Skip to main content
International Immunology logoLink to International Immunology
. 2018 Nov 23;31(3):119–125. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxy081

Thymus machinery for T-cell selection

Kenta Kondo 1,2, Izumi Ohigashi 2, Yousuke Takahama 1,2,
PMCID: PMC6400048  PMID: 30476234

How thymic epithelial cells control the T-cell repertoire

Keywords: central tolerance, cortical thymic epithelial cell, medullary thymic epithelial cell, positive selection

Abstract

An immunocompetent and self-tolerant pool of naive T cells is formed in the thymus through the process of repertoire selection. T cells that are potentially capable of responding to foreign antigens are positively selected in the thymic cortex and are further selected in the thymic medulla to help prevent self-reactivity. The affinity between T-cell antigen receptors expressed by newly generated T cells and self-peptide–major histocompatibility complexes displayed in the thymic microenvironments plays a key role in determining the fate of developing T cells during thymic selection. Recent advances in our knowledge of the biology of thymic epithelial cells have revealed unique machinery that contributes to positive and negative selection in the thymus. In this article, we summarize recent findings on thymic T-cell selection, focusing on the machinery unique to thymic epithelial cells.

Introduction

The thymus produces T cells and selects newly produced T cells to generate a functionally competent and self-tolerant T-cell pool. After migrating into the microenvironment of the thymic cortex, hematopoietic lymphoid progenitors are induced to develop into T-cell antigen receptor (TCR)-expressing CD4+CD8+ double-positive (DP) thymocytes. The V(D)J rearrangement of TCRα and TCRβ genomic loci in early thymocytes allows the formation of great diversity in the pre-selected repertoire of TCR recognition specificities in newly generated cortical DP thymocytes, which are individually selected for their fate according to their TCR recognition specificities. DP thymocytes that express TCRs interacting at low affinity with self-peptide-associated major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) or MHC class II (MHC-II) molecules displayed in the thymic cortex are rescued from cell death to survive and differentiate into CD4+CD8 or CD4CD8+ single-positive (SP) thymocytes, a process called positive selection in the thymus (1–3).

Positively selected thymocytes begin expressing the chemokine receptor CCR7 and migrate to the thymic medulla, where a subpopulation of medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs) produce CCR7 ligands, including CCL21 (4, 5), thereby attracting the positively selected thymocytes. In the thymic medulla, a distinct subpopulation of mTECs produces a wide range of self-molecules, including ‘tissue-specific’ self-proteins (i.e. proteins that are otherwise only found in specific peripheral tissues) and displays the vast majority of self-antigens, in cooperation with dendritic cells (DCs) (6–8).

Medullary thymocytes that express TCRs with high affinity for self-peptide–MHC (self-pMHC) complexes displayed in the medullary microenvironment are either deleted by apoptosis or destined to become regulatory T cells and other agonist-selected ‘unconventional’ T-cell populations (3, 9, 10). Negative selection in the thymus conventionally refers to the process of self-antigen-mediated deletion of developing thymocytes through apoptosis, including deletion of the high-affinity self-reactive thymocytes in the medulla. The lineage deviation in the medulla, which gives rise to regulatory and other ‘unconventional’ T cells by high-affinity TCR interactions, could be viewed as a form of positive selection of unconventional T cells, but could alternatively be viewed as a form of negative selection of thymocytes to exclude self-reactive cells from the ‘conventional’ effector T-cell pool.

Here, we start by discussing the importance of TCR affinity thresholds in thymocyte selection. Focusing on recent advances, we then detail the machinery that is utilized in the cortex and in the medulla to screen developing T cells and enable the optimal repertoire to be available for peripheral immune responses.

TCR affinity

The affinity between TCRs and their peptide–MHC ligands determines the fate of developing thymocytes. Early studies showed that differences in ligand concentration and ligating TCR valency as well as differences among agonist and antagonist peptide ligands affect life-or-death determination in immature thymocytes (11–14). The findings that agonist peptide ligation promotes differentiation into unconventional T-cell lineages, including regulatory T cells, pointed to the view that the quality of TCR signals triggered in developing thymocytes not only determines life-or-death selection in generating a conventional T-cell pool but also contributes to determining a way to direct cells towards unconventional T-cell subpopulations (15, 16).

It is now understood that the affinity between TCRs expressed by developing thymocytes and self-pMHC complexes displayed in the thymus is the major parameter that determines the fate of newly generated T cells. The TCR–ligand affinity determines life or death (i.e. positive and negative selection) as well as lineage direction to become functionally distinct cells (e.g. conventional CD4+ helper and CD8+ killer T cells). A low-affinity interaction between TCR and pMHC promotes thymocyte maturation to give rise to functionally competent T cells (i.e. positive selection), whereas a high-affinity interaction causes the deletion of self-reactive T cells (i.e. negative selection) or the generation of unconventional T cells (1, 17).

The narrow TCR–pMHC affinity range sets the threshold for life or death in developing thymocytes, contributing to the enrichment of functionally potent and self-protective T cells while excluding potentially harmful self-reactive T cells from the mature T-cell pool (18, 19). It is considered that the affinity threshold determines the dependence on intra-thymocyte signals through Themis, Tespa1, a voltage-gated sodium-ion channel and miR-181a (a non-coding small RNA), all of which are expressed in pre-selected DP thymocytes and are important for promoting positive selection rather than negative selection (20–24).

Within the TCR–ligand affinity range that promotes positive selection, the ligand affinity during positive selection influences later functional capability in positively selected T cells (25–28), as was recently discussed elsewhere (29). Recent studies have indicated that CD8+ T cells differ in functional capability depending on their ontogeny during the fetal, neonatal and adult periods (30) and that the TCR–ligand affinity during positive selection appears higher in neonatal mice than in adult mice (31). These observations suggest that the magnitude of TCR–ligand affinity optimal for thymic positive selection, which affects subsequent antigen responsiveness in T cells, diminishes through postnatal ontogeny and ageing.

Cortex machinery

In the thymic cortex, cortical TECs (cTECs) architecturally and functionally provide the microenvironment for T-lymphoid progenitor cells to become T cells, for example by supplying T-lineage-inducing molecules including DLL4 and IL-7 (32, 33). The cTECs also provide a unique microenvironment, for example by expressing MHC-I and MHC-II molecules, for newly generated T cells to undergo positive selection (34, 35). Recent studies have revealed that cTECs are heterogeneous in mediating these functions (35, 36) and are capable of optimizing T-cell positive selection by further providing unique machinery for protein degradation (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Cortical protein degradation and medullary gene expression in the thymus.

MHC-II-associated self-peptide production in cTECs

Peptides associated with MHC-II molecules are generated by proteolysis within the lumen of the endosomal–lysosomal system. Cathepsin L, a lysosomal endopeptidase abundant in cTECs, is involved in the processing of MHC-II invariant chain (Ii) and in the generation of MHC-II-associated self-peptides that promote cTEC-mediated positive selection of CD4+ T cells (37–39). Another endosomal peptidase, thymus-specific serine protease (TSSP, also known as Prss16), is also abundant in cTECs. Studies using MHC-II-restricted TCR transgenic mice showed that TSSP contributes to the production of positively selecting MHC-II-associated self-peptides (40–42). TSSP is also reported to play a role in the production of negatively selecting MHC-II-associated self-peptides, influencing the severity of autoimmune inflammation in type 1 diabetes in the NOD mouse strain (43–45).

Both cathepsin L and TSSP are abundant in cTECs but are also expressed in various cell types other than cTECs. Their co-abundance in combination with other proteases may create a unique endosomal–lysosomal proteolytic microenvironment in cTECs, which may contribute to the production of unique MHC-II-associated self-peptides that optimize positive selection of CD4+ T cells.

Unlike most cells, in which autophagy is activated by nutrient starvation, cTECs are constitutively active in autophagy-mediated degradation of cytoplasmic proteins (46, 47). Autophagy in cTECs contributes to the production of MHC-II-associated self-peptides, including cytoplasmic protein-derived peptides, thereby optimizing the repertoire selection of CD4+ T cells (47, 48).

Stabilization of surface MHC-II in cTECs

March family E3 ubiquitin ligases regulate the degradation and turnover of MHC-II molecules. The cTECs predominantly express March8, the activity of which is attenuated by the immunoglobulin superfamily cell surface protein CD83, which is also expressed in cTECs. CD83 stabilizes surface MHC-II molecules in cTECs by slowing March8-mediated MHC-II turnover (49, 50). CD83-deficient mice are defective in MHC-II stabilization in cTECs and in CD4+ T-cell generation in the thymus (49–51), whereas these defects are rescued by a deficiency in March8 (49, 50). CD83- and March8-mediated stabilization of surface MHC-II molecules in cTECs may contribute to maintaining persistent TCR engagement, which is important for positive selection of CD4+ T cells in the thymus (2, 52).

MHC-I-associated self-peptide production in cTECs

Peptides associated with MHC-I molecules are generated through proteasome-mediated degradation of cytoplasmic proteins. The cTECs express a unique form of proteasome, termed the thymoproteasome, which is characterized by the inclusion of the catalytic subunit β5t, also known as Psmb11 (53, 54). The expression of β5t and β5t-containing thymoproteasomes is highly specific to cTECs (55, 56). In comparison with other forms of proteasomes, β5t-containing thymoproteasomes exhibit altered proteolytic specificity, producing a unique set of MHC-I-associated peptides (57, 58). In β5t-deficient mice, CD8+ T cells are reduced in numbers, altered in TCR repertoire and defective in fine-tuning TCR responsiveness (28, 59–61). Thus, thymoproteasome-dependent positive selection in the thymic cortex is important for promoting positive selection of CD8+ T cells. The possible mechanisms underlying how β5t-containing thymoproteasome works in the positive selection of CD8+ T cells are discussed elsewhere (62–64).

Human genome variations in β5t

In humans, β5t is also specifically expressed in cTECs (65). More than 150 kinds of genomic variations, including single nucleotide polymorphisms in the β5t-coding sequence, have been registered in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) public database. Among those variants, the rs34457782 single nucleotide polymorphism that alters the 49th amino acid of the human β5t pro-protein from glycine to serine (G49S) is detected at an appreciable allele frequency in various human populations (66). The 49th amino acid is located at the carboxyl terminus of the pro-peptide that is cleaved to generate catalytically active β5t protein, the amino terminus of which begins at the 50th threonine.

The G49S variant in either human β5t or mouse β5t has inefficient processing of the pro-peptide to generate mature β5t protein (66). In mice that are manipulated to carry this variation in the genome, heterozygotes show reduced β5t expression in cTECs and homozygotes further exhibit reduction in the numbers of CD8+ T cells in the thymus and the periphery (66). In cohort studies in humans, however, no severe health problems have been noticed in many heterozygous and a small number of homozygous human individuals (66). A study has reported that homozygosity in this variation is associated with an elevated risk of Sjögren’s syndrome, an autoimmune disease (67). Further analysis of the health of humans with this genomic variation, particularly of the homozygotes, would help improve our understanding of the thymoproteasome-dependent positive selection of CD8+ T cells in humans.

Medulla machinery

It is the privilege of positively selected thymocytes to migrate to the thymic medulla (68, 69). In the medullary microenvironment, the thymocytes must interact with a variety of antigen-presenting cells, including mTECs and hematopoietic DCs, in order to establish self-tolerance in T cells (Fig. 1). Only cells that survive medullary selection may be released from the thymus to the circulation as mature naive T cells.

Promiscuous gene expression in mTECs

More than 85% of all genes encoded in the genome, including many tissue-restricted self-antigen genes, are detectable in mTECs (70–73). This characteristic, termed promiscuous gene expression (pGE), in mTECs contributes to the display of self-antigens, including tissue-restricted self-antigens, to newly generated T cells and therefore the establishment of self-tolerance in T cells.

The nuclear protein Aire is an epigenetic regulator that magnifies pGE in mTECs through interactions with multiple partner proteins (74–78). It has been shown that Aire enhances gene transcription by releasing RNA polymerase II at silenced loci, promoting promiscuousness in gene expression (79). It has also been shown that Aire limits transcription by repressing Brg1-mediated chromatin accessibility, which is implicated as a mechanism to avoid the deleterious effects of ectopically expressed genes (80). The development and function of mTECs, including pGE, is regulated by signals mediated via tumor necrosis factor superfamily members RANK, CD40 and LTβR (81–83)—the ligands of which are provided by positively selected thymocytes and by other thymic hematopoietic cells (84–86)—and by transcription factors RelB, NFκB2, Fezf2 and Blimp1 (87–92).

Hematopoietic antigen-presenting cells

The thymic medulla is enriched in hematopoietic antigen-presenting cells, including DCs and B cells, which contribute to the establishment of self-tolerance in T cells (93–97). Thymic DCs are classified into CD8α+Sirpα conventional DCs (cDC1s), CD8αSirpα+ cDCs (cDC2s) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs). It has been shown that cDC1s are intrathymically generated, whereas cDC2s and pDCs are derived from the peripheral circulation into the thymus (98–100).

The cDC1s efficiently mediate the cross-presentation of mTEC-derived pGE antigens and efficiently promote the generation of regulatory T cells (101). The scavenger receptor CD36 expressed by cDC1s facilitates the transfer of mTEC-derived self-antigens to cDC1s (102). The chemokine CCL21Ser, which is produced by an LTβR-dependent mTEC subpopulation (103), promotes the recruitment of cDC1 progenitors to the thymus (104). The chemokine XCL1, which is produced by a distinct Aire-dependent mTEC subpopulation, supports the interplay between mTECs and DCs to promote the generation of regulatory T cells (105).

Thymic tuft cells

The mTEC population is functionally and morphologically heterogeneous, including cystic ciliated cells, neurosecretory cells, concentric Hassall’s corpuscles and cholinergic chemosensory cells (106–108). Recent studies have highlighted a subpopulation of mTECs that resemble tuft cells of the small intestine (109, 110). Like tuft cells in the gut, the thymic tuft cells are dependent on the transcription factor Pou2f3 for their generation, and express chemosensory receptors and the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-25 (109, 110). Unlike intestinal tuft cells, however, thymic tuft cells are generated as a post-Aire mTEC subpopulation and express both MHC-I and MHC-II molecules (109). The functions of thymic tuft cells are not clear, although reports suggest their roles in supporting type 2 invariant natural killer T cells (iNKT2s) to form an IL-4-rich microenvironment and/or in controlling type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) in the thymic medulla.

Medullary thymocyte traffic

Multiple chemokines expressed by mTECs and other cells in the thymic medulla are important for regulating the traffic of developing thymocytes. Positively selected thymocytes, which are generated in the thymic cortex, begin expressing CCR7 and migrate to the thymic medulla in response to CCR7 ligands produced by mTECs (68, 69, 111, 112). A recent study has pointed to the non-redundant importance of CCL21Ser among several different CCR7 ligands (113). The CCR7–CCL21Ser chemokine axis essentially contributes to the establishment of self-tolerance in T cells in the thymic medulla (113). The medullary migration of positively selected thymocytes is additionally regulated by chemokines CXCL12 and CCL25 as well as Sema3E–PlexinD1 guidance proteins (114–117). Chemokines CCL17 and CCL22 and their receptor CCR4 are also suggested to contribute to the medullary migration of positively selected thymocytes (118, 119).

The egress of mature thymocytes from the thymic medulla to the circulation is regulated by the interaction between sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P1) expressed by mature thymocytes and S1P, which is abundant in the circulation (120). The role of CCR7 chemokine signals in thymic emigration during the newborn period has also been described (121). A recent study has suggested that CCR7 expression on iNKT cells defines iNKT precursor cells that emigrate from the thymus (122). Another study has pointed to a role for type 2 IL-4 receptor-mediated signals in mTECs in the thymic egress of mature thymocytes (123).

Conclusions

The cortical and medullary microenvironments in the thymus coordinate to sequentially support the formation of a self-protective T-cell pool, by providing distinct yet unique machinery in cTECs and mTECs (Fig. 1). The thymic cortex offers a unique protein degradation machinery both in the cytoplasm and in the endosomal–lysosomal lumen of cTECs to promote the display of a unique set of self-peptides that are important for positive selection of functionally competent T cells. In contrast, the thymic medulla is equipped with unique gene expression machinery in the nuclei of mTECs, enabling the display of an unusually promiscuous set of self-peptides that contribute to the establishment of self-tolerance in newly generated T cells.

These machineries in cTECs and mTECs appear mechanistically and anatomically distinct from each other, in protein degradation and in gene expression, respectively. However, these sets of machinery share a common importance in displaying the body’s unique self to developing thymocytes for the formation of a functionally competent yet self-tolerant T-cell pool. The coordination of these sets of machinery for cTEC-dependent positive selection and mTEC-dependent self-tolerance is central to the development of the functional immune system.

As summarized in this article, recent advances in TEC biology have revealed new mechanisms that contribute to T-cell repertoire formation in the thymus. In parallel, studies have uncovered tremendous diversity in TECs (Fig. 2). Still, these findings have been largely achieved by the analysis of cTECs and mTECs isolated from the thymus by enzymatic digestion method, which can yield only a small fraction of cTECs and mTECs (124, 125). The biology in the majority of TECs has yet to be examined. Further advances in thymus biology may accelerate our understanding of T-cell repertoire formation and immune system development.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Multiple tasks coordinated by cortex and medulla in the thymus.

Funding

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the US National Institutes of Health, the National Cancer Institute and the Center for Cancer Research, and by grants from MEXT-JSPS (16H02630 to Y.T., 17K08884 to I.O. and 17K15727 to K.K.), Ichiro Kanehara Foundation (to I.O.), Daiichi Sankyo Foundation of Life Science (to I.O.) and Glaxo Smith Kline Japan (to K.K.).

Conflicts of interest statement: The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs Amy Plain and Yu Tanaka for reading the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Starr, T. K., Jameson, S. C. and Hogquist, K. A. 2003. Positive and negative selection of T cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21:139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Singer, A., Adoro, S. and Park, J. H. 2008. Lineage fate and intense debate: myths, models and mechanisms of CD4- versus CD8-lineage choice. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8:788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Klein, L., Kyewski, B., Allen, P. M. and Hogquist, K. A. 2014. Positive and negative selection of the T cell repertoire: what thymocytes see (and don’t see). Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14:377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Takahama, Y. 2006. Journey through the thymus: stromal guides for T-cell development and selection. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6:127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Love, P. E. and Bhandoola, A. 2011. Signal integration and crosstalk during thymocyte migration and emigration. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 11:469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kyewski, B. and Klein, L. 2006. A central role for central tolerance. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 24:571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Anderson, G., Lane, P. J. and Jenkinson, E. J. 2007. Generating intrathymic microenvironments to establish T-cell tolerance. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7:954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Derbinski, J. and Kyewski, B. 2010. How thymic antigen presenting cells sample the body’s self-antigens. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 22:592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Sprent, J. and Kishimoto, H. 2002. The thymus and negative selection. Immunol. Rev. 185:126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sakaguchi, S., Yamaguchi, T., Nomura, T. and Ono, M. 2008. Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell 133:775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ashton-Rickardt, P. G.,, Bandeira, A.,, Delaney, J. R., et al. 1994. Evidence for a differential avidity model of T cell selection in the thymus. Cell 76:651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Sebzda, E., Wallace, V. A., Mayer, J., Yeung, R. S., Mak, T. W. and Ohashi, P. S. 1994. Positive and negative thymocyte selection induced by different concentrations of a single peptide. Science 263:1615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Takahama, Y., Suzuki, H., Katz, K. S., Grusby, M. J. and Singer, A. 1994. Positive selection of CD4+ T cells by TCR ligation without aggregation even in the absence of MHC. Nature 371:67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hogquist, K. A., Jameson, S. C. and Bevan, M. J. 1995. Strong agonist ligands for the T cell receptor do not mediate positive selection of functional CD8+ T cells. Immunity 3:79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. von Boehmer, H. and Melchers, F. 2010. Checkpoints in lymphocyte development and autoimmune disease. Nat. Immunol. 11:14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Stritesky, G. L., Jameson, S. C. and Hogquist, K. A. 2012. Selection of self-reactive T cells in the thymus. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 30:95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Alam, S. M.,, Travers, P. J.,, Wung, J. L., et al. 1996. T-cell-receptor affinity and thymocyte positive selection. Nature 381:616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Daniels, M. A.,, Teixeiro, E.,, Gill, J., et al. 2006. Thymic selection threshold defined by compartmentalization of Ras/MAPK signalling. Nature 444:724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Palmer, E. and Naeher, D. 2009. Affinity threshold for thymic selection through a T-cell receptor-co-receptor zipper. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9:207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Fu, G.,, Casas, J.,, Rigaud, S., et al. 2013. Themis sets the signal threshold for positive and negative selection in T-cell development. Nature 504:441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Choi, S.,, Warzecha, C.,, Zvezdova, E., et al. 2017. THEMIS enhances TCR signaling and enables positive selection by selective inhibition of the phosphatase SHP-1. Nat. Immunol. 18:433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Wang, D.,, Zheng, M.,, Lei, L., et al. 2012. Tespa1 is involved in late thymocyte development through the regulation of TCR-mediated signaling. Nat. Immunol. 13:560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Lo, W. L., Donermeyer, D. L. and Allen, P. M. 2012. A voltage-gated sodium channel is essential for the positive selection of CD4(+) T cells. Nat. Immunol. 13:880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Li, Q. J.,, Chau, J.,, Ebert, P. J., et al. 2007. miR-181a is an intrinsic modulator of T cell sensitivity and selection. Cell 129:147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Mandl, J. N., Monteiro, J. P., Vrisekoop, N. and Germain, R. N. 2013. T cell-positive selection uses self-ligand binding strength to optimize repertoire recognition of foreign antigens. Immunity 38:263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Persaud, S. P., Parker, C. R., Lo, W. L., Weber, K. S. and Allen, P. M. 2014. Intrinsic CD4+ T cell sensitivity and response to a pathogen are set and sustained by avidity for thymic and peripheral complexes of self peptide and MHC. Nat. Immunol. 15:266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Fulton, R. B.,, Hamilton, S. E.,, Xing, Y., et al. 2015. The TCR’s sensitivity to self peptide-MHC dictates the ability of naive CD8(+) T cells to respond to foreign antigens. Nat. Immunol. 16:107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Takada, K.,, Van Laethem, F.,, Xing, Y., et al. 2015. TCR affinity for thymoproteasome-dependent positively selecting peptides conditions antigen responsiveness in CD8(+) T cells. Nat. Immunol. 16:1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kondo, K., Takada, K. and Takahama, Y. 2017. Antigen processing and presentation in the thymus: implications for T cell repertoire selection. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 46:53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Smith, N. L.,, Patel, R. K.,, Reynaldi, A., et al. 2018. Developmental origin governs CD8+ T cell fate decisions during infection. Cell 174:117.e14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Dong, M.,, Artusa, P.,, Kelly, S. A., et al. 2017. Alterations in the thymic selection threshold skew the self-reactivity of the TCR repertoire in neonates. J. Immunol. 199:965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Mohtashami, M., Shah, D. K., Nakase, H., Kianizad, K., Petrie, H. T. and Zúñiga-Pflücker, J. C. 2010. Direct comparison of Dll1- and Dll4-mediated Notch activation levels shows differential lymphomyeloid lineage commitment outcomes. J. Immunol. 185:867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Shitara, S.,, Hara, T.,, Liang, B., et al. 2013. IL-7 produced by thymic epithelial cells plays a major role in the development of thymocytes and TCRγδ+ intraepithelial lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 190:6173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Anderson, G. and Takahama, Y. 2012. Thymic epithelial cells: working class heroes for T cell development and repertoire selection. Trends Immunol. 33:256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Nakagawa, Y.,, Ohigashi, I.,, Nitta, T., et al. 2012. Thymic nurse cells provide microenvironment for secondary T cell receptor α rearrangement in cortical thymocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109:20572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Takahama, Y., Ohigashi, I., Baik, S. and Anderson, G. 2017. Generation of diversity in thymic epithelial cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17:295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Nakagawa, T.,, Roth, W.,, Wong, P., et al. 1998. Cathepsin L: critical role in Ii degradation and CD4 T cell selection in the thymus. Science 280:450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Honey, K., Nakagawa, T., Peters, C. and Rudensky, A. 2002. Cathepsin L regulates CD4+ T cell selection independently of its effect on invariant chain: a role in the generation of positively selecting peptide ligands. J. Exp. Med. 195:1349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Takada, K. and Takahama, Y. 2015. Positive-selection-inducing self-peptides displayed by cortical thymic epithelial cells. Adv. Immunol. 125:87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Gommeaux, J.,, Grégoire, C.,, Nguessan, P., et al. 2009. Thymus-specific serine protease regulates positive selection of a subset of CD4+ thymocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 39:956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Viret, C.,, Lamare, C.,, Guiraud, M., et al. 2011. Thymus-specific serine protease contributes to the diversification of the functional endogenous CD4 T cell receptor repertoire. J. Exp. Med. 208:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Guerder, S., Hassel, C. and Carrier, A. 2018. Thymus-specific serine protease, a protease that shapes the CD4 T cell repertoire. Immunogenetics. In press. doi: 10.1007/s00251-018-1078-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Viret, C.,, Leung-Theung-Long, S.,, Serre, L., et al. 2011. Thymus-specific serine protease controls autoreactive CD4 T cell development and autoimmune diabetes in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 121:1810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Viret, C., Mahiddine, K., Baker, R. L., Haskins, K. and Guerder, S. 2015. The T cell repertoire-diversifying enzyme TSSP contributes to thymic selection of diabetogenic CD4 T cell specificities reactive to ChgA and IAPP autoantigens. J. Immunol. 195:1964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Serre, L.,, Girard, M.,, Ramadan, A., et al. 2017. Thymic-specific serine protease limits central tolerance and exacerbates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 199:3748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Kuma, A.,, Hatano, M.,, Matsui, M., et al. 2004. The role of autophagy during the early neonatal starvation period. Nature 432:1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Nedjic, J., Aichinger, M., Emmerich, J., Mizushima, N. and Klein, L. 2008. Autophagy in thymic epithelium shapes the T-cell repertoire and is essential for tolerance. Nature 455:396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Aichinger, M., Wu, C., Nedjic, J. and Klein, L. 2013. Macroautophagy substrates are loaded onto MHC class II of medullary thymic epithelial cells for central tolerance. J. Exp. Med. 210:287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. von Rohrscheidt, J.,, Petrozziello, E.,, Nedjic, J., et al. 2016. Thymic CD4 T cell selection requires attenuation of March8-mediated MHCII turnover in cortical epithelial cells through CD83. J. Exp. Med. 213:1685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Liu, H.,, Jain, R.,, Guan, J., et al. 2016. Ubiquitin ligase MARCH 8 cooperates with CD83 to control surface MHC II expression in thymic epithelium and CD4 T cell selection. J. Exp. Med. 213:1695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Fujimoto, Y.,, Tu, L.,, Miller, A. S., et al. 2002. CD83 expression influences CD4+ T cell development in the thymus. Cell 108:755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Brugnera, E.,, Bhandoola, A.,, Cibotti, R., et al. 2000. Coreceptor reversal in the thymus: signaled CD4+8+ thymocytes initially terminate CD8 transcription even when differentiating into CD8+ T cells. Immunity 13:59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Murata, S.,, Sasaki, K.,, Kishimoto, T., et al. 2007. Regulation of CD8+ T cell development by thymus-specific proteasomes. Science 316:1349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Murata, S., Takahama, Y., Kasahara, M. and Tanaka, K. 2018. The immunoproteasome and thymoproteasome: functions, evolution and human disease. Nat. Immunol. 19:923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Ripen, A. M., Nitta, T., Murata, S., Tanaka, K. and Takahama, Y. 2011. Ontogeny of thymic cortical epithelial cells expressing the thymoproteasome subunit β5t. Eur. J. Immunol. 41:1278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Ohigashi, I.,, Zuklys, S.,, Sakata, M., et al. 2013. Aire-expressing thymic medullary epithelial cells originate from β5t-expressing progenitor cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110:9885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Sasaki, K.,, Takada, K.,, Ohte, Y., et al. 2015. Thymoproteasomes produce unique peptide motifs for positive selection of CD8(+) T cells. Nat. Commun. 6:7484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Florea, B. I.,, Verdoes, M.,, Li, N., et al. 2010. Activity-based profiling reveals reactivity of the murine thymoproteasome-specific subunit beta5t. Chem. Biol. 17:795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Nitta, T.,, Murata, S.,, Sasaki, K., et al. 2010. Thymoproteasome shapes immunocompetent repertoire of CD8+ T cells. Immunity 32:29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Xing, Y., Jameson, S. C. and Hogquist, K. A. 2013. Thymoproteasome subunit-β5T generates peptide-MHC complexes specialized for positive selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110:6979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Takada, K., Kondo, K. and Takahama, Y. 2017. Generation of peptides that promote positive selection in the thymus. J. Immunol. 198:2215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Murata, S., Takahama, Y. and Tanaka, K. 2008. Thymoproteasome: probable role in generating positively selecting peptides. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 20:192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Takahama, Y., Takada, K., Murata, S. and Tanaka, K. 2012. β5t-containing thymoproteasome: specific expression in thymic cortical epithelial cells and role in positive selection of CD8+ T cells. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 24:92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Takahama, Y., Ohigashi, I., Murata, S. and Tanaka, K. 2018. Thymoproteasome and peptidic self. Immunogenetics. In press. doi: 10.1007/s00251-018-1081-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Tomaru, U.,, Ishizu, A.,, Murata, S., et al. 2009. Exclusive expression of proteasome subunit {beta}5t in the human thymic cortex. Blood 113:5186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Ohigashi, I., Ohte, Y., Setoh, K.et al. 2017. A human PSMB11 variant affects thymoproteasome processing and CD8+ T cell production. JCI Insight 2:e93664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Nitta, T., Kochi, Y., Muro, R.et al. 2017. Human thymoproteasome variations influence CD8 T cell selection. Sci Immunol. 2:eaan5165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Ueno, T.,, Saito, F.,, Gray, D. H., et al. 2004. CCR7 signals are essential for cortex-medulla migration of developing thymocytes. J. Exp. Med. 200:493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Kwan, J. and Killeen, N. 2004. CCR7 directs the migration of thymocytes into the thymic medulla. J. Immunol. 172:3999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Sansom, S. N.,, Shikama-Dorn, N.,, Zhanybekova, S., et al. 2014. Population and single-cell genomics reveal the Aire dependency, relief from Polycomb silencing, and distribution of self-antigen expression in thymic epithelia. Genome Res. 24:1918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Koble, C. and Kyewski, B. 2009. The thymic medulla: a unique microenvironment for intercellular self-antigen transfer. J. Exp. Med. 206:1505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Danan-Gotthold, M., Guyon, C., Giraud, M., Levanon, E. Y. and Abramson, J. 2016. Extensive RNA editing and splicing increase immune self-representation diversity in medullary thymic epithelial cells. Genome Biol. 17:219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Abramson, J. and Anderson, G. 2017. Thymic epithelial cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 35:85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Anderson, M. S.,, Venanzi, E. S.,, Klein, L., et al. 2002. Projection of an immunological self shadow within the thymus by the aire protein. Science 298:1395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Org, T.,, Rebane, A.,, Kisand, K., et al. 2009. AIRE activated tissue specific genes have histone modifications associated with inactive chromatin. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18:4699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Abramson, J., Giraud, M., Benoist, C. and Mathis, D. 2010. Aire’s partners in the molecular control of immunological tolerance. Cell 140:123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Koh, A. S., Kingston, R. E., Benoist, C. and Mathis, D. 2010. Global relevance of Aire binding to hypomethylated lysine-4 of histone-3. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107:13016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Meredith, M., Zemmour, D., Mathis, D. and Benoist, C. 2015. Aire controls gene expression in the thymic epithelium with ordered stochasticity. Nat. Immunol. 16:942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Giraud, M.,, Yoshida, H.,, Abramson, J., et al. 2012. Aire unleashes stalled RNA polymerase to induce ectopic gene expression in thymic epithelial cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109:535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Koh, A. S.,, Miller, E. L.,, Buenrostro, J. D., et al. 2018. Rapid chromatin repression by Aire provides precise control of immune tolerance. Nat. Immunol. 19:162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Boehm, T., Scheu, S., Pfeffer, K. and Bleul, C. C. 2003. Thymic medullary epithelial cell differentiation, thymocyte emigration, and the control of autoimmunity require lympho-epithelial cross talk via LTbetaR. J. Exp. Med. 198:757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Rossi, S. W.,, Kim, M. Y.,, Leibbrandt, A., et al. 2007. RANK signals from CD4(+)3(-) inducer cells regulate development of Aire-expressing epithelial cells in the thymic medulla. J. Exp. Med. 204:1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Akiyama, T.,, Shimo, Y.,, Yanai, H., et al. 2008. The tumor necrosis factor family receptors RANK and CD40 cooperatively establish the thymic medullary microenvironment and self-tolerance. Immunity 29:423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Hikosaka, Y.,, Nitta, T.,, Ohigashi, I., et al. 2008. The cytokine RANKL produced by positively selected thymocytes fosters medullary thymic epithelial cells that express autoimmune regulator. Immunity 29:438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. White, A. J.,, Nakamura, K.,, Jenkinson, W. E., et al. 2010. Lymphotoxin signals from positively selected thymocytes regulate the terminal differentiation of medullary thymic epithelial cells. J. Immunol. 185:4769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Roberts, N. A.,, White, A. J.,, Jenkinson, W. E., et al. 2012. Rank signaling links the development of invariant γδ T cell progenitors and Aire(+) medullary epithelium. Immunity 36:427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Burkly, L.,, Hession, C.,, Ogata, L., et al. 1995. Expression of relB is required for the development of thymic medulla and dendritic cells. Nature 373:531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Weih, F.,, Carrasco, D.,, Durham, S. K., et al. 1995. Multiorgan inflammation and hematopoietic abnormalities in mice with a targeted disruption of RelB, a member of the NF-kappa B/Rel family. Cell 80:331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Zhu, M.,, Chin, R. K.,, Christiansen, P. A., et al. 2006. NF-kappaB2 is required for the establishment of central tolerance through an Aire-dependent pathway. J. Clin. Invest. 116:2964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Takaba, H.,, Morishita, Y.,, Tomofuji, Y., et al. 2015. Fezf2 orchestrates a thymic program of self-antigen expression for immune tolerance. Cell 163:975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Roberts, N. A.,, Adams, B. D.,, McCarthy, N. I., et al. 2017. Prdm1 regulates thymic epithelial function to prevent autoimmunity. J. Immunol. 199:1250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Cosway, E. J.,, Lucas, B.,, James, K. D., et al. 2017. Redefining thymus medulla specialization for central tolerance. J. Exp. Med. 214:3183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Gallegos, A. M. and Bevan, M. J. 2004. Central tolerance to tissue-specific antigens mediated by direct and indirect antigen presentation. J. Exp. Med. 200:1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Hubert, F. X.,, Kinkel, S. A.,, Davey, G. M., et al. 2011. Aire regulates the transfer of antigen from mTECs to dendritic cells for induction of thymic tolerance. Blood 118:2462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Perera, J., Meng, L., Meng, F. and Huang, H. 2013. Autoreactive thymic B cells are efficient antigen-presenting cells of cognate self-antigens for T cell negative selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110:17011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Yamano, T.,, Nedjic, J.,, Hinterberger, M., et al. 2015. Thymic B cells are licensed to present self antigens for central T cell tolerance induction. Immunity 42:1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Perry, J. S. and Hsieh, C. S. 2016. Development of T-cell tolerance utilizes both cell-autonomous and cooperative presentation of self-antigen. Immunol. Rev. 271:141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Shortman, K., Vremec, D., Corcoran, L. M., Georgopoulos, K., Lucas, K. and Wu, L. 1998. The linkage between T-cell and dendritic cell development in the mouse thymus. Immunol. Rev. 165:39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Wu, L. and Shortman, K. 2005. Heterogeneity of thymic dendritic cells. Semin. Immunol. 17:304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Bonasio, R., Scimone, M. L., Schaerli, P., Grabie, N., Lichtman, A. H. and von Andrian, U. H. 2006. Clonal deletion of thymocytes by circulating dendritic cells homing to the thymus. Nat. Immunol. 7:1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Perry, J. S. A.,, Lio, C. J.,, Kau, A. L., et al. 2014. Distinct contributions of Aire and antigen-presenting-cell subsets to the generation of self-tolerance in the thymus. Immunity 41:414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Perry, J. S. A.,, Russler-Germain, E. V.,, Zhou, Y. W., et al. 2018. CD36 mediates cell-surface antigens to promote thymic development of the regulatory T cell receptor repertoire and allo-tolerance. Immunity 48:923.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Lkhagvasuren, E., Sakata, M., Ohigashi, I. and Takahama, Y. 2013. Lymphotoxin β receptor regulates the development of CCL21-expressing subset of postnatal medullary thymic epithelial cells. J. Immunol. 190:5110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Cosway, E. J.,, Ohigashi, I.,, Schauble, K., et al. 2018. Formation of the intrathymic dendritic cell pool requires CCL21-mediated recruitment of CCR7+ progenitors to the thymus. J. Immunol. 201:516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Lei, Y.,, Ripen, A. M.,, Ishimaru, N., et al. 2011. Aire-dependent production of XCL1 mediates medullary accumulation of thymic dendritic cells and contributes to regulatory T cell development. J. Exp. Med. 208:383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Farr, A., Nelson, A., Hosier, S. and Kim, A. 1993. A novel cytokine-responsive cell surface glycoprotein defines a subset of medullary thymic epithelium in situ. J. Immunol. 150:1160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Farr, A. G. and Rudensky, A. 1998. Medullary thymic epithelium: a mosaic of epithelial “self”?J. Exp. Med. 188:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Panneck, A. R.,, Rafiq, A.,, Schütz, B., et al. 2014. Cholinergic epithelial cell with chemosensory traits in murine thymic medulla. Cell Tissue Res. 358:737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Miller, C. N.,, Proekt, I.,, von Moltke, J., et al. 2018. Thymic tuft cells promote an IL-4-enriched medulla and shape thymocyte development. Nature 559:627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Bornstein, C.,, Nevo, S.,, Giladi, A., et al. 2018. Single-cell mapping of the thymic stroma identifies IL-25-producing tuft epithelial cells. Nature 559:622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Kurobe, H.,, Liu, C.,, Ueno, T., et al. 2006. CCR7-dependent cortex-to-medulla migration of positively selected thymocytes is essential for establishing central tolerance. Immunity 24:165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Nitta, T., Nitta, S., Lei, Y., Lipp, M. and Takahama, Y. 2009. CCR7-mediated migration of developing thymocytes to the medulla is essential for negative selection to tissue-restricted antigens. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106:17129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Kozai, M.,, Kubo, Y.,, Katakai, T., et al. 2017. Essential role of CCL21 in establishment of central self-tolerance in T cells. J. Exp. Med. 214:1925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Suzuki, G.,, Sawa, H.,, Kobayashi, Y., et al. 1999. Pertussis toxin-sensitive signal controls the trafficking of thymocytes across the corticomedullary junction in the thymus. J. Immunol. 162:5981. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Suzuki, G.,, Nakata, Y.,, Dan, Y., et al. 1998. Loss of SDF-1 receptor expression during positive selection in the thymus. Int. Immunol. 10:1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Plotkin, J., Prockop, S. E., Lepique, A. and Petrie, H. T. 2003. Critical role for CXCR4 signaling in progenitor localization and T cell differentiation in the postnatal thymus. J. Immunol. 171:4521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Choi, Y. I.,, Duke-Cohan, J. S.,, Ahmed, W. B., et al. 2008. PlexinD1 glycoprotein controls migration of positively selected thymocytes into the medulla. Immunity 29:888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Hu, Z., Lancaster, J. N., Sasiponganan, C. and Ehrlich, L. I. 2015. CCR4 promotes medullary entry and thymocyte-dendritic cell interactions required for central tolerance. J. Exp. Med. 212:1947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Cowan, J. E.,, McCarthy, N. I.,, Parnell, S. M., et al. 2014. Differential requirement for CCR4 and CCR7 during the development of innate and adaptive αβT cells in the adult thymus. J. Immunol. 193:1204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Matloubian, M.,, Lo, C. G.,, Cinamon, G., et al. 2004. Lymphocyte egress from thymus and peripheral lymphoid organs is dependent on S1P receptor 1. Nature 427:355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Ueno, T.,, Hara, K.,, Willis, M. S., et al. 2002. Role for CCR7 ligands in the emigration of newly generated T lymphocytes from the neonatal thymus. Immunity 16:205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Wang, H. and Hogquist, K. A. 2018. CCR7 defines a precursor for murine iNKT cells in thymus and periphery. ELife. 7: e34793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. White, A. J.,, Baik, S.,, Parnell, S. M., et al. 2017. A type 2 cytokine axis for thymus emigration. J. Exp. Med. 214:2205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Sakata, M., Ohigashi, I. and Takahama, Y. 2018. Cellularity of thymic epithelial cells in the postnatal mouse. J. Immunol. 200:1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Hirakawa, M.,, Nagakubo, D.,, Kanzler, B., et al. 2018. Fundamental parameters of the developing thymic epithelium in the mouse. Sci. Rep. 8:11095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Immunology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES