Abstract
Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) is an important cytosolic DNA sensor that plays a crucial role in triggering STING-dependent signal and inducing type I interferons (IFNs). cGAS is important for intracellular bacterial recognition and innate immune responses. However, the regulating effect of the cGAS pathway for bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) during Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) infection is still unknown. We hypothesized that the maturation and activation of BMDCs were modulated by the cGAS/STING/TBK1/IRF3 signaling pathway. In this study, we found that M. bovis promoted phenotypic maturation and functional activation of BMDCs via the cGAS signaling pathway, with the type I IFN and its receptor (IFNAR) contributing. Additionally, we showed that the type I IFN pathway promoted CD4+ T cells’ proliferation with BMDC during M. bovis infection. Meanwhile, the related cytokines increased the expression involved in this signaling pathway. These data highlight the mechanism of the cGAS and type I IFN pathway in regulating the maturation and activation of BMDCs, emphasizing the important role of this signaling pathway and BMDCs against M. bovis. This study provides new insight into the interaction between cGAS and dendritic cells (DCs), which could be considered in the development of new drugs and vaccines against tuberculosis.
Keywords: Mycobacterium bovis, cGAS pathway, dendritic cells, type I interferons, CD4+ T cells
1. Introduction
Mycobacterium bovis, the causative agent of tuberculosis in cattle, is an important intracellular pathogen that can cross species barriers and trigger disease in humans and other mammals [1]. M. bovis has caused great economic loss and severely threatened public health on a global scale. As a classic intracellular bacterium, M. bovis usually causes persistent infection, which triggers disease in humans by direct contact with infected cattle, unpasteurized dairy products, or undercooked meat [2]. In the United States and Mexico, accumulating evidence confirms that those with pulmonary infection and children and persons with HIV co-infection have twice the risk of death from M. bovis [3]. In addition, Scott et al. indicated that the burden of M. bovis was still underestimated around the world [4].
In recent reports, cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) has been identified as a key cytosolic DNA sensor and participant in many innate immune responses [5], particularly in antiviral, anti-infection, and immunologic adjuvants [6,7,8]. The cGAS pathway can be activated by cytosolic pathogenic DNA or self-DNA, which ultimately induces type I interferon (IFN) production. cGAS has also been identified as an important interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) [9]. STING (also referred to as TMEM173, MITA, MPYS, or ERIS) is located downstream of cGAS, which is a critical central adaptor protein and participates in many intracellular signaling pathways, such as IFI16 and DDX41, which are also STING-dependent signaling [10]. Wasserman et al. found that punctate cGAS staining was up-regulated in macrophages during M. tuberculosis infection [11], and DNA transfection was co-localized with cGAS in many domains.
Dendritic cells (DCs), the most potent antigen-presenting cells, initiate and modulate host immune responses via various signaling pathways [12]. Several studies have shown that macrophages were the primary site for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) infection, but DCs can also be infected [13]. Infected DCs generally enhance the expression of some adhesion molecules and T-cell co-stimulatory molecules, such as CD40, CD80, CD83, and CD86. Generally, these surface markers are highly expressed on mature DCs, which play an important role in antigen presentation and adaptive immune responses.
For M. tuberculosis infection, some proteins have been reported to induce the maturation and activation of DCs [14]. In contrast, some research showed that M. tuberculosis inhibited DCs maturation and impaired antigen presenting capability [15]. Previous studies usually focused on M. tuberculosis with macrophage. However, the mechanism of M. bovis infects DCs is still unclear, and the regulatory mechanism of the cGAS signaling pathway in DCs also needs to be investigated. We hypothesized that the maturation and activation of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) were modulated by the cGAS/STING/TBK1/IRF3 signaling pathway during M. bovis infection. Using a targeted knockdown technique, we found that the cGAS pathway was activated by M. bovis, which promoted the maturation and antigen presentation of BMDCs. Moreover, our research showed that cGAS and DCs played a critical role in connecting the innate and adaptive immune responses, which would be considered as the particular target for the development of drugs and vaccines against tuberculosis infection.
2. Results
2.1. cGAS Pathway Is Activated in BMDCs During Mycobacterium bovis Infection
To determine whether the cGAS pathway could be activated in BMDCs during M. bovis infection, we treated BMDCs with siRNA and non-targeting control small interfering RNA (siCon) (Figure 1A, Figures S1 and S2). There were no significant differences with or without siCon treatment, which were identified as the control in subsequent experiments. After M. bovis infection, cGAS increased markedly, and its expression was significantly inhibited by cGAS-specific siRNA. For the downstream signaling proteins, p-STING was observably upregulated during infection. There were no significant differences in TBK1 expression among the groups. We further measured phosphorylated-TBK1 (p-TBK1) to determine whether TBK1 was activated. Post-infection 24 and 48 h, p-TBK1 was observably increased, whereas it was decreased in the siRNA group (Figure 1B and Figure S3). Compared to control and siRNA groups, more IRF3 migrated into the nucleus during infection (Figure 1C). Moreover, the production of IFN-β was significantly increased after M. bovis infection, whereas it was reduced in the siRNA group (Figure 1D).
2.2. cGAS Pathway Promotes Maturation and Activation of BMDCs
To determine whether the cGAS pathway affects BMDCs maturation and activation after M. bovis infection, we assayed the surface markers on BMDCs by flow cytometry (FCM) (Figure 2A). The infection group showed a notable increase in the expression of CD40, CD80, CD86, and MHC class II. However, these were significantly reduced compared to the infected group in the siRNA group (Figure 2B). Further, inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-12p70 were detected (Figure 2C). At resting state, the production was undetectable or at low level. Following M. bovis stimulation, the expression was observably increased. However, the cytokine secretions were significantly down-regulated in the siRNA group.
2.3. Type I Interferon and Its Receptor Contribute to the cGAS Pathway in BMDCs
In previous experiments, our results showed that the cGAS signaling pathway could induce IFN-β expression in BMDCs during M. bovis infection. We hypothesized that type I IFN would be the key point in the cGAS pathway for BMDCs. In addition, the IFN-β production was not influenced by monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that block the type I IFN receptor (Figure 3A). In the blocked group (Figure 3B), BMDC surface markers CD80, CD86, and MHC class II were significantly reduced in comparison with the infection group (Figure 3C). Furthermore, the type I IFN receptor (IFNAR) mAb significantly reduced the expression of IL-12p70, IL-10, and IL-6, but TNF-α was not influenced. Interestingly, adding the exogenous IFN-β enhanced the production of TNF-α and IL-12p70; however, IL-10 and IL-6 were not affected (Figure 3D).
2.4. BMDCs Promote T cell Activity in the Presence of Type I Interferons
The mature DCs generally present antigens to T cells and induce a cellular immune response. Therefore, we assessed whether type I IFN boosted BMDCs to activate T cell proliferation. The CD4+ T cells were labeled with CFSE stain before co-incubation with different treated BMDCs. As expected, the control group displayed nearly no proliferation, it was significantly increased in the single infection group, whereas the proliferation was dramatically inhibited in the blocked group (Figure 4A). Furthermore, the variation trend of IFN-γ production was consistent with T cell proliferation (Figure 4B).
3. Discussion
In this study, we identified cGAS as an important signaling pathway that responded to M. bovis infection in murine BMDCs. We found that the cGAS pathway was activated and promoted the expression of related signaling proteins during infection. Our data suggested that cGAS recognizing M. bovis was a crucial interaction to mediate host immune response, while it also promoted the maturation and activation of BMDCs and up-regulated the expression of some correlative cytokines, such as IL6, IFN-β, and TNF-α. Furthermore, we confirmed that type I IFN and its receptor played an important role in the underlying mechanism to regulate the maturation and activation of BMDCs. Moreover, we found that BMDCs treated with an IFNAR blocking agent inhibited T cell proliferation.
DCs are potent antigen-presenting cells in the host, linking innate and adaptive immunity. Mature DCs have a strong ability to present antigens to T cells. Some reports found that M. tuberculosis triggered maturation and innate immune response in DCs [17], and mediated Th0 differentiation toward the Th1 or Th2 subtypes [18]. However, Satchidanandam et al. suggested that some M. tuberculosis proteins inhibited DCs maturation and downregulated the proliferation of T cells [15]. Our data showed that M. bovis infection upregulated BMDC surface markers and enhanced T cell proliferation, suggesting that M. bovis induces the maturation of BMDCs. Furthermore, cGAS played a crucial role in this process. cGAS is an important intracellular DNA sensor that has been shown to participate in multiple innate immune responses [19,20,21,22,23,24]. Our research showed that the cGAS signaling pathway could be activated in BMDCs during M. bovis infection in vitro, and enhanced the type I IFN expression, whereas the cGAS and IFN-β were inhibited in the siRNA group. These results are consistent with previous findings. For example, cGAS was upregulated within M. tuberculosis-infected cells, as indicated by punctate cytoplasmic staining [25]. In addition, Teles et al. showed that cGAS−/− mice were more sensitive to M. tuberculosis infection [26]. For a different population of DCs, Radtke AJ et al. found that lymph-node resident dendritic cells could capture antigens and elicit CD8+ T cell responses [27]. Human plasmacytoid dendritic cells induce type I interferon response by the cGAS-STING signaling pathway [28]. STING showed two bands after M. bovis infection, indicating it was activated. Within this signaling pathway, STING recruited TBK-1, which is generally located in the cytoplasm, and showed no significant difference between groups in the present study. Active TBK1 was revealed with a phosphor-specific antibody. IRF3 is a critical interferon regulatory factor, which enters into the nucleus and drives IFN-β transcription after infection. In animal experiments, Manzanillo et al. reported the impairment of IFN-β production during M. tuberculosis infection in IRF-3-deficient mice [29].
Type I IFN plays an important role in antiviral immunity and intracellular bacteria elimination. IFNAR has a crucial role in inducing adaptive immunity, particularly cytotoxic and CD4+ T cell responses. In the IFNAR blocked-infected group, our research showed a significant decrease in the related surface molecules during M. bovis infection. However, CD40 was the exception to this effect. It is possible that the CD40 costimulatory protein is not regulated by the type I IFN pathway. This protein was encoded by a member of the TNF-receptor superfamily, but our results suggested that TNF-α was not influenced by the type I IFN pathway. It is possible that its receptor was regulated by the STING-IKK-NF-κB pathway, thus the CD40 marker was not affected. Furthermore, the CD4+ T cell proliferation significantly declined in the blocked group. In other words, we found that type I IFN and IFNAR promoted the proliferation of CD4+ T cells. Similarly, Hansen et al. confirmed that type I IFN had multiple effects on DCs by several pathways, and was involved in its differentiation, maturation, and migration [30]. The reduction of co-stimulatory marker expression has been reported by Montoya et al. in IFNAR-deficient BMDCs [31]. However, Stanley et al. reported that IFNAR−/− mice were more resistant than wild-type mice to Francisella. novicida and M. tuberculosis infection, which suggested that type I IFN promoted pathogen survival [32]. These discrepancies may be due to variant cells or pathogen types, and other complicated regulatory networks, which need further research. Ma et al. showed that cGAS expression was specifically regulated by IFNAR signaling, and cGAS expression was induced by type I IFN feedback regulation [33]. Bode et al. reported that the cGAS-STING pathway-dependent type I IFN expression in DCs may be beneficial for patients who have autoimmune diseases, cancer, or infectious diseases [28]. Recently, type I IFNs have been used to treat chronic viral hepatitis, certain cancers, and multiple sclerosis [34]. Most importantly, our results suggest that type I IFN expression in BMDCs might act in an autocrine or paracrine positive feedback regulatory mechanism via the cGAS signaling pathway, strengthening the host immune response (Figure 5).
Diverse cytokines are essential for host immune responses against infection or tissue injury. TNF-α, IL-12p70, IL-10, and IL-6 were secreted by BMDCs to respond to M. bovis infection. Interestingly, TNF-α declined during the period that cGAS was treated with siRNA. However, it was not influenced after IFNAR blockage, which suggested that TNF-α secretion is independent of the type I IFN signaling pathway. Abe et al. [35] found that STING could mediate the activation of NF-κB/IRF3 and promote pro-inflammatory gene transcription. Their findings suggested that cGAS regulated TNF-α indirectly via the STING-IKK-NF-κB pathway, and therefore TNF-α production was not influenced by the IFNAR pathway. Lienard et al. [36] also confirmed that IL-10 and IL-6 were significantly decreased after knocking out IFNAR, whereas TNF-α was not changed. These findings are highly consistent with our results. IL-10 is a major anti-inflammatory cytokine, and it participates in multiple regulations. Ersoy et al. [37] found that when multiple sclerosis patients were treated with IFN-β, the IL-10 levels were significantly increased. In murine experiments, IFN-β could promote antigen-specific T cells to express IL-10 [38]. On the contrary, Feng et al. [39] found that IFN-α and IFN-β prevented the production of IL-10 at the mRNA and protein levels in activated monocytes. Our findings suggested that type I IFN promoted the expression of some inflammatory cytokines and induced a host immune response. In the review of tuberculosis pathogenesis, Etna et al. [40] indicated that the pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines are a double-edged sword, balancing immune protection and evasion during infection.
In conclusion, we provide evidence that the cGAS signaling pathway was activated during M. bovis infection and mediated the maturation and activation of BMDCs. Furthermore, we reveal the potential regulatory mechanism of type I IFN and its receptor for the cGAS pathway. Moreover, we highlight the role of BMDCs between innate and adaptive immunity. Our research provides new insights into the cGAS pathway, DCs, and type I IFN, which could be considered to develop prevention or immunotherapy strategies against tuberculosis.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Ethics Statement
All protocols and procedures were performed according to the Chinese Regulations of Laboratory Animals—The Guidelines for the Care of Laboratory Animals (Ministry of Science and Technology of People’s Republic of China) and Laboratory Animal Requirements of Environment and Housing Facilities (GB 14925–2010, National Laboratory Animal Standardization Technical Committee). The license number associated with the research protocol was 20110611-01. The animal study proposal was approved by the Laboratory Animal Ethical Committee of China Agricultural University (approved date: 11 June 2011).
4.2. Mice
Six- to eight-week-old female C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). Mice were exposed to a 12 h/12 h light/dark regimen at 25 °C. All mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions, and all efforts were made to minimize mouse suffering.
4.3. Cell Preparation
BMDCs were prepared using a previously described method [41]. Femurs and tibias of 6–8 week-old female mice were separated and surrounding muscle tissue was removed. Then, intact bone was put in 75% ethanol for 2–5 min and washed with PBS. This was cut at both ends and marrow was flushed with PBS by syringe. After being washed, primary cells were cultured in bacteriological Petri dishes with 100 mm diameter. Cell culture medium was RPMI-1640 (GIBCO BRL, Eggenstein, Germany) supplemented with streptomycin (100 μg/mL, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), l-glutamine (2 mM, Sigma), 10% fetal calf serum (GIBCO BRL), and 10 ng/mL recombinant murine GM-CSF (315-03, PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). After 7 days, cells were harvested and analyzed by flow cytometry (FCM).
4.4. siRNA Transfection
BMDCs were cultivated in a 12-well plate. Subsequently, the cell culture medium was replaced, and cells were transfected with 20 ng/mL non-targeting control small interfering RNA (siCon) and cGAS-specific siRNA (L-055608-01-0005, GE Dharmacon, Fairfield, CT, USA) using transfection reagent (Polyplus Transfection, Illkirch, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 48 h of transfection, the efficiency of the knockdown was confirmed by Western blotting.
4.5. M. bovis Infection
The M. bovis were cultured in 7H9 Middlebrook media (BD Biosciences, New York, NY, USA) containing albumin-dextrose-catalase (ADC) enrichment solution with 0.05% Tween-80 (Difco, New York, NY, USA), and grown to mid-logarithmic phase for 1 week at 37 °C.
Experimental groups were as follows: control group, non-stimulated BMDCs throughout the whole process; M. bovis group, BMDCs only infected with M. bovis (CFU/Cell = 5:1); siRNA + M. bovis group, BMDCs were pre-treated with siRNA and then infected with M. bovis; IFNAR mAb + M. bovis group, BMDCs were pre-treated with the neutralizing anti-mouse IFNAR mAb (10 ng/mL, MAR1-5A3, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) to block the IFNAR and then infected with M. bovis; IFN-β + M. bovis group, BMDCs were pre-treated with exogenous IFN-β (10 ng/mL, ab24324, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and then infected with M. bovis.
4.6. Western Blotting
Western blotting was performed as previously described [42]. Briefly, cells were lysed in cold radio immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer for 30 min and centrifuged to remove precipitates. Loading buffer was added, then samples were boiled for 10 min. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes, which were washed with Tris-buffered saline plus Tween-20 (TBST) and blocked with 5% non-fat milk. Next, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, washed with TBST, then incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled secondary antibodies. Finally, an enhanced chemiluminescence system was used to detect proteins according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The antibodies used were rabbit anti-cGAS (D3080, CST, anti-MB21D1, Boston, MA, USA), rabbit anti-STING (19851-1-AP, Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA), rabbit anti-TBK1 (ab40676, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and p-TBK1 (ab109272, Abcam).
4.7. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Supernatants were collected for analysis of IFN-β (CSB-E04945m), IL-12p70 (KE10014), IL-10 (KE10008), IL-6 (KE10007), TNF-α (KE10002), and IFN-γ (CSB-E04578m) using the mouse enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (Proteintech and Cusabio, Chicago, IL, USA). All processing was strictly according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
4.8. Flow Cytometry
Cells were harvested and washed with PBS, and subsequently exposed to mouse antibody against MHC class II (11-5322-81), CD80 (11-0801-81), CD86 (11-0862-81), and CD40 (11-0402-81), as well as anti-CD11c mAb (17-0114-82) at room temperature 30 min away from light (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). Then, cells were washed three times in PBS and re-suspended in the fixation buffer. Samples were detected by an LSR II (BD Biosciences) flow cytometer and analyzed with FlowJo software (TreeStar, Ashland, OR, USA). All operations were per manufacturer’s instructions.
4.9. Proliferation of CD4+ T Cells
CD4+ T cells were isolated from the spleens of female C57BL/6 mice (4–6 weeks old) by magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) columns (130-104-454, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Then, CD4+ T cells were stained with 1 μM carboxyfluorescein (CFSE, C34554, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), as previously described [43]. Following BMDC infection with M. bovis, CFSE-stained CD4+ T cells were co-cultured with BMDCs in different groups at a BMDC:T cell ratio of 1:10. After 3 days of co-culture, cells were collected for flow cytometry analysis, and culture supernatants were collected for cytokine assays.
4.10. Statistical Analysis
All experiments were repeated at least three times with consistent results. Data were expressed as the mean value ± SD. The differences were evaluated by ANOVA test using the 95% confidence level in Tukey’s multiple comparisons. All data were calculated and analyzed with SPSS 22.0 software, and the graphs were generated in GraphPad Prism 7 software (San Diego, CA, USA). The Western blot density was analyzed by ImageJ. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical significance was expressed as follows: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Acknowledgments
We also thank China Agricultural University, which provided us with BSL-3 laboratories for experiments requiring M. bovis culture and infection.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary materials can be found at http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/4/895/s1.
Author Contributions
Q.L. and X.Z. designed the study; Q.L., C.L., X.H. and R.Y. performed the experiments; Q.L., C.L., and J.W. analyzed the data; Q.L. and S.E.-A. drafted the manuscript; D.Z., X.Z., and L.X. contributed to the laboratory work and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version.
Funding
This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 31560687, No. 31572487 and No.31760722) and the Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (Project No. NZ12104 and No. NZ15031), and the Ningxia Key Research & Development Plan (Project No. 2017BY078).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Glaziou P., Sismanidis C., Floyd K., Raviglione M. Global Epidemiology of Tuberculosis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015;5:a017798. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Evans J.T., Smith E.G., Banerjee A., Smith R.M., Dale J., Innes J.A., Hunt D., Tweddell A., Wood A., Anderson C., Hewinson R.G., et al. Cluster of human tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium bovis: Evidence for person-to-person transmission in the UK. Lancet. 2007;369:1270–1276. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60598-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Muller B., Durr S., Alonso S., Hattendorf J., Laisse C.J., Parsons S.D., van Helden P.D., Zinsstag J. Zoonotic Mycobacterium bovis-induced tuberculosis in humans. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013;19:899–908. doi: 10.3201/eid1906.120543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Scott C., Cavanaugh J.S., Pratt R., Silk B.J., LoBue P., Moonan P.K. Human Tuberculosis Caused by Mycobacterium bovis in the United States, 2006–2013. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016;63:594–601. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sun L.J., Wu J., Du F., Chen X., Chen Z.J. Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase Is a Cytosolic DNA Sensor That Activates the Type I Interferon Pathway. Science. 2013;339:786–791. doi: 10.1126/science.1232458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lam E., Stein S., Falck-Pedersen, E. Adenovirus Detection by the cGAS/STING/TBK1 DNA Sensing Cascade. J. Virol. 2014;88:974–981. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02702-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bridgeman A., Maelfait J., Davenne T., Partridge T., Peng Y., Mayer A., Dong T., Kaever V., Borrow P., Rehwinkel J. Viruses transfer the antiviral second messenger cGAMP between cells. Science. 2015;349:1228–1232. doi: 10.1126/science.aab3632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Carroll E.C., Jin L., Mori A., Munoz-Wolf N., Oleszycka E., Moran H.B.T., Mansouri S., McEntee C.P., Lambe E., Agger E.M., et al. The Vaccine Adjuvant Chitosan Promotes Cellular Immunity via DNA Sensor cGAS-STING-Dependent Induction of Type I Interferons. Immunity. 2016;44:597–608. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schoggins J.W., MacDuff D.A., Imanaka N., Gainey M.D., Shrestha B., Eitson J.L., Mar K.B., Richardson R.B., Ratushny A.V., Litvak V., et al. Pan-viral specificity of IFN-induced genes reveals new roles for cGAS in innate immunity. Nature. 2014;505:691. doi: 10.1038/nature12862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang Z.Q., Yuan B., Bao M., Lu N., Kim T., Liu Y.J. The helicase DDX41 senses intracellular DNA mediated by the adaptor STING in dendritic cells. Nat. Immunol. 2011;12:959. doi: 10.1038/ni.2091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wassermann R., Gulen M.F., Sala C., Perin S.G., Lou Y., Rybniker J., Schmid-Burgk J.L., Schmidt T., Hornung V., Cole S.T., et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Differentially Activates cGAS- and Inflammasome-Dependent Intracellular Immune Responses through ESX-1. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:799–810. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Arnold-Schrauf C., Dudek M., Dielmann A., Pace L., Swallow M., Kruse F., Kuhl A.A., Holzmann B., Berod L., Sparwasser T. Dendritic cells coordinate innate immunity via MyD88 signaling to control Listeria monocytogenes infection. Cell Rep. 2014;6:698–708. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Khan N., Vidyarthi A., Pahari S., Agrewala J.N. Distinct Strategies Employed by Dendritic Cells and Macrophages in Restricting Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection: Different Philosophies but Same Desire. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2016;35:386–398. doi: 10.3109/08830185.2015.1015718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Byun E.H., Kim W.S., Kim J.S., Jung I.D., Park Y.M., Kim H.J., Cho S.N., Shin S.J. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv0577, a novel TLR2 agonist, induces maturation of dendritic cells and drives Th1 immune response. FASEB J. 2012;26:2695–2711. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-199588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Satchidanandam V., Kumar N., Jumani R.S., Challu V., Elangovan S., Khan N.A. The Glycosylated Rv1860 Protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Inhibits Dendritic Cell Mediated TH1 and TH17 Polarization of T Cells and Abrogates Protective Immunity Conferred by BCG. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004176. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu C., Yue R., Yang Y., Cui Y., Yang L., Zhao D., Zhou X. AIM2 inhibits autophagy and IFN-beta production during M. bovis infection. Oncotarget. 2016;7:46972–46987. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tailleux L., Schwartz O., Herrmann J.-L., Pivert E., Jackson M., Amara A., Legres L., Dreher D., Nicod L.P., Gluckman J.C., et al. DC-SIGN is the major Mycobacterium tuberculosis receptor on human dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 2003;197:121–127. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Steinman R.M. Dendritic cells: Understanding immunogenicity. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007;37:S53–S60. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li X., Shu C., Yi G., Chaton C.T., Shelton C.L., Diao J., Zuo X., Kao C.C., Herr A.B., Li P. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is activated by double-stranded DNA-induced oligomerization. Immunity. 2013;39:1019–1031. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shu C., Yi G., Watts T., Kao C.C., Li P. Structure of STING bound to cyclic di-GMP reveals the mechanism of cyclic dinucleotide recognition by the immune system. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012;19:722. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Civril F., Deimling T., de Oliveira Mann C.C., Ablasser A., Moldt M., Witte G., Hornung V., Hopfner K.P. Structural mechanism of cytosolic DNA sensing by cGAS. Nature. 2013;498:332–337. doi: 10.1038/nature12305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kranzusch P.J., Lee A.S., Berger J.M., Doudna J.A. Structure of Human cGAS Reveals a Conserved Family of Second-Messenger Enzymes in Innate Immunity. Cell Rep. 2013;3:1362–1368. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang X., Wu J., Du F., Xu H., Sun L., Chen Z., Brautigam C.A., Zhang X., Chen Z.J. The Cytosolic DNA Sensor cGAS Forms an Oligomeric Complex with DNA and Undergoes Switch-like Conformational Changes in the Activation Loop. Cell Rep. 2014;6:421–430. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gao P., Ascano M., Zillinger T., Wang W., Dai P., Serganov A.A., Gaffney B.L., Shuman S., Jones R.A., Deng L., et al. Structure-Function Analysis of STING Activation by c[G(2′,5′) pA(3′,5′)p] and Targeting by Antiviral DMXAA. Cell. 2013;154:748–762. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Collins A.C., Cai H., Li T., Franco L.H., Li X.D., Nair V.R., Scharn C.R., Stamm C.E., Levine B., Chen Z.J., et al. Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase Is an Innate Immune DNA Sensor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:820–828. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Teles R.M.B., Graeber T.G., Krutzik S.R., Montoya D., Schenk M., Lee D.J., Komisopoulou E., Kelly-Scumpia K., Chun R., Iyer S.S., Sarno E.N., et al. Type I Interferon Suppresses Type II Interferon-Triggered Human Anti-Mycobacterial Responses. Science. 2013;339:1448–1453. doi: 10.1126/science.1233665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Radtke A.J., Kastenmuller W., Espinosa D.A., Gerner M.Y., Tse S.W., Sinnis P., Germain R.N., Zavala F.P., Cockburn I.A. Lymph-node resident CD8α+ dendritic cells capture antigens from migratory malaria sporozoites and induce CD8+ T cell responses. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004637. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bode C., Fox M., Tewary P., Steinhagen A., Ellerkmann R.K., Klinman D., Baumgarten G., Hornung V., Steinhagen F. Human plasmacytoid dentritic cells elicit a Type I Interferon response by sensing DNA via the cGAS-STING signaling pathway. Eur. J. Immunol. 2016;46:1615–1621. doi: 10.1002/eji.201546113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Manzanillo P.S., Shiloh M.U., Portnoy D.A., Cox J.S. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Activates the DNA-Dependent Cytosolic Surveillance Pathway within Macrophages. Cell Host & Microbe. 2012;11:469–480. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hansen M., Met O., Svane I.M., Andersen M.H. Cellular Based Cancer Vaccines: Type 1 Polarization of Dendritic Cells. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012;19:4239–4246. doi: 10.2174/092986712802884213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Montoya M., Schiavoni G., Mattei F., Gresser I., Belardelli F., Borrow P., Tough D.F. Type I interferons produced by dendritic cells promote their phenotypic and functional activation. Blood. 2002;99:3263–3271. doi: 10.1182/blood.V99.9.3263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Stanley S.A., Johndrow J.E., Manzanillo P., Cox J.S. The type I IFN response to infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis requires ESX-1-mediated secretion and contributes to pathogenesis. J. Immunol. 2007;178:3143–3152. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.5.3143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ma F., Li B., Liu S.Y., Iyer S.S., Yu Y., Wu A., Cheng G. Positive Feedback Regulation of Type I IFN Production by the IFN-Inducible DNA Sensor cGAS. J. Immunol. 2015;194:1545–1554. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pelka K., Latz E. IRF5, IRF8, and IRF7 in human pDCs—The good, the bad, and the insignificant? Eur J. Immunol. 2013;43:1693–1697. doi: 10.1002/eji.201343739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Abe T., Barber G.N. Cytosolic-DNA-mediated, STING-dependent proinflammatory gene induction necessitates canonical NF-kappaB activation through TBK1. J. Virol. 2014;88:5328–5341. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00037-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lienard J., Movert E., Valfridsson C., Sturegard E., Carlsson F. ESX-1 exploits type I IFN-signalling to promote a regulatory macrophage phenotype refractory to IFNgamma-mediated autophagy and growth restriction of intracellular mycobacteria. Cell Microbiol. 2016;18:1471–1485. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ersoy E., Kus C.N., Sener U., Coker I., Zorlu Y. The effects of interferon-beta on interleukin-10 in multiple sclerosis patients. Eur. J. Neurol. 2005;12:208–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.00986.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang D., Zhang W., Ng T.W., Wang Y., Liu Q., Gorantla V., Lakkis F., Zheng X.X. Adoptive cell therapy using antigen-specific CD4−CD8−T regulatory cells to prevent autoimmune diabetes and promote islet allograft survival in NOD mice. Diabetologia. 2011;54:2082–2092. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2179-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Feng X., Petraglia A.L., Chen M., Byskosh P.V., Boos M.D., Reder A.T. Low expression of interferon-stimulated genes in active multiple sclerosis is linked to subnormal phosphorylation of STAT1. J. Neuroimmunol. 2002;129:205–215. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5728(02)00182-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Etna M.P., Giacomini E., Severa M., Coccia E.M. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in tuberculosis: A two-edged sword in TB pathogenesis. Semin. Immunol. 2014;26:543–551. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2014.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lutz M.B., Kukutsch N., Ogilvie A.L., Rossner S., Koch F., Romani N., Schuler G. An advanced culture method for generating large quantities of highly pure dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow. J. Immunol. Methods. 1999;223:77–92. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(98)00204-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhou Y., Zhao D., Yue R., Khan S.H., Shah S.Z., Yin X., Yang L., Zhang Z., Zhou X. Inflammasomes-dependent regulation of IL-1 beta secretion induced by the virulent Mycobacterium bovis Beijing strain in THP-1 macrophages. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015;108:163–171. doi: 10.1007/s10482-015-0475-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kim J.S., Kim W.S., Choi H.G., Jang B., Lee K., Park J.H., Kim H.J., Cho S.N., Shin S.J. Mycobacterium tuberculosis RpfB drives Th1-type T cell immunity via a TLR4-dependent activation of dendritic cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2013;94:733–749. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0912435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.