Abstract
Particulate matter (PM) pollution, which usually carries viruses and bacteria, has drawn considerable attention as a major threat to public health. In this present study, an environment-friendly antibacterial Poly(lactic acid)(PLA)/chitosan composite air filter was fabricated using the one-step electrospinning technique. The composite PLA/chitosan fibres show a highly porous structure, in which chitosan nanoparticles (NPs) were found to be uniformly distributed throughout the entire fibre. The morphologies, through-pore size and distribution, air filtration and anti-microbial properties of these filter media were studied. The results showed that it was not the chitosan content but instead the concentration of the spinning solutions that had the greatest effect on the morphologies of the porous fibres. The relative humidity influenced the nanometre-scale pores on the surface of PLA/chitosan fibres. The PLA/chitosan fibrous membranes with a chitosan to PLA mass ratio of 2.5:8 exhibited a high filtration efficiency of 98.99% and a relatively low pressure drop (147.60 Pa) when the air flow rate was 14 cm/s, while these also had high antibacterial activity of 99.4% and 99.5% against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively. It took 33 min for the PM2.5 concentration to decrease to 0 μg/m3 from 999 μg/m3 using the PLA/chitosan fibrous membranes, which demonstrates obviously effective air purification performance.
Keywords: electrospinning, PLA, chitosan NPs, filtration, antibacterial
1. Introduction
In recent decades, the levels of particulate matter (PM) in the air, which are well known to affect the quality of human life and even to pose a serious threat to the health of the public [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] have been obviously rising due to rapid urbanization and industrialization. In most situations, the components of indoor air are complex, including solid particles, liquid droplets, pet hairs, etc., and can pose great harm. Previous studies have shown that PM2.5, which are particles with diameters that are less than 2.5 μm, are particularly harmful because they can penetrate human bronchi, lungs and even extrapulmonary organs [1,8,9]. In addition, PM2.5 always carries and spreads bacteria and viruses, causing serious harm [9]. Therefore, filter media with excellent filtration and antibacterial performance are in high demand.
Recently, various types of polymers have been fabricated as electrospun fibrous membranes to be used as air filtration media. Nanofibre membranes with optimal characteristics, such as a high specific surface area and porous microstructure with interconnected pores, can efficiently capture the fine particles [8,10,11,12]. Electrospun mats have also been widely researched in the field of biomedical materials, such as tissue engineering scaffolds, drug delivery, etc. [13,14,15]. Electrospinning is an efficient and versatile continuous process for the preparation of uniform nanofibres and the technique is becoming increasingly mature after years of research. In recent years, various types of polymers have been fabricated as electrospun fibrous membranes to be used as air filtration media, such as PVA [16], Nylon 6 [17] and PAN [8,12,18]. Most of them are petroleum-based polymers, the application of which has been found to coincide with serious environmental pollution. Additionally, fossil resources are gradually being depleted [19].
Poly(lactic acid) (PLA, [CH(CH3)COO]n) is a linear aliphatic polyester, which can be prepared from renewable bioresources through fermentation and polymerization [15]. In recent years, PLA has drawn research attention worldwide due to its good biocompatibility and biodegradability [20,21]. In addition, PLA can be dissolved in common solvents and turned into nanofibrous membranes with good mechanical properties through electrospinning. Bognitiski et al. were the first to fabricate nanostructured, electrospun PLA fibres using a dichloromethane (DCM) solvent [22]. Zhe Wang et al. used PLA as a raw material in the manufacture of porous nanofibre membranes, which displayed excellent air filtration performance [23,24].
Chitosan has attracted great interest as a new functional biomaterial because of its advantageous properties, such as biodegradability, biocompatibility [25], nontoxicity and natural antimicrobial activities against different groups of microorganisms [26,27]. However, the electrospinning of chitosan is difficult due to its limited solubility in most organic solvents as well as its high viscosity and strong hydrogen bonds in acidic aqueous solutions [28,29], which has resulted in chitosan having limited applications as an electrospun fibre material. Therefore, chitosan and its derivatives should be blended with a polymer solution before electrospinning. Polymers that can be dissolved in acidic aqueous solutions are preferred, such as PEO and PVA [30,31].
Electrospun PLA/chitosan nanofibres are expected to form a new biomaterial that possesses a combination of properties, which cannot be exhibited by individual polymers. During recent decades, significant progress has been made in the preparation of PLA/chitosan nanofibres [32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. The results show that the differences in nature, structure and compatibility between PLA and chitosan lead to a poor dispersion of the two phases. Nguyue et al. [39] even used PEO as a compatibilizer in order to improve the interaction and dispersion between PLA and chitosan phases. Andri et al. [14] added ethanol to make PLA/chitosan solutions miscible without precipitation. However, these measures did not appear to work well.
In this study, chitosan NPs were added to PLA solutions and were dispersed homogeneously without affecting the solution viscosity. Fibres made from the suspension by electrospinning had nanopores on their surfaces and the chitosan was distributed on the surfaces of the fibres in the form of particles. The membranes were characterized with a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDX), a transmission electron microscope (TEM), a through-pore size analyser and automated filtration testing unit. The antibacterial activity of the PLA/chitosan composite fibrous membranes was evaluated according to GB/T 20944.3-2008: Textiles–Evaluation for antibacterial activity—Part 3: Shake flask method.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
PLA (Wm = 1.0 × 105, Melt Index (190 °C, 2.16 kg) = 1–30 g/10 min) was obtained from Zhejiang Hai Zheng Biological Materials Co., Ltd., Taizhou, China. Chitosan NPs (degree of deacetylation = 95%, viscosity = 42 cps) with a diameter of 100–600 nm were supplied by ShanDong LaiZhou Highly Bio-Products Co., Ltd., Laizhou, China. Both N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAC) and dichloromethane (DCM) were purchased from the National Medicine Group Chemical Reagents Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China. All of the chemicals were of analytical grade and were used without further purification.
2.2. Preparation of Solutions
A mixture of DCM/DMAC (with a mass ratio of 10:1) was used as the solvent for the PLA. Initially, the PLA polymer was dissolved by stirring for 12 h at room temperature. After that, the chitosan NPs were added to the as-prepared PLA solutions by stirring for 2 h, with these dispersed NPs having maintained their shape without being dissolved. The solutions were then sonicated for 90 min to obtain a well-mixed homogenized suspension.
As listed in Table 1, one set of samples (set A) was composed of PLA solutions of different concentrations (4 wt %, 5 wt %, 6 wt %, 7 wt % and 8 wt %), while the mass ratio of chitosan NPs to PLA was 1:4 (w/w). The other one (set B) was composed of PLA solutions with 8 wt % concentration containing different mass ratios of chitosan NPs (the chitosan NPs to PLA ratios were 0:8, 1:8, 1.5:8, 2:8 and 2.5:8 (w/w)).
Table 1.
Set | Sample | Chitosan/Solution wt % |
PLA/Solution wt % |
Mass Ratio of DCM/DMAC | Mass Ratio of Chitosan/PLA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | A1 | 1 | 4 | 10:1 | 1:4 |
A2 | 1.25 | 5 | 10:1 | 1:4 | |
A3 | 1.5 | 6 | 10:1 | 1:4 | |
A4 | 1.75 | 7 | 10:1 | 1:4 | |
A5 | 2 | 8 | 10:1 | 1:4 | |
B | B1 | 0 | 8 | 10:1 | 0:8 |
B2 | 1 | 8 | 10:1 | 1:8 | |
B3 | 1.5 | 8 | 10:1 | 1.5:8 | |
B4 | 2 | 8 | 10:1 | 2:8 | |
B5 | 2.5 | 8 | 10:1 | 2.5:8 |
2.3. Electrospinning
The prepared PLA/chitosan solution was loaded into a 5-mL syringe with a 21-gauge needle tip that was connected to a voltage supply (DWP503-1ACDF, Tianjin Dongwen High Voltage Co., Tianjin, China) and ejected at a controllable feed rate (1 mL/h), which was operated by a syringe pump (KDS-100, KD Scientific Inc., Holliston, MA, USA). A high voltage (18 kV) was applied to the needle tip. The composite PLA/chitosan fibres were deposited on the nonwoven fabrics wrapped around a grounded metallic roller rotating at 5.5 m/min, which was positioned 14 cm from the tip of the needle.
2.4. Characterisation
2.4.1. Solution Viscosity
The viscosity of the PLA and PLA/chitosan solutions was measured with a rheometer (AR 2000, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) at 20 °C. The diameter of the cone plate was 40 mm and the shear rate was 0–1001 s−1.
2.4.2. Fibre Morphology
The FE-SEM (S-4800, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) images of the electrospun fibres were obtained under an accelerating voltage of 3 kV. The dispersion of chitosan NPs in the fibres was examined using a TEM (HT7700, 120 kV, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The average fibre diameter and average diameter of the pores on the surface of the micro-scale fibres were measured by using image processing software (Image-Pro Plus 5.0) and were tested 100 times and 300 times, respectively.
2.4.3. Elemental Detection
EDX analysis combined with SEM (TM3030, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used to detect the element concentrations and distribution on the electrospun fibrous membranes at randomly selecting areas, before X-ray net counts were obtained.
2.4.4. Through-Pore Size and Distribution
The through-pore size and through-pore size distribution of the fibrous membranes were measured by using a manually operated through-pore size analyser (Porometer 3G, Quantachrome Instruments Co., Boynton Beach, FL, USA). The fibrous membranes were cut to a diameter of 2.5 cm and thoroughly wetted with a liquid accessory kit (Number 01150-10035) to fill all of the pores with liquid (Porometer 3G—Porofil® Wetting Solution). The wetted sample was subjected to increasing pressure from a gas source. As the pressure of the gas increased, the liquid in the largest pores was pushed out. Increasing the pressure further allowed the gas to flow through the smaller pores until all of the pores were emptied and thus, a ‘wet’ run was obtained. When the dried sample was then tested without liquid, a ‘dry’ run was obtained. Comparing the flows from the ‘wet’ run with those from the ‘dry’ run, the through-pore size and through-pore size distribution could be calculated.
2.4.5. Filtration Performance
The aerosol filtration efficiency and airflow resistance of the composite PLA/chitosan fibrous membranes were measured with an automated filtration testing unit (TSI8130, TSI Inc., Shoreview, MN, USA). NaCl aerosol particles with a 260-nm mass median diameter and a 75-nm count median diameter were prepared with an aerosol particle generator. The neutralized NaCl aerosol particles were fed into a filter holder and passed through a filter with an effective area of 100 cm2. All NaCl aerosol tests were conducted at room temperature at a continuous face velocity of 14 cm/s.
Quality factors (QF) were generally used as the comprehensive parameter to evaluate the filtration performance of the filter. QF were defined as , where and refer to the filtration efficiency and the pressure drop, respectively.
2.4.6. Antibacterial Activity
The antibacterial activity of the composite PLA/chitosan fibrous membranes against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus was evaluated using a viable cell-counting method, which is described below, according to GB/T 20944.3-2008. Here, both E. coli and S. aureus bacterial species were first activated with a fresh nutrient agar medium, before being incubated overnight (18–24 h) at 37 °C. Subsequently, the typical colonies were placed in 20 mL of nutrient broth and were incubated at 37 °C with gentle shaking (130 rpm) for 18–20 h. After this, the bacterial solution was diluted to a concentration of approximately 4 × 105 CFU/mL. Typically, the sterilized PLA/chitosan fibrous membranes with a weight of 0.75 g were exposed to the bacterial solution for 24 h at 24 °C under visible light. The bacterial solutions were then inoculated in Petri dishes containing the nutrient agar after ten-fold dilutions at 37 °C for 24 h. The average number of surviving bacteria was determined by counting the colonies on the three incubated agar plates for each sample. The antibacterial activity was evaluated based on
(1) |
where and are the quantities of the visual bacterial colonies on the standard cotton fabric and the tested PLA/chitosan composite fibrous membranes, respectively.
2.4.7. Air Purification Performance
In order to evaluate the air purification performance, a filter element for a car air purifier (HS3122, Husum Technology Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) was prepared using the membrane, with the area maintained at a consistent value with the filter included with the purifier. A polluted environment was created with cigarettes in a confined space with a volume of 0.125 m3, before the vehicle filter was placed in the polluted space. The PM2.5 concentration was tested by an air quality detector (MEF-550, Sensology Institute, Michigan, MI, USA). The time taken for the concentration of PM2.5 to decrease to 0 μg/m3 from 999 μg/m3 was recorded, which was an indication of the air purification performance of the fibrous membranes.
All the membranes used for through-pore size, filtration and air purification performance tests were prepared under the same conditions, including the spinning time (6 h) and the humidity.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Morphologies of PLA/Chitosan Porous Nanofibres
3.1.1. Effect of Concentration on Morphology of PLA/Chitosan Fibres
Concentration has a significant influence on the morphology of fibres. The FE-SEM micrographs of PLA/chitosan nanofibres fabricated from the PLA/chitosan solutions (the weight ratio of chitosan to PLA was 1:4) under 45% humidity are presented in Figure 1. Bead-on-string fibres were obviously observed when the mass fractions of PLA in the mixtures were 4%, 5% and 6% (Figure 1a–f). The number of the beads gradually decreased and the wrinkles on the beads smoothened as the concentration increased. When the concentration of PLA in the solution reached 8 wt %, the fibres became even with no beads present (Figure 1i,j). The reason for this phenomenon was that the increased solution concentration led to changes in the properties of the solutions, especially viscosity. As shown in Figure 2a, the viscosity increased with the increase in the concentration of polymers, which was the main factor resulting in changes to the fibre morphology. As clearly displayed in Figure 1b,d,f,h,j, many mesopores and macropores (with a width ranging from 29 nm to 107 nm) were distributed on the surface of the beads and bead-less fibres, which resulted from the phase separation and breath figure induced by the rapid solvent evaporation and vapor penetration and condensation [40]. It is generally accepted that the pores on the surface of fibres affect the specific surface area and the nanoporous structure of the resultant fibrous membranes [24,41,42], which ultimately affect the air filtration efficiency and purification performance [43]. Additionally, no chitosan NPs were observed on the surface of the fibres in Figure 1 (×4k, 5k and 10k) and it was speculated that the chitosan NPs could be broken up into smaller particles under the high-voltage electric field during the electrospinning process, before being distributed on PLA fibres [15].
3.1.2. Effect of Humidity on Morphology of PLA/Chitosan Fibres
Water droplets are most likely to be the cause of pore formation on the fibre surface so humidity may significantly affect the nanopore size and number because much more vapor will distribute into the air when the relative humidity is high. To determine the effects of humidity on the nanopores and the properties of the fibrous membranes, fibres with different pore structures (Figure 3) were fabricated with a solution at a PLA/chitosan mass ratio of 8:2. In this experiment, we varied the humidity from 15% to 60% while the other parameters were kept constant. As seen in Figure 3a, the surface of the fibres prepared at a humidity of 15% was nearly smooth with an average fibre diameter of 0.91 μm (Table 2). When the humidity increased to 30%, many pores were discovered and the average diameter increased to 1.15 μm. Under 45% and 60% humidity, the nanopores became denser and deeper, while the diameters increased to 1.34 μm and 1.50 μm, respectively. As displayed in Table 2, the average surface nanopore width increased from 46.0 nm to 65.8 nm and the surface nanopore coverage ranged from 18.13% to 32.72% when the humidity was varied from 30% to 60%.
Table 2.
Humidity/% | Diameter/µm | Coverage of Pores/% | Width of Pores/nm |
---|---|---|---|
15 | 0.91 ± 0.14 | / | / |
30 | 1.15 ± 0.12 | 18.13 | 46.0 ± 12.8 |
45 | 1.34 ± 0.28 | 26.91 | 58.1 ± 14.8 |
60 | 1.50 ± 0.26 | 32.72 | 65.8 ± 15.9 |
All the results above show that the humidity had a significant effect on the formation of nanopores on the fibre surface, which is consistent with the conclusions of previous reports [24]. It could be interpreted that a high relative humidity would result in much more vapor in the air and thus, a large number of water droplets form on the surface of the solution jets and penetrate the jet fluid [44,45,46].
3.1.3. Effect of Mass Ratios of PLA and Chitosan on Morphology of Fibres
As reported previously [47], the type of additive may have an effect on the morphology of the polymer fibres. For instance, chitosan dissolved in the solution could increase the charge density of the polymer jet, resulting in a smaller diameter of the fibres [14]. In order to identify whether the chitosan NPs affected the morphology of the fibres or not, PLA/chitosan fibres with different chitosan (CS) contents (the ratios of chitosan NPs to PLA were 0:8, 1:8, 1.5:8, 2:8 and 2.5:8) were prepared and analysed by FE-SEM. As reported in Table 3, the diameter of the PLA/chitosan fibres was larger than that of pure PLA fibres. However, the morphologies of fibres with different levels of chitosan showed no obvious distinction, including in the surface nanopore width and coverage. This shows that the increase in the chitosan content had little effect on the viscosity (Figure 2b) of the solutions, as reflected by the fewer changes in morphology. Moreover, dispersing the chitosan NPs into the solution to fabricate the electrospun fibres made the process simple and easy to control.
Table 3.
Samples | Diameter/µm | Width of Pores/nm | Coverage of Pores/% | Mean Flow through-Pore Size/µm |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 wt % CS + 8 wt % PLA | 1.21 ± 0.21 | 58.52 ± 18.97 | 23.22 | 4.50 |
1 wt % CS + 8 wt % PLA | 1.34 ± 0.34 | 63.72 ± 18.02 | 23.85 | 7.25 |
1.5 wt % CS + 8 wt % PLA | 1.31 ± 0.26 | 64.97 ± 16.32 | 24.46 | 7.53 |
2 wt % CS + 8 wt % PLA | 1.35 ± 0.28 | 59.52 ± 20.57 | 23.81 | 7.92 |
2.5 wt % CS + 8 wt % PLA | 1.35 ± 0.26 | 53.19 ± 20.39 | 23.57 | 7.72 |
3.2. Dispersion of Chitosan NPs and Element Contents
The TEM image of the PLA/chitosan fibres is displayed in Figure 4. It can be observed that when the chitosan concentration was 20% in the fibre, the chitosan NPs were evenly inlaid on the surface of the fibre without agglomeration. It is important to note that the chitosan NPs were very small, with sizes of just tens of nanometres. This proved that the hypothesis in Section 3.1.1 is reasonable. SEM-EDX analysis was used to investigate the chemical composition and relative distribution of chitosan on the surface of PLA/chitosan fibrous membranes. Figure 5 shows that the pure PLA fibres contained carbon (C) and oxygen (O), but no nitrogen (N). When the chitosan was added to the membranes, N was also detected. The membranes contained 2.75 wt % of N as the content of chitosan was up to 20 wt % in PLA/chitosan fibres (Table 4), which also confirmed that the chitosan NPs were successfully loaded onto the PLA fibres. The EDX mapping (with the red colour corresponding to C, the white colour corresponding to N and the purple colour corresponding to O) in Figure 4d–f shows the distribution of N on the fibres, indicating that the chitosan particles were uniformly distributed along the PLA fibres.
Table 4.
Samples | C/wt % | N/wt % | O/wt % |
---|---|---|---|
100% PLA | 70.13 | 0 | 29.87 |
100% chitosan | 51.97 | 8.86 | 39.17 |
80% PLA/20% chitosan | 60.45 | 2.75 | 36.50 |
3.3. Through-Pore Size and Distribution
The through-pore size and through-pore size distribution of the nanofibre membranes are very important parameters in determining the air filtration performance of the fibrous filter. The results shown in Table 3 clearly indicated that the addition of chitosan increased the mean flow through-pore size of the fibrous membranes from 4.5 μm to more than 7 μm, while the distribution of the through-pore size became slightly broader (Figure 6). However, the mean flow through-pore sizes between the membranes varied slightly with any further increase in the chitosan contents, which was the same as in the case of the fibre diameter.
3.4. Filtration Efficiency
The filtration efficiency and pressure drop of the fibrous membranes are the main properties that are important for air filtration. They were evaluated by filtering NaCl aerosol particles with a mass median diameter of 260 nm, which is shown in Table 5. The commercially available filter element FY3107 (NanoProtect filter Pro S2, FY3107, Royal Philips Electronics of the Netherlands, Netherlands) was tested as a control. It can be observed that the filtration efficiency of nanofibre membranes is significantly greater than that of the filter purchased (89.18%). This result could be because of the high specific surface area and the small through-pore size of nanofibre membranes. Compared to the pure PLA membrane (99.90%), the filtration efficiency of PLA/chitosan fibrous membranes was slightly lower at 98.10–98.99%, whereas the chitosan content had almost no effect on the filtration efficiency. However, the pressure drop of pure PLA membrane was 335.90 Pa and it decreased to 167.05 Pa when the mass ratio of chitosan to PLA was 1:8. These phenomena can be attributed to the variation of fibre diameter and through-pore size of the membranes (Table 3). As the fibre diameter and the through-pore size increased, the corresponding filtration efficiency and pressure drop decreased. According to the quality factor, when the mass ratio of chitosan to PLA was 2.5:8, the quality factor (up to 0.0312) was the highest, which indicated the best filtration performance.
Table 5.
Samples | Thickness/mm | Filtration Efficiency/% | Pressure Drop/Pa | Quality Factor |
---|---|---|---|---|
FY3107 | 1.152 | 89.18 | 71.67 | 0.0310 |
0 wt % CS + 8 wt % PLA | 0.215 | 99.90 | 335.90 | 0.0207 |
1 wt % CS + 8 wt % PLA | 0.196 | 98.10 | 167.05 | 0.0237 |
1.5 wt % CS + 8 wt % PLA | 0.198 | 98.78 | 162.35 | 0.0271 |
2 wt % CS + 8 wt % PLA | 0.206 | 98.26 | 147.00 | 0.0276 |
2.5 wt % CS + 8 wt % PLA | 0.202 | 98.99 | 147.60 | 0.0312 |
3.5. Antibacterial Activity
E. coli is a gram-negative bacterium while S. aureus is a gram-positive bacterium. Both were used as model pathogenic bacteria to evaluate the effect of chitosan contents on antibacterial activity according to the national standard. As shown in Table 6, the antibacterial activity of nanofibre membranes was significantly enhanced with an increase in the chitosan content. PLA fibrous membranes without chitosan had a weak bacteriostatic effect, while the antibacterial activity of the PLA/chitosan membrane containing 1 wt % chitosan in the electrospinning solution increased remarkably. This is due to the presence of positively charged NH2 groups carried by chitosan, which are known to hinder biosynthesis and energy transport through the cell wall in order to kill bacteria [48]. It could be seen that when the mass ratio of chitosan to PLA was 2.5:8, the PLA/chitosan fibrous membrane exhibited an inhibition of 99.4% and 99.5% against E. coli and S. aureus, respectively, which is demonstrated in Figure 7. The results confirmed that the PLA/chitosan fibrous membranes exhibited excellent antibacterial capabilities.
Table 6.
Samples | Antibacterial Rate/% | |
---|---|---|
S. aureus | E. coli | |
0 wt % CS + 8 wt % PLA | 10.1 | 4.6 |
1 wt % CS + 8 wt % PLA | 79.0 | 57.8 |
1.5 wt % CS + 8 wt % PLA | 72.5 | 48.2 |
2 wt % CS + 8 wt % PLA | 87.5 | 92.8 |
2.5 wt % CS + 8 wt % PLA | 99.5 | 99.4 |
3.6. Air Purification Performance
Fibrous membranes will eventually be applied in the field of air purification. In order to study the air purification performance in a real polluted environment, a filter element for a car air purifier was prepared using the membrane (the apparatus is displayed in Figure 8). An artificially polluted environment was created by burning cigarettes in a confined space with a volume of 0.125 m3. The PM2.5 concentration tested by an air quality detector was initially over 999 μg/m3. The PM2.5 concentration decreased to 0 μg/m3 (PM2.5 removal efficiency of 100%) in 33 min when the PLA/chitosan fibrous membrane (the mass ratio of PLA to chitosan was 8:2.5) filter was used to purify the air. For comparison, the original filter included with the purifier required 44 min to achieve the same effect, which shows a purification efficiency that is 33% lower than that of the PLA/chitosan fibrous membrane. As shown in Figure 9, a large amount of particulate matter was deposited in the through-pores and on the surface of the fibres. Hence, the PLA/chitosan fibrous membrane could be used as an air filter medium with excellent purification performance.
4. Conclusions
In summary, an easy strategy for the preparation of porous composite fibrous air purification materials with excellent filtration and antibacterial performance has been demonstrated in this study. The porous PLA/chitosan fibrous membranes with different concentrations or different mass ratios of PLA to chitosan were prepared by dispersing the chitosan NPs in PLA/(DCM/DMAC) solutions. The solution concentration had a significant influence on the structure of the fibres. The fibres fabricated with low-concentration solutions consisted of bead-on-string structures. When the concentrations of PLA and chitosan were 8% and 2%, the fibres became even with no beads. A large number of nanopores was distributed on the surface of the fibres fabricated at over 30% humidity, while the width of the pores increased with the humidity. The different chitosan contents in the PLA solutions seem to have little impact on the morphology and through-pore structure, leading to a similar filtration efficiency and pressure drop. The membranes containing more chitosan certainly exhibited better antibacterial performance. The PLA/chitosan fibrous membranes (with a mass ratio of chitosan to PLA of 2.5:8) exhibited a high filtration efficiency of 98.99% and a relatively low pressure drop of 147.60 Pa. In addition, these membranes showed a high antibacterial activity of 99.4% and 99.5% against E. coli and S. aureus, respectively. The purification experiment further demonstrated that the fibrous membranes could form promising materials for air purification and consequently, other filtration applications.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding from DIFITE(SIP) CO., LTD. (1P11596016).
Author Contributions
Z.P., Z.W. and H.L. conceived and designed the experiments; H.L. and H.Z. performed the experiments; H.L. analysed the data and wrote the paper; Z.P. and Z.W. proofread the technical content.
Funding
This research was funded by DIFITE(SIP) CO., LTD.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
References
- 1.Nel A. Atmosphere. Air pollution-related illness: Effects of particles. Science. 2005;308:804–806. doi: 10.1126/science.1108752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yildiz O., Bradford P.D. Aligned carbon nanotube sheet high efficiency particulate air filters. Carbon. 2013;64:295–304. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yoon K., Hsiao B.S., Chu B. Functional nanofibers for environmental applications. J. Mater. Chem. 2008;18:5326–5334. doi: 10.1039/b804128h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Horton D.E., Skinner C.B., Singh D., Diffenbaugh N.S. Occurrence and persistence of future atmospheric stagnation events. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2014;4:698–703. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Harrison R.M., Yin J.X. Particulate matter in the atmosphere: Which particle properties are important for its effects on health? Sci. Total Environ. 2000;249:85–101. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00513-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rodriguez S., Querol X., Alastuey A., Viana M.M., Alarcon M., Mantilla E., Ruiz C.R. Comparative PM10-PM2.5 source contribution study at rural, urban and industrial sites during PM episodes in Eastern Spain. Sci. Total Environ. 2004;328:95–113. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00411-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Thavasi V., Singh G., Ramakrishna S. Electrospun nanofibers in energy and environmental applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 2008;1:205–221. doi: 10.1039/b809074m. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu C., Hsu P.C., Lee H.W., Ye M., Zheng G., Liu N., Li W., Cui Y. Transparent air filter for high-efficiency PM2.5 capture. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6205. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pope C.A., Dockery D.W. Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Lines that Connect. J. Air Waste Manag. 2012;56:709–742. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huang L.W., Arena J.T., Manickam S.S., Jiang X.Q., Willis B.G., McCutcheon J.R. Improved mechanical properties and hydrophilicity of electrospun nanofiber membranes for filtration applications by dopamine modification. J. Membr. Sci. 2014;460:241–249. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang R., Liu C., Hsu P.C., Zhang C., Liu N., Zhang J., Lee H.R., Lu Y., Qiu Y., Chu S., et al. Nanofiber Air Filters with High-Temperature Stability for Efficient PM2.5 Removal from the Pollution Sources. Nano Lett. 2016;16:3642–3649. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yun K.M., Hogan C.J., Mastubayashi Y., Kawabe M., Iskandar F., Okuyama K. Nanoparticle filtration by electrospun polymer fibers. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007;62:4751–4759. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.06.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Balogh A., Domokos A., Farkas B., Farkas A., Rapi Z., Kiss D., Nyiri Z., Eke Z., Szarka G., Orkenyi R., et al. Continuous end-to-end production of solid drug dosage forms: Coupling flow synthesis and formulation by electrospinning. Chem. Eng. J. 2018;350:290–299. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.188. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hardiansyah A., Tanadi H., Yang M.C., Liu T.Y. Electrospinning and antibacterial activity of chitosan-blended poly(lactic acid) nanofibers. J. Polym. Res. 2015;22:59. doi: 10.1007/s10965-015-0704-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lv J., Yin X.Q., Zeng Q.H., Dong W.Y., Liu H.F., Zhu L. Preparation of carboxymethyl chitosan nanofibers through electrospinning the ball-milled nanopowders with poly (lactic acid) and the blood compatibility of the electrospun NCMC/PLA mats. J. Polym. Res. 2017;24:60. doi: 10.1007/s10965-017-1224-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wu S.J., Li F.T., Wang H.T., Fu L., Zhang B.R., Li G.T. Effects of poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA) content on preparation of novel thiol-functionalized mesoporous PVA/SiO2 composite nanofiber membranes and their application for adsorption of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution. Polymer. 2010;51:6203–6211. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang S., Shim W.S., Kim J. Design of ultra-fine nonwovens via electrospinning of Nylon 6: Spinning parameters and filtration efficiency. Mater. Des. 2009;30:3659–3666. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.02.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jing L., Shim K., Toe C.Y., Fang T., Zhao C., Amal R., Sun K.N., Kim J.H., Ng Y.H. Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile-Ionic Liquid Nanofibers for Superior PM2.5 Capture Capacity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8:7030–7036. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b12313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wen Z.W., Li D.N., Qi J.Q., Chen X.D., Jiang Y., Chen L., Gao B., Cui Y., Duan Q. Effect of the phenyl ring substituent on stereoselectivity in the ring-opening polymerization of the rac-lactide initiated by salen aluminum complexes. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2015;293:3449–3457. doi: 10.1007/s00396-015-3720-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ramot Y., Haim-Zada M., Domb A.J., Nyska A. Biocompatibility and safety of PLA and its copolymers. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016;107:153–162. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Da Silva D., Kaduri M., Poley M., Adir O., Krinsky N., Shainsky-Roitman J., Schroeder A. Biocompatibility, biodegradation and excretion of polylactic acid (PLA) in medical implants and theranostic systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2018;340:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bognitzki M., Czado W., Frese T., Schaper A., Hellwig M., Steinhart M., Greiner A., Wendorff J.H. Nanostructured fibers via electrospinning. Adv. Mater. 2001;13:70–72. doi: 10.1002/1521-4095(200101)13:1<70::AID-ADMA70>3.0.CO;2-H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang Z., Pan Z.J. Preparation of hierarchical structured nano-sized/porous poly(lactic acid) composite fibrous membranes for air filtration. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015;356:1168–1179. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang Z., Zhao C., Pan Z. Porous bead-on-string poly(lactic acid) fibrous membranes for air filtration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015;441:121–129. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kumar A., Vimal A., Kumar A. Why Chitosan? From properties to perspective of mucosal drug delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016;91:615–622. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.05.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kamari A., Pulford I.D., Hargreaves J.S. Chitosan as a potential amendment to remediate metal contaminated soil—A characterisation study. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2011;82:71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rabea E.I., Badawy M.E.T., Stevens C.V., Smagghe G., Steurbaut W. Chitosan as antimicrobial agent: Applications and mode of action. Biomacromolecules. 2003;4:1457–1465. doi: 10.1021/bm034130m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Su P., Wang C.J., Yang X.Y., Chen X.Y., Gao C.Y., Feng X.X., Chen J.Y., Ye J.A., Gou Z.R. Electrospinning of chitosan nanofibers: The favorable effect of metal ions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011;84:239–246. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.11.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Homayoni H., Ravandi S.A.H., Valizadeh M. Electrospinning of chitosan nanofibers: Processing optimization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009;77:656–661. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.02.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Klossner R.R., Queen H.A., Coughlin A.J., Krause W.E. Correlation of chitosan’s rheological properties and its ability to electrospin. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9:2947–2953. doi: 10.1021/bm800738u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang Y.Y., Huang X.B., Duan B., Wu L.L., Li S., Yuan X.Y. Preparation of electrospun chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol) membranes. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2007;285:855–863. doi: 10.1007/s00396-006-1630-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Thuy T.T.N., Chung O.H., Park J.S. Coaxial electrospun poly(lactic acid)/chitosan (core/shell) composite nanofibers and their antibacterial activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011;86:1799–1806. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shan X.Q., Li F.Q., Liu C.S., Gao Q. Electrospinning of Chitosan/Poly(lactic acid) Nanofibers: The Favorable Effect of Nonionic Surfactant. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014;131 doi: 10.1002/app.41098. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li Y.J., Chen F., Nie J., Yang D.Z. Electrospun poly(lactic acid)/chitosan core-shell structure nanofibers from homogeneous solution. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012;90:1445–1451. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tighzert W., Habi A., Ajji A., Sadoun T., Daoud F.B.O. Fabrication and Characterization of Nanofibers Based on Poly(lactic acid)/Chitosan Blends by Electrospinning and Their Functionalization with Phospholipase A1. Fiber Polym. 2017;18:514–524. doi: 10.1007/s12221-017-6953-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Au H.T., Pham L.N., Thu H.T.V., Park J.S. Fabrication of an antibacterial non-woven mat of a poly(lactic acid)/chitosan blend by electrospinning. Macromol. Res. 2012;20:51–58. doi: 10.1007/s13233-012-0010-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dong W.Y., Zeng Q.H., Yin X.Q., Liu H.F., Lv J., Zhu L. Preparation and blood compatibility of electrospun nanofibrous CTS/PLA mats from chitosan nanopowders and poly(lactic acid) Polym. Compos. 2018;39:E416–E425. doi: 10.1002/pc.24500. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xu J., Zhang J.H., Gao W.Q., Liang H.W., Wang H.Y., Li J.F. Preparation of chitosan/PLA blend micro/nanofibers by electrospinning. Mater. Lett. 2009;63:658–660. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.12.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chinh N.T., Trang N.T.T., Thanh D.T.M., Hang T.T.X., Giang N.V., Quan P.M., Dung N.T., Hoang T. Thermal property, morphology, and hydrolysis ability of poly(lactic acid)/chitosan nanocomposites using polyethylene oxide. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015;132:41690. doi: 10.1002/app.41690. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Touny A.H., Bhaduri S.B. A reactive electrospinning approach for nanoporous PLA/monetite nanocomposite fibers. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. 2010;30:1304–1312. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2010.07.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ding B., Lin J.Y., Wang X.F., Yu J.Y., Yang J.M., Cai Y. Investigation of silica nanoparticle distribution in nanoporous polystyrene fibers. Soft Matter. 2011;7:8376–8383. doi: 10.1039/c1sm05791j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lin J., Ding B., Yang J., Yu J., Sun G. Subtle regulation of the micro- and nanostructures of electrospun polystyrene fibers and their application in oil absorption. Nanoscale. 2012;4:176–182. doi: 10.1039/C1NR10895F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wang N., Si Y.S., Wang N., Sun G., El-Newehy M., Al-Deyab S.S., Ding B. Multilevel structured polyacrylonitrile/silica nanofibrous membranes for high-performance air filtration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014;126:44–51. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.02.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Casper C.L., Stephens J.S., Tassi N.G., Chase D.B., Rabolt J.F. Controlling surface morphology of electrospun polystyrene fibers: Effect of humidity and molecular weight in the electrospinning process. Macromolecules. 2004;37:573–578. doi: 10.1021/ma0351975. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lin J., Tian F., Shang Y., Wang F., Ding B., Yu J. Facile control of intra-fiber porosity and inter-fiber voids in electrospun fibers for selective adsorption. Nanoscale. 2012;4:5316–5320. doi: 10.1039/c2nr31515g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang Z., Pan Z.J., Wang J.G., Zhao R.Z. A Novel Hierarchical Structured Poly(lactic acid)/Titania Fibrous Membrane with Excellent Antibacterial Activity and Air Filtration Performance. J. Nanomater. 2016;2016:1–17. doi: 10.1155/2016/6272983. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Arrieta M.P., Lopez J., Lopez D., Kenny J.M., Peponi L. Effect of chitosan and catechin addition on the structural, thermal, mechanical and disintegration properties of plasticized electrospun PLA-PHB biocomposites. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016;132:145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.02.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hu S.G., Jou C.H., Yang M.C. Surface grafting of polyester fiber with chitosan and the antibacterial activity of pathogenic bacteria. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002;86:2977–2983. doi: 10.1002/app.11261. [DOI] [Google Scholar]