Abstract
Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is the most prevalent course of multiple sclerosis. It is an autoimmune inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. To investigate the gender-specific involvement of microRNAs (miRNAs) in RRMS pathogenesis, we compared miRNA profiles in peripheral blood mononuclear cells separately in men and women (eight RRMS patients versus four healthy controls of each gender) using high-throughput sequencing. In contrast to women, six downregulated and 26 upregulated miRNAs (padj < 0.05) were identified in men with RRMS. Genes encoding upregulated miRNAs are co-localized in DLK1-DIO3 imprinted locus on human chromosome 14q32. Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis was performed in independent groups of men (16 RRMS patients and 10 healthy controls) and women (20 RRMS patients and 10 healthy controls). Increased expression of miR-431, miR-127-3p, miR-379, miR-376c, miR-381, miR-410 and miR-656 was again demonstrated in male (padj < 0.05), but not in female RRMS patients. At the same time, the expression levels of these miRNAs were lower in healthy men than in healthy women, whereas in RRMS men they increased and reached or exceeded levels in RRMS women. In general, we demonstrated that expression levels of these miRNAs depend both on “health–disease” status and gender. Network-based enrichment analysis identified that receptor tyrosine kinases-activated pathways were enriched with products of genes targeted by miRNAs from DLK1-DIO3 locus. These results suggest the male-specific involvement of these miRNAs in RRMS pathogenesis via regulation of PI3K/Akt signaling.
Keywords: relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, miRNA, DLK1-DIO3 imprinted locus, gender specificity, network-based enrichment analysis, receptor tyrosine kinase
1. Introduction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune inflammatory disease of central nervous system, which is characterized by demyelination and axon damage caused by inflammatory attacks. By studying the most common MS course, the relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), which is characterized by recurrent acute exacerbations followed by partial or complete recovery [1], one can focus on general mechanisms that underlie the complex pathologic processes in MS.
Long-term studies of genetic susceptibility to RRMS couldn’t explain a substantial proportion of the observed heritability. In today’s knowledge this is related to the minor effects of genes, which are not directly associated with the disease. These genes could be integrated in networks, regulated by miRNAs—small (19–24 nucleotides) non-coding RNAs. MiRNA inhibits target mRNAs’ expression through the complete or incomplete complementary binding of the miRNA seed region (6–8 nucleotide sequence) mainly with the 3′-untranslated region of mRNA [2]. MiRNAs were shown to mediate the normal functioning of the immune system and, moreover, to regulate the autoimmune inflammatory processes, including MS [3,4]. One of the most effective approaches in searching for novel MS-related miRNAs is high-throughput sequencing (next generation sequencing, NGS), which allows to examine the expression of all miRNAs in the analyzed biological material. Thus far, only a few studies applied this approach to identify miRNA signatures in RRMS, focusing mostly on the expression of miRNAs in serum or in whole blood of patients and healthy individuals [5,6,7,8,9].
Similar to other autoimmune diseases, RRMS is more prevalent in women than in men [10]. Recent studies demonstrated gender differences in miRNA expression in MS [11,12], which raised the question of miRNA involvement in different molecular processes promoting MS in men and women. Using high-throughput sequencing, we analyzed the miRNA profiles looking for MS-related miRNAs separately in men and women. We have chosen peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) as an informative and easily accessible biological material. To estimate the functional role of differentially expressed miRNAs, we applied network-based enrichment analysis.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Patients and Controls
52 unrelated patients with RRMS and 28 healthy controls (HCs) of comparable age and sex were enrolled in the study. Among RRMS patients 24 were in clinical relapse (24–36 h after relapse manifestation and before the first corticosteroid administration) and 28 were in remission (clinically stable for at least 6 months). All RRMS patients fulfilled the McDonald criteria for MS diagnosis (2010 revisions) [13], were treatment-naive and were free from any other inflammatory disorders. A group of HCs was formed from volunteers free of significant acute or chronic inflammatory diseases and not on any medications. Demographic and clinical characteristics of all the subjects included in the study at the stages of sequencing (16 RRMS patients and eight HCs) and subsequent validation (36 RRMS patients and 20 HCs) are shown in Table 1. No significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics were observed when RRMS patients were stratified by gender (data not shown). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to their inclusion in this study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Decision #139 from 10/11/2014).
Table 1.
Stable RRMS (Remission) | Acute RRMS (Relapse) | HCs | |
---|---|---|---|
Sequencing | |||
N | 8 | 8 | 8 |
Gender, (M/F) | 4/4 | 4/4 | 4/4 |
Age, mean ± SD, (years) | 38.9 ± 4.3 | 35.4 ± 6.8 | 37.1 ± 6.4 |
Disease duration, mean ± SD, (years) | 5.6 ± 3.2 | 5.4 ± 3.1 | - |
EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale | 2.4 ± 1.0 | 3.1 ± 1.0 | - |
Validation | |||
N | 20 | 16 | 20 |
Gender, (M/F) | 10/10 | 6/10 | 10/10 |
Age, mean ± SD, (years) | 34.8 ± 5.0 | 35.8 ± 4.5 | 38.1 ± 4.6 |
Disease duration, mean ± SD, (years) | 4.5 ± 2.3 | 5.3 ± 2.9 | - |
EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale | 2.0 ± 0.5 | 2.7 ± 0.6 | - |
2.2. RNA Isolation
PBMC were isolated using Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient method (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) within 3 h of sampling. RNA was isolated using miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The total RNA concentration was measured with a NanoDrop-2000 spectrophotometer and the RNA integrity was assessed by QIAxcel Advanced System (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Samples with a RNA integrity number (RIN) value above eight were included in subsequent experiments.
2.3. RNA-seq Data Analysis
Small RNA libraries were constructed using TruSeq® Small RNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) following manufacturer instructions. Samples were individually barcoded and sequenced in multiplexed pools each containing four samples using the 36 bp fragment protocol on Illumina MiSeq platform. The sequencing generated an average of 15M reads. All miRNA-sequencing data are deposited in the international public repository, Gene Expression Omnibus, under accession identification as GSE124900 [14].
2.4. Reverse Transcription Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR)
Mature miRNA TaqMan assays (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were used to validate differential expression of miRNAs based on RNA-seq data analysis. The small RNA RNU6B was used as endogenous control due to the smallest variance in its expression in all samples. MiRNA differential expression was calculated using the ΔΔCt method [15].
2.5. Statistical Analysis
R programming language was used to perform all statistical analyses. The sample size calculation for compared groups was performed using the pwr library based on statistical significance level of 0.05, power of 0.8 and the expected effect size of more than 2. The sequencing data analysis on miRNA expression between RRMS and HCs and between patients in remission and patients in relapse separately in men and women was conducted using the limma package [16]. The False Discovery Rate (FDR) procedure of Benjamini-Hochberg was used to adjust for multiple testing correction (padj) [17]. MiRNA considered to be differentially expressed if padj was less 0.05 and logarithm of fold change (Log2FC) value was less −1 or more 1. The interaction between “health–disease” status and gender that determines the expression levels of selected miRNAs in (−ΔCt) values was estimated using two-way ANOVA. The assumptions in ANOVA were checked based on Shapiro-Wilk and Levene’s tests; to fulfill these assumptions the data were then Z scale-transformed. The significance of interaction beased in ANOVA test was adjusted for multiple testing correction using Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. The post-hoc analysis was performed using Tukey’s HSD (honestly significant difference). Threshold for statistical significance was equal to padj < 0.05.
2.6. Network-Based Enrichment Analysis
To estimate the functional role of differentially expressed miRNAs, the over-representation analysis was carried out based on the representation of differentially expressed miRNAs’ target genes in a specific signaling pathway from the Reactome pathway database of the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) [18] using a method described in [19]. Reactome pathways, which were significantly overrepresented by miRNA target genes, were set as nodes; two nodes were connected by edge when overlap between their gene sets did exist. Edge weight was equal to ratio of cardinality of gene set’ overlaps between two pathways to the union of gene sets of these two pathways. A network of overlaps was built and analyzed using library NetworkX version 2.1 for Python 3.7 [20]. The network was visualized using prefuse force directed layout by edge weight in Cytoscape version 3.6.1 [21].
3. Results
3.1. NGS Screening of Differentially Expressed miRNAs and the Following Validation
We performed a small RNA high-throughput sequencing in PBMC of 16 RRMS patients (eight men and eight women) and 8 HCs (four men and four women). Based on statistical estimation, a sample of four people is sufficient to carry out the present study. Тaking into account the specificity of disease course in men and women, we applied gender-based approach. For searching MS-associated miRNAs we compared eight male RRMS patients to four healthy men and identified 114 differentially expressed miRNAs (p < 0.05; −1 < Log2FC > 1) of which 32 miRNAs passed threshold for multiple corrections (padj < 0.05). Among them, six miRNAs were downregulated (Log2FC < −1), while the other 26 miRNAs were upregulated (Log2FC > 1) in RRMS patients (Table 2). In case of miRNA profiling in eight women with RRMS and four healthy women, none of the 46 differentially expressed miRNAs passed the FDR threshold (Table S1). Thus, substantial changes in miRNA expression profiles were found out only in men.
Table 2.
Number | miRNA | Gene | Localization | Log2FC | p-value | p adj | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. RRMS patients versus HCs | |||||||
Downregulated miRNAs | |||||||
1 | hsa-miR-3647-3p | SNORD111B | 16q22.1 | −4.15 | 1.04E-05 | 0.0017 | |
2 | hsa-miR-181a* | MIR181A2 | 9q33.3 | −1.50 | 5.06E-06 | 0.0017 | |
3 | hsa-miR-181a | MIR181A2 | 9q33.3 | −1.27 | 1.73E-05 | 0.0017 | |
4 | hsa-miR-181b | MIR181B1 | 1q32.1 | −1.32 | 8.69E-06 | 0.0017 | |
5 | hsa-miR-3607-3p | SNORD138 | 5q14.3 | −3.41 | 0.00040 | 0.017 | |
6 | hsa-miR-330-5p | MIR330 | 19q13.32 | −1.15 | 0.00075 | 0.021 | |
Upregulated miRNAs | |||||||
1 | hsa-miR-431 | MIR431 | 14q32.2 | 1.86 | 1.21E-05 | 0.0017 | |
2 | hsa-miR-432 | MIR432 | 14q32.2 | 1.71 | 1.73E-05 | 0.0017 | |
3 | hsa-miR-376c | MIR376C | 14q32.31 | 1.86 | 2.53E-05 | 0.0021 | |
4 | hsa-miR-656 | MIR656 | 14q32.31 | 2.37 | 3.47E-05 | 0.0025 | |
5 | hsa-miR-409-5p | MIR409 | 14q32.31 | 5.99 | 9.94E-05 | 0.0064 | |
6 | hsa-miR-411 | MIR411 | 14q32.31 | 1.54 | 0.00011 | 0.0065 | |
7 | hsa-miR-376a | MIR376A-1 | 14q32.31 | 1.99 | 0.00015 | 0.0077 | |
8 | hsa-miR-377 | MIR377 | 14q32.31 | 2.62 | 0.00016 | 0.0077 | |
9 | hsa-miR-127-3p | MIR127 | 14q32.2 | 1.50 | 0.00023 | 0.010 | |
10 | hsa-miR-410 | MIR410 | 14q32.31 | 1.29 | 0.00047 | 0.018 | |
11 | hsa-miR-379 | MIR379 | 14q32.31 | 1.69 | 0.00059 | 0.020 | |
12 | hsa-miR-758 | MIR758 | 14q32.31 | 1.51 | 0.00065 | 0.020 | |
13 | hsa-miR-889 | MIR889 | 14q32.31 | 1.47 | 0.00064 | 0.020 | |
14 | hsa-miR-337-3p | MIR337 | 14q32.2 | 2.25 | 0.00066 | 0.020 | |
15 | hsa-miR-485-5p | MIR485 | 14q32.31 | 1.88 | 0.00075 | 0.021 | |
16 | hsa-miR-485-3p | MIR485 | 14q32.31 | 1.47 | 0.00093 | 0.024 | |
17 | hsa-miR-136* | MIR136 | 14q32.2 | 1.39 | 0.00093 | 0.024 | |
18 | hsa-miR-433 | MIR433 | 14q32.2 | 1.65 | 0.0012 | 0.030 | |
19 | hsa-miR-493 | MIR493 | 14q32.2 | 1.31 | 0.0015 | 0.032 | |
20 | hsa-miR-495 | MIR495 | 14q32.31 | 1.50 | 0.0015 | 0.032 | |
21 | hsa-miR-337-5p | MIR337 | 14q32.2 | 2.02 | 0.0018 | 0.038 | |
22 | hsa-miR-409-3p | MIR409 | 14q32.31 | 1.15 | 0.0020 | 0.040 | |
23 | hsa-miR-376b | MIR376B | 14q32.31 | 2.23 | 0.0021 | 0.040 | |
24 | hsa-miR-370 | MIR370 | 14q32.31 | 1.77 | 0.0022 | 0.041 | |
25 | hsa-miR-134 | MIR134 | 14q32.31 | 1.32 | 0.0023 | 0.041 | |
26 | hsa-miR-381 | MIR381 | 14q32.31 | 1.63 | 0.0034 | 0.048 | |
B. RRMS patients in relapse versus RRMS patients in remission | |||||||
1 | hsa-miR-1 |
MIR1-1/ MIR1-2 |
20q13.33/18q11.2 | 3.82 | 3.58E-06 | 0.002 |
miRNA was considered as differentially expressed if padj < 0.05; −1< Log2FC >1.
As can be seen from Table 2, genes encoding downregulated miRNAs in men are located in different chromosomes, whereas all genes of upregulated miRNAs in men were found to be structurally associated by their genomic location on the long arm of chromosome 14 (14q32) in DLK1-DIO3 imprinted locus. The schematic representation of DLK1-DIO3 imprinted locus and localization of identified miRNA genes with increased expression in male RRMS patients within this locus are depicted on Figure 1.
As RRMS patients in the study differed by disease activity (remission and relapse), we also compared the miRNA expression patterns between RRMS patients in remission and relapse separately for men and women (each group consisted of four patients). In women, we did not find specific for remission or relapse miRNAs, which passed FDR correction (not shown). In men, miR-1 was found to be upregulated in relapse relative to remission (Log2FC = 3.82; padj = 0.002) (Table 2), whereas expression of all other miRNAs including those transcribed from DLK1-DIO3 imprinted locus was not identified as stage-specific. From this point on, the disease activity was not taken into account.
To confirm high-throughput sequencing data on the gender specificity of differential expression of miRNAs from DLK1-DIO3 locus in RRMS, we selected miR-431, miR-127-3p, miR-379, miR-376c, miR-381, miR-410 and miR-656 (underlined in Figure 1): miR-431 and miR-127-3p were located in 14q32.2 miRNA cluster, the other five in different structural units of the 14q32.31 miRNA cluster. Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis was performed in independent groups of men (16 RRMS patients and 10 HCs) and women (20 RRMS patients and 10 HCs). RT-qPCR data were then analyzed by two-way ANOVA to estimate the interplay (interaction) between “health–disease” status and gender that influences miRNA expression. The assumptions of ANOVA were checked using Shapiro-Wilk and Levene’s tests (Table S2). The levels of analyzed miRNAs were lower in healthy men than in healthy women, whereas in RRMS men they increased and reached or exceeded levels in RRMS women (Figure 2). For all miRNAs observed interactions between gender and “health–disease” status were significant, according to ANOVA analysis; after the procedure of Benjamini-Hochberg multiple correction padj ranged from 0.026 to 0.0009. Thus, the impact of “health–disease” status on miRNA expression from DLK1-DIO3 locus should be qualified in terms of the impact of gender.
To quantify observed differences between four compared groups we performed post-hoc analysis using Tukey’s HSD (Table S3). Based on this analysis, when compared RRMS to HCs, the expression levels of all miRNAs from DLK1-DIO3 locus in men were significantly upregulated in RRMS (Log2FC ranged from 2.49 to 3.05; padj ranged from 0.00001 to 0.0018) whereas in women these levels did not differ (Table 3), that is in a good accordance with NGS data (Table 2).
Table 3.
MiRNAs | Men: RRMS versus HCs (16 versus 10) |
Women: RRMS versus HCs (20 versus 10) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Log2FC | p adj | Log2FC | p adj | |
miR-431 | 3.05 | 0.00014 | 0.16 | 0.99 |
miR-127-3p | 3.00 | 0.00028 | 0.55 | 0.85 |
miR-379 | 3.06 | 0.0018 | −0.90 | 0.48 |
miR-376c | 2.50 | 0.00001 | 0.07 | 0.99 |
miR-381 | 2.52 | 0.00006 | 0.08 | 0.99 |
miR-410 | 2.49 | 0.00001 | 0.36 | 0.99 |
miR-656 | 2.81 | 0.0001 | 0.97 | 0.36 |
MiRNA expression was calculated relative to endogenous RNU6B using ΔΔCt method. Tukey-test was used to estimate statistical significance between compared groups. MiRNA considered to be differentially expressed if −1 ≤ Log2FC ≥1 and padj < 0.05 (values are given in bold).
MiRNA expression’ levels for men and women in health and disease, which have been analyzed by post-hoc test, are visualized on Figure 3. The significantly lower expression levels of miR-431-5p, miR-376c and miR-410 were observed in healthy menn than in healthy women: padj was equal to 0.04, 0.0049 and 0.0019, respectively (Figure 3A). In similar comparison in RRMS patients (Figure 3B), levels of all miRNAs expression in men were higher than those in women; for miR-379 and miR-376c, the higher expression was statistically significant (padj was equal to 0.012 and 0.0011, respectively). The absence of significant changes in the expression levels of some miRNAs in combination with unidirectional effects for significant miRNAs may be due to insufficient power of study.
3.2. The Analysis of the Functional Role of miRNAs, Differentially Expressed from DLK1-DIO3 Locus in RRMS Pathogenesis
The network-based enrichment analysis was carried out to assess the functional role of 26 miRNAs encoded in DLK1-DIO3 locus, which were upregulated in male RRMS patients according to NGS data (see Table 2). For this, we computed overlaps between the sets of the experimentally confirmed target genes of each of 26 miRNAs (from MiRTaRBase [26]) and the Reactome gene sets (from MSigDB [18]). Reactome sets which were significantly overrepresented by miRNA target genes (p < 0.05) were selected for the further analysis. In total, 456 signaling pathways were found to be enriched with target genes of at least one identified miRNA. It emerged that 25% (Q1) of these pathways were enriched with target genes of one miRNA, 50% (Q2)—with target genes of no less than two miRNAs and 75% (Q3), with target genes of no less than three miRNAs. For the following analysis, we chose those pathways, which were enriched with target genes of extreme number of miRNAs, exceeding Q3 + 1.5 interquartile range; as a result, we identified 24 signaling pathways, which were enriched with target genes of more than 6 miRNAs. For these pathways, a network of overlaps was built where signaling pathways (nodes) were connected by edge if overlaps between their gene sets did exist (Figure 4A). Importantly, the constructed network turned out to be a nearly complete graph: 248 edges from 276 edges for complete graph. Of 24 identified pathways 17 were highly overlapped and, as it turned out, belonged among pathways activated through receptor tyrosine kinases (p < 0.0001; the calculation was described in Equation S1) [27]. Most of these pathways are regulated by the highest number of miRNAs: from 7 to 11 that is reflected by sizes of nodes on Figure 4A. Based on Reactome hierarchy all of these 17 receptor tyrosine kinase-activated pathways are involved in signal transduction assisted by stem cell factor (SCF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 1 (NTRK1), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), receptor tyrosine-protein kinase ERBB-2 and ERBB-4, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and insulin like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) (Figure 4B). The majority of them directly or indirectly (via EGFR-induced GRB2-associated-binding protein 1 activation) regulates PI3K/Akt signaling (green arrows on Figure 4B). Thus, network-based enrichment analysis allowed to single out 17 receptor tyrosine kinase-activated pathways as the most abundantly regulated by miRNAs encoded in DLK1-DIO3 locus.
4. Discussion
Here, we identified novel MS-related miRNAs in PBMC using the hypothesis-free NGS approach. To exclude bias in miRNA expression levels caused by disease modifying therapies, miRNA profiling was performed in treatment-naive RRMS patients. Taking into account hypothetic gender specificity in disease pathogenesis we compared miRNA expression in RRMS patients and HCs separately for men and women. This approach proved to be very informative. MiRNA profiling in men identified 32 MS-related miRNAs, which passed threshold for multiple corrections (padj ranged from 0.0017 to 0.048). Results of NGS screening for seven upregulated miRNAs, namely miR-431, miR-127-3p, miR-379, miR-376c, miR-381, miR-410 and miR-656, were validated in an independent sample using RT-qPCR; all selected miRNAs were significantly upregulated in male RRMS patients. At the same time, we did not find well-defined RRMS-specific miRNA expression signatures in women neither using NGS, nor with RT-qPCR (Table 3). Obviously, both increasing the sample number and decreasing the threshold for effect size could lead to detection of additional MS-specific miRNAs in men and/or to identification of any differentially expressed miRNAs in women.
Based on NGS data, we also performed the comparison between RRMS patients in remission and relapse and revealed differences in miRNA expression in men, not in women. Here, only miR-1, which was not previously described as associated with RRMS, was found to be stage-specific in men; it was not among the MS-related miRNAs identified in our study as differentially expressed in men.
Genes of all miRNAs upregulated in male RRMS patients are co-localized in DLK1-DIO3 locus on chromosome 14. The organization of the DLK1-DIO3 locus is highly conserved in all mammals and shares similar imprinting regulation of coding and noncoding genes [28]. The DLK1-DIO3 locus includes the largest in the human genome cluster of 54 miRNAs genes (Figure 1). There are contrary data about the expression mechanisms of miRNA genes from this locus. Some arguments support the hypothesis that all miRNAs are derived from a single polycistronic RNA, sharing a common mechanism of regulation [29]. However, separate enhancers, regulating miRNA expression from 14q32.2 and 14q32.31 clusters in DLK1-DIO3 locus, were also identified [30,31]. Differences in activity of distinct miRNAs inside one 14q32.2 cluster were also described by other authors [32,33,34], particularly on postnatal, developmental stages, and in adult brains. Moreover, expression levels of not all miRNAs from 14q32 locus were increased in lung adenocarcinoma [35]. Similarly, in our study we observed increased expression of not 54 but 26 miRNAs from both clusters (Log2FC > 1 and padj < 0.05). It should be mentioned that NGS analysis identified 25 other miRNAs from DLK1-DIO3 imprinted locus, from which more than half (15) miRNAs were upregulated in RRMS men with nominal significance (Log2FC > 1; p < 0.05) (Table S4). Possibly, future investigations will extend the number of MS-associated miRNAs from this locus. In general, all available relevant data highlight that exact ways of miRNA expression from DLK1-DIO3 locus and mechanisms of its regulation still remain to be uncovered.
The DLK1-DIO3 locus was shown to be involved in the regulation of different stages of developmental processes. In humans, imprinting abnormalities at the DLK1-DIO3 locus have been associated with developmental disorders, such as Temple syndrome, caused by maternal uniparental disomy (MatUPD14) (i.e. patients inherit two maternal copies of chromosome 14q32), and Kagami–Ogata syndrome (PatUPD14), caused by paternal uniparental disomy (reviewed in [36]). With that, miRNAs from this imprinting locus were found to be associated with the development of several diseases (reviewed in [37]), such as different types of cancer (reviewed in [36]), cardiovascular diseases [38], autoimmune diseases [39,40] and schizophrenia [41].
Male-specific massive upregulation of miRNAs encoded in imprinted DLK1-DIO3 locus in MS patients was observed in our study for the first time. However, separate miRNAs from this locus were found to be deregulated during MS earlier. The significant differences in serum levels of miR-127-3p, miR-370-3p, miR-409-3p, miR-432-5p, as well as miR-376c-3p were identified in progressive MS patients’ compared to HCs [5,42]. The expression of miR-433-3p, miR-485-3p and miR-432-5p distinguished between relapsing-remitting and progressive MS patients [5]. Mir-494 was found to be downregulated in T-cells of MS patients when compared to controls [43]. Recently, we demonstrated the upregulation of miR-379-5p in PBMC of remitting MS patients compared to relapsing MS patients [11]. In a good accordance with the results of present study, increased expression of miR-127 and miR-136 after experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) induction in EAE-susceptible rat strains compared to EAE-resistant rat strains was reported; increased expression of other miRNAs from DLK1-DIO3 locus such as miR-434, miR-541 and miR-369 was also identified in EAE [44].
It is interesting to note that a decrease in expression level of miR-411* from DLK1-DIO3 imprinted locus was detected in peripheral blood of RRMS patients treated with natalizumab, compared to a treatment-naive RRMS patients [45]. In the context of our results on the increased expression of this miRNA in PBMC of RRMS patients, these data can be considered as the starting point for the study of miRNAs from this locus in terms of prospects of using in clinical implication for RRMS treatment.
In contrast to genes of upregulated miRNAs, genes of identified in our study downregulated miRNAs are distributed over the genome. The data on downregulation of miR-181a and miR-181b are consistent with previous studies, describing miR-181a and -181b suppression in the central nervous system in MS and EAE, as well as in activated lymphocytes [46,47]. Downregulation of miR-3647-3p, miR-3607-3p and miR-330-5p in male RRMS patients was first identified in our study.
Our results showed the validity and effectiveness of the gender-based approach in miRNA expression’ studying. We first established that baseline expression levels of miRNAs from this locus are peculiar to MS patients; these levels preexist in healthy women, whereas in men they are reached or even exceeded only with disease. The origin of this phenomenon is unclear and requires further studying. However, it is tempting to assume that lower incidence of MS in men than in women may be associated with lower expression of miRNAs from DLK1-DIO3 locus and, at the same time, a more severe disease course in men may be associated with increased expression of these miRNAs in male MS patients.
Recent studies demonstrated gender-specific differences in miRNA expression in various female-predominant autoimmune diseases, including MS [11,12]. Despite the fact that a number of studies were addressed to reviewing the data on sexual dimorphism of miRNA expression [48,49,50], and highlight the important contribution of the X-chromosome and sex hormones in this phenomenon, the nature of the sex-biased miRNA expression is poorly studied. Little is known about miRNAs expression from DLK1-DIO3 locus in this context. Indeed, the transcription of miR-433 and miR-127 genes encoded within DLK1-DIO3 locus was found to be regulated by nuclear hormone receptor ERRγ [31]. It was also found that cis-miR-eQTL SNP rs4905998 on 14 chromosome influenced allele-specific expression of 16 miRNAs from DLK1-DIO3 imprinting locus; its proxy SNP rs6575793 was associated with the age at menarche according to genome-wide association study data [51]. Another study demonstrated that imprinted genes more often tend to harbor sex-specific CpGs than non-imprinted; meta-analysis identified significant associations of sex-specific methylation among its CpG regions in MEG3 gene [52].
Network-enrichment analysis performed on the target genes of differentially expressed miRNAs encoded in the DLK1-DIO3 locus allowed us to reduce the redundancy among enriched gene sets. From 24 pathways, included in the constructed network, 17 pathways were highly overlapping based on their gene sets and belonged among pathways, activated through receptor tyrosine kinases. These gene sets were reduced to eight “parent” pathways and collocated high up in the Reactome hierarchy [53]. Interestingly, the majority of them directly or indirectly regulate PI3K/Akt signaling; on that basis, miRNAs action is mostly referred to the cell activation, proliferation, metabolism and apoptosis. Recent studies demonstrated the enrichment of the target genes of the miRNAs within DLK1-DIO3 locus in immune functions [37,54,55]. This is further consistent with the increasing data, showing that alterations in this pathway may result in enhanced susceptibility to autoimmunity [56,57,58].
Although the results described in our study were obtained by two different methods and using two independent samples, further investigation of involvement of miRNAs from DLK1-DIO3 imprinted locus in MS pathogenesis are imperatively needed, preferably in larger cohorts. Moreover, miRNA expression profiles in cell subtypes other than PBMC should be studied in order to obtain more precise results. Possible directions of research include experimental validation of PI3K/Akt involvement in MS pathogenesis. Altogether, these results could be of use to clarify the role of DLK1-DIO3 imprinted locus and nature of gender-specific expression of its miRNA genes.
5. Conclusions
The involvement of miRNAs encoded in DLK1-DIO3 imprinted locus in MS pathogenesis was observed for the first time. The upregulation in men was reliably established for miR-431, miR-127-3p, miR-379, miR-376c, miR-381, miR-410 and miR-656 and deemed rather likely for other 19 miRNAs encoded in this locus. At the same time, the expression of these miRNAs in women did not change during MS. Network-based enrichment analysis demonstrated that receptor tyrosine kinase-activated pathways were enriched with products of genes targeted by miRNAs from DLK1-DIO3 locus, and the majority of these proteins directly or indirectly regulate PI3K/Akt signaling.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Petr Favorov for his help with proof-reading of this article.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/8/2/133/s1, Table S1: The high-throughput sequencing data on miRNA differential expression separately in men and women, Table S2: Checking the assumptions for two-way ANOVA. Table S3: Post-hoc analysis of miRNA expression between four compared groups using Tukey’s HSD, Table S4: The high-throughput sequencing data on expression of miRNAs from DLK1-DIO3 locus, Equation S1: The testing of statistical hypothesis of the equality of the number of edges in observed and random networks.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, N.B. and O.K.; Data curation, G.O., E.P. and A.B.; Formal analysis, N.B. and O.K.; Funding acquisition, O.F.; Investigation, N.B. and G.O.; Methodology, N.B. and I.K.; Project administration, O.F.; Resources, E.P.; Software, G.O.; Supervision, O.F.; Validation, N.B.; Visualization, N.B. and G.O.; Writing—original draft, N.B.; Writing—review & editing, N.B. and O.F.
Funding
This research was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant number 17-00-00206 and by the government contract with Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, contract number 2-00-050-056.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
- 1.Lublin F.D., Reingold S.C. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: Results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology. 1996;46:907–911. doi: 10.1212/WNL.46.4.907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bartel D.P. MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136:215–233. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Baulina N.M., Kulakova O.G., Favorova O.O. MicroRNAs: The Role in Autoimmune Inflammation. Acta Nat. 2016;8:21–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dolati S., Marofi F., Babaloo Z., Aghebati-Maleki L., Roshangar L., Ahmadi M., Rikhtegar R., Yousefi M. Dysregulated Network of miRNAs Involved in the Pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis. Biomed. Pharm. 2018;104:280–290. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.05.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ebrahimkhani S., Vafaee F., Young P.E., Hur S.S.J., Hawke S., Devenney E., Beadnall H., Barnett M.H., Suter C.M., Buckland M.E. Exosomal microRNA signatures in multiple sclerosis reflect disease status. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:14293. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14301-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Keller A., Leidinger P., Meese E., Haas J., Backes C., Rasche L., Behrens J.R., Pfuhl C., Wakonig K., Giess R.M., et al. Next-generation sequencing identifies altered whole blood microRNAs in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder which may permit discrimination from multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroinflamm. 2015;12:196. doi: 10.1186/s12974-015-0418-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Keller A., Leidinger P., Steinmeyer F., Stahler C., Franke A., Hemmrich-Stanisak G., Kappel A., Wright I., Dorr J., Paul F., et al. Comprehensive analysis of microRNA profiles in multiple sclerosis including next-generation sequencing. Mult. Scler. 2014;20:295–303. doi: 10.1177/1352458513496343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liguori M., Nuzziello N., Licciulli F., Consiglio A., Simone M., Viterbo R.G., Creanza T.M., Ancona N., Tortorella C., Margari L., et al. Combined microRNA and mRNA expression analysis in pediatric multiple sclerosis: An integrated approach to uncover novel pathogenic mechanisms of the disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2018;27:66–79. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Selmaj I., Cichalewska M., Namiecinska M., Galazka G., Horzelski W., Selmaj K.W., Mycko M.P. Global exosome transcriptome profiling reveals biomarkers for multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2017;81:703–717. doi: 10.1002/ana.24931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Compston A., Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2002;359:1221–1231. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08220-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Baulina N., Kulakova O., Kiselev I., Osmak G., Popova E., Boyko A., Favorova O. Immune-related miRNA expression patterns in peripheral blood mononuclear cells differ in multiple sclerosis relapse and remission. J. Neuroimmunol. 2018;317:67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2018.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Munoz-Culla M., Irizar H., Saenz-Cuesta M., Castillo-Trivino T., Osorio-Querejeta I., Sepulveda L., Lopez de Munain A., Olascoaga J., Otaegui D. SncRNA (microRNA &snoRNA) opposite expression pattern found in multiple sclerosis relapse and remission is sex dependent. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:20126. doi: 10.1038/srep20126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Polman C.H., Reingold S.C., Banwell B., Clanet M., Cohen J.A., Filippi M., Fujihara K., Havrdova E., Hutchinson M., Kappos L., Lublin F.D., Montalban X., O’Connor P., Sandberg-Wollheim M., Thompson A.J., Waubant E., et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann. Neurol. 2011;69:292–302. doi: 10.1002/ana.22366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gene Expression Omnibus. [(accessed on 11 January 2019)]; Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE124900.
- 15.Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ritchie M.E., Phipson B., Wu D., Hu Y., Law C.W., Shi W., Smyth G.K. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B. 1995;57:289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liberzon A., Subramanian A., Pinchback R., Thorvaldsdottir H., Tamayo P., Mesirov J.P. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1739–1740. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Backes C., Keller A., Kuentzer J., Kneissl B., Comtesse N., Elnakady Y.A., Muller R., Meese E., Lenhof H.P. GeneTrail--advanced gene set enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W186–W192. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hagberg A., Schult D., Swart P. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. In: Varoquaux G., Vaught T., editors. Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy2008); Pasadena, CA, USA. 19–24 August 2008; Lyon, France: HAL; 2008. pp. 11–15. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shannon P., Markiel A., Ozier O., Baliga N.S., Wang J.T., Ramage D., Amin N., Schwikowski B., Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13:2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Genome Reference Consortium Human Build 38 patch release 12 (GRCh38.p12) [(accessed on 21 December 2017)]; Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCF_000001405.38.
- 23.Falix F.A., Aronson D.C., Lamers W.H., Gaemers I.C. Possible roles of DLK1 in the Notch pathway during development and disease. Mol. Basis Dis. 2012;1822:988–995. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dentice M., Salvatore D. Deiodinases: The balance of thyroid hormone: Local impact of thyroid hormone inactivation. J. Clin. Endocr. Metab. 2011;209:273–282. doi: 10.1530/JOE-11-0002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Court F., Tayama C., Romanelli V., Martin-Trujillo A., Iglesias-Platas I., Okamura K., Sugahara N., Simon C., Moore H., Harness J.V., et al. Genome-wide parent-of-origin DNA methylation analysis reveals the intricacies of human imprinting and suggests a germline methylation-independent mechanism of establishment. Genome Res. 2014;24:554–569. doi: 10.1101/gr.164913.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chou C.H., Shrestha S., Yang C.D., Chang N.W., Lin Y.L., Liao K.W., Huang W.C., Sun T.H., Tu S.J., Lee W.H., et al. miRTarBase update 2018: a resource for experimentally validated microRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D296–D302. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ghiassian S.D., Menche J., Chasman D.I., Giulianini F., Wang R., Ricchiuto P., Aikawa M., Iwata H., Muller C., Zeller T., et al. Endophenotype Network Models: Common Core of Complex Diseases. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:27414. doi: 10.1038/srep27414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Da Rocha S.T., Edwards C.A., Ito M., Ogata T., Ferguson-Smith A.C. Genomic imprinting at the mammalian Dlk1-Dio3 domain. Trends Genet. 2008;24:306–316. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2008.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tierling S., Dalbert S., Schoppenhorst S., Tsai C.E., Oliger S., Ferguson-Smith A.C., Paulsen M., Walter J. High-resolution map and imprinting analysis of the Gtl2-Dnchc1 domain on mouse chromosome 12. Genomics. 2006;87:225–235. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fiore R., Khudayberdiev S., Christensen M., Siegel G., Flavell S.W., Kim T.K., Greenberg M.E., Schratt G. Mef2-mediated transcription of the miR379-410 cluster regulates activity-dependent dendritogenesis by fine-tuning Pumilio2 protein levels. EMBO J. 2009;28:697–710. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Song G., Wang L. Transcriptional mechanism for the paired miR-433 and miR-127 genes by nuclear receptors SHP and ERRgamma. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:5727–5735. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cohen J.E., Lee P.R., Chen S., Li W., Fields R.D. MicroRNA regulation of homeostatic synaptic plasticity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:11650–11655. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017576108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Schratt G.M., Tuebing F., Nigh E.A., Kane C.G., Sabatini M.E., Kiebler M., Greenberg M.E. A brain-specific microRNA regulates dendritic spine development. Nature. 2006;439:283–289. doi: 10.1038/nature04367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wheeler G., Ntounia-Fousara S., Granda B., Rathjen T., Dalmay T. Identification of new central nervous system specific mouse microRNAs. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:2195–2200. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nadal E., Zhong J., Lin J., Reddy R.M., Ramnath N., Orringer M.B., Chang A.C., Beer D.G., Chen G. A MicroRNA cluster at 14q32 drives aggressive lung adenocarcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014;20:3107–3117. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Enterina J.R., Enfield K.S.S., Anderson C., Marshall E.A., Ng K.W., Lam W.L. DLK1-DIO3 imprinted locus deregulation in development, respiratory disease, and cancer. Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 2017;11:749–761. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2017.1355241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Benetatos L., Hatzimichael E., Londin E., Vartholomatos G., Loher P., Rigoutsos I., Briasoulis E. The microRNAs within the DLK1-DIO3 genomic region: Involvement in disease pathogenesis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2013;70:795–814. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1080-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dill T.L., Naya F.J. A Hearty Dose of Noncoding RNAs: The Imprinted DLK1-DIO3 Locus in Cardiac Development and Disease. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2018;5:37. doi: 10.3390/jcdd5030037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dai R., Lu R., Ahmed S.A. The Upregulation of Genomic Imprinted DLK1-Dio3 miRNAs in Murine Lupus Is Associated with Global DNA Hypomethylation. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0153509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kameswaran V., Bramswig N.C., McKenna L.B., Penn M., Schug J., Hand N.J., Chen Y., Choi I., Vourekas A., Won K.J., et al. Epigenetic regulation of the DLK1-MEG3 microRNA cluster in human type 2 diabetic islets. Cell Metab. 2014;19:135–145. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hollins S.L., Zavitsanou K., Walker F.R., Cairns M.J. Alteration of imprinted Dlk1-Dio3 miRNA cluster expression in the entorhinal cortex induced by maternal immune activation and adolescent cannabinoid exposure. Transl. Psychiat. 2014;4:e452. doi: 10.1038/tp.2014.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Vistbakka J., Elovaara I., Lehtimaki T., Hagman S. Circulating microRNAs as biomarkers in progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2017;23:403–412. doi: 10.1177/1352458516651141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jernas M., Malmestrom C., Axelsson M., Nookaew I., Wadenvik H., Lycke J., Olsson B. MicroRNA regulate immune pathways in T-cells in multiple sclerosis (MS) BMC Immunol. 2013;14:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-14-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bergman P., James T., Kular L., Ruhrmann S., Kramarova T., Kvist A., Supic G., Gillett A., Pivarcsi A., Jagodic M. Next-generation sequencing identifies microRNAs that associate with pathogenic autoimmune neuroinflammation in rats. J. Immunol. 2013;190:4066–4075. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ingwersen J., Menge T., Wingerath B., Kaya D., Graf J., Prozorovski T., Keller A., Backes C., Beier M., Scheffler M., et al. Natalizumab restores aberrant miRNA expression profile in multiple sclerosis and reveals a critical role for miR-20b. Ann. Clin. Trans. Neurol. 2015;2:43–55. doi: 10.1002/acn3.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ghorbani S., Talebi F., Chan W.F., Masoumi F., Vojgani M., Power C., Noorbakhsh F. MicroRNA-181 Variants Regulate T Cell Phenotype in the Context of Autoimmune Neuroinflammation. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:758. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Junker A., Krumbholz M., Eisele S., Mohan H., Augstein F., Bittner R., Lassmann H., Wekerle H., Hohlfeld R., Meinl E. MicroRNA profiling of multiple sclerosis lesions identifies modulators of the regulatory protein CD47. J. Neurol. 2009;132:3342–3352. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cui C., Yang W., Shi J., Zhou Y., Yang J., Cui Q., Zhou Y. Identification and Analysis of Human Sex-biased MicroRNAs. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2018;16:200–211. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2018.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dai R., Ahmed S.A. Sexual dimorphism of miRNA expression: A new perspective in understanding the sex bias of autoimmune diseases. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2014;10:151–163. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S33517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sharma S., Eghbali M. Influence of sex differences on microRNA gene regulation in disease. Biol. Sex Differ. 2014;5:3. doi: 10.1186/2042-6410-5-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Huan T., Rong J., Liu C., Zhang X., Tanriverdi K., Joehanes R., Chen B.H., Murabito J.M., Yao C., Courchesne P., et al. Genome-wide identification of microRNA expression quantitative trait loci. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6601. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Singmann P., Shem-Tov D., Wahl S., Grallert H., Fiorito G., Shin S.Y., Schramm K., Wolf P., Kunze S., Baran Y., et al. Characterization of whole-genome autosomal differences of DNA methylation between men and women. Epigenet. Chromatin. 2015;8:43. doi: 10.1186/s13072-015-0035-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mirshafiey A., Ghalamfarsa G., Asghari B., Azizi G. Receptor Tyrosine Kinase and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: New Hope for Success in Multiple Sclerosis Therapy. Innov. Clin. Neurosci. 2014;11:23–36. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ruhrmann S., Stridh P., Kular L., Jagodic M. Genomic imprinting: A missing piece of the Multiple Sclerosis puzzle? Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2015;67:49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2015.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Vinuesa C.G., Rigby R.J., Yu D. Logic and extent of miRNA-mediated control of autoimmune gene expression. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2009;28:112–138. doi: 10.1080/08830180902934909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Giacoppo S., Pollastro F., Grassi G., Bramanti P., Mazzon E. Target regulation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway by cannabidiol in treatment of experimental multiple sclerosis. Fitoterapia. 2017;116:77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2016.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Liu Y., Zhang D.T., Liu X.G. mTOR signaling in T cell immunity and autoimmunity. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2015;34:50–66. doi: 10.3109/08830185.2014.933957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mammana S., Bramanti P., Mazzon E., Cavalli E., Basile M.S., Fagone P., Petralia M.C., McCubrey J.A., Nicoletti F., Mangano K. Preclinical evaluation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in animal models of multiple sclerosis. Oncotarget. 2018;9:8263–8277. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.