Skip to main content
Zoological Studies logoLink to Zoological Studies
. 2018 Dec 17;57:e56. doi: 10.6620/ZS.2018.57-56

The Scleractinia (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) of Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands, Persian Gulf

Parisa Alidoost Salimi 1, Pargol Ghavam Mostafavi 1,*, Chaolun Allen Chen 2, Seyed Mohammad Reza Fatemi 1, Michel Pichon 3
PMCID: PMC6409733  PMID: 31966296

Abstract

Parisa Alidoost Salimi, Pargol Ghavam Mostafavi, Chaolun Allen Chen, Seyed Mohammad Reza Fatemi, and Michel Pichon (2018) There are many islands in the Iranian waters, but little is known about their coral species. This is a first attempt to describe and illustrate the coral species occurring in Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands. Overall, 26 species belonging to 9 families are reported, and three unidentified species and two species are added to coral communities of Iran. This study also provides overall insight on coral fauna in the Persian Gulf.

Keywords: Corals, Morphological identification, Abu-Musa Island, Sirri Island, Persian Gulf

BACKGROUND

The Persian Gulf, which is considered part of the Indo-Pacific, is a semi-enclosed epicontinental sea that is linked to the Oman Sea by the Strait of Hormuz (Sheppard et al. 1992). The coral fauna of the Persian Gulf appear to be relatively similar to those of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. The similarity could be due to a shared paleoceanographic history of restriction during the last sea-level low stand and simultaneous flooding during the Holocene transgression (Riegl and Purkis 2012). Despite this shared restriction, the Red Sea has more endemic species and greater diversity than the Persian Gulf (Sheppard and Sheppard 1991; Riegl and Purkis 2012; Rasul and Stewart 2015). Nevertheless, the low coral diversity in the Persian Gulf may not necessarily be the result of primary isolation, because a same or even a greater isolation has occurred in the Red Sea (Coles 2003).

Compared to other coral communities in tropical regions, the coral fauna of the Persian Gulf have been subjected to a wide range of natural stressors (Riegl and Purkis 2012; Coles 2003; Burt et al. 2014). The extreme seasonal variation in sea surface temperature (16-36°C), high turbidity, high salinity (36-43 PPT), and overall stressful conditions have led to regular coral mortality, which has eventually prevented the build-up of a true reef framework. Therefore, the coral assemblages in this region are more appropriately referred to as “coral carpets” rather than “coral reefs” (Burt et al. 2014). In fact, coral carpets are defined as non-accreting coral communities and non- three dimensional structures; the colonies grow on exposed rocky substrates rather than building on older dead coral skeletons. This type of coral assemblages is generally dominated by sediment- tolerant species and mainly occupies flat areas (Riegl and Piller 1999; Burt et al. 2014).

Most studies on corals species, such as those carried out by Downing (1985), Sheppard and Wells (1988), Sheppard and Sheppard (1991), Carpenter et al. (1997) and Riegl and Purkis (2012) are related to the southern parts of the Persian Gulf. These studies revealed that the highest coral diversity is found in Saudi Arabia (50 species) and then the UAE (34 species) (Sheppard and Sheppard 1991; Coles 2003; Riegl and Purkis 2012). Compared to the southern regions, fewer studies have been conducted on coral species in Iranian waters. There are 17 islands in Iranian waters that are surrounded by corals including Farsi, Greater and Lesser Tombs, Abu-Musa, Sirri, etc. However, lack of information and research on the coral fauna from the Iranian Islands in comparison to the southern parts has led to underestimation of the actual richness of coral species in this region. So far, 31 species from Nay-Band Bay and Kish and Farur Islands and 40 species from Larak Island have been reported (Fatemi and Shokri 2001; Riegl and Purkis 2012; Vajed Samiei et al. 2013, Rahmani et al. 2013; pers obs).

The presence of numerous coral species in the Persian Gulf demonstrates the adaptability of many Indo-Pacific species to the environmental conditions experienced in the Gulf and their tolerance to extreme conditions. Such tolerance could also help better understand the potential survival and adaptation of similar coral species elsewhere, in the face of climate change (Coles and Riegl 2013; Burt et al. 2014).

The aim of this study was to describe and illustrate the coral species occurring in Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands. Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands are located about midway across the width of the Persian Gulf (near the Strait of Hormuz) and their coral communities are mostly found in the shallow waters. Nomenclature for genera and families is based on the recent changes introduced by Budd et al. (2012) and later taxonomic revisions. This study also provides overall insight into the coral fauna composition from the Persian Gulf by amalgamating observations from the present study with previous reports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Before actually sampling the coral species in Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands, initial surveys were conducted using manta tow method to find out representative areas in terms of coral coverage. Based on coral coverage, six sites in Abu-Musa and four sites in Sirri Islands respectively were selected for coral sampling (Fig. 1). Sampling was carried out along non-straight lines (due to scattered coral distributions) by scuba diving in August 2015 at depths between 3-10 m, except for Turbinaria sp. 1, Turbinaria peltata and Goniopora djiboutiensis, which were collected by one deep diving at a depth of 22 m in Sirri Island. The corals were photographed in situ using an underwater camera, Canon G12. Approximately 5-10 cm2 of each colony was broken off using hammer and chisel and transported to Marine Biology laboratory of Science and Research Branch, Azad University. In the laboratory, coral samples were bleached in a sodium hypochlorite solution (10%), rinsed with fresh water, and then air-dried. All available specimens were examined under a stereomicroscope (Leica, EZ490). Specimens were identified to the species level based on skeleton traits (as corallite arrangement, septa, columella, costae, paliform lobes, etc.) according to available taxonomic guides (Veron et al. 1977; Veron and Pichon 1979 1982; Veron and Wallace 1984; Miller 1994; Pichon et al. 2010; Riegl and Purkis 2012). The skeletal characters were measured and counted from 5-20 randomly selected mature corallites per colony. Twenty-six samples from Hengam, Larak and Kish Islands and Nay-Band Bay were also collected in December 2016 and May 2017, and were included in this study as additional materials. All the collected specimens are lodged in the Zoological Museum of University of Tehran (ZUTC), Accession No. from ZUTC 6578 to 6634.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands in the Persian Gulf; the red circle indicates the sampling sites.

RESULTS

Overall, we collected sixty-one specimens of scleractinian corals from Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands. Twenty-six species belonging to 9 scleractinian families have been identified and they are described and illustrated below.

Family Acroporidae Verrill, 1902

Genus Acropora Oken, 1815

Acropora downingi Wallace, 1999

(Fig. 2)

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Acropora downingi, (a-b) Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands; (c-d) Larak and Hengam Islands; (e-f) close-up of radial and axial corallites. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Acropora downingi Wallace, 1999

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6578), Sirri Island (ZUTC 6579).

Other Material: Larak Island (ZUTC 6580), Hengam Island (ZUTC 6581).

Description: Color was brown to dark brown. Colonies are Plate-like with short vertical branches over the plates. Corallite diameter 1 mm. Primary septa well developed. Coenosteum between redial corallite simple spinule and costate. Radial wall porous.

Distribution: Widespread in the Persian Gulf and Red Sea. However, most of Acropora species have bleached in summer 2017 as a result of extreme summer temperatures. In some area as Bahrain, Abu Dhabi (Riegl and Purkis 2012) and in the Nay-Band bay in Busher Province (Personal observation), presence of Acropora species is reduced or disappeared.

Genus Montipora de Blainville, 1830 Montipora sp.

(Fig. 3)

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. (a-b) Montipora sp. from Abu-Musa Island; (c-d) close-up of corallites. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Montipora de Blainville 1830; Manopora Dana, 1846.

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6582).

Description: Color is uniformly pale light brown. Colony is encrusting to sub massive. Corallites diameter is almost 1 mm. Six septa in 2 alternating orders, secondary septa limited to wall. Corallites immersed. Theca papillae (5-6) taller than coenosteum papillae and not fused together. Coenosteum reticulated. Columella absent.

Remarks: The colony was small size. Corallites were relatively similar to those of Montipora aequituberculata (Veron and Wallace 1984). The specimen of Montipora cf. aequituberculata deposited at ZTUC (Acc. No Cnid. 1003) have been re-examined, but its growth forms and the corallites does not resemble to the present specimen.

Distribution: Known from the northern part of the Persian Gulf.

Family Agariciidae Gray, 1847

Genus Pavona Lamarck, 1801

Pavona decussata (Dana, 1846)

(Fig. 4)

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. (a-b) Different colonies of Pavona decussata from Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands; (c-d) close-up of orallites. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Pavonia decussata Dana, 1846; Pavona lata Dana, 1846; Pavona seriata Brüggemann, 1879.

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6583), Sirri Island (ZUTC 6584).

Other Material: Nay-band Bay (ZUTC 6585), Kish Island (ZUTC 6586).

Description: Color is greenish with some shade of brown. Colony is encrusting at the base from which numerous thick bifacial fronds extending more or less vertically, upper margin of fronds straight or contorted. Corallites arrangement is thamnasterioid and formation by extratentacular budding. Septa arranged in 2 alternating orders, primary septa markedly exert, thick and reaching/ fusing to the columella. Secondary septa less exert, short and sometimes only discerned at the calice rim. Septal margin is smooth, plunging vertically into the calices. Septocostae is well developed, regular, in straight rows alternating in thickness and height. Columella is a single low boss or granule, rod-like, sometimes flattened laterally. Coenosteum reticulated.

Remarks: In the Persian Gulf, P. decussata displays two colony forms; type 1 (Fig. 4a) have a thick bifacial fronds extending more or less vertically with greenish color. In type 2 (Fig. 4b), the bifacial frond is not clear and color is white- brown. Phylogenetic analysis (rDNA region) carried out by authors showed that both mentioned types are monophyletic and well supported (unpublished study).

Distribution: Widespread in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea and the Indo-Pacific.

Pavona cactus (Forskål, 1775)

(Fig. 5)

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. (a-b) Pavona cactus from Sirri Islands; (c-d) close-up of corallites. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Madrepora cactus Forskål, 1775; Pavona praetorta Dana, 1846; Pavona formosa Dana, 1846; Pavona venusta Dana, 1846; Lophoseris knorri Milne Edwards & Haime, 1851.

Material examined: Sirri Island (ZUTC 6587).

Description: The color is pale light brown. Margins paler in color than the sides. Colony is typically frondose, fronds thin, bifacial and anastomosing. Free upper margin, either straight or contorted. Corallites arrangement is thamnasterioid and formation by extratentacular budding. Septa are in 2 alternating orders, Primary septa slightly exert and reaching/fusing to the columella. Secondary septa less exert and short. Septocostae is well developed, regular straight rows between corallite centers. Columella is rod- like (styliform). Coenosteum reticulated.

Remarks: This species has much thinner fronds than P. dacussata. There is a similarity between P. cactus and P. frondifera, but striking difference in their colony shapes. Plates usually have radiating ridges which intergrade with fronds in P. frondifera.

Distribution: Common in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea, Indo-Pacific.

Family Dendrophylliidae Gray, 1847

Genus Turbinaria Oken, 1815

urbinaria peltata (Esper, 1794)

(Fig. 6)

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. (a) Turbinaria peltata from Sirri Island. Scale bar = 1 cm; (b-d) close-up of corallites and columella. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Madrepora peltata Esper, 1794; Gemmipora peltata Esper, 1794, Turbinaria dichotoma Verrill, 1870; Turbinaria maxima Ortmann, 1888.

Material examined: Sirri Island (ZUTC 6588). Other Material: Kish (ZUTC 6589). Description: Colony is a horizontal plate, thickness range 7-13 mm. Corallites are conspicu- ously larger than in any other Turbinaria species. Corallites arrangement is plocoid, from slightly protruding to immersed, also present on the edge of the corallum. Corallites average diameter 4 mm. Septa arranged mostly in 2 orders with 20-23 septa, at time hardly distinguishable. They project inwards 1/2 calice radius. Columella is one or a few elongate lamellar process with granulated sides. Costae absent. Coenosteum and exotheca are reticulated and echinulated.

Remarks: It is mostly found in the deeper parts of the reefs. Affinities of T. peltata to the genus Duncanopsammia, Wells, 1936 have been suggested by Arrigoni et al. 2014.

Distribution: Not common in the Persian Gulf and usually can be found in deeper waters.

Turbinaria sp. 1

(Fig. 7)

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7. (a) Turbinaria sp.1 from Sirri Islands. Scale bar = 1 cm; (b-d) close-up of corallites. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Explanaria Lamarck, 1816; Gemmipora de Blainville, 1830; Turbinacis Quenstedt, 1880.

Material examined: Sirri Island (ZUTC 6590).

Description: Colony is a small plate, attached to the bottom. The plate thickness is 2-7 mm. Corallites are small but distinctly protuberant, roughly arranged in lines more or less parallel to the margin of the corallum. A line or series of corallites conspicuously present on the very edge of the corallum. Calice diameter range 1-3 mm. Septa are well developed, reaching up to 2/3 of the calice radius with mostly 12 septa in one order. Septal margins distinctly and irregularly serrated. Columella is a small peg-like trabecular rising vertically. Occasionally the calice is almost completely invaded by a large mass of twisted and anastomosed trabecular, giving the appearance of a “closed” corallite. Costae absent. Coenosteum and exotheca are reticulated and echinulated.

Remarks: Corallites are similar to those of T. reniformis. However, the growth form differs from T. reniformis that had been reported from Abu-Dhabi (Riegl and Purkis 2012). The corallites size is smaller than that of the same species in the Yemen (Pichon et al. 2010). Because of limited material and small colony, positive species identification is not possible.

Distribution: Rare in the Persian Gulf.

Turbinaria sp. 2

(Fig. 8)

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8. (a-b) Turbinaria sp.2 from Sirri Island; (c-d) close-up of corallites and columella. Scale bar = 1 mm

Synonym: Explanaria Lamarck, 1816; Gemmipora de Blainville, 1830; Turbinacis Quenstedt, 1880.

Material examined: Sirri Island (ZUTC 6591).

Description: The color is light brown. Colony is small, encrusting and irregular in shape. Corallites formation by extratentacular budding. Corallites are tubular and mostly protruding above the surface of the corallum, nearly cylindrical to semi-conical in shape with aperture circular. Calice diameter 1-2 mm. Septa are mostly 12 to 16 in one order, very short and most projecting inwards 1/3 calice radius. Septal free inner margin usually vertical or near vertical, very finely dentate, side smooth without ornamentation. Columella is smooth and twisted. Coenosteum and exotheca are reticulated and echinulated.

Remarks: This specimen was found in shallow waters of Sirri Island. Because of limited material, positive species identification is not possible.

Distribution: Rare in the Persian Gulf.

Family Plesiastreidae Dai & Horng, 2009

Genus Plesiastrea Milne Edwards and Haime, 1848

Plesiastrea versipora (Lamarck, 1816)

(Fig. 9)

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9. (a-b) Plesiastrea versipora from Sirri Islands; (c-d) close-up of corallites and extratentacular budding; (e) exsert septa and well developed pali; (f) SEM image of corallites. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Astraea versipora Lamarck, 1816; Plesiastrea urvillei Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849; Plesiastrea quatrefagiana Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849; Milne Edwards & Haime (as P. quatrefaeesana) (1857); Brüggemann (1879); Plesiastrea peroni Milne Edwards & Haime, 1857; Favia versipora Lamarck 1816; Plesiastrea proximans Dennant, 1904; Orbicella gravien Vaughan, 1918; Favia ingolfi Crossland, 1931.

Material examined: Sirri Island (ZUTC 6592).

Description: Color is light brown. Colony is encrusting and irregular in shape. Corallites formation by extratentacular budding. Corallites are close to each other, arrangement is plocoid and outline circular to subcircular (diameter 3-4 mm). Septa are in two orders; first order reach columella, secondary order is shorter (S1 and S2:12-13) but rarely in some large corallites S1 and S2:19- 25. Primary septa markedly exert with margins dentations. Septal side granulated. Pali structures well developed. Wall is distinct and comparatively thin. Coenosteum is smooth and occasionally with a few granulated ridges. Columella is small and papillose (trabecular).

Remarks: This specimen showed some morphological affinities with Astrea devantieri Veron, 2000. However, P. versipora and A. devantieri are genetically distinct (Benzoni et al. 2011).

Distribution: Not common in the Persian Gulf. Widespread in the Red Sea and Indo-Pacific.

Incertae sedis

Genus Leptastrea Milne Edwards and Haime, 1848

Leptastrea pruinosa Crossland, 1952

(Fig. 10)

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10. (a-b) Colonies of Leptastrea pruinosa from Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands; (c-d) close-up of corallites and septal arrangement. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Leptastrea pruinosa Crossland, 1952.

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6593), Sirri Island (ZUTC 6594).

Other Material: Nay-Band Bay (ZUTC 6595).

Description: Colony is encrusting with irregular shapes. Corallites are polygonal to subcircular; formation by extratentacular budding. Arrangement mostly is plocoid. Corallite diameter is 3-7 mm. 24-47 septa in 2 or 3 orders, most are slightly exert above the wall margins; septal margins ornamented with dentations increasing in size toward the calice center. Septal free inner margins regularly oblique and usually sloping gently towards the columella. Small septa sometimes fusing to the sides of larger septa. Columella trabecular and intermixed with lower septa dentation. Costae absent. Coenosteum is smooth and usually forms a narrow strip between adjacent corallites.

Remarks: Presence of green color on center of polyps is a criterion for field identification.

Distribution: Common in northern part of the Persian Gulf.

Leptastrea transversa Klunzinger, 1879

(Fig. 11)

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11. (a-b) Leptastrea tranversa from Abu-Musa Island; (c-d) close-up of corallites. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Leptastrea transversa Klunzinger, 1879.

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6596).

Description: Colony is small and encrusting. Corallites formation by extratentacular budding and arrangement is plocoid. Corallites diameter 3 mm. Septa are in 2 orders with 24-29 septa (in a few corallites up to 42) and slightly exert above the wall. Primary septa is reaching the columella, secondary septa is short and limited to wall. Septal margins are horizontal at first near the wall, then descending vertically and rapidly towards the calice center. Margins slightly dentate, with a paliform lobe weakly developed in some corallites. Columella trabecular and trabecular often fused. Costae absent. Coenosteum is smooth and distance between adjacent corallites variable.

Distribution: Common in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea and Indo-Pacific.

Family Merulinidae Verrill, 1865

Genus Cyphastrea Milne Edwards and Haime, 1848

Cyphastrea serailia (Forskål, 1775)

(Fig. 12)

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12. (a-b) Cyphastrea serailia from Abu-Musa Island; (c-d) close-up of corallites, coenosteum and septal arrangement. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Madrepora serailia Forskål, 1775; Cyphastrea danai Milne Edwards & Haime, 1857; Cyphastrea brueggemanni Quelch, 1886; Cyphastrea suvadivae Gardiner, 1904; Cyphastrea conferta Nemenzo, 1959; Cyphastrea laticostata Nemenzo, 1959; Cyphastrea incrustans Klunzinger, 1879; Cyphastrea maldivensis Gardiner, 1904.

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6597).

Other Material: Nay-Band Bay (ZUTC 6598).

Description: Colony is submassive with numerous irregular short columnar processes extending mostly vertically. Corallites formation by extratentacular budding and arrangement is plocoid. Corallite aperture is slightly protruding, flush with corallum surface or immersed, outline circular. Corallites diameter 2 to 3 mm. Septa in 2 markedly distinct orders, with 12 primary and 12 secondary septa (in a majority of calices), Primary septa are exert above the wall margin and reach the columella. Secondary septa reduced (and limited to a ridge on the inside of the wall). Septal margins serrated. Costae are equal or un-equal and poorly developed. Coenosteum not heavily ornamented but a few granules present. Columella is loosely trabecular.

Distribution: Widespread in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea and western Indo-Pacific.

Cyphastrea microphthalma (Lamark, 1816)

(Fig. 13)

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13. (a-b) Cyphastrea microphthalma from Sirri and Abu-Musa Islands; (c-d) close-up of corallites, coenosteum and septal arrangement. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Astraea microphthalma Lamarck, 1816; Cyphastrea aspera Quelch, 1886; Cyphastrea gardineri Matthai, 1914; Cyphastrea muelleri Milne Edwards & Haime, 1851; Cyphastrea savignyi Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849.

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6599), Sirri Island (ZUTC 6600).

Other Material: Kish Island (ZUTC 6601).

Description: Colony is irregular and sub massive to encrusting. Corallites arrangement is plocoid and formation by extratentacular budding. They are circular in outline, average diameter 2 to 3 mm. Septa are in 2 orders with 10 primary and 10 secondary septa (in most calices); primary septa markedly exert, reaching the columella, secondary septa are less exert and short (< R/3 on average). Secondary septa limited to the wall. Septal margins finely serrated. At the base of the septal margin, occasionally one long, thin, twisted paliform structure extends vertically or obliquely upwards at times merging with the columella. Costae present, first order well developed bearing 2 or 3 blunt spines, second order is little developed or obsolete. Coenosteum is covered with granules or blunt spines, themselves bearing minute star- shaped ornamentations. Columella is trabecular (compact).

Distribution: Widespread in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea and Indo-Pacific.

Genus Favites Link, 1807

Favites pentagona (Esper, 1794)

(Fig. 14)

Fig. 14.

Fig. 14.

Fig. 14. (a-b) Morphotypes of Favites pentagona from Sirri and Abu-Musa Islands; (c-d) close-up of corallites and well developed paliform. Scale bar = 1 mm

Synonym: Madrepora pentagona Esper, 1794; Astraea deformis Lamarck, 1816; Aphrastraea deformis Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848; Prionastraea gibbosissima Milne Edwards & Haime, 1850; Goniastrea rudis Milne Edwards & Haime, 1850; Plesiastrea haeckeli Brüggemann, 1878; Favia adduensis Gardiner, 1904; Stephanocoenia maldivensis Gardiner, 1904; Favites parvicella Nemenzo, 1959; Favites gailei Chevalier, 1971.

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6602), Sirri Island (ZUTC 6603).

Other Material: Kish Island (ZUTC 6604).

Description: Colony is encrusting to nodular with irregular shapes. Corallites arrangement is cerioid and formation by intratentacular budding. Corallite outline is irregular and subcircular to polygonal, at times distinctly pentagonal. Calice diameter 3-6 mm. Septa are mostly in two orders, primary septa reaching the columella with conspicuous paliforme lobes. Secondary septa reduced and limited to the wall, in some corallites a third order of septa can be observed but is much reduced and limited to wall (or abortive). Septal margins have small-tiny horizontal flattened teeth. Well-developed paliform lobes forming a crown around the columella. Columella is compact or made of few tangled trabecular poorly developed. Theca is thick and angular.

Remarks: This species displays different colony forms. Main differences among specimens were the shapes of paliform lobes and their ornamentation (Fig. 15a). Indeed, skeletal exami nation indicated corallites traits (e.g. paliform crown, septa, etc.) were stable among the specimens (Fig. 15c-d).

Distribution: Widespread in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea and Indo-Pacific.

Favites chinensis (Verrill, 1866)

(Fig. 15)

Fig. 15.

Fig. 15.

Fig. 15. (a-b) Favites chinensis from Abu-Musa Island; (c-d) close-up of corallites. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Prionastraea chinenis Verrill, 1866; Favites yamanarii Yabe & Sugiyama, 1935.

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6605).

Description: Colony is encrusting and irregular, with a few humps a few cm high above the general surface of the corallum. Corallites arrangement is cerioid and formation by intratentacular budding. Outline subcircular to polygonal. Calice diameter is 5-8 mm. Some corallites are raised and have a nodular form. Up to 40 septa regularly spaced in two orders. First order reaching the columella. Second order reduced and limited to wall. Septal margin dentation well developed, size of the dentations increasing near the calice center. Septa of adjacent corallites are continuous above the common walls. Paliform lobes are absent or inconspicuous. Columella is spongy. Theca is angular, particularly in the corallites present on the nodules or humps of the corallum. The structure and appearance of the thecae often vary greatly from one part of the corallum to another. They are usually thin and irregular on hillocky parts and broad on flat parts where calices are shallow. Remarks: In the present study, the specimens have slightly larger corallites than those found outside the Persian Gulf. This species may be confused with F. abdita or F. pentagona in the field. However, the wall of F. chinensis is thinner than F. pentagona and the corallite is fairly angled (Sheppard and Sheppard 1991).

Distribution: Rare in the Persian Gulf and Indo-Pacific.

Genus Platygyra Ehrenberg, 1834

Platygyra daedalea (Ellis and Solander, 1786)

(Fig. 16)

Fig. 16.

Fig. 16.

Fig. 16. (a-b) Different colonies of Platygyra daedalea from Abu-Musa (rather flat) and Sirri Islands (spherical); (c-d) close-up of corallites. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Madrepora daedalea Ellis & Solander, 1786; Astroria

astraeiformis Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849; Astroria daedalea (Ellis & Solander, 1786); Astroria esperi Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849; Caeloria daedalea (Ellis & Scholander, 1786); Coeloria astraeiformis (Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849); Coeloria esperi (Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849); Coeloria rustica (Dana, 1846); Maeandra astraeiformis (Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849); Maeandra daedalea (Ellis & Solander, 1786); Maeandrina daedalea (Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849); Maeandrina rustica Dana, 1846; Meandra esperi (Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849); Platygyra astraeiformis (Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849); Platygyra esperi (Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849); Platygyra rustica (Dana, 1846).

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6606), Sirri Island (ZUTC 6607).

Other Material: Kish island (ZUTC 6608), Nay-Band Bay (ZUTC 6609).

Description: Colony is encrusting and massive to sub massive. Corallites arrangement is meandroid. Septa are in two orders (mostly distinguishable). Septa slightly exert above the wall. Septal margins ornamented with teeth. Septal side frequently connected by a thin vertical ridge running parallel to the valley axis above the wall. Exertness of septa above the theca (ES) 1-2 mm, valley width (VW) 4-5 mm, valley depth (VD) 4.5-6 mm (vertically from the columella to the top of the septa). Paliform lobes absent. Columella present. Wall is thin and not perforated.

Remarks: The genus Platygyra is a common throughout the Indo-Pacific and its species displays wide genotypic and phenotypic variation (Veron et al. 1977). The specimens showed different colony forms and colors in the field (Fig. 16a-b), but skeletal examination indicated their corallites traits (VW, VD, ES, etc.) are stable, so that collected specimens belonged to a single species. Distribution: Widespread in the Persian Gulf,

Red Sea and Indo-Pacific.

Genus Dipsastraea de Blainville, 1830

Dipsastraea pallida (Dana, 1846)

(Fig. 17)

Fig. 17.

Fig. 17.

Fig. 17. (a-c-e) Different colonies of Dipsastraea pallida from Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands; (b-d-f) close-up of their corallites. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Astraea (Fissicella) denticulata Dana, 1846; Astraea cellulosa Verrill, 1872; Astraea denticulata Dana, 1846; Astraea doreyensis (Milne Edwards & Haime, 1857); Astraea ordinata Verrill, 1866; Favia amplior (Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849); Favia denticulata (Gardiner, 1904); Favia doreyensis Milne Edwards & Haime, 1850; Favia laccadivica Gardiner, 1904; Favia okeni Milne Edwards & Haime, 1857; Favia pallida (Dana, 1846); Favia tubulifera Klunzinger, 1879; Goniastraea serrata Ortmann, 1889; Heliastrea borradailei Gardiner, 1904; Parastrea amplior Milne Edwards & Haime, 1850;

Parastrea verrilleana Milne Edwards & Haime, 1850.

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6610), Sirri Island (ZUTC 6611).

Other Material: Nay-Band Bay (ZUTC 6612), Kish Island (ZUTC 6613).

Description: Colony is massive and hemis- pherical. Corallites arrangement is plocoid to sub- plocoid, even sub ceroid in parts of the colony. Corallites formation by intratentacular budding. Corallite and calice diameter are 8-10 mm and 8-9 mm, respectively. 22-28 septa in two orders (sometimes indistinguishable). Septa are well separated and exert above the wall margin. Most septa descend abruptly down the endotheca and then reach the columella. Septal margins always ornamented with very short and irregular dentations. These dentations are themselves finely serrated, especially at their tips which frequently form minute horizontal fans. Palar structures absent (occasionally may be weakly present). Columella is spongy. Costae equal and sometimes adjacent costae join together.

Remarks: The specimens showed different colony forms and colors in the field; however, their skeletal features were similar (Fig. 17a, c-d). D. pallida had a smaller corallite size than the other species and a slightly lower calic (Kongjandtre et al. 2012). Pale discoloration is because of presence mucus sheathing (Fig. 17a-c) (Alidoost Salimi et al. 2017).

Distribution: Widespread in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea and Indo-Pacific.

Dipsastraea favus (Forskål, 1775)

(Fig. 18)

Fig. 18.

Fig. 18.

Fig. 18. (a-b) Dipsastraea favus from Sirri Island; (c-d) close-up of corallites. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Madrepora favus (pars) Forskål, 1775; Madrepora cavernosa Forsskål, 1775; Madrepora denticulata Ellis & Solander, 1786; Parastrea denticulata Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849; Favia jacquinoti Milne Edwards & Haime, 1857; Favia geoffroyi Milne Edwards & Haime, 1857; Favia deformata Milne Edwards & Haime, 1857; Favia aspera Milne Edwards & Haime, 1857; Favia ehrenbergi Klunzinger, 1879; Orbicella borradailei Gardiner, 1904.

Material examined: Sirri Island (ZUTC 6614).

Description: Colony is massive and hemis- pherical. Corallites are circular and arrangement is plocoid. Corallites formation by extratentacular budding. Corallite and calice diameter 9-12 mm and 7-11 mm, respectively. Septa are well separated and exert above the wall margin. 24-40 septa in 2 or 3 orders. Primary order septa reach columella, third order reduced or abortive (orders sometimes indistinctive). Septa descend steeply into the calyx immediately from the wall towards the center. Palar structures absent or weakly developed. Columella is compact. Costae equal, dentate and adjacent costae sometimes joined together. Coenosteum smooth

Remarks: The skeleton did not clearly show the more common shape of the corallites, and it should be noted that there is considerable intraspecific variability in this particular species.

Dipsastraea favus displays a larger corallite size and higher calice compared to D. pallida (Kongjandtre et al. 2012), and this feature has been considered as a main criterion for identification. The pale mucus sheaths were peeling off, revealing the normal coloration underneath (Alidoost Salimi et al. 2017) (Fig. 18a- b).

Distribution: Uncommon in the Persian Gulf.

Dipsastraea rotumana (Gardiner, 1899)

(Fig. 19)

Fig. 19.

Fig. 19.

Fig. 19. (a) Dipsastraea rotumana from Sirri Island; (b) corallite/primary septa taller and thicker than other; (c-d) close-up of septa. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Astraea rotumana Gardiner, 1899; Favia rotumana (Gardiner, 1899)

Material examined: Sirri Island (ZUTC 6615). Description: Colony is massive and hemisph- erical. Corallites outline are circular and irregular. Corallite arrangement is plocoid but occasionally tending to cerioid. Corallites formation by intratencular budding. Corallites and calice diameter are 9-13 mm and 7-11 mm, respectively. Septa are well separated and markedly exert above the wall margin. 24-38 septa in two or three orders. Primary septa are distinctively taller and thicker than the others, and steep descending. Secondary septa are shorter and descend abruptly down the calice without reaching the columella; third order septa abortive. Septal margins with conspicuous irregular dentations at times flattened transversally. All septa descend abruptly down the calice. Palar structures absent. Columella is small, trabecular. Costae equal and ornamented. Coenosteum smooth.

Remarks: Pale discoloration is because of presence mucus sheathing (Fig. 19a) (Alidoost Salimi et al. 2017). The specimen seems relatively close to D. favus but the primary septa are distinctively taller and thicker than the other septa, which is characteristic of D. rotumana (Sheppard and Sheppard 1991; Veron et al. 1977).

Distribution: Rare in the Persian Gulf, common in the Red Sea and Indo-Pacific.

Family Lobophylliidae Dai and Horng, 2009

Genus Acanthastrea Milne Edwards and Haime, 1848

Acanthastrea echinata (Dana, 1846)

(Fig. 20)

Fig. 20.

Fig. 20.

Fig. 20. (a-b) Acanthastrea echinata from Abu-Musa Island; (c) close-up of corallites; (d) septal margin with 3-5 conspicuous. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Astrea echinata Dana, 1846; Astrea patula Dana, 1846; Acanthastrea spinosa Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848; Acanthastrea hirsuta Milne Edwards & Haime, 1857; Acanthastrea brevis Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849; Acanthastrea grandis Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849; Favia hirsuta (Milne Edwards & Haime, 1857); Favites hirsuta (Milne Edwards & Haime, 1857).

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6616).

Description: Colony is encrusting to massive with fleshy polyps. Corallites arrangement is cerioid and formation by intratentacular (sometimes marginal) budding. Outline circular to subcircular. Corallites diameter variable (average 10-15 mm). 24-31 septa in one order and reaching the columella. They are continuous over the wall extending from one corallite to the adjacent ones. Upper septal margin with 3-5 conspicuous, large dentations with acute tips. Septal sides smooth. Columella is compact, a tangle of twisted trabecular.

Distribution: Common in the Persian Gulf, Red Sea and Indo-Pacific.

Family Poritidae Gray, 1842

Genus Porites Link, 1807

Porites harrisoni Veron, 2000

(Fig. 21)

Fig. 21.

Fig. 21.

Fig. 21. (a-b) Porites harrisoni from Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands; (c-d) close-up of corallites. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Porites harrisoni Veron, 2000.

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6617), Sirri Island (ZUTC 6618).

Other Material: Nay-Band Bay (ZUTC 6619), Kish Island (ZUTC 6620).

Description: Colony basically columnar, but may tend towards nodular or even branching. An encrusting base may be visible. Color is mostly shades of dark brown. Corallites round to polygonal. Calice diameter 0.8 to 1 mm. Septa well developed with complete lateral pairs. Dorsal directive is relatively smaller than lateral pairs. Ventral triplet is generally free. Uncommonly a fusion (trident) may be observed. A synapticular ring may be present, deeper in the calice. Eight well developed pali, those of the dorsal directive septum and triplet being usually smaller than those of the lateral pairs. Generally one granule present on the septa, between the pali and the wall. Columella is small and styliform. Wall mostly thin with a row of granules on the upper edge.

Remarks: The growth forms are nodular, columnar to branching, hence very different in comparison to P. lobata and P. lutea; the only similar species is P. nodifera, which makes much thicker columns and is rare in the Persian Gulf (Riegl and Purkis 2012). Some of the specimens from the Persian Gulf referred in the literature as P. compressa may actually belong to the present species.

Distribution: The species is very common inside the Persian Gulf and is also present in the North West Arabian Sea (Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden) and the Red Sea.

Porites lobata Dana, 1846

(Fig. 22)

Fig. 22.

Fig. 22.

Fig. 22. (a-b) Different colonies of Porites lobata from Sirri and Abu-Musa Islands; (c) close-up of corallites and septal arrangements; (d) ventral triplet free. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Porites (Porites) lobata Dana, 1846; Porites lobata cf. nodulosa Hoffmeister, 1925; Porites globosa Nemenzo, 1976; Porites excavata Verrill, 1869.

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6621), Sirri Island (ZUTC 6622).

Other Material: Kish Island (ZUTC 6623).

Description: Colony thick encrusting to small massive. Surface may near some humps. Corallites round to polygonal. Calice diameter 1.0-1.5 mm. Septa well developed with complete lateral pairs; dorsal and ventral directives smaller than other septa. Ventral triplet is free (no fusion). Eight weakly developed pali, those of the dorsal directive septum and triplet usually being smaller than those of the lateral pairs. One granule present on the septa between the pali and the wall. Inner synapticular ring present. Columella present well-developed and styliform. Wall mostly thin, ornamented with a row of spicule-like granules on the upper edge.

Remarks: The species differs from P. harrisoni in having encrusting or massive colony forms and eight weakly developed pali. Specimens display different morphotypes, while skeletal examination indicated septal pattern (as main criterion) is remarkably stable (Fig. 22c-d). It seems that P. lobata specimens are able to reform their growth strategy in order to persist over the reef framework (Tortolero-Langarica et al. 2016).

Distribution: Widely distributed throughout the Persian Gulf. Very common in the Indo-Pacific and Pacific Ocean.

Porites lutea Milne Edwards and Haime, 1851

(Fig. 23)

Fig. 23.

Fig. 23.

Fig. 23. (a-b) Different colonies of Porites lutea from Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands; (c) close-up of corallites and septa arrangements; (d) ventral triplet with trident fusion. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Porites conglomerata var. lutea Quoy & Gaimard, 1833; Porites lutea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1851; Porites arenosa var. lutea Gardiner 1898; Madrepora arenosa Esper, 1797; Porites tenuis Verrill, 1866; Porites haddoni Vaughan, 1918.

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6624), Sirri Island (ZUTC 6625).

Other Material: Nay-Band Bay (ZUTC 6626).

Description: Color is light yellow to brown. Colony is submassive to massive. Corallite outline round to polygonal. Calice diameter 1.0-1.3 mm. Septa well developed and lateral pairs are complete and fusing at the end. Dorsal directive is much smaller than other septa, ventral triplet with characteristic trident formation. One inner synapticular ring present, five pali developed, one at the end of each lateral pair and one on the ventral directive. Radii joining the pali to the columella may be present particularly between the ventral directive and the columella. Generally one granule present between the pali and the wall. Columella present but often small styliform. Wall mostly thin with a row of spicules on the upper edge.

Remarks: This species differs from P. harrisoni and P. lobata in having a ventral triplet with a conspicuous trident formation. The collected specimens have different morphotypes (Fig. 23a- b); but septal pattern (as main trait) was constant in collected specimens (Fig. 23c-d).

Distribution: Common in the Persian Gulf and widely distributed in the Indo-Pacific.

Genus Goniopora de Blainville, 1830

Goniopora columna Dana, 1846

(Fig. 24)

Fig. 24.

Fig. 24.

Fig. 24. (a-b) Goniopora columna from Abu-Musa Island; (c-d) close-up of corallites. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Goniopora columna Dana, 1846.

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6627).

Description: Colony is columnar. Corallites are subcircular to polygonal and formation by extratentacular budding, diameter 2.5 to 3 mm. Calice shallow, less than 1 mm deep. Irregular septa, arrangement is gonioporoid and sometimes indistinct. Septa consist of perforated vertical plates and occasionally continuous over the wall of adjacent corallites. Columella is broad, spongy, filling up to 1/2 calice diameter. Wall comparatively thin, porous, but not heavily perforated. Polyps like for many other species of Goniopora, polyps are fully extended during daytime. A whitish oral cone is conspicuous.

Distribution: Rare in the Persian Gulf. Relatively common in the Indo-Pacific.

Goniopora djiboutiensis Vaughan, 1907

(Fig. 25)

Fig. 25.

Fig. 25.

Fig. 25. Goniopora djiboutiensis from Sirri Island; (a) extratentacular budding; (b) close-up of corallites. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Goniopora djiboutiensis Vaghan 1907; Goniopora

pulvinella Wells, 1954.

Material examined: Sirri Island (ZUTC 6628).

Description: Colony is thick encrusting to submassive. Corallites are circular to polygonal and formation extratentacular budding. Corallite diameter is 5 mm. Corallites depth 2-3 mm. Septa regularly arranged in 24 septa (up to 36 in larger corallites). Gonioporoid arrangement pattern in most of septa equal and short, only projecting inwards into the calice to a limited extent, but 6-8 of them reach the columella. Free margins serrated and sides highly perforated at times ornamented with clearly visible short protuberances. Columella is well developed, spongy and dome-shaped. Wall is synapticular, a porous fenestrate meshwork of ragged appearance and thickness variable.

Remarks: The specimen displays some affinities with G. stokesi, Milne Edwards and Haime, 1851, in particular with respect to the depth of the calices and very fenestrate wall. It is ascribed here to G. djiboutiensis on the basis of the regularly arranged short septa, while the 6 primaries are conspicuous in reaching the columella, and of a dome-shaped columella.

Distribution: Rare in the Persian Gulf.

Family Psammocoridae Chevalier and Beauvais, 1987

Genus Psammocora Dana, 1846

Psammocora stellata Verrill, 1866

(Fig. 26)

Fig. 26.

Fig. 26.

Fig. 26. (a-b) Psammocora stellata from Abu-Musa Island and Sirri Island; (c-d) close-up of corallites. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Psammocora (Stephanaria) stellata Verrill, 1866; Psammocora (Stephanaria) brighami (Vaughan, 1907); Psammocora planipora Milne Edwards & Haime, 1851 (possible hybrid); Stephanacora stellata Verrill, 1866; Stephanaria brighami Vaughan, 1907.

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6629), Sirri Island (ZUTC 6630).

Other Material: Nay-Band Bay (6631), Kish island (ZUTC 6632).

Description: Colony with an encrusting base, from which stem numerous short and knobby branches. Corallite are polygonal and shallow. Calice diameter is 1-1.5 mm. Septa are thin. Septal margins and septocostae carry granulated dentations. Columella short, trabecular and composed of a few trabecular processes.

Distribution: Common in the Persian Gulf.

Family Siderastreidae Vaughan and Wells, 1943

Genus Siderastrea de Blainville, 1830

Siderastrea savignyana Milne Edwards and Haime, 1850

(Fig. 27)

Fig. 27.

Fig. 27.

Fig. 27. (a-b) Siderastrea savignyana from Abu-Musa Island; (c) corallites; (d) synapticulothecal theca with two rings. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Synonym: Siderastrea savignyana Milne Edwards & Haime, 1850.

Material examined: Abu-Musa Island (ZUTC 6633).

Other Material: Nay-Band color. Colony is thick encrusting to submassive. Corallum surface with irregular humps. Corallites arrangement is cerioid and formation by extratentacular budding. Corallites are polygonal to subcircular in outline and small-sized (maximum diameter 3 mm). 24-30 septa are in 2 orders. The inner free margin of the second order septa curve and fuse with first order septa, forming the characteristic triangular group or wedge commonly found in the families Siderastreidae and Coscinaraeidae. Septal free upper margin gently and regularly sloping towards the center of the calice. Wall is synapticulothecal with 2 clearly visible rings and the inner one often incomplete. Columella well developed, a solid mass and

Bay (ZUTC 6634). Description: The living colony has light blue slightly elongated or oval in outline.

Remarks: This species mostly founds in the sedimentary substrate, and sometimes have to take the sediments off to find it. This species is considered to be the mono-species of Siderastrea in the Persian Gulf and is restricted to west of Indo-Pacific.

Distribution: Relatively common in the Iranian waters.

DISCUSSION

The coral fauna of the Persian Gulf is a subset of the general Indo-Pacific fauna, with about 10% of the total Indo-Pacific species are also found in the Persian Gulf (Coles 2003). The presence of two species Acropora downingi and Porites harrisoni with a restricted regional distribution in the Persian Gulf, Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea is to be noted, although their origins remain questionable. The Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands have coral carpets with mono-specific stands dominated mainly by A. downingi and Porites species. These species have an important role in building the coral carpets of the Persian Gulf (Sheppard and Sheppard 1991; Benzoni et al. 2006; Alidoost Salimi et al. 2017).

Most, but not all, of the coral species in Abu- Musa and Sirri Islands are similar to those that occur in other parts of the Persian Gulf. Corals P. decussata, P. daedalea, C. microphthalma, D. pallida, A. downingi, P. harrisoni, P. lutea, P. lobata, P. stellata, S. savignyana and F. pentagona have a wide distributions and are among the common species in this region (Carpenter et al. 1997; Fatemi and Shokri 2001; Riegl and Purkis 2012; Vajed Samiei et al. 2013; Moradi et al. 2014; pers obs). It seems that these species are able to withstand the salinity, sedimentation and temperature fluctuations of the Persian Gulf (Riegl and Purkis 2012; Burt et al. 2014; Alidoost Salimi et al. 2017).

This study illustrates different morphotypes of some widespread species, including P. daedalea, P. decussata, F. pentagona, D. pallida, P. lutea and P. lobata. In addition, we documented two morphotypes for F. pentagona that had never been considered previously. It is understandable that coral species can display morphological variations in response to environmental conditions and substrates. Even though this morphological variability creates a problem for identifying species, it is a valuable strategy to survive and tolerate the environmental variability (Mangubhai et al. 2007; Todd 2008). Different morphotypes for some of the above-mentioned species have already been reported in the Indo-Pacific and Pacific Oceans. In particular, the multiple-morphology seems to be a common occurrence for Platygyra (Miller 1994). It is likely that such variations play a key role in explaining the widespread distribution of mentioned species in a variety of environments throughout the Indo-Pacific, including the Persian Gulf (Miller 1994; Mangubhai et al. 2007; Tortolero- Langarica et al. 2016). The coral morphotypes have never been considered in the Persian Gulf, so molecular studies are needed to clarify the right situation of mentioned species.

Conversely, some species recorded in this study are restricted to Iranian waters or have not been recorded in the southern regions. Leptastrea pruinosa, for instance, is only reported in Iranian waters. This species occurs in most coral carpets of Iranian islands (Vajed Samiei et al. 2013; Fatemi and Shokri 2001; pers obs). The poritid genus Goniopora is generally restricted to Iranian waters, and only one species, G. lobata, has been recorded in Kuwait (Carpenter et al. 1997; Coles 2003; Riegl and Purkis 2012). In this study, G. columna and G. djiboutiensis were found in Abu- Musa and Sirri Islands, respectively, but were not reported in southern coral communities. Both species are widely distributed throughout the Indo- Pacific (Veron and Pichon 1982; Sheppard and Sheppard 1991).

This study reported two species P. cactus and D. rotumana in Sirri Island. Pavona cactus is a rare species that had previously been reported only once in Kuwait (Sheppard and Shappard 1991). It occurs mostly in turbid and sheltered conditions and has a wide distribution throughout the Indo- Pacific. This species commonly occurs in the Red Sea (Veron and Pichon 1979; Pichon et al. 2010; Riegl and Purkis 2012; Rasul and Stewart 2015). Dipsastraea rotumana was commonly presumed to be present in the Persian Gulf without any evidence of its record (Riegl and Purkis 2012), and the current report confirms that it is indeed present in the Gulf. This species is restricted to the western Indo-Pacific and displays a wide variation in structure (Veron et al. 1977).

It should be noted that Stylophora pistillata, Pocillopora damicornis, Echinophyllia aspera, Cycloseris curvata, and Acropora pharaonis have previously been reported from some part of the Persian Gulf (Riegl and Purkis 2012; Vajed Samiei et al. 2013; Moradi et al. 2014), but were not found during our survey. The reason for the presence or absence of some species in different parts of the Persian Gulf remains unclear. Coles (2003) believed that there are geographic discrepancies in the number and type of coral species in the Persian Gulf. In general, differences in the presence or absence of species in each area can be explained by the variable environmental factors that affect the corals, such as the different requirements of substratum necessary for larval settlement (Coles 2003). These differences may also be due to rarity, different sampling methods and presence in infrequent habitats (Benzoni et al. 2006; DeVantier and Turak 2017).

Psammocora has a wide geographic distribu- tion in the Indo-Pacific. This genus comprises of six species in the Persian Gulf: P. superficialis, P. stellata, P. contigua, P. haimeana, P. profundacella and P. albopicta (Riegl and Purkis 2012; Vajed Samiei et al. 2013). Hybrids between P. contigua and P. stellata have been reported from Kuwait (Benzoni et al. 2007). Hence, in this study the authors refer only to P. stellata, with a note stating that in the reefs of Kuwait, at least, the populations are hybrids in nature between P. contigua and P. stellata. The possible existence of such hybrids on Sirri and Abu-Musa Islands has not been tested yet and the status of previous taxonomic records of P. contigua in the Persian Gulf needs to be reappraised.

Providing additional criteria for identification is practically impossible for certain genera with less distinctive skeletal features. Therefore, molecular analyses are often necessary to determine species boundaries. Montipora is one of the genera that is relatively restricted to the northern parts and, due to its morphological variations and skeletal features, needs to be studied further (Riegl and Purkis 2012). The presence of Montipora in the Persian Gulf has drastically decreased in the last two decades (Riegl and Purkis 2012). In contrast, this genus is one of the main genera in the Red Sea’s coral community (Rasul and Stewart 2015). In this study, only one specimen belonging to Montipora was reported from Abu-Musa Island. However, species identification was not possible.

The Fungiidae are known as free-living corals that generally occur on soft bottoms, especially in the deep zone. The Fungiidae are not common in the Persian Gulf and only Cycloseris curvata was observed in the coral community of Abu-Musa and Farur Islands and Kuwait (Riegl and Purkis 2012). Interestingly, a large community of C. fragilis, C. costulata and C. curvata has been recently discovered in Qatar (Hoeksema et al. 2018). This phenomenon rarely occurs in the Persian Gulf and the reason for such a large coral aggregation in deep waters is not clear.

Finally, Favites micropentagona (ZUTC Cnid. 1021) and Goniopora columna (ZUTC Cnid. 1014), which were previously reported from Larak Island (Vajed Samiei et al. 2013), have been re-examined and were found to belong to F. pentagona and G. cf. lobata, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides insights into corals species in Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands. Overall, 26 species were found from Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands, and P. cactus and D. rotumana were added to the present list of coral species in Iranian waters. An aggregate of the current study and earlier reports from other islands showed that more than 50 species occur in the Iranian waters, with the highest number of species belonging to the Larak Island (40 species). Coral species in Iranian waters have mostly been reported in shallow waters (3-9 m). However, this study and previous studies show that coral species occur in deep waters as well (up to 22 m).

Although, coral fauna composition in the Persian Gulf are poor compared with that of the Indo-Pacific, further surveys may reveal the existence of more species from the Indo-Pacific in the Persian Gulf. Also, some species such as F. chinensis, P. cactus, D. rotumana and G. columna, which at this stage appear to be rare, may prove to be more common.

The current coral fauna of the Persian Gulf compared to that of the Indo-Pacific leads us to hypothesize that the fauna of Gulf is not only a subset of the Indo-Pacific fauna, but there is also an additional, albeit small, stock of species of unknown origin restricted to the Persian Gulf, Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgment: Thanks to Dr. Davood Mirshekar (Department of Environment) for help conducting the studies at Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands and for providing accommodations during the fieldwork in Nay-Band Bay. Thanks to Dr. Mahsa Alidoost Salimi for kindly making available some of the samples used in this study from Kish Islands. Thanks to Dr. Morteza Sepehr for providing the GIS map. Thanks to Dr. Shashank keshavmurthy and Dr. Jessica Bouwmeester for their comments on the manuscript. This paper is part of the Ph.D. dissertation of the first author and was supported with funding from the Department of Environment (Tehran-Iran). We thank the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions which have improved the manuscript and clarity of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Authors’ contributions: PAS and MP identified the corals species and provided descriptions and illustrations. This study has been carried out under supervision of PGM and CAC. PAS, MP, PGM, CAC and SMRF wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests: PAS, PGM, CAC, SMRF and MP declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Availability of materials: All materials for this study are available and lodged in the Zoological Museum of University of Tehran (ZUTC), Accession No. from ZUTC 6578 to 6634.

Consent for publication: Not availability.

Ethics approval consent to participate: All authors have agreed to authorship and approved the submitted manuscript to the Zoological Studies.

References

  1. Salimi Alidoost, Mostafavi Ghavam, Fatemi P, Aeby Smr. Health status of corals surrounding Kish Island, Persian Gulf. Dis Aquat Org. 124:77–84. doi: 10.3354/dao03105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arrigoni R, Kitano Y F, Stolarski J, Hoeksema B W, Fukami H, Stefani F, Galli P, Montano S, Castoldi E, Benzoni F. A phylogeny reconstruction of the Dendrophylliidae (Cnidaria, Scleractinia) based on molecular and micromorphological criteria and its ecological implications. Zool Scr. 43:661–688. [Google Scholar]
  3. Benzoni F, Arrigoni R, Stefani F, Pichon M. Phylogeny of the coral genus Plesiastrea (Cnidaria, Scleractinia) Contrib Zool. 2011;80:231–249. [Google Scholar]
  4. Benzoni F, Pichon M, Hazeem S A, Galli P. The coral reefs of the Northern Arabian Gulf: stability over time in extreme environmental conditions? Proceeding of 10th International Coral Reef symposium. pp. 969–975.
  5. Benzoni F, Stefani F, Stolarski J, Pichon M, Mitta G, Galli P. Debating phylogenetic relationships of the scleractinian Psammocora: molecular and morphological evidences. Contrib Zool. 76:35–54. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brüggemann F. Neue Korallen-Arten aus dem Rothen Meer und von Mauritius. Abhandlungen erausgegeben vom naturwissenschaftlichen Vereine zu Bremen. 5:395–400. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brüggemann F. Ueber die Korallen der Insel Ponapé. Journal du Museum Godefroy. 14:201–212. [Google Scholar]
  8. Budd A F, Fukami H, Smith N D, Knowlton N. Taxonomic classification of coral reef family Mussidae (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Scleractinia) Zool Linn Soc Lond. 166:465–529. [Google Scholar]
  9. Burt J, Van Lavieren H, Feary D A. Persian Gulf reef, an important asset for climate science in urgent need of protection. Ocean Challenge; 2014. 20 [Google Scholar]
  10. Carpenter K E, Harrison P L, Hodgson G, Alsaffar A, Alhazeem S H. The corals and coral reef fishes of Kuwait. Kuwait): 1997. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chevalier J P, Beauvais L. Ordre des Scleractiniaires. Paris): Masson; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chevalier J P. Nouvelles Hébrides). I. Expedition Française sur les. Les Scléractiniaires de la Mélanésie Française. 5:1–307. [Google Scholar]
  13. Coles S. Coral species diversity and environmental factors in the Arabian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman: A comparison to the Indo-Pacific region. Atoll Res Bull; 2003. 507 [Google Scholar]
  14. Coles S L, Riegl B M. Thermal tolerances of reef corals in the Gulf: A review of the potential for increasing coral survival and adaptation to climate change through assisted translocation. Mar Pollut Bull. 72:322–323. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Crossland C. Madreporaria, Hydrocorallinae, Heliopora and Tubipora. pp. 85–257.
  16. Crossland C. The reduced building-power and other variation in the astrean corals of Tahiti, with a note on Herpetolitha limax and Fungia spp. Proc Zool Soc Lond. 1931:351–392. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dai C F, Horng S. Scleractinia fauna of Taiwan. II. The robust group. pp. 1–162.
  18. Dana J D, Lea Blanchard. United States Exploring Expedition during the years 1838-1842. 7:121–708. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. De Blainville H M. Dictionnaire des sciences naturelles, dans lequel on traitre méthodiquement des differéns êtres de la nature, considérés soit en euxmêmes, d'après l'état actuel de nos connoissances, soit relativement a l'utlité qu'en peuvent retirer la médicine, l'agriculture, le commerce et les arts. 60:1–546. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dennant J. Recent corals from the South Australian and Victorian coasts. Trans Proc Roy Soc South Australia. 28:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  21. Devantier L, Turak E. Species Richness and Relative Abundance of Reef-Building Corals in the Indo-West Pacific. Diversity; 2017. 9 [Google Scholar]
  22. Downing N. Coral reef communities in an extreme environment: the Northwest Arabian Gulf. Proceedings of the 5th international coral reef congress. Tahiti. pp. 343–348.
  23. Ehrenberg C G. Beiträge zur physiologischen Kenntniss der Corallenthiere im allgemeinen, und besonders des rothen Meeres, nebst einem Versuche zur physiologischen Systematik derselben. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. 1:225–380. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ellis J, Solander D. The Natural History of many curious and uncommon Zoophytes, collected from various parts of the Globe. Systematically arranged and described by the late Daniel Solander. 4:1–206. [Google Scholar]
  25. Esper Ecj. Die Pflanzenthiere in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Farben erleuchtet. nebst Beschreibungen. Zweyter Theil. (Raspe: Nürnberg) pp. 1–303.
  26. Esper Ecj. Fortsetzungen der Pflanzenthiere in Abbildungennach der Natur mit Farben erleuchtet nebst Beschreibungen. Erster Theil. pp. 1–230.
  27. Fatemi Smr, Shokri M. Iranian coral reefs status with particular reference to Kish Island, Persian Gulf. Indian Ocean Regional Workshop. Mozambique): 2001. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gardiner J S. On the perforate corals collected by the author in the South Pacific. P Zool Soc Lond. 1898:257–276. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gardiner J S. On the Astraeid corals collected by the author in the South Pacific. P Zool Soc Lond. 1899:734–764. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gardiner J S. Madreporaria Parts I. and II: I. Introduction with notes on variation, II. Astraeidae. Fauna and geography of the Maldives and Laccadives Archipelagoes. 2:736–790. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gray Je 1842. London): Synopsis of the contents of the British Museum; [Google Scholar]
  32. Gray J E. An outline of an arrangement of stony corals. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 1st Series. 19:120–128. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hoffmeister J E. Some corals from American Samoa and the Piji Islands. Pap Dcp Mar Biol Carnegie Insl. Wash. 343:1–90. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hoeksema B W, Bouwmeester J, Range P, Ben-Hamadou R. A large aggregation of self-fragmenting mushroom corals in the Arabian/Persian Gulf. Ecology. 99:1236–1238. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Klunzinger C B. Berlin): Die Korallenthiere des Rothen Meeres, 3. Theil: Die Steinkorallen. Zweiter Abschnitt: Die Asteraeaceen und Fungiaceen, 1-100, pls. 1-10. Gutmann; 1879. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kongjandtre N, Ridgway T, Cook L G, Huelsken T, Budd A F, Hoegh-Guldberg O. Taxonomy and species boundaries in the coral genus Favia Milne Edwards and Haime, 1857 (Cnidaria: Scleractinia) from Thailand revealed by morphological and genetic data. Coral Reefs. 31:581–601. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lamarck J B. Système des animaux sans vertèbres, ou tableau général des classes, des ordres et des genres de ces animaux; Présentant leurs caractères essentiels et leur distribution, d'apres la considération de leurs rapports naturels et de leur organisation, et suivant l'arrangement établi dans les galeries du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle, parmi leurs dépouilles conservées; Précédé du discours d'ouverture du Cours de Zoologie, donné dans le Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle l'an 8 de la République. Paris): viii; 1801. 432 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lamarck Jbm. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres. Tome second. Paris): Verdière; 1816. 568 [Google Scholar]
  39. Link Dhf. Beschreibung der Naturalien-Sammlung der. 1807.
  40. Mangubhai S, Souter P, Grahn M. Phenotypic variation in the coral Platygyra daedalea in Kenya: morphometry and genetics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 345:105–115. [Google Scholar]
  41. Matthai G. A revision of the recent colonial Astreidae possessing distinct corallites. Trans Linn Soc Lond, 2nd Ser. 17:1–140. [Google Scholar]
  42. Miller K J. Morphological variation in the coral genus Platygyra: environmental influences and taxonomic implication. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 110:19–28. [Google Scholar]
  43. Edwards Milne, Haime H. Note sur la classification de la deuxième tribu de la famille des Astréides. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences. 27:490–497. [Google Scholar]
  44. Edwards Milne, Haime H. Recherches sur les polypiers. Mémoire 4. Monographie des Astréides. Ann Sci Nat Zool Ser. 3:95–197. [Google Scholar]
  45. Edwards Milne, 1850 Haime J. Recherches sur les polvpiers. Mémoire 5. Monographic des oculinides. Ann Sci Nat Zool Ser. 3:3–4. [Google Scholar]
  46. Edwards Milne, Haime H. Recherches sur les polypiers. Mémoire 6. Monographie des Fongides. Ann Sci Nat Zool. 15:73–144. [Google Scholar]
  47. Edwards Milne, Haime H. Histoire naturelle des coralliaires ou polypes proprement dits 2. Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret. Paris): 1857. 631 [Google Scholar]
  48. Moradi M, Malekzadeh-Viayeh R, Eshaghi-Radand J. Biodiversity of scleractinian corals in the reefs of Qeshm and Larak Islands of the Persian Gulf, in association with environmental variables. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 94:907–916. [Google Scholar]
  49. Nemenzo F. Systematic studies on Philippine shallow water scleractinians: II. Suborder Faviida. Natural and Applied Science Bulletin, University of the Philippines. 16:73–135. [Google Scholar]
  50. Nemenzo F. Some new Philippine scleractinian reef corals. Natural and Applied Science Bulletin, University of the Philippines. 28:229–276. [Google Scholar]
  51. Oken L. 1815. Steinkorallen. Lehrbuch Naturgeschichte; [Google Scholar]
  52. Ortmann A. Studien über Systematik und geographische Verbreitung der Steinkorallen. Zoologische Jahrbüchern, Abteilung für Systematik. Biologie und Biogeographie der Tiere. 3:143–188. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ortmann A. Beobachtungen an Steinkorallen von der Südküste Ceylons. Zoologische Jahrbüchern, Abteilung für Systematik. Biologie und Biogeographie der Tiere. 4:493–590. [Google Scholar]
  54. Pichon M, Benzoni F, Chaineu C H, Dutrieux E. Field guide to the hard corals of the Southern Coast of Yemen. Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle. Biotope; 2010. 256 [Google Scholar]
  55. Quenstedt F A. Petrefactenkunde Deutschlands, Rohrenund Sternkorallen. 6:625–912. [Google Scholar]
  56. Quelch J J. Report on the reef-corals collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-76. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years. 16:1–203. [Google Scholar]
  57. Quoy Jrc, Gaimard J P. Zoologie IV: Zoophytes. In: Zoologie. Voyage de la corvette l'Astrolabe: exécuté par ordre du roi, pendant les années 1826-1827-1828-1829 / sous le commandement de. J. Dumont. pp. 1–390.
  58. Rahmani M, Rahimian H, Ardlan M, Sh Keshvamurthy, Fontana S, Wallace C, Chen C A. Acropora distribution patterns in the northern and northeastern Persian Gulf. Zool Stud; 2013. 52 [Google Scholar]
  59. Rasul Nma, Stewart Icf. The Red Sea: The Formation, Morphology, Oceanography and Environment of a Young Ocean Basin. Berlin Heidelberg): Springer; 2015. 446 [Google Scholar]
  60. Riegl B, Piller W E. Coral frameworks revisited-reefs and coral carpets in the northern Red Sea. Coral Reefs. 18:241–253. [Google Scholar]
  61. Riegl B, Purkis SJ. 2012. Coral Reefs of the Gulf: Adaptation to Climatic Extremes. Coral Reefs of the World; 3 [Google Scholar]
  62. Sheppard C, Price A, Roberts C. Marine ecology of the Arabian region: patterns and processes in extreme tropical environments. Academic Press; 1991. 12 [Google Scholar]
  63. Sheppard Crc, Wells S. UNEP/IUCN; 1988. 2 [Google Scholar]
  64. Todd P. Morphological plasticity in scleractinian corals. Biol Rev; 2008. 83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Tortolero-Langarica Jja, Carricartganivet A L, Mayfield J P, Rodríguez-Troncoso A B. Differences in Growth and Calcification Rates in the Reef-Building Coral Porites lobata: The Implications of Morphotype and Gender on Coral Growth. Front Mar Sci; 2016. 3 [Google Scholar]
  66. Samiei Vajed, Dab J, Ghezellou K, Shirvani P. Some scleractinian corals (Scleractinia: Anthozoa) of Larak Island, Persian Gulf. Zootaxa. 3636:101–143. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3636.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Vaughan T W. Some madreporarian corals from French Somaliland. East Africa, collected by Dr. Ch. Gravier. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum. 32:249–266. [Google Scholar]
  68. Vaughan T W. Some shallow-water corals from Murray Island (Australia), Cocos-Keeling Island, and Fanning Island. Papers from the Department of Marine Biology of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. 9:49–234. [Google Scholar]
  69. Vaughan T W, Wells J W. Revision of the suborders, families and genera of the Scleractinia. Geol Soc Spec Pap. 44:1–363. [Google Scholar]
  70. Verrill A E. Classification of polyps (extract condensed from Synopsis of the Polyps and Corals of the North Pacific Exploring Expedition under Commodore C. Ringgold and Captain John Rodgers, USN) Communications of the Essex Institute. 4:145–152. [Google Scholar]
  71. Verrill A E. Synopsis of the polyps and corals of the North Pacific Exploring Expedition, under Commodore C. Ringgold and Capt. John Rodgers, USN., from 1853 to 1856. Collected by Dr. Wm. Stimpson, Naturalist to the Expedition. With descriptions of some additional species from the west coast of North America. Part III. Madreporaria. Communications of the Essex Institute. 5:17–50. [Google Scholar]
  72. Verrill A E. Notes on the Radiata in the Museum of Yale College, with descriptions of new genera and species. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences. 1:377–558. [Google Scholar]
  73. Verrill A E. Synopsis of the polyps and corals of the North Pacific Exploring Expedition, under Commodore C. Ringgold and Capt. John Rodgers, USN, from 1853 to 1856. Collected by Dr. Wm. Stimpson, Naturalist to the Expedition. Communications of the Essex Instute. 6:51–104. [Google Scholar]
  74. Verrill A E. Names of the species of corals in Dana. J.D.: Corals and coral islands. pp. 379–388.
  75. Verrill A E. Variations and nomenclature of Bermudian, West Indian and Brazilian reef corals, with notes on various Indo-Pacific corals. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences. 11:63–168. [Google Scholar]
  76. Veron Jen. Australian Institute of Marine Science and CRR. Corals of the World; 2000. 1 [Google Scholar]
  77. Veron Jen, Pichon M. Scleractinia of eastern Australia. Australian institute of marine science monograph series. Part III; 1979. 4 [Google Scholar]
  78. Veron Jen, Pichon M. Scleractinia of eastern Australia. Australian institute of marine science monograph series. Part IV; 1982. 5 [Google Scholar]
  79. Veron Jen, Pichon M, Wijsman-Best M. Scleractinia of eastern Australia. Australian institute of marine science monograph series. Part II; 1977. 3 [Google Scholar]
  80. Veron Jen, Wallace C. Scleractinia of eastern Australia. Australian institute of marine science monograph series. Part V; 1984. 6 [Google Scholar]
  81. Wallace C C. Staghorn corals of the world: a revision of the coral genus Acropora (Scleractinia; Astrocoeniina; Acroporidae) worldwide, with emphasis on morphology, phylogeny and biogeography. 1999. pp. 1–421.
  82. Wells J W. A new genus of the Madreporarian Family Eupsammidae. Ann Mag Nat Hist Ser. 10:546–52. [Google Scholar]
  83. Wells J W. Bikini and nearby atolls, part 2, oceanography (biologic) Professional Papers of the United States Geological Survey. 260:94–185. [Google Scholar]
  84. Yabe H, Sugiyama T. Revised list of the reef-corals from the Japanese seas and of the fossil reef corals of the raised reefs and the Ryukyu limestone of Japan. J Geol Soc Japan. 42:379–403. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Zoological Studies are provided here courtesy of Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica

RESOURCES