Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 17.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Infect Dis. 2019 May 17;68(11):1791–1797. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy776

Estimation of direct healthcare costs of fungal diseases in the United States

Kaitlin Benedict 1, Brendan R Jackson 1, Tom Chiller 1, Karlyn D Beer 1
PMCID: PMC6409199  NIHMSID: NIHMS991623  PMID: 30204844

Abstract

Background:

Fungal diseases range from relatively minor superficial and mucosal infections to severe, life-threatening systemic infections. Delayed diagnosis and treatment can lead to poor patient outcomes and high medical costs. The overall burden of fungal diseases in the United States is challenging to quantify because they are likely substantially underdiagnosed.

Methods:

To estimate total national direct medical costs associated with fungal diseases from a healthcare payer perspective, we used insurance claims data from the Truven Health MarketScan® 2014 Research Databases, combined with hospital discharge data from the 2014 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample and outpatient visit data from the 2005–2014 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. All costs were adjusted to 2017 dollars.

Results:

We estimate that fungal diseases cost more than $7.2 billion in 2017, including $4.5 billion from 75,055 hospitalizations and $2.6 billion from 8,993,230 outpatient visits. Hospitalizations for Candida infections (n=26,735, total cost $1.4 billion) and Aspergillus infections (n=14,820, total cost $1.2 billion) accounted for the highest total hospitalization costs of any disease. Over half of outpatient visits were for dermatophyte infections (4,981,444 visits, total cost $802 million), and 3,639,037 visits occurred for non-invasive candidiasis (total cost $1.6 billion).

Conclusions:

Fungal diseases impose a considerable economic burden on the healthcare system. Our results likely under-estimate their true costs because they are underdiagnosed. More comprehensive estimates of the public health impact of these diseases are needed to improve their recognition, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.

Keywords: Mycoses, Costs and Cost Analysis, Hospitalization, Outpatients, United States


40-word summary: To provide insight into the burden of fungal diseases in the United States, we used several administrative data sources to estimate their total direct healthcare costs. We estimate that fungal disease healthcare costs exceed $7 billion annually.

Introduction

Fungal diseases vary greatly in severity, from relatively minor infections of the skin and mucous membranes to severe, life-threatening infections affecting multiple organs. Symptoms of fungal diseases are often similar to those of other infections, resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment, which can lead not only to poor patient outcomes, but also to unnecessary medical expenses. The overall burden of fungal diseases in the United States is unknown and is difficult to quantify because they are likely substantially underdiagnosed, and no national public health surveillance exists for most fungal diseases [1]. In the absence of comprehensive surveillance, large administrative databases offer unique opportunities to examine the burden of multiple diseases using consistent methodology.

Previous studies show that patients with invasive fungal diseases incur additional costs, experience longer hospitalizations, and have higher mortality than similar patients without these diseases.[24] Several analyses of hospital discharge data have estimated national numbers and costs of hospitalizations due to specific fungal diseases, [510] often with a focus on the highest-risk patient populations (e.g., transplant, HIV/AIDS, and cancer) [3, 4]. However, few recent studies have examined similar metrics for all patients across multiple diseases and for outpatient visits associated with fungal diseases [11, 12].

More comprehensive estimates of the nationwide inpatient and outpatient visits and costs for fungal diseases are needed to help better define their burden on the healthcare system and would be useful for resource prioritization related to their prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. We used data from large insurance claims databases to calculate average costs per inpatient and outpatient visits, combined with national-level hospital discharge data and outpatient visit data, to estimate total yearly direct US healthcare costs associated with fungal diseases.

Methods

Data sources

We used the Truven Health MarketScan® 2014 Research Databases to obtain the average cost per hospitalization and outpatient visit among patients with private insurance, Medicare supplemental insurance, and Medicaid. The MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare Supplemental Databases contain health insurance claims data for more than 50 million employees, dependents, and retirees across the United States, and the Multi-State Medicaid Database contains claims data for nearly 12 million Medicaid enrollees in 11 states. We used the 2014 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to estimate the total number of US fungal disease-associated hospitalizations. The NIS is the largest all-payer database of inpatient stays in the United States, covering >96% of the population and representing >94% of discharges from community hospitals [13]. Similarly, we used the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) to estimate the average yearly number of fungal disease-associated outpatient visits nationwide. NAMCS and NHAMCS are national probability sample surveys of visits to outpatient and hospital ambulatory care departments, respectively [14]. The data are based on a systematic random sample of ambulatory physician visits and hospital outpatient, surgery, and emergency department (ED) visits, nationally weighted to describe utilization of ambulatory medical and hospital care in the United States. Because some fungal diseases are rare, we used 10 years of NAMCS and NHAMCS ED data (2005–2014) to increase total visit numbers and improve statistical reliability. NAMCS also contains data on visits to physicians at community health centers (CHC) for 2005–2011. We also included 2012 CHC data, which includes visits to both physicians and other healthcare providers and was the most recent year of available data. NAMCS/NHAMCS estimates based on <30 visits or standard error >30% are not presented.

MarketScan, HCUP, and NAMCS/NHAMCS contain preexisting, de-identified data. Because no interaction or intervention with human subjects occurred and no personally identifiable information was used, collected, or transmitted, this analysis did not involve human subjects under 45 Code of Federal Regulations 46.102(f), and was therefore not subject to review by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention institutional review board.

Disease groupings and exclusion criteria

We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes 110.0–118 (excluding 112.85 and 117.0), 136.3, 321.0, 321.1, 370.05, 484.6, 484.7, 518.6, and 771.7 to identify fungal diseases (Table 1). For inpatient data, we included visits with any fungal disease listed as the principal diagnosis and invasive fungal diseases listed in any position on the record. For outpatient data, we included visits with any fungal disease code listed in any position on the record. Some insurance plans do not contribute outpatient pharmaceutical information to the MarketScan databases; we excluded patients who did not have drug data available.

Table 1.

Estimated numbers of inpatient visits (HCUP, 2014) and outpatient visits (NAMCS/NHAMCS, 2005–2014 yearly average) for fungal diseases, United States.

Disease ICD9-CM code(s) Inpatient visits (95% CI) Outpatient visits (95% CI)
Aspergillus infection 117.3, 484.6, 518.6 14,820 (13,690–15,950) *
 Invasive aspergillosis 117.3, 484.6 14,465 (13,356–15,574) *
 ABPA 518.6 375 (289–461) *
Blastomycosis 116.0 950 (794–1,106) *
Candida infection 112.0–112.9 excluding 112.85, 771.7 26,735 (25,669–27,801) 3,648,715 (3,212,465–4,084,966)
 Invasive candidiasis 112.5, 112.81, 112.83 12,770 (11,997–13,543) *
 Non-invasive candidiasis 112.0–112.4, 112.82, 112.84, 112.89, 112.9, 771.7 13,990 (13,384–14,596) 3,639,037 (3,203,170–4,074,903)
  Vaginal candidiasis 112.1 380 (295–465) 1,354,331 (1,114,767–1,593,895)
  Oral candidiasis 112.0 1,090 (947–1,233) 782,522 (638,164–926,880)
  Esophageal candidiasis 112.84 5,365 (5,031–5,699) *
  Candidiasis of skin and nails 112.3 410 (320–500) 359,599 (274,013–445,185)
  Candidiasis of unspecified site 112.9 * 792,057 (644,084–940,030)
Coccidioidomycosis 114.0–114.9 6,670 (5,432–7,908) *
Cryptococcosis 117.5, 321.0 4,755 (4,331–5,179) *
Dermatophyte infections 110.0–111.9 690 (573–807) 4,981,444 (4,454,010–5,508,878)
Histoplasmosis 115.00–115.99 4,630 (4,164–5,096) 79,993 (43,064–116,922)
Pneumocystis pneumonia 136.3 10,590 (9,864–11,316) *
Mucormycosis 117.7 1,140 (912–1,368) *
Uncommon and opportunistic mycoses 116.1, 116.2, 117.1, 117.2, 117.4, 117.6, 117.8, 118, 321.1, 370.05, 484.7 5,585 (4,525–6,645) *
Other and unspecified mycoses 117.9 1,770 (1,351–2,189) 204,780 (134,958–274,602)
Total** All codes listed above 75,055 (71,492–78,618) 8,993,230 (8,131,234–9,855,226)
*

Estimates suppressed according to NAMCS/NHAMCS and HCUP protocols.

**

Numbers of visits do not sum to total because some visits had more than one fungal disease listed on the record.

ABPA = allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.

Visit cost calculations and national cost estimates

We calculated insurer costs, out-of-pocket costs (deductibles, co-payments, and co-insurance), and the sum of total payments from either source for hospitalizations and outpatient visits for each disease using the MarketScan databases. Because these payment sources include third party reimbursements as well as out-of-pocket costs, we refer to them collectively as “costs.” Costs include all costs incurred at a hospitalization or outpatient visit, even if fungal infection was not the primary diagnosis. Outpatient visit costs included costs of antifungals (and antibiotics for Pneumocystis pneumonia prophylaxis and treatment, among patients with ICD-9-CM code 136.3) listed on prescription drug claims in the seven days before to 30 days after fungal disease-associated outpatient visits [15, 16]. We chose this time window because MarketScan data do not indicate which outpatient visit or diagnosis was associated with a prescription.

We used the NIS to estimate the proportion of payers (Medicare, Medicaid, private insurance, and “other”) for each disease. “Other” payment sources included self-pay and insurance plans such as Tricare, Veterans health care, and other government programs; we used the privately-insured average cost per case for these sources. To estimate total national costs by disease from a healthcare payer perspective, we multiplied the average cost per hospitalization and outpatient visit from MarketScan by the corresponding proportion of payers and the total number of hospitalizations and outpatient visits in the HCUP NIS and NAMCS/NHAMCS, respectively. We did not calculate national costs for diseases with fewer than five visits per payment source in MarketScan or with relative standard errors greater than 30% in HCUP, to avoid unreliable calculations based on small sample sizes. We used the Medical Care Consumer Price Index from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor, to adjust costs to 2017 US Dollars [17].

Results

We estimate that 75,055 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71,492–78,618) fungal-disease-associated hospitalizations and 8,993,230 (95% CI: 8,131,234–9,855,226) outpatient visits occurred in 2014 (Table 1), resulting in total direct medical costs of over $7.2 billion.

The total estimated cost of fungal disease hospitalizations was $4.6 billion, including more than $1.8 billion for the Medicare supplemental population, $1.6 billion for the privately-insured, and $591 million for the Medicaid population. Candida infections (26,735 hospitalizations, total cost $1.4 billion) and Aspergillus infections (14,820 hospitalizations, total cost $1.2 billion) accounted for the most hospitalizations and the highest total costs of any disease. Specifically, 84% of the total costs and 48% of the hospitalizations for Candida infections were due to invasive candidiasis. Average cost per hospitalization varied by payment source, but were generally highest for mucormycosis ($106,655–$112,849), invasive candidiasis ($64,723–$153,090), and uncommon and opportunistic mycoses ($49,463–$131,823) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Mean inpatient and outpatient costs (2017 US Dollars) per fungal disease visit by payment source, MarketScan

Private insurance ($) Medicare supplemental ($) Medicaid ($)
Disease Inpatient Outpatient Inpatient Outpatient Inpatient Outpatient
Aspergillus infection 104,547 1,470 75,316 1,057 57,984 452
 Invasive aspergillosis 106,819 1,605 76,926 1,160 58,433 538
 ABPA 36,998 1,258 25,511 769 19,756 302
Blastomycosis 47,209 1,234 23,877 670 36,736 462
Candida infection 92,048 345 42,199 544 38,920 162
 Invasive candidiasis 153,090 725 73,250 1,278 64,723 406
 Non-invasive candidiasis 51,752 343 27,511 537 23,234 162
  Vaginal candidiasis 20,142 287 14,819 288 17,317 186
  Oral candidiasis 58,585 416 24,873 580 25,066 144
  Esophageal candidiasis 22,777 1,812 20,048 1,540 12,882 708
  Candidiasis of skin and nails 16,798 286 14,407 326 8,860 144
  Candidiasis of unspecified site 51,954 323 39,563 500 41,282 170
Coccidioidomycosis 39,786 620 26,101 488 16,320 156
Cryptococcosis 69,586 1,034 46,197 993 39,289 436
Dermatophyte infections 48,185 217 24,947 152 12,644 123
Histoplasmosis 48,782 581 35,305 460 20,609 405
Pneumocystis pneumonia 63,388 1,061 43,000 632 23,342 526
Mucormycosis 108,895 4,437 106,655 3,732 112,849 1,382
Uncommon and opportunistic mycoses 131,823 970 83,171 1,074 49,463 385
Other and unspecified mycoses 91,467 992 65,834 1,005 35,430 382
Any fungal disease 84,790 281 51,365 188 38,898 146

ABPA = allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.

Fungal disease outpatient visits cost an estimated $2.7 billion, including $1.7 billion for the Medicare supplemental population, $538 million for the privately-insured, and $295 million for the Medicaid population (Table 3). Over half of all outpatient visits were for dermatophyte infections (4,981,444 visits), resulting in a national cost of $821 million. 3,639,037 outpatient visits occurred for non-invasive candidiasis at a total cost of nearly $2.1 billion. Of those, 1,354,331 visits (37%) were for vaginal candidiasis (total cost $368 million), 782,522 visits (22%) were for oral candidiasis (total cost $335 million), and 792,057 visits (22%) were for candidiasis of an unspecified site. Total outpatient costs for “other and unspecified mycoses” (n=204,780 visits) were $182 million. For all payment sources, the highest average visit costs were for mucormycosis ($1,382–$4,437) and esophageal candidiasis ($708–$1,812). Dermatophyte infections had the lowest average visit costs ($123–$217), and costs for vaginal candidiasis were also relatively low ($186–$287).

Table 3.

Estimated total inpatient and outpatient costs for fungal diseases by payment source, United States

Private insurance ($) Medicare supplemental ($) Medicaid ($) Other payment source ($) Total ($) Percent of total fungal disease costs
Disease Inpatient Outpatient Inpatient Outpatient Inpatient Outpatient Inpatient Outpatient Inpatient Outpatient Inpatient and Outpatient
Aspergillus infection 446,841,070 12,839,459* 553,960,403 15,890,078* 140,499,827 2,238,847* 80,257,862 2,306,116* 1,221,559,161 33,274,501* 17%
 Invasive aspergillosis 442,681,293 5,650,145* 553,811,378 7,091,038* 138,364,739 1,082,713* 80,347,041 1,025,506* 1,215,204,451 14,849,402* 17%
 ABPA 5,179,233 8,454,944* 4,082,156 5,906,029* 1,185,346 871,365* 554,967 905,968* 11,001,702 16,138,305* 0%
Blastomycosis 15,826,969 1,461,367* n/a 902,506* n/a 223,839 4,556,589 420,728* 20,383,558 3,008,440* 0%
Candida infection 450,591,119 230,527,371 668,675,721 1,176,010,880 175,743,403 99,595,206 136,087,869 69,624,050 1,431,098,112 1,575,757,507 41%
 Invasive candidiasis 426,962,153 1,532,546* 486,034,050 6,424,624* 167,863,985 798,446* 115,146,844 413,310* 1,196,007,032 9,168,927* 17%
 Non-invasive candidiasis 109,326,427 188,408,371 253,749,411 1,288,966,937 44,660,334 80,805,709 37,866,041 65,256,674 445,602,212 1,623,437,691 29%
  Vaginal candidiasis 2,244,941 114,077,438 2,552,632 176,978,941 1,052,898 40,225,444 714,126 36,288,527 6,564,598 367,570,351 5%
  Oral candidiasis 15,593,985 79,501,316 12,492,855 209,079,126 6,420,647 26,506,078 3,825,060 19,500,937 38,332,546 334,587,457 5%
  Esophageal candidiasis 21,678,237 11,880,455* 65,579,141 34,703,110* 10,387,413 3,931,580* 7,649,705 4,192,314* 105,294,496 54,707,458* 2%
  Candidiasis of skin and nails 1,091,594 16,306,328 3,961,829 78,745,383 531,460 7,583,049 168,044 2,510,249 5,752,927 105,145,008 2%
  Candidiasis of unspecified site n/a 46,542,441 n/a 108,022,489 n/a 61,322,810 n/a 23,271,220 n/a 239,158,960 3%
Coccidioidomycosis 63,051,899 4,059,240* 68,645,512 5,301,322* 29,946,670 1,183,250* 24,679,405 1,588,844* 186,323,486 12,132,656* 3%
Cryptococcosis 75,375,122 2,696,042* 84,109,486 4,349,829* 52,215,642 1,393,727* 36,297,853 1,298,313* 247,998,103 9,737,911* 4%
Dermatophyte infections 6,263,852 203,937,154 7,983,570 350,677,518 2,402,654 169,279,653 2,410,453 78,479,000 19,060,529 802,373,326 11%
Histoplasmosis 69,317,014 14,261,580 75,062,421 16,886,634 15,266,836 5,185,051 16,713,780 3,438,765 176,360,051 39,772,029 3%
Pneumocystis pneumonia 178,292,626 1,630,534* 110,382,541 886,434* 86,269,038 1,062,448* 95,993,394 877,885* 470,937,600 4,457,302* 7%
Mucormycosis 42,654,497 327,752* 38,032,358 251,006* 36,831,788 85,094* 7,113,221 54,657* 124,631,863 718,510* 2%
Uncommon and opportunistic mycoses 253,778,258 5,930,461* 200,437,028 8,226,405* 41,796,380 1,034,779* 53,376,628 1,247,341* 549,388,295 16,438,986* 8%
Other and unspecified mycoses 48,018,540 60,221,513 53,660,574 94,735,364 10,980,641 13,704,048 10,976,591 13,766,077 123,636,346 182,427,002 4%
Any fungal disease** 1,561,698,461 619,341,968 1,815,405,002 795,389,705 607,543,161 273,841,778 481,110,039 190,799,726 4,465,756,664 1,879,373,178
Total*** 1,650,010,967 537,892,470 1,860,949,615 1,674,117,977 591,952,878 294,985,943 468,463,645 173,101,777 4,571,377,104 2,680,098,168 100%
*

Cost calculation based on <30 NAMCS/NHAMCS visits or relative standard error >30%; interpret with caution.

**

Costs of visits for one or more of the fungal diseases listed in the table.

***

The sum of costs for every disease category in the table. This value is subject to double counting of visits where multiple fungal disease codes were listed at a single visit, and excludes sub-categories and the “any fungal disease” category.

ABPA = allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.

n/a = Costs not calculated for <5 visits per payment source in MarketScan or HCUP relative standard error >30%.

Discussion

These estimates of direct healthcare costs associated with administratively-identified fungal diseases provide insight into their overall burden in the United States, which has not been systematically characterized. Our findings suggest that fungal diseases have direct medical costs of more than $7 billion annually, approximately 0.22% of the total national health expenditures of $3.3 trillion in 2016 (the most recent year of data available) [18]. Our results likely under-estimate the true cost burden of fungal diseases because they often go undiagnosed, leading to unnecessary treatment and in severe cases, substantial morbidity and death.

For most of the public, the term “fungal diseases” brings to mind superficial fungal infections, such as those from dermatophyte infections and non-invasive candidiasis. These superficial fungal infections were associated with >8 million national outpatient visits and $2.4 billion in costs. Lesser-known diseases like invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis affect a much smaller number of people (~15,000 hospitalizations in this analysis) but result in similarly large national costs because of their severity. Patients at risk for these severe fungal diseases often have underlying conditions that can require additional healthcare expenditures, which are captured in our analysis if billed in the same outpatient visit or hospitalization with a fungal disease, and would inflate these estimates. Complete attribution of specific comorbid conditions was not feasible in this analysis.

Nonetheless, our results are generally consistent with prior estimates of costs associated with fungal diseases based on ICD codes. The national cost of aspergillosis, candidiasis, cryptococcosis, and histoplasmosis in high-risk patients was previously estimated to be $2.6 billion in 1998, equivalent to $5.1 billion in 2017 [4]. We found that these four diseases did in fact contribute much of the national costs (67% of total inpatient costs); however, there were several methodological differences between our analysis and the previous study. Namely, the previous study included post-hospitalization nursing home and home health care costs, which accounted for 35% of total costs, but did not include costs of outpatient visits among patients who did not require hospitalization.

Aspergillosis, candidiasis, and mucormycosis are among the most studied invasive fungal diseases in terms of their economic impact. Other studies of aspergillosis-related hospitalizations using administrative data found a median cost of $52,803 (inflation-adjusted to $74,653 in 2017 dollars) in 2006 [6] and a mean of $76,235 ($99,532 in 2017 dollars) specifically among intensive care unit patients during 2005–2008, [19] compared with a mean all-payer cost of $82,427 in this study. In 1996, the total national costs of aspergillosis-related hospitalizations were estimated to be $633 million, [20] equivalent to approximately $1.3 billion in 2017, similar to our estimate of $1.2 billion. An analysis of nationwide hospitalizations for invasive candidiasis during 2002–2012 found a median cost of $46,684, [9] which, unadjusted for inflation, are somewhat lower than our estimates. We did not specifically examine costs associated with fungal meningitis, but another recent analysis using MarketScan data found that patients with Candida meningitis had comparatively high average charges ($103,803), as did patients with cryptococcal, coccidioidal, and Histoplasma meningitis [21]. Other studies also support our findings that mucormycosis, though a rare disease, consistently results in high average hospitalization costs (>$100,000 in this study) due to its severity and long length of stay [10, 22]. This finding is particularly notable since mucormycosis rates doubled from 2000 to 2013 [23].

Our findings confirm that cutaneous fungal diseases and vaginal candidiasis are associated with a substantial economic and public health burden in the United States. Prior estimates of the total direct costs of cutaneous fungal diseases, including both dermatophyte infections and candidiasis of skin and nails, were $1.7 billion in 2004, [24] with 4.1 million average yearly visits during 1995–2004, [12] compared with nearly $1 billion and 5.3 million average yearly visits for these two groups of infections in this analysis. We also found more than twice as many vaginal candidiasis visits than a previous study of NAMCS data, which described an average of 534,000 average annual visits nationwide during 1996–2001, [11] suggesting possible increases in recognition and diagnosis, actual infections, or both, in recent years.

Even though costs attributed to healthcare for comorbid conditions could not be isolated and removed, the true economic burden of fungal diseases in the United States is likely larger than our estimates. Given the challenges with timely diagnosis, many fungal diseases likely go unrecognized. For example, studies of autopsy reports suggest that only 50% of invasive fungal diseases are diagnosed before death [25]. In addition, our analysis is subject to several limitations inherent in administrative data, notably, the potential for ICD-9-CM code misclassification. Other studies have found that ICD-9-CM codes for aspergillosis and candidemia have only modest sensitivity and sometimes poor positive predictive values [2628]. We also observed a remarkable number of visits and high associated costs for “other and unspecified mycoses” (ICD-9-CM code 117.9), perhaps indicating a need for both better diagnostic testing and coding practices. In general, ICD-10-CM codes contain a greater level of detail than ICD-9-CM, which could help improve future administrative analyses of fungal diseases. However, in the absence of surveillance for many fungal diseases, large administrative datasets such as MarketScan, HCUP, and NAMCS/NHAMCS are some of the best data sources available. NAMCS/NHAMCS might also underestimate the number of visits for certain diseases due to the survey design, in which data are collected on the day of the visit, so initial visits for diseases that require laboratory test results to diagnose might not be captured with ICD-9-CM codes. Because HCUP and NAMCS/NHAMCS cannot identify unique patients, our analysis captures prevalent rather than incident disease and therefore represents a snapshot of yearly costs rather than average costs incurred during a patient’s entire illness episode. Specifically, our results likely under-estimate prescription drug costs because for some diseases, many patients might receive antifungal medication for longer than the time window we evaluated or receive free or discounted medication through pharmaceutical assistance programs.

Our results also underestimate the true costs associated with fungal diseases because they do not account for costs related to unnecessary testing, medical procedures, and inappropriate treatment before a fungal diagnosis is established, nor do they include costs of over-the-counter antifungal medications or nursing home care. Our estimates also do not include indirect costs such as those associated with decreased productivity, like time spent away from work due to disability, or deaths. In general, these indirect costs have not been well-established for most fungal diseases, but several studies document the negative impacts of certain diseases on patients’ quality of life [29, 30]. Such costs may be substantial and merit further study.

Further strategies to prevent fungal diseases and subsequently reduce costs are needed. Many fungal diseases, particularly those acquired from the natural environment via inhalation, are difficult to prevent. Therefore, public health efforts directed at increasing public and healthcare provider awareness and facilitating earlier diagnosis and treatment are of utmost importance. For example, coccidioidomycosis patients in Arizona who were aware of coccidioidomycosis before seeking healthcare were diagnosed faster than those who did not know about the disease, [29] and earlier diagnosis and treatment has been associated with improved outcomes [19, 3133] and reduced costs [19] for several fungal diseases. Because non-specific signs and symptoms can make fungal diseases challenging to identify, improved diagnostic strategies are needed to detect them early. Early detection is especially important in patients at high risk for developing invasive fungal diseases; examples of existing strategies include galactomannan assay for aspergillosis and β-D-glucan and T2Candida for invasive candidiasis [34]. When applied in at-risk populations with higher pre-test probability of infection, diagnostic-driven strategies like these have reduced costs by 32%, [35] and reduced empiric antifungal use by 11–14% compared with standard empiric strategies [36]. Similarly, screening for cryptococcal antigenemia, an early indicator of cryptococcal infection, is not routinely performed in the United States but might prevent deaths and be cost-effective among HIV-infected persons with low CD4 T-cell counts [37].

Early prevention methods for fungal diseases include prophylaxis and empiric treatment to prevent specific fungal diseases such as aspergillosis, candidemia, and Pneumocystis pneumonia in certain high-risk patients. These interventions are generally recognized as cost-effective, but the benefits can depend on the specific antifungal agent, patient characteristics and underlying conditions, and the baseline invasive fungal infection rate; more research is needed to better define optimal prophylaxis strategies for certain patient populations [38]. Judicious use of antifungal agents, including use of stewardship programs, is warranted given the increasing threat of antifungal resistance, particularly in Aspergillus and Candida [39]. Echinocandins, posaconazole, and isavuconazole are some of the most expensive antimicrobials currently on the market, and costs of these medications contribute to the overall cost estimates presented here. Other prevention approaches include healthcare infection control methods such as hand hygiene for invasive Candida infections and environmental strategies such as indoor air quality management, especially during construction or renovation activities, for preventing invasive mold infections. Adherence to infection control methods, along with other prevention efforts such as screening case-patient contacts for colonization, is especially important for preventing infections with Candida auris, a globally-emerging and often multi-drug resistant organism that is difficulty to identify with standard laboratory methods and spreads quickly in healthcare settings. Lastly, vaccines to prevent fungal disease do not yet exist but are being pursued for Candida infections and coccidioidomycosis; it is estimated that a potential coccidioidomycosis vaccine would save 1.9 quality-adjusted life days and $33 per person among children in highly-endemic areas [40].

In conclusion, fungal diseases are known to cause considerable morbidity and mortality. We show that they are also associated with substantial direct medical costs. These estimates are important for better defining the burden of these diseases in the United States, with the ultimate goal of improving their recognition, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge colleagues from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Sarah A. Collier, Elizabeth Adam, Stacy Crim, and Pinyao Rui for their important contributions to the methodology and Hilary Whitham for manuscript review. We also thank the HCUP data partners that contribute data to Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/hcupdatapartners.jsp).

Funding

No specific funding was received for this work.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

References

  • 1.Vallabhaneni S, Mody RK, Walker T, Chiller T. The Global Burden of Fungal Diseases. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dodds Ashley E, Drew R, Johnson M, et al. Cost of invasive fungal infections in the era of new diagnostics and expanded treatment options. Pharmacotherapy 2012; 32(10): 890–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Menzin J, Meyers JL, Friedman M, et al. The economic costs to United States hospitals of invasive fungal infections in transplant patients. American journal of infection control 2011; 39(4): e15–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wilson LS, Reyes CM, Stolpman M, Speckman J, Allen K, Beney J. The direct cost and incidence of systemic fungal infections. Value Health 2002; 5(1): 26–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Benedict K, Derado G, Mody RK. Histoplasmosis-Associated Hospitalizations in the United States, 2001–2012. Open Forum Infect Dis 2016; 3(1): ofv219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim A, Nicolau DP, Kuti JL. Hospital costs and outcomes among intravenous antifungal therapies for patients with invasive aspergillosis in the United States. Mycoses 2011; 54(5): e301–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Luo R, Greenberg A, Stone CD. Hospitalized burden and outcomes of coccidioidomycosis: A nationwide analysis, 2005–2012. Med Mycol 2017; 55(4): 368–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pyrgos V, Seitz AE, Steiner CA, Prevots DR, Williamson PR. Epidemiology of cryptococcal meningitis in the US: 1997–2009. PLoS One 2013; 8(2): e56269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Strollo S, Lionakis MS, Adjemian J, Steiner CA, Prevots DR. Epidemiology of Hospitalizations Associated with Invasive Candidiasis, United States, 2002–20121. Emerg Infect Dis 2016; 23(1): 7–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zilberberg MD, Shorr AF, Huang H, Chaudhari P, Paly VF, Menzin J. Hospital days, hospitalization costs, and inpatient mortality among patients with mucormycosis: a retrospective analysis of US hospital discharge data. BMC infectious diseases 2014; 14: 310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McCaig LF, McNeil MM. Trends in prescribing for vulvovaginal candidiasis in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2005; 14(2): 113–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Panackal AA, Halpern EF, Watson AJ. Cutaneous fungal infections in the United States: Analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 1995–2004. International journal of dermatology 2009; 48(7): 704–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.HCUP National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). 2014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD: www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp [Google Scholar]
  • 14.CDC. About the Ambulatory Health Care Surveys. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ahcd/about_ahcd.htm. Accessed 3/14/2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Beer KD, Collier SA, Du F, Gargano JW. Giardiasis Diagnosis and Treatment Practices Among Commercially Insured Persons in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 64(9): 1244–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Owusu-Edusei K Jr., Carroll DS, Gift TL. Examining Fluoroquinolone Claims Among Gonorrhea-Associated Prescription Drug Claims, 2000–2010. American journal of preventive medicine 2015; 49(5): 761–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.United States Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Price Index (CPI) Databases. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/cpi/data.htm.
  • 18.CMS. NHE Fact Sheet Available at: https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/statistics-trends-and-reports/nationalhealthexpenddata/nhe-fact-sheet.html. Accessed 3/13/2018.
  • 19.Baddley JW, Stephens JM, Ji X, Gao X, Schlamm HT, Tarallo M. Aspergillosis in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients: epidemiology and economic outcomes. BMC infectious diseases 2013; 13: 29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dasbach EJ, Davies GM, Teutsch SM. Burden of aspergillosis-related hospitalizations in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 31(6): 1524–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Charalambous LT, Premji A, Tybout C, et al. Prevalence, healthcare resource utilization and overall burden of fungal meningitis in the United States. Journal of medical microbiology 2018; 67(2): 215–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kontoyiannis DP, Yang H, Song J, et al. Prevalence, clinical and economic burden of mucormycosis-related hospitalizations in the United States: a retrospective study. BMC infectious diseases 2016; 16(1): 730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vallabhaneni S, Benedict K, Derado G, Mody RK. Trends in Hospitalizations Related to Invasive Aspergillosis and Mucormycosis in the United States, 2000–2013. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017; 4(1): ofw268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bickers DR, Lim HW, Margolis D, et al. The burden of skin diseases: 2004 a joint project of the American Academy of Dermatology Association and the Society for Investigative Dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55(3): 490–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dignani MC. Epidemiology of invasive fungal diseases on the basis of autopsy reports. F1000Prime Rep 2014; 6: 81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Asti L, Newland J, Zerr D, et al. Multi-Center Validation of ICD-9 Codes for Candidemia in a Pediatric Population. In: 48th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chang DC, Burwell LA, Lyon GM, et al. Comparison of the use of administrative data and an active system for surveillance of invasive aspergillosis. Infection control and hospital epidemiology : the official journal of the Society of Hospital Epidemiologists of America 2008; 29(1): 25–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schneeweiss S, Robicsek A, Scranton R, Zuckerman D, Solomon DH. Veteran’s affairs hospital discharge databases coded serious bacterial infections accurately. Journal of clinical epidemiology 2007; 60(4): 397–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tsang CA, Anderson SM, Imholte SB, et al. Enhanced surveillance of coccidioidomycosis, Arizona, USA, 2007–2008. Emerg Infect Dis 2010; 16(11): 1738–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Drake LA, Scher RK, Smith EB, et al. Effect of onychomycosis on quality of life. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 38(5 Pt 1): 702–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chamilos G, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. Delaying amphotericin B-based frontline therapy significantly increases mortality among patients with hematologic malignancy who have zygomycosis. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2008; 47(4): 503–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Garey KW, Rege M, Pai MP, et al. Time to initiation of fluconazole therapy impacts mortality in patients with candidemia: a multi-institutional study. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 43(1): 25–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Patterson TF, Thompson GR 3rd, Denning DW, et al. Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 63(4): e1–e60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. Diagnosing Invasive Candidiasis. J Clin Microbiol 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Barnes R, Earnshaw S, Herbrecht R, et al. Economic Comparison of an Empirical Versus Diagnostic-Driven Strategy for Treating Invasive Fungal Disease in Immunocompromised Patients. Clin Ther 2015; 37(6): 1317–28e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tan BH, Low JG, Chlebicka NL, et al. Galactomannan-guided preemptive vs. empirical antifungals in the persistently febrile neutropenic patient: a prospective randomized study. International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases 2011; 15(5): e350–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.McKenney J, Smith RM, Chiller TM, et al. Prevalence and correlates of cryptococcal antigen positivity among AIDS patients--United States, 1986–2012. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report 2014; 63(27): 585–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pechlivanoglou P, De Vries R, Daenen SM, Postma MJ. Cost benefit and cost effectiveness of antifungal prophylaxis in immunocompromised patients treated for haematological malignancies: reviewing the available evidence. Pharmacoeconomics 2011; 29(9): 737–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Munoz P, Valerio M, Vena A, Bouza E. Antifungal stewardship in daily practice and health economic implications. Mycoses 2015; 58 Suppl 2: 14–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Barnato AE, Sanders GD, Owens DK. Cost-effectiveness of a potential vaccine for Coccidioides immitis. Emerg Infect Dis 2001; 7(5): 797–806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES