Abstract
Objective
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a devastating disease. Interferon α-inducible protein 27 (IFI27), originally known to involve in innate immunity, is later found to intervene in cell proliferation, leading to inventive studies regarding the role of IFI27 in cancer treatment. We aimed to investigate the role of IFI27 in CCA.
Materials and methods
Cell proliferation, migration, and invasion assays, Western blot, gene transfection and knockdown, immunofluorescent and immunohistochemical stains, and xenograft animal model were applied.
Results
IFI27 knockdown in CCA cells induced cell cycle arrest in S phase, resulting in lower cell proliferative rate in vitro and in vivo. IFI27 knockdown attenuated CCA cell migration and invasion through inhibition of epithelial–mesenchymal transition, which was supported by increased E-cadherin and decreased N-cadherin and fibronectin. Filamentous actin level was also reduced. IFI27 knockdown further repressed expression and secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A), a strong stimulator of angiogenesis, through downregulation of c-jun and c-fos, which was supported in vitro by the finding that human vascular endothelial cells grew more slowly in conditioned medium of IFI27 knockdown on CCA cells and in vivo by the lower erythropoietin concentration found in the xenografted tumors derived from IFI27 knockdown on CCA cells. In addition, anti-VEGF-A antibody treatment was able to repress CCA cell growth. To the contrary, IFI27 overexpression could increase CCA cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. Clinically, higher IFI27 expression was linked to inferior overall survival of CCA patients.
Conclusion
Our data strongly suggest that IFI27 could be deemed as a potential target for CCA treatment.
Keywords: IFI27, cholangiocarcinoma, oncogene, angiogenesis, VEGF-A, metastasis, tumor growth, cell cycle
Introduction
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a biliary tract cancer and ranks as second most liver primary malignancy, after hepatoma. CCA accounts for 20% of primary liver cancers1 and mainly happens in patients aged over 50 years.2 Due to the asymptomatic nature during the early stage of CCA, most CCA patients are diagnosed with advanced disease, which excludes the feasibility of the most effective CCA treatment, radical surgery.3 The median survival of non-resectable CCA is reported to be around 3–6 months due to resistance to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy.4 Thus, developing new therapeutic targets for CCA should be urgently prioritized.
Interferons activate the interferon-inducible genes to exert the biological functions. Interferon α-inducible protein 27 (IFI27) is coded by one kind of small genes induced highly by interferon α and with basal expression in almost all cell types. Primarily, IFI27 is deemed as a key factor for interferon-mediated antivirus treatment.5 The cDNA for IFI27 was first cloned in the human breast cancer cell line, MCF-7, after estrogen exposure.6 Suomela et al showed that IFI27 mRNA expressed highly in inflammatory epidermis and squamous cell cancers, and IFI27 could be deemed as a cell proliferative marker for epithelium and cancer.7 IFI27 expression has also been found to be upregulated in various cancers with underlying mechanism not fully understood.7 In ovarian cancer, IFI27 was shown to promote epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and stemness.8 Regarding CCA, there is no IFI27 relevant study available at present.
Angiogenesis plays a crucial role during cancer growth and metastasis, and thus targeting angiogenesis has emerged as a new therapeutic trend for cancer treatment.9 Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), usually known as VEGF-A, is an endothelial cell-specific mitogen and is a strong stimulator of angiogenesis.10 VEGF-A-targeting drugs (like Bevacizumab and Aflibercept) are widely applied in cancer treatment.11 In CCA, higher VEGF expression was shown to imply high hematogenic metastasis.12 Recent in vitro study demonstrated that apatinib, a VEGF receptor inhibitor, could inhibit CCA proliferation through VEGF signaling repression,13 further strongly suggesting the important role of VEGF signaling activation in CCA.
In this study, we investigated the role of IFI27 in CCA in vitro and in vivo. The influence and regulatory mechanism of IFI27 on VEGF-A expression in CCA cells were also studied. In addition, we examined IFI27 expression of human CCA specimen by immunohistochemical staining to evaluate the clinical meaning of IFI27 on CCA patients’ survival. We aimed to develop a new therapeutic target for CCA.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Human CCA cell lines were purchased from Korean Cell Line Bank (Seoul, Korea). Cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic agents. Culture medium was changed thrice per week. Human vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs) were purchased from Bioresource Collection and Research Center (Hsinchu, Taiwan R.O.C.) and maintained as previously described.14
Knockdown of IFI27 in SNU308 cells
SNU308 cells were transduced with lentiviral particles containing control small hairpin (sh)RNA (sc-108080; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) or IFI27 shRNA (sc-105551-V; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. One day after transduction, SNU308-COLsi (with control shRNA) and SNU308-IFI27si (with IFI27 shRNA) were selected by incubation with 2 µg/mL puromycin dihydrochloride for another three generations.
IFI27 overexpression in YSCCC cells
YSCCC cells were transduced with control lentiviral activation particles (sc-437282; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) or IFI27 lentiviral activation particles (sc-416981-LAC; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Three days after transduction, the cells (YSCCC-DNA and YSCCC-IFI27) were selected by incubation with 10 µg/mL puromycin dihydrochloride (sc-108071; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), 500 µg/mL hygromycin B (sc-29067; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), and 10 µg/mL Blasticidin S HCl (sc-495389; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) for at least four generations.
Cell cycle analysis
The analysis procedure was performed as previously described.15,16 Cell cycle analysis was performed using a FACSCalibur cytometer and CellQuest Pro software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).
Matrigel invasion assay
The matrigel invasion assay was conducted as previously described.17 It was carried out for 48 hours and the invading cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in 1× PBS, stained, digitally photographed, and counted under the microscope (IX71; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The experiments were performed in triplicate.
Transwell filter migration assay
The migration assay was conducted as previously described.18 It was carried out for 24 hours and the migrating cells were stained and counted under four random high-power microscopic fields (100×) per filter. The experiments were performed in triplicate.
Real-time quantitative-PCR (RT-qPCR)
Total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). RT-qPCR was performed using the Mx3000P™ QPCR system (Stratagene, San Diego, CA, USA) with EvaGreen® (TOOLS Biotechnology Co., Ltd., New Taipei City, Taiwan R.O.C.) as fluorescent dye. The sequences of specific PCR primers were described in the supplemental data.
Western blotting
Western blots were performed as described previously.15 The antibodies used are listed in the supplementary data.
Filamentous actin (F-actin) staining
The detailed procedures were as described previously.19 The F-actin expression was shown by incubation with FITC-conjugated phalloidin and mounted with ProLongR Gold reagent as instructed by the manufacturer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Fluorescence representing the distribution of F-actin was checked using confocal microscope (LSM 510 Meta; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
VEGF promoter activity assay
Cells (5×104 cells/well) were seeded in 24-well plate, 24 hours prior to transfection with mixture containing 1 µg VEGF promoter plasmid DNA (S721026; Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 3 µL transfection reagent FuGENE® HD (Active Motif), and Opti-MEM. Promoter activity was quantified 24 hours post-transfection using the LightSwitch™ Luciferase Assay Kit (Active Motif).
VEGF-A ELISA
VEGF-A concentration in conditioned media was measured by VEGF-A ELISA according to the methods described by the manufacturer (DY293B; R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA).
Tumor xenografts
This study was approved by the Chang Gung University Animal Research Committee (Permit Number: 2014022601). All methods were performed in accordance with the “Animal Welfare Law and Policy” (LAW3ANI). Equal volumes of tumor cells and matrigel were mixed (total 100 µL, containing 5×106 cells) and injected into the dorsal region of nude mice (BALB/cAnN-Foxn1, 4 weeks old). The weight, volume, and erythropoietin (EPO) concentrations of the xenografts were measured after 4 weeks. The EPO concentration was quantified using Mouse EPO Quantikine ELISA Kit (R&D Systems Inc.).
Patient demographics for IHC analysis and bile collection
Patients with CCA who underwent hepatectomy between 1989 and 2006 at the Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were enrolled (N=96). The study was approved by the local institutional review board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (clinical study numbers 99-2886B, 99-3810B, and 102-5813B). Written informed consents for participants were obtained. All methods were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
IFI27 immunohistochemistry
IFI27 expression levels in the aforementioned 96 CCA patients were examined by immunohistochemical staining. IFI27 primary antibody (NBP1-84745, 1:50 dilution; Novus Biologicals, LLC, Centennial, CO, USA) was used. Bound antibody signal was visualized using Labelled Streptavidin-Biotin2 System horseradish peroxidase (No. K0675; Dako Denmark A/S, Glostrup, Denmark). Staining intensities were scored as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (strong). H-scores were calculated as the percentage of positive staining (0–100) × the corresponding staining intensity (0–3). Specimens with H-scores <160 or ≥160 were classified as having low or high expression, respectively.
Statistical analyses
Differences between the experimental and control groups were calculated using the Student’s t-test. Differences in tumor weights between the experimental and control animals were compared by the Mann–Whitney U test. Overall survival (OS) rate was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Several clinicopathological variables were considered for the initial single-variable analysis, which was performed with the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was applied for multivariate regression. A value of P≤0.05 derived from a two-tailed test was considered statistically significant.
Result
IFI27 knockdown reduced the proliferation of CCA cells
Eight kinds of CCA cells, including RBE, TFK-1, SSP-25, SNU308, SNU1079, TGBC-24, YSCCC, and HUCCT1 cells, were evaluated for IFI27 mRNA expressions by RT-qPCR. Figure 1A shows that HUCCT1 expressed the most IFI27 mRNA expression, while YSCCC expressed the least.
To investigate the potential role of IFI27 in CCA cell proliferation, IFI27 was knocked down in SNU308 cells (SNU308-IFI27si cells). As shown in Figure 1B, upper panel, the expression of IFI27 protein was knocked down significantly in SNU308-IFI27si cells to <35% of that in SNU308-COLsi cells (Figure 1B, lower panel). The doubling time of SNU308-IFI27si cells was increased to 72 hours compared to 44 hours of SNU308-COLsi cells (Figure 1C). We further evaluated cell proliferation rate by MTT assay. As shown in Figure 1D, SNU308-IFI27si cells had a decreased cell proliferation rate compared to SNU308-COLsi cells after 2 and 3 days. The cell cycle distribution as analyzed by flow cytometry revealed an S-phase arrest in SNU308-IFI27si cells, which was similar to the IFI27 knockdown effect in epidermal keratinocytes reported in our previous study.20 The percentage of S-phase cells increased from 29.01% ±2.8% in SNU308-COLsi cells to 38.5%±2.9% SNU308-IFI27si cells (Figure 1E). Taken together, our results indicated that the functional role of IFI27 was indeed involved in the cell proliferation and cell cycle progression of SNU308 cells.
IFI27 knockdown inhibited the migration and invasion of CCA cells
Since cancer metastasis is one of the main causes of cancer-related death, we evaluated the potential role of IFI27 in CCA cell metastasis. As shown in Figure 2A, SNU308-IFI27si cells had only 80%±4% cell migration ability compared to that of SNU308-COLsi cells. The invasion ability of SNU308-IFI27si cells was also reduced to 74%±3.8% of SNU308-COLsi cells (Figure 2B). E-and N-cadherins were next evaluated. Figure 2C demonstrated that SNU308-IFI27si cells had higher E-cadherin but lower N-cadherin expression than SNU308-COLsi cells. Fibronectin, one of the mesenchymal cell markers, was also found to be expressed in lower level in SNU308-IFI27si cells (Figure 2C). The fluorescent stain by FITC-conjugated phalloidin showed that the formation of F-actin in SNU308-IFI27si was also decreased compared to that in SNU308-COLsi cells (Figure 2D). Collectively, our data indicated that knockdown of IFI27 in SNU308 cells would inhibit cell metastasis through inhibition of EMT and F-actin formation.
IFI27-regulated VEGF-A expression in CCA cells
Since VEGF-A is a strong stimulator of angiogenesis, which plays a vital role during cancer growth and metastasis, we evaluated whether IFI27 exerted any effect on the regulation of VEGF-A expression in CCA cells. Figure 3A and B showed that IFI27 knockdown in SNU308 cells attenuated the expressions of VEGF-A at the mRNA and secreted protein levels. The luciferase activity of VEGF-A promoter was also decreased to 45%±6% in SNU308-IFI27si cells (Figure 3C). Two VEGF-A-inducing transcriptional factors, c-jun and c-fos, were also downregulated by IFI27 knockdown in SNU308 cells (Figure 3D). To evaluate the role of VEGF-A in CCA cell growth, SNU308 cells were then treated by anti-VEGF-A antibodies for 1 day. As shown in Figure 3E, the cell growth was inhibited to 72% ±3% by anti-VEGF-A antibody treatment, indicating the stimulatory effect of VEGF-A on the proliferation of CCA cells. Conditioned medium taken from SNU308-IFI27si cells and SNU308-COLsi cells was further used for the growth of HUVECs culture. Figure 3F showed that HUVECs cultured with SNU308-IFI27si cell medium had lower cell proliferation rate as determined by MTT assay. Our results showed, for the first time, that IFI27 knockdown in SNU308 cells could inhibit the production and secretion of VEGF-A, thus repressing the cell growth of both CCA cells and vascular endothelial cells, and therefore, involved in the control of angiogenesis.
The in vivo functional role of IFI27 on CCA cell growth and angiogenesis
To determine the cell growth of SNU308-IFI27si and SNU308-COLsi cells in vivo, two cells were xenografted into two groups of nude mice (Figure 4A). After 4 weeks, the tumor volume, weight, and EPO concentration were measured. As shown in Figure 4B and C, the tumors derived from SNU308-IFI27si cells had much smaller tumor volume and tumor weight than tumors from SNU308-COLsi cells. The EPO concentration in tumors from SNU308-IFI27si cells was around 587 pg/mL compared to 786 pg/mL of tumors from SNU308-COLsi cells (Figure 4E), indicating a less amount of vessel formation inside the tumor mass. These results demonstrated that IFI27 knockdown could also attenuate in vivo CCA cell growth and angiogenesis.
IFI27 overexpression in CCA cells promoted proliferation, migration, and matrix invasion
To evaluate the effect of IFI27 overexpression in CCA cells, YSCCC cells, like the other CCA cells expressing lower level of IFI27 compared to that of SNU308 cells were transfected with recombinant IFI27 gene, and cells with increased IFI27 protein expression (Figure 5A) were selected to perform the following experiments. As expected, IFI27 overexpression promoted the cell proliferation rate of YSCCC cells (Figure 5B). The doubling time of YSCCC IFI27 cells (YSCCC with IFI27 overexpression) was 12.1 hours, while the doubling time of YSCCC DNA cells (YSCCC with IFI27 mock overexpression) was 18.9 hours. IFI27 overexpression also markedly increased the cell migration and matrix invasion of YSCCC IFI27 cells to 229% and 210%, respectively, comparted to YSCCC DNA cells (Figure 5C and D).
Survival and prognostic analysis of CCA patients
The expression of IFI27 was then analyzed in 96 CCA patient specimens (all intrahepatic CCA) and 43 of them (45%) revealed high cytoplasmic immunostaining for IFI27 (H-score ≥160, Figure 6A). Less intense staining of IFI27 expression was found in other specimens (Figure 6B). Interestingly, overexpression of IFI27 was found to be independently associated with symptoms and tumor size >5 cm (Table S1). Univariate log-rank analysis identified the following factors as adverse influences on OS: presence of symptoms, elevated ALP, decreased albumin, CAE >5, tumor size >5 cm, positive surgical margin and lymph node status, and high IFI27 immunostaining (Table S2). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that elevated ALP, non-curative hepatectomy, and high IFI27 immunostaining independently predicted an inferior OS rate for MF mass-forming-CCA patients after hepatectomy (Table S2, Figure 6C).
Discussion
In this current study, we show for the first time that IFI27 functions as on oncogene in CCA. Knockdown of IFI27 in CCA cells would lead to cell growth attenuation in vitro through cell cycle arrest in S-phase. Further, the migration and invasion ability of CCA cells would be decreased with IFI27 knockdown, which was found to repress EMT and F-actin synthesis. VEGF-A expression and secretion were also downregulated by IFI27 knockdown. Furthermore, in vivo xenograft animal study demonstrated that tumor growth and vascularity were less in CCA cells with IFI27 knock-down. Higher IFI27 expression indicated poorer prognosis of CCA patients as determined by IHC staining. Our results clearly show that IFI27-targeting therapy could be deemed as a promising direction for CCA treatment.
To grow cell needs reproduction entailing DNA replication and division of the cytoplasm and nucleus, which is now known as cell cycle consisting of G0, G1, S, G2, and M phases. Cell cycle is under strict control in normal circumstance to maintain homeostasis. Once on deregulation the cells may sustain uncontrolled proliferation. Due to excess mitogenic signaling stimulation, cancer cells tend to have cell cycle disturbance, leading to the unlimited growth.21 Previously, Hsieh et al demonstrated that IFI27 knockdown in keratinocytes could slow cell cycle progression at S-phase,20 which is in line with our result shown in Figure 1E indicating that IFI27 knockdown could induce a S-phase cell cycle arrest in SNU308 cells. The lower cell growth rate of SNU308-IFI27si cells was further supported by the longer cell doubling time and lower cell proliferative rate shown in Figure 1C and D. Similar results are found in Figure 4B and C, demonstrating that after we xenografted SNU308-IFI27si cells into the nude mice, tumors derived from SNU308-IFI27si cells also had lower tumor volume and lighter tumor weight. In addition, overexpression of IFI27 in SNU308 cells could increase the cell growth rate (Figure 5B).
Cancer metastasis accounts for 90% of cancer-related death.22 To initiate metastasis, cancer cells need to get abilities of migration and invasion, which let cancer cells move from one place to another place. SNU308-IFI27si cells had lower migration and invasion ability compared to IFI27 COLsi cells (Figure 2A and B), indicating IFI27 knockdown could attenuate SNU308 cell metastatic potential. To the contrary, overexpression of IFI27 could increase CCA cell metastasis (Figure 5C and D). EMT is a key process during embryonic development. It is also found to be involved in wound healing and tumor cell migration.23 After EMT, cancer cells lose epithelial cell characteristics and gain mesenchymal cell features, which makes cancer cells lose cell–cell adhesion and endows them with the ability to migrate, leading to the higher metastatic potential. Thus, targeting EMT process has emerged as a new therapeutic trend against cancer progression.24 EMT could induce cadherin switch, which means increase of N-cadherin and decrease of E-cadherin.25 At the same time, the mesenchymal cell marker, fibronectin, would increase.26 As shown in Figure 2C, SNU308-IFI27si cells had higher E-cadherin expression and lower N-cadherin and fibronectin expressions than SNU308 cells, indicating that IFI27 knockdown could block EMT process in SNU308 cells, leading to the attenuation of metastatic ability shown in Figure 2A and B.
F-actin cytoskeleton networks regulate many vital cellular functions, in addition to maintaining and changing cellular shape. The change of F-actin could generate force contributing to cell migration.27 As shown in Figure 2D, knockdown of IFI27 in SNU308 cells could inhibit F-actin synthesis, leading to the weaker migration ability noted in Figure 2A.
Angiogenesis is crucial for cancer growth and metastasis. It is suggested that prevention of neovascularization is an effective way to keep tumor stay in dormancy.28 Thus, antiangiogenesis therapy has been applied clinically, and successfully prolonged progression of free survival in some cancers.29,30 Since VEGF-A is a strong stimulator for angiogenesis, targeting VEGF-A has emerged as an effective way to treat cancers.10 As shown in Figure 3A–C, IFI27 knock-down in SNU308 cells reduced VEGF-A mRNA expression, secretion, and reporter activity. To further evaluate the effect of VEGF-A on SNU308 cells, anti-VEGF-A antibodies were used to treat SNU308 cells, which effectively repressed SNU308 cells growth (Figure 4D), indicating IFI27 knock-down inhibited SNU308 cell growth partly medicated by downregulation of VEGF-A.
The analysis of VEGF-A promoter sequence revealed several binding sites for transcriptional factors, including AP-1 and AP-2 (c-jun and c-fos).31 Figure 4D showed that c-jun and c-fos were downregulated with IFI27 knockdown in SNU308 cells, implicating that IFI27 knockdown repressed VEGF-A through inhibition of c-jun and c-fos. It has previously been shown that VEGF-A is able to stimulate HUVECs growth.32 The cultured mediums from SNU308-IFI27si cells and SNU308-COLsi cells were then applied to treat HUVECs. It is obvious that HUVECs cultured with the medium from SNU308-IFI27si cells had lower cell proliferative rate (Figure 3F). To further investigate the effect of IFI27 on angiogenesis, EPO concentrations of the xenografted tumors were measured. Figure 4D showed that tumors derived from SNU308-IFI27si cells group had lower EPO concentration than that from SNU308-COLsi cells group.
The finding that 43 out of 96 CCA patients expressed high IFI27 demonstrates the IFI27 expression in CCA. It is interesting to find that high IFI27 expression was associated with symptoms and large tumor size (>5 cm) (Table S1). After multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, elevated ALP, non-curative hepatectomy, and high IFI27 immunostaining were identified as predictors for inferior OS of CCA patients after surgery (Table S2 and Figure 6C). For the first time it was shown that IFI27 expression could correlate with survival of cancer patients.
Conclusion
Since currently available therapies only have limited effect on CCA, finding new therapeutic method for CCA patients is urgently needed. Our results show that IFI27 could increase tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis. VEGF-A is one of the downstream genes of IFI27. Higher IFI27 expression is associated with poorer OS in CCA patients after surgery. Collectively, our data suggest that IFI27 is a novel oncogene for human CCA. Targeting IFI27 therapy has the potential to become a new CCA therapeutic direction.
Supplementary materials
The primary antibodies used in this study were monoclonal antibodies against cIFI27 (1:1,000, H00003429-D01P; Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan R.O.C.), c-jun (1:1,000, #9165; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), c-fos (1:1,000, #2250; Cell Signaling Technology), E-cadherin (1:1,000, #3195; Cell Signaling Technology), N-cadherin (1:1,000, #2189; Cell Signaling Technology), and Fibronectin (1:500, MAB1918; R&D Systems Inc.).
The primer sequences used in this study
5′->3′
IFI27-sense GTGCCCATGGTGCTCAGT
IFI27-antisense CCAGTGACTGCAGAGTAGCC
VEGFA-sense ATTATGCGGATCAAACCT
VEGFA-antisense TTCTTGTCTTGCTCTATCTT
Table S1.
IFI27 low expression | IFI27 high expression | P | |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Age (years) | 59.50±11.2 | 61.26±12.6 | |
Gender | 0.092 | ||
Male | 25 (47.2%) | 13 (30.2%) | |
Female | 28 (52.8%) | 30 (69.8%) | |
Symptom | 0.022* | ||
No | 13 (24.5%) | 3 (7.0%) | |
Yes | 40 (75.5%) | 40 (93.0%) | |
AST (IU/L) | 0.127 | ||
≤34 | 24 (47.1%) | 27 (62.8%) | |
>34 | 27 (52.9%) | 16 (37.2%) | |
ALT (U/L) | 0.625 | ||
≤36 | 28 (58.3%) | 26 (63.4%) | |
>36 | 20 (41.7%) | 15 (36.6%) | |
ALP (U/L) | 0.085 | ||
≤94 | 23 (47.9%) | 13 (30.2%) | |
>94 | 25 (52.1%) | 30 (69.8%) | |
Bilirubin (total) (mg/dL) | 0.187 | ||
≤1.3 | 43 (81.1%) | 39 (90.7%) | |
>1.3 | 10 (18.9%) | 4 (9.3%) | |
Albumin (g/dL) | 0.451 | ||
≤3.5 | 11 (22.9%) | 12 (30.0%) | |
>3.5 | 37 (77.1%) | 28 (70.0%) | |
Serum CEA (ng/mL) | 0.487 | ||
≤5 | 21 (55.3%) | 16 (47.1%) | |
>5 | 17 (44.7%) | 18 (52.9%) | |
Size (cm) | 0.004* | ||
≤5 | 29 (58.0%) | 12 (27.9%) | |
>5 | 21 (42.0%) | 31 (72.1%) | |
Lymph node | 0.273 | ||
Negative | 38 (71.7%) | 25 (61.0%) | |
Positive | 15 (28.3%) | 16 (39.0%) | |
Differentiated | 0.463 | ||
Well | 1 (1.9%) | 2 (4.7%) | |
Moderate | 30 (56.6%) | 18 (41.9%) | |
Poorly | 21 (39.6%) | 22 (51.2%) | |
Other | 1 (1.9%) | 1 (2.3%) | |
Margin | 0.190 | ||
Negative | 42 (79.2%) | 29 (67.4%) | |
Positive | 11 (20.8%) | 14 (32.6%) | |
Post-chemotherapy | 0.305 | ||
Without | 29 (54.7%) | 19 (44.2%) | |
With | 24 (45.3%) | 24 (55.8%) | |
Post-radiotherapy | 0.816 | ||
With | 46 (86.8%) | 38 (88.4%) | |
Without | 7 (13.2%) | 5 (11.6%) |
Note:
Statistically significant by multi-logistic regression analysis: P=0.048 for symptoms with relative risk (95% CI: 4 [1.01–16.67]); P=0.010 for tumor size >5 cm with relative risk (95% CI: 3.24 [1.33–7.91]).
Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CCA, cholangiocarcinoma; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; IFI27, interferon α-inducible protein 27; IU, international unit.
Table S2.
Factors | Survival time (months) | P | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
Median | 95% CI of median | 3-Year (%) | 5-Year (%) | ||
| |||||
Gender | 0.589 | ||||
Male (n=38) | 18.51 | 11.88–25.14 | 23.9 | 20.9 | |
Female (n=58) | 14.14 | 10.39–17.89 | 24.7 | 13.7 | |
Age | 0.670 | ||||
≤60 (n=46) | 14.70 | 7.46–21.93 | 25.2 | 20.4 | |
>60 (n=50) | 14.53 | 7.87–21.20 | 23.7 | 12.3 | |
Symptoms | 0.002 | ||||
Negative (n=16) | 46.26 | 13.92–78.60 | 58.9 | 43.0 | |
Positive (n=80) | 12.99 | 9.82–16.15 | 17.8 | 11.6 | |
AST (IU/L) | 0.243 | ||||
≤34 (n=51) | 14.40 | 6.89–21.91 | 29.5 | 22.2 | |
>34 (n=43) | 15.85 | 5.83–25.86 | 20.3 | 11.6 | |
ALT (IU/L) | 0.426 | ||||
≤36 (n=54) | 14.53 | 7.79–21.27 | 27.1 | 19.4 | |
>36 (n=35) | 15.85 | 8.72–22.97 | 19.6 | 9.8 | |
ALP (IU/L) | 0.001* | ||||
≤94 (n=36) | 26.86 | 14.77–38.95 | 40.3 | 27.5 | |
>94 (n=55) | 10.72 | 6.29–15.15 | 14.5 | 9.1 | |
Bilirubin (total) (mg/dL) | 0.392 | ||||
≤1.3 (n=82) | 15.81 | 10.07–21.56 | 26.2 | 16.8 | |
>1.3 (n=14) | 10.72 | 0.00–22.23 | 14.3 | 14.3 | |
Albumin (g/dL) | 0.023 | ||||
≤3.5 (n=23) | 5.75 | 4.06–7.45 | 17.4 | 13 | |
>3.5 (n=65) | 19.89 | 14.35–25.43 | 25.1 | 15 | |
Serum CEA (ng/dL) | 0.030 | ||||
≤5 (n=37) | 19.17 | 10.82–27.51 | 37.3 | 22.6 | |
>5 (n=35) | 12.72 | 8.24–17.20 | 8.9 | 8.9 | |
Margin | <0.001* | ||||
Negative (n=71) | 19.89 | 14.80–24.98 | 33.6 | 22.8 | |
Positive (n=25) | 4.70 | 2.69–6.71 | 0 | 0 | |
Size | 0.006 | ||||
≤5 cm (n=41) | 20.88 | 12.58–29.17 | 38.8 | 29.1 | |
>5 cm (n=52) | 12.89 | 8.76–17.01 | 14.8 | 7.4 | |
Lymph node | 0.016 | ||||
Negative (n=63) | 20.88 | 14.11–27.64 | 31.1 | 18.4 | |
Positive (n=31) | 12.72 | 4.83–20.61 | 12.9 | 12.9 | |
Histological differentiation | 0.960 | ||||
Well (n=3) | 6.08 | 0.72–11.45 | 33.3 | 33.3 | |
Moderate (n=48) | 15.81 | 8.89–22.73 | 26.6 | 18.6 | |
Poor (n=43) | 14.40 | 10.92–17.88 | 22.9 | 14.6 | |
Others (n=2) | 10.72 | NA | 0 | 0 | |
IFI27 expression | <0.001* | ||||
Low (n=51) | 23.90 | 17.92–29.89 | 34.7 | 29.4 | |
High (n=45) | 9.73 | 6.64–12.82 | 12.0 | 2.4 | |
Post-op chemotherapy | 0.383 | ||||
Without (n=48) | 14.40 | 0.00–30.88 | 33.4 | 23.8 | |
With (n=48) | 14.70 | 10.34–19.05 | 16.7 | 10.4 | |
Post-op radiotherapy | 0.075 | ||||
Without (n=84) | 14.53 | 10.66–18.40 | 28.2 | 19.2 | |
With (n=12) | 7.17 | 0.00–27.65 | 0 | 0 |
Note:
Means statistically significant in Cox’s proportional hazards analysis; relative risks (P-value) for ALP, margin, and IFI27 expression are 2.17 (0.025), 2.11(0.022), and 2.73 (0.002), respectively. Bold indicates significance in univariate analysis.
Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CCA, cholangiocarcinoma; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; IFI27, interferon α-inducible protein 27; IU, international unit; op, operation; OS, overall survival.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by CMRPG2F0111-3 to Kun-Chun Chiang.
Footnotes
Author contributions
All authors contributed to data analysis, drafting and revising the article, gave final approval of the version to be published, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- 1.Deoliveira ML, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma: thirty-one-year experience with 564 patients at a single institution. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):755–762. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000251366.62632.d3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Charbel H, Al-Kawas FH. Cholangiocarcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, and diagnosis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011;13(2):182–187. doi: 10.1007/s11894-011-0178-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Doherty B, Nambudiri VE, Palmer WC. Update on the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017;19(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s11894-017-0542-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cunningham SC, Choti MA, Bellavance EC, Pawlik TM. Palliation of hepatic tumors. Surg Oncol. 2007;16(4):277–291. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2007.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cheriyath V, Leaman DW, Borden EC. Emerging roles of FAM14 family members (G1P3/ISG 6–16 and ISG12/IFI27) in innate immunity and cancer. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2011;31(1):173–181. doi: 10.1089/jir.2010.0105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rasmussen UB, Wolf C, Mattei MG, et al. Identification of a new interferon-alpha-inducible gene (p27) on human chromosome 14q32 and its expression in breast carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1993;53(17):4096–4101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Suomela S, Cao L, Bowcock A, Saarialho-Kere U. Interferon alpha-inducible protein 27 (IFI27) is upregulated in psoriatic skin and certain epithelial cancers. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;122(3):717–721. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.22322.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kuo YY, Jim WT, Su LC, et al. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester is a potential therapeutic agent for oral cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(5):10748–10766. doi: 10.3390/ijms160510748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Albini A, Tosetti F, Li VW, Noonan DM, Li WW. Cancer prevention by targeting angiogenesis. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9(9):498–509. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010–2020. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(2):117–128. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ribatti D. Tumor refractoriness to anti-VEGF therapy. Oncotarget. 2016;7(29):46668–46677. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yoshikawa D, Ojima H, Iwasaki M, et al. Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of EGFR, VEGF, and HER2 expression in cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2008;98(2):418–425. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Peng H, Zhang Q, Li J, et al. Apatinib inhibits VEGF signaling and promotes apoptosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7(13):17220–17229. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tsai MY, Yang RC, Wu HT, Pang JH, Huang ST. Anti-angiogenic effect of tanshinone IIA involves inhibition of matrix invasion and modification of MMP-2/TIMP-2 secretion in vascular endothelial cells. Cancer Lett. 2011;310(2):198–206. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.06.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chiang KC, Yeh CN, Chen HY, et al. 19-Nor-2α-(3-hydroxypropyl)-1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (MART-10) is a potent cell growth regulator with enhanced chemotherapeutic potency in liver cancer cells. Steroids. 2011;76(13):1513–1519. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2011.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ouyang W, Ma Q, Li J, et al. Cyclin D1 induction through IkappaB kinase beta/nuclear factor-kappaB pathway is responsible for arsenite-induced increased cell cycle G1-S phase transition in human keratinocytes. Cancer Res. 2005;65(20):9287–9293. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tsui KH, Chung LC, Feng TH, Chang PL, Juang HH. Upregulation of prostate-derived Ets factor by luteolin causes inhibition of cell proliferation and cell invasion in prostate carcinoma cells. Int J Cancer. 2012;130(12):2812–2823. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chiang KC, Chen SC, Yeh CN, et al. MART-10, a less calcemic vitamin D analog, is more potent than 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in inhibiting the metastatic potential of MCF-7 breast cancer cells in vitro. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;139:54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chiang KC, Kuo SF, Chen CH, et al. MART-10, the vitamin D analog, is a potent drug to inhibit anaplastic thyroid cancer cell metastatic potential. Cancer Lett. 2015;369(1):76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hsieh WL, Huang YH, Wang TM, Ming YC, Tsai CN, Pang JH. IFI27, a novel epidermal growth factor-stabilized protein, is functionally involved in proliferation and cell cycling of human epidermal keratinocytes. Cell Prolif. 2015;48(2):187–197. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vermeulen K, Van Bockstaele DR, Berneman ZN. The cell cycle: a review of regulation, deregulation and therapeutic targets in cancer. Cell Prolif. 2003;36(3):131–149. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2184.2003.00266.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gupta GP, Massagué J. Cancer metastasis: building a framework. Cell. 2006;127(4):679–695. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Guarino M, Rubino B, Ballabio G. The role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer pathology. Pathology. 2007;39(3):305–318. doi: 10.1080/00313020701329914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Palena C, Fernando RI, Hamilton DH. An immunotherapeutic intervention against tumor progression: targeting a driver of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Oncoimmunology. 2014;3(1):e27220. doi: 10.4161/onci.27220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wheelock MJ, Shintani Y, Maeda M, Fukumoto Y, Johnson KR. Cadherin switching. J Cell Sci. 2008;121(6):727–735. doi: 10.1242/jcs.000455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Christiansen JJ, Rajasekaran AK. Reassessing epithelial to mesenchymal transition as a prerequisite for carcinoma invasion and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2006;66(17):8319–8326. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stricker J, Falzone T, Gardel ML. Mechanics of the F-actin cytoskeleton. J Biomech. 2010;43(1):9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med. 1971;285(21):1182–1186. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197111182852108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ebos JM, Kerbel RS. Antiangiogenic therapy: impact on invasion, disease progression, and metastasis. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8(4):210–221. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jayson GC, Hicklin DJ, Ellis LM. Antiangiogenic therapy--evolving view based on clinical trial results. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9(5):297–303. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tischer E, Mitchell R, Hartman T, et al. The human gene for vascular endothelial growth factor. multiple protein forms are encoded through alternative exon splicing. J Biol Chem. 1991;266(18):11947–11954. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tsui KH, Lin YH, Chung LC, et al. Prostate-derived Ets factor represses tumorigenesis and modulates epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in bladder carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2016;375(1):142–151. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.02.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table S1.
IFI27 low expression | IFI27 high expression | P | |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Age (years) | 59.50±11.2 | 61.26±12.6 | |
Gender | 0.092 | ||
Male | 25 (47.2%) | 13 (30.2%) | |
Female | 28 (52.8%) | 30 (69.8%) | |
Symptom | 0.022* | ||
No | 13 (24.5%) | 3 (7.0%) | |
Yes | 40 (75.5%) | 40 (93.0%) | |
AST (IU/L) | 0.127 | ||
≤34 | 24 (47.1%) | 27 (62.8%) | |
>34 | 27 (52.9%) | 16 (37.2%) | |
ALT (U/L) | 0.625 | ||
≤36 | 28 (58.3%) | 26 (63.4%) | |
>36 | 20 (41.7%) | 15 (36.6%) | |
ALP (U/L) | 0.085 | ||
≤94 | 23 (47.9%) | 13 (30.2%) | |
>94 | 25 (52.1%) | 30 (69.8%) | |
Bilirubin (total) (mg/dL) | 0.187 | ||
≤1.3 | 43 (81.1%) | 39 (90.7%) | |
>1.3 | 10 (18.9%) | 4 (9.3%) | |
Albumin (g/dL) | 0.451 | ||
≤3.5 | 11 (22.9%) | 12 (30.0%) | |
>3.5 | 37 (77.1%) | 28 (70.0%) | |
Serum CEA (ng/mL) | 0.487 | ||
≤5 | 21 (55.3%) | 16 (47.1%) | |
>5 | 17 (44.7%) | 18 (52.9%) | |
Size (cm) | 0.004* | ||
≤5 | 29 (58.0%) | 12 (27.9%) | |
>5 | 21 (42.0%) | 31 (72.1%) | |
Lymph node | 0.273 | ||
Negative | 38 (71.7%) | 25 (61.0%) | |
Positive | 15 (28.3%) | 16 (39.0%) | |
Differentiated | 0.463 | ||
Well | 1 (1.9%) | 2 (4.7%) | |
Moderate | 30 (56.6%) | 18 (41.9%) | |
Poorly | 21 (39.6%) | 22 (51.2%) | |
Other | 1 (1.9%) | 1 (2.3%) | |
Margin | 0.190 | ||
Negative | 42 (79.2%) | 29 (67.4%) | |
Positive | 11 (20.8%) | 14 (32.6%) | |
Post-chemotherapy | 0.305 | ||
Without | 29 (54.7%) | 19 (44.2%) | |
With | 24 (45.3%) | 24 (55.8%) | |
Post-radiotherapy | 0.816 | ||
With | 46 (86.8%) | 38 (88.4%) | |
Without | 7 (13.2%) | 5 (11.6%) |
Note:
Statistically significant by multi-logistic regression analysis: P=0.048 for symptoms with relative risk (95% CI: 4 [1.01–16.67]); P=0.010 for tumor size >5 cm with relative risk (95% CI: 3.24 [1.33–7.91]).
Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CCA, cholangiocarcinoma; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; IFI27, interferon α-inducible protein 27; IU, international unit.
Table S2.
Factors | Survival time (months) | P | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
Median | 95% CI of median | 3-Year (%) | 5-Year (%) | ||
| |||||
Gender | 0.589 | ||||
Male (n=38) | 18.51 | 11.88–25.14 | 23.9 | 20.9 | |
Female (n=58) | 14.14 | 10.39–17.89 | 24.7 | 13.7 | |
Age | 0.670 | ||||
≤60 (n=46) | 14.70 | 7.46–21.93 | 25.2 | 20.4 | |
>60 (n=50) | 14.53 | 7.87–21.20 | 23.7 | 12.3 | |
Symptoms | 0.002 | ||||
Negative (n=16) | 46.26 | 13.92–78.60 | 58.9 | 43.0 | |
Positive (n=80) | 12.99 | 9.82–16.15 | 17.8 | 11.6 | |
AST (IU/L) | 0.243 | ||||
≤34 (n=51) | 14.40 | 6.89–21.91 | 29.5 | 22.2 | |
>34 (n=43) | 15.85 | 5.83–25.86 | 20.3 | 11.6 | |
ALT (IU/L) | 0.426 | ||||
≤36 (n=54) | 14.53 | 7.79–21.27 | 27.1 | 19.4 | |
>36 (n=35) | 15.85 | 8.72–22.97 | 19.6 | 9.8 | |
ALP (IU/L) | 0.001* | ||||
≤94 (n=36) | 26.86 | 14.77–38.95 | 40.3 | 27.5 | |
>94 (n=55) | 10.72 | 6.29–15.15 | 14.5 | 9.1 | |
Bilirubin (total) (mg/dL) | 0.392 | ||||
≤1.3 (n=82) | 15.81 | 10.07–21.56 | 26.2 | 16.8 | |
>1.3 (n=14) | 10.72 | 0.00–22.23 | 14.3 | 14.3 | |
Albumin (g/dL) | 0.023 | ||||
≤3.5 (n=23) | 5.75 | 4.06–7.45 | 17.4 | 13 | |
>3.5 (n=65) | 19.89 | 14.35–25.43 | 25.1 | 15 | |
Serum CEA (ng/dL) | 0.030 | ||||
≤5 (n=37) | 19.17 | 10.82–27.51 | 37.3 | 22.6 | |
>5 (n=35) | 12.72 | 8.24–17.20 | 8.9 | 8.9 | |
Margin | <0.001* | ||||
Negative (n=71) | 19.89 | 14.80–24.98 | 33.6 | 22.8 | |
Positive (n=25) | 4.70 | 2.69–6.71 | 0 | 0 | |
Size | 0.006 | ||||
≤5 cm (n=41) | 20.88 | 12.58–29.17 | 38.8 | 29.1 | |
>5 cm (n=52) | 12.89 | 8.76–17.01 | 14.8 | 7.4 | |
Lymph node | 0.016 | ||||
Negative (n=63) | 20.88 | 14.11–27.64 | 31.1 | 18.4 | |
Positive (n=31) | 12.72 | 4.83–20.61 | 12.9 | 12.9 | |
Histological differentiation | 0.960 | ||||
Well (n=3) | 6.08 | 0.72–11.45 | 33.3 | 33.3 | |
Moderate (n=48) | 15.81 | 8.89–22.73 | 26.6 | 18.6 | |
Poor (n=43) | 14.40 | 10.92–17.88 | 22.9 | 14.6 | |
Others (n=2) | 10.72 | NA | 0 | 0 | |
IFI27 expression | <0.001* | ||||
Low (n=51) | 23.90 | 17.92–29.89 | 34.7 | 29.4 | |
High (n=45) | 9.73 | 6.64–12.82 | 12.0 | 2.4 | |
Post-op chemotherapy | 0.383 | ||||
Without (n=48) | 14.40 | 0.00–30.88 | 33.4 | 23.8 | |
With (n=48) | 14.70 | 10.34–19.05 | 16.7 | 10.4 | |
Post-op radiotherapy | 0.075 | ||||
Without (n=84) | 14.53 | 10.66–18.40 | 28.2 | 19.2 | |
With (n=12) | 7.17 | 0.00–27.65 | 0 | 0 |
Note:
Means statistically significant in Cox’s proportional hazards analysis; relative risks (P-value) for ALP, margin, and IFI27 expression are 2.17 (0.025), 2.11(0.022), and 2.73 (0.002), respectively. Bold indicates significance in univariate analysis.
Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CCA, cholangiocarcinoma; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; IFI27, interferon α-inducible protein 27; IU, international unit; op, operation; OS, overall survival.