Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2019 Feb 6;286(1896):20182899. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2899

Correction to: ‘Sexual dimorphism in a top predator (Notophthalmus viridescens) drives aquatic prey community assembly’

D Start, S De Lisle
PMCID: PMC6408617  PMID: 30963941

Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20181717. (Published 7 November 2018). (doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.1717)

In our original article, we inadvertently overstated the novelty of our work. Specifically, we argued that our manuscript was the first to experimentally link patterns of sexual dimorphism to changes in prey community composition. In fact, Fryxell et al. [1] used a mesocosm approach similar to our own that linked sex-ratio manipulations of mosquito fish to trophic cascades in their aquatic communities. Fryxell et al. [1] was not, however, the first test of the idea that sexual dimorphism may influence the structure of ecological communities, as an old and rich body of correlative studies do so (e.g. [24]), a point we acknowledged in our original paper. Thus, our work adds to a growing number of recently published studies (including in plants; [5,6]) that together indicate that sex differences may have important consequences for ecological communities across a wide range of taxa and ecological settings.

Acknowledgements

We thank David Fryxell for making us aware of the interesting paper by Fryxell and colleagues.

References

  • 1.Fryxell DC, Arnett HA, Apgar TM, Kinnison MT, Palkovacs EP. 2015. Sex ratio variation shapes the ecological effects of a globally introduced freshwater fish. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20151970 ( 10.1098/rspb.2015.1970) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schoener TW. 1977. Competition and the niche. In Biology of the reptilia, vol. 7 (eds Gans C, Tinkle DW), pp. 35–136. New York, NY: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dayan T, Simberloff D. 1994. Character displacement, sexual dimorphism, and morphological variation among British and Irish Mustelids. Ecology 75, 1063–1073. ( 10.2307/1939430) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Butler M, et al. 2007. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive radiation in Anolis lizards. Nature 447, 202–205. ( 10.1038/nature05774) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nell CS, Meza-Lopez MM, Croy JR, Nelson AS, Moreira X, Pratt JD, Mooney KA. 2018. Relative effects of genetic variation sensu lato and sexual dimorphism on plant traits and associated arthropod communities. Oecologia 187, 389–400. ( 10.1007/s00442-018-4065-y) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tsuji K, Fukami T. 2018. Community-wide consequences of sexual dimorphism: evidence from nectar microves in dioceious plants. Ecology 99, 2476–2484. ( 10.1002/ecy.2494) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES