Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery logoLink to Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery
. 2018 Nov 8;71(1):136–139. doi: 10.1007/s12070-018-1516-z

A Hybrid Approach Towards Successful Resection of a Huge Carotid Body Paraganglioma Using Coil Embolization and Traditional Surgical Techniques

T N Janakiram 1,, Joseph Nadakkavukaran 1, Shilpee Bhatia Sharma 1, J D Sathyanarayanan 2
PMCID: PMC6401046  PMID: 30906731

Abstract

Carotid Body Paraganglioma (CBPGL), is a type of neuroendocrine tumor that should be managed promptly due to their malignant potential and locally aggressive nature making resection at a later stage difficult. The objective of this case report is to explore the benefit of coil embolization and describe the surgical techniques employed in successful resection of a huge CBPGL.

Keywords: Carotid body tumor, Paraganglioma, Micro coil embolization, Shamblin III, Extra adrenal

Introduction

Paragangliomas (PGLs) are a group of neuroendocrine tumors derived from chromaffin cells of the neuroectoderm, paravertebral sympathetic or parasympathetic chain ganglia [1]. Approximately 10% of PGLs are extra-adrenal, 70% of which are found in the Head and Neck region [1, 2]. The Carotid body is the site of origin in 60% cases of head and neck PGLs and are very vascular tumors. Very few studies have explored the benefits of using microcoils over traditional embolization techniques for this indication. The objective of this case report is to explore the role of coil embolization and describe the surgical techniques employed in safe resection of CBPGL, without the need for external carotid artery (ECA) or internal carotid artery (ICA) ligation, stenting, repair or reconstruction.

Case Report

A 40-year-old Indian woman presented with an asymptomatic, pulsatile, neck swelling, progressively increasing in size for 13 years. Family history was negative. On examination a 6 × 4 cm non-tender pulsatile mass anterior to the left sternocleidomastoid muscle extending from, left angle of the mandible to the level of cricoid cartilage not crossing the midline was palpable. Fontaine’s sign was positive. Cranial nerve examination revealed an afferent sensory deficit in the gag reflex pathway.

Preoperative workup including a 24 h urine VMA estimation was normal. CT Angiography revealed an intensely enhancing mass of size 8.5 × 5.1 cm in the left carotid sheath at the level of left carotid bifurcation splaying the external and internal carotid arteries (Lyre’s sign) with multiple dilated feeding arteries from the left ECA and multiple draining veins into the left internal and external jugular veins. The tumor completely encased both ECA and ICA (Fig. 1). A halo around the carotid arteries suggested a free periadventitial plane of dissection. There was no evidence of vascular infiltration, Aneurysms or Arterio-venous malformation. All vessels showed normal luminal diameter without flow-limiting plaques or stenosis. There was no evidence of a contralateral tumor. As per the surgical classification described by Shamblin et al. [3] the tumor was classified into category III.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

CT Angiography with 3D reconstruction. a anterior view, b posterior view, c lateal view

Preoperative embolization of the Left ECA was done using micro coils, 36 h prior to surgery. Three fiber coated stainless steel coils of 0.035 inch thickness; 6 mm diameter; 6 cm(1) and 5 cm(2) lengths were used. Post-embolization tumor blush was absent and there were no neurovascular complications following the procedure (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Digital substraction Angiography and Coil embolization. a tumor blush pre-embolization, b, c coil embolization being carried out, d post coil embolization with absence of tumor blush

Surgery was performed under General Anaesthesia with the patient in supine position, neck extended and rotated to the right with head end elevation to minimize venous bleeding. Under aseptic precautions, 2% Xylocaine with adrenaline was infiltrated along a modified Schobinger’s incision line. Subplatysmal flap elevation and dissection exposed the tumor pseudocapsule which was tightly adherent to the Common Carotid Artery(CCA), ECA and ICA. Meticulous dissection of the lower border of the tumor was done to identify the “White Line” which marks the Peri adventitial plane [4]. Periadventitial dissection was carried out in a caudocranial direction from the CCA towards the carotid bifurcation with the help of bipolar cautery under microscopic magnification. Proximal control of the CCA was obtained just above the omohyoid muscle. The distal ECA was dissected free after ligating all the feeders. The tumor seemingly encased the ICA; however, it was successfully taken off the ICA, by retro-carotid dissection in the periadventitial plane in a caudocranial direction with the use of a fine-tipped right-angle instrument between the carotid sheath and the ICA adventitia, obviating the need for arterial resection or replacement. Major cranial nerves including the X and XII nerves were not encountered during dissection. The carotid artery system in the neck was covered using a partial sternocleidomastoid muscle rotation flap.

The patient recovered without any neurovascular complications. Histopathological examination of the tumor showed features typical of CBPGL such as Zellballen cell nests and Immunohistochemistry was positive for Synaptophysin, Chromogranin and S100 [5] (Fig. 3). Postoperative MRI was negative for residual tumor or thrombosis of the Carotid artery system.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Histopathological examination and Immunohistochemistry. a hematoxylin and Eosin staining showing Zellballen cell nests, b chromogranin positivity, c S100 positivity of sustentacular cells, d synaptophysin positivity

Discussion

Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for CBPGL and it involves a multidisciplinary team to achieve maximum results [69]. Excision was first carried out in 1889 by Sir Albert [10] and in 1940 Sir Gordon Taylor described the Peri adventitial dissection technique [9]. In 1980s devascularisation of the tumor by ligating feeding vessels from the ECA gained popularity and first pre-op embolization was done in 1983.

Previous studies have reported various benefits of embolization such as reduction in tumor size, intra-operative blood loss, operative time, reduced complications and hospital stay [1113]. The unique advantage of Microcoil embolization as we have experienced, is the ability to deploy the coil selectively, precisely and proximal to the feeding vessel thereby preventing complications of unwarranted distal embolization [13, 14]. Intraoperatively an added advantage is the ability to palpate the coil and it acts as a surgical marker in identifying the feeding vessels [14]. A recent advancement in the endovascular approach to CBPGLs is the use of covered stents for vascular exclusion and studies have shown promising results. Limitations of covered stents are its high cost, unavailability in our country, lifelong antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy and followup to rule out stent thrombosis/displacement [1518].

Studies have demonstrated shorter procedure time and hospital stays with retrograde caudo-cranial dissection technique when compared to the cranio-caudal approach [19]. In our case, we used both retrograde caudo cranial and retro carotid dissection in a periadventitial plane. Dissection adhering to the tumor psuedocapsule helps prevent any neurological complication [20]. A relative contraindication to surgery is a distance of less than 2 cm between the upper border of the tumor and the skull base [21, 22].

Shamblin 3 CBPGL as it is in our case, is a major challenge due to carotid encasement, cranial nerve involvement that may lead to neurovascular complications like intra op haemorrhage, stroke and cranial nerve injuries [23]. In our case, the patient recovered without any such complications. Post-embolization tumor size reduction was not appreciated but intraoperative blood loss was minimal amounting to approximately 180 ml and procedure time was 150 min.

In conclusion, a hybrid approach employing endovascular micro coiling of the feeding vessels and meticulous surgical dissection techniques under the microscope can be successfully used for safe resection of advanced CBPGL.

Contributor Information

T. N. Janakiram, Email: tnjanakiram777@gmail.com

Joseph Nadakkavukaran, Email: poppysdreams@gmail.com.

Shilpee Bhatia Sharma, Email: shilpeesharma83@gmail.com.

J. D. Sathyanarayanan, Email: sathyajd@live.com

References

  • 1.Wieneke JA, Smith A. Paraganglioma: carotid body tumor. Head Neck Pathol. 2009;3:303–306. doi: 10.1007/s12105-009-0130-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kimura N. Extra-adrenal paraganglioma: carotid body jugulotympanic, vagal, laryngeal, aortico-pulmonary. In: DeLellis RA, Lloyd RV, Heitz PU, Eng C, editors. Pathology and genetics of tumors of endocrine organs. Lyon: IARC Press; 2004. pp. 159–161. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shamblin WR, Remine WH, Sheps SG, Harrison EG. Carotid body tumor (chemodectoma). Clinicophatologic analysis of 90 cases. Am J Surg. 1971;122:732–739. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(71)90436-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gordon-Taylor G (1982) On carotid body tumors. BMJ 284:1507–1508. Chemodectoma. Am J Surg 1971; 122:732–743
  • 5.Patetsios P, Gable D, Garrett W, Lamont J, Kuhn J, Shutze W, Kourlis H, Grimsley B, Pearl G, Smith B, Talkington C, Thompson J. Management of carotid body paragangliomas and review of a 30-year experience. Ann Vasc Surg. 2002;16:331–338. doi: 10.1007/s10016-001-0106-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Knight TT, Jr, Gonzalez JA, Rary JM, et al. Current concepts for the surgical management of carotid body tumor. Am J Surg. 2006;191:104–110. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Luna-Ortiz K, Rascon-Ortiz M, Villavicencio-Valencia V, et al. Does Shamblin’s classification predict postoperative morbidity in carotid body tumors? A proposal to modify Shamblin’s classification. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;263:171–175. doi: 10.1007/s00405-005-0968-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.van der Mey AGL, Jansen JC, van Baalen JM. Management of carotid body tumors. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2001;34:907–924. doi: 10.1016/S0030-6665(05)70354-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mathew BK, Bandgar T, Menon PS, et al. Carotid body tumours: three case reports. Singapore Med J. 2009;50:58–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Muhm M, Polterauer P, Gstottner W, Temmel A, Richling B, Undt G, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to carotid body tumors: review of 24 patients. Arch Surg. 1997;132(3):279–284. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430270065013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Persky M, Setton A, Niimi Y, Hartman J, Frank D, Berenstein A. Combined endovascular and surgical treatment of head and neck paragangliomas—a team approach. Head Neck. 2002;24:423–431. doi: 10.1002/hed.10068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Murphy TP, Brackmann D. Effects of preoperative embolization on glomus jugulare tumors. Laryngoscope. 1989;99:1244–1247. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198912000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.LaMuraglia GM, Fabian RL, Brewster DC, Pile-Spellman J, Darling RC, Cambria RP, Abbott WM. Current surgical management of carotid body paragangliomas. J Vasc Surg. 1992;15:1038–1045. doi: 10.1016/0741-5214(92)90461-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cvjetko I, Erdelez L, Podvez Z, Buhin M, Vidjak V, Borovecki A, Cvjetko T, Grsic K. Coil embolization and surgical removal of carotid body paraganglioma. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(3):242–245. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828607ef. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tripp H, Fail P, Beyer M, Chaisson G. New approach to preoperative vascular exclusion for carotid body tumor. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:389–391. doi: 10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00140-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hurtado-Lopez LM, Fink-Josephi G, Ramos-Méndez L, Dena-Espinoza E, Rosenthal EL. Nonresectable carotid body tumor: hybrid surgical procedure to achieve complete and safe resection. Head Neck. 2008;30:1646–1649. doi: 10.1002/hed.20808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Piazza P, Di Lella F, Bacciu A, et al. Preoperative protective stenting of the internal carotid artery in the management of complex head and neck paragangliomas: long-term results. Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(6):345–352. doi: 10.1159/000354158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McDougall CM, Liu R, Chow M. Covered carotid stents as an adjunct in the surgical treatment of carotid body tumors: a report of 2 cases and a review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(1 Suppl Operative):182–184. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31824b131b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hinojosa CA, Ortiz-Lopez LJ, Anaya-Ayala JE, Orozco-Sevilla V, Nunez-Salgado AE. Comparison of retrocarotid and caudocranial dissection techniques for the surgical treatment of carotid body tumors. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(4):958–964. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hallett JW, Jr, Nora JD, Hollier LH, et al. Trends in neurovascular complications of surgical management for carotid body and cervical paragangliomas: a fiftyyear experience with 153 tumors. J Vasc Surg. 1988;7:284–291. doi: 10.1016/0741-5214(88)90147-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hinerman RW, Mendenhall WM, Amdur RJ, Stringer SP, Antonelli PJ, Cassisi NJ. Definitive radiotherapy in the management of chemodectomas arising in the temporal bone, carotid body and glomus vagale. Head Neck. 2001;23:363–371. doi: 10.1002/hed.1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cole JM, Beiler D. Long-term results of treatment for glomus jugulare and glomus vagale tumors with radiotherapy. Laryngoscope. 1994;04:1461–1465. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199412000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hinojosa CA, Ortiz-Lopez LJ, Anaya-Ayala JE, Orozco-Sevilla V, Nunez-Salgado AE. Comparison of retrocarotid and caudocranial dissection techniques for the surgical treatment of carotid body tumors. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(4):958–964. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES