Magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) share the unique capability of magnetic navigation, one of the most complex behavioral responses found in prokaryotes, by means of magnetosomes, which act as an internal compass. Due to formation of these unique nanoparticles, MTB have emerged as a model to study prokaryotic organelle formation and cytoskeletal organization in conjunction with complex motility systems. Despite the high degree of subcellular organization required in MTB, less is known about cell-cycle-related factors or proteins responsible for spatiotemporal polarity control. Here, we investigate the function of the polar organizer PopZ in the magnetotactic alphaproteobacterium Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense. Although PopZ is widely distributed among the alphaproteobacteria, its function in MTB belonging to this class has remained unexplored. Our results suggest that in M. gryphiswaldense, PopZ has a key role during cell division and subcellular organization. Furthermore, we show that PopZ localization and function differ from other nonmagnetotactic alphaproteobacterial model organisms.
KEYWORDS: magnetosome, Magnetospirillum, magnetotaxis, PopZ, polarity
ABSTRACT
Magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) are of special scientific interest due to the formation of magnetosomes, intracellular membrane-enveloped magnetite crystals arranged into a linear chain by a dedicated cytoskeleton. Magnetotaxis relies on the formation and proper inheritance of these unique magnetic organelles, both of which need to be coordinated with the segregation of other cellular content such as chromosomes or motility and chemotaxis related structures. Thus, elaborated mechanisms are required in MTB to coordinate and maintain a high level of spatial and temporal subcellular organization during cytokinesis. However, thus far, underlying mechanisms and polarity determinants such as landmark proteins remained obscure in MTB. Here, we analyzed an ortholog of the polar organizing protein Z in the alphaproteobacterium Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense termed PopZMgr. We show that deletion of the popZMgr gene causes abnormal cell elongation, minicell formation, DNA missegregation, and impairs motility. Overproduction of PopZMgr results in PopZ-rich regions near the poles, which are devoid of larger macromolecules, such as ribosomes, chromosomal DNA, and polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) granules. Using superresolution microscopy, we show that PopZMgr exhibits a bipolar localization pattern throughout the cell cycle, indicating that the definition of new poles in M. gryphiswaldense occurs immediately upon completion of cytokinesis. Moreover, substitution of PopZ orthologs between M. gryphiswaldense and the related alphaproteobacterium Caulobacter crescentus indicated that PopZ localization depends on host-specific cues and that both orthologs have diverged to an extent that allows only partial reciprocal functional complementation. Altogether, our results indicate that in M. gryphiswaldense, PopZ plays a critical role during cell division and segregation of cellular content.
INTRODUCTION
During cytokinesis, bacteria have to coordinate division with the equipartitioning or de novo synthesis of cellular content, such as chromosomes, intracellular storage granules, or (polar) structures, such as chemosensory clusters, flagella, or pili (1–5). In magnetotactic bacteria (MTB), this in addition has to be coordinated with the proper duplication and segregation of their key organelles, the magnetosomes (6–8). In the widely studied magnetotactic alphaproteobacterium Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense, the magnetosomes consist of membrane-enclosed crystals of magnetite, which during their biosynthesis become arranged into linear chains to build a magnetic sensor sufficiently strong to align the cells in the weak Earth’s magnetic field (9, 10). During cell division, this magnetosome chain is then split and magnetosomes are equipartitioned to daughter cells (6, 7). To overcome magnetic forces during separation of magnetosome chains, cells divide by asymmetric septation (i.e., unidirectional constriction of the inner and outer membranes) (6). Both magnetosome chain formation and division are orchestrated by a multipartite and complex cytoskeleton (the “magnetoskeleton” [M. Toro-Nahuelpan, G. Giacomelli, O. Raschdorf, S. Borg, J. M. Plitzko, M. Bramkamp, D. Schüler, and F. D. Müller, submitted for publication]), involving the actin-like MamK protein, which forms dynamic filaments which position and relocate the magnetosome chain within the cell (11, 12). For proper magnetic navigation, the inherent magnetic polarity of the resulting cellular compass has to be coordinated with the organization of motility and chemotaxis structures, such as polar flagella and chemosensory clusters, resulting in a biased directionality of swimming motility (8, 13). However, despite the high degree of intra- and extracellular polar organization required in MTB, underlying cell-cycle-related factors and mechanisms have been only poorly characterized.
In other alphaproteobacteria, polar organizing protein Z (PopZ) has been found to play a major role in definition of cell polarity and spatiotemporal control of multiple proteins. In Caulobacter crescentus, PopZ (PopZCc) assembles into a putative filamentous network in chromosome-free regions at the cell poles, serving as a hub for many other cell-cycle-related proteins (14–18). During the asymmetric cell cycle of C. crescentus, PopZ first localizes to the old stalked pole, where it binds to the adaptor protein ParB, tethering the chromosome to the pole. In the second half of the cell cycle, the PopZ network duplicates at the opposite pole, to ensure capture of the sister chromosome upon replication, which avoids chromosome missegregation (17, 18). In addition, PopZ plays a critical role in cell division by polar retention of MipZ, which is a regulator ensuring proper midcell assembly of the FtsZ ring (19, 20). Therefore, deletion of popZ in C. crescentus causes severe cell division phenotypes, including abnormal cell elongation and formation of minicells (17, 18). Additionally, since PopZ is required for robust recruitment of proteins necessary for stalk synthesis, loss of popZ also affects formation of this organelle (15). In Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which grows predominantly by addition of peptidoglycan at one pole (the new “growth pole”) (21, 22), PopZ is located specifically at the growing pole. After septation, PopZ switches to the newly generated “growth poles” of both daughter cells (23, 24). Absence of popZ in A. tumefaciens resulted in asymmetric sites of cell constriction and cell branching (25, 26). In the pathogen Brucella abortus, PopZ is also unipolar and marks the new pole throughout the cell cycle (27).
Although PopZ is widespread among the alphaproteobacteria (28), its function has been studied in only a very few representatives, and its role in MTB from this class has remained entirely unexplored. Here, we characterized an ortholog of the PopZ polarity factor in M. gryphiswaldense (referred to as PopZMgr). Loss of popZMgr caused severe defects of growth, cell division, and motility. In contrast, the dynamic MamK pole-to-midcell treadmilling was independent of PopZMgr. Moreover, we observed remarkable differences in the cell-cycle-dependent localization pattern of PopZ between M. gryphiswaldense, C. crescentus, and A. tumefaciens. Substitution of PopZ orthologs between M. gryphiswaldense and C. crescentus indicated that the proteins from both strains can partially replace their respective functionalities, but differ to an extent that prevents full implementation within the cell-cycle-dependent interaction network of the heterologous host. In summary, our results reveal a key role of PopZMgr in subcellular organization and provide the first fundamental insights into its function in cell cycle control and polarity determination in MTB. Thus, this work also demonstrates the usefulness of M. gryphiswaldense as a potential and emerging model to scrutinize the bacterial cell cycle and its coordination to spatiotemporal organelle organization.
RESULTS
PopZMgr localizes to both cell poles.
In M. gryphiswaldense, PopZMgr is encoded in a conserved genomic region, similar to C. crescentus, next to putative genes coding for a valyl-tRNA synthetase and an outer membrane efflux protein (see Fig. S1A in the supplemental material). To study its localization pattern throughout the cell cycle, PopZMgr was translationally fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) by integration of an M. gryphiswaldense codon-optimized gfp gene (magegfp [29]) within this genomic region. Expression of popZMgr-gfp from its native promoter was verified via immunoblotting using an antibody against GFP (not shown). In vivo time-lapse fluorescence microscopy revealed that PopZMgr-GFP localized to both cell poles and exhibited a bipolar localization pattern throughout the cell cycle (Fig. 1A; see Movie S1 in the supplemental material). PopZ foci at the future new poles appeared at the end of the cell cycle (Fig. 1B). Since conventional wide-field microscopy did not allow us to judge with high confidence if cells with PopZ foci present at the division plane had already completed cytokinesis, we imaged dividing cells with superresolution three-dimensional structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM). Using FM4-64 membrane staining, 3D-SIM revealed two adjacent PopZ foci (∼250 nm apart) at the cell division site (Fig. 1Ci; see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). In general, all cells with two PopZ foci present at the division site had already completed separation of their membranes (Fig. 1Ci and Fig. S2). In contrast, no PopZ foci were observed in cells with membranes and cytoplasm still connected, but which already had undergone partial membrane constriction (Fig. 1Cii and Fig. S2). These results indicated that formation of PopZ-rich zones at the new poles occurs very late during or shortly after completion of cytokinesis.
Deletion of popZMgr causes severe cell division defects.
To study the effects of popZ absence in M. gryphiswaldense, a markerless in-frame deletion mutant was constructed. The ΔpopZMgr strain was viable, but showed severely impaired growth and increased cell length (Fig. 2). Some cells were elongated up to 60 µm (Fig. 2Ai), equivalent to ∼20-fold the length of a newborn wild-type cell (∼3 µm). Elongated cells contained between 1 and 3 abnormally long magnetosome chains running in parallel, which were sometimes interspaced by segments of unknown origin and composition—i.e., parts of the cell body that appeared brighter in the electron microscope (Fig. 2Aii, black arrowheads). Elongated magnetosome chains were up to ∼20 µm in length (allowing gaps not larger than 150 nm). Elongated cells with more than 700 particles were observed; however, cell length and number of magnetosomes were well correlated, resulting in ∼12 particles/µm (Fig. 2B). For comparison, we determined that the wild type typically exhibited a median chain length of ∼1 µm and median magnetosome numbers of 35 particles per cell. In contrast to the ΔpopZMgr strain, particle number and cell length were only poorly correlated in the wild type (Fig. 2B, inset), similar to previous correlative estimations of magnetosome particle numbers versus cell area (30). Moreover, even in the most highly elongated cells, magnetosome chains were mostly absent from the regions near the cell poles (Fig. 2Aiii). As is also commonly observed in the wild type (31), cells of the ΔpopZMgr strain contained large amounts of polyphosphate and polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) granules (Fig. 2Ai to Aiii).
During time-lapse microscopy (Fig. 2C), the wild type divided at a median cell length of 3.3 µm, whereas in the ΔpopZMgr strain, the cell elongation and unequal division produced a much broader length distribution with a median cell length of 3.9 µm during division (Fig. 2D). Furthermore, the time required to complete a division cycle was less regular for the ΔpopZMgr strain (Fig. 2C and Movie S1). While wild-type cells divide approximately every 4 to 5 h, cell division in the ΔpopZMgr strain occurred with variable timing and at ectopic positions, suggesting that the generation time as well as division septum positioning were affected. To measure potential asymmetry during cell division, the difference in length of both newborn daughter cells was calculated from time-lapse series (Fig. 2E). Thus, the median cell length differences for wild-type daughter cells were 0.29 and 0.94 µm for the popZMgr deletion strain, confirming that the ΔpopZMgr population contained cells with high variation in length caused by unequal division. Also, a slight asymmetry (∼11% off-center) was detected for newborn daughter cells of the wild-type strain, in agreement with previous observations (on average, 15% off-center) by Katzmann et al. (6).
CET ultrastructural analysis of the ΔpopZMgr mutant reveals missegregation of cellular content and chemotactic receptor arrays, septum mislocalization, and minicell formation.
Prompted by the observed cell elongation and impairment of division, we performed cryo-electron tomography (CET) to further investigate the cell division defect of the ΔpopZMgr strain. A cryo-electron micrograph of an elongated ΔpopZMgr cell (Fig. 3A) indicates the areas analyzed by CET (cell pole and cell body) and confirms the formation of distinct minicells at the poles that were also observed in time-lapse imaging experiments (Fig. 2C and Movie S1). CET and further segmentation of the cell pole showed the typical arrangement of magnetosomes by the actin-like MamK filament (Fig. 3Bi and Bii). In addition, a chemoreceptor array was observed at the pole close to the lateral cytoplasmic membrane (inset from Fig. 3Bi and purple objects in Bii), as observed previously in wild-type cells (11). Additionally, a tomographic slice of the cell pole revealed the presence of chemoreceptor arrays also within the minicell (Fig. 3Bi and vi), highlighted in the tomogram segmentation (purple objects in Fig. 3Bii and Biii). Moreover, additional structures inside the minicell, such as magnetosome membrane vesicles, MamK filaments, and ribosomes, were visible (Fig. 3Biv to vi), indicating putative defects in segregation of cellular content. The presence of chemoreceptor arrays at both the pole and within the adjacent minicell (Fig. 3B), and the observation of double chemoreceptor arrays at the cell poles (see Fig. S3Ai in the supplemental material) argue for an improper polar chemoreceptor array localization (CET micrographs of chemoreceptor arrays in the wild-type strain can be found in reference 11 for comparison).
Localization of magnetosome chains did not seem to be affected in the ΔpopZMgr strain, as tomographic slices of the cell body showed a properly localized magnetosome chain across the long cell axis (Fig. 3Ci). Remarkably, a deep unidirectional constriction of the membrane located distant from midcell indicated a putative septum mispositioning (black-white arrowheads in Fig. 3A and Cii and white arrowheads in Fig. 3Ciii and Civ). Furthermore, both the misplaced septum invaginations far-off midcell (Fig. S3Aii and Aiv and Bi, Bii, and Cii) and minicell formation (Fig. S3Bi to Biii) were commonly observed by CET. Therefore, minicell formation is likely caused by ectopic septum localization, confirming the cell division impairment in the ΔpopZMgr mutant. Thus, ΔpopZMgr cells are likely unable to properly control the FtsZ ring localization.
Since one of the major functions of PopZ in both C. crescentus and A. tumefaciens is also in regulation of chromosome segregation (17, 18, 24), we quantified DNA content of ΔpopZMgr minicells by staining with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole), a dye specific for DNA (Fig. 4A). Remarkably, minicells had an approximately 2.8-fold or 1.5-fold reduced mean cell fluorescence (Fig. 4B) compared to either other cells or their polar regions (to account for possible volume differences of minicells, since cells get thinner toward the poles), further suggesting that PopZ in M. gryphiswaldense also contributes to proper chromosome segregation.
Deletion of popZMgr impairs motility and magneto-aerotaxis.
In M. gryphiswaldense, magnetotaxis is tightly coupled to aerotaxis in order to govern directed swimming toward optimal low-oxygen levels (13, 32). Remarkably, it was also found that cells that perform polar magneto-aerotaxis and display a distinct swimming polarity bias within the magnetic field (preferentially north or south seeking) can be enriched within only few generations (13). Thus, during cytokinesis the proper segregation of magnetosome chains with an inherent physically imprinted magnetic polarity must be coordinated with the determination of the magnetotactic swimming direction. In order to analyze if the ΔpopZMgr strain is affected with respect to motility and magneto-aerotaxis, we performed tracking microscopy (Fig. 5A) and various soft-agar-based assays (Fig. 5B to D). Most cells of the ΔpopZMgr strain contained bipolar flagella as in the wild type (Fig. 2Aiii and 2iv), but occasionally additional flagella were observed along the cell body (Fig. 2Aii). Elongated cells of the popZMgr deletion strain were motile and despite their highly increased length still aligned to an external magnetic field when observed by dark-field microscopy (Fig. 5Aii; see Movie S3 in the supplemental material) or optical measurement of their magnetic response (Cmag). In general, the ΔpopZMgr population was heterogeneous, consisting of smaller fast-swimming cells and more elongated cells that moved at a lower speed than the wild type (Movie S3 [movies of the wild-type strain can be found in reference 13]). Shorter cells, which had higher swimming speeds and traveled longer distances within the time frame of observation, were observed to swim in circular motions and were not well aligned within the magnetic field (Fig. 5Aii and Movie S3), which might be due to their altered cell length or the existence of no or only short magnetosome chains. In contrast, longer cells, which displayed low swimming speeds and traveled only short distances, were very well aligned within the magnetic field, presumably due to their overly elongated magnetosome chains. In summary, due to the higher number of highly motile short cells, the mean overall alignment of the ΔpopZMgr population was reduced compared to that of the wild type (Fig. 5Aiii), whereas the swimming speed distribution did not differ significantly from the wild type (Fig. 5Aiv). Accordingly, ΔpopZMgr cultures also reproducibly displayed a slightly lower Cmag than the wild type (as determined from at least triplicate cultures [values are given in the legend to Fig. 5Aiii and Aiv]). In contrast to the wild type, the formation of aerotactic swim halos in semisolid medium was almost completely abolished (Fig. 5B). Moreover, in comparison to the wild type, which forms sharp aerotactic bands in soft agar tubes, the ΔpopZMgr mutant grew only in a diffuse zone close to the surface (Fig. 5C). When soft agar assays were performed in the presence of a magnetic field (Fig. 5D; see Fig. S4C in the supplemental material), spreading of the popZMgr deletion mutant parallel to the magnetic field was only observed after prolonged incubation (>4 days), confirming that cells are still able to align and distribute along the magnetic field lines, but in a slow and possibly only growth-dependent manner. We also failed to restore a swimming polarity bias in elongated ΔpopZMgr cells by magnetic selection. Whereas the wild-type and popZMgr::popZMgr-gfp strains displayed a south-seeking polarity bias upon repeated passaging in O2 gradients within a superimposed vertical Southern Hemisphere-like magnetic field, ΔpopZMgr cells were rather equally distributed toward both magnetic poles (Fig. 5D and Fig. S4C). These findings were confirmed by the hanging drop assay (not shown). In general, only few cells of the ΔpopZMgr strain accumulated in equal proportions at the northern and southern magnetic pole (facing the air-adjacent borders of the drop), speaking for a general impairment of aerotaxis. In summary, deletion of popZMgr severely impaired motility and aerotaxis. Since we observed an increased tendency of highly elongated ΔpopZMgr cells to intertwine and aggregate (Fig. 5E), reduced motility in soft agar is also partially explained by the formation of cell clumps.
MamK filament dynamics is independent of PopZMgr.
In M. gryphiswaldense, magnetosome chains are recruited to midcell to ensure equal partitioning of magnetosomes to both daughter cells. It has been recently found that the MamK filament has a particular dynamic behavior, growing from both cell poles, elongating toward midcell, and undergoing treadmilling (7).
Therefore, based on the PopZMgr localization pattern, we asked whether PopZMgr is involved in or influences the MamK dynamics. To examine this hypothesis, we performed photokinetic analysis of the MamK filament in ΔpopZMgr cells. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) of MamK filaments using an mCherry-MamK fusion showed a half-time fluorescence recovery (t1/2) of 87.6 ± 17.9 s (Fig. 6A). Recently, it was reported that the mCherry-MamK translational fusion expressed in M. gryphiswaldense wild-type cells from a plasmid and chromosomally showed t1/2 values of 71.8 ± 6.6 and 68.3 ± 4.8 s, respectively (7). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey's multiple-comparison test determined that the mCherry-MamK filament t1/2 in the absence of popZMgr is statistically not significant compared to the previously reported values for the wild-type strain (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the MamK pole-to-midcell growth and its treadmilling behavior are not affected upon absence of popZMgr (Fig. 6B). Thus, it can be concluded that the MamK filament dynamics, especially the directed pole-to-midcell growth, is independent of PopZMgr.
PopZMgr forms a polar exclusion zone devoid of macromolecules and chromosomal DNA.
To study the effect of popZMgr overexpression, PopZMgr and PopZMgr-GFP were overproduced in trans under the control of Ptet (anhydrotetracycline-inducible promoter) in the M. gryphiswaldense wild type and ΔpopZMgr strain. Upon reintroduction of popZMgr (or popZMgr-gfp), cell morphology of the wild type, formation of swim halos, and growth were restored in the ΔpopZMgr strain (see Fig. S5 in the supplemental material). Furthermore, prolonged overexpression of popZMgr or popZMgr-gfp in the wild-type strain caused severe cell filamentation and delayed growth, whereas expression in the ΔpopZMgr strain had a lesser effect on growth and cell length, likely due to the absence of endogenous PopZMgr (Fig. 6D and Fig. S5). Moreover, PopZMgr-GFP overproduction in the M. gryphiswaldense wild type caused either (i) cells with two large polar foci and multiple smaller foci distributed across the cell and in between the PHB granules (stained with the lipophilic dye Nile red, specific for membranes and polyhydroxybutyrate [PHB]) (Fig. 6C, inset) or (ii) cells with a large PopZ accumulation cluster expanding from one pole (Fig. 6C). In the latter, some cells had an additional smaller PopZMgr-GFP cluster at the opposite pole. The PopZ expansion zone encompassed several micrometers in length and presented a reduced cell diameter, resulting in a tail-like appearance. Additional staining with DAPI and Nile red revealed that chromosomal DNA and PHB granules were excluded from the expanded PopZ area. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis confirmed that this zone was depleted of larger cytoplasmic structures such as PHB or polyphosphate granules (Fig. 6D). Furthermore, the brighter appearance indicated that the putative polar PopZ-rich region is mostly devoid of electron-dense cytoplasmic structures and macromolecules (e.g., ribosomes). Even upon PopZMgr overexpression, magnetosome chains were still located at midcell, resembling the wild-type phenotype, but in a few cases were also embedded into the outermost part of the PopZ expansion zone. Of note, the formation of flagella at the PopZ-rich poles was not impaired (Fig. 6D). In summary, PopZMgr forms a polar expansion zone that is depleted in larger macromolecules and organelles, similar to previously reported observations regarding PopZ in C. crescentus (15, 17).
Bipolar PopZMgr localization requires host-specific factors.
In C. crescentus, PopZ (abbreviated PopZCc) first localizes to the old pole and undergoes a transition from monopolar to bipolar after completion of cell division (17). The C. crescentus life cycle is highly asymmetric, generating a smaller and motile swarmer cell and a stalked cell that possesses a tubular extension at the old pole, required for surface attachment. The distinct bipolar localization pattern in M. gryphiswaldense (Fig. 1) prompted us to investigate the localization pattern of PopZMgr in C. crescentus (Fig. 7; see Fig. S6A in the supplemental material). When PopZMgr-GFP was heterologously produced in C. crescentus NA1000 (in trans expressed from Ptet in the presence of endogenous PopZCc), a unipolar-to-bipolar transition pattern was revealed (Fig. 7A, 1-h time-point and Fig. S6A), similar to the localization pattern of PopZCc. PopZMgr and PopZCc are conserved in their N- and C-terminal regions (37.2% identity and 51.3% similarity, in a global alignment, including some of the most related orthologs [Fig. S1B to D]), which are known to be important in C. crescentus for interaction with the ParA/ParB chromosome segregation machinery and PopZ cluster formation, respectively. Thus, the observed localization pattern of PopZMgr in C. crescentus might be explained by a direct interaction between PopZMgr and PopZCc and/or with other known PopZ interactors present in C. crescentus, such as ParA/ParB. Upon prolonged expression of popZMgr-gfp in C. crescentus, cells became heavily elongated and aberrantly shaped (Fig. 7A and B), indicating that overexpression of PopZMgr also interferes with cell division in C. crescentus. In addition, heterologous popZMgr-gfp overproduction in C. crescentus resulted in the appearance of multiple PopZ foci and large polar PopZ exclusion zones (Fig. 7A), similar to the previously described observations regarding the overproduction of native PopZCc in C. crescentus (15, 17). As observed for M. gryphiswaldense (Fig. 6C and D), PopZMgr exclusion zones in C. crescentus were devoid of DNA and PHB storage granules (Fig. 7C). Heterologous expression of popZMgr-gfp in the ΔpopZCc background partially restored the cellular morphology of the C. crescentus wild-type strain (Fig. 7A), resulting in a reduced cell length close to wild-type-like levels (Fig. 7B). However, in some cells, we observed PopZMgr-GFP foci located at ectopic positions opposite to the stalked pole (Fig. 7A, 12-h time point, yellow arrowheads), indicating that the absence of PopZCc was not fully transcomplemented by PopZMgr-GFP.
In order to avoid artifacts caused by altered expression levels (due to expression from a random ectopic locus under the control of Ptet or the presence of endogenous PopZCc), we constructed a C. crescentus strain harboring a site-specific chromosomal replacement of popZCc against popZMgr-gfp. We also performed the reciprocal experiment and constructed an M. gryphiswaldense strain that carries a site-specific chromosomal replacement of popZMgr for an mCherry-popZCc fusion. Notably, PopZMgr-GFP localized in a monopolar-to-bipolar fashion in C. crescentus (Fig. 7Di and Ei), when expressed from the endogenous popZCc-promoter as the sole source of PopZ present. However, transition of PopZMgr-GFP to the new poles occurred with ectopic timings, and not all PopZMgr was retained in polar regions, as indicated by the diffuse cytoplasmic fluorescence signal (Fig. 7Di and Ei). In M. gryphiswaldense, mCherry-PopZCc in general did localize to both cell poles (Fig. 7Dii and Eii). However, one cell pole displayed much stronger fluorescence, and filamentous localization patterns were observed (Fig. 7Dii, elongated cell at the bottom left). Furthermore, the appearance of PopZ foci at the new cell poles was delayed, and disappearance of polar foci was observed in some cases (Fig. 7Eii). Together, these results indicated that bipolar PopZ localization is regulated by host-specific proteins in M. gryphiswaldense and that both PopZ orthologs differ to an extent that does not allow full functionality within the cell cycle of the heterologous host. The findings that bipolar PopZ subcellular localization is not inherent to the protein itself but rather host specific were further corroborated by expression of PopZMgr-GFP in various other bacterial hosts (as shown in Fig. S6B to E), including only distantly related Escherichia coli and the two other alphaproteobacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Rhodospirillum rubrum, which contain no PopZ (R. sphaeroides) or an endogenous PopZ ortholog (R. rubrum [49% identical to PopZMgr]) (28). Expression of PopZMgr-GFP in E. coli WM3064 resulted in the formation of large fluorescent clusters in polar nucleoid-free regions, exhibiting unipolar localization at either the new or old pole (Fig. S6B), similar to the observations made upon expression of PopZCc in E. coli (17, 18). When we studied the localization of PopZMgr-GFP in spheroid 2,6-diaminopimelic acid (DAP)-auxotrophic WM3064 cells formed after depletion of DAP, random foci were formed close to the cell periphery (Fig. S6C), indicating that localization of PopZMgr does not depend on geometrical constraints. In ovoid rod-shaped R. sphaeroides cells, PopZMgr generally localized only at the old pole (Fig. S6D). A similar bipolar pattern to that in M. gryphiswaldense was observed in spirillum-shaped R. rubrum cells, with two new PopZ foci emerging at the site of cell division (Fig. S6E). In summary, these results suggest that monopolar accumulation in DNA-free polar regions occurs by a mechanism that is inherent to PopZMgr, whereas bipolar localization apparently depends on distinct alphaproteobacterium-specific host factors.
To further investigate whether PopZ orthologs can replace their functionalities, we compared median cell lengths of M. gryphiswaldense and C. crescentus strains harboring reciprocal PopZ orthologs with the respective wild-type and ΔpopZ strains. The median cell length of the C. crescentus popZCc::popZMgr-gfp strain was 1.5-fold reduced compared to the ΔpopZCc strain (and 1.2-fold higher than that of the NA1000 wild-type strain [Fig. 7Fi]), whereas the median cell length of the M. gryphiswaldense popZMgr::mCherry-popZCc strain was 1.4-fold lower than that of the ΔpopZMgr strain (but only 1.05-fold larger than that of the M. gryphiswaldense wild-type strain [Fig. 7Fii]). These results indicated that in both strains, the loss of the respective PopZ ortholog can be partially rescued by expression of the reciprocal ortholog.
To analyze whether PopZMgr is capable to accomplish functions with respect to stalk formation, which is impaired in the C. crescentus popZ deletion strain (17, 18), we also analyzed stalk length and frequency in cells grown under phosphate-limiting conditions, known to cause severe stalk elongation (33), to facilitate detection and analysis of stalks (Fig. 7G). In contrast to previous reports that the ΔpopZCc strain does not form stalks (3, 21), we found that the ΔpopZCc strain grown under phosphate starvation is still able to form stalks, but of 2.5-fold-reduced median length (Fig. 7Gii) and at a lower frequency (Fig. 7Giii) than the NA1000 wild-type strain. In comparison, the fraction of cells with monopolar stalks was 1.6-fold lower in the ΔpopZCc mutant than in the NA1000 wild-type strain. In contrast, the fraction of cells without stalks was 2.3-fold reduced in the popZCc::popZMgr-gfp strain compared to the ΔpopZCc strain, whereas the number of cells with monopolar stalks was 1.9-fold higher, bringing both values closer to wild-type levels. A minor fraction of cells with bipolar stalks was detected within the ΔpopZCc and popZCc::popZMgr-gfp populations, whereas no cells containing bipolar stalks were found in the NA1000 wild type. Median stalk lengths of the popZCc::popZMgr-gfp strain were still 1.4-fold lower relative to the wild type but 1.8-fold larger in comparison to the ΔpopZCc strain. Notably, stalk formation was also restored upon expression of popZMgr-gfp in the ΔpopZCc strain from Ptet (Fig. 7A, 8 and 12 h, yellow arrowheads), and overexpression of PopZMgr-GFP in NA1000 caused aberrant bipolar stalk formation (Fig. 7C, yellow arrowheads). In summary, these results argue that PopZMgr is able to partially accomplish functions inherent to PopZCc with respect to stalk formation in C. crescentus.
DISCUSSION
In C. crescentus, PopZ has been described as an important landmark protein, generating a polar hub domain for multiple proteins involved in cell cycle control and polar morphogenesis (14–18, 34, 35). In addition to C. crescentus, PopZ has been studied in A. tumefaciens (23–26), which exhibits unipolar growth by addition of peptidoglycan at the new “growth pole” (22). Here, we report that PopZ in the magnetotactic model organism M. gryphiswaldense plays a similar, but somewhat distinct role. In contrast to C. crescentus and A. tumefaciens, where cell division results in morphologically distinct cells and/or daughter cells that differ in cell cycle progression, division in M. gryphiswaldense gives rise to morphologically nearly equal daughter cells. Deletion and overexpression of popZ in M. gryphiswaldense resulted in severe cell division defects (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. S3, Movie S1, Movie S2, and Fig. 6C and D and Fig. S5A and B, respectively) and DNA missegregation (Fig. 4), consistent with previous observations in C. crescentus (17, 18) and A. tumefaciens (24, 25). However, we did not observe formation of ectopic poles and cell branching as in A. tumefaciens (25, 26). In accordance with reported results in C. crescentus (15, 17), we have observed formation of large exclusion zones upon overproduction of PopZMgr in M. gryphiswaldense (Fig. 6C and D). These results imply that PopZMgr may have an important role as a putative landmark protein and in the control of cell-cycle-related factors in M. gryphiswaldense. As for now, it can only be speculated that the severe cell elongation and minicell formation of the ΔpopZMgr strain are due to an indirect impairment in FtsZ ring positioning. In C. crescentus, MipZ inhibits FtsZ polymerization by generating a gradient with the highest concentration in polar regions via ParB-PopZ-dependent retention of MipZ (19, 20), thus creating a region with the lowest MipZ concentration at midcell with suitable conditions for FtsZ ring positioning and formation. Since orthologs of the ParA/ParB chromosome segregation system and MipZ spatial regulator are present in M. gryphiswaldense, it is likely that PopZMgr contributes to stabilization of the MipZ gradient and, thereby, proper placement of the division site. However, the specific functions of ParA, ParB, and MipZ in M. gryphiswaldense remain to be elucidated.
Deletion of popZ in M. gryphiswaldense severely affected motility and apparently polar magneto-aerotactic behavior (Fig. 5, Fig. S4, and Movie S3). Inheritance of a specific magnetotactic pole-seeking polarity was hypothesized to rely on a yet elusive superimposed mechanism of cellular polarity control, by defining a cellular polarity axis in addition to the magnetosome chain’s magnetic dipole (8, 13). However, the affected motility and loss of swimming polarity are supposedly not directly caused by the absence of popZMgr. In contrast, the aforementioned phenotypes are likely explained by a general impairment of aerotaxis in the ΔpopZMgr strain (i.e., due to improper localization of motility-related structures, as discussed below) and as an indirect effect due to formation of short cells that are highly motile, but only weakly aligned within the magnetic field, as well as severe cell elongation, which affects hydrodynamic properties of cells’ propulsion during swimming (as also previously observed for artificially elongated cells caused by cephalexin treatment [6]). Furthermore, we observed an increased tendency of elongated ΔpopZMgr cells to form aggregates (Fig. 5E), which might contribute to the strong motility phenotype observed in soft-agar-based assays (Fig. 5B, C, and D). An increased tendency of ΔpopZ cells to aggregate has also been observed in A. tumefaciens and might be caused by an altered formation of extracellular polysaccharides (25), but in the case of M. gryphiswaldense also due to the helical nature of intertwined elongated cells. It can be further hypothesized that the disturbed aerotactic behavior in the ΔpopZMgr strain may be due to a delayed or impaired signal transduction from the chemotactic machinery to the flagellar motors, since some cells contained improperly placed (Fig. 3B) or additional chemosensory clusters (as confirmed by fluorescence microscopy of various methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins [MCPs] fused to GFP in the ΔpopZMgr parent strain [results not shown]) as well as occasional flagella located in nonpolar regions (Fig. 2Aii). Altered localization of MCPs, chemoreceptor-associated histidine kinase CheA, and flagellar basal body proteins FliG and FliM upon popZ deletion has been also reported for C. crescentus (17) and A. tumefaciens (25) or in artificially elongated cephalexin-treated E. coli cells (36, 37). However, only a mild effect on motility in swim plate assays has been observed upon popZ deletion in A. tumefaciens (25), and artificially elongated E. coli cells were only affected in their swimming speed, but were still able to perform chemotaxis (36). Hence, due to their different flagellation patterns, cell shapes, and chemotactic behaviors, the experimental results among different strains are not directly comparable.
In addition, severe cell elongation upon popZ deletion in M. gryphiswaldense resulted in drastically elongated magnetosome chains and a highly increased number of particles per cell (Fig. 2A and B). Our results imply that magnetosome number and chain length are likely directly related to cell length, resembling previously published observations on artificially elongated cephalexin-treated cells (6). Besides, it has recently been shown that increased gene dosage by genomic multiplication of the magnetosome island results in increased particle numbers as well (38), but with several chains running in parallel or cells closely packed with magnetosomes that lack an ordered chain-like arrangement. Presumably, elongated ΔpopZMgr cells also possess an increased number of gene copies due to the presence of multiple chromosomes (albeit we were not able to identify distinct individual chromosomes by DAPI staining, without any specific treatment to condense DNA [Fig. 4A]). However, in contrast to the overproducer strain (38), the amount of magnetosomes and gene copies per cell volume in elongated ΔpopZMgr cells can be assumed to be roughly in the same range as for the wild type.
Magnetosome synthesis, midcell positioning and proper segregation of magnetosome chains are controlled by the treadmilling behavior of the actin-like MamK, which forms dynamic filaments (6, 7). MamK-dependent repositioning of magnetosome chains was not affected in the ΔpopZMgr strain (Fig. 2A and Fig. 6A and B), suggesting that PopZMgr does not play a role in magnetosome organelle segregation or positioning by exerting direct control of the MamK dynamics. Since magnetosome chain segregation is tightly coupled to cell division, it can be hypothesized that PopZMgr may influence magnetosome segregation indirectly—likely by regulating the FtsZ ring localization. Thus, lack of PopZMgr causes unequal cell division and misdistribution of chains during cell division as a side effect.
Most strikingly, a consistent bipolar localization pattern of PopZ in M. gryphiswaldense was observed (Fig. 1, Fig. S2, and Movie S1), contrasting with the reported monopolar-to-bipolar transition in C. crescentus (17, 18) and unipolar localization in A. tumefaciens (23–25). Ortholog substitution experiments between C. crescentus and M. gryphiswaldense (Fig. 7 and Fig. S6) indicated that bipolar PopZ localization is not inherent to the protein itself but rather is host specific. PopZMgr and PopZCc have conserved N and C termini (Fig. S1) and were capable of partially substituting their reciprocal functionalities (Fig. 7). Thus, the observed localization pattern of both orthologs may be explained by a direct interaction with the respective PopZ interactors present in each host, albeit our results also indicate that both orthologs have diverged to an extent that does not allow full conservation of all PopZ-dependent interactions. For C. crescentus, several factors for control of PopZ localization have been discussed (14, 15, 34, 39). Polar localization of PopZ relies on its self-assembly into higher-order structures in DNA-free polar regions, and the unipolar-to-bipolar transition is coupled to the asymmetric distribution of ParA during the cell cycle (14). The chromosome segregation system adaptor protein ParB and the ParA ATPase, which act together to spatially separate replicated chromosomes in C. crescentus (1), might be suitable candidates for control of bipolar PopZ localization in M. gryphiswaldense. Recently, the zinc finger protein ZitP (28, 40) and muramidase homolog SpmX (41) have been described as additional important factors to nucleate new PopZ microdomains in C. crescentus. An ortholog of ZitP (locus tag MGR_3358) is also encoded in the M. gryphiswaldense genome (23% identity and 39% similarity compared to ZitPCc, respectively), whereas no protein orthologous to SpmX is present. Further investigation is needed to identify PopZ interactors in M. gryphiswaldense and elucidate how they differ in function from those of other alphaproteobacteria.
In conclusion, protein functions depend on the genetic context, and can be implemented in different ways, even in closely related species. Thus, M. gryphiswaldense also serves as an appropriate and interesting model organism to study the function of cell cycle factors and its coordination with organelle synthesis and segregation. In the near future, these cell-cycle-related studies will also help to understand how polar magnetotaxis is functionally controlled and inherited in MTB.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and culture conditions.
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Text S1 in the supplemental material. Cells were grown using previously described standard procedures described in detail in Text S1.
Molecular and genetic techniques.
Oligonucleotides (sequences are listed in Text S1) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Plasmids were constructed by standard recombinant techniques (as described in Text S1), employing a homologous recombination-based counterselectable system for the construction of in-site deletion and insertion mutants (31) and a Tn5-based anhydrotetracycline-inducible expression vector (29, 42) for the construction of transcomplementation and overexpression constructs. All constructs were sequenced by Macrogen Europe (Amsterdam, Netherlands).
Motility assay.
Motility soft agar assays were performed as described by Popp et al. (13) and in Text S1. Single-cell tracking was performed at 24°C on a Nikon FN1 Eclipse microscope (Fig. S4A) equipped with an S Plan Fluor 20× differential inference contrast (DIC) N1 objective (NA0.5), a dark-field condenser (NA0.95), a pco.edge 4.2 sCMOS camera (PCO), and one pair of coils connected to a Kepco BOP 50-2M power supply. The coil setup was calibrated with a GM08 gaussmeter connected to a TP002HS high-sensitivity transverse probe (Hirst Magnetic Instruments). Hence, 10 µl of cell suspension diluted to an optical density at 565 nm (OD565) of 0.01 were pipetted onto a glass slide and covered with a coverslip. Videos were recorded for 40 s at a frame rate of 15 frames per second (fps). Tracking was performed with NIS-Elements 5.1 employing the “spot detection” algorithm and “random motion” model, with the “standard deviation multiplication factor” set to 2.5 and “maximum object speed” set to 80 µm/s. Tracks with 30 or fewer frames and line speeds lower than 2 µm/s were excluded from the analysis. Cells which were tracked due to Brownian motion were deleted manually from the analysis. Values given in Fig. 5A are defined as follows: “line speed” is the length of a straight line from the track origin to the current point (=“line length”) divided by the time elapsed. “Swimming speed” is the track segment length divided by the amount of time elapsed between two positions. “Heading” is the angle between the direction of the velocity vector and the x axis. “Alignment” within the magnetic field (along the x axis) was calculated in Excel (Microsoft) with the following formula: abs[cos(“heading”)].
Fluorescence microscopy.
To image fluorescent protein fusions, 3 µl of cell suspension were immobilized on MSR agarose pads (7) and covered with a coverslip. For fluorescent staining, 20 µl of cell suspension was mixed with either 10 µl of a Nile red solution (0.5 µg/ml in dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]) or 6 µl of MM4-64 (an FM4-64 derivative [16 µM in DMSO]) and/or 10 µl of a DAPI solution (50 µg/ml). Conventional epifluorescence microscopy was performed on an Olympus BX81 microscope equipped with a 100× UPLSAPO100×O objective (NA1.4) and an Orca-ER camera (Hamamatsu). Time-lapse imaging and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) were performed on a Deltavision Elite system (GE Healthcare) equipped with a U-Plan S-Apo 100× oil PSF objective (NA1.4) and a CoolSnap HQ2 charge-coupled device (CCD) camera as described previously (7). Additional time-lapse series were acquired on a Nikon Eclipse Ti2-E microscope equipped with a CFI SR Apo TIRF AC 100×H oil objective (NA1.49) and Retiga R1 CCD camera (QImaging). Further methodological details with respect to image deconvolution and the different systems used for epifluorescence microscopy, FRAP, and time-lapse imaging are given in Text S1.
Structured illumination microscopy.
3D-SIM (striped illumination at 3 angles and 5 phases) was performed on a Nikon Eclipse Ti2-E N-SIM E fluorescence microscope equipped with a CFI SR Apo TIRF AC 100×H NA1.49 oil lens objective. Samples (3 µl of FM4-64-stained cell suspension) were immobilized on MSR agarose pads (7). High-precision coverslips of 0.17 mm thickness (no. 15H; Marienfeld) and immersion oil (type F 30cc; Nikon) with a refractive index of 1.518 (at 23°C) were used to minimize sample-induced spherical aberration. Samples were sealed with wax to provide long-term stability and avoid sample drift during imaging. Calibration of the SIM grating focus and motorized temperature change objective correction collar was performed at 22°C with a bead sample (T-7279 TetraSpeck microspheres) for high-quality image reconstructions at around 115-nm lateral (xy) spatial resolution with 32.5-nm reconstructed image pixel spacing. System and samples were preequilibrated at 22°C before imaging to avoid temperature-induced changes in the refractive index. Fast piezo stage z-series images were taken at a total thickness of 1.5 to 2.0 µm with 200-nm z-step spacing with raw frame exposure times in the range 100 to 150 ms, avoiding detector saturation of the 16-bit 1.5-electron read noise Orca Flash4.0 LT Plus sCMOS camera (Hamamatsu). EM700/75 and EM525/50 emission filters and fluorescence excitation with 561- and 488-nm laser lines at 80% laser power were used for imaging of FM4-64 and PopZMgr-GFP, respectively. 3D-SIM image reconstruction was performed in NIS-Elements 5.01 (Nikon) using the “stack reconstruction” algorithm with the following parameter settings. The “illumination modulation contrast” was set either to “auto” for the FM4-64 channel or to custom values between 1.5 and 3.3 for the GFP channel. The “high resolution noise suppression” was set to 0.1.
Image analysis.
Images were processed and analyzed with ImageJ Fiji v1.50c (43). Demographs and line plots (Fig. 1 and Fig. S6) were constructed by manually measuring the fluorescence intensity profiles in Fiji and processing the data in R (version 3.3.1 [http://www.r-project.org]), with the cell profiles script (21 [http://github.com/ta-cameron/cell-profiles]) and ggplot2 package (version 2.1.0; Hadley Wickham, Department of Statistics, Rice University [https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org/]). Intensity profiles either were oriented with the fluorescent cell pole toward the left (E. coli and R. sphaeroides), or random sorting was applied (M. gryphiswaldense and R. rubrum). In the case of C. crescentus, the stalk was used as the old pole reference. To confidently and accurately identify stalks, FM4-64 staining (which in our hands did not always stain all cells) and DAPI staining (which we found to unspecifically stain stalks) were used, in addition to DIC microscopy.
The corrected mean cell fluorescence (Fig. 4) was determined in ImageJ Fiji by estimation of the “mean gray values” (=the sum of the gray values of all the pixels in the selection divided by the number of pixels) in selected cell outlines subtracted by the “mean gray value” of the background. For the selection and quantification of cell poles, circular outlines with a diameter of 450 nm were used. The background was estimated within square outlines with a size of 20 by 20 pixels.
Transmission electron microscopy and cryo-electron tomography.
Conventional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and cryo-electron tomography (CET) were performed in a similar manner as described previously (7). Detailed instructions are given in Text S1.
Statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis was performed in Prism 7.04 (GraphPad) as described in the respective legend to each figure. Data sets were tested for normality using the D’Agostino and Pearson, Shapiro-Wilk, and Kolmogorow-Smirnov tests.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant DFG Schu 1080/16-1) and European Research Council (ERC AdG Syntomagx).
We thank Katharina Silbermann and Agata Käsbohrer for technical assistance during all kinds of experiments. The help of Annika Stüven and Julian Herz during PopZ ortholog replacement experiments is greatly acknowledged. In addition, we are grateful to Alexander Cuba Ramos for help with immunoblotting and E. coli DAP starvation experiments. We thank Daniel J. White of GE Healthcare—Cell Analysis, for technical specifications for publication and assistance with 3D-SIM microscopy. We are thankful to Patrick Viollier and Matthieu Berge (University of Geneva Medical School) for providing C. crescentus strains and helpful discussions. We are grateful to Günter Pfeifer, Tillman Schäffer, and Ruben Fernandez-Busnadiego (MPI of Biochemistry) for permanent support with TEM and CET.
D.S., D.P., and M.T.-N. designed and outlined the study. D.P. constructed plasmids and strains. D.P. performed and analyzed most epifluorescence microscopy experiments. D.P. conducted TEM, 3D-SIM, motility, and transcomplementation experiments and analyzed the data. M.T.-N. performed time-lapse imaging of the wild-type, ΔpopZ, and popZMgr::popZMgr-gfp strains, and D.P. analyzed the data. M.T.-N. performed cryo-electron tomography experiments, and M.T.-N. and J.M.P. analyzed the data. M.T.-N. performed FRAP experiments, and M.T.-N. and M.B. analyzed the data. D.P., M.T.-N., and D.S. wrote the manuscript.
Footnotes
Citation Pfeiffer D, Toro-Nahuelpan M, Bramkamp M, Plitzko JM, Schüler D. 2019. The polar organizing protein PopZ is fundamental for proper cell division and segregation of cellular content in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense. mBio 10:e02716-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02716-18.
REFERENCES
- 1.Treuner-Lange A, Søgaard-Andersen L. 2014. Regulation of cell polarity in bacteria. J Cell Biol 206:7–17. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201403136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Laloux G, Jacobs-Wagner C. 2014. How do bacteria localize proteins to the cell pole? J Cell Sci 127:11–19. doi: 10.1242/jcs.138628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pfeiffer D, Wahl A, Jendrossek D. 2011. Identification of a multifunctional protein, PhaM, that determines number, surface to volume ratio, subcellular localization and distribution to daughter cells of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate), PHB, granules in Ralstonia eutropha H16. Mol Microbiol 82:936–951. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07869.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jones CW, Armitage JP. 2015. Positioning of bacterial chemoreceptors. Trends Microbiol 23:247–256. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schuhmacher JS, Thormann KM, Bange G. 2015. How bacteria maintain location and number of flagella? FEMS Microbiol Rev 39:812–822. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuv034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Katzmann E, Müller FD, Lang C, Messerer M, Winklhofer M, Plitzko JM, Schüler D. 2011. Magnetosome chains are recruited to cellular division sites and split by asymmetric septation. Mol Microbiol 82:1316–1329. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07874.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Toro-Nahuelpan M, Müller FD, Klumpp S, Plitzko JM, Bramkamp M, Schüler D. 2016. Segregation of prokaryotic magnetosomes organelles is driven by treadmilling of a dynamic actin-like MamK filament. BMC Biol 14:88. doi: 10.1186/s12915-016-0290-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lefèvre CT, Bennet M, Klumpp S, Faivre D. 2015. Positioning the flagellum at the center of a dividing cell to combine bacterial division with magnetic polarity. mBio 6:e02286-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02286-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bazylinski DA, Frankel RB. 2004. Magnetosome formation in prokaryotes. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:217–230. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Uebe R, Schüler D. 2016. Magnetosome biogenesis in magnetotactic bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:621–637. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Katzmann E, Scheffel A, Gruska M, Plitzko JM, Schüler D. 2010. Loss of the actin-like protein MamK has pleiotropic effects on magnetosome formation and chain assembly in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense. Mol Microbiol 77:208–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07202.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Draper O, Byrne ME, Li Z, Keyhani S, Barrozo JC, Jensen G, Komeili A. 2011. MamK, a bacterial actin, forms dynamic filaments in vivo that are regulated by the acidic proteins MamJ and LimJ. Mol Microbiol 82:342–354. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07815.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Popp F, Armitage JP, Schüler D. 2014. Polarity of bacterial magnetotaxis is controlled by aerotaxis through a common sensory pathway. Nat Commun 5:5398. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Laloux G, Jacobs-Wagner C. 2013. Spatiotemporal control of PopZ localization through cell cycle-coupled multimerization. J Cell Biol 201:827–841. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201303036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bowman GR, Comolli LR, Gaietta GM, Fero M, Hong S-H, Jones Y, Lee JH, Downing KH, Ellisman MH, McAdams HH, Shapiro L. 2010. Caulobacter PopZ forms a polar subdomain dictating sequential changes in pole composition and function. Mol Microbiol 76:173–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07088.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Holmes JA, Follett SE, Wang H, Meadows CP, Varga K, Bowman GR. 2016. Caulobacter PopZ forms an intrinsically disordered hub in organizing bacterial cell poles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:12490–12495. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602380113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ebersbach G, Briegel A, Jensen GJ, Jacobs-Wagner C. 2008. A self-associating protein critical for chromosome attachment, division, and polar organization in caulobacter. Cell 134:956–968. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bowman GR, Comolli LR, Zhu J, Eckart M, Koenig M, Downing KH, Moerner WE, Earnest T, Shapiro L. 2008. A polymeric protein anchors the chromosomal origin/ParB complex at a bacterial cell pole. Cell 134:945–955. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Du S, Lutkenhaus J. 2012. MipZ: one for the pole, two for the DNA. Mol Cell 46:239–240. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Thanbichler M, Shapiro L. 2006. MipZ, a spatial regulator coordinating chromosome segregation with cell division in Caulobacter. Cell 126:147–162. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cameron TA, Anderson-Furgeson J, Zupan JR, Zik JJ, Zambryski PC. 2014. Peptidoglycan synthesis machinery in Agrobacterium tumefaciens during unipolar growth and cell division. mBio 5:e01219-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01219-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brown PJB, de Pedro MA, Kysela DT, van der Henst C, Kim J, Bolle X, de Fuqua C, Brun YV. 2012. Polar growth in the Alphaproteobacterial order Rhizobiales. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:1697–1701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114476109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Grangeon R, Zupan JR, Anderson-Furgeson J, Zambryski PC. 2015. PopZ identifies the new pole, and PodJ identifies the old pole during polar growth in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:11666–11671. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1515544112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ehrle HM, Guidry JT, Iacovetto R, Salisbury AK, Sandidge DJ, Bowman G. 2017. The polar organizing protein PopZ is required for chromosome segregation in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 199:e00111-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00111-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Howell M, Aliashkevich A, Salisbury AK, Cava F, Bowman GR, Brown PJB. 2017. Absence of the polar organizing protein PopZ causes aberrant cell division in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 199:JB.00101-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00101-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Grangeon R, Zupan J, Jeon Y, Zambryski PC. 2017. Loss of PopZ at activity in Agrobacterium tumefaciens by deletion or depletion leads to multiple growth poles, minicells, and growth defects. mBio 8:e01881-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01881-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Deghelt M, Mullier C, Sternon J-F, Francis N, Laloux G, Dotreppe D, van der Henst C, Jacobs-Wagner C, Letesson J-J, De Bolle X. 2014. G1-arrested newborn cells are the predominant infectious form of the pathogen Brucella abortus. Nat Commun 5:4366. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Berge M, Campagne S, Mignolet J, Holden S, Theraulaz L, Manley S, Allain FH-T, Viollier PH. 2016. Modularity and determinants of a (bi-)polarization control system from free-living and obligate intracellular bacteria. eLife 5:e20640. doi: 10.7554/eLife.20640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Borg S, Hofmann J, Pollithy A, Lang C, Schüler D. 2014. New vectors for chromosomal integration enable high-level constitutive or inducible magnetosome expression of fusion proteins in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:2609–2616. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00192-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Katzmann E, Eibauer M, Lin W, Pan Y, Plitzko JM, Schüler D. 2013. Analysis of magnetosome chains in magnetotactic bacteria by magnetic measurements and automated image analysis of electron micrographs. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:7755–7762. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02143-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Raschdorf O, Plitzko JM, Schüler D, Müller FD. 2014. A tailored galK counterselection system for efficient markerless gene deletion and chromosomal tagging in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:4323–4330. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00588-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lefèvre CT, Bennet M, Landau L, Vach P, Pignol D, Bazylinski DA, Frankel RB, Klumpp S, Faivre D. 2014. Diversity of magneto-aerotactic behaviors and oxygen sensing mechanisms in cultured magnetotactic bacteria. Biophys J 107:527–538. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.05.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gonin M, Quardokus EM, O'Donnol D, Maddock J, Brun YV. 2000. Regulation of stalk elongation by phosphate in Caulobacter crescentus. J Bacteriol 182:337–347. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.2.337-347.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bowman GR, Perez AM, Ptacin JL, Ighodaro E, Folta-Stogniew E, Comolli LR, Shapiro L. 2013. Oligomerization and higher-order assembly contribute to sub-cellular localization of a bacterial scaffold. Mol Microbiol 90:776–795. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ptacin JL, Gahlmann A, Bowman GR, Perez AM, von Diezmann AR, Eckart MR, Moerner WE, Shapiro L. 2014. Bacterial scaffold directs pole-specific centromere segregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:E2046–E2055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405188111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Maki N, Gestwicki JE, Lake EM, Kiessling LL, Adler J. 2000. Motility and chemotaxis of filamentous cells of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 182:4337–4342. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.15.4337-4342.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Draper W, Liphardt J. 2017. Origins of chemoreceptor curvature sorting in Escherichia coli. Nat Commun 8:14838. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lohße A, Kolinko I, Raschdorf O, Uebe R, Borg S, Brachmann A, Plitzko JM, Müller R, Zhang Y, Schüler D. 2016. Overproduction of magnetosomes by genomic amplification of biosynthesis-related gene clusters in a magnetotactic bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:3032–3041. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03860-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Saberi S, Emberly E. 2010. Chromosome driven spatial patterning of proteins in bacteria. PLoS Comput Biol 6:e1000986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mignolet J, Holden S, Berge M, Panis G, Eroglu E, Theraulaz L, Manley S, Viollier PH. 2016. Functional dichotomy and distinct nanoscale assemblies of a cell cycle-controlled bipolar zinc-finger regulator. eLife 5:e18647. doi: 10.7554/eLife.18647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Perez AM, Mann TH, Lasker K, Ahrens DG, Eckart MR, Shapiro L. 2017. A localized complex of two protein oligomers controls the orientation of cell polarity. mBio 8:e02238-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02238-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Borg S, Popp F, Hofmann J, Leonhardt H, Rothbauer U, Schüler D. 2015. An intracellular nanotrap redirects proteins and organelles in live bacteria. mBio 6:e02117-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02117-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez J-Y, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.