creatinine [18]. The subjects had an onset of proteinuria and hematuria before an age of 25 years. It has previously been reported that the overall prevalence of monogenic CKD is >20% in patients manifesting before age 20 years [1], with 29.5% of nephrotic syndrome cases caused by single gene mutations [16]. A separate, previous study molecularly solved 83% of patients with AS with an average age of molecular diagnosis of 26 years [11]. Based on these previous studies, there is good evidence to support the use of an age cutoff of 25 years, with a high likelihood of monogenic CKD etiology in patients presenting before age 25 years. Thus a total of 362 families (371 patients) who met the inclusion criteria were included in this study, which consisted of 193 male and 178 female subjects. There was a bias against inclusion of patients positive for WT1 mutations due to initial prescreening of patients with phenotypically described Denys–Drash syndrome, Frasier syndrome or Wilms tumor. Our patient cohort had partial overlap with a previously published cohort, as discussed below [16].

Mutation analysis

In order to screen patients for monogenic forms of AS, aHUS and SRNS, we took a two-pronged approach (Supplementary data, Figure S1). For monogenic forms of AS, aHUS and TTP, we screened all 362 families using barcoded multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), even if they had previously undergone WES screening for mutations in SRNS-causing genes before the start of this study. This was done to ensure that we had thoroughly and uniformly screened every single patient for any mutations in any of the AS-, aHUS- and TTP-causing genes by the time of completion of this study. For monogenic forms of SRNS, some of our patients had been screened previously for pathogenic mutations in SRNS-causing genes in a previously published barcoded multiplex PCR and NGS study [16]. Of the 362 families, 315 had been previously screened for monogenic forms of SRNS using either WES or barcoded multiplex PCR and NGS, as alluded to above [16]. Thus there were 47 remaining families who had never been screened for monogenic forms of SRNS who were subsequently screened for monogenic forms of SRNS in this study using barcoded multiplex PCR and NGS. In summary, by the end of this study all 362 families were newly screened for mutations in AS-, aHUS- and TTP-causing genes and 47 families that had never been screened for mutations in NS-causing genes were newly screened for NS-causing mutations (Supplementary data, Figure S1).

High-throughput mutation analysis by array-based multiplex PCR and NGS

We designed 358 target-specific primer pairs for 300 coding exons and the adjacent splice sites of 11 genes that are known to cause AS, aHUS or TTP when mutated. The genes sequenced were ADAMTS13, C3, CD46, CFH, CFHR5, CFI, COL4A3, COL4A4, COL4A5, DGKE and THBD (Supplementary data, Table S1). For the 47 families who had not been screened previously for monogenic forms of SRNS, we used 524 target-specific primer pairs for 460 coding exons and the adjacent splice sites of 23 genes that are known to cause NS when mutated [16]. These 524 primer pairs were the same as those used for multiplex PCR and NGS in the patients previously screened for monogenic forms of NS [16]. The genes screened by multiplex PCR and NGS were ACTN4, ADCK4, ARHGAP24, ARHGDIA, CD2AP, COQ2, COQ6, CRB2, CUBN, INF2, ITGA3, ITGB4, LAMB2, LMX1B, MYO1E, NPHS1, NPHS2, PDSS2, PLCE1, PTPRO, SMARCAL1, TRPC6 and WT1 (Supplementary data, Table S2). In all multiplex PCRs, amplicon sizes ranged from 200 to 300 base pairs (primer sequences are available from the authors upon request). The use of barcoded multiplex PCR (48.48 Access Arrays system, Fluidigm, South San Francisco, CA, USA) allowed parallel amplification of all 358 amplicons in 362 families while screening AS, aHUS, and TTP genes and all 524 amplicons in the 47 families not previously screened for monogenic causes of SRNS. Subsequently the pooled barcoded PCR product libraries were sequenced on a MiSeq system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) using the v2 chemistry. Sequence reads were aligned to the human reference sequence using CLC Genomics Workbench (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark) [19]. Prior to further evaluation, we excluded synonymous variants and variants that occur with a minor allele frequency >1% in the Short Genetic Variations database (dbSNP, version 138).

Homozygosity mapping

For genome-wide homozygosity mapping the GeneChip Human Mapping 250k StyI Array from Affymetrix (Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used. Nonparametric logarithm of odds scores were calculated using a modified version of the program GENEHUNTER 2.1 [20, 21] through stepwise use of a sliding window with sets of 110 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and the program ALLEGRO [22] in order to identify regions of homozygosity as described [23, 24] using a disease allele frequency of 0.0001 and Caucasian marker allele frequencies.

WES

WES and variant burden analysis were performed as described previously [25]. In brief, genomic DNA was isolated from blood lymphocytes and subjected to exome capture using SureSelect human exome capture arrays (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) followed by NGS on the HiSeq sequencing platform (Illumina) as previously described.

Mutation calling

Sequence reads were mapped against the human reference genome (National Center for Biotechnology Information build 37/hg19) using the CLC Genomics Workbench (version 6.5.1; CLC bio). Variants with minor allele frequencies <1% in the dbSNP (version 138) were selected and annotated for impact on the encoded protein and for conservation of the reference base and amino acid among orthologs across phylogeny. All patients were evaluated for mutations in genes known to cause AS or aHUS when mutated (Supplementary data, Table S1) and for genes known to cause SRNS when mutated (Supplementary data, Table S2). In all patients with any potentially pathogenic heterozygous variant in NPHS2, we further verified for the presence or absence of a second heterozygous c.686 G > A (p.R229Q) mutation [26]. This was done because the allele frequency of the NPHS2 p.R229Q mutation exceeds the 1% cutoff used in this study and thus would have been missed during our initial analysis unless we explicitly checked for it [26].

Validation of variants

Variants were validated as previously described [16]. Briefly, all variants previously reported as pathogenic in individuals with AS, aHUS, TTP or SRNS were considered as likely disease causing. Novel variants were ranked based on their likelihood to be deleterious for the function of the encoded protein. We considered protein truncation and obligatory splice site mutations as likely disease causing. For missense alleles, evolutionary conservation among orthologues and across phylogeny and bioinformatics prediction programs PolyPhen-2 [27], SIFT [28] and MutationTaster [29] were taken into consideration. All variants that were frequently present in the homozygous state for recessive genes (>1%) heterozygous state for dominant genes (>0.1%), or hemizygous state for X-linked dominant genes in healthy control cohorts [1000 Genomes Browser, Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC), Exome Variant Server (EVS) and Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD)] were excluded unless previous studies demonstrated concrete loss of function or incomplete penetrance for the specific variant. Variants were confirmed in patient DNA using Sanger sequencing. Whenever parental DNA was available, segregation analysis was performed. Final calling of variant pathogenicity was performed by geneticists together with physician scientists who had knowledge of the clinical phenotypes and pedigree structure.

Coverage statistics for multiplex PCRs

While sequencing AS-, aHUS- and TTP-causing genes, we achieved a median sequencing coverage of 200× per individual and 400× per amplicon. Only 11 individuals (3%) and 27 amplicons (7.5%) had a median coverage <20×. While sequencing SRNS-causing genes in the 47 previously unscreened families in our cohort, we achieved a median sequencing coverage of 200× per individual and 200× per amplicon. No individuals (0%) and 43 amplicons (8.2%) had a median coverage <20×. Coverage statistics for our patients previously sequenced for mutations in SRNS-causing genes were previously reported [16].

Web Resources

Software

  • CLC Genomics Workbench, version 6.5.1 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark)

  • Alamut Visual, version 2.7, revision 1) (Interactive Biosoftware, Rouen, France)

RESULTS

Mutation detection

In a pediatric cohort of 371 patients (362 families) who had proteinuria and hematuria with an onset before 25 years of age, we examined for mutations in 11 genes that are known monogenic causes of AS (3 genes), aHUS (7 genes) or TTP (1 gene) if mutated (Supplementary data, Table S1) and for 23 genes that are known as monogenic causes of SRNS (Supplementary data, Table S2). Consanguinity was present in 56 of the 362 families screened (15.5%). We detected mutations in three of the three AS-causing genes and in three of the seven aHUS-causing genes (Table 1). We did not detect any mutations in the TTP-causing gene ADAMTS13. We detected causative mutations in 12 of the 23 SRNS-causing genes (Table 1). Mutations that likely explained the molecular etiology of disease were detected 51 of 362 unrelated families (14.1%) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Distribution of causative mutations detected in 18 of 34 sequenced genes for AS, aHUS, TTP and SRNS in 56 families presenting with proteinuria and hematuria before age 25 years

Gene symbol (n = 34) Number of families with molecular genetic diagnosis (n = 51) Percentage of total families (=100%)
Alport syndrome
 COL4A5 10 2.76
 COL4A3 6 1.66
 COL4A4 1 0.28
aHUS
 CFHR5 3 0.84
 CFH 1 0.28
 CFI 1 0.28
 C3 0 0
 CD46 0 0
 DGKE 0 0
 THBD 0 0
TTP
 ADAMTS13 0 0
Nephrotic syndrome
 NPHS1 5 1.38
 NPHS2 5 1.38
 LMX1B 4 1.10
 PLCE1 4 1.10
 LAMB2 3 0.82
 SMARCAL1 2 0.56
 ACTN4 1 0.28
 ARHGDIA 1 0.28
 COQ2 1 0.28
 CUBN 1 0.28
 INF2 1 0.28
 TRPC6 1 0.28
 ADCK4 0 0
 ARHGAP24 0 0
 CD2AP 0 0
 COQ6 0 0
 CRB2 0 0
 ITGA3 0 0
 ITGB4 0 0
 MYO1E 0 0
 PDSS2 0 0
 PTPRO 0 0
 WT1 0 0
Total 51 14.1

Genes with pathogenic variants

Variants were validated as previously described in the methods and in Sadowski et al. [16]. Mutations were detected in three AS-causing genes in 17 families: COL4A5 (10 families), COL4A3 (6 families) and COL4A4 (1 family) (Tables 2 and 3). Mutations were detected in three aHUS-causing genes in five families: CFHR5 (three families), CFH (one family) and CFI (one family) (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2.

Pathogenic variants detected by multiplex PCR and NGS in 362 families (371 patients) with proteinuria and hematuria with an age of onset <25 in 11 genes that if mutated, cause AS, aHUS or TTP

Family Exon (Zygosity) Nucleotide change Amino acid change dbSNP (rs #) Conserved to Poly- phen2 SIFT Mutation taster Sex Ethnicity (consan- guinity) gnO-MAD general population gnO-MAD closest ethnicity Bio- base
COL4A3
A2041 4 (Het) c.272G>A p.Gly91Asp Dr 0.994 Del DC m Euro (N) 1/30960 (0 hom) 0/14998 (0 hom) [30]
48 (Het) c.4421T>C p.Leu1474Pro 200302125 Dr 1 Del DC 735/276998 (0 hom) 620/126548 (0 hom) [31, 32]
A1916 4 (Het) c.279 + 6T>C Splice 770953670 NA −71% −15.4% −2.4% f Slavic (N) 1/245742 (0 hom) 0/30758 (0 hom) Novel
A2490 23 (Het) c.1504 + 6A>C Splice 760718271 NA +2.8% +0.9% +0.2% f Kazakh (N) 1/246078 (0 hom) 1/111616 (0 hom) Novel
A1479 27 (Het) c.1978C>A p.Pro660Thr 773674552 Gg 0.661 Del DC f Turk (Y) 5/277150 (0 hom) 5/126688 (0 hom) Novel
A2358 29 (Hom) c.2162del p.Gly721Val*26 NA NA NA NA m Asian (Y) 3/240354 (0 hom) 2/29504 (0 hom) Novel
A2609 49 (Het) c.4487G>A p.Arg1496Gln 776086781 Gg 0.989 Del DC m Euro (N) 11/276940 (0 hom) 1/126550 (0 hom) Novel
COL4A4
B789 2 (Hom) c.71 + 1G>A Splice NA −100% −100% −100% f Cauc (N) [33]
COL4A5
A5192 3 (Hem) c.231 + 3A>G Splice 376366035 NA −32.2% −0.4% −11.1% m Turk (Y) 2/178120 (2 hem) 2/79762 (2 hem) Novel
A965 4 (Hem) c.274_279del p.Arg92_Gly93del Dm NA NA NA m Euro (Y) Novel
A3676 6 (Hem) c.322-1G>A Splice NA −100% −100% −100% m Indian (Y) [34]
A2917 20 (Hem) c.1217del p.Gly406Val*68 NA NA NA NA m Slavic (N) Novel
A3933 24 (Hem) c.1634G>A p.Gly545Asp Dm 1 Del DC m Indian (N) Novel
24 (Hem) c.1634G>A p.Gly545Asp Dm 1 Del DC m Indian (N) Novel
B711 25 (Hem) c.1781G>A p.Gly594Asp Dm 0.355 Del DC m Euro (N) [35]
A1963 25 (Hem) c.1931G>A p.Gly644Asp Dm 1 Del DC m Hisp (Y) [11, 36]
B28 46 (Hem) c.4063del p.Glu1355Asn*22 NA NA NA NA m Arabic (Y) Novel
A4926 48 (Hem) c.4309C>G p.Gln1437Glu 143778018 Dm 0.407 Del DC m Filipino (N) 19/197664 (3 hom) 2/4713 (0 hom) Novel
A169 49 (Hem) c.4439del p.Pro1480His*74 NA NA NA NA m Turk (Y) Novel
49 (Hem) c.4439del p.Pro1480His*74 NA NA NA NA m Turk (Y) Novel
CFH
A4035 10 (Het) c.1507C>G p.Pro503Ala 570523689 Ci 0.746 Del PMP f Euro (N) 4/245456 (0 hom) 4/111226 (0 hom) [37]a
CFHR5
A4967 2 (Het) c.232T>C p.Ser78Pro 146025130 NA 0.986 Tol PMP m African (N) 32/277182 (0 hom) 27/24038 (0 hom) Novel
A2351 4 (Het) c.486dup p.Glu163Arg*35 565457964 NA NA NA NA f Cauc (N) 564/276160 (0 hom) 395/126014 (0 hom) [38, 39]
A3422 10 (Het) c.1615T>G p.Phe539Val 111989094 NA 0.998 Del DC m Arabic (?) 5/277086 (0 hom) 0/126608 (0 hom) Novel
CFI
A2336 13 (Het) c.1558 + 5G>T Splice 1114013791 NA −21.2% −11.9% −12.3% f Asian (N) 2400/276954 (19 hom) 0/18862 (0 hom) [40, 41]

The genes sequenced were ADAMTS13, C3, CD46, CFH, CFHR5, CFI, COL4A3, COL4A4, COL4A5, DGKE and THBD.

a

Variant reported in Biobase for nonrenal disease. The splice site prediction scores were derived left to right from the MaxEnt, NNSPLICE and HSF prediction programs, respectively.

Cauc, Caucasian; Ci, Ciona intestinalis; DC, disease causing; Del, deleterious; Dm, Drosophila melanogaster; Dr, Danio rerio; dup, duplication; Euro, European; F, female; Gg, Gallus gallus; Hem, hemizygous; Het, heterozygous; Hisp, Hispanic; Hom, homozygous; M, male; N, no; NA, not applicable; PMP, polymorphism; Tol, tolerated; Turk, Turkish; Y, yes.

Table 3.

Phenotypes of patients with pathogenic variants in 1 of 11 genes that if mutated cause AS, aHUS or TTP after multiplex PCR and NGS in 362 families (371 patients) with proteinuria and hematuria with an age of onset <25 years

Family Sex Age of onset (ESRD) Proteinuria Hematuria Biopsy Family history Ethnicity (consanguinity) Extrarenal treatment (response) Biobase
COL4A3
A2041 M 18 months 4 +(dipstick) Microscopic FSGS None Euro (N) Azospermia, ACEi(UR) [30]
[31, 32]
A1916 F 6 years 6 g/day Microscopic MPGN type 1 None Slavic (N) HTN, HepB, SST, BAS, SS(PR), CS(NR), MMF(UR) Novel
A2490 F 9 years 1 g/day Microscopic ND None Kazakh (N) HTN, SS(CR) Novel
A1479 F 4 years 1.08 g/day Microscopic ND Mother Turk (Y) SS(CR) Novel
A2358 M 10 years 4+ Microscopic FSGS 2 siblings (deceased) Asian (Y) SR Novel
A2609 M 10 years UPC 4 mg/mg Microscopic ND None Euro (N) SS(CR) Novel
COL4A4
B789 F 4 years UPC 2.57 mg/mg Microscopic FSGS None Cauc (N) [33]
COL4A5
A5192 M 3 years (3 years) 5 g/day Microscopic FSGS, TubAt None Turk (Y) SR, CP(NR) Novel
A965 M 15 years 1.88 g/day Macroscopic Alport, BM lamellation Mother Euro (Y) SR, CS(CR) Novel
A3676 M 5 years 15.5 g/day Y, type N/A ND None Indian (Y) Syncope, SR [34]
A2917 M 2 years 2 g/day Macroscopic Non-specified Mother Slavic (N) Novel
A3933 M 6 years 9.5 g/day Microscopic MCNS, MesP, TBM Brother, paternal cousin, paternal grandma Indian (N) Novel
B711 M 15 years 2 g/day Macroscopic Alport, FSGS Mother, father Euro (N) SR [35]
A1963 M 14 years 7 g/day Y, type N/A ND Uncle Hisp (Y) SR, CP(PR) [11, 36]
B28 M 1 year 3 g/day Microscopic ND None Arabic (Y) Novel
A4926 M 1 year 2 g/day Microscopic ND None Filipino (N) Cough, Pnm, FR, capto, cerf/erythro, albmn trans Novel
A169-21 M 7 years UPC 1.37 mg/mg Microscopic Crescentic GN Brother Turk (Y) SR, CP(NR) Novel
A169-22 M 1 year UPC 0.1 mg/mg Microscopic Crescentic GN Brother Turk (Y) SR, TX Novel
CFH
A4035 F 13 years UPC 2.57 mg/mg Y, type N/A FSGS, TMA None Euro (N) HTN, SS(PR) [37]a
CFHR5
A4967 M 7 years (7 years) 3 g/day Microscopic Active SLN None African (N) HTN, SS(PR), ESRD Novel
A2351 F 14 years 4 g/day Microscopic Diffuse MesP, TBM None Cauc (N) HTN, SR, CP(UR) [38, 39]
A3422 M 4 years 5 g/day Microscopic MPGN None Arabic (N) Novel
CFI
A2336 F 9 years 3.3 g/day Microscopic ND Sister, father Asian (N) [40, 41]

The genes sequenced were ADAMTS13, C3, CD46, CFH, CFHR5, CFI, COL4A3, COL4A4, COL4A5, DGKE and THBD.

a

Variant reported in Biobase for nonrenal disease.

ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; Albmn trans, albumin transfusions; BAS, bronchial asthma; BM, basement membrane; Capto, captopril; Cauc, Caucasian; Cerf/erythro, cefuroxime and erythromycin; CP, cyclophosphamide; CR, complete response; CS, cyclosporine; Euro, European; F, female; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; GN, glomerulonephritis; HepB, hepatitis B; Hisp, Hispanic; HTN, hypertension; M, male; MCNS, minimal change nephrotic syndrome; MesP, mesangial proliferation; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MPGN, membrane proliferative glomerulonephritis; N, no; ND, not done; NR, no response; Pnm, pneumonia; PR, partial response; SLN, sclerosing lobular nephritis; SR, steroid resistant; SS, steroid sensitive; SST, short stature; TBM, thin basement membrane; TMA, thrombotic microangiopathy; TubAt, tubular atrophy; Turk, Turkish; TX, transplant; type N/A, hematuria type unknown; UPC, urine protein:creatinine ratio; UR, unknown response; Y, yes.

In addition, mutations were detected in 12 SRNS-causing genes in 29 families: NPHS1 (5 families), NPHS2 (5 families), LMX1B (4 families), PLCE1 (4 families), LAMB2 (3 families), SMARCAL1 (2 families), ACTN4 (1 family), ARHGDIA (1 family), COQ2 (1 family), CUBN (1 family), INF2 (1 family) and TRPC6 (1 family) (Tables 4 and 5). No pathogenic variants were found in the following 16 genes: ADAMTS13, ADCK4, ARHGAP24, C3, CD2AP, CD46, COQ6, CRB2, DGKE, ITGA3, ITGB4, MYO1E, PDSS2, PTPRO, THBD and WT1. Of the 55 different disease-causing mutations detected in this study, 19 (34.5%) were novel variants that had never previously been reported in databases containing human disease-causing mutations.

Table 4.

Pathogenic variants detected in 362 families (371 patients) with proteinuria and hematuria with an age of onset <25 years in 23 genes that cause nephrotic syndrome if mutated

Family Exon (Zygo- sity) Nucleotide change Amino acid change dbSNP (rs #) Conserved to Poly- phen 2 SIFT Muta- tion taster Sex Ethnicity (consan- guinity) gnOMAD general population gnO-MAD closest ethnicity Bio- base Method
ACTN4
A1055 14 (Het) c. 1606C>A P.Arg536Ser Dr 0.933 Del DC M Kurd (Y) Novel EXM
ARHGDIA
A1432 5 (Hom) c.518G>T p.Gly173Val Sc 1 Del DC F Jewish (Y) 1/246016 (0 hom) 1/9840 (0 hom) [42] PCR
5 (Hom) c.518G>T p.Gly173Val Sc 1 Del DC M Jewish (Y) 1/246016 (0 hom) 1/9840 (0 hom) [42] PCR
COQ2
A103 3 (Het) c.683A>G p.Asn228Ser 121918232 Ce 0.918 Tol DC F Euro (N) 32/276228 (0 hom) 0/111262 (0 hom) [16, 43] PCR
5 (Het) c.856C>T p.Leu286Phe 776124921 Dm 0.997 Del DC 2/245656 (0 hom) 2/111470 (0 hom) [16] PCR
CUBN
A1213 19 (Hom) c. 2613_2614del p.Asp872Leu*3 386833777 NA NA NA NA M Balkan (N) 6/276980 (0 hom) 0/126554 (0 hom) [44] EXM
19 (Hom) c. 2613_2614del p.Asp872Leu*3 386833777 NA NA NA NA M Balkan (N) 6/276980 (0 hom) 0/126554 (0 hom) [44] EXM
19 (Hom) c. 2613_2614del p.Asp872Leu*3 386833777 NA NA NA NA M Balkan (N) 6/276980 (0 hom) 0/126554 (0 hom) [44] EXM
INF2
A675 2 (Het) c.37G>A p.Ala13Thr 201383094 Dr 0.982 Tol DC F Euro (N) 85/240928 (1 hom) 40/106632 (0 hom) [45]a PCR
LAMB2
A1757 2 (Hom) c.143A>C p.Tyr48Ser 776905329 Dr 1 Del DC M Hisp (N) 9/239510 (0 hom) 0/33384 (0 hom) Novel EXM
2 (Hom) c.143A>C p.Tyr48Ser 776905329 Dr 1 Del DC F Hisp (N) 9/239510 (0 hom) 0/33384 (0 hom) Novel EXM
A2356 7 (Hom) c.736C>T p.Arg246Trp 121912488 Ce 1 Del DC M Asian (Y) 3/240414 (0 hom) 0/17184 (0 hom) [16, 46] PCR
A1613 10 (Hom) c.1405 + 1G>A Splice 780041521 NA −100% 0% −100% M Euro (N) 4/244056 (0 hom) 1/109858 (0 hom) [16, 47] PCR
LMX1B
A200 4 (Het) c.737G>A p.Arg246Gln Ce 1 Del DC F Turk (Y) [16, 48] PCR
A2175 4 (Het) c.737G>A p.Arg246Gln 1 Del DC M Euro (N) [16, 48] PCR
A3180 4 (Het) c.737G>A p.Arg246Gln Ce 1 Del DC F Euro (N) [16, 48] PCR
A4009 7 (Het) c.929C>G p.Thr310Arg Gg 0.701 Del DC F Arabic (Y) Novela PCR
NPHS1
A1803 2 (Hom) c.139delG p.Ala47Pro*81 386833882 NA NA NA NA M Cauc (N) 2/241678 (0 hom) 1/107982 (0 hom) Novela PCR
A3775 7 (Het) c.840 + 1G>T Splice NA −100% −100% −100% F Indian (N) 1/245036 (0 hom) 1/30778 (0 hom) [49]a PCR
21 (Het) c.2903G>T p.Gly968Val 771798618 Ce 1 Del DC 1/236378 (0 hom) 0/30014 (0 hom) Novela PCR
A3380 8 (Het) c.928G>A p.Asp310Asn 763972372 Dm 0.99 Del DC M Asian (N) 3/241700 (0 hom) 3/17218 (0 hom) [50, 51] PCR
21 (Het) c.2816-3T>G Splice NA −91.9% −77.2% −2.9% [16, 51] PCR
B115 12 (Hom) c.1555C>T p.Pro519Ser Dr 0.984 Tol PMP F Cauc (N) [52] EXM
A1500 20 (Hom) c.2728T>C p.Ser910Pro Dr 0.959 Del DC F Afr-Am (N) [53, 54] PCR
NPHS2
A4681 1 (Hom) c.1A>T p.Met1* NA NA NA NA F Arabic (Y) [16] EXM
A4624 4 (Hom) c.467dup p.Leu156Phe*11 NA NA NA NA F Arabic (Y) [17, 51, 55, 56] PCR
B188 7 (Hom) c.855-856del p.Arg286Thr*17 749740335 NA NA NA NA F Hisp (Y) 18/275798 (0 hom) 0/34342 (0 hom) [57, 58]a PCR
A1616 7 (Hom) c.868G>A p.Val290Met 200482683 Dr 0.998 Del DC F Cauc (N) 33/276038 (0 hom) 32/126036 (0 hom) [59–61] PCR
A2239 8 (Hom) c.926C>T p.Ala309Val Ce 0.742 Del DC M Turk (N) [62]a PCR
PLCE1
A3233 10 (Hom) c.3169C>T p.Arg1057* NA NA NA NA F Arabic (Y) 1/245964 (0 hom) 0/111494 (0 hom) [16] PCR
A3617 11 (Hom) c.3379_3380del p.Asn1127* NA NA NA NA F Arabic (Y) [16] PCR
A3510 20 (Hom) c.4600A>G p.Lys1534Glu Sc 0.998 Del DC F Turk (Y) [16] PCR
A3869 26 (Hom) c.5521A>G p.Lys1841Glu Sc 1 Del DC M Arabic (Y) [16] PCR
SMARCAL1
A3146 4 (Het) c.49C>T p.Arg17* 119473034 NA NA NA NA F Euro (N) 2/246210 (0 hom) 1/111680 (0 hom) [63]a PCR
5 (Het) c.836T>C p.Phe279Ser 775057827 Ci 0.985 Tol DC 28/277230 (0 hom) 23/126712 (0 hom) [64]a PCR
A4162 12 (Hom) c.1736C>A p.Ser579* NA NA NA NA F Euro (N) [16] PCR
TRPC6
A4685 2 (Het) c.523C>T p.Arg175Trp Dr 1 Del DC F Arabic (N) [17] EXM

The genes sequenced were ACTN4, ADCK4, ARHGAP24, ARHGDIA, CD2AP, COQ2, COQ6, CUBN, INF2, ITGA3, ITGB4, LAMB2, LMX1B, MYO1E, NPHS1, NPHS2, PDSS2, PLCE1, PTPRO, SMARCAL1, TRPC6 and WT1.

a

Solved in this study using multiplex PCR. The splice site prediction scores were derived left to right from the MaxEnt, NNSPLICE and HSF prediction programs, respectively.

Afr-Am, African American; Cauc, Caucasian; Ce, Caenorhabditis elegans; Ci, Ciona intestinalis; DC, disease causing; Dr, Danio rerio; Del, deleterious; Dm, Drosophila melanogaster; dup, duplication; Euro, European; F, female; EXM, homozygosity mapping and whole exome sequencing; Gg, Gallus gallus; Het, heterozygous; Hisp, hispanic; Hom, Homozygous; M, male; N, no; NA, not applicable; PCR, Fluidigm multiplex PCR + NGS; PMP, polymorphism; Sc, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Tol, tolerated; Turk, Turkish; Y, yes.

Table 5.

Phenotypes of patients with pathogenic variants in 1 of 23 genes that if mutated cause nephrotic syndrome after multiplex PCR and NGS in 362 families (371 patients) with proteinuria and hematuria with an age of onset <25 years

Family Sex Age of onset (ESRD) Proteinuria Hematuria Biopsy Family history Ethnicity (consanguinity) Extrarenal treatment (response) Biobase
ACTN4
A1055 M 10 years UPC 4 mg/mg Y, type N/A FSGS None Kurd (Y) SS(CR), CS(CR) Novel
ARHGDIA
A1432 F 2 years (3 years) ACR 0.85 mg/mg Y, type N/A DMS None Jewish (Y) DF, SST, ID, CS(NR), TX [42]
M 1 year (1 year) 17.3 g/day Y, type N/A ND None Jewish (Y) SST, TX [42]
COQ2
A103 F 1 year 4 g/day Y, type N/A FSGS None Euro (N) SR, CS(PR) [16, 43]
CUBN
A1213 M 12 ACR 0.28 mg/mg Microscopic ND None Balkan (N) Hypocalcemia [44]
M 5 years ACR 0.26 mg/mg Microscopic ND None Balkan (N) [44]
M <1× month ACR 0.9 mg/mg Microscopic ND None Balkan (N) [44]
INF2
A675 F 16 years UPC 7.5 mg/mg Y, type N/A FSGS None Euro (N) Steroids(UR) [45]a
LAMB2
A1757 M 13 years 2.8 g/day Y, type N/A FSGS Aunt Hisp (N) HTN, SR, Cellcept(NR) Novel
F 13 years Y Y, type N/A FSGS Aunt Hisp (N) Novel
A2356 M 1 year 4+ Microscopic Finnish type 2 Brothers Asian (Y) Blindness [16, 46]
A1613 M <1 month 9.8 g/day Y, type N/A Dilated tubules, Microcysts None Euro (N) FTT [16, 47]
LMX1B
A200 F 8 years (9 years) 1.5 g/day Y, type N/A FSGS Mother Turk (Y) SR, HemDi [16, 48]
A2175 M 4 years (43 years) 3.1 g/L Y, N/A FSGS None Euro (N) Factor XII Deficiency, SR, CS(PR), Acei(UR), HemDi, TX [16, 48]
A3180 F 18 years (43 years) UPC 2 mg/mg Y, type N/A FSGS None Euro (N) HemDi, TX [16, 48]
A4009 F <1 month UPC 4 mg/mg Y, type N/A MCNS None Arabic (Y) SR, CS(NR) Novela
NPHS1
A1803 M <1 month UPC 38 mg/mg Microscopic MCNS None Cauc (N) CS(NR) Novela
A3775 F 1 year 0.95 g/day Y, type N/A Diffuse MesP None Indian (N) SS(CR) [49]a
A3380 M <1 month Y Y, type N/A ND None Asian (N) [50, 51]
B115 F <1 month 50 mg/mg Y, type N/A ND None Cauc (N) Hypothyroidism [52]
A1500 F 1 year UPC 20 mg/mg Y, type N/A MCNS None Afr-Am (N) HTN [53, 54]
NPHS2
A4681 F 7 years UPC 8 mg/mg Y, type N/A FSGS None Arabic (Y) SR [16]
A4624 F 1 year UPC 3.9 mg/mg Y, type N/A MPGN None Arabic (Y) HTN, SR, CP(NR), CS(NR) [17, 51, 55, 56]
B188 F 3 years (15 years) 3+ Macroscopic MCNS None Hisp (Y) TX [57, 58]a
A1616 F 5 months 2.2 g/day Y, type N/A ND None Cauc (N) Presentation post infection [59–61]
A2239 M <18 5.1 g/day Microscopic FSGS Cousin Turk (N) [62]a
PLCE1
A3233 F 2 UPC 8.4 mg/mg Y, type N/A ND None Arabic (Y) HTN, SR, CP(NR) [16]
A3617 F 7 months UPC 12 mg/mg Y, type N/A FSGS Cousin, aunt Arabic (Y) [16]
A3510 F 1 year UPC 2.7 mg/mg Microscopic ND None Turk (Y) HTN [16]
A3869 M 7 months UPC 4.5 mg/mg Y, type N/A FSGS None Arabic (Y) [16]
SMARCAL1
A3146 F 9 years 5 g/day Y, type N/A FSGS None Euro (N) HTN, ID [63]a
A4162 F 4 years UPC 7.5 mg/mg Y, type N/A FSGS None Euro (N) Celiac, VSD, PDA, SR, CS(UR) [16]
TRPC6
A4685 F 17 years UPC 9.8 mg/mg Y, type N/A FSGS None Arabic (N) HTN, Allergies, CS(NR) [17]

The genes sequenced were ACTN4, ADCK4, ARHGAP24, ARHGDIA, CD2AP, COQ2, COQ6, CUBN, INF2, ITGA3, ITGB4, LAMB2, LMX1B, MYO1E, NPHS1, NPHS2, PDSS2, PLCE1, PTPRO, SMARCAL1, TRPC6 and WT1.

a

Solved in this study using multiplex PCR.

ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ACR, albumin:creatinine ratio; Afr-Am, African American; Cauc, Caucasian; CP, cyclophosphamide; CR, complete response; CS, cyclosporine; DF, deafness; DMS, diffuse mesangial sclerosis; Euro, European; F, female; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; FTT, failure to thrive; HemDi, hemodialysis; Hisp, Hispanic; HTN, hypertension; ID, intellectual disability; M, male; MCNS, minimal change nephrotic syndrome; MesP, mesangial proliferation; MPGN, membrane proliferative glomerulonephritis; N, no; ND, not done; NR, no response; PDA, persistent ductus arteriosus; PR, partial response; SR, steroid resistant; SS, steroid sensitive; SST, short stature; Turkish; TX, transplant; type N/A, hematuria type unknown; UPC, urine protein:creatinine ratio; UR, unknown response; VSD, ventricular septal defect; Y, yes.

DISCUSSION

Rate of mutation detection in AS and aHUS genes versus previous studies

Here we screened 362 families of 371 patients presenting with proteinuria and hematuria before age 25 years. We sequenced the coding regions of 34 genes known to cause monogenic AS, aHUS or SRNS and identified a causative mutation in 51 of 362 families (14.1%). AS, aHUS and SRNS often progress to ESRD, placing a significant health burden on patients and their families and adversely impacting quality of life [2]. Multiple monogenic causes of AS, aHUS and SRNS have been identified [4–6, 12, 13, 15, 43, 65, 44–46, 57, 58, 63, 66–89]. The frequency of single-gene mutations in typical, pediatric patients with proteinuria and hematuria has not yet been studied systematically in these genes. Our detection rate of AS-causing genes in 17 of 362 families (4.7%) was much lower than the 80% previously reported in a cohort of 101 patients with suspected or diagnosed AS [11]. The difference in mutation detection rates between our study and the previous study is likely due to the preselection of a cohort highly enriched for AS phenotypes in previous studies. Our mutation detection rate for AS-causing genes of 4.7% was reflective of broad inclusion criteria of proteinuria and hematuria instead of a distinct AS phenotype.

Mutation detection rate in SRNS genes versus previous studies

In 29 (8.0%) of 362 families, we identified pathogenic mutations in SRNS-causing genes. This percentage is much lower than previously reported mutation detection rates of 29.5% [16], 28.3% [17] and 31.7% [90] in three pediatric NS cohorts. This discrepancy is partially due to our exclusion of patients with Denys–Drash syndrome, Frasier syndrome or Wilms tumor phenotypes during patient cohort selection prior to beginning the study. Yet in the three previous cohort studies, mutations in WT1 only explained 4.8%, 5.8% and 2.6% of solved NS cases, respectively [16, 17, 90]. In addition, our cohort differed from previous NS cohorts in two major ways: first by the additional required inclusion criteria of the presence of hematuria, and second by the fact that the previous NS cohort studies only screened patients with SRNS, while our cohort included both steroid-sensitive and steroid-resistant NS patients. In addition, one of the previous studies actively excluded patients diagnosed with AS from their cohort [17]. Despite our broad inclusion criteria of proteinuria plus hematuria, we were still able to molecularly solve 14.1% of patients for monogenic forms of AS, aHUS or SRNS, further highlighting the power of using genetic screening to obtain a molecular etiology of disease.

Two of the previous NS cohort studies excluded consanguineous cases from their cohorts [17, 90]. The third previous SRNS cohort study had an overall consanguinity rate of 20.9% and solved 59.5% of consanguineous cases and 25% of nonconsanguineous cases [16]. In our study with an overall consanguinity rate of 15.5%, we detected a causative mutation in 20 of the 56 (35.7%) consanguineous families and we detected a causative mutation in 31 of the 306 (10.1%) nonconsanguineous families. This approximately matches previous reported rates of identification of causative monogenic variants in SRNS genes [16].

Study limitations

In this study we did not sequence CFB, CFHR1 and CFHR3, which have previously been described to cause aHUS when mutated [91, 92]. Currently 50 genes have been identified to cause SRNS when mutated [93]. Lastly, only patients who underwent WES were sequenced for all monogenic forms of NS. The majority of patients were sequenced for mutations in NS-causing genes using multiplex PCR limited to 23 genes. Therefore only 23 SRNS-causing genes were systematically screened in all patients. This contributed to the low rate at which a causative mutation was identified (Supplementary data, Tables S1 and S2).

Future directions

Although we used a minor allele frequency cutoff of 0.1% for dominant alleles, we detected heterozygous, pathogenic mutations in two patients in which the minor allele frequency was >0.1%. In patient A2336, we detected a heterozygous CFI mutation with a minor allele frequency of 0.9% in the general population. This exact allele, however, had been published twice [40, 41]. The first study identified this allele in 1 of 45 patients screened for mutations in aHUS-causing genes [40]. The second report of this allele was in a patient with sporadic aHUS not secondary to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or shiga toxin etiology [41]. In both reports, no additional phenotypic details were reported, but given the convergence of evidence from multiple research groups, we believe that the c.1558 + 5 G > T splice site mutation may cause aHUS.

In patient A2351, we detected a heterozygous mutation in CFHR5 with a minor allele frequency of 0.2% in the general population. As was the case with the CFI allele in patient A2336, the CFHR5 allele in patient A2351 was also published twice previously [38, 39]. It was first reported in a 7-year-old presenting with proteinuria, hematuria and loss of corticomedullary differentiation on ultrasound [39]. A biopsy 9 months later showed mesangial hypercellularity, CFHR5 deposits and a thickened glomerular basement membrane [39]. Like our patient, this patient carried the same CFHR5 allele heterozygously, but the healthy mother and sister were also heterozygous carriers, suggesting incomplete penetrance for this allele [39]. The patient had significantly reduced serum CFHR5 when compared with healthy controls [39]. In the second report of this allele, an 11-year-old male presented with gross hematuria, edema, proteinuria and hypoalbuminemia [38]. The authors reported dense deposits on the glomerular basement membrane and Bowman’s capsule and ophthalmic drusen [38]. This second patient also carried the CFHR5 allele heterozygously [38]. Given the above evidence, we believe the CFHR5 allele in patient A2351 can cause aHUS. We detected AS-causing mutations in some patients without a documented familial history of renal disease or copresentation with ocular abnormalities. Future investigations should focus on early detection of ocular abnormalities with more careful follow-up by health care providers in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study undertaken to determine the prevalence of mutations in AS-, aHUS- and NS-causing genes in a pediatric cohort with inclusion criteria of proteinuria and hematuria, which are common and practically relevant findings in any pediatric nephrology clinic. We detected disease-causing mutations in 14.1% of families sequenced, highlighting the utility of using genetics to obtain a definitive molecular etiology of disease. Clinicians should continue to utilize DNA sequencing technologies to further clinical practice, especially in cases of monogenic aHUS, where recently developed therapies such as eculizumab can be used to chronically treat the disease. Early angiotensin blockade can delay the onset of ESRD in patients with AS and an early molecular genetic etiology of disease is critical to helping delay a severe decline of renal function in pediatric patients [94].

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank the participating families and the physicians for their contributions. In particular, the authors would like to acknowledge the referring physicians and collaborators: Sevcan Bakkaloglu, Melissa Cadnapaphornchai, Gil Chernin, Sherif El Desoky, Robert Ettenger, Hanan Fathy, Seema Hashmi, Jameela Kari, Markus Kemper, Jeffrey Kopp, Richard P. Lifton, Reynar Loza Munarriz, Shrikant Mane, Dominik Mueller, Fatih Ozaltin, Erkin Serdaroglu, Neveen A. Soliman, Velibor Tasic and Martin Zenker. F.H. is the William E. Harmon Professor of Pediatrics.

FUNDING

This research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (DK076683 to F.H.), Harvard Stem Cell Institute and National Institutes of Health (T32DK007726-31A1 to A.J.M.), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (JO 1324/1-1 to T.J.S.) and German Research Foundation (VE 916/1-1 to A.T.v.d.V.). Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (HE 7456/1-1 to T.H.) and German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina (LPDS 2015-07 to E.W.) and American Society of Nephrology (Benjamin J. Lipps Research Fellowship Award FP01014311 to W.T.).

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

D.S., A.D., J.A.L., A.J.M., S.L., W.T., J.K.W., I.F., J.R., M.A., H.Y.G., R.S., E.W., T.H., S.A., T.J.-S., A.T.v.d.V., M.N., S.S., D.A.B. and F.H. generated total genome linkage data, performed exome capture with massively parallel sequencing and performed whole exome evaluation and mutation analysis. D.S., A.D., J.A.L., A.J.M., S.L., W.T., J.K.W. and F.H. recruited patients and gathered detailed clinical information for the study. All authors critically reviewed the article. F.H. conceived of and directed the project and wrote the article.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

F.H. is a cofounder of Goldfinch Bio and receives royalties from Claritas Genomics. E.W. reports grants from the National Institutes of Health and the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina during the conduct of the study.

Neither this manuscript nor substantial parts of it are under consideration for publication elsewhere. Twenty-two families analyzed in this study were independently and previously published, either as index families in papers describing novel SRNS-causing genes or in our previous high-throughput exon sequencing paper on monogenic forms of SRNS [16]; however, none of the families included in this study had previously been analyzed comprehensively for AS- or aHUS-causing mutations.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Vivante A, Hildebrandt F.. Exploring the genetic basis of early-onset chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 2016; 12: 133–146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Smith JM, Stablein DM, Munoz R. et al. Contributions of the transplant registry: the 2006 annual report of the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies (NAPRTCS). Pediatr Transplant 2007; 11: 366–373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kashtan CE, Segal Y.. Genetic disorders of glomerular basement membranes. Nephron Clin Pract 2011; 118: c9–c18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lemmink HH, MochlzukJ T, van den Heuvel LPWJ. et al. Mutations in the type IV collagen alpha 3 (COL4A3) gene in autosomal recessive Alport syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 1994; 3: 1269–1273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Mochizuki T, Lemmink HH, Mariyama M. et al. Identification of mutations in the alpha 3(IV) and alpha 4(IV) collagen genes in autosomal recessive Alport syndrome. Nat Genet 1994; 8: 77–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Antignac C, Knebelmann B, Drouot L. et al. Deletions in the COL4A5 collagen gene in X-linked Alport syndrome. Characterization of the pathological transcripts in nonrenal cells and correlation with disease expression. J Clin Invest 1994; 93: 1195–1207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Savige J, Gregory M, Gross O. et al. Expert guidelines for the management of Alport syndrome and thin basement membrane nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2013; 24: 364–375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kruegel J, Rubel D, Gross O.. Alport syndrome—insights from basic and clinical research. Nat Rev Nephrol 2013; 9: 170–178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Pieri M, Stefanou C, Zaravinos A. et al. Evidence for activation of the unfolded protein response in collagen IV nephropathies. J Am Soc Nephrol 2014; 25: 260–275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Giglio S, Provenzano A, Mazzinghi B. et al. Heterogeneous genetic alterations in sporadic nephrotic syndrome associate with resistance to immunosuppression. J Am Soc Nephrol 2015; 26: 230–236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Moriniere V, Dahan K, Hilbert P. et al. Improving mutation screening in familial hematuric nephropathies through next generation sequencing. J Am Soc Nephrol 2014; 25: 2740–2751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lemaire M, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Schaefer F. et al. Recessive mutations in DGKE cause atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Nat Genet 2013; 45: 531–536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Neumann HP, Salzmann M, Bohnert-Iwan B. et al. Haemolytic uraemic syndrome and mutations of the factor H gene: a registry-based study of German speaking countries. J Med Genet 2003; 40: 676–681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Noris M, Caprioli J, Bresin E. et al. Relative role of genetic complement abnormalities in sporadic and familial aHUS and their impact on clinical phenotype. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5: 1844–1859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Westra D, Vernon KA, Volokhina EB. et al. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and genetic aberrations in the complement factor H-related 5 gene. J Hum Genet 2012; 57: 459–464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Sadowski CE, Lovric S, Ashraf S. et al. A single-gene cause in 29.5% of cases of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol 2015; 26: 1279–1289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Wang F, Zhang Y, Mao J. et al. Spectrum of mutations in Chinese children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol 2017; 32: 1181–1192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int Suppl 2012; 2: 1–274 [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Halbritter J, Diaz K, Chaki M. et al. High-throughput mutation analysis in patients with a nephronophthisis-associated ciliopathy applying multiplexed barcoded array-based PCR amplification and next-generation sequencing. J Med Genet 2012; 49: 756–767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kruglyak L, Daly MJ, Reeve-Daly MP. et al. Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. Am J Hum Genet 1996; 58: 1347–1363 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Strauch K, Fimmers R, Kurz T. et al. Parametric and nonparametric multipoint linkage analysis with imprinting and two-locus-trait models: application to mite sensitization. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 66: 1945–1957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Gudbjartsson DF, Jonasson K, Frigge ML. et al. Allegro, a new computer program for multipoint linkage analysis. Nat Genet 2000; 25: 12–13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hildebrandt F, Heeringa SF, Ruschendorf F. et al. A systematic approach to mapping recessive disease genes in individuals from outbred populations. PLoS Genet 2009; 5: e1000353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Sayer JA, Otto EA, O’Toole JF. et al. The centrosomal protein nephrocystin-6 is mutated in Joubert syndrome and activates transcription factor ATF4. Nat Genet 2006; 38: 674–681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Boyden LM, Choi M, Choate KA. et al. Mutations in kelch-like 3 and cullin 3 cause hypertension and electrolyte abnormalities. Nature 2012; 482: 98–102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Tory K, Menyhard DK, Woerner S. et al. Mutation-dependent recessive inheritance of NPHS2-associated steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Nat Genet 2014; 46: 299–304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L. et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 2010; 7: 248–249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC.. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 2009; 4: 1073–1081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Schwarz JM, Cooper DN, Schuelke M. et al. MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat Methods 2014; 11: 361–362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Weber S, Strasser K, Rath S. et al. Identification of 47 novel mutations in patients with Alport syndrome and thin basement membrane nephropathy. Pediatr Nephrol 2016; 31: 941–955 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Chatterjee R, Hoffman M, Cliften P. et al. Targeted exome sequencing integrated with clinicopathological information reveals novel and rare mutations in atypical, suspected and unknown cases of Alport syndrome or proteinuria. PLoS One 2013; 8: e76360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Gast C, Pengelly RJ, Lyon M. et al. Collagen (COL4A) mutations are the most frequent mutations underlying adult focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016; 31: 961–970 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Nabais Sa MJ, Storey H, Flinter F. et al. Collagen type IV-related nephropathies in Portugal: pathogenic COL4A3 and COL4A4 mutations and clinical characterization of 25 families. Clin Genet 2015; 88: 456–461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Plant KE, Green PM, Vetrie D. et al. Detection of mutations in COL4A5 in patients with Alport syndrome. Hum Mutat 1999; 13: 124–132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Hashimura Y, Nozu K, Kaito H. et al. Milder clinical aspects of X-linked Alport syndrome in men positive for the collagen IV alpha5 chain. Kidney Int 2014; 85: 1208–1213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Mencarelli MA, Heidet L, Storey H. et al. Evidence of digenic inheritance in Alport syndrome. J Med Genet 2015; 52: 163–174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Hoffman JD, Cooke Bailey JN, D’Aoust L. et al. Rare complement factor H variant associated with age-related macular degeneration in the Amish. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 55: 4455–4460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Vernon KA, Goicoechea de Jorge E, Hall AE. et al. Acute presentation and persistent glomerulonephritis following streptococcal infection in a patient with heterozygous complement factor H-related protein 5 deficiency. Am J Kidney Dis 2012; 60: 121–125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Figueres ML, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Rabant M. et al. Heterogeneous histologic and clinical evolution in 3 cases of dense deposit disease with long-term follow-up. Hum Pathol 2014; 45: 2326–2333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Geerdink LM, Westra D, van Wijk JA. et al. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in children: complement mutations and clinical characteristics. Pediatr Nephrol 2012; 27: 1283–1291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Caprioli J, Noris M, Brioschi S. et al. Genetics of HUS: the impact of MCP, CFH, and IF mutations on clinical presentation, response to treatment, and outcome. Blood 2006; 108: 1267–1279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Gee HY, Saisawat P, Ashraf S. et al. ARHGDIA mutations cause nephrotic syndrome via defective RHO GTPase signaling. J Clin Invest 2013; 123: 3243–3253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Diomedi-Camassei F, Di Giandomenico S, Santorelli FM. et al. COQ2 nephropathy: a newly described inherited mitochondriopathy with primary renal involvement. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 18: 2773–2780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Tanner SM, Sturm AC, Baack EC. et al. Inherited cobalamin malabsorption. Mutations in three genes reveal functional and ethnic patterns. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2012; 7: 56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Brown EJ, Schlondorff JS, Becker DJ. et al. Mutations in the formin gene INF2 cause focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Nat Genet 2010; 42: 72–76 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Zenker M, Aigner T, Wendler O. et al. Human laminin beta2 deficiency causes congenital nephrosis with mesangial sclerosis and distinct eye abnormalities. Hum Mol Genet 2004; 13: 2625–2632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Bredrup C, Matejas V, Barrow M. et al. Ophthalmological aspects of Pierson syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 146: 602–611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Isojima T, Harita Y, Furuyama M. et al. LMX1B mutation with residual transcriptional activity as a cause of isolated glomerulopathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014; 29: 81–88 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Ovunc B, Ashraf S, Vega-Warner V. et al. Mutation analysis of NPHS1 in a worldwide cohort of congenital nephrotic syndrome patients. Nephron Clin Pract 2012; 120: c139–c146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Fu R, Gou MF, Ma WH. et al. Novel NPHS1 splice site mutations in a Chinese child with congenital nephrotic syndrome. Genet Mol Res 2015; 14: 433–439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Klaassen I, Ozgoren B, Sadowski CE. et al. Response to cyclosporine in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: discontinuation is possible. Pediatr Nephrol 2015; 30: 1477–1483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Heeringa SF, Vlangos CN, Chernin G. et al. Thirteen novel NPHS1 mutations in a large cohort of children with congenital nephrotic syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23: 3527–3533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Schoeb DS, Chernin G, Heeringa SF. et al. Nineteen novel NPHS1 mutations in a worldwide cohort of patients with congenital nephrotic syndrome (CNS). Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25: 2970–2976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Sabi KA, Noto-Kadou-Kaza B, Gnionsahe DA. et al. [Changing c.106delG (p.Ala36fs*6) loss syndrome associated with congenital Finnish type: first case diagnosed in Togo]. Nephrol Ther 2013; 9: 494–496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Caridi G, Bertelli R, Carrea A. et al. Prevalence, genetics, and clinical features of patients carrying podocin mutations in steroid-resistant nonfamilial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 2742–2746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Schultheiss M, Ruf RG, Mucha BE. et al. No evidence for genotype/phenotype correlation in NPHS1 and NPHS2 mutations. Pediatr Nephrol 2004; 19: 1340–1348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Boute N, Gribouval O, Roselli S. et al. NPHS2, encoding the glomerular protein podocin, is mutated in autosomal recessive steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Nat Genet 2000; 24: 349–354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Correction to ‘NPHS2, encoding the glomerular protein podocin, is mutated in autosomal recessive steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome’. Nat Genet 2000; 25: 125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Karle SM, Uetz B, Ronner V. et al. Novel mutations in NPHS2 detected in both familial and sporadic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 388–393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Lu L, Sun XM, Yin Y. et al. The amino acid mutations of the podocin in proteinuria: a meta-analysis. Ren Fail 2015; 37: 1329–1337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Sylva Skálová MP, Vondrák K, Chernin G.. Plasmapheresis-induced clinical improvement in a patient with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome due to podocin (NPHS2) gene mutation. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 2010; 53: 3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Bouchireb K, Boyer O, Gribouval O. et al. NPHS2 mutations in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a mutation update and the associated phenotypic spectrum. Hum Mutat 2014; 35: 178–186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Boerkoel CF, Takashima H, John J. et al. Mutant chromatin remodeling protein SMARCAL1 causes Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia. Nat Genet 2002; 30: 215–220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Lucke T, Billing H, Sloan EA. et al. Schimke-immuno-osseous dysplasia: new mutation with weak genotype-phenotype correlation in siblings. Am J Med Genet A 2005; 135: 202–205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Ebarasi L, Ashraf S, Bierzynska A. et al. Defects of CRB2 cause steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2015; 96: 153–161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Levy GG, Nichols WC, Lian EC. et al. Mutations in a member of the ADAMTS gene family cause thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Nature 2001; 413: 488–494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Miller EC, Liszewski MK. et al. Mutations in complement C3 predispose to development of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Blood 2008; 112: 4948–4952 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Noris M, Brioschi S, Caprioli J. et al. Familial haemolytic uraemic syndrome and an MCP mutation. Lancet 2003; 362: 1542–1547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Edelsten AD, Tuck S.. Familial haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Arch Dis Child 1978; 53: 255–256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Gale DP, de Jorge EG, Cook HT. et al. Identification of a mutation in complement factor H-related protein 5 in patients of Cypriot origin with glomerulonephritis. Lancet 2010; 376: 794–801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Dragon-Durey MA, Blouin J. et al. Complement factor I: a susceptibility gene for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome. J Med Genet 2004; 41: e84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Delvaeye M, Noris M, De Vriese A. et al. Thrombomodulin mutations in atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 345–357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Kaplan JM, Kim SH, North KN. et al. Mutations in ACTN4, encoding alpha-actinin-4, cause familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Nat Genet 2000; 24: 251–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Ashraf S, Gee HY, Woerner S. et al. ADCK4 mutations promote steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome through CoQ10 biosynthesis disruption. J Clin Invest 2013; 123: 5179–5189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Akilesh S, Suleiman H, Yu H. et al. Arhgap24 inactivates Rac1 in mouse podocytes, and a mutant form is associated with familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. J Clin Invest 2011; 121: 4127–4137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Gupta IR, Baldwin C, Auguste D. et al. ARHGDIA: a novel gene implicated in nephrotic syndrome. J Med Genet 2013; 50: 330–338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Lowik MM, Groenen PJ, Pronk I. et al. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in a patient homozygous for a CD2AP mutation. Kidney Int 2007; 72: 1198–1203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Heeringa SF, Chernin G, Chaki M. et al. COQ6 mutations in human patients produce nephrotic syndrome with sensorineural deafness. J Clin Invest 2011; 121: 2013–2024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Ovunc B, Otto EA, Vega-Warner V. et al. Exome sequencing reveals cubilin mutation as a single-gene cause of proteinuria. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 22: 1815–1820 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Has C, Sparta G, Kiritsi D. et al. Integrin alpha3 mutations with kidney, lung, and skin disease. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1508–1514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Kambham N, Tanji N, Seigle RL. et al. Congenital focal segmental glomerulosclerosis associated with beta4 integrin mutation and epidermolysis bullosa. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36: 190–196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Dreyer SD, Zhou G, Baldini A. et al. Mutations in LMX1B cause abnormal skeletal patterning and renal dysplasia in nail patella syndrome. Nat Genet 1998; 19: 47–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Mele C, Iatropoulos P, Donadelli R. et al. MYO1E mutations and childhood familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 295–306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Kestila M, Lenkkeri U, Mannikko M. et al. Positionally cloned gene for a novel glomerular protein—nephrin—is mutated in congenital nephrotic syndrome. Mol Cell 1998; 1: 575–582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Lopez LC, Schuelke M, Quinzii CM. et al. Leigh syndrome with nephropathy and CoQ10 deficiency due to decaprenyl diphosphate synthase subunit 2 (PDSS2) mutations. Am J Hum Genet 2006; 79: 1125–1129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Hinkes B, Wiggins RC, Gbadegesin R. et al. Positional cloning uncovers mutations in PLCE1 responsible for a nephrotic syndrome variant that may be reversible. Nat Genet 2006; 38: 1397–1405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Ozaltin F, Ibsirlioglu T, Taskiran EZ. et al. Disruption of PTPRO causes childhood-onset nephrotic syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2011; 89: 139–147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Winn MP, Conlon PJ, Lynn KL. et al. A mutation in the TRPC6 cation channel causes familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Science 2005; 308: 1801–1804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Jeanpierre C, Denamur E, Henry I. et al. Identification of constitutional WT1 mutations, in patients with isolated diffuse mesangial sclerosis, and analysis of genotype/phenotype correlations by use of a computerized mutation database. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 62: 824–833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Wang Y, Dang X, He Q. et al. Mutation spectrum of genes associated with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in Chinese children. Gene 2017; 625: 15–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Goicoechea de Jorge E, Harris CL, Esparza-Gordillo J. et al. Gain-of-function mutations in complement factor B are associated with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 240–245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Zipfel PF, Edey M, Heinen S. et al. Deletion of complement factor H-related genes CFHR1 and CFHR3 is associated with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. PLoS Genet 2007; 3: e41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Lovric S, Ashraf S, Tan W. et al. Genetic testing in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: when and how? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016; 31: 1802–1813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Povey S, Al Aqeel AI, Cambon-Thomsen A. et al. Practical guidelines addressing ethical issues pertaining to the curation of human locus-specific variation databases (LSDBs). Hum Mutat 2010; 31: 1179–1184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES