Abstract
Choline availability modulates neurogenesis and cerebral cortex development through the regulation of neural progenitor cell (NPC) proliferative and differentiation capacity. In this study, we demonstrated that cortical NPC self-renewal is controlled by choline via the expression of a microRNA (miR-129-5p), whose role in the developing brain has not been examined, and which, in turn, inhibits synthesis of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein. Specifically, we found that low choline (LC) availability led to the upregulation of miR-129-5p expression in cortical NPCs in vitro and in vivo, causing the downregulation of EGFR and thereby disrupting NPC self-renewal and cortical neurogenesis. Furthermore, in response to LC availability, methylation potential (the S-adenosylmethionine:S-adenosylhomocysteine ratio) in the developing brain was reduced. Restoring methylation potential in LC cortical NPCs led to the re-establishment of normal miR-129-5p expression. We concluded that inhibiting miR-129-5p function and restoring EGFR protein levels in vivo is sufficient to reverse LC-induced defects in cortical NPC self-renewal. For the first time, to our knowledge, we have identified the molecular links that explain how a change in the availability of the diet metabolite choline impacts the essential cellular processes underlying brain development.—Trujillo-Gonzalez, I., Wang, Y., Friday, W. B., Vickers, K. C., Toth, C. L., Molina-Torres, L., Surzenko, N., Zeisel, S. H. MicroRNA-129-5p is regulated by choline availability and controls EGF receptor synthesis and neurogenesis in the cerebral cortex.
Keywords: cortical development, EGFR, maternal nutrition, brain development
Choline is a nutrient that is essential for multiple cellular functions, such as the production of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine and synthesis of betaine—a metabolite involved in the generation of methyl groups that are necessary for DNA, RNA, and protein methylation (1). Phosphatidylcholine, another choline metabolite, is one of the most abundant components of the cellular membranes (2). The importance of adequate choline (AC) for brain development has been well established (1). If choline availability is increased above adequate in pregnant rodent dams, between d 11 and 17 of gestation, the offspring perform better on memory-related tasks, such as the Morris water maze and radial arm maze, throughout life (3–7). In humans, higher intake of choline during pregnancy is associated with better performance on memory tests in the 7-yr-old children of these mothers (8). On the contrary, an insufficient supply of choline during development increases the risk of neural tube closure defects (9) and leads to aberrant genesis of the cerebral cortex and hippocampus (10, 11). The molecular mechanisms of these effects of choline have not been identified.
We reported that in the developing cerebral cortex, choline acts to modulate neural progenitor cell (NPC) self-renewal by regulating the synthesis of the full-length (isoform 1) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), an essential component of a signaling pathway involved in diverse cellular processes (11), including cortical neurogenesis (12–16). Yet, how choline controls EGFR synthesis remains unknown. In fetal brains from mouse dams fed a LC diet, we showed that Egfr mRNA was expressed normally, but the synthesis of the EGFR protein was inhibited (11). This result suggests that microRNAs (miRs; small noncoding RNAs) post-transcriptionally regulate the synthesis of the EGFR protein (17–19). However, whether miRs respond to nutrient status to modulate brain development has not been demonstrated.
In this study, we identified a specific miR, miR-129-5p, that is upregulated in LC NPCs, binds the 3′ UTR of Egfr, and inhibits its protein synthesis. Although expression of miR-129-5p was detected in the developing and adult brain, its role during neurogenesis has not been examined. In this study, miR-129-5p was up-regulated in cortical NPCs in response to LC status. We further found that inhibition of miR-129-5p function in the developing cortex in vivo is sufficient to restore NPC self-renewal in LC embryos. Together, our results demonstrate, for the first time to our knowledge, that NPC self-renewal and differentiation capacity in the developing cerebral cortex is controlled by choline availability through the regulation of miR expression. These findings provide a direct demonstration of a mechanism whereby metabolism of nutrients influences gene and protein expression during development.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
Mice were bred and maintained at the David H. Murdock Research Institute (DHMRI), Center for Laboratory Animal Science facilities. All experiments were performed in accordance with the standards of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the DHMRI Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Nestin-CFPnuc transgenic mice were generously provided by Dr. Grigori Enikolopov (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA) (20), and were maintained on a C57BL/6J background. The Egfrf mouse line was kindly provided by Dr. David. W. Threadgill (Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA) (21). Genotyping for the Nestin-CFPnuc and Egfrf lines was performed according to the providers’ protocols (20, 21). Nestin-CreERT2+/− and Ai9 mouse lines were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and maintained on a C57BL/6J background (22, 23). Genotyping for Nestin-CreERT2+/− and Ai9 lines was performed according to protocols provided by The Jackson laboratory.
Diets
For at least 2 wk before mating, all animals were fed an AC diet (modified AIN93G diet with 1.4 g/kg choline chloride; D16040703Y; Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ, USA) (Supplemental Fig. S4) through embryonic day (ED) 10. On ED 11, timed-pregnant mice were randomly assigned to 2 feeding groups: LC (LC; modified AIN93G diet with 0 g/kg choline chloride) or AC diet and were fed these diets until ED 17.
Neural progenitor cell culture
Neural progenitor cells were isolated from AC embryonic ED 14 brains and cultured as previously described (24). In brief, cerebral hemispheres from ED 14 embryos were dissected and dissociated into single cells. NPCs were grown in custom choline-free neurobasal medium, supplemented with 2 mM l-glutamine and B27 supplement without vitamin A (all from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Choline chloride (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA), dissolved in PBS and sterile filtered, was added to culture medium to final concentrations of 7 μM (LC) or 70 μM (AC) (25). For monolayer cultures, neurospheres were dissociated and plated in 24-well glass-bottom plates (MatTek, Ashland, MA, USA), precoated with polyornithine (MilliporeSigma) and fibronectin (MilliporeSigma). NPCs were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2.
S-adenosylmethionine treatment in cultured NPCs
Neural progenitor cells were cultured as previously described. S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet), in the stable form of AdoMet-tosylate (Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), was used at a final concentration in the medium of 100 μM.
Neural progenitor cell isolation for in vivo treatment experiments
For experiments in which diets/treatments were administered in vivo, nestinCFP+ cells were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (Aria III sorter; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), from AC and LC ED 17 embryos. The isolated cell population was pelleted and stored at −80°C.
Transfection of neural progenitor cells
Neural progenitor cells were plated as monolayers for 24 h before transfection, as previously described. Transient transfections (DharmaFECT1 transfection reagent; Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO, USA) were conducted at 24 h of culture with miR-129-5p miRidian mimic and scrambled control miR (sc-miR) (Dharmacon). 5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) was added to the culture medium at 10 μM for 24 h between 48 and 72 h of culture. EdU detection was performed at 72 h of culture with the Click-iT EdU Alexa Fluor 555 Detection Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Genetic lineage tracing
Heterozygous Egfrf/+-Ai9+/− females (21) were mated to Nestin-CreERT2+/− males (22, 23) to obtain Egfrf/+-Nestin-CreERT2+/−-Ai9+/− and Egfr+/+-Nestin-CreERT2+/−-Ai9+/− triple-transgenic littermates, and 1 mg tamoxifen (TM; MilliporeSigma) dissolved in 200 μl corn oil was administered to pregnant females at E12 by oral gavage. Embryos were collected at ED 17 for analysis.
In utero electroporation
Electroporation was performed, essentially as previously described (26, 27). In brief, 1–2 μl pooled plasmid DNA (1.5 μg/μl) and miRNAs were injected into the lateral ventricles of E14.5 brains with a Minj-D pressure injector (Tritech Research, Los Angeles, CA, USA) and electroporated by using five 50-ms pulses of 40 V and a 950-ms interpulse duration through the uterine wall using paddle electrodes and a NEPA21 electroporator (Nepagene, Ichikawa, Japan). Plasmids for electroporation were prepared by using the EndoFree Plasmid Maxi Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The following DNA and miR combinations were used: pCAG-EGFP (plasmid 11150; Addgene, Cambridge, MA, USA) control DNA and sc-miR (1 μg/μl) (Dharmacon); mixture of pCAG-EGFP and 40 picomoles of mature miR-129-5p (Dharmacon); mixture of locked nucleic acid–modified oligonucleotide miR-129-5p inhibitor (100 nM) (Exiqon; Qiagen) or sc-miR-inh, and pCAG-EGFP.
MiR microarrays
Cells were harvested from cultured NPCs for real-time PCR Taq-Man miRNA arrays. Total RNA was isolated from neural progenitor cells incubated in LC and AC medium by Qiazol miRNAeasy kits (Qiagen), according to the protocol described by the manufacturer. Reverse transcription was performed with Rodent MegaPlex RT Primer pools. cDNA was amplified by using rodent MegaPlex PreAmp Primer Pools and PreAmp Master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The amplified samples were loaded into Taqman miR arrays (4470188; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and analyzed with the 7900 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Ct values were calculated by SDS 1.2 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific), normalized to MammU6 (miRNA) housekeeping Ct values, and expressed as 2−[Ct(miR) − Ct(U6)].
RT-PCR analysis
Total RNA was isolated from cyan fluorescent protein (CFP)+AC and LC E17 NPCs isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) with the miRNeasy mini kit (Qiagen). For each sample, cortices were pooled from 6 to 8 embryos in the litter. Mature miR-129-5p expression was quantified by real-time RT-PCR with a TaqMan miR assay kit for hsa-miR-129-5p (ID 00590; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Mouse U6 snRNA was used as internal control (ID 001973; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Real-time RT-PCR for primary precursor of miR-129-5p (pri-miR-129-5p, ID Mm03306410) was performed with RT2 Sybr Green Quantitative PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific), with U6 used as the normalization control. For Egfr expression, primers were from Qiagen (ID PPM0714F) and TATA box binding protein was used as the normalization control. Values were normalized with the ΔCt method as previously described.
Luciferase reporter assay
Human embryonic kidney (HEK 293T) cells were maintained in DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific), containing 10% FBS and 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and seeded in a 96-well plate (2 × 104 cells/well) 24 h before transfection. Fifty nanomolar of the miR-129-5p miRidian mimic (Dharmacon) or scrambled control (sc-miR; Dharmacon) were cotransfected with 100 ng per well of the pEZXMT06 vector, containing the full-length 3′ UTR of Egfr (GeneCopoeia, Rockville, MD, USA), using Fugene HD (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. To test binding specificity, EGFR 3′ UTR with mutations in the miR-129-5p recognition sites was subcloned into the pEZXMT06 vector and cotransfected with the control vector as previously described. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h after transfection with the Luc-Pair Luciferase assay kit (GeneCopoeia).
Site-directed mutagenesis
Site-directed mutagenesis (performed at GeneCopoeia) was conducted to change the GCAAAAA seed sequence in the 3′ UTR of Egfr. Two predicted miR-129-5p sites were mutated for CGUUU, to determine whether the putative site influenced luciferase activity. Luciferase reporter assays were performed as previously described.
Western blot analysis
Cultured NPCs were used to evaluate EGFR levels. Protein extracts were prepared with RIPA lysis buffer supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Total protein concentration for all samples was quantified by bicinchoninic assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Proteins were loaded into SDS-PAGE gels and blotted on PVDF membranes. Immunolabeling was accomplished with the following antibodies: EGFR (2232; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA; this antibody is specific for the full-length isoform 1 and does not detect the truncated isoform 2) (28, 29), H3K23me3 (05-1951; MilliporeSigma), and total H3 (ab134198; Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom). The secondary antibodies were goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase–conjugated, donkey anti-chicken 800CW (925-32218; Li-Cor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) and goat anti-mouse 600RD (925-68070; Li-Cor Biosciences). ECL (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to detect proteins. The membranes were imaged in a Li-Cor Odyssey imaging system.
AdoMet and S-adenosylhomocysteine assays
Embryonic brains from AC or LC mice were collected at E17, pulverized, and analyzed. Concentrations of AdoMet and S-adenosylhomocysteine (AdoHcy) were measured with an HPLC assay, as described by Molloy et al. (30).
Immunohistochemistry, microscopy, and data analysis
Embryonic brains were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and cryoprotected in a gradient of 10–30% sucrose/1× PBS solution. Coronal sections (20 µm) were prepared by cryosectioning. Brain sections were blocked with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 5% normal goat serum in 1× PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Incubation with primary antibodies was performed at 4°C overnight. Secondary antibodies were applied for 1 h at room temperature. Antibodies used and dilutions are as follows: rabbit polyclonal anti-EGFR detecting the intracellular EGFR domain (1:1000; Abcam), chicken polyclonal anti-EGFP detecting the intracellular EGFR domain (1:1000; Aves Labs, Togard, OR, USA), and rabbit monoclonal anti-Ki67 (1:500; Abcam). Antigen retrieval [10 nm sodium citrate (pH 6.0) in steam heat for 20 min] was performed for detection of Ki67. Secondary antibodies were goat anti-rabbit Cy3 (1:250; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA), goat anti-chicken Alexa 488 (1:1000; Jackson ImmunoResearch). DAPI (1:2000; MilliporeSigma) was used to label nuclei. The Click-iT EdU kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to detect 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine incorporation (EdU; 10 μM; Click-iT Alexa Fluor 555 Kit; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Images were collected on a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope (Zeiss GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany). Z-stacks were acquired for each coronal section with ×10, 20, or 40 objectives. Cell counts and tissue measurements were obtained with ImageJ (NIH; Bethesda, MD, USA) and LSM Browser (Zeiss GmbH) software.
Bioinformatics
MicroRNA target-prediction analysis was conducted with the miRanda (http://www.microrna.org) (31) and TargetScan (http://genes.mit.edu/targetscan) (32) algorithms.
Statistical analyses
The number of samples per group and the probabilities are indicated in the figure legends. Statistical analyses were performed with Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Data distribution was tested for statistical normality. The Brown-Forsythe test (F test) was used to compare group variances. Groups with equal variances were compared using 1-Way ANOVA (more than 2 groups) or Student’s t test (2 groups). Groups with unequal variances were compared using nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis (more than 2 groups) or Mann-Whitney (2 groups) tests. The χ2 test was used to compare cell distribution in Fig. 4. Data are presented as means ± sem.
RESULTS
MiR-129-5p is upregulated in LC NPCs and inhibits EGFR synthesis by binding its 3′ UTR
We previously found, in vivo, a substantial decrease in proliferating embryonic cortical NPCs (radial glia and intermediate progenitor cells), as well as a persistent decrease in the number of the upper-layer cortical neurons resulting from reduced choline availability during gestation (11). These changes in NPC properties were accompanied by a reduction in EGFR protein levels in embryonic cortical NPCs, which occurred because of aberrant EGFR protein synthesis, as opposed to changes in EGFR protein or mRNA stability. We therefore sought to examine whether lowering choline availability in the fetal brain would lead to upregulation of miRs that would in turn regulate the synthesis of EGFR.
To identify which miRs expressed in cortical NPCs may be sensitive to choline availability, we used NestinCFPnuc+/− transgenic animals, in which CFP marks predominantly radial glial cells (11). When expanded in culture, NPCs isolated from NestinCFPnuc+/− express nestin, suggesting that they maintain the properties of radial glia in vitro. We previously demonstrated that, in this culture model, low levels of choline induce changes in NPC self-renewal, mimicking the behavior of LC CFP-expressing NPCs in vivo (11). We first screened for changes in miR expression in primary NPCs cultured for 48 h in response to LC (7 μM) vs. AC (70 μM) levels. Using real-time PCR-based miR arrays, we detected statistically significant changes in the expression of 11 miRs between AC and LC NPCs (Fig. 1A), suggesting that an LC maternal diet does not induce major defects in miR-processing machinery, but specifically affects the expression of select miRs.
We reasoned that reduction of EGFR protein in NPCs could be mediated by miRs that were up-regulated in LC conditions, both in vitro and in vivo, and could target full-length Egfr 3′ UTR. Using the TargetScan algorithm (www.targetscan.org) (32), we determined that, among the miRs up-regulated in LC NPCs, miR-129-5p is predicted to target the full-length Egfr 3′ UTR at the 4 binding sites that are conserved between the mouse and the human (Fig. 1G). We next used qPCR to confirm that miR-129-5p up-regulation under LC conditions would also be observed in vivo. We found a more than 2-fold increase in miR-129-5p expression in LC CFP-expressing NPCs isolated from Nestin-CFP+/− cortices by FACS (Fig. 1B). Furthermore, up-regulation of miR-129-5p occurred at the transcriptional level; expression of the primary precursor of miR-129-5p in FACS-identified LC NPCs was ∼5-fold higher than in AC NPCs (Fig. 1C).
To test whether miR-129-5p functions to regulate EGFR synthesis in NPCs, we transfected AC NPCs with miR-129 mimics (Fig. 1D, E). No changes in Egfr mRNA expression were detected among the groups (Fig. 1D). However, we found that miR-129-5p–transfected NPCs had a significant reduction in EGFR protein levels (Fig. 1E, F). These data demonstrate that miR-129-5p targets Egfr and inhibits its protein synthesis in NPCs. To confirm that miR-129-5p targets Egfr through its predicted binding sites, we transfected HEK293T cells with a firefly/Renilla dual-luciferase reporter vector, pEZX-MT06, containing the full-length mouse Egfr 3′ UTR, along with mature miR-129-5p. An ∼50% reduction of the reporter luciferase activity was observed when cells were transfected with miR-129-5p (Fig. 1H). To demonstrate that this repression is caused by the specific binding of miR-129-5p to Egfr 3′ UTR, we introduced mutations in miR-129-5p binding sites within the Egfr 3′ UTR. Mutations in the Egfr 3′ UTR abolished reporter repression by miR-129-5p (Fig. 1I). Consistent with the reduction in EGFR protein levels, miR-129-5p alters NPCs proliferative capacity, evidenced by the reduced incorporation of EdU in transfected miR-129-5p compared with AC NPCs (Fig. 1J–L). Together, these results demonstrate that LC availability results in the up-regulation of miR-129-5p expression in NPCs, which inhibits EGFR protein synthesis, thus altering NPC proliferative and differentiation capacity.
Egfr haploinsufficiency in NPCs, as well as LC availability, disrupt cortical neurogenesis in vivo
We reasoned that if EGFR protein levels were regulated by choline via miR-129-5p in vivo, we could expect loss of EGFR function to replicate the neurogenesis defects caused by the reduction in choline supply. To examine whether reduction in EGFR protein levels in NPCs disrupts neurogenesis, we generated triple-transgenic Egfrf/+-Nestin-CreERT2+/−-Ai9+/− embryos, in which activation of Cre recombinase and deletion of 1 copy of Egfr in nestin-expressing NPCs can be achieved in a temporally controlled manner by administration of TM (Fig. 2A) (21–23). Cells in which Cre was activated, and all their progeny, were permanently labeled by the expression of tdTomato fluorescent protein from the Ai9 Cre-reporter allele. Based on our observations that EGFR protein levels are reduced in LC NPCs in vivo as early as E14 (11), we treated pregnant females with TM at E12 to allow sufficient time for TM-induced recombination to occur. We first confirmed that TM-induced inactivation of 1 copy of Egfr allele in Egfrf/+-Nestin-CreERT2+/−-Ai9+/− embryos results in the reduction in EGFR protein levels in cortical NPCs. Using immunostaining, we found that tdTomato-expressing cells in Egfrf/+-Nestin-CreERT2+/−-Ai9+/− E17 embryos contained reduced amounts of EGFR protein (Fig. 2H and Supplemental Fig. S1A). Moreover, compared to control Egfr+/+-Nestin-CreERT2+/−-Ai9+/− embryos, 1 dose of TM at E12 consistently resulted in fewer tdTomato-labeled cells in the E17 cortices of Egfrf/+-Nestin-CreERT2+/−-Ai9+/− embryos (Fig. 2B, E vs. Fig. 2C, F). In contrast to migrating and differentiating neurons in control Egfr+/+-Nestin-CreERT2+/−-Ai9+/− brains, most of which were elongated with distinct bipolar morphology (Fig. 2E), the proportions of tdTomato-expressing cells in the cortical plate (CP) of Egfrf/+-Nestin-CreERT2+/−-Ai9+/− brains that clearly exhibit bipolar morphology in apicobasal orientation are significantly reduced, the proportions of tangentially migrating cells, as well as cells with undefined morphology increased, whereas the proportions of multipolar cells remained unchanged (Fig. 2B, E vs. Fig. 2C, F; Fig. 2I and Supplemental Table S1).
To further confirm that reduction in EGFR protein levels leads to defects in neurogenesis similar to those caused by LC, we induced activation of Cre recombinase in Nestin-CreERT2+/−-Ai9+/− embryos derived from dams fed an LC diet between ED 11 and ED 17, and characterized tdTomato-labeled cells in the CP at ED 17. We found that, similar to Egfrf/+-Nestin-CreERT2+/−-Ai9+/− brains, the number of tdTomato-labeled cells was consistently reduced in LC brains, whereas the proportions of labeled cells with elongated bipolar morphology were also significantly decreased, whereas the proportions of undefined cells increased in LC vs. AC Egfr+/+-Nestin-CreERT2+/−-Ai9+/− E17 cortices (Fig. 2B, E vs. Fig. 2D, G; Fig. 2I and Supplemental Table S1). These results show that partial loss of EGFR function in NPCs reduces the proportion of radially migrating differentiating neurons and increases the proportions of cells with abnormal morphology in the cortical wall, similar to the effects induced by LC availability.
Inhibition of miR-129-5p function in LC cortical NPCs is sufficient to restore neurogenesis
To examine whether inhibiting miR-129-5p function in LC NPCs would restore their self-renewal capacity, we first evaluated incorporation of EdU in NPCs cultured in adequate or LC conditions. NPCs were transfected with either control locked nucleic acid–modified oligonucleotide scrambled inhibitor or miR-129-5p inhibitor (Fig. 3A–D). Consistent with our predictions, inhibiting miR-129-5p function in LC NPCs restores the proportion of EdU+ cells among the transfected NPCs (Fig. 3), confirming our hypothesis that miR-129-5p mediates the effect of LC on NPC self-renewal.
Next, we sought to determine whether inhibiting miR-129-5p in the developing LC cortex in vivo would restore the genesis of cortical neurons. An miR-129-5p inhibitor or an sc-miR-inh, along with pCAG-EGFP DNA plasmid, was introduced into E14 cortical NPCs by in utero electroporation. We found that EGFR expression levels were increased in EGFP-expressing NPCs transfected with miR-129-5p inhibitor in vivo (Fig. 3E).
Consistent with our previous finding that NPC self-renewal and the production of pyramidal neurons are substantially reduced because of LC supply, we observed fewer EGFP-expressing cells transfected with sc-miR in the CP of LC embryos at E17, as compared to brains from embryos exposed to AC (Fig. 4A vs. Fig. 4B). Inhibiting miR-129-5p in LC NPCs restored the density of EGFP-labeled cells in the CP of LC E17 embryos (Fig. 4C vs. Fig. 4B). Furthermore, most of the EGFP-expressing cells in the ventricular and subventricular zones (VZ and SVZ) of LC cortices lacked expression of Ki67, a proliferative cell marker (Fig. 4E vs. Fig. 4D), suggesting that they had exited the cell cycle, whereas EGFP-expressing NPCs transfected with miR-129-5p inhibitor in LC cortices coexpressed Ki67 (Fig. 4F vs. Fig. 4E), suggesting that their self-renewal properties are restored. Consistent with our previous observations (see Fig. 2) (11), many EGFP-expressing cells in the CP of LC embryos exhibit small cell body size and do not possess characteristic bipolar morphology observed in AC cortices (Fig. 4H vs. Fig. 4G, arrowheads). On the contrary, when miR-129-5p inhibitor is introduced into cortical NPCs of LC embryos, differentiating neurons exhibiting typical bipolar morphology are observed among EGFP-expressing cells (Fig. 4I vs. Fig. 4H, arrowheads). The distribution of EGFP-labeled cells in the CP of LC embryos transfected with sc-miR-inh, showing reduced proportions of cells observed at midlevels of the cortical wall [SVZ and intermediate zone (IZ)], suggest that newly born, migrating neurons are reduced in LC brains (Fig. 4K, L; also see Supplemental Fig. S1B). Expression of miR-129-5p inhibitor in LC NPCs partially restores the distribution of EGFP-labeled cells in the cortical wall, with larger proportions of EGFP-expressing cells now observed in the IZ compared with LC cortices transfected with sc-miR-inh (Fig. 4K; also see Supplemental Fig. S1B). In contrast, when miR-129-5p is misexpressed in cortical NPCs, EGFP-labeled cells localize primarily to the IZ (Supplemental Fig. S2), suggesting that sustained maintenance of miR-129-5p expression in differentiating neurons prevents their proper placement in the cortical wall. These data demonstrate that inhibition of miR-129-5p function in LC NPCs restores their self-renewal and differentiation capacity, evidenced by an increase in EGFP-labeled cells expressing proliferative marker Ki67 in the VZ, and an increase in migration of cells located in the SVZ/IZ into the CP.
Choline-mediated changes in methylation potential regulate expression of miR-129-5p in NPCs
One of the important functions of choline is to serve as a methyl-group donor used for the synthesis of AdoMet (1). AdoMet concentrations are diminished, and S-adenosylhomocysteine (AdoHcy) concentrations are increased in animals consuming LC diets (33, 34); the ratio of these 2 metabolites determines the rate of methylation reactions (35, 36). Therefore, we assayed AdoMet and AdoHcy concentrations in AC and LC E17 brains. We find that AdoMet concentrations and the AdoMet:AdoHcy ratio were significantly diminished in LC embryonic brains (Fig. 5A). To investigate whether increasing AdoMet availability can restore miR-129-5p expression in LC NPCs, we examined the expression of mature miR-129-5p in LC NPCs treated with AdoMet. We found that the addition of exogenous AdoMet to LC cultured NPCs reduced miR-129-5p expression levels (Fig. 5B).
Choline is a potent modifier of epigenetic marks (33), and we asked whether epigenetic marks previously reported to regulate miR-129-5p expression in cancer cells are changed by choline availability in NPCs. Luan et al. (37) previously reported that miR-129-5p expression is modulated by a promoter histone 3 modification (H3K27me3). We did not find choline-induced alterations in global H3K27me3 in NPCs (Supplemental Fig. S3A, B). In gastric cancer cells, expression of miR-129-5p is controlled by DNA methylation at a specific CpG island located upstream of miR-129-5p transcriptional start site (38). However, we detected no changes in the methylation status of this CpG island in cultured cortical NPCs in response to choline availability (Supplemental Fig. S3C). Thus, we concluded that the 2 known epigenetic marks that regulate miR-129-5p expression are not differentially methylated in brain NPCs.
Based on our findings, we propose a model whereby LC availability during gestation lowers methylation potential in the developing brain, leading to up-regulation of miR-129-5p expression in cortical NPCs (Fig. 6). As a consequence, synthesis of full-length EGFR protein is inhibited by miR-129-5p, disrupting NPC self-renewal capacity and production of pyramidal neurons in the developing cerebral cortex.
DISCUSSION
For the first time to our knowledge, we have identified the molecular links that explain how a change in the availability of the dietary nutrient choline can modify important developmental processes in the brain. Specifically, we demonstrate that, in LC conditions, methylation potential (the AdoMet:AdoHcy ratio) is reduced in embryonic mouse brains and that this effect is associated with increased expression of miR-129-5p, whose role in the developing brain has not been examined. When miR-129-5p expression in NPCs increases, the synthesis of EGFR is blocked, disrupting neurogenesis.
The role of miR-129-5p in the regulation of brain development, or as an effector of nutrient status, has not been reported. Expression of miR-129-5p is enriched in the developing brain, and in neurons, specifically (39–41), where its known targets are fragile X mental retardation 1 and voltage-gated potassium channel Kv1.1 (42), suggesting an important role for miR-129-5p in the maintenance of neuronal function and homeostasis. In the proliferating progenitor cells of the developing retina (RPCs), however, miR-129-5p is known to inhibit the synthesis of transcription factors necessary for the acquisition of RPC competence to generate late born retinal cell types (43). The capacity of miR-129-5p to block cell cycle progression, in a manner similar to what we observed in NPCs (Figs. 1, 3, and 4), is consistent with its role in inhibiting cycle-dependent kinase 6 in lung cancer cells, as well as its role in inhibiting the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma cells through targeting p21-activated kinase 5 (44). Thus, the diverse functions of miR-129-5p and the selection of its targets appear to depend on the cellular context. Further investigation into whether miR-129-5p expression is modulated by nutrient status in tissues other than the developing brain is necessary. In addition to regulating mRNA stability (45), miR-129-5p is reported to function through inhibiting protein synthesis of its select known targets (42–44, 46), consistent with our findings that it is involved in post-transcriptional regulation of EGFR synthesis downstream of choline.
To date, the role of EGFR loss of function in the developing brain in vivo has been characterized primarily on a gross-morphologic level or in culture. Frontal brain regions, such as prefrontal cortex and olfactory bulbs, degenerate in Egfr congenic knockout and brain-specific knockout animals shortly after birth, whereas EGF-dependent proliferation of NPCs in vitro is diminished by the loss of Egfr (47–50). Similarly, loss of EGFR function in the developing retina leads to premature depletion of mitotic RPCs (51). In contrast, EGFR gain of function in cortical NPCs, as well as in RPCs, promotes neuronal migration and acquisition of glial cell fate (12, 13, 52). We extended these findings by demonstrating that partial loss of EGFR function in cortical NPCs in vivo results in aberrant neurogenesis. Specifically, NPC self-renewal and generation of radially migrating cortical neurons in Egfr f/+-Nestin-CreERT2+/−-Ai9+/− embryos were compromised, whereas the proportions of tangentially migrating cells and cells with aberrant, round morphology, increased (Fig. 2I). Although we detected discrepancies between the effects of partial loss of EGFR function in NPCs vs. low availability of choline in the maternal diet on the proportions of radially and tangentially migrating cells and cells with aberrant, undefined morphology, these may be attributable to possible differential requirements for choline and EGFR signaling in migrating neurons, as well as in cortical NPCs vs. NPCs giving rise to interneurons. Expression levels of known EGFR ligands do not change in LC brains, whereas increasing concentrations of these ligands do not restore LC NPC self-renewal, suggesting that the receptor itself is the limiting factor in LC-induced defects in cortical neurogenesis (11).
Two isoforms of Egfr are present in the mouse: full-length isoform 1, and a truncated isoform 2, which lacks an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain (53). In this study, we found 4 miR-129-5p binding sites in a 3′ UTR specific to the full-length isoform 1 of Egfr (Fig. 1). In addition, down-regulation of EGFR protein induced by LC availability to NPCs disrupts the EGFR downstream signaling cascade (11), which relies on a functional tyrosine kinase domain. Moreover, we previously demonstrated that an miR-resistant form of full-length EGFR, EGFR-EGFP fusion protein lacking Egfr isoform 1 3′ UTR, is sufficient to restore the self-renewal capacity of LC NPCs (11), further supporting our conclusions that low availability of choline leads to post-transcriptional inhibition of EGFR synthesis through its 3′ UTR. Thus, our results represent the first evidence of sensitivity of EGFR protein synthesis to nutrient availability and to miR-129-5p-mediated inhibition, as well as the requirement for adequate EGFR protein levels to maintain cortical NPC self-renewal and differentiation capacity.
The long-term consequences of LC availability during pregnancy for neuronal differentiation and function remain unclear. We found that the morphologies of differentiating cortical pyramidal neurons are abnormal under LC conditions (Fig. 4). Low choline intake during pregnancy is associated with lower scores on visual memory tests in children (8). Studies addressing the role of choline in neuronal maturation and physiology are needed to understand how cognitive function may be affected by choline supply during development.
Finally, we showed that restoring AdoMet and methylation potential in NPCs prevents choline-mediated increase in miR-129-5p expression (Fig. 5). This finding strongly suggests that the effects of choline in NPCs are mediated through its role as a methyl donor and not via its role in phospholipid synthesis. Loss of histone methylation because of reduced methylation potential caused by LC availability is a plausible mechanism whereby expression of miR-129-5p could be increased in LC NPCs. In breast cancer cells, expression of mir-129-5p is regulated through the establishment of histone marks. Specifically, enhancer of zeste homolog-2 mediates the trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3 (H3K27me3) in the promoter region of the miR-129-5p, leading to down-regulation of its expression (37). AdoMet levels constitute a limiting factor affecting the extent of histone methylation (54). However, we did not find methylation changes in global H3K27me3 in NPCs with LC availability (Supplemental Fig. S3). Loss of DNA methylation is also a plausible mechanism whereby expression of miR-129-5p could be increased in LC NPCs. Such a mechanism was reported for the regulation of miR-129-5p expression in gastric cancer cell lines (38). However, we found that methylation changes in the CpG islands reported to control miR-129-5p expression in cancer cells were not observed in LC NPCs. Methyltransferases are essential in epigenetic control, lipid biosynthesis, protein repair, hormone inactivation, and tissue differentiation; there are at least 208 proteins in the human genome that are identified as known or putative methyltransferases (55). More research is needed to identify which of these methyltransferases mediates the effects of choline-mediated changes in methylation potential on miR-129-5p expression.
Our results demonstrate that in response to the low availability of choline and because of the accompanying reduction in the methylation potential in the developing brain, miR-129-5p expression is increased in cortical NPCs. This process then inhibits the formation of the EGF receptor, thereby perturbing the EGF-mediated signaling that controls NPC proliferation and differentiation (Fig. 6).
The molecular mechanisms we identified are of significance to human health. There is a wide variation in choline intake in the diet; in several human cohorts choline intake varies by ∼3-fold. The U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2009–2012) data showed that only 11% of adult Americans achieve the adequate intake levels of choline, with mean intake being 300 mg/d (10th percentile being 200 mg/d; 90th percentile being 500 mg/d) (56). Only 7% of women in the developed countries, and even fewer in the developing countries, achieve the recommended levels of choline intake (1, 8, 57–60). Moreover, almost half of women in North Carolina (USA) who could become pregnant had single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the gene phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase, encoding an essential enzyme in the production of phosphatidylcholine in the liver (phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase), making these women sensitive to low dietary choline during pregnancy because they lacked the estrogen upregulation of phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase gene expression that is needed to meet the choline-demands of the growing fetus (61, 62). We demonstrated that reduction in choline supply during pregnancy leads to abnormalities in the cellular architecture of the developing cerebral cortex, potentially leading to cognitive deficits. Given that many women eat diets marginal in choline content during pregnancy, it is possible that what we call normal cognitive function in children is not optimal cognitive function.
Supplementary Material
This article includes supplemental data. Please visit http://www.fasebj.org to obtain this information.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Dr. Praveen Sethupathy (Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA) for providing support in the use of miR analysis tools; Dr. Eva Anton (UNC Neuroscience Center, Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA) and Dr. David Horita (Nutrition Research Institute) for critically evaluating the manuscript; Dr. Jiami Guo (UNC Neuroscience Center) for providing assistance with in utero electroporations; Dr. Ying Wang (Nutrition Research Institute) for help with metabolites assessment; Dr. Steve Oreña (Nutrition Research Institute) for providing FACS services; Dr. Daniel Lupu (Nutrition Research Institute) for help with pyrosequencing; and Dr. Eneda Pjetri (Nutrition Research Institute) for help with statistical analyses. The study was supported by U.S. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grants DK056350 and DK115380 (to S.H.Z.). Dr. Zeisel has received research funding for other studies from Balchem (New Hampton NY, USA), a manufacturer of choline. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Glossary
- AC
adequate choline
- AdoHcy
S-adenosylhomocysteine
- AdoMet
S-adenosylmethionine
- CFP
cyan fluorescent protein
- CP
cortical plate
- ED
embryonic day
- EdU
5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine
- EGFP
enhanced green fluorescent protein
- EGFR
epidermal growth factor receptor
- FACS
fluorescence activated cell sorting
- H3K27me3
promoter histone 3 modification
- IZ
intermediate zone
- LC
low choline
- miR
microRNA
- NPC
neural progenitor cell
- sc-miR
scrambled miR
- sc-miR-inh
scrambled miR inhibitor
- SVZ
subventricular zone
- TM
tamoxifen
- VZ
ventricular zone
Footnotes
This article includes supplemental data. Please visit http://www.fasebj.org to obtain this information.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
I. Trujillo-Gonzalez performed experiments, interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript; Y. Wang performed experiments; W. B. Friday performed experiments; K. C. Vickers and C. L. Toth performed experiments; L. Molina-Torres performed experiments; and N. Surzenko and S.H. Zeisel conceived the study, interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.Zeisel S. H. (2006) Choline: critical role during fetal development and dietary requirements in adults. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 26, 229–250 10.1146/annurev.nutr.26.061505.111156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tayebati S. K., Marucci G., Santinelli C., Buccioni M., Amenta F. (2015) Choline-containing phospholipids: structure-activity relationships versus therapeutic applications. Curr. Med. Chem. 22, 4328–4340 10.2174/0929867322666151029104152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Meck W. H., Williams C. L. (2003) Metabolic imprinting of choline by its availability during gestation: implications for memory and attentional processing across the lifespan. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 27, 385–399 10.1016/S0149-7634(03)00069-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Meck W. H., Williams C. L. (1997) Perinatal choline supplementation increases the threshold for chunking in spatial memory. Neuroreport 8, 3053–3059 10.1097/00001756-199709290-00010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Meck W. H., Smith R. A., Williams C. L. (1988) Pre- and postnatal choline supplementation produces long-term facilitation of spatial memory. Dev. Psychobiol. 21, 339–353 10.1002/dev.420210405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Meck W. H., Williams C. L., Cermak J. M., Blusztajn J. K. (2008) Developmental periods of choline sensitivity provide an ontogenetic mechanism for regulating memory capacity and age-related dementia. Front. Integr. Nuerosci. 1, 7 10.3389/neuro.07.007.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mellott T. J., Williams C. L., Meck W. H., Blusztajn J. K. (2004) Prenatal choline supplementation advances hippocampal development and enhances MAPK and CREB activation. FASEB J. 18, 545–547 10.1096/fj.03-0877fje [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Boeke C. E., Gillman M. W., Hughes M. D., Rifas-Shiman S. L., Villamor E., Oken E. (2013) Choline intake during pregnancy and child cognition at age 7 years. Am. J. Epidemiol. 177, 1338–1347 10.1093/aje/kws395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shaw G. M., Carmichael S. L., Yang W., Selvin S., Schaffer D. M. (2004) Periconceptional dietary intake of choline and betaine and neural tube defects in offspring. Am. J. Epidemiol. 160, 102–109 10.1093/aje/kwh187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Craciunescu C. N., Albright C. D., Mar M. H., Song J., Zeisel S. H. (2003) Choline availability during embryonic development alters progenitor cell mitosis in developing mouse hippocampus. J. Nutr. 133, 3614–3618 10.1093/jn/133.11.3614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang Y., Surzenko N., Friday W. B., Zeisel S. H. (2016) Maternal dietary intake of choline in mice regulates development of the cerebral cortex in the offspring. FASEB J. 30, 1566–1578 10.1096/fj.15-282426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Caric D., Raphael H., Viti J., Feathers A., Wancio D., Lillien L. (2001) EGFRs mediate chemotactic migration in the developing telencephalon. Development 128, 4203–4216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Burrows R. C., Wancio D., Levitt P., Lillien L. (1997) Response diversity and the timing of progenitor cell maturation are regulated by developmental changes in EGFR expression in the cortex. Neuron 19, 251–267 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80937-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ferri R. T., Levitt P. (1995) Regulation of regional differences in the differentiation of cerebral cortical neurons by EGF family-matrix interactions. Development 121, 1151–1160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lillien L., Gulacsi A. (2006) Environmental signals elicit multiple responses in dorsal telencephalic progenitors by threshold-dependent mechanisms. Cereb. Cortex 16(Suppl 1), i74–i81 10.1093/cercor/bhj169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang J., Yu R. K. (2013) Interaction of ganglioside GD3 with an EGF receptor sustains the self-renewal ability of mouse neural stem cells in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 19137–19142 10.1073/pnas.1307224110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fabian M. R., Sonenberg N., Filipowicz W. (2010) Regulation of mRNA translation and stability by microRNAs. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79, 351–379 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060308-103103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Iwakawa H. O., Tomari Y. (2015) The functions of MicroRNAs: mRNA decay and translational repression. Trends Cell Biol. 25, 651–665 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bartel D. P. (2004) MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116, 281–297 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Encinas J. M., Vaahtokari A., Enikolopov G. (2006) Fluoxetine targets early progenitor cells in the adult brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8233–8238 10.1073/pnas.0601992103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lee T. C., Threadgill D. W. (2009) Generation and validation of mice carrying a conditional allele of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Genesis 47, 85–92 10.1002/dvg.20464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Madisen L., Zwingman T. A., Sunkin S. M., Oh S. W., Zariwala H. A., Gu H., Ng L. L., Palmiter R. D., Hawrylycz M. J., Jones A. R., Lein E. S., Zeng H. (2010) A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 133–140 10.1038/nn.2467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lagace D. C., Whitman M. C., Noonan M. A., Ables J. L., DeCarolis N. A., Arguello A. A., Donovan M. H., Fischer S. J., Farnbauch L. A., Beech R. D., DiLeone R. J., Greer C. A., Mandyam C. D., Eisch A. J. (2007) Dynamic contribution of nestin-expressing stem cells to adult neurogenesis. J. Neurosci. 27, 12623–12629 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3812-07.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mehedint M. G., Niculescu M. D., Craciunescu C. N., Zeisel S. H. (2010) Choline deficiency alters global histone methylation and epigenetic marking at the Re1 site of the calbindin 1 gene. FASEB J. 24, 184–195 10.1096/fj.09-140145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Scremin O. U., Roch M., Norman K. M., Djazayeri S., Liu Y. Y. (2015) Brain acetylcholine and choline concentrations and dynamics in a murine model of the Fragile X syndrome: age, sex and region-specific changes. Neuroscience 301, 520–528 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.06.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yokota Y., Ring C., Cheung R., Pevny L., Anton E. S. (2007) Nap1-regulated neuronal cytoskeletal dynamics is essential for the final differentiation of neurons in cerebral cortex. Neuron 54, 429–445 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yokota Y., Kim W. Y., Chen Y., Wang X., Stanco A., Komuro Y., Snider W., Anton E. S. (2009) The adenomatous polyposis coli protein is an essential regulator of radial glial polarity and construction of the cerebral cortex. Neuron 61, 42–56 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gstrein T., Edwards A., Přistoupilová A., Leca I., Breuss M., Pilat-Carotta S., Hansen A. H., Tripathy R., Traunbauer A. K., Hochstoeger T., Rosoklija G., Repic M., Landler L., Stránecký V., Dürnberger G., Keane T. M., Zuber J., Adams D. J., Flint J., Honzik T., Gut M., Beltran S., Mechtler K., Sherr E., Kmoch S., Gut I., Keays D. A. (2018) Mutations in Vps15 perturb neuronal migration in mice and are associated with neurodevelopmental disease in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 207–217; erratum: 1139 10.1038/s41593-017-0053-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lanaya H., Natarajan A., Komposch K., Li L., Amberg N., Chen L., Wculek S. K., Hammer M., Zenz R., Peck-Radosavljevic M., Sieghart W., Trauner M., Wang H., Sibilia M. (2014) EGFR has a tumour-promoting role in liver macrophages during hepatocellular carcinoma formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 972–977 10.1038/ncb3031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Molloy A. M., Weir D. G., Kennedy G., Kennedy S., Scott J. M. (1990) A new high performance liquid chromatographic method for the simultaneous measurement of S-adenosylmethionine and S-adenosylhomocysteine: concentrations in pig tissues after inactivation of methionine synthase by nitrous oxide. Biomed. Chromatogr. 4, 257–260 10.1002/bmc.1130040611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.John B., Enright A. J., Aravin A., Tuschl T., Sander C., Marks D. S. (2004) Human MicroRNA targets. PLoS Biol. 2, e363; erratum: 3, e264 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lewis B. P., Shih I. H., Jones-Rhoades M. W., Bartel D. P., Burge C. B. (2003) Prediction of mammalian microRNA targets. Cell 115, 787–798 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01018-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zeisel S. (2017) Choline, other methyl-donors and epigenetics. Nutrients 9, 445 10.3390/nu9050445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Davison J. M., Mellott T. J., Kovacheva V. P., Blusztajn J. K. (2009) Gestational choline supply regulates methylation of histone H3, expression of histone methyltransferases G9a (Kmt1c) and Suv39h1 (Kmt1a), and DNA methylation of their genes in rat fetal liver and brain. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 1982–1989 10.1074/jbc.M807651200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tehlivets O., Malanovic N., Visram M., Pavkov-Keller T., Keller W. (2013) S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine hydrolase and methylation disorders: yeast as a model system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1832, 204–215 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.09.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lupu D. S., Orozco L. D., Wang Y., Cullen J. M., Pellegrini M., Zeisel S. H. (2017) Altered methylation of specific DNA loci in the liver of Bhmt-null mice results in repression of Iqgap2 and F2rl2 and is associated with development of preneoplastic foci. FASEB J. 31, 2090–2103 10.1096/fj.201601169R [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Luan Q. X., Zhang B. G., Li X. J., Guo M. Y. (2016) MiR-129-5p is downregulated in breast cancer cells partly due to promoter H3K27m3 modification and regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and multi-drug resistance. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 20, 4257–4265 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wu Q., Yang Z., Xia L., Nie Y., Wu K., Shi Y., Fan D. (2014) Methylation of miR-129-5p CpG island modulates multi-drug resistance in gastric cancer by targeting ABC transporters. Oncotarget 5, 11552–11563 10.18632/oncotarget.2594 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lagos-Quintana M., Rauhut R., Yalcin A., Meyer J., Lendeckel W., Tuschl T. (2002) Identification of tissue-specific microRNAs from mouse. Curr. Biol. 12, 735–739 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00809-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gebhardt M. L., Reuter S., Mrowka R., Andrade-Navarro M. A. (2014) Similarity in targets with REST points to neural and glioblastoma related miRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 5436–5446 10.1093/nar/gku231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Miska E. A., Alvarez-Saavedra E., Townsend M., Yoshii A., Sestan N., Rakic P., Constantine-Paton M., Horvitz H. R. (2004) Microarray analysis of microRNA expression in the developing mammalian brain. Genome Biol. 5, R68 10.1186/gb-2004-5-9-r68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sosanya N. M., Huang P. P., Cacheaux L. P., Chen C. J., Nguyen K., Perrone-Bizzozero N. I., Raab-Graham K. F. (2013) Degradation of high affinity HuD targets releases Kv1.1 mRNA from miR-129 repression by mTORC1. J. Cell Biol. 202, 53–69 10.1083/jcb.201212089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Decembrini S., Bressan D., Vignali R., Pitto L., Mariotti S., Rainaldi G., Wang X., Evangelista M., Barsacchi G., Cremisi F. (2009) MicroRNAs couple cell fate and developmental timing in retina. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 21179–21184 10.1073/pnas.0909167106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wu J., Qian J., Li C., Kwok L., Cheng F., Liu P., Perdomo C., Kotton D., Vaziri C., Anderlind C., Spira A., Cardoso W. V., Lü J. (2010) miR-129 regulates cell proliferation by downregulating Cdk6 expression. Cell Cycle 9, 1809–1818 10.4161/cc.9.9.11535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zongaro S., Hukema R., D’Antoni S., Davidovic L., Barbry P., Catania M. V., Willemsen R., Mari B., Bardoni B. (2013) The 3′ UTR of FMR1 mRNA is a target of miR-101, miR-129-5p and miR-221: implications for the molecular pathology of FXTAS at the synapse. Hum. Mol. Genet. 22, 1971–1982 10.1093/hmg/ddt044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cremisi F. (2013) MicroRNAs and cell fate in cortical and retinal development. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 7, 141 10.3389/fncel.2013.00141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tropepe V., Sibilia M., Ciruna B. G., Rossant J., Wagner E. F., van der Kooy D. (1999) Distinct neural stem cells proliferate in response to EGF and FGF in the developing mouse telencephalon. Dev. Biol. 208, 166–188 10.1006/dbio.1998.9192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wagner B., Natarajan A., Grünaug S., Kroismayr R., Wagner E. F., Sibilia M. (2006) Neuronal survival depends on EGFR signaling in cortical but not midbrain astrocytes. EMBO J. 25, 752–762 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Threadgill D. W., Dlugosz A. A., Hansen L. A., Tennenbaum T., Lichti U., Yee D., LaMantia C., Mourton T., Herrup K., Harris R. C., Barnard J. A., Yuspa S. H., Coffey R. J., Magnuson T. (1995) Targeted disruption of mouse EGF receptor: effect of genetic background on mutant phenotype. Science 269, 230–234 10.1126/science.7618084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sinor-Anderson A., Lillien L. (2011) Akt1 interacts with epidermal growth factor receptors and hedgehog signaling to increase stem/transit amplifying cells in the embryonic mouse cortex. Dev. Neurobiol. 71, 759–771 10.1002/dneu.20878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Close J. L., Liu J., Gumuscu B., Reh T. A. (2006) Epidermal growth factor receptor expression regulates proliferation in the postnatal rat retina. Glia 54, 94–104 10.1002/glia.20361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lillien L., Wancio D. (1998) Changes in epidermal growth factor receptor expression and competence to generate glia regulate timing and choice of differentiation in the retina. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 10, 296–308 10.1006/mcne.1997.0659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Reiter J. L., Threadgill D. W., Eley G. D., Strunk K. E., Danielsen A. J., Sinclair C. S., Pearsall R. S., Green P. J., Yee D., Lampland A. L., Balasubramaniam S., Crossley T. D., Magnuson T. R., James C. D., Maihle N. J. (2001) Comparative genomic sequence analysis and isolation of human and mouse alternative EGFR transcripts encoding truncated receptor isoforms. Genomics 71, 1–20 10.1006/geno.2000.6341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Shyh-Chang N., Locasale J. W., Lyssiotis C. A., Zheng Y., Teo R. Y., Ratanasirintrawoot S., Zhang J., Onder T., Unternaehrer J. J., Zhu H., Asara J. M., Daley G. Q., Cantley L. C. (2013) Influence of threonine metabolism on S-adenosylmethionine and histone methylation. Science 339, 222–226 10.1126/science.1226603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Petrossian T. C., Clarke S. G. (2011) Uncovering the human methyltransferasome. Mol Cell Proteomics 10, M110.000976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wallace T. C., Fulgoni V. L., III (2016) Assessment of total choline intakes in the United States. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 35, 108–112 10.1080/07315724.2015.1080127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wallace T. C., McBurney M., Fulgoni V. L., III (2014) Multivitamin/mineral supplement contribution to micronutrient intakes in the United States, 2007-2010. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 33, 94–102 10.1080/07315724.2013.846806 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Shaw G. M., Carmichael S. L., Laurent C., Rasmussen S. A. (2006) Maternal nutrient intakes and risk of orofacial clefts. Epidemiology 17, 285–291 10.1097/01.ede.0000208348.30012.35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gossell-Williams M., Fletcher H., McFarlane-Anderson N., Jacob A., Patel J., Zeisel S. (2005) Dietary intake of choline and plasma choline concentrations in pregnant women in Jamaica. West Indian Med. J. 54, 355–359 10.1590/S0043-31442005000600002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Dominguez-Salas P., Moore S. E., Cole D., da Costa K. A., Cox S. E., Dyer R. A., Fulford A. J., Innis S. M., Waterland R. A., Zeisel S. H., Prentice A. M., Hennig B. J. (2013) DNA methylation potential: dietary intake and blood concentrations of one-carbon metabolites and cofactors in rural African women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 97, 1217–1227 10.3945/ajcn.112.048462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Fischer L. M., daCosta K. A., Kwock L., Stewart P. W., Lu T.-S., Stabler S. P., Allen R. H., Zeisel S. H. (2007) Sex and menopausal status influence human dietary requirements for the nutrient choline. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 85, 1275–1285 10.1093/ajcn/85.5.1275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Resseguie M. E., da Costa K. A., Galanko J. A., Patel M., Davis I. J., Zeisel S. H. (2011) Aberrant estrogen regulation of PEMT results in choline deficiency-associated liver dysfunction. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 1649–1658 10.1074/jbc.M110.106922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.