Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0213255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213255

Normative range of blood biochemical parameters in urban Indian school-going adolescents

Khushdeep Bandesh 1,2,#, Punam Jha 1,2,#, Anil K Giri 1,2, Raman K Marwaha 3; INDICO, Vinod Scaria 2,4,*, Nikhil Tandon 5,*, Dwaipayan Bharadwaj 1,2,6,*
Editor: Domenico Tricò7
PMCID: PMC6405124  PMID: 30845211

Abstract

Adolescence is the most critical phase of human growth that radically alters physiology of the body and wherein any inconsistency can lead to serious health consequences in adulthood. The timing and pace at which various developmental events occur during adolescence is highly diverse and thus results in a drastic change in blood biochemistry. Monitoring the physiological levels of various biochemical measures in ample number of individuals during adolescence can call up for an early intervention in managing metabolic diseases in adulthood. Today, only a couple of studies in different populations have investigated blood biochemistry in a small number of adolescents however, there is no comprehensive biochemical data available worldwide. In view, we performed a cross-sectional study in a sizeable group of 7,618 Indian adolescents (3,333 boys and 4,285 girls) aged between 11–17 years to inspect the distribution of values of common biochemical parameters that generally prevails during adolescence and we observed that various parameters considerably follow the reported values from different populations being 3.56–6.49mmol/L (fasting glucose), 10.60–199.48pmol/L (insulin), 0.21–3.22nmol/L (C–peptide), 3.85–6.25% (HbA1c), 2.49–5.54mmol/L (total cholesterol), 1.16–3.69mmol/L (LDL), 0.78–1.85mmol/L (HDL), 0.33–2.24mmol/L (triglycerides), 3.56–11.45mmol/L (urea), 130.01–440.15μmol/L (uric acid) and 22.99–74.28μmol/L (creatinine). Barring LDL and triglycerides, all parameters differed significantly between boys and girls (p< 0.001). Highest difference was seen for uric acid (p = 1.3 x10-187) followed by C–peptide (p = 6.6 x10-89). Across all ages during adolescence, glycemic and nitrogen metabolites parameters varied markedly with gender. Amongst lipid parameters, only HDL levels were found to be significantly associated with gender following puberty (p< 0.001). All parameters except urea, differed considerably in obese and lean adolescents (p< 0.0001). The present study asserts that age, sex and BMI are the essential contributors to variability in blood biochemistry during adolescence. Our composite data on common blood biochemical measures will benefit future endeavors to define reference intervals in adolescents especially when the global availability is scarce.

Introduction

Blood tests are routinely prescribed in healthcare systems to analyze the biochemistry to determine a diseased or a healthy state. A panel of blood tests commonly measures metabolic parameters–glycemic (glucose, insulin), lipids (total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, triglycerides), nitrogen metabolites (urea, creatinine, uric acid); important electrolytes (Na+, K+, Cl-, HCO3-) and crucial enzymes (liver aminotransferases and phosphatases, etc.) [1]. These biochemical parameters vary considerably depending upon an individual's age, sex, ethnicity, dietary intake or physiological state of the body [28].

Age is a major factor that contributes to variation in blood biochemistry [9]. Ageing is a continuous dynamic process that leads to physiological, psychological and behavioral changes resulting in biological aberrations, metabolic dysfunction, cellular senescence or decline in function of organ systems [10, 11]. Amongst various life stages–infancy, childhood, adolescence, adulthood and old age, adolescence is the critical one. It marks the period of transition from childhood to adulthood and is characterized by rapid biological, social and emotional changes [12] that severely impacts future health. This transition is largely governed by gender of an individual that gives rise to difference in hormonal levels among boys and girls at puberty [13]. On account of these multiple significant physiological changes, biochemical parameters tend to vary drastically. Administering the variability of these parameters during adolescence can layoff allied metabolic diseases in adulthood. Currently, a large body of studies have examined variability in blood biochemistry in children in different populations, however only a few inspected adolescents. In view, we analyzed physiological levels of common biochemical parameters in blood (glucose, insulin, C–peptide, HbA1c, total cholesterol {TC}, LDL, HDL, triglycerides, urea, creatinine and uric acid) and studied their variation with Body Mass Index (BMI) in several adolescents (N = 7,618), a number that has never been studied previously. The samples were collected as a part of another ongoing project beyond the intentions to define reference intervals. Therefore, we conveniently aimed to look at the mere dispersion of values of different parameters that normally exists during adolescence.

The physiological changes during adolescence always occur in a universal order however, their timing and pace vary depending upon environmental influences (e.g. food habits, lifestyle, and cultural systems) [1417]. Today, several populations worldwide have encountered rapid urbanization swiftly changing the lifestyle of its people and hence predisposing them to several complex diseases. These changes together with the genetic makeup determine population specific normal range of values for common biochemical parameters. One such population that exhibits huge diversity on grounds of both genetic and lifestyle ways is Indians. Indians amounting to one-sixth of world's total population [18], comprise several endogamous groups that are genetically distinct and highly diverse in terms of dietary intake and ways of living [19]. Indian diets are typically carbohydrate rich compared to the dietary patterns favored in rest of the world [20, 21], and indeed pose Indians at a high risk for metabolic diseases [2124]. Therefore, we exclusively studied Indians at a younger age to institute an early intervention and management of highly prevalent metabolic diseases in the adult population.

Materials and methods

The study was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and approved by Human Ethics Committee of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India and CSIR–Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India. A written informed consent was obtained from parents/guardians of each participant followed by a verbal consent from participants themselves.

Study population

We conducted the study at CSIR–Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India. A total of 7,618 adolescents (3,333 boys and 4,285 girls) aged between 11–17 years were enrolled from various schools located in urban areas of Delhi–National Capital Region as a part of a study on childhood obesity conducted previously in our laboratory [25]. Average age in total sample group was observed to 13.73 years (± 1.80 years), 13.68 ±1.78 years in boys and 13.77 ±1.77 years in girls. Residing in north part of Indian subcontinent, all participants comprised Indo–European ethnicity and were selected through a pre–designed questionnaire assessing their age, dietary habits, state of birth, parent's state of origin and, past and present medical history. Participants who suffered from any chronic ailments, under medication, history of hospitalization in last six months and self–denial for blood withdrawal were excluded from the study.

The samples were categorized as Obese (OB), Overweight (OW) and Lean or Normal weight (NW) by calculating BMI z-scores and inspecting the previously established BMI percentiles for specific age and sex in children during adolescence (CDC Growth Charts) [26, 27]. BMI at or above 95th percentile at same age and sex was counted as Obese [26]. BMI below 95th percentile but at or above 85th percentile was considered Overweight and BMI in-between 85th percentile and 5th percentile was defined as Lean [26].

Sample collection and biochemical analysis

Participants were subjected to an overnight fast and their peripheral blood was collected by trained phlebotomists in three different vacutainers–serum separator tubes, sodium fluoride vacuette and potassium EDTA tubes manufactured by Becton Dickinson, New Jersey, USA. Samples were transported to laboratory over ice for processing within 2 hours of collection. Different biochemical parameters were measured using well-recognized robust analyzers–COBAS Integra 400 plus and COBAS e411. Details regarding assay methods for studied clinical parameters have been described previously [28].

Statistical analyses

As mentioned, we wanted to capture the natural spread of values for each parameter during adolescence, so no outliers were deleted. Thus, instead of presenting the mean values that are normally affected by the outliers, we rather looked at the median values and interquartile ranges (2.5 percentile and 97.5 percentile). Mann–Whitney U test was used for comparing difference among different groups that were analyzed. P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. R version 3.4.0 was used for statistical analysis (http://www.R-project.org/). Although there were a small number of tests (11 parameters) that were performed between different groups, the observed differences were further reviewed after applying Bonferroni correction wherein the corrected p value was assumed to be 0.0045 (α/number of comparisons i.e. 0.05/{11}).

Power calculation

The power of the study was calculated using two different tools separately–OpenEpi, an open-source tool for computing epidemiologic statistics for public health [29] and G*Power 3, a robust power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences [30]. Power of a two-sided U test of each parameter was computed at α level of 0.05 and 95% confidence intervals from the respective effect size in boys and girls (i.e. = {difference in group means}/{standard deviation}) (S1 Table).

Results

For nearly all studied biochemical parameters, the power of the study was observed to be 100 percent (97 percent for TC) to detect genuine differences between various groups (S1 Table). For LDL and TG, overall comparison among all adolescent boys and girls lacked sufficient power, however their individual comparisons at specific age groups secured necessary power.

Glycemic parameters are strongly associated with gender and adolescence age

Normative range of plasma glycemic parameters in Indian adolescents was 3.56–6.49mmol/l (fasting glucose), 10.60–199.48pmol/l (insulin), 0.21–3.22nmol/l (C–peptide) and 3.85–6.25% (HbA1c) (Table 1).

Table 1. Normative range of common biochemical parameters in Indian adolescents.

Age group
(years)
11–17 (Total) 11–17 (Boys) 11–17 (Girls) P value
Parameters N Median
(Percentiles 2.5–97.5)
Mean N Median
(Percentiles 2.5–97.5)
Mean N Median
(Percentiles 2.5–97.5)
Mean
FPG (mmol/L) 6977 4.79 (3.56–6.49) 4.80 3087 4.88 (3.61–6.88) 4.91 3890 4.70 (3.52–6.16) 4.72 < 0.0001
Insulin (pmol/L) 5536 57.45 (10.60–199.48) 68.90 2480 52.12 (10.50–199.12) 65.34 3056 61.12 (10.75–198.84) 71.79 < 0.0001
C-peptide (nmol/L) 5084 1.09 (0.21–3.22) 1.26 2189 0.79 (0.19–2.98) 1.03 2895 1.35 (0.25–3.33) 1.43 < 0.0001
HbA1c (%) 3725 5.16 (3.85–6.25) 5.16 1795 5.09 (3.86–6.17) 5.08 1930 5.28 (3.86–6.34) 5.24 < 0.0001
TC
(mmol/L)
6981 3.70 (2.49–5.54) 3.78 3089 3.67 (2.47–5.41) 3.74 3892 3.74 (2.51–5.62) 3.81 0.0001
LDL (mmol/L) 7000 2.15 (1.16–3.69) 2.20 3100 2.14 (1.15–3.63) 2.19 3900 2.16 (1.17–3.72) 2.22 0.10
HDL (mmol/L) 7002 1.19 (0.78–1.85) 1.22 3099 1.17 (0.78–1.81) 1.20 3903 1.20 (0.78–1.88) 1.24 < 0.0001
TG (mmol/L) 6982 0.96 (0.33–2.24) 1.04 3086 0.95 (0.36–2.30) 1.04 3896 0.96 (0.33–2.16) 1.03 0.81
Urea (mmol/L) 4860 6.75 (3.56–11.45) 6.94 2302 7.18 (3.91–11.63) 7.32 2558 6.39 (3.35–11.21) 6.60 < 0.0001
Uric acid (μmol/L) 5064 257.55 (130.01–440.15) 268.51 2419 297.99 (149.83–470.55) 300.27 2645 231.97 (120.74–364.55) 239.45 < 0.0001
Creatinine (μmol/L) 4830 42.44 (22.99–74.28) 44.02 2296 44.21 (25.64–78.36) 46.29 2534 40.67 (22.11–69.85) 41.96 < 0.0001

Values for biochemical parameters have been presented as Median (2.5 percentile and 97.5 percentile). N: sample number; FPG: fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c: glycosylated hemoglobin, TC: total cholesterol, LDL: low–density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL: high–density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG: triglycerides. Mann Whitney U test was used to compare difference for biochemical parameters between boys and girls.

Plasma glucose

Boys consistently showed significantly higher levels of fasting plasma glucose than girls across all ages during adolescence (p ≤ 0.001) (Table 2, S2 Table). Mean value of plasma glucose was observed to be 4.91mmol/L in boys and 4.72mmol/L in girls (p = 6.2 x 10−31) (Table 1). Between subsequent ages, both boys and girls show consistent plasma glucose levels, except for age of 14 years, where plasma glucose levels in boys were observed to decline significantly than other ages during adolescence (Table 2).

Table 2. Variation of glycemic parameters with gender across different ages during adolescence.
Glycemic parameters Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) Fasting insulin (pmol/l) C-peptide (nmol/l) HbA1c (%)
Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls
11 years 4.81 (3.67–5.75) 4.65 (3.58–5.74)*** 50.21 (11.70–170.96) 61.39 (12.61–224.46)*** 0.64 (0.20–2.71) 1.15 (0.25–3.14)*** 4.94 (4.0–6.01) 5.19 (4.05–6.22)***
N 382 473 309 345 293 331 238 208
12 years 4.83 (3.82–5.94) 4.69 (3.60–5.82)*** 50.14 (9.44–189.55) 65.53 (13.36–215.78)*** 0.87 (0.22–2.97) $ $ $ 1.38 (0.21–4.12)***,$ $ $ 5.02 (3.86–6.22) $ 5.49 (4.16–6.40)***,$ $
N 523 635 421 498 387 483 283 314
13 years 4.90 (3.69–6.25) 4.76 (3.58–6.10)*** 49.57 (11.06–158.91) 59.48 (10.18–191.72)***,$ 0.74 (0.21–3.09) 1.37 (0.28–3.25)*** 5.10 (3.59–6.23) 5.34 (3.39–6.44)***
N 590 733 485 607 428 575 360 369
14 years 4.83 (3.44–6.82) $ 4.73 (3.51–6.62)** 52.43 (10.14–181.40) 62.64 (9.47–199.5)*** 0.70 (0.20–3.05) 1.41 (0.33–3.14)*** 5.11 (3.85–6.13) 5.20 (4.0–6.19) $ $
N 579 684 483 523 404 491 310 331
15 years 4.87 (3.49–7.21) 4.6 (3.38–6.70)*** 53.34 (12.26–209.78) 61.60 (9.69–186) 0.82 (0.17–3.20) 1.31 (0.30–3.50)*** 5.14 (4.22–6.22) 5.27 (4.00–6.31)*
N 430 564 346 453 285 426 260 287
16 years 4.85 (3.56–7.35) 4.70 (3.41–7.33)*** 60.14 (10.17–203.13) 61.05 (9.00–188.42) 0.82 (0.11–2.75) 1.32 (0.26–3.03)*** 5.17 (4.11–5.90) 5.21 (3.94–6.17)*
N 359 481 279 386 251 361 217 244
17 years 4.78 (3.62–7.24) 4.62 (3.51–6.26)** 53.62 (7.53–245.92) 53.98 (11.13–200.54) $ $ 1.04 (0.22–3.55) $ $ 1.43 (0.27–2.94)* 5.16 (4.20–6.20) 5.15 (3.4–6.17)
N 224 320 157 244 141 228 127 177

Values for biochemical parameters have been presented as Median (2.5 percentile and 97.5 percentile). N: sample number. Mann Whitney U test was used to compare difference in glycemic parameters between boys and girls of same age group and also for calculating difference between different age groups of boys and girls separately.

*p ≤ 0.01

**p ≤ 0.001

***p ≤ 10−4 for comparisons between boys and girls.

$p ≤ 0.05

$ $p ≤ 0.01

$ $ $p ≤ 0.001 for comparison within same sex with the adjacent younger age group.

Plasma insulin

Fasting plasma insulin levels were remarkably higher in girls than boys (p = 5.1 x 10−15) (Table 1). This observation prevailed over the ages from 11 years to 14 years (p ≤ 10−4), but at later ages of adolescence both boys and girls featured comparable plasma insulin levels (Table 2). Highest insulin levels were observed to be 65.53pmol/L (median value) at age of 12 years in girls and 60.14pmol/L in boys at age of 16 years (Table 2). Among boys, we noticed that plasma insulin levels change negligibly with age (Table 2, S3 Table). However, in girls, plasma insulin levels change significantly between ages of 12 to 13 years (p = 0.01) and 16 to 17 years (p = 0.008) (Table 2, S4 Table).

C–peptide

Alike plasma insulin, significantly higher levels of C–peptide were found in girls than boys across different ages in adolescence (p ≤ 10−7{11–16 years}, p = 0.046 {16–17 years}) (Table 2). Mean C–peptide levels were 1.43nmol/L in girls in contrast to 1.03nmol/L in boys (p = 6.6 x 10−89) (Table 1). Furthermore, C–peptide levels varied significantly between ages of 11–12 years in both genders–boys (p = 4.73 x 10−4) and girls (p = 1.88 x 10−4) (S3 and S4 Tables). Additionally, boys showed markedly different C–peptide levels between 16 and 17 years of age (p = 0.002) (Table 2).

HbA1c

Mean levels of HbA1c were noted to be 5.24% in girls and 5.08% in boys (p = 3.0 x 10−17) (Table 1). With increasing age in adolescence, girls showed unusually higher HbA1c levels than boys (p < 10−5 {11–13 years}, p = 0.01{15–16 years}) (Table 1). Both boys and girls exhibited significantly different HbA1c levels between ages of 11 and 12 years (p = 0.02 and 0.003) (S3 and S4 Tables). Additionally, girls aged 14 years displayed drastically lower HbA1c levels than their younger mates (p = 0.003) (Table 2).

Amongst blood lipids only HDL varies robustly with gender and age throughout adolescence

In Indian adolescents, plasma levels for different lipids were commonly seen in the range of 2.49–5.54mmol/L (TC), 1.16–3.69mmol/L (LDL), 0.78–1.85mmol/L (HDL) and 0.33–2.24mmol/L (triglycerides) (Table 1). Indian girls had significantly higher TC and HDL levels than boys (respective p = 1.3 x 10−4 and 5.3 x 10−11) (Table 1).

Total Cholesterol

Across all ages during adolescence, boys and girls revealed identical plasma TC levels except at age of 14 years, when girls have robustly higher levels than boys (p = 2.44 x 10−4) (Table 3). Barring the age of 14 years in boys, no significant change in levels of plasma TC was observed with increasing age during adolescence within each gender (S3 and S4 Tables).

Table 3. Changes in lipid profile in adolescent boys and girls with age.
Lipid parameters Total cholesterol (mmol/L) LDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) Triglycerides (mmol/L)
Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls
11 years 3.78 (2.48–5.92) 3.74 (2.51–5.40) 2.20 (1.17–3.80) 2.15 (1.24–3.54) 1.19 (0.81–1.78) 1.19 (0.73–1.85) 0.95 (0.34–2.19) 1.05 (0.34–2.36)***
N 386 475 386 476 386 477 377 475
12 years 3.70 (2.51–5.31) 3.73 (2.58–5.57) 2.15 (1.10–3.62) 2.12 (1.16–3.65) 1.19 (0.76–1.92) 1.19 (0.80–1.88) 0.91 (0.30–2.22) 0.98 (0.30–2.29)*,$
N 530 644 532 643 532 645 527 641
13 years 3.67 (2.46–5.23) 3.72 (2.50–5.60) 2.12 (1.15–3.59) 2.12 (1.16–3.56) 1.17 (0.78–1.89) 1.19 (0.78–1.85) 0.94 (0.35–2.19) 0.96 (0.32–2.20)
N 586 731 588 731 588 731 587 729
14 years 3.58 (2.47–5.31) $ 3.70 (2.55–5.39)*** 2.12 (1.21–3.40) 2.13 (1.23–3.68) 1.16 (0.77–1.75) 1.21 (0.78–1.86)*** 0.94 (0.40–2.22) 0.96 (0.34–2.05)
N 577 689 580 689 580 689 580 689
15 years 3.64 (2.37–5.36) 3.76 (2.47–5.44)* 2.14 (1.10–3.54) 2.2 (1.10–3.67) 1.15 (0.78–1.70) 1.22 (0.79–1.80)*** 0.97 (0.44–2.35) $ 0.92 (0.30–2.11)**
N 427 559 428 565 429 565 430 565
16 years 3.69 (2.62–5.44) 3.78 (2.49–5.93) 2.18 (1.22–3.84) 2.19 (1.15–4.23) 1.14 (0.78–1.72) 1.22 (0.79–1.94)*** 1.03 (0.41–2.39) 0.95 (0.37–2.12)**
N 360 475 362 477 362 478 361 478
17 years 3.71 (2.46–5.85) 3.76 (2.59–5.78) 2.18 (1.22–4.15) 2.23 (1.22–3.73) 1.14 (0.75–1.74) 1.24 (0.86–1.97)*** 0.97 (0.32–2.67) 0.90 (0.32–1.98)**
N 223 319 224 319 222 318 224 319

Values for biochemical parameters have been presented as Median (2.5 percentile and 97.5 percentile). N: sample number. Mann Whitney U test was used to compare difference in glycemic parameters between boys and girls of same age group and also for calculating difference between different age groups of boys and girls separately.

*p ≤ 0.01

**p ≤ 0.001

***p ≤ 10−4 for comparisons between boys and girls.

$p ≤ 0.05 for comparison within same sex with the adjacent younger age group.

LDL

Like TC, LDL levels were similar in boys and girls across different adolescence ages (Table 3). Besides, no difference was seen with increasing age in either gender (Table 3).

HDL

Indian boys and girls portrayed significantly distinct HDL levels from ages 14 years to 17 years (p < 0.001) (Table 3), with girls having higher HDL levels than boys. HDL levels were found to be constant over adolescence period in both the genders (Table 3, S3 and S4 Tables).

Triglycerides

Girls showed robustly higher triglyceride levels than boys at ages 11 and 12 years (p = 8.5 x 10−4 and p = 0.01), but unexpectedly lower triglyceride levels at ages 15, 16 and 17 years (p < 0.01) (Table 3, S2 Table). Within boys, triglyceride levels varied significantly between 14 and 15 years (Table 3, S3 and S4 Tables), conversely at 11–12 years among girls (Table 3, S3 and S4 Tables).

Nitrogen metabolites show marked difference among adolescent boys and girls

Plasma nitrogen metabolites were observed to be normally in the ranges of 3.56–11.45mmol/L (urea), 130.01–440.15μmol/L (uric acid) and 22.99–74.28μmol/L (creatinine) in Indian adolescents (Table 1). Boys retained strikingly higher levels of all studied nitrogen metabolites than girls (p = 1.0 x 10−39 {urea}; 1.3 x 10−187 {uric acid} and 1.97 x 10−28 {creatinine}).

Urea

Throughout adolescence (11–17 years), girls showed dramatically low levels of plasma urea than boys (p <10−4) (Table 4). Across teenage years, plasma urea levels differed suggestively from ages 11–12 years and 15–16 years in boys (respective p = 0.04, 0.006), however only between ages 15–16 years in girls (p = 0.007) (S3 and S4 Tables).

Table 4. Status of nitrogen metabolites in adolescent boys and girls with age.
Nitrogen metabolites Urea (mmol/L) Uric acid (μmol/L) Creatinine (μmol/L)
Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls
11 years 7.23 (4.27–11.44) 5.93 (3.53–10.43)*** 238.22 (130.26–368.72) 226.92 (115.93–335.99)** 38.02 (23.65–68.53) 36.25 (22.75–57.32)
N 312 312 312 314 311 310
12 years 7.03 (3.69–11.42) $ 6.07 (3.37–10.81)*** 255.17 (139.20–428.64) $ $ $ 239.11 (124.52–364.20)***, $ $ 39.35 (22.13–68.04) $ 38.90 (20.34–66.05) $ $
N 464 412 370 415 362 407
13 years 6.96 (4.17–11.21) 6.39 (3.32–10.83)*** 281.64 (148.45–452.27) $ $ $ 234.95 (120.24–370.29)*** 40.67 (24.14–67.20) $ 39.79 (20.34–66.98) $
N 455 475 464 487 453 471
14 years 7.03 (3.51–11.66) 6.50 (3.54–10.86)*** 310.49 (175.17–470.49) $ $ $ 233.76 (124.76–358.87)*** 45.09 (26.53–79.16) $ $ $ 41.56 (23.87–68.97)***,$
N 421 451 461 472 420 446
15 years 7.17 (3.93–12.21) 6.32 (2.95–11.78)*** 342.90 (204.45–506.99) $ $ $ 229.30 (126.05–373.34)*** 50.40 (29.18–80.46) $ $ $ 43.33 (25.64–74.18)***,$ $
N 321 393 350 414 321 389
16 years 7.68 (4.11–11.82) $ $ 6.78 (3.59–11.56)***,$ $ 334.58 (218.74–500.39) 231.97 (131.15–352.72)*** 54.82 (33.14–79.58) $ $ $ 45.09 (23.59–69.85)***
N 260 310 280 331 260 308
17 years 7.60 (4.53–11.44) 6.60 (3.41–11.31)*** 332.20 (208.08–465.42) 222.46 (113.99–368.15)*** 55.70 (39.08–81.17) 44.21 (23.03–68.08)***
N 169 205 182 212 169 203

Values for biochemical parameters have been presented as Median (2.5 percentile and 97.5 percentile). N: sample number. Mann Whitney U test was used to compare difference in glycemic parameters between boys and girls of same age group and also for calculating difference between different age groups of boys and girls separately.

*p ≤ 0.01

**p ≤ 0.001

***p ≤ 10−4 for comparisons between boys and girls.

$p ≤ 0.05

$ $p ≤ 0.01

$ $ $p ≤ 0.001 for comparison within same sex with the adjacent younger age group.

Uric acid

Plasma levels of uric acid were also remarkably low in girls than boys across all ages during adolescence (p < 0.005, 11 years and p < 10−4, 12 to 17 years) (Table 4). With each successive year in age from 11 years to 15 years, plasma uric acid levels increased in boys (p ≤ 10−4). On contrary, uric acid levels were seen to rise significantly only during transition from 11–12 years in girls (p = 0.005) (S3 and S4 Tables).

Creatinine

Together with urea and uric acid, Indian girls had apparently low levels of plasma creatinine than boys, with significant difference especially during the late adolescence period than boys (p < 10−4) (Table 1). In boys, creatinine levels were consistently found to be increased from age of 12 years to 16 years, with highest increment between 13 to 15 years (p < 10−6) (Table 4, S3 Table). Girls did not show a remarkable upsurge in creatinine levels during adolescence wherein levels increased only marginally from ages 11 to 15 years (p < 0.05).

BMI status significantly governs blood biochemistry during adolescence

We categorized our samples as per their BMI z-scores and observed that levels of all biochemical parameters except urea alter drastically among OB, OW and NW adolescents (Table 5). Similar trend of association was also noted for all parameters in the respective BMI categories within each gender (Table S5a and S5b) barring FG, which however showed consistency when investigated individually in boys and girls.

Table 5. Variation of biochemical parameters with BMI during adolescence.

Parameters Obese (OB) Overweight (OW) Normal weight (NW) P value
N Median Mean N Median Mean N Median Mean OB vs NW OW vs NW OB vs OW
FPG (mmol/L) 645 4.805
(3.69–6.04)
4.808 913 4.698
(3.52–6.05)
4.716 5413 4.810
(3.56–6.67)
4.818 0.956 0.0004 0.0104
Insulin (pmol/L) 548 97.890
(10.78–294.76)
112.490 755 78.660
(7.56–222.99)
87.912 4232 52.460
(12.04–149.3)
59.865 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001
C-peptide (nmol/L) 495 1.690
(0.29–4.49)
1.847 707 1.390
(0.28–3.59)
1.542 3881 0.983
(0.21–2.85)
1.130 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001
HbA1c (%) 331 5.540
(4.35–6.58)
5.558 533 5.380
(4.18–6.37)
5.356 2855 5.090
(3.77–6.16)
5.079 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001
TC (mmol/L) 649 4.061
(2.49–6.52)
4.197 925 3.859
(2.65–5.79)
3.953 5402 3.652
(2.45–5.28)
3.701 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001
LDL (mmol/L) 654 2.394
(1.39–4.45)
2.554 929 2.305
(1.26–3.96)
2.377 5411 2.108
(1.22–3.40)
2.133 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.0002
HDL (mmol/L) 652 1.070
(0.73–1.58)
1.096 927 1.160
(0.73–1.69)
1.169 5417 1.199
(0.78–1.89)
1.247 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001
TG (mmol/L) 477 1.062
(0.39–2.11)
1.162 718 0.975
(0.35–1.93)
1.009 5396 0.927
(0.33–1.98)
0.987 < 0.0001 0.0498 < 0.0001
Urea (mmol/L) 382 6.372
(4.0–10.64)
6.691 382 6.605
(4.11–10.07)
6.876 2390 6.533
(4.18–10.21)
6.654 0.774 0.534 0.489
Uric acid (μmol/L) 381 291.452
(179.04–439.56)
295.636 643 271.824
(154.08–414.49)
279.184 3974 249.816
(123.91–427.66)
258.703 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.0002
Creatinine (μmol/L) 377 41.557
(25.64–67.38)
42.871 645 43.326
(25.73–73.39)
45.396 3711 41.557
(23.87–69.85)
43.152 0.901 0.0001 0.0059

BMI status of samples was determined by calculating BMI z-scores and BMI-for-age and sex percentiles using standard CDC Growth charts. Values for biochemical parameters have been presented as Median (2.5 percentile and 97.5 percentile) and Mean. OB: Obese; OW: Overweight; NW: Normal Weight (Lean); N: sample number. FPG: fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c: glycosylated hemoglobin, TC: total cholesterol, LDL: low–density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL: high–density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG: triglycerides. Mann Whitney U test was used to calculate p values.

Discussion

Rapid growth and development during childhood administer normal circulating levels of various biochemical markers. Abnormal levels of such markers are classical indications that can potentially signal an underlying pediatric disease or early signs of an adult onset disease. These levels are strongly influenced by their rate of growth, organ maturity, hormone responsiveness, nutrition and metabolism [31, 32]. Additionally, children are immunologically naive and respond differently to infections, therefore adult normative values of various biochemical markers are not applicable in a pediatric setting. Given this background, we aimed to establish normative range of commonly studied blood biochemical parameters in Indian adolescents.

This is the first comprehensive study in 7,618 Indo–Europeans and a largest one worldwide ever conducted to examine blood biochemistry and its variation with gender and age during adolescence. Previously, Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Pediatric Reference Intervals (CALIPER) compiled health information from nearly 9000 community children of all ages from birth to 18 years but comprised only a handful of adolescents [33]. Likewise, the BCAMS Study in Chinese population inspected 3,223 schoolchildren aged 6–18 years [34]. Earlier studies investigating blood biochemistry specifically in adolescents were conducted in limited samples—Nigerians (N = 628) [35], Croatians (N = 998) [36] and Czech (N = 1,518) [37], which is much narrow than the present study. In India, a previous study examined a few surrogate markers for insulin resistance in 695 adolescents [38] and serum lipid profile in 4,245 children and adolescents aging from 6–17 years [39] but failed to deliver normative ranges for all common blood biochemical parameters assessed in a large sample set that could represent Indian population.

In accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [40], we studied various parameters in an interval between 0.025 and 0.975 fractiles of the distribution of results wherein 95% of the values resided. In adolescents, normative range for fasting plasma glucose of 3.56–6.49mmol/L was observed in Indians as against 3.77–8.27mmol/L in Nigerians [35] and 3.9–5.9mmol/L in Croatians [36]. For plasma insulin, Indian adolescents have normal levels within a range of 10.60–199.48pmol/L that is typically less than reported by a recent multiethnic study in Canada–CALIPER (15 – 345pmol/L) [33]. Mean plasma glucose and insulin levels were found to be 4.8mmol/L and 68.90pmol/L in the present study in lieu of previously reported levels of 5.19mmol/L and 87.5pmol/L in mere 695 Indian adolescents [38]. Besides, Indian boys featured considerably higher plasma glucose levels but lower plasma insulin than girls. This agrees with previous studies in normal weight adolescents from Czech [37] and Chinese populations [34] but confronts CALIPER data reporting similar insulin levels in both genders [33]. Girls are more insulin resistant than boys [41]. Adolescence period is largely predominated by puberty that is associated with a marked decrease in insulin sensitivity [42] that in turn is accompanied by compensatory increase in insulin secretion eventually leading to insulin resistance [43]. This provides a biological rationale for presence of remarkably high insulin and correspondingly low glucose levels in girls during adolescence.

Normative levels of C–peptide (0.21–3.22nmol/L) in Indians encompassed larger confines than reported levels in Canadians (0.26–2.24nmol/L) [33]. Besides insulin, Indian girls showed significantly higher C–peptide levels than boys. C–peptide, a product of insulin biosynthesis, is released in equimolar amount as mature insulin [44]. In view of higher secretion of insulin in girls, higher levels of C–peptide were anticipated [44, 45, 46]. Furthermore, mean HbA1c levels in Indians (5.16%) resembled Mexican–Americans (5.05%), non–Hispanic blacks (5.07%) and non–Hispanic whites (4.93%) [47]. Despite low glucose levels, we noticed unusually high HbA1c in girls during adolescence. Plasma glucose molecules attach non–enzymatically to hemoglobin in erythrocytes (HbA1c) [48]. Any variation in hemoglobin levels due to erythrocyte turnover will influence HbA1c values regardless of glucose levels. During adolescence, there is an upsurge in release of sex–specific hormones–estrogen in girls and testosterone in boys. Higher testosterone synthesis in boys at puberty results in greater production of hemoglobin [49]. HbA1c is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin content. Hence, a higher amount of total hemoglobin in boys will end up in lower HbA1c levels than girls which is what we also observed in our study.

Levels of total cholesterol in Indian adolescents were found to lie between 2.49–5.54mmol/L that is correspondent to well–established levels (2.9–5.8mmol/L) in children and adolescents from multiple ethnicities in Canada [33]. We observed mean levels of TC as 3.78mmol/L that is marginally lower than previously reported TC levels (4.85mmol/L) in Indian adolescents [38]. Further, presence of high TC levels in girls than boys during adolescence is also detected in Croatians where girls display normal TC levels within 3.3–6.2mmol/L as against 2.8–5.6mmol/L in boys [36]. Identification of high TC in girls is also noticed in Chinese adolescents [50]. In each gender, TC levels remained constant across different ages during adolescence. This finding is however inconsistent with the results in US adolescents that presented a decrease in TC levels with sexual maturation [51]. It is well–established that during puberty plasma lipid levels tend to differ by gender, ethnicity or both [51]. Correspondingly normal LDL levels in Indian adolescents were found to be similar between genders ranging from 1.16–3.69mmol/L. Similarity in LDL levels between girls and boys is also seen in Europeans ({Boys: 1.5–4.1mmol/L}; {Girls: 1.6–4.3mmol/L }) [36] and previously studied Indians ({Boys: mean levels = 2.20mmol/L}; {Girls: mean levels = 2.22mmol/L}) [38]. After the age of 13 years (peak pubertal period), girls showed higher LDL levels than boys. This nicely agrees with the observations in 14-year-old Chinese adolescents (girls: 1.03–3.41mmol/L; boys: 0.97–2.99mmol/L) [50]. Puberty is accompanied by increased BMI and subcutaneous adiposity owing to abrupt rise in estrogen levels [52]. Subcutaneous adiposity is a major covariate for LDL levels in adolescents (p < 0.001) [53] which fairly accounts for raised LDL levels in girls following puberty.

Normative range of HDL levels in Indians (0.78–1.85mmol/L) is lower than previously reported limits in Europeans (0.9–2.2mmol/L) [36]. In addition, mean HDL levels were observed to be like earlier stated levels in Indian adolescents (1.22mmol/L against 1.14mmol/L) [38]. During early years of adolescence, both boys and girls harbored similar HDL levels. However, at puberty, boys uniquely encountered a radical decline in HDL levels. Essentially, male puberty is characterized by boost in testosterone production that stimulates hepatic lipase activity [54], thereby reducing plasma HDL levels during the period [55]. On the other hand, observed TG levels in Indian adolescents (0.33–2.24mmol/L) correspond to normative TG levels in children and adolescents in Canada (0.5–2.23mmol/L) [33], however disperse over a wider range than Europeans (0.3–1.6mmol/L) [36]. Mean TG levels were slightly lower than our previously reported TG levels in lesser number of Indian adolescents (1.04mmol/L than 1.56mmol/L) [38]. At all successive ages after onset of puberty (14 years), high TG levels prevailed in Indian boys. Also, in Chinese boys, TG levels were reported to significantly increase from 0.79mmol/L at 12 years to 1.00mmol/L at 18 years of age [50]. Elevated TG levels in boys during adolescence occurs due to testosterone mediated decrease in Post Heparin (PH) Lipoprotein Lipase [56], an enzyme that catalyzes hydrolysis of TG [57].

Serum urea, uric acid and creatinine levels in Indian adolescents were observed to commonly reside within respective limits of 3.56–11.45mmol/L; 130.01–440.15μmol/L and 22.99–74.28μmol/L that are wider in comparison to 2.7–6.8mmol/L, 125–228μmol/L and 46–80μmol/L in Europeans [36]. All three studied nitrogen metabolites revealed exceptionally high levels in boys than girls throughout adolescence. Urea is a chief nitrogenous waste product of dietary proteins [58]. Protein rich foods largely comprise fish, meat, poultry and eggs. We recruited our samples from Northern part of India that is mainly dominated by vegetarian population [21, 59]. Here, men are primary meat consuming people [21, 59] and therefore vindicates high urea levels in boys. Similarly, dietary intake of high amounts of purine rich foods–red meat, sea foods, mushrooms, etc. end up in high uric acid levels in blood plasma [60]. At odds with fundamental influence of diet on plasma levels of urea and uric acid, creatinine is a waste product synthesized by muscles at a steady rate as a part of normal daily activity [61]. Men have higher muscle mass than women throughout their life [61] which corresponds to high creatinine production and elevated levels in blood.

Besides drastic variation in blood biochemistry due to multiple physiological events, a higher BMI further reinforces this variability during adolescence. We observed that all biochemical parameters vary considerably among Obese/ overweight and lean adolescents. Urea was noted to be an exception to the prevalent trend. The underlying rationale behind consistency of serum urea levels with obesity is though unknown, however urea levels has been previously been reported to remain unaltered with weight loss [62].

As is now evident that normal blood biochemistry indeed changes with ethnicity and food habits, our study therefore established a population specific normative range of common blood biochemical parameters in Indian adolescents and investigated its variability with gender, age and BMI. The age of onset of puberty varies widely among individuals owing to their genetic and environmental factors starting from as early as 8 years to as late as 16 years. The precise interpretation of our data is confined by lack of information about the age of onset of puberty in our cohort. Our findings will benefit medical practitioners assessing pediatric and adolescent health in piloting a timely intervention for chronic conditions and also serve as a platform for future studies to design proper reference intervals for adolescents in different world populations.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Statistical power of the study.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Calculated p values for comparison of various biochemical parameters between boys and girls of same age group.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Calculated p values for comparison of various biochemical parameters among boys of different age.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Calculated p values for comparison of various biochemical parameters among girls of different age groups.

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Variation of biochemical parameters with BMI in boys and girls during adolescence.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank all adolescents and their parents for participation and school authorities for cooperation in carrying out the study. We also thank all the members of INDICO Consortium: Viswanathan Mohan, Saurabh Ghosh, Abhay Sharma, Rubina Tabassum, Ganesh Chauhan, Anubha Mahajan, Om Prakash Dwivedi, Lakshmi Ramakrishnan, Radha Venkatesan, M. Chidambaram, D. Prabhakaran, K.S Reddy, Monisha Banerjee, Madhukar Saxena, Sandeep Mathur, Anil Bhansali, Viral Shah, S.V. Madhu, R.K. Marwaha, Pradeep Venkatesh, S.K. Aggarwal, Shantanu Sen Gupta, Sreenivas Chavali, Amitabh Sharma, Analabha Basu, Priyanka Banerjee, Anil K Giri, Shraddha Chakraborty, Yasmeen Kauser, Gauri Prasad, B. Abitha, Aditya Undru, Donaka Rajashekar, Vaisak Parekatt, Suki Roy and Anjali Singh for their support in sample collection, processing and data generation.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The study was supported by the Department of Biotechnology [DBT], Government of India through GLUE grant project (N 1292) and BIOCHILD project (GAP0089). The work was also funded by Department of Science and Technology [DST], Government of India (DST/SR/PURSE PHASE II/11). Council of Scientific and Industrial Research CSIR-Senior Research Fellowship [KB] and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research CSIR-TWAS Postgraduate fellowship [PJ]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Kratz A, Ferraro M, Sluss PM, Lewandrowski KB. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopathological exercises. Laboratory reference values. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(15): 1548–1563. 10.1056/NEJMcpc049016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sebastiani P, Thyagarajan B, Sun F, Honig LS, Schupf N, Cosentino S, et al. Age and sex distributions of age-related biomarker values in healthy older adults from the Long Life Family Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016; 64(11): e189–e194. 10.1111/jgs.14522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Horn PS, Pesce AJ. Effect of ethnicity on reference intervals. Clin Chem. 2002; 48(10): 1802–1804. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lim E, Miyamura J, Chen JJ. Racial/Ethnic-Specific Reference Intervals for Common Laboratory Tests: A Comparison among Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and White. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2015; 74(9): 302–310. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Du Y, Sun H, Li Y, Shi X, Pei D, Qi D, et al. Reference intervals for six lipid analytes in 8–14 year-old school children from three different ethnical groups in the HulunBuir area of China. Clin Lab. 2014; 60(8): 1295–1300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Romeo J, Wärnberg J, Gómez‐Martínez S, Díaz LE, Moreno LA, Castillo MJ, et al. Haematological reference values in Spanish adolescents: the AVENA study. Eur J Haematol. 2009; 83(6): 586–594. 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01326.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dosoo DK, Kayan K, Adu-Gyasi D, Kwara E, Ocran J, Osei-Kwakye K, et al. Haematological and Biochemical Reference Values for Healthy Adults in the Middle Belt of Ghana. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(4): e36308 10.1371/journal.pone.0036308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ashavaid TF, Todur SP and Dherai AJ. Establishment of reference intervals in Indian population. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2005; 20(2): 110–118. 10.1007/BF02867409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Adeli K, Higgins V, Nieuwesteeg M, Raizman JE, Chen Y, Wong SL, et al. Biochemical marker reference values across pediatric, adult, and geriatric ages: establishment of robust pediatric and adult reference intervals on the basis of the Canadian Health Measures Survey. Clin Chem. 2015; 61(8): 1049–1062. 10.1373/clinchem.2015.240515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lopez-Otin C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013; 153 (6): 1194–1217. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nathan Wetherill Shock. Article—Human aging. Encyclopædia Britannica, inc. Date Published: November 23, 2017. Online at https://www.britannica.com/science/human-aging, Access Date: April 25, 2018.
  • 12.Carol M. Worthman and Kathy Trang. Dynamics of body time, social time and life history at adolescence. Nature. 2018; 554: 445–457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. Article—Puberty. Encyclopædia Britannica, inc. Date Published: April 05, 2018. Online at https://www.britannica.com/science/puberty, Accessed: 25 April 2018.
  • 14.Nu CT, MacLeod P, Barthelemy J. Effects of age and gender on adolescents' food habits and preferences. Food Qual Prefer. 1996; 7(3): 251–262. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Conner M. Accounting for gender, age and socioeconomic differences in food choice. Appetite. 1994; 123:195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Antonishak J, Sutfin EL, Reppucci ND. Community Influence on Adolescent Development In: Gullotta TP, Adams GR. (eds) Handbook of Adolescent Behavioral Problems. Springer, Boston, MA: 2005; 57–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.David Wakefield W. & Cynthia Hudley. Ethnic and Racial Identity and Adolescent Well-Being, Theory Into Practice. 2009; 46(2): 147–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Trading Economics. Online at https://tradingeconomics.com/india/population. Accessed: 29 May 2018.
  • 19.Majumder PP, Mukherjee BN. Genetic Diversity and Affinities among Indian Populations: An Overview In: Majumder PP. (eds) Human Population Genetics. Springer, Boston, MA: 1993; 255–275. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Misra A, Khurana L, Isharwal S, Bhardwaj S. South Asian diets and insulin resistance. Br J Nutr. 2009; 101(4): 465–473. 10.1017/S0007114508073649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Satija A, Hu FB, Bowen L, Bharathi AV, Vaz M, Prabhakaran D, et al. Dietary patterns in India and their association with obesity and central obesity. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(16): 3031–3041. 10.1017/S1368980015000312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Misra A, Wasir JS, Vikram NK. Carbohydrate diets, postprandial hyperlipidaemia, abdominal obesity and Asian Indians: a recipe for atherogenic disaster. Indian J Med Res. 2005; 121(1): 5–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Feng R, Du S, Chen Y, Zheng S, Zhang W, Na G, et al. High carbohydrate intake from starchy foods is positively associated with metabolic disorders: a Cohort Study from a Chinese population. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:16919 10.1038/srep16919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ha K, Kim K, Chun OK, Joung H, Song Y. Differential association of dietary carbohydrate intake with metabolic syndrome in the US and Korean adults: data from the 2007–2012 NHANES and KNHANES. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018. 10.1038/s41430-017-0031-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.INdianDIabetesCOnsortium. INDICO: the development of a resource for epigenomic study of Indians undergoing socioeconomic transition. HUGO J. 2011; 5(1–4): 65–69. 10.1007/s11568-011-9157-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Growth Charts: United States. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/ Accessed: December 2018.
  • 27.Must A and Anderson SE. Body mass index in children and adolescents: considerations for population-based applications. Int. J. of Obesity 2006; 30: 590–594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tabassum R, Mahendran Y, Dwivedi OP, Chauhan G, Ghosh S, Marwaha RK, et al. Common variants of IL6, LEPR, and PBEF1 are associated with obesity in Indian children. Diabetes. 2012; 61(3): 626–631. 10.2337/db11-1501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sullivan KM, Dean A, Soe MM. OpenEpi: A Web-based Epidemiologic and Statistical Calculator for Public Health. Public Health Rep. 2009; 124(3): 471–474. 10.1177/003335490912400320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39(2): 175–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Soliman A, De Sanctis V, Elalaily R. Nutrition and pubertal development. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 18, Suppl S1: 39–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Spear LP. The psychobiology of adolescence In: Kline K, editor. Authoritative Communities: The Scientific Case for Nurturing the Child (The Search Institute Series on Developmentally Attentive Community and Society). Springer; New York, NY: 2007. pp. 263–280. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Colantonio DA, Kyriakopoulou L, Chan MK, Daly CH, Brinc D, Venner AA, et al. Closing the gaps in pediatric laboratory reference intervals: a CALIPER database of 40 biochemical markers in a healthy and multiethnic population of children. Clin Chem. 2012; 58(5): 854–868. 10.1373/clinchem.2011.177741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Xu L, Li M, Yin J, Cheng H, Yu M, Zhao X, et al. Change of body composition and adipokines and their relationship with insulin resistance across pubertal development in obese and nonobese Chinese children: the BCAMS study. Int J Endocrinol. 2012; 2012:389108 10.1155/2012/389108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Oluwayemi I, Brink S, Oyenusi E, Oduwole O, Oluwayemi M. Fasting blood glucose profile among secondary school adolescents in Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. J NutrMetab. 2015; 2015: 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jagarinec N, Flegar-Meštrić Z, Šurina B, Vrhovski-Hebrang D, Preden-Kereković V. Pediatric reference intervals for 34 biochemical analytes in urban school children and adolescents. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 1998; 36(5): 327–337. 10.1515/CCLM.1998.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Aldhoon-Hainerová I, Zamrazilová H, Dušátková L, Sedláčková B, Hlavatý P, Hill M, et al. Glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance: prevalence, gender differences and predictors in adolescents. DiabetolMetabSyndr. 2014; 6(1):100 10.1186/1758-5996-6-100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Garg M, Tandon N, Marwaha R, Singh Y. Evaluation of surrogate markers for insulin resistance for defining metabolic syndrome in urban Indian adolescents. Indian Pediatr. 2014; 51(4): 279–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Marwaha R, Khadgawat R, Tandon N, Kanwar R, Narang A, Sastry A, et al. Reference intervals of serum lipid profile in healthy Indian school children and adolescents. Clin Biochem. 2011; 44(10): 760–766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wayne P. Defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory: approved guideline third edition CLSI document C28-A3c 3rd ed Wayne (PA): Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Solorzano CMB, McCartney CR. Obesity and the pubertal transition in girls and boys. Reproduction. 2010; 140(3): 399–410. 10.1530/REP-10-0119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Moran A, Jacobs DR, Steinberger J, Hong C-P, Prineas R, Luepker R, et al. Insulin resistance during puberty: results from clamp studies in 357 children. Diabetes. 1999; 48(10): 2039–2044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kelsey MM, Zeitler PS. Insulin Resistance of Puberty. Curr Diab Rep. 2016; 16(7): 64 10.1007/s11892-016-0751-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rubenstein A, Steiner D. Proinsulin. Annu Rev Med. 1971; 22(1): 1–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Steiner DF, Cunningham D, Spigelman L, Aten B. Insulin biosynthesis: evidence for a precursor. Science. 1967; 157:697–700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bandesh K, Podder A. C-peptide–A Promising Biomarker Beneath the Radar of Diabetes Therapeutics. J Biomol Res Ther 2018; 7:167. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Saaddine JB, Fagot-Campagna A, Rolka D, Narayan KV, Geiss L, Eberhardt M, et al. Distribution of HbA1c levels for children and young adults in the US: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(8): 1326–1330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Stevens VJ, Vlassara H, Abati A, Cerami A. Nonenzymatic glycosylation of hemoglobin. J Biol Chem. 1977; 252(9): 2998–3002. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hero M, Wickman S, Hanhijarvi R, Siimes MA, Dunkel L. Pubertal upregulation of erythropoiesis in boys is determined primarily by androgen. J Pediatr. 2005; 146(2): 245–252. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hu C, Tao F, Wan Y, Hao J, Ye D. Normal reference values for serum lipid levels in Chinese adolescents between 12 and 18 years of age. J Trop Pediatr. 2009; 56(1): 13–18. 10.1093/tropej/fmp042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Eissa MA, Mihalopoulos NL, Holubkov R, Dai S, Labarthe DR. Changes in fasting lipids during puberty. J Pediatr. 2016; 170: 199–205. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.11.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Burt Solorzano CM, McCartney CR. Obesity and the pubertal transition in girls and boys. Reproduction. 2010; 140(3), 399–410. 10.1530/REP-10-0119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ali O, Cerjak D, Kent JW, James R, Blangero J, Zhang Y. Obesity, central adiposity and cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents: a family-based study. PediatrObes. 2014; 9(3): e58–e62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Herbst KL, Amory JK, Brunzell JD, Chansky HA, Bremner WJ. Testosterone administration to men increases hepatic lipase activity and decreases HDL and LDL size in 3 wk. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2003; 284(6): E1112–E1118. 10.1152/ajpendo.00524.2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kirkland RT, Keenan BS, Probstfield JL, Patsch W, Lin T-L, Clayton GW, et al. Decrease in plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels at puberty in boys with delayed adolescence: correlation with plasma testosterone levels. J Am Med Assoc. 1987; 257(4): 502–507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Shearer GC, Joles JA, Jones H, Walzem RL, Kaysen GA. Estrogen effects on triglyceride metabolism in analbuminemic rats. Kidney Int. 2000; 57(6): 2268–2274. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00087.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Goldberg IJ. Lipoprotein lipase and lipolysis: central roles in lipoprotein metabolism and atherogenesis. Journal of Lipid Research. 1996; 37(4): 693–707. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Walser M, Bodenlos LJ. Urea metabolism in man. J Clin Invest. 1959; 38(9): 1617–1626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Government of India, Sample Registration System Baseline Survey 2014. Online at https://data.gov.in/, accessed 26 April 2018.
  • 60.Zgaga L, Theodoratou E, Kyle J, Farrington SM, Agakov F, Tenesa A, Walker M, McNeill G, Wright AF, Rudan I, Dunlop MG. The association of dietary intake of purine-rich vegetables, sugar-sweetened beverages and dairy with plasma urate, in a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(6): e38123 10.1371/journal.pone.0038123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chanutin A, Kinard FW. The relationship between muscle creatinine and creatinine coefficient. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1932; 99(1): 125–134. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Faber P, Johnstone AM, Gibney ER, Elia M, Stubbs RJ, Roger PL, Milne E, Buchan W and Lobley GE. The effect of rate and extent of weight loss on urea salvage in obese male subjects. British J of Nutrition 2003; 90(1): 221–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Statistical power of the study.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Calculated p values for comparison of various biochemical parameters between boys and girls of same age group.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Calculated p values for comparison of various biochemical parameters among boys of different age.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Calculated p values for comparison of various biochemical parameters among girls of different age groups.

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Variation of biochemical parameters with BMI in boys and girls during adolescence.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES