High-resolution population structure and runs of homozygosity reveal the genetic architecture of complex traits in the Lipizzan horse

Abstract

Background

The sample ascertainment bias due to complex population structures remains a major challenge in genome-wide investigations of complex traits. In this study we derived the high-resolution population structure and levels of autozygosity of 377 Lipizzan horses originating from five different European stud farms utilizing the SNP genotype information of the high density 700 k Affymetrix Axiom™ Equine genotyping array. Scanning the genome for overlapping runs of homozygosity (ROH) shared by more than 50% of horses, we identified homozygous regions (ROH islands) in order to investigate the gene content of those candidate regions by gene ontology and enrichment analyses.

Results

The high-resolution population network approach revealed well-defined substructures according to the origin of the horses (Austria, Slovakia, Croatia and Hungary). The highest mean genome coverage of ROH (S_ROH) was identified in the Austrian (S_ROH = 342.9), followed by Croatian (S_ROH = 214.7), Slovakian (S_ROH = 205.1) and Hungarian (S_ROH = 171.5) subpopulations. ROH island analysis revealed five common islands on ECA11 and ECA14, hereby confirming a closer genetic relationship between the Hungarian and Croatian as well as between the Austrian and Slovakian samples. Private islands were detected for the Hungarian and the Austrian Lipizzan subpopulations. All subpopulations shared a homozygous region on ECA11, nearly identical in position and length containing among other genes the homeobox-B cluster, which was also significantly (p < 0.001) highlighted by enrichment analysis. Gene ontology terms were mostly related to biological processes involved in embryonic morphogenesis and anterior/posterior specification. Around the STX17 gene (causative for greying), we identified a ROH island harbouring the genes NR4A3, STX17, ERP44 and INVS. Within further islands on ECA14, ECA16 and ECA20 we detected the genes SPRY4, NDFIP1, IMPDH2, HSP90AB1, whereas SPRY4 and HSP90AB1 are involved in melanoma metastasis and survival rate of melanoma patients in humans.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that the assessment of high-resolution population structures within one single breed supports the downstream genetic analyses (e.g. the identification of ROH islands). By means of ROH island analyses, we identified the genes SPRY4, NDFIP1, IMPDH2, HSP90AB1, which might play an important role for further studies on equine melanoma. Furthermore, our results highlighted the impact of the homeobox-A and B cluster involved in morphogenesis of Lipizzan horses.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-019-5564-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background

The Lipizzan horse breed is globally one of the best-documented horse population, as pedigree records can be traced back to the known founder animals born in the early eighteenth century. The founder population, described in detail by Zechner et al. [1], Druml and Sölkner [2] and Druml et al. [3], comprises 456 animals, whereas the major part of horses originated from the former imperial stud farm of Lipica founded in the year 1580. Since the First World War the stud book of Lipizzan horses is closed and presently conservation breeding strategies are applied by eleven state stud farms located in nine European countries. National Lipizzan breeding herds have limited population sizes; therefore, maintenance of genetic diversity has been in the focus of state stud farms over decennia.

Numerous genetic approaches and methods have been applied to characterise the gene pool, the genetic diversity and the population structure of the Lipizzan breed. Comprehensive pedigree data (max. 31 generations, generation equivalent 19.1) were used to estimate inbreeding coefficients and effective population sizes by Zechner et al. [1], Sölkner and Druml [2] and Druml et al. [3]. Furthermore, microsatellite markers were employed to describe diversity measures, genetic distances and population structure by Achmann et al. [4]. Kavar et al. [5, 6] investigated mtDNA maternal diversity; Kasarda et al. [7] estimated genetic relatedness between Old Kladruber, Slovenian and Slovakian Lipizzans, whilst Wallner et al. [8] highlighted the patrilinear structure conducting haplotype-based analyses of the Y-chromosome. Most of these scientific publications arose from a multilateral research project, which is described in the review by Dovc et al. [9]. Based upon this scientific project further research was conducted focusing on the inheritance of melanoma, vitiligo and greying [10–13].

In this study we used the SNP genotype information of the Affymetrix Axiom™ Equine genotyping array [14] to analyse the high-resolution population structure of Lipizzan horses originating from five different European stud farms, which differ in breeding history and breeding objectives. To ascertain the high-resolution population structure of the gene pool, we applied a recently described three-step procedure as presented in Druml et al. [15], which includes individual levels of admixture and genomic inbreeding (ROH) in the final population network visualization. After the assessment of the high-resolution population structure, we identified overlapping homozygous regions (ROH islands) within the entire population and respective subpopulations, and conducted a gene ontology and enrichment analysis of annotated genes located within ROH islands. We demonstrate that the combination of different approaches elaborate insights in population structure and underlying differences in levels of autozygosity and distribution of ROH islands.

Results

Genetic diversity and admixture analysis

Principal Component analysis (PCA) as presented in Fig. 1a) revealed that the first three Principal Components (PCs) accounted for 35% of the total genetic variance. Based upon the visualization of the first three PCs the Austrian population is characterized by lower pairwise genetic distances and a distinct clustering. The other three subpopulations (Croatia, Hungary and Slovakia) appear to be highly interrelated simultaneously expressing a high level of genetic diversity, whilst a subset of the Austrian samples shares similarities with Croatian, Slovakian and Hungarian horses. F_ST analysis recapitulated these findings, as nearest relationships were documented for Austrian, Croatian and Slovakian samples (pairwise F_ST from 0.025 to 0.045), whereas the Hungarian subpopulation exhibited higher genetic differentiation (pairwise F_ST from 0.068 to 0.092) (Additional file 1).

Fig. 1.

Visualization of the dataset on the first 3 Principal Components (PCs) together explaining 35% of the variation. a On the left plot of PC1 and PC2; on the right plot of PC1 and PC3. b Graphical representation of individual cluster membership coefficients for Admixture runs increasing K = 2–8 for the Austrian, Croatian, Hungarian and Slovakian sample of Lipizzan horses

The first level (K = 2) of model-based clustering using the programme Admixture separated the Austrian population from the other Lipizzan samples (Fig. 1b). At the second level of clustering K = 3 the Hungarian sample were allocated in a distinct cluster. Further increasing K to 4 and 5 the Austrian subpopulation was further sub-structured, whilst at K = 6 the Slovakian sample formed a distinct cluster. At the additional levels of K = 7 and K = 8 the identified subpopulations were subsequently sub-structured. The visualization of the cross-validation (CV) error for each K, increasing K from 2 to 10, did not result in an optimal number of clusters (Additional file 2).

High-resolution network visualisation

Using a high-resolution network graph we combined individual levels of S_ROH (see the results below) and individual levels of admixture (K = 8). The network analysis improved the assessment of the population structure, compared to PCA and Admixture, by clearly separating the horses according to their origin, simultaneously highlighting four population outliers (Fig. 2). The horses of the stud farm Piber characteristically were connected by short and thick links, representing higher co-ancestry and lower genetic distance. The network highlighted two sub-clusters with higher levels of admixture, which were linked to Slovakian and Hungarian Lipizzans (marked with arrows in Fig. 2). According to pedigree information these cross-link animals were foreign bred mares, which were integrated into the Piber breeding population and thus are characterized by a lower co-ancestry level (longer and thinner links) and smaller S_ROH values (smaller node sizes).

Fig. 2.

High-resolution network visualisation of Lipizzan horses from the stud farms Piber (Austria), Topol’čianky (Slovakia), Đakovo and Lipik (Croatia) and Szilvasvárad (Hungary). a On the top network the horses (nodes) are colored by stud farm. On the lower network (b) nodes are containing individual cluster membership coefficients from Admixture analysis. Each node represents an individual and the size of node is in relation to S_ROH, link lengths between nodes illustrate the genetic distance between individuals, thickness of links are proportional to genetic relationship. Two arrows pinpoint sub-clusters in the Austrian sample

The Croatian sample was separated from the Austrian sample, connected directly by one cross-link animal. The network analysis identified three sub-clusters within the Croatian sample. According to pedigree information, the cluster on the right involved horses from the stud farm Lipik, whilst the left cluster represented the core population from the stud farm Đakovo. The accumulation in the middle of the Croatian sample included horses from Đakovo, which showed high levels of admixture with horses from Lipik, as well as with Slovakian and Hungarian Lipizzans, respectively. The Hungarian sample was characterised by the highest genetic distances between the samples and by the lowest S_ROH values, indicating genealogical separation between Hungarian and Austrian Lipizzans. The Slovakian sample showed genetic relationships in both directions – to the Austrian and to the Croatian samples. These relationships were illustrated by manifold cross-link animals, which had small S_ROH values and higher degree of admixture connecting both clusters.

Runs of homozygosity

Including the entire sample of Lipizzan horses in the ROH analysis the mean number of ROH (N_ROH) comprised 202.07 segments at a mean genome length covered by ROH (S_ROH) of 297.01 Mb (+ − 119.85), resulting in a mean ROH length (L_ROH) of 1.42 Mb (Table 1).

Table 1.

Mean values, standard deviation (SD), minimum and maximum values for the variables S_ROH (in Mb), N_ROH, L_ROH (in Mb) and F_ROH for the entire Lipizzan sample, the Austrian population sample of the stud farm Piber, the population of the Slovakian stud farm of Topol’čianky, the Croatian and the Hungarian sample

Total sample	n	mean	SD	Min.	Max.
SROH	377	297.01	119.85	1.91	550.21
NROH		202.07	51.96	3.00	333.00
LROH		1.42	0.43	0.56	2.45
FROH		0.13	0.05	0.00	0.25
Piber/Austria
SROH	254	342.88	105.43	3.35	550.21
NROH		211.85	46.00	6.00	333.00
LROH		1.59	0.41	0.56	2.45
FROH		0.15	0.05	0.00	0.25
Topol’čianky/Slovakia
SROH	55	205.05	76.75	30.38	359.72
NROH		178.58	50.81	48.00	301.00
LROH		1.06	0.17	0.63	1.35
FROH		0.09	0.03	0.01	0.16
Lipik, Đakovo/Croatia
SROH	45	214.66	85.99	81.31	401.22
NROH		186.87	47.38	96.00	320.00
LROH		1.11	0.22	0.85	1.62
FROH		0.10	0.04	0.04	0.18
Szilvasvárad/Hungary
SROH	23	171.53	112.58	1.91	402.80
NROH		158.39	83.30	3.00	131.00
LROH		0.98	0.22	0.64	1.44
FROH		0.07	0.05	0.00	0.18

ROH parameters varied between samples. Highest estimates of S_ROH and N_ROH were identified for horses originating from the stud farm of Piber/Austria (S_ROH = 342.88 Mb; N_ROH = 211.85), followed by the Croatian horses (S_ROH = 214.66 Mb; N_ROH = 186.87) and Slovakian horses (S_ROH = 205.06 Mb; N_ROH = 187.58). Lowest S_ROH and N_ROH were found in the Hungarian sample (S_ROH = 171.53 Mb; N_ROH = 158.39) (Table 1). Five Austrian Lipizzan horses reached the highest S_ROH with more than 500 Mb, whereas the smallest S_ROH were detected in three Hungarian Lipizzan horses (1.91 Mb to 20 Mb).

Inbreeding as defined by F_ROH reached a mean value of 13.2% (+ − 5.3%) within the entire sample, ranging from 15.3% (+ − 4.7%) in the Piber population to 7.6% (+ − 5.0%) in the Hungarian sample (Table 1). To differentiate old and recent inbreeding we calculated F_ROH based upon different ROH length classes (Table 2). The values for F_{ROH < 2Mb} were highest in the Austrian (6.7%) and lowest in the Hungarian sample (5.6%). To quantify recent inbreeding we calculated F_ROH considering ROHs longer than 10 MB. Recent inbreeding was absent in the Slovakian sample and tended to zero in the Hungarian sample, whereas the highest value of 1.1% was observed for the Austrian sample.

Table 2.

Distribution of ROHs and F_ROH (in percent) in different length classes (0.5–1 Mb, 1–2 Mb, 2–4 Mb, 4–6 Mb, 6–8 Mb, 8–10 Mb, > 10 Mb) respectively cumulative length classes (< 1 Mb, < 2 Mb, < 4 Mb, < 6 Mb, < 8 Mb, < 10 Mb, total F_ROH) for the Austrian, Croatian, Hungarian, Slovakian samples and the entire data set (All)

Distribution ROH in length classes	Austria	Croatia	Hungary	Slovakia	All
0.5–1 Mb	22.7	37.7	41.0	40.0	28.1
1–2 Mb	21.3	31.1	32.1	32.3	24.8
2–4 Mb	23.9	22.2	19.4	21.4	23.1
4–6 Mb	12.9	5.7	5.2	4.8	10.4
6–8 Mb	7.6	2.2	1.2	0.9	5.6
8–10 Mb	4.2	0.4	0.4	0.5	3.0
> 10 Mb	7.4	0.6	0.6	0.0	5.1
FROH per length class
FROH 0.5 -1Mb	3.5	3.6	3.1	3.7	3.5
FROH 1-2Mb	3.3	3	2.5	3	3.1
FROH 2-4Mb	3.7	2.2	1.5	2	3.1
FROH 4-6Mb	2	0.6	0.4	0.4	1.5
FROH 6-8Mb	1.2	0.2	0.1	0.1	0.8
FROH 8-10Mb	0.6	0	0	0	0.4
FROH > 10Mb	1.1	0.1	0	0	0.8
FROH per length class (cum.)
FROH < 1Mb	3.5	3.6	3.1	3.7	3.5
FROH < 2Mb	6.7	6.5	5.6	6.6	6.6
FROH < 4Mb	10.4	8.7	7.1	8.6	9.7
FROH < 6Mb	12.4	9.3	7.5	9	11.2
FROH < 8Mb	13.5	9.5	7.6	9.1	12
FROH < 10Mb	14.2	9.5	7.6	9.1	12.5
FROH total	15.3	9.6	7.6	9.1	13.2

ROH patterns as revealed by the plot N_ROH versus S_ROH indicate for the majority of the Piber population a strong right shift towards a higher S_ROH and an increased variance of S_ROH (Additional file 3). The samples of Slovakia and Croatia were distributed along the diagonal, whereas in the left corner of the plot a cluster of 11 horses with the lowest ROH parameters can be observed, indicating out-breeding. These horses were also clearly identified as cross-link animals between stud farms within the high-resolution population network (Fig. 2).

Concerning the distribution of ROH segments of different length categories, the Austrian Lipizzan population is characterized by the lowest proportion of ROH smaller than 2 Mb (21.3%), which varied in the other samples between 31.1 and 32.3% (Table 2). At the same time the Austrian horses had the highest proportion of ROHs longer than 6 Mb (19.2%). In the other samples this ROH category was present at an amount from 1.4 to 3.2%. In the Austrian sample 7.4% of ROHs were longer than 10 Mb, whereas in the other samples this category was underrepresented at a percentage of < 0.6%.

ROH islands

Within the entire dataset, we identified three ROH islands on ECA11 and two islands on ECA14, which were shared by more than 50% of the horses (Table 3). The overlapping homozygous region on ECA11:24.13–24.81 Mb was shared by 61.3% of animals and harboured the genes COPZ2, CBX1, SNX11, HOXB1, HOXB2, HOXB3, HOXB5, HOXB6, HOXB7, HOXB8, HOXB13, TTLL6. Figure 3a illustrates this island and the position of the homeobox-B cluster (HOXB) for each sample separately. These overlapping homozygous regions were nearly identical in position and length in all samples and the frequency varied between 59.2% (Slovakia) and 72.7% (Hungary).

Table 3.

ROH islands, shared by more than 50% (ROH freq.) of the entire sample of Lipizzan horses and the annotated genes in corresponding regions

Chr.	Begin	End	Length (kb)	ROH freq.	Known genes
11	24,134.125	24,816.254	682.1	0.613	COPZ2, CBX1, SNX11, HOXB1, HOXB2, HOXB3, HOXB5, HOXB6, HOXB7, HOXB8, HOXB13, TTLL6
11	30,677.562	30,685.590	8.0	0.501	–
11	31,015.821	31,942.748	926.9	0.666	C11H17orf67, DGKE, COIL, SCPEP1, AKAP1, MSI2
14	34,988.691	34,999.535	10.8	0.501	–
14	34,651.534	34,935.341	283.8	0.514	SPRY4, NDFIP1

Fig. 3.

a Plot of the ROH islands containing the HOXB cluster at ECA11:24.13–24.81 Mb for each single sample. In Figure b) the island on ECA11:31.01–31.94 Mb including the genes C11H17orf67, DGKE, COIL, SCPEP1, AKAP1, MSI2 is shown

The second ROH island on ECA11 (position 31,015.821 - 31,942.748) was up to 927 kb long in Austrian and Croatian samples and was shared by 72.8 and 62.6% of the horses, respectively (Fig. 3b). The Slovakian Lipizzans had two overlapping homozygous segments in this region. Within the Hungarian sample, 47.0% of horses shared a much smaller island, which was directly located in the Musashi RNA binding protein 2 (MSI2).

We identified a ROH island on ECA25 around the STX17 (syntaxin-17) gene responsible for grey coat colour, shared by 46.2% of horses within the entire sample, containing the genes NR4A3, STX17, ERP44 and INVS. This ROH island was embedded in the centre of a 1.38 Mb long homozygous region at position ECA25:5.69–7.07 Mb present in 36.6% of Lipizzan horses. The frequency was below our expectations. From a previous study, it is known that the STX17 genotype frequencies for homozygous G/G horses reached up to 67.3% in Lipizzans [13]. Scanning this region for ROHs shorter than 500 kb, we applied a smaller boundary (80 kb window length, min. 20 SNPs), and detected a 399.9kb long ROH island at position ECA25:6394.110-6794.044 centred round the STX17 gene that was shared by 66.1% of the entire sample (Fig. 4). Across the subpopulations the frequencies for this ROH island was highest in the Austrian sample (71.2%) and lowest in the Croatian sample (51.1%).

Fig. 4.

ROH island around the STX17 gene (begin and end illustrated by red vertical reference lines) at ECA25:6.394.110–6.794.044. Subpopulations are presented in different colours: Austria = blue, Slovakia = brown, Croatia = red, Hungary = green

Considering the Austrian sample we found 16 ROH islands, which were located on ECA3 (2 islands), ECA5, ECA7 (2 islands), ECA8, ECA11 (3 islands), ECA14, ECA16 (4 islands), ECA18 and ECA20 (Table 4). The ROH islands ranged in length between 20.2 kb and 953.3 kb, whereas the longest fragment on ECA11 at 31.01–31.94 Mb was shared by the highest number of individuals (72,8%), followed by the ROH island on ECA11 at position 24.13–24.81 Mb, which was observed in 61,1% of animals. Within the Austrian sample eight ROH islands on ECA3, ECA5, ECA8, ECA11, ECA14, ECA16, ECA18 and ECA20 were private.

Table 4.

ROH islands, shared by more than 50% (ROH freq.) of the Lipizzan horses from the Austrian stud farm Piber and the annotated genes in corresponding regions

Chr.	Begin	End	Length (kb)	ROH freq.	Known genes
3	118,669.793	118,769.903	100.1	0.508	UVSSA, MAEA
3	118,809.979	118,893.880	83.9	0.506	CTBP1
5	48,702.703	49,211.103	508.4	0.530	CHD1L, FMO5, PRKAB2
7	50,434.281	50,606.416	172.1	0.507	–
7	50,636.963	50,733.100	96.1	0.508	–
8	93,409.518	93,605.837	196.3	0.538	CTDP1
11	24,134.125	24,816.254	682.1	0.611	COPZ2, CBX1,SNX11, HOXB1, HOXB2, HOXB3, HOXB5, HOXB6, HOXB7, HOXB8, HOXB13, TTLL6
11	30,607.721	30,687.266	79.6	0.526	–
11	31,015.821	31,942.748	926.9	0.728	C11H17orf67, DGKE, COIL, SCPEP1, AKAP1, MSI2
14	41,779.891	42,365.786	585.9	0.546	FSTL4
16	37,870.208	38,823.469	953.3	0.542	C16H3orf84, KLHDC8B, CCDC71, LAMB2, USP19, QARS, QRICH1, IMPDH2, NDUFAF3, DALRD3, ARIH2, WDR6, P4HTM, IP6K2, NCKIPSD, CELSR3, TMEM89, UQCRC1, SLC26A6, UCN2, PFKFB4, SHISA5, TREX1, ATRIP, CCDC51, PLXNB1, NME6, ECATH-3, ECATH-2
16	39,675.098	39,695.300	20.2	0.507	–
16	39,890.148	39,920.855	30.7	0.507	CCDC12
16	40,077.806	40,159.633	81.8	0.514	TMIE, ALS2CL
18	635.232	1235.687	600.5	0.528	ARHGEF4, PLEKHB2
20	43,065.487	43,166.223	100.8	0.507	CAPN11, SLC29A1, HSP90AB1, SLC35B2, NFKBIE, TCTE1

Within the Slovakian sample we detected six ROH islands on ECA11 (3), ECA14, ECA16 and ECA22, whereas the islands on ECA11 and ECA16 overlapped with corresponding islands of the Austrian Lipizzans (Table 5). The ROH islands on ECA22:47.90–48.48 Mb and ECA14:34.65–35.08 Mb were also identified in the Croatian sample.

Table 5.

ROH islands, shared by more than 50% (ROH freq.) of the Lipizzan horses from the Slovakian stud farm Topol’čianky and the annotated genes in corresponding regions

Chr.	Begin	End	Length (kb)	ROH freq.	Known genes
11	24,140.999	24,793.573	652.6	0.598	COPZ2, CBX1,SNX11, HOXB1, HOXB2, HOXB3, HOXB5, HOXB6, HOXB7, HOXB8, HOXB13, TTLL6
11	31,000.312	31,347.338	347.0	0.552	C11H17orf67, DGKE
11	31,507.758	31,942.748	435.0	0.567	AKAP1, MSI2
14	34,651.534	35,086.649	435.1	0.609	SPRY4, NDFIP1, GNPDA1, RNF14
16	39,675.098	39,775.712	100.6	0.507	SETD2
22	47,905.031	48,488.839	583.8	0.576	CDH4, TAF4, LSM14B, PSMA7, SS18L1, MTG2, HRH3, OSBPL2, ADRM1, LAMA5, CABLES2, RBBP8NL, GATA5

Within the Croatian sample six ROH islands on ECA4, ECA7, ECA11 (2 islands), ECA14, ECA22, which varied in length between 129.1 kb and 1.14 Mb, were identified. The longest overlapping homozygous region on ECA14:34.05–35.18 Mb was shared by 72.6% of horses and contained nine annotated genes (Table 6).

Table 6.

ROH islands, shared by more than 50% (ROH freq.) of the Lipizzan horses from the Croatian stud farms Lipik and Đakovo and the annotated genes in corresponding regions

Chr.	Begin	End	Length (kb)	ROH freq.	Known genes
4	58,110.547	58,620.749	510.2	0.529	HOXA1, HOXA2, HOXA3, HOXA5, HOXA6, HOXA7, HOXA9, HOXA10, HOXA11, EVX1, HIBADH
7	52,014.500	52,143.583	129.1	0.532	–
11	24,144.431	24,816.254	671.8	0.592	COPZ2, CBX1,SNX11, HOXB1, HOXB2, HOXB3, HOXB5, HOXB6, HOXB7, HOXB8, HOXB13, TTLL6
11	31,032.580	31,942.748	910.2	0.626	C11H17orf67, DGKE, COIL, SCPEP1, AKAP1, MSI2
14	34,051.957	35,189.508	1137.5	0.726	ARHGAP26, FGF1, SPRY4, NDFIP1, GNPDA1, RNF14, PCDH12, PCDH1, DELE1
22	47,901.830	48,624.259	722.4	0.549	TAF4, CDH4, LSM14B, PSMA7, SS18L1, MTG2, HRH3, OSBPL2, ADRM1, LAMA5, CABLES2, RBBP8NL, GATA5, SLCO4A1, NTSR1

The island on ECA4 at position 58.11–58.62 Mb was also present in the Hungarian Lipizzans and contained among other annotated genes the homeobox-A cluster (HOXA). Furthermore, an island on ECA22 at position 47.90–48.62 Mb was exclusively detected within the Croatian and Slovakian sample.

Within the Hungarian Lipizzans six ROH islands on ECA4, ECA8, ECA11, ECA22, ECA23, ECA30 were identified, varying in length between 497.4 kb and 699.2 kb (Table 7). Four ROH islands on ECA8, ECA22, ECA23 and ECA30 were specific for the Hungarian sample. On ECA8 also a private island of the Austrian sample was documented (Fig. 5).

Table 7.

ROH islands, shared by more than 50% (ROH freq.) of the Lipizzan horses from the Hungarian stud farms Szilvasvárad and the annotated genes in corresponding regions

Chr.	Begin	End	Length (kb)	ROH freq.	Known genes
4	58,107.774	58,605.189	497.4	0.522	HOXA1, HOXA2, HOXA3, HOXA5, HOXA6, HOXA7, HOXA9, HOXA10, HOXA11, EVX1
8	22,121.802	22,651.589	529.8	0.602	TMEM120B, RHOF, SETD1B, HPD, PSMD9, WDR66, BCL7A, MLXIP, IL31, LRRC43, B3GNT4, DIABLO, CLIP1
11	24,134.125	24,833.366	699.2	0.727	COPZ2, CBX1,SNX11, HOXB1, HOXB2, HOXB3, HOXB5, HOXB6, HOXB7, HOXB8, HOXB13, TTLL6, CALCOCO2
22	45,518.067	46,096.341	578.3	0.522	ZNF831, EDN3, PHACTR3
23	27,658.254	28,189.490	531.2	0.522	UHRF2, GLDC, KDM4C
30	4781.530	5465.214	683.7	0.522	KIF26B, SMYD3

Fig. 5.

ROH distribution on ECA8 for the entire Lipizzan sample containing one private ROH island for the Hungarian sample (blue line) and one ROH island for the Austrian sample (red line) in the line plot below

Gene ontology and enrichment analysis

Gene ontology and enrichment analysis highlighted within all Lipizzan samples the homeobox-B cluster, where the highest significance levels (p < 0.001) were reached for the terms GO:0048704~embryonic skeletal system morphogenesis and GO:0009952~anterior/posterior pattern specification (Additional file 4). Further the term GO:0043565~sequence-specific DNA binding related to molecular functions reached a significance level of p < 0.001 for the entire Lipizzan sample. Three out of 20 genes located in the identified ROH islands were listed in OMIM (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man) database (DGKE - 615,008~Hemolytic uremic syndrome; HOXB1–614744~Facial paresis; SPRY4–615266~Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism), but none of the identified genes were listed in OMIA (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals) database for horses.

In the Austrian Lipizzan population (Additional file 5) GO analysis confirmed the aforementioned terms in biological processes (GO:0048704 and GO:0009952 containing the HOXB cluster), and highlighted additionally the five terms GO:0021570~rhombomere 4 development, GO:0021612~facial nerve structural, GO:0006183~GTP biosynthetic process, GO:0006950~response to stress and GO:0071353~cellular response to interleukin-4, related to biological processes.

The Slovakian Lipizzans (Additional file 6) where characterized by three specific terms related to biological processes: GO:0048864~stem cell development, GO:0001525~angiogenesis, GO:0006368~transcription elongation from RNA polymerase II promoter.

GO analysis revealed 12 identical terms, related to biological processes for the Hungarian and Croatian samples and additionally two sample specific terms (GO:0006355~regulation of transcription, DNA-templated; GO:0001578~microtubule bundle formation) for the Hungarian and three terms for the Croatian sample (GO:0007156~homophilic cell adhesion via plasma membrane adhesion molecules; GO:0050890~cognition; GO:0001759~organ induction) (Additional files 7 and 8). All these 12 terms related to biological processes are based upon the HOXB- and HOXA-clusters. The highest significance levels (p < 0.001) were found in concordance with the other samples for GO:0009952~anterior/posterior pattern specification and GO:0048704~embryonic skeletal system morphogenesis. Summarizing the results from gene ontology analysis of these two samples a high number of terms were highlighted for different aspects of embryonic morphogenesis (f.e. GO:0009953~dorsal/ventral pattern formation, GO:0009954~proximal/distal pattern formation, GO:0008584~male gonad development, GO:0060065~uterus development, GO:0021615~glossopharyngeal nerve morphogenesis).

Single SNP analysis

Two islands in the entire sample and six islands in the Austrian Lipizzans were remarkable short (8.0–101.1 kb length) and matched in size with single genes. One short island on ECA3:118.67–118.77 Mb (length 101.1kb) directly overlapped with the genes UVSSA (UV-stimulated scaffold protein A) and MAEA (macrophage erythroblast attacher) and was shared by 50.8% of the Austrian horses. 76 kb upstream a second ROH island (ECA3:118.80–118.89 Mb, length 83.9kb) was centred on the CTBP1 gene (C-terminal binding protein 1), that was shared by 50.2% of Austrian Lipizzans. To examine levels of homozygosity for SNPs located within the three named genes, we extracted the following SNPs from the entire sample: UVSSA: AX-104358355 Pos.:118,712.729, AX-104277358 Pos.:118,716.414, AX-103191894 Pos.:118,724.527, AX-104669126 Pos.:118,727.858; MAEA: AX-104046583 Pos.:118,750.308, AX-104041685 Pos.:118,752.167; CTBP1: AX-103592395 Pos.:118,874.036. The four SNPs within UVSSA revealed homozygosity for 78.2% of individuals. For the two SNPs located in MAEA 90.5% of animals were homozygous in the Austrian population and 78.5% of the horses were homozygous for these SNPs within the entire sample. At the SNP located in CTBP1 all horses of the entire sample were homozygous.

Discussion

The high-resolution population network (Admixture and Netview analysis) of the Lipizzan horse breed revealed that the single stud farms represent differentiated subpopulations, whereas the highest genetic distances were observed between the Austrian and the Hungarian/Croatian samples. The Slovakian Lipizzans clustered between the Austrian and the Croatian Lipizzans. These findings are in concordance with Achmann et al. [4], who derived a comparable structure for 561 Lipizzans from seven European countries. In the present study the Austrian and Slovakian horses were characterized by a lower genetic distances and higher pairwise relationship coefficients compared to the Croatian and Hungarian animals. This can be explained by the limited census of breeding animals in the Slovakian stud farm Topol’čianky, and the limited level of introgression of horses into the Austrian breeding herd. Due to the obligatory performance test of stallions in the Spanish riding school, in the Austrian stud farm Piber only foreign mares can be used to increase genetic diversity, whereas in Hungary, Slovakia and Croatia an exchange of breeding stallions is commonly applied. At the same time the Croatian and Hungarian breeding stock has been bigger than the Slovakian one.

Generally genetic distances between horses, illustrated in the high-resolution network visualization, was relatively equally distributed within the breeding herds of Piber and Topol’čianky and no outstanding contribution of single animals (key-contributor) were detected, revealing the efforts of a conservation breeding program with narrow sex ratios and moderate selection intensity. Between Piber, Szilvasvárad and Topol’čianky cross-link animals were found, which showed markedly smaller mean genome-wide coverage of ROH and a higher degree of admixture. A comparable “outbreeding-effect” was detected in a previous study in the Haflinger breed, where outcrosses between horses from different countries/stud books were characterised by low S_ROH and the lack of ROHs > 6 Mb [15].

All ROH parameters observed in our four subpopulations, reached highest values in the Austrian Lipizzans, whereas the lowest values were found in the Hungarian sample. The values of F_ROH generally were in concordance with the findings of pedigree analyses from Zechner et al. [1] and did not exceed 15%. Genomic inbreeding, as described by F_ROH in the Lipizzan breed (F_ROH = 0.13) was lower than expected from long-term stud farm breeding at small census and it is comparable to values found in the Austrian Haflinger (0.13), the Slovenian Haflinger (0.12) and the Bosnian Mountain Horse (0.14) [15, 16]. Higher levels of F_ROH were identified in Shagya Arabians (F_ROH = 0.16) and Purebred Arabians (F_ROH = 0.18), two breeds characterized by early closure of stud books [15].The length of ROHs is expected to correlate to ancient and recent inbreeding due to number of recombination events. Thus, recent inbreeding events result in longer ROHs as only a few identical by descent (IBD) segments can be broken down by repeated meiosis. According to Browning and Browning [17] and Thompson [18] ROHs of a length of 16.6, 10.0 and 5.0 Mb are assumed to origin from common ancestors back in the 3rd, 5th and 10th generations (6, 10 and 20 meioses respectively). Considering a mean generation interval of 10 years in Lipizzan horses the origin of ROHs in length class of < 2 Mb can be dated to the foundation period of this breed (foundation time 1580 AC). We observed F_ROH values calculated based upon ROHs shorter than 2 Mb ranging from 5.6 to 7.1%. F_{ROH > 10Mb} was absent in Slovakian Lipizzans and tended toward zero in Croatian and Hungarian horses, indicating minimal recent inbreeding within the past five generations [18, 19]. In the Austrian population F_{ROH > 10Mb} reached 1.1%. These results demonstrated that it is feasible to minimize the increase of inbreeding in populations limited in size and closed stud books. The ROH profile illustration for the Austrian Lipizzan revealed a strong right shift and a higher variance typical for consanguineous and bottlenecked populations according to Ceballos et al. [20]. The Slovakian sample was characterized by a similar profile, but at a much lower extend, whereas the Croatian and Hungarian samples showed the effects of small census [20].

The identification of overlapping homozygous regions confirmed a closer genetic relationship between the Hungarian and Croatian samples as well as between the Austrian and Slovakian samples, which was also highlighted within the high-resolution population network. Private islands were detected for the Hungarian sample on ECA8, ECA14, ECA23 and ECA30 and for the Austrian sample on ECA3, ECA5, ECA8, ECA16 and ECA20. Within the Austrian Lipizzans an overlapping 953.3kb long homozygous region on ECA16:37.87–38.82 Mb was found, that contained among 29 annotated genes the two genes ECATH-3 and ECATH-2. Both were described as functional genes encoding Cathelicidin-derived antimicrobial peptides, involved in the peptide-based host defence of neutrophils and epithelia in horses [21, 22]. GO analysis for the Austrian Lipizzan gene list highlighted the term GO:0006950~response to stress for the gene UCN2 (urocortin 2, a member of the corticotropin-releasing hormone family) on ECA16 and the gene HSP90AB1 (Equus caballus heat shock protein 90 alpha family class B member 1) on ECA20, whereas the latter was assigned to four Equus caballus species by Vidale et al. [23]. HSP90AB1 is considered to play a role in the age-dependent metabolism of chondrocytes in horses [24].

All subpopulations shared a homozygous region on ECA11, nearly identical in position and length (mean length 676.4 kb) at 24.13–24.81 Mb containing the annotated genes COPZ2, CBX1, SNX11, HOXB1, HOXB2, HOXB3, HOXB5, HOXB6, HOXB7, HOXB8, HOXB13, TTLL6 (and CALCOCO2, additional in the Hungarian sample). For the Croatian/Hungarian Lipizzans an additional island on ECA4:58.10–58.60 Mb was confirmed containing the homeobox-A cluster. Enrichment analysis highlighted for all samples highly significant levels (p < 0.001) for the homeobox-B cluster, mostly related to biological processes involved in embryonic morphogenesis and anterior/posterior specification (GO:0009952, GO:0048704, GO:0009953, GO:0009954). Significant levels for GO terms based upon the HOXA cluster (GO:0060065~uterus development, GO:0009954~proximal/distal pattern formation, GO:0007338~single fertilization, GO:0008584~male gonad development) were exclusively documented for Croatian and Hungarian Lipizzans. The island on ECA11 including the HOXB cluster and highly significant GO terms related to morphogenesis were recently also documented in the Posavina horse by Grilz-Seger et al. [16]. Zhang et al. [25] listed HOXB13 in a recent selection signature study in horses. HOX genes play a fundamental role for morphological diversity in animals and for the control of axial morphology along the anterior-posterior body axis. As these gene clusters are directly assigned to axial body segments in numerical order, they can control single segments during embryogenesis concerning their position, segmentation and further differentiation [26].

On ECA11:31.01–31.94 another common homozygous region was found in all samples, whereas the frequency in Hungarian Lipizzans was with 47% slightly below the threshold. This ROH island, nearly identical in length (926.9/910.2 kb) in the Austrian and Croatian Lipizzans, harboured the genes C11H117orf67, DGKE, COIL, SCPEP1, AKAP1, MSI2 and was partially overlapping with two smaller islands of the Slovakian population. The Hungarian sample had a 244.4 long overlapping homozygous region within the Musashi RNA binding protein 2 (MSI2), which is involved in stem cell proliferation [27], haematopoiesis and can promote aggressive myeloid leukaemia in humans [28]. Four of these genes (COIL, SCPEP1, AKAP1, MSI2) were listed among other 121 genes that underwent positive selection during the domestication process of the horse [29].

In general the majority of ROH islands were medium sized (between 100 and 900 kb) to small sized (8–100 kb) according to the classification of Pemperton et al. [30]. Only in the Croatian sample one island on ECA14 was longer than 1 Mb. Most of the short ROH islands did not exceed the length of the contained gene, e.g. the island on ECA3:118.66–118.76 Mb, containing the two genes UV-stimulated scaffold protein A (UVSSA) and macrophage erythroblast attacher (MAEA). UVSSA is involved into the repair process of DNA damaged by ultraviolet (UV) sun rays. These two genes were directly followed by a 83 kb long island containing the gene C-terminal-binding protein 1 (CTBP1), a transcriptional co-repressor. Pemperton et al. [30] emphasized the investigation of short ROHs (< 100 kb), as they reflect homozygosity for ancient haplotypes contributing to local linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns. Intermediary ROHs longer than 100 kb up to 2.5 Mb are deemed to be the result from background relatedness in populations with limited census. Furthermore, Pemperton et al. [30] stated that by the commonly applied windows approach as implemented in PLINK [31], ancient haplotypes and small ROHs due to high recombination rate might remain undetected. With the 500 kb applied boundary we were able to detect very small ROH islands, but SNP extraction revealed, that the frequencies of animals sharing those islands were underestimated, exemplarily demonstrated for the genes MAEA, UVSSA, CTBP1 and the STX17 locus.

Grey coat color, caused by a 4.6 kb duplication in intron 6 of Syntaxin 17 (STX17), is an essential part of the breeding objective in Lipizzan horses and it has been under selection since the past 150 years. The STX17 mutation is embedded into 352 kb long haplotype [13, 32].The frequency of the identified ROH island (ECA25:6,39-6,79) harbouring the genes STX17, NR4A3, ERP44 and INVS, was in concordance with genotype frequencies cited in Pielberg et al. [13], and ranged from 51.1% (Croatia) to 71.2% (Austria) among the respective subpopulations. In the Austrian breeding program only grey horses are used for reproduction, whilst the Slovakian, Hungarian and Croatian stud farms also permit solid colored horses. As a consequence the proportion of homozygous grey G/G horses is higher in the Austrian population.

The allele status of STX17 influences the progression of greying by age, grade of speckling (pigmentation among grey hair), grade of vitiligo and incidences and grade of melanoma [10–13]. The incidence of melanoma in Lipizzans was reported to affect 80% of the animals older than 15 years [10, 13]. Mostly melanomas in Lipizzans are benign and do not metastasize [33]. A previous study revealed, that the genes STX17, NR4A3, ERP44 and INVS, which are located in the aforementioned ROH island also were expressed in melanoma tissues [13]. Pielberg et al. [13] observed an over-expression of NR4A3 (nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 3), which is influenced by the dominant G-allele. The underlying molecular processes are not clearly understood [34]. Seltenhammer et al. [33] investigated factors retarding metastasis in affected grey Lipizzan horses and revealed common features with blue nevi in humans and identified potential markers for equine melanoma (S-100, PCNA, HMB-45, Ki-67, T-311, CD44). We identified within the entire Lipizzan sample an island on ECA14 containing the genes SPRY4 (Sprouty4) and NDFI1 (Nedd4-family interacting protein 1). SPYR4 is a member of the SPYR proteins, which are negative regulators of growth factor signaling pathways. Thus, SPRY4 inhibits transformed cell growth, migration and invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition [35]. Shaverdashvili et al. [36] provided evidence in human melanoma for an inverse relationship between the expression of SPYR4 and Membrane-type 1 Matrix Metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP), one important driver of melanoma metastasis. Inhibition of MT1-MMP resulted in increased expression of SPYR4 and was correlated with the survival of melanoma patients in humans. NDFIP1 also acts as a tumour suppressor by repressing cell proliferation and was reported to be down-regulated in human uveal melamoma [37]. In a previous study Jiang et al. [34] investigated the ERK pathway and studied the effects of BRAF, RAS, GNAQ, GNA11, KIT on melanoma development in grey horses, whereas an association between STX17 and an activation of the ERK pathway was shown, but no activation of the aforementioned genes were observed. In the Austrian Lipizzan sample we identified an island containing the gene HSP90AB1. Metri et al. [38] identified HSP90AB1 as a main discriminator between metastatic and primary melanoma in humans, which also was correlated with survival rate of melanoma patients. In our data GO analysis revealed an enrichment of HSP90AB1 in the terms GO:0069550-reponse to stress and GO:0071353-cellular response to interleukin-4.

Conclusions

The enhanced high-resolution Netview approach results in a generally understandable visualisation, which is able to simultaneously present fundamental metrics of genetic diversity, coancestry and relatedness on population and individual level. This approach thus provides a high practical impact for conventional and conservation breeding management. The analyses of ROH islands based upon the conventional ROH size boundary of > = 500 kb have proven to be a valuable approach to screen for signatures of selection, also able to detect short homozygous overlapping regions. In order to avoid an underestimation of the frequencies of very short ROHs the underlying size boundary should be adapted in regions of special interest. The investigation of subpopulations within one single breed allows a fine-scale analysis and we demonstrated that slightly different breeding objectives have a high impact on genomic regions and gene content. ROH island analyses identified several annotated genes (SPRY4, NDFIP1, HSP90AB1 and IMPDH2), which may play a role for further studies on equine melanoma.

Methods

Ethics statement

This study was discussed and approved by the institutional Commission for Ethics and Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, protocol number: ETK-06/05/2015, in accordance with GSP guidelines and national legislation. The Lipizzan state stud farms Piber (Austria), Topol’čianky (Slovakia), Lipik, Đakovo (Croatia) and Szilvasvárad (Hungary) granted the permission to take hair samples from their horses.

Sampling

The horses included in this study originated from five European state stud farms, which are located in four different countries. The Austrian and the Slovakian samples represent the entire breeding populations of the stud farm of Piber (Austria, 254 horses) and Topol’čianky (Slovakia, 55 horses). The Croatian Lipizzans were sampled from the state stud farms Lipik (8 horses) and Đakovo (37 horses), whilst 23 Lipizzan horses were collected from the Hungarian state stud farm Szilvasvárad.

The hair samples were taken between the years 2013 and 2017 and the selected horses were born between 1989 and 2014. For Austria and Slovakia we were able to collect the whole stud farm populations. The breeding stock of the Croatian stud farms comprises together approximately 120 breeding animals, the number in the Hungarian state stud farm is on a similar level.

SNP genotyping

The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes for the 377 horses were determined using the Affymetrix Axiom™ Equine genotyping array [14]. The chromosomal position of the SNPs was derived from EquCab2.0 reference genome. We excluded SNPs positioned on the sex chromosomes (X: 28,017 SNPs and Y: 1 SNP), SNPs without known chromosomal position (30,864 SNPs) and SNPs with more than 10% missing genotypes, resulting in a total of 611,914 SNPs for each horse. For the analysis of population structure and genetic diversity we excluded SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF) less than 0.01, resulting in 492,719 SNPs per horse.

Genetic diversity and ROH analysis

In order to illustrate the population structure we applied Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on basis of the genetic relationship matrix (G) with pairwise identities by state (IBS) between horses as provided by PLINK v.1.7 [31]. The PCA was performed using R platform, whilst pairwise F_ST values were calculated with the R package Geneland (https://rdrr.io/cran/Geneland).

Population clustering and admixture analysis were determined using the program Admixture 1.23 [39]. We ran Admixture for 100 iterations increasing K from 2 to 10. Convergence between independent runs at the same K was monitored by comparing the resulting log-likelihood scores (LLs) following 100 iterations, and was inferred from stabilized LLs with less than 1 LL unit of variation between runs. Cross validation (CV) error estimation for each K was performed to determine the optimal number of clusters. Admixture results were visualized with the program Distruct 1.1 [40] and integrated in the high-resolution network following the procedure of Druml et al. [15].

ROH were determined with an overlapping window approach implemented in PLINK v1.7 [31] based on the settings: minimum SNP density = one SNP per 50 kb; maximum gap length = 100 kb; minimum length of homozygous segment > 500 kb (including more than 80 homozygous SNPs); one heterozygote and two missing genotypes were permitted within each segment.

The total number of ROH (N_ROH), average length of ROH (L_ROH) and the sum of all ROH segments (S_ROH) were summarized according to respective subpopulations. To analyze ROH length classes, ROHs were divided into following seven length categories: 0.5–1, 1–2, > 2–4, > 4–6, > 6–8, > 8–10 and > 10 Mb. The genomic inbreeding coefficients (F_ROH) were calculated by use of following formular:

$$F_{\mathit{ROH}}=\sum \frac{L_{\mathit{ROH}}}{L_{\mathit{\text{AUTO}}}}$$

,whereas the length of the autosomal genome (L_AUTO), was set to 2243 GB. Statistical analyses and graphical representations of specific genomic regions and distribution of ROH segments were performed using the R-package detectROHs (www.r-project.org)and SAS v.9.1. [41].

High-resolution population networks

In order to ascertain the high-resolution population structure of Lipizzan horses, we performed a network visualization based upon the aforementioned IBS derived relationship matrix (G), following the description of Druml et al. [15]. The different components involved in the so-called NetView approach are described in detail by Neuditschko et al. [42] and Steining et al. [43]. Briefly, we computed genetic distances by subtracting pairwise relationships from 1 and applied the algorithm in its default setting (number of k nearest neighbors k-NN = 10). To illustrate the genetic relatedness between neighboring horses, we associated the thickness of edges (connecting lines) with the proportion of the genetic distance, whilst thicker edges corresponding to lower genetic distances. To identify highly inbred and outcrossed horses within the respective population networks we scaled the node size of each horse based on the individual S_ROH. The node colors of each horse represent the individual level of admixture at the selected number of K-clusters, whilst the node border colors illustrate the origin of the horses.

Gene characterization in ROH islands

The distribution of ROH segments across the genome was visualized using the R-package detect ROHs (www.r-project.org). Putative ROH islands were determined based upon overlapping homozygous regions, which were shared by more than 50% of the horses. ROH islands were calculated for the entire data sample and respective subpopulations. Genes located in ROH regions were identified with the map viewer of the equine ensemble database EquCab2.0 (www.ensembl.org) and Gene Ontology (GO) terms and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways of annotated genes were analyzed using the open source Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) v6.8 package (https://david.ncifcrf.gov) using the Equus caballus annotation file as background [44].

Abbreviations

ADRM1

Proteasomal ubiquitin receptor ADRM1

AKAP1

A-kinase anchoring protein 1

ALS2CL

ALS2 C-terminal-like protein

ARHGAP26

Rho GTPase activating protein 26

ARHGEF4

Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 4

ARIH2

Ariadne RBR E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 2

ATRIP

ATR interacting protein

B3GNT4

UDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 4

BCL7A

BAF chromatin remodeling complex subunit BCL7A

bp

Base pair

BRAF

B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase

C11H17orf67

Chromosome 11 C17orf67 homolog

C16H3orf84

Chromosome 16 H17orf84 homolog

CABLES2

CDK5 and ABL1 enzyme substrate 2

CAPN11

Calpain-11

CBX1

Chromobox 1

CCDC12

Coiled-coil domain-containing protein 12

CCDC51

Coiled-coil domain containing 51

CCDC71

Coiled-coil domain containing 71

CDH

Cadherin

CELSR3

Cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 3

CHD1L

Chromodomain Helicase DNA Binding Protein 1 Like

CLIP1

CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1

COIL

Coilin

COPZ2

Coatomer Protein Complex Subunit Zeta 2

CTBP1

C-Terminal Binding Protein 1

CTDP1

CTD Phosphatase Subunit 1

CV

Cross validation

DALRD3

DALR anticodon binding domain containing 3

DAVID

Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery

DELE1

DAP3 binding cell death enhancer 1

DGKE

Diacylglycerol kinase epsilon

DIABLO

Diablo IAP-binding mitochondrial protein

ECA11

Equine chromosome 11

ECA14

Equine chromosome 14

ECA16

Equine chromosome 16

ECA18

Equine chromosome 18

ECA20

Equine chromosome 20

ECA25

Equine chromosome 25

ECA3

Equine chromosome 3

ECA30

Equine chromosome 30

ECA5

Equine chromosome 5

ECA8

Equine chromosome 8

ECATH-2

Myeloid cathelicidin 2

ECATH-3

Myeloid cathelicidin 3

EDN3

Endothelin 3

EquCab2.0

Equus caballus reference genome version 2

ERK pathway

Extracellular-signal-regulated kinase

ERP44

Endoplasmic reticulum protein 44

EVX1

Even-skipped homeobox 1

FGF1

Fibroblast growth factor 1

FMO5

Flavin Containing Monooxygenase 5

F_ROH

Inbreeding coefficient based upon ROH

F_ST

Fixation coefficient

FSTL4

Follistatin like 4

G

Genetic relationship matrix

GATA5

Transcription factor GATA-5

GLDC

Glycine decarboxylase

GNA1

Glucosamine 6-phosphate N-acetyltransferase

GNAQ

G protein subunit alpha q

GNPDA1

Glucosamine-6-phosphate deaminase 1

GO

Gene ontology

HIBADH

3-hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial

HOXA1

Homeobox A1

HOXA10

Homeobox A10

HOXA11

Homeobox A11

HOXA2

Homeobox A2

HOXA3

Homeobox A3

HOXA5

Homeobox A5

HOXA6

Homeobox A6

HOXA7

Homeobox A7

HOXA9

Homeobox A9

HOXB

Homeobox B

HOXB1

Homeobox B1

HOXB13

Homeobox B13

HOXB2

Homeobox B2

HOXB3

Homeobox B3

HOXB5

Homeobox B5

HOXB6

Homeobox B6

HOXB7

Homeobox B7

HOXB8

Homeobox B8

HPD

4-hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid dioxygenase

HRH3

Histamine H3 receptor

HSP90AB1

Equus caballus heat shock protein 90 alpha family class B member 1

IBS

Identity by state

IL31

Interleukin 31

IMPDH2

Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 2

INVS

Inversin

IP6K2

Inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 2

K

Cluster

kb

Kilobase

KDM4C

Lysine demethylase 4C

KEGG

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

KIF26B

Kinesin family member 26B

KIT

KIT proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase

KLHDC8B

Kelch domain containing 8B

LAMA5

Laminin subunit alpha-5

LAMB2

Laminin subunit beta 2

LD

Linkage disequilibrium

L_ROH

ROH length

LRRC43

Leucine rich repeat containing 43

LSM14B

LSM family member 14B

MAEA

Macrophage Erythroblast Attacher

MAF

Minor allele frequency

Mb

Megabase

MLXIP

MLX interacting protein

MSI2

Musashi RNA binding protein 2

mtDNA

Mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid

MTG2

Mitochondrial ribosome-associated GTPase 2

NCKIPSD

NCK interacting protein with SH3 domainM

NDFIP1

Nedd4 family interacting protein 1

NDUFAF3

NADH:Ubiquinone oxidoreductase complex assembly factor 3

NFKBIE

NF-kappa-B inhibitor epsilon

NME6

NME/NM23 nucleoside diphosphate kinase 6

NR4A3

Nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 3

N_ROH

mean number of ROHs

OMIA

Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals

OMIM

Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man

OSBPL2

Oxysterol-binding protein-related protein 2

P4HTM

Prolyl 4-hydroxylase, Transmembrane

PC

Principal component

PCA

Principal component analysis

PCDH1

Protocadherin 1

PCDH12

Protocadherin 12

PFKFB4

6-Phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 4

PHACTR3

Phosphatase and actin regulator 3

PLEKHB2

Pleckstrin homology domain-containing family B member 2

PLXNB1

Plexin B1

PRKAB2

Protein kinase AMP-activated non-catalytic subunit beta 2

PSMA7

Proteasome subunit alpha type-7

PSMD9

Proteasome 26S subunit, non-ATPase 9

QARS

Glutaminyl-TRNA synthetase

QRICH1

Glutamine rich 1

RAS

Resistance to audiogenic seizures

RBBP8NL

RBBP8 N-terminal-like protein

RHOF

Ras homolog family member F, filopodia associated

RNF14

Ring finger protein 14

ROH

Runs of homozygosity

SCPEP1

Serine carboxypeptidase 1

SD

Standard deviation

SETD1B

SET domain containing 1B, histone lysine methyltransferase

SETD2

Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETD2

SHISA5

Shisa family member 5

SLC26A6

Solute carrier family 26 member 6

SLC29A1

Solute carrier family 29 member 1

SLC35B2

Solute carrier family 35 member B2

SMYD3

SET and MYND domain containing 3

SNP

Single nucleotide polymorphism

SNX11

Sorting nexin 11

SPRY4

Sprouty4

S_ROH

mean genome coverage of ROH

SS18L1

SS18L1 subunit of BAF chromatin remodeling complex

STX17

Syntaxin 17

TAF4

Transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 4

TCTE1

T-complex-associated-testis-expressed 1

TMEM120B

Transmembrane protein 120B

TMEM89

Transmembrane protein 89

TMIE

Transmembrane inner ear expressed protein

TREX1

Three prime repair exonuclease 1

TTLL6

Tubulin tyrosine ligase like 6

UCN2

Urocortin 2

UHRF2

Ubiquitin like with PHD and ring finger domains 2

UQCRC1

Ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase core protein 1

USP19

Ubiquitin specific peptidase 19

UV

ultraviolet

UVSSA

UV Stimulated Scaffold Protein A

WDR6

WD repeat domain 6

WDR66

WD repeat domain 66

ZNF831

Zinc finger protein 831

Authors’ contributions

GGS, TD, MN performed statistical analyses, GGS and TD wrote the paper and designed the study, TD, MD and MH were responsible for data collection and GB and TD were responsible for funding acquisition and project administration. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

This study was discussed and approved by the institutional Commission for Ethics and Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, protocol number: ETK-06/05/2015, in accordance with GSP guidelines and national legislation.

Consent for publication

The Lipizzan state stud farms Piber (Austria), Topol’čianky (Slovakia), Lipik, Đakovo (Croatia) and Szilvasvárad (Hungary) granted the permission to take hair samples from their horses.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.