Abstract
We report a novel synthesis of monodisperse samples of copper telluride with crystallinity and stoichiometry corresponding to forms of rickardite, Cu3−xTe2 (x < 1). This synthesis makes use of a ligand balanced reaction to allow control over shape and size by varying the relative and absolute concentration of oleylamine to stearic acid. The rickardite samples presented here display size dependent plasmon peaks in the near infrared and direct energy band gaps between 1.7 and 2.3 eV. As such they may find utility in photovoltaic, thermoelectric or as novel optical materials for study of surface plasmons.
Keywords: sulfur-free synthesis, Cu3−xTe2, spheroids and planar squares, nanocrystals
1. Introduction
Recently, solar cells using semiconductor nanocrystal (NC) films have shown great promise for the production of low-cost, high efficiency photovoltaic (PVs) devices. Colloidal nanocrystals [1,2] and nanowires [3–5] can be well controlled and deposited by low temperature, non-vacuum methods such as ink-jet printing [6], spray coating [7], soft templates [8] and roll-to-roll printing [9], while allowing tuning of the size, band gap, conductivity and crystallinity of the films [10–20]. As such PVs made from semiconductor NCs have a distinct advantage over current, state-of-the-art PVs made using thin film production methods. To date, photovoltaic devices (PVs) have been made from colloidal nanocrystals of PbSe, PbS, CdSe, CuIn(S,Se)2, Cu(InGa)Se2, CZTS, CdTe and TiO2 colloidal nanocrystals [7,21–24].
Given the interest in using copper based materials in PV applications, there is an effort to identify new nanomaterials to develop ‘greener’ [25] nanocrystal-based PVs. Copper tellurides, like many cupric chalcogenides (CuxEy, E = S, Se, Te), occur in several stoichiometric and crystalline forms, and tend to be p-type materials with broad absorbance across the visible spectrum [26–28]. Forms of copper telluride have been used to make thin films [29], nanowires [30] and nanocrystals [10,26–28,30] and have been investigated recently as model systems for studying plasmon physics in quantum dots [10,31]. Forms of aggregated nanocrystalline rickardite [32,33] were reported in the late 1990s but without size or shape control, while monodisperse weissite and vulcanite have recently been reported [10,26,31]. Here we report the synthesis of highly monodisperse rickardite (Cu3−xTe2, x < 1) nanocrystals with non-hexagonal symmetry, produced by arrested precipitation in a high boiling solvent. With a direct band gap tunable between 1.7 and 2.3 eV, these materials have the potential to be used in a variety of photovoltaic, optical switching or thermoelectric [34] applications. Furthermore, by controlling reaction conditions such as relative ligand concentrations, we can demonstrate control over size, dispersity and crystal structure.
2. Material and methods
In a typical synthesis, 1 mmol of copper acetylacetonate is placed in a 3-neck flask with 12 ml of octadecene and 3 mmol of stearic acid. The flask is degassed under vacuum at 100°C for 1 h, after which 0.5 ml of oleylamine is added, at which point the clear copper solution turns from blue-green to dark blue, indicating formation of a copper oleylamine complex. The solution is degassed at 100°C for a further 30 min after which it is placed under 1 atm of nitrogen and heated to the injection temperature, typically 165°C. 4 ml of a 0.25 M solution of trioctylphosphine telluride is then quickly injected into the solution to cause nucleation and the nanocrystals are grown for approximately 5 min at 180°C before the reaction is cooled quickly to room temperature. Nanocrystals can be purified up to three times using the standard solvent/non-solvent method, with ethanol as the initial non-solvent and toluene as the dispersant.
3. Results and discussion
The synthesis described above generated monodisperse, spheroidal nanocrystals with average diameter of 9.2 ± 1.1 nm (approx. 11%) variation in the major axis (figure 1a,b). Based on X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements (figure 1c) these particles appear to have orthorhombic structure of rickardite, Cu2.86Te2, and are clearly neither weissite (Cu2−xTe, JCPDS 10-0421) nor vulcanite (CuTe, JCPDS 65-4264) nor other observed forms of copper telluride, copper tellurium oxide or any combinations or subsets thereof. Elemental analysis (figure 1d,e) indicates that they are a copper deficient form of the crystal as the ratio of copper to tellurium was measured to be 2.45 : 2 (x = 0.55) via energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrum measurements. UV-vis-IR absorption measurements (figure 4e) show strong absorption in the visible part of the spectrum dropping off rapidly near the band edge. The band gap for these particles was estimated to be around 2.2 eV using the linear region of the Tauc plot for a direct band gap semiconductor, which also reveals a significant Urbach tail indicating a large density of trap states near the band edge. At energies below the band gap, a broad plasmon absorption peak is visible, centred between 800 and 1000 nm (figure 4e,f). This feature has been attributed to localized surface plasmons, which arise due to oxidation of the Cu+ to Cu2+ and has been previously found to coincide with the copper-poor stoichiometry of the NCs [27]. The position of the spectral peak has been found to be strongly dependent on particle size [10,27,31] due to the confinement effect on the resonant energy of the surface plasmon in the particle. The band gap is also found to be shifted from the bulk reported values of 0.9–1.2 eV [35]. This is most likely a result of the confinement effect in nanoparticles [36] although slight changes in the crystal structure and stoichiometry can also affect the band structure [35].
Figure 1.
Standard reaction results. (a) Histograph and transmission electron micrographs of copper telluride nanocrystals from the ‘standard’ reaction. (b) NCs appear to be crystalline oblate spheres. (c) X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD) are matched by computer to those of Cu2.86Te2, an orthorhombic form of rickardite. Energy dispersive secondary X-ray (EDX) measurements on a sample on holey-carbon TEM grids show the sample to be purely copper (d) and tellurium (e) (dark spots are holes in the grid).
Figure 4.
Shape control via increased addition of oleylamine. (a–d): A series of TEMs of Cu3−xTe2 synthesized via the standard reaction with varying volumes of oleylamine added. UV-vis-IR absorption spectra for the standard reaction sample (e) and the planar squares (f) showing the direct band edge for both materials. The absorbance decays sharply near the band edge at 600–700 nm, which can be fitted more precisely using the linear region of the Tauc plot for both samples (inset). Indirect band gaps were not clearly observed so the near band edge intensity around 1.5 eV is presumed to be due to absorption by optically active traps. The absorbance after 800 nm, peaked at 950 nm (spheroidal) and 1550 nm (squares), is caused by plasmon absorbances. This is due to localized surface plasmons caused by free carriers in the copper telluride, as observed in previous studies [10,31].
Similar nanocrystals, shown in figure 2b could also be grown via a one-pot synthesis using this standard reaction in which precursors are added at room temperature. The pot was then heated to reaction temperature, again 180°C. This method produces almost entirely spheroidal nanocrystals but with an average diameter of 6.1 ± 1.1 nm (18%). The improved shape uniformity can be ascribed to greater uniformity of growth conditions after nucleation. The larger distribution in size is typical of many one-pot syntheses, in which nucleation occurs over a longer period of time. Without significant size focusing, larger particles grow from earlier nuclei while later nucleation events spawn smaller particles. The XRD pattern of this material (figure 2a) was assigned to that of tetragonal rickardite, Cu2.74Te2, but the decreased crystallinity and resulting missing peaks make this determination difficult.
Figure 2.
Size control. (a) XRDs of each match slightly different crystal structures, although both symmetries are within the same family and hence represent slightly more or less symmetric forms of the material. TEMs of rickardite NCs from the one-pot (b) and oleylamine syntheses (c) showing size control over the NCs. (d) The one-pot synthesis appears to be less crystalline and is difficult to match accurately.
Very small particles (figure 2d) could be grown by performing the standard reaction using pure oleylamine as the solvent, without octadecene or oleic acid present. This reaction produces nanoparticles of approximately 2 nm in size with most particles appearing to be spheroidal in loose clusters or slightly ovular when close packed. Based on XRD measurements (figure 2c), these nanocrystals appear to be a highly crystalline orthorhombic form of rickardite, Cu2.86Te2. Furthermore, they appear highly faceted and disk-like in shape, with several apparent ‘nanorods’ in close-packed formations. This behaviour has been previously observed with oblate spheroids and often indicates these particles are stacked disks [26,37] with c-axis dimensions of approximately 1 nm, giving a maximum observed aspect ratio of about 2. The change in the size of the particles can be ascribed to the lack of stearic acid. Compared to copper stearate, the copper oleylamine ligand bond should be significantly weaker, permitting the formation of many more nuclei upon injection [38]. This allows the formation of a larger number of nuclei at the injection temperature which in turn restricts the final size of the particles. Furthermore, amines have been observed to effectively etch copper nanocrystals. The size of the nanoparticles is then a steady state function of the competing deposition and etching reactions. In the latter case, the reaction is likely to be highly anisotropic as the amine will preferentially etch copper rich surfaces. The reactivity of the oleylamine with respect to any one facet is then a function of the availability and reactivity of copper at that site (figure 3).
Figure 3.
Planar squares. (a,b) TEMs of the shape controlled rickardite planar squares. Although samples are polydisperse nearly all NCs have the square shape. (c) The XRD measurements match well with those of Cu2.74Te2, a tetragonal form of rickardite. (d) NCs are up to 50 nm in the length of their principle dimension and several NCs appear stacked on edge with aspect a ratio of up to 4.
Thus altering the ratio of oleylamine/stearic acid in the standard reaction appears to vastly change the shape of the NCs produced. From figure 4a,b,d, increasing the concentration of oleylamine eightfold in the standard reaction creates a polydisperse sample of planar squares with principle dimensions between 5 and 30 nm. These squares have a crystal structure of tetragonal rickardite, nominally Cu2.74Te2. The stoichiometric ratio of the particles in this sample was observed to be Cu2.26Te2 by EDX measurements, demonstrated in table 1, indicating a large degree of copper oxidation and/or vacancy. The transition from isotropic growth to shape controlled growth can be seen from figure 4a to d where increasing the addition of oleylamine increases directed growth along the [010] and [100] planes. The formation mechanism for these particles is, as previously assumed, kinetically controlled growth where the oleylamine encourages facet-selective growth along the a-axes. This occurs by etching copper from the copper rich surfaces of the [001] plane and depositing it along the tellurium rich [010] and [100] planes. The absorption profile for the planar squares (figure 4f) is much closer to the bulk values of copper telluride, with a plasmon peak at approximately 1500 nm and an optical band edge around 1.85 eV. Assuming rectangular shapes visible in the sample TEMs to be stacked planar crystals, we observed NCs with aspect ratios of up to 4.
Table 1.
EDX data collected from Cu2.26Te2.
| element | peak area | area sigma | k-factor | weight% | atomic% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | 10 187 | 185 | 0.007 | 36.02 | 53.07 |
| Te | 12 863 | 245 | 0.010 | 63.98 | 46.93 |
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a ligand balanced reaction to produce monodisperse samples of Cu3−xTe2, corresponding to tetragonal and orthorhombic forms of rickardite. These can be synthesized with principle dimensions between 1 nm to 30 nm and c/a aspect ratios of up to 4, and are readily dispersible in non-polar solvents. We have also demonstrated the ability to use the oleylamine to stearic acid ratio to control the shape of the NCs, with lower ratios producing small spheroidal faceted NCs and high ratios producing polydisperse planar squares. As these materials are optically active and capable of absorbing wavelengths as low as 1.0 eV, monodisperse samples of rickardite could be used as the absorptive layer in solar cells and photodetectors, for optical switching applications, or as ideal systems for studying surface plasmon effects. Furthermore, square planes of Cu3−xTe2 should display unique optical properties with respect to plasmon absorption in the IR, certainly warranting further investigation. As such, Cu3−xTe2 represents yet another attractive nanocrystalline material for both photovoltaic applications as well as further study of fundamental NC physics.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge Professor Liguo Wang of the Henan Province Industrial Technology Research Institute of Resources and Materials.
Data accessibility
This article does not contain any additional data.
Authors' contributions
J.D. and G.J. conceived, designed and conducted the experiments. C.W., P.Y. and R.L. participated in the manuscript preparation. J.L. and W.Z. collected and analysed the data. S.Z. supervised and funded the project. All authors gave final approval for publication.
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests.
Funding
Financial support for this work was provided by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (no. 2016YFB0301101), the Robert A. Welch Foundation (F-1464), and the National Science Foundation Industry/University Cooperative Research Center on Next Generation Photovoltaics (IIP-1134849).
References
- 1.Enrico M, Mauro G, Tu RY, Jeremy D, Giovanni B, Roberto G, Luca T, Liberato M. 2018. Ab initio structure determination of Cu2−xTe plasmonic nanocrystals by precession-assisted electron diffraction tomography and HAADF-STEM imaging. Inorg. Chem. 57, 10 241−10 248. ( 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b01445) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lim J, Schleife A, Smith M. 2017. Optical determination of crystal phase in semiconductor nanocrystals. Nat. Commun. 8, 14849 ( 10.1038/ncomms14849) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jia GW, Du J. 2018. Foreign metal ions to control the morphology of solution–liquid–solid reaction. Cryst. Growth Des. 18, 7489–7495. ( 10.1021/acs.cgd.8b01289) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jia GW, Du J. 2018. Solution–liquid–solid growth of CuInTe2 and CuInSexTe2−x semiconductor nanowires. Inorg. Chem. 57, 14 961–14 966. ( 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b02779) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jia GW, Du J. 2018. Catalyst-assisted solution-liquid-solid synthesis of CdS/CuInSe2 and CuInTe2/CuInSe2 nanorod heterostructures. Inorg. Chem. 58, 695–702. ( 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b02870) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Habas SE, Platt HAS, Hest MFAM, Ginley DS. 2010. Low-cost inorganic solar cells: from ink to printed device. Chem. Rev. 110, 6571–6594. ( 10.1021/cr100191d) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Akhavan VA, Goodfellow BW, Panthani MG, Steinhagen C, Harvey TB, Stolle CJ, Korgel BA. 2012. Colloidal CIGS and CZTS nanocrystals: a precursor route to printed photovoltaics. J. Solid State Chem. 189, 2–12. ( 10.1016/j.jssc.2011.11.002) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Du J, Lai XY, Yang NL, Zhai J, Kisailus D, Su FB, Jiang L. 2010. Hierarchically ordered macro–mesoporous TiO2–graphene composite films: improved mass transfer, reduced charge recombination, and their enhanced photocatalytic activities. ACS Nano 5, 590–596. ( 10.1021/nn102767d) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tian QW, Xu XF, Han LB, Tang MH, Zou RJ, Chen ZG, Yu MH, Yang JM, Hu JQ. 2012. Hydrophilic Cu2ZnSnS4 nanocrystals for printing flexible, low-cost and environmentally friendly solar cells. CrystEngComm 14, 3847–3850. ( 10.1039/C2CE06552E) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kriegel I, Jiang C, Rodríguez-Fernández J, Schaller RD, Talapin DV, Como ED, Feldmann J. 2012. Tuning the excitonic and plasmonic properties of copper chalcogenide nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 1583–1590. ( 10.1021/ja207798q) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang JJ, Wang YQ, Cao FF, Guo YG, Wan LJ. 2010. Synthesis of monodispersed wurtzite structure CuInSe2 nanocrystals and their application in high-performance organic-inorganic hybrid photodetectors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 12 218–12 221. ( 10.1021/ja1057955) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Panthani MG, Akhavan V, Goodfellow B, Schmidtke JP, Dunn L, Dodabalapur A, Barbara PF, Korgel BA. 2008. Synthesis of CuInS2, CuInSe2, and Cu(InxGa1−x)Se2 (CIGS) nanocrystal ‘inks’ for printable photovoltaics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 16 770–16 777. ( 10.1021/ja805845q) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Steinhagen C, Panthani MG, Akhavan V, Goodfellow B, Koo B, Korgel BA. 2009. Synthesis of Cu2ZnSnS4 nanocrystals for use in low-cost photovoltaics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 12 554–12 555. ( 10.1021/ja905922j) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Guo Q, Hillhouse HW, Agrawal R. 2009. Synthesis of Cu2ZnSnS4 nanocrystal ink and its use for solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 11 672–11 673. ( 10.1021/ja904981r) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Castro SL, Bailey SG, Raffaelle RP, Banger KK, Hepp AF. 2004. Synthesis and characterization of colloidal CuInS2 nanoparticles from a molecular single-source precursor. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 12 429–12 435. ( 10.1021/jp049107p) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Goossens A, Hofhuis J. 2008. Spray-deposited CuInS2 solar cells. Nanotechnology 19, 424018 ( 10.1088/0957-4484/19/42/424018) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.McDonald SA, Konstantatos G, Zhang S, Cyr PW, Klem EJD, Levina L, Sargent EH. 2005. Solution-processed PbS quantum dot infrared photodetectors and photovoltaics. Nat. Mater. 4, 138–142. ( 10.1038/nmat1299) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hillhouse HW, Beard MC. 2009. Solar cells from colloidal nanocrystals: fundamentals, materials, devices, and economics. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 14, 245–259. ( 10.1016/j.cocis.2009.05.002) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Khare A, Wills AW, Ammerman LM, Norris DJ, Aydil ES. 2011. Size control and quantum confinement in Cu2ZnSnS4 nanocrystals. Chem. Commun. 47, 11 721–11 723. ( 10.1039/c1cc14687d) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mitzi DB, Gunawan O, Todorov TK, Barkhouse DA. 2013. Prospects and performance limitations for Cu-Zn-Sn-S-Se photovoltaic technology. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 371, 20110432 ( 10.1098/rsta.2011.0432) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim JY, Voznyy O, Zhitomirsky D, Sargent EH. 2013. 25th anniversary article: colloidal quantum dot materials and devices: a quarter-century of advances. Adv. Mater. 25, 4986–5010. ( 10.1002/adma.201301947) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tang J, Sargent EH. 2011. Infrared colloidal quantum dots for photovoltaics: fundamentals and recent progress. Adv. Mater. 23, 12–39. ( 10.1002/adma.201001491) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Du J, Qi J, Wang D, Tang ZY.. 2012. Facile synthesis of Au@TiO2 core–shell hollow spheres for dye-sensitized solar cells with remarkably improved efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 6914–6918. ( 10.1039/c2ee21264a) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Du J, Lai XY, Halpert JE, Yang Y, Wang D.. 2011. Formation of efficient dye-sensitized solar cells by introducing an interfacial layer of hierarchically ordered macro-mesoporous TiO2 film. Sci. China Chem. 54, 930–935. ( 10.1007/s11426-011-4288-9) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Anastas PT, Warner JC. 1998. Green chemistry: theory and practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li H, Brescia R, Povia M, Prato M, Bertoni G, Manna L, Moreels I. 2013. Synthesis of uniform disk-shaped copper telluride nanocrystals and cation exchange to cadmium telluride quantum disks with stable red emission. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12 270–12 278. ( 10.1021/ja404694k) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Saldanha PL, Brescia R, Prato M, Li H, Povia M, Manna L, Lesnyak V. 2014. Generalized one-pot synthesis of copper sulfide, selenide-sulfide, and telluride-sulfide nanoparticles. Chem. Mater. 26, 1442–1449. ( 10.1021/cm4035598) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kumar P, Singh K. 2009. Element directed aqueous solution synthesis of copper telluride nanoparticles, characterization, and optical properties. Cryst. Growth Des. 9, 3089–3094. ( 10.1021/Cg800836t) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Farag BS, Khodier SA. 1991. Direct and indirect transitions in copper telluride. Thin Solid Films 201, 231–240. ( 10.1016/0040-6090(91)90113-C) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lin CC, Lee WF, Lu MY, Chen SY, Hung MH, Chan TC, Tsai HW, Chueh YL, Chen LJ. 2012. Low temperature synthesis of copper telluride nanostructures: phase formation, growth, and electrical transport properties. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 7098 ( 10.1039/c2jm16486h) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Luther JM, Jain PK, Ewers T, Alivisatos AP. 2011. Localized surface plasmon resonances arising from free carriers in doped quantum dots. Nat. Mater. 10, 361–366. ( 10.1038/nmat3004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yang J, Yu SH, Han ZH, Qian Y, Zhang YH. 1999. Synthesis and phase transformation of IB-VIA nonstoichiometric nanocrystalline tellurides by a hydrothermal-reduction process. J. Solid State Chem. 146, 387–389. ( 10.1006/jssc.1999.8366) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dusastre V, Omar B, Parkin IP, Shaw GA. 1997. Convenient, room-temperature, amine-assisted routes to metal sulfides, selenides and tellurides. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 3505–3508. ( 10.1039/A702833D) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nethravathi C, Rajamathi CR, Rajamathi M, Maki R, Mori T, Golberg D, Bando Y. 2014. Synthesis and thermoelectric behaviour of copper telluride nanosheets. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 985–990. ( 10.1039/C3TA12877F) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Da Silva JL., Wei SH, Zhou J, Wu XZ.. 2007. Stability and electronic structures of Cux Te. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 091902 ( 10.1063/1.2775835) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Murray CB, Norris DJ, Bawendi MG. 1993. Synthesis and characterization of nearly monodisperse CdE (E=S, Se, Te) semiconductor nanocrystallites. J Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 8706–8715. ( 10.1021/ja00072a025) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Puntes VF, Zanchet D, Erdonmez CK, Alivisatos AP. 2002. Synthesis of hcp-Co nanodisks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 12 874–12 880. ( 10.1021/ja027262g) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mourdikoudis S, Liz-Marzan LM. 2013. Oleylamine in nanoparticle synthesis. Chem. Mater. 25, 1465–1476. ( 10.1021/cm4000476) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
This article does not contain any additional data.




