Skip to main content
PMC home page
International Journal of Molecular Medicine logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Medicine
. 2019 Feb 13;43(4):1635–1642. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2019.4096

Enhanced antiproliferative effect of resveratrol in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using GE11 peptide conjugated liposome

Tingting Zheng 1,2,3, Huanhuan Feng 4, Li Liu 1,2, Jiao Peng 5, Haitao Xiao 6, Tao Yu 7, Ziqian Zhou 1,2, Ying Li 6, Yuseng Zhang 1,2, Xiaohe Bai 1,2, Simeng Zhao 1,2, Yu Shi 1,2,3, Yun Chen 1,2,3,✉
PMCID: PMC6414163  PMID: 30816515

Abstract

The present study describes the preparation of a dodecapeptide YHWYGYTPQNVI (GE11)-conjugated liposome bound with polyethylene glycol to enhance the therapeutic effect of resveratrol (RSV) in head and neck cancer cells. The results indicated that (RSV)-loaded GE11-conjugated liposomes (RSV-GL) exhibited a high entrapment efficiency of >95%, with an active drug loading level of 19.5% w/w. Release kinetics revealed that RSV was released in a slow and sustained manner from the RSV-GL and RSV-loaded liposome (RSV-L) nanoparticulate systems. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-overexpressing squamous cell carcinoma HN cells specifically internalized GE11 surface-conjugated liposome in a manner that was markedly increased compared with that of the non-targeted carrier. Consistently, RSV-GL exhibited a significantly increased cytotoxic effect compared with that of the non-targeted nanoparticles. Notably, RSV-GL induced significantly increased proportions of early (~60%) and late (~10%) apoptotic cells in head and neck cancer cell populations. To the best of our knowledge, the application and development of EGFR-targeted peptide-conjugated liposome system for RSV delivery has not been studied previously in the treatment of head and neck cancer. In addition, RSV-GL exhibited the greatest antitumor efficacy compared with any other group. RSV-GL exhibited a 2-fold decrease in tumor volume compared with the free RSV and a 3-fold decrease in volume compared with the control. Overall, the nanomedicine strategy described in the present study may potentially advance the chemotherapy-based treatment of head and neck cancer, with promising applications in other EGFR-overexpressing tumors.

Keywords: resveratrol, head and neck cancer, apoptosis, liposome, epidermal growth factor receptors

Introduction

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) constitutes an entire group of epithelial cancer types, including cancer of the lip, oral, salivary glands, pharynx and larynx (1). According to one estimate, 600,000 incident cases of HNSCC occur every year worldwide (2). At present, surgery is performed in combination with radiotherapy or chemotherapy to treat cancer of the head and neck (3,4). However, these treatment strategies generally result in significant side effects and decreases in patient quality of life. In particular, chemotherapy started at an early stage may be effective; however, cancer cells often develop resistance and delivering large amounts of the drug locally to specific tumor sites remains a challenge (5,6). Therefore, the development of strategies that increase the local concentration of drugs in the tumor tissues is required.

In this regard, resveratrol (RSV), a naturally occurring polyphenolic compound (flavonoid) has been demonstrated to exhibit multiple key properties, including anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, anti-aging, cardio-neuro protective and antitumor effects (7-9). RSV serves an important role in the suppression of cancer cell proliferation, tumor ablation, angiogenesis and cancer metastasis (10). RSV has been revealed to inhibit the proliferation of HL60, MCF-7, SW480 and U251 glioma cells by inducing apoptosis (11,12). However, the efficacy of RSV is limited due to its low levels of solubility; therefore, the present study aimed to combine RSV with a nanocarrier and evaluate its anticancer effect in head and neck cancer (13).

Nanoparticles have been wide investigated as drug delivery carriers with cancer targeting applications. A poorly soluble drug may be stably incorporated in the nanoparticles and thereby its solubility and bioavailability is improved (14-16). Among all the carriers, liposomes have been widely studied for their suitability for systemic application (17). At present, a number of commercial liposomal formulations are available including Doxil®, Myocet® and LipoPlatin (18,19). The systemic circulation of liposomes may be improved by the surface conjugation of polyethylene glycol (PEG) as a hydrophilic shell. The nanosize and hydrophilic layer of PEG confers prolonged blood circulation and decreases the level of reticuloendothelial (RES)-mediated plasma clearance (20,21). Nanoparticles may passively accumulate in the tumor tissues via the enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect. In order to additionally increase the cancer specificity, liposomes may be conjugated with specific ligands that bind to the extracellular domains of cancer cells (22). Among all the molecular targets, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in head and neck cancer and its activation is expected to inhibit the tumor cell proliferation and enhance apoptosis in cancer cells (23,24). Various EGFR inhibitors include tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immunoconjugates, oligonucleotides and epidermal growth factor (EGF). A number of studies have conjugated EGF on the surface of nanoparticles to target cancer cells (25-27). In the present study, the dodecapeptide YHWYGYTPQNVI (GE11) was conjugated onto the surface of nanoparticles. The GE11 peptide is able to selectively bind to the EGFR but with decreased mitogenic activity compared with that of other EGF blockers (28).

In the present study, liposomes and nanoparticles conjugated with the GE11 surface peptide were prepared to increase the anticancer effects of RSV. We hypothesized that surface conjugation of the liposome with the targeting ligand would improve the anticancer effect effectively compared with that of non-targeted nanoparticles. The targeting efficiency of the nanoparticles was examined in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) HN cancer cells. The anticancer effect was evaluated using MTT cytotoxicity and apoptosis assays in EGFR-overexpressing SCC HN cells.

Materials and methods

Materials

Egg L-a-phosphatidylcholine (EPC) and diste-roylphosphatidylethanolamine-PEG (2000) (DSPE-PEG), and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-PEG-maleimide (DSPE-PEG2000-MAL) were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc. (Alabaster, AL, USA). Cholesterol and RSV were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). GE11 (YHWYGYTPQNVIGGGGC), which is a specific peptide for EGFR, was purchased from GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All other chemicals were of reagent grade and used without additional purification.

Preparation of RSV-loaded GE11-conjugated liposomes

The RSV-loaded liposome (RSV-L) was prepared by a thin-film hydration technique. In brief, EPC, DSPE-PEG, DSPE-PEG-Mal and cholesterol at a molar fraction of 59:10:5:26 were added to 2 ml chloroform and placed in a round bottomed flask. Then, 20% w/w RSV was also added (20% w/w lipid). The organic solvents were evaporated by rotary evaporator by rotation (0.2 × g) at 60°C for 1 h and to produce a thin film. PBS was added to the thin film and hydrated for 1 h at 60°C. The suspension was then extruded 21 times through a polycarbonate membrane with a pore size of 200 nm (Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc.). The drug-loaded liposomes were stored in a refrigerator until use. To conjugate the peptide, GE11 was dissolved in HEPES buffer (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and reacted with liposomes containing DSPE-PEG-Mal (1:5 molar ratio) and incubated at 24°C for 15 h in the dark. The unconjugated GE11 was removed by ultracentrifugation at 24°C and 4,000 × g for 15 min.

Particle size and morphology

The average particle size and polydispersity index, a measure of uniformity of particle size distribution and surface charge, were evaluated by dynamic light scattering using a Nano-Z590 Zetasizer instrument (Malvern Instruments, Ltd., Malvern, UK). The suspension was diluted with distilled water and examined at 25°C. The experiment was performed in triplicate using 3 independent samples. The morphology of the particles were evaluated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) by field-emission TEM using a JEM-2100F microscope (JEOL, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The suspension was stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid and placed on a copper grid for 15 min at 24°C. The sample was dried and observed under a microscope at ×10,000.

In vitro release study

The dialysis bag was immersed in water for 8 h prior to the commencement of the study. The samples (RSV-L and RSV-GL; 1 ml drug-loaded suspension) were packed in the dialysis bag and ends were sealed appropriately. The bag was immersed in PBS (pH 7.4) and maintained at 37°C. The samples were collected at pre-determined time intervals and replaced with equal amounts of fresh buffer. The amount of drug released in the medium was calculated using a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. A 10 μl sample was used. A Jasco HPLC system (pump PU-2089, autosampler AS-2057 and LC-Net II/ADC controller; Jasco, Inc., Easton, MD, USA) was coupled to a fluorometric detector (Jasco FP-2020, λ excitation = 330 nm and λ emission = 374 nm). Synergi 4 μ HydroRP 80A and Luna 5 μ 100A C18 analytical columns (250×4.60 mm; Phenomenex, Inc., Torrance, CA, USA) were used. The mobile phase comprised of methanol: ACN: 0.1% phosphoric acid in water (60:10:30 v/v) with a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Ibuprofen was used as the internal standard, and injection volume was 20 μl with flow rate of 1 ml/min and isocratic flow was adapted.

Cell culture

The SCC HN cancer cell line (SCC-VII) was purchased from Soochow University Cell Bank (Suzhou, China) and grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 1% antibiotic mixture. The cells were grown at 37°C with 65% humidity.

Cellular uptake of GE11-conjugated liposomes

Rhodamine-B (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was used as a fluorescent probe to track the intracellular uptake of nanoparticles. The SCC HN cells were seeded in a 6-well plate (3×105) and incubated overnight at 37°C. The cells were then exposed to 10 μg RSV-L and RSV-loaded GE11-conjugated liposomes (RSV-GL) and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. The cells were then washed and extracted using 5% trypsin. The cells were washed again and reconstituted in a PBS buffer. The cellular internalization of the RSV-L and RSV-GL was studied using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). BD CellQuest Pro software (version 5.1; BD Biosciences).

Cytotoxicity assay

The cytotoxicity potential of individual formulation was evaluated by a CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation MTT assay (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). The cells were seeded at a density of 1.5×104 cells/well in a 96-well plate and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The old medium was replaced with new medium containing unbound RSV, RSV-L and RSV-GL, and incubated at 37°C for 24 h with 50 μg liposome in each group. The following day, the medium was removed, and cells were washed twice with PBS. The cells were treated with MTS solution as per the manufacturer’s protocol. The absorbance of each well was studied using a microplate reader a 490 nm. Control cells were treated with dimethyl sulfoxide alone and a separate control was established using non-treated cells. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Apoptosis assay

The apoptosis of cancer cell was studied using an Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)/prop-idium iodide (PI) staining protocol. Briefly, cells were seeded at a density of 2×105 cells/well in a 12-well plate and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The old medium was replaced with new medium containing unbound RSV, RSV-L and RSV-GL (0.1 to 10 μg/ml), respectively and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Following incubation, cells were washed twice with PBS and extracted. The cells were centrifuged at 200 × g for 4 min at 8°C, and the pellets was reconstituted with binding buffer (100 μl; BD Biosciences). The cells were stained with 2 μl Annexin V-FITC and 2 μl PI (BD Biosciences) and incubated for 15 min at 24°C. The volume was made up to 1 ml and examined using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and CellQuest Pro software (version 5.1; BD Biosciences).

In vivo antitumor efficacy analysis and immunostaining

The animal study was approved by the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee of the Shenzhen Peking University-Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center (Shenzhen, China). Female nude mice (~20 g; 5 weeks old) were purchased from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Animals were housed in separate cages (16 animals with 4 animals per cage) and maintained under a controlled atmosphere (50±7% humidity, 21±1°C) with a 12 h light/dark cycle. The animals had free access to food and water throughout the study period. The tumor xenograft model was developed by injecting 1×106 cells in 100 μl growth media into the right flank of female BALB/c nude mice. The tumors were allowed to grow until 100 mm3 and then experiments were initiated. The mice were randomly divided into four groups: The control; RSV; RSV-L; and RSV-GL groups, with 8 mice in each group. The mice were injected with 10 mg/kg RSV (equivalent concentration) three times (with 3-day intervals) via a tail vein injection. The tumor volume was measured using Vernier Caliper and calculated using the formula V = (length × width2)/2. All animals were sacrificed, and tumors were surgically removed and examined histologically. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed on the tumor slices following fixing with 10% formalin solution for 20 min at 24°C. The images were obtained at ×40 magnification using a fluorescence microscope (1X81; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test for pairs of groups and one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple groups in Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, CA, USA). All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. For the cell viability assay, data were assessed using GraphPad Prism software v.7.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

Results and Discussion

In the present study, the dodecapeptide GE11 was conjugated onto the surface of nanoparticles (Fig. 1). RSV, which serves an important role in the suppression of cancer cell proliferation, tumor ablation, angiogenesis and cancer metastasis, was selected as the nanoparticle. We hypothesized that surface conjugation of liposome with targeting ligand would improve the anticancer effect effectively compared with that of non-targeted nanoparticles.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Schematic illustration of preparation of GE11-conjugated resveratrol-loaded liposomal formulations. GE11, dodecapeptide YHWYGYTPQNVI.

Physicochemical characterizations of RSV-GL

The average particle size of RSV-GL was observed to be ~185 nm compared with ~130 nm for RSV-L (Table I) with a surface charge of -23.4±0.98 mV. The increase in particle size in the case of RSV-GL was primarily attributed to the conjugation of GL on its surface (Fig. 2). The particle size of RSV-GL in culture medium was observed to be ~208 nm. A slight increase in the particle size in culture medium may be due to the adsorption of proteins on the surface. It has been suggested that nanocarriers with an average size between 100-200 nm will extravasate into the tumor tissues preferentially via the EPR effect (25). General features of tumors include leaky blood vessels and poor lymphatic drainage. In these conditions, a nanocarrier may extravasate into the tumor tissues via the leaky vessels by the EPR effect. The dysfunctional lymphatic drainage in tumors retains the accumulated nanocarriers and allows them to release drugs into the vicinity of the tumor cells. Experiments using liposomes of different mean sizes have suggested that the threshold vesicle size for extravasation into tumors is ~400 nm (29,30), but previous studies have indicated that particles with diameters <200 nm are more effective (20). In addition, the presence of PEG on the outer surface will increase the blood circulation. The small particle size also allows it to escape from RES-based systemic clearances (31).

Table I.

Physicochemical characteristics of drug-loaded formulations.

Nanoparticles Size, nm Surface charge, mV Polydispersity index Entrapment efficiency, % Loading efficiency, %
Blank L 104.3±1.65 -21.4±1.14 0.089 - -
RSV-L 129.5±1.65 -24.1±1.19 0.112 96.2±1.18 8.95±1.28
RSV-GL 187.5±2.13 -23.4±0.98 0.145 94.2±1.26 7.45±1.57
Open in a new tab

RSV, resveratrol; L, GL, GE11-conjugated liposomes.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Particle size distribution of RSV-L and RSV-GL. The particle size evaluated by means of dynamic light scattering analysis. RSV, resveratrol; GE11, dodecapeptide YHWYGYTPQNVI; RSV-L, RSV-loaded liposome; RSV-GL, RSV-loaded GE11-conjugated liposomes.

Entrapment efficiency and loading efficiency are two important parameters that determine the entrapment capacity of the liposomal carrier. The results of the present study demonstrated that RSV-GL exhibited a high entrapment efficiency of >95% with an active drug loading 19.5% w/w, indicating the excellent characteristics of the present carrier (Table I). This may be attributed to the fact that RSV has high hydrophobic characteristics that allow integration into the lipid bilayer of the liposome.

In vitro drug release study

The drug release study was performed in PBS (pH 7.4) at 37°C. It was observed that RSV was released in a slow and sustained manner from the RSV-L and RSV-GL nanoparticulate systems (Fig. 3). For example, ~30% of RSV was released from the nanocarriers after 24 h, while ~70% of the drug was released after 72 h from RSV-GL. The slightly decreased drug release rate observed in the RSV-GL group compared with RSV-L was primarily attributed to the presence of GL on the outer surface. During initial time points, significant differences between the RSV-L and RSV-GL nanoparticles were observed (P<0.05). It should be noted that no initial high rate of release was observed, indicating that all of the drugs were stably loaded into the cores of the nanoparticles, and none had been absorbed onto the surface of the carrier. This is crucial, as a sustained release of drugs from the nanocarrier system will be a beneficial characteristic for its proposed cancer-targeting applications (32).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

In vitro release study of RSV from RSV-L and RSV-GL. The release of the drug from the nanoparticle was evaluated by means of high-performance liquid chromatography. *P<0.05 vs. RSV-L. RSV, resveratrol; GE11, dodecapeptide YHWYGYTPQNVI; RSV-L, RSV-loaded liposome; RSV-GL, RSV-loaded GE11-conjugated liposomes.

In vitro cellular uptake analysis

The cellular uptake efficiency of individual nanoparticles was evaluated by FACS analysis. The cancer cells were treated with respective formulations and cellular uptake was observed after 2 h incubation (Fig. 4). As observed, rhodamine-B loaded RSV-L exhibited definite internalization of the carrier in the cancer cells, while RSV-GL exhibited significantly increased cellular uptake in cancer cells compared with the RSV-L nanoparticles. The EGFR-overexpressing SCC HN cells specifically internalized the GL11 surface conjugated liposome in a manner that was markedly increased compared with that of the non-targeted carrier. The liposomes were internalized via a specific receptor-mediated active internalization triggered by the binding of the GE11 peptides to the EGFR-overexpressing head and neck cancer cells. This increased cellular uptake of nanocarrier is expected to increase the therapeutic efficacy in cancer cells (33,34).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

In vitro cellular uptake analysis of RSV-L and RSV-GL using FACS flow cytometry. The rhodamine-B was used as a fluorescent probe to evaluate cellular uptake. *P<0.05 vs. RSV-L. RSV, resveratrol; GE11, dodecapeptide YHWYGYTPQNVI; RSV-L, RSV-loaded liposome; RSV-GL, RSV-loaded GE11-conjugated liposomes.

In vitro cytotoxicity assay

The in vitro cytotoxicity of individual formulations was evaluated by MTT assay. As observed, unbound RSV and RSV-loaded nanoparticles exhibited a typical time-dependent cytotoxic effect in head and neck cancer cells (Fig. 5). It was observed that NP encapsulation of RSV increased the therapeutic effect in cancer cells. To be specific, RSV-GL exhibited a significantly increased cytotoxic effect compared with that of the non-targeted nanoparticles (P<0.05). The half maximal inhibitory concentration values of unbound RSV, RSV-L and RSV-GL were 4.5, 22.5 and 34.6 μg/ml, respectively. The superior anticancer effect of RSV-GL was attributed to the specific receptor-mediated active internalization of RSV-GL, which triggered the binding of the GE11 peptides to the EGFR-overexpressing head and neck cancer cells and resulted in increased intracellular concentrations and a cytotoxic effect.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

In vitro cytotoxicity assay of unbound RSV, RSV-L and RSV-GL in head and neck cancer cells. The cytotoxicity assay was determined by MTT assay. *P<0.05 vs. RSV-L. RSV, resveratrol; GE11, dodecapeptide YHWYGYTPQNVI; RSV-L, RSV-loaded liposome; RSV-GL, RSV-loaded GE11-conjugated liposomes.

Apoptosis assay

The antitumor efficacy of individual formulations was additionally evaluated by an apoptosis assay using a flow cytometer (Fig. 6). For this assay, cells were treated with respective formulations and then stained with an Annexin V/PI staining kit. A total of ~9% of the cells treated with RSV were identified to be in early apoptosis. Conversely, RSV-L induced a relatively increased apoptosis effect, with ~17.5% in early and ~4% in late apoptosis. Notably, RSV-GL induced a significantly increased early (~60%) and late (~5%) apoptotic effect in head and neck cancer cells (P<0.01) compared with the RSV-L-treated cells. The increased populations of early and late apoptotic cells in the RSV-GL-treated cancer cells compared with control demonstrates an enhanced anticancer effect of the ESV-GL nanoparticle system. The increased proportion of cells in early apoptosis compared with late apoptosis may be due to the limited incubation period of 24 h. The enhanced apoptosis effect was due to the enhanced cellular accumulation of nanoparticles attributed to the receptor-mediated endocytosis (35).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Apoptosis analysis of unbound RSV, RSV-L and RSV-GL in head and neck cancer cells. The apoptosis of cancer cells was studied by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining. **P<0.01 vs. RSV-L. RSV, resveratrol; GE11, dodecapeptide YHWYGYTPQNVI; RSV-L, RSV-loaded liposome; RSV-GL, RSV-loaded GE11-conjugated liposomes; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PI, propidium iodide.

In vivo antitumor efficacy and immunohistology analysis

The in vivo antitumor efficacy was performed in SCC-bearing xenograft mice (Fig. 7A). As demonstrated, tumors in the untreated animal model grew continuously at every time point. The unbound RSV exhibited a limited effect on tumor growth, and the effect on tumor growth of RSV-L nanoparticle was slightly improved compared with the unbound RSV group. Notably, RSV-GL demonstrated significant antitumor efficacy compared with any other group (P<0.0001). RSV-GL exhibited a 2-fold decrease in tumor volume compared with the free RSV group, and a 3-fold decrease in volume compared with the control. The final tumor volumes were 1,152, 985, 768 and 467 mm3 for the control, unbound RSV, RSV-L and RSV-GL groups, respectively. The improved anticancer efficacy of RSV-GL was attributed to the specific affinity of GE11 towards the overexpressed EGFRs in the cancer cells. The presence of PEG on the outer surface and smaller particle size attributed to the decreased tumor burden (36-38). The histological analysis was performed by H&E staining analysis (Fig. 7B). The tumors in the control group exhibited darker stained nuclei, indicating continuous tumor cell proliferation, whereas RSV-GL demonstrated high numbers of apoptotic nuclei and a marked decrease in the proportion of cancerous cells.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

In vivo anticancer efficacy study in squamous cell carcinoma-bearing xenograft model. (A) Tumor volume measurement. (B) Hematoxylin and eosin histology staining analysis. The animals were treated with respective formulations (unbound RSV, RSV-L and RSV-GL) and the experiments were initiated when the tumor volumes reached ~100 mm3. ***P<0.0001 vs. RSV. RSV, resveratrol; GE11, dodecapeptide YHWYGYTPQNVI; RSV-L, RSV-loaded liposome; GL, GE11-conjugated liposomes.

In conclusion, the GE11-conjugated PEGylated liposome was successfully prepared to enhance the therapeutic effect of RSV in head and neck cancer cells. The EGFR-overexpressing SCC HN cells specifically internalized the GE11 surface conjugated liposome in a manner that was markedly increased compared with that of the non-targeted carrier. Consistently, RSV-GL exhibited a significantly increased cytotoxic effect compared with that of non-targeted NPs. Notably, RSV-GL induced significantly increased proportions of early (~60%) and late (~10%) apoptotic head and neck cancer cells. To the best of our knowledge, the application and development of an EGFR-targeted peptide-conjugated liposome system for RSV delivery has not been studied previously in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Overall, the nanomedicine strategy described in the present study may potentially advance the chemotherapy-based treatment of head and neck cancer, with promising applications in other EGFR-overexpressing tumors.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by grants from the Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center (grant nos. 2016YFC0104707, SZSM201512026, ZDSYS201504301045406, 2015A030313889, JCYJ20170413100222613, JCYJ20170412171856582 and 20171228).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated and analyzed during the present study are included in this article.

Authors’ contributions

TZ, HF, LL, JP and HX performed the experiments, contributed to data analysis and wrote the manuscript. TY, ZZ, YL, YZ, XB, SZ and YS analyzed the data. YC conceptualized the study design, and contributed to data analysis and experimental materials. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The animal study was approved by the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee of Shenzhen Peking University-Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center (Shenzhen, China).

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: Defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2137–2150. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Leemans CR, Braakhuis BJ, Brakenhoff RH. The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:9–22. doi: 10.1038/nrc2982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Marur S, Forastiere AA. Head and neck cancer: Changing epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:489–501. doi: 10.4065/83.4.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vermorken JB, Specenier P. Optimal treatment for recurrent/ metastatic head and neck cancer. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 7):vii252–vii261. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kuczynski EA, Sargent DJ, Grothey A, Kerbel RS. Drug rechallenge and treatment beyond progressionimplications for drug resistance. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10:571–587. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Holohan C, Van Schaeybroeck S, Longley DB, Johnston PG. Cancer drug resistance: An evolving paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:714–726. doi: 10.1038/nrc3599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yang CS, Landau JM, Huang MT, Newmark HL. Inhibition of carcinogenesis by dietary polyphenolic compounds. Annu Rev Nutr. 2001;21:381–406. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.21.1.381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Joe AK, Liu H, Suzui M, Vural ME, Xiao D, Weinstein IB. Resveratrol induces growth inhibition, S-phase arrest, apoptosis and changes in biomarker expression in several human cancer cell lines. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:893–903. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jiang H, Zhang L, Kuo J, Kuo K, Gautam SC, Groc L, Rodriguez AI, Koubi D, Hunter TJ, Corcoran GB, et al. Resveratrol-induced apoptotic death in human U251 glioma cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005;4:554–561. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-04-0056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Buhrmann C, Shayan P, Kraehe P, Popper B, Goel A, Shakibaei M. Resveratrol induces chemosensitization to 5-fluorouracil through up-regulation of intercellular junctions, Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and apoptosis in colorectal cancer. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015;98:51–68. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2015.08.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shen M, Wu RX, Zhao L, Li J, Guo HT, Fan R, Cui Y, Wang YM, Yue SQ, Pei JM. Resveratrol attenuates ischemia/reperfusion injury in neonatal cardiomyocytes and its underlying mechanism. PLoS One. 2012;7:e51223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ku CR, Lee HJ, Kim SK, Lee EY, Lee MK, Lee EJ. Resveratrol prevents streptozotocininduced diabetes by inhibiting the apoptosis of pancreatic β-cell and the cleavage of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase. Endocr J. 2012;59:103–109. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ11-0194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Walle T, Hsieh F, DeLegge MH, Oatis JE, Jr, Walle UK. High absorption but very low bioavailability of oral resveratrol in humans. Drug Metab Dispos. 2004;32:1377–1382. doi: 10.1124/dmd.104.000885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ramasamy T, Kim JH, Choi JY, Tran TH, Choi HG, Yong CS, Kim JO. pH sensitive polyelectrolyte complex micelles for highly effective combination chemotherapy. J Material Chem B. 2014;2:6324. doi: 10.1039/C4TB00867G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hare JI, Lammers T, Ashford MB, Puri S, Storm G, Barry ST. Challenges and strategies in anti-cancer nanomedicine development: An industry perspective. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:25–38. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sundaramoorthy P, Ramasamy T, Mishra SK, Jeong KY, Yong CS, Kim JO, Kim HM. Engineering of caveolae-specific self-micellizing anticancer lipid nanoparticles to enhance the chemotherapeutic efficacy of oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer cells. Acta Biomater. 2016;42:220–231. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Allen TM, Cullis PR. Liposomal drug delivery systems: From concept to clinical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65:36–48. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kneidl B, Peller M, Winter G, Lindner LH, Hossann M. Thermosensitive liposomal drug delivery systems: State of the art review. Int J Nanomed. 2014;9:4387–4398. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S49297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mohan A, Narayanan S, Balasubramanian G, Sethuraman S, Krishnan UM. Dual drug loaded nanoliposomal chemotherapy: A promising strategy for treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2016;99:73–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ramasamy T, Ruttala HB, Gupta B, Poudel BK, Choi HG, Yong CS, Kim JO. Smart chemistry-based nanosized drug delivery systems for systemic applications: A comprehensive review. J Control Release. 2017;258:226–253. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.04.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ramasamy T, Haidar ZS, Tran TH, Choi JY, Choi HG, Yong CS, Kim JO. Layer-by-layer assembly of liposomal nanoparticles with PEGylated polyelectrolytes enhances systemic delivery of multiple anticancer drugs. Acta Biomaterialia. 2014;10:5116–5127. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rosi NL, Mirkin CA. Nanostructures in biodiagnostics. Chem Rev. 2005;105:1547–1562. doi: 10.1021/cr030067f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sheng Q, Liu J. The therapeutic potential of targeting the EGFR family in epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:1241–1245. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vidal F, de Araujo WM, Cruz AL, Tanaka MN, Viola JP, Morgado-Díaz JA. Lithium reduces tumorigenic potential in response to EGF signaling in human colorectal cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2011;38:1365–1373. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2011.955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Acharya S, Dilnawaz F, Sahoo SK. Targeted epidermal growth factor receptor nanoparticle bioconjugates for breast cancer therapy. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5737–5750. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen L, She X, Wang T, He L, Shigdar S, Duan W, Kong L. Overcoming acquired drug resistance in colorectal cancer cells by targeted delivery of 5-FU with EGF grafted hollow meso-porous silica nanoparticles. Nanoscale. 2015;7:14080–14092. doi: 10.1039/C5NR03527A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kim MW, Jeong HY, Kang SJ, Choi MJ, You YM, Im CS, Lee TS, Song IH, Lee CG, Rhee KJ, et al. Cancer-targeted nucleic acid delivery and quantum dot imaging using EGF receptor aptamer-conjugated lipid nanoparticles. Sci Rep. 2017;7:9474. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09555-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li Z, Zhao R, Wu X, Sun Y, Yao M, Li J, Xu Y, Gu J. Identification and characterization of a novel peptide ligand of epidermal growth factor receptor for targeted delivery of therapeutics. FASEB J. 2005;19:1978–1985. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-4058com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, Farokhzad OC, Margalit R, Langer R. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2:751–760. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu D, Auguste DT. Cancer targeted therapeutics: From molecules to drug delivery vehicles. J Control Release. 2015;219:632–643. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.08.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Huang WC, Chen SH, Chiang WH, Huang CW, Lo CL, Chern CS, Chiu HC. Tumor microenvironment-responsive nanoparticle delivery of chemotherapy for enhanced selective cellular uptake and transportation within tumor. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17:3883–3892. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Field LD, Nag OK, Sangtani A, Burns KE, Delehanty JB. The role of nanoparticles in the improvement of systemic anticancer drug delivery. Ther Deliv. 2018;9:527–545. doi: 10.4155/tde-2018-0015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ruttala HB, Chitrapriya N, Kaliraj K, Ramasamy T, Shin WH, Jeong JH, Kim JR, Ku SK, Choi HG, Yong CS, Kim JO. Facile construction of bioreducible crosslinked polypeptide micelles for enhanced cancer combination therapy. Acta Biomater. 2017;63:135–149. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Xu Y, Wang S, Chan HF, Liu Y, Li H, He C, Li Z, Chen M. Triphenylphosphonium-modified poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(ε-caprolactone) micelles for mitochondria- targeted gambogic acid delivery. Int J Pharm. 2017;522:21–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.01.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sundaramoorthy P, Baskaran R, Mishra SK, Jeong KY, Oh SH, Kyu Yoo B, Kim HM. Novel self-micellizing anticancer lipid nanoparticles induce cell death of colorectal cancer cells. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2015;135:793–801. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.08.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ma J, Wu H, Li Y, Liu Z, Liu G, Guo Y, Hou Z, Zhao Q, Chen D, Zhu X. Novel core-interlayer-shell DOX/ZnPc Co-loaded MSNs@ pH-sensitive CaP@PEGylated liposome for enhanced synergetic chemo-photodynamic therapy. Pharm Res. 2018;35:57. doi: 10.1007/s11095-017-2295-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gupta B, Ramasamy T, Poudel BK, Pathak S, Regmi S, Choi JY, Son Y, Thapa RK, Jeong JH, Kim JR, et al. Development of bioactive PEGylated nanostructured platforms for sequential delivery of doxorubicin and imatinib to overcome drug resistance in metastatic tumors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:9280–9290. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b09163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tyagi P, Subramony JA. Nanotherapeutics in oral and parenteral drug delivery: Key learnings and future outlooks as we think small. J Control Release. 2018;272:159–168. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated and analyzed during the present study are included in this article.

Articles from International Journal of Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES