Skip to main content
Journal of Diabetes Investigation logoLink to Journal of Diabetes Investigation
. 2018 Aug 28;10(2):272–282. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12899

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and neighborhood deprivation index: A spatial analysis in Zhejiang, China

Xin Zhang 1,2, Xiaoxiao Chen 1, Weiwei Gong 2,
PMCID: PMC6400165  PMID: 30040249

Abstract

Aims/Introduction

Many studies have reported that socioeconomically disadvantaged people or people who live in deprived areas are more vulnerable to diabetes complications. However, few such studies were carried out in China. The present study examined the spatial association between the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and neighborhood deprivation in Zhejiang, China, from a spatial epidemiology perspective.

Materials and Methods

Type 2 diabetes mellitus data (2012–2016) in the present study were derived from a population‐based diabetes registry system maintained by Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Principal components analysis was used to combine different socioeconomic variables together into a composited Neighborhood Deprivation Index. We applied the global Moran's I and Anselin's local Moran's I statistics to explore the spatial patterns of type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence and Neighborhood Deprivation Index.

Results

Type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence (Moran's I: 0.531, P < 0.001) and Neighborhood Deprivation Index (Moran's I: 0.772, P < 0.001) showed positive statistically significant global Moran's I index values, showing a tendency towards clustering. The local Moran's I analyses showed that type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence hot spots were mainly located in urban centers, and type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence cold spots appeared in the provincial capital area (Hangzhou city) and western and south‐western regions of Zhejiang; the hot spots of the less deprived areas were concentrated in urban centers (except Lishui city), and the cold spots of the most deprived areas were clustered in western and south‐western regions of Zhejiang.

Conclusions

The study showed that the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus was higher in affluent areas than the deprived areas across the study period. It will be significant to focus preventive efforts on the least deprived areas.

Keywords: Deprivation, Diabetes, Spatial analysis

Introduction

With economic development and increased living standards, type 2 diabetes mellitus is on the rise worldwide, which is estimated to be the third most challenging disease threatening human health after cancer and cardiovascular disease1. China has >110 million people with diabetes, the highest number of any country in the world2. According to the International Diabetes Federation, the yearly cost of diabetes in China is $25 billion. It is estimated that these costs will constantly increase and reach more than $47 billion in 20302, 3. Zhejiang is one of the high prevalence areas in China, and there has been >150,000 reported type 2 diabetes mellitus cases every year since 20094. Thus, preventive strategies are urgently required to prevent the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Accumulating evidence shows that diabetes is inversely associated with socioeconomic status (SES) in developed countries1. Type 2 diabetes is more prevalent in relatively lower SES groups. Socioeconomic disparities in the prevalence of diabetes are not only limited at the individual level, but also extend to the contextual (neighborhood) level. Increasingly, Western studies on the measurement of specific characteristics of the economic, social and built environment within relatively small areas, conceptualized as ‘neighborhood deprivation,’ show that neighborhood deprivation could shape the level of diabetes incidence and prevalence5. However, China has witnessed extremely rapid economic development during recent decades, and economic disparities exists within and between areas, but it is not clear how this is associated with diabetes.

Due to the absence of fine‐level socioeconomic data, studies on the relationship between SES and type 2 diabetes mellitus at the neighborhood level in China are sparse. Two pilot studies attempted to explore the neighborhood SES–health relationship within a city region, but their findings were not convincing, as there were just 57 districts (samples) included in the studies6, 7. With the development of remote sensing technology, increasing data (e.g., night‐time light data and built environment data) could be aggregated for constructing the neighborhood deprivation index at a fine geographical resolution (sub‐districts and townships level), which could improve the neighborhood deprivation measures and the understanding of the neighborhood SES–health relationship in China.

Meanwhile, Geographic Information System has taken giant steps forward in the recent decade, which makes it possible to undertake a sophisticated visual approach to data analysis in public health fields8, 9. The mapping technology could help us to understand the distribution of disease; spatial autocorrelation analysis is carried out to detect significant differences from a random spatial distribution. Spatial cluster analysis is carried out to identify whether cases of disease are geographically clustered. For policymakers, these applications are significant in that the spatial epidemiology technology could be useful for carrying out regional prevention and control strategies. To our knowledge, however, no studies have explored the spatial epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus in China.

Therefore, the main objective of the present study was to investigate the association between neighborhood deprivation and the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in China, based on a spatial epidemiology perspective. We initially created a neighborhood deprivation index (NDI) at a township level, and then carried out Geographic Information System‐based spatial analysis for type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence and NDI.

Methods

Study site

Zhejiang, one of the most relatively affluent coastal provinces in China, includes nine municipalities comprising of 90 counties with a population of 54 million. There are a total of 1,531 sub‐districts (‘Jiedao’) and townships (‘Xiangzhen’) across the whole of Zhejiang, which are called the townships level and defined as the smallest formal administrative divisions in China. In the present study, the data were aggregated and analyzed at this level.

Type 2 diabetes data

The type 2 diabetes mellitus data analyzed in the present study came from a population‐based diabetes registry system maintained by Zhejiang Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (Zhejiang CDC). Type 2 diabetes mellitus cases between 2012 and 2016 were routinely reported to the Zhejiang CDC diabetes surveillance system and verified by the provincial Non‐Communicable Disease program. All cases had elevated blood glucose according to at least one of the following World Health Organization criteria10: (i) random plasma glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L; (ii) fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L; or (iii) 2‐h plasma glucose value after the oral glucose tolerance test ≥11.1 mmol/L; and presented classic symptoms and were diagnosed as diabetes. A number of confirmed cases were geocoded and matched to the township level layers of the polygon in terms of their residential addresses using the ArcGIS v10.1 software (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA). The annual type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence (2012–2016) was calculated by dividing the number of annual cases by the corresponding population and multiplied by 100,000 at the township level. As a consequence of the diabetes surveillance coverage issue in Zhejiang, there were 1,299 out of 1,531 sub‐districts and townships with type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence. The Jenks natural break was used in the classification of all choropleth maps in ArcGIS v 10.1, which is a data classification method designed to place variable values into naturally occurring data categories. Natural breaks in the data are identified by finding points that minimize the within‐class sum of squared differences and maximize the between‐group sum of squared differences11.

Constructing area‐based deprivation indictors

The utilization of area‐based deprivation measurements in health research is widely accepted by international scholars. A great variety of indicators have been used for measuring area deprivation in relevant studies12, 13, 14, 15, 16, which are usually linked to social deprivation (e.g., illiteracy rate, unemployment rate and population structure) and material deprivation (e.g., gross domestic product [GDP], income and car ownership). In general, they depend on the availability of information in the census and the objective of the study. However, because of the general lack of reliable census information on the small areas, the relevant studies are limited in the Chinese context.

In light of data availability for overall provincial areas, remote sensing data and statistical information were integrated in the present study for measuring deprivation in the Zhejiang area. Satellite‐derived night‐time light data have been extensively used as an efficient proxy measure for monitoring urbanization dynamics and socioeconomic activity17. In the present study, we used night‐time light data made available by the US National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration. The observations on which the data are assembled were made by the Operational Linescan System flown on the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program satellites18, 19. An excellent detailed description of the satellite instrumentation, and the data collection and processing methods was provided by Elvidge et al.17

Considering all the data consistency in this study, we requested and downloaded the Zhejiang Operational Linescan System/Defense Meteorological Satellite Program night‐time light image of 2013 from the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, which is shown in Figure 1. Each pixel also has a numerical value, called a digital number, which records the intensity of electromagnetic energy measured for the ground resolution cell represented by that pixel20. Digital number values range from 0 to 63. Higher digital number values are associated with more intense lights.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Operational Linescan System flown on the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program night‐time light image of Zhejiang province (2013).

Other area‐based socioeconomic data included GDP per capita (2013), the proportion of the population that was illiterate (2010), urban built‐up area information (2013), the number of hospital beds (per 1,000 people; 2013) and living space per person (2013) at the township level for Zhejiang province. The data were collected by the local statistics department of Zhejiang. Although the illiteracy rate data had a 3‐year lag compared with others, we assumed that the data remained credible and showed correlations among the variables. The descriptive statistics for all the variables are shown in Table S1.

In the present study, principal components analysis was used to combine different socioeconomic variables together into a composite index of deprivation. Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin and Bartlett's tests were applied to the six variables by using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 22.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). The test results (P < 0.001) showed strong correlations amongst the variables. The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin sampling adequacy was 0.736, showing that the principal components analysis method was suitable for the present study. The first two components together explained approximately 79.02% of the total variance of the dataset; therefore, they were used in they present study. Finally, the composited NDI can then be simplified to the following equation (1):

NDI=0.680Z1+0.257Z2 (1)

where Z 1 and Z 2 were, respectively, the first principal component and the second principal component in this study.

Therefore, compound indices relating to night‐time lights index, GDP, the proportion of the population that was illiterate, urban built‐up area, hospital beds and living space were generated to describe deprivation at the township level for Zhejiang province in the present study.

Assessment of spatial pattern

Global Moran's I is a measure of spatial autocorrelation across an entire study area, developed by Moran. Spatial autocorrelation indicates that neighbored observations of the same phenomenon are correlated21. The values of the Moran's I range between −1 and 1, with 1 for maximum positive association and −1 for maximum negative association. A zero value indicates a random spatial pattern; a higher positive value indicates a stronger spatial autocorrelation and vice versa for negative values. We applied this method to identify the global pattern of type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence and NDI at the townships level in ArcGIS v10.

Moran's I identifies the type and strength of spatial autocorrelation for overall data, but it does not show the actual location of significant spatial clusters and outliers. Therefore, local indicators of spatial association (LISA) were used in the present study to detect spatial clusters and outliers22. A LISA map can produce four different types of spatial association. The types high‐high (HH) and low‐low (LL) indicate spatial clusters (hot spots and cold spots, respectively), whereas the types high‐low (HL) and low‐high (LH) mean spatial outliers22. For instance, the HH type means that an area with high incidence is surrounded by neighboring areas also with high incidence; whereas the LH type means that an area with low incidence is surrounded by neighboring areas with high incidence. The first order queen spatial weight was used to identify neighbors for the spatial features. The first order queen weight defines neighbors as areas (polygons) that share either a common border or a vertex with a given area. The final LISA map was based on 999 permutations and a pseudo‐significance level of P = 0.05.

Ethical review

In the present study, type 2 diabetes data were collected as part of routine disease surveillance and control activities. We did not carry out any human subject research; therefore, institutional review board approval was not required.

Results

Type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence and NDI mapping

There were a total of 934,385 type 2 diabetes cases reported in Zhejiang Province, China, between 2012 and 2016 (Table 1). Annualized average type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence at the township level ranged from 196.710 to 278.986 per 100,000 (Table 2). The geographical distribution of type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence from 2012 to 2016 at the township level is shown in Figure 2. Type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence varied by years, and thus the cut‐off values could not be same. The highest incidence rates were respectively found in Ningbo, Shaoxing, Quzhou, Jinhua and Huzhou. The relatively low incidence rates appeared in the provincial capital city of Hangzhou, and the west and south hilly parts of the province (e.g., Lishui and Quzhou).

Table 1.

Distribution of type 2 diabetes mellitus cases in Zhejiang, China from 2012 to 2016

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Sex
Male 90,191 (49.22) 98,786 (50.26) 105,333 (51.39) 97,822 (52.43) 87,103 (53.42) 479,235
Female 93,038 (50.78) 97,763 (49.74) 99,628 (48.61) 88,771 (47.57) 75,950 (46.58) 455,150
183,229 196,549 204,961 186,593 163,053 934,385
Age
0–15 years 69 (0.04) 81 (0.04) 96 (0.05) 73 (0.04) 112 (0.07) 431
15–30 years 2,425 (1.32) 3,008 (1.53) 3,331 (1.63) 3,361 (1.80) 3,247 (1.99) 15,372
30–45 years 21,353 (11.65) 24,198 (12.31) 25,767 (12.57) 22,632 (12.13) 19,664 (12.06) 113,624
45–60 years 70,883 (38.69) 76,400 (38.87) 80,770 (39.41) 72,795 (39.01) 62,724 (38.47) 363,572
>60 years 88,500 (48.30) 92,862 (47.25) 94,997 (46.35) 87,732 (47.02) 77,295 (47.40) 441,386

Data presented as n (%).

Table 2.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence at the township level, Zhejiang, China (per 100,000 persons)

Year Min. Max. Mean SD
2012 19.796 768.320 245.876 184.591
2013 20.899 801.376 233.364 198.364
2014 22.706 796.271 278.986 168.985
2015 25.225 759.770 227.169 179.521
2016 21.983 771.562 196.710 140.710

Min., minimum; Max., maximum; SD, standard deviation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The geographical distribution of type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence from 2012 to 2016.

The NDI was produced for 1,299 sub‐districts and townships in Zhejiang, ranging from 0 to 1. NDI scores were divided into quintiles, with the first quintile (Q1) including the deprived areas, and the sixth quintile (Q6) including the least deprived areas. The distribution of NDI scores is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A composited Neighborhood Deprivation Index in Zhejiang.

Spatial autocorrelation analysis of type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence and NDI

The global spatial autocorrelation analyses for type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence (2012–2016) and NDI (2013) in Zhejiang showed that the Moran's I was significant (see Table 3), implying that type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence and NDI were spatially autocorrelated in Zhejiang. The township scale LISA measures for type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence and NDI were calculated, and the significant cluster (HH, LL, HL and LH) is shown in Figures 4 and 5. The HH category indicates clustering of high type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence and relatively affluent areas (high NDI value), whereas the LL category indicates clustering of type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence and less affluent areas (low NDI value).

Table 3.

Global Moran's I test for the spatial autocorrelation of type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence (2012–2016) and Neighborhood Deprivation Index (2013)

Moran's I P‐value Pattern
Type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence 2012 0.439 <0.001 Cluster
Type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence 2013 0.422 <0.001 Cluster
Type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence 2014 0.398 <0.001 Cluster
Type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence 2015 0.387 <0.001 Cluster
Type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence 2016 0.363 <0.001 Cluster
NDI 2013 0.593 <0.001 Cluster

NDI, Neighborhood Deprivation Index.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Local indicators of spatial association map of type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence from 2012 to 2016.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Local indicators of spatial association map of Neighborhood Deprivation Index.

The hot spots of type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence were shown to be dynamic in space and time. Three persistent hot spots were found in the urban centers of Ningbo, Shaoxing and Jiaxing. The cold spots were always observed in Hangzhou (urban and rural areas) and south of Quzhou and Lishui. After 2012, the hot spots in Jinhua disappeared, but the other hot spots were detected in urban areas of Quzhou, Taizhou and Wenzhou from 2013 to 2016.

As expected, the result of LISA analysis for NDI suggested the hot spots persisted in eight cities’ centers, except Lishui city; the cold spots were detected in the west and south of Zhejiang, which were considered as the relatively deprived areas.

Visual comparison of the spatial pattern of type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence with NDI pattern, we can clearly see that the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus was roughly prevalent in the relatively affluent areas, consistent with the results shown in Figure 6. The differences between Q1 (deprived areas) and Q6 (the least deprived areas) were substantial: the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus increased with decreasing neighborhood deprivation. However, the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the least deprived areas decreased slightly.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Box plot of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) incidence by the different level of neighborhood deprivation.

Discussions

In the present study, we initially attempted to construct a composite neighboring deprivation index based on integrating remote sensing data and socioeconomic statistical data. The spatial analysis was used to quantify the spatial pattern of type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence and NDI at the township level. In contrast to existing studies, the present investigation took the spatial variation into account to explore the association between diabetes and area deprivation23, 24. It is significant in that it made an approach to this study based on the area level, whereas most previous studies were carried out at the individual level. It is therefore expected that the present study could contribute to neighborhood SES–health studies.

Traditionally, area socioeconomic assessment is based on statistics collected by local governments25. However, there are limits to local socioeconomic census data in China, as it could generate a huge amount of economic costs. In addition, considering national political issues, some socioeconomic census data at the small census units are not allowed to be announced to the public; for example, the income and employment rate. Therefore, we integrated the night‐time light data as a main proxy for measuring area socioeconomic status at the local level in the present study. Although international studies have proven that the night‐time light data is capable of providing a strong estimation of GDP26, 27 and income28, its application for relevant studies in China is still innovative.

The significant positive spatial autocorrelation and the significant local clusters confirmed the spatial variances of type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence from 2012 to 1016. We found that the persistent hot spots for type 2 diabetes mellitus emerged in the city centers, but the cold spots for type 2 diabetes mellitus were found in the rural areas. People who live in affluent areas are more likely to suffer from diabetes. It is consistent with the findings of previous studies in China. One study approximated economic development using data on the provincial GDP per capita, showing higher diabetes prevalence in developed urban (12%) and rural (12%) areas and in underdeveloped urban areas (10.4%), but lower prevalence in underdeveloped rural areas (5.8%)29. Similarly, a study from Xu et al.30 reported the prevalence of diabetes was higher in urban residents and in persons living in economically developed regions.

Diabetes is considered to be a so‐called ‘disease of affluence’ in developing countries31. Along with the urban transition, the lifestyle of the Chinese has changed, obviously as a result of engaging in less physical activity and consuming a diet rich in high‐fat food32. A national study in China showed that just 18% of urban participants reported they carry out moderate or vigorous physical activity in their leisure time33. Residents in urban areas were more sedentary and more exposed to high‐calorie foods than residents of rural areas34.

By contrast, the results from studies carried out in developed countries were quite divergent from Chinese studies, showing higher diabetes prevalence in disadvantaged areas than in affluent areas. In an analysis from Germany, the diabetes prevalence in the most deprived municipalities was clearly higher compared with the least deprived municipalities35. Other studies from Scotland36, Australia37 and Spain38 also well established the positive association between neighborhood deprivation and the risk of diabetes. We might argue that this discrepancy between the developed counties and the developing counties could be attributed to the level of economic development, but few empirical studies further support the point.

Also of importance is the fact that the direction of the association between neighborhood deprivation and type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence is not stationary in the present study. Once exceeding a certain threshold level of socioeconomic development, the overall level of type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence might be slightly decreased (Figure 6). Spatial analysis also confirmed that there were persistent spatial clusters of low type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence in Hangzhou (urban and rural areas), which is a provincial city and considered as the most affluent area in Zhejiang province. Hangzhou's GDP per capita already reached over $20,000 in 201739. All kinds of collective infrastructural resources (e.g., health education, medical care facility and public health service) are densely concentrated in Hangzhou. Additionally, the Hangzhou government has included diabetes prevention and control in its community‐based chronic disease management program for long‐term supervision and intervention since 200940. Most community health centers started to educate people on diabetes, screen those at risk and put in place a patient management system41. The Hangzhou government put a great deal of effort into combating diabetes and has been a flagship city for preventing the non‐communicable disease in China, which could partially explain why the spatial pattern of type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence in Hangzhou is different to other developed cites.

Studies have more commonly focused on how individual socioeconomic characteristics influence health42. However, there is a growing consensus that socioeconomic characteristics of neighborhoods could have an effect on the health of the residents43. The present study extends the existing literature on neighborhood SES–health, while considering spatial heterogeneity in the relationship between area deprivation and type 2 diabetes mellitus. This is a typical ecological study. The findings from the results are best not interpreted at the individual level, thus avoiding the ecological fallacy. Because of the absence of data at the individual level, we are unable to differentiate between SES effects at the individual and at the neighborhood level; that is, to carry out multilevel analyses. However, the present study does not refute the impact of individual characteristics and behaviors on health. The findings indirectly reveal that, to a large extent, individual unhealthy behavior and lifestyle might be responsible for the high incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in urban areas.

There were some limitations to the present study that are worth mentioning. First, our data relied on official surveillance, and it is possible that some community health centers or hospitals might underreport the number of cases for various reasons. However, this situation is currently being rectified, in that Zhejiang CDC has continuously improved the diabetes surveillance system for decreasing the underreporting rate of diabetes. Second, the spatial analysis of type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence in Zhejiang was carried out based at the township level, but the boundaries are a reflection of administrative needs rather than the actual spatial distribution of epidemiological factors. It might lead to a modifiable areal unit problem. Third, spatial analysis is suitable for visualizing and detecting the spatial patterns of disease, but it could not explain the patterns it showed. Thus, further work is necessary to incorporate the statistical models to improve the research.

In summary, the present study showed spatial variation in type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence and neighborhood deprivation index at the finest scale in Zhejiang. The spatial and place‐based methods aid future investigators to improve understanding of the association between neighborhood deprivation and type 2 diabetes mellitus in developing countries. It is very intriguing that type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence is higher in affluent areas than the deprived areas across the study period. The implication is that health prevention and programs can be focused to specific neighborhoods of high risk to better meet their health needs. There is not a one‐size‐fits‐all strategy for all neighborhoods within a large‐scale area. The policymakers should enhance the public knowledge of the risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus and strongly promote community‐based chronic disease management programs for urban areas. Meanwhile, we should also realize that a non‐trivial proportion of people living with diabetes in rural china has not been diagnosed29. Diabetes detection was not proportional to the underlying incidence. Therefore, improving the quality of the local public health service and reinforcing access to routine health checks in the relatively deprived rural areas could be a key priority for policymakers and practitioners.

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

Table S1 ¦ Descriptive statistics for the variables at the township level, Zhejiang, China.

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (ref 41401143), and was also partly supported by ACON Primary Care Research Center. The authors thank colleagues in the Zhejiang CDC for their assistance in data collection.

J Diabetes Investig 2019; 10: 272–282

References

  • 1. Grintsova O, Maier W, Mielck A. Inequalities in health care among patients with type 2 diabetes by individual socio‐economic status (SES) and regional deprivation: a systematic literature review. Int J Equity Health 2014; 13: 43–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Zimmet P, Magliano DJ, Herman WH, et al Diabetes: a 21st century challenge. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014; 2: 56–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hu H, Sawhney M, Shi L, et al A systematic review of the direct economic burden of type 2 diabetes in China. Diabetes Ther 2015; 6: 7–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wu H, Zhong J, Yu M, et al Incidence and time trends of type 2 diabetes mellitus in youth aged 5–19 years: a population‐based registry in Zhejiang, China, 2007 to 2013. BMC Pediatr 2017; 17: 85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Pearson AL, Pearce J, Kingham S. Deprived yet healthy: neighbourhood‐level resilience in New Zealand. Soc Sci Med 2013; 91: 238–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Weng M, Pi J, Tan B, et al Area deprivation and liver cancer prevalence in Shenzhen, China: a spatial approach based on social indicators. Soc Indic Res 2017; 133: 317–332. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Su S, Gong Y, Tan B, et al Area social deprivation and public health: analyzing the spatial non‐stationary associations using geographically weighed regression. Soc Indic Res 2017; 133: 819–832. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Luo W, Wang F. Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in the Chicago Region. Environ Plan B Plan Design 2003; 30: 865–884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Robinson TP. Spatial statistics and geographical information systems in epidemiology and public health. Advances in Parasitology. New York, NY: Academic Press, 2000; 81–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. World Health Organization . Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications: report of a WHO consultation. Part 1. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Jenks GF. Optimal data classification for choropleth maps. Department of Geography, University of Kansas Occasional Paper, 1977.
  • 12. Meijer M, Engholm G, Grittner U, et al A socioeconomic deprivation index for small areas in Denmark. Scand J Public Health 2013; 41: 560–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Bonfim C, Aguiar‐Santos AM, Pedroza D, et al Social deprivation index and lymphatic filariasis: a tool for mapping urban areas at risk in northeastern Brazil. Int Health 2009; 1: 78–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Noble M, Wright G, Smith GD, et al Measuring multiple deprivation at the small‐area level. Environ Plan A 2006; 38: 169–185. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Allik M, Brown D, Dundas R, et al Small‐area deprivation measure datasets for Scotland, 2001 and 2011. Data Brief 2016; 7: 1682–1686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Pornet C, Delpierre C, Dejardin O, et al Construction of an adaptable European transnational ecological deprivation index: the French version. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012; 66: 982–989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Elvidge CD, Sutton PC, Ghosh T, et al A global poverty map derived from satellite data. Comput Geosci 2009; 35: 1652–1660. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Elvidge CD, Baugh KE, Kihn EA, et al Mapping city lights with nighttime data from the DMSP operational linescan system. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 1997; 63: 727–734. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Elvidge CD, Baugh KE, Kihn EA, et al Relation between satellite observed visible‐near infrared emissions, population, economic activity and electric power consumption. Int J Remote Sens 1997; 18: 1373–1379. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Imhoff ML, Lawrence WT, Stutzer DC, et al A technique for using composite DMSP/OLS “City Lights” satellite data to map urban area. Remote Sens Environ 1997; 61: 361–370. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ord JK, Getis A. Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geographic Anal 2010; 27: 286–306. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Anselin L. Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA. Geographic Anal 2010; 27: 93–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Xu F, Yin XM, Zhang M, et al Family average income and diagnosed Type 2 diabetes in urban and rural residents in regional mainland China. Diabet Med 2006; 23: 1239–1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Andersen AF, Carson C, Watt HC, et al Life‐course socio‐economic position, area deprivation and Type 2 diabetes: findings from the British Women's Heart and Health Study. Diabet Med 2008; 25: 1462–1468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Saunders J. Weighted Census‐based deprivation indices: their use in small areas. J Public Health 1998; 20: 253–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Mellander C, Lobo J, Stolarick K, et al Night‐time light data: a good proxy measure for economic activity? PLoS ONE 2015; 10: 1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Chen Q, Hou X, Zhang X, et al Improved GDP spatialization approach by combining land‐use data and night‐time light data: a case study in China's continental coastal area. Int J Remote Sens 2016; 37: 4610–4622. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Ebener S, Murray CJL, Tandon A, et al From wealth to health: modelling the distribution of income per capita at the sub‐national level using night‐time light imagery. Int J Health Geogr 2005; 4: 5–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Zhou M, Astell‐Burt T, Bi Y, et al Geographical variation in diabetes prevalence and detection in China: multilevel spatial analysis of 98,058 adults. Diabetes Care 2015; 38: 72–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Xu Y, Wang L, He J, et al Prevalence and control of diabetes in chinese adults. JAMA 2013; 310: 948–959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Weber MB, Oza‐Frank R, Staimez LR, et al Type 2 diabetes in Asians: prevalence, risk factors, and effectiveness of behavioral intervention at individual and population levels. Annu Rev Nutr 2012; 32: 417–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Wong K, Wang Z. Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus of Chinese populations in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2006; 73: 126–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Tian Y, Jiang C, Wang M, et al BMI, leisure‐time physical activity, and physical fitness in adults in China: results from a series of national surveys. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2013; 4: 487–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Du S, Lu B, Zhai F, et al A new stage of the nutrition transition in China. Public Health Nutr 2006; 5: 169–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Grundmann N, Mielck A, Siegel M, et al Area deprivation and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes and obesity: analysis at the municipality level in Germany. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 1264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Cox M, Boyle P, Davey P, et al Does health‐selective migration following diagnosis strengthen the relationship between Type 2 diabetes and deprivation? Soc Sci Med 2007; 65: 32–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Williams ED, Magliano DJ, Zimmet P, et al Area‐level socioeconomic status and incidence of abnormal glucose metabolism The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle (AusDiab) study. Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 1455–1461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Gray J, Millett C, Osullivan C, et al Association of age, sex and deprivation with quality indicators for diabetes: population‐based cross sectional survey in primary care. J R Soc Med 2006; 99: 576–581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. China CN. Hangzhou GDP per Capital, Zhejiang [database on the Internet], 2017. Available from: https://www.ceicdata.com/en/china/gross-domestic-product-per-capita-prefecture-level-city/cn-gdp-per-capita-zhejiang-hangzhou Accessed June 20, 2018.
  • 40. Lin F, Sun Q, Peng Z, et al The Innovations in China Primary Healthcare Reform: development and Characteristics of the Community Health Services in Hangzhou. Family Med Commun Health 2015; 1: 10–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Xiao Y. Community‐based integration of management of non‐communicable diseases in China. Chronic Dis Translat Med 2015; 1: 133–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Adler NE, Ostrove JM. Socioeconomic status and health: what we know and what we don't. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999; 896: 3–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Pickett KE, Pearl M. Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001; 55: 111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1 ¦ Descriptive statistics for the variables at the township level, Zhejiang, China.


Articles from Journal of Diabetes Investigation are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES